Anadolu Isuzu Bus & Coach Range

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ANADOLU ISUZU BUS & COACH RANGE CLASS III COACH AND MIDICOACH RANGE CLASS I & CLASS II BUS AND MIDIBUS RANGE 3 4 3368 3010 4660 1890 1751 2012 9560 2454 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1008 0 3 3 3 335 1650 3815 2300 2250 1605 7720 15 16 17 Anadolu Isuzu is one of the leading medium-sized bus and coach manufacturing companies in Europe whose major shareholders are the Anadolu Group from Turkey, and Isuzu Motors Limited and Itochu Corporation from Japan. The company is the first Japanese joint venture in Turkish automotive industry. Its main fields of operation are the production and marketing of light duty trucks and midibuses. Since the establishment of the company in 1984, nearly 150.000 vehicles have been manufactured in accordance with the Isuzu Motors license agreement. The experience and know-how of Anadolu Isuzu dates back to the Çelik Montaj, which was established in 1965 to build pick-ups and motorcycles. In 1984 the company signed the licence agreement with Isuzu Motors to produce Isuzu vehicles in Istanbul Kartal Plants. The title of the company was amended as Anadolu Isuzu Otomotiv Sanayi ve Ticaret A.ﬁ. In 1999 Anadolu Isuzu moved to its new facilities in Gebze ekerpınar, in Kocaeli. The new facilities are established on an area of 230.000 m2 where the company employs nearly 700 people. The facilities include two separate plants for truck and bus manufacturing. As a company, producing commercial vehicles with the license of a world-class Japanese brand in the European region, Anadolu Isuzu drives all its production processes according to the world’s famous Japanese quality management systems and the European Union’s quality standards and regulations. The inevitable results are the products manufactured at the global standards of excellence. Anadolu Isuzu’s export activities cover 26 countries in three continents. Majority of these markets are subject to the European Union regulations. The company is the midibus export leader in Turkey since 2004. In 2012, Anadolu Isuzu actualized 81 percent of the total midibus exports from Turkey. 18 ﬁekerp›nar Mah. Otomotiv Cad. No:2 41435 Çay›rova / Kocaeli - Turkey Tel: +90 (262) 658 88 43 Fax: +90 262 658 85 59 - 69 www.isuzu.com.tr.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Minibus Or Coach Module 4 Driver CPC Questions and Answers
Minibus or coach Module 4 Driver CPC questions and answers The Initial Driver CPC qualification was introduced into the bus and coach industry on September 10th 2008. Exactly one year before Driver CPC came into force for the commercial goods (HGV) industry (September 10th 2009). Part of acquiring the PCV Initial Driver CPC qualification means having to pass the module 4 examination. Module 4 is the practical associated knowledge test that is carried out at a DSA approved test centre. There is no driving required (suffice for the rolling brake check.) Students will need a DSA approved vehicle to demonstrate their answers. This test is all about scenarios a professional PCV driver may encounter in his or her working life. It includes PCV drivers legal obligations (vehicles checks, not overloading, pre-use checking), as well as checking for illegal immigrants, dealing with emergency situations etc. The Module 4 exam will last approximately 20-30 minutes and the DSA examiner will ask approximately 5-6 questions. To be successful you must attain at least 75% for each question and at least 80% overall. This post looks at the possible questions you may be given for your minibus or coach Driver CPC module 4 examination. If you need HGV Module 4 questions and answers we recommend your visit our Module 4 HGV Driver CPC page. Module 4 requires competence of skills and knowledge in the following areas. Carrying passengers with due regard for safety rules and proper vehicle use. Ensuring passenger, comfort, safety and security. Preventing criminality and trafficking of illegal immigrants Assessing emergency situations Preventing physical risk The following should be used as a guide only.
[Show full text]
Buses – Global Market Trends
2017 BUSES – GLOBAL MARKET TRENDS Markets – Competition – Companies – Key Figures Extract from the study BUSES – GLOBAL MARKET TRENDS Markets – Competition – Companies – Key figures In all regions across the globe, buses remain the most widespread public transport mode. Their demand goes hand in hand with several, mostly region-specific factors, including demographics, increasing mobility of people and environmental awareness, as well as public funding. Buses are comparatively to other transportation modes cheap and easy to use, since their use does not necessarily require the implementation of a specific infrastructure. This makes buses ideal vehicles for both short- and long-distance services. Based on the current developments, this Multi Client Study offers a comprehensive insight into the structure, volumes and development trends of the worldwide bus market. In concrete terms, the market study “BUSES – GLOBAL MARKET TRENDS” includes: A look at the worldwide market for buses differentiated by region An analysis of the relevant market data including present and future market volumes Information concerning the installed fleet and future procurement potential until 2022 An assessment of current developments and growth drivers of the worldwide bus markets in the individual regions An overview of bus manufacturers including an analysis of the market shares, financial backups as well as a brief description of the current product portfolio and strategy outlook A list of the major production facilities in each of the regions including product range as well as production capacities Presentation of the development stage of alternative propulsions, their manufacturers and their occurrence worldwide The study is available in English from the August 2017 at the price of EUR 3,400 plus VAT.
[Show full text]
The Influence of Passenger Load, Driving Cycle, Fuel Price and Different
Transportation https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9925-0 The infuence of passenger load, driving cycle, fuel price and diferent types of buses on the cost of transport service in the BRT system in Curitiba, Brazil Dennis Dreier1 · Semida Silveira1 · Dilip Khatiwada1 · Keiko V. O. Fonseca2 · Rafael Nieweglowski3 · Renan Schepanski3 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract This study analyses the infuence of passenger load, driving cycle, fuel price and four diferent types of buses on the cost of transport service for one bus rapid transit (BRT) route in Curitiba, Brazil. First, the energy use is estimated for diferent passenger loads and driving cycles for a conventional bi-articulated bus (ConvBi), a hybrid-electric two- axle bus (HybTw), a hybrid-electric articulated bus (HybAr) and a plug-in hybrid-electric two-axle bus (PlugTw). Then, the fuel cost and uncertainty are estimated considering the fuel price trends in the past. Based on this and additional cost data, replacement scenarios for the currently operated ConvBi feet are determined using a techno-economic optimisa- tion model. The lowest fuel cost ranges for the passenger load are estimated for PlugTw amounting to (0.198–0.289) USD/km, followed by (0.255–0.315) USD/km for HybTw, (0.298–0.375) USD/km for HybAr and (0.552–0.809) USD/km for ConvBi. In contrast, C the coefcient of variation ( v ) of the combined standard uncertainty is the highest for C PlugTw ( v : 15–17%) due to stronger sensitivity to varying bus driver behaviour, whereas C it is the least for ConvBi ( v : 8%).
[Show full text]
Totaltrack Holds the Line for Action Distribution Warehouse
Top Transport Vehicle Manufacturer Uses Intelligent Video to Prevent Intrusion and Scrap Metal Theft ioimage intelligent-video system installed to upgrade existing indoor and outdoor security at the Merkavim Merkavim Metal Works Ltd. Description: Transport & Bus Manufacturer founded in 1946 Cesarea Plant Employees: Approx. 300 Produces: Entire range of mini-buses, low-floor and articulated The theft and removal of items low-floor city buses, inter-city buses, tourist coaches, armored from outdoor sites that store and prisoner buses and other specialized passenger transport materials and equipment for solutions. Central Distribution Center: Production facility, covering over manufacturing and building 100,000 sqm, is located in Central Israel construction is becoming more widespread. Most often the damage far exceeded The assembly plant is located in the street or scrap value of the items an area that is surrounded by Worldwide equipment and scrap stolen farmland and open field areas. metal theft is costing billions of dollars and there are few ways Merkavim found that thieves were Thieves can easily scale to prevent these crimes or catch taking parts from busses and doing landscape walls and commercial these criminals. considerable damage in the process. wrought iron fences that protect Most often the damage far exceeded the the site. Just beyond the semi- The common reasons for the street or scrap value of the items stolen. decorative fences are access outbreak is an inability to watch On several occasions component steel roads, main streets and rail lines over expansive areas, absence used for manufacturing was stolen by that provide thieves access to the of security, or patchy traditional scrap metal thieves from the outdoor property as well as offer a means security that is too labor storage areas.
[Show full text]
Mass Limits for Three-Axle Buses Discussion Paper June 2018
Mass limits for three-axle buses Discussion paper June 2018 Mass limits for three-axle buses: Discussion paper June 2018 1 Report outline Title Mass limits for three-axle buses Type of report Discussion paper Purpose For public consultation Abstract This paper investigates whether there is a need to increase the mass limits that apply to three-axle buses to accommodate the current number of passengers that such buses may carry. It also assesses the implications of a potential increase in three-axle bus mass limits. The paper addresses project options, industry impact, risks and benefits. It is based on research and stakeholder engagement with states and territories, industry. Submission Any individual or organisation can make a submission to the NTC. details Submissions will be accepted until 24 July 2018 online at www.ntc.gov.au, via Twitter or LinkedIn or by mail to: Chief Executive Officer National Transport Commission Level 3/600 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 30000 Where possible, please provide evidence, such as data and documents, to support your position. We publish all submissions online, unless you request us not to. The Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cwlth) applies to the NTC. Key words Three-axle, bus, mass, loading, capacity, coach, tourist bus, tourism, passengers, baggage allowance, double decker, articulated bus Contact National Transport Commission Level 3/600 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 (03) 9236 5000 [email protected] www.ntc.gov.au Mass limits for three-axle buses: Discussion paper June 2018 2 Contents Report
[Show full text]
Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry
Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry Michael Renner and Gary Gardner Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry Michael Renner and Gary Gardner September 2010 2 GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS IN THE RAIL AND TRANSIT INDUSTRY © 2010 Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C. Printed on paper that is 50 percent recycled, 30 percent post-consumer waste, process chlorine free. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Worldwatch Institute; of its directors, oﬃcers, or staﬀ; or of its funding organizations. Editor: Lisa Mastny Designer: Lyle Rosbotham Table of Contents 3 Table of Contents Summary . 7 U.S. Rail and Transit in Context . 9 The Global Rail Market . 11 Selected National Experiences: Europe and East Asia . 16 Implications for the United States . 27 Endnotes . 30 Figures and Tables Figure 1. National Investment in Rail Infrastructure, Selected Countries, 2008 . 11 Figure 2. Leading Global Rail Equipment Manufacturers, Share of World Market, 2001 . 15 Figure 3. Leading Global Rail Equipment Manufacturers, by Sales, 2009 . 15 Table 1. Global Passenger and Freight Rail Market, by Region and Major Industry Segment, 2005–2007 Average . 12 Table 2. Annual Rolling Stock Markets by Region, Current and Projections to 2016 . 13 Table 3. Profiles of Major Rail Vehicle Manufacturers . 14 Table 4. Employment at Leading Rail Vehicle Manufacturing Companies . 15 Table 5. Estimate of Needed European Urban Rail Investments over a 20-Year Period . 17 Table 6. German Rail Manufacturing Industry Sales, 2006–2009 . 18 Table 7. Germany’s Annual Investments in Urban Mass Transit, 2009 . 19 Table 8.
[Show full text]
New Requirements to the Emergency Exits of Buses
NEW REQUIREMENTS TO THE EMERGENCY EXITS OF BUSES Dr. MATOLCSY, Mátyás Scientific Society of Mechanical Engineers Hungary Paper Number: 09-0181 ABSTACT general safety requirements of buses. The EE’s requirements are grouped as follows: Based on certain assumptions, the requirements of a) required number of EE-s emergency exits on buses and coaches are specified b) their location and distribution in ECE Regulation No.107. Different accident c) the required minimum dimensions situations, real accidents proved that some of the d) required access to EE-s original assumptions are not valid, so it is necessary e) technical requirements of their operation. to reformulate them. Accident statistics – contain- ing some hundreds bus accidents – and in depth These requirements are in force since 30 years and accident analysis were studied, concentrating on the during this period only a few, small corrections evacuation of buses and the rescue possibilities of were made to improve them for better understand- the bus occupants. Certain results and conclusions ing. But during this period a lot of experiences were of evacuation tests are also considered which show collected about the usability of different EE-s and the capabilities and limitations of different groups some very serious accidents – fire in the bus, many of passengers (men-women, young or elderly peo- injured passengers on board, panic among the pas- ple, etc.) when evacuating the bus through different sengers, etc. when the passengers could not evacu- kind of emergency exits. The new assumptions to ate the bus – called the attention to the problems of specify the required number and location of emer- the existing regulation.
[Show full text]
Buy America on Transportation Infrastructure and U.S
Effects of Buy America on Transportation Infrastructure and U.S. Manufacturing Updated July 2, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44266 SUMMARY R44266 Effects of Buy America on July 2, 2019 Transportation Infrastructure and Michaela D. Platzer U.S. Manufacturing Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business In 1978, Congress began placing domestic content restrictions on federally funded transportation projects that are carried out by nonfederal government agencies such as state and local William J. Mallett governments. These restrictions, which have changed over the years, are commonly referred to as Specialist in the Buy America Act, or more simply, Buy America. Although there has been ongoing Transportation Policy congressional interest in domestic preference policy over the years, statements and actions by the Trump Administration about reinvigorating domestic manufacturing and investing in infrastructure have stimulated renewed interest in Buy America. Buy America refers to several similar statutes and regulations that apply when federal funds are used to support projects involving highways, public transportation, aviation, and intercity passenger rail, including Amtrak. Unless a nationwide or project-specific waiver is granted, Buy America requires the use of U.S.-made iron and steel and the domestic production and assembly of other manufactured goods, particularly the production of rolling stock (railcars and buses) used in federally funded public transportation and Amtrak’s intercity passenger rail service. A separate law requires that at least half the value of products imported by sea for federally supported transportation projects be transported in U.S.-flag ships. This report examines the effects of Buy America on iron and steel manufacturing, rolling stock manufacturing, and transportation.
[Show full text]
Vehicle Technologies Memo
Technical Memorandum #2 Review of Vehicle Technology This document briefly summarizes the vehicle technologies that are being used today on commuter rail, express bus, and bus rapid transit (BRT) services in North America. This information will assist in the evaluation of alternatives as part of the Red Rock Corridor Alternatives Analysis Update. October 1, 2013 October 2, 2013 Red Rock Corridor Alternatives Analysis Update Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Express Bus Systems ............................................................................................................................. 4 a. Examples ........................................................................................................................................... 4 b. Features ............................................................................................................................................ 5 c. Capacity ............................................................................................................................................. 5 d. Capital Costs ...................................................................................................................................... 5 e. Operating Costs ................................................................................................................................. 6 f. Future Directions .............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
An Analysis of Transit Bus Axle Weight Issues
AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT BUS AXLE WEIGHT ISSUES Prepared for: American Public Transportation Association Prepared by: MORR Transportation Consulting Ltd. 202-1465 Buffalo Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 1L8 November, 2014 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of TCRP Project J-11, Task 20, Transit Cooperative Research Program. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Acknowledgements This study was conducted for the American Public Transportation Association, with funding provided through the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Project J-11, Quick- Response Research on Long-Term Strategic Issues. The TCRP is sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration; directed by the Transit Development Corporation, the education and research arm of the American Public Transportation Association; and administered by The National Academies, through the Transportation Research Board. Project J-11 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the TCRP Oversight and Project Selection (TOPS) Committee, the Federal Transit Administration, and the American Public Transportation Association and its committees. The report was prepared by MORR Transportation Consulting, Ltd. The work was guided by a technical working group, including: Rene Allen, Nova Bus; Joseph Gibson, North American Bus Industries; Jeffrey D. Gonneville, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority;
[Show full text]
Trolley Coach Applications in the 1980S
12 TRB Special Report 200 extensive bid for any trolley bus procurement in politan Toronto, contained for the most part in the North America. Some of these were permutations of city of Toronto. These trolley coaches were intro different electrical manufacturers with the same duced in the late 1940s to the early 1950s and re body builder, making evaluation difficult. placed streetcars that formerly operated on these One distressing aspect was that all the vehicles routes. Figure 1 shows the geographic location of offered were heavier than the buses being replaced. these trolley coach routes within the TTC system. 'l'he low bid with Japanese electrical equipment had The trolley coach has a rather limited, albeit to be disqualified because, with a passenger load, important, share in the public transit make-up in it exceeded the rear-axle highway loading limit. Toronto. In 1981, trolley coaches constituted 3. 7 Some of the vehicles offered had a power-to-weight percent of the total annual TTC system mileage ratio inferior to the buses being replaced because (3,938,374 miles). This compares with 48.1 percent of their weight. There was some difficulty in eval for diesel buses, 39. 6 percent for subways, and 8. 6 uating technical risk. On the premise that complex percent for streetcars. In terms of passenger use, ity is the enemy of reliablility, there was a desire 4.9 percent of system ridership--representing for simple proven equipment, which was in conflict 19,204,000 revenue passengers--traveled on trolley with energy efficiency and lower bids.
[Show full text]
COACH / MINIBUS ACCESS to SPECTATOR CAR PARKS a Shakedown (Thu) / Coaches by Prior Arrangement Only
Motor Sports House, Riverside Park, Colnbrook, SL3 0HG, UK T: +44 (0)1753 765105 F: +44 (0)1753 765106 W: walesrallygb.com E: [email protected] COACH / MINIBUS ACCESS TO SPECTATOR CAR PARKS A Shakedown (Thu) / Coaches by prior arrangement only. Passengers would need to be dropped off Clocaenog (Fri) at the entrance to the car park on the B road. This results in a 15 minute walk to the stage on a flat gravel road, with a parking area being identified in advance for the coach. Fifteen seater (transit size) minibuses OK - anything any larger by prior arrangement only. Overnight parking is allowed from 20:00 Wednesday 3 Oct, additional cost of £10 per vehicle applies. B Visit Conwy Tir Prince Coaches by prior arrangement only. 12 – 14 seater Minibuses are ok, slightly larger minibuses to contact organisers prior to attending. No Overnight parking. Car park opens at 16:00 Thursday 4 Oct. C Clocaenog (East) (Fri) As per Car Park A, Shakedown on Thursday. Car park opens at 04:00 Friday 5 October. D Brenig South Not suitable for coaches. Minibuses OK – with a 15-25 minute walk to the stage on 90% flat gravel / road, with the last short distance uphill gravel road. Overnight parking is allowed from 18:00 Thursday 4 October, additional cost of £10 per vehicle applies. E Brenig North Coaches with prior arrangement only. Passengers will be dropped off on the B4501 from the north. This results in a 5-10 minute walk to the stage on all flat tarmac / gravel road to access the viewing area.
[Show full text]