DOCSLIB.ORG

General Information and Statistics About Port Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Information and Statistics About Port Authority Exhibit 9 Request for Proposal No. 21-02 GENERAL INFORMATION AND STATISTICS ABOUT PORT AUTHORITY AVERAGE SPEEDS Bus: ................................................................................... 12.9 Date Port Authority Light Rail: .......................................................................... 12.6 began transit operations: March 1, 1964 Monongahela Incline: ......................................................... 2.3 Duquesne Incline: ............................................................... 3.7 Service Area: 775 square miles including the City of ACCESS: .......................................................................... 15.5 Pittsburgh and suburban Allegheny County. AVERAGE DAILY PASSENGERS CARRIED Headquarters: Port Authority of Allegheny County (FY 2020) 345 Sixth Avenue – Third Floor Bus: ............................................................................. 149,879 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2527 Light Rail: ...................................................................... 19,116 Monongahela Incline: ........................................................ 824 ACCESS: ........................................................................ 3,763 MODES OF TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED Average Weekday Passengers: .................................. 172,582 Bus Average Saturday Passenger: ……………………83,937 Light Rail Transit Average Sunday/Holiday Passengers: …………………..55,888 Inclines Monongahela Incline LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (operated by Port Authority) Opening Dates: Downtown Subway 7/03/85 Duquesne Incline Stage I: 5/22/82 (operated by a non-profit society: Society for the Stage II: 6/01/04 Preservation of Duquesne Heights Incline.) N Shore Connector Project: 03/23/12 ACCESS Paratransit System Total Length: 26.2 miles MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. EAST BUSWAY Opening Date 2/19/83 REVENUE VEHICLES Length: (with the opening of Phase I Martin Luther King, Jr. EBE on 6/15/03) 9.1 miles Buses: ........................................................................... 787 Light Rail Vehicles: ............................................................... 83 SOUTH BUSWAY Monongahela Incline Cars: ..................................................... 2 Duquesne Incline Cars: ......................................................... 2 Opening Date: 12/18/77 Length: 4.3 miles VEHICLE MILES OPERATED WEST BUSWAY Opening Date: 9/10/00 Bus: ........................................................................ 27,178,942 Length: 5.0 miles Light Rail: ................................................................. 1,891,163 Monongahela Incline: .................................................... 15,123 MONONGAHELA INCLINE Duquesne Incline: ......................................................... 18,231 Year Constructed: 1870 ACCESS: ............................................................... 11,088,260 Length: 630 feet DUQUESNE INCLINE Year Constructed: 1877 Length: 800 feet Exhibit 9 - Page 1 of 2 Division Opening Date Ross 03/31/68 Collier 06/30/69 West Mifflin 11/23/69 Harmar 11/13/70 East Liberty 07/09/72 South Hills Rail Center 04/15/84 (dedicated) 05/06/84 EMPLOYEES (as of January 2021) Total Active Employees: .................................................. 2,569 Total Union: .................................. 2,184Not Represented by a Union:………………………………..385 FINANCIAL INFORMATION (FY 2020) Revenues: Passenger Revenue: ........................................... $69,052,645 Shared Ride Programs: ........................................ $10,018,850 Advertising…………………………………………$3,089,427 Other: ...................................................................... $8,578,608 TOTAL: ................................................................. $90,679,530 Capital Funds Used for Operating Assistance for FY 2020: Federal Government:…………………………...$92,371,313 State Government: ........................................ $313,718,500 Allegheny County: ................................................. $31,161,525 TOTAL: ............................................................... $437,251,338 CONTRAFLOW BUS LANES Total Length of Contraflow Bus Lanes: 3.7 miles HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HOV) LANES (Operated by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation) Total Length of HOV facilities: 6.9 miles Exhibit 9 - Page 2 of 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
    BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    [Show full text]
  • Value Capture Strategies for Funding Public Mobility Improvements: Case Studies and Knowledge Share Results [December 2020]
    Value Capture Strategies for Funding Public Mobility Improvements: Case Studies and Knowledge Share Results [December 2020] Prepared for the Hillsborough County City- County Planning Commission and the Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization Mark R. Hafen, Ph.D. University of South Florida - Tampa With the Contributions of: Vasilya Allakhverdieva Mercy Muga Samuel Stokes Aaron Young Hanbo Zhou 1 Contents I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 3 II. Case Studies .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Eugene-Springfield, Oregon – Lane Transit District (pop. ~300,000) .................................. 3 B. San Francisco – Transbay Joint Powers Authority (pop. ~900,000) .................................. 4 C. Pittsburgh – Port Authority of Allegheny County (pop. ~1,400,000) ................................... 6 D. Santa Clara County, California – Valley Transportation Authority (pop. ~1,900,000) ......... 8 E. Seattle – King County Metro (pop. ~2,200,000) .................................................................10 F. Denver – Regional Transit District (pop. ~2,800,000) ........................................................11 G. San Diego – Metropolitan Transit System (pop. ~3,300,000) ............................................13 H. Houston - Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (pop. ~6,700,000) ....................14
    [Show full text]
  • BUS STATIONS AS TOD ANCHORS REPORT Prepared in Accordance with California Senate Bill 961, 2017-2018 Regular Session
    Housing Financing Tools and Equitable, Location-Efficient Development in California BUS STATIONS AS TOD ANCHORS REPORT Prepared in Accordance with California Senate Bill 961, 2017-2018 Regular Session Prepared for: Governor's Office of Planning and Research December 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 Report Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 5 Report Organization ................................................................................................................ 5 II. BACKGROUND ON THE SECOND NEIGHBORHOOD INFILL FINANCE AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ACT ................................................................................................................ 7 Definition of Bus Transit ......................................................................................................... 7 Extent of Use ........................................................................................................................... 7 III. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 9 Literature Overview ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019
    Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019 PortAuthority.o rg This page intentionally left blank Board of Directors Officers Jeffrey W. Letwin, Esq., Chairperson of the Board of Directors Jennifer M. Liptak, Vice Chairperson of the Board of Directors Senator Jim Brewster, Secretary of the Board of Directors Directors Representative Dom Costa Robert J. Kania, Jr. Ann Ogoreuc D. Raja John L. Tague, Jr. Stephanie Turman Robert Vescio Michelle Zmijanac 2 | P a g e Chief Executive Officer Katharine Eagan Kelleman Officers and Assistant General Managers Barry Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer Michael Cetra, Chief Legal Officer Jeffrey Devlin, Chief Information Officer David Huffaker, Chief Development Officer William Miller, Chief Operations Officer James Ritchie, Chief Communications Officer Peter Schenk, Chief Financial Officer Heinz 57 Center 345 Sixth Avenue Floor 3 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2327 (412) 566-5500 www.portauthority.org 3 | P a g e FY 2019 Operating and Capital Table of Contents Improvement Budget Board of Directors ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Officers and Assistant General Managers ..................................................................................................... 3 Regional and Port Authority Profile .............................................................................................................. 6 Allegheny County .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes
    PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Change in the Strip
    Guiding Change in the Strip Capstone Seminar in Economic Development, Policy and Planning Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (GSPIA) University of Pittsburgh December 2002 GUIDING CHANGE IN THE STRIP University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Capstone Seminar Fall 2002 Contributing Authors: Trey Barbour Sherri Barrier Carter Bova Michael Carrigan Renee Cox Jeremy Fine Lindsay Green Jessica Hatherill Kelly Hoffman Starry Kennedy Deb Langer Beth McCall Beth McDowell Jamie Van Epps Instructor: Professor Sabina Deitrick i ii MAJOR FINDINGS This report highlights the ongoing nature of the economic, social and environmental issues in the Strip District and presents specific recommendations for Neighbors in the Strip (NITS) and policy makers to alleviate problems hindering community development. By offering a multitude of options for decision-makers, the report can serve as a tool for guiding change in the Strip District. Following is a summary of the major findings presented in Guiding Change in the Strip: • The Strip has a small residential population. As of 2000, the population was on 266 residents. Of these residents, there is a significant income gap: There are no residents earning between $25,000 and $35,000 annually. In other words, there are a limited amount of middle-income residents. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters of the 58 families living in the Strip earned less than $25,000 in 1999. These figures represent a segment of the residential population with limited voice in the development of the Strip. There is an opportunity for NITS, in collaboration with the City of Pittsburgh, to increase the presence of these residents in the future of the Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Y46 Elizabeth Flyer
    Y46 ELIZABETH FLYER MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY SERVICE BUS STOPS To Downtown Pittsburgh To Century III Mall - Clairton Y46 & Y1 Downtown Stops East Carson Street at Smithfield Street Bridge Fort Pitt Boulevard past Smithfield Street Wood Street past Third Avenue btw Forbes and Fifth Avenue at Sixth Avenue Elizabeth 3rd St under Route 51 Bridge Clairton St Clair Ave at Miller Ave Century Townhomes Desiderio Blvd at Soltis Dr Jefferson Ave Worthington at Hwy Rt 51 Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Lewis Run Rd West Mifflin Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Old Lebanon Church Rd Brentwood Hwy Rt 51 at Brownsville Rd Overbrook Glenbury St Ramp at South Busway South Hills Junction South Busway at inbound shelter Downtown Sixth Ave at Smithfield St Downtown Sixth Ave at Smithfield St South Hills Junction South Busway at outbound shelter Overbrook South Busway at Glenbury St Brentwood Hwy Rt 51 at Brownsville Rd Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Old Clairton Rd West Mifflin Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 opp. Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 opp. Lewis Run Rd Jefferson Ave Worthington past Hwy Rt 51 Century Townhomes Desiderio Blvd at Soltis Dr Clairton St Clair Ave past Miller Ave Elizabeth 3rd St under Route 51 Bridge Sixth Avenue at Smithfield Street 4:28 4:33 4:36 4:43 4:48 .... 4:50 4:53 4:59 5:06 5:15 5:27 5:27 5:35 5:44 5:49 5:54 ...
    [Show full text]
  • IL Im Urr Urr Im Rn Volume 20 Summer 1991 Number 2 20Th Annual Cont., June 13-17, 1991 Chicago: Industrial Heartland, U.S.A
    T SOCIETY ~@IB1 IN":OU'STR,IAL AR,CH:EOLOGY ~ Im \YIYl ~ IL Im urr urr Im rn Volume 20 Summer 1991 Number 2 20th Annual Cont., June 13-17, 1991 Chicago: Industrial Heartland, U.S.A. Ahm·e: Bridges and architecture arc two of Chicago's Leji: The Bismarck (and to ur leaders Kim & Linda prime attractions. Viewed on the Sunday boat tour. the Brietcnbach) welcomed the Society to Chicago. huge Merchandise Mart (1930) looms above the Franklin­ Orleans St. double-leaf trunnion bascule. The Mart was Ahon•: Chicago no longer is Sandburg's ··Hog Butcher for the world's largest building ( in fl oor area). until the the World." Only the 1875 Union Stock Yard Gate INHL: Pentagon was built. Burnham & Root! remains from the original 475 acres of yards and packing houses. R . Frame photo.\·. Below: Jn the Mainstream Station pumphouse, 300 ft. underground. th e painted circle shows the scale of the 33- ft.-diam. hardrock tunnel. R. Frame photos. town of Pullman, to the little known, such as the Replogle Globe plant, and from the early-the Illinois & Michigan Canal, to the most modem-the great Mainstream Pumping Station. Throughout the weekend we took in the neighbor­ hood IA around the conference HQ, the Bismarck Hotel, including the Chicago El and the many movable bridges, mar­ velous engineering works that are part of Chicagoans ' everyday lives. A welcoming reception Thursday evening at the Chicago Maritime Muse um in the historic North Pier Terminal building kicked off the festivities. Paul Barrett, Illinois In st. of Tech., presented a slide overview of the city's transporta­ tion networks and related industrial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Square Station Area Plan Executive Summary
    STATION SQUARE STATION AREA PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STATION ACCESS STATION DESIGN PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PLANNING AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT PURPOSE CONTEXT The Port Authority’s Planning and Evaluation Department has initiated The Station Square transit center is home to four bus stops, a light rail a Station Improvement Program (SIP) that is focused on promoting station, and an incline station and occupies a critical location within the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), improving operations, and Pittsburgh region; it is separated from the central business district by enhancing customer amenities at select fixed-guideway stations, with the Monongahela River, is directly adjacent to a destination mixed-use the ultimate goal of growing ridership and revenue for the agency. development (Station Square), and lies along Carson Street – a major Ideally, new capital investment at transit stations will in turn leverage commercial corridor of South Side neighborhoods. In 1976, Station new development adjacent to Port Authority transit. Stations were Square was developed as a historic adaptive reuse project by the prioritized for the SIP based on a detailed evaluation of factors Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation (it is currently owned by contributing to TOD, with Station Square rated as one of the high priority Forest City Enterprises). locations. Relevant external and internal stakeholders were engaged to A new mixed-use development, Glasshouse, recently broke ground at ensure that proposed initiatives reflect common goals and objectives. the northeast corner of East Carson Street and Smithfield Street. The first phase of the new development by the Trammell Crow Company will have 320 multi-family units, with additional phases planned to include a mix of commercial uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of City Planning's
    Division of Zoning and Development Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 HISTORIC REVIEW COMMISSION OF PITTSBURGH Properties that are Designated as City Landmarks or are Located in City Designated Historic Districts Revised June 2019 Key: ALL COMMONS Allegheny Commons Parks Historic Site ALL WEST Allegheny West Historic District ALPHA TERRACE Alpha Terrace Historic District DEUTSCHTOWN Deutschtown Historic District EAST CARSON East Carson Street Historic District INDIVIDUAL Individually Designated City Historic Structure LEMMON ROW Lemmon Row Historic District MANCHESTER Manchester Historic District MARKET SQUARE Market Square Historic District MEX WAR STREETS Mexican War Streets Historic District MURRAY HILL Murray Hill Avenue Historic District OAKLAND Oakland Civic Historic District OAKLAND SQUARE Oakland Square Historic District PENN-LIBERTY Penn-Liberty Historic District ROSLYN FARMS Roslyn Farms Historic District SCHENLEY FARMS Schenley Farms Historic District NOMINATED Nominated for Historic Designation STREET ADDRESS HISTORIC DISTRICT 43rd Street 160 (Turney House) INDIVIDUAL 46th Street 340 (St. Mary’s Academy) INDIVIDUAL 172 (Peterson House) INDIVIDUAL Abdell Street 1006-1014 (even) MANCHESTER Adams Street 1307-1445 (odd) MANCHESTER 1400-1438 (even) MANCHESTER Allegheny Avenue 1100 ALL WEST 920 (Calvary Methodist Church) INDIVIDUAL 1001-1207 (odd) MANCHESTER 1305-1315 (odd) MANCHESTER 1501-1513 (odd) MANCHESTER Allegheny Commons Allegheny Commons Parks ALL COMMONS (North, West, and East Parks) Allegheny Square Allegheny Library INDIVIDUAL Pittsburgh Children’s Museum INDIVIDUAL (former Old Allegheny Post Office) Former Buhl Planetarium Building INDIVIDUAL Alger Street 1 (Greenfield Elementary School) INDIVIDUAL Apple Avenue 7101 (National Negro Opera House) INDIVIDUAL Arch Street 810 (Allegheny Middle School) INDIVIDUAL 1416 (former Engine House No.
    [Show full text]
  • Operating a Bus Rapid Transit System
    APTA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM APTA-BTS-BRT-RP-007-10 RECOMMENDED PRACTICE Approved October, 2010 American Public Transportation Association APTA BRT Operations Working 1666 K Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20006-1215 Group Operating a Bus Rapid Transit System Abstract: This Recommended Practice provides guidance for operational considerations for bus rapid transit systems. Keywords: bus rapid transit (BRT), operations Summary: BRT is a suite of elements that create a high-quality rapid transit experience using rubber-tired vehicles. This experience often includes a high degree of performance (especially speed and reliability), ease of use, careful attention to aesthetics and comprehensive planning that includes associated land uses. BRT seeks to meet or exceed these characteristics through the careful application of selected elements. Scope and purpose: The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to planners, transit agencies, local governments, developers and others interested in operating a BRT systems or enhancing existing BRT systems. This Recommended Practice is part of a series of APTA documents covering the key elements that may comprise a BRT system. Because BRT elements perform best when working together as a system, each Recommended Practice may refer to other documents in the series. Agencies are advised to review all relevant guidance documents for their selected elements. This Recommended Practice represents a common viewpoint of those parties concerned with its provisions, namely, transit operating/planning agencies, manufacturers, consultants, engineers and general interest groups. The application of any standards, practices or guidelines contained herein is voluntary. In some cases, federal and/or state regulations govern portions of a rail transit system’s operations.
    [Show full text]