DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning SPARQL, 2E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning SPARQL, 2E Compliments of 2nd Edition Querying and Updating with SPARQL 1.1 Learning SPARQL Bob DuCharme FREE CHAPTERS YOUR DATA DESERVES BETTER The Evolution of Data Integration Each year billions of dollars and countless hours are spent integrating data from silos across organizations. Legacy tools aren’t agile enough to handle today’s heterogeneous data. Find out how you can use a multi-model database to reduce complexity and risk, save money, and shorten time to value. Download your free eBook, compliments of MarkLogic. MARKLOGIC.COM/MULTIMODEL SECOND EDITION Learning SPARQL Querying and Updating with SPARQL 1.1 This excerpt contains Chapters 2 and 7 of the book Learning SPARQL, Second Edition. The complete book is available at oreilly.com and through other retailers. Bob DuCharme Beijing Boston Farnham Sebastopol Tokyo Learning SPARQL, Second Edition by Bob DuCharme Copyright © 2013 O’Reilly Media. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (http://oreilly.com/safari). For more information, contact our corporate/insti‐ tutional sales department: 800-998-9938 or [email protected]. Editors: Simon St. Laurent and Meghan Blanchette Indexer: Bob DuCharme Production Editor: Kristen Borg Interior Designer: David Futato Proofreader: Amanda Kersey Cover Designer: Randy Comer Illustrator: Rebecca Demarest August 2013: Second Edition Revision History for the Second Edition 2013-06-27: First Release See http://oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=9781449371432 for release details. Nutshell Handbook, the Nutshell Handbook logo, and the O’Reilly logo are registered trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Learning SPARQL, the image of an anglerfish and related trade dress are trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and O’Reilly Media, Inc., was aware of a trade‐ mark claim, the designations have been printed in caps or initial caps. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and author assume no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information con‐ tained herein. 978-1-449-37143-2 [LSI] 1372271958 Table of Contents 1. The Semantic Web, RDF, and Linked Data (and SPARQL). 1 What Exactly Is the “Semantic Web”? 1 URLs, URIs, IRIs, and Namespaces 3 The Resource Description Framework (RDF) 6 Storing RDF in Files 6 Storing RDF in Databases 12 Data Typing 12 Making RDF More Readable with Language Tags and Labels 14 Blank Nodes and Why They’re Useful 16 Named Graphs 18 Reusing and Creating Vocabularies: RDF Schema and OWL 19 Linked Data 25 SPARQL’s Past, Present, and Future 26 The SPARQL Specifications 27 Summary 28 2. Query Efficiency and Debugging. 31 Efficiency Inside the WHERE Clause 31 Reduce the Search Space 32 OPTIONAL Is Very Optional 33 Triple Pattern Order Matters 34 FILTERs: Where and What 36 Property Paths Can Be Expensive 39 Efficiency Outside the WHERE Clause 40 Debugging 41 Manual Debugging 42 SPARQL Algebra 44 Debugging Tools 46 Summary 47 iii CHAPTER 1 The Semantic Web, RDF, and Linked Data (and SPARQL) The SPARQL query language is for data that follows a particular model, but the semantic web isn’t about the query language or about the model—it’s about the data. The booming amount of data becoming available on the semantic web is making great new kinds of applications possible, and as a well-implemented, mature standard designed with the semantic web in mind, SPARQL is the best way to get that data and put it to work in your applications. The flexibility of the RDF data model means that it’s being used more and more with projects that have nothing to do with the “semantic web” other than their use of technology that uses these standards—that’s why you’ll often see references to “semantic web technology.” What Exactly Is the “Semantic Web”? As excitement over the semantic web grows, some vendors use the phrase to sell products with strong connections to the ideas behind the semantic web, and others use it to sell products with weaker connections. This can be confusing for people try‐ ing to understand the semantic web landscape. I like to define the semantic web as a set of standards and best practices for sharing data and the semantics of that data over the Web for use by applications. Let’s look at this definition one or two phrases at a time, and then we’ll look at these issues in more detail. A set of standards 1 Before Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web, more powerful hypertext sys‐ tems were available, but he built his around simple specifications that he published as public standards. This made it possible for people to implement his system on their own (that is, to write their own web servers, web browsers, and especially web pages), and his system grew to become the biggest hypertext system ever. Berners-Lee founded the W3C to oversee these standards, and the semantic web is also built on W3C standards: the RDF data model, the SPARQL query language, and the RDF Schema and OWL standards for storing vocabularies and ontologies. A product or project may deal with semantics, but if it doesn’t use these standards, it can’t connect to and be part of the semantic web any more than a 1985 hypertext system could link to a page on the World Wide Web without using the HTML or HTTP standards. (There are those who disagree on this last point.) best practices for sharing data... over the Web for use by applications Berners-Lee’s original web was designed to deliver human-readable documents. If you want to fly from one airport to another next Sunday afternoon, you can go to an airline website, fill out a query form, and then read the query results off the screen with your eyes. Airline comparison sites have programs that retrieve web pages from multiple airline sites and extract the information they need, in a process known as “screen scraping,” before using the data for their own web pages. Before writing such a program, a developer at the airline comparison website must analyze the HTML structure of each airline’s website to determine where the screen scraping program should look for the data it needs. If one airline redesigns their website, the developer must update his screen-scraping program to account for these differences. Berners-Lee came up with the idea of Linked Data as a set of best practices for shar‐ ing data across the web infrastructure so that applications can more easily retrieve data from public sites with no need for screen scraping—for example, to let your cal‐ endar program get flight information from multiple airline websites in a common, machine-readable format. These best practices recommend the use of URIs to name things and the use of standards such as RDF and SPARQL. They provide excellent guidelines for the creation of an infrastructure for the semantic web. and the semantics of that data The idea of “semantics” is often defined as “the meaning of words.” Linked Data prin‐ ciples and the related standards make it easier to share data, and the use of URIs can provide a bit of semantics by providing the context of a term. For example, even if I don’t know what “sh98003588#concept” refers to, I can see from the URI http:// id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98003588#concept that it comes from the US Library of Con‐ gress. Storing the complete meaning of words so that computers can “understand” these meanings may be asking too much of current computers, but the W3C Web Ontology Language (also known as OWL) already lets us store valuable bits of mean‐ ing so that we can get more out of our data. For example, when we know that the 2 | Chapter 1: The Semantic Web, RDF, and Linked Data (and SPARQL) term “spouse” is symmetric (that is, that if A is the spouse of B, then B is the spouse of A), or that zip codes are a subset of postal codes, or that “sell” is the opposite of “buy,” we know more about the resources that have these properties and the relationships between these resources. Let’s look at these components of the semantic web in more detail. URLs, URIs, IRIs, and Namespaces When Berners-Lee invented the Web, along with writing the first web server and browser, he developed specifications for three things so that all the servers and browsers could work together: • A way to represent document structure, so that a browser would know which parts of a document were paragraphs, which were headers, which were links, and so forth. This specification is the Hypertext Markup Language, or HTML. • A way for client programs such as web browsers and servers to communicate with each other. The Hypertext Transfer Protocol, or HTTP, consists of a few short commands and three-digit codes that essentially let a client program such as a web browser say things like “Hey www.learningsparql.com server, send me the index.html file from the resources directory!” They also let the server say “OK, here you go!” or “Sorry, I don’t know about that resource.” We’ll learn more about HTTP in “SPARQL and HTTP.” • A compact way for the client to specify which resource it wants—for example, the name of a file, the directory where it’s stored, and the server that has that file sys‐ tem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basic Querying with SPARQL
    Basic Querying with SPARQL Andrew Weidner Metadata Services Coordinator SPARQL SPARQL SPARQL SPARQL SPARQL Protocol SPARQL SPARQL Protocol And SPARQL SPARQL Protocol And RDF SPARQL SPARQL Protocol And RDF Query SPARQL SPARQL Protocol And RDF Query Language SPARQL SPARQL Protocol And RDF Query Language SPARQL Query SPARQL Query Update SPARQL Query Update - Insert triples SPARQL Query Update - Insert triples - Delete triples SPARQL Query Update - Insert triples - Delete triples - Create graphs SPARQL Query Update - Insert triples - Delete triples - Create graphs - Drop graphs Query RDF Triples Query RDF Triples Triple Store Query RDF Triples Triple Store Data Dump Query RDF Triples Triple Store Data Dump Subject – Predicate – Object Query Subject – Predicate – Object ?s ?p ?o Query Dog HasName Cocoa Subject – Predicate – Object ?s ?p ?o Query Cocoa HasPhoto ------- Subject – Predicate – Object ?s ?p ?o Query HasURL http://bit.ly/1GYVyIX Subject – Predicate – Object ?s ?p ?o Query ?s ?p ?o Query SELECT ?s ?p ?o Query SELECT * ?s ?p ?o Query SELECT * WHERE ?s ?p ?o Query SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } Query select * WhErE { ?spiderman ?plays ?oboe } http://deathbattle.wikia.com/wiki/Spider-Man http://www.mmimports.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/used-oboe.jpg Query SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } Query SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } Query SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } Query SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } LIMIT 10 SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } LIMIT 10 http://dbpedia.org/snorql SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } LIMIT 10 http://dbpedia.org/snorql SELECT * WHERE { ?s
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Spatiotemporal Data to RDF: a SPARQL Endpoint for Brussels
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Mapping Spatiotemporal Data to RDF: A SPARQL Endpoint for Brussels Alejandro Vaisman 1, * and Kevin Chentout 2 1 Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1424, Argentina 2 Sopra Banking Software, Avenue de Tevuren 226, B-1150 Brussels, Belgium * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +54-11-3457-4864 Received: 20 June 2019; Accepted: 7 August 2019; Published: 10 August 2019 Abstract: This paper describes how a platform for publishing and querying linked open data for the Brussels Capital region in Belgium is built. Data are provided as relational tables or XML documents and are mapped into the RDF data model using R2RML, a standard language that allows defining customized mappings from relational databases to RDF datasets. In this work, data are spatiotemporal in nature; therefore, R2RML must be adapted to allow producing spatiotemporal Linked Open Data.Data generated in this way are used to populate a SPARQL endpoint, where queries are submitted and the result can be displayed on a map. This endpoint is implemented using Strabon, a spatiotemporal RDF triple store built by extending the RDF store Sesame. The first part of the paper describes how R2RML is adapted to allow producing spatial RDF data and to support XML data sources. These techniques are then used to map data about cultural events and public transport in Brussels into RDF. Spatial data are stored in the form of stRDF triples, the format required by Strabon. In addition, the endpoint is enriched with external data obtained from the Linked Open Data Cloud, from sites like DBpedia, Geonames, and LinkedGeoData, to provide context for analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Validating RDF Data Using Shapes
    83 Validating RDF data using Shapes a Jose Emilio Labra Gayo ​ ​ a University​ of Oviedo, Spain Abstract RDF forms the keystone of the Semantic Web as it enables a simple and powerful knowledge representation graph based data model that can also facilitate integration between heterogeneous sources of information. RDF based applications are usually accompanied with SPARQL stores which enable to efficiently manage and query RDF data. In spite of its well known benefits, the adoption of RDF in practice by web programmers is still lacking and SPARQL stores are usually deployed without proper documentation and quality assurance. However, the producers of RDF data usually know the implicit schema of the data they are generating, but they don't do it traditionally. In the last years, two technologies have been developed to describe and validate RDF content using the term shape: Shape Expressions (ShEx) and Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL). We will present a motivation for their appearance and compare them, as well as some applications and tools that have been developed. Keywords RDF, ShEx, SHACL, Validating, Data quality, Semantic web 1. Introduction In the tutorial we will present an overview of both RDF is a flexible knowledge and describe some challenges and future work [4] representation language based of graphs which has been successfully adopted in semantic web 2. Acknowledgements applications. In this tutorial we will describe two languages that have recently been proposed for This work has been partially funded by the RDF validation: Shape Expressions (ShEx) and Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL).ShEx was Competitiveness, project: TIN2017-88877-R proposed as a concise and intuitive language for describing RDF data in 2014 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Integrity for Outsourced Execution of SPARQL Queries
    Computational integrity for outsourced execution of SPARQL queries Serge Morel Student number: 01407289 Supervisors: Prof. dr. ir. Ruben Verborgh, Dr. ir. Miel Vander Sande Counsellors: Ir. Ruben Taelman, Joachim Van Herwegen Master's dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Engineering Academic year 2018-2019 Computational integrity for outsourced execution of SPARQL queries Serge Morel Student number: 01407289 Supervisors: Prof. dr. ir. Ruben Verborgh, Dr. ir. Miel Vander Sande Counsellors: Ir. Ruben Taelman, Joachim Van Herwegen Master's dissertation submitted in order to obtain the academic degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Engineering Academic year 2018-2019 iii c Ghent University The author(s) gives (give) permission to make this master dissertation available for consultation and to copy parts of this master dissertation for personal use. In the case of any other use, the copyright terms have to be respected, in particular with regard to the obligation to state expressly the source when quoting results from this master dissertation. August 16, 2019 Acknowledgements The topic of this thesis concerns a rather novel and academic concept. Its research area has incredibly talented people working on a very promising technology. Understanding the core principles behind proof systems proved to be quite difficult, but I am strongly convinced that it is a thing of the future. Just like the often highly-praised artificial intelligence technology, I feel that verifiable computation will become very useful in the future. I would like to thank Joachim Van Herwegen and Ruben Taelman for steering me in the right direction and reviewing my work quickly and intensively.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Vocabulary an Excerpt of a Dbpedia Dataset
    D2K Master Information Integration Université Paris Saclay Practical session (2): SPARQL Sources: http://liris.cnrs.fr/~pchampin/2015/udos/tuto/#id1 https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/ Introduction For this practical session, we will use the DBPedia SPARQL access point, and to access it, we will use the Yasgui online client. By default, Yasgui (http://yasgui.org/) is configured to query DBPedia (http://wiki.dbpedia.org/), which is appropriate for our tutorial, but keep in mind that: - Yasgui is not linked to DBpedia, it can be used with any SPARQL access point; - DBPedia is not related to Yasgui, it can be queried with any SPARQL compliant client (in fact any HTTP client that is not very configurable). Vocabulary An excerpt of a dbpedia dataset The vocabulary of DBPedia is very large, but in this tutorial we will only need the IRIs below. foaf:name Propriété Nom d’une personne (entre autre) dbo:birthDate Propriété Date de naissance d’une personne dbo:birthPlace Propriété Lieu de naissance d’une personne dbo:deathDate Propriété Date de décès d’une personne dbo:deathPlace Propriété Lieu de décès d’une personne dbo:country Propriété Pays auquel un lieu appartient dbo:mayor Propriété Maire d’une ville dbr:Digne-les-Bains Instance La ville de Digne les bains dbr:France Instance La France -1- /!\ Warning: IRIs are case-sensitive. Exercises 1. Display the IRIs of all Dignois of origin (people born in Digne-les-Bains) Graph Pattern Answer: PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> PREFIX skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> PREFIX dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> PREFIX dbo: <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/> PREFIX dbr: <http://dbpedia.org/resource/> PREFIX db: <http://dbpedia.org/> SELECT * WHERE { ?p dbo:birthPlace dbr:Digne-les-Bains .
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting SPARQL Update Queries in RDF-XML Integration *
    Supporting SPARQL Update Queries in RDF-XML Integration * Nikos Bikakis1 † Chrisa Tsinaraki2 Ioannis Stavrakantonakis3 4 Stavros Christodoulakis 1 NTU Athens & R.C. ATHENA, Greece 2 EU Joint Research Center, Italy 3 STI, University of Innsbruck, Austria 4 Technical University of Crete, Greece Abstract. The Web of Data encourages organizations and companies to publish their data according to the Linked Data practices and offer SPARQL endpoints. On the other hand, the dominant standard for information exchange is XML. The SPARQL2XQuery Framework focuses on the automatic translation of SPARQL queries in XQuery expressions in order to access XML data across the Web. In this paper, we outline our ongoing work on supporting update queries in the RDF–XML integration scenario. Keywords: SPARQL2XQuery, SPARQL to XQuery, XML Schema to OWL, SPARQL update, XQuery Update, SPARQL 1.1. 1 Introduction The SPARQL2XQuery Framework, that we have previously developed [6], aims to bridge the heterogeneity issues that arise in the consumption of XML-based sources within Semantic Web. In our working scenario, mappings between RDF/S–OWL and XML sources are automatically derived or manually specified. Using these mappings, the SPARQL queries are translated on the fly into XQuery expressions, which access the XML data. Therefore, the current version of SPARQL2XQuery provides read-only access to XML data. In this paper, we outline our ongoing work on extending the SPARQL2XQuery Framework towards supporting SPARQL update queries. Both SPARQL and XQuery have recently standardized their update operation seman- tics in the SPARQL 1.1 and XQuery Update Facility, respectively. We have studied the correspondences between the update operations of these query languages, and we de- scribe the extension of our mapping model and the SPARQL-to-XQuery translation algorithm towards supporting SPARQL update queries.
    [Show full text]
  • Querying Distributed RDF Data Sources with SPARQL
    Querying Distributed RDF Data Sources with SPARQL Bastian Quilitz and Ulf Leser Humboldt-Universit¨at zu Berlin {quilitz,leser}@informatik.hu-berlin.de Abstract. Integrated access to multiple distributed and autonomous RDF data sources is a key challenge for many semantic web applications. As a reaction to this challenge, SPARQL, the W3C Recommendation for an RDF query language, supports querying of multiple RDF graphs. However, the current standard does not provide transparent query fed- eration, which makes query formulation hard and lengthy. Furthermore, current implementations of SPARQL load all RDF graphs mentioned in a query to the local machine. This usually incurs a large overhead in network traffic, and sometimes is simply impossible for technical or le- gal reasons. To overcome these problems we present DARQ, an engine for federated SPARQL queries. DARQ provides transparent query ac- cess to multiple SPARQL services, i.e., it gives the user the impression to query one single RDF graph despite the real data being distributed on the web. A service description language enables the query engine to decompose a query into sub-queries, each of which can be answered by an individual service. DARQ also uses query rewriting and cost-based query optimization to speed-up query execution. Experiments show that these optimizations significantly improve query performance even when only a very limited amount of statistical information is available. DARQ is available under GPL License at http://darq.sf.net/. 1 Introduction Many semantic web applications require the integration of data from distributed, autonomous data sources. Until recently it was rather difficult to access and query data in such a setting because there was no standard query language or interface.
    [Show full text]
  • SPARQL Query Processing with Conventional Relational Database Systems
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by e-Prints Soton SPARQL query processing with conventional relational database systems Steve Harris IAM, University of Southampton, UK [email protected] Abstract. This paper describes an evolution of the 3store RDF storage system, extended to provide a SPARQL query interface and informed by lessons learned in the area of scalable RDF storage. 1 Introduction The previous versions of the 3store [1] RDF triplestore were optimised to pro- vide RDQL [2] (and to a lesser extent OKBC [3]) query services, and had no efficient internal representation of the language and datatype extensions from RDF 2004 [4]. This revision of the 3store software adds support for the SPARQL [5] query language, RDF datatype and language support. Some of the representation choices made in the implementation of the previous versions of 3store made efficient support for SPARQL queries difficult. Therefore, a new underlying rep- resentation for the RDF statements was required, as well as a new query en- gine capable of supporting the additional features of SPARQL over RDQL and OKBC. 2 Related Work The SPARQL query language is still at an early stage of standardisation, but there are already other implementations. 2.1 Federate Federate [6] is a relational database gateway, which maps RDF queries to existing database structures. Its goal is for compatibility with existing relational database systems, rather than as a native RDF storage and querying engine. However, it shares the approach of pushing as much processing down into the database engine as possible, though the algorithms employed are necessarily different.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiting from Kitties on Ethereum: Leveraging Blockchain RDF Data with SANSA
    Profiting from Kitties on Ethereum: Leveraging Blockchain RDF Data with SANSA Damien Graux1, Gezim Sejdiu2, Hajira Jabeen2, Jens Lehmann1;2, Danning Sui3, Dominik Muhs3 and Johannes Pfeffer3 1 Fraunhofer IAIS, Germany fdamien.graux,[email protected] 2 Smart Data Analytics, University of Bonn, Germany fsejdiu,jabeen,[email protected] 3 Alethio [email protected] fdanning.sui,[email protected] Abstract. In this poster, we will present attendees how the recent state- of-the-art Semantic Web tool SANSA could be used to tackle blockchain specific challenges. In particular, the poster will focus on the use case of CryptoKitties: a popular Ethereum-based online game where users are able to trade virtual kitty pets in a secure way. 1 Introduction During the recent years, the interest of the research community for blockchain technologies has raised up since the Bitcoin white paper published by Nakamoto [4]. Indeed, several applications either practical or theoretical have been made, for instance with crypto-currencies or with secured exchanges of data. More specifically, several blockchain systems have been designed, each one having their own set of properties, for example Ethereum [6] {further described in Section2{ which provides access to so-called smart-contracts. Recently, Mukhopadhyay et al. surveyed major crypto-currencies in [3]. In parallel to ongoing blockchain development, the research community has focused on the possibilities offered by the Semantic Web such as designing efficient data management systems, dealing with large and distributed knowledge RDF graphs. As a consequence, recently, some studies have started to connect the Semantic Web world with the blockchain one, see for example the study of English et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Vec2sparql: Integrating SPARQL Queries and Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/463778; this version posted November 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Vec2SPARQL: integrating SPARQL queries and knowledge graph embeddings 1[0000 0003 1710 1820] 1[0000 0001 7509 5786] Maxat Kulmanov ¡ ¡ ¡ , Senay Kafkas ¡ ¡ ¡ , Andreas 2[0000 0002 6942 3760] 3[0000 0002 8394 3439] Karwath ¡ ¡ ¡ , Alexander Malic ¡ ¡ ¡ , Georgios V 2[0000 0002 2061 091X ] 3[0000 0003 4727 9435] Gkoutos ¡ ¡ ¡ , Michel Dumontier ¡ ¡ ¡ , and Robert 1[0000 0001 8149 5890] Hoehndorf ¡ ¡ ¡ 1 Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Science and Engineering Division, Computational Bioscience Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia {maxat.kulmanov,senay.kafkas,robert.hoehndorf}@kaust.edu.sa 2 Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK {a.karwath,g.gkoutos}@bham.ac.uk 3 Institute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands {alexander.malic,michel.dumontier}@maastrichtuniversity.nl Abstract. Recent developments in machine learning have lead to a rise of large number of methods for extracting features from structured data. The features are represented as a vectors and may encode for some semantic aspects of data. They can be used in a machine learning models for different tasks or to compute similarities between the entities of the data. SPARQL is a query language for structured data originally developed for querying Resource De- scription Framework (RDF) data.
    [Show full text]
  • Validating Shacl Constraints Over a Sparql Endpoint
    Validating shacl constraints over a sparql endpoint Julien Corman1, Fernando Florenzano2, Juan L. Reutter2 , and Ognjen Savković1 1 Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy 2 PUC Chile and IMFD, Chile Abstract. shacl (Shapes Constraint Language) is a specification for describing and validating RDF graphs that has recently become a W3C recommendation. While the language is gaining traction in the industry, algorithms for shacl constraint validation are still at an early stage. A first challenge comes from the fact that RDF graphs are often exposed as sparql endpoints, and therefore only accessible via queries. Another difficulty is the absence of guidelines about the way recursive constraints should be handled. In this paper, we provide algorithms for validating a graph against a shacl schema, which can be executed over a sparql end- point. We first investigate the possibility of validating a graph through a single query for non-recursive constraints. Then for the recursive case, since the problem has been shown to be NP-hard, we propose a strategy that consists in evaluating a small number of sparql queries over the endpoint, and using the answers to build a set of propositional formu- las that are passed to a SAT solver. Finally, we show that the process can be optimized when dealing with recursive but tractable fragments of shacl, without the need for an external solver. We also present a proof-of-concept evaluation of this last approach. 1 Introduction shacl (for SHApes Constraint Language),3 is an expressive constraint lan- guage for RDF graph, which has become a W3C recommendation in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Index Extraction from Linked Open Data Sources
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivio istituzionale della ricerca - Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia Online Index Extraction from Linked Open Data Sources Fabio Benedetti1,2, Sonia Bergamaschi2, Laura Po2 1 ICT PhD School - Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia - Italy [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Ingegneria "Enzo Ferrari" - Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia - Italy fi[email protected] Abstract. The production of machine-readable data in the form of RDF datasets belonging to the Linked Open Data (LOD) Cloud is growing very fast. However, selecting relevant knowledge sources from the Cloud, assessing the quality and extracting synthetical information from a LOD source are all tasks that require a strong human effort. This paper proposes an approach for the automatic extrac- tion of the more representative information from a LOD source and the creation of a set of indexes that enhance the description of the dataset. These indexes col- lect statistical information regarding the size and the complexity of the dataset (e.g. the number of instances), but also depict all the instantiated classes and the properties among them, supplying user with a synthetical view of the LOD source. The technique is fully implemented in LODeX, a tool able to deal with the performance issues of systems that expose SPARQL endpoints and to cope with the heterogeneity on the knowledge representation of RDF data. An eval- uation on LODeX on a large number of endpoints (244) belonging to the LOD Cloud has been performed and the effectiveness of the index extraction process has been presented.
    [Show full text]