DOCSLIB.ORG

Nist Sp 800-95

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nist Sp 800-95 Special Publication 800-95 (Draft) Guide to Secure Web Services Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Anoop Singhal Theodore Winograd Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-95 Guide to Secure Web Services Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Anoop Singhal Theodore Winograd Karen Scarfone C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 August 2007 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director GUIDE TO SECURE WEB SERVICES Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-95 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-95, 128 pages (Aug. 2007) Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessa rily the best available for the purpose. ii GUIDE TO SECURE WEB SERVICES Acknowledgements The authors, Anoop Singhal and Karen Scarfone of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Theodore Winograd of Booz Allen Hamilton, wish to thank their colleagues who contributed technical content to this document, especially Holly Lynne McKinley, Patrick Holley, and Karen Mercedes Goertzel of Booz Allen Hamilton. The authors would like to acknowledge Tim Grance, David Ferraiolo, and Rick Kuhn of NIST, Jeremy Epstein of Web Methods and David Kleiner, Michael Colon, Steven Lavenhar, and Victoria Thompson of Booz Allen Hamilton, for their keen and insightful assistance throughout the development of the document. iii GUIDE TO SECURE WEB SERVICES Table of Contents Executive Summary..............................................................................................................ES-1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Authority...................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Audience ..................................................................................................................1-1 1.4 Document Structure .................................................................................................1-2 2. Background to Web Services and Their Relationship to Security ..............................2-1 2.1 Introducing Web Services ........................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Web Service Discovery ................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Web Service Messaging...............................................................................2-2 2.1.3 Web Portals ..................................................................................................2-3 2.1.4 Web Service Roles, Modes, and Properties.................................................2-3 2.1.5 Coordination: Orchestration and Choreography...........................................2-5 2.2 Elements of Security ................................................................................................2-7 2.3 Web Services Security Dimensions .........................................................................2-8 2.3.1 Secure Messaging........................................................................................2-8 2.3.2 Protecting Resources ...................................................................................2-8 2.3.3 Negotiation of Contracts ...............................................................................2-9 2.3.4 Trust Relationships.....................................................................................2-10 2.3.5 Requirements for Secure Software ............................................................2-11 2.4 Meeting the Requirements for Securing Web Services .........................................2-11 2.4.1 Secure Web Service Standards Stack .......................................................2-11 2.4.2 Relationship of Web Service Security Requirements to Standards............2-13 2.5 Core Services ........................................................................................................2-13 2.6 Threats Facing Web Services................................................................................2-15 2.7 Common Risks Facing Web Services....................................................................2-17 2.8 Web Services’ Interfaces with Network/Infrastructure Security Architectures........2-19 2.9 Summary................................................................................................................2-20 3. Web Service Security Functions and Related Technologies.......................................3-1 3.1 Service-to-Service Authentication............................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Service Chaining ..........................................................................................3-1 3.1.2 WS-Security for Authentication.....................................................................3-2 3.1.3 Security Concerns of WS-Security ...............................................................3-3 3.2 Identity Management ...............................................................................................3-4 3.2.1 Identity Management Architectures ..............................................................3-6 3.2.2 Laws of Identity.............................................................................................3-6 3.2.3 Identity Management and Web Services......................................................3-7 3.3 Establishing Trust between Services .......................................................................3-8 3.3.1 Federation of Trust .......................................................................................3-9 3.3.2 Trust Federation Frameworks ......................................................................3-9 3.4 Describing Web Services Policies (WS-Policy)......................................................3-11 3.5 Distributed Authorization and Access Management ..............................................3-14 3.5.1 Authorization Models ..................................................................................3-14 3.5.2 Enforcing Least Privilege for Services........................................................3-17 3.5.3 SAML..........................................................................................................3-18 iv GUIDE TO SECURE WEB SERVICES 3.5.4 XACML .......................................................................................................3-25 3.5.5 Role of XML Schema in Implementing Access Control ..............................3-28 3.5.6 Use of Specialized Security Metadata for Access Control .........................3-29 3.6 Confidentiality and Integrity of Service to Service Interchanges............................3-30 3.6.1 Transport Layer Confidentiality and Integrity: HTTPS ................................3-30 3.6.2 XML Confidentiality and Integrity................................................................3-30 3.6.3 WS-Security for SOAP Confidentiality and Integrity ...................................3-31 3.6.4 Role of XML Gateways in Integrity Protection ............................................3-32 3.7 Accountability End-to-End throughout a Service Chain .........................................3-33 3.7.1 Audit in the SOA Environment....................................................................3-34 3.7.2 Non-Repudiation of Web Service Transactions..........................................3-34 3.8 Availability of Web Services...................................................................................3-35 3.8.1 Failover.......................................................................................................3-36 3.8.2 Quality of Service .......................................................................................3-36 3.8.3 Reliable Messaging ....................................................................................3-37 3.8.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Theory on Information Security
    Australasian Conference on Information Systems Horne et al. 2016, Wollongong, Australia A Theory on Information Security A Theory on Information Security Craig A. Horne Department of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne Victoria, Australia Email: [email protected] Atif Ahmad Department of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne Victoria, Australia Email: [email protected] Sean B. Maynard Department of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne Victoria, Australia Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper proposes a theory on information security. We argue that information security is imperfectly understood and aim to bring about an altered understanding of why efforts are made to engage in information security. The goal of information security is widely recognised as the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information however we argue that the goal is actually to simply create resources. This paper responds to calls for more theory in information systems, places the discussion in philosophical context and compares various definitions. It then identifies the key concepts of information security, describes the relationships between these concepts, as well as scope and causal explanations. The paper provides the theoretical base for understanding why information is protected, in addition to theoretical and practical implications and suggestions for future research. Keywords Information security, resources, controls, threats, theory development. 1 Australasian Conference on Information Systems Horne et al. 2016, Wollongong, Australia A Theory on Information Security 1 INTRODUCTION Despite the concept of information security being very well established, the reasons and motivations behind it are imperfectly understood. This paper seeks to explain how and why the phenomena that comprise the concepts of information security occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Realization of the System for Access Management and Identity Federation with Use of Service Mojeid and the Product Dirx Access
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA}w¡¢£¤¥¦§¨ INFORMATIKY !"#$%&'()+,-./012345<yA| Realization of the system for access management and identity federation with use of service mojeID and the product DirX Access. DIPLOMA THESIS Jakub Šebök Brno, Autumn 2014 Declaration Hereby I declare, that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out by my own. All sources, references and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Jakub Šebök Advisor: RNDr. JUDr. Vladimír Šmíd, CSc. ii Acknowledgement I would like to thank firstly to my technical consultant Filip Höfer for his guidance. Secondly I thank to Mr. Šmíd for his advice about methodology and formal formatting of the thesis. And lastly I would like to thank all who survived by my side and cheered me up espe- cially during last months before the deadline. These are namely my mom, my girlfriend, Anton Gierlti, Matej Chrenko, Buddha and Bill Cosby. Thank you all again for enormous support. iii Abstract The aim of this thesis is implementation of a client program on the side of DirX Access which cooperates with the Czech identity provider mojeID. This cooperation consists of authenticating users by third party authority such that their credentials can be used for further processing in access management mechanism of DirX Access. iv Keywords security, SSO, OpenID, policies, RBAC, identity, mojeID, access man- agement, authentication, authorization v Contents 1 Introduction ............................3 2 Internet Security and Terminology ..............5 2.1 Identity ............................5 2.2 Identity Provider and Relying Party ...........6 2.3 Claims vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Android Application Security
    A Study of Android Application Security William Enck, Damien Octeau, Patrick McDaniel, and Swarat Chaudhuri Systems and Internet Infrastructure Security Laboratory Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University enck, octeau, mcdaniel, swarat @cse.psu.edu { } Abstract ingly desire it, markets are not in a position to provide security in more than a superficial way [30]. The lack of The fluidity of application markets complicate smart- a common definition for security and the volume of ap- phone security. Although recent efforts have shed light plications ensures that some malicious, questionable, and on particular security issues, there remains little insight vulnerable applications will find their way to market. into broader security characteristics of smartphone ap- In this paper, we broadly characterize the security of plications. This paper seeks to better understand smart- applications in the Android Market. In contrast to past phone application security by studying 1,100 popular studies with narrower foci, e.g., [14, 12], we consider a free Android applications. We introduce the ded decom- breadth of concerns including both dangerous functional- piler, which recovers Android application source code ity and vulnerabilities, and apply a wide range of analysis directly from its installation image. We design and exe- techniques. In this, we make two primary contributions: cute a horizontal study of smartphone applications based on static analysis of 21 million lines of recovered code. We design and implement a Dalvik decompilier, • Our analysis uncovered pervasive use/misuse of person- ded. ded recovers an application’s Java source al/phone identifiers, and deep penetration of advertising solely from its installation image by inferring lost and analytics networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Data and Database Security and Controls
    1 Handbook of Information Security Management, Auerbach Publishers, 1993, pages 481-499. DATA AND DATABASE SECURITY AND CONTROLS Ravi S. Sandhu and Sushil Jajodia Center for Secure Information Systems & Department of Information and Software Systems Engineering George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444 Telephone: 703-993-1659 1 Intro duction This chapter discusses the topic of data security and controls, primarily in the context of Database Management Systems DBMSs. The emphasis is on basic principles and mechanisms, which have b een successfully used by practitioners in actual pro ducts and systems. Where appropriate, the limitations of these techniques are also noted. Our discussion fo cuses on principles and general concepts. It is therefore indep endent of any particular pro duct except for section 7 which discusses some pro ducts. In the more detailed considerations we limit ourselves sp eci cally to relational DBMSs. The reader is assumed to be familiar with rudimentary concepts of relational databases and SQL. A brief review of essential concepts is given in the app endix. The chapter b egins with a review of basic security concepts in section 2. This is followed, in section 3, by a discussion of access controls in the current generation of commercially available DBMSs. Section 4 intro duces the problem of multilevel security. It is shown that the techniques of section 3 are inadequate to solve this problem. Additional techniques develop ed for multilevel security are reviewed. Sec- tion 5, discusses the various kinds of inference threats that arise in a database system, and discusses metho ds that have b een develop ed for dealing with them.
    [Show full text]
  • XML Signature/Encryption — the Basis of Web Services Security
    Special Issue on Security for Network Society Falsification Prevention and Protection Technologies and Products XML Signature/Encryption — the Basis of Web Services Security By Koji MIYAUCHI* XML is spreading quickly as a format for electronic documents and messages. As a consequence, ABSTRACT greater importance is being placed on the XML security technology. Against this background research and development efforts into XML security are being energetically pursued. This paper discusses the W3C XML Signature and XML Encryption specifications, which represent the fundamental technology of XML security, as well as other related technologies originally developed by NEC. KEYWORDS XML security, XML signature, XML encryption, Distributed signature, Web services security 1. INTRODUCTION 2. XML SIGNATURE XML is an extendible markup language, the speci- 2.1 Overview fication of which has been established by the W3C XML Signature is an electronic signature technol- (WWW Consortium). It is spreading quickly because ogy that is optimized for XML data. The practical of its flexibility and its platform-independent technol- benefits of this technology include Partial Signature, ogy, which freely allows authors to decide on docu- which allows an electronic signature to be written on ment structures. Various XML-based standard for- specific tags contained in XML data, and Multiple mats have been developed including: ebXML and Signature, which enables multiple electronic signa- RosettaNet, which are standard specifications for e- tures to be written. The use of XML Signature can commerce transactions, TravelXML, which is an EDI solve security problems, including falsification, spoof- (Electronic Data Interchange) standard for travel ing, and repudiation. agencies, and NewsML, which is a standard specifica- tion for new distribution formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Opentext Product Security Assurance Program
    The Information Company ™ Product Security Assurance Program Contents Objective 03 Scope 03 Sources 03 Introduction 03 Concept and design 04 Development 05 Testing and quality assurance 07 Maintain and support 09 Partnership and responsibility 10 Privavy and Security Policy 11 Product Security Assurance Program 2/11 Objective The goals of the OpenText Product Security Assurance Program (PSAP) are to help ensure that all products, solutions, and services are designed, developed, and maintained with security in mind, and to provide OpenText customers with the assurance that their important assets and information are protected at all times. This document provides a general, public overview of the key aspects and components of the PSAP program. Scope The scope of the PSAP includes all software solutions designed and developed by OpenText and its subsidiaries. All OpenText employees are responsible to uphold and participate in this program. Sources The source of this overview document is the PSAP Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). This SOP is highly confidential in nature, for internal OpenText consumption only. This overview document represents the aspects that are able to be shared with OpenText customers and partners. Introduction OpenText is committed to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of its customer information. OpenText believes that the foundation of a highly secure system is that the security is built in to the software from the initial stages of its concept, design, development, deployment, and beyond. In this respect,
    [Show full text]
  • The OWASP Application Security Program Quick Start Guide
    Quick Start Guide The OWASP Application Security Program Quick Start Guide Five Days to Setting Up an Application Security Program Quickstart Guide About this Guide This guide is intended to be a short, straightforward introductory guide to standing-up or improving an Application Security Program1. The intended goal of the AppSec program is to implement measures throughout the code’s life- cycle to prevent gaps in the application security policy or the underlying system through flaws in the design, development, deployment, upgrade, or maintenance of the application. The application security program should effectively manage the security of its application systems, protecting information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction in order to provide integrity, confidentiality and availability. A fundamental component of this improved application security management is the ability to demonstrate acceptable levels of risk based on defined KPIs, including but limited to: 1. The number of vulnerabilities present in an application 2. The time to fix vulnerabilities 3. The remediation rate of vulnerabilities 4. The time vulnerabilities remain open The application security program deliverables include a holistic view of the state of security for each application, identifying the risks associated with the application and the countermeasures implemented to mitigate those risks, explaining how security is implemented, planning for system downtimes and emergencies, and providing a formal plan to improve the security in one or more of these areas. Audience The intended audience of this document is anyone from security engineers, developers, program managers, senior managers or a senior executive. This guide should be considered the start of a comprehensive approach, it is intended to give the basic questions and answers that should be asked by those who are in charge of the application security program in your organization, this includes those responsible for managing the risk of the entire organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Trusted Computing Or Distributed Trust Management?
    Trusted computing or distributed trust management? Michele Tomaiuolo Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione Università di Parma Via Usberti, 181/A – 43100 Parma – Italy [email protected] Abstract Nowadays, in contrast with centralized or hierarchical certification authorities and directory of names, other solutions are gaining momentum. Federation of already deployed security systems is considered the key to build global security infrastructures. In this field, trust management systems can play an important role, being based on a totally distributed architecture. The idea of distributed trust management can be confronted with the concept of trusted computing. Though having a confusingly similar denomination, the different interpretation of trust in these systems drives to divergent consequences with respect to system architectures and access policies, but also to law, ethics, politics. While trusted computing systems assure copyright holders and media producers that the hosting system will respect the access restrictions they defined, trust management systems, instead, allow users to grant trust to other users or software agents for accessing local resources. Keywords Data security, Security Management, Authentication, Authorization, Intellectual Property Rights, Information Access, Digital Books, Multimedia, Web Technologies Introduction A number of architectures and systems are being proposed as a ground for improved interoperability among diverse systems, mainly exploiting the idea of service-oriented architecture. Yet, some issues remain open. In fact, composition of services requires some delegation of goals and duties among partners. But these delegations cannot come into effect, if they’re not associated with a corresponding delegation of privileges, needed to access some resources and complete delegated tasks, or achieve desired goals.
    [Show full text]
  • OASIS Response to NSTC Request for Feedback on Standard Practices
    OASIS RESPONSE TO NSTC REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK ON STANDARDS PRACTICES OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) is pleased to respond to the request from the National Science and Technology Council's Sub-Committee on Standards published at 75 FR 76397 (2010), and extended by 76 FR 3877 (2011), for feedback and observations regarding the effectiveness of Federal agencies' participation in the development and implementation of standards and conformity assessment activities and programs. We have advised our own members about the Federal Register inquiry, in case they wish to respond. Of course, their opinions are their own, and this response does not represent the views of any members, but only the observations of OASIS professional staff. I. RESPONDENT'S BACKGROUND OASIS is one of the largest and oldest global open data standards consortia, founded in 1993 as SGML Open. OASIS has over 5000 active participants representing about 600 member organizations and individual members in over 80 countries. We host widely-used standards in multiple fields including • cybersecurity & access control (such as WS-Security, SAML, XACML, KMIP, DSS & XSPA) [/1], • office documents and smart semantic documents (such as OpenDocument, DITA, DocBook & CMIS) [/2], and • electronic commerce (including SOA and web services, such as BPEL, ebXML, WS-ReliableMessaging & the WS-Transaction standards) [/3] among other areas. Various specific vertical industries also fulfill their open standards requirements by initiating OASIS projects, resulting in mission-specific standards such as • UBL and Business Document Exchange (for e-procurement) [/4], • CAP and EDML (for emergency first-responder notifications) [/5], and • LegalXML (for electronic court filing data)[/6].
    [Show full text]
  • Information Security Essentials Definition of Information Security
    Computing Services Information Security Office Information Security Essentials Definition of Information Security Information security is the protection of information and systems from unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, destruction or disruption. The three objectives of information security are: • Confidentiality • Integrity • Availability Confidentiality Confidentiality refers to the protection of information from unauthorized access or disclosure. Ensuring confidentiality is ensuring that those who are authorized to access information are able to do so and those who are not authorized are prevented from doing so. Integrity Integrity refers to the protection of information from unauthorized modification or destruction. Ensuring integrity is ensuring that information and information systems are accurate, complete and uncorrupted. Availability Availability refers to the protection of information and information systems from unauthorized disruption. Ensuring availability is ensuring timely and reliable access to and use of information and information systems. Information Security Policy Carnegie Mellon has adopted an Information Security Policy as a measure to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of institutional data as well as any information systems that store, process or transmit institutional data. Institutional data is defined as any data that is owned or licensed by the university. Information system is defined as any electronic system that stores, processes or transmits information. Policies • Throughout its lifecycle, all Institutional Data shall be protected in a manner that is considered reasonable and appropriate given the level of sensitivity, value and criticality that the Institutional Data has to the University. • Any Information System that stores, processes or transmits Institutional Data shall be secured in a manner that is considered reasonable and appropriate given the level of sensitivity, value and criticality that the Institutional Data has to the University.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociotal Creating a Socially Aware Citizen-Centric Internet of Things
    Ref. Ares(2017)3187879 - 26/06/2017 Specific Targeted Research Projects (STReP) SocIoTal Creating a socially aware citizen-centric Internet of Things FP7 Contract Number: 609112 WP1 – Socially-aware citizen centric architecture and community APIs Deliverable report Contractual date of delivery:31/08/2016 Actual submission date: 31/08/2016 Deliverable ID: D1.2.2 Deliverable Title: Final version of SocIoTal Architecture Responsible beneficiary: UNIS Contributing beneficiaries: UNIS, CEA, UC, CRS4, DNET, UMU Start Date of the Project: 1 September 2013 Duration: 36 Months Revision: 1 Dissemination Level: Public PROPRIETARY RIGHTS STATEMENT This document contains information, which is proprietary to the SOCIOTAL Consortium. Neither this document nor the information contained herein shall be used, duplicated or communicated by any means to any third party, in whole or in parts, except with prior written consent of the SOCIOTAL consortium. FP7 Contract Number: 609112 Deliverable report – WP1 / T1.2/D1.2.1 Document ID: D1.2.1 Document Information Document ID: D1.2.2 Version: Final 1.0 Version Date: 31 August 2016 Authors: Colin O’Reilly (UNIS), Ignacio Elicegui (UC), Carmen Lopez (UC), Luis Sanchez (UC), Jose Luis Hernández, Jorge Bernabé (UMU), Alberto Serra (CRS4), Nenad Gligoric, Srdjan Krco (DNET), Christine Hennebert (CEA), Alexandre MACABIES (CEA), Niklas Palaghias (UNIS) Security: Public Approvals Name Organization Date Visa Project Management K. MOESSNER UNIS Team Internal Reviewer Colin O’Reilly UNIS 24/08/2016 Internal Reviewer Srdjan
    [Show full text]
  • ICSOC Phd Symposium 2008
    Hamid Reza Motahari-Nezhad Farouk Toumani Yannis Velegrakis (Eds.) ICSOC PhD Symposium 2008 Co-located with 6th International Conference on Service Ori- ented Computing (ICSOC) Sydney, Australia, 1 December 2008 Proceedings Sponsor: IBM Research, USA Copyright c 2008 for the individual papers by the papers’ authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes. Re-publication of material from this volume requires permission by the copyright owners. Preface Service oriented computing (SOC) has rapidly transformed from a vision, in the beginning of the century, to realisation in paradigms such as Web services, Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and cloud services. While this has provided the industry and practitioners with the opportunities for a new generation of products and services, it has brought forward a tremendous amount of challenges and open issues for researchers. The International Con- ferences on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC) is a pioneering event for researchers, practitioners and industry leaders to discuss and share the success and achievements in this area. The ICSOC PhD Symposium, as part of the ICSOC conference, is an international forum for PhD students working in the broad areas of service computing, web services and ser- vice engineering to present and discuss emerging research problems and ideas on how to tackle these issues. The forum is intended to bring together PhD students and give them the opportunity to present and discuss their research in a constructively critical atmosphere. The symposium operates in a workshop format, giving PhD students an opportunity to showcase their research and providing them with feedback from senior international re- searchers and peer PhD students.
    [Show full text]