<<

Mechanisms of and in vitro

Nik Hodges School of Biosciences [email protected] Cell Toxicity The “makes” the

"dosis sola facit venenum" - dosage alone makes the poison. Dose-response curves

Dead

Depressed breathing Unconscious Deep Sleep Asleep

R

e

s Giddy

p

o n Happy

s

e

” No effect

Dose (at target tissue) How do cells die ?

Necrosis Molecular pathways involved in apoptosis

e.g. osmotic * Doesn’t require energy * Unregulated * Damaging to surrounding

cells Likely effect of detergents

Adaptation Apoptosis Necrosis

Concentration Measuring cell death

MTT Mitochondrial function

Cyt c

Caspase 3/7

N

Adenylate kinase (AK) assay Membrane integrity How do chemicals cause toxicity ?

1) 3D Shape: enzyme inhibition mediated effects - activation of transcription factors resulting in inappropriate changes in gene expression other specific interactions

2) Reactivity: covalent binding DNA - mutations - cancer Protein - altered protein function – immune responses

reaction with other biomolecules -depletion of protective factors glutathione depletion lipid peroxidation

*Interfere with/compromise normal cellular functioning* Why is it important to understand the mechanism of toxicity ?

Understanding of mechanism facilitates:

• Extrapolation of data and in vitro data to the humans • Biological monitoring and screening • Understanding and predicting toxicity of new substances

• Risk assessment • Make chemicals safer Chemical

Metabolism

Toxic Metabolite

Cellular targets

Adaptive response Cellular Damage

Repair Toxicity Reactive metabolites are often critical

Formation of reactive intermediates from xenobiotics

compound formula proposed RI type of toxicity O bromobenzene Br Br necrosis

O

vinyl chloride CH2 CHCl CH2 CHCl liver cancer

aniline H2N HO NH methaemoglobinaemia

dimethylnitrosamine (CH ) N N O 3 2 H3C+ carcinogenesis

C*Cl liver necrosis tetrachloride CCl4 3 (free radical)

renal necrosis C*Cl3 chloroform CHCl3 Bromobenzene - Reactive metabolite and glutathione depletion

• Solvent for heavy liquids • Intermediate for organic synthesis - agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals • Motor oil additive • Volatile ---- inhalation • Br

Depletion of glutathione Relationship between cellular glutathione and bromobenzene liver toxicity

Cellular glutathione Protein binding

Liver damage

%

Threshold (~30%)

Bromobenzene

• Good correlation between protein binding and • Clear existence of a threshold of effect • Assessment of protein adducts potentially useful for biomonitoring of exposure Toxicity

Protective Damaging factors species

Homeostasis Its all about balance….. Strategies for toxicity testing

rodent in vivo Human in vivo

rodent in vitro

human in vitro Can in vitro systems replace ?

Non physiological loss of barriers such as blood/brain and placental loss of complex 3D organ and tissue structures loss of communication between cells/tissues/organs

Lack of toxicokinetics and (often) FRAME – Fund for replacement of animals in medical experiments

www.frame.org.uk

The 3 Rs Refinement Reduction Replacement Liver a complex organ

Aim – to maintain biochemical and structural features

e.g. bile formation, albumin secretion P450 and phase II expression / induction

Models ?

• Hepatocyte monolayers • Couplets • Co-cultures • Sandwich cultures • Liver spheroids Hepatocyte culture models: Couplets

membrane asymmetry bile formation Liver spheroids

Lee et al, Small 5, 1213-21, 2009

LDH MTT Another example in vitro model

24 Hours 72 Hours After Seeding Differentiation

• Cells can be differentiated in culture • Have “normal” muscle phenotype – both structurally and biochemically

e.g. they form muscle fibres that twitch, they store glycogen Twitching rat muscle fibres in vitro Testing Carcinogenicity of Tungsten Alloys

Human HSkMC Rat L6 C11

Tungsten 97% 2% Cobalt 1%

Tungsten 91% Nickel 6% Cobalt 3% Transcriptomic approach

WNiCo

Control Toxic alloys: Genes involved in apoptosis signalling pathways Epiocular model: * In vitro model of human corneal epithelium using differentiated keratinocytes

Can also model skin, gut, epithelia in similar ways Other more complex in vitro models: e.g. Skin co-culture models

EpidermTM

• In vivo like growth and morphological characeteristics • Highly reproducible • Replicates many of the structures found in vivo • Validated • Rapid easy, quick clear testing protocols

From FRAME High throughput screening

What do we want to be able to do ?

Detect all compounds that are toxic and Pie in the sky understand mechanism

Might be able to identify chemicals common mechanisms of action – e.g. genotoxins, enzyme inducers etc….

Approaches - fluorescent probes (GSH, Ca++) - nuclear translocation of tagged stress proteins e.g. nrf2 - reporter assays e.g. activation of p53, stress response genes - transcriptomics, proteomics, metabonomics Reporter assays Can be highly discriminatory Micro-array technologies

Problems

what cells / tissues ? what dose ? how long ? data analysis data interpretation validation

Can we build profiles of changes in gene expression representative of exposure to classes of ? Modulation by genetic and epigenetic factors

1- Metabolism

2 - Depletion of cellular protective factors UNDERSTAND MECHANISM 3- Cellular/molecular targets

DOSE RESPONSE

MORE RATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT Some things good toxicologists think about

Toxicity reversible or irreversible ?

Relationship with exposure: - e.g. is there a threshold of effect ?

Are there susceptible sub-populations ?

Target organs ? Make chemicals as safe to use as possible Effect species specific ?

Role of metabolism ?

Trans-generational effects ?

What is the mechanism of toxicity ? Examples of current toxicological challenges

Extrapolating from in vitro to in vivo and animal to human.. Nanoparticles Mixtures Better in vitro and in silico models Low dose effects e.g. hormesis, practical thresholds of effect Endocrine disruptors