DOCSLIB.ORG

Leveraging Collective Intelligence in Recommender System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leveraging Collective Intelligence in Recommender System Leveraging Collective Intelligence in Recommender System A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Shuo Chang IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy Loren G Terveen August, 2016 c Shuo Chang 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Acknowledgements Through the five years of my graduate school, I have received numerous support from my family, friends and colleagues. This thesis would not have been possible without them. First and foremost, I thank my advisor Dr. Loren Terveen for sharing his wisdom and helping me to grow. He gave me the freedom to pursue my research interest and challenge me to be better. During difficult times, he consuls me with his kindness and patience. I am forever grateful for what I have learned from him during this five years. I would also like to thank my committee members | Dr. Joseph Konstan, Dr. George Karypis and Dr. Yuqing Ren | for providing valuable feedback. I thank Ed Chi, Peng Dai and Elizabeth Churchill for giving me internship oppor- tunities and being awesome mentors. During the internships, I was fortunate to receive guidance and support from Atish Das Sarma, Lichan Hong, Jilin Chen and Zhiyuan Cheng. I am very thankful to be a member of the GroupLens research lab, which will always have a special place in my heart. I'd like to thank Dr. John Riedl for welcoming me to the GroupLens family. I truly enjoyed working and being friend with Max Harper, Vikas Kumar, Daniel Kluver, Tien Nguyen, Hannah Miller, Jaccob Thebault-Spieker, Aditya Pal, Isaac Johnson, Qian Zhao, Dr. Brent Hecht and other members in GroupLens. Last but not least, I would like thank my parents for giving me inspiration for pursuing a PhD, and Steve Gartland and Merlajean Gartland for making me feel at home in a foreign country. Finally, I am thankful to my wife, Jingnan Zhang, for her encouragement, patience and love. I am lucky to have her to share all the laughters and tears while pursuing my dream. i Dedication To John Riedl, a greatly missed mentor and role model. ii Abstract Recommender systems, since their introduction 20 years ago, have been widely deployed in web services to alleviate user information overload. Driven by business objectives of their applications, the focus of recommender systems has shifted from accurately modeling and predicting user preferences to offering good personalized user experience. The later is difficult because there are many factors, e.g., tenure of a user, context of recommendation and transparency of recommender system, that affect users' perception of recommendations. Many of these factors are subjective and not easily quantifiable, posing challenges to recommender algorithms. When pure algorithmic solutions are at their limits in providing good user expe- rience in recommender systems, we turn to the collective intelligence of human and computer. Computer and human are complementary to each other: computers are fast at computation and data processing and have accurate memory; humans are capable of complex reasoning, being creative and relating to other humans. In fact, such close collaborations between human and computer have precedent: after chess master Garry Kasparov lost to IBM computer \Deep Blue", he invited a new form of chess | ad- vanced chess, in which human player and a computer program teams up against such pairs. In this thesis, we leverage the collective intelligence of human and computer to tackle several challenges in recommender systems and demonstrate designs of such hybrid systems. We make contributions to the following aspects of recommender systems: providing better new user experience, enhancing topic modeling component for items, composing better recommendation sets and generating personalized natural language explanations. These four applications demonstrate different ways of designing systems with collective intelligence, applicable to domains other than recommender systems. We believe the collective intelligence of human and computer can power more intelligent, user friendly and creative systems, worthy of continuous research effort in future. iii Contents Acknowledgements i Dedication ii Abstract iii List of Tables viii List of Figures x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is Collective Intelligence? . .2 1.2 Challenges in Recommender System . .3 1.3 Leverage Collective Intelligence in Recommender Systems . .4 1.4 Research Platforms . .5 1.4.1 MovieLens . .5 1.4.2 Google+ . .7 1.5 Thesis Overview . .8 2 Interactive New User Onboarding Process for Recommender Systems 10 2.1 Introduction . 10 2.2 Related work . 13 2.3 Design Space Analysis . 15 2.3.1 Design space . 16 2.3.2 Design challenges . 17 iv 2.4 Feasibility study . 21 2.4.1 Data . 21 2.4.2 Method . 22 2.4.3 Baseline . 22 2.4.4 Metrics . 23 2.4.5 Results . 23 2.5 User Experiment . 26 2.5.1 Overview of the cluster-picking interface . 26 2.5.2 Method . 26 2.5.3 Results . 29 2.6 Discussion . 32 3 Automatic Topic Labeling for Multimedia Social Media Posts 34 3.1 Introduction . 34 3.2 Related Work . 36 3.2.1 Crowdsourcing . 36 3.2.2 Topic Extractors and Annotators . 37 3.2.3 Topic Labeling for Twitter . 38 3.3 Our Approach . 38 3.3.1 Single-Source Annotators . 39 3.3.2 Crowdsourcing Training Labels . 41 3.3.3 Supervised Ensemble Model . 44 3.4 Evaluation . 47 3.4.1 Evaluation Setup . 47 3.4.2 Binary Classification for Main Topic Labels . 48 3.4.3 Multiclass Classification of Topic Labels . 52 3.5 Discussion . 54 4 CrowdLens: Recommendation Powered by Crowd 56 4.1 Introduction . 56 4.2 Related work . 58 4.3 The CrowdLens Framework . 60 4.3.1 Recommendation Context: Movie Groups . 60 v 4.3.2 Crowd Recommendation Workflow . 61 4.3.3 User Interface . 62 4.4 Experiment . 63 4.4.1 Obtaining Human Quality Judgments . 65 4.5 Study: Recommendations . 66 4.5.1 Different pipelines yield different recommendations . 67 4.5.2 Measured Quality: Algorithm slightly better . 67 4.5.3 Judged Quality: Crowdsourcing pipelines slightly preferred . 68 4.5.4 Diversity: A trend for crowdsourcing . 69 4.5.5 Crowdsourcing may give less common recommendations . 71 4.5.6 Recency: Little difference . 71 4.5.7 Discussion . 72 4.6 Study: Explanations . 73 4.6.1 Explanation quality . 74 4.6.2 Features of Good Explanations . 74 4.6.3 Discussion . 76 4.7 Summary Discussion . 77 5 Personalized Natural Language Recommendation Explanations Pow- ered by Crowd 78 5.1 Introduction . 78 5.2 Design Space and Related Work . 80 5.3 System Overview . 82 5.4 Experiment Platform . 83 5.5 Overview of System Processes . 84 5.5.1 Select Key Topical Dimensions of Items . 84 5.5.2 Generate Natural Language Explanations for The Key Topical Dimensions . 87 5.5.3 Model Users' Preferences and Present Explanations in a Person- alized Fashion . 90 5.6 User Evaluation . 91 5.6.1 Survey Design . 92 vi 5.6.2 Results . 94 5.7 Discussion . 97 6 Conclusion 99 6.1 Summary of Contributions . 99 6.2 Implications . 101 6.3 Future Work . 103 References 105 Appendix A. Glossary and Acronyms 117 A.1 Additional Figures . 117 vii List of Tables 2.1 Example of weighted aggregation of ranked item lists. List 1 has 2 points and list 2 has 1 point. We assign scores to items in the lists based on ranking. We re-rank items based on the weighted average of item scores in two lists and take top 3. 21 2.2 User-expressed familiarity with recommended movies and prediction ac- curacy. Familiarity is represented by the average number of movies (out of 10) that users had heard of or seen. Prediction accuracy is measured by average RMSE. 31 3.1 Comparison of two answer statistics between with and without verifiable questions(\VQ" and \No VQ"). Workers spend longer time on tasks and have higher chance to reach agreement when there are verifiable questions. 43 3.2 Unbalanced class distribution in gold standard data set. 49 3.3 Comparison of the best performing ensemble model and single-source annotators, listed above. \All annotator" predicts the union of topic labels from single-source annotators as positive. The best performing algorithm is GBC trained on all five features, having the best overall F 1-score here. 49 3.4 The F 1-scores of the best-performing model of every classification algo- rithm for multiclass classification along with their feature combinations. GBC performs the best. All ensemble learning algorithms outperform the baseline algorithm, which consistently predicts the most popular cat- egory, \Main or Important". 53 4.1 Final recommendation lists from the five pipelines for the movie group shown in Figure 4.1. 67 viii 4.2 Average number of overlapping movies recommended from any pair of pipelines across 6 movie groups. Each pipeline generates 5 movies as final recommendations. Standard deviations are included in parenthesis 67 4.3 Measured and human-judged quality of recommended movies. For a movie group in a pipeline, measured quality is computed as the average of ratings (on a 5 star scale) on recommended movies from MovieLens users who indicated a preference for the movie group. User judgments from the online evaluation range from -2 (very inappropriate) to 2 (very appropriate). Both columns show the average for all pipelines across six movie groups. 68 4.4 Extracted features of recommendation explanations, along with their ef- fect and statistical significance in a logistic regression model to predict whether an explanation is evaluated to be good or bad by MovieLens users. 75 5.1 Summary of questions asked in the 3-stage user survey.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Use of Time Dimension in Recommender Systems for Learning
    The Use of Time Dimension in Recommender Systems for Learning Eduardo José de Borba1, Isabela Gasparini1 and Daniel Lichtnow2 1Graduate Program in Applied Computing (PPGCA), Department of Computer Science (DCC), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Paulo Malschitzki 200, Joinville, Brazil 2Polytechnic School, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Av. Roraima 1000, Santa Maria, Brazil Keywords: Recommender System, Context-aware, Time, Learning. Abstract: When the amount of learning objects is huge, especially in the e-learning context, users could suffer cognitive overload. That way, users cannot find useful items and might feel lost in the environment. Recommender systems are tools that suggest items to users that best match their interests and needs. However, traditional recommender systems are not enough for learning, because this domain needs more personalization for each user profile and context. For this purpose, this work investigates Time-Aware Recommender Systems (Context-aware Recommender Systems that uses time dimension) for learning. Based on a set of categories (defined in previous works) of how time is used in Recommender Systems regardless of their domain, scenarios were defined that help illustrate and explain how each category could be applied in learning domain. As a result, a Recommender System for learning is proposed. It combines Content-Based and Collaborative Filtering approaches in a Hybrid algorithm that considers time in Pre- Filtering and Post-Filtering phases. 1 INTRODUCTION potential to improve the quality of recommendation (Campos et al., 2014). Nowadays, there are distinct educational approaches, This work aims to identify how Time-aware RS e.g. online learning, blended learning, face-to-face (Context-aware RS that uses time context) can be learning, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • CRUC: Cold-Start Recommendations Using Collaborative Filtering in Internet of Things
    CRUC: Cold-start Recommendations Using Collaborative Filtering in Internet of Things Daqiang Zhanga,*, Qin Zoub, Haoyi Xiongc a School of Computer Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210046,China b School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430072, China c Department of Telecommunication, Institute Telecome – Telecom SudParis, Evry, 91011, France Abstract The Internet of Things (IoT) aims at interconnecting everyday objects (including both things and users) and then using this connection information to provide customized user services. However, IoT does not work in its initial stages without adequate acquisition of user preferences. This is caused by cold-start problem that is a situation where only few users are interconnected. To this end, we propose CRUC scheme --- Cold-start Recommendations Using Collaborative Filtering in IoT, involving formulation, filtering and prediction steps. Extensive experiments over real cases and simulation have been performed to evaluate the performance of CRUC scheme. Experimental results show that CRUC efficiently solves the cold-start problem in IoT. Keywords: Cold-start Problem, Internet of Things, Collaborative Filtering 1. Introduction The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to a self-configuring network in which everyday objects are interconnected to the Internet [1] [2]. IoT deploys sensors in infrastructures (e.g., rooms and buildings) to get a heightened awareness of real-time events. It also employs sensors capturing contextual information about objects (e.g., user preferences) to achieve an enhanced situational awareness [3] [21-26]. Readings from a large number of sensors for various objects are enormous, but only a few of them are useful for a specific user.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Transfer Learning Framework for Improved Long-Tail Item Recommendation
    A Model of Two Tales: Dual Transfer Learning Framework for Improved Long-tail Item Recommendation Yin Zhang*, Derek Zhiyuan Cheng, Tiansheng Yao, Xinyang Yi, Lichan Hong, Ed H. Chi [email protected],{zcheng,tyao,xinyang,lichan,edchi}@google.com Google, Inc, USA Texas A&M University, USA ABSTRACT Highly skewed long-tail item distribution is very common in recom- mendation systems. It significantly hurts model performance on tail items. To improve tail-item recommendation, we conduct research to transfer knowledge from head items to tail items, leveraging the rich user feedback in head items and the semantic connec- tions between head and tail items. Specifically, we propose a novel dual transfer learning framework that jointly learns the knowledge transfer from both model-level and item-level: 1. The model-level knowledge transfer builds a generic meta-mapping of model param- eters from few-shot to many-shot model. It captures the implicit data augmentation on the model-level to improve the represen- tation learning of tail items. 2. The item-level transfer connects head and tail items through item-level features, to ensure a smooth transfer of meta-mapping from head items to tail items. The two types of transfers are incorporated to ensure the learned knowledge from head items can be well applied for tail item representation learning in the long-tail distribution settings. Through extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets, results show that our pro- posed dual transfer learning framework significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods for tail item recommendation in hit ratio and NDCG. It is also very encouraging that our framework further improves head items and overall performance on top of the gains on tail items.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch and Bramble-Youtube Guide-Download
    YOUTUBE SEO A GUIDE Why YouTube SEO? Dos and Don’ts Overall Recommended Steps Keyword Tools & Processes THE GIST Best Prac4ces: Before Uploading Best Prac4ces: Uploading Best Prac4ces: AIer Publica4on YouTube Stories Appendix WHY YOUTUBE SEO? Op4mizing around YouTube SEO is essen4al to the success of a video and is slightly different than tradi4onal SEO. Unlike web pages or digital copy, videos cannot be ”read” by search engines’ algorithms. This significantly reduces discoverability if certain steps are not taken when crea4ng, producing, and uploading project to the plaSorm. YouTube is the 2nd largest YouTube is improving video search engine a4er Google. discovery by offering capon uploading. Videos are not “read” by Titles, descripons, keywords, search engines’ algorithms. hashtags, and metatags are several elements that help increase a video’s searchability. DO THIS: • Include long tail keywords that are more than 3 words long. • Focus on choosing 5-7 keywords. YOUTUBE KEYWORDS • Determine why someone would watch the video. Today’s YouTube SEO focuses on user intent, par4cularly when it comes to language. Since algorithms know language just as well, if not beWer, than we do, choosing keywords based on why individuals are looking for a par4cular video is DON’T DO THIS: paramount. • Do not keyword stuff — write as many There are two different methods for finding keywords and keywords as possible. they should be tailored based on where you’re at in the video process. • Use keywords that are unrelated to the video. • Use the same keyword finding process for new videos vs. already published videos. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Find 5-7 relevant video keywords based on 1 7 Upload cap4ons for every video.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Pseudo-Relevance Feedback Methods for Collaborative Filtering Recommendation
    Efficient Pseudo-Relevance Feedback Methods for Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Daniel Valcarce, Javier Parapar, and Álvaro Barreiro Information Retrieval Lab Computer Science Department University of A Coruña, Spain {daniel.valcarce,javierparapar,barreiro}@udc.es Abstract. Recently, Relevance-Based Language Models have been dem- onstrated as an effective Collaborative Filtering approach. Nevertheless, this family of Pseudo-Relevance Feedback techniques is computationally expensive for applying them to web-scale data. Also, they require the use of smoothing methods which need to be tuned. These facts lead us to study other similar techniques with better trade-offs between effective- ness and efficiency. Specifically, in this paper, we analyse the applicability to the recommendation task of four well-known query expansion tech- niques with multiple probability estimates. Moreover, we analyse the ef- fect of neighbourhood length and devise a new probability estimate that takes into account this property yielding better recommendation rank- ings. Finally, we find that the proposed algorithms are dramatically faster than those based on Relevance-Based Language Models, they do not have any parameter to tune (apart from the ones of the neighbourhood) and they provide a better trade-off between accuracy and diversity/novelty. Keywords: Recommender Systems, Collaborative Filtering, Query Expansion, Pseudo-Relevance Feedback. 1 Introduction Recommender systems are recognised as a key instrument to deliver relevant information to the users. Although the problem that attracts most attention in the field of Recommender Systems is accuracy, the emphasis on efficiency is increasing. We present new Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms. CF methods exploit the past interactions betweens items and users. Common approaches to CF are based on nearest neighbours or matrix factorisation [17].
    [Show full text]
  • Combining User-Based and Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Using Machine Learning
    Combining User-Based and Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Using Machine Learning Priyank Thakkar, Krunal Varma, Vijay Ukani, Sapan Mankad and Sudeep Tanwar Abstract Collaborative filtering (CF) is typically used for recommending those items to a user which other like-minded users preferred in the past. User-based collaborative filtering (UbCF) and item-based collaborative filtering (IbCF) are two types of CF with a common objective of estimating target user’s rating for the target item. This paper explores different ways of combining predictions from UbCF and IbCF with an aim of minimizing overall prediction error. In this paper, we propose an approach for combining predictions from UbCF and IbCF through multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector regression (SVR). Results of the proposed approach are compared with the results of other fusion approaches. The comparison demonstrates the superiority of the proposed approach. All the tests are performed on a large publically available dataset. Keywords User-based collaborative filtering · Item-based collaborative filtering Machine learning · Multiple linear regression · Support vector regression P. Thakkar (B) · K. Varma · V. Ukani · S. Mankad · S. Tanwar Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad 382481, India e-mail: [email protected] K. Varma e-mail: [email protected] V. Ukani e-mail: [email protected] S. Mankad e-mail: [email protected] S. Tanwar e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019 173 S. C. Satapathy and A. Joshi (eds.), Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 107, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1747-7_17 174 P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grouplens Perspective
    From: AAAI Technical Report WS-98-08. Compilation copyright © 1998, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. RecommenderSystems: A GroupLensPerspective Joseph A. Konstan*t , John Riedl *t, AI Borchers,* and Jonathan L. Herlocker* *GroupLensResearch Project *Net Perceptions,Inc. Dept. of ComputerScience and Engineering 11200 West78th Street University of Minnesota Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN55455 Minneapolis, MN55344 http://www.cs.umn.edu/Research/GroupLens/ http://www.netperceptions.com/ ABSTRACT identifying sets of articles by keyworddoes not scale to a In this paper, wereview the history and research findings of situation in which there are thousands of articles that the GroupLensResearch project I and present the four broad contain any imaginable set of keywords. Taken together, research directions that we feel are most critical for these two weaknesses represented an opportunity for a new recommender systems. type of filtering, that would focus on finding which INTRODUCTION:A History of the GroupLensProject available articles matchhuman notions of quality and taste. The GroupLens Research project began at the Computer Such a system would be able to produce a list of articles Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)Conference in 1992. that each user wouldlike, independentof their content. Oneof the keynote speakers at the conference lectured on a Wedecided to apply our ideas in the domain of Usenet his vision of an emerging information economy,in which news. Usenet screamsfor better information filtering, with most of the effort in the economywould revolve around hundreds of thousands of articles posted daily. Manyof the production, distribution, and consumptionof information, articles in each Usenet newsgroupare on the sametopic, so rather than physical goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Effective Crowdsourcing Recommendation System a Survey of the State-Of-The-Art
    2015 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering Towards an Effective Crowdsourcing Recommendation System A Survey of the State-of-the-Art Eman Aldhahri, Vivek Shandilya, Sajjan Shiva Computer Science Department, The University of Memphis Memphis, USA {aldhahri, vmshndly, sshiva}@memphis.edu Abstract—Crowdsourcing is an approach where requesters can behaviors. User behavior can be interpreted as preferable call for workers with different capabilities to process a task for features.. Explicit profiles are based on asking users to complete monetary reward. With the vast amount of tasks posted every a preferable features form. Two techniques common in this area day, satisfying workers, requesters, and service providers--who are: a collaborative filtering approach (with cold start problems, are the stakeholders of any crowdsourcing system--is critical to scarcity and scalability in large datasets [6]), and a content- its success. To achieve this, the system should address three based approach (with problems due to overspecialization, etc.). objectives: (1) match the worker with a suitable task that fits the A hybrid approach that combines the two techniques has also worker’s interests and skills, and raise the worker’s rewards; (2) been used. give requesters more qualified solutions with lower cost and II. MOTIVATION time; and (3) raise the accepted tasks rate which will raise the The main objective in this study is to investigate various online aggregated commissions accordingly. For these objectives, we recommendation systems by analyzing their input parameters, present a critical study of the state-of-the-art in effectiveness, and limitations in order to assess their usage in recommendation systems that are ubiquitous among crowdsourcing systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Application Recommender System
    UPTEC IT 10 025 Examensarbete 30 hp December 2010 Mobile Application Recommender System Christoffer Davidsson Abstract Mobile Application Recommender System Christoffer Davidsson Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten With the amount of mobile applications available increasing rapidly, users have to put a lot of effort into finding applications of interest. The purpose of this thesis is to Besöksadress: investigate how to aid users in the process of discovering new mobile applications by Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 providing them with recommendations. A prototype system is then built as a Hus 4, Plan 0 proof-of-concept. Postadress: The work of the thesis is divided into three phases where the aim of the first phase is Box 536 751 21 Uppsala to study related work and related systems to identify promising concepts and features. During the second phase, a prototype system is designed and implemented. Telefon: The outcome and result of the first two phases is then evaluated and analyzed in the 018 – 471 30 03 third and final phase. Telefax: 018 – 471 30 00 The prototype system integrates and extends an existing recommender engine previously used to recommend media items. As a part of the system, an Android Hemsida: application is developed, which observes user actions and presents recommended http://www.teknat.uu.se/student applications to the user. In parallel to the development, the system was tested by a small group of users recruited among colleagues at Ericsson. The data generated during this test period is analyzed to show the usefulness of observed user actions over explicit ratings and the dependency on context for application usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiki-Rec: a Semantic-Based Recommendation System Using Wikipedia As an Ontology
    Wiki-Rec: A Semantic-Based Recommendation System Using Wikipedia as an Ontology Ahmed Elgohary, Hussein Nomir, Ibrahim Sabek, Mohamed Samir, Moustafa Badawy, Noha A. Yousri Computer and Systems Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University Alexandria, Egypt {algoharyalex, hussein.nomier, ibrahim.sabek, m.samir.galal, moustafa.badawym}@gmail.com, [email protected] Abstract— Nowadays, satisfying user needs has become the Hybrid models try to overcome the limitations of each in main challenge in a variety of web applications. Recommender order to generate better quality recommendations. systems play a major role in that direction. However, as most Since most of the information on the web is present in a of the information is present in a textual form, recommender textual form, recommendation systems have to deal with systems face the challenge of efficiently analyzing huge huge amounts of unstructured text. Efficient text mining amounts of text. The usage of semantic-based analysis has techniques are, therefore, needed to understand documents in gained much interest in recent years. The emergence of order to extract important information. Traditional term- ontologies has yet facilitated semantic interpretation of text. based or lexical-based analysis cannot capture the underlying However, relying on an ontology for performing the semantic semantics when used on their own. That is why semantic- analysis requires too much effort to construct and maintain the based analysis approaches have been introduced [1] [2] to used ontologies. Besides, the currently known ontologies cover a small number of the world's concepts especially when a non- overcome such a limitation. The use of ontologies have also domain-specific concepts are needed.
    [Show full text]
  • User Relevance for Item-Based Collaborative Filtering R
    User Relevance for Item-Based Collaborative Filtering R. Latha, R. Nadarajan To cite this version: R. Latha, R. Nadarajan. User Relevance for Item-Based Collaborative Filtering. 12th International Conference on Information Systems and Industrial Management (CISIM), Sep 2013, Krakow, Poland. pp.337-347, 10.1007/978-3-642-40925-7_31. hal-01496080 HAL Id: hal-01496080 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01496080 Submitted on 27 Mar 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License User Relevance for Item-based Collaborative Filtering R. Latha, R. Nadarajan Department of Applied Mathematics and Computational Sciences, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore Tamil Nadu, India [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. A Collaborative filtering (CF), one of the successful recommenda- tion approaches, makes use of history of user preferences in order to make pre- dictions. Common drawback found in most of the approaches available in the literature is that all users are treated equally. i.e., all users have same im- portance. But in the real scenario, there are users who rate items, which have similar rating pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Explanations in Decision Support and Recommender Systems
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Explanations in Decision Support and Recommender Systems Ingrid Nunes · Dietmar Jannach Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract With the recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence, an increasing number of decision-making tasks are delegated to software systems. A key requirement for the success and adoption of such systems is that users must trust system choices or even fully automated decisions. To achieve this, explanation facilities have been widely investigated as a means of establishing trust in these systems since the early years of expert systems. With today's increasingly sophisticated machine learning algorithms, new challenges in the context of explanations, accountability, and trust towards such systems con- stantly arise. In this work, we systematically review the literature on expla- nations in advice-giving systems. This is a family of systems that includes recommender systems, which is one of the most successful classes of advice- giving software in practice. We investigate the purposes of explanations as well as how they are generated, presented to users, and evaluated. As a result, we derive a novel comprehensive taxonomy of aspects to be considered when de- signing explanation facilities for current and future decision support systems. The taxonomy includes a variety of different facets, such as explanation objec- tive, responsiveness, content and presentation. Moreover, we identified several challenges that remain unaddressed so far, for example related to fine-grained issues associated with the presentation of explanations and how explanation facilities are evaluated. Keywords Explanation · Decision Support System · Recommender System · Expert System · Knowledge-based System · Systematic Review · Machine Learning · Trust · Artificial Intelligence I.
    [Show full text]