DOCSLIB.ORG

Hume and Dartmouth Dams Operations Review Options Paper N O V E M B E R 1 9 9 8 HUME and DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW REFERENCE PANEL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW REFERENCE PANEL Hume and Dartmouth Dams Operations Review Options Paper N O V E M B E R 1 9 9 8 HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW REFERENCE PANEL Hume and Dartmouth Dams Operations Review Options Paper N O V E M B E R 1 9 9 8 Please note! The deadline for comment on this paper is Wednesday 10 February 1999 For details see page 1 (‘About this Options Paper’) i HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW REFERENCE PANEL Published by: Hume and Dartmouth Dams Operations Review Reference Panel Postal address: c/- MDBC, GPO Box 409, Canberra ACT 2601 Office location: c/- Murray-Darling Basin Commission, 2nd Floor, 7 Moore Street, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory Telephone: (02) 6279 0100; international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile: (02) 6248 8053; international + 61 2 6248 8053 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.mdbc.gov.au Map on cover: © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 1985 Remainder of publication: © Copyright Murray-Darling Basin Commission 1998 This document may be reproduced in whole or in part, provided that the information in it is not sold for commercial benefit and its source is acknowledged. Dissemination and discussion of the document is encouraged. For further copies and assistance contact the Reference Panel at the above address. ISBN 1 875 209 92 1 ii HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW Contents 1. About this options paper 3 2. Overview 5 3. Introduction 7 3.1 History of River Murray water regulation 7 3.2 Roles of Hume and Dartmouth storages 7 3.3 The Operations Review 8 3.4 Work related to the review 8 3.5 Community consultation 9 4. Water regulation issues 11 4.1 Identification of issues 11 4.2 Issues that do not involve competing claims for water 11 4.3 Issues that involve competing claims for water 12 5. Issues that do not involve competing claims for water 13 5.1 Economic impact of Dartmouth Dam on the Mitta Mitta valley 13 5.1.1 Effect of Dartmouth Dam on pasture productivity 13 5.1.2 Flood duration in the Mitta Mitta valley 14 5.1.3 Adverse effects on agricultural land at peak regulated flow 16 5.1.4 Erosion on the Mitta Mitta River 16 5.2 Economic impact of Hume Dam on the floodplain below 17 5.2.1 Adverse effects on agricultural land at peak regulated flow 17 5.2.2 The need for a comprehensive river management plan between Hume and Yarrawonga 17 5.3 Effect of dams on non-flow environmental values 19 5.3.1 Impact of Dartmouth Dam on water temperature and quality 19 5.3.2 Effects of regulated flows and rain rejections on natural drying cycles in wetlands 20 5.4 The need to better manage minimum flows downstream of Mildura 21 5.5 The need for improved communication 21 1 HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW REFERENCE PANEL 6. Issues that involve competing claims for water 23 6.1 Issues and approaches to solving them 23 6.2 Testing single operational changes 24 6.2.1 Natural conditions 26 6.2.2 Benchmark (B42800) 26 6.2.3 Fill and spill (B42810) 26 6.2.4 Provision of airspace (B46770) 27 6.2.5 Relaxed pre-release rules (B42840) 27 6.2.6 Translucent flows (B46750) 28 6.2.7 Use of Dartmouth power station during floods (B42801) 28 6.2.8 “Sharing the Murray” proposal for the Barmah-Millewa forest (B47850) 29 6.2.9 Increased pre-release from Hume Dam (B46160) 30 6.3 Scenarios outside the scope of the review 32 6.4 Combined scenarios 33 7. Summary of options and preliminary panel views 37 Appendix A: Terms of reference for the Operations Review 41 Appendix B: Reference panel 43 Appendix C: Key issues identified in scoping study 45 Appendix D: Details of “Backgrounder” papers 47 Appendix E: Issue register 49 Appendix F: Supporting documents and references 51 Glossary 53 2 HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW 1. About this options paper In December 1996 the Murray-Darling modelling group has carried out the necessary computer simulations. Basin Ministerial Council agreed that This options paper is the result of the review to November 1998. It describes the issues that have been the way in which Hume and identified as needing attention, the way in which the Dartmouth dams are operated should panel has gone about its task, the tensions that arise because of competing objectives for managing the be reviewed. regulated Murray, and possible improvements and changes to the balance between competing objectives. he review has been guided by a reference panel At this stage the panel has reached no fixed Tconsisting of members representing different conclusions. The paper presents options, and in most interest groups and drawn from the general cases also presents a preliminary panel view. community, and supported by relevant government The work to date now needs to be exposed to the agencies. wider community. The Murray-Darling Basin Commission appointed A series of public meetings will be held to present the reference panel, and the panel’s final product will and explain the material in the paper, discuss the be a report and recommendations to the Commission. options, and stimulate comment and feedback. The However the panel is fully independent and its work panel expects to refine its views in the light of public has not been influenced or directed by the comment before making its recommendations to Commission, nor has the Commission considered or the Commission. endorsed this options paper. Comments may be made to any member of the The technical work has been managed by a small panel (see contact numbers in appendix B) or can be project team. The team has utilised private addressed to Clarke Ballard, c/o Murray-Darling Basin consultants, expertise available in government Commission, GPO Box 409, Canberra ACT 2601; agencies and the internal resources of the Murray- telephone 02 6279 0176; fax 02 6230 6005; Darling Basin Commission. The Commission’s email: [email protected] The deadline for comment is 10 February 1999. HUME AND DARTMOUTH DAMS OPERATIONS REVIEW 3 2. Overview The terms of reference of the review (see — for example, the fact that water temperatures are lowered and steady regulated flows diminish appendix A) are essentially to review the riverbank vegetation and can aggravate erosion. operating procedures for the Hume and The panel has been able to arrive at preliminary views on most of these issues, which tend to be reasonably Dartmouth Dams and to recommend self-contained. how they might be amended to better The second group of issues essentially revolves around trade-offs between different management address the competing objectives of water objectives, and judging where the balance between them should lie. Computer models were used supply, environmental enhancement and extensively to analyse different possible operational scenarios. These led the panel to a fairly clear flood mitigation. A broad perspective is understanding of the effects of each strategy and those required, including consideration of a strategies — or packages of strategies — that might be useful in achieving a different balance. However, no wide range of economic, social and option was found that resulted in improvements from the viewpoint of every interest group. environmental factors. The panel has therefore been unable, so far, to reach a definitive view on strategies that should be he reference panel visited many areas of interest recommended. Despite this, it has formed a view that Talong the river, and spent a lot of time collecting the likely direction is towards a package that includes: input from interested groups. The result was a long list • arrangements for effectively watering the Barmah- of issues that were seen as important by one or more Millewa forest using the water already allocated for interest group. It was necessary to be rigorous in that purpose, pursuing only those issues that are related to dam • continued “harmony” operation of Hume and operation. Dartmouth storages, Another difficulty in maintaining focus has been the • some form of varied pre-release strategy to mimic other processes, programs and inquiries (such as the natural variability in flows below the storages, and Snowy Inquiry and work on environmental flows) that • possibly the acquisition of easements over are under way at present. It has been necessary to frequently flooded land between Hume and minimise potential duplication and overlap by forming, Yarrawonga. as clearly as possible, a picture of the boundaries between the various activities and where the review fits Such a package could be implemented with minor into the larger picture. environmental benefits and little adverse effect on The panel has found that issues fall into two distinct consumptive users, beyond that already in train because groups: those that do not involve finding a balance of the water already committed to Barmah-Millewa between competing claims to water, and those that do. watering. However, there would be further environmental The first group of issues includes: benefits, and further adverse effects on consumptive use, • the need for better communication between the if pre-release targets were revised to introduce a higher- Commission’s operational arm and interested than-current risk of storages failing to fill. community groups; Floodplain dwellers would obtain some benefit from • economic impacts of the dams on human uses of these strategies, but those benefits would not the floodplains below them; necessarily increase as the specified risk of storages • management of flow variability in the river failing to fill was increased. downstream; and The panel seeks opinions from the wider • environmental impacts of the dams (excluding the community on where the balance between the various impacts of extraction of water further downstream) competing interests should lie.
Recommended publications
  • DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background

    DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background

    DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity.
  • World's Major Rivers

    World's Major Rivers

    WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss AAnn IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn ttoo iinntteerrnnaattiioonnaall wwwwwwaatteerr llaawwwwww wwwwwwiitthh ccaassee ssttuuddiieess THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK WWWWWWoorrlldd’’ss mmaajjoorr rriivveerrss An introduction to international water law with case studies Colorado River Commission of Nevada 555 E. Washington Avenue, Suite 3100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: (702) 486-2670 Website: http://crc.nv.gov November 2008 Jacob (Jay) D. Bingham, Chairman Ace I. Robinson, Vice Chairman Andrea Anderson, Commissioner Marybel Batjer, Commissioner Chip Maxfield, Commissioner George F. Ogilvie III, Commissioner Lois Tarkanian, Commissioner George M. Caan, Executive Director Primary Author: Daniel Seligman, Attorney at Law Columbia Research Corp. P.O. Box 99249 Seattle, Washington 98139 (206) 285-1185 Project Editors: McClain Peterson, Project Manager Manager, Natural Resource Division Colorado River Commission of Nevada Sara Price Special Counsel-Consultant Colorado River Commission of Nevada Esther Valle Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada Nicole Everett Natural Resource Analyst Colorado River Commission of Nevada THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK World’s Major Rivers ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Daniel Seligman at the Columbia Research Corp. wishes to thank Jacqueline Pruner, attorney at law in Seattle, for her contribution to the section on water law in Canada and her valuable editing assistance throughout the entire document. The staff at the Murray-Darling Basin Commission and Goulburn-Murray Water in Australia provided important information about the Murray-Darling River system, patiently answered the author’s questions, and reviewed the draft text on water trading. Staff at the International Joint Commission in Washington, D.C., and the Prairie Provinces Water Board in Regina, Canada, also offered helpful comments on an earlier draft.
  • River Murray Operations | Murray–Darling Basin Authority August 2020

    River Murray Operations | Murray–Darling Basin Authority August 2020

    River Murray Key facts The River Murray is Australia’s longest operations river and flows for more than 2500 kilometres through New South The River Murray flows through New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. Wales, Victoria and South Australia, sustaining rural towns and communities, supporting Several major rivers join the Murray, including the agricultural production and nourishing many Goulburn, Murrumbidgee unique Australian plants and animals. and Darling, and many smaller rivers and MDBA River Operations is responsible for operating the tributaries on its westward River Murray on behalf of the joint governments of New journey to the sea. South Wales (NSW), Victoria and South Australia. Key water regulation assets under control of the MDBA The Murray–Darling Basin include Dartmouth Dam, Hume Dam, Yarrawonga Weir, Agreement (the Agreement) Torrumbarry Weir, Lake Victoria and the locks and weirs sets out the water sharing from Lock 15 at Euston to Lock 7 at Rufus River. rules across the states. The MDBA determines the volume of water released to meet demands, but does not own any water and can only The main storages in the release water from storage when there are state orders or River Murray are system demands to be met. Dartmouth Dam, Hume Dam, Yarrawonga Weir The physical operation of structures is managed by water and Lake Victoria. authorities in each state. This includes Menindee Lakes on the Darling River, which contributes some water for use in the Murray system, but is managed by the NSW Other major storages Government. Additionally, the MDBA does not operate the connected to the system River Murray downstream of the South Australian border, (but not the responsibility where the South Australian Government take on this role.
  • 1870 1956 1895 1944 History of Water Resources and Management in the Murray–Darling Basin 2006 1997 1880 1890 1864 1936 1902

    1870 1956 1895 1944 History of Water Resources and Management in the Murray–Darling Basin 2006 1997 1880 1890 1864 1936 1902

    Major flood in northern Severe drought leads to Highest Basin inflows in Basin and Darling River. the end of commercial recorded history navigation on the Murray (111,000 GL) cause and Darling Rivers. widespread flooding. Modelling inflows within 1914 Severe drought. 1956 1890 the Murray–Darling Hume Dam drops to 1% of capacity. Basin commences. Severe drought 1892 throughout Widespread flooding across the Basin. Flood along the Murray. 1968 HISTORY OF WATER RESOURCES NSW, Vic and Known as the ‘big wet’. Start of the ‘Federation SA. Murray Drought throughout drought’, which lasted ceased to flow AND MANAGEMENT IN THE 1917 Drought forces Adelaide to take 90% of its water from the Murray. 1974 Australia lasts for two years. 1944 for seven years. in some areas. The Murray Mouth closes for first time in recorded history. MURRAY–DARLING4 BASIN5,000 Highest recorded flood Floods across QLD, Flood in Flood 1981 in Murray system. 1895 Major flood across NSW and Victoria. 1864 the the entire Basin. Large flood on Severe Murray Beginning of longest drought in 1952 1909 and Murrumbidgee drought in 1993 Australia’s recorded history. Wimmera 1921 Flood along River inundates 1870 southern 40,000 the Murray. the town of and eastern Rivers. Murray Mouth closes and 1852 Gundagai, NSW. states 1931 requires dredging. 1997 1880 50000 lasting six Drought in NSW. years. 2000 Lowest Basin water inflows 35,000 Drought in NSW. Average, post 2000-01 on record (9,300 GL). MurrumbidgeeLon g term average, 1824 River waterholes 10,900 GL 3,980 GL Widespread flooding dry up, fish throughout the Basin.
  • Appendix F. Statement of Heritage Impacts

    Appendix F. Statement of Heritage Impacts

    Hume Battery Energy Storage System Environmental Impact Statement Appendix F. Statement of Heritage Impacts Hume Battery Energy Storage System Statement of Heritage Impact IA213400_Hume BESS SOHI | Final 28 July 2020 Meridian Energy Australia Statement of Heritage Impact Meridian Energy Australia Statement of Heritage Impact Hume Battery Energy Storage System Project No: IA213400 Document Title: Statement of Heritage Impact Document No.: IA213400_Hume BESS SOHI Revision: Final Date: 28 July 2020 Client Name: Meridian Energy Australia Project Manager: Thomas Muddle Author: Deborah Farina File Name: IA213400 Hume BESS SOHI_Final Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 7, 177 Pacific Highway North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia PO Box 632 North Sydney NSW 2059 Australia T +61 2 9928 2100 F +61 2 9928 2444 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. IA213400_Hume BESS SOHI i Statement of Heritage Impact Contents Executive Summary
  • Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents

    Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents

    Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................3 3.5 Healthy Ecosystems ...........................................24 1. Objectives of the Plan ..........................................4 3.5.1 Native Flora and Fauna ............................24 2. Context .......................................................................4 3.5.2 Foreshore Vegetation Management .........25 3.5.3 Pest and Nuisance Plants ........................26 2.1 Lake Eildon Development ....................................4 3.5.4 Pest Animals .............................................27 2.2 Lake Eildon as a Water Supply ............................4 3.5.5 References ...............................................27 2.3 Storage Operations ..............................................5 2.4 Land Status ...........................................................5 3.6 Land Management ..............................................28 2.5 Legal Status ..........................................................5 3.6.1 Permits, Licences and Lease Arrangements ................................28 2.6 Study Area .............................................................5 3.6.2 Fire ............................................................29 3. A Plan for the Management 3.6.3 Foreshore Erosion ....................................30 of Lake Eildon ..........................................................5 3.6.4 Stream Bank Erosion ................................31 3.1 Plan
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals

    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals

    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
  • River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir Reach Report Constraints Management Strategy

    River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir Reach Report Constraints Management Strategy

    River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir reach report Constraints Management Strategy August 2015 Hume–Yarrawonga reach report, Constraints Management Strategy Published by the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority Postal Address: GPO Box 1801, Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6279 0100 international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile: (02) 6248 8053 international + 61 2 6248 8053 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mdba.gov.au ISBN (online): 978-1-925221-10-7 All material and work produced by the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority constitutes Commonwealth copyright. MDBA reserves the right to set out the terms and conditions for the use of such material. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, photographs, the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority logo or other logos and emblems, any material protected by a trade mark, any content provided by third parties, and where otherwise noted, all material presented in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au © Murray‒Darling Basin Authority 2015. The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any Murray‒ Darling Basin Authority material sourced from it) using the following wording within your work: Title: River Murray from Hume Dam to Yarrawonga Weir reach report: Constraints Management Strategy. Source: Licensed from the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. As far as practicable, material for which the copyright is owned by a third party will be clearly labelled. The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that this material has been reproduced in this publication with the full consent of the copyright owners.
  • The Old Hume Highway History Begins with a Road

    The Old Hume Highway History Begins with a Road

    The Old Hume Highway History begins with a road Routes, towns and turnoffs on the Old Hume Highway RMS8104_HumeHighwayGuide_SecondEdition_2018_v3.indd 1 26/6/18 8:24 am Foreword It is part of the modern dynamic that, with They were propelled not by engineers and staggering frequency, that which was forged by bulldozers, but by a combination of the the pioneers long ago, now bears little or no needs of different communities, and the paths resemblance to what it has evolved into ... of least resistance. A case in point is the rough route established Some of these towns, like Liverpool, were by Hamilton Hume and Captain William Hovell, established in the very early colonial period, the first white explorers to travel overland from part of the initial push by the white settlers Sydney to the Victorian coast in 1824. They could into Aboriginal land. In 1830, Surveyor-General not even have conceived how that route would Major Thomas Mitchell set the line of the Great look today. Likewise for the NSW and Victorian Southern Road which was intended to tie the governments which in 1928 named a straggling rapidly expanding pastoral frontier back to collection of roads and tracks, rather optimistically, central authority. Towns along the way had mixed the “Hume Highway”. And even people living fortunes – Goulburn flourished, Berrima did in towns along the way where trucks thundered well until the railway came, and who has ever through, up until just a couple of decades ago, heard of Murrimba? Mitchell’s road was built by could only dream that the Hume could be convicts, and remains of their presence are most something entirely different.
  • Dams in Victoria Safe and Versatile Infrastructure

    Dams in Victoria Safe and Versatile Infrastructure

    Dams in Victoria Safe and versatile infrastructure A dam is a wall that holds back water to form a basin, lake or reservoir. Dams are typically made of earth, rock or concrete. Dams can be privately owned, owned by business or a Government agency. They can be used to store water for drinking, industry or farming, to protect property from flooding, or for recreation. Dams in Victoria Victoria has about 450,000 dams – this number shows how important dams are to the economy and our way of life. The sizes of our dams range from major storages such as Dartmouth dam (about 4,000,000 ML), Lake Eildon (about 3,300,000 ML) and the Thomson dam (about 1,070,000 Farm dams ML) to small swimming pool-sized dams on farms or lifestyle properties. These smaller privately-owned dams are the most Generating power: these large dams hold water for cooling common type of dam in Victoria. Together, Victoria’s dams have coal or gas-fired power stations or to generate hydro-electric a total storage capacity of about 13,400,000 ML. power. How we use our dams Recreation: some of the lakes created by dams are used for recreational activities such as boating and fishing. These dams Dams have huge social, economic and environmental benefits. can be popular tourist destinations and the tourism generated The vast majority of dams in Victoria have been built to store by these dams can be important to the social and economic rainfall when it is plentiful for use in times when it is most wellbeing of regional communities.
  • Data Versus Desktop: an Assessment of the Severity of Cold Water Pollution in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers Below Khancoban Dam Pope E1 and Nolan A2

    Data Versus Desktop: an Assessment of the Severity of Cold Water Pollution in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers Below Khancoban Dam Pope E1 and Nolan A2

    Full Paper Pope and Nolan – An assessment of the severity of Cold Water Pollution below Khancoban Dam Data versus Desktop: An assessment of the severity of Cold Water Pollution in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers below Khancoban Dam Pope E1 and Nolan A2 1. Snowy Hydro Limited, Cooma NSW 2630. Email: [email protected] 2. Snowy Hydro Limited, Cooma NSW 2630. Email: [email protected] Key Points Cold Water Pollution occurs downstream of Khancoban Dam but effects are not as severe or persistent as expected on the basis of the original desktop study Summer suppression is evident but winter elevation, annual amplitude reduction, seasonal displacement and impacts to diel variation are very minor Causes of cold water releases appear to be a combination of reservoir stratification and releases from Murray 2 Power station with releases from the power station being the dominant cause The presence of Khancoban Reservoir appears to be having a minor impact on the percentage of time that breeding temperature thresholds are exceeded during the breeding seasons of a number of native fish expected to occur in the Swampy Plains and Murray Rivers. Abstract In 2004, Khancoban Dam was listed as one of 9 Dams in NSW considered to cause severe cold water pollution on the basis of a desktop study. This study, based on 5 years of field data, demonstrates that cold water releases do occur from Khancoban but that these events are not as severe or prolonged as expected. On average, there is a difference in temperature of only -2.2°C between monitoring points upstream and downstream of Khancoban Dam during summer.
  • Bank Erosion Along the River Murray Between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction with a Focus on the Impacts of Vessel Wash

    Bank Erosion Along the River Murray Between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction with a Focus on the Impacts of Vessel Wash

    Bank erosion along the River Murray between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction With a focus on the impacts of vessel wash April 2017 Bank erosion along the River Murray between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction Published by the Murray–Darling Basin Authority GPO Box 1801, Canberra ACT 2601 MDBA publication no: 09/17 02 6279 0100 ISBN (online): 978-1-925599-21-3 [email protected] © Murray–Darling Basin Authority 2017 mdba.gov.au With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the MDBA logo, trademarks and any exempt photographs and graphics (these are identified), this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any Murray‒ Darling Basin Authority material sourced from it) using the following wording within your work: Title: Bank erosion along the Murray River between Hume Dam and the Ovens Junction Source: Licensed from the Murray‒Darling Basin Authority under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence Accessibility The Murray‒Darling Basin Authority makes its documents and information available in accessible formats. On some occasions the highly technical nature of the document means that we cannot make some sections fully accessible. If you encounter accessibility problems or the document is in a format that you cannot access, please contact us. Acknowledgement of the Traditional Owners of the Murray–Darling Basin The Murray–Darling Basin Authority acknowledges and pays respect to the Traditional Owners, and their Nations, of the Murray–Darling Basin, who have a deep cultural, social, environmental, spiritual and economic connection to their lands and waters.