Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2012 Many-to-Many Contracts Heidi S. Bond Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty Part of the Contracts Commons Recommended Citation Heidi S. Bond, Many-to-Many Contracts, 86 TUL. L. REV. 519 (2012). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. TULANE LAW REVIEW VOL. 86 FEBRUARY 2012 No. 3 Many-to-Many Contracts Heidi S. Bond* In classical contract law the concept of one-to-one negotiations is familiar contracts where one party negotiates with the other ant eventually terms air offered and then accepted Mom modern times have made us comfortable with the notion of one-to-many contracts: contractstypically drafledbylarge corporationsand then disturbutedona take-it-or-leave-itbasis to the masses. ThisArticle dhscusses a thrd and ofcontract: a many-to-many contract which may look like the standard one-to-many contract in that it is composed of nonnegotiable language But when the arrangements between the partiesare further considered we will see that thepoint ofthe contractis not for oneparty to imposeits terms on anotherwithout question, but fora series ofparties to determine the best way to facilitate interchange. In such situations, inposig standarddoctrines of contractinterprrtation may frustrate the purpose of the contract entrely and for that reason, courts should appmach the interpretation of these contracts with Cam.