DOCSLIB.ORG

An Overview History of the Taranaki Confiscation Claim 1920S-1980S: from The' Sim Corinnission to the Submission of Taranaki Claims to the Waitangi Tribunal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Overview History of the Taranaki Confiscation Claim 1920S-1980S: from The' Sim Corinnission to the Submission of Taranaki Claims to the Waitangi Tribunal An Overview History of the Taranaki confiscation claim 1920s-1980s: from the' Sim corinnission to the sUbmission of Taranaki claims to the waitangi Tribunal. cathy Marr . t A report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal wai 143 15 April 1993 '" .('1' .... ... ';"" ';+' .... , ... Introduction .:; '.:')' ;L This report was commissioned by the Wai tangi Tribunal in a direction dated 14 June 1992. The report addresses the specific issues raised in that direction. These were: a summary of the Sim commission; its terms of reference, recommendations and outcomes an analysis of the effect of the Sim commission in terms of settlement of the Taranaki confiscated, land claims a definition of exactly what the settlement was for - for example if it was for the wrong done only a brief history to the present of ways in which the confiscated land claims of Taranaki iwi have been maintained since the Sim commission and the establishment of the Trust Board, including the 1978 settlement concerning Taranaki maunga a brief history of the establishment of the Taranaki Maori Trust Board and a description of the legislation and regulations it operates under an analysis of the way in which the legislation and regulations the Trust Board operates under' have and continue to promote and/or hinder the implementation of both the spirit and terms of the settlement arrived at with 'the Crown The research for this report has been based mainly on official do'cuments and is intended to provide an initial basis for claimant and Crown comment. A draft of this report was submitted to the Research Manager of the waitangi Tribunal Division in December 1992. At that time research for the history of the 1970s and 1980s was incomplete because of difficulties in locating the relevant files still held by departments. Since that' time relevant files of the old Maori Affairs department have been located and researched at Te Puni Kokori. Thanks are due to Fleur Taiapa of that office for her assistance with this. A number of unsuccessful requests over some months have also been made for access to Treasury files. At the time of writing the most recent request under the Official Information Act had still received no response. Nevertheless it has been possible to complete a broad outline of the Taranaki muru raupatu claim during that time using documents available. In the early part of the report substantial use has been made of qocuments, copies of which are in the waitangi Tribunal Raupatu Document Bank. References to this are abbreviated to RBD. A further document bank is attached to this report containing copies of documents not in the Raupatu Document Bank. The attached document bank is separately indexed. , / I. 1/ ,/ / / Contents Chapter 1 Background to the sim commission of inquiry 1926-28 1 Chapter 2 Summary of the sim commission - terms of reference, findings and recommendations 12 Chapter 3 The 1930 agreement - the first stage of the implementation of the Taranaki awards 1928-30 33 Chapter 4 The interim agreement 1930-44 and the Taranaki Maori Claims Settlement Act 1944 49 Chapter 5 A brief history of the maintenance of confiscation claims of Taranaki iwi subsequent to the sim commission and the establishment of the Trust. Board, including the Taranaki maunga negotiations 65 Chapter 6 A brief history of the establishment of the I " / Taranaki Maori Trust Board and t~e legislation and regulations it operates under 94 Chapter 7 The impact of the legislation and regulations governing the Taranaki Maori Trust Board on the spirit and terms of the settlement with the Crown 108 Possible Issues 1 :{) Chapter 1 Background to the sim Commission of Inguiry 1926-28 A Commission of inquiry was formally established by government in October 1926 to inquire into and recommend on 'confiscated lands and other grievances'. 1 The three person inquiry became known as the Sim commission after its chairman, Justice Sir William Sim. The other members were Vernon Reed from the Bay of Islands, a member of the Legislative Council, and a Maori member, william Cooper, a Native Associate, of Gisborne. The commission's main duty was to investigate the confiscations made by the Crown following the New Zealand wars of the 1860s. The primary confiscation legislation was the New Zealand Settlements Act 1863 and its amendments. The confiscations were made in the districts of Taranaki, Waikato - Auckland, Tauranga, the eastern. Bay of Plenty and the East Coast. The 'other grievances' were a variety of other Maori claims that had been referred for fUrther investigation by parliamentary committee. These included lands lost after the Tar.awera eruption and various north Auckland claims. However it is apparent from the commission's report that the main focus of investigations was the confiscations and in particular those that took place in Taranaki and Waikato. 2 The sim commission inquiry was not established in isolation. It was one of a number of major inquiries and negotiations of tne 1920s. The 'Jones' Commission of inquiry of 1920-21 for example, investigated a number of claims, in particular the major long standing Ngai Tahu grievance. In 1922 settlement had also been reached over Te Arawa lakes after years of court action and 1 Notice of establishment of commission dated 18 October 1926, in New Zealand Gazette no 73 of 28 October 1926 pp 3021-3. Copy also in ROB v 48 PP"18524-8 and in document bank attached pp 472-475. 2 Sim commission report in ROB v 48 pp 18524-18563 2 negotiations. A similar lake - agreement was -·made wit:h Ngati Tuwharetoa in 1926. The approach to claim inquiry and settlement was of course still limited by the prevailing attitudes of the time. The Treaty of waitangi for example was not accepted by government as a basis for claim. The work of the sim commission therefore needs to be seen within the context of its time. The cluster of major claim inquiries and negotiations of the 1920s seem to have resulted from a combination of the pressure Maori were able to place on government at the time, increased goodwill by Pakeha to enable claims to be reconsidered and a growing pragmatic concern by some Pakeha, including politicians, that fair settlements had to be made for the good of -future race relations in New Zealand. Pressure on governments from Maori appears to have been a major factor. The major claims investigated in the 1920s were not new ~ . and the government recognised that Maori claimants had been pressing consistently for settlement for many years, from the time many of the grievances took place. The methods used by claimants in attempting to obtain proper inquiry and redress varied according to what 'seemed most appropriate and the opportunities available at the time. They had included action at a local level, petitions to parliament and the British Crown, representations through Maori members of parliament and pressure on local and national authorities through individuals, iwi and a variety of Maori organisations. In spite of active discouragement by successive governments, claimants had also consistently invoked the Treaty of Waitangi in challenging Crown actions associated with claims. In the case of Taranaki for example, Smith, counsel for claimants, briefly described the long history of actions on the 3 claim in his opening submission to the Sim commission • smith referred to the history of petitioning the British monarch and 3 Smith, opening sUbmission to sim commission in RDB v 48 pp 18565-18706. 3 the Imperial government as well as the New. Zealand Parliament. He traced efforts to gain redress in a direct line from original attempts to have the Wai tara purchase properly investigated, through the leadership of Te Whiti and acts of passive resistance, to the pressure resulting in the Sim commission. He told the commission that Te Whiti had prophesied that peaceful resistance would bring about the establishment of an inquiry by the government and that for many of the claimants the sim commission was that inquiry. Smith reminded the commission of the continuance of the tradition of resistance in the relUctance of many men in the confiscation districts to enlist for the first world war. Attempts to have a proper inquiry into the confiscations had previously failed. There had never been a full and proper investigation of the confiscations and requests for an inquiry had been refused· because it had generally been assumed that the confiscations had been warranted and the compensation courts had dealt with any genuine claims at the time. smith ~fj) reminded the commission that the earlier Fox-Bell inquiry in Taranaki in 1880 had in fact been limited to seeing that compensation awards were implemented. It had not been an inquiry into the confiscations themselves and for this reason the Maori member appointed at the time had resigned. In addition to the history covered by smith, there is evidence of the consistency of Taranaki claims through the existence of formal petitions. Petitions had to be presented in an acceptable form and through accepted processes to be formally accepted as petitions to parliament. These formal petitions, although costly for petitioners, were regularly present~d to parliament concerning the Taranaki claims. surviving petitions included in the Raupatu Document Bank show an average of one every two years for Taranaki from the 1870s to the first World War, when serious consideration was first given to the possibility of a confiscation commission. 4 4 Raupatu Document Bank vols 1-6 4 I) The Maori members of parliament were also given strong mandates by their electorates to press for the resolution of claims from the time the Maori seats were established. In some cases support for a candidate depended on a strong commitment to having claims resolved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southern Taranaki Settlers Fled. Still, I Do Not See How the Maori, Heavily Outnumbered, Had Any Hope of Winning the War. As
    200 REVIEWS southern Taranaki settlers fled. Still, I do not see how the Maori, heavily outnumbered, had any hope of winning the war. As always, James Belich writes well and wittily, a gift not given to all our historians. The story is exciting, the pace rapid. Maori boys are massacred, prisoners killed — by kupapa. One section is written like a novel, inviting us to visit Whanganui in 1868 and engage in various activities such as visiting the kupapa leader, Mete Kingi, stopping for a morning draught at James Cathro's hotel, and so on. This comes off very well. The only problem is that, while we feel sure that it could be documented, there are no footnotes, only lists of sources for each chapter, so that we cannot follow up, at all easily, any point which interests us. During a recent discussion of the' new history', Dr Belich said that previous historians had forced their readers to 'chomp their way through a dry muesli'. Presumably he belongs to a 'snap, crackle, pop' school of history. Dr Belich is particularly good at writing pen-portraits of his characters, such as Colonels Whitmore and McDonnell, and Titokowaru, but at least once he misses a trick. He says that E. W. Stafford, the longest serving nineteenth-century Premier, had (and he. quotes someone) 'an entire want of social magnetism'. In fact, he was noted for his very great attraction to women: the closeness of his relationships is not known, though an historian is working on it. And a final point, not at all critical: the photograph on p.64 of Lucy Takiora Dalton appears to be one of another woman, often called 'Queen Victoria' or the Queen of Nukumaru.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling a Settler Family's History in Aotearoa New Zealand
    genealogy Article A Tale of Two Stories: Unsettling a Settler Family’s History in Aotearoa New Zealand Richard Shaw Politics Programme, Massey University, PB 11 222 Palmerston North, New Zealand; [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27609-8603 Abstract: On the morning of the 5 November 1881, my great-grandfather stood alongside 1588 other military men, waiting to commence the invasion of Parihaka pa,¯ home to the great pacifist leaders Te Whiti o Rongomai and Tohu Kakahi¯ and their people. Having contributed to the military campaign against the pa,¯ he returned some years later as part of the agricultural campaign to complete the alienation of Taranaki iwi from their land in Aotearoa New Zealand. None of this detail appears in any of the stories I was raised with. I grew up Pakeh¯ a¯ (i.e., a descendant of people who came to Aotearoa from Europe as part of the process of colonisation) and so my stories tend to conform to orthodox settler narratives of ‘success, inevitability, and rights of belonging’. This article is an attempt to right that wrong. In it, I draw on insights from the critical family history literature to explain the nature, purposes and effects of the (non)narration of my great-grandfather’s participation in the military invasion of Parihaka in late 1881. On the basis of a more historically comprehensive and contextualised account of the acquisition of three family farms, I also explore how the control of land taken from others underpinned the creation of new settler subjectivities and created various forms of privilege that have flowed down through the generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Parihaka and Hatea River Reserves Management Plan 2009(PDF, 2MB)
    Parihaka and Hatea River Reserves Management Plan Including Parihaka Forest, Mackesy Bush, Ross Park, Drummond Park, Mair Park, Dobbie Park, Lovatt Sanctuary Area, Whareora Road Reserve, A H Reed Kauri Memorial Park and Whangarei Falls WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Parihaka and Hatea River Reserves Management Plan Acknowledgements Special thanks are extended to Jo Ritchie, Natural Logic Ltd. and Glenys Mullooly for providing much of the background information in this plan. Acknowledgement is also given to the following people and organisations who contributed to this plan. Ngatiwai Trust Board Ngati Kahu o Torongare – Te Parawhau Hapu Iain Reid, Friends of Matakohe/Limestone Island Inc. Peter Anderson and Wendy Holland, Department of Conservation Joan Maingay, New Zealand Historic Places Trust Lisa Forrester, Northland Regional Council Kevin Mason, Watson and Mason Phil Stocker, Northland Forest Managers Ltd. The Council wishes to thank those people who made oral and written submissions through various stages of this management plan. WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Contents Section 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of this Management Plan..............................................................................................1 1.2 Plan Review.............................................................................................................................1 1.3 The Origin of ‘Parihaka’ ............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 10. South Taranaki
    10. South Taranaki Fighting in South Taranaki began when General Cameron’s invasion army marched north from Whanganui on 24 January 1865. This was a major New Zealand campaign, exceeded in the number of Pākehā troops only by the Waikato War a year earlier. A chain of redoubts protected communications, notably on each bank of the Waitotara, Patea, Manawapou and Waingongoro rivers. Pā were mostly inland, at or near the bush edge, and were left alone. The invasion halted at Waingongoro River on the last day of March 1865. British troops then stayed on at the redoubts, while colonial forces took Māori land in return for service, with local fortifications put up for refuge and defence. On 30 December 1865, General Chute marched north from Whanganui on a very different campaign. By the time his combined British Army, colonial and Whanganui Māori force returned on 9 February 1866, seven fortified pā and 21 kāinga had been attacked and taken in search and destroy operations. When British regiments left South Taranaki later that year, colonial troops took over the garrison role. Titokowaru’s 1868–69 campaign was an outstanding strategic episode of the New Zealand Wars. Colonial troops were defeated at Te Ngutu o te Manu and Moturoa and forced back to Whanganui, abandoning Pākehā settlement north of Kai Iwi but for posts at Patea and Wairoa (Waverley). The Māori effort failed early in 1869 when Tauranga Ika, the greatest of Titokowaru’s pā, was given up without a fight. In the years that followed, Pākehā settlers on Māori land were protected by Armed Constabulary and militia posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Walks Track Guide Tongariro 2019-20
    W h a k a " p a p a T R i o v e N r a t io n a l P W h a a r W k k a p a a p a i i k t i S a t r e r a e m S H t W r e o a l m h i d a a k y a 4 p 8 P a a p r k a R " S " a i l p i c i d a s " E W a i r " e " r e " S 4 7 t " r R e a o m M a d a Mangat e epopo Str n eam n g d a " S t P e u E h k p T F e e a o a o T n l r o l # l t a a p s T # u e n k ra e o a n r g k i i " " W M ha nganui River a a N n n " g d # a # T C S a C a " o t t d n o e d e a i l p e o m n " o n p g p s ( o a a N i # t # P g l L H r T e 1 u ā o a 6 T k i u P w 9 m e a P 2 r k e t m a m a u a r o i k n a i o r a r l e a E k S S a k " o p e T d r R i U s a T a n a m p g o R m p s I H G a a e a o H K N ) r d T t O e # S O e # t N M P # e F 2 p U # g T M o n t 2 A B r o a a # 1 " u o i 8 C # L n T u 9 n d h n u 7 I K C a 1 g r 6 C t g i n u m m 6 E a 7 s t h S 2 S r e m a i o 3 S r o e h t m e e t l C R a t " " r e " e h a d t r i e W r " " a a a n E ( i N n h m d g O d # o " e ā # R C r B ( o t h a R o T C u l l t t e a u d o o o e " r e a p t m W # " L o n e a R # L m a p u a a u r T 1 a n k o p e i n 7 e g k e u p W 3 g S L " a s M e H s n 9 a i u s H h a a i h m g u t l a ī m a i p r o e u r t o k h t i u o e a a u t ) n a ) r t " a W a i h o h " o n u S t r e a m M a n g 4 a 7 h R o O u o L " h t t a u o o r u k e a n r e e u i r i S a S t r t e r e a a M m a m n g W S S a a S T t i H H u t o o 1 r 4 r e e u a t 7 r a o t n a m e u o g n t i u o i 1 W well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social History of Taranaki 1840-2010 Puke Ariki New Zealand
    Date : 07/06/2006 Common Ground: the social history of Taranaki 1840-2010 Bill Mcnaught Puke Ariki New Zealand Meeting: 153 Genealogy and Local History Simultaneous Interpretation: No WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 72ND IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/index.htm Abstract: Puke Ariki opened in 2003 and is the flagship museum, library and archival institution for Taranaki. Some commentators have suggested that there is no region in New Zealand with a richer heritage than Taranaki, but some episodes were among the most difficult in New Zealand’s history. There is a growing view that New Zealand needs to talk about some of its difficult history before it can heal the wounds that are still apparent in society. ‘Common Ground’ is a ground-breaking 5 year programme that begins in 2006 to look at the social history of Taranaki including some of the painful chapters. This paper explains some of the background and ways of joint working across library, museum and archival professions at Puke Ariki. Puke Ariki (pronounced ‘poo kay ah ree kee’ with equal emphasis on each syllable) means ‘Hill of Chiefs’ in the Māori language. Before Europeans arrived it was a fortified Māori settlement - also a sacred site because the bones of many chiefs are said to have been interred there. When the British settlers founded the small city of New Plymouth in the 19th century they removed the hill and used the soil as the foundation material for industrial building. Today it is the location for the flagship Taranaki museum, library and archival institution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public and Political Life of Wiremu Te Kakakura Parata 1871-1906
    Wai 2200, #A216 The Public and Political Life of Wiremu Te Kakakura Parata 1871-1906 Tony Walzl Walghan Partners 10 May 2019 1 Contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 6 PARATA AS PARLIAMENTARIAN .......................................................................... 8 The 1871 Parliamentary Session.......................................................................... 10 Confiscation .............................................................................................................. 11 Maori Representation .............................................................................................. 13 Other Issues .............................................................................................................. 20 The 1872 Parliamentary Session.......................................................................... 23 Hui at Otaki and Parihaka ........................................................................................ 24 Maori Representation .............................................................................................. 25 Land Confiscation ..................................................................................................... 27 The Fall of the Fox Ministry...................................................................................... 31 The Rise and Fall of the Stafford Ministry ............................................................... 36 Parata’s Appointment to
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Hazards Agricultural and Pastoral Producers Can Thank Mount Taranaki’S Historical Eruptions for the Region’S Fertile Soils
    Mount Taranaki is closely monitored for signs of eruption. Geological hazards Agricultural and pastoral producers can thank Mount Taranaki’s historical eruptions for the region’s fertile soils. However, a volcanic eruption today has the potential to affect the region for a long period of time. Volcanic eruption is the region’s key geological hazard and the mountain is monitored closely to ensure timely and appropriate action can be taken if there is any threat of an event. Taranaki is less likely to experience earthquakes and liquefaction than other regions because of the geographical distance from New Zealand’s major fault lines and the types of soil in the region. However, being on the coast means the region could be affected by storm surges or earthquake-created tsunami. The Taranaki coastline has high rates of erosion. ‘Volcanic eruption is the A number of national and regional agencies and region’s key geological organisations are responsible for monitoring and preparing for potential geological hazards in the region. hazard.’ Volcanic eruption At 2,518 metres high, Mount Taranaki is the second highest peak in the North Island and one of the most symmetrical volcanic cones in the world. The mountain is the youngest and only remaining active volcano in a chain that includes the Kaitake and Pouakai ranges, Paritūtū, and the Sugar Loaf Islands. The Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS) undertakes volcanic monitoring through the nationwide GeoNet network. GNS has nine regional seismometers that detect any local earthquakes or magma movement that would indicate the beginning of an eruption.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pacifist Traditions of Parihaka
    Reclaiming the Role of Rongo: The Pacifist Traditions of Parihaka. Introduction: This paper seeks to introduce a form of radical politics centred on the role of Rongo, the Māori god of peace. As part of the focus on Rongo, this paper will discuss the pacifist traditions of Parihaka, the Day of Reconciliation and what the future trajectory for Parihaka may hold. The theoretical analysis will encompass a discourse analysis of the traditional waiata or Maori songs, as well as highlight the living history component of Parihaka by following an autoethnographic approach. The central question behind this paper asks whether the pacifism of the past influenced by the scriptures is less influential and needs to be replaced by an understanding of Rongo – a revolutionary and radical form of nonviolent politics. History and context of Parihaka: Parihaka was established in 1867 in Taranaki, the west coast of the north island of New Zealand. It wasn’t the first Maori settlement of peace in Taranaki, it followed on from other attempts to establish a peaceful community at Warea, Ngākumikumi, Te Puru, Kēkēua and Waikoukou. The leaders of the movement Te Whiti o Rongomai and Tohu Kakahi were well versed in the bible and decided to provide refuge to the landless Maori of Taranaki who had suffered the land confiscations in the 1860’s. Although the land was confiscated, it wasn’t enforced north of the Waingōngoro river from 1865 to 1878. (Riseborough, 1989, p. 31) The influence of Parihaka grew overtime, and it became difficult for government officials to bypass Te Whiti and Tohu, who were patient on waiting for their reserves that were promised to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Will You Survive the Next Eruption? Before The
    AN EXHIBITION EXPLORING A HYPOTHETICAL ERUPTION OF MT. TARANAKI WILL YOU SURVIVE THE NEXT ERUPTION? Mount Taranaki or Mount Egmont is a The last major eruption of Taranaki occurred stratovolcano of alternating layers of lava around 1755, and it is estimated that the flows and ash deposits. It stands at 2,518m volcano has erupted over 160 times in the last in Egmont National Park and is the second 36,000 years. There are no indications that highest mountain in the North Island. It Mt. Taranaki is about to erupt, however, its is the dominant landmark towering over a unbroken geological history of activity tells us district of fertile, pastoral land with a bounty it will in the future. of resources ranging from oil to iron-sand to Mt. Taranaki is well monitored by the groundwater. GeoNet project, and dormant volcanoes like Mt. Taranaki is part of a volcanic chain that Taranaki almost always demonstrate unrest includes the Kaitake and Pouakai Ranges, before an eruption starts, with warning Paritutu, and the Sugar Loaf islands. periods likely to range between days to months. BEFORE THE ERUPTION Find out about the volcanic risk in your community. Ask your local council about emergency plans and how they will warn you of a volcanic eruption. ICAO AVIATION VOLCANO NEW ZEALAND VOLCANIC ALERT LEVEL SYSTEM COLOUR CODE Volcanic Alert Level Volcanic Activity Most Likely Hazards Volcano is in normal, non- Major volcanic eruption Eruption hazards on and beyond volcano* eruptive state or, a change 5 from a higher alert level: Moderate volcanic eruption Eruption hazards on and near volcano* GREEN Volcanic activity is considered 4 to have ceased, and volcano reverted to its normal, non- ERUPTION 3 Minor volcanic eruption Eruption hazards on and near vent* eruptive state.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating an Online Exhibit
    CREATING AN ONLINE EXHIBIT: TARANAKI IN THE NEW ZEALAND WARS: 1820-1881 A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History (Public History) by Tracy Phillips SUMMER 2016 © 2016 Tracy Phillips ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii CREATING AN ONLINE EXHIBIT: TARANAKI IN THE NEW ZEALAND WARS: 1820-1881 A Project by Tracy Phillips Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Patrick Ettinger, PhD __________________________________, Second Reader Christopher Castaneda, PhD ____________________________ Date iii Student: Tracy Phillips I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Patrick Ettinger, PhD Date iv Abstract of CREATING AN ONLINE EXHIBIT: TARANAKI IN THE NEW ZEALAND WARS: 1820-1881 by Tracy Phillips This thesis explicates the impact of land confiscations on Maori-Pakeha relations in Taranaki during the New Zealand Wars and how to convey the narrative in an online exhibit. This paper examines the recent advent of digital humanities and how an online platform requires a different approach to museum practices. It concludes with the planning and execution of the exhibit titled “Taranaki in the New Zealand Wars: 1820- 1881.” _______________________, Committee Chair Patrick Ettinger, PhD _______________________ Date v DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this paper to my son Marlan. He is my inspiration and keeps me motivated to push myself and reach for the stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples' Ownership and Management of Mountains
    Indigenous Peoples’ Ownership and Management of Mountains: The Aotearoa/New Zealand Experience JACINTA RURU∗ I INTRODUCTION 112 II THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MOUNTAINS TO PEOPLES IN AOTEAROA/NEW ZEALAND 114 Māori Association 114 Pakeha Association 116 III THE TREATY OF WAITANGI: THE BASIS FOR RIGHTS AND NEGOTIATION 118 IV CROWN TACTICS: HISTORICAL AND CURRENT TRANSFERS OF OWNERSHIP 122 Tongariro 122 Taranaki/Mount Egmont 123 Aoraki/Mount Cook 124 V A LOSS OF MANAGEMENT RIGHTS: HISTORICAL EXCLUSIVITY 125 Tongariro 126 Taranaki/Mount Egmont 127 Aoraki/Mount Cook 127 VI MANAGEMENT TODAY: AD HOC INCLUSIVITY 128 Management Ethic 128 Treaty of Waitangi Direction 130 ∗ B.A. (University of Wellington), LL.M. (University of Otago), Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Otago. Ngati Raukawa ki Waikato, Ngai te Rangi ki Tauranga. Email: [email protected]. My thanks to Nicola Wheen, John Dawson and the Indigenous Law Journal’s anonymous reviewers and editorial staff for detailed comments on earlier drafts of this article. Indigenous Law Journal/Volume 3/Fall 2004 111 112 Indigenous Law Journal Vol. 3 Recognition and Representation Rights 133 VII PATHWAYS FORWARD 136 VIII CONCLUSION 137 In 1840, the British Crown guaranteed to Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa/New Zealand, the continued right to exercise tino rangatiratanga (self- determination) over their own taonga (treasures). This article assesses the historic and current legislative reality for giving effect to this guarantee in the context of the treasured landscapes of mountains. Throughout the world, mountain ownership and management has become an integral part of many Indigenous peoples’ struggles for self-determination.
    [Show full text]