Wade Wietgrefe, Planning Department RE: Appeal of Preliminary M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wade Wietgrefe, Planning Department RE: Appeal of Preliminary M DATE: April 25, 2013 TO: San Francisco Planning Commission FROM: Wade Wietgrefe, Planning Department RE: Appeal of Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration for Mission Dolores Park Rehabilitation and Improvement Project, Assessor’s Block 3586, Lot 001, Assessor’s Block 3599, Lot 001 Planning Department Case No. 2011.1355E HEARING DATE: May 2, 2013 An appeal has been received concerning a preliminary mitigated negative declaration for the following project: Case No. 2011.1355E – Mission Dolores Park Rehabilitation and Improvement Project: The project site is a 700,920-square-foot (16.1 acres) city park bounded by 18th Street to the north, Dolores Street to the east, 20th Street to the south, and Church Street to the west. The project site is within P (Public) Use District encompassing two parcels: Block 3599, Lot 001 and Block 3586, Lot 001. The proposed project would include rehabilitations and improvements throughout Mission Dolores Park including: relocating and/or refurbishing existing athletic courts; constructing a new multi-use court; removing an existing building and constructing three new buildings; removing and widening existing pathways; constructing new internal pathways; design changes at the edges and entry points of the Park; repaving the Muni tracks and minor Muni shelter stop alterations within the Park; and other Park-wide changes. This matter is calendared for public hearing on May 2, 2013. Enclosed are the appeal letter, the staff response, the amended mitigated negative declaration, and the draft motion. If you have any questions related to this project’s environmental evaluation, please contact me at (415) 575-9050 or [email protected]. Thank you Memo Appeal of Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration Executive Summary HEARING DATE: MAY 2, 2013 Date: April 25, 2013 Case No.: 2011.1355E Project Name: Mission Dolores Park Rehabilitation and Improvement Project Zoning: P (Public) Use District OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3586/001 & 3599/001 Project Sponsor: Jacob Gilchrist, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department (415) 581-2561 Staff Contact: Wade Wietgrefe – (415) 575-9050 Wade [email protected] PROPOSED COMMISSION ACTION: Consider whether to uphold staff’s decision to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), or whether to overturn that decision and require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report due to specified potential significant environmental effects of the proposed project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mission Dolores Park (project site or the Park) is a 16.1-acre city park bounded by 18th Street to the north, Dolores Street to the east, 20th Street to the south, and Church Street to the west. The proposed project would make project site rehabilitations and improvements to the athletic courts, buildings, open space, edges and entrance points, internal circulation system, and San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (Muni) system and other Park-wide changes. Athletic court changes would include reconfiguring existing athletic courts near their existing locations and constructing a new 7,200-square-foot multi-use court adjacent to the reconfigured athletic courts near the northwest corner of the Park. Building changes would include removing an existing 24-foot, six-inch-tall, 980-square-foot building and two 10-foot-tall, 220-square-foot portable storage containers located near the center of the Park and constructing three new buildings: a 12-foot-tall, 1,250-square-foot restroom located adjacent to the southeastern side of the existing playground; a 13-foot-tall, 1,270-square-foot restroom and 1,013-square-foot paved plaza located near the reconfigured athletic courts; and a 12-foot-tall, 3,365-square-foot operations building and 2,610- square-foot reinforced concrete platform with a crawl space built beneath the new location of the basketball court. The new operations building would be adjacent to a new 2,233-square-foot service yard and driveway from 18th Street. In addition, the proposed project would construct a new pissoir, located in the Park’s southwest quadrant. Open space changes would include reduction in approximately 0.8 acre of grass or turf from various aforementioned and below changes and providing new markings for two existing off-leash dog play areas. At various edges and entrance points to the Park, the proposed project would add new ADA accessible ramps, access paths to the internal circulation system, and design Appeal of PMND Executive Summary Case No. 2011.1355E May 2, 2013 Mission Dolores Park Rehabilitation and Improvement Project changes. Internal circulation changes would include removal and widening of existing and constructing new internal pathways, for a total net increase of 786 lineal feet. Changes to the Muni system would include repaving the Muni tracks within the Park, removing the chain link structure on the existing bridge over the tracks, placing planters over and adjacent to the abandoned Muni stop under the bridge and over the stairs leading to it, and relocating the Muni shelter for the Muni stop at 20th Street and Church Street 10 feet southwest of its current location. Other Park-wide rehabilitations and improvements would include vegetation removal and plantings, grading, upgrades to the drainage and irrigation system, and adding new signage, lighting, bicycle parking, benches, picnic tables, and trash receptacles. With project implementation, the project site would remain a city park and no change in hours of operation would occur. ISSUES: The Planning Department published a Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration (PMND) on March 13, 2013, and received an appeal letter from Claudia Praetel on April 2, 2013, appealing the determination to issue a MND. The appeal letter states that the PMND fails to adequately address the following issues: 1. The number of existing and proposed dog play areas at the Park 2. Loss of open space 3. Hazards 4. Aesthetics 5. Hydrology and Water Quality 6. Traffic and Noise 7. Parking Other comments, not appeals of the PMND, were received related to historic architectural resources. All of the issues raised in the Appeal Letter and other comments have been addressed in the attached materials, which include: 1. A draft Motion upholding the decision to issue a MND; 2. Exhibit A to draft Motion, Planning Department Response to the Appeal Letter; 3. Exhibit B - Appeal Letter; Comment Letter 4. Exhibit C – Memorandum for Operations Committee of the Recreation and Park Commission on January 5, 2005 and minutes from the full Recreation and Park Commission on January 20, 2005; and 5. Exhibit D - PMND and Initial Study as amended, with deletions shown in strikethrough and additions shown in underline. 2 Appeal of PMND Executive Summary Case No. 2011.1355E May 2, 2013 Mission Dolores Park Rehabilitation and Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the motion to uphold the Amended Mitigated Negative Declaration (AMND). No substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that a significant environmental effect may occur as a result of the project has been presented that would warrant preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. By upholding the AMND (as recommended), the Planning Commission would not prejudge or restrict its ability to consider whether the proposed project’s uses or design is consistent with the San Francisco General Plan. 3 Planning Commission Motion [XXXX] HEARING DATE: MAY 2, 2013 Hearing Date: May 2, 2013 Case No.: 2011.1355E Project Address: Mission Dolores Park Rehabilitation and Improvement Project Zoning: P (Public) Use District OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3586/001 & 3599/001 Project Sponsor: Jacob Gilchrist, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department (415) 581-2561 Staff Contact: Wade Wietgrefe – (415) 575-9050 [email protected] ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATED TO THE APPEAL OF THE PRELIMINARY MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, FILE NUMBER 2011.1355E FOR THE PROPOSED REHABILITAITON AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (“PROJECT”) AT MISSION DOLORES PARK. MOVED, that the San Francisco Planning Commission (hereinafter “Commission”) hereby AFFIRMS the decision to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration, based on the following findings: 1. On November 10, 2011, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, the Planning Department (“Department”) received an Environmental Evaluation Application form for the Project, in order that it might conduct an initial evaluation to determine whether the Project might have a significant impact on the environment. 2. On March 13, 2013, the Department determined that the Project, as proposed, could not have a significant effect on the environment. 3. On March 13, 2013, a notice of determination that a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be issued for the Project was duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration posted in the Department offices, and distributed all in accordance with law. 4. On April 2, 2013, an appeal of the decision to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration was timely filed by Claudia Praetel. 5. A staff memorandum, dated April 25, 2013, addresses and responds to all points raised by appellant in the appeal letter. That memorandum is attached as Exhibit A and staff’s findings as to those points are incorporated by reference
Recommended publications
  • H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
    IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Environmental Setting The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department maintains more than 200 parks, playgrounds, and open spaces throughout the City. The City’s park system also includes 15 recreation centers, nine swimming pools, five golf courses as well as tennis courts, ball diamonds, athletic fields and basketball courts. The Recreation and Park Department manages the Marina Yacht Harbor, Candlestick (Monster) Park, the San Francisco Zoo, and the Lake Merced Complex. In total, the Department currently owns and manages roughly 3,380 acres of parkland and open space. Together with other city agencies and state and federal open space properties within the city, about 6,360 acres of recreational resources (a variety of parks, walkways, landscaped areas, recreational facilities, playing fields and unmaintained open areas) serve San Francisco.172 San Franciscans also benefit from the Bay Area regional open spaces system. Regional resources include public open spaces managed by the East Bay Regional Park District in Alameda and Contra Costa counties; the National Park Service in Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties as well as state park and recreation areas throughout. In addition, thousands of acres of watershed and agricultural lands are preserved as open spaces by water and utility districts or in private ownership. The Bay Trail is a planned recreational corridor that, when complete, will encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays with a continuous 400-mile network of bicycling and hiking trails. It will connect the shoreline of all nine Bay Area counties, link 47 cities, and cross the major toll bridges in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Fitness FAQ (Updated: 8/23/20)
    Outdoor Fitness FAQ (Updated: 8/23/20) Outdoor Fitness FAQ Contents 1. What is the difference between small and large group fitness? .......................................................... 1 2. Can I apply for both the small group license and a large group permit?.............................................. 1 3. What is the fee for a small group license? ............................................................................................ 1 4. What certifications are required for a small group license? ................................................................ 2 5. What equipment can I bring to the workout and setup ....................................................................... 2 6. What is the fee for a large group permit? ............................................................................................ 2 7. Do all applicants for a large group permit, with and without studios, participate in the lottery? ....... 2 8. What locations are reservable under a large group permit? ................................................................ 2 9. What is a lottery slot? ........................................................................................................................... 2 10. How will the lottery for large group permits work? ............................................................................. 3 11. What is the cost for each slot? ............................................................................................................. 3 12. Are these classes still only
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Status Report Presented to the CITIZENS’ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
    2012 San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Status Report Presented to the CITIZENS’ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE May 2018 McLaren Bike Park Opening Prepared by: Antonio Guerra, Capital Finance Manager, Recreation and Parks 415‐581‐2554, [email protected] Ananda Hirsch, Capital Manager, Port of San Francisco 415‐274‐0442, [email protected] 2012 San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Status Report Presented to the CITIZENS’ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Program Budget Project Revenues 2 Project Expenditures 4 Project Schedules 6 Project Status Summaries 8 Citywide Programs 2930 Citywide Parks 3334 Executive Summary San Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Bond Program Budget $M Neighborhood Parks In November 2012, 71.6% of voters approved Proposition B for a Angelo J. Rossi Playground 8.2 $195 million General Obligation Bond, known as the 2012 San Balboa Park 7 Francisco Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond (the “bond”). Garfield Square 11 George Chri s topher Playground 2.8 This funding will continue a decade of investment in the aging Gilman Playground 1.8 infrastructure of our park system. Specifically, the bond Glen Ca nyon Park 12 allocates: Hyde & Turk Mini Park 1 Joe DiMaggio Playground 5.5 Margaret S. Hayward Playground 14 $99 million for Neighborhood Parks, selected based on Moscone Recreation Center 1.5 community feedback, their physical condition, the variety of Mountain Lake Park 2 amenities offered,
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Cultural District Draft Ordinance 2020
    FILE NO. ORDINANCE NO. 1 [Administrative Code - American Indian Cultural District] 2 3 Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish the American Indian Cultural 4 District in and around the northwestern quadrant of the Mission District; to require the 5 Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to submit written reports and 6 recommendations to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor describing the cultural 7 attributes of the District and proposing strategies to acknowledge and preserve the 8 cultural legacy of the District; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination 9 under the California Environmental Quality Act. 10 11 NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font. Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font. 12 Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times New Roman font. Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. 13 Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font. Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code 14 subsections or parts of tables. 15 16 Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: 17 18 Section 1. Findings. 19 (a) The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in this 20 ordinance comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources 21 Code Sections 21000 et seq.). Said determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of 22 Supervisors in File No. ___ and is incorporated herein by reference. The Board affirms this 23 determination. 24 (b) On _____________________, the Historic Preservation Commission held a duly 25 noticed hearing regarding the effects of this ordinance upon historic or cultural resources, and Supervisors Ronen; Mandelman, Brown, Haney, Fewer, Peskin, Mar, Safai BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 1 submitted a written report to the Board of Supervisors as required under Charter Section 2 4.135.
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Memorandum Union Square | San Francisco
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 166 GearyUNION SQUARE | SAN FRANCISCO A PRIDE-OF-OWNERSHIP COMMERCIAL ASSET ADJACENT TO SAN FRANCISCO’S FAMED UNION SQUARE 166 GEARY STREET exclusively listed by: Vincent Schwab Senior Managing Director Investments San Francisco Office [email protected] Cell: (415) 828-4372 Tel: (415) 625-2171 Fax: (415) 989-9220 UNION GLicense: CA 00840133 SQUARE SAN FRANCISCO CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Institutional Property Advisors, a Division of Marcus & Millichap (“IPA”) and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of IPA. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. IPA and Marcus & Millichap have not made any investigation, and make no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects
    [Show full text]
  • Pokemon Go Crawl Wednesday, July 20Th from 6:00 PM to 1:00 AM Market Street, San Francisco
    Pokemon Go Crawl Wednesday, July 20th from 6:00 PM to 1:00 AM Market Street, San Francisco As confirmed by several news sources including SF Gate, KRON 4, and KTVU, there is a “Pokemon Go Crawl” planned for tonight, Wednesday, July 20th beginning at 6:00 PM. Attendees plan to walk around the city and use their Pokemon Go mobile phone apps. According to SF Gate, the event is scattered through the city’s Mission district and South of Market neighborhood. The initial meeting spots are set for the Embarcadero near the Ferry Building and Mission Dolores Park. The Pokemon Go Crawl is being reported to end in the Mission District and turn into a bar crawl later in the evening ending at 1:00 AM, although specific bar locations are unknown. This event is planned on Facebook and it is NOT an official organized event. Even though the event has nearly 8,000 “attendees” on Facebook and another 28,000 “interested”, it is difficult to predict how many people will actually attend the event -- please be prepared for heavy congestion and possible delays in the locations listed below and plan accordingly. Please refer to the event page on Facebook for specific details. Starting Locations • Start Point A: Embarcadero near the Ferry Building • Start Point B: Mission Dolores Park Ending Location • Near 17th Street and Mission in the Mission District For a map of the route, please see SF Gate. Please note that this is only a suggested route – event attendees might choose their own start and end locations.
    [Show full text]
  • HELEN DILLER CIVIC CENTER PLAYGROUNDS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2325 Third Street #210 San Francisco CA 94107 415.503.0060 1 PROJECT GOALS
    ANDREA COCHRAN HELEN DILLER CIVIC CENTER PLAYGROUNDS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2325 Third Street #210 San Francisco CA 94107 415.503.0060 1 PROJECT GOALS Functional Considerations Design Considerations Playground Experience • Serve the hub of the City’s cultural life by engaging with cultural institutions • Create a timeliness anchor for one of the The design is inspired by nature with such as the Main Public Library, the Asian Art Museum, the San Francisco Symphony, great civic plazas in the world the goal of creating a warm and unique the San Francisco Ballet, and many other institutions that have active programming outdoor experience. Using extensive for children • Activate and bring the civic space to life planting and natural materials, the playgrounds aim to inspire: • Provide open space in an area where it is lacking to serve residents of the • Employ a unique, inspiring and artful Tenderloin, Civic Center, Hayes Valley and South of Market neighborhoods approach to playground design, to create a • surprise and delight playground unlike any other in the country • retreat and escape • Replace the existing 20 year old playgrounds and successfully serve current and • explore and roam future generations • experiment and investigate • challenge and thrill • Provide a safe place for children and families, in a way that is engaging and not isolating, including for example fencing design that is artistic and permeable ANDREA COCHRAN HELEN DILLER CIVIC CENTER PLAYGROUNDS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2325 Third Street #210 San Francisco CA 94107 415.503.0060 2 PROJECT TEAM Helen Diller Family Foundation The Helen Diller Family Foundation supports programs and institutions in both the Bay area and throughout the world with a focus on education, science and the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Séjour Culturel, Sportif Et Linguistique Au Lycée Français De San Francisco (LFSF)
    Séjour culturel, sportif et linguistique au lycée Français de San Francisco (LFSF) 2017-2018 / 20 élèves / 2 accompagnateurs Intérêt pédagogique : Dans le cadre des pratiques d’échange définies lors de la rédaction du projet d’établissement, nous souhaiterions monter un partenariat avec le Lycée Français de San Francisco, lycée d'affectation de notre ancienne collègue de JJR, Amélie Beaufour), il s'agirait d'élèves volontaires de la section sportive scolaire du lycée JJR, en échange avec les élèves de l’AES basket du LFSF et dans le cadre des cours d’EPS du LFSF. Une vingtaine d’élèves de JJR seraient accueillis dans des familles du LFSF, participeraient au cours et s’entraîneraient avec les élèves de l’AES. Il s’agit de la section basket de JJR, section importante au sein du lycée. On peut envisager un partenariat en deux temps, avec accueil des élèves de France cette année et un voyage à Paris pour les élèves du LFSF l’année suivante. Cet échange sera l’occasion de mener des échanges en amont et en aval de la rencontre, dans le cadre de l’AP par exemple mais aussi de la section sportive scolaire (contrats sportifs, décrochage et persévérance scolaire). Il s'agit surtout de permettre aux élèves du lycée de Sarcelles, issus de milieux dits fragiles voir défavorisés, de vivre une expérience extraordinaire et inédite dans une des villes les plus célèbres du monde. PROGRAMME SUR LA SEMAINE Jour 1 = lundi Arrivée à SF Accueil dans les familles Jour 2 = mardi Accueil au lycée + dans les classes jusqu’à 10h.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Your Free Cheat Sheet on All Dog Friendly Things to Do in San
    A COMPLETE DOG FRIENDLY GUIDE TO SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco is one of the top dog friendly cities in USA. As a resident dog mom, you can find all my favorite dog friendly things to do, see, eat and enjoy in this one handy cheat sheet. 1. Alta Plaza Park-has off leash play area 2. Alamo Square Park-home to the famous Painted Ladies S 3. Bernal heights park-get a fantastic view from Bernal Hill K 4. Grand View Park-the 16th Avenue Mosaic steps lead this park with great views R 5. Sutro Heights Park-right next to Ocean beach (dog friendly) A 6. Mountain Lake Park-has a tranquil lake 7. John Mclaren Park P 8. Buena Vista Park 9. Lincoln Park G 10. Strawberry Hill (Golden Gate Park)-waterfall and Chinese pagoda 11.Duboce Park O 12.Dolores Park D 13.Lafayette Park 14. Precita Park S 1. Grand View Park H W T E 2. Corona Heights Park I I W 3. Tank Hill Park V S 4. Billy Goat Hill C I K 5. Mt. Davidson Park R M A 6. Bernal Heights Park A P R 7. Buena Vista Park O G 8. Kite Hill N O A D 9. Ina Coolbrith Park P S 1. Sutro open space reserve Y L L I 2. Mt. Davidson D A N 3. Glen Canyon Park R E T I 4. Presidio of San Francisco-Ecology Trail, R G Batteries to Bluffs Trail, Lovers lane F N I 5. Coastal Trail at Land's End G K O I 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Clyde Wahrhaftig Collection
    Clyde Wahrhaftig Collection GOGA 35329 Golden Gate National Recreation Area Park Archives and Records Center ATTN: Park Archives and Records Center Presidio of San Francisco Building 201, Fort Mason Building 667 McDowell Ave. San Francisco, CA 94123 San Francisco, CA 94129 [Mailing Address] [Physical Address] go.nps.gov/gogacollections Phone: 415-561-2807 Fax: 415-441-1618 Introduction Golden Gate National Recreation Area Park Description Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), a unit of the National Park Service, was established by an Act of Congress on October 27, 1972. The 80,000-acre park encompasses a great diversity of cultural and natural resources in and around the Bay Area of San Francisco, California. It includes Muir Woods National Monument and Fort Point National Historic Site. The park holds almost five million three-dimensional and documentary artifacts dating from the time before European contact to the present. They are preserved and maintained for the public by the Division of Cultural Resources and Museum Management, which includes the Park Archives and Records Center (PARC). Park Archives and Records Center (PARC) Historical Note GGNRA and the sites within it have been collecting records since their inception. The PARC was established in 1994 to receive records and archival collections from the U.S. Army and the Presidio Army Museum after the closure of the Presidio of San Francisco as an Army base. The collections continue to grow through the donation of materials by private individuals, transfer of inactive park records by staff, and acquisition of relevant documentary materials. Scope of Collections The archival collections in the custody of the GGNRA document the history and activity of the various sites and groups associated with the park, described in the park’s Scope of Collection Statement (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017
    Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017 Hilltop Park Park Maintenance Standards Annual Report 2017 December 5, 2017 City & County of San Francisco Office of the Controller CITY PERFORMANCE City Services Auditor About City Performance The City Services Auditor (CSA) was created in the Office of the Controller through an amendment to the San Francisco City Charter that was approved by voters in November 2003. Within CSA, City Performance ensures the City’s financial integrity and promotes efficient, effective, and accountable government. City Performance Goals: • City departments make transparent, data-driven decisions in policy development and operational management. • City departments align programming with resources for greater efficiency and impact. • City departments have the tools they need to innovate, test, and learn. City Performance Team Peg Stevenson, Director Joe Lapka, Project Manager Alice Kassinger, Performance Analyst Emily Vontsolos, San Francisco Fellow San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department Project Sponsors Denny Kern, Director of Operations Lydia Zaverukha, Asset Manager For more information please contact: Joe Lapka Office of the Controller City and County of San Francisco (415) 554-7528 | [email protected] | http://sfcontroller.org/ Summary Under an amendment approved by voters in 2003, Appendix F of the City Charter requires the City Services Auditor Division (CSA) of the Controller’s Office to work in cooperation with the Recreation and Parks Department (RPD) to establish objective and measurable park maintenance standards, and to assess on an annual basis the extent to which the City’s parks meet those standards. In fiscal year 2016-2017 (FY17), the park evaluation program reached an important milestone with the development of a new database system, which enables evaluators to complete evaluations using a mobile device rather than a paper form.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco
    To Marin County Vallejo Ferry 101 Alcatraz Ferry (S.F. Bay Ferry) 27 30 54 FARE ZONE 2 (Hornblower) Golden S 70 72 101 Tiburon and Alameda- T a Gate FARE ZONE 1 i Larkspur Sausalito Ferry Oakland Ferry u b Bridge (S.F. Bay Ferry) s u Ferry (Blue & a r l o Gold Fleet) i t n o F F e e r r See map on reverse for continuation r r y y of routes in Marin County. Financial Fisherman’s Wharf District Routes Golden Gate Toll Plaza Fort Beach St via Battery St Mason Stockton St (inbound) Bridge Fillmore St Doyle Dr North PointTaylor St St via Sansome St Richardson Ave Jones St Toll Plaza Hyde St Marina Polk St (outbound) Sansome St The Embarcadero 27 30 54 70 Chestnut St Columbus Ave 27 54 72 72 101 101 Lombard St Presidio of Battery St Green St San Francisco Lyon St Union St Broadway 30 70 Ferry Ferry Building 1 Vallejo St Building Embarcadero & Divisadero St California 101 Jackson St Financial Embarcadero Market Pacific Clay St BART Station Medical Sacramento St District Ferry Service to Presidio Ave California Gough St Montgomery Center Laguna St St. Francis Larkspur, Sausalito Fillmore St BART Station Pacific Hospital Medical 101 Main St & Tiburon Powell St Beale St Lake St Center Baker St Van Ness Ave Sutter St Fremont St California St BART Station 1st St BART Spruce St Mt. Zion Geary Blvd Hospital O’Farrell St San Francisco Webster St Howard St Civic Hyde St Folsom St Bay Ferry Park Presidio Blvd Eddy St Geary Blvd Center Market StMission St Harrison St San Francisco Perry St 2nd St Kaiser 3rd St Brannan St Muni Arguello Blvd Golden Gate Ave Hospital SolTrans 4th St Oracle USF McAllister StCity Hall 5th St Park Fulton St 8th St Civic Center 6th St SOMA Salesforce Fell St BART Station Caltrain Pier 48 Transit Center Oak St 7th St Townsend St Fulton St St.
    [Show full text]