Progress Report for the Years 1960
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OCTOBER 1960 • • R St Rs (Conthiued Fi.·Om Page 1) Some :Sources in 1959 to 1960 ; Ary Increases for the Business
•.' _, -PERMANENT FILE '•' STATIONARY. ~ ENGfNEERS. ·. '· ... .·. -~· - .. OCTOBER,"1960 • " ~- ~- .,,.,. " J ' • •• r • • '•Ort ~ - r • :• s• "'• Past. -~ .' . --· \! . By NEWELL J. · CA~MAN, Superf isor : ·, io~aL B< Election;,, .·· ·. ;: .c. " , .' SUPElR.V.ISOR TM report-. unfolded ~ below is -~one ::. of .genuine .· accorriplfshmerit : by the Officers and Members toward improvement ·oftoc~l :N·o. 3's - .. REPORTS -~ st~tti:i-e iii: the LabOr Movement and :the community. This same p~dod _has been one of difficulty _·::1\ . :.- ~a~:-:::·-~- ·t· .. _,;·_··;_··· o~/·.:··· a-- ···- e:· < ~_:: ·· a ·ctlle:-=- .l -.-i·. · ;FiNANCES: · .. for the--Laj)or ... _. :- .. ·. ~ __1, ...:- .~ ~. '·. /: u t' Movement: As a result of labor legislation, the day-to;.day £:unc :.ye · ~q~·t W:~rt,h~Op' ll , per tions of a. labor union . · · c;ent have been.. tremendously complicated .. This · . .· .. • · . · · report is one in which · -•Income Down ;.... .Protec:- the membership m<~y be· proud because . -tici'n ·.up,·. · · · withoqt .the~r sincere --cooperation and understanding from the maj~.r,:ity tb,e task could not h<~ up-.;-:Resul!:s.Up _ve •• . Mo•~ " t5~·. l'alliid ·: Nov.,• 2~ -.>•_Cost~ '. been·· · so suec~ssfully · acc'oni- ()n the ord~i: ~ of S_up~~vis.or New ,eli. '"J~ . C~rn~a:n.; a_cting unde;, di · . • Members: , Moriey~Safe plished. · · . , r.ectlon' Qf-Ge)l'eralPresidell,t Joseph JhD_elaney~ an'electlori of' ·cott~ctrve aA.fiG~INI;i\iG - . In spite. of the significant'" ad~ · fleers and -D1§tricf Executive ·J.3oard ·.Memb€rs .of Operating . · ··wage: Increases - 'More 'd'itional expenditures of 'the1' Lo giiie$rs :· LCic<U Union ·· N:o: 3 :will b.e li~la .:ne:xtrnonth . -
John F. Kennedy and West Virginia, 1960-1963 Anthony W
Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2004 John F. Kennedy and West Virginia, 1960-1963 Anthony W. Ponton Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons, Election Law Commons, Political History Commons, Political Theory Commons, Politics Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ponton, Anthony W., "John F. Kennedy and West Virginia, 1960-1963" (2004). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 789. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John F. Kennedy and West Virginia, 1960-1963. Thesis Submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts, Department of History by Anthony W. Ponton Dr. Frank Riddel, Committee Chairperson Dr. Robert Sawrey Dr. Paul Lutz Marshall University April 27, 2004 Abstract John F. Kennedy and West Virginia, 1960-1963 By Anthony W. Ponton In 1960, John F. Kennedy, a wealthy New England Catholic, traveled to a rural, Protestant state to contend in an election that few thought he could win. While many scholars have examined the impact of Kennedy’s victory in the West Virginia primary, few have analyzed the importance that his visit to the state in 1960 and his ensuing administration had on West Virginia. Kennedy enacted a number of policies directed specifically toward relieving the poverty that had plagued West Virginia since statehood. -
Mcneil River State Game Sanctuary Annual Management Report 2018
Special Areas Management Report, ADF&G/DWC/SAMR-2019-1 McNeil River State Game Sanctuary Annual Management Report 2018 Thomas M. Griffin Edward W. Weiss ©2018 ADF&G, photo by Thomas M. Griffin 2019 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation Special Areas Management Report ADF&G/DWC/SAMR-2019-1 McNeil River State Game Sanctuary Annual Management Report 2018 Thomas M. Griffin Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, AK 99518-1565 Edward W. Weiss Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, AK 99518-1565 © 2019 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation PO Box 115526 Juneau, AK 99811-5526 The State of Alaska’s wildlife refuges, sanctuaries, and critical habitat areas are managed cooperatively by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (Divisions of Habitat and Wildlife Conservation) and the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. The McNeil River public use and viewing program, and its publications, are managed by the Lands and Refuges Program at the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation. Funding comes from appropriations made by the Alaska Legislature and program receipts deposited to the State of Alaska’s Fish and Game Fund. Special areas management reports address management activities and goals within specific refuges, critical habitat areas, and sanctuaries managed by the division. Special areas management reports are intended for biologists or other technical professionals, as well as to inform the general public about the special areas. -
1 a Review of the Record-Breaking Snow and Persistent Cold Of
A Review of the Record-Breaking Snow and Persistent Cold of February and March 1960 Laurence G. Lee NOAA/National Weather Service Greer, SC 1. Introduction February and March 2010 marked the 50th anniversary of one of the most severe periods of winter weather on record in the western Carolinas and extreme northeast Georgia. Beginning in February 1960 a series of winter storms and a prolonged period of below normal temperatures disrupted commerce, schools, and life in general across the region. The severe winter weather was not confined to the southern Appalachians and nearby areas. The entire eastern United States was affected. According to narratives at the time (Ludlum 1960a,b), the month of March 1960 had more records for snow and cold in the eastern states than any previous March. March 1960 is still the coldest March on record at Asheville, Charlotte, and Greenville-Spartanburg. Figure 1 displays the departure of March 1960 average temperature from normal1. The total March 1960 snowfall distribution is in Fig. 2. The general nature of the snowfall map does not depict details and extremes in the southern Appalachians. Fig. 1. Departure of average temperature from normal for March 1960. (U.S. Department of Commerce, 1960d) 1 Normals in this document refer to the 30-year period from 1921 to 1950. 1 Fig 2. Monthly snowfall (top) percentage of mean monthly snowfall (bottom) for March 1960. (U.S. Department of Commerce, 1960d) Following December 1959 and January 1960 with near or slightly above normal temperatures in the Southeast, the flow pattern across North America changed abruptly to a configuration that favored cold weather for the eastern United States. -
Analysis of the Lincoln, Nebraska Housing Market
72t.1 ',3c$ F A1" LtrrtCc t,^l , N EB ' l16r W"{tfrp" ,I + LINCOLN, NEBRASKA HOUSING MARKET as of October 1,196G I A Report by the ,l' DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FED ERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C.2O4I1 Aug u sr 1967 "'i,.i,: ..,_.-_ vva,.oHirtr.tr,,....._. - . :,.?!,,r; l:. J, 'f t.l " .'.-+ u,,: r ,l "^ ig67 ANALYSIS OF IIIE LINCOLN, NEBRASKA, HOUSING MARKET AS OF OCTOBER 1 L966 FieId Market Analysis Service Federal Housing AdminisEration Department of Housing and Urban Development Foreuord Aa a prbllc cewlce to assiet local houelng actlvltles through clearer understrndlng of local houelng narket conditlona, FIIA lnttlated publtcatton of lts comprehenalve houslng market analyses early tn 1.965. Uhlle each report ls deelgned specifical.ly for FtlA use tn admlnlaterlng ltt morEgage lneurance operatlons, 1t le expected that the factual lnfornatlon and Ehe flndlngs and concluilonc of theee reports wlll. be generally useful also to bulldenr DortScgees, and others concerned wlth local houelng probleae and to others havlng an lnterest tn local economlc con- dltlons rnd trend8. Slnce luket analysls ls not an eract aclence, the Judgmental factor 1r loportant ln the developent of flndlngs and conclusions. There wlll be dlfferencee of oplntonr of courser ln the lnter- proEttlon of avallabl.e factual lnformatlon ln determlnlng the abeorptlve capaclty of the market and the requirements for nain- tenance of a reaeonable balance ln demand-supply relat,lonehips. The factual'fraaework for each analyale le developed ae thoroughly as poaelble on the baele of lnformatlon avallable from both local End lratlonrl aources. -
Loudon County (Page 1 of 17) Office: Chancery Court
Loudon County (Page 1 of 17) Office: Chancery Court Type of Record Vol Dates Roll Format Notes Enrollments Jul 1870 - Jul 1876 17 35mm Minutes 1-2 Nov 1870 - Nov 1889 18 35mm Minutes 3-4 Nov 1889 - May 1907 19 35mm Minutes 5-6 May 1907 - Nov 1921 20 35mm Minutes 7-8 Nov 1921 - May 1930 21 35mm Minutes 9-10 May 1930 - Nov 1940 22 35mm Minutes 11-12 Nov 1940 - May 1945 23 35mm Minutes 13-14 May 1945 - May 1952 24 35mm Minutes 15-16 May 1952 - Jul 1957 25 35mm Minutes 17-18 Jul 1957 - Dec 1962 26 35mm Minutes 19 Dec 1962 - Nov 1965 27 35mm Minutes 20-21 Nov 1965 - Jul 1971 A-8035 35mm Minutes 22-25 Jul 1971 - May 1977 A-8036 16mm Minutes 26-28 May 1977 - Nov 1982 A-8037 16mm Minutes 29-31 Nov 1982 - Jan 1987 A-8038 16mm Minutes, Final Decree Appeals 1 May 1936 - Mar 1968 28 35mm Loudon County (Page 2 of 17) Office: Circuit Court Type of Record Vol Dates Roll Format Notes Minutes, Civil and Criminal 1-2 Sep 1870 - Apr 1882 2 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 3-4 Apr 1882 - Aug 1894 3 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 5-6 Dec 1894 - Feb 1908 4 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 7-8 Jun 1908 - Jul 1916 5 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 9-10 Oct 1916 - Feb 1923 6 35mm Minutes, Civil and Criminal 11 Feb 1923 - Feb 1927 7 35mm Minutes, Civil 12 Feb 1927 - Nov 1931 7 35mm Minutes, Civil 13-14 Feb 1932 - Aug 1950 8 35mm Minutes, Civil 15-16 Sep 1950 - Jun 1962 9 35mm Minutes, Civil 17-18 Jun 1962 - Apr 1967 10 35mm Minutes, Civil 19-20 Apr 1967 - Jul 1968 11 35mm Minutes, Civil 21-26 Dec 1968 - Jun 1973 A-8039 16mm Minutes, Civil 27-31 Jul 1973 - Mar -
Phytoplankton Diversity in the Lower York River, Virginia, June 1960 -June 1961
W&M ScholarWorks Reports 1962 Phytoplankton diversity in the lower York River, Virginia, June 1960 -June 1961 Bernard C. Patten Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Patten, B. C., & Virginia Institute of Marine Science. (1962) Phytoplankton diversity in the lower York River, Virginia, June 1960 -June 1961. Special scientific eporr t (Virginia Institute of Marine Science); no. 38. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V5R307 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYTOPLANKTON DIVERSITY IN THE LOWER YORK RIVER, VIRGINIA June 1960 - June 1961 __________________________, ____ _ SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT NO. 38 VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE Gloucester Point, Virginia 1962 -1- PHYTOPLANKTON DIVERSITY IN THE LOWER YORK RIVER, VIRGINIA June 1960 - June 1961 Data on phytoplankton diversity obtained in connection with 37 productivity experiments conducted in the lower York River by the Planktology Department are reported. A single station situated about 300 yards from the VIMS pier was studied. Hydrographic, nutrient, chlorophyll, seston and productivity data obtained were summarized in Report No. 22 (1961) of this series. The diversity indices employed have been fully described in Special Scientific Report No. 23 (1961), and also in J. Mar. Res. �: 57-75 (1962). -
Yellowstone Grizzly Bears: Ecology and Conservation of an Icon of Wildness
YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS ecology and conservation of an ICON OF WILDNESS EDITED BY P.J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Frank T. van Manen YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS Yellowstone Grizzly Bears: Ecology and Conservation of an Icon of Wildness Editors P. J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Frank T. van Manen Contributing Authors Daniel D. Bjornlie, Amanda M. Bramblett, Steven L. Cain, Tyler H. Coleman, Jennifer K. Fortin-Noreus, Kevin L. Frey, Mark A. Haroldson, Pauline L. Kamath, Eric G. Reinertson, Charles T. Robbins, Daniel J. Thompson, Daniel B. Tyers, Katharine R. Wilmot, and Travis C. Wyman Managing Editor Jennifer A. Jerrett YELLOWSTONE FOREVER, YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK AND U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCIENCE CENTER Yellowstone Forever, Yellowstone National Park 82190 Published 2017 Contents Printed in the United States of America All chapters are prepared solely by officers or employees of the United States Preface ix government as part of their official duties and are not subject to copyright protection Daniel N. Wenk, Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply. National Park Service (NPS) photographs are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign Introduction xv copyrights may apply. However, because this work may contain other copyrighted images or other incorporated material, permission from the copyright holder may be P. J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Frank T. van Manen necessary. Cover and half title images: www.revealedinnature.com by Jake Davis. Chapter 1: The Population 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data P. J. White, Kerry A. Gunther, and Travis C. -
Summary of Floods Ir the United States During 1960
Summary of Floods ir the United States During 1960 By J. O. ROSTVEDT FLOODS OF 1960 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1790-B Prepared in cooperation with Federal, State, and local agencies CNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE DTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.G. 20402 - Price 45 cents (pap^r cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract___-_--_____-__-____---_--__-______-___-___.____________ Bl Introduction._____________________________________________________ 1 Determination of flood stages and discharges_________________________ 6 Explanation of data_________________-__-___________________-_____- 11 Summary of floods of 1960_____________________________________ 13 Floods of: February 8-10 in northern California._______________________ 13 March 7-9 in southern Idaho.______,____-__-__-_-_____-____ 18 March 17-April 5 in central Florida.________________________ 20 March-April in the Skunk River and lower Iowa River basins, Iowa_ _________________________________________________ 24 March 29-April 6 in southeastern Wisconsin and northeastern Illinois.----.-.-_____________________________-. 27 March-April in eastern Nebraska and adjacent areas._________ 30 March 30-April 6 in New York___-_-_____---_-__-_-_--__-__ 47 April 15^19 in west-central Missouri.________________________ 51 April and May in northern Wisconsin and Michigan Upper Peninsula. ___ ___________-_-______-__-_-_--___-_-_-_-_-__ 53 May 4-6 in northwestern Arkansas and east-central Oklahoma. _ 58 May 5-9 in southern Mississippi.___________________________ 60 May 6 in south-central Missouri.- __________________________ 64 May 19-22 in southwestern Arkansas and southeastern Okla homa. -
Management of Large Mammalian Carnivores in North America
Management of Large Mammalian Carnivores in North America Technical Review 12-01 August 2012 The Wildlife Society Management of Large Mammalian Carnivores in North America Technical Review 12-01 March 2012 Management of Large Mammalian Carnivores in North America Technical Review 12-01 March 2012 The Wildlife Society Technical Review Committee on the Management of Large Mammalian Carnivores in North America James Peek (Chair) Shane Mahoney Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Sustainable Development and Strategic Science Branch University of Idaho Department of Environment and Conservation Moscow, Idaho 83844-1136 USA St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B4J6 Canada Bruce Dale Craig Miller Alaska Department of Fish and Game Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources 1800 Glenn Highway University of Georgia Palmer, Alaska 99645 USA Athens, Georgia 30602 USA Hank Hristienko Dennis Murray Manitoba Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch Department of Biology Box 24-200 Saulteaux Crescent Trent University Winnipeg, Manitoba R3J 3W3 Canada Peterborough, Ontario K9J7B8 Canada Lee Kantar Linda Olver Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Bureau of Wildlife Management Bangor, Maine 04401-5654 USA Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Madison, Wisconsin 53707 USA Kerrie Anne Loyd Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Colleen Soulliere University of Georgia Sustainable Development and Strategic Science Branch Athens, Georgia 30602 USA Department of Environment and Conservation St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B4J6 Canada The Wildlife Society 5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200 Bethesda, MD 20814 This report is copyrighted by TWS, but individuals are granted permission to make single copies for noncommercial purposes. To view or download a PDF of this report, or to order hard copies, go to http://wildlife.org/TechnicalReview ISBN: 978-1-937504-10-6 TWS106 Large center photo: Radio-collared gray wolf (Credit: William Campbell/U.S. -
Brown Bear Population Characteristics at Mcneil
BROWN BEAR POPULATIONCHARACTERISTICS AT MCNEILRIVER, ALASKA RICHARDA. SELLERS,Alaska Departmentof Fish and Game, P.O. Box 37, KingSalmon, AK 99613 LARRYD. AUMILLER,Alaska Departmentof Fish and Game, 333 RaspberryRoad, Anchorage, AK 99518 Abstract:Observations of recognizablebrown bears (Ursus arctos) at McNeilRiver State Game Sanctuary (MRSGS) during 1963-91 provided long-termdata on populationsize, sex andage composition,reproductive success, and survival rates. Bearsusing MRSGS increased from 66 (SE = 5.8) during1969-84 to 113 (SE = 8.5) during1987-91. Adultsex ratioaveraged 121 males/100females. This reflecteda low exploitationrate and greater seasonal movements of malebears. Adultsurvival rates averaged 0.94 formales and 0.93 for females. Since1963, 31%of 168 cubsdisappeared between 0.5 and1.5 yearsof age. Kaplan-Meierestimates of summersurvival rates were 0.67 for cubsand 0.89 for yearlings. Twentyfemales, observed for a totalof 242 bear-years,raised 83 yearlingsin 47 litters. Lifetimerecruitment for 11 females observedfrom sexual maturity to presumeddeath averaged 2 (range0-8) yearlings.Despite the high ratio of adultmales to femalesand increased populationsize, we did not detecta density-dependentsuppression of cub productionor survival. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 9(1):283-293 Brown bears are a K-selected species (Cowan et al. possible at McNeil River because of the presence of 1974). Absent substantial human-induced mortality, habituated,individually recognizable bears that visit the populations should stabilize at carryingcapacity and be site to catch salmon during mid-summer. In this paper, regulated by density-dependentmechanisms, including we build upon earlier data collected at this site and one or more of the following: lower reproductive compare contemporary values with earlier results rates, lower survival rates, and higher dispersal rates. -
157 at the 855Th Meeting on 1 April 1960, the Repre
Part II 157 At the 855th meeting on 1 April 1960, the repre- COMPLAINT BY THE USSR (U-2 INCIDENT) sentative of the Union of South Africa,* who had taken INTIAL PROC EEDIKGS By cablew dated 18 May 1960, the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the USSRrequested an urgent meet- also stated that the Union Government would regard ing of the Security Council to consider the question of in a serious light any resolution adopted by the aggressive acts by the United States Air Force Council in connexion with the local disturbances that against the Soviet Union, which created a threat to uni- had taken place in South Africa. Should any further versal peace. The need for immediate examination of bloodshed in South Mrica result from a decision of this question arose from the fact that United States the Council, the latter would have to accept its full military aircraft had repeatedly encroached upon the share of responsibility.jS” airspace of the USSR and the United States Government At the 856th meeting on 1 April 1960, the Security had declared these actions to be its policy, Under the Council adopted=’ the Ecuadorean draft resolution United Xations Charter the Security Council bore the by 9 votes in favour, none against, with 2 abstentions. main responsibility for the maintenance of inter- The resolution60/ read as follows: national peace and security; consequently, the USSR Government expected that it would take the necessary The Security Council, measures to halt the provocative actions which “Having considered the complaint of twenty-nine threatened the peace. Member States contained in document S/4279 and In an explanatory memorandum6A’ dated 19 May 1960, Add.1 concerning ‘the situation arising out of the the USSR Government gave the dates of the alleged large-scale killings of unarmed and peaceful demon- incursions, the kinds of aircraft used, the distance strators ag.Cnst raci.d discrimin&ion and segrcga- they penetra.