DOCSLIB.ORG

Financial Market History Reflections on the Past for Investors Today

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Financial Market History Reflections on the Past for Investors Today FINANCIAL MARKET HISTORY REFLECTIONS ON THE PAST FOR INVESTORS TODAY Edited by David Chambers and Elroy Dimson FINANCIAL MARKET HISTORY REFLECTIONS ON THE PAST FOR INVESTORS TODAY Edited by David Chambers and Elroy Dimson Statement of Purpose The CFA Institute Research Foundation is a not-for-profit organization established to promote the development and dissemination of relevant research for investment practitioners worldwide. Neither the Research Foundation, CFA Institute, nor the publication’s edi- torial staff is responsible for facts and opinions presented in this publi- cation. This publication reflects the views of the author(s) and does not represent the official views of the CFA Institute Research Foundation. The CFA Institute Research Foundation and the Research Foundation logo are trademarks owned by The CFA Institute Research Foundation. CFA®, Chartered Financial Analyst®, AIMR-PPS®, and GIPS® are just a few of the trademarks owned by CFA Institute. To view a list of CFA Institute trademarks and the Guide for the Use of CFA Institute Marks, please visit our website at www.cfainstitute.org. © 2016 The CFA Institute Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Cover Image Photo Credit: bunhill/Getty Images ISBN 978-1-944960-13-1 December 2016 Editorial Staff Abby Farson Pratt Julia Mackesson, PMP Assistant Editor Manager, Publishing, Standards and Advocacy Anh Pham Publishing Technology Specialist Biographies Olivier Accominotti is associate professor of economic history at the London School of Economics and Political Science and an affiliate at the Centre for Economic Policy Research. He is a specialist in international finan- cial history and has published extensively in this area. Professor Accominotti is also a member of the editorial board of Financial History Review, and his current projects focus on currency markets and the international propaga- tion of financial crises. He holds a PhD in economics from Sciences Po Paris and has held postdoctoral or visiting positions at Princeton University; the University of California, Berkeley; the European University Institute; and the Bank of France. Jan Annaert is professor of finance at the University of Antwerp and at the Antwerp Management School. He is chairman of the Study Centre on Stock Exchanges and Enterprises (SCOB), the university’s research center for financial history. Professor Annaert also serves as independent director on the board of mutual funds and is an external member of the Pricing and Valuation Committee of KBC Asset Management. His teaching and research interests include portfolio theory, asset pricing, financial risk management, and financial history. Professor Annaert has published his research in a vari- ety of publications, including Cliometrica, Explorations in Economic History, Financial History Review, the Journal of Banking and Finance, and the Journal of International Money and Finance. Stephen J. Brown joined Monash Business School as professor of finance in January 2016, transitioning to emeritus status at New York University (NYU) Stern School of Business. Before joining NYU in 1986, Professor Brown worked at Bell Telephone Laboratories, where he spent time as dis- trict manager at AT&T Pension Fund, as well as at Yale University. He has published widely in a range of high-quality journals and is the author of five books. Professor Brown has recently been appointed executive editor of the Financial Analysts Journal®. He graduated from Monash University in 1971 and earned an MBA and a PhD from the University of Chicago in 1976. Frans Buelens is senior researcher at the Study Centre on Stock Exchanges and Enterprises (SCOB) at the University of Antwerp. He is responsible for supervising the work on the digitization of the Brussels and Antwerp Stock Exchanges. Dr. Buelens is the author (and coauthor) of sev- eral books, including Congo 1885–1960 and Beurzen van België: een geschiedenis van het beurswezen, 1801–1867 (Stock Exchanges of Belgium: A History of Stock Exchange Life). He has published in Economic History Review, Explorations in © 2016 CFA Institute Research Foundation. All rights reserved. iii Financial Market History Economic History, the Journal of European Economic History, Financial History Review, Cliometrics, and other journals. Carsten Burhop is professor of economic and social history at the University of Vienna and a research affiliate at the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods in Bonn, Germany. His research focuses on many aspects of economic and business history, including the history of stock markets, financial institutions, corporate governance, and the management of innovation. Professor Burhop has published in the Journal of Economic History, Business History Review, European Review of Economic History, German Economic Review, and Schmalenbach Business Review. David Chambers is a reader in finance, a Keynes Fellow, and academic director of the Centre for Endowment Asset Management at Cambridge Judge Business School. His research interests span asset management and financial history, and he has published in theJournal of Finance, the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, the Journal of Economic Perspectives, the Journal of Economic History, Economic History Review, Explorations in Economic History, the Financial Analysts Journal, and the Journal of Portfolio Management. Prior to returning to full-time education in 2001, Dr. Chambers worked for 20 years in investment banking and asset management at Barings, Hotchkis & Wiley, and Merrill Lynch. He sits on the editorial board of the Financial Analysts Journal. Elroy Dimson is chairman of the Centre for Endowment Asset Management at Cambridge Judge Business School, emeritus professor of finance at London Business School, and adviser to the board of FTSE International. He previously served London Business School in a variety of senior positions and the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global as chairman of the Strategy Council. Dr. Dimson is coauthor of Triumph of the Optimists and has published in a number of journals, including the Journal of Finance, the Journal of Financial Economics, the Review of Financial Studies, the Journal of Business, the Journal of Portfolio Management, and the Financial Analysts Journal, where he serves as a member of the Advisory Council. Barry Eichengreen is George C. Pardee and Helen N. Pardee Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley, a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and a research fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research. He is a fel- low of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Caroline Fohlin is a professor of economics at Emory University. She has published extensively on the history of financial markets, institutions, and systems, including two monographs: Finance Capitalism and Germany’s Rise iv © 2016 CFA Institute Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Biographies to Industrial Power and Mobilizing Money: How the World’s Richest Nations Financed Industrial Growth. Professor Fohlin has recently completed the first comprehensive high-frequency transaction and quote database for the NYSE for the period 1900–1925. She holds the position of Distinguished Visiting Professor, Economics, at Emory University. Professor Fohlin holds a BS in mathematics and quantitative economics from Tufts University and a PhD in economics from the University of California, Berkeley. William N. Goetzmann is the Edwin J. Beinecke Professor of Finance and Management Studies at Yale School of Management. His research topics include asset pricing, the equity risk premium, arbitrage strategies, selecting investment managers, global investing, and financial history. Professor Goetzmann’s work has been featured in most of the major finan- cial news publications and his academic research has been published in all of the major academic finance journals. His current work focuses on endow- ments, financial history, operational risk, securitization, credit risk, and behavioral finance. Professor Goetzmann is the director of the International Center for Finance at the Yale School of Management, where he has been since 1994. Previously, he taught investments and real estate at Columbia Business School. Charles Goodhart, CBE, FBA, is emeritus professor of banking and finance with the Financial Markets Group at the London School of Economics (LSE), having previously been its deputy director. Until his retire- ment in 2002, he had served as the Norman Sosnow Professor of Banking and Finance at LSE since 1985. Dr. Goodhart also worked at the Bank of England for 17 years as a monetary adviser, becoming a chief adviser in 1980. In 1997, he was appointed one of the outside independent members of the Bank of England’s new Monetary Policy Committee. Dr. Goodhart also taught at Cambridge University. Leslie Hannah is visiting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambridge University Press
    Duomenų bazės Cambridge Core kolekcijos Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) žurnalų sąrašas Pavadinimas Elektroninio leidinio ISSN 1. Advances in Archaeological Practice 2326-3768 2. Africa 1750-0184 3. African Studies Review 1555-2462 4. Ageing & Society 1469-1779 5. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2372-2614 6. AJIL Unbound 2398-7723 7. AJS Review 1475-4541 8. American Antiquity 2325-5064 9. American Journal of International Law 2161-7953 10. American Political Science Review 1537-5943 11. Americas 1533-6247 12. Anatolian Studies 2048-0849 13. Ancient Mesoamerica 1469-1787 14. Anglo-Saxon England 1474-0532 15. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales: Editio Française 1953-8146 16. Annals of Actuarial Science 1748-5002 17. Annual of the British School at Athens 2045-2403 18. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1471-6356 19. Antichthon 2056-8819 20. Antiquaries Journal 1758-5309 21. Antiquity 1745-1744 22. Applied Psycholinguistics 1469-1817 23. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 1474-0524 24. Archaeological Dialogues 1478-2294 25. Archaeological Reports 2041-4102 26. Architectural History 2059-5670 27. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly 1474-0516 28. Art Libraries Journal 2059-7525 29. Asian Journal of Comparative Law 1932-0205 30. Asian Journal of International Law 2044-2521 31. Asian Journal of Law and Society 2052-9023 32. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 1783-1350 33. Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology 2054-2232 34. Australasian Journal of Special Education 1833-6914 35. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 2049-775X 36. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 2049-7784 37. Austrian History Yearbook 1558-5255 38. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1469-1841 39.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Financial Market Facts: the Importance of Incomplete Markets and Transaction Costs (P
    On the Emergence of Parliamentary Government: The Role of Private Information (p. 2) Edward J. Green Explaining Financial Market Facts: The Importance of Incomplete Markets and Transaction Costs (p. 17) S. Rao Aiyagari 1992 Contents (p. 32) 1992 Staff Reports (p. 33) Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review voi.17.no. 1 ISSN 0271-5287 This publication primarily presents economic research aimed at improving policymaking by the Federal Reserve System and other governmental authorities. Any views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Federal Reserve System. Editor: Arthur J. Rolnick Associate Editors: S. Rao Aiyagari, John H. Boyd, Warren E. Weber Economic Advisory Board: Nobuhiro Kiyotaki, Jim Schmitz, Neil Wallace Managing Editor: Kathleen S. Rolfe Article Editor/Writers: Patricia C. Haswell, Kathleen S. Rolfe, Martha L. Starr Designer: Phil Swenson Associate Designer: Beth Grorud Typesetters: Jody Fahland, Correan M. Hanover Editorial Assistant: Correan M. Hanover Circulation Assistant: Cheryl Vukelich The Quarterly Review is published by the Research Department Direct all comments and questions to of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Subscriptions are Quarterly Review available free of charge. Research Department Articles may be reprinted if the reprint fully credits the source— Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank as well as the Quarterly P.O. Box 291 Review. Please include with the reprinted article some version of Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291 the standard Federal Reserve disclaimer and send the Minneapo- (612-340-2341 / FAX 612-340-2366). lis Fed Research Department a copy of the reprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Markets and Trading Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons Is the Oldest Independent Publishing Company in the United States
    Financial Markets and Trading Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons is the oldest independent publishing company in the United States. With offices in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, Wiley is globally committed to developing and market- ing print and electronic products and services for our customers’ professional and personal knowledge and understanding. The Wiley Finance series contains books written specifically for finance and investment professionals as well as sophisticated individual investors and their financial advisors. Book topics range from portfolio management to e-commerce, risk management, financial engineering, valuation, and financial instrument analysis, as well as much more. For a list of available titles, visit our web site at www.WileyFinance.com. Financial Markets and Trading An Introduction to Market Microstructure and Trading Strategies ANATOLY B. SCHMIDT John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright # 2011 by Anatoly B. Schmidt. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Microstructure and Corporate Finance
    Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (2003) 377–384 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Market microstructure and corporate finance Marc L. Lipson* Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA Received 20 October 2002; accepted 24 October 2002 Abstract This article provides a brief overview of the importance of market microstructure research and identifies existing areas of research that focus on links between microstructure and corporate finance. Each of the special issue articles is then summarized with particular attention given to the research contribution of the article and to the links explored between microstructure and corporate finance. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Market microstructure; Stock; Corporate finance These trees are magnificent, but even more magnificent is the sublime and moving space between them. Rainer Rilke.1 While the growing complexity of both theoretical constructs and empirical method- ologies leads to ever more specialized research, a healthy preoccupation with the meaning and relevance of our research still ensures we never loose sight of the forest for the trees.2 Furthermore, an honest fascination with the myriad details and nuances of our work ensures that every tree gets more than a passing glance. What Rilke so elegantly reminds us, is to devote at least some of our attention to those topics that lie between established lines of inquiry. This special issue explores just such a set of topics—those that combine corporate finance with market microstructure.3 * Tel.: +1-706-542-3644; fax: +1-706-542-9434. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Spillovers from Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash?
    No. 622 / January 2019 Did Spillovers From Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash? David-Jan Jansen Did Spillovers From Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash? David-Jan Jansen * * Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of De Nederlandsche Bank. De Nederlandsche Bank NV Working Paper No. 622 P.O. Box 98 1000 AB AMSTERDAM January 2019 The Netherlands Did Spillovers From Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash?* David-Jan Jansen a a De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, The Netherlands This version: January 2019 Abstract Using intraday data, we study spillovers from European stock markets to the U.S. in the hours before the flash crash on 6 May 2010. Many commentators have pointed to negative market sentiment and high volatility during the European trading session before the Flash Crash. However, based on a range of vector autoregressive models, we find no robust evidence that spillovers increased at that time. On the contrary, spillovers on 6 May were mostly smaller than in the preceding days, during which there was great uncertainty surrounding the Greek sovereign debt crisis. The absence of evidence for spillovers underscores the difficulties in understanding the nature of flash events in financial markets. Keywords: flash crash, spillovers, financial stability, connectedness. JEL classifications: G15, N22, N24. * This paper benefitted from discussions with Sweder van Wijnbergen as well as from research assistance by Jack Bekooij. Any errors and omissions remain my responsibility. Views expressed in the paper do not necessarily coincide with those of de Nederlandsche Bank or the Eurosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauging Taylor Rules: Do Differences Make a Difference?
    Gauging Taylor rules: Do differences make a difference? Severin Bernhard∗ Tommaso Mancini Griffoliyz October 2011; first version April 2010 Abstract The normative literature on Taylor rules is vibrant with debates as to the value of one rule formulation versus another. But do these “differences make a difference” in practice, in terms of recommended interest rates when responding to actual data? And if differences do arise, which are the elements of rules most responsible for them? Their specification, their assumptions of parameter values, or their defini- tions of inflation and output gaps? This paper attempts to provide a systematic and rigorous analysis of these questions over the 1990 to 2010 sample period. While the normative literature mostly insists on specification and assumptions, it is the choice of data that makes the biggest difference to interest rates. These findings imply that debates as to the conduct of policy should primarily focus on data sources. Yet, even the most favorable choice of data does not satisfactorily ex- plain the very loose policy of the Federal Reserve between 2002 and 2007. JEL classification: TBD Keywords: TBD ∗University of Fribourg, [email protected] ySwiss National Bank, [email protected] zMany thanks to Jean-Pierre Danthine for comments to have pushed us to explore the questions behind this paper, as well as to Katrin Assenmacher, Daniel Kaufmann, Bob King, Elmar Mertens, Michel Peytrignet, Marcel Savioz, John Taylor, S´ebastienW¨alti and Mark Watson for helpful comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swiss National Bank or University of Fribourg.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic History, Historical Analysis, and the “New History of Capitalism”
    Preliminary Draft- Comments Welcome Economic History, Historical Analysis, and the “New History of Capitalism” Eric Hilt* Department of Economics Wellesley College and NBER December, 2016 Abstract: This paper presents a critical survey of ten books from the history of capitalism, a newly emerging subfield of history. The books include Sven Beckert’s Empire of Cotton, Edward Bapitst’s The Half Has Never Been Told, and others on finance, risk, and conservative economic doctrines. The critical perspective of this new literature, which emphasizes the human costs of economic development, distinguishes it from the field of economic history. At their best, the books offer provocative insights and vivid descriptions of some of the darker episodes of our economic past. Yet their neglect of social scientific methods and lack of engagement with the economic history literature undermines their analysis and their effectiveness as social criticism. In this paper I highlight insights from the field of economic history that would strengthen the future work of historians of capitalism. I also suggest some questions that might create opportunities for cross-pollination, if not collaboration, between the two communities of scholars. * Email: [email protected]. I would like to thank Bill Collins, Ann Carlos, Peter Conti-Brown, Robert DuPlessis, Philip Hoffman, John Majewski, Naomi Lamoreaux, Noam Maggor, Petra Moser, Dan Raff, Paul Rhode, Caitlin Rosenthal, Gavin Wright, and seminar participants at the University of Pennsylvania for helpful comments and suggestions. I. Introduction Economic history was once a deeply interdisciplinary field. The Economic History Association was founded by members of both the American Historical Association and the American Economic Association, and the early volumes of the Journal of Economic History included numerous contributions by historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Equity Market Reactions to Infer Exposure to Trade Liberalization
    Using Equity Market Reactions to Infer Exposure to Trade Liberalization Andrew Greenland∗ Mihai Iony John Loprestiz Peter K. Schott§ First Draft: June 2018 This Draft: June 2019{ Abstract We develop a method for identifying firm exposure to changes in policy using ab- normal equity returns, and employ it to study US trade liberalization with China. Abnormal returns surrounding the liberalization’s passage into law vary substantially even within industries, are correlated with but have explanatory power beyond tradi- tional measures of import competition, and predict sharper relative changes in operating profit, employment and capital than abnormal returns during randomly chosen days. Predicted relative increases in operating profit among the very largest firms swamp the losses of smaller firms, providing further insight into this liberalization’s distributional implications. ∗Martha and Spencer Love School of Business, Elon University; [email protected] yEller College of Management, University of Arizona; [email protected] zThe College of William & Mary; [email protected] §Yale School of Management & NBER; [email protected] {We thank Kerem Cosar, Teresa Fort, Justin Pierce and seminar participants at CUHK, Elon University, the Fed Board, Hitotsubashi, LSE, the Mid-Atlantic Trade Workshop, UNC Chapel Hill, the University of Toronto and the University of Tokyo for helpful comments and feedback. 1 Introduction We propose a method for measuring firm exposure to changes in policy. Our approach is based on financial markets’ reactions to key events associated with the new regime, e.g., the legislative votes during which it becomes law, and assumes that all new information relevant for firm value is fully reflected in its stock price.
    [Show full text]
  • Cracks in the Pipeline 2
    MEDIA CONTACT: Lauren Strayer | [email protected] 212-389-1413 FINANCIAL PIPELINE .o rg Series CRACKS IN THE PIPELINE 2 HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING by: Wallace C. Turbeville his is the second of a series of articles, that increase the inefficiency of Capital Intermediation and entitled “The Financial Pipeline Series”, its cost. The increased volumes in the traded markets are examining the underlying validity of the largely a result of high-speed, computer driven trading assertion that regulation of the financial by large banks and smaller specialized firms. This article markets reduces their efficiency. These illustrates how this type of trading (along with other activ- articles assert that the value of the finan- ities discussed in subsequent articles) extracts value from cial markets is often mis-measured. The the Capital Intermediation process rendering it less efficient. efficiency of the market in intermediat- It also describes how the value extracted is a driver of even ing flows between capital investors and more increased volume creating a dangerous and powerful capital users (like manufacturing and service businesses, feedback loop. individuals and governments) is the proper measure. Unreg- Tying increased trading volume to inefficiencies runs ulated markets are found to be chronically inefficient using counter to a fundamental tenet of industry opponents to Tthis standard. This costs the economy enormous amounts financial reform. They assert that burdens on trading will each year. In addition, the inefficiencies create stresses to the reduce volumes and thereby impair the efficient functioning system that make systemic crises inevitable. Only prudent of the markets. regulation that moderates trading behavior can reduce these The industry’s position that increased volume reduces inefficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets an International Perspective
    The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets An International Perspective FINAL PROJECT REPORT This Report should be cited as: Foresight: The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets (2012) Final Project Report The Government Office for Science, London The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets An International Perspective This Report is intended for: Policy makers, legislators, regulators and a wide range of professionals and researchers whose interest relate to computer trading within financial markets. This Report focuses on computer trading from an international perspective, and is not limited to one particular market. Foreword Well functioning financial markets are vital for everyone. They support businesses and growth across the world. They provide important services for investors, from large pension funds to the smallest investors. And they can even affect the long-term security of entire countries. Financial markets are evolving ever faster through interacting forces such as globalisation, changes in geopolitics, competition, evolving regulation and demographic shifts. However, the development of new technology is arguably driving the fastest changes. Technological developments are undoubtedly fuelling many new products and services, and are contributing to the dynamism of financial markets. In particular, high frequency computer-based trading (HFT) has grown in recent years to represent about 30% of equity trading in the UK and possible over 60% in the USA. HFT has many proponents. Its roll-out is contributing to fundamental shifts in market structures being seen across the world and, in turn, these are significantly affecting the fortunes of many market participants. But the relentless rise of HFT and algorithmic trading (AT) has also attracted considerable controversy and opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taylor Rule and Interval Forecast for Exchange Rates
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion Papers Number 963 January 2009 The Taylor Rule and Interval Forecast For Exchange Rates Jian Wang and Jason J. Wu NOTE: International Finance Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to International Finance Discussion Papers (other than an acknowledgment that the writer has had access to unpublished material) should be cleared with the author or authors. Recent IFDPs are available on the Web at www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/. This paper can be downloaded without charge from Social Science Research Network electronic library at http://www.ssrn.com/. The Taylor Rule and Interval Forecast For Exchange Rates Jian Wang and Jason J. Wu* Abstract: This paper attacks the Meese-Rogoff (exchange rate disconnect) puzzle from a different perspective: out-of-sample interval forecasting. Most studies in the literature focus on point forecasts. In this paper, we apply Robust Semi-parametric (RS) interval forecasting to a group of Taylor rule models. Forecast intervals for twelve OECD exchange rates are generated and modified tests of Giacomini and White (2006) are conducted to compare the performance of Taylor rule models and the random walk. Our contribution is twofold. First, we find that in general, Taylor rule models generate tighter forecast intervals than the random walk, given that their intervals cover out-of-sample exchange rate realizations equally well. This result is more pronounced at longer horizons. Our results suggest a connection between exchange rates and economic fundamentals: economic variables contain information useful in forecasting the distributions of exchange rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Fragmentation
    Market Fragmentation By Daniel Chen and Darrell Duffie∗ We model a simple market setting in which fragmentation of trade of the same asset across multiple exchanges improves al- locative efficiency. Fragmentation reduces the inhibiting e↵ect of price-impact avoidance on order submission. Although fragmenta- tion reduces market depth on each exchange, it also isolates cross- exchange price impacts, leading to more aggressive overall order submission and better rebalancing of unwanted positions across traders. Fragmentation also has implications for the extent to which prices reveal traders’ private information. While a given exchange price is less informative in more fragmented markets, all exchange prices taken together are more informative. JEL: G14, D47, D82 Keywords: market fragmentation, price impact, allocative effi- ciency, price discovery In modern financial markets, many financial instruments trade simultaneously on multiple exchanges (Eric Budish, Robin Lee and John Shim, 2019; Carole Gresse, 2012; Emiliano Pagnotta and Thomas Philippon, 2018). This fragmenta- tion of trade across venues raises concerns over market depth. One might therefore anticipate that fragmentation worsens allocative efficiency through the strategic avoidance of price impact, which inhibits beneficial gains from trade (Vayanos, 1999; Du and Zhu, 2017). Fragmentation might seemingly, therefore, lead to less aggressive trade, which could in turn impair the informativeness of prices, relative to a centralized market in which all trade flows are consolidated. Perhaps sur- prisingly, we o↵er a simple model of how fragmentation of trade across multiple exchanges, despite reducing market depth, actually improves allocative efficiency and price informativeness. In the equilibrium of our market setting, the option to split orders across dif- ferent exchanges reduces the inhibiting e↵ect of price-impact avoidance on total order submission.
    [Show full text]