DOCSLIB.ORG

Jackson(County(Community( Wildfire(Protection(Plan(

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jackson(County(Community( Wildfire(Protection(Plan( Jackson(County(Community( Wildfire(Protection(Plan( September 2015 ! Process for Revision and Updates This CWPP is a living document that should be reviewed annually and updated as needed. The core individuals are encouraged to track projects and record needed revisions in an addendum section of their copy of the CWPP. It is requested that these revisions be submitted to Jackson County Administrator’s Office once a year for inclusion in the Jackson County master CWPP. Jackson County will maintain a single master CWPP in which all revisions and updates will be tracked. The revised CWPP will be submitted for approval to all signatories as needed. ! ! The following mutually agree with the contents of this Jackson County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP): James A. Murphy Date Board of County Commissioners, Jackson County Charles B. Clayton Date Board of County Commissioners, Jackson County Betsy Blecha Date Board of County Commissioners, Jackson County Kent Crowder Date County Administrator/Emergency Management, Jackson Cty Jeff Benson Date Fire Chief, North Park Fire & Rescue Authority Gary L. Cure Date Sheriff, Jackson County ! ! John Twitchell Date District Forester, Colorado State Forest Service Jeremiah Zamora Date District Ranger, Parks Ranger District Routt-Medicine Bow National Forest Stephanie Odell Date Field Manager, Kremmling Field Office Bureau of Land Management ! ! TABLE&OF&CONTENTS& INTRODUCTION)....................................................................................................................................................)3! OVERVIEW)...................................................................................................................................................)3! REVIEW)TEAM)&)MEETINGS)......................................................................................................................)4! BACKGROUND)AND)HISTORY).....................................................................................................................)5! GENERAL)FIRE)INFORMATION)........................................................................................................................)7! FIRE)ECOLOGY).............................................................................................................................................)7! FIRE)BEHAVIOR)...........................................................................................................................................)8! VEGETATIVE)TYPES)....................................................................................................................................)8! LODGEPOLE!PINE!............................................................................................................................................!8! SUBALPINE!FIR!................................................................................................................................................!9! ASPEN!............................................................................................................................................................!10! SAGEBRUSH!...................................................................................................................................................!10! GAMBEL!OAK!.................................................................................................................................................!11! GRASSLAND–GRASSES/FORBS!..................................................................................................................!12! FIRE)STATISTICS).......................................................................................................................................)12! HISTORICAL)WILDFIRES)...........................................................................................................................)14! WILDFIRE)RISK)ASSESMENT))REPORT).....................................................................................................)16! COMMUNITY)INFORMATION)..........................................................................................................................)17! GENERAL)INFORMATION)...........................................................................................................................)17! TOPOGRAPHY/SLOPE)...............................................................................................................................)18! METEOROLOGY).........................................................................................................................................)19! HYDROLOGY)..............................................................................................................................................)21! HOMES,)BUSINESSES)AND)ESSENTIAL)INFRASTRUCTURE)AT)RISK).........................................................)22! OTHER)COMMUNITY)VALUES)...................................................................................................................)25! EMERGENCY)SERVICES)..............................................................................................................................)26! NORTH!PARK!FIRE!RESCUE!AUTHORITY!................................................................................................!26! US!FOREST!SERVICE!(PARKS!RANGER!DISTRICT)!................................................................................!27! BLM!(KREMMLING!FIELD!OFFICE)!.........................................................................................................!27! COMMUNICATIONS)....................................................................................................................................)27! MITIGATION)AREAS)&)STRATEGIES)............................................................................................................)29! DESIRED)FUTURE)CONDITIONS)AND)GOALS)............................................................................................)29! GOALS!............................................................................................................................................................!29! OBJECTIVES/STRATEGIES!..........................................................................................................................!29! FIREFIGHTER)RESPONSE)GUIDE)...............................................................................................................)30! PLANNING)AREA)BOUNDARIES).................................................................................................................)30! NORTHEAST)JACKSON)COUNTY)................................................................................................................)31! NORTHWEST)JACKSON)COUNTY)...............................................................................................................)34! SOUTHEAST)JACKSON)COUNTY).................................................................................................................)38! SOUTHWEST)JACKSON)COUNTY)................................................................................................................)41! COMPLETED)PROJECTS).............................................................................................................................)44! FUTURE)PROJECTS)SUMMARY)..................................................................................................................)46! ! 1( ! APPENDIX)A:))MAPS! APPENDIX)B:))CO)WILDFIRE)RISK)ASSESSMENT! APPENDIX)C:))OTHER)INFORMATION! APPENDIX)D:))ANNUAL)PROJECT)UPDATES)AND)ADDENDUMS! APPENDIX)E:))EXISTING)CWPPS! ! 2( ! Introduction Overview( Members of the Jackson County community, in cooperation with local, state and federal agencies and other interested parties have collaboratively developed this Jackson County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). This CWPP was created according to the guidelines of Preparing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan, A Handbook for Wildland-Urban Interface Communities, March 2004, Communities Committee, National Association of Counties, National Association of State Foresters, Society of American Foresters, Western Governors’ Association. The handbook was designed to lead the community through a process that includes eight steps to completion of a CWPP. The Jackson County, Wildland Fire and Fuel Management Plan was completed in 2003. All resource materials used are included or listed in the Appendix.( The Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) passed by congress on November 21, 2003 directs the federal agencies to collaborate with communities in developing hazardous fuel reduction projects, and in the prioritization of treatment areas as defined by a community’s CWPP. It identifies strategies for reducing wildfire fuels while improving forest health, supporting local industry and economy, and improving fire fighting response capabilities. More recently in 2009, Colorado Senate Bill 09-001 was passed, signed and went into effect. This bill’s purpose was to establish CWPPs at the county level, most notably, determining fire hazard areas within the unincorporated portion of the county. The wildland/urban interface is defined as an area or zone where structures and other human development meets or intermingles with undeveloped wildland or vegetative fuels.1 An analysis by Colorado State Forest Service in 1990 showed that an estimated 3,310 acres of wildland/urban interface exist in Jackson County with 3 subdivisions in the affected area. Obviously, many
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy and Correlation of Glacial Deposits of the Rocky Mountains, the Colorado Plateau and the Ranges of the Great Basin
    STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF GLACIAL DEPOSITS OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, THE COLORADO PLATEAU AND THE RANGES OF THE GREAT BASIN Gerald M. Richmond u.s. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Federal Center, MS 913, Denver, Colorado 80225, U.S.A. INTRODUCTION glaciations (Charts lA, 1B) see Fullerton and Rich- mond, Comparison of the marine oxygen isotope The Rocky Mountains, Colorado Plateau, and Basin record, the eustatic sea level record, and the chronology and Range Provinces (Fig. 1) together occupy much of of glaciation in the United States of America (this the western interior United States. These regions volume). include approximately 140 mountain ranges that were glaciated during the Pleistocene. Most of the glaciers Historical Perspective were valley glaciers, but ice caps formed on uplands Following early recognition of deposits of two alpine locally. Discussion of the deposits of all of these ranges glaciations (Gilbert, 1890; Ball, 1908; Capps, 1909; would require monographic analysis. To avoid this, Atwood, 1909), deposits of three glaciations gradually representative ranges in each province are reviewed. became widely recognized (Alden, 1912, 1932, 1953; Atwood and Mather, 1912, 1932; Alden and Stebinger, Purpose and Scope 1913; Blackwelder, 1915; Atwood, 1915; Fryxell, 1930; This report summarizes the evidence for correlation Bradley, 1936). Subsequently drift of the intermediate of the Quaternary glacial deposits in 26 broadly glaciation was shown to represent two glacial advances distributed mountain ranges selected on the basis of (Fryxell, 1930; Horberg, 1938; Richmond, 1948, 1962a; availability of detailed information and length of glacial Moss, 1951a; Nelson, 1954; Holmes and Moss, 1955), record. and the older drift was shown to include deposits of Because the glacial deposits rarely are traceable from three glaciations (Richmond, 1957, 1962a, 1964a).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the United States 2000
    United States Department Forest Insect and Of Agriculture Forest Service Disease Conditions Forest Health Protection in the United States March 2002 2000 Healthy Forests Make A World of Difference United States Department Of Agriculture Forest Insect and Forest Service Disease Conditions Forest Health Protection in the United States March 2002 2000 PREFACE This is the 50th annual report prepared by the U.S. • seed orchard insects and diseases; Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USDA • nursery insects and diseases; and Forest Service) of the insect and disease conditions of • abiotic damage. the Nation's forests. This report responds to direction in the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978, as These categories are listed in the table of contents; amended, to conduct surveys and report annually on there is no index. insect and disease conditions of major national significance. Insect and disease conditions of local The information in this report is provided by the Forest importance are reported in regional and State reports. Health Protection Program of the USDA Forest Service. This program serves all Federal lands, The report describes the extent and nature of insect- including the National Forest System and the lands and disease-caused damage of national significance in administered by the Departments of Defense and 2000. As in the past, selected insect and disease Interior. Service is also provided to tribal lands. The conditions are highlighted in the front section of the program provides assistance to private landowners report. Maps are provided for some pests showing through the State foresters. A key part of the program affected counties in the East and affected areas in the is detecting and reporting insect and disease epidemics West.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014
    Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014 Aerial detection surveys of tree killing or damaging insects and diseases are conducted annually over Colorado’s forest lands. This is a cooperative effort between the US Forest Service and the Colorado State Forest Service. In 2014, 28 million acres were surveyed by 7 trained federal and state surveyors. Highlights of the survey by damage agent are reported below. In 2014, all reported agents are insects that kill and/or defoliate trees. This report includes only forest damage that is visible from the air. Spruce Beetle • Since 1996, spruce beetle has affected approximately 1,397,000 acres to varying degrees in Colorado. • Spruce beetle activity was detected on 485,000 acres in Colorado in 2014. Of these, 253,000 acres are in areas not previously mapped as having spruce beetle activity (new acres). This epidemic continues to expand rapidly (Figures 1, 2). In some areas, the outbreak has moved through entire drainages in the course of one year. In the most heavily impacted drainages, nearly every mature spruce has been killed (Figure 3). • The spruce beetle epidemic is expanding most rapidly in southern Colorado’s Forests and impacts many thousands of acres. Areas affected are found from the La Garita Wilderness Area to north of Cottonwood Pass, the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, as well as south to the Colorado border and into New Mexico. Aerial survey in south central Colorado showed spruce beetle epidemics expanded on the San Juan (26,000 new acres on 53,000 active acres), Rio Grande (78,000 new acres on 192,000 active acres), Gunnison (54,000 new acres on 79,000 active acres), and San Isabel (26,000 new acres on 31,000 active acres) National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • District Court, Water Division 6, Colorado
    DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIV. 6, COLORADO TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIV. 6 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, you are hereby notified that the following pages comprise a resume of Applications and Amended Applications filed in the office of Water DIV. 6, during the month of August, 2008. 1. 08CW3 (00CW60, 81CW200) JACKSON COUNTY Amended Application for Finding of Diligence and to Make Absolute. Walden Reservoir Co., c/o Stanley W. Cazier or John D. Walker, P.O. Box 500, Granby, CO 80446 970-887-3376. Name of structure: Walden Reservoir (Old S.C. Ditch Enlargement and Extension). Describe conditional water right (as to each structure) giving the following from the Referee’s Ruling and Judgment and Decree: Date of Original Decree: October 14, 1982. Case No: 81CW200 Court: Water Division No. 6. Location and legal description for the structures are: Walden Reservoir: The outlet is located 50 feet West of the East Section line and 2150 feet North of the South Section line of Section 19, T9N, R79W of the 6th P.M. Old S.C. Ditch: Headgate is located at a point on the West Bank of the Michigan River whence the 1/4 Corner between Sections 17 & 18, T8N, R78W of the 6th P.M., bears North 72 degrees, 05 minutes West a distance of 3483 feet. Point of diversion from Old S.C. Ditch to Illinois River Basin: Point of diversion bears South 88 degrees, 43 minutes West, 4283 feet from the East 1/4 Corner of Section 34, T9N, R79W, of the 6th P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routt National Forest
    100 YEARS OF CONSERVATION AND PUBLIC SERVICE ON THE ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST The Early History of Forest Reserves and National Forests that formed the Routt National Forest by Mary Peterson, Forest Supervisor 2005 marks the 100th anniversary of conservation and public service for the Forest Service nationally! The Routt National Forest has also been the result of a long and colorful history in the last 100+ years! Over the next year, I’d like to share with you some of this great history of the Routt National Forest in a series of articles to celebrate our Centennial. The Routt National Forest is comprised of the dramatic and beautiful Park, Gore, Medicine Bow, Elkhead, and Flat Tops Mountain Ranges. Fortunately for us today, the beauty and resources of these mountain ranges were recognized by early conservation leaders and were set aside as forest reserves, national forests, and a national park. Over the last 100+ years, the current Routt National Forest experienced several boundary and name changes. Following is a brief reconstruction of those changes. The current Routt National Forest was produced from the entire Park Range Forest Reserve and portions of the Medicine Bow, Sierra Madre, and White River Plateau Forest Reserves, established respectively in 1905, 1902, 1906, and 1891. By an Act of Congress approved March 4, 1907, the forest reserves were renamed “national forests”, thus resulting in the creation of the Park Range, Medicine Bow, Sierra Madre, and White River National Forests. Portions of the current Routt National Forest contained portions of these four "early" national forests as well as portions of the Hayden, Colorado, and Arapaho National Forests, and Rocky Mountain National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Shrubs, Seed, Soil, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Seed Bank, Seed
    Soils and Vegetation of the Snowy Range, Southeastern Wyoming Wildland Shrub Symposium Field Trip: Laramie to Woods Landing, Riverside, Libby Flats, and Centennial, Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Larry Munn C. Lynn Kinter Laramie, Wyoming, was established as a railroad con- trains also used 2 million gallons of water each day from the struction town in May, 1868. The transcontinental railroad Laramie River. Stops along the track where coal and water (Union Pacific) came across the Rockies in the late 1860s, were available developed into towns, for example, Rawlins across the then unsettled landscape that now contains and Rock Springs. We left town heading southwest via Cheyenne and Laramie, after a southern route through Highway 230. Elevation at Laramie is 7,170 ft (2,185 m), and Colorado was rejected because of the terrain. A relic of the precipitation is 10.5 inches (26 cm), most of which falls in Tertiary Ogallala formation called the “Gangplank” west of March through July. Cheyenne provided an access ramp across the mountains; Stop 1: University of Wyoming, Monolith Ranch by this was the first place north of Denver where it was feasible the fishing access to a Laramie River site with greasewood to build the railroad. It was also the first place west of (Sarcobatus vermiculatus). This is an area that was farmed Missouri that railroad ties could be cut from the surrounding at the turn of the last century. In 1906, a grain elevator forests, and railroaders timbered for ties extensively in the capable of loading 50,000 bushels onto railroad cars daily Laramie and Snowy Ranges (about 3,000,000 ties were cut was built in Laramie.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Location Street & Number Bridge Street and County Road 402 Not for Publication City, Town Elk Mountain Vicinity of State Wyoming Code 056 County Carbon Code 007 3
    NPS Form 10-900 (3-82) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received SEP I 0 Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms OCT | 0 1986 Type all entries complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic John S. Evans Hotel: Mountain View Hotel: Grand view Hotel and or common Elk Mountain Hotel (preferred)________________ 2. Location street & number Bridge Street and County Road 402 not for publication city, town Elk Mountain vicinity of state Wyoming code 056 county Carbon code 007 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district rpublic X occupied agriculture museum X building(s) X private unoccupied X commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object n/a in process yes: restricted government scientific n/a being considered X,_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military Other; 4. Owner of Property name c.H. and S.P. Martin street & number Elk Mountain Hotel Box 76 city, town Elk Mountain vicinity of state Wyoming 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Carbon County Courthouse street & number 4th and Spruce city, town Rawlins state Wyoming 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title University of Wyo. History Class has this property been determined eligible? yes no date 1984 federal state county X local depository for survey records Sl-ai-P ir. Preservation Office city, town Cheyenne state Wyoming 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered X original3 site / ruins X altered moved date n/a X fair unexposed Describe ;thf present and original (if known) physical appearance Located on their original sites on the eastern side of the community, the Elk Mountain Hotel and Garden Spot Pavilion are physically separated by a tree filled grassy area that has long functioned as the town's park.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey for Bats in Jackson County, Colorado
    Survey for Bats in Jackson County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Col~ University /(now/edge to Go Places Colorado Natural Heritage Program October 2006 Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Survey for Bats in Jackson County, Colorado Robert A. Schorr Zoologist Cover photographs: 1. Mist nets over pond near North Platte River, Jackson County, Colorado 2. Long-eared myotis (Myotis evotis) in hand INTRODUCTION Bats, as a group, are of conservation concern in much of the United States. Because bats have low reproductive rates, undergo major physiological stress (from hibernation and/or migration), are susceptible to human disturbance at roost sites, and may be disproportionately impacted by some energy development, they are receiving ever-increasing levels of conservation attention (Racey and Entwistle 2003). One of the primary facets of most conservation strategies is the need to obtain better distributional information (Racey and Entwistle 2003, Fenton 2003). Bats pose a particularly difficult information gap because of the lack of survey effort and the inherent difficulty of surveying for nocturnal, volant species. Of the approximately 126 species of mammals found in Colorado, bats, with approximately 20 species, are second only to the rodents in diversity. Despite being a large component of the mammalian fauna, the distribution, abundance, and ecology of most bats species is poorly understood. Much of the absence of biological information is driven by the paucity of survey effort dedicated to bats. In turn, the lack of distributional information has raised concern that many bat species in Colorado are of conservation concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Geography of the United States, 1922
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE UNITED STATES, 1922. PENEPLAINS OF4 THE FRONT RANGE AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK, COLORADO. By Wnxis T. LEE. PURPOSE OF THE PAPER. The purpose of this paper is to call attention to some of the major surface features in the Rocky Mountain National Park and to point out their probable correlation with similar features in neigh­ boring regions. The observations on which the paper is based were made in the summer of 1916, during an investigation in which other work demanded first consideration. This paper may therefore be considered a by-product. For the same reason many of the observa­ tions were not followed to conclusions, yet the data obtained seem to be sufficient to establish a certain order of events, the recognition of which may be of assistance in working out in detail the geologic and geographic history of the Rocky Mountain region. TWO CYCLES OF EROSION PREVIOUSLY RECOGNIZED. In an account of the general geology of the Georgetown quad­ rangle, Colo.j Ball x describes three distinct types of land forms " an old, mature mountainous upland; younger V-shaped valleys in­ cised in this upland; and glacial cirques developed at the heads of some of the streams, passing downward into U-shaped valleys." Ball describes the mountainous upland as consisting of highlands of rounded or gently sloping tops which are remnants of an ancient peneplain or old surface of erosion. Most of these remnants in the Georgetown quadrangle lie above an altitude of 11,500 feet. On thig old peneplain there were many monadnocks, some of which are now recognizable as the summits of the highest mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2008–1360
    The Search for Braddock’s Caldera—Guidebook for Colorado Scientific Society Fall 2008 Field Trip, Never Summer Mountains, Colorado By James C. Cole,1 Ed Larson,2 Lang Farmer,2 and Karl S. Kellogg1 1U.S. Geological Survey 2University of Colorado at Boulder (Geology Department) Open-File Report 2008–1360 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D.Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Cole, James C., Larson, Ed, Farmer, Lang, and Kellogg, Karl S., 2008, The search for Braddock’s caldera—Guidebook for the Colorado Scientific Society Fall 2008 field trip, Never Summer Mountains, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1360, 30 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. 2 Abstract The report contains the illustrated guidebook that was used for the fall field trip of the Colorado Scientific Society on September 6–7, 2008. It summarizes new information about the Tertiary geologic history of the northern Front Range and the Never Summer Mountains, particularly the late Oligocene volcanic and intrusive rocks designated the Braddock Peak complex.
    [Show full text]