Slavery and Its Transformations: Prolegomena for a Global and Comparative Research Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Slavery and Its Transformations: Prolegomena for a Global and Comparative Research Agenda Comparative Studies in Society and History 2021;63(3):566–598. 0010-4175/21 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Common Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S0010417521000153 Slavery and Its Transformations: Prolegomena for a Global and Comparative Research Agenda MATTHIAS VAN ROSSUM International Institute of Social History (IISH), Amsterdam, The Netherlands SLAVERY REVISITED In public and academic domains, the history of slavery is still commonly understood through the lens of “classic” slavery in the early modern Atlantic, the nineteenth-century United States, and the Greco-Roman world. The majority of people throughout history who faced conditions of slavery, however, did not live in these classic slavery societies, but in societies with a much wider range of slavery regimes. This was the case before the abolition of the slave trade and legal slavery, especially in the early modern Indian Ocean and Indonesian Archipelago worlds where commercial or chattel slavery systems coexisted with a variety of other regimes. It remained the case after the abolitions, with the continuation of informal “modern” forms of slavery that today characterize the lives and working conditions of an estimated 40.3 million people, again particularly in South and Southeast Asia.1 The focus on “classic” formal slavery has in some ways limited our understanding of the adaptable and persistent nature of slavery regimes and their trajectories of development. The definitions developed for these classical histories have reinforced the often implicit and sometimes explicit assumption that the Atlantic history of chattel slavery was largely different and isolated from the wider histories of informal and also “modern” slaveries. This has de-historicized these other, informal forms of slavery as static and unchangeable; in the words of Michael Zeuske, it has led to “smaller slaveries” being “overlaid by hegemonic slaveries” and “conceptualized as ‘special forms.’”2 This has obscured our understanding of 1 International Labour Office, Global Estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage (Geneva, 2017). 2 Michael Zeuske, “Historiography and Research Problems of Slavery and the Slave Trade in a Global-Historical Perspective,” International Review of Social History 57 (2012): 87–111, 106. 566 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 30 Sep 2021 at 05:49:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417521000153 SLAVERY AND ITS TRANSFORMATIONS 567 the wider historical trajectories of different forms of slavery as they developed across the globe. It long allowed perceptions of the history of slavery to dominate that conceptualized its development in linear fashion, from an Atlantic expansion of slave trade and slavery to “enlightened” abolitions—in short, from “unfreedom” to “freedom.” Such linear conceptions are increasingly being critiqued by scholars who argue that we need to develop perspectives that account for the coexistence, interaction, decline, and emergence of different forms of slavery.3 There is a growing academic awareness of the need to break away from these classical confinements in order to develop more global and encompassing approaches that can better make sense of slavery’s long and complex history.4 There have been important advances in the rich historiography of Atlantic slavery, and in the expanding scholarship on slavery and slave trades in other parts of the world, but the shift remains incomplete. Though new key concepts of slaving and availability are gaining ground, the wider field of slavery studies has been pointing toward new horizons and proclaiming new dawns more than we have actually, systematically explored them. In 2012, Michael Zeuske called for the “analysis of slavery” to “be replaced by the history of slaveries, or of actors in these slaveries, in the tradition of ‘small’ and kin slaveries, which extend up to the present.” So far, this call has not yet been taken up energetically, although we can take hope from the fact that it is apparent in the agendas of some recently developed research centers.5 Thus, although global slavery studies stand on the shoulders of giants, from Nieboer to Patterson, in some respects we have only begun to develop a truly global and encompassing approach, one that addresses not only the enormous variety of slavery forms, but also slavery’s adaptability and persistence, from earliest times to the present. This article aims to contribute to the development of approaches that will improve our understandings of slavery as a persistent social and societal phenomenon from global and long-term perspectives. It explores what can be gained by reversing the dominant perspective, to develop an analytical framework and method that will allow us to integrate and compare the 3 E.g., Ulbe Bosma, The Making of a Periphery: How Island Southeast Asia Became a Mass Exporter of Labor (New York, 2019); Christian G. De Vito, Juliane Schiel, and Matthias van Rossum, “From Slavery to Precarity? Labour History Revisited, and Beyond,” Journal of Social History 54, 2 (2020): 644–62; Matthias van Rossum “Global Slavery, Local Bondage? Rethinking Slaveries as (Im)Mobilizing Regimes from the Case of the Dutch Indian Ocean and Indonesian Archipelago Worlds,” Journal of World History 31, 4 (2020): 693–727. 4 N. Lenski and C. M. Cameron, eds., What Is a Slave Society? The Practice of Slavery in Global Perspective (Cambridge, 2018); Michael Zeuske, Sklaverei: Eine Menschheitsgeschichte von der Steinzeit bis heute (Reclam Verlag, 2018); S. Conermann et al., “Objective: The Cluster of Excellence ‘Beyond Slavery and Freedom,’” Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies, https://www.dependency.uni-bonn.de/en/program/about (accessed 1 Aug. 2019). 5 E.g., The Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies (BCDSS). Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 30 Sep 2021 at 05:49:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417521000153 568 MATTHIAS VAN ROSSUM experiences of slavery “outside” of the Atlantic into a global history of slavery. That is, I argue that we need to reverse our perspective from that of the formal to that of the informal, from the Atlantic to the rest of the world, and away from binary understandings toward ones that are more connected and historical- contextual. I will begin by examining the possibilities for, and existing perspectives on, such a global approach and engaging the crucial but often glossed-over distinction between formal and informal regimes of slavery. I then take stock of the growing body of work dealing with slavery, especially in the Indian Ocean and Indonesian Archipelago worlds, to consider what can be gained by incorporating a wider spectrum of historical “slaveries” into our analyses and (re)conceptualizations, as Zeuske has rightfully argued for. This underscores the point that in order to make sense of the highly diverse, adaptable, and persistent nature of slavery we must develop a more systematic comparative agenda that lays the basis for a consistent rethinking of slaveries’ forms and developments. A third section of the article reflects upon what we can gain from renewed comparisons to explore the many- faceted, persistent history of slavery before, after, and beyond the trans- Atlantic slave trade. The fourth and fifth sections propose contours for a global and connecting approach for this comparative endeavor. They lay out the first steps toward an analytical model for rethinking the history and presence of slavery by analyzing slavery regimes and their trajectories through both contrasting comparisons and global connections. The development of such a model requires, first, that we understand both the commonalities and the distinguishing features of different forms of coerced labor regimes, or coercive asymmetrical dependencies. Different forms or regimes did not exist in isolation, but were connected and impacted by their interactions, one of the most important of which was via slave trade—the coerced transportation of people. Secondly, we need to account for these connections by looking at interactions and external impacts. These connections, in turn, remind us that neither the classic nor the smaller slaveries were stagnant, self-contained, or unchangeable. Over time, they developed and adapted along different paths, continuously influenced, again, by their interactions. Thirdly, the focus proposed here, on trajectories of slavery regimes, can help us integrate comparative and connecting aspects with their spatial and temporal dimensions. To enhance our understanding of slavery, we need to undertake a more inclusive, open investigation into the broader spectrum of slavery regimes. We must take an inductive approach that incorporates observations from in- depth, source-based analyses and that systematically compares slavery regimes to understand their characteristics, differences, and commonalities. We should avoid static units of analysis and top-down approaches and Downloaded from
Recommended publications
  • Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 1
    AI Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 1 Slavery Today Auriana Ojeda, Book Editor Daniel Leone, President Bonnie Szumski, Publisher Scott Barbour, Managing Editor Helen Cothran, Senior Editor San Diego • Detroit • New York • San Francisco • Cleveland New Haven, Conn. • Waterville, Maine • London • Munich AI Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 2 © 2004 by Greenhaven Press. Greenhaven Press is an imprint of The Gale Group, Inc., a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Greenhaven® and Thomson Learning™ are trademarks used herein under license. For more information, contact Greenhaven Press 27500 Drake Rd. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535 Or you can visit our Internet site at http://www.gale.com ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution or information storage retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher. Every effort has been made to trace the owners of copyrighted material. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Slavery today / Auriana Ojeda, book editor. p. cm. — (At issue) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7377-1614-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBN 0-7377-1613-4 (lib. bdg. : alk. paper) 1. Slavery. 2. Slave labor. I. Ojeda, Auriana, 1977– . II. At issue (San Diego, Calif.) HT871.S55 2004 306.3'62—dc21 2003051617 Printed in the United States of America AI Slavery Today INT 8/8/03 12:08 PM Page 3 Contents Page Introduction 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Relatively Poor People Not More Supportive of Redistribution? Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment Across 10 Countries
    Why are relatively poor people not more supportive of redistribution? Evidence from a randomized survey experiment across 10 countries By Christopher Hoy and Franziska Mager∗ We test a key assumption of conventional theories about prefer- ences for redistribution, which is that relatively poor people should be the most in favor of redistribution. We conduct a randomized survey experiment with over 30,000 participants across 10 coun- tries, half of whom are informed of their position in the national income distribution. Contrary to prevailing wisdom, people who are told they are relatively poorer than they thought are less con- cerned about inequality and are not more supportive of redistri- bution. This finding is driven by people using their own living standard as a \benchmark" for what they consider acceptable for others. JEL: D31, D63, D72, D83, O50, P16, H23 Keywords: Inequality, Social Mobility, Redistribution, Political Economy Social commentators and researchers struggle to explain why, despite growing inequality in many countries around the world, there is often relatively limited support among poorer ∗ Hoy: Australian National University, JG Crawford Building, 132 Lennox Crossing, Acton Australian Capital Territory 0200 Australia, [email protected]. Mager: Oxfam Great Britain, Oxfam Great Britain Oxfam House John Smith Drive Oxford OX4 2JY United Kingdom, [email protected]. The authors are very grateful for detailed comments provided on an earlier version of this paper by Michael Norton, Daniel Treisman, Elisabeth Bublitz, Edoardo Teso, Christopher Roth, Russell Toth, Eva Vivalt, Stephen Howes, Emma Samman, Mathias Sinning, Deborah Hardoon, David Hope, Alice Krozer, David McArthur and Ben Goldsmith.
    [Show full text]
  • Hari Nair 915-747-7544 | [email protected] | Web |
    Hari Nair 915-747-7544 j [email protected] j web j Appointments The University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX Assistant Professor, Department of Physics Sep. 2018 { present The University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, TX Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Physics Sep. 2017 { Sep. 2018 Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO, USA Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Physics Feb 2016 { Aug 2017 University of Johannesburg Johannesburg, South Africa Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Physics Oct 2014 { Dec 2015 JCNS-2 & Peter Grunberg Institute J¨ulich, Germany Scientific Staff, Forschungszentrum J¨ulichGmbH Apr 2011 { Jul2014 Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Physics Feb 2011 { Apr 2011 Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India Researcher, Department of Physics Oct 2009 { Sep 2010 Visiting positions Universitat zu K¨oln K¨oln,Germany Researcher, II. Physikalisches Institut Oct 2010 { Jan 2011 Forschungszentrum J¨ulich GmbH J¨ulich, Germany Visiting Researcher, Institut fur Festk¨orperforschung (IFF) Jun 2009 { Sep 2009 Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids Dresden, Germany Visiting Researcher May 2008 { Jul 2008 Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research Dresden, Germany Visiting Researcher Oct 2006 { Dec 2006 Education Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India PhD in experimental condensed matter physics Jun. 2002 { Dec. 2009 Mahatma Gandhi University Kerala, India MSc in Physics from C. M. S. College 2000 { 2002 Kerala University Kerala, India BSc in Physics from T. K. M. College 1997 { 2000 Grants/ Awards/ Honours 2020: (1) coPI in National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation program award to UTEP to acquire an MPMS.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Abolition of Slavery: a Comparative Approach
    Religions and the abolition of slavery - a comparative approach William G. Clarence-Smith Economic historians tend to see religion as justifying servitude, or perhaps as ameliorating the conditions of slaves and serving to make abolition acceptable, but rarely as a causative factor in the evolution of the ‘peculiar institution.’ In the hallowed traditions, slavery emerges from scarcity of labour and abundance of land. This may be a mistake. If culture is to humans what water is to fish, the relationship between slavery and religion might be stood on its head. It takes a culture that sees certain human beings as chattels, or livestock, for labour to be structured in particular ways. If religions profoundly affected labour opportunities in societies, it becomes all the more important to understand how perceptions of slavery differed and changed. It is customary to draw a distinction between Christian sensitivity to slavery, and the ingrained conservatism of other faiths, but all world religions have wrestled with the problem of slavery. Moreover, all have hesitated between sanctioning and condemning the 'embarrassing institution.' Acceptance of slavery lasted for centuries, and yet went hand in hand with doubts, criticisms, and occasional outright condemnations. Hinduism The roots of slavery stretch back to the earliest Hindu texts, and belief in reincarnation led to the interpretation of slavery as retribution for evil deeds in an earlier life. Servile status originated chiefly from capture in war, birth to a bondwoman, sale of self and children, debt, or judicial procedures. Caste and slavery overlapped considerably, but were far from being identical. Brahmins tried to have themselves exempted from servitude, and more generally to ensure that no slave should belong to 1 someone from a lower caste.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Accountability and Preventing Reoccurrence: Addressing Conflict- Related Sexual Slavery Through the Women, Peace, and Se
    SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND PREVENTING REOCCURRENCE: ADDRESSING CONFLICT- RELATED SEXUAL SLAVERY THROUGH THE WOMEN, PEACE, AND SECURITY AGENDA A publication of the Global Network of Women Peacebuilders, funded by the Korean International Cooperation Agency © 2020 Global Network of Women Peacebuilders Printed in New York, New York, USA Lead Author and Overall Project Coordinator Mallika Iyer Co-Authors Dr. Heisoo Shin, Jihyun Kim, Jenaina Irani, and Heela Yoon Case Study Authors Iraq: Anonymous Researcher* Uganda: Twijukireho Edwins Ahumuza World War Two in Asia and the Pacific: Dr. Heisoo Shin and Jihyun Kim Peer Reviewer and Editor Eleonore Veillet-Chowdhury Project Advisor Mavic Cabrera Balleza Layout and Design Katrina Leclerc *The author preferred to remain anonymous due to safety concerns. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Please feel free to use and cite parts of this publication, crediting the authors and the Global Network of Women Peacebuilders. Acknowledgments We thank the survivors of conflict-related sexual slavery, women’s rights activists, local and national government officials, human rights lawyers, and grassroots peacebuilders in South Korea, Uganda, and Iraq whose generous participation in focus group discussions and key informant interviews made this research possible. We hope that this research will inform and strengthen the global response to conflict-related sexual slavery and survivor- centered implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Agenda. Special thanks goes to global policymakers who provided valuable insights to this research through key informant interviews. We are grateful to the Korean International Cooperation Agency for their generous support, continuous partnership, and valuable inputs into the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Community List
    ANNEXURE - III LIST OF COMMUNITIES I. SCHEDULED TRIB ES II. SCHEDULED CASTES Code Code No. No. 1 Adiyan 2 Adi Dravida 2 Aranadan 3 Adi Karnataka 3 Eravallan 4 Ajila 4 Irular 6 Ayyanavar (in Kanyakumari District and 5 Kadar Shenkottah Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 6 Kammara (excluding Kanyakumari District and 7 Baira Shenkottah Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 8 Bakuda 7 Kanikaran, Kanikkar (in Kanyakumari District 9 Bandi and Shenkottah Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 10 Bellara 8 Kaniyan, Kanyan 11 Bharatar (in Kanyakumari District and Shenkottah 9 Kattunayakan Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 10 Kochu Velan 13 Chalavadi 11 Konda Kapus 14 Chamar, Muchi 12 Kondareddis 15 Chandala 13 Koraga 16 Cheruman 14 Kota (excluding Kanyakumari District and 17 Devendrakulathan Shenkottah Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 18 Dom, Dombara, Paidi, Pano 15 Kudiya, Melakudi 19 Domban 16 Kurichchan 20 Godagali 17 Kurumbas (in the Nilgiris District) 21 Godda 18 Kurumans 22 Gosangi 19 Maha Malasar 23 Holeya 20 Malai Arayan 24 Jaggali 21 Malai Pandaram 25 Jambuvulu 22 Malai Vedan 26 Kadaiyan 23 Malakkuravan 27 Kakkalan (in Kanyakumari District and Shenkottah 24 Malasar Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 25 Malayali (in Dharmapuri, North Arcot, 28 Kalladi Pudukkottai, Salem, South Arcot and 29 Kanakkan, Padanna (in the Nilgiris District) Tiruchirapalli Districts) 30 Karimpalan 26 Malayakandi 31 Kavara (in Kanyakumari District and Shenkottah 27 Mannan Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 28 Mudugar, Muduvan 32 Koliyan 29 Muthuvan 33 Koosa 30 Pallayan 34 Kootan, Koodan (in Kanyakumari District and 31 Palliyan Shenkottah Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 32 Palliyar 35 Kudumban 33 Paniyan 36 Kuravan, Sidhanar 34 Sholaga 39 Maila 35 Toda (excluding Kanyakumari District and 40 Mala Shenkottah Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 41 Mannan (in Kanyakumari District and Shenkottah 36 Uraly Taluk of Tirunelveli District) 42 Mavilan 43 Moger 44 Mundala 45 Nalakeyava Code III (A).
    [Show full text]
  • Business Integrity Tool Kit - Modern Slavery Prepared By: Khoirun Mumpuni
    Business Integrity Tool Kit - Modern Slavery Prepared by: Khoirun Mumpuni WHAT IS MODERN SLAVERY? Modern slavery takes various forms and affects all ages of people, gender and races all over the world which include forced labour, debt bondage, forced marriage, human traficking, sexual exploitation and children slavery1. It is a serious violation of human and labour rights which is classified as a criminal offence. This condition is observed in many types of economic activities include domestic work, agriculture, manufacturing etc. and in every country across the world. According to the International Labour Organisation (ILO)2, there are currently 40.3 million people are enslaved accross the world, which most cases happening in Asia-Pacific region with the total of 30.4 million people are in slavery. Other modern slavery in numbers: ​ ​ ● 10 million children are in slavery across the world ● 24.9 million people in forced labour ● 15.4 million people in forced marriage ● 4.8 million people in forced sexual exploitation ● 99% of people trafficked for sexual exploitation are women and girls ● 4.1 million people in slavery are exploited by governments ● US$ 150 billion – illegal profits forced labour in the private economy generates per year Modern Slavery in numbers in Asia Pacific Region can more be seen in: ● https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/regional-analysis/asia-and-the-p acific/ ● https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@ipec/documents/publicati on/wcms_597873.pdf 1 See: Global estimates of modern slavery: forced labour and forced marriage, ILO, Geneva, ​ September 2017, http://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_575479/lang--en/index.htm (accessed 1 October 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • MODERN SLAVERY in EAST ASIA Protecting the Rights and Promoting the Autonomy of Domestic Migrant Workers from Indonesia and the Philippines
    February 2016 MODERN SLAVERY IN EAST ASIA Protecting the rights and promoting the autonomy of domestic migrant workers from Indonesia and the Philippines www.seefar.org This publication is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ The research for the study and publication of this report has been made possible thanks to the support of the Macquarie Group Foundation Protecting rights and promoting autonomy of migrant domestic workers OVER Hong Kong Indonesia 4,000 Philippines respondents About Average length of service 4.5 yrs (Filipinos) Singapore countries 12 MONTH and 4 yrs (Indonesia) 4 research study 80% More than 40% are women 2 Million Context of the world’s estimated Indonesians and Filipinos are 52 Million domestic workers overseas at any given point as in Asia Pacific. migrant domestic workers Exploitation and rights violations occur during all phases of labour migration 97% 71 49 32 77 Percent Percent Percent Percent Migrate for experienced exploitation suffer limited freedom of have identity and travel Returned Migrants still want economic reasons during the recruitment process movement documents confiscated to go back overseas Findings Overcoming misconceptions Economically vulnerable There is a misconception between An average worker spends 63% of respondents faced 4 months of a 2 year contract exploitive practices while foreigners and migrants alike that working abroad paying back initial debts women who choose to migrate to work overseas are saving and accumulating wealth. This is not the case. They are participating in an overseas labour market to The research for the study and publication of this report has been made maintain a subsistence income.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Studies and Contingency
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Melissa Fernández Arrigoitia, Gwendolyn Beetham, Cara E. Jones, and Sekile Nzinga-Johnson Women’s studies and contingency: between exploitation and resistance Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Fernández Arrigoitia, Melissa, Beetham, Gwendolyn, Jones, Cara E. and Nzinga- Johnson, Sekile (2015) Women’s studies and contingency: between exploitation and resistance. Feminist Formations, 27 (3). pp. 81-113. ISSN 1040-0656 DOI: 10.1353/ff.2016.0000 © 2015 Feminist Formations This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64149/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Women’s Studies and Contingency: Between Exploitation and Resistance Melissa Fernández Arrigoitia, Gwendolyn Beetham, Cara E. Jones, and Sekile Nzinga-Johnson We know the numbers: 76 percent of faculty in US universities is contingent. We are captivated by the viral news pieces—“Thesis Hatement,” “Academia’s Indentured Servants,” “Death of a Professor,” and “The PhD Now Comes with Food Stamps”— and we follow hashtags on Twitter—#NotYourAdjunctSidekick.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Trafficking in Asia: the Impact of Policy, Economic Opportunity, and Globalization" (2019)
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2019 Sex Trafficking in Asia: The Impact ofolicy P , Economic Opportunity, and Globalization Emma C. M. Lavoie Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Asian Studies Commons, East Asian Languages and Societies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Lavoie, Emma C. M., "Sex Trafficking in Asia: The Impact of Policy, Economic Opportunity, and Globalization" (2019). Student Publications. 747. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/747 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/747 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sex Trafficking in Asia: The Impact ofolicy P , Economic Opportunity, and Globalization Abstract This paper examines the prevalence of sex trafficking in Asia and considers factors that make it stand out among other regions of the world. It explains the consequences of poorly designed policy on sex trafficking, using the Chinese One Childolicy P as an example. It also looks at the lack of economic opportunity in countries like Thailand and Cambodia, that can incentivize the selling of women to traffickers. Finally, this paper considers the role of globalization in making the transport of sex trafficking victims easier as well as the effect of modern communication technologies on trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • Slave Trading and Slavery in the Dutch Colonial Empire: a Global Comparison
    rik Van WELie Slave Trading and Slavery in the Dutch Colonial Empire: A Global Comparison INTRODUCTION From the early seventeenth to the mid-nineteenth century, slavery played a fundamental role in the Dutch colonial empire.1 All overseas possessions of the Dutch depended in varying degrees on the labor of slaves who were imported from diverse and often remote areas. Over the past decades numer- ous academic publications have shed light on the history of the Dutch Atlantic slave trade and of slavery in the Dutch Americas.2 These scholarly contribu- tions, in combination with the social and political activism of the descen- dants of Caribbean slaves, have helped to bring the subject of slavery into the national public debate. The ongoing discussions about an official apology for the Dutch role in slavery, the erection of monuments to commemorate that history, and the inclusion of some of these topics in the first national history canon are all testimony to this increased attention for a troubled past.3 To some this recent focus on the negative aspects of Dutch colonial history has already gone too far, as they summon the country’s glorious past to instill a 1. I would like to thank David Eltis, Pieter Emmer, Henk den Heijer, Han Jordaan, Gerrit Knaap, Gert Oostindie, Alex van Stipriaan, Jelmer Vos, and the anonymous reviewers of the New West Indian Guide for their many insightful comments. As usual, the author remains entirely responsible for any errors. This article is an abbreviated version of a chapter writ- ten for the “Migration and Culture in the Dutch Colonial World” project at KITLV.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL LIST of Obcs for the STATE of TAMILNADU Entry No
    CENTRAL LIST OF OBC FOR THE STATE OF TAMILNADU E C/Cmm Rsoluti No. & da N. Agamudayar including 12011/68/93-BCC(C ) dt 10.09.93 1 Thozhu or Thuluva Vellala Alwar, -do- Azhavar and Alavar 2 (in Kanniyakumari district and Sheoncottah Taulk of Tirunelveli district ) Ambalakarar, -do- 3 Ambalakaran 4 Andi pandaram -do- Arayar, -do- Arayan, 5 Nulayar (in Kanniyakumari district and Shencottah taluk of Tirunelveli district) 6 Archakari Vellala -do- Aryavathi -do- 7 (in Kanniyakumari district and Shencottah taluk of Tirunelveli district) Attur Kilnad Koravar (in Salem, South 12011/68/93-BCC(C ) dt 10.09.93 Arcot, 12011/21/95-BCC dt 15.05.95 8 Ramanathapuram Kamarajar and Pasumpon Muthuramadigam district) 9 Attur Melnad Koravar (in Salem district) -do- 10 Badagar -do- Bestha -do- 11 Siviar 12 Bhatraju (other than Kshatriya Raju) -do- 13 Billava -do- 14 Bondil -do- 15 Boyar -do- Oddar (including 12011/68/93-BCC(C ) dt 10.09.93 Boya, 12011/21/95-BCC dt 15.05.95 Donga Boya, Gorrela Dodda Boya Kalvathila Boya, 16 Pedda Boya, Oddar, Kal Oddar Nellorepet Oddar and Sooramari Oddar) 17 Chakkala -do- Changayampadi -do- 18 Koravar (In North Arcot District) Chavalakarar 12011/68/93-BCC(C ) dt 10.09.93 19 (in Kanniyakumari district and Shencottah 12011/21/95-BCC dt 15.05.95 taluk of Tirunelveli district) Chettu or Chetty (including 12011/68/93-BCC(C ) dt 10.09.93 Kottar Chetty, 12011/21/95-BCC dt 15.05.95 Elur Chetty, Pathira Chetty 20 Valayal Chetty Pudukkadai Chetty) (in Kanniyakumari district and Shencottah taluk of Tirunelveli district) C.K.
    [Show full text]