DOCSLIB.ORG

Williamsonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Issue #1, No.Williamsonia 1 Published by the Michigan Odonata Survey Winter, 1997 Welcome to the MOS! Michigan Odonata Survey - by Mark O’Brien This newsletter marks the beginning of 1997, and 1st Meeting Highlights the second six months of the Michigan Odonata Survey. I decided to name the newsletter Williamsonia due to the fact that E.B. Williamson’s collection is the nucleus of On Sept. 28, the MOS held its first meeting, and 14 our Odonata collection at the UMMZ, and also because Odonata enthusaists attended. Tim Vogt gets the the genus bearing his name is a most desirable one, award for "farthest travelled" as he drove from especially in Michigan. The Michigan Odonata Survey is Springfield IL. His knowledge and enthusaism were barely six months old as I write this, and I feel that we greatly appreciated by all of us. With the exception of have accomplished some goals in a short time. Tim Vogt and Bob Glotzhober, the attendees were from The past summer was an exciting one for me, SE lower Michigan. really getting my feet wet (and other body parts) with Bob Glotzhober of the Ohio Dragonfly Survey Odonata in the field. Mike Kielb and I and shared some shared some of his experience from the ODS's real good collecting days. We were lucky this past activities. He made some very pertinent suggestions summer to have found some significant records, and the and observations that we'll try to follow. He also number of new county and state records will likely brought along some copies to sell of the very beautiful increase next season. We have been busy identifying our Ohio Dragonflies poster. I know that was appreciated catches from the summer, and here is a quick list of the by several of us. other projects we have going on: By far, the best aspect of the meeting was the sharing of ideas and experiences that we have had. I 1. Sorting, identification and cataloging of the larval think everyone took something useful away with them odonate collections by Ethan Bright. (More about this from the meeting. There were all levels of experience later in this issue). present, from beginners to established experts. 2. Cataloging the Michigan adults in the UMMZ Everyone was able to contribute to the meeting, which Collection. Mike Kielb and I have been entering the bodes well for the survey. Several items stand out and data from the summer 1996 specimens, and we have some of them have already been acted upon: only just begun to enter the UMMZspecimens into the Specify targeted species, areas and habitats for future database. As of the end of December, there are about collecting efforts Use exuviae surveys in places like the MetroParks to 1700 specimens catalogued. Of course, we are always acquaint visitors with Odonata and to survey without looking for volunteers for this monumental task. worrying about collecting living insects. 3. Cataloging the UMMZ exuviae collection - a project Make changes to the database to accomodate UTM undertaken by Alexis Kielb, a student at Ann Arbor coordinates, as well as numbering each specimen. Community High SChool. We inherited the Kennedy Finish an updated distribution map for each species to be and Williamson collections, but the exuviae were used by MOS members definitely not well-curated. Most have been locked away Find volunteers to help catalogue specimens in the database in storage for many years, and as a result the data Prepare an MOS member packet to provide as much (much of it valuable) has been unavailable until now. information for the participants as possible Alexis is doing a great job getting the collection into a Provide an MOS "ID Card" and MOS fact sheet for field useful state. About half of the exuviae collection is now workers Provide "target species" fact sheets to participants catalogued and curated. We all agreed that a late winter-early spring workshop in 1997 would be a good idea, and we are making plans We have plans for a spring MOS meeting/workshop, to do so. Such a workshop would likely be held in Ann Arbor, and might include: •Identification of adults using keys •Larval morphology and keys to identification •Specimen preparation techniques continued on page 3 2 Williamsonia, Vol. 1, No. 1 Surveying for Odonata in the Stylogomphus albistylus, Boyeria vinosa, Cordulegaster maculata, Ophiogomphus colubrinus, and Hagenius Huron Mountains in 1996 brevistylus. by Mark O'Brien At Ives Lake, we were sucessful at catching many Didymops transversa and Macromia illinoiensis, both county The Huron Mountains region in Marquette County, MI records for Marquette. Basiaeschna janata was the most (about an hour northwest of Marquette) is an interesting area common aeshnid in late June and early July. Epitheca canis, for dragonflies, due to the variety of undisturbed stream spinigera and cynosura were all present in the Huron systems, lakes, beaver ponds and other wetland areas. I had Mountains. Dorocordulia libera and Cordulia shurtleffi were made five previous trips to the Huron Mountains from 1984- abundant in many locations. Four species of Somatochlora 94 to work on solitary and social wasps, and had made were taken, and hopefully, we’ll catch a few more. A small incidental collections of some odonates. However, in the past open area surrounded by trees at Conway Bay was a “sink” for year I began to transform myself into an odonatologist, and I dragonflies. Catching Somatochloras that had dropped into knew that the Huron Mountain region would be a great place the clearing was way too easy, but I’m not complaining! Mike for a survey. In late June, Mike and Susan Kielb, Ethan and I had a wonderful time on the two occasions we collected Bright, and I arrived at the Huron Mountain Club to begin an there. Odonata survey. Our research was funded by the Huron Ethan Bright collected aquatic samples from Ives Lake, Mountain Wildlife Foundation. Canyon Lake, Mountain Stream, Salmon-Trout River, Elm We were pleased with the diversity of Odonata in the Creek, and many smaller ponds and the shore of Lake areas we studied in late June early July and again in mid- Superior. He will likely have some new records of other August, and hope to finish up our survey in another season or aquatic insects for his effort. two. Based upon our estimates, there should be about 100 We have not even started to sort and identify the species of Odonata in the Huron Mountains region, and we damselflies from our trips, but I am sure we found something found approximately half of them on our first trip. During interesting among those, too. Luckily, we now have the early summer, Libellula julia (Uhler) was the the most monumental publication by Westfall and May to work with. common species of Anisoptera. At Lily Pond, Mike and Susan The end result our Huron Mountains work will be a Keilb saw thousands on a single day. We probably witnessed publication devoted to the dragonflies and damselflies of the a big emergence, so it would be interesting to see what the Huron Mountains region, probably published in the Great numbers are in a subsequent year. Lakes Entomologist. We welcome any other collection data From the 25 June to 3 July 1996, we collected a total of from Marquette County to add to our database. D 391 adult specimens of Odonata, representing 40 species. In addition, 15 sites were sampled for aquatic stages (larvae), with a total of 20 species found as larvae. Two exciting finds Seney National Wildlife Refuge - for the trip (aside from claiming numerous new county A Target Area records) was the discovery of Stylogomphus albistylus, a small stream-dwelling gomphid dragonfly that was previously unreported from the UP. That find is published in the by Mark O’Brien summer, 1996 issue of the Great Lakes Entomologist (Kielb, Bright, & O’Brien 1996. Great Lakes Entomol. On my way to the Huron Mts. in late June 1996, I stopped 29[2]:87-88). The second major discovery wasn’t realized for a break at Seney National Wildlife Refuge, and was quite until we were sorting specimens in the fall back at the amazed at the number of dragonflies that were in the air. Museum. I was sorting out the aeshnids, and found that we There were hundreds hawking around the parking lots, and had collected four Gomphaeschna furcillata from three all along the side of the road. Since I did not have a permit, I sites in the Huron Mountains. This species has not been didn’t collect any that day . However, I made a mental note to recorded from Michigan since the late 1800’s by Hagen. try and get a permit for another trip. Mike Tansey, the Gomphaeschna furcillata is a resident of alder swamps and Refuge Manager, provided me with a permit for my visit on similar habitats. There is no lack of those types of habitats in August 13. Adrienne, Marjorie and I made a one-day survey the UP, so there ought to be more records (See Tennessen’s along the major loop road, and although not a comprehensive note!). The funny thing about those specimens is that I recall effort, we did pretty well. It is obvious to me that early making some comment about collecting an aeshnid that summer is really the time to be there, and perhaps even looked like a gomphid, not knowing what Gomphaeschna was Williamsonia might be found off in the big bogs that are at the time... there. Mountain Stream is an interesting place to collect, due to I missed the refuge’s biologist that day, but on the the diversity of stream micro-habitats and substrates.
Recommended publications
  • The Engineering of the Giant Dragonflies of the Permian: Revised Body Mass, Power, Air Supply, Thermoregulation and the Role of Air Density Alan E

    The Engineering of the Giant Dragonflies of the Permian: Revised Body Mass, Power, Air Supply, Thermoregulation and the Role of Air Density Alan E

    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb185405. doi:10.1242/jeb.185405 COMMENTARY The engineering of the giant dragonflies of the Permian: revised body mass, power, air supply, thermoregulation and the role of air density Alan E. R. Cannell ABSTRACT abdomen as well as spiny and surprisingly robust legs. Illustrations An engineering examination of allometric and analogical data on the of M. monyi and a female Meganeurula selysii (Shear and flight of giant Permian insects (Protodonata, Meganeura or griffinflies) Kukalova-Peck, 1990) also indicate creatures with strong mouth indicates that previous estimates of the body mass of these insects parts, well-developed pincers and strong long thick legs. In both are too low and that the largest of these insects (wingspan of 70 cm or drawings, the abdomen is similar in diameter to the thorax, unlike more) would have had a mass of 100–150 g, several times greater the structure of most modern dragonflies, which have much more – – than previously thought. Here, the power needed to generate lift and slender abdomens. This large size and consequently high mass fly at the speeds typical of modern large dragonflies is examined has attracted attention for over a hundred years as there are no extant together with the metabolic rate and subsequent heat generated by insects of this size and their physiology in terms of power generation the thoracic muscles. This evaluation agrees with previous work and thermoregulation is not understood. This Commentary suggesting that the larger specimens would rapidly overheat in the examines the questions of mass, power generation to fly and high ambient temperatures assumed in the Permian.
  • Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And

    Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And

    DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES STATUS RANKING AND PRELIMINARY ATLAS PAUL M. CATLING University of Ottawa 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................3 Acknowledgements ...........................................................3 Methods ....................................................................3 The database .................................................................4 History .....................................................................5 Rejected taxa ................................................................5 Possible additions ............................................................5 Additional field inventory ......................................................7 Collection an Inventory of dragonflies .............................................8 Literature Cited .............................................................10 Appendix Table 1 - checklist ...................................................13 Appendix Table 2 - Atlas and ranking notes .......................................15 2 ABSTRACT: occurrences was provided by Dr. Rex Thirty-five species of Odonata are given Kenner, Dr. Donna Giberson, Dr. Nick status ranks in the Northwest Territories Donnelly and Dr. Robert Cannings (some based on number of occurrences and details provided below). General distributional area within the territory. Nine information on contacts and locations of species are ranked as S2, may be at risk, collections provided by Dr. Cannings
  • Rare Native Animals of RI

    Rare Native Animals of RI

    RARE NATIVE ANIMALS OF RHODE ISLAND Revised: March, 2006 ABOUT THIS LIST The list is divided by vertebrates and invertebrates and is arranged taxonomically according to the recognized authority cited before each group. Appropriate synonomy is included where names have changed since publication of the cited authority. The Natural Heritage Program's Rare Native Plants of Rhode Island includes an estimate of the number of "extant populations" for each listed plant species, a figure which has been helpful in assessing the health of each species. Because animals are mobile, some exhibiting annual long-distance migrations, it is not possible to derive a population index that can be applied to all animal groups. The status assigned to each species (see definitions below) provides some indication of its range, relative abundance, and vulnerability to decline. More specific and pertinent data is available from the Natural Heritage Program, the Rhode Island Endangered Species Program, and the Rhode Island Natural History Survey. STATUS. The status of each species is designated by letter codes as defined: (FE) Federally Endangered (7 species currently listed) (FT) Federally Threatened (2 species currently listed) (SE) State Endangered Native species in imminent danger of extirpation from Rhode Island. These taxa may meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Formerly considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Federal listing as endangered or threatened. 2. Known from an estimated 1-2 total populations in the state. 3. Apparently globally rare or threatened; estimated at 100 or fewer populations range-wide. Animals listed as State Endangered are protected under the provisions of the Rhode Island State Endangered Species Act, Title 20 of the General Laws of the State of Rhode Island.
  • Natural Areas Inventory of Bradford County, Pennsylvania 2005

    Natural Areas Inventory of Bradford County, Pennsylvania 2005

    A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF BRADFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 2005 Submitted to: Bradford County Office of Community Planning and Grants Bradford County Planning Commission North Towanda Annex No. 1 RR1 Box 179A Towanda, PA 18848 Prepared by: Pennsylvania Science Office The Nature Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 This project was funded in part by a state grant from the DCNR Wild Resource Conservation Program. Additional support was provided by the Department of Community & Economic Development and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through State Wildlife Grants program grant T-2, administered through the Pennsylvania Game Commission and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission. ii Site Index by Township SOUTH CREEK # 1 # LITCHFIELD RIDGEBURY 4 WINDHAM # 3 # 7 8 # WELLS ATHENS # 6 WARREN # # 2 # 5 9 10 # # 15 13 11 # 17 SHESHEQUIN # COLUMBIA # # 16 ROME OR WELL SMITHFI ELD ULSTER # SPRINGFIELD 12 # PIKE 19 18 14 # 29 # # 20 WYSOX 30 WEST NORTH # # 21 27 STANDING BURLINGTON BURLINGTON TOWANDA # # 22 TROY STONE # 25 28 STEVENS # ARMENIA HERRICK # 24 # # TOWANDA 34 26 # 31 # GRANVI LLE 48 # # ASYLUM 33 FRANKLIN 35 # 32 55 # # 56 MONROE WYALUSING 23 57 53 TUSCARORA 61 59 58 # LEROY # 37 # # # # 43 36 71 66 # # # # # # # # # 44 67 54 49 # # 52 # # # # 60 62 CANTON OVERTON 39 69 # # # 42 TERRY # # # # 68 41 40 72 63 # ALBANY 47 # # # 45 # 50 46 WILMOT 70 65 # 64 # 51 Site Index by USGS Quadrangle # 1 # 4 GILLETT # 3 # LITCHFIELD 8 # MILLERTON 7 BENTLEY CREEK # 6 # FRIENDSVILLE # 2 SAYRE # WINDHAM 5 LITTLE MEADOWS 9
  • Boreal Snaketail

    Boreal Snaketail

    Species Status Assessment Class: Insecta Family: Gomphidae Scientific Name: Ophiogomphus colubrinus Common Name: Boreal snaketail Species synopsis: As its name implies, the boreal snaketail (Ophiogomphus colubrinus) is a species of northern distribution, and it has the most northern range of any clubtail (Mead 2003). The range extends from the western provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, eastward across Canada, to Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick. In the United States, it occurs in Maine, New Hampshire, and New York, as well as in Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Wyoming (Needham et al. 2000). O. colubrinus was first documented in New York in 1995, with a number of subsequent records in 1996. All of these records are from the Ausable River in the central Adirondacks, including both the East and West Branch. Some of the recorded locations were documented only by the collection of exuviae. Although the original New York location, the Ausable River along Riverside Drive near Lake Placid, and nearby stretches of the Ausable were searched on several occasions, presence was not documented during the New York State Dragonfly and Damselfly Survey (NYDDS). There is no evidence that changes have occurred in the Ausable River in the vicinity of the previously documented records, so additional surveys would be desirable to confirm the continued presence of this species in New York (White et al. 2010). Previously recorded locations for O. colubrinus in New York are on rivers, principally nearer to the headwaters where the rivers are rapid and shallow with sand, gravel, rock, and boulder substrate, and are primarily bordered by trees and shrubs (New York Natural Heritage Program 2010).
  • NYSDEC SWAP High Priority SGCN Dragonflies Damselflies

    NYSDEC SWAP High Priority SGCN Dragonflies Damselflies

    Common Name: Tiger spiketail SGCN – High Priority Scientific Name: Cordulegaster erronea Taxon: Dragonflies and Damselflies Federal Status: Not Listed Natural Heritage Program Rank: New York Status: Not Listed Global: G4 New York: S1 Tracked: Yes Synopsis: The distributional center of the tiger spiketail (Cordulegaster erronea) is in northeastern Kentucky in the mixed mesophytic forest ecoregion, and extends southward to Louisiana and northward to western Michigan and northern New York. New York forms the northeastern range extent and an older, pre-1926 record from Keene Valley in Essex County is the northernmost known record for this species. Southeastern New York is the stronghold for this species within the lower Hudson River watershed in Orange, Rockland, Putnam and Westchester counties and is contiguous with New Jersey populations (Barlow 1995, Bangma and Barlow 2010). These populations were not discovered until the early 1990s and some have remained extant, while additional sites were added during the New York State Dragonfly and Damselfly Survey (NYSDDS). A second occupied area in the Finger Lakes region of central New York has been known since the 1920s and was rediscovered at Excelsior Glen in Schuyler County in the late 1990s. During the NYDDS, a second Schuyler County record was reported in 2005 as well as one along a small tributary stream of Otisco Lake in southwestern Onondaga County in 2008 (White et al. 2010). The habitat in the Finger Lakes varies slightly from that in southeastern New York and lies more in accordance with habitat in Michigan (O’Brien 1998) and Ohio (Glotzhober and Riggs 1996, Glotzhober 2006)—exposed, silty streams flowing from deep wooded ravines into large lakes (White et al.
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R

    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R

    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata

    A Checklist of North American Odonata

    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
  • Full Volume 50 Nos. 1&2

    Full Volume 50 Nos. 1&2

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 50 Numbers 1 & 2 -- Spring/Summer 2017 Article 12 Numbers 1 & 2 -- Spring/Summer 2017 September 2017 Full Volume 50 Nos. 1&2 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation 2017. "Full Volume 50 Nos. 1&2," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 50 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol50/iss1/12 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. et al.: Full Volume 50 Nos. 1&2 Vol. 50, Nos. 1 & 2 Spring/Summer 2017 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Published by ValpoScholar, 2017 1 The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 50, No. 1 [2017], Art. 12 THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2016–17 OFFICERS President Robert Haack President Elect Matthew Douglas Immediate Pate President Angie Pytel Secretary Adrienne O’Brien Treasurer Angie Pytel Member-at-Large (2016-2018) John Douglass Member-at-Large (2016-2018) Martin Andree Member-at-Large (2015-2018) Bernice DeMarco Member-at-Large (2014-2017) Mark VanderWerp Lead Journal Scientific Editor Kristi Bugajski Lead Journal Production Editor Alicia Bray Associate Journal Editor Anthony Cognato Associate Journal Editor Julie Craves Associate Journal Editor David Houghton Associate Journal Editor William Ruesink Associate Journal Editor William Scharf Associate Journal Editor Daniel Swanson Newsletter Editor Matthew Douglas and Daniel Swanson Webmaster Mark O’Brien The Michigan Entomological Society traces its origins to the old Detroit Entomological Society and was organized on 4 November 1954 to “.
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) photo by Clifton Avery Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata, 2021 1 Each Species Entry in the Checklist Is a Paragraph In- Table 2

    A Checklist of North American Odonata, 2021 1 Each Species Entry in the Checklist Is a Paragraph In- Table 2

    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009; updated February 2011, February 2012, October 2016, November 2018, and February 2021. Copyright © 2021 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2018, and 2021 editions published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Male Calopteryx aequabilis, River Jewelwing, from Crab Creek, Grant County, Washington, 27 May 2020. Photo by Netta Smith. 1 1724 NE 98th Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 471 species of North American Odonata (Canada and the continental United States) considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approximate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION We publish this as the most comprehensive checklist Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, of all of the North American Odonata. Muttkowski with number of species. (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Anisoptera and Zygoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Needham, Westfall, and May (2014) and West- fall and May (2006), respectively.
  • Recovery Strategy for the Hine's Emerald

    Recovery Strategy for the Hine's Emerald

    Photo: C.G. Evans Hine’s Emerald (Somatochlora hineana) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 Ministry of Natural Resources About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated a government response statement will be published species is arrested or reversed, and threats are which summarizes the actions that the Government of removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. species’ persistence in the wild. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to For more information achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, survival and recovery of the species. It also makes please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at recommendations on the objectives for protection and Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation.