DOCSLIB.ORG

Coast Management Plan 2015 – 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan 2015 – 2020 Produced by the North Yorkshire and Cleveland Coastal Forum Partnership North York Moors National Park Authority, North Yorkshire County Council, Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, North Yorkshire and Cleveland Coastal Forum BACKGROUND 2 National Objectives 4 Heritage Coast Management 4 Management Resources 7 Planning Policy Context 8 Relationship with other strategies and EU Directives 9 Coastal Economy 10 CONSERVATION OF THE COASTLINE – National Objective 1 11 Landscape 11 Seascapes 12 Natural Environment 12 Geological Conservation 14 Coastal Villages and the Built Environment 14 Historic Environment 15 PUBLIC ENJOYMENT AND RECREATION – National Objective 2 16 Access 17 Interpretation and Tourism 18 Visitor, Transport and Traffi c Issues 19 IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF COASTAL WATERS AND BEACHES – Objective 3 20 Litter 20 Bathing Water Quality 20 Beach Awards 21 Emergency Planning 21 COASTAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – National Objective 4 22 Land Use 22 Fishing 22 OTHER FACTORS INFLUENCING COASTAL MANAGEMENT 24 Conclusion 27 APPENDICES AND MAPS 29 - 44 Background Fig 1.1 The purpose of this organisations that develop 1. North Northumberland Management Plan is to the strategies and plans for 2. Durham provide a framework for these areas. management of the North 3. North Yorkshire & Cleveland The concept of Heritage Yorkshire and Cleveland 4. Flamborough Head Coasts was fi rst proposed Heritage Coast over the 5. Spurn Point in 1970. Today many of next fi ve years. It replaces 6. North Norfolk the fi nest stretches of the Heritage Coast 7. Suffolk undeveloped outstanding Strategy 2008 – 2013 and 8. South Foreland natural coastlines have builds on achievements 9. Dover – Folkestone been defi ned as Heritage from that period. 10. Sussex Coast (see fi g. 1.1). The North 11. Tennyson The new plan is based on the Yorkshire and Cleveland 12. Hamstead original national objectives Heritage Coast was 13. Purbeck set out for Heritage Coasts defi ned in 1974 by the then 14. West Dorset around England and Wales. Countryside Commission 15. East Devon Natural England is the (now Natural England) with 16. South Devon national body that oversees small boundary changes 17. Rame Head work undertaken on Heritage negotiated in 1981 and 1996. 18. Gribbin Head – Polperro Coasts in England whilst 19. The Roseland the relevant local coastal 20. The Lizard authorities are the 21. Isles of Scilly 22. Pentwith 23. Godrevy – Portreath 24. St.Agnes 25. Trevose Head 26. Pentire Point – Widemouth 27. Hartland 28. Hartland (Devon) 29. Lundy 30. North Devon 31. Exmoor 32. St.Bees Head Fig 1.1 2 North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan | 2015 - 2020 The North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast boundary extends for 55 kilometres or 34 miles between Saltburn by the Sea in Cleveland and Scalby Mills, near Scarborough (See fi g 1.2) The original Countryside Commission policy statement on Heritage Coasts stated that: ‘All Heritage Coasts should have a management plan stating how Heritage Coast objectives are to be met, including the organisations involved, the targets to be adopted, the resources that will be required, and a timetable for implementation. The plan should complement the statutory plan policies and should also accord with, or be an identifiable part of, Fig 1.2 any National Park or Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) management plan that relates to the area. The original purpose of defi ning Heritage Coasts was not simply to identify them for protection but to focus on the management needs of the coasts and the relationship between different and sometimes confl icting issues’. Robin Hood’s Bay and Ravenscar (Mike Kipling) 3 National Objectives for Heritage Coasts The original policy document public by improving and 4. To take account of the published in 1992 by the extending opportunities needs of agriculture, Countryside Commission for for recreational, forestry and fi shing and Heritage Coasts identifi ed educational, sporting of the economic needs the following objectives; and tourist activities of these small coastal that draw on and are communities, through 1. To conserve, protect consistent with, the promoting sustainable and enhance the conservation of their forms of social and natural beauty of these natural beauty and economic development, coasts, including their the protection of their which in themselves terrestrial, littoral and heritage features; conserve and enhance marine flora and fauna, the natural beauty and 3. To maintain and improve and their heritage heritage features. (where necessary) features of architectural, the environmental historical and health of inshore waters archaeological interest; affecting Heritage 2. To facilitate and enhance Coasts and their beaches their enjoyment, through appropriate understanding and works and management appreciation by the measures and Management of the Heritage Coast The national policy on It has been the Heritage Coasts are Heritage Coasts also makes commitment and properly protected and clear recommendations enthusiasm of Heritage funds secured for their about the management of Coast Offi cers and management; the Heritage Coast. Although Rangers that has led to A management plan is there has been no recent successful management prepared for the area review of Heritage Coast measures. However, including the intertidal policy at a national level their brief has often strand and adjacent the original objectives are been too limited and the inshore waters and still very relevant in 2015. resources only suffi cient The original policy to cope with small scale The management statement noted that; management measures. plans implementation Many problems remain is overseen through Local authorities that require the full use of a countryside should take the prime all local authority powers management approach responsibility for and greater fi nancial towards practical work, Heritage Coast matters; resources; through liaison with all There is a need for interests involved in the Local authorities need Heritage Coasts to have management and use to ensure that each has an identity within a local of the Heritage Coast such a service and that authority; and through statutory the responsibilities are planning. For those Heritage Coasts clearly defi ned at all within National Parks, levels, including senior National Park Authorities ones so that the principle should look after tasks are carried out; Heritage Coast interests; 4 North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan | 2015 - 2020 Coordination of Heritage Coast management This new plan has been of the Tees Estuary) through EU recommendation on County Council, National produced by a coastal to Speeton (southern coastal Integrated Coastal Zone Trust, National Farmers partnership consisting of the boundary of the county of Management (ICZM), Union and the North North York Moors National North Yorkshire) and includes the Forum is tasked with East Inshore Fisheries Park Authority, North the entire length of the North overseeing many of the Conservation Authority Yorkshire County Council, Yorkshire and Cleveland coastal plans for North Redcar & Cleveland Borough Heritage Coast. The coastline Yorkshire and Cleveland. The terms of reference for Council and the North within the Forum area north The full Forum consists the North Yorkshire and Yorkshire and Cleveland and south of the Heritage of over 160 coastal Cleveland Coastal Forum Coastal Forum. These Coast contains some varied organisations and individuals are to provide: organisations will ensure land and seascapes that are who take an active interest ‘An integrated Forum for that the plan is implemented of considerable value. in coastal matters. the co-ordination of coastal and monitored as The Coastal Forum is a The Forum partners include management focusing on opportunities allow. non- statutory body and Scarborough Borough conservation, recreation, The North Yorkshire and has been in existence Council, Redcar & Cleveland coastal and fl ood defence, Cleveland Coastal Forum since 2002. Developed Borough Council, North natural processes, water covers the area between by the local authority York Moors National Park quality and marine issues, South Gare (southern bank partners in response to the Authority, North Yorkshire tourism and the economy’. Coastal Forum members gather at the annual conference 2014 (J. Beech) 5 Heritage Coast boundary The boundaries of the but it is considered that the due to their undeveloped Heritage Coast are identifi ed extent of inshore waters up nature, the coastline between on site by stone boundary to 3 miles out to sea is an Holbeck and Filey could well markers. These are situated obvious marker for infl uential qualify for Heritage Coast on the cliff above the Ship management. status on certain grounds. Inn at Saltburn, Upgang A proposal from Scarborough The majority of the Heritage Chine at Whitby, Abbey Field Borough Council to include Coast lies within the at Whitby and Scalby Mills this area as Heritage Coast boundaries of the North near Scarborough. The entire was put to Natural England York Moors National Park, coastal frontage between in 2009. Unfortunately, at a nationally designated these stones is included that time Natural England landscape selected for its in the Heritage Coast, were not in a position to intrinsic merits as an area with a small area at Whitby defi ne or designate any of beautiful and unspoilt being excluded due to more protected landscapes country and magnifi cent Heritage Coast boundary its developed nature. or alter boundaries. coast with a wealth of marker at Upgang, However, this is still an The inland boundary is the architectural interest. The Whitby (J. Beech) action that the Heritage first major road from the National Park designation Coast Partnership would clifftop, or as is the case overlaps the Heritage Coast like to see implemented as at Robin Hood’s Bay the status for approximately 70% opportunities arise and as old railway line or Cinder of the coastal area and brings such should be included as Track. This gives a linear increased protection for the an option for this Plan.
Recommended publications
  • Heritage Coast Management Plan, 3Rd Review

    Heritage Coast Management Plan, 3Rd Review

    North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan, 3rd Review HERITAGE COAST North Yorkshire & Cleveland markdentonphotographic.co.uk www. photograph: North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Contents Management Plan, 3rd Review STRATEGY Background 3 National Objectives for Heritage Coasts 3 2008 - 2013 National Targets for Heritage Coasts 4 Heritage Coast Organisation 4 Heritage Coast Boundary 6 Co-ordination of Work 6 Staffing Structure and Issues 6 Monitoring and Implementation 7 Involvement of Local People in Heritage Coast Work 7 Planning Policy Context 8 Relationship with other Strategies 9 Protective Ownership 9 CONSERVATION Landscape Conservation and Enhancement 10 Natural and Geological Conservation 10 Village Enhancement and the Built Environment 11 Archaeology 12 PUBLIC ENJOYMENT AND RECREATION Interpretation 14 Visitor and Traffic Management 15 Access and Public Rights of Way 16 HERITAGE COAST Tourism 16 North Yorkshire & Cleveland HEALTH OF COASTAL WATERS & BEACHES Litter 17 Beach Awards 17 Water Quality 18 OTHER ISSUES Coastal Defence and Natural Processes 19 Renewable Energy, Off Shore Minerals and Climate Change 19 ACTION PLAN 2008 - 2013 20-23 Heritage Coast - a coastal partnership financially supported by: Appendix 1 - Map Coverage 24-32 Printed on envir0nmentally friendly paper Published by North Yorkshire and Cleveland Coastal Forum representing the North York Moors © North York Moors National Park Authority 2008 National Park Authority, Scarborough Borough Council, North Yorkshire County Council, www.coastalforum.org.uk
  • North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    National Character 25. North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area profile: Supporting documents www.gov.uk/natural-england 1 National Character 25. North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
  • Prop Ref Full Property Address Primary Liable Party Name

    Prop Ref Full Property Address Primary Liable Party Name

    Prop Ref Full Property Address Primary Liable party name Rateable Value Account Ref Account Start date Relief Type Relief Description Relief Start Date 102009050600 36, Bridlington Street, Hunmanby, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 0JR Yorkshire Wildlife Trust Ltd 900 100902707 01/04/1990 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 103038750560 18, John Street, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 9DQ The Cambridge Centre (S.A.D.A.C) Ltd 11250 101540647 27/06/1997 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 103086250500 Car Park, Wharfedale, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 0DG Home Group Ltd 8000 700078619 01/05/2013 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 104025750540 Builders Yard, Main Street, Flixton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO11 3UB Groundwork Wakefield Ltd 21500 700078709 01/06/2013 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 108045150555 Adj 116, Main Street, Cayton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO11 3RP Yorkshire Coast Homes Limited 11500 700080167 17/04/2014 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 109045450540 33, Main Street, Seamer, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 4PS Next Choice (Yorkshire) Ltd 4950 700082311 01/06/2014 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 117074150505 9, Station Road, Snainton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO13 9AP Scarborough Theatre Trust Ltd 53000 700082857 12/01/2015 DI20 20% DISCRETIONARY TOP UP RELIEF 01/04/2016 124052050500 Cober Hill, Newlands Road, Cloughton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO13 0AR Yorkshire Coast Workshops Ltd 15000 700056775 14/01/2000 DI DISCRETIONARY
  • Yorkshire-Coast--Moorland-Scenes

    Yorkshire-Coast--Moorland-Scenes

    Produced by Ted Garvin, Ginny Brewer and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team YORKSHIRE COAST AND MOORLAND SCENES Painted and Described By GORDON HOME _Second Edition_ 1907 _First Edition published April 26, 1904 Second Edition published April, 1907_ PREFACE page 1 / 92 It may seem almost superfluous to explain that this book does not deal with the whole of Yorkshire, for it would obviously be impossible to get even a passing glimpse of such a great tract of country in a book of this nature. But I have endeavoured to give my own impressions of much of the beautiful coast-line, and also some idea of the character of the moors and dales of the north-east portion of the county. I have described the Dale Country in a companion volume to this, entitled 'Yorkshire Dales and Fells.' GORDON HOME. EPSOM, 1907. CONTENTS CHAPTER I ACROSS THE MOORS FROM PICKERING TO WHITBY CHAPTER II ALONG THE ESK VALLEY CHAPTER III THE COAST FROM WHITBY TO REDCAR page 2 / 92 CHAPTER IV THE COAST FROM WHITBY TO SCARBOROUGH CHAPTER V SCARBOROUGH CHAPTER VI WHITBY CHAPTER VII THE CLEVELAND HILLS CHAPTER VIII GUISBOROUGH AND THE SKELTON VALLEY CHAPTER IX FROM PICKERING TO RIEVAULX ABBEY LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1. On Barnby Moor 2. Goathland Moor 3. An Autumn Scene on the Esk page 3 / 92 4. Sleights Moor from Swart Houc Cross 5. A Stormy Afternoon 6. East Row, Sandsend 7. In Mulgrave Woods 8. Runswick Bay 9. A Sunny Afternoon at Runswick 10. Sunrise from Staithes Beck 11. Three Generations at Staithes 12.
  • Annex a Ecology Survey Report 2020

    Annex a Ecology Survey Report 2020

    Dogger Bank C/Sofia Onshore Works Application Appendix 4 – Annex A Ecology Survey Report 2020 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 1 of 28 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 2 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 3 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Report This Report provides baseline information for the Ecology Assessment which supports the Environmental Appraisal submitted to support the planning application (the Application) made by Doggerbank Offshore Wind Farm Project 3 Projco Limited (the Projco) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited (SOWFL) (the Applicants), for consent pursuant to Section 62 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended. The Application includes five areas of alternative and additional infrastructure to the consented 9 kilometres (km) buried onshore grid connection, from approximately 1.5 km landward of the landfall for Dogger Bank Wind Farm C (DB-C) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm (Sofia) to the National Grid at Lackenby Substation (the Works). 1.2 Development Context For the ease of reference, the Works, as shown in Figure 1.2 (a – c) of the Environmental Appraisal, is split into areas as below: Area 1 – A174 Crossing; Area 2 – South of Kirkleatham Memorial Park; Area 3 – Wilton East; Area 4 – Main Welfare Hub south of Wilton; and Area 5 – HVAC Cable Corridor.
  • Cleveland Naturalists'

    Cleveland Naturalists'

    CLEVELAND NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Volume 5 Part 1 Spring 1991 CONTENTS Recent Sightings and Casual Notes CNFC Recording Events and Workshop Programme 1991 The Forming of a Field Study Group Within the CNFC Additions to Records of Fungi In Cleveland Recent Sightings and Casual Notes CNFC Recording Events and Workshop Programme 1991 The Forming of a Field Study Group Within the CNFC Additions to Records of Fungi In Cleveland CLEVELAND NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB 111th SESSION 1991-1992 OFFICERS President: Mrs J.M. Williams 11, Kedleston Close Stockton on Tees. Secretary: Mrs J.M. Williams 11 Kedleston Close Stockton on Tees. Programme Secretaries: Misses J.E. Bradbury & N. Pagdin 21, North Close Elwick Hartlepool. Treasurer; Miss M. Gent 42, North Road Stokesley. Committee Members: J. Blackburn K. Houghton M. Yates Records sub-committee: A.Weir, M Birtle P.Wood, D Fryer, J. Blackburn M. Hallam, V. Jones Representatives: I. C.Lawrence (CWT) J. Blackburn (YNU) M. Birtle (NNU) EDITORIAL It is perhaps fitting that, as the Cleveland Naturalist's Field Club enters its 111th year in 1991, we should be celebrating its long history of natural history recording through the re-establishment of the "Proceedings". In the early days of the club this publication formed the focus of information desemmination and was published continuously from 1881 until 1932. Despite the enormous changes in land use which have occurred in the last 60 years, and indeed the change in geographical area brought about by the fairly recent formation of Cleveland County, many of the old records published in the Proceedings still hold true and even those species which have disappeared or contracted in range are of value in providing useful base line data for modern day surveys.
  • Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017

    Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017

    Redcar & Cleveland Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017 this is Redcar & Cleveland 1 BACKGROUND 3 2 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES 5 3 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL GEOLOGICAL SITES 11 APPENDIX 1: Location Maps 15 2017 y anuar J te Upda Sites Geological and e ildlif W Local Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan 1 2 Local Wildlife and Geological Sites Update January 2017 R edcar & Cle v eland Local Plan 1. BACKGROUND What are Local Sites and why do we need them? 1.1 Local Sites can be Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) or Local Geological Sites (LGS). Local Wildlife Sites are areas of land which meet specific, objective criteria for nature conservation value. These criteria, which are based on the Defra guidance(1), have been decided locally by the Tees Valley Local Sites Partnership. The sites represent a range of important habitat types and variety of species that are of conservation concern. The Tees Valley RIGS (Regionally Important Geological Sites) group advises the Local Sites Partnership on the selection and management of Local Geological Sites, areas which they have identified as being of geological importance. 1.2 Local Sites can provide local contact with nature and opportunities for education, however designation as a Local Site does not confer any right of access. 1.3 Formerly known as Sites of Nature Conservation Interest (SNCIs) and RIGS, Local Sites are non-statutory site designations that have a lower level of protection than statutory designations, such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). Local Sites, excluding those within the North York Moors National Park, currently receive protection from certain types of inappropriate development through our Local Development Framework.
  • FOIA2062 Response Please Find Attached to This E-Mail an Excel Spreadsheet Detailing the Current Recipients of Mandatory Charity

    FOIA2062 Response Please Find Attached to This E-Mail an Excel Spreadsheet Detailing the Current Recipients of Mandatory Charity

    FOIA2062 Response Please find attached to this e-mail an excel spreadsheet detailing the current recipients of mandatory charity relief from Scarborough Borough Council in respect of Business Rates. Relief Award Primary Liable party name Full Property Address Start Date Filey Museum Trustees 8 - 10, Queen Street, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 9HB 04/01/1997 Filey Sea Cadets, Southdene Pavilion, Southdene, Filey, North Filey Sea Cadets Yorkshire, YO14 9BB 04/01/1997 Endsleigh Convent, South Crescent Road, Filey, North Institute Of Our Lady Of Mercy Yorkshire, YO14 9JL 04/01/1997 Filey Cancer Fund 31a, Station Road, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 9AR 04/01/1997 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust Ltd Car Park, Wharfedale, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 0DG 04/01/1997 Village Hall, Filey Road, Flixton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, Folkton & Flixton Village Hall YO11 3UG 04/01/1997 Muston Village Hall Village Hall, Muston, Filey, North Yorkshire, YO14 0HX 04/01/1997 Jubilee Hall, 133-135, Main Street, Cayton, Scarborough, North Cayton Jubilee Hall Yorkshire, YO11 3TE 04/01/1997 Hall, North Lane, Cayton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO11 Cayton Village Hall 3RZ 04/01/1997 Memorial Hall, Main Street, Seamer, Scarborough, North Seamer & Irton War Memorial Hall Yorkshire, YO12 4QD 04/01/1997 Hall, Moor Lane, Irton, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 Derwent Valley Scout Group 4RW 04/01/1997 Village Hall, Wilsons Lane, East Ayton, Scarborough, North Ayton Village Hall Yorkshire, YO13 9HY 04/01/1997 Village Hall, Cayley Lane, Brompton-By-Sawdon, Scarborough, Brompton Village Hall Committee North Yorkshire, YO13 9DL 04/01/1997 42nd St Marks Scout Group 120, Coldyhill Lane, Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 6SD 04/01/1997 Burniston & Cloughton V.
  • Introduction to National Trails Part 1: Their Origins in the UK

    Introduction to National Trails Part 1: Their Origins in the UK

    Extract from lecture: Introduction to National Trails Part 1: their origins in the UK Dave McGlade Hadrian’s Wall Path National Trail Officer 6th September 2015 Origins in UK: Report of National Parks Committee 1931 (Addison report) In discussing the South Downs: “There would be provided a 70 mile walk along a green ridgeway, through typical English country, with convenient halts and camping sites at regular intervals” (Is this the first documented proposal for a long-distance route in UK?) Source: Daily Telegraph 23rd April 2005 Origins in UK: Report of the Committee on Land Utilisation in Rural Areas 1942 (Scott report) “The principle that the countryside is the heritage of all involves the corollary that there must be facility of access for all” “The recognition of such schemes for main hikers’ highways as the proposed Pennine Way” “The re-opening of the old coastguard path as a right of way for walkers round the whole coastline of England and Wales” Origins in UK: National Parks in England and Wales (Dower report, 1945) “A first main installment of decisions (which should include schemes for the Pennine Way and other long- distance walking routes referred to in the Scott report) should be reached and put into execution as soon as possible”. (p38) Origins in UK: Report of the National Parks Committee 1947 (Hobhouse) “We also attach importance to the provision of long distance paths and bridleways in and between National Parks and Conservation Areas. There should be continuous routes which will enable walkers and riders to travel the length and breadth of the Parks, moving as little as possible on the motor roads.
  • Skinningrove Valley Trail

    Skinningrove Valley Trail

    Skinningrove Zig Zag Railway Project is a joint venture The Story of the Merman between Cleveland Ironstone Mining Museum and Cleveland Model Railway Club. One story about Skinningrove’s past that is still See their websites for information about this recounted is that of the “sea-man” or merman who ambitious project to build a working scale model of allegedly visited in about 1530. Writing in the early Loftus mine, the internal railway system and part of 17th century, William Camden states “Upon the shore, the zig zag connection to the main line. Skengrave, a small village, thrives by the great variety of fish which it takes; where it is reported that, seventy years ago, they caught a sea-man, who lived upon raw fish for some days, but at last, taking his opportunity, he made his escape into his own element. When the winds are laid and the sea is calm… a hideous groaning is oftentimes heard in these parts on a sudden, and then the fishermen are afraid to go to sea.” Another account claims that during his stay “fayre maidens were welcomest guests to his harbour, whome he woulde beholde with a very earnest countenaynce, as if his phlegmatic breast had been touched with the sparke of love.” (J.W. Ord 1846) Skinningrove Station above the village on the Loftus to Middlesbrough line. It opened in 1875 and closed in 1958. Skinningrove in 1846 The following description is taken from “The History and Antiquities of Cleveland” by John Walker Ord, published in 1846. Skinningrave, a small village lying in a low deep creek of the sea, presents many charms to the admirer of the romantic and picturesque.
  • Heritage Coast Leaflet

    Heritage Coast Leaflet

    seo ih OBPartnership AONB Wight of Isle Hamstead Tennyson & ɀ The wildlife reflects the tranquil nature of the landscape – the wildlife and habitats that thrive Hamstead here are susceptible to disturbance, please respect this – please stay on the paths and avoid lighting fires or barbeques. Heritage Coasts ɀ Fossils are easy to find amongst the beach gravel. Look for flat, black coloured pieces of turtle The best and most valued parts of the coastlines of shell, after you have found these start looking for England and Wales have been nationally recognised teeth and bones. through the Heritage Coast accolade. ɀ Hamstead Heritage Coast Birds such as teal, curlew, snipe and little egrets Bouldnor Cliffs CA Wooden causeway at Newtown CA feed on a diet of insects, worms and crustaceans. The Hamstead Heritage Coast is situated on the north ɀ west of the Isle of Wight running from Thorness near A home to 95 different species, suggests that life ɀ The salt marsh at Newtown is a valuable habitat Cowes to Bouldnor near Yarmouth. A tranquil and in the mud of Newtown Harbour is relatively that supports a wide range of wildlife and is also a secretive coastline with inlets, estuaries and creeks; unaffected by human activities. superb natural resource for learning. wooded hinterland and gently sloping soft cliffs, this ɀ Some of the woodland is ancient and the woods beautiful area offers a haven for wildlife including red contain a huge biodiversity with many nationally squirrels and migratory birds. The ancient town of rare species such as red squirrels. Newtown and its National Nature Reserve also fall within this area.
  • North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan 2015 – 2020

    North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan 2015 – 2020

    North Yorkshire and Cleveland Heritage Coast Management Plan 2015 – 2020 Produced by the North Yorkshire and Cleveland Coastal Forum Partnership North York Moors National Park Authority, North Yorkshire County Council, Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, North Yorkshire and Cleveland Coastal Forum BACKGROUND 2 National Objectives 4 Heritage Coast Management 4 Management Resources 7 Planning Policy Context 8 Relationship with other strategies and EU Directives 9 Coastal Economy 10 CONSERVATION OF THE COASTLINE – National Objective 1 11 Landscape 11 Seascapes 12 Natural Environment 12 Geological Conservation 14 Coastal Villages and the Built Environment 14 Historic Environment 15 PUBLIC ENJOYMENT AND RECREATION – National Objective 2 16 Access 17 Interpretation and Tourism 18 Visitor, Transport and Traffi c Issues 19 IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF COASTAL WATERS AND BEACHES – Objective 3 20 Litter 20 Bathing Water Quality 20 Beach Awards 21 Emergency Planning 21 COASTAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT – National Objective 4 22 Land Use 22 Fishing 22 OTHER FACTORS INFLUENCING COASTAL MANAGEMENT 24 Conclusion 27 APPENDICES AND MAPS 29 - 44 Background Fig 1.1 The purpose of this organisations that develop 1. North Northumberland Management Plan is to the strategies and plans for 2. Durham provide a framework for these areas. management of the North 3. North Yorkshire & Cleveland The concept of Heritage Yorkshire and Cleveland 4. Flamborough Head Coasts was fi rst proposed Heritage Coast over the 5. Spurn Point in 1970. Today many of next fi ve years. It replaces 6. North Norfolk the fi nest stretches of the Heritage Coast 7. Suffolk undeveloped outstanding Strategy 2008 – 2013 and 8. South Foreland natural coastlines have builds on achievements 9.