IDENTIFYING STREAMS of CONSCIOUSNESS WITHOUT APPEALING to SUBJECTS of EXPERIENCE a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of San Franci

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IDENTIFYING STREAMS of CONSCIOUSNESS WITHOUT APPEALING to SUBJECTS of EXPERIENCE a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of San Franci IDENTIFYING STREAMS OF CONSCIOUSNESS WITHOUT APPEALING TO SUBJECTS OF EXPERIENCE As A Thesis submitted to the faculty of 3G San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree * Master of Arts In Philosophy by Allison Keiko Allen San Francisco, California January 2016 Copyright by Allison Keiko Allen 2016 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Identifying Streams of Consciousness without Appealing to Subjects of Experience by Allison Keiko Allen, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Philosophy at San Francisco State University. Carlos Montemayor, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Philosophy Isabelle Peschardf Ph.D. Associate Professor of Philosophy Ezequiel Morsella, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology IDENTIFYING STREAMS OF CONSCIOUSNESS WITHOUT APPEALING TO SUBJECTS OF EXPERIENCE Allison Keiko Allen San Francisco, California 2016 What are the identity conditions for streams of consciousness? Elizabeth Schecter poses this question in her paper, “The unity of consciousness: subjects and objectivity.” In particular, she is interested in the capacity of a recent thesis about the unity of consciousness, one posed by Tim Bayne in the book, The Unity o f Consciousness. In this paper, I take into consideration the main limitations Schecter finds with Bayne’s view. I use her main points to formulate a new unity thesis—one which addresses a kind of unity that neither Bayne nor Schecter describe, and yet belongs in a complete account of the unity of consciousness. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. /JL / 2 /X o]5_ Chair, Thesis Committee Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is dedicated in loving memory to my grandmother, Keiko Sutton. I am especially grateful to my advisors, Dr. Carlos Montemayor and Dr. Ezequiel Morsella, for their outstanding guidance and support over the last few years. Having the opportunity to work with them has been the most enriching experience. I am also thankful to Dr. Isabelle Peschard for her assistance on this project, as well as her support and guidance in related areas of research. Finally, special thanks are due to Dr. Alice Sowaal and Dr. Shelley Wilcox for inspiring me as an undergraduate to pursue studies in philosophy. Without their encouragement I may not have had to courage to try my hand at being a philosopher. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................... 7 The Unity of Consciousness................................ ...9 The Subjective-Objective Distinction....................................................................................12 Token Streams and Phenomenal Unity.......................................................................... 14 Subjects Cannot Distinguish Token Streams........................................................................16 Using Causal Streams for Token Streams......................................................................... 17 The Action Unity Thesis .................................................... 18 Assessing the Action Unity Thesis........................................................................................25 Conclusion......................................................................... 28 References....................................................................... 30 Footnotes................................................................................................................................. 32 7 I. Introduction What are the identity conditions for streams of consciousness? In Elizabeth Schecter’s (2012) paper, “The unity of consciousness: subjects and objectivity,” she considers the role subjects of experience may play in individuating and providing identity conditions for streams of consciousness. The question arises as she examines Tim Bayne’s (2010) tripartite account of phenomenal unity in his book, The Unity o f Consciousness. In Bayne’s book, the unity of consciousness is regarded as a three part relationship between the subject of experience, representational content, and phenomenal unity. However, Bayne provides two accounts of the subject of experience which lend themselves to two different interpretations of the unity thesis. For most of the book, Bayne relies on an animalist, or biological, account, according to which subjects are organisms. Then, in the last chapter of his book, he provides a phenomenalist account, according to which subjects are intentional entities. These two accounts come with their own set of limitations. Schecter argues that Bayne must pick between the two accounts: Going the [phenomenal] route allows the tripartite account to articulate the subjective structure of consciousness, but no more; it cannot be used to individuate streams of consciousness or subjects of experience. Going the [biological] route, forgoing a subjective account of the identity of experiences, requires foregoing the conceptual connection between our 8 identities of first-personal perspectives on our own conscious experiences (691). Keeping a clear distinction between subjective explanations and objective explanations of consciousness places pressure on Bayne to select only one of the versions of his account. Bayne’s primary project is to explain the subjective, ‘what it is like,’ structures of consciousness. However Schecter suggests that Bayne’s biological account of the subject introduces an error that confuses the above distinction because it implies there are at least some physical structures (e.g., organisms) at play in delineating boundaries of the subject and, by extension, streams of consciousness. Schecter then considers whether either formulation of Bayne’s unity thesis can identify streams of consciousness, ultimately concluding that his biological account is inadequate but preferred. She explains why within the context of her own proposal one should appeal to causal streams to identify streams of consciousness. I agree with Schecter that the phenomenal formulation of Bayne’s unity thesis is not capable of identifying streams of consciousness, and that one must appeal to something objective in order to do so. Despite this agreement, I think that Schecter dismisses Bayne’s unity thesis too quickly. In this paper, I defend the view that the phenomenal formulation of Bayne’s unity thesis is not at odds with Schecter’s formulation of co-consciousness (which includes her method for individuating streams of consciousness). In addition, I consider some of the strengths of Bayne’s unity thesis in light of Schecter’s criticisms and use some of these insights to formulate a third unity thesis, the action unity thesis. I argue 9 in support of the claims that the action unity thesis is compatible with Bayne and Schecter’s theses and that it is needed for a more complete account of the unity of consciousness. Section II begins by exploring Bayne and Schecter’s different formations of the unity of consciousness. Section III goes on to explain the distinction between subjective and objective explanations of consciousness, a distinction on which Schecter’s criticisms rest. Section IV formulates the problem of tokening streams of consciousness and the main limitations Schecter finds with purely phenomenal accounts of the unity of consciousness. Section V focuses on problems associated with both kinds of subject and is followed by a review of Schecter’s suggestion to use causal systems to identify streams of consciousness in Section VI. With Schecter’s position outlined, Section VII introduces the action unity thesis and its place in the causal system (relative to Bayne and Schecter’s theses). Finally, Section VIII assess the action unity thesis. II. The unity of consciousness Both Bayne and Schecter are concerned in particular with phenomenal consciousness, also referred to as subjective experience, or ‘what it is like’ to be an organism (Block, 1995). The unity of consciousness, then, is ‘what it is like’ to experience two or more conscious states or properties in the same conscious field at the same time.1 Although Bayne and Schecter provide different approaches to this problem, most generally the concern is about how two or more conscious states are experienced at the same time: 10 What kind of relationship holds between two conscious states so that they appear together? To demonstrate this concern more clearly, consider the experience one has while watching a film. Broadly speaking, there are a set of visual experiences one has of the film and another set of auditory experiences one has of the film’s score. According to Bayne, there is something it is like to have each of these experiences independently, <seeing film> and <hearing score>, but the phenomenal unity of consciousness is concerned with ‘what it is like’ to have two qualitatively different conscious contents experienced conjointly at the same time: <seeing film and hearing score>. For Schecter, this formulation of the unity of consciousness runs into particular problems (discussed below) by focusing on the subjective aspects of consciousness. She opts instead for a definition, inspired in part by Susan Hurley (1998) which regards unity as an objective relation held between experiences. In particular, the relation is identified as, “whatever relation it is that holds between experiences in virtue of which
Recommended publications
  • Philosophy, Theory, and Literature
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS PHILOSOPHY, THEORY, AND LITERATURE 20% DISCOUNT NEW & FORTHCOMING ON ALL TITLES 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Redwood Press .............................2 Square One: First-Order Questions in the Humanities ................... 2-3 Currencies: New Thinking for Financial Times ...............3-4 Post*45 ..........................................5-7 Philosophy and Social Theory ..........................7-10 Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics ............10-12 Cultural Memory in the Present ......................... 12-14 Literature and Literary Studies .................... 14-18 This Atom Bomb in Me Ordinary Unhappiness Shakesplish The Long Public Life of a History in Financial Times Asian and Asian Lindsey A. Freeman The Therapeutic Fiction of How We Read Short Private Poem Amin Samman American Literature .................19 David Foster Wallace Shakespeare’s Language Reading and Remembering This Atom Bomb in Me traces what Critical theorists of economy tend Thomas Wyatt Digital Publishing Initiative ....19 it felt like to grow up suffused with Jon Baskin Paula Blank to understand the history of market American nuclear culture in and In recent years, the American fiction Shakespeare may have written in Peter Murphy society as a succession of distinct around the atomic city of Oak Ridge, writer David Foster Wallace has Elizabethan English, but when Thomas Wyatt didn’t publish “They stages. This vision of history rests on ORDERING Tennessee. As a secret city during been treated as a symbol, an icon, we read him, we can’t help but Flee from Me.” It was written in a a chronological conception of time Use code S19PHIL to receive a the Manhattan Project, Oak Ridge and even a film character. Ordinary understand his words, metaphors, notebook, maybe abroad, maybe whereby each present slips into the 20% discount on all books listed enriched the uranium that powered Unhappiness returns us to the reason and syntax in relation to our own.
    [Show full text]
  • What Literature Knows: Forays Into Literary Knowledge Production
    Contributions to English 2 Contributions to English and American Literary Studies 2 and American Literary Studies 2 Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Kai Merten (eds.) Merten Kai / What Literature Knows This volume sheds light on the nexus between knowledge and literature. Arranged What Literature Knows historically, contributions address both popular and canonical English and Antje Kley US-American writing from the early modern period to the present. They focus on how historically specific texts engage with epistemological questions in relation to Forays into Literary Knowledge Production material and social forms as well as representation. The authors discuss literature as a culturally embedded form of knowledge production in its own right, which deploys narrative and poetic means of exploration to establish an independent and sometimes dissident archive. The worlds that imaginary texts project are shown to open up alternative perspectives to be reckoned with in the academic articulation and public discussion of issues in economics and the sciences, identity formation and wellbeing, legal rationale and political decision-making. What Literature Knows The Editors Antje Kley is professor of American Literary Studies at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. Her research interests focus on aesthetic forms and cultural functions of narrative, both autobiographical and fictional, in changing media environments between the eighteenth century and the present. Kai Merten is professor of British Literature at the University of Erfurt, Germany. His research focuses on contemporary poetry in English, Romantic culture in Britain as well as on questions of mediality in British literature and Postcolonial Studies. He is also the founder of the Erfurt Network on New Materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION in FICTION HONORS THESIS Presented to The
    CHARACTERIZATION IN FICTION HONORS THESIS Presented to the Honors Committee of Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation in the Honors College by Jack Reams San Marcos, Texas May 2015 CHARACTERIZATION IN FICTION Thesis Supervisor: ________________________________ John M. Blair, Ph.D. Department of English Second Reader: __________________________________ Twister Marquiss, M.F.A Department of English Approved: ____________________________________ Heather C. Galloway, Ph.D. Dean, Honors College Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 P.A.R.T.S of Characterization .............................................................................................4 Direct Characterization ......................................................................................................15 Indirect Characterization ....................................................................................................30 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................43 Abstract The purpose of my thesis is to examine the importance of characterization in fiction, as well as the methods of characterization itself. The scope of the paper will be primarily limited to three works of
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRENDS of STREAM of CONSCIOUSNESS TECHNIQUE in WILLIAM FAULKNER S NOVEL the SOUND and the FURY'' Chitra Yashwant Ga
    AMIERJ Volume–VII, Issues– VII ISSN–2278-5655 Oct - Nov 2018 THE TRENDS OF STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS TECHNIQUE IN WILLIAM FAULKNER S NOVEL THE SOUND AND THE FURY’’ Chitra Yashwant Gaidhani Assistant Professor in English, G. E. Society RNC Arts, JDB Commerce and NSC Science College, Nashik Road, Tal. & Dist. Nashik, Maharashtra, India. Abstract: The term "Stream-of-Consciousness" signifies to a technique of narration. Prior to the twentieth century. In this technique an author would simply tell the reader what one of the characters was thinking? Stream-of-consciousness is a technique whereby the author writes as though inside the minds of the characters. Since the ordinary person's mind jumps from one event to another, stream-of- consciousness tries to capture this phenomenon in William Faulkner’s novel The Sound and Fury. This style of narration is also associate with the Modern novelist and story writers of the 20th century. The Sound and the Fury is a broadly significant work of literature. William Faulkner use of this technique Sound and Fury is probably the most successful and outstanding use that we have had. Faulkner has been admired for his ability to recreate the thought process of the human mind. In addition, it is viewed as crucial development in the stream-of-consciousness literary technique. According encyclopedia, in 1998, the Modern Library ranked The Sound and the Fury sixth on its list of the 100 best English-language novels of the 20th century. The present research focuses on stream of consciousness technique used by William Faulkner’s novel “The Sound and Fury”.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction
    Dr. Hallett ELEMENTS OF FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms that Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction” is defined as any imaginative re-creation of life in prose narrative form. All fiction is a falsehood of sorts because it relates events that never actually happened to people (characters) who never existed, at least not in the manner portrayed in the stories. However, fiction writers aim at creating “legitimate untruths,” since they seek to demonstrate meaningful insights into the human condition. Therefore, fiction is “untrue” in the absolute sense, but true in the universal sense. Critical Thinking – analysis of any work of literature – requires a thorough investigation of the “who, where, when, what, why, etc.” of the work. Narrator / Narrative Voice Guiding Question: Who is telling the story? …What is the … Narrative Point of View is the perspective from which the events in the story are observed and recounted. To determine the point of view, identify who is telling the story, that is, the viewer through whose eyes the readers see the action (the narrator). Consider these aspects: A. Pronoun p-o-v: First (I, We)/Second (You)/Third Person narrator (He, She, It, They] B. Narrator’s degree of Omniscience [Full, Limited, Partial, None]* C. Narrator’s degree of Objectivity [Complete, None, Some (Editorial?), Ironic]* D. Narrator’s “Un/Reliability” * The Third Person (therefore, apparently Objective) Totally Omniscient (fly-on-the-wall) Narrator is the classic narrative point of view through which a disembodied narrative voice (not that of a participant in the events) knows everything (omniscient) recounts the events, introduces the characters, reports dialogue and thoughts, and all details.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. List of Film Genres and Sub-Genres PDF HANDOUT
    9. List of film genres and sub-genres PDF HANDOUT The following list of film genres and sub-genres has been adapted from “Film Sub-Genres Types (and Hybrids)” written by Tim Dirks29. Genre Film sub-genres types and hybrids Action or adventure • Action or Adventure Comedy • Literature/Folklore Adventure • Action/Adventure Drama Heroes • Alien Invasion • Martial Arts Action (Kung-Fu) • Animal • Man- or Woman-In-Peril • Biker • Man vs. Nature • Blaxploitation • Mountain • Blockbusters • Period Action Films • Buddy • Political Conspiracies, Thrillers • Buddy Cops (or Odd Couple) • Poliziotteschi (Italian) • Caper • Prison • Chase Films or Thrillers • Psychological Thriller • Comic-Book Action • Quest • Confined Space Action • Rape and Revenge Films • Conspiracy Thriller (Paranoid • Road Thriller) • Romantic Adventures • Cop Action • Sci-Fi Action/Adventure • Costume Adventures • Samurai • Crime Films • Sea Adventures • Desert Epics • Searches/Expeditions for Lost • Disaster or Doomsday Continents • Epic Adventure Films • Serialized films • Erotic Thrillers • Space Adventures • Escape • Sports—Action • Espionage • Spy • Exploitation (ie Nunsploitation, • Straight Action/Conflict Naziploitation • Super-Heroes • Family-oriented Adventure • Surfing or Surf Films • Fantasy Adventure • Survival • Futuristic • Swashbuckler • Girls With Guns • Sword and Sorcery (or “Sword and • Guy Films Sandal”) • Heist—Caper Films • (Action) Suspense Thrillers • Heroic Bloodshed Films • Techno-Thrillers • Historical Spectacles • Treasure Hunts • Hong Kong • Undercover
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Paratext Author(S): Gérard Genette and Marie Maclean Source: New Literary History, Vol
    Introduction to the Paratext Author(s): Gérard Genette and Marie Maclean Source: New Literary History, Vol. 22, No. 2, Probings: Art, Criticism, Genre (Spring, 1991), pp. 261-272 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/469037 Accessed: 11-01-2019 17:12 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to New Literary History This content downloaded from 128.227.202.135 on Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:12:58 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Introduction to the Paratext* Gerard Genette HE LITERARY WORK consists, exhaustively or essentially, of a text, that is to say (a very minimal definition) in a more or less lengthy sequence of verbal utterances more or less con- taining meaning. But this text rarely appears in its naked state, without the reinforcement and accompaniment of a certain number of productions, themselves verbal or not, like an author's name, a title, a preface, illustrations. One does not always know if one should consider that they belong to the text or not, but in any case they surround it and prolong it, precisely in order to present it, in the usual sense of this verb, but also in its strongest meaning: to make it present, to assure its presence in the world, its "reception" and its consumption, in the form, nowadays at least, of a book.
    [Show full text]
  • Scriptwriting Theories & Practice
    Storyboarding and Scriptwriting • AD210 • Spring 2011 • Gregory V. Eckler Storyboarding and Scriptwriting Scriptwriting Theories & Practice Theories on Scriptwriting Fundamentally, the screenplay is a unique literary form. It is like a musical score, in that it is intended to be interpreted on the basis of other artists’ performance, rather than serving as a “finished product” for the enjoyment of its audience. For this reason, a screenplay is written using technical jargon and tight, spare prose when describing stage directions. Unlike a novel or short story, a screenplay focuses on describing the literal, visual aspects of the story, rather than on the internal thoughts of its characters. In screenwriting, the aim is to evoke those thoughts and emotions through subtext, action, and symbolism. There are several main screenwriting theories which help writers approach the screenplay by systematizing the structure, goals and techniques of writing a script. The most common kinds of theories are structural. Screenwriter William Goldman is widely quoted as saying “Screenplays are structure”. Three act structure Most screenplays have a three act structure, following an organization that dates back to Aristotle’s Poetics. The three acts are setup (of the location and characters), confrontation (with an obstacle), and resolution (culminating in a climax and a dénouement). In a two-hour film, the first and third acts both typically last around 30 minutes, with the middle act lasting roughly an hour. In Writing Drama, French writer and director Yves Lavandier shows a slightly different approach. As most theorists, he maintains that every human action, whether fictitious or real, contains three logical parts: before the action, during the action, and after the action.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Appeals (Or Modes of Persuasion)
    Rhetorical Appeals (or modes of persuasion) The rhetorical appeals were introduced by Aristotle (382-322 B.C.) in his text Rhetoric: Of the modes of persuasion furnished by the spoken word there are three kinds. [...] Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible. [...] Secondly, persuasion may come through the hearers, when the speech stirs their emotions. [...] Thirdly, persuasion is effected through the speech itself when we have proved a truth or an apparent truth by means of the persuasive arguments suitable to the case in question. Three Appeals Ethos Proof in the Persuader (ethical appeal) Arguments based on increasing the writer or the paper’s credibility and authority o How knowledgeable and prepared is the writer Types o Referring to your skills or titles o Research from reliable sources o Personal Experience and/or interest in the topic o References to credible individuals (quotes and paraphrase) Pros: enhances writer; makes other research look better; adds new voices Cons: bias may influence; lack of expertise shows; doesn’t work by itself Pathos (the pathetic) Emotional appeals Arguments based on reactions from readers o Connects argument to reader values Types o Vivid Language (metaphor, simile, word choice) o Examples/Stories o Imagery (ex: animal rights newsletters or arguments about abortion) Pros: highly persuasive; involves readers; can lead to quick action Cons: over-emotion; easier to disprove; readers may have negative reaction Logos Logical appeals Appeals and arguments that refer to factual proof, evidence, and/or reason Types o Statistics o Examples o Cause and Effect o Syllogism (A + B = C) Pros: hard to disprove; highly persuasive; makes writer look more prepared (enhances ethos) Cons: Numbers can lie or confuse; may not intrigue reader (lack of emotion); may be inaccurate Sources to consult: Lunsford, Andrea.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream of Consciousness Technique: Psychological Perspectives and Use in Modern Novel المنظور النفسي واستخدا
    Stream of Consciousness Technique: Psychological Perspectives and Use in Modern Novel Weam Majeed Alkhafaji Sajedeh Asna'ashari University of Kufa, College of Education Candle & Fog Publishing Company Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract Stream of Consciousness technique has a great impact on writing literary texts in the modern age. This technique was broadly used in the late of nineteen century as a result of thedecay of plot, especially in novel writing. Novelists began to use stream of consciousness technique as a new phenomenon, because it goes deeper into the human mind and soul through involving it in writing. Modern novel has changed after Victorian age from the traditional novel that considers themes of religion, culture, social matters, etc. to be a group of irregular events and thoughts interrogate or reveal the inner feeling of readers. This study simplifies stream of consciousness technique through clarifying the three levels of conscious (Consciousness, Precociousness and Unconsciousness)as well as the subconsciousness, based on Sigmund Freud theory. It also sheds a light on the relationship between stream of consciousness, interior monologue, soliloquy and collective unconscious. Finally, This paper explains the beneficial aspects of the stream of consciousness technique in our daily life. It shows how this technique can releaseour feelings and emotions, as well as free our mind from the pressure of thoughts that are upsetting our mind . Key words: Stream of Consciousness, Modern novel, Consciousness, Precociousness and Unconsciousness and subconsciousness. تقنية انسياب اﻻفكار : المنظور النفسي واستخدامه في الرواية الحديثة وئام مجيد الخفاجي ساجدة اثنى عشري جامعة الكوفة – كلية التربية – قسم اللغة اﻻنكليزية دار نشر كاندل وفوك الخﻻصة ان لتقنية انسياب اﻻفكار تأثير كبير على كتابة النصوص اﻻدبية في العصر الحديث.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Action and Theory of Narrative1
    PHILOSOPHY OF ACTION AND THEORY OF NARRATIVE1 TEUN A. VAN DIJK 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The aim of this paper is to apply some recent results from the philosophy of action in the theory of narrative. The intuitive idea is that narrative discourse may be conceived of as a form of natural action description, whereas a philosophy or, more specifically, a logic of action attempts to provide formal action descriptions. It is expected that, on the one hand, narrative discourse is an interesting empirical testing ground for the theory of action, and that, on the other hand, formal action description may yield insight into the abstract structures of narratives in natural language. It is the latter aspect of this interdisciplinary inquiry which will be em- phasized in this paper. 1.2. If there is one branch of analytical philosophy which has received particular at- tention in the last ten years it certainly is the philosophy of action. Issued from classical discussions in philosophical psychology (Hobbes, Hume) the present analy- sis of action finds applications in the foundations of the social sciences, 2 in ethics 3 1This paper has issued from a seminar held at the University of Amsterdam in early 1974. Some of the ideas developed in it have been discussed in lectures given at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (Paris), Louvain, Bielefeld, Münster, Ann Arbor, CUNY (New York) and Ant- werp, in 1973 and 1974. A shorter version of this paper has been published as Action, Action Description and Narrative in New literary history 6 (1975): 273-294.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS the USE of PARATEXTUAL DEVICES in BROADCAST PROMOTION: a CONTENT ANALYSIS of SEASON THREE of GLEE on FACEBOOK Submitted
    THESIS THE USE OF PARATEXTUAL DEVICES IN BROADCAST PROMOTION: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SEASON THREE OF GLEE ON FACEBOOK Submitted by Rachel Timmons Department of Journalism and Technical Communication In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2015 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Kirk Hallahan Scott Diffrient Rosa Martey Copyright by Rachel Timmons 2015 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE USE OF PARATEXTUAL DEVICES IN BROADCAST PROMOTION: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SEASON THREE OF GLEE ON FACEBOOK This study analyzed all Facebook posts during the third season of the Fox Broadcast Network television show Glee (n=763), from August 2011 to May 2012. The study illustrated that Facebook posts can be considered valuable paratextual devices (Gray, 2010b) that can be used in the promotion of a television program. The program’s promoters, who served as Facebook Page administrators, used Facebook for three purposes: build viewership, enhance the live-viewing experience, and build brand awareness and engagement. Visual paratexts, such as images and videos, were used more widely than text-based paratexts. Some of the most frequently employed paratexts included previews/sneak peeks/promos, cast-member specific posts, spoilers or teasers, and music video clips. Posts were about equally split in terms of being related to specific episodes versus the show in general. Almost half of the overall posts displayed high interactivity, which prompted the users to leave the Facebook platform. These posts can be valuable if the show is interested in building brand awareness and enhancing the viewing experience, not just increasing post and Page likes.
    [Show full text]