WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 2007

Home , 1994 WTA Tour, 2006 Hopman Cup, 2006 WTA Tour, 2007 Australian Open, 2007 Hopman Cup, 2007 Rogers Cup

Contents Introduction...... 1 Player Results Characterized ...... 95 Fraction of Points Earned at Slams...... 95 2007 In Review: The Top Players . . . . .2 Ratio of Round to Quality Points ...... 98 The Final Top Thirty ...... 2 Strength of Schedule (based on tournament tier)...... 101 The Beginning Top Twenty-Five ...... 3 Strength of Schedule (based on actual strength) ...... 102 Summary of Changes, Beginning to End of 2007...... 3 Average Round Reached ...... 104 Top Players Analysed ...... 4 Quality of Wins...... 106 All the Players in the Top Ten in 2007: Quality of Losses...... 110 The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA Statistics...... 4 Success During the First and Second Half of the Year 113 Short Summary: The Top Eighty...... 5 Surface Preferences ...... 117 Rankings Month By Month ...... 7 Player Surface Biases ...... 118 Tournament Results ...... 8 Alternate Rankings ...... 120 Tournament Winners by Date (High-Tier Events) ...... 8 Basic Alternate Ranking Data...... 120 Tournament Winners by Type — High-Tier Events) .....9 2005 Rankings: Best 17 Rankings w/Quality Points.122 Winners at Smaller Tournaments (Tier III, IV)...... 10 1996 Ranking System: The Divisor...... 123 1996 Ranking System Updated: Declining Divisor ..125 Full Summary of Tournament Results...... 11 2007 Rankings with Triple Quality Points...... 127 Title Defences ...... 32 1996-Style Divisor with Triple Quality Points...... 128 Tournament Strengths ...... 33 Declining Divisor with Triple Quality Points...... 129 Tournament Strength versus Tournament Points...... 37 Quality Points per Tournament...... 130 Tough Bills and Cheap Thrills ...... 39 Tournament Strength-Based Rankings...... 131 Adjusted Strength per Tournament Ranking...... 133 Player Results ...... 41 Idealized Won/Lost...... 135 The “Majors Ranking” ...... 137 Upsets...... 62 The Majors Ranking 2000Ð2007 (Graph)...... 139 The 100 Biggest Upsets of 2007 ...... 62 Worst Losses ...... 65 Doubles ...... 140 Worst Losses (based on year-end 2007 rankings)...... 66 2007 In Review: The Top Doubles Players . . .140 The Final Top Twenty-Five Doubles Players ...... 140 Winning and Losing Streaks ...... 67 The Beginning Doubles Top Twenty-Five...... 141 The Ten Longest Winning Streaks by Top Players...... 70 Summary of Doubles Changes ...... 141 The Ten Longest Losing Streaks by Top Players ...... 70 Top Doubles Players Analysed ...... 142 Surface Results ...... 71 All the Players in the Doubles Top Ten in 2007: Clay ...... 71 The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA Statistics .142 Total Wins on Clay ...... 75 Short Summary: The Doubles Top Fifty . . . . .143 Winning Percent on Clay ...... 76 Doubles Rankings Month By Month ...... 145 Grass ...... 77 Team Doubles Titles, Most to Least ...... 146 Total Wins on Grass ...... 78 Individual Doubles Titles, Most to Least. . . . .148 Winning Percent on Grass ...... 79 Doubles Tournament Strengths ...... 150 Hardcourts (Outdoor)...... 80 Doubles Results ...... 152 Total Wins on Hard ...... 83 Winning Percent on Hard...... 84 Doubles Upsets...... 170 The 50 Biggest Doubles Upsets of 2007 ...... 170 Indoor Courts (Carpet and Indoor Hard) ...... 85 Doubles Team Winning Percentage...... 172 Total Wins Indoors ...... 88 Winning Percent Indoors...... 89 Alternate Doubles Rankings ...... 173 Doubles 2005 Rankings: Best 11 Rankings with Quality Surface Balance ...... 90 Points...... 173 Percentage of Wins on Each Surface ...... 90 Doubles 1996 Ranking System: The Divisor...... 174 Percentage of Points on Each Surface ...... 92 Doubles 1996 Ranking System Updated: The Declining Divisor ...... 175

Contents Doubles 2006 Rankings w/ Quintuple Quality Points 176 Singles Winners, Finalists, Semifinalists. . . . .207 Doubles 1996-Style Divisor Rankings with Triple Quality Career Results for Leading Players ...... 222 Points ...... 177 Career Results — Singles...... 222 Doubles Declining Divisor with Triple Quality Points 178 Doubles Quality Points per Tournament...... 179 Slam History...... 249 Doubles Tournament Strength-Based Rankings...... 180 Singles Slam Winners...... 249 Doubles Adjusted Strength per Tournament Ranking 181 Doubles Slam Winners...... 252 Doubles “Majors Ranking” — Team...... 182 Men’s Singles Slam Winners...... 255 Doubles “Majors Ranking” — Individual ...... 183 Men’s Doubles Slam Winners...... 258 Singles and Doubles at the Same Slam (Open Era)..262 Miscellaneous Statistics ...... 184 Doubles Slams and Partners...... 263 Statistics About Tournaments...... 184 Grand Slams and Career Slams...... 268 Total Ranked Players, 1999Ð2007 ...... 185 Total Slam Victories, Open Era ...... 270 The Busiest Players on the Tour ...... 186 Players and Titles ...... 271 Total Events Played...... 186 Players with Titles, Year by Year...... 271 Total Matches Played by Top Players...... 188 Most Titles, Year By Year ...... 274 Number of Events Played by the Top 100 ...... 190 Five Or More Titles in a Year...... 275 Total Matches Played by the Top 30 Doubles Players 193 Surface Sweeps — Singles (Since 1990) ...... 276 Number of Events Played By the Top Doubles Players 194 Career Surface Sweeps/Singles...... 278 Injuries ...... 196 Career Grand Surface Sweep ...... 279 WTA Tour History ...... 197 Year-End Top Players ...... 280 Year-End Top Eight, with Years, Since 1975...... 280 Who Won What Summary — Singles...... 197 Total Years Ended At Each Rank, Since 1975 ...... 282 Who Won What Summary — Doubles...... 198 Strongest Career Rankings Showings...... 284 Who Won What — History of Tournaments. .200 Total Years in the Top Eight ...... 285 Who Won What Part 1: 2002Ð2007 ...... 200 Doubles Wins & Partners...... 286 Who Won What Part 2: 1996Ð2002 ...... 201 Winningest Doubles Player, From 1983...... 286 Who Won What Part 3: 1990Ð1996 ...... 202 Who Won What Part 4: 1986Ð1989 ...... 203 Index ...... 288 Who Won What Part 5: 1983Ð1986 ...... 204 Active Leaders in Titles (Singles/Doubles) ...... 206

Introduction I’m not going to give you a big introduction this year. Between a shorter-than-usual off season and a call for jury duty in December, I had to put this Statistical Abstract together in rather a rush. This meant, first, increasing my reliance on data extracted from my database and not cross-checked, and second, less time spent looking for peculiarities in the final product. Still, the general purpose should be served. This is an attempt to fill in the details that the WTA’s handful of statistics about players do not supply. These are not player biographies; the WTA supplies those. They aren’t complete results for all players; the ITF is the source for those. The Statistical Abstract is, instead, an attempt to demonstrate, via numbers, the real nature of some players’ results. Plus there is a certain amount of history, to try to put it all in perspective. In one sense, there was less need of the Abstract this year than in some years. When the contest for year- end #1 was close, the Abstract sometimes gave different perspectives on the matter (there was one year when three different players were #1 in some statistical models). That doesn’t come up this year; there is no doubt about who was #1 in 2007. It was Justine Hénin by a landslide — indeed, she had a year for the ages; her winning percentage (94%) was the best since Steffi Graf’s miracle years in the late Nineties; the only season since then that has been comparable is Martina Hingis’s 1997. But the #2? The WTA says it’s Svetlana Kuznetsova. The statistics pretty consistently say it’s someone else — though they don’t agree on the Someone Else. Adding up every statistic, I think the best candidate is probably Ana Ivanovic; she has the best combined score in the most important statistics. But it’s certainly a point that could be debated. Readers of past Statistical Abstracts may note that the Alternate Rankings section has been somewhat modified. This was conditioned by a change in the WTA rankings — a very silly one. They arbitrarily cranked up the points for most events by roughly a third (e.g. a Slam title, which was worth 700 points in 2006, increased to 1000 points in 2007). This was fundamentally silly — since they increased everything by the same ratio, they were just puffing up everyone’s point totals (as if having 5000 inflated points make a player better than having 3500 uninflated points!). It also caused problems through the year, because new events were worth more than the old events they replaced. But, at the end of the year, most of that washed out as far as the Tour was concerned: Everybody had nice shiny new-style inflated points, and who cares what the “exchange rate” is. It made a problem for me, though: The Alternate Rankings were built around a certain set of ratios of round and quality points. The inflation of round points upset that ratio. So the alternate rankings have been retooled to get back to the same approximate ratio of points. A point on nomenclature: Hénin has now changed her name twice (Hénin to Hénin-Hardenne back to Hénin). Other players, like Anna Smasnova/Pistolesi/Smashnova-Pistolesi/Smashnova-again, have done the same thing. I have adopted the policy of calling a player what she was called at the time of her results (e.g. Hénin is listed as “Hénin” on titles she won in 2007 but “Hénin-Hardenne” for results in 2006), but I try to index mentions under current names (Hénin, Smashnova, etc.). Incidentally, about the index: I make no attempt to index every time a player’s name occurs in this book (or else you’d find several hundred index entries for every top player). This strikes me as making the index less useful, not more so. I index cases where a player is mentioned for a significant reason (e.g. being near the top or the bottom of some particular ranking list. The idea is to let you find out what is most noteworthy about that player.

You may distribute this document freely. Print it, give someone a copy, cite it in any way you wish. There are only two restrictions: I ask that you not modify it (if you want to add your own statistics, do so and cite this work rather than changing this original), and you may not charge for copies of it (beyond nominal costs of duplication). In return, I ask that you remember that I’m giving this away at no charge, so please forgive any errors — which are certainly mine, since I did the whole thing!

Robert B. Waltz December 2007

2007 In Review: The Top Players The Final Top Thirty Because we can’t cover every tennis pro, we have to devote our attention to relatively few. For obvious reasons, the WTA’s Top 30 are the most important of those few. The list below summarizes those players. In addition to listing the players, this table shows a few things about them. “Best 17 score” and “Number of Tournaments” are from the WTA, used to calculate their rankings. “Point gap from the preceding” shows how many points a player would need to earn to overtake the player above her. So Srebotnik, a mere one point behind #26 Radwanska, is a very strong #27, but Kuznetsova, 2430 points behind #1 Hénin, is a very weak #2. “Began year at” is the player’s ranking twelve months earlier. The final column shows how much each player’s ranking has changed in the interim. Note that a negative number in that column indicates an upward move; smaller numbers are better. We had some pretty amazing moves this year: Szavay, up 187 ranking spots, and Serena Williams, up 88. It probably goes without saying that such moves are exceptionally large.! Final Player Best 17 Number of Point Gap from Began Net Rank Name Score Tournaments Preceding Year At Change 1 Hénin, Justine 6155 15 1 0 2Kuznetsova, Svetlana 3725 19 2430 4 -2 3 Jankovic, Jelena 3475 28 250 12 -9 4Ivanovic, Ana 3461 20 14 14 -10 5 Sharapova, Maria 2956 13 505 2 3 6 Chakvetadze, Anna 2935 22 21 13 -7 7Williams, Serena 2802 12 133 95 -88 8Williams, Venus 2470 14 332 48 -40 9 Hantuchova, Daniela 2367 27 103 18 -9 10 Bartoli, Marion 2191 31 176 17 -7 11 Dementieva, Elena 1985 21 206 8 3 12 Vaidisova, Nicole 1942 14 43 10 2 13 Golovin, Tatiana 1882 20 60 22 -9 14 Petrova, Nadia 1862 19 20 6 8 15 Saﬁna, Dinara 1830 23 32 11 4 16 Schnyder, Patty 1806 26 24 9 7 17 Peer, Shahar 1675 22 131 20 -3 18 Mauresmo, Amélie 1538 17 137 3 15 19 Hingis, Martina 1372 15 166 7 12 20 Szavay, Agnes 1331.5 18 40.5 207 -187 21 Bammer, Sybille 1323 26 8.5 53 -32 22 Bondarenko, Alona 1171 25 152 32 -10 23 Zvonareva, Vera 1117 16 54 24 -1 24 Safarova, Lucie 1112 16 5 41 -17 25 Schiavone, Francesca 1046 23 66 15 10 26 Radwanska, Agnieszka 962 23 84 57 -31 27 Srebotnik, Katarina 961 24 1 23 4 28 Razzano, Virginie 956 23 5 87 -59 29 Li Na 937 15 19 21 8 30 Azarenka, Victoria 928 18 9 92 -62

The Beginning Top Twenty-Five Rank Name 2007 Final Ranking Net Change 1 Hénin-Hardenne, Justine 1 0 2 Sharapova, Maria 5 3 3Mauresmo, Amelie 18 15 4Kuznetsova, Svetlana 2 -2 5 Clijsters, Kim not ranked/retired NR 6 Petrova, Nadia 14 8 7 Hingis, Martina 19 12 8 Dementieva, Elena 11 3 9 Schnyder, Patty 16 7 10 Vaidisova, Nicole 12 2 11 Saﬁna, Dinara 15 4 12 Jankovic, Jelena 4 -8 13 Chakvetadze, Anna 6 -7 14 Ivanovic, Ana 4 -10 15 Schiavone, Francesca 25 10 16 Myskina, Anastasia 1065 1049 17 Bartoli, Marion 10 -7 18 Hantuchova, Daniela 9 -9 19 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 205 186 20 Peer, Shahar 17 -3 21 Li Na 29 8 22 Golovin, Tatiana 13 -9 23 Srebotnik, Katarina 27 4 24 Zvonareva, Vera 23 -1 25 Davenport, Lindsay 73 48 Summary of Changes, Beginning to End of 2007 Ranking Gains: From outside the Top 20 into the Top 20: Golovin, Szavay, S. Williams, V. Williams (total of 4) From outside the Top 20 into the Top 10: S. Williams, V. Williams (total of 2) From the Top 20 into the Top 10: Bartoli, Chakvetadze, Hantuchova Ivanovic, Jankovic (total of 5) Ranking Losses: Dropping out of the Top 20: (Clijsters), Grönefeld, Myskina, Schiavone (total of 4) Dropping out of the Top 10 but remaining Top 20: Dementieva, Hingis, Mauresmo, Petrova, Schnyder, Vaidisova (total of 6) Dropping from the Top 10 to below the Top 20: (Clijsters) (total of 1) Players who were in the Top 10 at beginning and end of the year: Hénin, Kuznetsova, Sharapova (total of 3) Players who were in the Top 20 at the beginning and end of the year: Bartoli, Chakvetadze, Dementieva, Hantuchova, Hénin, Hingis, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo, Petrova, Peer, Safina, Schnyder, Sharapova, Vaidisova (total of 16)

Top Players Analysed All the Players in the Top Ten in 2007: The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA (Best 17) Statistics The lists below show all players who have ranked in the Top 10 in 2007, with the highest rank achieved. A total of eighteen players — an unusually high number. Only fourteen players spent time in the Top Ten in 2006 (though that in turn was an unusually low number); there were sixteen players spent time in the Top Ten in 2005 and 2004, and fifteen in 2003. The recent low was twelve in 2002.

Bartoli (9) Hingis (6) Safina (9) Chakvetadze (5) Ivanovic (4) Schnyder (9) Clijsters (4) Jankovic (3) Sharapova (1) Dementieva (8) Kuznetsova (2) Vaidisova (7) Hantuchova (9) Mauresmo (3) S. Williams (5) Hénin (1) Petrova (6) V. Williams (8)

The following list shows all the players who have occupied a given position in the Top 10: 1. Hénin, Sharapova 2. Hénin, Kuznetsova, Sharapova 3. Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo 4. Clijsters, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo, Sharapova 5. Chakvetadze, Clijsters, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Mauresmo, Sharapova, S. Williams 6. Chakvetadze, Hingis, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Mauresmo, Petrova, Sharapova, S. Williams, 7. Chakvetadze, Hingis, Ivanovic, Jankovic, Mauresmo, Petrova, Vaidisova, S. Williams 8. Chakvetadze, Dementieva, Ivanovic, Petrova, Vaidisova, S. Williams, V. Williams 9. Bartoli, Hantuchova, Hingis, Jankovic, Petrova, Safina, Schnyder, Vaidisova, S. Williams, V. Williams 10. Bartoli, Chakvetadze, Dementieva, Hantuchova, Jankovic, Mauresmo, Petrova, Safina, Vaidisova

Short Summary: The Top Eighty The following table shows the entire WTA Top Eighty, with brief summary of results. In the table, Final Rank is a player’s year-end ranking (based on the November 12, 2007 rankings), Player is of course the player, Score is her Best 17 point total, # of Trn is the number of tournaments she is listed as playing (including Challengers), Best Rank is her highest ranking during the year 2007, Won/Lost is won/lost record (in the notes to this field, Wi=Withdrawal, WO=walkover. So Jankovic, for instance, won 72 matches, lost 25, received one walkover, and withdrew once). Note that this figure includes only WTA main draws. Many players will have losses in wins and losses in qualifying and/ or Challengers. Titles is the list of titles the player won, if any. We list the names (sometimes abbreviated), then the number of titles in parentheses. So Jankovic’s line, e.g.., reads Auck[land], Charl[eston], Rome, Birm[ingham] (4). This means Jankovic won four titles — the four listed. Titles at $50K and higher Challengers are also shown (in [green smaller type] to distinguish them from regular titles). Challengers from after the end of the 2006 season are included. Challengers do not count toward a player’s calculated total titles.

Final # of Best Rank Player Name Score Trn Rank Won/Lost Titles 1Hénin, Justine 6155 15 1 63Ð4 (94%) Dubai, Doha, Warsaw, Roland Garros, Eastbourne, Canadian Open, U. S. Open, Stuttgart, Zürich, Madrid Championships (10) 2Kuznetsova, Svetlana 3725 19 2 51Ð20 (72%) New Haven (1) 3 Jankovic, Jelena 3475 28 3 72Ð25 (74%)[+1WO,1Wi] Auck, Charl, Rome, Birm (4) 4 Ivanovic, Ana 3461 20 4 51Ð18 (74%) Berlin, Los Ang, Luxemb (3) 5 Sharapova, Maria 2956 13 1 40Ð11 (78%)[+1Wi] San Diego (1) 6Chakvetadze, Anna 2935 22 5 56Ð19 (75%) Hobart, ’s-Hert, Cinc, Stanf (4) 7Williams, Serena 2802 12 5 34Ð10 (77%) Australian Open, Miami (2) 8Williams, Venus 2470 14 8 46Ð10 (82%) Memph, Wimbledon, Seoul (3) 9Hantuchova, Daniela 2367 27 9 52Ð26 (67%) Indian Wells, Linz (2) 10 Bartoli, Marion 2191 31 9 47Ð31 (60%) 11 Dementieva, Elena 1985 21 8 48Ð18 (73%) Istanbul, Moscow (2) 12 Vaidisova, Nicole 1942 14 7 35Ð14 (71%) 13 Golovin, Tatiana 1882 20 13 43Ð17 (72%) Amelia Island, Portoroz (2) 14 Petrova, Nadia 1862 19 6 36Ð18 (67%)[+1WO] Paris (1) 15 Safina, Dinara 1830 23 9 43Ð22 (66%) Gold Coast (1) 16 Schnyder, Patty 1806 26 9 45Ð25 (64%)[+1Wi] 17 Peer, Shahar 1675 22 15 42Ð22 (66%) 18 Mauresmo, Amélie 1538 17 3 27Ð14 (66%) Antwerp (1) 19 Hingis, Martina 1372 15 6 24Ð13 (65%) Pan Pacific (1) 20 Szavay, Agnes 1331.5 18 20 28Ð10 (74%)[+1WO] Paler, Beij (2) [Zagreb $75K+H] 21 Bammer, Sybille 1323 26 20 43Ð25 (63%) Pattaya City (1) 22 Bondarenko, Alona 1171 25 21 32Ð24 (57%)[+1WO] [Kharkov $100K] 23 Zvonareva, Vera 1117 16 19 30Ð14 (68%) 24 Safarova, Lucie 1112 16 22 28Ð16 (64%) 25 Schiavone, Francesca 1046 23 15 27Ð22 (55%) Bad Gastein (1) 26 Radwanska, Agnieszka 962 23 26 27Ð19 (59%) Stockholm (1) [Biella $100K] 27 Srebotnik, Katarina 961 24 20 29Ð24 (55%) 28 Razzano, Virginie 956 23 27 34Ð20 (63%) Guangzhou, Japan Open (2) 29 Li Na 937 15 16 23Ð13 (64%) 30 Azarenka, Victoria 928 18 26 30Ð16 (65%) 31 Kirilenko, Maria 928 28 26 29Ð27 (52%) Kolkata (1) 32 Mirza, Sania 921 21 27 30Ð19 (61%)[+1Wi] 33 Vakulenko, Julia 916 24 33 22Ð19 (54%) 34 Krajicek, Michaella 864 25 31 21Ð25 (46%) 35 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 840 24 23 24Ð22 (52%)[+1WO] Strasbourg (1) 36 Santangelo, Mara 824 21 27 27Ð21 (56%)

37 Garbin, Tathiana 805 18 22 23Ð16 (59%)[+1Wi] 38 Dulko, Gisela 780 26 32 28Ð23 (55%)[+1WO] Budapest, Forest Hills (2) 39 Sugiyama, Ai 743 23 22 17Ð22 (44%) 40 Pennetta, Flavia 737 28 29 30Ð25 (55%) Bangkok (1) 41 Dushevina, Vera 722 21 40 19Ð15 (56%) 42 Paszek, Tamira 718 16 35 15Ð14 (52%) 43 Daniilidou, Eleni 710 29 35 27Ð29 (48%) 44 Bondarenko, Kateryna 695 25 39 12Ð19 (39%) [Dubai $75K 2006] 45 Loit, Emilie 659 25 36 26Ð21 (55%)[+1Wi] Acapulco (1) 46 Peng Shuai 619 21 32 19Ð18 (51%) 47 Stosur, Samantha 611 16 27 17Ð16 (52%) 48 Tu, Meilen 607 25 35 20Ð21 (49%)[+1Wi] 49 Govortsova, Olga 592 27 49 14Ð12 (54%) 50 Morigami, Akiko 588 23 43 16Ð18 (47%) Prague (1) [Taoyuan $50K] 51 Knapp, Karin 574.5 28 46 14Ð14 (50%) 52 Cibulkova, Dominika 559 24 47 17Ð17 (50%) 53 Shaughnessy, Meghann 541 26 33 18Ð23 (44%) Barcelona (1) 54 Müller, Martina 540 30 33 16Ð28 (36%) 55 Vesnina, Elena 524 26 41 19Ð22 (46%) 56 Olaru, Ioana Raluca 521 18 55 14Ð10 (58%) [Torrent $50K] 57 Cornet, Alizé 506 17 57 8Ð9 (47%) [Dnepropetrovsk $50K] 58 Molik, Alicia 505 23 57 18Ð21 (46%)[+1Wi] 59 Parmentier, Pauline 505 25 59 9Ð4 (69%) Tashkent (1) [Petange $75K+H]) 60 Yan Zi 498 14 58 9Ð12 (43%)[+1WO] 61 Meusburger, Yvonne 493 26 61 10Ð10 (50%) [Latina $50K] 62 Zakopalova, Klara 478.5 26 62 12Ð12 (50%) [Zlin $50K] 63 Vinci, Roberta 470 20 43 11Ð18 (38%) Bogota (1) [Milan $50K+H 2006] 64 Wozniacki, Caroline 470 20 62 12Ð15 (44%) [Ortisei $75K, Las Vegas $75K] 65 Granville, Laura 460 19 52 11Ð15 (42%) 66 Likhovtseva, Elena 458 18 43 13Ð18 (42%) 67 Chan Yung-Jan 450 22 50 10Ð17 (37%) [Kaohsiung $75K 2006, Dothan $75K 2007, Gifu $50K, Fukuoka $50K] 68 Nakamura, Aiko 445 23 47 13Ð21 (38%) 69 Déchy, Nathalie 437 22 42 16Ð19 (46%) 70 Errani, Sara 436 28 68 10Ð7 (59%) 71 Pratt, Nicole 433 18 38 11Ð17 (39%) 72 Dominguez Lino, Lourdes 433 21 44 16Ð21 (43%) 73 Davenport, Lindsay 430 8 25 13Ð1 (93%) Bali, Quebec City (2) 74 Sequera, Milagros 424 14 48 13Ð8 (62%) Fes (1) 75 Kanepi, Kaia 421 23 40 13Ð17 (43%) 76 Harkleroad, Ashley 410 23 72 7Ð14 (33%) [San Francisco $50K, Pittsburg $75K] 77 Pin, Camille 407 28 61 17Ð23 (43%) 78 Dellacqua, Casey 402 30 77 6Ð12 (33%) 79 Rodionova, Anastasia 397 29 63 11Ð20 (35%) 80 Rezai, Aravane 394 26 40 8Ð21 (28%) [Poitiers $75K 2006]

A handful of titles were won by players not in the Top Eighty: Sydney by Kim Clijsters (who of course would have been Top Eighty had she not retired), Bangalore by Yaroslava Shvedova, and Estoril by Greta Arn.

Rankings Month By Month The list below shows who held each spot in the Top Thirty at the beginning of each month of the year. Names have necessarily been abbreviated. Rank January February March April May June July August Septembr October November 1 Hénin-Ha Sharapov Sharapov Hénin Hénin Hénin Hénin Hénin Hénin Hénin Hénin 2 Sharapov Hénin Hénin Sharapov Sharapov Sharapov Sharapov Sharapov Sharapov Kuznetso Kuznetso 3 Mauresm Mauresm Mauresm Kuznetso Mauresm Kuznetso Jankovic Jankovic Jankovic Jankovic Jankovic 4 Kuznetso Clijsters Clijsters Mauresm Clijsters Mauresm Mauresm Kuznetso Kuznetso Sharapov Ivanovic 5 Clijsters Kuznetso Kuznetso Clijsters Kuznetso Jankovic Kuznetso Ivanovic Ivanovic Ivanovic SWilliam 6 Petrova Hingis Hingis Hingis Hingis Hingis Ivanovic Chakveta Chakveta Chakveta Sharapov 7 Hingis Petrova Petrova Petrova Jankovic Ivanovic Chakveta Maures Mauresm SWilliam Chakveta 8 Dementie Dementie Dementie Vaidisova Vaidisova SWilliam SWilliam SWilliam Petrova VWilliam VWilliam 9 Schnyder Vaidisova Vaidisova Jankovic Petrova Chakveta Petrova Petrova SWilliam Petrova Hantucho 10 Vaidisova Jankovic Jankovic Dementie Safina Vaidisova Vaidisova Hantucho Bartoli Hantucho Bartoli 11 Safina Chakveta Chakveta Chakveta Chakveta Safina Hingis Vaidisova Hantucho Bartoli Dementie 12 Jankovic Safina Safina Hantucho SWilliam Petrova Hantucho Bartoli Schnyder Mauresm Vaidisova 13 Chakveta Schnyder Schnyder Schnyder Dementi Hantucho Dementie Hingis Dementie Schnyder Mauresm 14 Ivanovic Ivanovic Ivanovic Safina Hantucho Dementie Safina Safina VWilliam Vaidisova Petrova 15 Schiavon SWilliam SWilliam Ivanovic Ivanovic Schnyder Schnyder Dementie Vaidisova Dementie Golovin 16 Myskina Peer Peer Peer Peer Golovin Peer VWilliam Safina Peer Safina 17 Hantucha Li Li Li Li Peer Golovin Schnyder Hingis Safina Schnyder 18 Bartoli Golovin Golovin SWilliam Golovin Li Li Peer Golovin Hingis Peer 19 Grönefel Hantucho Hantucho Golovin Schnyder Zvonarev Bartoli Golovin Peer Golovin Hingis 20 Peer Zvonarev Zvonarev Zvonarev Zvonarev Srebotnik Zvonarev Li Bammer Szavay Szavay 21 Li Grönefel Grönefel Schiavon Srebotnik Bartoli Bammer Bammer ABondar Bammer Bammer 22 Golovin Sugiyam Sugiyam Bartoli VWilliam Garbin Srebotnik ABondar Li Safarova ABondar 23 Srebotnik Srebotnik Srebotnik Srebotnik Bartoli MedinaG Garbin Srebotnik Safarova Srebotnik Safarova 24 Zvonarev Bartoli Bartoli Sugiyam Garbin ABondar ABondar Safarova Srebotnik Zvonarev Zvonarev 25 Davenpor Schiavon Schiavon Garbin Bammer Bammer Safarova Garbin Schiavon ABondar Schiavon 26 Sugiyam Safarova Safarova Safarova Schiavon Sugiyam MedinaG Zvonarev Garbin Kirilenko ARadwan 27 MedinaG Garbin Garbin Stosur Sugiyam VWilliam Sugiyam Schiavon Mirza Li Azarenka 28 Pennetta Myskina Myskina Grönefel Stosur Schiavon Stosur Santangel Zvonarev Schiavon Srebotnik 29 Stosur Stosur Stosur Myskina MedinaG Safarova Santangel Stosur Santangel Mirza Razzano 30 Kirilenko Zheng Zheng Bammer Safarova Stosur Schiavon Sugiyam Sugiyam Garbin Li

Tournament Results Tournament Winners by Date (High-Tier Events) The following list shows the winner of all important (Tier II or higher) tournaments, in the order the events occurred: Tournament Tier Winner Sydney II Clijsters Australian Open Slam S. Williams Tokyo (Pan Paciﬁc) I Hingis Paris II Petrova Antwerp II Mauresmo Dubai II Hénin Doha II Hénin Indian Wells I Hantuchova Miami I S. Williams Amelia Island II Golovin Charleston I Jankovic Warsaw II Hénin Berlin I Ivanovic Rome I Jankovic Roland Garros Slam Hénin Eastbourne II Hénin Wimbledon Slam V. Williams Stanford II Chakvetadze San Diego I Sharapova Los Angeles II Ivanovic Canadian Open (Toronto) I Hénin New Haven II Kuznetsova U.S. Open Slam Hénin Beijing II Szavay Luxembourg II Ivanovic Stuttgart II Hénin Moscow I Dementieva Zürich I Hénin Linz II Hantuchova Los Angeles Championships Champ Hénin

Tournament Winners by Tournament Type (High-Tier Events) The following list shows winners of the top-tier events by tier. Within the tiers, events are sorted by date. SLAMS Event Australian Open S. Williams Roland Garros Hénin Wimbledon V. Williams U.S. Open Hénin YEAR-END CHAMPIONSHIP Event Madrid Championships Hénin TIER I Event Pan Paciﬁc (Tokyo) Hingis Indian Wells Hantuchova Miami S. Williams Charleston Jankovic German Open (Berlin) Ivanovic Italian Open (Rome) Jankovic San Diego Sharapova Canadian Open Hénin Moscow Dementieva Zürich Hénin TIER II Event Sydney Clijsters Paris Petrova Antwerp Mauresmo Dubai Hénin Doha Hénin Amelia Island Golovin Warsaw Hénin Eastbourne Hénin Stanford Chakvetadze Los Angeles Ivanovic New Haven Kuznetsova Beijing Szavay Luxembourg Ivanovic Stuttgart Hénin Linz Hantuchova

Winners at Smaller Tournaments (Tier III, IV) Tournament Winner Tier Same Week As Gold Coast Saﬁna III Auckland (IV) Auckland Jankovic IV Gold Coast (III) Hobart Chakvetadze IV Sydney (II) Pattaya City Bammer III Paris (II) Bangalore Shvedova IV Antwerp (II) Memphis V. Williams III Dubai (II+), Bogota (III) Bogota Vinci III Dubai (II+), Memphis (III) Acapulco Loit III Doha (II) Budapest Dulko IV Estoril Arn IV Warsaw (II) Prague Morigami IV Berlin (I) Fes Sequera IV Rome (I) Strasbourg Medina Garrigues III Istanbul (III) Istanbul Dementieva III Strasbourg (III) Birmingham Jankovic III Barcelona Barcelona Shaughnessy IV Birmingham (III) ’s-Hertogenbosch Chakvetadze III Eastbourne (II) Cincinnati Chakvetadze III Palermo (IV) Palermo Szavay IV Cincinnati (III) Bad Gastein Schiavone III Stanford (II) Stockholm A. Radwanska IV San Diego (I) Forest Hills Dulko IV New Haven (II) Bali Davenport III+ Kolkata Kirilenko III Beijing (II), Portoroz (IV) Portoroz Golovin IV Beijing (II), Kolkata (III) Guangzhou Razzano III Luxembourg (II), Seoul (IV) Seoul V. Williams IV Luxembourg (II), GuangZhou (III) Japan Open Razzano III Stuttgart (II), Tashkent (IV) Tashkent Parmentier IV Stuttgart (II), Japan Open (III) Bangkok Pennetta III Moscow (I) Quebec City Davenport III

Full Summary of Tournament Results The following list shows all tournaments since the end of the 2006 Tour year (November 13, 2006). This includes not only Tour events but also $50K and higher challengers. The tournament summary includes several statistics about the Tournament. First is the date and the name. Also on the first line of the entry are the tournament’s strength (Slam, Championships, Tier I, Tier II, $75K Challenger, etc., and the surface on which it is played. The second line, “Modified TSI” and “Top Four Strength,” give statistics about the strength of the event. The Modified TSI is my modification of Geert Calliauw’s Tournament Strength Index, (for details of this, see the section “Tournament Strength Based on Modified TSI” on page 35); in this statistic, the higher the number, the stronger the event; the maximum is 475. The next statistic, Top Four Strength, is also a strength measure(explained in the section“It’s probably not surprising to note that almost the only tournaments to have the maximum strength of 13 are required events:Roland Garros, Wimbledon, the U. S. Open, and the Madrid Championships, plus Zürich, with the Australian Open and Miami right behind. We note that Stuttgart, which was weak in its first year, has now gained the strength it always had while held in Filderstadt.” on page 33); it is based on the rankings of the top four players in the field. For this statistic, lower is better; a tournament with a strength of 13 is at maximum strength under this measure. The third line of any entry, “Top players,” lists the four top players in the field, with their ranking and the round in which they lost. Note that this is not the top four seeds; it the four highest-ranked players whatever their seeding. The fourth and fifth lines list the winner, finalist, and semifinalists, with their rankings. The final line lists the doubles winner and finalists. November 19, 2006: Kaohsiung $75K 2006 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 506 Top Players: Bardina (#74; lost 1R); Tanasugarn (#75; lost SF); Chan (#96; Won event); Yuan (#112; lost QF) Winner: Chan Yung-Jan (#96). Finalist: Hsieh Su-Wei (#140) Semifinalists: Tamarine Tanasugarn (#75), Chang Kai-Chen (#1440) Doubles Winners: Chan/Chuang. Finalists: Chan/Hsieh November 19, 2006: Deauville $50K 2006 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 393 Top Players: Loit (#58; lost QF); Fedak (#68; lost 2R); Yakimova (#69; lost SF); Bychkova (#72; lost 1R) Winner: Viktoriya Kutuzova (#107). Finalist: Alberta Brianti (#106) Semifinalists: Anastasia Yakimova (#69), Kristina Barrois (#124) Doubles Winners: Beygelzimer/Fedak. Finalists: Disderi/Obziler November 19, 2006: Lawrenceville $50K 2006 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 573 Top Players: Harkleroad (#86; lost 2R); Wozniak (#91; lost 1R); Mattek (#104; lost 2R); Gallovits (#111; lost QF) Winner: Stéphanie Dubois (#134). Finalist: Julie Ditty (#297) Semifinalists: Alisa Kleybanova (#262), Rossana de los Rios (#285) Doubles Winners: Baker/Ditty. Finalists: Fusano/Tsoubanos November 26, 2006: Poitiers $75K 2006 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 380 Top Players: Rezai (#48; Won event); Yakimova (#65; lost 2R); Bychkova (#72; lost QF); Birnerova (#82; lost 1R) Winner: Aravane Rezai (#48). Finalist: Ivana Lisjak (#146) Semifinalists: Sandra Kloesel (#101), Stéphanie Foretz (#117) Doubles Winners: Beygelzimer/Fedak. Finalists: Kustova/Poutchek

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 11 December 3, 2006: Milan $50K+H 2006 ($50K+H/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 350 Top Players: Garbin (#40; lost SF); Camerin (#52; lost QF); Laine (#78; lost QF); Birnerova (#88; lost QF) Winner: Roberta Vinci (#103). Finalist: Margalita Chakhnashvili (#153) Semifinalists: Tathiana Garbin (#40), Yulia Beygelzimer (#111) Doubles Winners: Jans/Rosolska. Finalists: Koryttseva/Laine December 3, 2006: San Diego $50K 2006 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 693 Top Players: Wozniak (#99; lost SF); Mattek (#115; lost 1R); Sromova (#117; lost 1R); Spears (#148; lost 1R) Winner: Rossana de los Rios (#263). Finalist: Ivana Abramovic (#165) Semifinalists: Aleksandra Wozniak (#99), Leanne Baker (#306) Doubles Winners: Abramovic/Sromova. Finalists: Fusano/Tsoubanos December 17, 2006: Dubai $75K 2006 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 398 Top Players: Kostanic (#46; lost 1R); Laine (#74; lost QF); Bardina (#77; lost SF); Fedak (#81; lost QF) Winner: Kateryna Bondarenko (#118). Finalist: Ekaterina Dzehalevich (#309) Semifinalists: Vasilisa Bardina (#77), Klara (Koukalova) Zakopalova (#124) Doubles Winners: Jugic-Salkic/Kostanic. Finalists: K. Bondarenko/V. Bondarenko January 7, 2007: Gold Coast 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 113. Top Four Strength: 69 Top Players: Hingis (#7; lost F); Safina (#11; Won event); Ivanovic (#14; lost QF); Grönefeld (#19; lost 1R) Winner: Dinara Safina (#11). Finalist: Martina Hingis (#7) Semifinalists: Shahar Peer (#20), Tathiana Garbin (#38) Doubles Winners: Safina/Srebotnik. Finalists: Benesova/Voskoboeva January 7, 2007: Auckland 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 60. Top Four Strength: 91 Top Players: Jankovic (#12; Won event); Myskina (#16; lost 1R); Hantuchova (#17; lost 2R); Bartoli (#18; lost 2R) Winner: Jelena Jankovic (#12). Finalist: Vera Zvonareva (#24) Semifinalists: Jill Craybas (#70), Camille Pin (#75) Doubles Winners: Husarova/Suárez. Finalists: Hsieh/S. Uberoi January 12, 2007: Sydney 2007 (II/Hard) Modified TSI: 386. Top Four Strength: 25 Top Players: Mauresmo (#3; lost QF); Kuznetsova (#4; lost 2R); Clijsters (#5; Won event); Petrova (#6; lost 2R) Winner: Kim Clijsters (#5). Finalist: Jelena Jankovic (#12) Semifinalists: Nicole Vaidisova (#11), Li Na (#21) Doubles Winners: Grönefeld/Shaughnessy. Finalists: Bartoli/Tu

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 12 January 12, 2007: Hobart 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 15. Top Four Strength: 141 Top Players: Chakvetadze (#13; Won event); Medina Garrigues (#28; lost 2R); Kirilenko (#29; lost 1R); Santangelo (#30; lost 2R) Winner: Anna Chakvetadze (#13). Finalist: Vasilisa Bardina (#70) Semifinalists: Sybille Bammer (#56), Sania Mirza (#66) Doubles Winners: Likhovtseva/Vesnina. Finalists: Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual January 28, 2007: Australian Open 2007 (Slam/Hard) Modified TSI: 418. Top Four Strength: 19 Top Players: Sharapova (#2; lost F); Mauresmo (#3; lost R16); Kuznetsova (#4; lost R16); Clijsters (#5; lost SF) Winner: Serena Williams (#81). Finalist: Maria Sharapova (#2) Semifinalists: Kim Clijsters (#5), Nicole Vaidisova (#12) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Chan/Chuang January 28, 2007: Waikoloa $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 749 Top Players: Gallovits (#108; lost F); Czink (#118; Won event); Abramovic (#146; lost 2R); Hisamatsu (#151; lost QF) Winner: Melinda Czink (#118). Finalist: Edina Gallovits (#108) Semifinalists: Maria Jose Argeri (#188), Angelika Bachmann (#269) Doubles Winners: Grandin/Kops-Jones. Finalists: Dekmeijere/Ditty February 4, 2007: Pan Pacific 2007 (I/Indoor) Modified TSI: 279. Top Four Strength: 32 Top Players: Sharapova (#1; lost SF); Hingis (#6; Won event); Dementieva (#8; lost SF); Jankovic (#10; lost QF) Winner: Martina Hingis (#6). Finalist: Ana Ivanovic (#16) Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova (#1), Elena Dementieva (#8) Doubles Winners: Raymond/Stosur. Finalists: King/Stubbs February 4, 2007: Ortisei $75K 2007 ($75K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 375 Top Players: Camerin (#47; lost 1R); Birnerova (#59; lost 2R); Arvidsson (#84; lost 1R); Schruff (#89; lost 2R) Winner: Caroline Wozniacki (#227). Finalist: Alberta Brianti (#96) Semifinalists: Sandra Kloesel (#94), Tatjana Malek (#148) Doubles Winners: Blahotova/Koryttseva. Finalists: Kustova/Poutchek February 11, 2007: Paris 2007 (II/Indoor) Modified TSI: 322. Top Four Strength: 22 Top Players: Hénin (#2; lost SF); Mauresmo (#3; lost SF); Kuznetsova (#5; lost QF); Petrova (#7; Won event) Winner: Nadia Petrova (#7). Finalist: Lucie Safarova (#32) Semifinalists: Justine Hénin (#2), Amélie Mauresmo (#3) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: G. Navratilova/Uhlirova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 13 February 11, 2007: Pattaya City 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 10. Top Four Strength: 192 Top Players: Bartoli (#25; lost 2R); Kirilenko (#31; lost 1R); Santangelo (#38; lost QF); Peng (#42; lost SF) Winner: Sybille Bammer (#61). Finalist: Gisela Dulko (#52) Semifinalists: Shuai Peng (#42), Sania Mirza (#49) Doubles Winners: Pratt/Santangelo. Finalists: Chan/Chuang February 18, 2007: Antwerp 2007 (II/Indoor) Modified TSI: 267. Top Four Strength: 29 Top Players: Mauresmo (#3; Won event); Clijsters (#4; lost F); Petrova (#7; lost QF); Dementieva (#8; lost 2R) Winner: Amélie Mauresmo (#3). Finalist: Kim Clijsters (#4) Semifinalists: Anna Chakvetadze (#12), Tatiana Golovin (#20) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Likhovtseva/Vesnina February 18, 2007: Bangalore 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 302 Top Players: Santangelo (#36; lost F); Mirza (#46; lost QF); Bardina (#63; lost 2R); Fedak (#75; lost 1R) Winner: Yaroslava Shvedova (#143). Finalist: Mara Santangelo (#36) Semifinalists: Tzipora Obziler (#117), Olga Savchuk (#153) Doubles Winners: Chan/Chuang. Finalists: Hsieh/Kudryavtseva February 18, 2007: Saguenay $50K 2007 ($50K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 795 Top Players: Wozniak (#113; lost SF); Dubois (#137; lost 1R); Kerber (#147; Won event); Math. Johansson (#148; lost SF) Winner: Angelique Kerber (#147). Finalist: Sabine Lisicki (#433) Semifinalists: Aleksandra Wozniak (#113), Mathilde Johansson (#148) Doubles Winners: Kerber/Szatmari. Finalists: Klaschka/Roesch February 18, 2007: Saint Paul $50K 2007 ($50K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 677 Top Players: Sequera (#83; lost 1R); Arvidsson (#86; Won event); Perianu (#159; lost 1R); Keothavong (#160; lost SF) Winner: Sofia Arvidsson (#86). Finalist: Olga Govortsova (#266) Semifinalists: Anne Keothavong (#160), Kristina Brandi (#185) Doubles Winners: Arvidsson/Ant. Serra Zanetti. Finalists: Jugic-Salkic/Senoglu February 25, 2007: Dubai 2007 (II+/Hard) Modified TSI: 289. Top Four Strength: 21 Top Players: Hénin (#2; Won event); Mauresmo (#3; lost F); Kuznetsova (#5; lost SF); Hingis (#6; lost QF) Winner: Justine Hénin (#2). Finalist: Amélie Mauresmo (#3) Semifinalists: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5), Jelena Jankovic (#11) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Kuznetsova/Molik

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 14 February 25, 2007: Memphis 2007 (III/Indoor) Modified TSI: 20. Top Four Strength: 158 Top Players: Peer (#17; lost F); Bartoli (#25; lost 1R); Stosur (#28; lost QF); Pratt (#46; lost 2R) Winner: Venus Williams (#54). Finalist: Shahar Peer (#17) Semifinalists: Meilen Tu (#70), Ioana Raluca Olaru (#254) Doubles Winners: Pratt/Stewart. Finalists: Gajdosova/Morigami February 25, 2007: Bogota 2007 (III/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 239 Top Players: Garbin (#29; lost F); Pennetta (#39; lost SF); Domínguez Lino (#51; lost SF); Loit (#52; lost QF) Winner: Roberta Vinci (#64). Finalist: Tathiana Garbin (#29) Semifinalists: Flavia Pennetta (#39), Lourdes Domínguez Lino (#51) Doubles Winners: Dominguez Lino/Suárez. Finalists: Pennetta/Vinci March 4, 2007: Doha 2007 (II/Hard) Modified TSI: 256. Top Four Strength: 30 Top Players: Hénin (#2; Won event); Kuznetsova (#5; lost F); Hingis (#6; lost QF); Jankovic (#10; lost SF) Winner: Justine Hénin (#2). Finalist: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5) Semifinalists: Jelena Jankovic (#10), Daniela Hantuchova (#19) Doubles Winners: Hingis/Kirilenko. Finalists: Szavay/Uhlirova March 4, 2007: Acapulco 2007 (III/Clay) Modified TSI: 10. Top Four Strength: 173 Top Players: Bartoli (#24; lost 2R); Garbin (#27; lost QF); Brémond (#35; lost 2R); Müller (#36; lost 2R) Winner: Emilie Loit (#52). Finalist: Flavia Pennetta (#42) Semifinalists: Julia Schruff (#83), Sara Errani (#216) Doubles Winners: Dominguez Lino/Parra Santonja. Finalists: Loit/Pratt March 4, 2007: Las Vegas $75K 2007 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 444 Top Players: Morigami (#67; lost F); Vakulenko (#76; lost SF); Azarenka (#78; lost 2R); Bychkova (#80; lost 1R) Winner: Caroline Wozniacki (#172). Finalist: Akiko Morigami (#67) Semifinalists: Julia Vakulenko (#76), Jarmila Gajdosova (#91) Doubles Winners: Azarenka/Poutchek. Finalists: Ani/Brianti March 18, 2007: Indian Wells 2007 (I+/Hard) Modified TSI: 357. Top Four Strength: 23 Top Players: Sharapova (#1; lost R16); Kuznetsova (#4; lost F); Hingis (#6; lost R16); Petrova (#7; lost R16) Winner: Daniela Hantuchova (#18). Finalist: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4) Semifinalists: Li Na (#17), Sybille Bammer (#46) Doubles Winners: Raymond/Stosur. Finalists: Chan/Chuang

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 15 April 1, 2007: Miami 2007 (Ireq/Hard) Modified TSI: 452. Top Four Strength: 15 Top Players: Hénin (#1; lost F); Sharapova (#2; lost R16); Kuznetsova (#3; lost R16); Clijsters (#5; lost R16) Winner: Serena Williams (#18). Finalist: Justine Hénin (#1) Semifinalists: Anna Chakvetadze (#11), Shahar Peer (#16) Doubles Winners: Raymond/Stosur. Finalists: Black/Huber April 1, 2007: Latina $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 663 Top Players: Beygelzimer (#107; lost 1R); Meusburger (#110; Won event); Gagliardi (#114; lost SF); Bacsinszky (#115; lost 1R) Winner: Yvonne Meusburger (#110). Finalist: Caroline Wozniacki (#121) Semifinalists: Emmanuelle Gagliardi (#114), Alizé Cornet (#127) Doubles Winners: Errani/Gabba. Finalists: Cohen-Aloro/Sfar April 8, 2007: Amelia Island 2007 (II/Clay) Modified TSI: 161. Top Four Strength: 59 Top Players: Petrova (#7; lost F); Jankovic (#9; lost QF); Safina (#13; lost QF); Hantuchova (#14; lost QF) Winner: Tatiana Golovin (#20). Finalist: Nadia Petrova (#7) Semifinalists: Ana Ivanovic (#17), Sybille Bammer (#29) Doubles Winners: Santangelo/Srebotnik. Finalists: Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual April 8, 2007: Dinan $75K 2007 ($75K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 574 Top Players: Yakimova (#78; lost 2R); Meusburger (#102; lost 2R); Wozniacki (#106; lost 1R); Beygelzimer (#108; lost 1R) Winner: Masa Zec Peskiric (#317). Finalist: Karin Knapp (#117) Semifinalists: Sara Errani (#151), Marta Domachowska (#187) Doubles Winners: Kerber/Meusburger. Finalists: Foretz/Vedy April 15, 2007: Charleston 2007 (I/Clay) Modified TSI: 166. Top Four Strength: 57 Top Players: Vaidisova (#8; lost 2R); Jankovic (#9; Won event); S. Williams (#11; lost 2R); Safina (#12; lost F) Winner: Jelena Jankovic (#9). Finalist: Dinara Safina (#12) Semifinalists: Vera Zvonareva (#20), Venus Williams (#29) Doubles Winners: Yan/Zheng. Finalists: Peng/Sun April 22, 2007: Dothan $75K 2007 ($75K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 444 Top Players: Chan (#69; Won event); Perry (#72; lost 2R); Harkleroad (#77; lost 2R); Lepchenko (#85; lost 1R) Winner: Chan Yung-Jan (#69). Finalist: Alla Kudryavtseva (#118) Semifinalists: Edina Gallovits (#98), Angelika Bachmann (#231) Doubles Winners: Chan/Chuang. Finalists: Bachmann/Henke

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 16 April 29, 2007: Budapest 2007 (IV/Clay) Modified TSI: 10. Top Four Strength: 195 Top Players: Garbin (#23; lost 2R); Müller (#35; lost 2R); Kirilenko (#38; lost 1R); Loit (#41; lost QF) Winner: Gisela Dulko (#50). Finalist: Sorana Cirstea (#325) Semifinalists: Karin Knapp (#97), Agnes Szavay (#158) Doubles Winners: Szavay/Uhlirova. Finalists: Müller/G. Navratilova April 29, 2007: Cagnes-sur-Mer $100K 2007 ($100K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 461 Top Players: Vesnina (#70; lost 2R); Yakimova (#78; lost 1R); Bychkova (#79; lost 2R); Pin (#86; lost QF) Winner: Timea Bacsinszky (#138). Finalist: Tatjana Malek (#127) Semifinalists: Emmanuelle Gagliardi (#109), Klara (Koukalova) Zakopalova (#147) Doubles Winners: Bacsinszky/Vedy. Finalists: Kachlikova/Pavlyuchenkova April 29, 2007: Sea Island $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 548 Top Players: Harkleroad (#74; lost 2R); Sequera (#98; lost SF); Kudryavtseva (#99; lost SF); Gallovits (#105; lost QF) Winner: Julie Ditty (#185). Finalist: Anda Perianu (#201) Semifinalists: Milagros Sequera (#98), Alla Kudryavtseva (#99) Doubles Winners: Kops-Jones/Osterloh. Finalists: Perianu/Scheepers April 29, 2007: Torrent $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 830 Top Players: Arvidsson (#129; lost 1R); Errani (#139; lost 2R); Ani (#143; lost QF); Martinez Sanchez (#151; lost 2R) Winner: Ioana Raluca Olaru (#164). Finalist: Andrea Petkovic (#175) Semifinalists: Ekaterina Ivanova (#163), Tatiana Perebiynis (#218) Doubles Winners: Ivanova/Rodina. Finalists: Marrero/Suarez Navarro May 6, 2007: Warsaw 2007 (II/Clay) Modified TSI: 331. Top Four Strength: 22 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Clijsters (#4; lost 2R); Kuznetsova (#5; lost SF); Jankovic (#7; lost SF) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Alona Bondarenko (#40) Semifinalists: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5), Jelena Jankovic (#7) Doubles Winners: Douchevina/Perebiynis. Finalists: Likhovtseva/Vesnina May 6, 2007: Estoril 2007 (IV/Clay) Modified TSI: 10. Top Four Strength: 162 Top Players: Bartoli (#23; lost QF); Schiavone (#26; lost 2R); Safarova (#30; lost SF); Dulko (#34; lost QF) Winner: Greta Arn (#176). Finalist: Victoria Azarenka (#68) Semifinalists: Lucie Safarova (#30), Nuria Llagostera Vives (#410) Doubles Winners: Ehritt-Vanc/Rodionova. Finalists: Dominguez Lino/Parra Santonja

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 17 May 6, 2007: Charlottsville $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 523 Top Players: Shaughnessy (#56; lost 2R); Lepchenko (#98; lost QF); Gallovits (#101; Won event); Rolle (#114; lost 2R) Winner: Edina Gallovits (#101). Finalist: Angelika Bachmann (#205) Semifinalists: Olga Govortsova (#187), Brenda Schultz-McCarthy (#231) Doubles Winners: Krauth/Nooni. Finalists: Kops-Jones/Osterloh May 6, 2007: Gifu $50K 2007 ($50K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 859 Top Players: Chan (#57; Won event); Dellacqua (#121; lost QF); Takao (#135; lost SF); Hisamatsu (#168; lost 1R) Winner: Chan Yung-Jan (#57). Finalist: Ayumi Morita (#191) Semifinalists: Erika Takao (#135), Nicole Thyssen (#431) Doubles Winners: Morita/Sugiyama. Finalists: Iijima/Okamoto May 13, 2007: Berlin 2007 (I/Clay) Modified TSI: 408. Top Four Strength: 18 Top Players: Hénin (#1; lost SF); Mauresmo (#3; lost R16); Kuznetsova (#4; lost F); Jankovic (#6; lost QF) Winner: Ana Ivanovic (#16). Finalist: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4) Semifinalists: Justine Hénin (#1), Julia Vakulenko (#53) Doubles Winners: Raymond/Stosur. Finalists: Garbin/Vinci May 13, 2007: Prague 2007 (IV/Clay) Modified TSI: 10. Top Four Strength: 192 Top Players: Bartoli (#24; lost F); Dulko (#34; lost 1R); Poutchkova (#36; lost 2R); Krajicek (#40; lost 1R) Winner: Akiko Morigami (#60). Finalist: Marion Bartoli (#24) Semifinalists: Victoria Azarenka (#55), Klara (Koukalova) Zakopalova (#142) Doubles Winners: Cetkovska/A. Hlavackova. Finalists: Ji/S. Sun May 13, 2007: Rome $100K 2007 ($100K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 593 Top Players: Knapp (#82; lost 2R); Gagliardi (#104; lost 2R); Czink (#110; lost 2R); Beygelzimer (#111; lost 1R) Winner: Caroline Maes (#233). Finalist: Marta Marrero (#678) Semifinalists: Mathilde Johansson (#136), Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro (#149) Doubles Winners: Domachowska/Laine. Finalists: Ani/Maes May 13, 2007: Jounieh $75K 2007 ($75K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 594 Top Players: Yakimova (#85; lost 2R); Poutchek (#97; lost QF); Kudryavtseva (#98; lost 2R); Pous Tio (#132; lost SF) Winner: Selima Sfar (#177). Finalist: Mariya Koryttseva (#386) Semifinalists: Laura Pous Tio (#132), Katarina Kachlikova (#301) Doubles Winners: Poutchek/Yakimova. Finalists: Gojnea/Niculescu

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 18 May 13, 2007: Monzon $75K 2007 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 884 Top Players: Kerber (#115; lost F); Osterloh (#156; Won event); Lisjak (#159; lost 2R); Keothavong (#183; lost 2R) Winner: Lilia Osterloh (#156). Finalist: Angelique Kerber (#115) Semifinalists: Maria Emelia Salerni (#237), Vesna Manasieva (#294) Doubles Winners: Cabeza Candela/Salerni. Finalists: Kuryanovich/Manasieva May 13, 2007: Fukuoka $50K 2007 ($50K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 670 Top Players: Chan (#52; Won event); Dellacqua (#126; lost F); Takao (#146; lost QF); Hisamatsu (#168; lost 1R) Winner: Chan Yung-Jan (#52). Finalist: Casey Dellacqua (#126) Semifinalists: Junri Namigata (#193), Chuang Chia-Jung (#224) Doubles Winners: Morita/Yonemura. Finalists: Fujiwara/Namigata May 13, 2007: Indian Harbor Beach $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 564 Top Players: Perry (#73; lost 2R); Gallovits (#92; lost SF); Rolle (#114; lost 1R); Mattek (#120; Won event) Winner: Bethanie Mattek (#120). Finalist: Olga Govortsova (#172) Semifinalists: Edina Gallovits (#92), Chanelle Scheepers (#370) Doubles Winners: Adamczak/Haynes. Finalists: Gullickson/Lee-Waters May 20, 2007: Rome 2007 (I/Clay) Modified TSI: 302. Top Four Strength: 28 Top Players: Kuznetsova (#3; lost F); Mauresmo (#4; lost 2R); Jankovic (#5; Won event); Safina (#9; lost QF) Winner: Jelena Jankovic (#5). Finalist: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#3) Semifinalists: Daniela Hantuchova (#14), Patty Schnyder (#17) Doubles Winners: Déchy/Santangelo. Finalists: Garbin/Vinci May 20, 2007: Fes 2007 (IV/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 368 Top Players: Mirza (#51; lost 1R); Razzano (#63; lost 1R); Rodionova (#65; lost 1R); Craybas (#75; lost 2R) Winner: Milagros Sequera (#104). Finalist: Aleksandra Wozniak (#114) Semifinalists: Ioana Raluca Olaru (#146), Maria Emelia Salerni (#213) Doubles Winners: King/Mirza. Finalists: Ehritt-Vanc/Rodionova May 20, 2007: Zagreb $75K+H 2007 ($75K+H/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 547 Top Players: Kostanic (#81; lost 1R); Malek (#92; lost 1R); Ondraskova (#99; lost QF); Meusburger (#102; lost SF) Winner: Agnes Szavay (#129). Finalist: Nika Ozegovic (#229) Semifinalists: Yvonne Meusburger (#102), Ivana Lisjak (#159) Doubles Winners: Laine/Szavay. Finalists: Jans/Rosolska

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 19 May 20, 2007: Saint Gaudens $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 849 Top Players: Osterloh (#130; lost 2R); Kutuzova (#142; lost 2R); Cravero (#151; lost SF); Parmentier (#154; lost QF) Winner: Tatiana Perebiynis (#248). Finalist: Petra Cetkovska (#182) Semifinalists: Jorgelina Cravero (#151), Lioudmila Skavronskaia (#177) Doubles Winners: Cravero/Kustova. Finalists: Amanmuradova/Kuryanovich May 26, 2007: Istanbul 2007 (III/Clay) Modified TSI: 115. Top Four Strength: 72 Top Players: Sharapova (#2; lost SF); Dementieva (#14; Won event); Schnyder (#15; lost QF); A. Bondarenko (#25; lost SF) Winner: Elena Dementieva (#14). Finalist: Aravane Rezai (#59) Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova (#2), Alona Bondarenko (#25) Doubles Winners: A. Radwanska/U. Radwanska. Finalists: Y. Chan/Mirza May 26, 2007: Strasbourg 2007 (III/Clay) Modified TSI: 125. Top Four Strength: 57 Top Players: Jankovic (#4; lost SF); Mauresmo (#5; lost F); Li Na (#18; lost QF); Bartoli (#21; lost SF) Winner: Anabel Medina Garrigues (#27). Finalist: Amélie Mauresmo (#5) Semifinalists: Jelena Jankovic (#4), Marion Bartoli (#21) Doubles Winners: Yan/Zheng. Finalists: Molik/Sun June 3, 2007: Carson $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 1460 Top Players: Liggan (#231; lost QF); Haynes (#242; lost QF); Widmer (#254; lost 1R); Rao (#260; lost 2R) Winner: Jessica Kirkland (#280). Finalist: Lauren Albanese (#275) Semifinalists: Valerie Tetreault (#277), Maria Fernanda Alves (#289) Doubles Winners: Grant/Rao. Finalists: Haynes/Lee-Waters June 10, 2007: Roland Garros 2007 (Slam/Clay) Modified TSI: 475. Top Four Strength: 13 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Sharapova (#2; lost SF); Kuznetsova (#3; lost QF); Mauresmo (#4; lost 3R) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Ana Ivanovic (#7) Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova (#2), Jelena Jankovic (#5) Doubles Winners: Molik/Santangelo. Finalists: Srebotnik/Sugiyama June 10, 2007: Prerov $75K 2007 ($75K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 611 Top Players: Kerber (#93; Won event); Ondraskova (#100; lost QF); Gallovits (#104; lost 2R); Arvidsson (#121; lost SF) Winner: Angelique Kerber (#93). Finalist: Klara (Koukalova) Zakopalova (#130) Semifinalists: Sofia Arvidsson (#121), Sara Errani (#148) Doubles Winners: Hradecka/Voracova. Finalists: de los Rios/Gallovits

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 20 June 10, 2007: Zagreb $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 636 Top Players: Harkleroad (#80; lost 1R); Voskoboeva (#108; lost QF); Math. Johansson (#126; lost 1R); Zahlavova Strycova (#134; lost 2R) Winner: Kyra Nagy (#157). Finalist: Ivana Lisjak (#153) Semifinalists: Ekaterina Makarova (#224), Danica Krstajic (#283) Doubles Winners: Jovanovic/Poltoratskaya. Finalists: Krstajic/Mircic June 17, 2007: Birmingham 2007 (III/Grass) Modified TSI: 186. Top Four Strength: 41 Top Players: Sharapova (#2; lost F); Jankovic (#3; Won event); Hantuchova (#13; lost QF); Li Na (#18; lost QF) Winner: Jelena Jankovic (#3). Finalist: Maria Sharapova (#2) Semifinalists: Marion Bartoli (#20), Mara Santangelo (#30) Doubles Winners: Chan/Chuang. Finalists: Sun/Tu June 17, 2007: Barcelona 2007 (IV/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 227 Top Players: Schiavone (#29; lost 2R); Müller (#36; lost 1R); Loit (#48; lost QF); Shaughnessy (#49; Won event) Winner: Meghann Shaughnessy (#49). Finalist: Edina Gallovits (#91) Semifinalists: Virginie Razzano (#62), Flavia Pennetta (#87) Doubles Winners: Llagostera Vives/Parra Santonja. Finalists: Dominguez Lino/Pennetta June 17, 2007: GuangZhou $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 1025 Top Players: Hsieh (#126; lost 1R); C. Chan (#181; lost QF); Zhang (#203; Won event); Chen (#208; lost 1R) Winner: Zhang Shuai (#203). Finalist: Regina Kulikova (#318) Semifinalists: Kumiko Iijima (#258), Liu Wan-Ting (#382) Doubles Winners: Huang/Xu. Finalists: Chen/Zhou June 17, 2007: Marseille $50K 2007 ($50K+H/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 810 Top Players: Cohen-Aloro (#99; lost F); Cravero (#146; Won event); Foretz (#147; lost QF); Cirstea (#173; lost QF) Winner: Jorgelina Cravero (#146). Finalist: Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro (#99) Semifinalists: Selima Sfar (#192), Ksenia Milevskaya (#650) Doubles Winners: Milevskaya/Vaisemberg. Finalists: Llaguno/Vergos June 17, 2007: Zlin $50K 2007 ($50K+H/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 716 Top Players: Zakopalova (#105; Won event); Ondraskova (#111; lost 1R); Voracova (#127; lost 2R); Kutuzova (#157; lost 1R) Winner: Klara (Koukalova) Zakopalova (#105). Finalist: Petra Kvitova (#290) Semifinalists: Lucie Hradecka (#275), Eva Hrdinova (#301) Doubles Winners: Hradecka/Voracova. Finalists: Pastikova/Sromova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 21 June 24, 2007: Eastbourne 2007 (II/Grass) Modified TSI: 235. Top Four Strength: 33 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Mauresmo (#4; lost F); Petrova (#11; lost SF); Dementieva (#12; lost QF) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Amélie Mauresmo (#4) Semifinalists: Nadia Petrova (#11), Marion Bartoli (#20) Doubles Winners: Raymond/Stosur. Finalists: Peschke/Stubbs June 24, 2007: ’s-Hertogenbosch 2007 (III/Grass) Modified TSI: 240. Top Four Strength: 36 Top Players: Jankovic (#3; lost F); Ivanovic (#6; lost QF); Chakvetadze (#8; Won event); Hantuchova (#10; lost SF) Winner: Anna Chakvetadze (#8). Finalist: Jelena Jankovic (#3) Semifinalists: Daniela Hantuchova (#10), Dinara Safina (#13) Doubles Winners: Chan/Chuang. Finalists: Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual. July 8, 2007: Wimbledon 2007 (Slam/Grass) Modified TSI: 475. Top Four Strength: 13 Top Players: Hénin (#1; lost SF); Sharapova (#2; lost R16); Jankovic (#3; lost R16); Mauresmo (#4; lost R16) Winner: Venus Williams (#31). Finalist: Marion Bartoli (#19) Semifinalists: Justine Hénin (#1), Ana Ivanovic (#6) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Srebotnik/Sugiyama July 8, 2007: Cuneo $50K+H 2007 ($50K+H/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 504 Top Players: Gallovits (#73; lost 2R); Cibulkova (#84; lost SF); Bychkova (#93; lost 2R); Birnerova (#97; lost 2R) Winner: Maria Emelia Salerni (#150). Finalist: Sara Errani (#124) Semifinalists: Dominika Cibulkova (#84), Rossana de los Rios (#162) Doubles Winners: Kustova/Makarova. Finalists: Beygelzimer/Chakhnashvili July 15, 2007: Biella $100K 2007 ($100K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 258 Top Players: Müller (#33; lost 1R); A. Radwanska (#36; Won event); Kanepi (#51; lost SF); Knapp (#69; lost F) Winner: Agnieszka Radwanska (#36). Finalist: Karin Knapp (#69) Semifinalists: Kaia Kanepi (#51), Flavia Pennetta (#92) Doubles Winners: Ani/Kanepi. Finalists: Jugic-Salkic/Voracova July 15, 2007: Boston $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 954 Top Players: Lepchenko (#130; Won event); Czink (#160; lost QF); Bachmann (#167; lost QF); Grandin (#207; lost QF) Winner: Varvara Lepchenko (#130). Finalist: Kelly Liggan (#243) Semifinalists: Chanelle Scheepers (#265), Sandy Gumulya (#288) Doubles Winners: Czink/Grandin. Finalists: Dekmeijere/Senoglu

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 22 July 22, 2007: Cincinnati 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 58. Top Four Strength: 141 Top Players: Chakvetadze (#8; Won event); Schnyder (#16; lost QF); Mirza (#38; lost SF); Nakamura (#57; lost 1R) Winner: Anna Chakvetadze (#8). Finalist: Akiko Morigami (#61) Semifinalists: Sania Mirza (#38), Akgul Amanmuradova (#141) Doubles Winners: Mirza/Mattek. Finalists: Jidkova/Poutchek July 22, 2007: Palermo 2007 (IV/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 201 Top Players: Krajicek (#32; lost 1R); A. Radwanska (#33; lost QF); Müller (#34; lost F); Loit (#37; lost QF) Winner: Agnes Szavay (#53). Finalist: Martina Müller (#34) Semifinalists: Karin Knapp (#60), Sara Errani (#102) Doubles Winners: Koryttseva/Kustova. Finalists: Canepa/Knapp July 22, 2007: Contrexeville $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 654 Top Players: Cohen-Aloro (#96; lost 2R); Petkovic (#109; Won event); Fedossova (#115; lost 2R); Foretz (#129; lost QF) Winner: Andrea Petkovic (#109). Finalist: Ksenia Milevskaya (#453) Semifinalists: Margalita Chakhnashvili (#146), Eloisa Compostizo de Andres (#360) Doubles Winners: Voracova/Zahlavova Strycova. Finalists: Dzehalevich/Milevskaya July 22, 2007: Dnepropetrovsk $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 940 Top Players: Cornet (#116; Won event); Zahlavova (#148; lost 1R); O. Sanchez (#197; lost 2R); Woerle (#215; lost 1R) Winner: Alizé Cornet (#116). Finalist: Stefanie Vogele (#312) Semifinalists: Tina Schiechtl (#271), Anna Lapuschenkova (#298) Doubles Winners: Rakhim/Ar. Rodionova. Finalists: Abramovic/Abramovic July 29, 2007: Stanford 2007 (II/Hard) Modified TSI: 123. Top Four Strength: 65 Top Players: Chakvetadze (#7; Won event); Bartoli (#11; lost 2R); Hantuchova (#12; lost SF); Schnyder (#17; lost QF) Winner: Anna Chakvetadze (#7). Finalist: Sania Mirza (#35) Semifinalists: Daniela Hantuchova (#12), Sybille Bammer (#22) Doubles Winners: Mirza/Peer. Finalists: Azarenka/Chakvetadze July 29, 2007: Bad Gastein 2007 (III/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 217 Top Players: Schiavone (#31; Won event); Loit (#36; lost 1R); Szavay (#37; lost QF); Kanepi (#46; lost SF) Winner: Francesca Schiavone (#31). Finalist: Yvonne Meusburger (#82) Semifinalists: Kaia Kanepi (#46), Karin Knapp (#58) Doubles Winners: Hradecka/Voracova. Finalists: Szavay/Uhlirova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 23 July 29, 2007: Petange $75K+H 2007 ($75K+H/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 515 Top Players: Müller (#33; lost F); Petkovic (#102; lost 1R); Schruff (#119; lost QF); Nagy (#124; lost 1R) Winner: Pauline Parmentier (#137). Finalist: Martina Müller (#33) Semifinalists: Galina Voskoboeva (#151), Carla Suarez Navarro (#174) Doubles Winners: Suarez Navarro/Yakimova. Finalists: Müller/Schaul July 29, 2007: Lexington $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 812 Top Players: Dellacqua (#110; lost SF); Dubois (#141; Won event); Spears (#152; lost 1R); Czink (#158; lost QF) Winner: Stéphanie Dubois (#141). Finalist: Anne Keothavong (#181) Semifinalists: Casey Dellacqua (#110), Julie Ditty (#164) Doubles Winners: Czink/Lee-Waters. Finalists: Dellacqua/Grandin August 5, 2007: San Diego 2007 (I/Hard) Modified TSI: 315. Top Four Strength: 25 Top Players: Sharapova (#2; Won event); Jankovic (#3; lost R16); Chakvetadze (#6; lost SF); Petrova (#9; lost QF) Winner: Maria Sharapova (#2). Finalist: Patty Schnyder (#17) Semifinalists: Anna Chakvetadze (#6), Elena Dementieva (#15) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Azarenka/Chakvetadze August 5, 2007: Stockholm 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 211 Top Players: Medina Garrigues (#32; lost 2R); A. Radwanska (#35; Won event); Loit (#37; lost QF); Kanepi (#40; lost 1R) Winner: Agnieszka Radwanska (#35). Finalist: Vera Dushevina (#66) Semifinalists: Tsvetana Pironkova (#131), Julia Goerges (#177) Doubles Winners: Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual. Finalists: C. Chan/Luzhanska August 5, 2007: Rimini $75K 2007 ($75K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 699 Top Players: Cornet (#107; lost SF); Salerni (#117; lost QF); Voracova (#123; lost 2R); Foretz (#128; lost F) Winner: Emmanuelle Gagliardi (#133). Finalist: Stéphanie Foretz (#128) Semifinalists: Alizé Cornet (#107), Galina Voskoboeva (#136) Doubles Winners: Ani/Klepac. Finalists: Jovanovic/Jugic-Salkic August 5, 2007: Washington $75K 2007 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 649 Top Players: Wozniak (#90; lost QF); Savchuk (#101; lost F); Dellacqua (#106; lost SF); Cravero (#115; lost QF) Winner: Melinda Czink (#152). Finalist: Olga Savchuk (#101) Semifinalists: Casey Dellacqua (#106), Kristina Brandi (#185) Doubles Winners: Cravero/Jozami. Finalists: Ditty/Grandin

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 24 August 5, 2007: Vancouver $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 827 Top Players: Dubois (#121; lost F); O’Brien (#127; lost 2R); Spears (#164; lost 2R); Keothavong (#167; Won event) Winner: Anne Keothavong (#167). Finalist: Stéphanie Dubois (#121) Semifinalists: Racquel Kops-Jones (#186), Sunitha Rao (#243) Doubles Winners: Dubois/Pelletier. Finalists: Esperon/Lepore August 12, 2007: Los Angeles 2007 (II/Hard) Modified TSI: 294. Top Four Strength: 24 Top Players: Sharapova (#2; lost SF); Jankovic (#3; lost SF); Ivanovic (#5; Won event); Petrova (#9; lost F) Winner: Ana Ivanovic (#5). Finalist: Nadia Petrova (#9) Semifinalists: Maria Sharapova (#2), Jelena Jankovic (#3) Doubles Winners: Peschke/Stubbs. Finalists: Molik/Santangelo August 19, 2007: Canadian Open 2007 (I/Hard) Modified TSI: 387. Top Four Strength: 17 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Jankovic (#3; lost F); Ivanovic (#4; lost 2R); Kuznetsova (#5; lost QF) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Jelena Jankovic (#3) Semifinalists: Tatiana Golovin (#19), Yan Zi (#169) Doubles Winners: Srebotnik/Sugiyama. Finalists: Black/Huber August 19, 2007: Bronx $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 519 Top Players: Meusburger (#63; lost SF); Dellacqua (#96; Won event); Bychkova (#97; lost 1R); Kremer (#104; lost 1R) Winner: Casey Dellacqua (#96). Finalist: Ahsha Rolle (#122) Semifinalists: Yvonne Meusburger (#63), Pauline Parmentier (#111) Doubles Winners: Hradecka/U. Radwanska. Finalists: Koryttseva/Kustova August 19, 2007: Penza $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 1488 Top Players: Schiechtl (#237; lost 1R); Szatmari (#242; lost 1R); Lapuschenkova (#263; Won event); Kondratieva (#267; lost QF) Winner: Anna Lapuschenkova (#263). Finalist: Kristina Antoniychuk (#534) Semifinalists: Anastasia Pivovarova (#349), Ksenia Pervak (#623) Doubles Winners: Lefevre/Szatmari. Finalists: Buzarnescu/Kapshay August 25, 2007: New Haven 2007 (II/Hard) Modified TSI: 178. Top Four Strength: 51 Top Players: Kuznetsova (#4; Won event); Hantuchova (#10; lost 2R); Bartoli (#11; lost QF); Schnyder (#12; lost 1R) Winner: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4). Finalist: Agnes Szavay (#41) Semifinalists: Elena Dementieva (#15), Eleni Daniilidou (#42) Doubles Winners: Mirza/Santangelo. Finalists: Black/Huber

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 25 August 25, 2007: Forest Hills 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 264 Top Players: Razzano (#36; lost F); Tu (#46; lost QF); Vinci (#49; lost 1R); Dulko (#51; Won event) Winner: Gisela Dulko (#51). Finalist: Virginie Razzano (#36) Semifinalists: Nathalie Déchy (#57), Elena Vesnina (#58) Doubles Winners: NO DOUBLES. September 2, 2007: Moscow $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 1105 Top Players: Ivanova (#172; lost 2R); Dzehalevich (#176; lost 1R); Lukic (#203; lost 1R); Lapuschenkova (#206; Won event) Winner: Anna Lapuschenkova (#206). Finalist: Galyna Kosyk (#320) Semifinalists: Maria Kondratieva (#267), Amina Rakhim (#301) Doubles Winners: Kleybanova/Pivarova. Finalists: Davydova/Kondratieva September 9, 2007: U. S. Open 2007 (Slam/Hard) Modified TSI: 475. Top Four Strength: 13 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Sharapova (#2; lost 3R); Jankovic (#3; lost QF); Kuznetsova (#4; lost F) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4) Semifinalists: Anna Chakvetadze (#6), Venus Williams (#14) Doubles Winners: Déchy/Safina. Finalists: Chan/Chuang September 9, 2007: Denain $75K 2007 ($75K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 616 Top Players: Bacsinszky (#94; lost SF); Petkovic (#102; lost 1R); Malek (#111; lost SF); Kloesel (#113; lost 1R) Winner: Olivia Sanchez (#167). Finalist: Anastasia Yakimova (#135) Semifinalists: Timea Bacsinszky (#94), Tatjana Malek (#111) Doubles Winners: Hrdinova/Pelletier. Finalists: Bacsinszky/Kosinska September 9, 2007: Mestre $50K 2007 ($50K/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 802 Top Players: Voracova (#119; lost SF); Nagy (#137; lost QF); Zahlavova Strycova (#144; lost QF); Ani (#146; lost QF) Winner: Rossana de los Rios (#150). Finalist: Alisa Kleybanova (#208) Semifinalists: Renata Voracova (#119), Anna Korzeniak (#241) Doubles Winners: Kleybanova/Ruutel. Finalists: Jugic-Salkic/Kustova September 16, 2007: Bali 2007 (III+/Hard) Modified TSI: 96. Top Four Strength: 75 Top Players: Jankovic (#3; lost QF); Hantuchova (#12; lost F); Schnyder (#13; lost 2R); Medina Garrigues (#32; lost 2R) Winner: Lindsay Davenport (#234). Finalist: Daniela Hantuchova (#12) Semifinalists: Sara Errani (#90), Sorana Cirstea (#137) Doubles Winners: Ji/S. Sun. Finalists: Craybas/Grandin

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 26 September 16, 2007: Bordeaux $100K+H 2007 ($100K+H/Clay) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 365 Top Players: Loit (#42; lost SF); Meusburger (#63; lost 1R); Cornet (#68; lost F); Parmentier (#87; lost 1R) Winner: Tsvetana Pironkova (#97). Finalist: Alizé Cornet (#68) Semifinalists: Emilie Loit (#42), Tatjana Malek (#113) Doubles Winners: Bacsinszky/Kloesel. Finalists: Kleybanova/Vierin September 16, 2007: Kharkov $100K 2007 ($100K/Hard) Modified TSI: 10. Top Four Strength: 359 Top Players: A. Bondarenko (#21; Won event); K. Bondarenko (#46; lost QF); Kremer (#107; lost SF); Yakimova (#118; lost 1R) Winner: Alona Bondarenko (#21). Finalist: Vesna Manasieva (#253) Semifinalists: Anne Kremer (#107), Tatiana Perebiynis (#143) Doubles Winners: Koryttseva/Kustova. Finalists: A. Bondarenko/K. Bondarenko September 16, 2007: Tokyo $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 1163 Top Players: Namigata (#177; lost QF); Ferguson (#197; Won event); Hisamatsu (#206; lost QF); Coin (#209; lost QF) Winner: Sophie Ferguson (#197). Finalist: Zhao Yijing (#622) Semifinalists: Xie Yan-Ze (#364), Rika Fujiwara (#410) Doubles Winners: Fujiwara/Namigata. Finalists: Iijima/Yonemura September 23, 2007: Beijing 2007 (II/Hard) Modified TSI: 154. Top Four Strength: 59 Top Players: Jankovic (#3; lost F); Mauresmo (#10; lost QF); Dementieva (#15; lost QF); Hingis (#18; lost 2R) Winner: Agnes Szavay (#23). Finalist: Jelena Jankovic (#3) Semifinalists: Peng Shuai (#49), Lindsay Davenport (#154) Doubles Winners: Chuang/Hsieh. Finalists: Han/Xu September 23, 2007: Kolkata 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 30. Top Four Strength: 148 Top Players: Hantuchova (#11; lost SF); Bartoli (#12; lost 1R); Kirilenko (#35; Won event); Kudryavtseva (#67; lost 1R) Winner: Maria Kirilenko (#35). Finalist: Mariya Koryttseva (#164) Semifinalists: Daniela Hantuchova (#11), Anne Keothavong (#144) Doubles Winners: King/Kudryavtseva. Finalists: Brianti/Koryttseva September 23, 2007: Portoroz 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 45. Top Four Strength: 131 Top Players: Golovin (#19; Won event); Bammer (#20; lost QF); Srebotnik (#24; lost F); Zvonareva (#29; lost QF) Winner: Tatiana Golovin (#19). Finalist: Katarina Srebotnik (#24) Semifinalists: Gisela Dulko (#43), Vera Dushevina (#46) Doubles Winners: Hradecka/Voracova. Finalists: Klepac/Likhovtseva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 27 September 23, 2007: Albuquerque $75K 2007 ($75K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 796 Top Players: Dubois (#123; lost 1R); de los Rios (#136; Won event); Czink (#137; lost 1R); Ani (#141; lost F) Winner: Rossana de los Rios (#136). Finalist: Maret Ani (#141) Semifinalists: Marie-Eve Pelletier (#168), Michelle Larcher de Brito (#999) Doubles Winners: Czink/Haynes. Finalists: Dekmeijere/Lepchenko September 30, 2007: Luxembourg 2007 (II/Indoor) Modified TSI: 234. Top Four Strength: 40 Top Players: Chakvetadze (#5; lost QF); Ivanovic (#6; Won event); Petrova (#8; lost 2R); Hantuchova (#10; lost F) Winner: Ana Ivanovic (#6). Finalist: Daniela Hantuchova (#10) Semifinalists: Marion Bartoli (#11), Vera Zvonareva (#27) Doubles Winners: Benesova/Husarova. Finalists: Azarenka/Peer September 30, 2007: Guangzhou 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 241 Top Players: Medina Garrigues (#32; lost QF); Razzano (#39; Won event); Peng (#47; lost 2R); Cibulkova (#52; lost SF) Winner: Virginie Razzano (#39). Finalist: Tzipora Obziler (#105) Semifinalists: Dominika Cibulkova (#52), Anastasia Rodionova (#88) Doubles Winners: Peng/Yan. Finalists: King/Sun September 30, 2007: Seoul 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 53. Top Four Strength: 121 Top Players: V. Williams (#9; Won event); Szavay (#20; lost QF); Kirilenko (#29; lost F); Sugiyama (#34; lost 1R) Winner: Venus Williams (#9). Finalist: Maria Kirilenko (#29) Semifinalists: Eleni Daniilidou (#37), Flavia Pennetta (#62) Doubles Winners: Chuang/Hsieh. Finalists: Daniilidou/Woehr September 30, 2007: Ashland $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 749 Top Players: de los Rios (#114; lost 2R); Dubois (#126; lost SF); Ani (#129; lost QF); Czink (#140; Won event) Winner: Melinda Czink (#140). Finalist: Varvara Lepchenko (#147) Semifinalists: Stéphanie Dubois (#126), Alexandra Stevenson (#497) Doubles Winners: Alves/Hrdinova. Finalists: Ani/Kloesel October 7, 2007: Stuttgart 2007 (II+/Indoor) Modified TSI: 463. Top Four Strength: 14 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Kuznetsova (#2; lost SF); Jankovic (#3; lost SF); Ivanovic (#5; lost 2R) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Tatiana Golovin (#19) Semifinalists: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#2), Jelena Jankovic (#3) Doubles Winners: Peschke/Stubbs. Finalists: Chan/Safina

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 28 October 7, 2007: Japan Open 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 43. Top Four Strength: 130 Top Players: V. Williams (#8; lost F); Kirilenko (#26; lost 1R); Mirza (#29; lost QF); Razzano (#33; Won event) Winner: Virginie Razzano (#33). Finalist: Venus Williams (#8) Semifinalists: Flavia Pennetta (#53), Caroline Wozniacki (#73) Doubles Winners: Sun/Yan. Finalists: Chuang/King October 7, 2007: Tashkent 2007 (IV/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 279 Top Players: Azarenka (#35; lost F); Cibulkova (#47; lost 1R); Govortsova (#55; lost SF); Olaru (#60; lost QF) Winner: Pauline Parmentier (#87). Finalist: Victoria Azarenka (#35) Semifinalists: Olga Govortsova (#55), Elena Vesnina (#61) Doubles Winners: Dzehalevich/Yakimova. Finalists: Poutchek/Rodionova October 7, 2007: Troy $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 798 Top Players: Dubois (#125; lost F); Ani (#129; Won event); Lepchenko (#142; lost 1R); Kloesel (#148; lost QF) Winner: Maret Ani (#129). Finalist: Stéphanie Dubois (#125) Semifinalists: Ekaterina Shulaeva (#309), Gail Brodsky (#685) Doubles Winners: Haynes/Washington. Finalists: Hrdinova/Pelletier October 14, 2007: Moscow 2007 (I/Indoor) Modified TSI: 276. Top Four Strength: 25 Top Players: Kuznetsova (#2; lost SF); Sharapova (#4; lost 2R); Chakvetadze (#6; lost 2R); S. Williams (#7; lost F) Winner: Elena Dementieva (#14). Finalist: Serena Williams (#7) Semifinalists: Svetlana Kuznetsova (#2), Dinara Safina (#17) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Azarenka/Poutchek October 14, 2007: Bangkok 2007 (III/Hard) Modified TSI: 124. Top Four Strength: 65 Top Players: Jankovic (#3; lost 1R); V. Williams (#8; lost SF); Peer (#16; lost QF); Razzano (#27; lost 2R) Winner: Flavia Pennetta (#49). Finalist: Chan Yung-Jan (#97) Semifinalists: Venus Williams (#8), Yan Zi (#68) Doubles Winners: Sun/Yan. Finalists: Morita/Namigata October 14, 2007: Joue-Les-Tours $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 730 Top Players: Cetkovska (#105; lost SF); Schruff (#124; lost 2R); Goerges (#134; lost QF); Nagy (#138; lost 1R) Winner: Sofia Arvidsson (#143). Finalist: Kristina Barrois (#173) Semifinalists: Petra Cetkovska (#105), Youlia Fedossova (#146) Doubles Winners: Jans/Rosolska. Finalists: Cetkovska/Zahlavova Strycova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 29 October 14, 2007: San Francisco $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 648 Top Players: Harkleroad (#93; Won event); Cravero (#107; lost 1R); de los Rios (#115; lost QF); Ditty (#133; lost 1R) Winner: Ashley Harkleroad (#93). Finalist: Sunitha Rao (#185) Semifinalists: Eva Hrdinova (#195), Angela Haynes (#238) Doubles Winners: Haynes/Kops-Jones. Finalists: Cravero/Jozami October 21, 2007: Zürich 2007 (I/Indoor) Modified TSI: 440. Top Four Strength: 13 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Kuznetsova (#2; lost QF); Jankovic (#3; lost 2R); Ivanovic (#4; lost 2R) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Tatiana Golovin (#18) Semifinalists: Nicole Vaidisova (#15), Francesca Schiavone (#32) Doubles Winners: Peschke/Stubbs. Finalists: Raymond/Schiavone October 21, 2007: Lawrenceville $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 615 Top Players: Harkleroad (#92; lost 1R); de los Rios (#107; lost QF); Cravero (#108; lost 1R); Wozniak (#109; lost SF) Winner: Julie Ditty (#135). Finalist: Angela Haynes (#234) Semifinalists: Aleksandra Wozniak (#109), Stéphanie Dubois (#115) Doubles Winners: Dubois/Kleybanova. Finalists: Baker/Ditty October 21, 2007: Saint Raphael $50K 2007 ($50K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 552 Top Players: Osterloh (#82; lost 1R); Obziler (#88; lost QF); Cetkovska (#101; lost 1R); Cirstea (#111; lost QF) Winner: Alberta Brianti (#149). Finalist: Stéphanie Foretz (#146) Semifinalists: Ekaterina Makarova (#118), Julia Schruff (#128) Doubles Winners: Makarova/Osterloh. Finalists: Chakhnashvili/Milevskaya October 28, 2007: Linz 2007 (II/Indoor) Modified TSI: 194. Top Four Strength: 57 Top Players: Chakvetadze (#7; lost QF); Bartoli (#9; lost SF); Hantuchova (#10; Won event); Vaidisova (#14; lost SF) Winner: Daniela Hantuchova (#10). Finalist: Patty Schnyder (#17) Semifinalists: Marion Bartoli (#9), Nicole Vaidisova (#14) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Srebotnik/Sugiyama October 28, 2007: Bratislava $100K+H 2007 ($100K+H/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 339 Top Players: Cibulkova (#49; lost 2R); Parmentier (#60; lost 2R); Zakopalova (#63; lost 1R); Déchy (#68; lost 1R) Winner: Tatjana Malek (#102). Finalist: Petra Kvitova (#214) Semifinalists: Olga Savchuk (#106), Iveta Benesova (#133) Doubles Winners: Voracova/Zahlavova Strycova. Finalists: Rodionova/Savchuk

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 30 November 4, 2007: Quebec City 2007 (III/Indoor) Modified TSI: 25. Top Four Strength: 156 Top Players: Vaidisova (#12; lost 1R); Zvonareva (#24; lost SF); Vakulenko (#36; lost F); Tu (#48; lost 1R) Winner: Lindsay Davenport (#126). Finalist: Julia Vakulenko (#36) Semifinalists: Vera Zvonareva (#24), Julie Ditty (#122) Doubles Winners: Fusano/Kops-Jones. Finalists: Dubois/Voracova November 4, 2007: Taoyuan $50K 2007 ($50K/Hard) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 473 Top Players: Morigami (#53; Won event); Y. Chan (#69; lost 2R); Tanasugarn (#106; lost 1R); Yuan (#123; lost SF) Winner: Akiko Morigami (#53). Finalist: Yanina Wickmayer (#280) Semifinalists: Yuan Meng (#123), Rika Fujiwara (#312) Doubles Winners: Y. Chan/H. Chan. Finalists: Hsieh/S-Y Hsieh November 11, 2007: Madrid Championships 2007 (Champ/Indoor) Modified TSI: 475. Top Four Strength: 13 Top Players: Hénin (#1; Won event); Kuznetsova (#2; lost RR); Jankovic (#3; lost RR); Ivanovic (#4; lost SF) Winner: Justine Hénin (#1). Finalist: Maria Sharapova (#6) Semifinalists: Ana Ivanovic (#4), Anna Chakvetadze (#7) Doubles Winners: Black/Huber. Finalists: Srebotnik/Sugiyama November 11, 2007: Pittsburg $75K 2007 ($75K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 447 Top Players: Govortsova (#49; lost 2R); Obziler (#84; lost 2R); Craybas (#89; lost QF); Poutchkova (#92; lost F) Winner: Ashley Harkleroad (#95). Finalist: Olga Poutchkova (#92) Semifinalists: Stéphanie Dubois (#102), Jelena Pandzic (#322) Doubles Winners: Dubois/Kleybanova. Finalists: Kops-Jones/Spears November 11, 2007: Minsk $50K 2007 ($50K/Indoor) Modified TSI: 0. Top Four Strength: 616 Top Players: Kudryavtseva (#82; lost 1R); Rezai (#83; lost QF); Makarova (#107; lost 2R); Cirstea (#117; lost F) Winner: Evgeniya Rodina (#141). Finalist: Sorana Cirstea (#117) Semifinalists: Ekaterina Bychkova (#119), Ekaterina Dzehalevich (#188) Doubles Winners: Kudryavtseva/Pavlyuchenkova. Finalists: Ivanova/Manasieva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 31 Title Defences Title defences seem to have been declining in recent years. In 2003, we had no fewer than twelve title defences. There were nine in 2004, six in 2005 (two by Mauresmo, and one each by Davenport, Medina Garrigues, Medina Garrigues, and Zvonareva), and six again in 2006 (by five different players; only Kim Clijsters managed to defend twice). This year, we again had six defences — but the astonishing thing is, four of them were by Justine Hénin. Take her out, and title defences have almost ceased to exist.. Tournament Defender Antwerp Mauresmo Dubai Hénin Roland Garros Hénin Eastbourne Hénin San Diego Sharapova Madrid Championships Hénin

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 32 Tournament Strengths Tournament Strength Based on Top Four Players There is, unfortunately for statisticians and players alike, no accepted and universal measure for determining tournament strength. It’s unfortunate for players because they don’t get rewarded based on their actual accomplishments. It’s unfortunate for statisticians because it makes it hard to correlate tournament strength with anything else. We will take a couple of stabs at it, though. We have two methods, both of which are used in the table of tournament results above. The first is the “Top Four Strength,” or, to be more explicit, the “Tournament Strength Based on Top Four Players.” This is quite simple: We simply take the (WTA) rankings of the top four players (the top four based on actual rankings, not seeding, we note). We then add them up, counting the top two players twice. So the Australian Open, which featured the world’s #2, #3, #4, and #5 players, had a strength of 2+2+3+3+4+5, or 19. Sydney, which featured the #3, #4, #5, and #6, had a strength of 3+3+4+4+5+6, or 25. The strongest possible tournament, in this ranking, is one with a strength of 13. There is no absolute maximum score,, since theoretically a $10K event could have no ranked players at all, but in practice the maximum for a Tour event is around 300 and the maximum for a $50K or higher Challenger really ought to be in the 1000 range; a stronger Challenger will be above 500.\ It’s probably not surprising to note that almost the only tournaments to have the maximum strength of 13 are required events:Roland Garros, Wimbledon, the U. S. Open, and the Madrid Championships, plus Zürich, with the Australian Open and Miami right behind. We note that Stuttgart, which was weak in its first year, has now gained the strength it always had while held in Filderstadt. Rank Event Score Winner Rank Event Score Winner 1T Roland Garros 13 Justine Hénin 28T Charleston 57 Jelena Jankovic 1T Wimbledon 13 Venus Williams 28T Strasbourg 57 Medina Garrigues 1T U. S. Open 13 Justine Hénin 28T Linz 57 D. Hantuchova 1T Zürich 13 Justine Hénin 31T Amelia Island 59 Tatiana Golovin 1T Madrid Championships 13 Justine Hénin 31T Beijing 59 Agnes Szavay 6 Stuttgart 14 Justine Hénin 33T Stanford 65 A. Chakvetadze 7Miami 15 Serena Williams 33T Bangkok 65 Flavia Pennetta 8 Canadian Open 17 Justine Hénin 35 Gold Coast 69 Dinara Saﬁna 9 Berlin 18 Ana Ivanovic 36 Istanbul 72 Elena Dementieva 10 Australian Open 19 Serena Williams 37 Bali 75 L. Davenport 11 Dubai 21 Justine Hénin 38 Auckland 91 Jelena Jankovic 12T Paris 22 Nadia Petrova 39 Seoul 121 Venus Williams 12T Warsaw 22 Justine Hénin 40 Japan Open 130 Virginie Razzano 14 Indian Wells 23 D. Hantuchova 41 Portoroz 131 Tatiana Golovin 15 Los Angeles 24 Ana Ivanovic 42T Hobart 141 A. Chakvetadze 16T Sydney 25 Kim Clijsters 42T Cincinnati 141 A. Chakvetadze 16T San Diego 25 Maria Sharapova 44 Kolkata 148 Maria Kirilenko 16T Moscow 25 Elena Dementieva 45 Quebec City 156 L. Davenport 19 Rome 28 Jelena Jankovic 46 Memphis 158 Venus Williams 20 Antwerp 29 Amélie Mauresmo 47 Estoril 162 Greta Arn 21 Doha 30 Justine Hénin 48 Acapulco 173 Emilie Loit 22 Pan Paciﬁc 32 Martina Hingis 49T Pattaya City 192 Sybille Bammer 23 Eastbourne 33 Justine Hénin 49T Prague 192 Akiko Morigami 24 ’s-Hertogenbosch 36 A. Chakvetadze 51 Budapest 195 Gisela Dulko 25 Luxembourg 40 Ana Ivanovic 52 Palermo 201 Agnes Szavay 26 Birmingham 41 Jelena Jankovic 53 Stockholm 211 A. Radwanska 27 New Haven 51 S. Kuznetsova 54 Bad Gastein 217 F.Schiavone

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 33 Rank Event Score Winner Rank Event Score Winner 55 Barcelona 227 M. Shaughnessy 91 Lawrenceville $50K 615 Julie Ditty 56 Bogota 239 Roberta Vinci 92T Denain $75K 616 Olivia Sanchez 57 Guangzhou 241 Virginie Razzano 92T Minsk $50K 616 Evgeniya Rodina 58 Biella $100K 258 A. Radwanska 94 Zagreb $50K 636 Kyra Nagy 59 Forest Hills 264 Gisela Dulko 95 San Francisco $50K 648 A. Harkleroad 60 Tashkent 279 P. Parmentier 96 Washington $75K 649 Melinda Czink 61 Bangalore 302 Y. Shvedova 97 Contrexeville $50K 654 Andrea Petkovic 62 Bratislava $100K+H 339 Tatjana Malek 98 Latina $50K 663 Y.Meusburger 63 Milan $50K+H 2006 350 Roberta Vinci 99 Fukuoka $50K 670 Chan Yung-Jan 64 Kharkov $100K 359 A. Bondarenko 100 Saint Paul $50K 677 Soﬁa Arvidsson 65 Bordeaux $100K 365 T. Pironkova 101 San Diego $50K 2006 693 R. de los Rios 66 Fes 368 Milagros Sequera 102 Rimini $75K 699 E.Gagliardi 67 Ortisei $75K 375 C. Wozniacki 103 Zlin $50K 716 Klara Zakopalova 68 Poitiers $75K 2006 380 Aravane Rezai 104 Joue-Les-Tours $50K 730 Soﬁa Arvidsson 69 Deauville $50K 2006 393 V. Kutuzova 105T Waikoloa $50K 749 Melinda Czink 70 Dubai $75K 2006 398 K. Bondarenko 105T Ashland $50K 749 Melinda Czink 71T Las Vegas $75K 444 C. Wozniacki 107 Saguenay $50K 795 Angelique Kerber 71T Dothan $75K 444 Chan Yung-Jan 108 Albuquerque $75K 796 R.de los Rios 73 Pittsburg $75K 447 A. Harkleroad 109 Troy $50K 798 Maret Ani 74 Cagnes-sur-Mer $100K 461 Timea Bacsinszky 110 Mestre $50K 802 R. de los Rios 75 Taoyuan $50K 473 Akiko Morigami 111 Marseille $50K 810 Jorgelina Cravero 76 Cuneo $50K+H 504 M. E. Salerni 112 Lexington $50K 812 Stéphanie Dubois 77 Kaohsiung $75K 2006 506 Chan Yung-Jan 113 Vancouver $50K 827 Anne Keothavong 78 Petange $75K+H 515 P. Parmentier 114 Torrent $50K 830 I. R. Olaru 79 Bronx $50K 519 Casey Dellacqua 115 Saint Gaudens $50K 849 Tatiana Perebiynis 80 Charlottsville $50K 523 Edina Gallovits 116 Gifu $50K 859 Chan Yung-Jan 81 Zagreb $75K+H 547 Agnes Szavay 117 Monzon $75K 884 Lilia Osterloh 82 Sea Island $50K 548 Julie Ditty 118 Patras $25K 897 Maret Ani 83 Saint Raphael $50K 552 Alberta Brianti 119 Dnepropetrovsk $50K 940 Alizé Cornet 84 IndianHarborBeach$50 564 Bethanie Mattek 120 Boston $50K 954 V.Lepchenko 85 Lawrenceville$50K ’06 573 Stéphanie Dubois 121 GuangZhou $50K 1025 Zhang Shuai 86 Dinan $75K 574 Masa Zec Peskiric 122 Moscow $50K 1105 A.Lapuschenkova 87 Rome $100K 593 Caroline Maes 123 Tokyo $50K 1163 Sophie Ferguson 88 Jounieh $75K 594 Selima Sfar 124 Carson $50K 1460 Jessica Kirkland 89 Surbiton $25K 603 Schultz-McCarthy 125 Penza $50K 1488 A.Lapuschenkova 90 Prerov $75K 611 Angelique Kerber

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 34 Tournament Strength Based on Modified TSI The second method of assessing strength, the Modified TSI, is better for ranking the top events, but is not intended to measure low-tier events. The original TSI (Tournament Strength Index) was proposed by Geert Calliauw. His Tournament Strength Index calculates the total quality points available for the top eight seeds, and calculates this as a fraction of the possible quality points if all of the Top Eight played. My modified version uses the same calculation, but counts only Top 25 players. (This is a change from 2002, when only Top Ten players counted; the purpose is to allow us to assess the sorts of events with only a handful of top players.) Recall that the #1 player is worth 100 quality points, #2 is worth 75, #3 66, #4 55, #5 50, and players #6-#10 are worth 43. Players below #10 are counted at a discounted rate: 15 points for those ranked #11-#16, 10 for those ranked #17Ð#25. The strongest possible tournament has a modified TSI of 475, so we can express this as a percentage: A tournament with a Modified TSI of 475 will be at 100% of full strength, one with a modified TSI of 427 would be at 90% strength, etc. The tables on the next two pages list the tournaments in order based on their strength. The first list, “Tournament strength based on Top Four Players,” includes all WTA events plus as many Challengers as fit (Note: I have calculated Top Four rankings for all $50K and higher events, but generally not $25K or lower events; it is unlikely, though, that any of the $25K events are stronger than the events listed here, with the exception of the Surbiton $25K event, which is listed). The second table, “Tournament Strength based on Modified TSI, includes primarily WTA events, since only one of the Challengers this year had a Top 25 player (Alona Bondarenko played the Kharkov $100K event). The greater ability of the Modified TSI ranking to distinguish strong events is shown at the top of its list: Once again the maximum score of 475 is achieved only by required events (Roland Garros, Wimbledon, U.S. Open, Madrid), but now Stuttgart is #5, with the other two required event and Zürich close behind. Still, despite the minor differences, we generally find that the same events show up near the top in both lists. There is one interesting curiosity this year: The gap between the Tier II and Tier III events has seemingly become slightly smaller. Last year, the weakest event of Tier II or higher was the Pan Pacific, and even so, it was stronger than Bali, the strongest Tier III. This year, the top 22 events are all Tier II or higher, but ’s- Hertogenbosch is #23, and stronger than fully eight Tier I/II events (Eastbourne, Luxembourg, Linz, New Haven, Charleston, Amelia Island, Beijing, Stanford). The weakest Tier II is Stanford, which is weaker than four Tier II events (’s-Hertogenbosch, Birmingham, Strasbourg, Bangkok. It is noteworthy that the two stronges Tier III events, ’s-Hertogenbosch and Birmingham, are on grass). This is probably a symptom in part of the current injury plague: A lot of events which expected strong fields had a lot of late withdrawals.. Another interesting point is about Justine Hénin’s great year: Not only did she win the most titles on the Tour, but unlike her nearest competitors, the titles weren’t weak. Hénin’s titles included five of the seven stronger event on the calendar, and six of the Top Ten. By contrast, the strongest event Jelena Jankovic won was #16, and Anna Chakvetadze’s biggest title was #23.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 35 Rank Event Score Winner Rank Event Score Winner 1T Roland Garros 475 Justine Hénin 32 Strasbourg 125 Medina Garrigues 1T Wimbledon 475 Venus Williams 33 Bangkok 124 Flavia Pennetta 1T U. S. Open 475 Justine Hénin 34 Stanford 123 A. Chakvetadze 1T Madrid Championship 475 Justine Hénin 35 Istanbul 115 Elena Dementieva 5 Stuttgart 463 Justine Hénin 36 Gold Coast 113 Dinara Saﬁna 6Miami 452 Serena Williams 37 Bali 96 L. Davenport 7 Zürich 440 Justine Hénin 38 Auckland 60 Jelena Jankovic 8 Australian Open 418 Serena Williams 39 Cincinnati 58 A. Chakvetadze 9 Berlin 408 Ana Ivanovic 40 Seoul 53 Venus Williams 10 Canadian Open 387 Justine Hénin 41 Portoroz 45 Tatiana Golovin 11 Sydney 386 Kim Clijsters 42 Japan Open 43 Virginie Razzano 12 Indian Wells 357 D. Hantuchova 43 Kolkata 30 Maria Kirilenko 13 Warsaw 331 Justine Hénin 44 Quebec City 25 L. Davenport 14 Paris 322 Nadia Petrova 45 Memphis 20 Venus Williams 15 San Diego 315 Maria Sharapova 46 Hobart 15 A. Chakvetadze 16 Rome 302 Jelena Jankovic 47T Budapest 10 Gisela Dulko 17 Los Angeles 294 Ana Ivanovic 47T Acapulco 10 Emilie Loit 18 Dubai 289 Justine Hénin 47T Estoril 10 Greta Arn 19 Pan Paciﬁc 279 Martina Hingis 47T Kharkov $100K 10 A. Bondarenko 20 Moscow 276 Elena Dementieva 47T Prague 10 Akiko Morigami 21 Antwerp 267 Amélie Mauresmo 47T Pattaya City 10 Sybille Bammer 22 Doha 256 Justine Hénin 53T Forest Hills 0 Gisela Dulko 23 ’s-Hertogenbosch 240 A. Chakvetadze 53T Bangalore 0 Y. Shvedova 24 Eastbourne 235 Justine Hénin 53T Tashkent 0 P. Parmentier 25 Luxembourg 234 Ana Ivanovic 53T Fes 0 Milagros Sequera 26 Linz 194 D. Hantuchova 53T Stockholm 0 A. Radwanska 27 Birmingham 186 Jelena Jankovic 53T Bogota 0 Roberta Vinci 28 New Haven 178 S. Kuznetsova 53T Guangzhou 0 Virginie Razzano 29 Charleston 166 Jelena Jankovic 53T Palermo 0 Agnes Szavay 30 Amelia Island 161 Tatiana Golovin 53T Barcelona 0 M. Shaughnessy 31 Beijing 154 Agnes Szavay 53T Bad Gastein 0 F. Schiavone

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 36 Tournament Strength versus Tournament Points The above data tell us which tournament are strongest; they do not tell us much about the relationship between tournament strength and points awarded. But we can easily examine this. The following graph compares points awarded with the Modified TSI value of the various tournaments:

Strength versus Points

500

450

400

350

300

250

200 Modified TSI

150

100

0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Points Awarded

It will be evident that this is anything but a linear relationship. On this graph, it’s almost a sideways parabola. If we take a correlation coefficient between points awarded and tournament strength1, it turns out to be about .82. The next page shows a similar graph, but this time we’ll correlate points awarded against the Top Four Players statistic, incorporating many more tournaments (including a lot of Challengers which, for space reasons, I did not show in the chart of strongest tournaments).

1. The correlation coefficient is a mathematical measure of how related two data sets are. If they correlate exactly, the correlation coefficient is 1.0 (or, possibly, -1.0, if the data set is in the wrong order). If the data are unrelated, the correlation coefficient is 0. My standard way of trying to explain what values mean is as follows: In physics lab, we thumb-fingered physics students still obtained correlations of at least .97 for our experimental data; a real physicist working with proper equipment could expect to get a correlation of .999 or so. In medical experiments, say involving genetics, ratios in the range of .3 to .5 are considered meaningful. My feeling is that the WTA could make the correlation between tournament strength and points awarded be at least .9 — if they wanted to.

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600 Top Four Strength

400

200

0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Points Awarded

I reversed the axes this time, but it is clear that we again have a generally parabolic shape. It’s pretty clear that the WTA would get a more accurate rankings system by spreading out the points awarded. (And in fact we have an Alternate Rankings for this, “Tournament Strength-Based Rankings” on page 131.) But accurate rankings are not their primary concern. If we take a correlation coefficient for this data, we find, astonishingly, a mere .59 correlation between tournament strength under this measure and tournament points. And if we correlate just the same 62 events we correlated under Modified TSI, that falls to .56. That’s almost frighteningly bad.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 38 Tough Bills and Cheap Thrills It’s one thing to win a title. It’s altogether another to win one against strong opposition. The lists below categorizes events of 2007 based on what the winner had to do to win the title. (Note: for brevity, titles are listed only once. So a player who won a title without beating a Top Twenty player clearly also won without beating a Top Ten player.) Won Title Beating At Least Two Top Ten Players (Total of 12): Australian Open: S. Williams (Top Opponent: Sharapova/#2) Dubai: Hénin (Top Opponent: Mauresmo/#3) Doha: Hénin (Top Opponent: Kuznetsova/#5) Indian Wells: Hantuchova (Top Opponent: Kuznetsova/#4) Miami: S. Williams (Top Opponent: Hénin/#1) Roland Garros: Hénin (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#5) ’s-Hertogenbosch: Chakvetadze (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#5) Wimbledon: V. Williams (Top Opponent: Sharapova/#2) Los Angeles: Ivanovic (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#3) Canadian Open: Hénin (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#3) U. S. Open: Hénin (Top Opponent: Kuznetsova/#4) Madrid Championships: Hénin (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#3) Won Title Beating One Top Ten Player (Total of 19): Gold Coast: Safina (Top Opponent: Hingis/#7) Pan Pacific: Hingis (Top Opponent: Dementieva/#8) Paris: Petrova (Top Opponent: Mauresmo/#3) Antwerp: Mauresmo (Top Opponent: Clijsters/#4) Amelia Island: Golovin (Top Opponent: Petrova/#7) Warsaw: Hénin (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#7) Berlin: Ivanovic (Top Opponent: Kuznetsova/#4) Rome: Jankovic (Top Opponent: Kuznetsova/#3) Strasbourg: Medina Garrigues (Top Opponent: Mauresmo/#5) Birmingham:Jankovic (Top Opponent: Sharapova/#2) Eastbourne: Hénin (Top Opponent: Mauresmo/#4) San Diego: Sharapova (Top Opponent: Chakvetadze/#6) Bali: Davenport (Top Opponent: Jankovic/33) Beijing: Szavay (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#3) Luxembourg: Ivanovic (Top Opponent: Hantuchova/#10) Stuttgart: Hénin (Top Opponent Jankovic/#3) Japan Open: Razzano (Top Opponent: V. Williams/#8) Moscow: Dementieva (Top Opponent: S. Williams/#7) Bangkok: Pennetta (Top Opponent: V. Williams/#8) Won Title Without Facing a Top Ten Player (Total of 7): Sydney: Clijsters (Top Opponent: Jankovic/#12) Charleston: Jankovic (Top Opponent: Safina/#12) Stanford: Chakvetadze (Top Opponent: Hantuchova/#12) New Haven: Kuznetsova (Top Opponent: Dementieva/#15) Kolkata: Kirilenko (Top Opponent: Hantuchova/#11) Zürich: Hénin (Top Opponent: Vaidisova/#15) Linz: Hantuchova (Top Opponent: Vaidisova/#14) Won Title Without Facing a Top Fifteen Player (Total of 2): Auckland: Jankovic (Top Opponent: Zvonareva/#24) Memphis: V. Williams (Top Opponent: Peer/#17)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 39 Won Title Without Facing a Top Twenty Player (Total of 6): Bogota: Vinci (Top Opponent; Garbin/#29) Prague: Morigami (Top Opponent: Bartoli/#24) Istanbul: Dementieva (Top Opponent: A. Bondarenko/#25) Portoroz: Golovin (Top Opponent: Srebotnik/#24) Seoul: V. Williams (Top Opponent: Kirilenko/#39) Quebec City: Davenport (Top Opponent: Zvonareva/#24) Won Title Without Facing a Top Thirty Player (Total of 8): Hobart: Chakvetadze (Top Opponent: Zheng/#34) Pattaya City: Bammer (Top Opponent: Peng/#42) Bangalore: Shvedova (Top Opponent: Santangelo/#36) Acapulco: Loit (Top Opponent: Müller/#36) Cincinnati: Chakvetadze (Top Opponent: Mirza/#38) Forest Hills: Dulko (Top Opponent: Razzano/#36) Palermo: Szavay (Top Opponent: A. Radwanska/#33) Bad Gastein: Schiavone (Top Opponent: Szavay/#37) Won Title Without Facing a Top Fifty Player (Total of 7): Budapest: Dulko (Top Opponent: Pironkova/#85) Estoril: Arn (Top Opponent: Azarenka/#68) Fes: Sequera (Top Opponent: Razzano/#63) Barcelona: Shaughnessy (Top Opponent: Pennetta/#87) Stockholm: A. Radwanska (Top Opponent: Dushevina/#66) Guangzhou: Razzano (Top Opponent: Cibulkova/#52) Tashkent: Parmentier (Top Opponent: Azarenka/#35)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 40 Player Results The list below shows all the tournaments played by the Highlight Players of 2007 — those who spent at least one week in the Top Thirty. To explain the data in the table: Each cell in the table begins by identifying the player by name. It then lists her final ranking (i.e. where she was ranked on the November 12, 2006 rankings), followed by the highest ranking she had during the 2007 season. Then comes the player’s actual results, with one line for eacy tournament she played. The numbers in parentheses list, first, the Tier of the tournament, second, how far the player went, and third, the number of wins achieved. This is followed by a list of top players beaten en route, with the player’s rank at the time. For example, the second item in the entry for Victoria Azarenka reads Australian Open 2007 (Slam, 3R/Jankovic [11], 2) — Bartoli (21) This means that Azarenka’s second tournament of 2007 was the Australian Open. The designation “Slam” means that it was a Grand Slam; if a Roman numeral is used, it refers to the tier of the event (Tier I, II, III, IV, sometimes with a suffix such as “+” or “req” — referring to events bigger than the “standard” Tier I/II/ III/IV); the other possibilities are “Slam” for the Grand Slams, “Champ” for the year-end Championships, and a dollar amount, e.g. $50K, for a Challenger. 3R/Jankovic means that Arvidsson reached the Round of 32 (third round), where she was beaten by Jelena Jankovic, then ranked #11. The 2 indicates that she won two matches prior to that defeat. Players she defeated included Marion Bartoli, then ranked #21. (Note: only wins over Top 35 players are listed.) If a tournament is shown in bold, it means the player won the title. Victoria Azarenka ¥ Final Rank: 30 ¥ Best Rank: 26 Hobart Qualifying (IV, Q2R/Gagliardi [113], 0+1 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Jankovic [11], 2) — Bartoli (21) Las Vegas $75K ($75K, 2R/Poutchek [118], 1) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Zvonareva [20], 2+2 in qualifying) — Zheng (31) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Vaidisova [8], 2) — Medina Garrigues (32) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Oprandi [62], 0) Estoril (IV, F/Arn [176], 4) — Schiavone (26), Dulko (34), Safarova (30) Prague (IV, SF/Morigami [60], 3) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Knapp [85], 0) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 1R/Chakvetadze [8], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Vaidisova [10], 2) — Garbin (23) Stanford (II, 1R/Kirilenko [45], 0) San Diego (I, 2R/Hantuchova [10], 1) Los Angeles (II, QF/Jankovic [3], 3) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Kuznetsova [4], 3) — Hingis (17) Luxembourg (II, QF/Zvonareva [27], 2) — A. Radwanska (30), Petrova (8) Tashkent (IV, F/Parmentier [87], 4) Moscow (I, QF/Dementieva [14], 2) — Bammer (21), Sharapova (4)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 41 Sybille Bammer ¥ Final Rank: 21 ¥ Best Rank: 20 Gold Coast (III, 1R/Hingis [7], 0) Hobart (IV, SF/Bardina [70], 3) — Medina Garrigues (28) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Chakvetadze [13], 0) Pattaya City (IV, Win, 5) Antwerp (II, 2R/Chakvetadze [12], 1) Acapulco (III, 1R/Errani [216], 0) Indian Wells (I+, SF/Kuznetsova [4], 4) — Ivanovic (14), Golovin (19) Miami (Ireq, 1R/Loit [42], 0) Amelia Island (II, SF/Petrova [7], 4) — Hantuchova (14) Charleston (I, R16/Krajicek [54], 2) Berlin (I, 2R/Kuznetsova [4], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Hantuchova [14], 1) — Dulko (33) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Hénin [1], 3) — Li Na (18) Eastbourne (II, QF/Petrova [11], 2) — Safarova (26) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Granville [77], 1) Stanford (II, SF/Mirza [25], 3) — Sugiyama (29) San Diego (I, 2R/Sugiyama [30], 1) Los Angeles (II, R16/Jankovic [3], 2) Canadian Open (I, R16/Jankovic [3], 2) New Haven (II, 2R/Daniilidou [42], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Jankovic [3], 3) — Dementieva (13) Portoroz (IV, QF/Dulko [43], 2) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Bartoli [11], 1) Moscow (I, 1R/Azarenka [32], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Kuznetsova [2], 1) Linz (II, 1R/Sugiyama [42], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 42 Marion Bartoli ¥ Final Rank: 10 ¥ Best Rank: 9 Auckland (IV, 2R/Loit [56], 1) Sydney (II, 1R/Fedak [82], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Azarenka [94], 1) Pan Pacific (I, 1R/Beltrame [39], 0) Pattaya City (IV, 2R/Bammer [61], 1) Memphis (III, 1R/Granville [66], 0) Acapulco (III, 2R/Schruff [83], 1) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Vaidisova [10], 2) — Safina (12) Miami (Ireq, 2R/Dushevina [101], 0) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Daniilidou [47], 0) Charleston (I, 2R/Dominguez Lino [69], 1) Estoril (IV, QF/Llagostera Vives [410], 2) Prague (IV, F/Morigami [60], 4) Strasbourg (III, SF/Mauresmo [5], 3) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Jankovic [5], 3) — Dementieva (14) Birmingham (III, SF/Sharapova [2], 3) — Hantuchova (13) Eastbourne (II, SF/Hénin [1], 3) — Garbin (23), Dementieva (12) Wimbledon (Slam, F/V. Williams [31], 6) — Peer (16), Jankovic (3), Hénin (1) Stanford (II, 2R/Osterloh [108], 0) San Diego (I, R16/Dementieva [15], 1) Los Angeles (II, R32/Kirilenko [35], 0) Canadian Open (I, QF/Yan [169], 2) — Kirilenko (35), Safina (14) New Haven (II, QF/Dementieva [15], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/S. Williams [9], 3) — Safarova (23) Kolkata (III, 1R/King [90], 0) Luxembourg (II, SF/Hantuchova [10], 3) — A. Bondarenko (22), Bammer (21), Chalvetadze (5) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/A. Radwanska [35], 0) Moscow (I, 2R/Dushevina [46], 1) — A. Bondarenko (25) Zürich (I, QF/Golovin [18], 2) — Krajicek (33) Linz (II, SF/Schnyder [17], 2) Madrid Championships (Champ, RR 3rd, 1-1 in Round Robin; lost to Hénin [1]) — Jankovic (3)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 43 Alona Bondarenko ¥ Final Rank: 22 ¥ Best Rank: 21 Hobart (IV, 2R/Molik [165], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Clijsters [5], 2) Doha (II, 1R/Camerin [58], 0) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/N. Li [17], 1) Miami (Ireq, 2R/Kostanic Tosic [98], 0) Amelia Island (II, R16/Jankovic [9], 2) Warsaw (II, F/Hénin [1], 4) — Srebotnik (21), Kuznetsova (5) Berlin (I, R16/Ivanovic [16], 2) — Schiavone (27), Garbin (23) Rome (I, R16/Jankovic [5], 2) — Garbin (23) Istanbul (III, SF/Dementieva [14], 2+ 1 walkover) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Knapp [85], 1) Birmingham (III, QF/Jankovic [3], 2) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, QF/Jankovic [3], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Schnyder [15], 2) San Diego (I, 2R/Srebotnik [23], 1) Los Angeles (II, 1R/Fedak [128], 0) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Camerin [78], 0) New Haven (II, QF/Szavay [41], 2) — Mirza (28) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/V. Williams [13], 2) Kharkov $100K ($100K, Win, 4+1 walkover) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Bartoli [11], 0) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/Krajicek [31], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/Bartoli [12], 0) Zürich (I, QF/Vaidisova [15], 2) — Mauresmo (13) Linz (II, QF/Hantuchova [10], 2) Anna Chakvetadze ¥ Final Rank: 6 ¥ Best Rank: 5 Hobart (IV, Win, 5) — Zheng (34) Australian Open (Slam, QF/Sharapova [2], 4) — Schnyder (9) Paris (II, QF/Mauresmo [3], 2) — Poutchkova (35), Medina Garrigues (33) Antwerp (II, SF/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Petrova (7) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Peer [16], 2) — Kirilenko (33) Miami (Ireq, SF/Hénin [1], 4) — Golovin (19), Li Na (17) Warsaw (II, QF/Jankovic [7], 2) — Garbin (24) Berlin (I, 2R/Safarova [30], 1) — Stosur (28) Rome (I, R16/Hantuchova [14], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Sharapova [2], 4) — Sugiyama (26), Safarova (29) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, Win, 5) — Schiavone (30), Hantuchova (10), Jankovic (3) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Krajicek [45], 2) Cincinnati (III, Win, 5) Stanford (II, Win, 4) — Srebotnik (25), Hantuchova (12), Mirza (35) San Diego (I, SF/Sharapova [2], 3) — Sugiyama (30), V. Williams (16) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Razzano [45], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, SF/Kuznetsova [4], 5) — Mirza (27), Peer (19) Luxembourg (II, QF/Bartoli [11], 1) Stuttgart (II+, 2R/Golovin [19], 0) Moscow (I, 2R/Saﬁna [17], 0) Linz (II, QF/Schnyder [17], 1) — Schiavone (25) Madrid Championships (Champ, SF/Sharapova [6], 2-1 in RR (lost to Hénin [1]), 2-2 overall) — S. Williams (5), Jankovic (3) Kim Clijsters ¥ Final Rank: (unranked/retired) ¥ Best Rank: 4 Sydney (II, Win, 4) — Peer (18), Li Na (21), Jankovic (12) Australian Open (Slam, SF/Sharapova [2], 5) — A. Bondarenko (34), Hantuchova (18), Hingis (7) Antwerp (II, F/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Ivanovic (14), Golovin (20) Miami (Ireq, R16/N. Li [17], 2) — Stosur (27) Warsaw (II, 2R/Vakulenko [61], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 44 Lindsay Davenport ¥ Final Rank: 73 ¥ Best Rank: 25 Bali (III+, Win, 5) — Jankovic (3), Hantuchova (12) Beijing (II, SF/Jankovic [3], 3) — Dementieva (15) Quebec City (III, Win, 5) — Zvonareva (24) Elena Dementieva ¥ Final Rank: 11 ¥ Best Rank: 8 Sydney (II, 2R/N. Li [21], 1) — Sugiyama (26) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Vaidisova [12], 3) Pan Paciﬁc (I, SF/Hingis [6], 2) Antwerp (II, 2R/Likhovtseva [62], 0) Warsaw (II, 2R/V. Williams [23], 1) Berlin (I, R16/Petrova [9], 2) — Santangelo (31) Rome (I, QF/Jankovic [5], 3) — Petrova (12) Istanbul (III, Win, 4) — A. Bondarenko (25) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Bartoli [21], 2) Eastbourne (II, QF/Bartoli [20], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Paszek [54], 2) San Diego (I, SF/Schnyder [17], 4) — Bartoli (12) Los Angeles (II, QF/Sharapova [2], 3) — Hantuchova (10) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Schiavone [26], 0) New Haven (II, SF/Kuznetsova [4], 3) — Santangelo (27), Bartoli (11) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Bammer [20], 2) Beijing (II, QF/Davenport [154], 1) Stuttgart (II+, QF/Hénin [1], 2) — Mauresmo (12), Hantuchova (10) Moscow (I, Win, 5) — Schnyder (15), Azarenka (32), Saﬁna (17), S. Williams (7) Zürich (I, 1R/Schiavone [32], 0) Tathiana Garbin ¥ Final Rank: 37 ¥ Best Rank: 22 Milan $50K+H 2006 ($50K+H, SF/Vinci [103], 3) Gold Coast (III, SF/Hingis [7], 3) — Grönefeld (19) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Sharapova [2], 2) Paris (II, 1R/Déchy [53], 0) Bogota (III, F/Vinci [64], 4) Acapulco (III, QF/Errani [216], 2) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Sugiyama [24], 1) Miami (Ireq, QF/Peer [15], 3) Budapest (IV, 2R/withdrew, 1) Warsaw (II, 2R/Chakvetadze [11], 1) Berlin (I, 2R/A. Bondarenko [29], 0) Rome (I, 2R/A. Bondarenko [28], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Vaidisova [10], 3) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Bartoli [20], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Azarenka [53], 1) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Peer [18], 1) New Haven (II, 1R/King [82], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Cibulkova [26], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 45 Tatiana Golovin ¥ Final Rank: 13 ¥ Best Rank: 13 Sydney (II, 2R/Mauresmo [3], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Peer [17], 2) Paris (II, QF/Hénin [2], 2) Antwerp (II, SF/Clijsters [4], 3) — Srebotnik (22), Schnyder (13) Indian Wells (I+, QF/Bammer [46], 3) — Stosur (29), Petrova (7) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Chakvetadze [11], 1) Amelia Island (II, Win, 5) — Stosur (27), V. Williams (32), Ivanovic (17), Petrova (7) Charleston (I, QF/Saﬁna [12], 3) — Peng (35) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Paszek [54], 1) Stanford (II, 2R/Mirza [35], 1) San Diego (I, R16/Sharapova [2], 2) Los Angeles (II, 1R/Tanasugarn [76], 0) Canadian Open (I, SF/Jankovic [3], 4) — Schiavone (26), Kuznetsova (5) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Rolle [109], 0) Portoroz (IV, Win, 5) — Srebotnik (24) Luxembourg (II, QF/Ivanovic [6], 2) — Schiavone (25) Stuttgart (II+, F/Hénin [1], 4) — Chakvetadze (6), Kuznetsova (2) Zürich (I, F/Hénin [1], 4) — Kirilenko (26), Ivanovic (4), Bartoli (11), Schiavone (32) Linz (II, 1R/Daniilidou [41], 0) Anna-Lena Grönefeld • Final Rank: 205 • Best Rank: 19 Gold Coast (III, 1R/Garbin [38], 0) Sydney (II, 1R/Peer [18], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Harkleroad [88], 1) Antwerp (II, 1R/Razzano [85], 0) Dubai (II+, 1R/Molik [90], 0) Doha (II, 1R/K. Bondarenko [131], 0) Warsaw (II, 2R/Hénin [1], 1) Berlin (I, 1R/Peer [15], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Déchy [50], 0) Istanbul (III, 1R/Castano [102], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Math. Johansson [126], 0) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Safarova [26], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Ozegovic [186], 0) Bad Gastein (III, 2R/Martinez Sanchez [211], 1) Stockholm (IV, 2R/Pironkova [131], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 46 Daniela Hantuchova ¥ Final Rank: 9 ¥ Best Rank: 9 Auckland (IV, 2R/Razzano [88], 1) Sydney (II, 1R/Vaidisova [11], 0) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Clijsters [5], 3) Pan Pacific (I, 1R/Vinci [119], 0) Dubai (II+, QF/Mauresmo [3], 2) — Kirilenko (32) Doha (II, SF/Kuznetsova [5], 3) — Hingis (6) Indian Wells (I+, Win, 6) — Schiavone (21), Hingis (6), Peer (16), Li Na (17), Kuznetsova (4) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Zvonareva [20], 1) Amelia Island (II, QF/Bammer [29], 2) Berlin (I, 1R/Ondraskova [117], 0) Rome (I, SF/Kuznetsova [3], 4) — Bammer (24), Chakvetadze (10),Medina Garrigues (31) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Medina Garrigues [23], 2) — Poutchkova (35) Birmingham (III, QF/Bartoli [20], 2) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, SF/Chakvetadze [8], 3) — Poutchkova (32), Ivanovic (6) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/S. Williams [8], 3) — Srebotnik (22) Stanford (II, SF/Chakvetadze [7], 2) San Diego (I, R16/V. Williams [16], 1) Los Angeles (II, R16/Dementieva [13], 1) New Haven (II, 2R/Szavay [41], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Vakulenko [50], 0) Bali (III+, F/Davenport [234], 3) Kolkata (III, SF/Kirilenko [35], 3) Luxembourg (II, F/Ivanovic [6], 3) — Schnyder (13), Bartoli (11) Stuttgart (II+, 2R/Dementieva [15], 1) — Safarova (11) Zürich (I, 2R/A. Radwanska [31], 1) — Safina (14) Linz (II, Win, 4) — A. Bondarenko (23), Vaidisova (14), Schnyder (17) Madrid Championships (Champ, RR3rd, 1-2 in Round Robin (lost to Sharapova [6], Ivanovic [4)) — Kuznetsova (2) Justine Hénin • Final Rank: 1 • Best Rank: 1 Paris (II, SF/Safarova [32], 2) — Golovin (19) Dubai (II+, Win, 4) — Kuznetsova (5), Mauresmo (3) Doha (II, Win, 4) — Schnyder (13), Jankovic (10), Kuznetsova (5) Miami (Ireq, F/S. Williams [18], 5) — Zvonareva (20), Petrova (7), Chakvetadze (11) Warsaw (II, Win, 4) — Santangelo (31), Jankovic (7) Berlin (I, SF/Kuznetsova [4], 3) — Jankovic (6) Roland Garros (Slam, Win, 7) — Santangelo (31), Bammer (25), S. Williams (8), Jankovic (5), Ivanovic (7) Eastbourne (II, Win, 4) — Vaidisova (14), Bartoli (20), Mauresmo (4) Wimbledon (Slam, SF/Bartoli [19], 5) — Schnyder (15), S. Williams (8) Canadian Open (I, Win, 5) — Petrova (9), Jankovic (3) U. S. Open (Slam, Win, 7) — Safina (16), S. Williams (9), V. Williams (14), Kuznetsova (4) Stuttgart (II+, Win, 4) — Safina (17), Dementieva (15), Jankovic (3), Golovin (19) Zürich (I, Win, 4) — Zvonareva (23), A. Radwanska (31), Vaidisova (15), Golovin (18) Madrid Championships (Champ, Win, 5) — Chakvetadze (7), Jankovic (3), Bartoli (10), Ivanovic (4), Sharapova (6)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 47 Martina Hingis ¥ Final Rank: 19 ¥ Best Rank: 6 Gold Coast (III, F/Safina [11], 4) Sydney (II, 1R/Jankovic [12], 0) Australian Open (Slam, QF/Clijsters [5], 4) — Li Na (16) Pan Pacific (I, Win, 4) — Stosur (27), Dementieva (8), Ivanovic (16) Dubai (II+, QF/Jankovic [11], 1) — Medina Garrigues (33) Doha (II, QF/Hantuchova [19], 1) — Kirilenko (33) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Hantuchova [18], 2) Miami (Ireq, 3R/A. Radwanska [49], 1) Berlin (I, R16/Schnyder [19], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Granville [77], 2) San Diego (I, R16/Schnyder [17], 1) — Krajicek (33) Los Angeles (II, R32/Mirza [30], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Azarenka [41], 2) Beijing (II, 2R/Peng [49], 1) Ana Ivanovic ¥ Final Rank: 4 ¥ Best Rank: 4 Gold Coast (III, QF/Peer [20], 2) Sydney (II, QF/Vaidisova [11], 2) — Petrova (6) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Zvonareva [24], 2) Pan Pacific (I, F/Hingis [6], 4) — Jankovic (10), Sharapova (1) Antwerp (II, QF/Clijsters [4], 2) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Bammer [46], 2) Miami (Ireq, 2R/Shvedova [84], 0) Amelia Island (II, SF/Golovin [20], 3) — Jankovic (9) Charleston (I, R16/Zvonareva [20], 1) Berlin (I, Win, 6) — A. Bondarenko (29), Schnyder (19), Kuznetsova (4) Roland Garros (Slam, F/Hénin [1], 6) — Medina Garrigues (23), Kuznetsova (3), Sharapova (2) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, QF/Hantuchova [10], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, SF/V. Williams [31], 5) — Petrova (9), Vaidisova (10) Los Angeles (II, Win, 5) — Safarova (24), Kirilenko (35), Jankovic (3), Petrova (9) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Yan [169], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/V. Williams [14], 3) Luxembourg (II, Win, 4) — Golovin (19), Zvonareva (27), Hantuchova (10) Stuttgart (II+, 2R/KBondarenko [46], 1) — Schnyder (13) Zürich (I, 2R/Golovin [18], 0) Madrid Championships (Champ, SF/Hénin [1], 2-1 in Round Robin (lost to Sharapova [6]), 2-2 overall) — Kuznetsova (2), Hantuchova (9)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 48 Jelena Jankovic ¥ Final Rank: 3 ¥ Best Rank: 3 Auckland (IV, Win, 5) — Zvonareva (24) Sydney (II, F/Clijsters [5], 4) — Hingis (7), Stosur (27), Mauresmo (3), Vaidisova (11) Australian Open (Slam, R16/S. Williams [81], 3) Pan Pacific (I, QF/Ivanovic [16], 1) — Zheng (33) Dubai (II+, SF/Mauresmo [3], 3) — Hingis (6) Doha (II, SF/Hénin [2], 2) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Li Na [17], 2) — Müller (35) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Santangelo [36], 1) Amelia Island (II, QF/Ivanovic [17], 2) Charleston (I, Win, 5) — Santangelo (30), Srebotnik (21), V. Williams (29), Safina (12) Warsaw (II, SF/Hénin [1], 2) — Chakvetadze (11) Berlin (I, QF/Hénin [1], 2) — Medina Garrigues (32), Peng (33) Rome (I, Win, 5) — A. Bonadarenko (28), Dementieva (13), Schnyder (17), Kuznetsova (3) Strasbourg (III, SF/withdrew, 2) Roland Garros (Slam, SF/Hénin [1], 5) — V. Williams (27), Bartoli (21), Vaidisova (10) Birmingham (III, Win, 5) — A. Bondarenko (25), Santangelo (30), Sharapova (2) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, F/Chakvetadze [8], 2+ 1 walkover) — A. Bondarenko (25), Safina (13) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Bartoli [19], 3) — Safarova (25) San Diego (I, R16/Kirilenko [42], 1) Los Angeles (II, SF/Ivanovic [5], 3) — Bammer (20) Canadian Open (I, F/Hénin [1], 4) — Bammer (20), Golovin (19) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/V. Williams [14], 4) — Bammer (20) Bali (III+, QF/Davenport [234], 1) Beijing (II, F/Szavay [28], 3) Stuttgart (II+, SF/Hénin [1], 2) — Peer (16), Petrova (9) Bangkok (III, 1R/Yan [68], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/Vaidisova [15], 0) Madrid Championships (Champ, RR Fourth, 0-3 in Round Robin; lost to Hénin [1], Chakvetadze [7],Bartoli [10])

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 49 Maria Kirilenko ¥ Final Rank: 31 ¥ Best Rank: 26 Gold Coast (III, 2R/Safina [11], 1) — Pennetta (28) Hobart (IV, 1R/Mirza [66], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Kuznetsova [4], 2) Pan Pacific (I, R16/Sugiyama [26], 1) — Peer (15) Pattaya City (IV, 1R/Pratt [45], 0) Dubai (II+, 2R/Hantuchova [19], 1) Doha (II, 2R/Hingis [6], 1) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Chakvetadze [11], 1) Miami (Ireq, 2R/V. Williams [39], 0) Budapest (IV, 1R/Kremer [100], 0) Estoril (IV, 1R/Ozegovic [267], 0) Berlin (I, 1R/Li Na [18], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Sugiyama [25], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Stosur [30], 1) Birmingham (III, R16/Jankovic [3], 2) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Bammer [22], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Cornet [139], 0) Stanford (II, 2R/Srebotnik [25], 1) San Diego (I, QF/Dementieva [15], 3) — Safarova (24), Jankovic (3) Los Angeles (II, QF/Ivanovic [5], 3) — Bartoli (11) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Bartoli [11], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Vakulenko [50], 2) — Srebotnik (24) Kolkata (III, Win, 5) — Hantuchova (11) Seoul (IV, F/V. Williams [9], 4) Japan Open (III, 1R/Pin [78], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/A. Radwanska [33], 0) Zürich (I, 1R/Golovin [18], 0) Linz (II, 1R/Vakulenko [38], 0) Svetlana Kuznetsova ¥ Final Rank: 2 ¥ Best Rank: 2 Sydney (II, 2R/Srebotnik [23], 0) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Peer [17], 3) — Kirilenko (28) Paris (II, QF/Safarova [32], 1) — Srebotnik (23) Dubai (II+, SF/Hénin [2], 2) — Schnyder (13) Doha (II, F/Hénin [2], 3) — Schiavone (25), Hantuchova (19) Indian Wells (I+, F/Hantuchova [18], 5) — Sugiyama (24), Vaidisova (10) Miami (Ireq, R16/Peer [16], 2) Warsaw (II, SF/ABondarenko [40], 2) — V. Williams (22) Berlin (I, F/Ivanovic [16], 4) — Bammer (25), Petrova (9), Henin (1) Rome (I, F/Jankovic [5], 4) — Santangelo (30), Safina (9), Hantuchova (14) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Ivanovic [7], 4) — Peer (17) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/V. Williams [23], 4) — A. Radwanska (35) Canadian Open (I, QF/Golovin [19], 2) New Haven (II, Win, 4) — A. Radwanska (32), Schiavone (26), Dementieva (15) U. S. Open (Slam, F/Hénin [1], 6) — Medina Garrigues (34), Szavay (31), Chatvetadze (6) Stuttgart (II+, SF/Golovin [19], 2) — A. Radwanska (35), S. Williams (7) Moscow (I, SF/S. Williams [7], 2) Zürich (I, QF/Schiavone [32], 1) — Bammer (21) Madrid Championships (Champ, RR 4th, 0-3 in RR; lost to Ivanovic [4], Sharapova [6], Hantuchova [9])

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 50 Li Na ¥ Final Rank: 29 ¥ Best Rank: 16 Gold Coast (III, 2R/Castaño [54], 1) Sydney (II, SF/Clijsters [5], 3) — Schiavone (15), Dementieva (8), Srebotnik (23) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Hingis [7], 3) — Safina (10) Pan Pacific (I, R16/Stosur [27], 1) Dubai (II+, 1R/Daniilidou [42], 0) Indian Wells (I+, SF/Hantuchova [14], 4) — A.Bondarenko (32), Jankovic (9), Zvonareva (20) Miami (Ireq, QF/Chakvetadze [11], 3) — Srebotnik (23), Clijsters (5) Amelia Island (II, R32/Sprem [107], 0) Charleston (I, R16/Medina Garrigues [32], 1) Berlin (I, 2R/Camerin [75], 1) Strasbourg (III, QF/Medina Garrigues [27], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Bammer [25], 2) Birmingham (III, QF/Santangelo [30], 2) Amélie Mauresmo ¥ Final Rank: 18 ¥ Best Rank: 3 Sydney (II, QF/Jankovic [12], 1) — Golovin (22) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Safarova [70], 3) Paris (II, SF/Petrova [7], 2) — Chakvetadze (13) Antwerp (II, Win, 4) — Safina (11), Chakvetadze (12), Clijsters (4) Dubai (II+, F/Hénin [1], 3) — Hantuchova (19), Jankovic (11) Berlin (I, R16/Vakulenko [53], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Stosur [29], 0) Strasbourg (III, F/Medina Garrigues [27], 3) — Bartoli (21) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Safarova [29], 2) Eastbourne (II, F/Hénin [1], 3) — Santangelo (29), Peer (16), Petrova (11) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Vaidisova [10], 3) — Santangelo (29) Beijing (II, QF/Peng [49], 1) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/Dementieva [15], 0) Moscow (I, 1R/Zvonareva [24], 0) Zürich (I, 2R/A. Bondarenko [25], 1) Anabel Medina Garrigues ¥ Final Rank: 35 ¥ Best Rank: 23 Hobart (IV, 2R/Bammer [56], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Vesnina [41], 0) Paris (II, 2R/Chakvetadze [13], 1) — Brémond (34) Dubai (II+, 2R/Hingis [6], 1) Doha (II, 2R/Schnyder [13], 1) Indian Wells (I+, 2R/Molik [66], 0) Miami (Ireq, 2R/Azarenka [66], 0) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Cibulkova [150], 0) Charleston (I, QF/V. Williams [29], 3) — Müller (33), Schiavone (24), Li Na (18) Berlin (I, 2R/Jankovic [7], 1) Rome (I, QF/Hantuchova [14], 3) — Srebotnik (20) Strasbourg (III, Win, 4+ 1 walkover) — Li Na (18), Mauresmo (5) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Ivanovic [7], 3) — Hantuchova (13) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 1R/Vesnina [68], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Ruano Pascual [96], 0) Stockholm (IV, 2R/Cibulkova [75], 1) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Schnyder [16], 0) New Haven (II, 1R/Mirza [28], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Kuznetsova [4], 2) Bali (III+, 2R/Errani [90], 1) Beijing (II, 1R/Morigami [56], 0) Guangzhou (III, QF/Rodionova [88], 2) Zürich Qualifying (I, Q3R/Daniilidou [43], 0+2 in qualifying) Linz (II, 1R/Paszek [44], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 51 Sania Mirza ¥ Final Rank: 32 ¥ Best Rank: 27 Hobart (IV, SF/Chakvetadze [13], 3) — Kirilenko (29) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Nakamura [65], 1) Pattaya City (IV, SF/Dulko [52], 3) Bangalore (III, QF/Shvedova [143], 2) Doha (II, 2R/withdrew, 1) Fes (IV, 1R/Salerni [213], 0) Istanbul (III, 1R/Shaughnessy [66], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Ivanovic [8], 1) Birmingham (III, R32/Santangelo [30], 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 1R/Schiavone [30], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Petrova [9], 1) Cincinnati (III, SF/Chakvetadze [8], 3) Stanford (II, F/Chakvetadze [7], 4) — Golovin (19), Schnyder (17), Bammer (22) San Diego (I, QF/Sharapova [2], 3) — Peer (18), Safina (14) Los Angeles (II, R16/Razzano [42], 2) — Hingis (12) New Haven (II, 2R/ABondarenko [23], 1) — Medina Garrigues (33) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Chakvetadze [6], 2) Japan Open (III, QF/Pennetta [53], 2) Moscow (I, 1R/Dulko [41], 0) Zürich (I, 1R/Krajicek [33], 0) Anastasia Myskina ¥ Final Rank: 1065 ¥ Best Rank: 15 Auckland (IV, 1R/Dulko [59], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Shaughnessy [61], 0) Shahar Peer ¥ Final Rank: 17 ¥ Best Rank: 15 Gold Coast (III, SF/Safina [11], 3) — Ivanovic (14) Sydney (II, QF/Clijsters [5], 2) — Grönefeld (19), Schnyder (9) Australian Open (Slam, QF/S. Williams [81], 4) — Golovin (23), Kuznetsova (4) Pan Pacific (I, 1R/Kirilenko [30], 0) Memphis (III, F/V. Williams [54], 4) Indian Wells (I+, QF/Hantuchova [18], 3) — Safarova (26), Chakvetadze (11) Miami (Ireq, SF/S. Williams [18], 4) — Kuznetsova (3), Garbin (25) Charleston (I, 2R/Zheng [38], 0) Berlin (I, 2R/Müller [39], 1) Rome (I, R16/S. Williams [11], 2) — Sugiyama (25) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Kuznetsova [3], 3) — Srebotnik (20) Eastbourne (II, QF/Mauresmo [4], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Bartoli [19], 2) Stanford (II, 2R/Govortsova [100], 1) San Diego (I, 1R/Mirza [31], 0) Los Angeles (II, R32/Razzano [52], 1) Canadian Open (I, R16/Razzano [45], 2) — Krajicek (34), Garbin (25) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Chakvetadze [6], 4) — Vaidisova (15), A. Radwanska (32) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Zvonareva [27], 1) — Safarova (23) Stuttgart (II+, 2R/Jankovic [3], 1) — Schiavone (28) Bangkok (III, QF/Pennetta [49], 2) Zürich (I, 1R/A. Radwanska [31], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 52 Flavia Pennetta ¥ Final Rank: 40 ¥ Best Rank: 28 Gold Coast (III, 1R/Kirilenko [30], 0) Hobart (IV, 1R/Nakamura [64], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Kanepi [77], 0) Bogota (III, SF/Vinci [64], 3) Acapulco (III, F/Loit [52], 4) Indian Wells (I+, 2R/Déchy [49], 0) Miami (Ireq, 1R/Razzano [71], 0) Amelia Island (II, 1R/Tu [51], 0) Charleston (I, 1R/Tu [47], 0) Estoril (IV, 2R/Dulko [34], 1) Berlin (I, 1R/Vakulenko [53], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Garbin [23], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Pratt [45], 0) Barcelona (IV, SF/Shaughnessy [49], 3) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, QF/Safina [13], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Bartoli [19], 0) Biella $100K ($100K, SF/A. Radwanska [36], 3) Palermo (IV, QF/Müller [34], 2) Bad Gastein (III, 1R/Cibulkova [77], 0) Los Angeles (II, 1R/Brengle [251], 0) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Schnyder [16], 1+2 in qualifying) New Haven (II, Q1R/Math. Johansson [114], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Vaidisova [15], 1) Kolkata (III, QF/Kirilenko [35], 2) Seoul (IV, SF/V. Williams [9], 3) Japan Open (III, SF/Razzano [33], 3) — Mirza (29) Bangkok (III, Win, 5) — Peer (16), V. Williams (8) Linz (II, 1R/Vaidisova [14], 0) Nadia Petrova ¥ Final Rank: 14 ¥ Best Rank: 6 Sydney (II, 2R/Ivanovic [14], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/S. Williams [81], 2) Paris (II, Win, 4) — Safina (12), Mauresmo (3), Safarova (32) Antwerp (II, QF/Chakvetadze [12], 1) — Zvonareva (21) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Golovin [19], 2) Miami (Ireq, QF/Hénin [1], 3) — Safina (14) Amelia Island (II, F/Golovin [20], 4) — Safina (12), Bammer (29) Warsaw (II, 2R/Santangelo [31], 1) Berlin (I, QF/Kuznetsova [4], 2) — Dementieva (14) Rome (I, R16/Dementieva [13], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Peschke [182], 0) Eastbourne (II, SF/Mauresmo [4], 2) — Bammer (22) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Ivanovic [6], 3) San Diego (I, QF/Schnyder [17], 2) — Srebotnik (23) Los Angeles (II, F/Ivanovic [5], 3+ 1 walkover) — Srebotnik (22) Canadian Open (I, QF/Hénin [1], 2) — Schnyer (16) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Szavay [1], 2) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Azarenka [38], 0) Stuttgart (II+, QF/Jankovic [3], 2) — Krajicek (31)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 53 Agnieszka Radwanska ¥ Final Rank: 26 ¥ Best Rank: 25 Hobart Qualifying (IV, Q3R/Bardina [70], 0+2 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Ivanovic [14], 1) Paris (II, 1R/Müller [37], 0+2 in qualifying) Dubai Qualifying (II+, Q2R/Kremer [109], 0+1 in qualifying) Indian Wells (I+, 2R/Safarova [26], 1) Miami (Ireq, R16/Garbin [24], 3) — Zheng (32), Hingis (6) Warsaw (II, 2R/A. Bondarenko [40], 1) Rome (I, 1R/Peer [15], 0) Istanbul (III, QF/Sharapova [2], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Santangelo [31], 0) Birmingham (III, R32/Likhovtseva [47], 1) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Hénin [1], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Kuznetsova [5], 2) — Müller (34) Biella $100K ($100K, Win, 5) Palermo (IV, QF/Szavay [53], 2) Stockholm (IV, Win, 5) New Haven (II, 2R/Kuznetsova [4], 1) — Sugiyama (30) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Peer [19], 3) — Sharapova (2) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Azarenka [38], 0) Stuttgart (II+, 2R/Kuznetsova [2], 1) — Bartoli (11) Moscow (I, 2R/Zvonareva [24], 1) — Kirilenko (26) Zürich (I, QF/Hénin [1], 2+2 in qualifying) — Peer (16), Hantuchova (9) Linz (II, 1R/Molik [67], 0) Virginie Razzano ¥ Final Rank: 28 ¥ Best Rank: 27 Auckland (IV, QF/Zvonareva [24], 2+ 3 in qualifying) — Hantuchova (17) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/A. Bondarenko [34], 1) Paris Qualifying (II, Q3R/Cohen-Aloro [147], 0+ 2 in qualifying) Antwerp (II, 2R/Mauresmo [3], 1+ 3 in qualifying) — Grönefeld (19) Indian Wells (I+, 1R/Yuan [160], 0) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Hénin [1], 2) — Müller (35) Amelia Island (II, R32/Bammer [29], 1) Charleston (I, 2R/Bammer [26], 1) Estoril (IV, 1R/Azarenka [68], 0) Prague (IV, 2R/Zakopalova [142], 1) Fes (IV, 1R/Sequera [104], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Sequera [69], 0) Barcelona (IV, SF/Gallovits [91], 3) Wimbledon (Slam, 1R/Meusburger [98], 0) Palermo (IV, 1R/Errani [102], 0) San Diego (I, 2R/V. Williams [16], 1) Los Angeles (II, QF/Petrova [9], 3) — Peer (18), Mirza (30) Canadian Open (I, QF/Jankovic [3], 3) — Chakvetadze (6), Peer (18) Forest Hills (IV, F/Dulko [51], 3) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/A. Radwanska [32], 1) Guangzhou (III, Win, 5) Japan Open (III, Win, 5) — V. Williams (8) Bangkok (III, 2R/U. Radwanska [407], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 54 Lucie Safarova ¥ Final Rank: 24 ¥ Best Rank: 22 Hobart (IV, 2R/S. Williams [94], 1) Australian Open (Slam, QF/Vaidisova [12], 4) — Schiavone (20), Mauresmo (3) Paris (II, F/Petrova [7], 4) — Vaidisova (9), Kuznetsova (5), Hénin (2) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Peer [16], 1) Miami (Ireq, 3R/S. Williams [18], 1) Estoril (IV, SF/Azarenka [68], 3) Berlin (I, R16/Saﬁna [10], 2) — Chakvetadze (11) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Chakvetadze [9], 3) — Mauresmo (4) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Bammer [22], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Jankovic [3], 2) San Diego (I, 2R/Kirilenko [42], 1) Los Angeles (II, R16/Ivanovic [5], 2) — Sugiyama (28) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Shaughnessy [43], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Bartoli [10], 2) Luxembourg (II, 1R/Peer [16], 0) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/Hantuchova [10], 0) Dinara Saﬁna • Final Rank: 15 • Best Rank: 9 Gold Coast (III, Win, 5) — Kirilenko (30), Stosur (29), Peer (20), Hingis (7) Sydney (II, 1R/Pratt [72], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Li Na [16], 2) Paris (II, QF/Petrova [7], 2) Antwerp (II, QF/Mauresmo [3], 2) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Bartoli [23], 1) Miami (Ireq, R16/Petrova [7], 2) — Sugiyama (24) Amelia Island (II, QF/Petrova [7], 2) — Srebotnik (22) Charleston (I, F/Jankovic [9], 4) — Golovin (19), Zvonareva (20) Berlin (I, QF/Vakulenko [53], 2) — Safarova (30) Rome (I, QF/Kuznetsova [3], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/S. Williams [8], 3) — Schiavone (28) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, SF/Jankovic [3], 3) — Krajicek (33) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Morigami [71], 1) San Diego (I, R16/Mirza [31], 1) Los Angeles (II, R32/K. Bondarenko [54], 0) Canadian Open (I, R16/Bartoli [11], 2) New Haven (II, QF/Daniilidou [42], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, R16/Hénin [1], 3) Stuttgart (II+, 2R/Hénin [1], 1) — Srebotnik (23) Moscow (I, SF/Dementieva [14], 3) — Chakvetadze (6), Zvonareva (24) Zürich (I, 1R/Hantuchova [9], 0) Linz (II, QF/Vaidisova [14], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 55 Mara Santangelo ¥ Final Rank: 36 ¥ Best Rank: 27 Hobart (IV, 2R/Castaño [46], 1) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/S. Williams [81], 0) Pan Pacific (I, R16/Ivanovic [16], 1) Pattaya City (IV, QF/Mirza [49], 2) Bangalore (III, F/Shvedova [143], 4) Dubai (II+, 2R/Jankovic [11], 1) — Müller (34) Doha (II, 2R/Schiavone [25], 1) Miami (Ireq, R16/Chakvetadze [11], 2) — Jankovic (9) Amelia Island (II, R32/Zheng [41], 1) Charleston (I, R16/Jankovic [9], 2) Warsaw (II, QF/Hénin [1], 2) — Petrova (9) Berlin (I, 1R/Dementieva [14], 0) Rome (I, 2R/Kuznetsova [3], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Hénin [1], 2) Birmingham (III, SF/Jankovic [3], 3) — Li Na (18) Eastbourne (II, 2R/Mauresmo [4], 1) — Sugiyama (29) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Mauresmo [4], 2) Los Angeles (II, R32/Srebotnik [22], 1) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Shaughnessy [43], 0) New Haven (II, 1R/Dementieva [15], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Dushevina [58], 0) Francesca Schiavone ¥ Final Rank: 25 ¥ Best Rank: 15 Sydney (II, 1R/Li Na [21], 0) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Safarova [70], 1) Pan Pacific (I, R16/Sharapova [1], 1) Dubai (II+, 1R/Schnyder [13], 0) Doha (II, QF/Kuznetsova [5], 2) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Hantuchova [18], 1) Miami (Ireq, 2R/Vakulenko [69], 0) Charleston (I, 2R/Medina Garrigues [32], 1) Estoril (IV, 2R/Azarenka [68], 1) Berlin (I, 1R/A. Bondarenko [29], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Stosur [29], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Safina [11], 2) Barcelona (IV, 2R/Szavay [82], 1) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 2R/Chakvetadze [8], 1) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Rezai [60], 1) Bad Gastein (III, Win, 5) Canadian Open (I, R16/Golovin [19], 2) — Dementieva (17) New Haven (II, QF/Kuznetsova [4], 2) — Schnyder (12) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Paszek [43], 1) Luxembourg (II, 2R/Golovin [19], 1) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/Peer [16], 0) Zürich (I, SF/Golovin [18], 3) — Dementieva (10), Schnyder (17), Kuznetsova (2) Linz (II, 2R/Chakvetadze [7], 1) — Srebotnik (28)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 56 Patty Schnyder ¥ Final Rank: 16 ¥ Best Rank: 9 Sydney (II, 2R/Peer [18], 1) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Chakvetadze [13], 3) Paris (II, 1R/Bychkova [100], 0) Antwerp (II, 2R/Golovin [20], 1) Dubai (II+, QF/Kuznetsova [5], 2) — Schiavone (22) Doha (II, QF/Hénin [2], 2) — Medina Garrigues (32) Miami (Ireq, 2R/Kanepi [56], 0) Amelia Island (II, R32/V. Williams [32], 0) Charleston (I, 2R/Peng [35], 0) Berlin (I, QF/Ivanovic [12], 3) — Hingis (7) Rome (I, SF/Jankovic [5], 4) — Stosur (29), S. Williams (11) Istanbul (III, QF/withdrew, 2) Roland Garros (Slam, R16/Santangelo [2], 3) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/Hénin [1], 3) — A. Bondarenko (24) Cincinnati (III, QF/Morigami [61], 2) Stanford (II, QF/Mirza [25], 1) San Diego (I, F/Sharapova [2], 5) — Hingis (13), Petrova (9), Dementieva (15) Canadian Open (I, R16/Petrova [9], 2) — Medina Garrigues (32) New Haven (II, 1R/Schiavone [26], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Paszek [43], 2) Bali (III+, 2R/Cirstea [137], 1) Luxembourg (II, QF/Hantuchova [10], 2) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/Ivanovic [5], 0) Moscow (I, 2R/Dementieva [14], 1) Zürich (I, 2R/Schiavone [32], 1) — S. Williams (6) Linz (II, F/Hantuchova [10], 4) — Chakvetadze (7), Bartoli (9) Maria Sharapova ¥ Final Rank: 5 ¥ Best Rank: 1 Australian Open (Slam, F/S. Williams [61], 6) — Garbin (33), Zvonareva (24), Chakvetadze (13), Clijsters (5) Pan Paciﬁc (I, SF/Ivanovic [16], 2) — Schiavone (25), Sugiyama (26) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Zvonareva [20], 2) Miami (Ireq, R16/S. Williams [18], 2) Istanbul (III, SF/Rezai [59], 2) Roland Garros (Slam, SF/Ivanovic [7], 5) — Schnyder (15), Chakvetadze (9) Birmingham (III, F/Jankovic [3], 4) — Bartoli (20) Wimbledon (Slam, R16/V. Williams [31], 3) — Sugiyama (27) San Diego (I, Win, 5) — Golovin (19), Mirza (31), Chakvetadze (6), Schnyder (17) Los Angeles (II, SF/withdrew, 3) — Krajicek (34), Dementieva (13) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/A. Radwanska [32], 2) Moscow (I, 2R/Azarenka [32], 0) Madrid Championships (Champ, F/Hénin [1], 4 (3-0 in RR)) — Hantuchova (9), Ivanovic (4), Kuznetsova (2), Chakvetadze (7)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 57 Katarina Srebotnik ¥ Final Rank: 27 ¥ Best Rank: 20 Gold Coast (III, 2R/Vesnina [47], 1) Sydney (II, QF/Li Na [21], 2) — Kuznetsova (4) Australian Open (Slam, 3R/Vaidisova [12], 2) Paris (II, 2R/Kuznetsova [5], 1) Antwerp (II, 1R/Golovin [20], 0) Dubai (II+, 1R/Paszek [127], 0) Miami (Ireq, 3R/N. Li [17], 1) Amelia Island (II, R16/Safina [13], 2) Charleston (I, QF/Jankovic [9], 3) Warsaw (II, 1R/A. Bondarenko [40], 0) Berlin (I, 1R/Tu [48], 0) Rome (I, 2R/Medina Garrigues [31], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Peer [17], 2) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III, 1R/Malek [94], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Hantuchova [12], 2) Stanford (II, QF/Chakvetadze [7], 2) San Diego (I, R16/Petrova [9], 2) — A. Bondarenko (22) Los Angeles (II, R16/Petrova [9], 2) — Santangelo (27) Canadian Open (I, 2R/Peng [58], 1) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Kirilenko [36], 1) Portoroz (IV, F/Golovin [19], 4) Stuttgart (II+, 1R/Safina [17], 0) Zürich (I, 1R/Vaidisova [15], 0) Linz (II, 1R/Schiavone [25], 0) Samantha Stosur ¥ Final Rank: 47 ¥ Best Rank: 27 Gold Coast (III, QF/Safina [11], 2) Sydney (II, 2R/Jankovic [12], 1) — Zvonareva (24) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Kostanic Tosic [67], 1) Pan Pacific (I, QF/Hingis [6], 2) — Zvonareva (21), Li Na (17) Memphis (III, QF/Olaru [254], 2) Indian Wells (I+, 3R/Golovin [19], 1) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Clijsters [5], 1) Amelia Island (II, R16/Golovin [20], 2) Charleston (I, 1R/V. Williams [29], 0) Berlin (I, 1R/Chakvetadze [11], 0) Rome (I, R16/Schnyder [17], 2) — Schiavone (26), Mauresmo (4) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Vaidisova [10], 2) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Vaidisova [14], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/Sequera [56], 1) New Haven (II, 1R/Szavay [41], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 1R/Cornet [96], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 58 Ai Sugiyama ¥ Final Rank: 39 ¥ Best Rank: 22 Gold Coast (III, 1R/Ferguson [184], 0) Sydney (II, 1R/Dementieva [8], 0+3 in qualifying) Australian Open (Slam, 2R/Yakimova [68], 1) Pan Paciﬁc (I, QF/Sharapova [1], 2) — Kirilenko (30) Dubai (II+, 2R/Daniilidou [42], 1) Doha (II, 1R/Molik [74], 0) Indian Wells (I+, R16/Kuznetsova [4], 2) — Garbin (27) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Saﬁna [10], 1) Rome (I, 2R/Peer [15], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Chakvetadze [9], 2) Birmingham (III, R32/Morita [200], 0) Eastbourne (II, 1R/Santangelo [29], 0) Wimbledon (Slam, 3R/Sharapova [2], 2) Stanford (II, 1R/Bammer [22], 0) San Diego (I, R16/Chakvetadze [6], 2) — Bammer (21) Los Angeles (II, R32/Safarova [24], 1) Canadian Open (I, 1R/Dubois [115], 0) New Haven (II, 1R/A. Radwanska [32], 0) U. S. Open (Slam, 2R/Makarova [156], 1) Seoul (IV, 1R/Morita [136], 0) Japan Open (III, 1R/Yuan [131], 0) Zürich Qualifying (I, Q3R/K. Bondarenko [44], 0+2 in qualifying) Linz (II, 2R/Vakulenko [38], 1) — Bammer (21) Agnes Szavay ¥ Final Rank: 20 ¥ Best Rank: 19 Dubai $75K 2006 ($75K, QF/Bardina [77], 2) Auckland Qualifying (IV, Q3R/Tu [90], 0+2 in qualifying) Australian Open Qualifying (Slam, Q2R/A. Rolle [137], 0+1 in qualifying) Paris (II, 1R/Pin [75], 0+3 in qualifying) Antwerp Qualifying (II, Q1R/Schruff [92], 0+0 in qualifying Dubai Qualifying (II+, Q3R/Gagliardi [112], 0+2 in qualifying) Doha (II, 1R/Goerges [414], 0+3 in qualifying) Budapest (IV, SF/Dulko [50], 2+1 walkover) Zagreb $75K+H ($75K+H, Win, 5) Roland Garros (Slam, 2R/Chakvetadze [9], 1+3 in qualifying) Barcelona (IV, QF/Shaughnessy [49], 2+3 in qualifying) — Schiavone (29) Wimbledon (Slam, 2R/ABondarenko [24], 1+3 in qualifying) Palermo (IV, Win, 5) — A. Radwanska (33), Müller (34) Bad Gastein (III, QF/Schiavone [31], 2) New Haven (II, F/Kuznetsova [4], 4+3 in qualifying) — Stosur (31), Hantuchova (10), A. Bondarenko (23) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Kuznetsova [4], 4) — Krajicek (33), Petrova (8) Beijing (II, Win, 5) — Jankovic (3) Seoul (IV, QF/Daniilidou [37], 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 59 Nicole Vaidisova ¥ Final Rank: 12 ¥ Best Rank: 7 Sydney (II, SF/Jankovic [12], 3) — Hantuchova (17), Ivanovic (14) Australian Open (Slam, SF/S. Williams [81], 5) — Srebotnik (22), Dementieva (8) Paris (II, 2R/Safarova [32], 1) Indian Wells (I+, QF/Kuznetsova [4], 3) — Bartoli (23) Miami (Ireq, QF/S. Williams [18], 3) Charleston (I, 2R/Krajicek [54], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Jankovic [5], 4) — Stosur (30), Garbin (22) Eastbourne (II, QF/Hénin [1], 2) — Stosur (28) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/Ivanovic [6], 4) — Mauresmo (4) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/Peer [19], 2) Moscow (I, QF/S. Williams [7], 2) Zürich (I, SF/Hénin [1], 3) — Srebotnik (24), Jankovic (3), A.Bondarenko (25) Linz (II, SF/Hantuchova [10], 3) — Safina (16) Quebec City (III, 1R/Voracova [114], 0) Serena Williams ¥ Final Rank: 7 ¥ Best Rank: 5 Hobart (IV, QF/Bammer [56], 2) Australian Open (Slam, Win, 7) — Santangelo (32), Petrova (6), Jankovic (11), Peer (17), Vaidisova (12), Sharapova (2) Miami (Ireq, Win, 6) — Safarova (26), Sharapova (2), Vaidisova (8), Peer (16), Hénin (1) Charleston (I, 2R/Chan [92], 0) Rome (I, QF/Schnyder [17], 2) — Peer (15) Roland Garros (Slam, QF/Hénin [1], 4) — Safina (11) Wimbledon (Slam, QF/Hénin [1], 4) — Hantuchova (12) U. S. Open (Slam, QF/Hénin [1], 4) — Zvonareva (28), Bartoli (10) Stuttgart (II+, QF/Kuznetsova [2], 2) Moscow (I, F/Dementieva [14], 3) — Vaidisova (13), Kuznetsova (2) Zürich (I, 1R/Schnyder [17], 0) Madrid Championships (Champ, 1R/Chakvetadze [7], 0; withdrew after 1 RR match) Venus Williams ¥ Final Rank: 8 ¥ Best Rank: 8 Memphis (III, Win, 5) — Peer (17) Miami (Ireq, 3R/Sharapova [2], 2) — Kirilenko (34) Amelia Island (II, QF/Golovin [20], 3) — Schnyder (16) Charleston (I, SF/Jankovic [9], 4) — Stosur (27), Medina Garrigues (32) Warsaw (II, QF/Kuznetsova [5], 2) — Dementieva (13) Istanbul (III, 2R/Rezai [59], 1) Roland Garros (Slam, 3R/Jankovic [5], 2) Wimbledon (Slam, Win, 7) — Sharapova (2), Kuznetsova (5), Ivanovic (6), Bartoli (19) San Diego (I, QF/Chakvetadze [6], 3) — Hantuchova (10) U. S. Open (Slam, SF/Hénin [1], 5) — A. Bondarenko (21), Ivanovic (5),Jankovic (3) Seoul (IV, Win, 5) — Kirilenko (29) Japan Open (III, F/Razzano [33], 4) Bangkok (III, SF/Pennetta [49], 3) Zheng Jie ¥ Final Rank: 163 ¥ Best Rank: 30 Hobart (IV, QF/Chakvetadze [13], 2) Australian Open (Slam, 1R/Schruff [97], 0) Pan Pacific (I, R16/Jankovic [10], 1) Indian Wells (I+, 2R/Azarenka [76], 0) Miami (Ireq, 2R/A. Radwanska [49], 0) Amelia Island (II, R16/Petrova [7], 2) — Santangelo (30) Charleston (I, R16/Srebotnik [21], 2) — Peer (15) Berlin (I, 1R/Camerin [75], 0) Rome (I, 1R/Medina Garrigues [31], 0) Roland Garros (Slam, 1R/Bacsinszky [125], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 60 Vera Zvonareva ¥ Final Rank: 23 ¥ Best Rank: 19 Auckland (IV, F/Jankovic [12], 4) Sydney (II, 1R/Stosur [27], 0) Australian Open (Slam, R16/Sharapova [2], 3) — Ivanovic (14) Pan Pacific (I, 1R/Stosur [27], 0) Antwerp (II, 2R/Petrova [7], 1) Indian Wells (I+, QF/N. Li [17], 3) — Sharapova (1) Miami (Ireq, R16/Hénin [1], 2) — Hantuchova (12) Charleston (I, SF/Safina [12], 4) — Ivanovic (17) U. S. Open (Slam, 3R/S. Williams [9], 2) Portoroz (IV, QF/Dushevina [46], 2) Luxembourg (II, SF/Ivanovic [6], 3) — Peer (16) Moscow (I, QF/Safina [17], 2) — Mauresmo (11), A. Radwanska (33) Zürich (I, 2R/Hénin [1], 1) Quebec City (III, SF/Davenport [126], 3)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 61 Upsets The 100 Biggest Upsets of 2007 Want to know who pulled off the biggest upset of 2007? Easy: Lindsay Davenport, who beat Jelena Jankovic at Bali. How did I decide that that was the biggest upset? By direct mathematical means: I took rankings ratios. Davenport was #234 at the time, Jankovic #3. So Davenport’s ranking was 234:3, or 78.0 times that of Jankovic. Of course, that’s an artifact of Davenport’s not-quite-retirement. Among players who had played the whole year, the biggest upset was #169 Yan Zi’s win over #4 Ana Ivanovic at the Canadian Open, which still featured an impressive 42.3 ratio between the two players’ rankings. To compile this list, I took every match played by a Top 100 player this year, and took the ratio of her ranking to the player she lost to. This list shows them, in descending order based on that ratio. Note: Where a player is unranked, I have treated her ranking as #999. Observe that that affects our #6 upset, where Michelle Larcher de Brito beat Meghann Shaughnessy. That is the only instance this year of an unranked player beating a Top Hundred player. 1. Bali QF: Lindsay Davenport (#234) def. Jelena Jankovic (#3). Ratio=78.0 2. Canadian Open 2R: Yan Zi (#169) def. Ana Ivanovic (#4). Ratio=42.3 3. Australian Open F: Serena Williams (#61) def. Maria Sharapova (#2). Ratio=30.5 4. Istanbul SF: Aravane Rezai (#59) def. Maria Sharapova (#2). Ratio=29.5 5. Australian Open R16: Lucie Safarova (#70) def. Amélie Mauresmo (#3). Ratio=23.3 6. Miami 1R: Michelle Larcher de Brito (unranked) def. Meghann Shaughnessy (#43). Ratio=23.2 7. Bangkok 1R: Yan Zi (#68) def. Jelena Jankovic (#3). Ratio=22.7 8. Indian Wells R16: Vera Zvonareva (#20) def. Maria Sharapova (#1). Ratio=20.0 9. Bali F: Lindsay Davenport (#234) def. Daniela Hantuchova (#12). Ratio=19.5 10. Wimbledon SF: Marion Bartoli (#19) def. Justine Hénin (#1). Ratio=19.0 11. Miami F: Serena Williams (#18) def. Justine Hénin (#1). Ratio=18.0 12. Estoril QF: Nuria Llagostera Vives (#410) def. Marion Bartoli (#23). Ratio=17.8 13. Berlin R16: Julia Vakulenko (#53) def. Amélie Mauresmo (#3). Ratio=17.7 14T. U. S. Open 3R: Agnieszka Radwanska (#32) def. Maria Sharapova (#2). Ratio=16.0 14T. Pan Pacific SF: Ana Ivanovic (#16) def. Maria Sharapova (#1). Ratio=16.0 14T. Zurich QF: Francesca Schiavone (#32) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (#2). Ratio=16.0 14T. Paris SF: Lucie Safarova (#32) def. Justine Hénin (#2). Ratio=16.0 18. Wimbledon R16: Venus Williams (#31) def. Maria Sharapova (#2). Ratio=15.5 19. Canadian Open QF: Yan Zi (#169) def. Marion Bartoli (#11). Ratio=15.4 20. Warsaw 2R: Julia Vakulenko (#61) def. Kim Clijsters (#4). Ratio=15.3 21. Roland Garros 1R: Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke (#182) def. Nadia Petrova (#12). Ratio=15.2 22. Bangkok 2R: Urszula Radwanska (#407) def. Virginie Razzano (#27). Ratio=15.1 23. San Diego R16: Maria Kirilenko (#42) def. Jelena Jankovic (#3). Ratio=14.0 24. Australian Open 3R: Serena Williams (#81) def. Nadia Petrova (#6). Ratio=13.5 25. Amelia Island 1R: Nuria Llagostera Vives (#571) def. Vasilisa Bardina (#53). Ratio=10.8 26. Bali 2R: Sorana Cirstea (#137) def. Patty Schnyder (#13). Ratio=10.5 27. Beijing QF: Lindsay Davenport (#154) def. Elena Dementieva (#15). Ratio=10.3 28. Stanford 2R: Lilia Osterloh (#108) def. Marion Bartoli (#11). Ratio=9.8 29. Forest Hills 1R: Audra Cohen (#578) def. Elena Likhovtseva (#59). Ratio=9.8 30T. Quebec City 1R: Renata Voracova (#114) def. Nicole Vaidisova (#12). Ratio=9.5 30T. Stuttgart SF: Tatiana Golovin (#19) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (#2). Ratio=9.5 32. Beijing F: Agnes Szavay (#28) def. Jelena Jankovic (#3). Ratio=9.3 33. Budapest 2R: Sorana Cirstea (#325) def. Martina Müller (#35). Ratio=9.3 34. Stuttgart 2R: Kateriyna Bondarenko (#46) def. Ana Ivanovic (#5). Ratio=9.2

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 62 35. Pattaya City Q3R: Noppawan Lertcheewakarn (#891) def. Melinda Czink (#97). Ratio=9.2 36. Paris 1R: Ekaterina Bychkova (#100) def. Patty Schnyder (#11). Ratio=9.1 37. Memphis QF: Ioana Raluca Olaru (#254) def. Samantha Stosur (#28). Ratio=9.1 38T. Miami R16: Serena Williams (#18) def. Maria Sharapova (#2). Ratio=9.0 38T. Berlin 1R: Zuzana Ondraskova (#117) def. Daniela Hantuchova (#13). Ratio=9.0 40. Acapulco 1R: Melissa Torres Sandoval (#402) def. Nicole Pratt (#45). Ratio=8.9 41. Zurich Q1R: Amra Sadikovic (#720) def. Yaroslava Shvedova (#86). Ratio=8.4 42. Charleston 2R: Chan Yung-Jan (#92) def. Serena Williams (#11). Ratio=8.4 43. Miami 3R: Agnieszka Radwanska (#49) def. Martina Hingis (#6). Ratio=8.2 44T. Warsaw SF: Alona Bondarenko (#40) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5). Ratio=8.0 44T. Acapulco QF: Sara Errani (#216) def. Tathiana Garbin (#27). Ratio=8.0 44T. Moscow 2R: Victoria Azarenka (#32) def. Maria Sharapova (#4). Ratio=8.0 47. Rome Q1R: Mirjana Lucic (#524) def. Elena Vesnina (#67). Ratio=7.8 48. Antwerp 2R: Elena Likhovtseva (#62) def. Elena Dementieva (#8). Ratio=7.8 49T. Kolkata 1R: Vania King (#90) def. Marion Bartoli (#12). Ratio=7.5 49T. Canadian Open 2R: Virginie Razzano (#45) def. Anna Chakvetadze (#6). Ratio=7.5 51. Birmingham R32: Ayumi Morita (#200) def. Ai Sugiyama (#27). Ratio=7.4 52. Budapest QF: Sorana Cirstea (#325) def. Eleni Daniilidou (#44). Ratio=7.4 53. Australian Open R16: Serena Williams (#81) def. Jelena Jankovic (#11). Ratio=7.4 54T. Roland Garros 3R: Lucie Safarova (#29) def. Amélie Mauresmo (#4). Ratio=7.3 54T. Rome 2R: Samantha Stosur (#29) def. Amélie Mauresmo (#4). Ratio=7.3 56. Tashkent 1R: Vlada Ekshibarova (#520) def. Alla Kudryavtseva (#72). Ratio=7.2 57. Sydney 1R: Nicole Pratt (#72) def. Dinara Safina (#10). Ratio=7.2 58. Gold Coast 1R: Sophie Ferguson (#184) def. Ai Sugiyama (#26). Ratio=7.1 59. Wimbledon 3R: Laura Granville (#77) def. Martina Hingis (#11). Ratio=7.0 60. Estoril 1R: Nika Ozegovic (#267) def. Maria Kirilenko (#39). Ratio=6.8 61T. Charleston 2R: Michaella Krajicek (#54) def. Nicole Vaidisova (#8). Ratio=6.8 61T. Australian Open SF: Serena Williams (#81) def. Nicole Vaidisova (#12). Ratio=6.8 63. Pan Pacific 1R: Roberta Vinci (#119) def. Daniela Hantuchova (#18). Ratio=6.6 64. Cincinnati 1R: Anna Tatishvili (#368) def. Aiko Nakamura (#57). Ratio=6.5 65. Wimbledon 3R: Michaella Krajicek (#45) def. Anna Chakvetadze (#7). Ratio=6.4 66. Paris QF: Lucie Safarova (#32) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (#5). Ratio=6.4 67. Wimbledon R16: Marion Bartoli (#19) def. Jelena Jankovic (#3). Ratio=6.3 68. Bali 1R: Lindsay Davenport (#234) def. Eleni Daniilidou (#37). Ratio=6.3 69. Doha 1R: Kateriyna Bondarenko (#131) def. Anna-Lena Grönefeld (#21). Ratio=6.2 70. Bangkok SF: Flavia Pennetta (#49) def. Venus Williams (#8). Ratio=6.1 71. U. S. Open 1R: Ahsha Rolle (#109) def. Tatiana Golovin (#18). Ratio=6.1 72. Amelia Island R32: Karolina Sprem (#107) def. Li Na (#18). Ratio=5.9 73. Sydney 2R: Katarina Srebotnik (#23) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (#4). Ratio=5.8 74. Rome 1R: Yan Zi (#199) def. Severine Brémond (#35). Ratio=5.7 75. Acapulco 2R: Melissa Torres Sandoval (#402) def. Eva Birnerova (#71). Ratio=5.7 76. Dubai $75K 2006 1R: Caroline Maes (#260) def. Jelena Kostanic Tosic (#46). Ratio=5.7 77. Miami 2R: Yaroslava Shvedova (#84) def. Ana Ivanovic (#15). Ratio=5.6 78. Los Angeles 1R: Yuliana Fedak (#128) def. Alona Bondarenko (#23). Ratio=5.6 79. Stanford 2R: Olga Govortsova (#100) def. Shahar Peer (#18). Ratio=5.6 80. Dubai 1R: Tamira Paszek (#127) def. Katarina Srebotnik (#23). Ratio=5.5 81. Strasbourg F: Anabel Medina Garrigues (#27) def. Amélie Mauresmo (#5). Ratio=5.4 82. Miami R16: Shahar Peer (#16) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova (#3). Ratio=5.3 83. Berlin QF: Julia Vakulenko (#53) def. Dinara Safina (#10). Ratio=5.3

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 63 84. Quebec City SF: Lindsay Davenport (#126) def. Vera Zvonareva (#24). Ratio=5.3 85. Auckland 1R: Paola Suárez (#178) def. Martina Müller (#34). Ratio=5.2 86. U. S. Open 2R: Ekaterina Makarova (#156) def. Ai Sugiyama (#30). Ratio=5.2 87. Auckland 2R: Virginie Razzano (#88) def. Daniela Hantuchova (#17). Ratio=5.2 88. Wimbledon SF: Venus Williams (#31) def. Ana Ivanovic (#6). Ratio=5.2 89. Hobart 2R: Alicia Molik (#165) def. Alona Bondarenko (#32). Ratio=5.2 90. Eastbourne Q1R: Elena Baltacha (#412) def. Yaroslava Shvedova (#80). Ratio=5.2 91. Wimbledon 2R: Akiko Morigami (#71) def. Dinara Safina (#14). Ratio=5.1 92. Indian Harbor Beach $50K 2R: Chanelle Scheepers (#370) def. Shenay Perry (#73). Ratio=5.1 93. Australian Open 1R: Tamira Paszek (#187) def. Severine Brémond (#37). Ratio=5.1 94. Zurich 2R: Nicole Vaidisova (#15) def. Jelena Jankovic (#3). Ratio=5.0 95. Acapulco 1R: Sara Errani (#216) def. Sybille Bammer (#44). Ratio=4.9 96. Beijing QF: Shuai Peng (#49) def. Amélie Mauresmo (#10). Ratio=4.9 97. Amelia Island 1R: Dominika Cibulkova (#150) def. Anabel Medina Garrigues (#31). Ratio=4.8 98. Amelia Island Q1R: Alexa Glatch (#479) def. Jarmila Gajdosova (#99). Ratio=4.8 99. Linz Q2R: Patricia Mayr (#387) def. Olga Poutchkova (#80). Ratio=4.8 100. Linz Q2R: Sandra Martinovic (#240) def. Olga Govortsova (#50). Ratio=4.8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 64 Worst Losses The above list of upsets is based on ranking ratios. This is a variation on a theme: The lowest-ranked player lost to. I took all players who ended 2007 in the Top 35, or who ended 2006 in the Top 30, and determined their two worst losses based on the opponent’s rank. The list of such losses is found below Worst Losses (based on rankings at the time of the match). Rank Player Worst Loss #2 Loss 30 Azarenka Estoril F: lost to Greta Arn (#176) Las Vegas $75K 2R: lost to T. Poutchek (#118) 21 Bammer Acapulco 1R: lost to Sara Errani (#216) Wimbledon 2R: lost to Laura Granville (#77) 10 Bartoli Estoril QF: lost to Nuria Llagostera Vives (#410) Canadian Open QF: lost to Zi Yan (#169) 22 A. Bondarenko Hobart 2R: lost to Alicia Molik (#165) Los Angeles 1R: lost to Yuliana Fedak (#128) 6 Chakvetadze Wimbledon 3R: lost to Michaella Krajicek (#45) Canadian Open 2R: lost to Virginie Razzano (#45) — Clijsters Warsaw 2R: lost to Julia Vakulenko (#61) Miami R16: lost to Li Na (#17) 73 Davenport Beijing SF: lost to Jelena Jankovic (#3) NONE 11 Dementieva Beijing QF: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#154) Antwerp 2R: lost to Elena Likhovtseva (#62) 13 Golovin U. S. Open 1R: lost to Ahsha Rolle (#109) Los Angeles 1R: lost to T. Tanasugarn (#76) 205 Grönefeld Bad Gastein 2R: lost to Martinez Sanchez (#211) Wimbledon 1R: lost to Nika Ozegovic (#186) 9 Hantuchova Bali F: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#234) Pan Paciﬁc 1R: lost to Roberta Vinci (#119) 1 Hénin Paris SF: lost to Lucie Safarova (#32) Wimbledon SF: lost to Marion Bartoli (#19) 19 Hingis Wimbledon 3R: lost to Laura Granville (#77) Miami 3R: lost to Agnieszka Radwanska (#49) 4Ivanovic Canadian Open 2R: lost to Zi Yan (#169) Miami 2R: lost to Yaroslava Shvedova (#84) 3 Jankovic Bali QF: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#234) Australian Open R16: lost to S. Williams (#81) 31 Kirilenko Estoril 1R: lost to Nika Ozegovic (#267) Wimbledon 1R: lost to Alizé Cornet (#139) 34 Krajicek Australian Open 1R: lost to Anne Kremer (#159) Moscow 1R: lost to Tatiana Perebiynis (#130) 2Kuznetsova Warsaw SF: lost to Alona Bondarenko (#40) Zurich QF: lost to Francesca Schiavone (#32) 29 Li Na Amelia Island R32: lost to Karolina Sprem (#107) Berlin 2R: lost to Maria Elena Camerin (#75) 18 Mauresmo Australian Open R16: lost to Lucie Safarova (#70) Berlin R16: lost to Julia Vakulenko (#53) 35 Medina Garrigu Amelia Island 1R: lost to D. Cibulkova (#150) Wimbledon 1R: lost to V. Ruano Pascual (#96) 32 Mirza Fes 1R: lost to Maria Emelia Salerni (#213) Bangalore QF: lost to Yaroslava Shvedova (#143) 1065 Myskina Roland Garros 1R: lost to M. Shaughnessy (#61) Auckland 1R: lost to Gisela Dulko (#59) 17 Peer Stanford 2R: lost to Olga Govortsova (#100) Australian Open QF: lost to Serena Williams (#81) 40 Pennetta Los Angeles 1R: lost to Madison Brengle (#251) New Haven Q1R: lost to Math. Johansson (#114) 14 Petrova Roland Garros 1R: lost to Kveta Peschke (#182) Australian Open 3R: lost to Serena Williams (#81) 26 A. Radwanska Dubai Q2R: lost to Anne Kremer (#109) Hobart Q3R: lost to Vasilisa Bardina (#70) 28 Razzano Bangkok 2R: lost to Urszula Radwanska (#407) Indian Wells 1R: lost to Yuan Meng (#160) 24 Safarova Hobart 2R: lost to Serena Williams (#94) Estoril SF: lost to Victoria Azarenka (#68) 15 Saﬁna Sydney 1R: lost to Nicole Pratt (#72) Wimbledon 2R: lost to Akiko Morigami (#71) 25 Schiavone Barcelona 2R: lost to Agnes Szavay (#82) Australian Open 2R: lost to Lucie Safarova (#70) 16 Schnyder Bali 2R: lost to Sorana Cirstea (#137) Paris 1R: lost to Ekaterina Bychkova (#100) 5 Sharapova Australian Open F: lost to Serena Williams (#61) Istanbul SF: lost to Aravane Rezai (#59) 27 Srebotnik Dubai 1R: lost to Tamira Paszek (#127) ’s-Hertogenbosch 1R: lost to Tatjana Malek (#94) 47 Stosur Memphis QF: lost to Ioana Raluca Olaru (#254) U. S. Open 1R: lost to Alizé Cornet (#96) 39 Sugiyama Birmingham R32: lost to Ayumi Morita (#200) Gold Coast 1R: lost to Sophie Ferguson (#184) 20 Szavay Doha 1R: lost to Julia Goerges (#414) Australian Open Q2R: lost to Ahsha Rolle (#130) 12 Vaidisova Quebec City 1R: lost to Renata Voracova (#114) Australian Open SF: lost to Serena Williams (#81) 33 Vakulenko Las Vegas $75K SF: lost to C. Wozniacki (#172) Paris Q1R: lost to Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro (#147) 7 S. Williams Charleston 2R: lost to Chan Yung-Jan (#92) Hobart QF: lost to Sybille Bammer (#56) 8V. Williams Istanbul 2R: lost to Aravane Rezai (#59) Bangkok SF: lost to Flavia Pennetta (#49) 23 Zvonareva Quebec City SF: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#126) Portoroz QF: lost to Vera Dushevina (#46)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 65 Worst Losses (based on year-end 2007 rankings) This is the equivalent of the preceding, but this time it lists the player’s worst losses based on her opponent’s year-end ranking, which may give better context on how bad the loss seems in hindsight. Rank Player Worst Loss #2 Loss 30 Azarenka Amelia Island 1R: lost to Romina Oprandi (#250) Hobart Q2R: lost to Emmanuelle Gagliardi (#132) 21 Bammer Hobart SF: lost to Vasilisa Bardina (#146) Acapulco 1R: lost to Sara Errani (#70) 10 Bartoli Estoril QF: lost to Nuria Llagostera Vives (#147) Sydney 1R: lost to Yuliana Fedak (#127) 22 A. Bondarenko Los Angeles 1R: lost to Yuliana Fedak (#127) Miami 2R: lost to Jelena Kostanic Tosic (#105) 6 Chakvetadze Wimbledon 3R: lost to Michaella Krajicek (#34) Canadian Open 2R: lost to Virginie Razzano (#28) — Clijsters Warsaw 2R: lost to Julia Vakulenko (#33) Miami R16: lost to Na Li (#29) 73 Davenport Beijing SF: lost to Jelena Jankovic (#3) NONE 11 Dementieva Beijing QF: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#73) Antwerp 2R: lost to Elena Likhovtseva (#66) 13 Golovin Los Angeles 1R: lost to T. Tanasugarn (#124) U. S. Open 1R: lost to Ahsha Rolle (#116) 205 Grönefeld Bad Gastein 2R: lost to Martinez Sanchez (#173) Wimbledon 1R: lost to Nika Ozegovic (#148) 9 Hantuchova Berlin 1R: lost to Zuzana Ondraskova (#139) Bali F: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#73) 1 Hénin Paris SF: lost to Lucie Safarova (#24) Wimbledon SF: lost to Marion Bartoli (#10) 19 Hingis Wimbledon 3R: lost to Laura Granville (#65) Beijing 2R: lost to Peng Shuai (#46) 4Ivanovic Miami 2R: lost to Yaroslava Shvedova (#89) Canadian Open 2R: lost to Zi Yan (#60) 3 Jankovic Bali QF: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#73) Bangkok 1R: lost to Zi Yan (#60) 31 Kirilenko Estoril 1R: lost to Nika Ozegovic (#148) Budapest 1R: lost to Anne Kremer (#85) 34 Krajicek Palermo 1R: lost to Eva Birnerova (#160) Birmingham 1R: lost to Yuliana Fedak (#127) 2Kuznetsova Sydney 2R: lost to Katarina Srebotnik (#27) Zurich QF: lost to Francesca Schiavone (#25) 29 Li Na Amelia Island R32: lost to Karolina Sprem (#208) Gold Coast 2R: lost to Catalina Castaño (#115) 18 Mauresmo Rome 2R: lost to Samantha Stosur (#47) Beijing QF: lost to Peng Shuai (#46) 35 Medina Garrigu Wimbledon 1R: lost to V. Ruano Pascual (#83) Guangzhou QF: lost to Anastassia Rodionova(#79) 32 Mirza Fes 1R: lost to Maria Emelia Salerni (#91) Bangalore QF: lost to Yaroslava Shvedova (#89) 1065 Myskina Roland Garros 1R: lost to M. Shaughnessy (#53) Auckland 1R: lost to Gisela Dulko (#38) 17 Peer Charleston 2R: lost to Jie Zheng (#163) Berlin 2R: lost to Martina Müller (#54) 40 Pennetta Los Angeles 1R: lost to Madison Brengle (#240) New Haven Q1R: lost to Math. Johansson (#125) 14 Petrova Warsaw 2R: lost to Mara Santangelo (#36) Luxembourg 2R: lost to Victoria Azarenka (#30) 26 A. Radwanska Hobart Q3R: lost to Vasilisa Bardina (#146) Dubai Q2R: lost to Anne Kremer (#85) 28 Razzano Bangkok 2R: lost to Urszula Radwanska (#288) Indian Wells 1R: lost to Yuan Meng (#128) 24 Safarova Canadian Open 2R: lost to M. Shaughnessy (#53) San Diego 2R: lost to Maria Kirilenko (#31) 15 Saﬁna Sydney 1R: lost to Nicole Pratt (#71) Wimbledon 2R: lost to Akiko Morigami (#50) 25 Schiavone Wimbledon 2R: lost to Aravane Rezai (#80) Rome 1R: lost to Samantha Stosur (#47) 16 Schnyder Paris 1R: lost to Ekaterina Bychkova (#113) Bali 2R: lost to Sorana Cirstea (#106) 5 Sharapova Istanbul SF: lost to Aravane Rezai (#80) Moscow 2R: lost to Victoria Azarenka (#30) 27 Srebotnik ’s-Hertogenbosch 1R: lost to Tatjana Malek (#88) Gold Coast 2R: lost to Elena Vesnina (#55) 47 Stosur Australian Open 2R:lost to J.Kostanic Tosic(#105) Wimbledon 2R: lost to Milagros Sequera (#74) 39 Sugiyama Gold Coast 1R: lost to Sophie Ferguson (#159) Seoul 1R: lost to Ayumi Morita (#140) 20 Szavay Dubai $75K 2006 QF: lost to V. Bardina (#146) Dubai Q3R: lost to Emmanuelle Gagliardi (#132) 12 Vaidisova Quebec City 1R: lost to Renata Voracova (#109) Charleston 2R: lost to Michaella Krajicek (#34) 33 Vakulenko Sydney Q3R: lost to Yuliana Fedak (#127) Indian Wells 1R: lost to T. Tanasugarn (#124) 7 S. Williams Charleston 2R: lost to Chan Yung-Jan (#67) Hobart QF: lost to Sybille Bammer (#21) 8V. Williams Istanbul 2R: lost to Aravane Rezai (#80) Bangkok SF: lost to Flavia Pennetta (#40) 23 Zvonareva Quebec City SF: lost to Lindsay Davenport (#73) Sydney 1R: lost to Samantha Stosur (#47)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 66 Winning and Losing Streaks The table below looks at most of the top players, listing their longest winning and losing streaks. Players with winning streaks of ten matches or more are shown in bold. Player Win Events in Loss Events in Comment Streak Win Streak Streak Loss Streak Azarenka 4 Indian Wells 3R as Qual or 3 Prague SF, Roland Garros 1R, Tashkent F ’s-Hertogenbosch 1R A.Bondarenk 4 Warsaw F or Kharkov $100 W 3 San Diego 2R, Los Angeles 1R, Canadian Open 1R or Luxembourg 1R, Stuttgart 1R, Moscow 1R Bammer 6 Pattaya City W, Antwerp 2R 2 Hobart SF, Australian Open 1R or Indian Wells SF, Miami 2R or Luxembourg 2R, Moscow 1R or Zürich 2R, Linz 1R Bartoli 6 Wimbledon F 3 Indian Wells R16, Miami 2R, Amelia Island 1R Chakvetadze 12 Cincinnati W, Stanford W, 3 Luxembourg QF, Stuttgart 2R, San Diego SF Moscow 1R Clijsters 9 Sydney W, Australian Open SF 2 Miami R16, Warsaw 2R Retired after Warsaw Davenport 8 Bali W, Beijing SF 1 Beijing SF Ended year with 5 match winning streak at Quebec CIty Dementieva 6 Istanbul W, Roland Garros 3R 2 Pan Paciﬁc SF, Antwerp 2R or Los Angeles QF, Canadian Open 2R Golovin 8 Amelia Island W, Charleston 2 San Diego R16, Los Angeles 1R or QF Canadian Open SF, U. S. Open 1R or Zürich F, Linz 1R Grönefeld 1 (won opening match at 5 events) 7 Warsaw 2R, Berlin 1R, Rome 1R, Istanbul 1R, Roland Garros 1R, Eastbourne 1, Wimbledon 1R Hantuchova 7 Indian Wells W, Miami 3R 3 Loss Angeles R16, New Haven 2R, U. S. Open 1R Hénin 25 Canadian Open W, U. S. Open 1 Had losses in Paris SF, Miami F, 25-match streak still W, Stuttgart W, Zürich W, Berlin SF, Wimbledon SF active; also had a 16 Madrid W (without a loss) match streak (Roland Garros W, Eastbourne W, Wimbledon SF) and a 13 match streak (Dubai W, Doha W, Miami F) Hingis 5 Pan Paciﬁc W, Dubai QF 2 Gold Coast F, Sydney 1R or San Diego R16, Los Angeles 2R Ivanovic 12 Berlin W, Roland Garros F 2 Indian Wells R16, Miami 2R or Stuttgart 2R, Zürich 2R Jankovic 9 Auckland W, Sydney F 6 Stuttgart SF, Bangkok 1R, Zürich 6-match losing streak 2R, Madrid RR 0-3 record still active Kirilenko 9 Kolkata W, Seoul F 6 Indian Wells 3R, Miami 2R, Budapest 1R, Estoril 1R, Berlin1R, Rome 1R

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 67 Krajicek 4 Wimbledon QF or Stuttgart 2R 3 Hobart 1R, Australian Open 1R, Losing streak at start of as qualifier Paris 1R year was actually 4, with one loss at the end of 2006; also had a 3-match losing streak entirely in 2007: Charleston QF, Warsaw 1R, Prague 1R Kuznetsova 10 New Haven W, U. S. Open F 4 Zürich QF, Madrid RR 0-3 4 match losing streak record still active Li Na 4 Indian Wells SF 2 Pan Pacific 2R, Dubai 1R or Miami QF, Amelia Island 2R Mauresmo 7 Antwerp W, Dubai F 3 Beijing QF, Stuttgart 1R, Moscow 1R Medina 7 Strasbourg W, Roland Garros 4 Doha 2R, Indian Well 2R, Miami Garrigues R16 2R, Amelia Island 1R Mirza 4 Stanford F 3 Japan Open QF, Moscow 1R, 3 match losing streak Zürich 1R still active Myskina 0 (no wins in 2007) 2 Auckland 1R, Roland Garros 1R (Myskina ended 2006 with 5 losses, so she now has 7 straight and counting) Peer 4 Australian Open QF or 2 Australian Open QF, Pan Pacific 1R Memphis F or Miami SF or U. or Miami SF, Charleston 2R or S. Open QF Stanford 2R, San Diego 1R or Bangkok QF, Zürich 1R Pennetta 5 Bangkok W, (Linz 1R) 5 Acapulco F, Indian Wells 2R, Miami 1R, Amelia Island 1R, Charleston 1R Petrova 5 Paris W, Antwerp QF 2 Rome R16, Roland Garros 1R or U. S. Open 3R, Luxembourg 2R ARadwanska 7 Biella $100K W, Palermo QF 2 Australian Open 2R, Paris 1R or Winning streak includes Warsaw 2R, Rome 1R or Istanbul Challengers; longest QF, Roland Garros 1R or U. S. winning streak at WTA Open R16, Luxembourg 1R or events is 6: Stockholm Zürich QF, Linz 1R W, New Haven 2R; one 3 match losing streak still active Razzano 11 Guangzhou W, Japan Open 3 Prague 2R, Fes 1R, Roland W, Bangkok 2R Garros 1R or Barcelona SF, Wimbledon 1R, Palermo 1R Safarova 4 Australian Open QF or Paris F 3 U. S. Open 3R, Luxembourg 1R, Losing streak still active Stuttgart 1R Safina 5 Gold Coast W 2 San Diego R16, Los Angeles 2R or Moscow SF, Zürich 1R Schiavone 7 Bad Gastein W, Canadian Open 3 Estoril 2R, Berlin 1R, Rome 1R R16 Schnyder 5 San Diego F 4 Doha QF, Miami 2R, Amelia Island 2R, Charleston 2R Sharapova 8 San Diego W, Los Angeles SF 2 U. S. Open 3R, Moscow 1R Srebotnik 4 Portoroz F 4 Portoroz F, Stuttgart 1R, Zürich 1R, Losing streak still active Linz 1R

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 68 Stosur 2 Gold Coast QF or Memphis QF 3 Amelia Island R16, Charleston 1R, Losing streak still active or Amelia Island R16 or Rome Berlin 1R or Wimbledon 2R, New R16 or Roland Garros 3R Haven 1R, U. S. Open 1R Sugiyama 3 Sydney 1R as qualifier 3 Roland Garros 3R, Birmingham (had five streaks of two 2R, Eastbourne 1R or Los Angeles wins in WTA main 2R, Canadian Open 1R, New Haven draws) 1R or U. S. Open 2R, Seoul 1R, Japan Open 1R Szavay 9 Zagreb $75K W, Roland Garros 2Paris 1R (as qualifier); Antwerp Winning streak includes 2R as qualifier Q1R Challengers; longest winning streak at WTA events is 7: Palermo W, Bad Gastein QF or Beijing W, Seoul QF Vaidisova 5 Australian Open SF 2 Miami QF, Amelia Island 2R or Linz SF, Quebec City 1R Vakulenko 5 Warsaw QF as qualifier 6 Birmingham R16, Wimbledon 1R, Longest winning streak Stanford 1R, San Diego 1R, Los of main drawmatches is Angele 1R, Canadian Open 1R 4: Berlin SF or Quebec City F; also had three 4- match winning streaks involving qualifying matches S. Williams 13 Australian Open W, Miami W 3 Moscow F, Zürich 1R, Madrid losing streak still active RR Loss (followed by withdrawal) V. Williams 10 Wimbledon W, San Diego QF 1 (no back-to-back losses) Zvonareva 4 Auckland F or Charleston SF 2 Auckland F, Sydney 1R or Australian Open R16, Pan Pacific 1R

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 69 The Ten Longest Winning Streaks by Top Players Streaks involving Challenger wins shown in italic. Since four players had nine-match streaks, we actually list 13 streaks — though one of those is Szavay’s, which involves only one WTA win. Player Win Streak Events in Win Streak Hénin 25 Canadian Open W, U. S. Open W, Stuttgart W, Zürich W, Madrid W (streak still active) Hénin 16 Roland Garros W, Eastbourne W, Wimbledon SF Hénin 13 Dubai W, Doha W, Miami F S. Williams 13 Australian Open W, Miami W Chakvetadze 12 Cincinnati W, Stanford W, San Diego SF Ivanovic 12 Berlin W, Roland Garros F Razzano 11 Guangzhou W, Japan Open W, Bangkok 2R Kuznetsova 10 New Haven W, U. S. Open F V. Williams 10 Wimbledon W, San Diego QF Clijsters 9 Sydney W, Australian Open SF Jankovic 9 Auckland W, Sydney F Kirilenko 9 Kolkata W, Seoul F Szavay 9 Zagreb $75K W, Roland Garros 2R as qualiﬁer

The Ten Longest Losing Streaks by Top Players This list actually contains 12 players, because six top players had four-match losing streaks. This makes an interesting change from last year, when 13 top players had five-match losing streaks. This year, only six top players had five-match losing streaks, and two of them (Grönefeld and Pennetta) were already in rankings trouble at the end of last year and perhaps shouldn’t even have been included in this list. So losing streaks by top players seem to have declined a lot. Probably something to do with the changes in the ranking system and how it affected the players I chose to examine. Player Loss Streak Events in Loss Streak Grönefeld 7 Warsaw 2R, Berlin 1R, Rome 1R, Istanbul 1R, Roland Garros 1R, Eastbourne 1, Wimbledon 1R Jankovic 6 Stuttgart SF, Bangkok 1R, Zürich 2R, Madrid RR 0-3 record Kirilenko 6 Indian Wells 3R, Miami 2R, Budapest 1R, Estoril 1R, Berlin1R, Rome 1R Vakulenko 6 Birmingham R16, Wimbledon 1R, Stanford 1R, San Diego 1R, Los Angele 1R, Canadian Open 1R Kirilenko 5 Seoul F, Japan Open 1R, Moscow 1R, Zürich 1R, Linz 1R Pennetta 5 Acapulco F, Indian Wells 2R, Miami 1R, Amelia Island 1R, Charleston 1R Grönefeld 4 Antwerp 2R, Dubai 1R, Doha 1R, Warsaw 1R Kuznetsova 4 Zürich QF, Madrid RR 0-3 record Medina 4 Doha 2R, Indian Well 2R, Miami 2R, Amelia Island 1R Garrigues Pennetta 4 Estoril 2R, Berlin 1R, Rome 1R, Roland Garros 1R Schnyder 4 Doha QF, Miami 2R, Amelia Island 2R, Charleston 2R Srebotnik 4 Portoroz F, Stuttgart 1R, Zürich 1R, Linz 1R

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 70 Surface Results This section examines results on different surfaces. As usual, we’ll look mostly at the top players, and examine their results on the four surfaces (clay, grass, hardcourt, indoors). We have several sets of statistics for each surface. I have attempted, in each section, to show the top thirty players in each statistic, plus all the highlight players. The first page in each section shows the total round points awarded on this surface — that is, the total WTA points each player earned on that surface. We note with interest, e.g., that Jelena Jankovic earned more points on clay than Justine Hénin. The next statistic “Round points per tournament,” does much to explain this: Jankovic earned more clay points — but she also played more clay events. So Hénin has the best per-tournament average on clay, with Jankovic a mere #5. Points per tournament is clearly a better measure of effectiveness on the surface. The second pair of statistics involve quality points. These were the points players earned for wins over top players — e.g., under the old WTA rules, you picked up an extra 100 points for beating the #1 player, or 75 points for beating #2, with lower-ranked players being worth less and less as you moved down the rankings. I won’t go into all the details, but it’s just the way the WTA used to do it. Unfortunately, the WTA no longer uses quality points (it’s unfortunate because quality points are a much better predictor of future results than are round points). But if the WTA doesn’t think you can handle it, I am going to assume that you are something other than blibbering idiots, and give you quality points, and quality points per tournament. These may not mean much for a particular surface (the sample size is too small — in the case of grass, so small that I didn’t even bother listing it), but they’re indicative. The third set of statistics, involving fractional points, are also calculated to cover a failing of the WTA rankings: Their failure to take into account tournament strength. (Quality points used to help with this, but quality points are no more.) A strong Tier II like Stuttgart is clearly much harder to win than a weak Tier I like the Pan Pacific, but the WTA gives more points for the latter than the former. The fractional points system avoids this: It calculates a tournament’s strength based on the Modified TSI standings (see the section on “Tournament Strengths” on page 33), then awards points accordingly. Again, we calculate fractional points and fractional points per tournament. The last two statistics, total wins on a surface and winning percentage on the surface, I assume are self- explanatory. In each case, I list the player’s ranking under each statistic, plus her name, her score in this system, and her WTA ranking. Clay

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 71 Round Points on Clay Round Points per Tournament on Clay Rank Player Round Pts WTA Rank Rank Player Points/ Trn WTA Rank 1 Jankovic 1680 3 1 Hénin 490 1 2 Hénin 1470 1 2 Ivanovic 329 4 3Ivanovic 1315 4 3 Sharapova 258 5 4Kuznetsova 975 2 4 Kuznetsova 244 2 5 Saﬁna 730 15 5 Jankovic 240 3 6Medina Garrigues 536 35 6 Zvonareva 195 23 7 Sharapova 515 5 7 Golovin 193 13 8 Schnyder 482 16 8 Saﬁna 146 15 9 A. Bondarenko 470 22 9 Vaidisova 126 12 10 V. Williams 445 8 10 S. Williams 120 7 11 Dementieva 435 11 11 Chakvetadze 104 6 12 Chakvetadze 415 6 12 Medina Garrigues 89 35 13 Petrova 397 14 13 V. Williams 89 8 14 Bammer 396 21 13 Hantuchova 89 9 15 Szavay 393 20 15 Dementieva 87 11 16 Golovin 385 13 16 Safarova 83 24 17 Bartoli 371 10 17 Schnyder 80 16 18 Garbin 361 37 18 Petrova 79 14 19 S. Williams 361 7 19 A. Bondarenko 78 22 20 Hantuchova 356 9 20 Bammer 66 21 20 Knapp 356 51 21 Szavay 66 20 22 Loit 353.5 45 22 Vakulenko 64 33 23 Vakulenko 318 33 23 Mauresmo 63 18 24 Müller 305 54 24 Sugiyama 63 39 25 Pennetta 302 40 25 Hingis 60 19 26 Schiavone 297 25 26 Peer 59 17 27 Dominguez Lino 289 72 27 Bartoli 53 10 28 Shaughnessy 287 53 28 Garbin 52 37 29 Gallovits 282 87 29 Peng 47 46 30 Dulko 278 38 30 Santangelo 46 36 31 Santangelo 276 36 31 Srebotnik 45 27 32 Srebotnik 272 27 32 Li Na 44 29 36 Krajicek 258 34 32 Olaru 44 56 38 Mauresmo 251 18 32 Sequera 44 74 38 Vaidisova 251 12 35 K. Bondarenko 44 44 40 Safarova 250 24 36 Schiavone 42 25 42 Peer 236 17 37 Cibulkova 42 52 43 Li Na 221 29 38 Yan 39 60 53 Zvonareva 195 23 39 Stosur 37 47 54 Stosur 187 47 40 Krajicek 37 34 56 RadwanskaA 173 26 41 Shaughnessy 36 53 66 Azarenka 133 30 42 Azarenka 33 30 69 Razzano 125 28 46 A. Radwanska 29 26 69 Sugiyama 125 39 53 Pennetta 25 40 93 Kirilenko 64 31 61 Zheng 20 163 98 Hingis 60 19 74 Kirilenko 13 31 Clijsters 1 — Clijsters 1 —

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 72 Quality Points on Clay Quality Points/Tournament on Clay Quality WTA QPoints/ WTA Rank Player Pts Rank Rank Player Trn Rank 1Ivanovic 544 4 1 Hénin 171 1 2 Jankovic 520 3 2 Ivanovic 136 4 3 Hénin 513 1 3 Sharapova 107 5 4Kuznetsova 372 2 4 Kuznetsova 93 2 5Medina Garrigues 294 35 5 Jankovic 74 3 6 Sharapova 214 5 6 Golovin 69 13 7Vakulenko 208 33 7 Safarova 65 24 8 Safarova 195 24 8 S. Williams 53 7 9 A. Bondarenko 182 22 9 Zvonareva 51 23 10 Saﬁna 180 15 10 Medina Garrigues 49 35 11 Schnyder 169 16 11 Vaidisova 44 12 12 S. Williams 159 7 12 Vakulenko 42 33 13 V. Williams 158 8 13 Saﬁna 36 15 14 Bammer 153 21 14 Chakvetadze 32 6 15 Golovin 137 13 15 V. Williams 32 8 16 Bartoli 136 10 16 Hantuchova 32 9 16 Knapp 136 51 17 A. Bondarenko 30 22 18 Dementieva 131 11 18 Peer 28 17 19 Chakvetadze 128 6 19 Schnyder 28 16 20 Hantuchova 126 9 20 Dementieva 26 11 21 Petrova 123 14 21 Bammer 26 21 22 Rezai 122 80 22 Petrova 25 14 23 Krajicek 120 34 23 Stosur 22 47 24 Santangelo 117 36 24 Santangelo 20 36 25 Szavay 115 20 25 Bartoli 19 10 26 Peer 113 17 26 Szavay 19 20 27 Stosur 110 47 27 Sugiyama 19 39 28 Cibulkova 107 52 28 Mauresmo 19 18 29 Errani 102 70 29 Cibulkova 18 52 30 Gallovits 92 87 30 Azarenka 17 30 32 Vaidisova 88 12 31 Krajicek 17 34 36 Srebotnik 76 27 32 Sprem 16 208 37 Mauresmo 74 18 33 Peng 16 46 39 Azarenka 69 30 39 Zheng 12 163 41 Pennetta 68 40 50 Garbin 8 37 47 Zheng 62 163 52 Li Na 8 29 48 Garbin 57 37 57 Schiavone 7 25 51 Zvonareva 51 23 62 A. Radwanska 6 26 52 Schiavone 50 25 68 Pennetta 6 40 65 A. Radwanska 38 26 82 Razzano 4 28 65 Li Na 38 29 89 Kirilenko 3 31 65 Sugiyama 38 39 92 Grönefeld 3 205 74 Razzano 30 28 93 Mirza 3 32 92 Kirilenko 16 31 97 Hingis 2 19 Mirza 8 32 Clijsters 0 — Hingis 2 19 Davenport 0 73

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 73 Fractional Points on Clay Fractional Points/Tournament on Clay Rank Player Fract Pts WTA Rank Rank Player fPoint/Trn WTA Rank 1 Jankovic 1029 3 1 Hénin 330 1 2 Hénin 990 1 2 Ivanovic 209 4 3Ivanovic 834 4 3 Kuznetsova 191 2 4Kuznetsova 764 2 4 Jankovic 147 3 5 A. Bondarenko 420 22 5 Sharapova 133 5 6 Saﬁna 396 15 6 Golovin 101 13 7Medina Garrigues 336 35 7 Saﬁna 79 15 8 Schnyder 328 16 8 Zvonareva 75 23 9 Dementieva 325 11 9 A. Bondarenko 70 22 10 Vakulenko 309 33 10 Chakvetadze 68 6 11 Petrova 297 14 11 Dementieva 65 11 12 Chakvetadze 273 6 12 S. Williams 65 7 13 Sharapova 266 5 13 Vakulenko 62 33 14 V. Williams 250 8 14 Vaidisova 59 12 15 Hantuchova 214 9 15 Petrova 59 14 16 Bammer 212 21 16 Medina Garrigues 56 35 17 K. Bondarenko 210 44 17 Schnyder 55 16 18 Golovin 203 13 18 Hantuchova 54 9 19 S. Williams 194 7 19 Hingis 53 19 20 Santangelo 179 36 20 V. Williams 50 8 21 Mauresmo 179 18 21 Mauresmo 45 18 22 Bartoli 166 10 22 Safarova 43 24 23 Garbin 163 37 23 Yan 36 60 24 Rezai 144 80 24 Bammer 35 21 25 Shaughnessy 143 53 25 K. Bondarenko 35 44 26 Peer 134 17 26 Peer 33 17 27 Szavay 132 20 27 Sugiyama 31 39 28 Müller 131 54 28 Santangelo 30 36 29 Safarova 129 24 29 Peng 29 46 30 Srebotnik 124 27 30 Li Na 25 29 31 Li Na 123 29 31 Bartoli 24 10 32 Vaidisova 119 12 32 Garbin 23 37 33 Cibulkova 118 52 33 Szavay 22 20 34 Krajicek 116 34 34 Srebotnik 21 27 45 Stosur 98 47 38 Stosur 20 47 47 Schiavone 91 25 44 Krajicek 17 34 51 A. Radwanska 80 26 50 A. Radwanska 13 26 54 Zvonareva 75 23 51 Schiavone 13 25 64 Pennetta 63 40 61 Azarenka 9 30 65 Sugiyama 62 39 64 Zheng 8 163 70 Hingis 53 19 68 Mirza 8 32 74 Razzano 44 28 69 Grönefeld 8 205 81 Azarenka 37 30 86 Razzano 6 28 91 Kirilenko 24 31 87 Pennetta 5 40 91 Mirza 24 32 91 Kirilenko 5 31 Myskina 0 1065 Myskina 0 1065 Clijsters 0 — Clijsters 0 —

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 74 Total Wins on Clay Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Jankovic 23 4 85.2% 3 1 Szavay 23 4 85.2% 20 3Ivanovic 16 3 84.2% 4 3 Pennetta 16 12 57.1% 40 5 Hénin 14 1 93.3% 1 5Kuznetsova 14 4 77.8% 2 5 Bartoli 14 7 66.7% 10 5Medina Garrigues 14 5 73.7% 35 9 Saﬁna 13 5 72.2% 15 9 A. Bondarenko 13 6 68.4% 22 11 V. Williams 12 5 70.6% 8 11 Dementieva 12 4 75.0% 11 11 Schnyder 12 5 70.6% 16 11 Vakulenko 12 5 70.6% 33 11 Garbin 12 6 66.7% 37 16 Bammer 11 6 64.7% 21 17 Schiavone 10 6 62.5% 25 17 A. Radwanska 10 5 66.7% 26 19 Chakvetadze 8 4 66.7% 6 19 Hantuchova 8 4 66.7% 9 19 Golovin 8 1 88.9% 13 19 Petrova 8 5 61.5% 14 19 Safarova 8 3 72.7% 24 19 Srebotnik 8 6 57.1% 27 19 Santangelo 8 6 57.1% 36 26 Sharapova 7 2 77.8% 5 26 Azarenka 7 4 63.6% 30 26 Krajicek 7 8 46.7% 34 29 S.Williams 6 3 66.7% 7 29 Peer 6 4 60.0% 17 29 Mauresmo 6 4 60.0% 18 29 Razzano 6 8 42.9% 28 29 Li Na 6 5 54.5% 29 29 Stosur 6 5 54.5% 47 Vaidisova 4 2 66.7% 12 Zvonareva 4 1 80.0% 23 Zheng 4 5 44.4% 163 Sugiyama 3 2 60.0% 39 Hingis 1 1 50.0% 19 Kirilenko 1 5 16.7% 31 Mirza 1 3 25.0% 32 Davenport 0 0 — 73 Myskina 0 1 0% 1065 Clijsters 0 1 0% 0 Note: For this table, I have concentrated on high-ranked players. Many players had a lot of Challenger clay wins — e.g. Errani, with 27 clay wins at the $50K level and higher, leads players I checked, and Cornet and Zakopalova, with 26, also led Jankovic.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 75 Winning Percent on Clay Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Hénin 14 1 93.3% 1 2 Golovin 8 1 88.9% 13 3 Jankovic 23 4 85.2% 3 3 Szavay 23 4 85.2% 20 5Ivanovic 16 3 84.2% 4 6Zvonareva 4 1 80.0% 23 7Kuznetsova 14 4 77.8% 2 7 Sharapova 7 2 77.8% 5 9 Dementieva 12 4 75.0% 11 10 Medina Garrigues 14 5 73.7% 35 11 Safarova 8 3 72.7% 24 12 Saﬁna 13 5 72.2% 15 13 V. Williams 12 5 70.6% 8 13 Schnyder 12 5 70.6% 16 13 Vakulenko 12 5 70.6% 33 16 A. Bondarenko 13 6 68.4% 22 17 Bartoli 14 7 66.7% 10 17 Garbin 12 6 66.7% 37 17 A. Radwanska 10 5 66.7% 26 17 Chakvetadze 8 4 66.7% 6 17 Hantuchova 8 4 66.7% 9 17 S.Williams 6 3 66.7% 7 17 Vaidisova 4 2 66.7% 12 24 Bammer 11 6 64.7% 21 25 Azarenka 7 4 63.6% 30 26 Schiavone 10 6 62.5% 25 27 Petrova 8 5 61.5% 14 28 Peer 6 4 60.0% 17 28 Mauresmo 6 4 60.0% 18 28 Sugiyama 3 2 60%.0 39 31 Pennetta 16 12 57.1% 40 31 Srebotnik 8 6 57.1% 27 31 Santangelo 8 6 57.1% 36 Li Na 6 5 54.5% 29 Stosur 6 5 54.5% 47 Hingis 1 1 50.0% 19 Krajicek 7 8 46.7% 34 Zheng 4 5 44.4% 163 Razzano 6 8 42.9% 28 Mirza 1 3 25.0% 32 Kirilenko 1 5 16.7% 31 Myskina 0 1 0% 1065 Clijsters 0 1 0% 0 As with the total clay wins, some players had very high percentages if you count in Challenger results. Angelique Kerber looked strong in this regard — though we’d pay more attention to Ioana Raluca Olaru, whom we show at 19Ð4. If she can keep that up at the WTA level, watch out.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 76 Grass Round Points on Grass Round Points per Tournament on Grass Rank Player Round Pts WTA Rank Rank Player Points/ Trn WTA Rank 1V. Williams 1000 8 1 V. Williams 1000 8 2 Bartoli 890 10 2 Hénin 363 1 3 Hénin 725 1 3 Bartoli 297 10 4Ivanovic 485 4 4 Kuznetsova 250 2 5 Jankovic 380 3 5 S. Williams 250 7 6Mauresmo 330 18 6 Ivanovic 243 4 7Vaidisova 320 12 7 Mauresmo 165 18 8 Krajicek 271 34 8 Vaidisova 160 12 9 Petrova 265 14 9 Schnyder 140 16 10 Kuznetsova 250 2 10 Petrova 133 14 10 S. Williams 250 7 11 Jankovic 127 3 12 Sharapova 240 5 12 Sharapova 120 5 12 Hantuchova 240 9 13 Chakvetadze 115 6 14 Chakvetadze 230 6 14 Szavay 91 20 15 Salerni 190 91 15 Perebiynis 91 96 16 Dementieva 160 11 16 Krajicek 90 34 16 Peer 160 17 17 Hingis 90 19 16 A. Bondarenko 160 22 18 Ruano Pascual 90 83 16 Paszek 160 42 19 Hantuchova 80 9 20 Granville 146 65 20 Dementieva 80 11 21 Schnyder 140 16 20 Peer 80 17 22 A. Radwanska 135 26 20 Paszek 80 42 23 Bammer 130 21 23 Bammer 65 21 24 Saﬁna 125 15 24 Salerni 63 91 24 Safarova 125 24 25 Saﬁna 63 15 26 Vesnina 118 55 26 Safarova 63 24 27 Likhovtseva 110 66 27 Golovin 60 13 27 Nakamura 110 68 28 Loit 60 45 29 Govortsova 109 49 28 Müller 60 54 30 Daniilidou 100 43 28 Cornet 60 57 30 Sequera 100 74 28 Meusburger 60 61 32 Sugiyama 92 39 28 Wozniacki 60 64 33 Szavay 91 20 28 Pratt 60 71 33 Srebotnik 91 27 28 Benesova 60 119 33 Azarenka 91 30 38 A. Bondarenko 53 22 39 Hingis 90 19 41 Srebotnik 46 27 43 Schiavone 80 25 42 Azarenka 46 30 44 Mirza 71 32 45 A. Radwanska 45 26 48 Garbin 61 37 46 Schiavone 40 25 48 Stosur 61 47 48 Li Na 35 29 51 Golovin 60 13 51 Sugiyama 31 39 62 Pennetta 37 40 52 Garbin 31 37 63 Li Na 35 29 53 Stosur 31 47 67 Kirilenko 23 31 58 Mirza 24 32 68 Vakulenko 22 33 63 Pennetta 19 40

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 77 Total Wins on Grass Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Bartoli 12 3 80% 10 2 Jankovic 10 2 83.3% 3 3 Hénin 9 1 90% 1 4 Hantuchova 8 3 72.7% 9 5V. Williams 7 0 100% 8 5 Chakvetadze 7 1 87.5% 6 5 Sharapova 7 2 77.8% 5 8Ivanovic 6 2 75% 4 8Vaidisova 6 2 75% 12 8Mauresmo 6 2 75% 18 8 A. Bondarenko 6 3 66.7% 22 8 Santangelo 6 3 66.7% 36 13 Petrova 5 2 71.4% 14 13 Krajicek 5 3 62.5% 34 15 Szavay 4 1 80% 20 15 Kuznetsova 4 1 80% 2 15 S.Williams 4 1 80% 7 15 Saﬁna 4 2 66.7% 15 15 Peer 4 2 66.7% 17 15 A. Radwanska 4 3 57.1% 26 21 Schnyder 3 1 75% 16 21 Dementieva 3 2 60% 11 21 Safarova 3 2 60% 24 21 Bammer 3 2 60% 21 25 Li Na 2 1 66.7% 29 25 Hingis 2 1 66.7% 19 25 Vakulenko 2 2 50% 33 25 Azarenka 2 2 50% 30 25 Schiavone 2 2 50% 25 25 Pennetta 2 2 50% 40 25 Srebotnik 2 2 50% 27 25 Sugiyama 2 3 40% 39 25 Mirza 2 3 40% 32 25 Kirilenko 2 3 40% 31 Golovin 1 1 50% 13 Garbin 1 2 33.3% 37 Stosur 1 2 33.3% 47 Davenport 0 0 — 73 Zvonareva 0 0 — 23 Zheng 0 0 — 163 Myskina 0 0 — 1065 Clijsters 0 0 — — As with clay, a few lower-ranked players had interesting results: Olga Govortsova and Elena Likhovtseva had seven grass wins. Govortsova won mostly in qualifying, but Likhovtseva made the Birmingham quarterﬁnal and the Wimbledon second round.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 78 Winning Percent on Grass Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1V. Williams 7 0 100.0% 8 2 Hénin 9 1 90.0% 1 3 Chakvetadze 7 1 87.5% 6 4 Jankovic 10 2 83.3% 3 5 Bartoli 12 3 80.0% 10 5 Szavay 4 1 80.0% 20 5Kuznetsova 4 1 80.0% 2 5 S.Williams 4 1 80.0% 7 9 Sharapova 7 2 77.8% 5 10 Ivanovic 6 2 75.0% 4 10 Vaidisova 6 2 75.0% 12 10 Mauresmo 6 2 75.0% 18 10 Schnyder 3 1 75.0% 16 14 Hantuchova 8 3 72.7% 9 15 Petrova 5 2 71.4% 14 16 A. Bondarenko 6 3 66.7% 22 16 Santangelo 6 3 66.7% 36 16 Saﬁna 4 2 66.7% 15 16 Peer 4 2 66.7% 17 16 Li Na 2 1 66.7% 29 16 Hingis 2 1 66.7% 19 22 Krajicek 5 3 62.5% 34 23 Dementieva 3 2 60.0% 11 23 Safarova 3 2 60.0% 24 23 Bammer 3 2 60.0% 21 26 A. Radwanska 4 3 57.1% 26 27 Vakulenko 2 2 50.0% 33 27 Azarenka 2 2 50.0% 30 27 Schiavone 2 2 50.0% 25 27 Pennetta 2 2 50.0% 40 27 Srebotnik 2 2 50.0% 27 27 Golovin 1 1 50.0% 13 33 Sugiyama 2 3 40.0% 39 33 Mirza 2 3 40.0% 32 33 Kirilenko 2 3 40.0% 31 36 Garbin 1 2 33.3% 37 36 Stosur 1 2 33.3% 47 38 Medina Garrigues 0 2 0% 35 38 Razzano 0 1 0% 28

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 79 Hardcourts (Outdoor) Round Points on Hard Round Points per Tournament on Hard Rank Player Round Pts WTA Rank Rank Player Points/ Trn WTA Rank 1 Hénin 2355 1 1 Hénin 471 1 2Kuznetsova 1951 2 2 S. Williams 445 7 3 Jankovic 1786 3 3 Clijsters 265 — 4 S. Williams 1780 7 4 Sharapova 247 5 5 Chakvetadze 1716 6 5 Kuznetsova 217 2 6 Sharapova 1480 5 6 Chakvetadze 191 6 7 Hantuchova 1269 9 7 Vaidisova 181 12 8 Peer 1126 17 8 V. Williams 148 8 9Vaidisova 905 12 9 Davenport 145 73 10 Schnyder 897 16 10 Jankovic 128 3 11 V. Williams 885 8 11 Mauresmo 124 18 12 Bammer 839 21 12 Li Na 104 29 13 Szavay 817.5 20 13 Peer 102 17 14 Razzano 798 28 14 Petrova 98 14 15 Clijsters 795 — 15 Szavay 91 20 16 Hingis 792 19 16 Dementieva 91 11 17 Mirza 790 32 17 Hantuchova 91 9 18 Kirilenko 789 31 18 Ivanovic 85 4 19 Petrova 781 14 19 Zvonareva 75 23 20 Dementieva 726 11 20 Schnyder 75 16 21 Golovin 693 13 21 Hingis 72 19 22 Ivanovic 677 4 22 Golovin 69 13 23 Safina 672 15 23 Safarova 68 24 24 Li Na 621 29 24 Safina 67 15 25 Srebotnik 566 27 25 Razzano 67 28 26 Daniilidou 564 43 26 Mirza 66 32 27 Safarova 545 24 27 Bammer 65 21 28 Bartoli 540 10 28 Cornet 62 57 29 Zvonareva 526 23 29 Paszek 62 42 30 Azarenka 525 30 30 Parmentier 59 59 31 Mauresmo 495 18 31 A. Radwanska 57 26 32 Peng 459 46 32 Azarenka 53 30 33 A. Radwanska 453 26 33 Srebotnik 51 27 34 A. Bondarenko 414 22 34 Garbin 51 37 35 Pennetta 413 40 36 Kirilenko 49 31 36 Dulko 386 38 37 Bartoli 42 10 37 Sugiyama 372 39 39 Schiavone 40 25 38 Paszek 372 42 41 A. Bondarenko 38 22 41 Schiavone 363 25 43 Vakulenko 35 33 42 Garbin 358 37 46 Pennetta 32 40 44 Vakulenko 350 33 47 Stosur 31 47 53 Davenport 290 73 50 Santangelo 29 36 60 Medina Garrigues 257 35 57 Sugiyama 25 39 70 Stosur 218 47 64 Krajicek 24 34 73 Krajicek 189 34 79 Medina Garrigues 20 35 Zheng 34 163 Zheng 9 163 WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 80 Quality Points on Hard Quality Points/Tournament on Hard Quality WTA QPoints/ WTA Rank Player Pts Rank Rank Player Trn Rank 1 S. Williams 884 7 1 S. Williams 221 7 2 Hénin 846 1 2 Hénin 169 1 3 Peer 636 17 3 Clijsters 101 — 4 Chakvetadze 583 6 4 Sharapova 82 5 5 Jankovic 549 3 5 Davenport 82 73 6Kuznetsova 501 2 6 V. Williams 73 8 7 Sharapova 494 5 7 Chakvetadze 65 6 8V. Williams 435 8 8 Li Na 62 29 9 Li Na 373 29 9 Vaidisova 61 12 10 Szavay 358 20 10 Peer 58 17 11 Hantuchova 351 9 11 Kuznetsova 56 2 12 Razzano 331 28 12 Zvonareva 41 23 13 Kirilenko 330 31 13 Szavay 40 20 14 Mirza 321 32 14 Jankovic 39 3 15 Bammer 319 21 15 Ivanovic 38 4 16 Vaidisova 307 12 16 A. Radwanska 38 26 17 Ivanovic 304 4 17 Mauresmo 35 18 18 A. Radwanska 303 26 18 Safarova 34 24 19 Clijsters 302 — 19 Paszek 34 42 20 Zvonareva 287 23 20 Dementieva 29 11 21 Safarova 275 24 21 Yan 29 60 22 Schnyder 254 16 22 Razzano 28 28 23 Golovin 252 13 23 Mirza 27 32 24 Dementieva 234 11 24 Petrova 26 14 24 Azarenka 234 30 25 Golovin 25 13 26 Daniilidou 228 43 26 Hantuchova 25 9 27 Hingis 209 19 27 Bammer 25 21 28 Petrova 208 14 28 Azarenka 23 30 29 Srebotnik 207 27 29 Cornet 23 57 30 Yan 203 60 30 Schnyder 21 16 32 Vakulenko 197 33 31 Kirilenko 21 31 33 Safina 195 15 32 Vakulenko 20 33 35 Bartoli 168 10 33 Safina 20 15 36 Davenport 164 73 34 Hingis 19 19 39 Pennetta 160 40 35 Srebotnik 19 27 41 Mauresmo 141 18 41 Schiavone 13 25 43 Schiavone 120 25 42 Bartoli 13 10 45 Sugiyama 109 39 43 Pennetta 12 40 50 Santangelo 98 36 44 Garbin 12 37 53 A. Bondarenko 96 22 54 Santangelo 9 36 56 Garbin 85 37 55 A. Bondarenko 9 22 71 Stosur 59 47 57 Stosur 8 47 73 Medina Garrigues 58 35 62 Sugiyama 7 39 96 Krajicek 21 34 83 Medina Garrigues 4 35 Zheng 14 163 90 Zheng 4 163 Myskina 0 1065 96 Krajicek 3 34

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 81 Fractional Points on Hard Fractional Points/Tournament on Hard Rank Player Fract Pts WTA Rank Rank Player FPoint/Trn WTA Rank 1 Hénin 1723 1 1 Hénin 345 1 2 Jankovic 1406 3 2 S. Williams 249 7 3Kuznetsova 1279 2 3 Clijsters 211 — 4 S. Williams 997 7 4 Sharapova 147 5 5 Chakvetadze 923 6 5 Kuznetsova 142 2 6 Sharapova 883 5 6 Vaidisova 120 12 7 Hantuchova 858 9 7 Chakvetadze 103 6 8 Peer 784 17 8 Jankovic 100 3 9 Clijsters 633 — 9 Mauresmo 98 18 10 Petrova 612 14 10 Li Na 86 29 11 Schnyder 607 16 11 Davenport 83 73 12 Vaidisova 602 12 12 V. Williams 78 8 13 Ivanovic 560 4 13 Petrova 76 14 14 Li Na 516 29 14 Peer 71 17 15 Hingis 501 19 15 Ivanovic 70 4 16 Golovin 484 13 16 Hantuchova 61 9 17 Dementieva 476 11 17 Dementieva 60 11 18 Bammer 471 21 18 Schnyder 51 16 19 V. Williams 467 8 19 Szavay 50 20 20 Szavay 453 20 20 Golovin 48 13 21 Kirilenko 453 31 21 Hingis 46 19 22 Saﬁna 431 15 22 Yan 43 60 23 Razzano 408 28 23 Saﬁna 43 15 24 Mauresmo 392 18 24 Zvonareva 42 23 25 Mirza 391 32 25 Paszek 39 42 26 Daniilidou 383 43 26 Safarova 38 24 27 Srebotnik 376 27 27 Garbin 37 37 28 Bartoli 323 10 28 Bammer 36 21 29 Azarenka 306 30 29 Cornet 36 57 30 Safarova 305 24 30 Srebotnik 34 27 31 Yan 303 60 31 Razzano 34 28 32 Zvonareva 294 23 32 Mirza 33 32 33 Peng 272 46 33 Azarenka 31 30 34 Garbin 256 37 34 Kirilenko 28 31 35 Pennetta 253 40 36 A. Radwanska 27 26 36 Sugiyama 252 39 37 Schiavone 26 25 38 Schiavone 232 25 39 Bartoli 25 10 41 A. Radwanska 214 26 41 Stosur 23 47 42 Vakulenko 206 33 43 Vakulenko 21 33 43 Santangelo 187 36 44 Pennetta 19 40 46 A. Bondarenko 173 22 46 Santangelo 17 36 50 Davenport 165 73 47 Sugiyama 17 39 51 Stosur 164 47 49 Krajicek 16 34 62 Medina Garrigues 137 35 50 A. Bondarenko 16 22 64 Krajicek 127 34 73 Medina Garrigues 11 35 Zheng 8 163 Zheng 2 163 Myskina 0 1065 Myskina 0 1065

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 82 Total Wins on Hard Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Jankovic 36 13 73.5% 3 2 Chakvetadze 32 6 84.2% 6 3 Razzano 30 10 75.0% 28 4 Szavay 28 8 77.8% 20 5Kuznetsova 27 8 77.1% 2 5Mirza 27 11 71.1% 32 7 Hantuchova 26 13 66.7% 9 7 Peer 26 11 70.3% 17 7 Bammer 26 12 68.4% 21 10 Hénin 25 1 96.2% 1 10 Kirilenko 25 15 62.5% 31 12 V. Williams 22 5 81.5% 8 13 Schnyder 21 12 63.6% 16 13 Azarenka 21 10 67.7% 30 15 Sharapova 20 4 83.3% 5 16 S.Williams 19 2 90.5% 7 16 Golovin 19 9 67.9% 13 18 Vakulenko 18 10 64.3% 33 18 Srebotnik 18 11 62.1% 27 20 Saﬁna 17 9 65.4% 15 20 A. Radwanska 17 7 70.8% 26 20 Dementieva 17 8 68.0% 11 20 Hingis 17 11 60.7% 19 20 Pennetta 17 12 58.6% 40 25 Ivanovic 16 7 69.6% 4 25 Vaidisova 16 5 76.2% 12 25 Petrova 16 8 66.7% 14 25 Zvonareva 16 7 69.6% 23 29 Li Na 14 6 70.0% 29 30 A. Bondarenko 13 10 56.5% 22 Safarova 13 8 61.9% 24 Bartoli 12 13 48.0% 10 Santangelo 12 11 52.2% 36 Sugiyama 12 15 44.4% 39 Clijsters 11 2 84.6% — Garbin 10 7 58.8% 37 Schiavone 9 9 50.0% 25 Medina Garrigues 9 13 40.9% 35 Mauresmo 8 4 66.7% 18 Davenport 8 1 88.9% 73 Krajicek 6 8 42.9% 34 Stosur 6 7 46.2% 47 Zheng 2 4 33.3% 163 Myskina 0 1 0% 1065

As was the case on clay and grass, several players picked up enough Challenger and qualifying wins that they would be among the leaders if such counted. Anne Kremer, with 26 wins, would be Top Ten; Melinda Czink, with 25 wins; Julie Ditty, with 22; Tzipora Obziler, with 21, and Kateryna Bondarneko, with 20, would be Top Twenty. WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 83 Winning Percent on Hard Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Hénin 25 1 96.2% 1 2 S.Williams 19 2 90.5% 7 3Davenport 8 1 88.9% 73 4 Clijsters 11 2 84.6% — 5 Chakvetadze 32 6 84.2% 6 6 Sharapova 20 4 83.3% 5 7V. Williams 22 5 81.5% 8 8 Szavay 28 8 77.8% 20 9Kuznetsova 27 8 77.1% 2 10 Vaidisova 16 5 76.2% 12 11 Razzano 30 10 75..0% 28 12 Jankovic 36 13 73.5% 3 13 Mirza 27 11 71.1% 32 14 A. Radwanska 17 7 70.8% 26 15 Peer 26 11 70.3% 17 16 Li Na 14 6 70.0% 29 17 Ivanovic 16 7 69.6% 4 17 Zvonareva 16 7 69.6% 23 19 Bammer 26 12 68.4% 21 20 Dementieva 17 8 68.0% 11 21 Golovin 19 9 67.9% 13 22 Azarenka 21 10 67.7% 30 23 Hantuchova 26 13 66.7% 9 23 Petrova 16 8 66.7% 14 23 Mauresmo 8 4 66.7% 18 26 Saﬁna 17 9 65.4% 15 27 Vakulenko 18 10 64.3% 33 28 Schnyder 21 12 63.6% 16 29 Kirilenko 25 15 62.5% 31 30 Srebotnik 18 11 62.1% 27 Safarova 13 8 61.9% 24 Hingis 17 11 60.7% 19 Garbin 10 7 58.8% 37 Pennetta 17 12 58.6% 40 A. Bondarenko 13 10 56.5% 22 Santangelo 12 11 52.2% 36 Schiavone 9 9 50.0% 25 Bartoli 12 13 48.0% 10 Stosur 6 7 46.2% 47 Sugiyama 12 15 44.4% 39 Krajicek 6 8 42.9% 34 Medina Garrigues 9 13 40.9% 35 Zheng 2 4 33.3% 163 Myskina 0 1 0% 1065

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 84 Indoor Courts (Carpet and Indoor Hard) Round Points Indoors Round Points per Tournament Indoors Rank Player Round Pts WTA Rank Rank Player Points/ Trn WTA Rank 1 Hénin 1605 1 1 Hingis 430 19 2Ivanovic 1021 4 2 Hénin 401 1 3 Golovin 781 13 3 Sharapova 240 5 4 Hantuchova 726 9 4 Clijsters 190 — 5 Sharapova 721 5 5 Ivanovic 170 4 6 Dementieva 702 11 6 Dementieva 140 11 7 Chakvetadze 672 6 7 Davenport 140 73 8Kuznetsova 620 2 7 V. Williams 140 8 9 Bartoli 548 10 9 Golovin 130 13 10 Vaidisova 466 12 10 Kuznetsova 124 2 11 Safina 446 15 11 Hantuchova 121 9 12 Mauresmo 437 18 12 Petrova 105 14 13 Hingis 430 19 13 S. Williams 103 7 14 Petrova 421 14 14 Chakvetadze 96 6 15 S. Williams 411 7 15 Vaidisova 93 12 16 Zvonareva 371 23 16 Azarenka 90 30 17 Schnyder 367 16 17 Jankovic 89 3 18 Jankovic 356 3 18 Vinci 88 63 19 Schiavone 326 25 19 Mauresmo 87 18 20 Vakulenko 238 33 20 Safina 74 15 21 A. Radwanska 197 26 21 Olaru 73 56 22 Safarova 192 24 22 Stosur 73 47 23 Clijsters 190 — 23 Bartoli 69 10 24 A. Bondarenko 183 22 24 Schiavone 65 25 25 Azarenka 180 30 25 Likhovtseva 65 66 26 Peer 177 17 26 Safarova 64 24 27 Vinci 175 63 27 Zvonareva 62 23 28 Sugiyama 160 39 28 Li Na 60 29 29 Dushevina 146 41 28 Santangelo 60 36 30 Stosur 145 47 28 Zheng 60 163 31 Davenport 140 73 31 Sugiyama 53 39 31 V. Williams 140 8 32 Schnyder 52 16 33 Likhovtseva 130 66 33 K. Bondarenko 42 44 33 Poutchkova 130 86 35 A. Bondarenko 37 22 35 Krajicek 129 34 36 Peer 35 17 39 Bammer 107 21 37 Vakulenko 34 33 54 Kirilenko 63 31 39 A. Radwanska 33 26 56 Li Na 60 29 41 Razzano 30 28 56 Razzano 60 28 49 Bammer 21 21 56 Santangelo 60 36 57 Medina Garrigues 17 35 56 Zheng 60 163 61 Kirilenko 16 31 65 Medina Garrigues 51 35 73 Garbin 11 37 75 Srebotnik 39 27 82 Szavay 8 20 Szavay 16 20 84 Srebotnik 8 27 Mirza 2 32 Mirza 1 32 Pennetta 1 40 Pennetta 1 40 WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 85 Quality Points Indoors Quality Points/Tournament Indoor Rank Player Quality Pts WTA Rank Rank Player QPoint/Trn WTA Rank 1 Hénin 526 1 1 Hénin 132 1 2Ivanovic 417 4 2 Hingis 101 19 3 Golovin 355 13 3 Sharapova 85 5 4 Hantuchova 296 9 4 Ivanovic 70 4 5 Sharapova 254 5 5 Azarenka 68 30 6 Chakvetadze 242 6 5 Clijsters 68 — 7 Bartoli 230 10 7 Golovin 59 13 8 Dementieva 214 11 8 Safarova 57 24 9Mauresmo 180 18 9 Hantuchova 49 9 10 Vaidisova 179 12 10 Davenport 43 73 11 Safarova 172 24 11 Dementieva 43 11 12 Schnyder 169 16 12 Petrova 42 14 13 Petrova 168 14 12 V. Williams 42 8 14 Schiavone 166 25 14 Mauresmo 36 18 15 A. Radwanska 140 26 15 Vaidisova 36 12 16 Safina 137 15 16 Chakvetadze 35 6 17 Azarenka 136 30 17 Schiavone 33 25 18 S. Williams 124 7 18 K. Bondarenko 31 44 18 Kuznetsova 124 2 19 S. Williams 31 7 20 Zvonareva 119 23 20 Bartoli 29 10 21 Hingis 101 19 21 Vinci 28 63 22 K. Bondarenko 94 44 22 Likhovtseva 28 66 23 Jankovic 93 3 23 Stosur 27 47 24 Bychkova 74 113 24 Kuznetsova 25 2 25 Knapp 70 51 25 Schnyder 24 16 26 Clijsters 68 — 26 A. Radwanska 23 26 27 Vakulenko 65 33 27 Jankovic 23 3 28 Dushevina 63 41 28 Safina 23 15 29 Krajicek 59 34 29 Olaru 22 56 30 A. Bondarenko 57 22 30 Zvonareva 20 23 31 Peer 56 17 31 Sugiyama 19 39 31 Sugiyama 56 39 32 Razzano 18 28 31 Vinci 56 63 39 A. Bondarenko 11 22 35 Stosur 54 47 40 Peer 11 17 39 Davenport 43 73 42 Vakulenko 9 33 40 V. Williams 42 8 46 Kirilenko 9 31 44 Razzano 36 28 47 Krajicek 8 34 45 Kirilenko 35 31 49 Santangelo 8 36 53 Bammer 22 21 52 Szavay 7 20 63 Szavay 14 20 64 Bammer 4 21 65 Medina Garrigues 12 35 65 Medina Garrigues 4 35 Li Na 2 29 77 Li Na 2 29 Srebotnik 2 27 77 Zheng 2 163 Zheng 2 163 Srebotnik 0 27 Garbin 0 37 Garbin 0 37 Mirza 0 32 Mirza 0 32 Pennetta 0 40 Pennetta 0 40

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 86 Fractional Points Indoors Fractional Points/Tournament Indoors Rank Player Frac Pts WTA Rank Rank Player FPoint/Trn WTA Rank 1 Hénin 1523 1 1 Hénin 381 1 2 Golovin 891 13 2 Hingis 279 19 3Ivanovic 770 4 3 Clijsters 187 — 4 Hantuchova 572 9 4 Sharapova 153 5 5Kuznetsova 523 2 5 Golovin 149 13 6 Chakvetadze 521 6 6 Ivanovic 128 4 7 Dementieva 517 11 7 Petrova 126 14 8 Petrova 505 14 8 Kuznetsova 105 2 9 Sharapova 458 5 9 Dementieva 103 11 10 Mauresmo 447 18 10 Hantuchova 95 9 11 Bartoli 443 10 11 Mauresmo 89 18 12 Vaidisova 396 12 12 Vaidisova 79 12 13 Saﬁna 380 15 13 S. Williams 77 7 14 S. Williams 309 7 14 Safarova 75 24 15 Schiavone 290 25 15 Chakvetadze 74 6 16 Schnyder 286 16 16 Jankovic 70 3 17 Hingis 279 19 17 Azarenka 64 30 18 Jankovic 278 3 18 Saﬁna 63 15 19 Zvonareva 258 23 19 K. Bondarenko 61 44 20 Safarova 225 24 20 Vinci 59 63 21 A. Radwanska 219 26 21 Schiavone 58 25 22 Clijsters 187 — 22 Bartoli 55 10 23 K. Bondarenko 184 44 23 Likhovtseva 52 66 24 A. Bondarenko 159 22 24 Zvonareva 43 23 24 Vakulenko 159 33 25 Schnyder 41 16 26 Krajicek 157 34 26 Stosur 39 47 27 Azarenka 128 30 27 A. Radwanska 36 26 28 Vinci 118 63 28 Santangelo 36 36 29 Peer 113 17 28 Li Na 36 29 30 Likhovtseva 103 66 28 Zheng 36 163 31 Bammer 100 21 31 Davenport 32 73 32 Sugiyama 95 39 31 V. Williams 32 8 33 Knapp 91 51 33 A. Bondarenko 32 22 35 Stosur 78 47 34 Sugiyama 32 39 42 Razzano 51 28 35 Razzano 25 28 47 Medina Garrigues 42 35 36 Vakulenko 23 33 47 Srebotnik 42 27 37 Peer 23 17 55 Kirilenko 36 31 38 Krajicek 22 34 55 Santangelo 36 36 39 Perebiynis 21 96 55 Li Na 36 29 40 Bammer 20 21 55 Zheng 36 163 41 Pratt 19 71 61 Davenport 32 73 48 Medina Garrigues 14 35 61 V. Williams 32 8 56 Szavay 10 20 70 Szavay 19 20 57 Kirilenko 9 31 78 Garbin 14 37 60 Srebotnik 8 27 Mirza 0 32 Mirza 0 32 Pennetta 0 40 Pennetta 0 40

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 87 Total Wins Indoors Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Hénin 15 1 93.8% 1 1 Golovin 15 6 71.4% 13 3Ivanovic 13 6 68.4% 4 4Vakulenko 11 7 61.1% 33 5Zvonareva 10 6 62.5% 23 5 Hantuchova 10 6 62.5% 9 7 Bartoli 9 8 52.9% 10 7 Chakvetadze 9 8 52.9% 6 7 Dementieva 9 4 69.2% 11 7 Saﬁna 9 6 60% 15 7 Schnyder 9 7 56.3% 16 7Vaidisova 9 5 64.3% 12 13 A. Radwanska 8 8 50% 26 14 Petrova 7 3 70% 14 14 Mauresmo 7 4 63.6% 18 16 Krajicek 6 7 46.2% 34 16 Kuznetsova 6 7 46.2% 2 16 Peer 6 5 54.5% 17 16 Razzano 6 2 75% 28 16 Schiavone 6 5 54.5% 25 16 Sharapova 6 3 66.7% 5 22 Davenport 5 0 100% 73 22 S.Williams 5 4 55.6% 7 22 Sugiyama 5 3 62.5% 39 22 V. Williams 5 0 100% 8 26 Azarenka 4 2 66.7% 30 26 A. Bondarenko 4 5 44.4% 22 26 Hingis 4 0 100% 19 26 Safarova 4 3 57.1% 24 26 Stosur 4 2 66.7% 47 Clijsters 3 1 75% — Szavay 3 1 75% 20 Jankovic 3 6 33.3% 3 Bammer 3 5 37.5% 21 Garbin 3 2 60% 37 Medina Garrigues 3 3 50% 35 Li Na 1 1 50% 29 Kirilenko 1 4 20% 31 Srebotnik 1 5 16.7% 27 Santangelo 1 1 50% 36 Zheng 1 1 50% 163 Mirza 0 2 0% 32 Pennetta 0 1 0% 40 Myskina 0 0 — 1065 As on all the other surfaces, some players accumulated a relative high number of indoor wins by playing Challengers. Lilia Osterloh and Ekaterina Bychkova, for instance, had 13 — though it took Osterloh eleven events to accumulate those 13 wins, and Bychkova nine.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 88 Winning Percent Indoors Rank Player Wins Losses Winning % WTA Rank 1 Hingis 4 0 100.0% 19 1Davenport 5 0 100.0% 73 1V. Williams 5 0 100.0% 8 4 Hénin 15 1 93.8% 1 5 Clijsters 3 1 75.0% — 5 Razzano 6 2 75.0% 28 5 Szavay 3 1 75.0% 20 8 Golovin 15 6 71.4% 13 9 Petrova 7 3 70.0% 14 10 Dementieva 9 4 69.2% 11 11 Ivanovic 13 6 68.4% 4 12 Sharapova 6 3 66.7% 5 12 Azarenka 4 2 66.7% 30 12 Stosur 4 2 66.7% 47 15 Vaidisova 9 5 64.3% 12 16 Mauresmo 7 4 63.6% 18 17 Zvonareva 10 6 62.5% 23 17 Hantuchova 10 6 62.5% 9 17 Sugiyama 5 3 62.5% 39 20 Vakulenko 11 7 61.1% 33 21 Saﬁna 9 6 60.0% 15 21 Garbin 3 2 60.0% 37 23 Safarova 4 3 57.1% 24 24 Schnyder 9 7 56.3% 16 25 S.Williams 5 4 55.6% 7 26 Peer 6 5 54.5% 17 26 Schiavone 6 5 54.5% 25 28 Chakvetadze 9 8 52.9% 6 28 Bartoli 9 8 52.9% 10 30 A. Radwanska 8 8 50.0% 26 30 Li Na 1 1 50.0% 29 30 Medina Garrigues 3 3 50.0% 35 30 Santangelo 1 1 50.0% 36 30 Zheng 1 1 50.0% 163 Kuznetsova 6 7 46.2% 2 Krajicek 6 7 46.2% 34 A. Bondarenko 4 5 44.4% 22 Bammer 3 5 37.5% 21 Jankovic 3 6 33.3% 3 Kirilenko 1 4 20.0% 31 Srebotnik 1 5 16.7% 27 Mirza 0 2 0% 32 Pennetta 0 1 0% 40 Myskina 0 0 — 1065 Among lower-ranked players, the most noteworthy was probably Chan Yung-Jan, whose several Challenger titles (see the list in the section on “Short Summary: The Top Eighty” on page 5) gave her a winning percentage trailing only Hingis, Davenport, Venus, and Hénin.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 89 Surface Balance Percentage of Wins on Each Surface This section attempts to show how “balanced” players were between surfaces — that is, how close they came to having a “typical” ratio of clay to grass to hardcourt to indoor wins. The table below shows how many wins each player had on each surface, and the percentage of her wins on that surface. For example, Victoria Azarenka had 34 total wins, and seven on clay, so she had 20.6% of her wins on clay. She had two of her 34 wins on grass, so 5.8% of her wins were grass win. The final column is the “surface deviation.” The players listed on the next page as a whole earned 24.5% of their wins on clay, 9.5% on grass, 49.5% on outdoor hardcourts, and 16.5% indoors. “Deviation” is each player’s root mean square deviation from this “standard” schedule of wins. A player who had an exactly typical schedule would have a deviation of 0; the higher the deviation, the stranger the player’s schedule. Roughly speaking, a deviation under 0.1 indicates a very balanced schedule — but the only players with such schedules were Kuznetsova, Petrova, Radwanska, Safarova, Schnyder, Serena Williams, and Venus Williams. A deviation under .15 could be considered balanced; 18 players (including of course the players who had deviations of less than .1) had such schedules. A schedule with a deviation of .15 to .3 is mildly unbalanced; 19 players had such a schedule. A deviation from .3 to .4 is unbalanced; three players had such schedules. Three players had extremely unbalanced schedules (deviation greater than .4), but one of these — Zheng — was injured for most of the year. The only player with an extremely unbalanced schedule who played the whole year was Maria Kirilenko. If we look at deviations by particular surfaces, we note that twp players (Clijsters and Davenport) had no clay wins; indeed, Davenport didn’t play a clay match. Among those who were reasonably healthy, Kirilenko and Mirza had the smallest clay percentages. Zheng had the highest fraction of her wins on clay, but that again is health; Garbin, who was third in the “heaviest clay schedule” also missed a big chunk of the year. Of healthy players, Medina Garrigues had the highest percent of her wins on clay, followed by Pennetta. (No surprises yet.) On grass, Clijsters, Davenport, Medina Garrigues, Razzano, Zheng, and Zvonareva had no wins; Clijsters, Davenport, Zheng, and Zvonareva had no grass events. The players with the heaviest biases toward grass, not surprisingly, was Bartoli, followed by Santangelo, Mauresmo, and Krajiek.. Turning to hardcourts, we at last have a surface that everyone played on, at least a little. Among players who played full scheduled, Krajicek had the strongest anti-hard bias, followed by Bartoli and Zheng. Mirza was the most extreme hardcourt fanatic (90% of her wins!), followed by Kirileno and Clijsters. Hingis and Razzano were also pretty extreme. Indoors, Pennetta and Mirza had no wins; Pennetta had one indoor event, Mirza two. Srebotnik, Kirilenko, Santangelo, Jankovic, Li Na, and Szavay also had very weak indoor results, with injury probably being the main reason for the latter two. Davenport had the strongest indoor bias, but of course she had only three events. Of players who played a full year, Golovin was had the strongest indoor bias. Zvonareva, Mauresmo, Vaidisova, and Vakulenko were next on the pro-indoor list. The full surface win data is shown in the table on the next page.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 90 Player WTA Total Clay Grass Hard Indoor Surface Name Rank Wins Wins % Wins Wins % Wins Wins % Wins Wins % Wins Deviation Azarenka 30 34 7 21% 2 6% 21 62% 4 12% 0.14 Bammer 21 43 11 26% 3 7% 26 60% 3 7% 0.15 Bartoli 10 47 14 30% 12 26% 12 26% 9 19% 0.29 A. Bondarenko 22 36 13 36% 6 17% 13 36% 4 11% 0.20 Chakvetadze 6 56 8 14% 7 13% 32 57% 9 16% 0.13 Clijsters — 14 0 0% 0 0% 11 79% 3 21% 0.39 Davenport 73 13 0 0% 0 0% 8 62% 5 38% 0.36 Dementieva 11 41 12 29% 3 7% 17 41% 9 22% 0.11 Garbin 37 26 12 46% 1 4% 10 38% 3 12% 0.25 Golovin 13 43 8 19% 1 2% 19 44% 15 35% 0.21 Hantuchova 9 52 8 15% 8 15% 26 50% 10 19% 0.11 Hénin 1 63 14 22% 9 14% 25 40% 15 24% 0.13 Hingis 19 24 1 4% 2 8% 17 71% 4 17% 0.29 Ivanovic 4 51 16 31% 6 12% 16 31% 13 25% 0.22 Jankovic 3 72 23 32% 10 14% 36 50% 3 4% 0.15 Kirilenko 31 29 1 3% 2 7% 25 86% 1 3% 0.44 Krajicek 34 24 7 29% 5 21% 6 25% 6 25% 0.29 Kuznetsova 2 51 14 27% 4 8% 27 53% 6 12% 0.07 Li Na 29 23 6 26% 2 9% 14 61% 1 4% 0.17 Mauresmo 18 27 6 22% 6 22% 8 30% 7 26% 0.26 Medina Garrigues 35 26 14 54% 0 0% 9 35% 3 12% 0.35 Mirza 32 30 1 3% 2 7% 27 90% 0 0% 0.49 Peer 17 42 6 14% 4 10% 26 62% 6 14% 0.16 Pennetta 40 35 16 46% 2 6% 17 49% 0 0% 0.27 Petrova 14 36 8 22% 5 14% 16 44% 7 19% 0.08 A. Radwanska 26 39 10 26% 4 10% 17 44% 8 21% 0.07 Razzano 28 42 6 14% 0 0% 30 71% 6 14% 0.26 Safarova 24 28 8 29% 3 11% 13 46% 4 14% 0.06 Saﬁna 15 43 13 30% 4 9% 17 40% 9 21% 0.12 Santangelo 36 27 8 30% 6 22% 12 44% 1 4% 0.19 Schiavone 25 27 10 37% 2 7% 9 33% 6 22% 0.21 Schnyder 16 45 12 27% 3 7% 21 47% 9 20% 0.06 Sharapova 5 40 7 18% 7 18% 20 50% 6 15% 0.11 Srebotnik 27 29 8 28% 2 7% 18 62% 1 3% 0.19 Stosur 47 17 6 35% 1 6% 6 35% 4 24% 0.20 Sugiyama 39 22 3 14% 2 9% 12 55% 5 23% 0.13 Szavay 20 58 23 40% 4 7% 28 48% 3 5% 0.19 Vaidisova 12 35 4 11% 6 17% 16 46% 9 26% 0.18 Vakulenko 33 43 12 28% 2 5% 18 42% 11 26% 0.13 S.Williams 7 34 6 18% 4 12% 19 56% 5 15% 0.10 V. Williams 8 46 12 26% 7 15% 22 48% 5 11% 0.08 Zheng 163 7 4 57% 0 0% 2 29% 1 14% 0.40 Zvonareva 23 30 4 13% 0 0% 16 53% 10 33% 0.23

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 91 Percentage of Points on Each Surface Pretty much the same as the preceding, except that we total players’ points instead of their wins. As it turns out, our players earned 24.7% of their points on clay, 9.4% on grass, 48.0% on hardcourt, and 17.9% indoors. If we look at deviations in points, following our same criteria, the playesr with very balanced schedule (deviation less than .1) were Schnyer, Safarova, Kuznetsova, Radwanska, Sugiyama, and Petrova. (This is in sharp contrast to last year, when only one player — Hingis — was very balanced. I have no clue what this means). A total of thirteen players had balanced schedules (deviation under .15): the above six plus Sharapova, Hénin, Azarenka, Bammer, Chakvetadze, Stosur, and Hantuchova. 19 players had mildly unbalanced schedules (deviation of .15 to .3). Six players had unbalanced schedules (deviation of .3 to .4). We had six players with extremely unbalanced schedules: Clijsters, Kirilenko, Zheng, Medina Garrigues, Mirza, and Myskina.(Note that Lindsay Davenport is merely “unbalanced,” not “extremely unbalanced,” even though she didn’t play either clay or grass. It just goes to show how hardcourt-heavy the schedule is.) Looking at clay, Davenport did not play, and Clijsters had just the one loss; Hingis had only one event though she did at least earn some points. The other players with the lowest fraction of points on clay were Mirza and Kirilenko. Formally, Myskina earned the highest fraction of her points on clay — but that’s because she only had three points. The stunning figure is Medina Garrigues’s 63% of her points on clay. Zheng and Garbin were a distant third and fourth in this regard, but they had injuries. It is noteworthy to observe that Jankovic earned 40% of her point on clay. Five players (Clijsters, Davenport, Myskina, Zheng, Zvonareva) missed grass. Razzano and Medina Garrigues had the lowest fraction of their points on grass among players who played grass. We had a near- tie for players who were most strongly biased toward grass: Venus Williams earned 40% of her points there, and Marion Bartoli 38%. Michaella Krajicek was a fairly strong third, and everyone else far back. Given her injuries, it is little surprise to see that Zheng had the lowest fraction of her points on hardcourt, but it’s a significant surprise to see Ivanovic the second-lowest. That Krajicek is third is little surprise; she seems to like her surfaces as fast as possible. We had four extreme hardcourt fanatics: Mirza earned 85% of her points on the stuff, Kirilenko 845, and Razzano and Clijsters 81%. Myskina had no indoor matches. Pennetta and Mirza had no indoor wins. Szavay also has a very low indoor total, because she was hurt before she could play the fall indoor season. Injury also hampered Garbin. That leaves Srebotnik as arguably our most extreme indoor-hater among players who played full schedules. Golovin was the clear leader in fraction of points earned indoors, followed rather distantly by Dementieva and Zvonareva. The overall data for this is shown in the table on the next page.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 92 Player WTA Total Clay Grass Hard Indoor Surface Name Rank Points Points % Points Points % Points Points % Points Points % Points Deviation Azarenka 30 929 133 14% 91 10% 525 57% 180 19% 0.13 Bammer 21 1472 396 27% 130 9% 839 57% 107 7% 0.14 Bartoli 10 2349 371 16% 890 38% 540 23% 548 23% 0.39 A. Bondarenko 22 1227 470 38% 160 13% 414 34% 183 15% 0.20 Chakvetadze 6 3033 415 14% 230 8% 1716 57% 672 22% 0.15 Clijsters — 986 1 0% 0 0% 795 81% 190 19% 0.42 Davenport 73 430 0 0% 0 0% 290 67% 140 33% 0.36 Dementieva 11 2023 435 22% 160 8% 726 36% 702 35% 0.21 Garbin 37 801 361 45% 61 8% 358 45% 21 3% 0.26 Golovin 13 1919 385 20% 60 3% 693 36% 781 41% 0.27 Hantuchova 9 2591 356 14% 240 9% 1269 49% 726 28% 0.15 Hénin 1 6155 1470 24% 725 12% 2355 38% 1605 26% 0.13 Hingis 19 1372 60 4% 90 7% 792 58% 430 31% 0.26 Ivanovic 4 3498 1315 38% 485 14% 677 19% 1021 29% 0.34 Jankovic 3 4202 1680 40% 380 9% 1786 43% 356 8% 0.19 Kirilenko 31 939 64 7% 23 2% 789 84% 63 7% 0.42 Krajicek 34 847 258 30% 271 32% 189 22% 129 15% 0.35 Kuznetsova 2 3796 975 26% 250 7% 1951 51% 620 16% 0.05 Li Na 29 937 221 24% 35 4% 621 66% 60 6% 0.22 Mauresmo 18 1513 251 17% 330 22% 495 33% 437 29% 0.24 Medina Garrigues 35 847 536 63% 3 0% 257 30% 51 6% 0.45 Mirza 32 925 62 7% 71 8% 790 85% 2 0% 0.45 Myskina 1065 3 2 67% 0 0% 1 33% 0 0% 0.49 Peer 17 1699 236 14% 160 9% 1126 66% 177 10% 0.22 Pennetta 40 753 302 40% 37 5% 413 55% 1 0% 0.25 Petrova 14 1864 397 21% 265 14% 781 42% 421 23% 0.10 A. Radwanska 26 958 173 18% 135 14% 453 47% 197 21% 0.09 Razzano 28 985 125 13% 2 0% 798 81% 60 6% 0.38 Safarova 24 1112 250 22% 125 11% 545 49% 192 17% 0.03 Saﬁna 15 1973 730 37% 125 6% 672 34% 446 23% 0.19 Santangelo 36 667 276 41% 15 2% 316 47% 60 9% 0.2 Schiavone 25 1066 297 28% 80 8% 363 34% 326 31% 0.19 Schnyder 16 1886 482 26% 140 7% 897 48% 367 19% 0.03 Sharapova 5 2956 515 17% 240 8% 1480 50% 721 24% 0.10 Srebotnik 27 968 272 28% 91 9% 566 58% 39 4% 0.18 Stosur 47 611 187 31% 61 10% 218 36% 145 24% 0.15 Sugiyama 39 749 125 17% 92 12% 372 50% 160 21% 0.09 Szavay 20 1317.5 393 30% 91 7% 817.5 62% 16 1% 0.23 Vaidisova 12 1942 251 13% 320 16% 905 47% 466 24% 0.15 Vakulenko 33 928 318 34% 22 2% 350 38% 238 26% 0.18 S. Williams 7 2802 361 13% 250 9% 1780 64% 411 15% 0.20 V. Williams 8 2470 445 18% 1000 40% 885 36% 140 6% 0.36 Zheng 163 193 99 51% 0 0% 34 18% 60 31% 0.44 Zvonareva 23 1092 195 18% 0 0% 526 48% 371 34% 0.20

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 93 The above may be clearer if we graph it. The graph on the next page shows the fraction of her points the players earned on each of the four surfaces.

Percent of Points on Each Surface

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Azarenka 14% 10% 57% 19% Bammer 27% 9% 57% 7% Bartoli 16% 38% 23% 23% A. Bondarenko 38% 13% 34% 15% Chakvetadze 14% 8% 57% 22% Clijsters 0% 81% 19% Davenport0% 67% 33% Dementieva 22% 8% 36% 35% Garbin 45% 8% 45% 3% Golovin 20% 3% 36% 41% Hantuchova 14% 9% 49% 28% Hénin 24% 12% 38% 26% Hingis 4% 7% 58% 31% Ivanovic 38% 14% 19% 29% Jankovic 40% 9% 43% 8% Kirilenko 7% 2% 84% 7% Krajicek 30% 32% 22% 15% Kuznetsova 26% 7% 51% 16% Li Na 24% 4% 66% 6% Mauresmo 17% 22% 33% 29% Medina Garrigues 63% 0% 30% 6% Mirza 7% 8% 85% 0% Myskina 67% 0% 33% 0% Peer 14% 9% 66% 10% Pennetta 40% 5% 55% 0% Petrova 21% 14% 42% 23% A. Radwanska 18% 14% 47% 21% Razzano 13% 0% 81% 6% Safarova 22% 11% 49% 17% Safina 37% 6% 34% 23% Santangelo 41% 2% 47% 9% Schiavone 28% 8% 34% 31% Schnyder 26% 7% 48% 19% Sharapova 17% 8% 50% 24% Srebotnik 28% 9% 58% 4% Stosur 31% 10% 36% 24% Sugiyama 17% 12% 50% 21% Szavay 30% 7% 62% 1% Vaidisova 13% 16% 47% 24% Vakulenko 34% 2% 38% 26% S. Williams 13% 9% 64% 15% V. Williams 18% 40% 36% 6% Zheng 51% 0% 18% 31% Zvonareva 18% 0% 48% 34% Clay Grass Hard Indoor

For an overall analysis of surface results, see the item “Surface Preferences” on page 117.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 94 Player Results Characterized The next few items attempt to describe just how players accomplished what they accomplished. Did a particular player earn most of her points at Slams? Did she earn most of her points by beating up on weak players? Did she play a particularly strong schedule? The statistics below attempt to answer at least some of those questions. Fraction of Points Earned at Slams This statistic takes a player’s Best 17 points, and her Slam points, and expresses the former as a percentage of the latter, sorting the list from highest to lowest percentave of points earned at Slams. The higher the percentage of Slam points, obviously, the more dependent on the Slams the player was. For these players overall, just over a third of the points (34.3%) were earned at Slams. Our extremes are, of course, special cases: Myskina, who had the highest fraction of her points at Slams, played only two events. Davenport had no Slams. But it is amazing to see the Williams Sisters with almost as extreme a ratio as Myskina. And it speaks very well of Golovin’s overall results that she managed to be Top Fifteen with almost no Slam points. The fact that Hantuchova is Top Ten with such a low fraction of Slam points is also fairly impressive.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 95 Standing Player WTA Rank Best 17 Points Slam Points Slam Pt % 1Myskina, Anastasia 1065 3 2 66.7% 2Williams, Serena 7 2802 1750 62.5% 3Williams, Venus 8 2470 1540 62.3% 4Vaidisova, Nicole 12 1942 1040 53.6% 5 Safarova, Lucie 24 1112 570 51.3% 6 Bartoli, Marion 10 2191 1040 47.5% 7 Sharapova, Maria 5 2956 1380 46.7% 8 Krajicek, Michaella 34 864 402 46.5% 9 Clijsters, Kim — 986 450 45.6% 10 Peer, Shahar 17 1675 730 43.6% 11 Sugiyama, Ai 39 743 300 40.4% 12 Ivanovic, Ana 4 3461 1380 39.9% 13 Hénin, Justine 1 6155 2450 39.8% 14 Garbin, Tathiana 37 805 292 36.3% 15 Kuznetsova, Svetlana 2 3725 1340 36.0% 16 Chakvetadze, Anna 6 2935 1040 35.4% 17 Azarenka, Victoria 30 928 322 34.7% 18 Stosur, Samantha 47 611 212 34.7% 19 Srebotnik, Katarina 27 961 330 34.3% 20 Szavay, Agnes 20 1331.5 447 33.6% 21 Hingis, Martina 19 1372 430 31.3% 22 Radwanska, Agnieszka 26 962 292 30.4% 23 Mirza, Sania 32 921 270 29.3% 24 Schnyder, Patty 16 1806 510 28.2% 25 Jankovic, Jelena 3 3475 980 28.2% 26 Bondarenko, Alona 22 1171 330 28.2% 27 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 35 840 234 27.9% 28 Kirilenko, Maria 31 928 242 26.1% 29 Bammer, Sybille 21 1323 342 25.9% 30 Schiavone, Francesca 25 1046 270 25.8% 31 Vakulenko, Julia 33 916 235 25.7% 32 Li Na 29 937 230 24.5% 33 Mauresmo, Amélie 18 1538 370 24.1% 34 Saﬁna, Dinara 15 1830 430 23.5% 35 Santangelo, Mara 36 824 184 22.3% 36 Dementieva, Elena 11 1985 410 20.7% 37 Zvonareva, Vera 23 1117 230 20.6% 38 Petrova, Nadia 14 1862 322 17.3% 39 Hantuchova, Daniela 9 2367 372 15.7% 40 Razzano, Virginie 28 956 124 13.0% 41 Pennetta, Flavia 40 737 66 9.0% 42 Golovin, Tatiana 13 1882 152 8.1% 43 Zheng Jie 163 193 4 2.1% 44 Davenport, Lindsay 73 430 0 0% The above data is again something we can graph. The graph is shown on the next page.

Azarenka 322 606 Bammer 342 981 Bartoli 1040 1151 A.Bondarenko 330 841 Chakvetadze 1040 1895 Clijsters 450 536 Davenport0 430 Dementieva 410 1575 Garbin 292 513 Golovin 152 1730 Hantuchova 372 1995 Hénin 2450 3705 Hingis 430 942 Ivanovic 1380 2081 Jankovic 980 2495 Kirilenko 242 686 Krajicek 402 462 Kuznetsova 1340 2385 Li 230 707 Mauresmo 370 1168 Medina Garrigues 234 606 Mirza 270 651 Myskina 2 1 Peer 730 945 Pennetta 66 671 Petrova 322 1540 Radwanska 292 670 Razzano 124 832 Safarova 570 542 Safina 430 1400 Santangelo 184 640 Schiavone 270 776 Schnyder 510 1296 Sharapova 1380 1576 Srebotnik 330 631 Stosur 212 399 Sugiyama 300 443 Szavay 447 884.5 Vaidisova 1040 902 Vakulenko 235 681 S. Williams 1750 1052 V. Williams 1540 930 Zheng 4 189 Zvonareva 230 887

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Slam Points Other Points

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 97 Ratio of Round to Quality Points This table takes our highlight players, and calculates the ratio of their round points (at all events, not just their best 17) to quality points. The more quality points (i.e. the lower the ratio), the more the players are earning their points “the hard way” (by beating top players). The higher the ratio, the higher the odds that they’re taking advantage of relatively easy draws. So Safarova and Radwanska, e.g., were facing tough going to earn their points, while Hingis and Garbin were, well, not. For our 42 highlight players (excluding Myskina, who had no quality points), the average ratio was 2.76 : 1 (for those who remember last year, when it was just about 2 : 1, remember that the WTA inflated round points this year; I have not inflated the quality points to match the WTA’s crazy notions of what point totals “ought” to look like). The median ratio is 2.71 : 1. Several lower-ranked players who do not appear in this table perhaps deserve mention. Yuliana Fedak’s ratio of 1.80 : 1 is better than anyone’s except Safarova’s; she has become, in a small way, an upset artist. Tamira Paszek was fourth among players I checked, at 1.84 : 1; this is another indication of her bright future. Yan Zi also scored in the Top Ten, but she is another who seems more an upset artist than a strong prospect.

Standing Player WTA Rank Round Points Qual Pts Ratio 1 Safarova 24 1112 674 1.65 : 1 2A. Radwanska 26 958 529 1.81 : 1 3Azarenka 30 929 493 1.88 : 1 4Vakulenko 33 928 476 1.95 : 1 5 Peer 17 1699 851 2.00 : 1 6Davenport 73 430 207 2.08 : 1 7Bartoli 10 2349 1077 2.18 : 1 8 S. Williams 7 2802 1275 2.20 : 1 9 Li Na 29 937 419 2.24 : 1 10 Medina Garrigues 35 847 364 2.33 : 1 11 V. Williams 8 2470 1053 2.35 : 1 12 Ivanovic 4 3498 1487 2.35 : 1 13 Kirilenko 31 939 393 2.39 : 1 14 Zvonareva 23 1092 457 2.39 : 1 15 Razzano 28 985 397 2.48 : 1 16 Golovin 13 1919 748 2.57 : 1 17 Vaidisova 12 1942 752 2.58 : 1 18 Szavay 20 1317.5 507 2.60 : 1 19 Krajicek 34 847 321 2.64 : 1 20 Clijsters — 986 370 2.66 : 1 21 Stosur 47 611 227 2.69 : 1 22 Chakvetadze 6 3033 1109 2.73 : 1 23 Mirza 32 925 337 2.74 : 1 24 Sharapova 5 2956 1073 2.75 : 1 25 Hénin 1 6155 2196 2.80 : 1 26 Hantuchova 9 2591 921 2.81 : 1 27 Bammer 21 1472 523 2.81 : 1 28 Schnyder 16 1886 666 2.83 : 1 29 Mauresmo 18 1513 522 2.90 : 1 30 Santangelo 36 667 225 2.96 : 1 31 Jankovic 3 4202 1405 2.99 : 1 32 Schiavone 25 1066 354 3.01 : 1 33 A. Bondarenko 22 1227 393 3.12 : 1 34 Pennetta 40 753 240 3.14 : 1 35 Petrova 14 1864 568 3.28 : 1 36 Dementieva 11 2023 609 3.32 : 1 37 Srebotnik 27 968 291 3.33 : 1 38 Safina 15 1973 559 3.53 : 1 39 Kuznetsova 2 3796 1071 3.54 : 1 40 Sugiyama 39 749 211 3.55 : 1 41 Hingis 19 1372 332 4.13 : 1 42 Garbin 37 801 146 5.49 : 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 99 The above is another item we can graph — though we’ll modify it a bit. The graph below shows what percentage of a player’s points would be round points, and what percentage from quality, if the WTA still awarded quality points. Players are in alphabetical order, with their rankings following their names. This year, in the aftermath of point inflation, The median percentage is 73% round points, 27% quality points. Anyone with more than about 78% round points it probably playing too many weak events; anyone with more than 33% quality is probably suffering from a bad schedule and will likely do better next year.

Round versus Quality Points

Azarenka 65% 35% Bammer 74% 26% Bartoli 69% 31% A. Bondarenko 76% 24% Chakvetadze 73% 27% Clijsters 73% 27% Davenport 68% 32% Dementieva 77% 23% Garbin 85% 15% Golovin 72% 28% Hantuchova 74% 26% Hénin 74% 26% Hingis 81% 19% Ivanovic 70% 30% Jankovic 75% 25% Kirilenko 70% 30% Krajicek 73% 27% Kuznetsova 78% 22% Li Na 69% 31% Mauresmo 74% 26% Medina 70% 30% Mirza 73% 27% Peer 67% 33% Pennetta 76% 24% Petrova 77% 23% A. Radwanska 64% 36% Razzano 71% 29% Safarova 62% 38% Safina 78% 22% Santangelo 75% 25% Schiavone 75% 25% Schnyder 74% 26% Sharapova 73% 27% Srebotnik 77% 23% Stosur 73% 27% Sugiyama 78% 22% Szavay 72% 28% Vaidisova 72% 28% Vakulenko 66% 34% S. Williams 69% 31% V. Williams 70% 30% Zvonareva 70% 30% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Round Points Quality Points

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 100 Strength of Schedule (based on nominal tournament tier) The table below determines how strong a player’s schedule was based on the tier of the event. For purposes of the calculation, a Slam or the year-end Championships is treated as a 0, a Tier I is 1, a Tier II is 2, etc.; a Challenger I have treated as “Tier 8.”A top player should probably play a schedule between 1.25 and 1.6; a player with a value of 1.0 or less is playing too high on the schedule, and one below about 1.7 is earning too many cheap points. So Szavay and (for the second straight year) Bartoli need to toughen their schedules to live up to their rankings, while Davenport, Pennetta, Razzzanno, Azarenka, Mirza, and Radwanska should do so if they want to rise; Serena Williams, Sharapova, Kuznetsova, Hénin, and Vaidisova probably need to lighten up. Player Rank Slam Champ Tier I Tier II Tier III Tier IV Challenger Average Azarenka 30 4 4414 12.17 Bammer 21 4 9823 01.65 Bartoli 10418954 01.84 A. Bondarenko 22 4 8831 11.80 Chakvetadze 6417721 01.41 Clijsters — 1 1300 01.40 Davenport 73 0 0120 02.67 Dementieva 11 4 7810 01.30 Golovin 13 3 6901 01.47 Grönefeld 205 3 2631 01.80 Hantuchova 9417104101.59 Hénin 1314600 01.14 Hingis 19 3 5510 01.29 Ivanovic 4417620 01.25 Jankovic 3419851 01.57 Kirilenko 31 4 9645 01.89 Krajicek 34 4 8823 01.68 Kuznetsova 2417700 01.11 Li Na 29 2 5330 01.54 Mauresmo 18 3 4710 01.40 Medina Garrigues 35 4 7742 01.71 Mirza 32 4 3463 02.05 Myskina 1065 1 0001 02.00 Peer 17 4 9630 01.36 Pennetta 40 4 6485 12.36 Petrova 14 4 6900 01.26 A. Radwanska 26 4 5823 12.04 Razzano 28 4 5437 02.17 Safarova 24 4 5502 01.44 Saﬁna 15 4 9820 01.35 Schiavone 25 4 8722 01.57 Schnyder 16 4 8 11 3 0 0 1.50 Sharapova 5415120 01.00 Srebotnik 27 4 7 10 2 1 0 1.54 Stosur 47 4 6420 01.25 Sugiyama 39 4 7831 01.57 Szavay204 0615 22.83 Vaidisova 12 4 5410 01.14 Vakulenko 33 4 7 10 2 0 1 1.71 S. Williams 7415101 00.92 V. Williams 8 3 3241 01.77 Zvonareva 23 2 6312 01.64

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 101 Strength of Schedule (based on actual tournament strength) The table below determines a player’s strength of schedule by taking the Modified TSI (for which see “Tournament Strength Based on Modified TSI” on page 35) of each of her events, adding them up, and then dividing by the number of events. The higher the average, the tougher the player’s schedule. Because the WTA doesn’t really have rules for tournament strenth, we can’t say what number a top player “should” be playing — but anyone with an average below 250 is probably getting a lot of cheap points. (Marion Bartoli and Venus Williams, are you listening?) Standing Player Total Strength Events Strength Avg. WTA Rank 1 Hénin 5483 14 392 1 2Kuznetsova 7165 19 377 2 3 Clijsters 1854 5 371 — 4 S. Williams 4432 12 369 7 5 Petrova 6757 19 356 14 6 Sharapova 4592 13 353 5 7Ivanovic 6965 20 348 4 8Mauresmo 5035 15 336 18 9Vaidisova 4696 14 335 12 10 Dementieva 6673 20 334 11 11 Hingis 4671 14 334 19 12 Safarova 5335 16 333 24 13 Safina 7564 23 329 15 14 Chakvetadze 7062 22 321 6 15 Peer 6941 22 316 17 16 Golovin 5974 19 314 13 17 Srebotnik 7541 24 314 27 18 Jankovic 8589 28 307 3 19 Vakulenko 7354 24 306 33 20 Stosur 4900 16 306 47 21 Schiavone 6884 23 299 25 22 Hantuchova 8061 27 299 9 23 A. Bondarenko 7457 25 298 22 24 Schnyder 7731 26 297 16 25 Li Na 3815 13 293 29 26 Sugiyama 6725 23 292 39 27 Krajicek 7255 25 290 34 28 Zvonareva 3880 14 277 23 29 Grönefeld 4070 15 271 205 30 A. Radwanska 6232 23 271 26 31 Myskina 535 2 268 1065 32 Medina Garrigues 6385 24 266 35 33 Bammer 6825 26 263 21 34 Bartoli 7719 31 249 10 35 Kirilenko 6920 28 247 31 36 V. Williams 3205 13 247 8 37 Azarenka 4330 18 241 30 38 Mirza 4392 20 220 32 39 Razzano 4811 23 209 28 40 Pennetta 5380 28 192 40 41 Szavay 3432 18 191 20 42 Davenport 275 3 92 73

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 102 Note that the numbers above do not measure how a player did against her schedule; they just measure what a player signed up for. We note that the total strength divided by total events for all our players combined is 292.3. On that basis, players from Hénin-Hardenne down to about Safina have schedules significantly tougher than average; players below Bammer were playing relatively soft schedules for a top player. We note with interest the very large gap between Sugiyama and Krajicek, which interestingly falls just a short distance below the average. The figure for Lindsay Davenport is almost unbelievably weak — but then, Davenport was playing mostly low-tier events. In 2006, Martina Müller, who had achieved relatively high ranking based on Challengers, also had a very low score — and, when she tried to move up in 2007, saw her ranking blown to shreds. It should be noted that a high-ranked player will inherently play a somewhat tougher schedule than a low- ranked, because she herself raises the strength score of the event. It’s worth asking just how strong this effect is. The graph below charts strength of schedule against ranking for the final Top 35. The result is striking. It turns out that, once you fall below the Top 35, there is effectively no correlation between schedule strength and ranking. But for the Top 35, the correlation coefficient is .54. And even that is down — in 2006, the correlation was .76,

Strength of Schedule versus Ranking

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100 Strength of Schedule (Modified TSI) 50

0 051015 20 25 30 35 Player Ranking

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 103 Average Round Reached The table below shows the typical level of success for each player, as shown by how far she went in the tournament. The table lists the number of titles, finals, semifinals, quarterfinals, earlier losses, and opening-round losses for each player. To take the average, we assign a “0” for an opening round or qualifying loss, “1” for an early loss (in any round before the quarterfinal), “2” for a quarterfinal, “3” for a semifinal, “4” for a final, and “5” for a title. From that, we calculate the average round reached. This is in the next-to-last column. The final column gives an approximation, in words, of what the number means. 1R Early QF SF F Titles Avg Rnd Typical Player Rank Events Losses Losses Reached Reached Reached Won Reached result Hénin 1 14 00031104.50 Much above F Davenport 73 3 0001024.33 Better than F V.Williams 8 13 0333132.85 Nearly SF Clijsters — 5 1101112.60 Not quite SF Kuznetsova 2 19 2254512.58 Not quite SF Jankovic 3 28 3557442.57 Not quite SF Sharapova 5 13 1404312.54 Not quite QF Chakvetadze 6 22 3465042.32 Better than QF Ivanovic 420 3543232.25 Better than Qf S. Williams 7 12 3060122.17 Better than QF Golovin 13 19 3642222.00 Exactly QF Mauresmo 18 15 3521311.93 Not quite QF Szavay2018 6251131.89 Not quite QF Vaidisova 12 14 2264001.86 Not quite QF Hantuchova 9 27 5 10 35221.81 Not quite QF Dementieva 11 20 3753021.80 Not quite QF Petrova 14 19 3661211.79 Not quite QF Zvonareva 23 14 2533101.71 Not quite QF Safina 15 23 3972111.65 Not quite QF Hingis 19 14 2730111.57 Not quite QF Peer 17 22 4962101.41 About R16 Razzano 28 23 7931121.39 About R16 Li Na 29 13 2632001.38 About R16 Bartoli 10 31 9 11 45201.35 About R16 Mirza 32 20 5833101.35 About R16 Schnyder 16 26 6 10 71201.35 About R16 Azarenka 30 18 5731201.33 About R16 Bammer 21 26 6 13 24011.31 About R16 A. Bondarenko 22 25 7 10 51111.28 About R16 Safarova 24 16 21111101.25 Mostly early L Pennetta 40 28 15 335111.18 Mostly early L A. Radwanska 26 23 7 11 30021.17 Mostly early L Schiavone 25 23 6 13 21011.09 Mostly early L Srebotnik 27 24 8 12 30100.92 Very early L Stosur 47 16 5830000.88 Very early L Kirilenko 31 28 13 11 20110.86 Very early L Medina Garrigues 35 24 11 930010.83 Very early L Vakulenko 33 24 13 622100.83 Very early L Krajicek 34 25 11 12 20000.64 Very early L Sugiyama 39 23 11 11 10000.57 Very early L Grönefeld 205 15 11 400000.27 Very early L Myskina 1065 2 2000000.00 Very early L

Average Round Reached

Azarenka Bammer Bartoli Bondarenko Chakvetadze Clijsters Davenport Dementieva Golovin Grönefeld Hantuchova Hénin Hingis Ivanovic Jankovic Kirilenko Krajicek Kuznetsova Li Na Mauresmo Medina Garrigues Mirza Myskina Peer Pennetta Petrova Radwanska Razzano Safarova Safina Schiavone Schnyder Sharapova Srebotnik Stosur Sugiyama Szavay Vaidisova Vakulenko Williams S WilliamsV Zvonareva 1R Early Quarter Semi Final Won Loss Loss final final Title

If anything is needed to back up Justine Hénin’s absolute dominance this year, this is surely the graph! Note that (except for the special case of Davenport), no one else was within a round and a halve of Hénin’s average! Bartoli was Top Ten but averages three rounds lower than Hénin!

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 105 Quality of Wins The table on the next page looks at the types of wins for our highlight players. Justine Hénin-Hardenne, for instance, had 63 total wins. Ten of these were over players who were Top Five at the time. twelve others were over players who were Top Ten but not Top Five. Fourteen were over players ranked #11-#20, two were over players ranked #21-#30, eight were over players ranked #31-#50, and 17 were over players ranked below the Top Fifty. The percent of her wins that fall in each category are also shown in this box. The last two columns require some additional explanation; they attempt to measure the quality of each player’s wins. The “average win” column calculates the average ranking of the opponents she beat; the lower, of course, the better (note: Players ranked below #75 are counted as #75 to keep wins over players with really low rankings from dominating. Also, qualifing wins are only counted as wins if they are against players ranked above #100. The “Median” Category is a calculation of the “middle” opponent the player faced. Again, the lower, the better — it means the player is beating top opponents.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 106 Player Rank Wins Top 5 Top 10 Top 20 Top 30 Top 50 Other Average Median Wins Wins Wins Wins Wins Wins Win Azarenka 30 30 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 6 (20%) 6 (20%) 14 (47%) 48 50.5 Bammer 21 43 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (12%) 4 (9%) 11 (26%) 23 (53%) 52 54 Bartoli 10 47 4 (9%) 0 (0%) 6 (13%) 5 (11%) 7 (15%) 25 (53%) 49 63 A. Bondarenko 22 33 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 5 (15%) 5 (15%) 21 (64%) 55 64 Chakvetadze 6 56 3 (5%) 3 (5%) 5 (9%) 9 (16%) 15 (27%) 21 (38%) 43 39 Clijsters — 14 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 5 (36%) 2 (14%) 3 (21%) 3 (21%) 33 24 Davenport 73 13 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 6 (46%) 47 37 Dementieva 11 41 0 (0%) 3 (7%) 6 (15%) 3 (7%) 7 (17%) 22 (54%) 49 56 Garbin 37 25 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 4 (16%) 20 (80%) 65 111 Golovin 13 43 3 (7%) 3 (7%) 3 (7%) 7 (16%) 8 (19%) 19 (44%) 44 47 Hantuchova 9 52 2 (4%) 4 (8%) 7 (13%) 5 (10%) 11 (21%) 23 (44%) 45 44 Hénin 1 63 10 (16%) 12 (19%) 14 (22%) 2 (3%) 8 (13%) 17 (27%) 31 18 Hingis 19 24 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 5 (21%) 15 (63%) 54 65 Ivanovic 4 51 6 (12%) 8 (16%) 3 (6%) 4 (8%) 9 (18%) 21 (41%) 40 43 Jankovic 3 72 3 (4%) 4 (6%) 11 (15%) 12 (17%) 12 (17%) 30 (42%) 44 38 Kirilenko 31 29 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 3 (10%) 3 (10%) 5 (17%) 17 (59%) 53 65 Krajicek 34 21 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 4 (19%) 13 (62%) 54 71 Kuznetsova 2 52 1 (2%) 5 (10%) 5 (10%) 9 (17%) 14 (27%) 18 (35%) 41 40 Li Na 29 23 1 (4%) 3 (13%) 2 (9%) 2 (9%) 4 (17%) 11 (48%) 47 47 Mauresmo 18 27 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 7 (26%) 4 (15%) 5 (19%) 10 (37%) 42 43 Medina Garrigues 35 24 1 (4%) 0 (0%) 4 (17%) 1 (4%) 5 (21%) 13 (54%) 51 56.5 Mirza 32 30 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (17%) 2 (7%) 5 (17%) 18 (60%) 54 62 Peer 17 42 2 (5%) 1 (2%) 5 (12%) 7 (17%) 8 (19%) 19 (45%) 46 45.5 Pennetta 40 33 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 6 (18%) 24 (73%) 63 95 Petrova 14 36 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 5 (14%) 5 (14%) 10 (28%) 15 (42%) 46 44 A. Radwanska 26 32 1 (3%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 22 (69%) 56 75 Razzano 28 35 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 4 (11%) 1 (3%) 3 (9%) 25 (71%) 56 67 Safarova 24 28 4 (14%) 1 (4%) 2 (7%) 1 (4%) 6 (21%) 14 (50%) 47 49.5 Saﬁna 15 43 0 (0%) 2 (5%) 3 (7%) 7 (16%) 4 (9%) 27 (63%) 51 57 Santangelo 36 28 0 (0%) 2 (7%) 2 (7%) 1 (4%) 7 (25%) 16 (57%) 54 63 Schiavone 25 27 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 6 (22%) 15 (56%) 52 56 Schnyder 16 45 0 (0%) 5 (11%) 3 (7%) 3 (7%) 9 (20%) 25 (56%) 52 58 Sharapova 5 39 3 (8%) 4 (10%) 5 (13%) 4 (10%) 10 (26%) 13 (33%) 38 37 Srebotnik 27 29 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (7%) 9 (31%) 17 (59%) 56 60 Stosur 47 17 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 1 (6%) 3 (18%) 2 (12%) 10 (59%) 52 62 Sugiyama 39 19 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 4 (21%) 2 (11%) 13 (68%) 59 74 Szavay 20 33 1 (3%) 2 (6%) 0 (0%) 2 (6%) 7 (21%) 21 (64%) 57 82 Vaidisova 12 35 2 (6%) 1 (3%) 3 (9%) 7 (20%) 3 (9%) 19 (54%) 48 54 Vakulenko 33 30 2 (7%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 8 (27%) 18 (60%) 53 55.5 S. Williams 7 34 4 (12%) 3 (9%) 8 (24%) 2 (6%) 4 (12%) 13 (38%) 37 30 V. Williams 8 46 4 (9%) 2 (4%) 4 (9%) 3 (7%) 3 (7%) 30 (65%) 52 64.5 Zheng 163 7 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 1 (14%) 4 (57%) 52 58 Zvonareva 23 30 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 5 (17%) 0 (0%) 4 (13%) 20 (67%) 54 61

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 107 If we want to take the above data and rank players based on the toughness of their opponents, the lists are shown below. Garbin and Pennetta are the weakest, as befits low-ranking players who play a lot of low-tier events, and the players at the top of the list are mostly the usual suspects — but perhaps the most noteworthy thing is how low Jankovic is.. It is also amazing how much better Hénin’s median win is than anyone else’s. Based on increasingly difficult Average Win Based on increasing Median Win Player Rank Average Win Player Rank Median Win Hénin 1 31 Hénin 1 18 Clijsters — 33 Clijsters — 24 S. Williams 7 37 S. Williams 7 30 Sharapova 5 38 Sharapova 5 37 Ivanovic 4 40 Davenport 73 37 Kuznetsova 2 41 Jankovic 3 38 Mauresmo 18 42 Chakvetadze 6 39 Chakvetadze 6 43 Kuznetsova 2 40 Jankovic 3 44 Ivanovic 4 43 Golovin 13 44 Mauresmo 18 43 Hantuchova 9 45 Hantuchova 9 44 Petrova 14 46 Petrova 14 44 Peer 17 46 Peer 17 45.5 Li Na 29 47 Golovin 13 47 Davenport 73 47 Li Na 29 47 Safarova 24 47 Safarova 24 49.5 Vaidisova 12 48 Azarenka 30 50.5 Azarenka 30 48 Vaidisova 12 54 Dementieva 11 49 Bammer 21 54 Bartoli 10 49 Vakulenko 33 55.5 Medina Garrigues 35 51 Dementieva 11 56 Safina 15 51 Schiavone 25 56 Bammer 21 52 Medina Garrigues 35 56.5 V. Williams 8 52 Safina 15 57 Schnyder 16 52 Schnyder 16 58 Zheng 163 52 Zheng 163 58 Stosur 47 52 Srebotnik 27 60 Schiavone 25 52 Zvonareva 23 61 Vakulenko 33 53 Stosur 47 62 Kirilenko 31 53 Mirza 32 62 Krajicek 34 54 Bartoli 10 63 Zvonareva 23 54 Santangelo 36 63 Mirza 32 54 A. Bondarenko 22 64 Santangelo 36 54 V. Williams 8 64.5 Hingis 19 54 Kirilenko 31 65 A. Bondarenko 22 55 Hingis 19 65 Srebotnik 27 56 Razzano 28 67 Razzano 28 56 Krajicek 34 71 A. Radwanska 26 56 Sugiyama 39 74 Szavay 20 57 A. Radwanska 26 75 Sugiyama 39 59 Szavay 20 82 Pennetta 40 63 Pennetta 40 95 Garbin 37 65 Garbin 37 111

Quality of Wins Total Wins 01020304050607080

Azarenka Bammer Bartoli A. Bondarenko Chakvetadze Clijsters Davenport Dementieva Garbin Golovin Hantuchova Hénin Hingis Ivanovic Jankovic Kirilenko Krajicek Kuznetsova Li Na Mauresmo Medina Garrigues Mirza Peer Pennetta Petrova A. Radwanska Razzano Safarova Safina Santangelo Schiavone Schnyder Sharapova Srebotnik Stosur Sugiyama Szavay Vaidisova Vakulenko S. Williams V. Williams Zheng Zvonareva

Top 5 Wins Top 10 Wins Top 20 Wins Top 30 Wins Top 50 Wins Other Wins

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 109 Quality of Losses The equivalent of the preceding set of statistics, but for losses rather than wins. I break losses into those to Top Five players, other Top Ten players, other Top Twenty players, other Top Thirty players, other Top Fifty players, other Top 100 players, and non-Top 100 players. Again, the higher the average and median wins, the better. There is one signiﬁcant footnote to this list, having to do with the average loss. Since top players have relatively few losses, even one very bad loss can badly skew the average (though not the median). So I have treated all losses between #51 and #100 as “50,” and all losses below #100 as 75. This means the lowest possible average loss is 75. Player Rank Losses Top 5 Top 10 Top 20 Top 30 Top 50 Top 100 Other Average Median Losses Losses Losses Losses Losses Losses Losses Loss Azarenka 30 18 2 (11%) 4 (22%) 3 (17%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 4 (22%) 3 (17%) 33 23.5 Bammer 21 25 7 (28%) 2 (8%) 5 (20%) 2 (8%) 5 (20%) 3 (12%) 1 (4%) 23 13 Bartoli 10 31 5 (16%) 3 (10%) 4 (13%) 0 (0%) 6 (19%) 9 (29%) 4 (13%) 35 39 A. Bondarenko 22 24 5 (21%) 2 (8%) 8 (33%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 4 (17%) 2 (8%) 25 15 Chakvetadze 6 19 8 (42%) 2 (11%) 6 (32%) 1 (5%) 2 (11%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 13 7 Clijsters — 4 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 18 10 Davenport 73 1 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 3 Dementieva 11 18 4 (22%) 2 (11%) 4 (22%) 4 (22%) 1 (6%) 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 22 20 Golovin 13 17 7 (41%) 1 (6%) 3 (18%) 0 (0%) 3 (18%) 2 (12%) 1 (6%) 21 11 Grönefeld 205 15 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 2 (13%) 3 (20%) 6 (40%) 50 88 Hantuchova 9 26 5 (19%) 5 (19%) 6 (23%) 2 (8%) 4 (15%) 1 (4%) 3 (12%) 24 15.5 Hénin 1 4 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 2 (50%) 0 (0%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 18 18.5 Hingis 19 13 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 7 (54%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 25 19 Ivanovic 4 18 3 (17%) 3 (17%) 6 (33%) 1 (6%) 3 (17%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 22 19 Jankovic 3 25 10 (40%) 3 (12%) 6 (24%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 17 10 Kirilenko 31 27 3 (11%) 2 (7%) 7 (26%) 5 (19%) 5 (19%) 3 (11%) 2 (7%) 28 25 Krajicek 34 25 2 (8%) 3 (12%) 10 (40%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 2 (8%) 5 (20%) 29 18 Kuznetsova 2 20 5 (25%) 4 (20%) 6 (30%) 2 (10%) 3 (15%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 15 16 Li Na 29 13 1 (8%) 1 (8%) 2 (15%) 4 (31%) 2 (15%) 2 (15%) 1 (8%) 30 27 Mauresmo 18 14 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 2 (14%) 5 (36%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 0 (0%) 24 24.5 Medina Garrigu 35 23 1 (4%) 3 (13%) 4 (17%) 2 (9%) 3 (13%) 9 (39%) 1 (4%) 34 43 Mirza 32 19 1 (5%) 5 (26%) 1 (5%) 3 (16%) 3 (16%) 4 (21%) 2 (11%) 32 30 Peer 17 22 4 (18%) 1 (5%) 5 (23%) 2 (9%) 6 (27%) 4 (18%) 0 (0%) 27 28.5 Pennetta 40 27 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 5 (19%) 2 (7%) 10 (37%) 7 (26%) 2 (7%) 38 36 Petrova 14 18 7 (39%) 1 (6%) 6 (33%) 0 (0%) 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 17 12.5 A. Radwanska 26 21 6 (29%) 0 (0%) 3 (14%) 3 (14%) 5 (24%) 3 (14%) 1 (5%) 26 24 Razzano 28 21 3 (14%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 3 (14%) 2 (10%) 5 (24%) 6 (29%) 42 51 Safarova 24 16 2 (13%) 5 (31%) 4 (25%) 1 (6%) 2 (13%) 2 (13%) 0 (0%) 20 14 Saﬁna 15 22 5 (23%) 6 (27%) 4 (18%) 1 (5%) 2 (9%) 4 (18%) 0 (0%) 19 10 Schiavone 25 22 3 (14%) 2 (9%) 7 (32%) 3 (14%) 2 (9%) 5 (23%) 0 (0%) 25 19 Schnyder 16 25 7 (28%) 3 (12%) 5 (20%) 2 (8%) 4 (16%) 3 (12%) 1 (4%) 22 14 Sharapova 5 11 2 (18%) 1 (9%) 3 (27%) 0 (0%) 3 (27%) 2 (18%) 0 (0%) 24 20 Srebotnik 27 24 1 (4%) 4 (17%) 9 (38%) 2 (8%) 5 (21%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 25 18 Stosur 47 16 1 (6%) 2 (13%) 7 (44%) 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 3 (19%) 1 (6%) 26 18 Sugiyama 39 23 3 (13%) 4 (17%) 1 (4%) 3 (13%) 4 (17%) 2 (9%) 6 (26%) 36 32 Szavay 20 15 2 (13%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 4 (27%) 4 (27%) 3 (20%) 42 50 Vaidisova 12 14 4 (29%) 3 (21%) 3 (21%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 21 11 Vakulenko 33 24 1 (4%) 2 (8%) 3 (13%) 4 (17%) 3 (13%) 7 (29%) 4 (17%) 39 43 S. Williams 7 10 4 (40%) 1 (10%) 3 (30%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 0 (0%) 16 10.5 V. Williams 8 10 4 (40%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 0 (0%) 18 7.5 Zvonareva 23 14 3 (21%) 3 (21%) 4 (29%) 2 (14%) 1 (7%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%) 19 12

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 110 As we did with wins, we can sort these by quality of average losses. Davenport’s result is of course meaningless, but the strong numbers for Chakvetadze are, at the very least, highly interesting. At the low end, Razzano’s collection of lousy lossesmay be more indicative of her actual level than is her ranking, though Szavay’s numbers are distorted by her rapid improvement. Based on increasingly difﬁcult Average L Based on increasing Median Loss Player Rank Average Loss Player Rank Median Loss Davenport 73 3 Davenport 73 3 Chakvetadze 6 13 Chakvetadze 6 7 Kuznetsova 2 15 V. Williams 8 7.5 S. Williams 7 16 Jankovic 3 10 Jankovic 3 17 Clijsters — 10 Petrova 14 17 Safina 15 10 Clijsters — 18 S. Williams 7 10.5 V. Williams 8 18 Vaidisova 12 11 Hénin 1 18 Golovin 13 11 Zvonareva 23 19 Zvonareva 23 12 Safina 15 19 Petrova 14 12.5 Safarova 24 20 Bammer 21 13 Vaidisova 12 21 Safarova 24 14 Golovin 13 21 Schnyder 16 14 Schnyder 16 22 A. Bondarenko 22 15 Dementieva 11 22 Hantuchova 9 15.5 Ivanovic 4 22 Kuznetsova 2 16 Bammer 21 23 Srebotnik 27 18 Mauresmo 18 24 Stosur 47 18 Sharapova 5 24 Krajicek 34 18 Hantuchova 9 24 Hénin 1 18.5 Schiavone 25 25 Ivanovic 4 19 A Bondarenko 22 25 Schiavone 25 19 Srebotnik 27 25 Hingis 19 19 Hingis 19 25 Dementieva 11 20 Stosur 47 26 Sharapova 5 20 A. Radwanska 26 26 Azarenka 30 23.5 Peer 17 27 A. Radwanska 26 24 Kirilenko 31 28 Mauresmo 18 24.5 Krajicek 34 29 Kirilenko 31 25 Li Na 29 30 Li Na 29 27 Mirza 32 32 Peer 17 28.5 Azarenka 30 33 Mirza 32 30 Medina Garrigues 35 34 Sugiyama 39 32 Bartoli 10 35 Pennetta 40 36 Sugiyama 39 36 Bartoli 10 39 Pennetta 40 38 Medina Garrigues 35 43 Vakulenko 33 39 Vakulenko 33 43 Razzano 28 42 Szavay 20 50 Szavay 20 42 Razzano 28 51 Grönefeld 205 50 Grönefeld 205 88

Quality of Player Losses

051015 20 25 30 35

Azarenka Bammer Bartoli A. Bondarenko Chakvetadze Clijsters Davenport Dementieva Golovin Grönefeld Hantuchova Hénin Hingis Ivanovic Jankovic Kirilenko Krajicek Kuznetsova Li Na Mauresmo Medina Garrigues Mirza Peer Pennetta Petrova A. Radwanska Razzano Safarova Safina Schiavone Schnyder Sharapova Srebotnik Stosur Sugiyama Szavay Vaidisova Vakulenko S. Williams V. Williams Zvonareva

Top 5 Losses Top 10 Losses Top 20 Losses Top 30 Losses Top 50 Losses Top 100 Losses Other Losses

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 112 Success During the First and Second Half of the Year This is mostly a measure of “trends” — of players who did significantly better, or worse, in the first or the second half of the year. There can be a lot of reasons for this, of course — Martina Hingis and Li Na did better in the first half than in the second because they got hurt; Agnes Szavay did better in the second half because she improved; Elena Dementieva did better in the second half because she was healty; Venus Williams did better in the second half because, well, she won Wimbledon. It is left to the reader to try to figure out the reasons; we’ll just offer the data. The first half of the year is defined as running from the end of the 2006 season the end of Roland Garros on June 9. The second half of the year runs from Birmingham to Madrid. It turns out that this is, indeed, almost exactly half the year in terms of points: our players earned 35428 points in the first half, 34942 in the second — a difference of 86 points out of more than 70,000 they collectively earned. That’s barely more than than one part in a thousand! So a player whose ratio of first half to second half points differs significantly from 1:1 is unbalanced for some reason. The table on the next page attempts to make that clear: It lists the player’s WTA ranking, her name, her first half points, her second half points, and the ratio, first half to second half. So, for example, #1 Justine Hénin-Hardenne earned 2520 points in the first half of the year, 3635 in the second half. Since she earned more points in the second half (due in large part to her slow start to the season), her ratio is 0.69 : 1 — i.e. she earned only .69 times as many points in the first half as the second. Note that we count every point earned in the first or second half, whether they count toward a player’s Best 17 or not. And, of course, the “expected’ ratio of first to second half points is 1:1. All ratios are expressed with respect to 1 — that is, 1.11:1, 0.95:1, etc. If the number to the left is larger than 1, then the player had a better first half; if it is less than one, then the player had a better second half. The amount of variation is extreme; as a rough rule of thumb, a player whose ratio falls between 0.6:1 and 1.5:1 can be considered fairly normal. Anything beyond those extremes is clearly unbalanced. If you prefer to think in terms of percentages instead of ratios, the graph that follows the table expresses its figures in percents rather than as a ratio.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 113 Rank Player First Half Pts Second Half Pts Ratio 30 Azarenka 332 597 0.56 : 1 21 Bammer 810 662 1.22 : 1 10 Bartoli 530 1854 0.29 : 1 22 A. Bondarenko 617 610 1.01 : 1 6Chakvetadze 1265 1768 0.72 : 1 —Clijsters 986 0 ∞ 73 Davenport 0 430 0 11 Dementieva 806 1217 0.66 : 1 13 Golovin 865 1054 0.82 : 1 205 Grönefeld 105 38 2.76 : 1 9Hantuchova 1223 1368 0.89 : 1 1Hénin 2520 3635 0.69 : 1 19 Hingis 1096 276 3.97 : 1 4 Ivanovic 1946 1552 1.25 : 1 3 Jankovic 2610 1592 1.64 : 1 31 Kirilenko 352 587 0.6 : 1 34 Krajicek 351 496 0.71 : 1 2Kuznetsova 1911 1885 1.01 : 1 29 Li Na 902 35 25.77 : 1 18 Mauresmo 1076 437 2.46 : 1 35 Medina Garrigues 665 182 3.65 : 1 32 Mirza 292 633 0.46 : 1 17 Peer 1062 637 1.67 : 1 40 Pennetta 192 561 0.34 : 1 14 Petrova 1023 841 1.22 : 1 26 A. Radwanska 246 712 0.35 : 1 28 Razzano 277 708 0.39 : 1 24 Safarova 790 322 2.45 : 1 15 Safina 1211 762 1.59 : 1 25 Schiavone 375 691 0.54 : 1 16 Schnyder 839 1047 0.8 : 1 5 Sharapova 1545 1411 1.09 : 1 27 Srebotnik 534 434 1.23 : 1 47 Stosur 547 64 8.55 : 1 39 Sugiyama 462 287 1.61 : 1 20 Szavay 279.5 1038 0.27 : 1 12 Vaidisova 1101 841 1.31 : 1 33 Vakulenko 526 402 1.31 : 1 7 S. Williams 1891 981 1.93 : 1 8V. Williams 630 1840 0.34 : 1 23 Zvonareva 637 455 1.4 : 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 114 And here is the graph of the above: First versus Second Half Points 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Azarenka 35.7% 64.3% Bammer 55.0% 45.0% Bartoli 22.2% 77.8% A. Bondarenko 50.3% 49.7% Chakvetadze 41.7% 58.3% Clijsters 100.0% 0.0% Davenport0.0% 100.0% Dementieva 39.8% 60.2% Golovin 45.1% 54.9% Grönefeld 73.4% 26.6% Hantuchova 47.2% 52.8% Hénin 40.9% 59.1% Hingis 79.9% 20.1% Ivanovic 55.6% 44.4% Jankovic 62.1% 37.9% Kirilenko 37.5% 62.5% Krajicek 41.4% 58.6% Kuznetsova 50.3% 49.7% Li Na 96.3% 3.7% Mauresmo 71.1% 28.9% Medina Garrigues 78.5% 21.5% Mirza 31.6% 68.4% Peer 62.5% 37.5% Pennetta 25.5% 74.5% Petrova 54.9% 45.1% A. Radwanska 25.7% 74.3% Razzano 28.1% 71.9% Safarova 71.0% 29.0% Safina 61.4% 38.6% Schiavone 35.2% 64.8% Schnyder 44.5% 55.5% Sharapova 52.3% 47.7% Srebotnik 55.2% 44.8% Stosur 89.5% 10.5% Sugiyama 61.7% 38.3% Szavay 21.2% 78.8% Vaidisova 56.7% 43.3% Vakulenko 56.7% 43.3% S. Williams 65.8% 34.2% V. Williams 25.5% 74.5% Zvonareva 58.3% 41.7% First Half Pts Second Half Pts

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 115 We can sort this data to see who has the most extreme “half preference.” That table is shown below, with the players at the top having the most extreme second half preference; those at the bottom did better in the first half. It is interesting and peculiar to note that the players who had the strongest bias toward the second half genuinely improved their results, while those who had the strongest bias toward the first half were, except for Clijsters, all injured. Rank Player First Half Pts Second Half Pts Ratio 73 Davenport 0 430 0 20 Szavay 279.5 1038 0.27 : 1 10 Bartoli 530 1854 0.29 : 1 40 Pennetta 192 561 0.34 : 1 8V. Williams 630 1840 0.34 : 1 26 A. Radwanska 246 712 0.35 : 1 28 Razzano 277 708 0.39 : 1 32 Mirza 292 633 0.46 : 1 25 Schiavone 375 691 0.54 : 1 30 Azarenka 332 597 0.56 : 1 31 Kirilenko 352 587 0.6 : 1 11 Dementieva 806 1217 0.66 : 1 1Hénin 2520 3635 0.69 : 1 34 Krajicek 351 496 0.71 : 1 6Chakvetadze 1265 1768 0.72 : 1 16 Schnyder 839 1047 0.8 : 1 13 Golovin 865 1054 0.82 : 1 9Hantuchova 1223 1368 0.89 : 1 22 A. Bondarenko 617 610 1.01 : 1 2Kuznetsova 1911 1885 1.01 : 1 5 Sharapova 1545 1411 1.09 : 1 14 Petrova 1023 841 1.22 : 1 21 Bammer 810 662 1.22 : 1 27 Srebotnik 534 434 1.23 : 1 4 Ivanovic 1946 1552 1.25 : 1 33 Vakulenko 526 402 1.31 : 1 12 Vaidisova 1101 841 1.31 : 1 23 Zvonareva 637 455 1.4 : 1 15 Safina 1211 762 1.59 : 1 39 Sugiyama 462 287 1.61 : 1 3 Jankovic 2610 1592 1.64 : 1 17 Peer 1062 637 1.67 : 1 7 S. Williams 1891 981 1.93 : 1 24 Safarova 790 322 2.45 : 1 18 Mauresmo 1076 437 2.46 : 1 205 Grönefeld 105 38 2.76 : 1 35 Medina Garrigues 665 182 3.65 : 1 19 Hingis 1096 276 3.97 : 1 47 Stosur 547 64 8.55 : 1 29 Li Na 902 35 25.77 : 1 —Clijsters 986 0 ∞

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 116 Surface Preferences The section on surfaces (page 71) gave us much detail on players’ surface preferences. It did not, however, give us one grand overview. Let’s offer a few statistics on that subject. The data here is based on the points on each surface; for this, see the section “Percentage of Points on Each Surface” on page 92. The table below sorts the players based on their degree of balance, as shown in the table following page 92. Player Name WTA % on clay % on grass % on hard % indoor Deviation Degree of Balance Schnyder 16 25.6% 7.4% 47.6% 19.5% 0.027 VERY BALANCED Safarova 24 22.5% 11.2% 49.0% 17.3% 0.031 VERY BALANCED Kuznetsova 2 25.7% 6.6% 51.4% 16.3% 0.048 VERY BALANCED A. Radwanska 26 18.1% 14.1% 47.3% 20.6% 0.086 VERY BALANCED Sugiyama 39 16.7% 12.3% 49.7% 21.4% 0.093 Balanced Petrova 14 21.3% 14.2% 41.9% 22.6% 0.097 Balanced Sharapova 5 17.4% 8.1% 50.1% 24.4% 0.100 Balanced Hénin 1 23.9% 11.8% 38.3% 26.1% 0.130 Balanced Azarenka 30 14.3% 9.8% 56.5% 19.4% 0.135 Balanced Bammer 21 26.9% 8.8% 57.0% 7.3% 0.141 Balanced Chakvetadze 6 13.7% 7.6% 56.6% 22.2% 0.147 Balanced Stosur 47 30.6% 10.0% 35.7% 23.7% 0.149 Balanced Hantuchova 9 13.7% 9.3% 49.0% 28.0% 0.149 Balanced Vaidisova 12 12.9% 16.5% 46.6% 24.0% 0.151 Mildly Unbalanced Vakulenko 33 34.3% 2.4% 37.7% 25.6% 0.175 Mildly Unbalanced Srebotnik 27 28.1% 9.4% 58.5% 4.0% 0.177 Mildly Unbalanced Jankovic 3 40.0% 9.0% 42.5% 8.5% 0.188 Mildly Unbalanced Schiavone 25 27.9% 7.5% 34.1% 30.6% 0.192 Mildly Unbalanced Saﬁna 15 37.0% 6.3% 34.1% 22.6% 0.195 Mildly Unbalanced S. Williams 7 12.9% 8.9% 63.5% 14.7% 0.197 Mildly Unbalanced Zvonareva 23 17.9% 0.0% 48.2% 34.0% 0.198 Mildly Unbalanced Santangelo 36 41.4% 2.2% 47.4% 9.0% 0.203 Mildly Unbalanced A. Bondarenko 22 38.3% 13.0% 33.7% 14.9% 0.203 Mildly Unbalanced Dementieva 11 21.5% 7.9% 35.9% 34.7% 0.210 Mildly Unbalanced Li Na 29 23.6% 3.7% 66.3% 6.4% 0.223 Mildly Unbalanced Peer 17 13.9% 9.4% 66.3% 10.4% 0.225 Mildly Unbalanced Szavay 20 29.8% 6.9% 62.0% 1.2% 0.226 Mildly Unbalanced Mauresmo 18 16.6% 21.8% 32.7% 28.9% 0.240 Mildly Unbalanced Pennetta 40 40.1% 4.9% 54.8% 0.1% 0.249 Mildly Unbalanced Garbin 37 45.1% 7.6% 44.7% 2.6% 0.258 Mildly Unbalanced Hingis 19 4.4% 6.6% 57.7% 31.3% 0.263 Mildly Unbalanced Golovin 13 20.1% 3.1% 36.1% 40.7% 0.269 Mildly Unbalanced Ivanovic 4 37.6% 13.9% 19.4% 29.2% 0.337 UNBALANCED Krajicek 34 30.5% 32.0% 22.3% 15.2% 0.348 UNBALANCED Davenport 73 0.0% 0.0% 67.4% 32.6% 0.359 UNBALANCED V. Williams 8 18.0% 40.5% 35.8% 5.7% 0.362 UNBALANCED Razzano 28 12.7% 0.2% 81.0% 6.1% 0.382 UNBALANCED Bartoli 10 15.8% 37.9% 23.0% 23.3% 0.393 UNBALANCED Clijsters — 0.1% 0.0% 80.6% 19.3% 0.419 VERY UNBALANCED Kirilenko 31 6.8% 2.4% 84.0% 6.7% 0.423 VERY UNBALANCED Zheng 163 51.3% 0.0% 17.6% 31.1% 0.435 VERY UNBALANCED Medina Garrigues 35 63.3% 0.4% 30.3% 6.0% 0.450 VERY UNBALANCED Mirza 32 6.7% 7.7% 85.4% 0.2% 0.451 VERY UNBALANCED

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 117 Player Surface Biases Knowing whether a player is balanced or unbalanced is interesting, but it doesn’t tell us her actual surface preferences. The table below does that, showing the surfaces where a player earned an unusually high or low fraction of her points. In the table below, a player is biased toward a surface if her fraction of points on that surface is at least half again the average for the top players. She is biased heavily toward a surface if her points on that surface are twice the top player average. A player is biased against a surface if her points on that surface are less than two-thirds the top player average, and is heavily biased against it if her points are less than half the top player average. Note that a player can have some biases and still be balanced overall. The “bias” shown below takes one surface at a time, whereas deviation measured above is based on all four surfaces simultaneously (meaning that a player who is significantly off-balance on all four surfaces, without a bias on a particular surface, may show more deviation than a player who has one relatively good or bad surface but who is otherwise fairly balanced). There has been an interesting change this year. Last year, only two players were without biases. This year, the number is eight —Hénin, Kuznetsova, Radwanska, Safarova, Schnyder, Sharapova, Stosur, Sugiyama. To try to make it clearer the level of bias for each player, I’ve put one bias on each line. So the shorter the entry below, the more nearly balanced the player. Players with no biases are shown in BOLD. Except for the handful of much-injured players, there are few real surprises here — e.g. Medina Garrigues is a clay freak, and it shows. Bartoli probably doesn’t really like grass that well. but her freak Wimbledon of course altered the picture. Kirilenko biases toward hard because she played well only during one brief stretch on summer and fall hardcourts. Ditto Razzano. Krajicek is a grass freak. Etc. Player WTA Clay Grass Hard Indoor Bias Toward Bias Against Rank % % % % Azarenka 30 14.3% 9.8% 56.5% 19.4% CLAY Bammer 21 26.9% 8.8% 57.0% 7.3% heavy against INDOOR Bartoli 10 15.8% 37.9% 23.0% 23.3% heavy toward GRASS CLAY heavy against HARD A. Bondarenko 22 38.3% 13.0% 33.7% 14.9% CLAY Chakvetadze 6 13.7% 7.6% 56.6% 22.2% CLAY Clijsters — 0.1% 0.0% 80.6% 19.3% HARD heavy against CLAY heavy against GRASS Davenport 73 0.0% 0.0% 67.4% 32.6% INDOOR heavy against CLAY heavy against GRASS Dementieva 11 21.5% 7.9% 35.9% 34.7% INDOOR Garbin 37 45.1% 7.6% 44.7% 2.6% CLAY heavy against INDOOR Golovin 13 20.1% 3.1% 36.1% 40.7% heavy toward INDOOR heavy against GRASS Hantuchova 9 13.7% 9.3% 49.0% 28.0% INDOOR CLAY Hénin 1 23.9% 11.8% 38.3% 26.1% Hingis 19 4.4% 6.6% 57.7% 31.3% INDOOR heavy against CLAY Ivanovic 4 37.6% 13.9% 19.4% 29.2% CLAY heavy against HARD INDOOR Jankovic 3 40.0% 9.0% 42.5% 8.5% CLAY heavy against INDOOR Kirilenko 31 6.8% 2.4% 84.0% 6.7% HARD heavy against CLAY heavy against GRASS heavy against INDOOR Krajicek 34 30.5% 32.0% 22.3% 15.2% heavy toward GRASS heavy against HARD

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 118 Kuznetsova 2 25.7% 6.6% 51.4% 16.3% Li Na 29 23.6% 3.7% 66.3% 6.4% heavy against GRASS heavy against INDOOR Mauresmo 18 16.6% 21.8% 32.7% 28.9% heavy toward GRASS INDOOR Medina Garrigues 35 63.3% 0.4% 30.3% 6.0% heavy toward CLAY heavy against GRASS HARD heavy against INDOOR Mirza 32 6.7% 7.7% 85.4% 0.2% HARD heavy against CLAY heavy against INDOOR Peer 17 13.9% 9.4% 66.3% 10.4% CLAY INDOOR Pennetta 40 40.1% 4.9% 54.8% 0.1% CLAY GRASS heavy against INDOOR Petrova 14 21.3% 14.2% 41.9% 22.6% GRASS A. Radwanska 26 18.1% 14.1% 47.3% 20.6% Razzano 28 12.7% 0.2% 81.0% 6.1% HARD CLAY heavy against GRASS heavy against INDOOR Safarova 24 22.5% 11.2% 49.0% 17.3% Safina 15 37.0% 6.3% 34.1% 22.6% CLAY Santangelo 36 41.4% 2.2% 47.4% 9.0% CLAY heavy against GRASS INDOOR Schiavone 25 27.9% 7.5% 34.1% 30.6% INDOOR Schnyder 16 25.6% 7.4% 47.6% 19.5% Sharapova 5 17.4% 8.1% 50.1% 24.4% Srebotnik 27 28.1% 9.4% 58.5% 4.0% heavy against INDOOR Stosur 47 30.6% 10.0% 35.7% 23.7% Sugiyama 39 16.7% 12.3% 49.7% 21.4% Szavay 20 29.8% 6.9% 62.0% 1.2% heavy against INDOOR Vaidisova 12 12.9% 16.5% 46.6% 24.0% GRASS CLAY Vakulenko 33 34.3% 2.4% 37.7% 25.6% heavy against GRASS S. Williams 7 12.9% 8.9% 63.5% 14.7% CLAY V. Williams 8 18.0% 40.5% 35.8% 5.7% heavy toward GRASS heavy against INDOOR Zheng 163 51.3% 0.0% 17.6% 31.1% heavy toward CLAY heavy against GRASS INDOOR heavy against HARD Zvonareva 23 17.9% 0.0% 48.2% 34.0% INDOOR heavy against GRASS

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 119 Alternate Rankings To justify this section, we should perhaps start at the very beginning, and ask, “What is a ranking system?” It’s pretty easy to rank two and only two players. Surely we can agree that, if player A beats player B in most of their meetings, and they never play others, then player A is better, right? Well, that gives us a way of ranking a whole bunch of players: The ideal ranking system is the one in which the rankings of all players most accurately reflects the head-to-head results of each individual pair of players. Or, to put it another way, for all pairs of players A and B, the ranking system is the ordering of players for which, if A>B (that is, if A wins the largest share of her matches against B), then A is ranked ahead of B for the highest number of pairs of players. An obvious concept, but a very difficult one to calculate. For one thing, these relationships are not transitive. If A>B, and B>C, it does not necessarily follow that A>C (think Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and James Blake to see what this means: Nadal, at least in the past, usually beat Federer, but Blake beat Nadal, and Federer beat Blake). For another, there is no method, except brute force, to test for the best ranking system under these circumstances — and the task is too large for any computer today. But we can approximate. The WTA ranking system is, in theory, an attempt to calculate this ranking list. Unfortunately, the WTA is run by marketing people, who of course should denied by law the right to have anything to do with mathematics or science, but of course, being marketing people (and not very good ones at that), they refuse to admit this. So they’ve created a ranking system that has no relationship whatsoever to the ideal ranking system. There is nothing magic about the current system. The WTA has revised its ranking system many times over the years; indeed, they in effect revised them every week of 2007 (they changed the points table for 2007, inflating the points by about 30% for most events, but did not adjust the old point totals in any way. So new events were worth about 30% more than old. The only real effect of the change, after the year was over, was to inflate everyone’s point total. But during the year, it meant that, in effect, every week saw a new twist on the points table). But two of these changes stand out as the most utterly stupid: The 1997 change from divisor rankings (under which losses counted) to additive rankings (in which losses didn’t count), and the 2006 change which eliminated the “quality points” players earned for wins over top players (meaning that you earned just as many points for a walkover as you did for beating the world’s top player). I won’t burden you with the reasons why these changes made the WTA rankings less like the real rankings — though there are good theoretical reasons why this is so. I’ll just note that what the WTA can miscalculate, we can recalculate. Remember that I can no more calculate the ideal rankings than the WTA can. But I’m going to make a few attempts at ranking systems which are more accurate, or which, in some cases, reveal a particular point without necessarily being a proper ranking system in themselves. The first few systems all rely on the same basic data: Points and number of events. The WTA calculates its rankings based on “round points” — points earned based on going a certain distance in a tournament. We’ll use those, but we’ll also calculate the quality points that the players would have earned if the WTA still had quality points. Then — well, then we’ll fiddle. The basic numbers we’ll be using are below. We’re looking at only the higher-ranked players — those the WTA had in the Top Forty at year-end, plus our usual handful of others. Basic Alternate Ranking Data

WTA Rank Name WTA Points Events Round Pts Quality Pts Slam Points 1 Justine Hénin 6155 14 6155 2196 2450 2 Svetlana Kuznetsova 3725 19 3796 1071 1340 3 Jelena Jankovic 3475 28 4202 1405 980 4Ana Ivanovic 3461 20 3498 1487 1380

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 120 5Maria Sharapova 2956 13 2956 1073 1380 6Anna Chakvetadze 2935 22 3033 1109 1040 7 Serena Williams 2802 12 2802 1275 1750 8Venus Williams 2470 13 2470 1053 1540 9Daniela Hantuchova 2367 27 2591 921 372 10 Marion Bartoli 2191 31 2349 1077 1040 11 Elena Dementieva 1985 20 2023 609 410 12 Nicole Vaidisova 1942 14 1942 752 1040 13 Tatiana Golovin 1882 19 1919 748 152 14 Nadia Petrova 1862 19 1864 568 322 15 Dinara Safina 1830 23 1973 559 430 16 Patty Schnyder 1806 26 1886 666 510 17 Shahar Peer 1675 22 1699 851 730 18 Amélie Mauresmo 1538 15 1513 522 370 19 Martina Hingis 1372 14 1372 332 430 20 Agnes Szavay 1331.5 18 1317.5 507 447 21 Sybille Bammer 1323 26 1472 523 342 22 Alona Bondarenko 1171 25 1227 393 330 23 Vera Zvonareva 1117 14 1092 457 230 24 Lucie Safarova 1112 16 1112 674 570 25 Francesca Schiavone 1046 23 1066 354 270 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 962 23 958 529 292 27 Katarina Srebotnik 961 24 968 291 330 28 Virginie Razzano 956 23 985 397 124 29 Li Na 937 13 937 419 230 30 Victoria Azarenka 928 18 929 493 322 31 Maria Kirilenko 928 28 939 393 242 32 Sania Mirza 921 20 925 337 270 33 Julia Vakulenko 916 24 928 476 235 34 Michaella Krajicek 864 25 847 321 402 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 840 24 847 364 234 36 Mara Santangelo 824 19 667 225 184 37 Tathiana Garbin 805 18 801 146 292 38 Gisela Dulko 780 26 793 202 124 39 Ai Sugiyama 743 23 749 211 300 40 Flavia Pennetta 737 28 753 240 66 42 Tamira Paszek 718 16 718 395 431 47 Samantha Stosur 611 16 611 227 212 73 Lindsay Davenport 430 3 430 207 0 163 Zheng Jie 193 10 193 78 4 205 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 143 15 143 24 64 —Kim Clijsters 986 5 986 370 450

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 121 2005 Rankings: Best 17 Rankings with Quality Points For our first measure, let’s see what the rankings would have been had the WTA not shifted ranking systems in 2006. The table below takes the player’s points as given by the WTA, subtracts a fourteenth of their Slam points (since the Slams were boosted in value as part of the system change), takes 25% more off the result (to get back to an approximation of the 2005 points table), then adds quality points. Notice that our first change occurs as high as #2! On the other hand, all the same players are Top Ten. 2005 Rank 2007 Rank Player Name 2005 Points Rank Difference 11Justine Hénin 6681 0 24Ana Ivanovic 4009 -2 33Jelena Jankovic 3959 0 42Svetlana Kuznetsova 3793 2 57Serena Williams 3283 -2 66Anna Chakvetadze 3255 0 75Maria Sharapova 3216 2 88Venus Williams 2823 0 99Daniela Hantuchova 2676 0 10 10 Marion Bartoli 2665 0 11 12 Nicole Vaidisova 2153 -1 12 13 Tatiana Golovin 2151 -1 13 11 Elena Dementieva 2076 2 14 17 Shahar Peer 2068 -3 15 16 Patty Schnyder 1993 -1 16 14 Nadia Petrova 1947 2 17 15 Dinara Safina 1908 2 18 18 Amélie Mauresmo 1656 0 19 21 Sybille Bammer 1497 -2 20 20 Agnes Szavay 1482 0 21 24 Lucie Safarova 1477 -3 22 19 Martina Hingis 1338 3 23 23 Vera Zvonareva 1282 0 24 22 Alona Bondarenko 1254 2 25 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 1235 -1 26 30 Victoria Azarenka 1172 -4 27 33 Julia Vakulenko 1150 -6 28 25 Francesca Schiavone 1124 3 29 29 Li Na 1109 0 30 28 Virginie Razzano 1107 2 — Kim Clijsters 1085 31 Maria Kirilenko 1076 32 Sania Mirza 1013 27 Katarina Srebotnik 994 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 981 34 Michaella Krajicek 947 42 Tamira Paszek 910 36 Mara Santangelo 833 40 Flavia Pennetta 789 38 Gisela Dulko 780 39 Ai Sugiyama 752 37 Tathiana Garbin 734 47 Samantha Stosur 674 73 Lindsay Davenport 530 WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 122 1996 Ranking System: The Divisor The ranking system above had results similar to the WTA’s. Not so the 1996 ranking system! The divisor takes a player’s total points in all events (including quality points), then divides by the number of events — or by 14, whichever is larger. (Players were expected to play at least 14 events.) We will again adjust the round points down to approximate the 2005 points table (our other alternative being to inflate the quality points, so as to make quality points have the same weight as before, but by doing it this way, we make our results more nearly comparable to numbers from 1996). This was a better reflection of a player’s actual abilities than the WTA’s Best 17— and, yes, it changes the rankings even more dramatically tha the preceding. The only player in the Top Ten who keeps her ranking is Hénin, and we have two new Top Ten players: Vaidisova and Golovin, replacing Hantuchova and Bartoli (the latter of whom, note, falls all the way to #17!)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 123 Divisor Rankings 1996 Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Justine Hénin 445 0 27Serena Williams 219 -5 35Maria Sharapova 214 -2 42Svetlana Kuznetsova 202 2 54Ana Ivanovic 202 1 68Venus Williams 188 -2 73Jelena Jankovic 161 4 86Anna Chakvetadze 151 2 912Nicole Vaidisova 144 -3 10 13 Tatiana Golovin 115 -3 11 18 Amélie Mauresmo 109 -7 12 9 Daniela Hantuchova 105 3 13 11 Elena Dementieva 105 2 14 14 Nadia Petrova 103 0 15 17 Shahar Peer 95 -2 16 24 Lucie Safarova 92 -8 17 10 Marion Bartoli 90 7 18 19 Martina Hingis 89 -1 19 15 Dinara Saﬁna 88 4 20 23 Vera Zvonareva 84 -3 21 20 Agnes Szavay 82 1 22 16 Patty Schnyder 79 6 23 29 Li Na 74 -6 24 — Kim Clijsters 72 — 25 30 Victoria Azarenka 65 -5 26 21 Sybille Bammer 62 5 27 42 Tamira Paszek 57 -15 28 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 54 2 29 22 Alona Bondarenko 52 7 30 32 Sania Mirza 51 -2 25 Francesca Schiavone 50 28 Virginie Razzano 49 33 Julia Vakulenko 48 47 Samantha Stosur 42 27 Katarina Srebotnik 42 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 41 37 Tathiana Garbin 41 31 Maria Kirilenko 39 36 Mara Santangelo 38 34 Michaella Krajicek 37 73 Lindsay Davenport 35 39 Ai Sugiyama 33 38 Gisela Dulko 30 40 Flavia Pennetta 29 163 Zheng Jie 15 205 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 124 1996 Ranking System Updated: The Declining Divisor As a ranking system, the divisor had much to commend it. We know on theoretical grounds (which I won’t bore you with) that it was a fairly good reflection of the ideal ranking system. Unfortunately, it doesn’t really reflect current WTA reality. The fact that the WTA ranking system just adds points means that losses don’t count. Players are rewarded for playing to, or even slightly past, their limits. And, because the number of high-tier events is fixed, they inevitably pay more weak events as they add tournaments. The solution: The declining divisor. We still take total points, but instead of dividing by total events (or by 14), we use a modified divisor. Since players are now expected to play at least 16 events, we divide by a minimum of 16 — but subtract a third of an event for each tournament above 16. So if player played 17 events, her total points are divided by 162⁄3. If she plays 18 events, her divisor is 171⁄3. And so forth. Not too surprisingly, the results of this are intermediate between the current ranking system and the 1996 system. In the Top Ten, we still have Vaisisova and Golovin at #9 and #10, rather than Hantuchova and Bartoli, but Bartoli doesn’t fall as far as under the divisor, and we see Ivanovic at #2, as she was under the 2005 rankings, rather than Serena who was #2 under ther divisor.. One thing this ranking makes abundantly clear is just how far ahead of the field Justine Hénin stands. Under the Declining Divisor, unlike the WTA rankings, you can’t just frequent fly your way to the top (note where it puts Jankovic!), but Hénin, with a very limited schedule, still has twice the score of her nearest rival. The results of this ranking are on the next page.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 125 Dec Div Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Justine Hénin 418 0 24Ana Ivanovic 215 -2 32Svetlana Kuznetsova 211 1 47Serena Williams 205 -3 55Maria Sharapova 201 0 68Venus Williams 176 -2 73Jelena Jankovic 165 4 86Anna Chakvetadze 163 2 912Nicole Vaidisova 135 -3 10 13 Tatiana Golovin 120 -3 11 9 Daniela Hantuchova 115 2 12 11 Elena Dementieva 111 1 13 14 Nadia Petrova 108 -1 14 18 Amélie Mauresmo 103 -4 15 17 Shahar Peer 103 -2 16 10 Marion Bartoli 102 6 17 15 Dinara Saﬁna 92 2 18 24 Lucie Safarova 92 -6 19 16 Patty Schnyder 88 3 20 20 Agnes Szavay 85 0 21 19 Martina Hingis 84 2 22 23 Vera Zvonareva 80 -1 23 29 Li Na 69 -6 24 — Kim Clijsters 68 — 25 30 Victoria Azarenka 68 -5 26 21 Sybille Bammer 66 5 27 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 60 1 28 22 Alona Bondarenko 57 6 29 42 Tamira Paszek 57 -13 30 25 Francesca Schiavone 54 5 32 Sania Mirza 54 -1 33 Julia Vakulenko 54 -1 28 Virginie Razzano 54 5 27 Katarina Srebotnik 47 7 36 Mara Santangelo 46 -1 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 46 1 31 Maria Kirilenko 45 6 34 Michaella Krajicek 43 4 37 Tathiana Garbin 42 2 47 Samantha Stosur 42 -7 39 Ai Sugiyama 36 2 38 Gisela Dulko 34 4 73 Lindsay Davenport 33 -30 40 Flavia Pennetta 33 4 163 Zheng Jie 14 -118 205 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 8 -159

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 126 2007 Rankings with Triple Quality Points Most of the rankings so far have looked at so far have, in some way or other, added back the quality points the WTA eliminated in 2006. But quality points were never more than about a third of a player’s points, and that fraction shrank over the years as the WTA inflated round points. We will see below that quality points are the forward-looking part of the rankings — the best predictor of future results. So the next few rankings try to be more balanced by increasing the quality points. In this case, we’ll take the actual WTA round points and add in triple quality points. The results are about typical: Ivanovic back at #2, but the same Top Ten as under the WTA rankings.. TripleQ Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Justine Hénin 12743 0 24Ana Ivanovic 7922 -2 33Jelena Jankovic 7690 0 42Svetlana Kuznetsova 6938 2 57Serena Williams 6627 -2 66Anna Chakvetadze 6262 0 75Maria Sharapova 6175 2 88Venus Williams 5629 0 910Marion Bartoli 5422 -1 10 9 Daniela Hantuchova 5130 1 11 17 Shahar Peer 4228 -6 12 12 Nicole Vaidisova 4198 0 13 13 Tatiana Golovin 4126 0 14 11 Elena Dementieva 3812 3 15 16 Patty Schnyder 3804 -1 16 14 Nadia Petrova 3566 2 17 15 Dinara Saﬁna 3507 2 18 24 Lucie Safarova 3134 -6 19 18 Amélie Mauresmo 3104 1 20 21 Sybille Bammer 2892 -1 21 20 Agnes Szavay 2853 1 22 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 2549 -4 23 23 Vera Zvonareva 2488 0 24 30 Victoria Azarenka 2407 -6 25 19 Martina Hingis 2368 6 26 22 Alona Bondarenko 2350 4 27 33 Julia Vakulenko 2344 -6 28 29 Li Na 2194 -1 29 28 Virginie Razzano 2147 1 30 25 Francesca Schiavone 2108 5 31 Maria Kirilenko 2107 — Kim Clijsters 2096 32 Sania Mirza 1932 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 1932 42 Tamira Paszek 1903 27 Katarina Srebotnik 1834 34 Michaella Krajicek 1827 36 Mara Santangelo 1499 40 Flavia Pennetta 1457 38 Gisela Dulko 1386 39 Ai Sugiyama 1376

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 127 1996-Style Divisor Rankings with Triple Quality Points As you can probably guess, this is calculated the same way as the “regular” 1996 rankings: total points plus quality points (doubled) divided by number of events or 14, whichever is larger. The results are not that much different from the other Divisor ranking: Serena #2, Hantuchova and Bartoli out of the Top Ten, Safarova up dramatically.. 3QDiv Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Justine Hénin 910 0 27Serena Williams 473 -5 35Maria Sharapova 441 -2 48Venus Williams 402 -4 54Ana Ivanovic 396 1 62Svetlana Kuznetsova 365 4 712Nicole Vaidisova 300 -5 86Anna Chakvetadze 285 2 93Jelena Jankovic 275 6 10 13 Tatiana Golovin 217 -3 11 18 Amélie Mauresmo 207 -7 12 24 Lucie Safarova 196 -12 13 17 Shahar Peer 192 -4 14 11 Elena Dementieva 191 3 15 9 Daniela Hantuchova 190 6 16 14 Nadia Petrova 188 2 17 23 Vera Zvonareva 178 -6 18 10 Marion Bartoli 175 8 19 19 Martina Hingis 169 0 20 20 Agnes Szavay 158 0 21 29 Li Na 157 -8 22 15 Dinara Saﬁna 152 7 23 — Kim Clijsters 150 — 24 16 Patty Schnyder 146 8 25 30 Victoria Azarenka 134 -5 26 42 Tamira Paszek 119 -16 27 21 Sybille Bammer 111 6 28 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 111 2 29 33 Julia Vakulenko 98 -4 30 32 Sania Mirza 97 -2 22 Alona Bondarenko 28 Virginie Razzano 25 Francesca Schiavone 47 Samantha Stosur 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 36 Mara Santangelo 27 Katarina Srebotnik 31 Maria Kirilenko 73 Lindsay Davenport 34 Michaella Krajicek 37 Tathiana Garbin 39 Ai Sugiyama 38 Gisela Dulko 40 Flavia Pennetta

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 128 Declining Divisor with Triple Quality Points The preceding would probably be just about the ideal points-and-divisor ranking if the WTA didn’t use additive rankings, but as it is, it ignores the players who overplay. So, under current circumstances, we should adjust for player schedules. If you’re read the preceding several introductions, you’ll probably understand this: Total round points, triple quality points, minimum divisor 16, with each event past #16 discounted by a third. The results of that are given below. Once again we see Kuznetsova fall, and Bartoli and Hantuchova below #10, but Serena doesn’t rise enough to pass Ivanovic, who again ends up with the #2 ranking. \ 3QDecD Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Justine Hénin 796 0 24Ana Ivanovic 426 -2 37Serena Williams 414 -4 42Svetlana Kuznetsova 389 2 55Maria Sharapova 386 0 68Venus Williams 352 -2 73Jelena Jankovic 351 4 86Anna Chakvetadze 318 2 912Nicole Vaidisova 262 -3 10 13 Tatiana Golovin 231 -3 11 9 Daniela Hantuchova 229 2 12 10 Marion Bartoli 215 2 13 17 Shahar Peer 213 -4 14 11 Elena Dementieva 206 3 15 14 Nadia Petrova 198 1 16 24 Lucie Safarova 196 -8 17 18 Amélie Mauresmo 192 -1 18 15 Dinara Saﬁna 177 3 19 16 Patty Schnyder 171 3 20 20 Agnes Szavay 164 0 21 23 Vera Zvonareva 154 -2 22 19 Martina Hingis 148 3 23 30 Victoria Azarenka 139 -7 24 29 Li Na 137 -5 25 21 Sybille Bammer 134 4 26 — Kim Clijsters 131 — 27 26 Agnieszka Radwanska 123 1 28 42 Tamira Paszek 119 -14 29 33 Julia Vakulenko 110 -4 30 22 Alona Bondarenko 109 8 28 Virginie Razzano 105 32 Sania Mirza 104 25 Francesca Schiavone 103 35 Anabel Medina Garrigues 91 31 Maria Kirilenko 88 27 Katarina Srebotnik 86 34 Michaella Krajicek 82 47 Samantha Stosur 81 36 Mara Santangelo 75 37 Tathiana Garbin 71 39 Ai Sugiyama 67 73 Lindsay Davenport 66

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 129 Quality Points per Tournament One last variation on the WTA Points-based ranking. Since we’ve said that quality points are the best predictors of future results, why not raw quality points per tournament? This is our “future potential ranking”: It is among the best at forecasting which players are likely to make big moves in future. Because this ranking is very different from most of the other rankings here, I have listed the entire Top Fifty under this ranking (at least, the Top Fifty among the players I checked, which includes all players with significant WTA- level results). Fascinatingly, the Top Five are unchanged under this ranking — something I would never have guessed. Though we note that Hénin-Hardenne’s lead, which is quite small in the WTA rankings, is huge in this department. We also notice Lindsay Davenport all the way up at #6, Venus Williams at #11, Serena Williams at #13 — and Patty Schnyder, whom the WTA alleges to be a Top Ten player, at #20! Virginia Ruano Pascual’s high ranking doesn’t mean much; she has a history as an upset artist. The evidence does seem to indicate that Paola Suárez still has the potential for a comeback, though, and Tsvetana Pironkova and (especially) Agnieszka Radwanska can still climb. Victoria Azarenka, who doesn’t get nearly as much attention, also looks like a good prospect. But Lucie Safarova looks like she’ll be falling, and Elena Vesnina probably isn’t as good as her WTA ranking indicates. How good is this ranking at predicting things? Pretty good. For 2002, e.g., it “predicted” Daniela Hantuchova,. For 2003 it forecast Maria Sharapova. Then, in 2004, it predicted that Sharapova would not improve as much in 2005; it also forecast falls for Anastasia Myskina, Svetlana Kuznetsova, and Ai Sugiyama. Plus it also forecast big moves by Sesil Karatancheva (who was last year’s #127, but #35 in quality points per tournament — which just happened to be her 2005 year-end ranking before she was suspended!), Anna Chakvetadze, Nicole Vaidisova, and Ana Ivanovic. Of these, only Vaidisova was really obvious at the end of 2004 — except in the quality standings. For 2006, it forecast the return of Justine Hénin-Hardenne, the fall of Nathalie Déchy, and the continued progress of Michaella Krajicek. And, in March of 2006, it said that Martina Hingis would end that year at #8. She was of course #7, but by a very small margin. Last year it predicted big things for Agnieszka Radwanska. It’s not perfect — for 2003, it forecast Myriam Casanova as the Next Big Thing, and it liked Tszvetna Pironkova in 2006 — but it’s the best predictor of future success I have found to date. On the evidence, if the Williams Sisters can stay healthy, they will still be threats. There was no need for Clijsters to retire, and there is every reason to think Davenport’s comeback will continue well. The supply of promising youngsters is surprisingly small — but watch out for Paszek.. Q/T Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Hénin 156.9 0 27Williams, S. 106.3 -5 35Sharapova 82.5 -2 48Williams, V. 81.0 -4 54Ivanovic 74.4 1 6—Clijsters 74.0 — 773Davenport 69.0 -66 82Kuznetsova 56.4 6 912Vaidisova 53.7 -3 10 6 Chakvetadze 50.4 4 11 3 Jankovic 50.2 8 12 24 Safarova 42.1 -12 13 13 Golovin 39.4 0 14 17 Peer 38.7 -3 15 18 Mauresmo 34.8 -3 16 10 Bartoli 34.7 6 17 9 Hantuchova 34.1 8 18 23 Zvonareva 32.6 -5 19 29 Li Na 32.2 -10

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 130 20 11 Dementieva 30.5 9 21 14 Petrova 29.9 7 22 20 Szavay 27.8 2 23 30 Azarenka 27.4 -7 24 16 Schnyder 25.6 8 25 42 Paszek 24.7 -17 26 15 Safina 24.3 11 27 19 Hingis 23.7 8 28 26 Radwanska, A. 23.0 2 29 21 Bammer 20.1 8 30 33 Vakulenko 19.8 -3 31 60 Yan 18.9 -29 32 28 Razzano 17.3 4 33 32 Mirza 16.9 1 34 44 Bondarenko, A. 15.7 -10 35 25 Schiavone 15.4 10 36 35 Medina Garrigues 15.2 1 37 47 Stosur 14.2 -10 38 31 Kirilenko 14.0 7 39 36 Santangelo 14.0 3 40 41 Dushevina 13.4 -1 41 46 Peng 13.0 -5 42 34 Krajicek 12.8 8 43 27 Srebotnik 12.1 16 44 43 Daniilidou 12.0 1 45 65 Granville 11.6 -20 46 57 Cornet 10.9 -11 47 50 Morigami 10.4 -3 48 44 Bondarenko, K. 10.3 4 49 58 Molik 9.3 -9 50 39 Sugiyama 9.2 11 54 56 Olaru 8.7 -2 58 51 Knapp 8.5 7 61 49 Govortsova 8.3 12

Tournament Strength-Based Rankings To this point, everything we’ve done has been based on WTA methods — not necessarily their current methods, but methods they’ve used at one time or another. Given their track record on rankings, there is no particular reason why we shouldn’t break away from this. One real defect in the WTA rankings (one of the aspects formerly covered up by quality points) is that the points the WTA awards for an event don’t correspond very closely to the actual strength of an event. The Slams are always stronger than the Tier III events, and even the weakest Tier I is stronger than the strongest Tier IV, but a weak Tier I like the Pan Pacific is hardly comparable to a strong Tier I like Zürich, and is in fact weaker than some strong Tier II events like Stuttgart. We can, of course, control for this if we have some measure of tournament strength. We find this measure in the Modified Tournament Strength Index, as discussed on page 35. On this basis, we can award points based on

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 131 tournament strengths. The WTA awards full points for winning an event, 70% of that total for a final, 45% for a semifinal, etc. We can use those numbers, but plug in our tournament strength values. We then add up a player’s total for all of her events. That gives us this list — fascinatingly unlike the WTA-based system above.: AdjStr Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Hénin 4684.25 0 23Jankovic 3128.50 -1 32Kuznetsova 2684.75 1 44Ivanovic 2437.75 0 56Chakvetadze 1995.00 -1 69Hantuchova 1859.25 -3 75Sharapova 1798.00 2 87Williams, S 1618.50 1 913Golovin 1601.25 -4 10 14 Petrova 1580.50 -4 11 10 Bartoli 1453.00 1 12 11 Dementieva 1414.50 1 13 15 Saﬁna 1337.75 -2 14 12 Vaidisova 1294.00 2 15 16 Schnyder 1282.50 -1 16 18 Mauresmo 1243.00 -2 17 8 Williams, V 1224.50 9 18 17 Peer 1126.25 1 19 22 Bondarenko, A 896.25 -3 20 19 Hingis 870.75 1 21 21 Bammer 865.50 0 22 — Clijsters 819.50 — 23 24 Safarova 727.50 -1 24 29 Li Na 721.75 -5 25 33 Vakulenko 697.25 -8 26 25 Schiavone 667.25 1 27 20 Szavay 656.50 7 28 23 Zvonareva 626.00 5 29 26 Radwanska, A 595.50 3 30 27 Srebotnik 579.75 3 34 Krajicek 550.25 31 Kirilenko 536.75 35 Medina Garrigues 515.00 30 Azarenka 507.50 28 Razzano 502.25 32 Mirza 453.25 39 Sugiyama 446.25 40 Pennetta 375.50 47 Stosur 363.00 73 Davenport 197.25 205 Grönefeld 71.75

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 132 Adjusted Strength per Tournament Ranking Of course, the above ranking suffers from the same problem as the WTA rankings: It’s all additive. If we take points per tournament under this system, things change significantly. Interesting to see Clijsters so strong despite her lack of motivation...: Adj/Trn Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Hénin 334.59 0 2—Clijsters 163.90 — 32Kuznetsova 141.30 1 45Sharapova 138.31 -1 57Williams, S 134.88 -2 64Ivanovic 121.89 2 73Jankovic 111.73 4 88Williams, V 94.19 0 912Vaidisova 92.43 -3 10 6 Chakvetadze 90.68 4 11 13 Golovin 84.28 -2 12 14 Petrova 83.18 -2 13 18 Mauresmo 82.87 -5 14 11 Dementieva 70.73 3 15 9 Hantuchova 68.86 6 16 73 Davenport 65.75 -57 17 19 Hingis 62.20 -2 18 15 Safina 58.16 3 19 29 Li Na 55.52 -10 20 17 Peer 51.19 3 21 16 Schnyder 49.33 5 22 10 Bartoli 46.87 12 23 24 Safarova 45.47 -1 24 23 Zvonareva 44.71 1 25 20 Szavay 36.47 5 26 22 Bondarenko, A 35.85 4 27 21 Bammer 33.29 6 28 33 Vakulenko 29.05 -5 29 25 Schiavone 29.01 4 30 30 Azarenka 28.19 0 26 Radwanska, A 25.89 27 Srebotnik 24.16 47 Stosur 22.69 32 Mirza 22.66 34 Krajicek 22.01 28 Razzano 21.84 35 Medina Garrigues 21.46 39 Sugiyama 19.40 31 Kirilenko 19.17 40 Pennetta 13.41 205 Grönefeld 4.78

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 133 Adjusted Strength per Tournament Ranking, With Quality Points One more variation on the Adjusted Tournament Strength: Let’s add quality points to the adjusted strength round points, then divide by the total number of events. Perhaps not surprisingly, this gives us a sort of a mix of the preceding with quality per tournament rankings: Serena and Clijsters take the #2 and #3 spots.: Ad+Q/Tn Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Hénin 491.45 0 27Williams, S 241.13 -5 3—Clijsters 237.90 — 45Sharapova 220.85 -1 52Kuznetsova 197.67 3 64Ivanovic 196.24 2 78Williams, V 175.19 -1 83Jankovic 161.91 5 912Vaidisova 146.14 -3 10 6 Chakvetadze 141.09 4 11 73 Davenport 134.75 -62 12 13 Golovin 123.64 -1 13 18 Mauresmo 117.67 -5 14 14 Petrova 113.08 0 15 9 Hantuchova 102.97 6 16 11 Dementieva 101.18 5 17 17 Peer 89.88 0 18 29 Li Na 87.75 -11 19 24 Safarova 87.59 -5 20 19 Hingis 85.91 1 21 15 Safina 82.47 6 22 10 Bartoli 81.61 12 23 23 Zvonareva 77.36 0 24 16 Schnyder 74.94 8 25 20 Szavay 64.64 5 26 30 Azarenka 55.58 -4 27 21 Bammer 53.40 6 28 22 Bondarenko, A 51.57 6 29 26 Radwanska, A 48.89 3 30 33 Vakulenko 48.89 -3 25 Schiavone 44.40 32 Mirza 39.51 28 Razzano 39.10 47 Stosur 36.88 35 Medina Garrigues 36.63 27 Srebotnik 36.28 34 Krajicek 34.85 31 Kirilenko 33.21 39 Sugiyama 28.58 40 Pennetta 21.98 205 Grönefeld 6.38

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 134 Idealized Won/Lost And now, for something completely different. So different, it makes WTA #8 Venus Williams the #2 player. In concept, this is simple: It’s a ranking based on won/loss percent. In practice it’s going to take a lot of explaining. Start with this: Theoretically, winning percentage ought to be a good measure of who is ranked highest. Except — a player who plays weak events may well produce a much higher winning percentage than a better player who plays stronger events. An obvious and infamous victim of this was Anna Kournikova. She played almost entirely Tier II and higher events, and never won any. As an obvious contrast, Henrieta Nagyova won nine career titles, mostly because she played a lot of Tier IV events. Kournikova was by far the better player (even at the very end of her career in 2003, when Kournikova was in her final spiral out of the game, she won her last meeting with Nagyova 6Ð1 6Ð2). But the Russian never put up the titles that would, on their face, prove it. So a ranking system based on won/lost must somehow take tournament strength into account. And we need to track wins over top players. An we need to encourage players to play as much as possible, within reason. We can do all of those things. To deal with the first, we simply diddle with the value of wins. Let’s arbitrarily say that a win at a Tier I counts as one standard win. Then we will assign a value of 1.1 wins for a Slam win (this is our Slam Bias, since in fact the early rounds at Slams are generally easier than at Tier I events). A Tier I win is, of course 1.0 wins. A Tier II win is .95 wins. A Tier III win is .8 wins. A Tier IV win is .6 wins. And a Challenger win is .4 wins. (I repeat that numbers are arbitrary, and different values will get you different results, but they feel about right to me). We will not count qualifying wins, though qualifying losses we will count. To take wins over top players into account, we’ll assign bonus wins: If you beat a Top Four player, it’s worth an extra .6 wins. A player ranked #5 to #10 gets you .4 bonus wins. Beating #11-#20 gets you .2, and beating #21-#35 is worth .1. To encourage players to play more, we do two things: First, we require you to play sixteen events, and add losses until you do. And second — and this is the key part — we reduce losses exponentially. Instead of calculating raw wins and losses, we take losses to the .8 power. What this means is that if two players have the same winning percentage, but one has played more, the one who has played more will have a slightly higher adjusted winning percentage. Not much — losses still count! But enough to make it worth playing more if it doesn’t drag your results down. Note: Withdrawals and walkovers do not count as wins or losses. The columns in the table on the next page are as follows: Rank: The player’s ranking under this system. Player: The player’s name. Events: How many tournaments she played. Wins: Actual WTA wins. Losses: Actual WTA losses. Top 4 Wins: How many wins she had over players ranked #1-#4. Top 10 Wins: Number of wins over players ranked #5-#10 (note that this is not actually the number of wins she has over Top Ten players; that is in fact the sum of “Top 4 wins” and “Top 10 Wins”). Top 20 Wins: Wins over players ranked #11-#20. Top 35 wins: Wins over players ranked #21-#35. Adjusted wins: The player’s adjusted win count. If this is higher than her number of actual wins, as is true e.g. of Sharapova and Hénin- Hardenne, it means the player is playing a lot of high-tier events; if it is dramatically lower than her number of wins, as e.g. for Peer or Bartoli, it means she is playing far down the tier scale. Bonus Wins: The value, in wins, of the victories over the top players. Adj Losses: Losses calculated according to the formula above. Adj W %: Winning percent under this formula: (Adjusted wins+Bonus Wins)/(Adjusted wins+Bonus Wins+Adj. Losses) WTA: The player’s WTA ranking This is a very different ranking, but still, eight of WTA Top Ten remain Top Ten. In a different order, though. And Bartoli and Hantuchova fall out of hte Top Ten (Bartoli to #22!), with Golovin and Dementieva taking their places.. Incidentally, an advantage of divisor rankings is the they generally lessen the penalty for being hurt or not playing. In this ranking system, we could handle that by eliminating the “penalty losses” players suffer

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 135 for being hurt. If we did that for Davenport or Clijsters, the one affected would be #8. That’s generally better injury protection than they get from the WTA, and it could also be entirely automatic. Top 4 Top 10 Top 20 Top 35 Adj. Bonus Adj Adj WTA Rank Player Events Wins Losses Wins Wins Wins Wins Wins Wins Losses W % 1 Hénin 14 63 4 7 15 14 5 64.3 13.5 4.2 94.9% 1 2Williams, V 13 46 10 244542.55 4.1 7.8 85.7% 8 3Ivanovic 20 51 18 683551.35 7.9 10.1 85.4% 4 4 Jankovic 28 72 25 3 4 11 16 68.45 7.2 13.1 85.2% 3 5 Chakvetadze 22 56 19 2451453.05 5.2 10.5 84.7% 6 6 Sharapova 13 40 11 255740.65 4.9 8.3 84.7% 5 7Kuznetsova 19 51 20 15524526.011.0 84.1% 2 8Williams, S 12 34 10 4383355.58.383.1% 7 9 Golovin 19 43 17 2431040.4 4.4 9.6 82.3% 13 10 Dementieva 20 41 18 036540.5 2.9 10.1 81.1% 11 11 Vaidisova 14 35 14 213736.05 2.9 9.2 80.9% 12 12 Hantuchova 27 52 26 247949.4 5.1 13.6 80.1% 9 13 Petrova 19 36 18 105735.85 2.3 10.1 79.1% 14 14 Peer 22 42 22 215941.1 3.5 11.9 79.0% 17 15 Saﬁna 23 43 22 023941.85 2.3 11.9 78.8% 15 16 Schnyder 26 45 25 053544.45 3.1 13.1 78.4% 16 17 Szavay183614120627.25 2.0 8.3 78.0% 20 18 Mauresmo 15 27 14 107426.5 2.4 8.7 76.8% 18 19 Safarova 16 28 16 322127.15 3.1 9.2 76.7% 24 20 Zvonareva 14 30 14 104127.3 1.5 9.2 75.8% 23 21 Bammer 26 43 25 0055391.513.1 75.5% 21 22 Bartoli 31 47 31 316743.35 4.1 15.6 75.3% 10 23 Hingis 14 24 13 012423.85 1.2 8.7 74.2% 19 24 Azarenka 18 31 18 111826.45 2.0 10.1 73.8% 30 25 Razzano 23 34 21 024228.15 1.8 11.4 72.4% 28 26 Bondarenko, A 25 36 24 011532.2 1.1 12.7 72.4% 22 27 Mirza 20 30 19 005326.1 1.3 10.5 72.2% 32 28 Garbin 18 26 17 001022.55 0.2 9.6 70.2% 37 29 Radwanska,A 23 32 23 1224262.212.3 69.7% 26 30 Schiavone 23 27 22 113125.2 1.7 11.9 69.4% 25 Santangelo 21 27 21 022224.45 1.4 11.4 69.4% 36 Srebotnik 24 29 24 100227.45 0.8 12.7 69.0% 27 Kirilenko 28 29 27 1033261.514.0 66.3% 31 Medina Garrigues 24 24 23 014322.15 1.5 12.3 65.8% 35 Stosur 16 17 16 101316.45 1.1 9.2 65.6% 47 Vakulenko 24 25 24 211222.1 2.0 12.7 65.5% 33 Li Na 32313042322.35 2.3 13.6 64.5% 29 Clijsters 5 14 4015314.15 1.7 8.7 64.5% — Pennetta 28 33 27 011123.9 0.7 14.0 63.8% 40 Krajicek 25 21 26 020621.25 1.4 13.6 62.6% 34 Dulko 26 28 24 002120.45 0.5 12.7 62.2% 38 Sugiyama 23 17 23 000417.45 0.4 12.3 59.2% 39 Davenport 3 13 1102110.85 1.1 8.3 59.1% 73 Grönefeld 15 4 15 00003.45 0.0 9.2 27.3% 205 Myskina 20200000 0.09.20.0% 1065

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 136 The “Majors Ranking” It is an unfortunate fact that tennis uses the word “major” as a synonym for “Slam.” It’s unfortunate because it leaves us with no good word for “the best events.” The Slams are, of course, among the strongest events on the tour — but there are usually at least half a dozen other events which are competitive in terms of field strength. And many of them aren’t even Tier I events; the Tier II tournaments at Sydney and Filderstadt have traditionally been stronger than the average Tier I; the Tier I events at Moscow and Tokyo, by contrast, have a history of being too weak for the points they award. Quality points make up for some of that — or they did in the days when the WTA had the brains to award them — but not all. Which gives us the basis for another ranking, the “Majors Ranking.” We take the ten best events (based partly on history, surface balance, and spread across the schedule) and partly on their strength this year, as reflected in the section on tournaments), and count results only in those events. In 2007, our list is Sydney, Australian Open, Miami, Berlin, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, San Diego, U. S. Open, Stuttgart, and the Madrid Championships. (The list does vary from year to year, as described below.) Since all these events are strong, we don’t need quality points for this ranking. And early losses are worthless. We’ll count only semifinals and better: 1 point for a semifinal, 3 for a final, 5 for a win. Note that this gives a title more relative value than the WTA ranking table. The WTA awards Win/Final/ Semifinal points in the ratio 20:14:9; this system awards 20:12:4, because winning is much more memorable than being a finalist, and hardly anyone remembers a player who doesn’t even make the semifinal. By definition, no more than forty players can earn majors points in a year, and in practice fifteen is about normal — meaning that the 17 we have this year is rather high. Also by definition, only 100 points are awarded in a year. It will be evident that the “Majors Ranking” is not useful as an overall ranking system — it isn’t intended to be — but it is a good measure of the accomplishments we might count toward Player of the Year. Hénin-Hardenne’s 25 points is about typical for a #1 in this ranking, though in recent years the totals have been much lower. To give some perspective on these numbers: In 2006, when the events on the list were the four Slams, the Championships, Miami, Sydney, Rome San Diego, and Zürich (the same list as this year, note, except for Rome/Berlin and Zürich/Stuttgart), we had 15 players, with Hénin #1 with 24 — and Sharapova right on her tail with 21. Mauresmo had 15, meaning that last year we had three players stronger than this year’s #2. Kuznetsova was #4 with 11 points, Clijsters #5 with 7 points, Hingis had 5 points, an no one else more than three. In 2005, when I counted Filderstadt instead of Zürich, we had a very high total of 21 players with Majors points, though the 15 points scored by leader Amélie Mauresmo was rather low. (That’s inevitable, with only 100 points to award: If a lot of players have points, then nobody can have many.) More surprising is the fact that, with such a low total for the leader, we have only four players with ten or more points: Mary Pierce had 14, Lindsay Davenport 12, Kim Clijsters 10. In 2004, we had 17 players with Majors points, though with even lower totals for the leader: Lindsay Davenport and Mauresmo led with 13 points, Serena Williams had 12, and four others had 10 points. 2003 was more typical though much more top-heavy: 14 players, led by Kim Clijsters (32 points), Justine Hénin-Hardenne (22), Serena Williams (15), and no one else with more than 8. In 2002, we had fifteen players: Serena Williams of course led with 29 points, then Venus Williams (16), Clijsters (13), Capriati (11), and all others below 10. In 2001, when Indian Wells replaced Rome, we had only thirteen Majors point-scorers, despite which the leaders had low totals: Venus Williams (22), Capriati (15), Davenport (14), Hingis (14), Serena (13), and the rest lower. In 2000, we must add Philadelphia (substituting for Filderstadt, which in 2000 had its field depleted by the Olympics) and the Canadian Open for Indian Wells. We had sixteen players that year; The rankings were: Hingis (24), Davenport (22), Venus (15), and the rest below ten. In 1999, Filderstadt substitutes for the Canadian Open, and we again had sixteen players: Hingis (31), Davenport (23), Venus (11), Graf (10), and the rest below 10.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 137 Since I started compiling this statistic, the highest score has been the 32 points by Clijsters in 2003 (yes, the year she didn’t win any Slams — but won everything else). Prior to that, the biggest score I can guarantee is Martina Hingis’s 43 points in 1997. No doubt players like Graf in 1988 and 1989 scored higher, but I don’t have the tournament strength data to determine which events belong on the Majors list. The list of players with at least one Majors point in 2007 is as follows (I also show the Majors points earned at each event):

Major WTA Major Syd- AO Miam Berlin RG Wim SD USO Stuttg Madr Rank Rank Player Points ney Cham 11Hénin 25 3151 555 25Sharapova 12 3153 3T 4 Ivanovic 10 531 1 3T 7 S. Williams 10 55 52Kuznetsova 7 331 6T — Clijsters 6 51 6T 8 V. Williams 6 51 73Jankovic 5 311 86Chakvetadze 4 1111 9T 10 Bartoli 3 3 9T 13 Golovin 3 3 9T 16 Schnyder 3 3 12 12 Vaidisova 2 11 13T 11 Dementieva 1 1 13T 29 Li Na 1 1 13T 17 Peer 1 1 13T 33 Vakulenko 1 1

The chart on the next page may give some perspective on this: It shows the points earned by the top eight players in the Majors Rankings over the years 2000Ð2006 (plus that 1997 Hingis data point for comparison) The actual data involved is as follows:

1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 #1 has 43 24 22 29 32 13 15 24 25 #2 has 22 15 16 22 13 14 21 12 #3 has 15 14 13 15 12 12 15 10 #4 has 7 14 11 8 10 10 11 10 #5 has 6 13 8610877 #6 has 574510656 #7 has 573510536 #8 has 43316535

45 1997 40 2000 2001 35 2002 2003 30 2004 2005 25 2006 2007 20

0 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 139 Doubles 2007 In Review: The Top Doubles Players The Final Top Twenty-Five Doubles Players For discussion of what this means, see the equivalent section for singles: “The Final Top Thirty” on page 2! Final Player Best 11 Number of Point Gap from Began Net Rank Name Score Tournaments Preceding Year At Change 1 Black, Cara 5560 23 5 -4 1 Huber, Liezel 5560 23 17 -16 3 Raymond, Lisa 3960 16 1600 1 2 4 Srebotnik, Katarina 3685 20 275 7 -3 5 Stosur, Samantha 3626 13 59 2 3 6 Sugiyama, Ai 3615 21 11 12 -6 7 Chuang Chia-Jung 3425 20 190 87 -80 8 Chan Yung-jan 3365 21 60 97 -89 9 Santangelo, Mara 3330 22 35 41 -32 10 Stubbs, Rennae 2990 20 340 6 4 11 Peschke, Kveta 2815 19 175 8 3 12 Molik, Alicia 2705 20 110 173 -161 13 Déchy, Nathalie 2415 19 290 20 -7 14 Saﬁna, Dinara 2315 16 100 16 -2 15 Yan Zi 2250 18 65 4 11 16 Sun Tiantian 1775 23 475 30 -14 17 Shaughnessy, Meghann 1775 22 0 15 2 18 Mirza, Sania 1680 16 95 24 -6 19 Uhlirova, Vladimira 1665 31 15 81 -62 20 Peng Shuai 1550 16 115 105 -85 21 Zheng Jie 1527 8 23 3 18 22 Likhovtseva, Elena 1505 17 22 28 -6 23 Dulko, Gisela 1490 22 15 29 -6 24 Husarova, Janette 1485 24 5 38 -14 25 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 1450 22 35 19 6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 140 The Beginning Doubles Top Twenty-Five Rank Name 2007 Final Ranking Net Change 1 Raymond, Lisa 3 2 1 Stosur, Samantha 5 4 3 Zheng Jie 21 18 4Yan Zi 15 11 5 Black, Cara 1 -4 6 Stubbs, Rennae 10 4 7 Srebotnik, Katarina 4 -3 8 Peschke, Kveta 11 3 3 Schiavone, Francesca 48 45 10 Ruano Pascual, Virginia 30 20 11 Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 52 41 12 Sugiyama, Ai 6 -6 13 Hantuchova, Daniela 44 31 14 Suárez, Paola 103 89 15 Shaughnessy, Meghann 17 2 16 Saﬁna, Dinara 14 -2 17 Huber, Liezel 1 -16 18 Zvonareva, Vera 72 54 19 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 25 6 20 Déchy, Nathalie 13 -7 21 Navratilova, Martina — — 22 Daniilidou, Eleni 54 32 23 Petrova, Nadia 57 34 24 Mirza, Sania 18 -6 25 Asagoe, Shinobu — — Summary of Doubles Changes, Beginning to End of 2007 Ranking Gains: From outside the Top 20 into the Top 20: Chan, Chuang, Mirza, Molik, Peng, Santangelo, Sun, Uhlirova (total of 8) From outside the Top 20 into the Top 10: Chan, Chuang, Santangelo (total of 3) From the Top 20 into the Top 10: Huber, Sugiyama (total of 2) Ranking Losses: Dropping out of the Top 20: Grönefeld, Hantuchova, Medina Garrigues, Ruano Pascual, Schiavone, Súarez, Zheng, Zvonareva (total of 8) Dropping out of the Top 10 but remaining Top 20: Peschke, Yan (total of 2) Dropping from the Top 10 to below the Top 20: Ruano Pascual, Schiavone (total of 3) Players who were in the Top 10 at beginning and end of the year: Black, Raymond, Srebotnik, Stosur, Stubbs (total of 5) Players who were in the Top 20 at the beginning and end of the year: Black, Déchy, Huber, Peschke, Raymond, Safina, Shaughnessy, Srebotnik, Stosur, Stubbs, Sugiyama, Yan (total of 12)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 141 Top Doubles Players Analysed All the Players in the Doubles Top Ten in 2007: The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA (Best 11) Statistics The lists below show all players who have ranked in the Top Ten in 2007, with the highest rank achieved. A total of seventeen players spent time in the Top Ten in 2007.

Black (1) Peschke (8) Stosur (1) Chan (8) Raymond (1) Stubbs (6) Chuang (7) Ruano Pascual (10) Sugiyama (6) Déchy (8) Santangelo (5) Yan (4) Huber (1) Schiavone (8) Zheng (3) Molik (8) Srebotnik (4)

The following list shows all the players who have occupied a given position in the Top 10: 1. Black, Huber, Raymond. Stosur 2. Hub,er Raymond, Stosur 3. Black, Raymond, Stosur, Zheng 4. Huber, Srebotnik, Stosur, Yan, Zheng 5. Black, Santangelo, Srebotnik, Yan, Zheng 6. Huber, Santangelo, Srebotnik, Stubbs, Sugiyama, Zheng 7. Chuang, Srebotnik, Stubbs, Sugiyama 8. Chan, Déchy, Molik, Peschke, Santangelo, Schiavone, Srebotnik, Stubbs, Sugiyama 9. Chan, Chuang, Peschke, Santangelo, Schiavone, Srebotnik, Stubbs, Sugiyama, Yan 10. Chan, Chuang, Peschke, Ruano Pascual, Srebotnik, Stubbs, Yan

It’s rather interesting to compare this with the doubles Top Ten at the end of, say, 1999. The Top Ten that year was 1. Kournikova, 2. Hingis, 3. Neiland, 4. Davenport, 5. Raymond, 6.Morariu, 7. Stubbs, 8. Likhovtseva, 9. Sanchez-Vicario, 10. Serena Williams, 10. Venus Williams. That list of 11 players includes the entire singles Top Four (Hingis, Davenport, Venus, Serena), and Kournikova, Likhovtseva, and Sanchez-Vicario were also Top Twenty players. The 2007 list has not one player who is in the singles Top Ten, and though a few players on the list have made runs at that ranking, only Molik seemed likely to stay there— and even she is there no longer. And we see increased numbers of doubles specialists — Black, Huber, Peschke, Raymond, and Stubbs no longer play singles at all, and of the others, only Santangelo, Schiavone, Srebotnik, Stosur, and Sugiyama are in any way significant in singles — and Sugiyama is fading fast. There can be little doubt: Doubles and singles are becoming separate though related sports.

Final Player Best 11 # of Rank Name Score Trn Won/Lost Titles 1Black, Cara 5560 23 69Ð14 (83%)[+2WO] Australian Open, Paris, Antwerp Dubai, Wimbledon, San Diego, Moscow, Linz, Madrid Champ (9) 1Huber, Liezel 5560 23 69Ð14 (83%)[+2WO] Australian Open, Paris, Antwerp, Dubai, Wimbledon, San Diego, Moscow, Linz, Madrid Champ (9) 3Raymond, Lisa 3960 16 40Ð10 (80%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Pan Pacific, Indian Wells, Miami, Berlin, Eastbourne (5) 4 Srebotnik, Katarina 3685 20 43Ð14 (75%)[+2WO][+3Wi] Gold Coast, Amelia Island, Canadian Open (3) 5 Stosur, Samantha 3626 13 36Ð7 (84%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Pan Pacific, Indian Wells, Miami, Berlin, Eastbourne (5) 6 Sugiyama, Ai 3615 21 38Ð18 (68%)[+2WO][+1Wi] Canadian Open (1), [Gifu $50K] 7Chuang Chia-Jung 3425 20 50Ð12 (81%) Bangalore, Birmingham, ’s-Hertogenbosch, Beijing, Seoul (5) [Kaohsiung $75K 2006, Dothan $75K] 8Chan Yung-Jan 3365 21 46Ð14 (77%) Bangalore, Birmingham, ’s-Hertogenbosch (3); [Kaohsiung $75K 2006; Dothan $75K; Taoyuan $75K] 9 Santangelo, Mara 3330 22 46Ð16 (74%)[+2WO][+1Wi] Pattaya City, Amelia Island, Rome, Roland Garros, New Haven (5) 10 Stubbs, Rennae 2990 20 37Ð17 (69%)[+2WO] Los Angeles, Stuttgart, Zürich (3) 11 Peschke, Kveta 2815 19 36Ð16 (69%)[+2WO] Los Angeles, Stuttgart, Zürich (3) 12 Molik, Alicia 2705 20 30Ð19 (61%)[+2Wi] Roland Garros (1) 13 Déchy, Nathalie 2415 19 25Ð15 (63%)[+1WO][+2Wi] Rome, U. S. Open (2) 14 Safina, Dinara 2315 16 28Ð10 (74%)[+4Wi] Gold Coast, U. S. Open (2) 15 Yan Zi 2250 18 39Ð13 (75%)[+4WO][+1Wi] Charleston, Strasbourg, Guangzhou Japan Open, Bangkok (5) 16 Sun Tiantian 1775 23 32Ð19 (63%)[+5WO][+2Wi] Japan Open, Bangkok (2) 17 Shaughnessy, Meghann 1775 22 26Ð20 (57%)[+1Wi] Sydney (1) 18 Mirza, Sania 1680 16 32Ð11 (74%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Fes, Cincinnati, Stanford, New Haven (4) 19 Uhlirova, Vladimira 1665 31 28Ð25 (53%)[+4WO][+1Wi] Budapest (1) 20 Peng Shuai 1550 16 23Ð14 (62%)[+1WO][+1Wi] GuangZhou (1) 21 Zheng Jie 1527 8 18Ð6 (75%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Charleston, Strasbourg (2) 22 Likhovtseva, Elena 1505 17 26Ð15 (63%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Hobart (1) 23 Dulko, Gisela 1490 22 25Ð19 (57%)[+1WO][+3Wi] 24 Husarova, Janette 1485 24 27Ð21 (56%)[+1Wi] Auckland, Luxembourg (2) 25 Medina Garrigues, A. 1450 22 28Ð20 (58%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Stockholm (1) 26 Szavay, Agnes 1425 15 20Ð11 (65%)[+2WO][+1Wi] Budapest (1); [Zagreb $75K+H] 27 King, Vania 1350 20 31Ð17 (65%)[+1WO][+2Wi] Fes, Kolkata (2) 28 Tu, Meilen 1335 24 23Ð22 (51%)[+2WO][+2Wi] 29 Peer, Shahar 1285 19 20Ð17 (54%)[+1Wi] Stanford (1) 30 Ruano Pascual, Virginia 1267 17 24Ð16 (60%)[+1WO] Stockholm (1) 31 Dushevina, Vera 1235 20 22Ð17 (56%)[+2Wi] Warsaw (1) 32 Azarenka, Victoria 1201 12 15Ð11 (58%) [Las Vegas $75K] 33 Garbin, Tathiana 1164 14 17Ð14 (55%) 34 Benesova, Iveta 1155 18 19Ð16 (54%) Luxembourg (1) 35 Kirilenko, Maria 1147 21 17Ð19 (47%)[+1WO][+1Wi] Doha (1) 36 Mattek, Bethanie 1068.5 18 17Ð14 (55%) Cincinnati (1) 37 Pennetta, Flavia 1060 25 21Ð22 (49%)[+1WO][+3Wi]

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 143 38 Pratt, Nicole 1052 19 22Ð17 (56%) Pattaya City, Memphis (2) 39 Poutchek, Tatiana 1047.5 24 16Ð17 (48%)[+1WO] [Las Vegas $75K, Jounieh $75K] 40 Voskoboeva, Galina 1045 20 16Ð15 (52%)[+2Wi] 41 Kuznetsova, Svetlana 1040 8 14Ð5 (74%)[+1WO][+3Wi] 42 Loit, Emilie 1035 18 20Ð18 (53%)[+1WO] 43 Voracova, Renata 1035 26 22Ð11 (67%) Bad Gastein, Portoroz (2); [Prerov $75K, Zlin $50K, Contrexeville $50K, Bratislava $100K+H] 44 Hantuchova, Daniela 1034 11 15Ð7 (68%)[+5Wi] 45 Vesnina, Elena 1032 18 19Ð16 (54%)[+1Wi] Hobart (1) 46 Hsieh Su-Wei 1008.5 19 18Ð10 (64%)[+1WO] Beijing, Seoul (2); [Shenzhen $50K 2006] 47 Krajicek, Michaella 1005 25 20Ð25 (44%) 48 Schiavone, Francesca 931 14 12Ð13 (48%)[+1Wi] 49 Vinci, Roberta 923 15 15Ð15 (50%) 50 Camerin, Maria Elena 900 15 14Ð15 (48%)[+2Wi]

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 144 Doubles Rankings Month By Month As with the singles month-by-month rankings on page 7, names have necessarily been abbreviated. Note that, at both the beginning and end of the year, we had co-ranked #1 players (Raymond/Stosur and Black/ Huber), leaving no #2 player. (The Black/Huber co-ranking does not appear in this list because Huber did not take the #1 spot until the end of the year, but it was there.) Rank January February March April May June July August Septembr October November 1 Ray/Stos Ray/Stos Ray/Stos Ray/Stos Raymond Raymond Raymond Black Black Black Black 2 Stosur Stosur Stosur Raymond Huber Huber Huber 3 Zheng Black Black Black Black Black Black Stosur Raymond Raymond Raymond 4 Yan Zheng Huber Huber Yan Huber Huber Huber Stosur Stosur Stosur 5 Black Yan Yan Yan Zheng Yan Yan Srebotnik Srebotnik Santangel Santangel 6 Stubbs Huber Zheng Zheng Huber Zheng Zheng Santangel Santangel Srebotnik Srebotnik 7 Srebotnik Stubbs Stubbs Stubbs Stubbs Stubbs Srebotnik Sugiyam Sugiyam Chuang Chuang 8 Peschke Peschke Schiavon Schiavon Srebotnik Déchy Santangel Stubbs Molik Sugiyam Sugiyam 9 Schiavon Schiavon Srebotnik Srebotnik Schiavon Srebotnik Stubbs Yan Stubbs Chan Chan 10 Ruano Pa Srebotnik Peschke Peschke Peschke Peschke Chan Chan Chan Stubbs Stubbs 11 Grönefel Sugiyam Sugiyam Grönefel Hantucho Schiavon Chuang Chuang Chuang Molik Peschke 12 Sugiyam Grönefel Hantucho Sugiyam Grönefel Chuang Déchy Zheng Peschke Déchy Molik 13 Hantucho Hantucho Grönefel Hantucho Chuang Chan Peschke Molik Yan Peschke Déchy 14 Suárez Ruano Pa Ruano Pa Ruano Pa Sugiyam Grönefel Ruano Pa Peschke Déchy Yan Yan 15 Shaughne Shaughne Shaughne Suárez Déchy Ruano Pa Schiavon Déchy Zheng Safina Safina 16 Safina Safina Suárez Déchy Ruano Pa Suárez Sugiyam Schiavon Schiavon Zheng Sun 17 Huber Suárez Safina Safina Chan Hantucho Grönefel Shaughne Sun Shaughne Shaughne 18 Zvonarev MedinaG Déchy Chuang Suárez Zvonarev Shaughne Safina Shaughne Uhlirova Zheng 19 MedinaG Zvonarev Zvonarev Zvonarev Safina Safina Molik Ruano Pa Safina Sun Mirza 20 Déchy Déchy MedinaG Shaughne Zvonarev Sugiyam Suárez Grönefel Mirza Mirza Uhlirova 21 Navratilo Daniilido Chuang Chan MedinaG Santangel Safina Sun Ruano Pa Husarova Peng 22 Daniilido Navratilo Daniilido MedinaG Shaughne Shaughne Zvonarev Zvonarev Likhovtse Szavay Likhovtse 23 Petrova Mirza Navratilo Navratilo Kirilenko Vesnina Dulko Likhovtse Zvonarev King Dulko 24 Mirza Chuang Chan Kirilenko Dulko Likhovtse Sun Petrova Kirilenko MedinaG Husarova 25 Asagoe Sun Likhovtse Daniilido Likhovtse King Husarova Husarova Dulko Peer MedinaG 26 Kirilenko Petrova Mirza Likhovtse Daniilido Dulko Likhovtse Mirza Husarova Likhovtse Szavay 27 Peer Bartoli Petrova King King Sun Dushevin Kirilenko King Dulko King 28 Likhovtse Peer Sun Dulko Santangel Kirilenko King Suárez Grönefel Peng Tu 29 Dulkp Chan Dulko Peer Sun Daniilido Hantucho Vesnina Vesnina Ruano Pa Peer 30 Sun Kirilenko Bartoli Petrova Peer Garbin MedinaG Peer Dushevin Schiavon Azarenka

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 145 Team Doubles Titles, Sorted from Most to Least Although the only teams listed are those with WTA titles, their titles at $50K and larger Challengers are also shown. A total of 40 teams won WTA titles this year. Team Titles Won (Tier) # of Titles Black/Huber Australian Open (Slam), Paris (II), Antwerp (II), Doha (II), 9 Wimbledon (Slam), San Diego (I), Moscow (I), Linz (II), Madrid (Champ) Raymond/Stosur Pan Paciﬁc (I), Indian Wells (I), Miami (I), Berlin (I), 5 Eastbourne (II) Chan/Chuang Bangalore (III), Birmingham (III), ’s-Hertogenbosch (III); 3 [Kaohsiung $75K 2006, Dothan $75K] Peschke/Stubbs Los Angeles (II), Stuttgart (II), Zürich (I) 3 Chuang/Hsieh Beijing (II), Seoul (IV) 2 Hradecka/Voracova Bad Gastein (III), Portoroz (IV); [Prerov $75K, Zlin $50K] 2 Sun/Yan Japan Open (III), Bangkok (III) 2 Yan/Zheng Charleston (I), Strasbourg (III) 2 Benesova/Husarova Luxembourg (II) 1 Cetkovska/Hlavackova Prague (IV) 1 Déchy/Saﬁna U. S. Open (Slam) 1 Déchy/Santangelo Rome (I) 1 Dominguez Lino/Suárez Bogota (III) 1 Dominguez Lino/Parra Santonja Acapulco (III) 1 Dushevina/Perebiynis Warsaw (II) 1 Dzehalevich/Yakimova Tashkent 1 Ehritt-Vanc/Rodionova Estoril (IV) 1 Fusano/Kops-Jones Quebec City (III) 1 Grönefeld/Shaughnessy Sydney (II) 1 Hingis/Kirilenko Doha (II) 1 Husarova/Suárez Auckland (IV) 1 Ji/S. Sun Bali (III) 1 King/Kudryavtseva Kolkata (III) 1 King/Mirza Fes (IV) 1 Koryttseva/Kustova Palermo (IV) 1 Likhovtseva/Vesnina Hobart (IV) 1 Llagostera Vives/Parra Santonja Barcelona (IV) 1 Medina Garrigues/Ruano Stockholm (IV) 1 Pascual Mirza/Mattek Cincinnati (III) 1 Mirza/Peer Stanford (II) 1 Mirza/Santangelo New Haven (II) 1 Molik/Santangelo Roland Garros (Slam) 1 Peng/Yan Guangzhou (III) 1 Pratt/Santangelo Pattaya City (IV) 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 146 Pratt/Stewart Memphis (III) 1 Radwanska/Radwanska Istanbul (III) 1 Saﬁna/Srebotnik Gold Coast (III) 1 Santangelo/Srebotnik Amelia Island (II) 1 Sugiyama/Srebotnik Canadian Open (I) 1 Szavay/Uhlirova Budapest (IV) 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 147 Individual Doubles Titles, Sorted from Most to Least Note: Only players with WTA doubles titles are listed, but their titles at $50K and larger Challengers are included in the list. A total of 60 players won at least one doubles title this year. Player Titles Won (Tier) # of Titles Black Australian Open (Slam), Paris (II), Antwerp (II), Doha (II), 9 Wimbledon (Slam), San Diego (I), Moscow (I), Linz (II), Madrid (Champ) Huber Australian Open (Slam), Paris (II), Antwerp (II), Doha (II), 9 Wimbledon (Slam), San Diego (I), Moscow (I), Linz (II), Madrid (Champ) Chuang Bangalore (III), Birmingham (III), ’s-Hertogenbosch (III), Beijing 5 (II), Seoul (IV); [Kaohsiung $75K 2006, Dothan $75K] Raymond Pan Pacific (I), Indian Wells (I), Miami (I), Berlin (I), Eastbourne (II) 5 Santangelo Pattaya City (IV), Amelia Island (II), Rome (I), Roland Garros (Slam), 5 New Haven (II) Stosur Pan Pacific (I), Indian Wells (I)), Miami (I), Berlin (I), Eastbourne (II) 5 Yan Charleston (I), Strasbourg (III), Guangzhou (III), Japan Open (III), 5 Bangkok (III) Mirza Fes (IV), Cincinnati (III), Stanford (II), New Haven (II) 4 Chan Bangalore (III), Birmingham (III), ’s-Hertogenbosch (III); [Kaohsiung 3 $75K 2006, Dothan $75K, Taoyuan $50K] Peschke Los Angeles (II), Stuttgart (II), Zürich (I) 3 Srebotnik Gold Coast (III), Amelia Island (II), Canadian Open (I) 3 Stubbs Los Angeles (II), Stuttgart (II), Zürich (I) 3 Déchy Rome (I), U. S. Open (Slam) 2 Dominguez Lino Bogota (III), Acapulco (III) 2 Hradecka Bad Gastein (III), Portoroz (IV); [Prerov $75K, Zlin $50K, Bronx $50K] 2 Hsieh Beijing (II), Seoul (IV) 2 Husarova Auckland (IV), Luxembourg (II) 2 King Fes (IV), Kolkata (III) 2 Parra Santonja Acapulco (III), Barcelona (IV) 2 Pratt Pattaya City (IV), Memphis (III) 2 Safina Gold Coast (III), U. S. Open (Slam) 2 Suárez Auckland (IV), Bogota (III) 2 Sun Tiantian Japan Open (III), Bangkok (III) 2 Voracova Bad Gastein (III), Portoroz (IV); [Prerov $75K, Zlin $50K, Contrexville 2 $50K, Bratislava $100K+H] Zheng Charleston (I), Strasbourg (III) 2 Benesova Luxembourg (II) 1 Cetkovska Prague (IV) 1 Dushevina Warsaw (II) 1 Dzehalevich Tashkent (IV) 1 Ehritt-Vanc Estoril (IV) 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 148 Fusano Quebec City (III); [La Quinta $50K] 1 Grönefeld Sydney (II) 1 Hingis Doha (II) 1 Hlavackova Prague (IV) 1 Ji Bali (III) 1 Kirilenko Doha (II) 1 Kops-Jones Quebec City (III); [Waikoloa $50K, Sea Island $50K, San Francico $50K] 1 Koryttseva Palermo (IV); [Ortisei $75K] 1 Kudryavtseva Kolkata (III); [Minsk $50K] 1 Kustova Palermo (IV); [Saint Gaudens $50K, Cuneo $50K+H, Kharkov $100K] 1 Likhovtseva Hobart (IV) 1 Llagostera Vives Barcelona (IV) 1 Mattek Cincinnati (III) 1 Medina Garrigues Stockholm (IV) 1 Molik Roland Garros (Slam) 1 Peer Stanford (II) 1 Peng Guangzhou (III) 1 Perebiynis Warsaw (II) 1 Radwanska, A Istanbul (III) 1 Radwanska, U Istanbul (III); [Bronx $50K] 1 Rodionova Estoril (IV); [Dnepropetrovsk $50K] 1 Ruano Pascual Stockholm (IV) 1 Shaughnessy Sydney (II) 1 Stewart Memphis (III) 1 Sugiyama Canadian Open (I);[Gifu $50K] 1 Sun Shengnan Bali (III) 1 Szavay Budapest (IV); [Zagreb $75K+H] 1 Uhlirova Budapest (IV) 1 Vesnina Hobart (IV) 1 Yakimova Tashkent (IV); [Jounieh $75K, Petange $75K+H] 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 149 Doubles Tournament Strengths Above, we calculated the strengths of the various WTA events based on two systems: Top Four Players (page 33) and Modified TSI (page 35). Modified TSI is not easy to apply to doubles events, but we can calculate Top Four Players — or, rather, Top Four Teams. We follow a rule similar to that we used for the singles, except that we count the top four teams equally: Take the combined rankings team with the best combined ranking. Add the ranking of the #2 team, then the ranking of the #3 and #4 teams. In singles, the minimum score is 13. In doubles, this is more complicated, since there can be multiple players with the same ranking, and of course the #1 player can choose to play with #100. The minimum if we have teams of #1+#2, #3+#4, #5+#6, and #7+#8 is 36. We had only one event — the U. S. Open — with a score of #36. There were, however, three other events with totals less than forty: Miami, Berlin, and Roland Garros. On the other hand, we have eight events with combined rankings greater than 50; these, obviously, were more like Challengers than Tour events (indeed, the gap between Tour events and Challengers is often less in doubles, because very good doubles players maybe forced into Challengers because their singles rankings are so low). The table below lists the sixty WTA events with a doubles draw (recall that Forest Hills has no doubles draw), sorted in order based on how strong they are. This table has one other twist: It also lists the tournament’s score in the singles Top Four rankings, so we can compare the tournament’s strength in singles and doubles. It turns out that a “normal” tournament will have a ratio of about 3.2 of singles strength to doubles strength On this basis, we can decide if a tournament is roughly equally strong in singles and doubles, or of singles or doubles is much stronger. Without going into detail, suffice it to say that we use four magic cutoffs to determine this: 2.0, 2.7, 3.8, 5.0. Doubles Event Doubles Singles Ratio Which is Rank Score Score stronger? 1 U. S. Open 36 13 2.77 About the Same 2 Miami 37 15 2.47 Doubles Stronger 3 Berlin 38 18 2.11 Doubles Stronger 4 Roland Garros 39 13 3.00 About the Same 5 Rome 47 28 1.68 Doubles Much Stronger 6 Charleston 48 57 0.84 Doubles Much Stronger 7 Zürich 49 13 3.77 About the Same 8 Wimbledon 53 13 4.08 Singles Stronger 9T Australian Open 54 19 2.84 About the Same 9T Madrid Championships 54 13 4.15 Singles Stronger 11 Linz 56 57 0.98 Doubles Much Stronger 12T Eastbourne 60 33 1.82 Doubles Much Stronger 12T San Diego 60 25 2.40 Doubles Stronger 14 Canadian Open 68 17 4.00 Singles Stronger 15 Pan Paciﬁc 69 32 2.16 Doubles Stronger 16T Sydney 79 25 3.16 About the Same 16T Dubai 79 21 3.76 About the Same 16T Indian Wells 79 23 3.43 About the Same 19 Amelia Island 81 59 1.37 Doubles Much Stronger 20 New Haven 105 51 2.06 Doubles Stronger 21T Gold Coast 124 69 1.80 Doubles Much Stronger 21T Birmingham 124 41 3.02 About the Same

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 150 23 Stuttgart 128 14 9.14 Singles Much Stronger 24 Moscow 131 25 5.24 Singles Much Stronger 25 Los Angeles 150 24 6.25 Singles Much Stronger 26 Paris 156 22 7.09 Singles Much Stronger 27 Antwerp 163 29 5.62 Singles Much Stronger 28 ’s-Hertogenbosch 176 36 4.89 Singles Stronger 29 Stanford 196 65 3.02 About the Same 30 Hobart 238 141 1.69 Doubles Much Stronger 31 Doha 242 30 8.07 Singles Much Stronger 32 Beijing 254 59 4.31 Singles Stronger 33 Luxembourg 258 40 6.45 Singles Much Stronger 34 Memphis 263 158 1.66 Doubles Much Stronger 35 Warsaw 264 22 12.00 Singles Much Stronger 36 Guangzhou 270 241 1.12 Doubles Much Stronger 37 Strasbourg 288 57 5.05 Singles Much Stronger 38 Stockholm 322 211 1.53 Doubles Much Stronger 39 Japan Open 333 130 2.56 Doubles Stronger 40 Estoril 334 162 2.06 Doubles Stronger 41 Auckland 355 91 3.90 Singles Stronger 42 Budapest 368 195 1.89 Doubles Much Stronger 43 Pattaya City 381 192 1.98 Doubles Much Stronger 44 Bad Gastein 411 217 1.89 Doubles Much Stronger 45 Istanbul 419 72 5.82 Singles Much Stronger 46 Portoroz 423 131 3.23 About the Same 47 Prague 426 192 2.22 Doubles Stronger 48 Bangkok 429 65 6.60 Singles Much Stronger 49 Acapulco 430 173 2.49 Doubles Stronger 50 Bangalore 434 302 1.44 Doubles Much Stronger 51 Seoul 466 121 3.85 Singles Stronger 52 Palermo 488 201 2.43 Doubles Stronger 53 Fes 508 368 1.38 Doubles Much Stronger 54 Bogota 528 239 2.21 Doubles Stronger 55 Barcelona 546 227 2.41 Doubles Stronger 56 Bali 553 75 7.37 Singles Much Stronger 57 Kolkata 671 148 4.53 Singles Stronger 58 Quebec City 674 156 4.32 Singles Stronger 59 Cincinnati 702 141 4.98 Singles Stronger 60 Tashkent 789 279 2.83 About the Same

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 151 Doubles Results What follows is similar to the tables for singles player results (page 41), with a handful of exceptions. For starters, obviously, the list shows which partner a player played each event with. Also, the list of teams beaten is a little different. Instead of listing rankings, it lists seed numbers, in curly brackets {}. In some cases, where a particularly significant team has gone unseeded, I’ve listed them anyway. So, for example, the second line in the entry for Shinobu Asagoe reads Australian Open w/Srebotnik (Slam, SF [Yan {34}/Zheng {33}], 4) — Huber/Schiavone {8}, Black/Stubbs {2} That means Asagoe played the Australian Open with Katarina Srebotnik. They made the semifinal before losing to #34 Yan Zi and #33 Zheng Jie, winning four matches to do so. Along the way, they beat #8 seeds Huber/Schiavone and #2 Black/Stubbs. A note about withdrawals: Doubles withdrawals have become so common that events often don’t have Lucky Losers available to fill draw slots when a team pulls out of the first round. For purposes of record- keeping, these withdrawals are listed in the player results below (see, e.g. Daniilidou at Birmingham). The WTA does not count either withdrawal as an event, so players with this sort of withdrawal will show more events than the WTA lists. When teams withdraw and another team replaces them, I have not listed these. Cara Black — Initial Rank: 5 • Final Rank: 1 • Best Rank: 1 • Events: 23 Gold Coast w/Huber (III, SF[Benesova {36}/Voskoboeva {48}], 2) — Likhovtseva/Vesnina Sydney w/Huber (II, SF[Bartoli {32}/Tu {46}], 2) Australian Open w/Huber (Slam, Win, 6) — Daniilidou/Woehr {16}, Hantuchova/Sugiyama {6}, Raymond/Stosur {1} Paris w/Huber (II, Win, 4) Antwerp w/Huber (II, Win, 4) — Husarova/Peschke {3}, Likhovtseva/Vesnina {4} Dubai w/Huber (II+, Win, 4) — Hantuchova/Sugiyama {3}, Kuznetsova/Molik Miami w/Huber (Ireq, F[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 4) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Hingis/Hantuchova Amelia Island w/Huber (II, SF[Santangelo {40}/Srebotnik {9}], 2) Charleston w/Huber (I, SF[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 2) Berlin w/Huber (I, SF[Garbin {69}/Vinci {68}], 2) — Sugiyama/Srebotnik {5} Rome w/Huber (I, SF[Garbin {45}/Vinci {55}], 2) Roland Garros w/Huber (Slam, SF[Molik {59}/Santangelo {21}], 4) — Loit/Pratt, Douchevina/Perebiynis {15}, Husarova/ Shaughnessy {10} Birmingham w/Huber (III, SF[Sun {26}/Tu {43}], 2) Eastbourne w/Huber (II, SF[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {9}], 2) Wimbledon w/Huber (Slam, Win, 6) — Kuznetsova/Petrova, Molik/Santangelo {6}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {4} San Diego w/Huber (I, Win, 4) — Chan/Chuang {3} Canadian Open w/Huber (I, F[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 3) — Déchy/Sun {4} New Haven w/Huber (II, F[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 2+ 1 walkover) — Davenport/Raymond U. S. Open w/Huber (Slam, R32[Camerin {67}/Dulko {25}], 1) Moscow w/Huber (I, Win, 4) — Likhovtseva/Saﬁna Zurich w/Huber (I, SF[Raymond {3}/Schiavone {44}], 2) Linz w/Huber (II, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Molik/Santangelo {4}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {2} Madrid Championships w/Huber (Champ, Win, 2) — Peschke/Stubbs {4}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {2}

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 152 Chan Yung-Jan — Initial Rank: 97 • Final Rank: 8 • Best Rank: 8 • Events: 21 Kaohsiung $75K 2006 w/Chuang ($75K, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Chuang (Slam, F[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 5) — Safina/Srebotnik {5}, Yan/Zheng {2}. Pattaya City w/Chuang (IV, F[Pratt {52}/Santangelo {57}], 3) Bangalore w/Chuang (III, Win, 4) — Hsieh/Kudryavtseva {4} Indian Wells w/Chuang (I+, F[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 4) — Yan/Zheng {2}, Déchy/Zvonareva {4} Miami w/Chuang (Ireq, SF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Yan/Zheng {3} Charleston w/Chuang (I, 1R[Molik {62}/Santangelo {28}], 0) Dothan $75K w/Chuang ($75K, Win, 4) Fukuoka $50K w/Chuang ($50K, SF[Fujiwara {—}/Namigata {206}], 2) Istanbul w/Mirza (III, F[A. Radwanska {329}/U. Radwanska {252}], 3) Roland Garros w/Chuang (Slam, QF[Molik {59}/Santangelo {21}], 3) Birmingham w/Chuang (III, Win, 4) — King/Yan {3} 's-Hertogenbosch w/Chuang (III, Win, 3) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {3} Wimbledon w/Chuang (Slam, R16[Peng {81}/Yan {5}], 2) San Diego w/Chuang (I, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {4}], 2) U. S. Open w/Chuang (Slam, F[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 5) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {9}, Mattek/Mirza {16}, Szavay/Uhlirova {14} Luxembourg w/Shaughnessy (II, QF[Dushevina {30}/Perebiynis {70}], 1) Stuttgart w/Safina (II+, F[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 3) Zurich w/Chuang (I, QF[Raymond {3}/Schiavone {44}], 1) Taoyuan $50K w/ChanH ($50K, Win, 4) Madrid Championships w/Chuang (Champ, SF[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {8}], 0) Xiamen $75K w/ChanH ($75K, SF[Ji {90}/S. Sun {59}], 1+ 1 walkover) Chuang Chia-Jung — Initial Rank: 87 • Final Rank: 7 • Best Rank: 7 • Events: 20 Kaohsiung $75K 2006 w/Chan ($75K, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Chan (Slam, F[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 5) — Safina/Srebotnik {5}, Yan/Zheng {2}. Pattaya City w/Chan (IV, F[Pratt {52}/Santangelo {57}], 3) Bangalore w/Chan (III, Win, 4) — Hsieh/Kudryavtseva {4} Indian Wells w/Chan (I+, F[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 4) — Yan/Zheng {2}, Déchy/Zvonareva {4} Miami w/Chan (Ireq, SF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Yan/Zheng {3} Charleston w/Chan (I, 1R[Molik {62}/Santangelo {28}], 0) Dothan $75K w/Chan ($75K, Win, 4) Fukuoka $50K w/Chan ($50K, SF[Fujiwara {—}/Namigata {206}], 2) Roland Garros w/Chan (Slam, QF[Molik {59}/Santangelo {21}], 3) Birmingham w/Chan (III, Win, 4) — King/Yan {3} 's-Hertogenbosch w/Chan (III, Win, 3) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {3} Wimbledon w/Chan (Slam, R16[Peng {81}/Yan {5}], 2) San Diego w/Chan (I, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {4}], 2) U. S. Open w/Chan (Slam, F[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 5) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {9}, Mattek/Mirza {16}, Szavay/Uhlirova {14} Beijing w/Hsieh (II, Win, 4) — Peng/Yan {2} Seoul w/Hsieh (IV, Win, 4) — Kim/Sugiyama, Daniilidou/Woehr {2} Japan Open w/King (III, F[Sun {19}/Yan {14}], 3) Zurich w/Chan (I, QF[Raymond {3}/Schiavone {44}], 1) Madrid Championships w/Chan (Champ, SF[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {8}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 153 Eleni Daniilidou — Initial Rank: 22 • Final Rank: 54 • Best Rank: 21 • Events: 30 Auckland w/Woehr (IV, SF[Husarova {39}/Suárez {14}], 2) Sydney w/Woehr (II, 1R[Morariu {33}/Stubbs {6}], 0) Australian Open w/Woehr (Slam, R16[Black {5}/Huber {17}], 2) Paris w/Woehr (II, QF[Jans {82}/Voracova {85}], 1) — Husarova/Peschke {3} Antwerp w/Woehr (II, QF[Déchy {19}/Zvonareva {20}], 1) Dubai w/Woehr (II+, 1R[Schiavone {8}/Srebotnik {10}], 0) Doha w/Woehr (II, 1R[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 0) Miami w/Woehr (Ireq, 1R[Chan {21}/Chuang {18}], 0) Amelia Island w/Pratt (II, 1R[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 0) Charleston w/Woehr (I, 1R[Granville {101}/Kostanic Tosic {51}], 0) Budapest w/Woehr (IV, SF[withdrew], 2) Estoril w/Woehr (IV, SF[withdrew], 1+ 1 walkover) Berlin w/Woehr (I, 1R[Jankovic {54}/N. Li {85}], 0) Rome w/Woehr (I, 1R[Müller {78}/G. Navratilova {68}], 0) Roland Garros w/Woehr (Slam, R32[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 1) Birmingham w/Woehr (III, 1R[Fedak {50}/Laine {70}], 0) 's-Hertogenbosch w/Woehr (III, 1R[Bremond {93}/Krajicek {49}], 0) Wimbledon w/Woehr (Slam, R32[Peng {81}/Yan {5}], 1) — Safina/Vinci {13} Stanford w/Kirilenko (II, 1R[Azarenka {113}/Chakvetadze {97}], 0) San Diego w/Woehr (I, 1R[Castaño {142}/Tanasugarn {123}], 0) Los Angeles w/Woehr (II, 1R[Fusano {145}/Kops-Jones {132}], 0) Canadian Open w/Woehr (I, 1R[Dementieva {105}/Pennetta {59}], 0) New Haven w/Woehr (II, 1R[Azarenka {57}/Kirilenko {25}], 0) U. S. Open w/Woehr (Slam, R32[Szavay {42}/Uhlirova {31}], 1) Bali w/Woehr (III+, 1R[Errani {186}/Medina Garrigues {27}], 0) Beijing w/Woehr (II, QF[Peng {38}/Yan {14}], 1) Seoul w/Woehr (IV, F[Chuang {7}/Hsieh {46}], 3) Stuttgart w/Woehr (II+, 1R[Schiavone {30}/Srebotnik {6}], 0) Moscow w/Woehr (I, 1R[Benesova {34}/Voskoboeva {40}], 0) Linz w/Woehr (II, 1R[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {9}], 0) Lindsay Davenport — (not ranked in 2007) ¥ Events: 2 New Haven w/Raymond (II, 1R[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Bali w/Hantuchova (III+, SF[withdrew], 2) Nathalie Déchy — Initial Rank: 20 • Final Rank: 13 • Best Rank: 8 • Events: 19 Sydney w/Zvonareva (II, 1R[King {52}/Sun {29}], 0) Australian Open w/Zvonareva (Slam, R16[S. Sun {117}/Sun {30}], 2) Paris w/Loit (II, QF[Kuznetsova {50}/Petrova {27}], 1) Antwerp w/Zvonareva (II, SF[Likhovtseva {32}/Vesnina {36}], 2) Indian Wells w/Zvonareva (I+, SF[Chan {25}/Chuang {21}], 3) — Likhovtseva/Medina Garrigues {6} Miami w/Zvonareva (Ireq, 1R[Kuznetsova {36}/Petrova {30}], 0) Amelia Island w/Kostanic (II, 1R[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 0) Charleston w/Zvonareva (I, QF[withdrew], 2) Prague w/Krajicek (IV, 1R[Schruff {112}/N.Uberoi {98}], 0) Rome w/Santangelo (I, Win, 5) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Peschke/Stubbs {3} Roland Garros w/Mauresmo (Slam, 1R[Medina Garrigues {33}/Ruano Pascual {15}], 0) Birmingham w/Beltrame (III, QF[Black {1}/L. Huber {4}], 1) Eastbourne w/Sun (II, QF[withdrew], 1) — Molik/Santangelo {4} Wimbledon w/Beltrame (Slam, 1R[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 0) Stockholm w/Loit (IV, QF[C. Chan {117}/Luzhanska {121}], 1) Canadian Open w/Sun (I, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1+ 1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Safina (Slam, Win, 6) — Garbin/Peer {12}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {3}, Peschke/Stubbs {6}, Chan/Chuang {5} Luxembourg w/Golovin (II, 1R[Chan {9}/Shaughnessy {17}], 0) Zurich w/Safina (I, 1R[Molik {11}/Santangelo {5}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 154 Gisela Dulko — Initial Rank: 29 • Final Rank: 23 • Best Rank: 22 • Events: 22 Auckland w/Tu (IV, 1R[Hsieh {104}/S. Uberoi {117}], 0) Hobart w/Camerin (IV, SF[Likhovtseva {28}/Vesnina {45}], 2) Australian Open w/Camerin (Slam, R16[Grönefeld {11}/Shaughnessy {12}], 2) Pan Pacific w/Tu (I, SF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 2) Acapulco w/Harkleroad (III, QF[Birnerova {90}/Zahlavova Strycova {64}], 1) Indian Wells w/Camerin (I+, R16[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 1) Miami w/Camerin (Ireq, 1R[Santangelo {49}/Stewart {60}], 0) Amelia Island w/Pennetta (II, 1R[Santangelo {40}/Srebotnik {9}], 0) Charleston w/Pennetta (I, SF[Peng {94}/Sun {44}], 2+ 1 walkover) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {7} Estoril w/Pennetta (IV, 1R[Dominguez Lino {78}/Parra Santonja {109}], 0) Prague w/Parra (IV, QF[withdrew], 1) Rome w/Pennetta (I, 1R[Déchy {15}/Santangelo {24}], 0) Roland Garros w/Camerin (Slam, QF[Srebotnik {9}/Sugiyama {20}], 3) — Morariu/Schnyder, Peschke/Stubbs {4} 's-Hertogenbosch w/Tu (III, QF[withdrew], 1) Wimbledon w/Camerin (Slam, 1R[Krajicek {47}/A. Radwanska {109}], 0) San Diego w/Kirilenko (I, R16[Castaño {142}/Tanasugarn {123}], 1) Los Angeles w/Kirilenko (II, SF[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {11}], 2) Canadian Open w/Camerin (I, QF[Molik {12}/Santangelo {6}], 2) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {5} U. S. Open w/Camerin (Slam, R16[Morariu {66}/Shaughnessy {18}], 2) — Black/Huber {1} Portoroz w/Camerin (IV, 1R[Klepac {223}/Likhovtseva {26}], 0) Stuttgart w/Camerin (II+, SF[Chan {9}/Safina {15}], 2) Linz w/Safina (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Anna-Lena Grönefeld — Initial Rank: 11 • Final Rank: 52 • Best Rank: 11 • Events: 14 Gold Coast w/Shaughnessy (III, 1R[N. Li {73}/Peng {105}], 0) Sydney w/Shaughnessy (II, Win, 4) — Loit/Pratt, Bartoli/Tu Australian Open w/Shaughnessy (Slam, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Camerin/Dulko {12} Dubai w/Shaughnessy (II+, 1R[Kuznetsova {40}/Molik {148}], 0) Doha w/Shaughnessy (II, SF[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 2) Warsaw w/RadwanskaU (II, 1R[A. Bondarenko {65}/KBondarenko {67}], 0) Berlin w/Santangelo (I, R16[Husarova {32}/Shaughnessy {21}], 1) Rome w/Brianti (I, R16[Sun {34}/Yan {5}], 1) Istanbul w/Senoglu (III, 1R[Buzarnescu {353}/Dzehalevich {139}], 0) Roland Garros w/Suárez (Slam, 1R[Krajicek {53}/A. Radwanska {186}], 0) Eastbourne w/Birnerova (II, 1R[Dushevina {28}/Sugiyama {16}], 0) Wimbledon w/Malek (Slam, R32[Kuznetsova {52}/Petrova {35}], 1) Bad Gastein w/Malek (III, QF[Gagliardi {114}/M. Niculescu {135}], 0+ 1 walkover) Stockholm w/Malek (IV, QF[Han {362}/Lu Jingjing {338}], 1) Daniela Hantuchova — Initial Rank: 13 • Final Rank: 44 • Best Rank: 11 • Events: 11 Sydney w/Sugiyama (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Australian Open w/Sugiyama (Slam, QF[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 3) — Medina Garrigues/Mirza {10} Pan Pacific w/Sugiyama (I, 1R[Jankovic {51}/Mattek {47}], 0) Dubai w/Sugiyama (II+, SF[Black {3}/Huber {6}], 2) — Husarova/Peschke Miami w/Hingis (Ireq, SF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 3) — Srebotnik/Sugiyama {5}, Likhovtseva/Vesnina Rome w/Petrova (I, R16[withdrew], 1) — Peer/Safina {8} Birmingham w/Mirza (III, 1R[withdrew], 0) Wimbledon w/Ivanovic (Slam, 1R[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 0) Los Angeles w/Hingis (II, QF[withdrew], 1) U. S. Open w/Hingis (Slam, R16[Peschke {12}/Stubbs {9}], 2) — Peng/Yan {10} Bali w/Davenport (III+, SF[withdrew], 2) Zurich w/Peer (I, 1R[Medina Garrigues {25}/Pennetta {48}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 155 Martina Hingis — Initial Rank: (none) • Final Rank: 64 • Best Rank: 61 • Events: 6 Australian Open w/Kuznetsova (Slam, R32[Dushevina {54}/Kirilenko {26}], 1) — Husarova/Jankovic {15} Dubai w/Kirilenko (II+, 1R[Husarova {37}/Peschke {9}], 0) Doha w/Kirilenko (II, Win, 4) — Husarova/Peschke {3}, Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {2} Miami w/Hantuchova (Ireq, SF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 3) — Srebotnik/Sugiyama {5}, Likhovtseva/Vesnina Los Angeles w/Hantuchova (II, QF[withdrew], 1) U. S. Open w/Hantuchova (Slam, R16[Peschke {12}/Stubbs {9}], 2) — Peng/Yan {10} Liezel Huber — Initial Rank: 17 • Final Rank: 1 • Best Rank: 1 • Events: 23 Gold Coast w/Black (III, SF[Benesova {36}/Voskoboeva {48}], 2) — Likhovtseva/Vesnina Sydney w/Black (II, SF[Bartoli {32}/Tu {46}], 2) Australian Open w/Black (Slam, Win, 6) — Daniilidou/Woehr {16}, Hantuchova/Sugiyama {6}, Raymond/Stosur {1} Paris w/Black (II, Win, 4) Antwerp w/Black (II, Win, 4) — Husarova/Peschke {3}, Likhovtseva/Vesnina {4} Dubai w/Black (II+, Win, 4) — Hantuchova/Sugiyama {3}, Kuznetsova/Molik Miami w/Black (Ireq, F[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 4) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Hingis/Hantuchova Amelia Island w/Black (II, SF[Santangelo {40}/Srebotnik {9}], 2) Charleston w/Black (I, SF[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 2) Berlin w/Black (I, SF[Garbin {69}/Vinci {68}], 2) — Sugiyama/Srebotnik {5} Rome w/Black (I, SF[Garbin {45}/Vinci {55}], 2) Roland Garros w/Black (Slam, SF[Molik {59}/Santangelo {21}], 4) — Loit/Pratt, Douchevina/Perebiynis {15}, Husarova/ Shaughnessy {10} Birmingham w/Black (III, SF[Sun {26}/Tu {43}], 2) Eastbourne w/Black (II, SF[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {9}], 2) Wimbledon w/Black (Slam, Win, 6) — Kuznetsova/Petrova, Molik/Santangelo {6}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {4} San Diego w/Black (I, Win, 4) — Chan/Chuang {3} Canadian Open w/Black (I, F[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 3) — Déchy/Sun {4} New Haven w/Black (II, F[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 2+ 1 walkover) — Davenport/Raymond U. S. Open w/Black (Slam, R32[Camerin {67}/Dulko {25}], 1) Moscow w/Black (I, Win, 4) — Likhovtseva/Saﬁna Zurich w/Black (I, SF[Raymond {3}/Schiavone {44}], 2) Linz w/Black (II, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Molik/Santangelo {4}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {2} Madrid Championships w/Black (Champ, Win, 2) — Peschke/Stubbs {4}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {2}

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 156 Janette Husarova — Initial Rank: 38 • Final Rank: 24 • Best Rank: 21 • Events: 24 Auckland w/Suárez (IV, Win, 4) — Daniilidou/Woehr {3} Sydney w/Voskoboeva (II, 1R[Bartoli {32}/Tu {46}], 0) Australian Open w/Jankovic (Slam, 1R[Hingis {—}/Kuznetsova {45}], 0) Paris w/Peschke (II, 1R[Daniilidou {21}/Woehr {54}], 0) Antwerp w/Peschke (II, SF[Black {3}/L. Huber {9}], 2) Dubai w/Peschke (II+, QF[Hantuchova {14}/Sugiyama {11}], 1) — Hingis/Kirilenko Doha w/Peschke (II, QF[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 1) Indian Wells w/Shaughnessy (I+, 1R[Hradecka {59}/Voracova {70}], 0) Miami w/Shaughnessy (Ireq, R16[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 1) Amelia Island w/Shaughnessy (II, SF[Medina Garrigues {22}/Ruano Pascual {14}], 2) — Yan/Zheng {2} Charleston w/Shaughnessy (I, 1R[Peng {94}/Sun {44}], 0) Berlin w/Shaughnessy (I, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 2) — Grönefeld/Santangelo {7} Rome w/Shaughnessy (I, QF[Déchy {15}/Santangelo {24}], 2) — Raymond/Stosur {1} Roland Garros w/Shaughnessy (Slam, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 3) 's-Hertogenbosch w/Shaughnessy (III, QF[withdrew], 1) Wimbledon w/Shaughnessy (Slam, R16[Kuznetsova {52}/Petrova {35}], 2) Stanford w/Shaughnessy (II, 1R[Hsieh {84}/Kudryavtseva {76}], 0) San Diego w/Shaughnessy (I, 1R[Vanc {65}/Rodionova {70}], 0) Los Angeles w/Krajicek (II, 1R[Mattek {66}/Mirza {26}], 0) New Haven w/Schnyder (II, QF[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 1) U. S. Open w/Schnyder (Slam, R32[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 1) Luxembourg w/Benesova (II, Win, 4) — Krajicek/Uhlirova {2} Stuttgart w/Peer (II+, 1R[A. Radwanska {81}/Zahlavova Strycova {90}], 0) Zurich w/Zvonareva (I, 1R[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {9}], 0) Vania King — Initial Rank: 59 • Final Rank: 27 • Best Rank: 23 • Events: 20 Gold Coast w/Pratt (III, SF[Safina {16}/Srebotnik {7}], 2) — Kirilenko/Peer {4} Sydney w/Sun (II, QF[Black {5}/L. Huber {16}], 1) — Déchy/Zvonareva Australian Open w/Kostanic (Slam, R32[Déchy {20}/Zvonareva {18}], 1) Pan Pacific w/Stubbs (I, F[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Likhovtseva/Vesnina, Yan/Zheng {2} Memphis w/Peer (III, 1R[Hradecka {60}/Voracova {76}], 0) Indian Wells w/Peer (I+, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 2) — Brémond/Sugiyama Miami w/Peer (Ireq, R16[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 1) Amelia Island w/Sun (II, 1R[Petrova {26}/Raymond {1}], 0) Charleston w/Stubbs (I, R16[Pratt {36}/Stewart {55}], 1) Fes w/Mirza (IV, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Ehritt-Vanc/Rodionova {2} Istanbul w/Kostanic (III, 1R[withdrew], 0) Roland Garros w/Kostanic (Slam, 1R[Gagliardi {115}/Schiavone {11}], 0) Birmingham w/Yan (III, SF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) Wimbledon w/Kostanic (Slam, 1R[Craybas {89}/Granville {61}], 0) San Diego w/Peng (I, QF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) — Jankovic/Petrova {8] Los Angeles w/Sun (II, 1R[Poutchek {78}/Rodionova {68}], 0) U. S. Open w/Loit (Slam, R16[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 2) Kolkata w/Kudryavtseva (III, Win, 4) Guangzhou w/Sun (III, F[Peng {34}/Sun {14}], 3) — Craybas/Kostanic Tosic {4} Japan Open w/Chuang (III, F[Sun {19}/Yan {14}], 3) Bangkok w/Rodionova (III, QF[withdrew], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 157 Maria Kirilenko — Initial Rank: 26 • Final Rank: 35 • Best Rank: 23 • Events: 21 Gold Coast w/Peer (III, QF[King {61}/Pratt {43}], 1) Australian Open w/Douchevina (Slam, R16[Harkleroad {55}/Voskoboeva {40}], 2) — Hingis/Kuznetsova Pan Pacific w/Douchevina (I, QF[Yan {5}/Zheng {4}], 1) — Bartoli/Peer Dubai w/Hingis (II+, 1R[Husarova {37}/Peschke {9}], 0) Doha w/Hingis (II, Win, 4) — Husarova/Peschke {3}, Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {2} Miami w/Ivanovic (Ireq, 1R[Loit {64}/Pratt {40}], 0) Budapest w/Likhovtseva (IV, SF[withdrew], 2) Estoril w/Bartoli (IV, 1R[Cohen Aloro {85}/Sfar {132}], 0) Berlin w/Ivanovic (I, 1R[Husarova {32}/Shaughnessy {21}], 0) Roland Garros w/Ivanovic (Slam, 1R[Jankovic {52}/N. Li {79}], 0) Eastbourne w/Likhovtseva (II, SF[Raymond {2}/Stosur {1}], 1+ 1 walkover) Wimbledon w/Vesnina (Slam, R16[Molik {19}/Santangelo {8}], 2) Stanford w/Daniilidou (II, 1R[Azarenka {113}/Chakvetadze {97}], 0) San Diego w/Dulko (I, R16[Castaño {142}/Tanasugarn {123}], 1) Los Angeles w/Dulko (II, SF[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {11}], 2) Canadian Open w/Brémond (I, 1R[Peng {46}/Yan {11}], 0) New Haven w/Azarenka (II, QF[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 1) U. S. Open w/Vesnina (Slam, 1R[Morigami {61}/Tu {35}], 0) Moscow w/Vesnina (I, 1R[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Zurich w/Vesnina (I, 1R[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 0) Linz w/Vesnina (II, 1R[A. Bondarenko {58}/K. Bondarenko {54}], 0) Svetlana Kuznetsova — Initial Rank: 37 • Final Rank: 41 • Best Rank: 34 • Events: 8 Australian Open w/Hingis (Slam, R32[Dushevina {54}/Kirilenko {26}], 1) — Husarova/Jankovic {15} Paris w/Petrova (II, SF[withdrew], 2) — Déchy/Loit {4} Dubai w/Molik (II+, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 3) — Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {4}, Schiavone/Srebotnik {2} Doha w/Molik (II, QF[Kostanic Tosic {58}/Perebiynis {72}], 1) Miami w/Petrova (Ireq, R16[Loit {64}/Pratt {40}], 1) — Déchy/Zvonareva {7} Berlin w/Petrova (I, QF[withdrew], 1+ 1 walkover) Wimbledon w/Petrova (Slam, QF[Black {3}/Huber {4}], 3) — Garbin/Suárez {9}, Husarova/Shaughnessy {7} Canadian Open w/Petrova (I, QF[withdrew], 2) Elena Likhovtseva — Initial Rank: 28 • Final Rank: 22 • Best Rank: 21 • Events: 17 Gold Coast w/Vesnina (III, QF[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 1) Hobart w/Vesnina (IV, Win, 4) — Camerin/Dulko {2}, Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {1} Australian Open w/Vesnina (Slam, 1R[Schiavone {9}/Schnyder {—}], 0) Pan Pacific w/Vesnina (I, QF[King {46}/Stubbs {7}], 1) — Shaughnessy/Zvonareva {4} Antwerp w/Vesnina (II, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 3) — Déchy/Zvonareva {2} Dubai w/Vesnina (II+, 1R[Vanc {58}/Rodionova {72}], 0) Indian Wells w/Medina Garrigues (I+, QF[Déchy {18}/Zvonareva {20}], 2) Miami w/Vesnina (Ireq, R16[Hantuchova {13}/Hingis {103}], 1) Budapest w/Kirilenko (IV, SF[withdrew], 2) Warsaw w/Vesnina (II, F[Dushevina {43}/Perebiynis {66}], 3) Berlin w/Vesnina (I, 1R[A. Bondarenko {61}/KBondarenko {63}], 0) Roland Garros w/Vesnina (Slam, 1R[Gajdosova {62}/Morigami {96}], 0) Eastbourne w/Kirilenko (II, SF[Raymond {2}/Stosur {1}], 1+ 1 walkover) Wimbledon w/Sun (Slam, QF[Srebotnik {7}/Sugiyama {16}], 3) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {8} U. S. Open w/Sun (Slam, 1R[Harkleroad {88}/Zvonareva {23}], 0) Portoroz w/Klepac (IV, F[Hradecka {56}/Voracova {47}], 3) — Camerin/Dulko {2} Moscow w/Safina (I, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 2)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 158 Anabel Medina Garrigues — Initial Rank: 19 • Final Rank: 25 • Best Rank: 18 • Events: 22 Hobart w/Ruano Pascual (IV, F[Likhovtseva {28}/Vesnina {45}], 3) Australian Open w/Mirza (Slam, R16[Hantuchova {14}/Sugiyama {13}], 2) Paris w/Birnerova (II, 1R[Saﬁna {16}/Srebotnik {10}], 0) Dubai w/Szavay (II+, 1R[K. Bondarenko {61}/Dushevina {44}], 0) Indian Wells w/Likhovtseva (I+, QF[Déchy {18}/Zvonareva {20}], 2) Miami w/Dominguez Lino (Ireq, 1R[Husarova {35}/Shaughnessy {20}], 0) Amelia Island w/Ruano Pascual (II, F[Santangelo {40}/Srebotnik {9}], 3) — Husarova/Shaughnessy Charleston w/Ruano Pascual (I, 1R[Dulko {30}/Pennetta {46}], 0) Berlin w/Ruano Pascual (I, 1R[Loit {64}/Stewart {48}], 0) Rome w/Ruano Pascual (I, 1R[Benesova {64}/Voskoboeva {37}], 0) Roland Garros w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 3) — Déchy/Mauresmo 's-Hertogenbosch w/Ruano Pascual (III, F[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 3) Wimbledon w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, R16[Likhovtseva {26}/Sun {24}], 1+ 1 walkover) Stockholm w/Ruano Pascual (IV, Win, 4) Canadian Open w/Ruano Pascual (I, 1R[Camerin {80}/Dulko {29}], 0) New Haven w/Ruano Pascual (II, 1R[Benesova {70}/Mattek {60}], 0) U. S. Open w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, R16[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) Bali w/Errani (III+, QF[withdrew], 1) — Daniilidou/Woehr {1} Beijing w/Ruano Pascual (II, QF[Han {266}/Xu {280}], 1) Guangzhou w/Ruano Pascual (III, SF[Peng {34}/Yan {14}], 2) Zurich w/Pennetta (I, QF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1) — Hantuchova/Peer Linz w/Pennetta (II, 1R[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Sania Mirza — Initial Rank: 24 • Final Rank: 18 • Best Rank: 18 • Events: 16 Hobart w/Molik (IV, QF[Camerin {41}/Dulko {27}], 1) Australian Open w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, R16[Hantuchova {14}/Sugiyama {13}], 2) Bangalore w/Santangelo (III, SF[Hsieh {105}/Kudryavtseva {92}], 2) Fes w/King (IV, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Ehritt-Vanc/Rodionova {2} Istanbul w/Chan (III, F[A. Radwanska {329}/U. Radwanska {252}], 3) Roland Garros w/Birnerova (Slam, 1R[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 0) Birmingham w/Hantuchova (III, 1R [withdrew], 0) Wimbledon w/Peer (Slam, R16[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 2) Cincinnati w/Mattek (III, Win, 4) Stanford w/Peer (II, Win, 4) San Diego w/Peer (I, R16[Hsieh {77}/Kudryavtseva {66}], 1) Los Angeles w/Mattek (II, QF[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {11}], 1) New Haven w/Santangelo (II, Win, 4) — Morariu/Shaughnessy, Husarova/Schnyder, Peschke/Stubbs {2}, Black/Huber {1} U. S. Open w/Mattek (Slam, QF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 3) — Raymond/Stosur {2} Japan Open w/Fusano (III, QF[withdrew], 1) Moscow w/Schnyder (I, QF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1) Zurich w/Schnyder (I, 1R[Peng {27}/Tu {33}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 159 Alicia Molik — Initial Rank: 173 • Final Rank: 12 • Best Rank: 8 • Events: 20 Hobart w/Mirza (IV, QF[Camerin {41}/Dulko {27}], 1) Australian Open w/Golovin (Slam, 1R[Hantuchova {14}/Sugiyama {13}], 0) Pattaya City w/Stewart (IV, 1R[Pratt {52}/Santangelo {57}], 0) Bangalore w/Ferguson (III, 1R[Gajdosova {59}/Horiatopoulos {152}], 0) Dubai w/Kuznetsova (II+, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 3) — Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {4}, Schiavone/Srebotnik {2} Doha w/Kuznetsova (II, QF[Kostanic Tosic {58}/Perebiynis {72}], 1) Indian Wells w/Petrova (I+, 1R[Likhovtseva {29}/Medina Garrigues {19}], 0) Miami w/Garbin (Ireq, R16[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 1) Amelia Island w/Stewart (II, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 1) — Gajdosova/Stubbs Charleston w/Santangelo (I, QF[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 2) — Chan/Chuang {5} Strasbourg w/Sun (III, F[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 3) Roland Garros w/Santangelo (Slam, Win, 6) — Chan/Chuang {5}, Black/Huber {2}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {7} Eastbourne w/Santangelo (II, 1R[Déchy {12}/Sun {25}], 0) Wimbledon w/Santangelo (Slam, SF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 4) — Morariu/Schnyder, Kirilenko/Vesnina {12}, Peng/Yan Los Angeles w/Santangelo (II, F[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {11}], 3) — Morariu/Shaughnessy Canadian Open w/Santangelo (I, SF[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 1+ 1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Santangelo (Slam, R16[Szavay {42}/Uhlirova {31}], 2) Moscow w/RadwanskaA (I, 1R[Azarenka {47}/Poutchek {68}], 0) Zurich w/Santangelo (I, QF[Peng {27}/Tu {33}], 1) — Déchy/Safina Linz w/Santangelo (II, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1+ 1 walkover) Corina Morariu — Initial Rank: 34 • Final Rank: 76 • Best Rank: 33 • Events: 13 Sydney w/Stubbs (II, QF[Loit {49}/Pratt {40}], 1) Australian Open w/Stubbs (Slam, 1R[Bovina {—}/Kudryavtseva {113}], 0) Indian Wells w/Wozniacki (I+, R16[Likhovtseva {29}/Medina Garrigues {19}], 1) Miami w/Schiavone (Ireq, R16[Golovin {196}/Safina {17}], 1) — Ruano Pascual/Suárez {6} Amelia Island w/Jankovic (II, 1R[Medina Garrigues {22}/Ruano Pascual {14}], 0) Charleston w/Schnyder (I, R16[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 1) Roland Garros w/Schnyder (Slam, 1R[Camerin {54}/Dulko {26}], 0) Wimbledon w/Schnyder (Slam, 1R[Molik {19}/Santangelo {8}], 0) San Diego w/Schnyder (I, R16[Black {1}/L. Huber {4}], 1) Los Angeles w/Shaughnessy (II, 1R[Molik {13}/Santangelo {8}], 0) Canadian Open w/Shaughnessy (I, 1R[Szavay {44}/Uhlirova {34}], 0) New Haven w/Shaughnessy (II, 1R[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 0) U. S. Open w/Shaughnessy (Slam, QF[Peschke {12}/Stubbs {10}], 3) Shahar Peer — Initial Rank: 27 • Final Rank: 29 • Best Rank: 25 • Events: 19 Gold Coast w/Kirilenko (III, QF[King {61}/Pratt {43}], 1) Australian Open w/Bartoli (Slam, 1R[Garbin {69}/Vinci {98}], 0) Pan Pacific w/Bartoli (I, 1R[Dushevina {48}/Kirilenko {30}], 0) Memphis w/King (III, 1R[Hradecka {60}/Voracova {76}], 0) Indian Wells w/King (I+, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 2) — Beltrame/Sugiyama Miami w/King (Ireq, R16[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 1) Charleston w/Obziler (I, 1R[Dominguez Lino {72}/Krajicek {53}], 0) Berlin w/Safina (I, R16[withdrew], 1) Rome w/Safina (I, 1R[Hantuchova {11}/Petrova {35}], 0) Roland Garros w/Safina (Slam, R16[Srebotnik {9}/Sugiyama {20}], 2) Eastbourne w/Garbin (II, 1R[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {9}], 0) Wimbledon w/Mirza (Slam, R16[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 2) Stanford w/Mirza (II, Win, 4) San Diego w/Mirza (I, R16[Hsieh {77}/Kudryavtseva {66}], 1) Canadian Open w/Garbin (I, R16[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1) U. S. Open w/Garbin (Slam, R16[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 2) Luxembourg w/Azarenka (II, F[Benesova {49}/Husarova {28}], 3) Stuttgart w/Husarova (II+, 1R[A. Radwanska {81}/Zahlavova Strycova {90}], 0) Zurich w/Hantuchova (I, 1R[Medina Garrigues {25}/Pennetta {48}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 160 Peng Shuai — Initial Rank: 105 • Final Rank: 20 • Best Rank: 20 • Events: 16 Gold Coast w/Li Na (III, QF[Benesova {35}/Voskoboeva {48}], 1) — Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {3} Australian Open w/Li Na (Slam, R32[Schiavone {9}/Schnyder {—}], 1) Pattaya City w/Castano (IV, 1R[Ji {123}/Sun {26}], 0) Indian Wells w/Sun (I+, 1R[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 0) Charleston w/Sun (I, F[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 3+ 1 walkover) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Raymond/Stosur {1} Berlin w/Sromova (I, 1R[Peer {31}/Safina {19}], 0) Wimbledon w/Yan (Slam, QF[Molik {19}/Santangelo {8}], 3) — Chan/Chuang {3} Stanford w/Golovin (II, QF[Hsieh {84}/Kudryavtseva {76}], 1) San Diego w/King (I, QF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) — Jankovic/Petrova {8] Los Angeles w/Yan (II, 1R[Hantuchova {36}/Hingis {80}], 0) Canadian Open w/Yan (I, QF[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 2) U. S. Open w/Yan (Slam, R32[Hantuchova {39}/Hingis {74}], 1) Beijing w/Yan (II, SF[Chuang {9}/Hsieh {77}], 2) Guangzhou w/Yan (III, Win, 4) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {2}, King/Sun {1} Zurich w/Tu (I, SF[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 2) — Molik/Santangelo {4} Linz w/RadwanskaA (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Kveta Peschke — Initial Rank: 8 • Final Rank: 11 • Best Rank: 8 • Events: 19 Paris w/Husarova (II, 1R[Daniilidou {21}/Woehr {54}], 0) Antwerp w/Husarova (II, SF[Black {3}/L. Huber {9}], 2) Dubai w/Husarova (II+, QF[Hantuchova {14}/Sugiyama {11}], 1) — Hingis/Kirilenko Doha w/Husarova (II, QF[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 1) Miami w/Stubbs (Ireq, R16[Santangelo {49}/Stewart {60}], 1) Berlin w/Stubbs (I, SF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 0+ 2 walkover) Rome w/Stubbs (I, SF[Déchy {15}/Santangelo {24}], 2) — Sun/Yan {5} Roland Garros w/Stubbs (Slam, R16[Camerin {54}/Dulko {26}], 2) Eastbourne w/Stubbs (II, F[Raymond {2}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Dushevina/Sugiyama, Black/Huber {2} Wimbledon w/Stubbs (Slam, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 3) San Diego w/Stubbs (I, R16[Golovin {109}/Safina {18}], 0) Los Angeles w/Stubbs (II, Win, 4) — Jankovic/Petrova, Dulko/Kirilenko {4}, Molik/Santangelo {1} New Haven w/Stubbs (II, SF[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 2) U. S. Open w/Stubbs (Slam, SF[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 4) — Hantuchova/Hingis, Morariu/Shaughnessy {13} Stuttgart w/Stubbs (II+, Win, 4) — Chan/Safina {2} Moscow w/Stubbs (I, QF[Benesova {34}/Voskoboeva {40}], 1) Zurich w/Stubbs (I, Win, 4) — Srebotnik/Sugiyama {2}, Raymond/Schiavone Linz w/Stubbs (II, SF[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {9}], 2) Madrid Championships w/Stubbs (Champ, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Lisa Raymond — Initial Rank: 1 • Final Rank: 3 • Best Rank: 1 • Events: 16 Sydney w/Stosur (II, 1R[Loit {49}/Pratt {40}], 0) Australian Open w/Stosur (Slam, SF[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 4) — Schiavone/Schnyder, Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {7} Pan Pacific w/Stosur (I, Win, 4) — King/Stubbs Memphis w/Stosur (III, QF[withdrew], 1) Indian Wells w/Stosur (I+, Win, 5) — King/Peer {8}, Chan/Chuang {5} Miami w/Stosur (Ireq, Win, 5) — Loit/Pratt, Chan/Chuang {8}, Black/Huber {2} Amelia Island w/Petrova (II, QF[Santangelo {40}/Srebotnik {9}], 1) Charleston w/Stosur (I, R16[Peng {94}/Sun {44}], 0) Berlin w/Stosur (I, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Peschke/Stubbs {4} Rome w/Stosur (I, R16[Husarova {31}/Shaughnessy {21}], 0) Roland Garros w/Stosur (Slam, SF[Srebotnik {9}/Sugiyama {29}], 4) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {8} Eastbourne w/Stosur (II, Win, 4) — Kirilenko/Likhovtseva, Peschke/Stubbs {3} Wimbledon w/Stosur (Slam, SF[Srebotnik {7}/Sugiyama {16}], 4) — Mirza/Peer {16}, Peschke/Stubbs {5} New Haven w/Davenport (II, 1R[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) U. S. Open w/Stosur (Slam, R16[Mattek {46}/Mirza {20}], 2) Zurich w/Schiavone (I, F[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 3) — Chan/Chuang {3}, Black/Huber {1}

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 161 Virginia Ruano Pascual — Initial Rank: 10 • Final Rank: 30 • Best Rank: 10 • Events: 17 Hobart w/Medina Garrigues (IV, F[Likhovtseva {28}/Vesnina {45}], 3) Australian Open w/Suárez (Slam, 1R[Loit {49}/Pratt {39}], 0) Indian Wells w/Suárez (I+, QF[Hradecka {59}/Voracova {70}], 2) Miami w/Suárez (Ireq, 1R[Morariu {52}/Schiavone {8}], 0) Amelia Island w/Medina Garrigues (II, F[Santangelo {40}/Srebotnik {9}], 3) — Husarova/Shaughnessy Charleston w/Medina Garrigues (I, 1R[Dulko {30}/Pennetta {46}], 0) Berlin w/Medina Garrigues (I, 1R[Loit {64}/Stewart {48}], 0) Rome w/Medina Garrigues (I, 1R[Benesova {64}/Voskoboeva {37}], 0) Roland Garros w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 3) — Déchy/Mauresmo 's-Hertogenbosch w/Medina Garrigues (III, F[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 3) Wimbledon w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, R16[Likhovtseva {26}/Sun {24}], 1+ 1 walkover) Stockholm w/Medina Garrigues (IV, Win, 4) Canadian Open w/Medina Garrigues (I, 1R[Camerin {80}/Dulko {29}], 0) New Haven w/Medina Garrigues (II, 1R[Benesova {70}/Mattek {60}], 0) U. S. Open w/Medina Garrigues (Slam, R16[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) Beijing w/Medina Garrigues (II, QF[Han {266}/Xu {280}], 1) Guangzhou w/Medina Garrigues (III, SF[Peng {34}/Yan {14}], 2) Dinara Saﬁna — Initial Rank: 16 • Final Rank: 14 • Best Rank: 14 • Events: 16 Gold Coast w/Srebotnik (III, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Srebotnik (Slam, R16[Chan {107}/Chuang {75}], 2) Paris w/Srebotnik (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Indian Wells w/Vaidisova (I+, R16[Ruano Pascual {12}/Suárez {16}], 1) Miami w/Golovin (Ireq, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 2) — Clijsters/Maes, Morariu/Schiavone Charleston w/Srebotnik (I, QF[withdrew], 1) Berlin w/Peer (I, R16[withdrew], 1) Rome w/Peer (I, 1R[Hantuchova {11}/Petrova {35}], 0) Roland Garros w/Peer (Slam, R16[Srebotnik {9}/Sugiyama {20}], 2) Wimbledon w/Vinci (Slam, 1R[Daniilidou {44}/Woehr {54}], 0) San Diego w/Golovin (I, QF[Azarenka {86}/Chakvetadze {78}], 2) — Peschke/Stubbs {4} U. S. Open w/Déchy (Slam, Win, 6) — Garbin/Peer {12}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {3}, Peschke/Stubbs {6}, Chan/Chuang {5} Stuttgart w/Chan (II+, F[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 3) Moscow w/Likhovtseva (I, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 2) Zurich w/Déchy (I, 1R[Molik {11}/Santangelo {5}], 0) Linz w/Dulko (II, QF[withdrew], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 162 Mara Santangelo — Initial Rank: 41 • Final Rank: 9 • Best Rank: 5 • Events: 22 Hobart w/Chakvetadze (IV, 1R[Medina Garrigues {19}/Ruano Pascual {10}], 0) Australian Open w/Chakvetadze (Slam, 1R[Safina {16}/Srebotnik {7}], 0) Pan Pacific w/Pratt (I, 1R[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 0) Pattaya City w/Pratt (IV, Win, 4) — Gajdosova/Kostanic Tosic {4}, Chan/Chuang {1} Bangalore w/Mirza (III, SF[Hsieh {105}/Kudryavtseva {92}], 2) Dubai w/Uhlirova (II+, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 1) Doha w/Douchevina (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Miami w/Stewart (Ireq, QF[Hantuchova {13}/Hingis {103}], 2) — Peschke/Stubbs {4} Amelia Island w/Srebotnik (II, Win, 4) — Petrova/Raymond {3}, Black/Huber {1}, Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {4} Charleston w/Molik (I, QF[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 2) — Chan/Chuang {5} Warsaw w/Srebotnik (II, SF[Dushevina {43}/Perebiynis {66}], 2) Berlin w/Grönefeld (I, R16[Husarova {32}/Shaughnessy {21}], 1) Rome w/Déchy (I, Win, 5) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Peschke/Stubbs {3} Roland Garros w/Molik (Slam, Win, 6) — Chan/Chuang {5}, Black/Huber {2}, Srebotnik/Sugiyama {7} Eastbourne w/Molik (II, 1R[Déchy {12}/Sun {25}], 0) Wimbledon w/Molik (Slam, SF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 4) — Morariu/Schnyder, Kirilenko/Vesnina {12}, Peng/Yan Los Angeles w/Molik (II, F[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {11}], 3) — Morariu/Shaughnessy Canadian Open w/Molik (I, SF[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 1+ 1 walkover) New Haven w/Mirza (II, Win, 4) — Morariu/Shaughnessy, Husarova/Schnyder, Peschke/Stubbs {2}, Black/Huber {1} U. S. Open w/Molik (Slam, R16[Szavay {42}/Uhlirova {31}], 2) Zurich w/Molik (I, QF[Peng {27}/Tu {33}], 1) — Déchy/Safina Linz w/Molik (II, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1+ 1 walkover) Francesca Schiavone — Initial Rank: 9 • Final Rank: 48 • Best Rank: 8 • Events: 14 Sydney w/Bovina (II, 1R[Dushevina {57}/Fedak {36}], 0) Australian Open w/Schnyder (Slam, R16[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 2) — Likhovtseva/Vesnina {13} Pan Pacific w/Vinci (I, 1R[Dementieva {45}/Savchuk {—}], 0) Dubai w/Srebotnik (II+, SF[Kuznetsova {40}/Molik {148}], 2) Indian Wells w/Vinci (I+, 1R[Camerin {45}/Dulko {28}], 0) Miami w/Morariu (Ireq, R16[Golovin {196}/Safina {17}], 1) — Ruano Pascual/Suárez {6} Rome w/Gagliardi (I, 1R[Husarova {31}/Shaughnessy {21}], 0) Roland Garros w/Gagliardi (Slam, R16[Medina Garrigues {33}/Ruano Pascual {15}], 2) — King/Kostanic {12} Wimbledon w/Gagliardi (Slam, 1R[Gajdosova {51}/Morigami {80}], 0) Canadian Open w/Vinci (I, R16[Foretz {89}/Sfar {94}], 1) New Haven w/Camerin (II, 1R[Pennetta {53}/Stewart {61}], 0) U. S. Open w/Knapp (Slam, 1R[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 0) Stuttgart w/Srebotnik (II+, QF[withdrew], 1) Zurich w/Raymond (I, F[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 3) — Chan/Chuang {3}, Black/Huber {1}

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 163 Meghann Shaughnessy — Initial Rank: 15 • Final Rank: 17 • Best Rank: 12 • Events: 22 Gold Coast w/Grönefeld (III, 1R[N. Li {73}/Peng {105}], 0) Sydney w/Grönefeld (II, Win, 4) — Loit/Pratt, Bartoli/Tu Australian Open w/Grönefeld (Slam, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Camerin/Dulko {12} Pan Pacific w/Zvonareva (I, 1R[Likhovtseva {35}/Vesnina {41}], 0) Dubai w/Grönefeld (II+, 1R[Kuznetsova {40}/Molik {148}], 0) Doha w/Grönefeld (II, SF[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 2) Indian Wells w/Husarova (I+, 1R[Hradecka {59}/Voracova {70}], 0) Miami w/Husarova (Ireq, R16[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 1) Amelia Island w/Husarova (II, SF[Medina Garrigues {22}/Ruano Pascual {14}], 2) — Yan/Zheng {2} Charleston w/Husarova (I, 1R[Peng {94}/Sun {44}], 0) Berlin w/Husarova (I, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 2) — Grönefeld/Santangelo {7} Rome w/Husarova (I, QF[Déchy {15}/Santangelo {24}], 2) — Raymond/Stosur {1} Roland Garros w/Husarova (Slam, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 3) 's-Hertogenbosch w/Husarova (III, QF[withdrew], 1) Wimbledon w/Husarova (Slam, R16[Kuznetsova {52}/Petrova {35}], 2) Stanford w/Husarova (II, 1R[Hsieh {84}/Kudryavtseva {76}], 0) San Diego w/Husarova (I, 1R[Vanc {65}/Rodionova {70}], 0) Los Angeles w/Morariu (II, 1R[Molik {13}/Santangelo {8}], 0) Canadian Open w/Morariu (I, 1R[Szavay {44}/Uhlirova {34}], 0) New Haven w/Morariu (II, 1R[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 0) U. S. Open w/Morariu (Slam, QF[Peschke {12}/Stubbs {10}], 3) Luxembourg w/Chan (II, QF[Dushevina {30}/Perebiynis {70}], 1) Katarina Srebotnik — Initial Rank: 7 • Final Rank: 4 • Best Rank: 4 • Events: 20 Gold Coast w/Safina (III, Win, 4) Australian Open w/Safina (Slam, R16[Chan {107}/Chuang {75}], 2) Paris w/Safina (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Dubai w/Schiavone (II+, SF[Kuznetsova {40}/Molik {148}], 2) Miami w/Sugiyama (Ireq, 1R[Hantuchova {13}/Hingis {103}], 0) Amelia Island w/Santangelo (II, Win, 4) — Petrova/Raymond {3}, Black/Huber {1}, Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {4} Charleston w/Safina (I, QF[withdrew], 1) Warsaw w/Santangelo (II, SF[Dushevina {43}/Perebiynis {66}], 2) Berlin w/Sugiyama (I, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 2) Rome w/Sugiyama (I, R16[Garbin {45}/Vinci {55}], 0) Roland Garros w/Sugiyama (Slam, F[Molik {59}/Santangelo {21}], 5) — Peer/Safina {11}, Camerin/Dulko {16}, Raymond/ Stosur {1} Wimbledon w/Sugiyama (Slam, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 4+ 1 walkover) — Loit/Pratt, Likhovtseva/Sun {10}, Raymond/ Stosur {1} Stanford w/Sugiyama (II, SF[Azarenka {113}/Chakvetadze {97}], 2) San Diego w/Sugiyama (I, SF[Azarenka {86}/Chakvetadze {78}], 2) Canadian Open w/Sugiyama (I, Win, 4) — Peng/Yan {6}, Molik/Santangelo {3}, Black/Huber {1} U. S. Open w/Sugiyama (Slam, QF[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 3) — King/Loit {15} Stuttgart w/Schiavone (II+, QF[withdrew], 1) Zurich w/Sugiyama (I, QF[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 1) — Husarova/Zvonareva Linz w/Sugiyama (II, F[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 2+ 1 walkover) — Peschke/Stubbs {3} Madrid Championships w/Sugiyama (Champ, F[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1) — Chan/Chuang {3}

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 164 Samantha Stosur — Initial Rank: 2 • Final Rank: 5 • Best Rank: 1 • Events: 13 Sydney w/Raymond (II, 1R[Loit {49}/Pratt {40}], 0) Australian Open w/Raymond (Slam, SF[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 4) — Schiavone/Schnyder, Grönefeld/Shaughnessy {7} Pan Pacific w/Raymond (I, Win, 4) — King/Stubbs Memphis w/Raymond (III, QF[withdrew], 1) Indian Wells w/Raymond (I+, Win, 5) — King/Peer {8}, Chan/Chuang {5} Miami w/Raymond (Ireq, Win, 5) — Loit/Pratt, Chan/Chuang {8}, Black/Huber {2} Charleston w/Raymond (I, R16[Peng {94}/Sun {44}], 0) Berlin w/Raymond (I, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Peschke/Stubbs {4} Rome w/Raymond (I, R16[Husarova {31}/Shaughnessy {21}], 0) Roland Garros w/Raymond (Slam, SF[Srebotnik {9}/Sugiyama {29}], 4) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {8} Eastbourne w/Raymond (II, Win, 4) — Kirilenko/Likhovtseva, Peschke/Stubbs {3} Wimbledon w/Raymond (Slam, SF[Srebotnik {7}/Sugiyama {16}], 4) — Mirza/Peer {16}, Peschke/Stubbs {5} U. S. Open w/Raymond (Slam, R16[Mattek {46}/Mirza {20}], 2) Rennae Stubbs — Initial Rank: 6 • Final Rank: 10 • Best Rank: 6 • Events: 20 Sydney w/Morariu (II, QF[Loit {49}/Pratt {40}], 1) Australian Open w/Morariu (Slam, 1R[Bovina {—}/Kudryavtseva {113}], 0) Pan Pacific w/King (I, F[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Likhovtseva/Vesnina, Yan/Zheng {2} Miami w/Peschke (Ireq, R16[Santangelo {49}/Stewart {60}], 1) Amelia Island w/Gajdosova (II, 1R[Molik {71}/Stewart {57}], 0) Charleston w/King (I, R16[Pratt {36}/Stewart {55}], 1) Berlin w/Peschke (I, SF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 0+ 2 walkover) Rome w/Peschke (I, SF[Déchy {15}/Santangelo {24}], 2) — Sun/Yan {5} Roland Garros w/Peschke (Slam, R16[Camerin {54}/Dulko {26}], 2) Eastbourne w/Peschke (II, F[Raymond {2}/Stosur {1}], 3) — Dushevina/Sugiyama, Black/Huber {2} Wimbledon w/Peschke (Slam, QF[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 3) San Diego w/Peschke (I, R16[Golovin {109}/Safina {18}], 0) Los Angeles w/Peschke (II, Win, 4) — Jankovic/Petrova, Dulko/Kirilenko {4}, Molik/Santangelo {1} New Haven w/Peschke (II, SF[Mirza {24}/Santangelo {6}], 2) U. S. Open w/Peschke (Slam, SF[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 4) — Hantuchova/Hingis, Morariu/Shaughnessy {13} Stuttgart w/Peschke (II+, Win, 4) — Chan/Safina {2} Moscow w/Peschke (I, QF[Benesova {34}/Voskoboeva {40}], 1) Zurich w/Peschke (I, Win, 4) — Srebotnik/Sugiyama {2}, Raymond/Schiavone Linz w/Peschke (II, SF[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {9}], 2) Madrid Championships w/Peschke (Champ, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Paola Suárez — Initial Rank: 14 • Final Rank: 103 • Best Rank: 11 • Events: 8 Auckland w/Husarova (IV, Win, 4) — Daniilidou/Woehr {3} Australian Open w/Ruano Pascual (Slam, 1R[Loit {49}/Pratt {39}], 0) Bogota w/Dominguez Lino (III, Win, 4) — Pennetta/Vinci {2} Indian Wells w/Ruano Pascual (I+, QF[Hradecka {59}/Voracova {70}], 2) Miami w/Ruano Pascual (Ireq, 1R[Morariu {52}/Schiavone {8}], 0) Roland Garros w/Grönefeld (Slam, 1R[Krajicek {53}/A. Radwanska {186}], 0) Wimbledon w/Garbin (Slam, 1R[Kuznetsova {52}/Petrova {35}], 0) U. S. Open w/Vinci (Slam, 1R[Marrero {226}/Sfar {85}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 165 Ai Sugiyama — Initial Rank: 12 • Final Rank: 6 • Best Rank: 6 • Events: 21 Sydney w/Hantuchova (II, QF[withdrew], 1) Australian Open w/Hantuchova (Slam, QF[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 3) — Medina Garrigues/Mirza {10} Pan Pacific w/Hantuchova (I, 1R[Jankovic {51}/Mattek {47}], 0) Dubai w/Hantuchova (II+, SF[Black {3}/Huber {6}], 2) — Husarova/Peschke Indian Wells w/Beltrame (I+, 1R[King {31}/Peer {33}], 0) Miami w/Srebotnik (Ireq, 1R[Hantuchova {13}/Hingis {103}], 0) Gifu $50K w/Morita ($50K, Win, 4) Berlin w/Srebotnik (I, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 2) Rome w/Srebotnik (I, R16[Garbin {45}/Vinci {55}], 0) Roland Garros w/Srebotnik (Slam, F[Molik {59}/Santangelo {21}], 5) — Peer/Safina {11}, Camerin/Dulko {16}, Raymond/ Stosur {1} Eastbourne w/Douchevina (II, QF[Peschke {14}/Stubbs {9}], 1) Wimbledon w/Srebotnik (Slam, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {4}], 4+ 1 walkover) — Loit/Pratt, Likhovtseva/Sun {10}, Raymond/ Stosur {1} Stanford w/Srebotnik (II, SF[Azarenka {113}/Chakvetadze {97}], 2) San Diego w/Srebotnik (I, SF[Azarenka {86}/Chakvetadze {78}], 2) Canadian Open w/Srebotnik (I, Win, 4) — Peng/Yan {6}, Molik/Santangelo {3}, Black/Huber {1} U. S. Open w/Srebotnik (Slam, QF[Déchy {14}/Safina {19}], 3) — King/Loit {15} Seoul w/SKim (IV, QF[Chuang {7}/Hsieh {46}], 1) Japan Open w/Morita (III, 1R[Chuang {7}/King {23}], 0) Zurich w/Srebotnik (I, QF[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 1) — Husarova/Zvonareva Linz w/Srebotnik (II, F[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 2+ 1 walkover) — Peschke/Stubbs {3} Madrid Championships w/Srebotnik (Champ, F[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1) — Chan/Chuang {3} Sun Tiantian — Initial Rank: 30 • Final Rank: 16 • Best Rank: 16 • Events: 23 Auckland w/S. Sun (IV, SF[withdrew], 2) Sydney w/King (II, QF[Black {5}/L. Huber {16}], 1) — Déchy/Zvonareva Australian Open w/S. Sun (Slam, QF[Yan {4}/Zheng {3}], 3) — Déchy/Zvonareva {8} Pan Pacific w/Li Na (I, 1R[Yan {5}/Zheng {4}], 0) Pattaya City w/Ji (IV, SF[Chan {31}/Chuang {25}], 2) — Fedak/Rodionova {3} Indian Wells w/Peng (I+, 1R[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 0) Miami w/Rodionova (Ireq, 1R[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 0) Amelia Island w/King (II, 1R[Petrova {26}/Raymond {1}], 0) Charleston w/Peng (I, F[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 3+ 1 walkover) — Husarova/Shaughnessy, Raymond/Stosur {1} Prague w/Horiatopoulos (IV, 1R[Vanc {62}/Rodionova {67}], 0) Rome w/Yan (I, QF[Peschke {10}/Stubbs {7}], 1+ 1 walkover) Strasbourg w/Molik (III, F[Yan {5}/Zheng {6}], 3) Roland Garros w/S. Sun (Slam, R32[Medina Garrigues {33}/Ruano Pascual {15}], 1) Birmingham w/Tu (III, F[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) — Black/Huber {1} Eastbourne w/Déchy (II, QF[withdrew], 1) — Molik/Santangelo {4} Wimbledon w/Likhovtseva (Slam, QF[Srebotnik {7}/Sugiyama {16}], 3) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {8} Los Angeles w/King (II, 1R[Poutchek {78}/Rodionova {68}], 0) Canadian Open w/Déchy (I, SF[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 1+ 1 walkover) U. S. Open w/Likhovtseva (Slam, 1R[Harkleroad {88}/Zvonareva {23}], 0) Beijing w/S. Sun (II, 1R[Jidkova {99}/Wozniacki {175}], 0) Guangzhou w/King (III, F[Peng {34}/Sun {14}], 3) — Craybas/Kostanic Tosic {4} Japan Open w/Yan (III, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Chuang/King {1} Bangkok w/Yan (III, Win, 3+ 1 walkover)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 166 Agnes Szavay — Initial Rank: 104 • Final Rank: 26 • Best Rank: 22 • Events: 15 Dubai $75K w/Laine ($75K, QF[A. Bondarenko {53}/K. Bondarenko {64}, 1) Auckland w/Loit (IV, QF[Husarova {39}/Suárez {14}], 1) Australian Open w/Krajicek (Slam, R32[Hantuchova {14}/Sugiyama {13}], 1) Paris w/Beygelzimer (II, 1R[Bremond {114}/Cohen Aloro {86}], 0) Dubai w/Medina Garrigues (II+, 1R[KBondarenko {61}/Dushevina {44}], 0) Doha w/Uhlirova (II, F[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 2+ 1 walkover) Budapest w/Uhlirova (IV, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) Zagreb $75K+H w/ Laine ($75K+H, Win, 3) Roland Garros w/Uhlirova (Slam, R16[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 2) — Garbin/Tu {13} Wimbledon w/Uhlirova (Slam, R32[Mirza {40}/Peer {36}], 1) Palermo w/Wozniacki (IV, QF[Lefevre {125}/Szatmari {148}], 1) — Dominguez Lino/Pennetta {2} Bad Gastein w/Uhlirova (III, F[Hradecka {58}/Voracova {49}], 3) Canadian Open w/Uhlirova (I, R16[Peng {46}/Yan {11}], 1) — Morariu/Shaughnessy New Haven w/Uhlirova (II, QF[withdrew], 1) U. S. Open w/Uhlirova (Slam, SF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 4) — Molik/Santangelo {4} Vladimira Uhlirova — Initial Rank: 81 • Final Rank: 19 • Best Rank: 18 • Events: 31 Lawrenceville $50K 2006 w/Dekmeijere ($50K, SF[Fusano {145}/Tsoubanos {147}], 2) Milan $50K+H 2006 w/Kloesel ($50K+H, 1R[Birnerova {85}/Foretz {77}], 0) Dubai $75K 2006 w/Sfar ($75K, SF[Jugic-Salkic {97}/Kostanic Tosic {59}], 2) Auckland w/ChanC (IV, 1R[Daniilidou {22}/Woehr {66}], 0) Hobart w/Morigami (IV, QF[Likhovtseva {28}/Vesnina {45}], 1) Australian Open w/Arvidsson (Slam, R32[Raymond {1}/Stosur {1}], 1) Ortisei $75K w/GNavratilova ($75K, SF[Kustova {138}/Poutchek {95}], 2) Paris w/GNavratilova (II, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 1+ 2 walkover) Antwerp w/GNavratilova (II, 1R[Benesova {39}/Krajicek {46}], 0) Dubai w/Santangelo (II+, QF[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 1) Doha w/Szavay (II, F[Hingis {—}/Kirilenko {35}], 2+ 1 walkover) Indian Wells w/Laine (I+, R16[King {31}/Peer {33}], 1) Charleston w/Gajdosova (I, 1R[Pratt {36}/Stewart {55}], 0) Budapest w/Szavay (IV, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) Warsaw w/Gajdosova (II, 1R[Garbin {74}/Krajicek {53}], 0) Berlin w/Fedak (I, 1R[Grönefeld {12}/Santangelo {24}], 0) Rome w/Fedak (I, 1R[Knapp {312}/Oprandi {228}], 0) Strasbourg w/Fedak (III, QF[Bardina {228}/Dushevina {32}], 1) Roland Garros w/Szavay (Slam, R16[Raymond {1}/Stosur {2}], 2) — Garbin/Tu {13} Birmingham w/Granville (III, 1R[Craybas {83}/Krajicek {47}], 0) Eastbourne w/Granville (II, QF[Raymond {2}/Stosur {3}], 1) Wimbledon w/Szavay (Slam, R32[Mirza {40}/Peer {36}], 1) Bad Gastein w/Szavay (III, F[Hradecka {58}/Voracova {49}], 3) Canadian Open w/Szavay (I, R16[Peng {46}/Yan {11}], 1) — Morariu/Shaughnessy New Haven w/Szavay (II, QF[withdrew], 1) U. S. Open w/Szavay (Slam, SF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 4) — Molik/Santangelo {4} Luxembourg w/Krajicek (II, SF[Benesova {49}/Husarova {28}], 2) Stuttgart w/Krajicek (II+, QF[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 1) Moscow w/Krajicek (I, 1R[Loit {46}/Tu {36}], 0) Zurich w/Krajicek (I, 1R[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Linz w/Krajicek (II, QF[Peschke {11}/Stubbs {10}], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 167 Elena Vesnina — Initial Rank: 46 • Final Rank: 45 • Best Rank: 22 • Events: 18 Gold Coast w/Likhovtseva (III, QF[Black {5}/L. Huber {17}], 1) Hobart w/Likhovtseva (IV, Win, 4) — Camerin/Dulko {2}, Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {1} Australian Open w/Likhovtseva (Slam, 1R[Schiavone {9}/Schnyder {—}], 0) Pan Pacific w/Likhovtseva (I, QF[King {46}/Stubbs {7}], 1) — Shaughnessy/Zvonareva {4} Antwerp w/Likhovtseva (II, F[Black {3}/L. Huber {6}], 3) — Déchy/Zvonareva {2} Dubai w/Likhovtseva (II+, 1R[Vanc {58}/Rodionova {72}], 0) Miami w/Likhovtseva (Ireq, R16[Hantuchova {13}/Hingis {103}], 1) Amelia Island w/Douchevina (II, QF[Medina Garrigues {22}/Ruano Pascual {14}], 1) — Bartoli/Tu Charleston w/Douchevina (I, R16[Dulko {30}/Pennetta {46}], 1) Warsaw w/Likhovtseva (II, F[Dushevina {43}/Perebiynis {66}], 3) Berlin w/Likhovtseva (I, 1R[A. Bondarenko {61}/KBondarenko {63}], 0) Roland Garros w/Likhovtseva (Slam, 1R[Gajdosova {62}/Morigami {96}], 0) Wimbledon w/Kirilenko (Slam, R16[Molik {19}/Santangelo {8}], 2) Stockholm w/Douchevina (IV, SF[withdrew], 2) U. S. Open w/Kirilenko (Slam, 1R[Morigami {61}/Tu {35}], 0) Moscow w/Kirilenko (I, 1R[Black {1}/L. Huber {2}], 0) Zurich w/Kirilenko (I, 1R[Peschke {13}/Stubbs {10}], 0) Linz w/Kirilenko (II, 1R[A. Bondarenko {58}/KBondarenko {54}], 0) Serena or Venus Williams — (not ranked in 2007) ¥ Events: 1 Wimbledon w/Williams (Slam, R32[withdrew], 1) Yan Zi — Initial Rank: 4 • Final Rank: 15 • Best Rank: 4 • Events: 18 Australian Open w/Zheng (Slam, SF[Chan {107}/Chuang {75}], 4) — Dementieva/Pennetta {14} Pan Pacific w/Zheng (I, SF[King {46}/Stubbs {7}], 2) — N. Li/T. Sun Indian Wells w/Zheng (I+, QF[Chan {25}/Chuang {21}], 2) Miami w/Zheng (Ireq, QF[Chan {21}/Chuang {18}], 2) Amelia Island w/Zheng (II, QF[Husarova {34}/Shaughnessy {20}], 1) — Daniilidou/Pratt Charleston w/Zheng (I, Win, 4) — Morariu/Schnyder, Black/Huber {2} Berlin w/Zheng (I, R16[withdrew], 0) Rome w/Sun (I, QF[Peschke {10}/Stubbs {7}], 1+ 1 walkover) Strasbourg w/Zheng (III, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Molik/Sun {4} Roland Garros w/Zheng (Slam, 1R[Llagostera Vives {271}/M. J. Martinez {90}], 0) Birmingham w/King (III, SF[Chan {10}/Chuang {11}], 2) Wimbledon w/Peng (Slam, QF[Molik {19}/Santangelo {8}], 3) — Chan/Chuang {3} Los Angeles w/Peng (II, 1R[Hantuchova {36}/Hingis {80}], 0) Canadian Open w/Peng (I, QF[Srebotnik {5}/Sugiyama {7}], 2) U. S. Open w/Peng (Slam, R32[Hantuchova {39}/Hingis {74}], 1) Beijing w/Peng (II, SF[Chuang {9}/Hsieh {77}], 2) Guangzhou w/Peng (III, Win, 4) — Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual {2}, King/Sun {1} Japan Open w/Sun (III, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Chuang/King {1} Bangkok w/Sun (III, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) Zheng Jie — Initial Rank: 3 • Final Rank: 21 • Best Rank: 3 • Events: 8 Australian Open w/Yan (Slam, SF[Chan {107}/Chuang {75}], 4) — Dementieva/Pennetta {14} Pan Pacific w/Yan (I, SF[King {46}/Stubbs {7}], 2) — N. Li/T. Sun Indian Wells w/Yan (I+, QF[Chan {25}/Chuang {21}], 2) Miami w/Yan (Ireq, QF[Chan {21}/Chuang {18}], 2) Amelia Island w/Yan (II, QF[Husarova {34}/Shaughnessy {20}], 1) — Daniilidou/Pratt Charleston w/Yan (I, Win, 4) — Morariu/Schnyder, Black/Huber {2} Berlin w/Yan (I, R16[withdrew], 0) Strasbourg w/Yan (III, Win, 3+ 1 walkover) — Molik/Sun {4} Roland Garros w/Yan (Slam, 1R[Llagostera Vives {271}/M. J. Martinez {90}], 0)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 168 Vera Zvonareva — Initial Rank: 18 • Final Rank: 72 • Best Rank: 18 • Events: 11 Sydney w/Déchy (II, 1R[King {52}/Sun {29}], 0) Australian Open w/Déchy (Slam, R16[SunS {117}/Sun {30}], 2) Pan Paciﬁc w/Shaughnessy (I, 1R[Likhovtseva {35}/Vesnina {41}], 0) Antwerp w/Déchy (II, SF[Likhovtseva {32}/Vesnina {36}], 2) Indian Wells w/Déchy (I+, SF[Chan {25}/Chuang {21}], 3) — Likhovtseva/Medina Garrigues {6} Miami w/Déchy (Ireq, 1R[Kuznetsova {36}/Petrova {30}], 0) Charleston w/Déchy (I, QF[withdrew], 2) U. S. Open w/Harkleroad (Slam, R32[withdrew], 1) — Likhovtseva/Sun {8} Moscow w/Chakvetadze (I, 1R[Likhovtseva {27}/Saﬁna {15}], 0) Zurich w/Husarova (I, 1R[Srebotnik {6}/Sugiyama {9}], 0) Quebec City w/Tu (III, QF[Alves {181}/Jozami {161}], 1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 169 Doubles Upsets The 50 Biggest Doubles Upsets of 2007 On page 62, we saw the 100 biggest singles upsets of 2007, based on the ratio of player rankings. The list below is equivalent for doubles. We take the combined ranking of the winning team (with unranked players being treated as “999”), and divide it by the ranking of the losing team. The higher that ratio, the higher the team stands on this list. 1. Charleston R16: Peng (#94)/Sun (#44) def. Raymond (#1)/Stosur (#2). Ratio: 46.0 2. Sydney 1R: Loit (#49)/Pratt (#40) def. Raymond (#1)/Stosur (#1). Ratio: 44.5 3. Fukuoka $50K SF: Fujiwara(unr)/Namigata (#206) def. Chan (#18)/Chuang (#13). Ratio: 38.9 4. Doha SF: Hingis(unr)/Kirilenko (#35) def. Grönefeld (#13)/Shaughnessy (#15). Ratio: 36.9 5. U. S. Open R32: Camerin (#67)/Dulko (#25) def. Black (#1)/Huber (#2). Ratio: 30.7 6. Roland Garros 1R: Llagostera Vives (#271)/Martinez Sanches (#90) def. Yan (#5)/Zheng (#7). Ratio: 30.1 7. Australian Open SF: Chan (#107)/Chuang (#75) def. Yan (#4)/Zheng (#3). Ratio: 26.0 8. Australian Open 1R: Bovina(unr)/Kudryavtseva (#113) def. Morariu (#41)/Stubbs (#6). Ratio: 23.7 9. Doha QF: Hingis(unr)/Kirilenko (#35) def. Husarova (#37)/Peschke (#10). Ratio: 22.0 10. Stanford SF: Azarenka (#113)/Chakvetadze (#97) def. Srebotnik (#5)/Sugiyama (#7). Ratio: 17.5 11. Rome R16: Husarova (#31)/Shaughnessy (#21) def. Raymond (#1)/Stosur (#2). Ratio: 17.3 12. Australian Open 1R: Schiavone (#9)/Schnyder (unr) def. Likhovtseva (#24)/Vesnina (#37). Ratio: 16.5 13. Zurich SF: Raymond (#3)/Schiavone (#44) def. Black (#1)/Huber (#2). Ratio: 15.7 14. Berlin SF: Garbin (#69)/Vinci (#68) def. Black (#3)/Huber (#6). Ratio: 15.2 15. Rome SF: Garbin (#45)/Vinci (#55) def. Black (#3)/Huber (#4). Ratio: 14.3 16. Birmingham SF: Sun (#26)/Tu (#43) def. Black (#1)/Huber (#4). Ratio: 13.8 17. San Diego SF: Azarenka (#86)/Chakvetadze (#78) def. Srebotnik (#5)/Sugiyama (#7). Ratio: 13.7 18. Doha 1R: Hingis(unr)/Kirilenko (#35) def. Daniilidou (#22)/Woehr (#54). Ratio: 13.6 19. Australian Open 1R: Hingis(unr)/Kuznetsova (#45) def. Husarova (#35)/Jankovic (#46). Ratio: 12.9 20. Roland Garros SF: Srebotnik (#9)/Sugiyama (#29) def. Raymond (#1)/Stosur (#2). Ratio: 12.7 21. Pan Pacific 1R: Dementieva (#45)/Savchuk (unr) def. Schiavone (#9)/Vinci (#80). Ratio: 11.7 22. Beijing QF: Han (#266)/Xu (#280) def. Medina Garrigues (#25)/Ruano Pascual (#22). Ratio: 11.6 23. Roland Garros SF: Molik (#59)/Santangelo (#21) def. Black (#3)/Huber (#4). Ratio: 11.4 24. U. S. Open R16: Foretz (#83)/Shvedova (unr) def. Morigami (#61)/Tu (#35). Ratio: 11.3 25. Australian Open SF: Black (#5)/Huber (#17) def. Raymond (#1)/Stosur (#1). Ratio: 11.0 26. Istanbul F: A. Radwanska (#329)/U. Radwanska (#252) def. Chan (#16)/Mirza (#37). Ratio: 11.0 27. Dubai SF: Kuznetsova (#40)/Molik (#148) def. Schiavone (#8)/Srebotnik (#10). Ratio: 10.4 28. New Haven F: Mirza (#24)/Santangelo (#6) def. Black (#1)/Huber (#2). Ratio: 10.0 29. U. S. Open R16: Mattek (#46)/Mirza (#20) def. Raymond (#3)/Stosur (#4). Ratio: 9.4 30. Bogota 1R: Llagostera Vives (unr)/Marrero (unr) def. Argeri (#115)/Sobral (#116). Ratio: 8.6 31. Bangkok 1R: Mulsap (#625)/Wongteanchai (#549) def. Dominguez Lino (#65)/Parra Santonja (#75). Ratio: 8.4 32. Charleston 1R: Morariu (#50)/Schnyder (unr) def. Vanc (#59)/Rodionova (#70). Ratio: 8.1 33. Roland Garros 1R: Krajicek (#53)/A. Radwanska (#186) def. Grönefeld (#14)/Suárez (#16). Ratio: 8.0 34. Australian Open R16: Chan (#107)/Chuang (#75) def. Safina (#16)/Srebotnik (#7). Ratio: 7.9 35. Wimbledon SF: Srebotnik (#7)/Sugiyama (#16) def. Raymond (#1)/Stosur (#2). Ratio: 7.7 36. Bad Gastein 1R: Klaffner (#574)/Meusburger (#245) def. Benesova (#69)/Kostanic (#42). Ratio: 7.4 37. Bogota QF: Llagostera Vives (unr)/Marrero (unr) def. Baker (#138)/Kriz (#140). Ratio: 7.2 38. Amelia Island SF: Santangelo (#40)/Srebotnik (#9) def. Black (#3)/Huber (#4). Ratio: 7.0 39. Dubai 1R: Kuznetsova (#40)/Molik (#148) def. Grönefeld (#12)/Shaughnessy (#15). Ratio: 7.0 40. Gold Coast 1R: N. Li (#73)/Peng (#105) def. Grönefeld (#11)/Shaughnessy (#15). Ratio: 6.8 41. Rome 1R: Knapp (#312)/Oprandi (#228) def. Fedak (#42)/Uhlirova (#39). Ratio: 6.7 42. Miami R16: Santangelo (#49)/Stewart (#60) def. Peschke (#10)/Stubbs (#7). Ratio: 6.4 43. Australian Open R32: Schiavone (#9)/Schnyder (unr) def. N. Li (#66)/Peng (#99). Ratio: 6.1 44. Pan Pacific SF: King (#46)/Stubbs (#7) def. Yan (#5)/Zheng (#4). Ratio: 5.9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 170 45. Doha F: Hingis(unr)/Kirilenko (#35) def. Szavay (#121)/Uhlirova (#55). Ratio: 5.9 46. San Diego R16: Golovin (#109)/Safina (#18) def. Peschke (#14)/Stubbs (#8). Ratio: 5.8 47. Miami 1R: Hantuchova (#13)/Hingis (#103) def. Srebotnik (#9)/Sugiyama (#12). Ratio: 5.5 48. U. S. Open R16: Szavay (#42)/Uhlirova (#31) def. Molik (#8)/Santangelo (#6). Ratio: 5.2 49. Stockholm QF: Han (#362)/LuJ (#338) def. Grönefeld (#20)/Malek (#118). Ratio: 5.1 50. Barcelona 1R: de los Rios (#243)/Gallovits (#190) def. Kostanic (#44)/Perebiynis (#42). Ratio: 5.0

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 171 Doubles Team Winning Percentage The list below shows the doubles teams with the best match winning percentage (minimum three events, and the team must have a WTA event; team with ﬁve or fewer events in italics). The list also shows the number of events played and the number of events won. Note withdrawals do not count as losses, and walkovers are not wins. Team Rank Team Wins Losses Win % Titles Events 1 Safina/Srebotnik 8 1 88.9% 1 4 2Black/Huber 69 14 83.1% 9 23 3Raymond/Stosur 36 8 81.8% 5 13 4Chan/Chuang 49 12 80.3% 5 17 5Mattek/Mirza 8 2 80.0% 1 3 6 Sun/Yan 7 2 77.8% 2 3 7Yan/Zheng 18 6 75.0% 2 9 7Hantuchova/Hingis 6 2 75.0% 0 3 9 Peschke/Stubbs 32 12 72.7% 3 15 10 Szavay/Uhlirova 17 7 70.8% 1 8 11 Srebotnik/Sugiyama 26 11 70.3% 1 12 12 Mirza/Peer 7 3 70.0% 1 3 13 Kuznetsova/Petrova 9 4 69.2% 0 5 14 Molik/Santangelo 20 10 66.7% 1 9 14 S. Sun/T. Sun 6 3 66.7% 0 4 16 Hradecka/Voracova 15 9 62.5% 2 10 16 Dementieva/Pennetta 5 3 62.5% 0 4 18 Pratt/Stewart 6 4 60.0% 1 4 18 Peer/Safina 3 2 60.0% 0 3 20 Camerin/Dulko 14 10 58.3% 0 10 21 Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual 22 16 57.9% 1 14 22 Peng/Yan 12 9 57.1% 1 6 23 Hsieh/Kudryavtseva 7 6 53.8% 0 6 24 Azarenka/Chakvetadze 8 7 53.3% 0 7 25 Loit/Pratt 9 8 52.9% 0 8 25 Dushevina/Perebiynis 9 8 52.9% 1 6 27 Likhovtseva/Vesnina 13 13 50.0% 1 10 27 Dominguez Lino/Parra Santonja 8 8 50.0% 1 7 27 Poutchek/Rodionova 6 6 50.0% 0 6 27 Husarova/Peschke 4 4 50.0% 0 4 27 Pennetta/Vinci 5 5 50.0% 0 4 27 Krajicek/A. Radwanska 5 5 50.0% 0 3 33 Ji/S. Sun 10 11 47.6% 1 11 34 Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 9 10 47.4% 1 5 35 Hantuchova/Sugiyama 6 7 46.2% 0 4 36 Muller/GNavratilova 9 11 45.0% 0 11 37 A. Bondarenko/K. Bondarenko 13 18 41.9% 0 19 38 Baker/Kriz 5 7 41.7% 0 7 38 Nakamura/Tanasugarn 5 7 41.7% 0 5 40 Vanc/Rodionova 12 17 41.4% 1 14 41 Dechy/Zvonareva 9 13 40.9% 0 6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 172 Alternate Doubles Rankings Doubles 2005 Rankings: Best 11 Rankings with Quality Points For explanation of this system, see page 122. Note that I have added in all quality points here, not just those from a player’s best 11 events Overall, this ranking doesn’t make much difference, but note how much Santangelo rises.. 2005 Rank 2007 Rank Player Name 2005 Points Rank Difference 11Cara Black 6282 0 11Liezel Huber 6282 0 33Lisa Raymond 4419 0 44Katarina Srebotnik 4341 0 56Ai Sugiyama 4194 -1 65Samantha Stosur 3975 1 79Mara Santangelo 3867 -2 87Chuang Chia-jung 3839 1 98Chan Yung-jan 3778 1 10 10 Rennae Stubbs 3323 0 11 11 Kveta Peschke 3096 0 12 12 Alicia Molik 3027 0 13 13 Nathalie Déchy 2717 0 14 14 Dinara Saﬁna 2597 0 15 15 Yan Zi 2473 0 16 16 Sun Tiantian 2017 0 17 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 1980 0 18 18 Sania Mirza 1924 0 19 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 1817 0 20 20 Peng Shuai 1776 0 21 23 Gisela Dulko 1750 -2 22 24 Janette Husarova 1658 -2 23 21 Zheng Jie 1633 2 24 22 Elena Likhovtseva 1615 2 25 26 Agnes Szavay 1565 -1 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 1546 27 Vania King 1480 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 1346 29 Shahar Peer 1344 35 Maria Kirilenko 1207 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 1168 44 Daniela Hantuchova 1146 45 Elena Vesnina 1113 48 Francesca Schiavone 1100 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 943 54 Eleni Daniilidou 919 64 Martina Hingis 899 72 Vera Zvonareva 784 76 Corina Morariu 626 103 Paola Suárez 396 —Venus/Serena Williams 90 — Lindsay Daveport 79

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 173 Doubles 1996 Ranking System: The Divisor For background, see the discussion of the singles divisor ranking on page 123. This produces a much greater change than the preceding — note, e.g., Stosur rising to #3. And that’s with a divisor of 14, even though a lot of significant players had fewer than 14 doubles events. Lower divisors might haveput Hingis and Kuznersova, e.g., in the Top Twenty. But players like Shaughnessy fall hard. 1996 Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Cara Black 353.1 0 11Liezel Huber 353.1 0 35Samantha Stosur 284.1 -2 43Lisa Raymond 278.6 1 54Katarina Srebotnik 253.4 1 66Ai Sugiyama 215.0 0 77Chuang Chia-jung 214.1 0 89Mara Santangelo 203.5 -1 98Chan Yung-jan 201.7 1 10 10 Rennae Stubbs 176.7 0 11 11 Kveta Peschke 174.7 0 12 14 Dinara Saﬁna 170.4 -2 13 15 Yan Zi 162.3 -2 14 12 Alicia Molik 160.2 2 15 13 Nathalie Déchy 143.5 2 16 18 Sania Mirza 128.3 -2 17 21 Zheng Jie 116.7 -4 18 20 Peng Shuai 113.4 -2 19 26 Agnes Szavay 105.8 -7 20 16 Sun Tiantian 98.5 4 21 22 Elena Likhovtseva 96.6 -1 22 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 92.0 5 23 23 Gisela Dulko 86.7 0 24 27 Vania King 85.7 -3 25 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 83.4 -16 44 Daniela Hantuchova 81.9 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 79.5 48 Francesca Schiavone 78.8 24 Janette Husarova 76.8 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 75.5 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 73.1 29 Shahar Peer 71.2 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 67.6 64 Martina Hingis 64.2 45 Elena Vesnina 62.3 35 Maria Kirilenko 57.3 72 Vera Zvonareva 56.0 76 Corina Morariu 44.9 54 Eleni Daniilidou 30.8 103 Paola Suárez 28.3 —Venus/Serena Williams 6.4 — Lindsay Daveport 5.6

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 174 Doubles 1996 Ranking System Updated: The Declining Divisor For explanation of this system, see the singles Declining Divisor, page 125. This, we observe, gives us results much more like the WTA doubles rankings than the preceding — almost identical, in fact, with the top seven players all the same. Of course, a lot of that is because the declining divisor requires so many events.. Dec Div Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Cara Black 393.0 0 11Liezel Huber 393.0 0 33Lisa Raymond 278.6 0 44Katarina Srebotnik 271.5 0 55Samantha Stosur 248.6 0 66Ai Sugiyama 233.5 0 77Chuang Chia-jung 229.3 0 89Mara Santangelo 223.8 -1 98Chan Yung-jan 219.1 1 10 10 Rennae Stubbs 189.3 0 11 11 Kveta Peschke 184.4 0 12 12 Alicia Molik 171.6 0 13 14 Dinara Saﬁna 170.4 -1 14 15 Yan Zi 168.6 -1 15 13 Nathalie Déchy 151.5 2 16 18 Sania Mirza 128.3 -2 17 20 Peng Shuai 113.4 -3 18 16 Sun Tiantian 109.6 2 19 21 Zheng Jie 102.1 -2 20 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 101.2 3 21 26 Agnes Szavay 99.2 -5 22 22 Elena Likhovtseva 98.6 0 23 23 Gisela Dulko 95.4 0 24 27 Vania King 91.8 -3 25 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 87.2 6 24 Janette Husarova 86.4 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 83.0 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 81.1 29 Shahar Peer 75.2 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 73.0 44 Daniela Hantuchova 71.7 48 Francesca Schiavone 68.9 45 Elena Vesnina 64.7 35 Maria Kirilenko 62.2 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 59.1 64 Martina Hingis 56.2 72 Vera Zvonareva 49.0 76 Corina Morariu 39.3 54 Eleni Daniilidou 36.4 103 Paola Suárez 24.8 —Venus/Serena Williams 5.6 — Lindsay Daveport 4.9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 175 Doubles 2006 Rankings with Quintuple Quality Points In concept, this is equivalent to the ““2007 Rankings with Triple Quality Points” on page 127. But, for this purpose, I’ve multipled the quality points by five. This is because doubles awarded proportionately fewer quality points (more on this later). Massively boosting the quality points is an attempt to offset this. Note what this does for Srebotnik and Sugiyama. 5Q Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Cara Black 9170 0 11Liezel Huber 9170 0 34Katarina Srebotnik 6965 -1 46Ai Sugiyama 6510 -2 53Lisa Raymond 6255 2 69Mara Santangelo 6015 -3 77Chuang Chia-jung 5495 0 88Chan Yung-jan 5430 0 95Samantha Stosur 5371 4 10 10 Rennae Stubbs 4655 0 11 12 Alicia Molik 4315 -1 12 11 Kveta Peschke 4220 1 13 13 Nathalie Déchy 3925 0 14 14 Dinara Saﬁna 3725 0 15 15 Yan Zi 3365 0 16 16 Sun Tiantian 2985 0 17 18 Sania Mirza 2900 -1 18 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 2800 1 19 23 Gisela Dulko 2790 -4 20 20 Peng Shuai 2680 0 21 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 2425 2 22 24 Janette Husarova 2350 -2 23 26 Agnes Szavay 2125 -3 24 21 Zheng Jie 2057 3 25 22 Elena Likhovtseva 2055 3 27 Vania King 2000 -1 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 1930 2 48 Francesca Schiavone 1776 -20 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 1680 -12 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 1662 0 44 Daniela Hantuchova 1594 -13 29 Shahar Peer 1580 3 35 Maria Kirilenko 1447 -2 45 Elena Vesnina 1437 -11 64 Martina Hingis 1291 -29 54 Eleni Daniilidou 1135 -18 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 1135 -16 72 Vera Zvonareva 1060 -34 76 Corina Morariu 798 -37 103 Paola Suárez 464 -63 — Lindsay Daveport 91 —Venus/Serena Williams 90

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 176 Doubles 1996-Style Divisor Rankings with Triple Quality Points This is the approximate equivalent of the “1996-Style Divisor Rankings with Triple Quality Points” on page 128. The main effect, of course, is to move Stosur up (because she earned her points in far fewer events than Srebotnik). 3QDiv Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Cara Black 415.9 0 11Liezel Huber 415.9 0 33Lisa Raymond 336.0 0 45Samantha Stosur 333.9 -1 54Katarina Srebotnik 319.0 1 66Ai Sugiyama 270.1 0 77Chuang Chia-jung 255.5 0 89Mara Santangelo 252.3 -1 98Chan Yung-jan 241.0 1 10 10 Rennae Stubbs 210.0 0 11 14 Dinara Saﬁna 205.6 -3 12 11 Kveta Peschke 204.3 1 13 12 Alicia Molik 192.4 1 14 15 Yan Zi 187.1 -1 15 13 Nathalie Déchy 175.3 2 16 18 Sania Mirza 158.8 -2 17 20 Peng Shuai 141.7 -3 18 21 Zheng Jie 131.9 -3 19 26 Agnes Szavay 124.4 -7 20 16 Sun Tiantian 119.6 4 21 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 110.7 4 22 23 Gisela Dulko 110.4 -1 23 22 Elena Likhovtseva 109.6 1 24 48 Francesca Schiavone 102.9 -24 25 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 101.7 -16 27 Vania King 98.7 44 Daniela Hantuchova 97.9 24 Janette Husarova 91.3 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 88.8 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 84.2 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 82.9 64 Martina Hingis 78.2 29 Shahar Peer 77.4 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 74.4 45 Elena Vesnina 71.3 72 Vera Zvonareva 65.9 35 Maria Kirilenko 63.0 76 Corina Morariu 51.0 54 Eleni Daniilidou 34.4 103 Paola Suárez 30.7 —Venus/Serena Williams 6.4 — Lindsay Daveport 6.1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 177 Doubles Declining Divisor with Triple Quality Points This of course combines the previous two ranking tricks. 3QDecD Rank 2006 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 11Cara Black 462.9 0 11Liezel Huber 462.9 0 34Katarina Srebotnik 341.8 -1 43Lisa Raymond 336.0 1 56Ai Sugiyama 293.4 -1 65Samantha Stosur 292.2 1 79Mara Santangelo 277.5 -2 87Chuang Chia-jung 273.7 1 98Chan Yung-jan 261.8 1 10 10 Rennae Stubbs 224.9 0 11 11 Kveta Peschke 215.6 0 12 12 Alicia Molik 206.1 0 13 14 Dinara Saﬁna 205.6 -1 14 15 Yan Zi 194.3 -1 15 13 Nathalie Déchy 185.1 2 16 18 Sania Mirza 158.8 -2 17 20 Peng Shuai 141.7 -3 18 16 Sun Tiantian 133.1 2 19 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 121.7 2 20 23 Gisela Dulko 121.4 -3 21 26 Agnes Szavay 116.7 -5 22 21 Zheng Jie 115.4 1 23 22 Elena Likhovtseva 111.8 1 24 27 Vania King 105.7 -3 25 24 Janette Husarova 102.7 1 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 98.9 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 92.6 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 90.6 48 Francesca Schiavone 90.1 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 89.0 44 Daniela Hantuchova 85.7 29 Shahar Peer 81.7 45 Elena Vesnina 74.1 64 Martina Hingis 68.4 35 Maria Kirilenko 68.4 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 65.1 72 Vera Zvonareva 57.6 76 Corina Morariu 44.6 54 Eleni Daniilidou 40.7 103 Paola Suárez 26.9 —Venus/Serena Williams 5.6 — Lindsay Daveport 5.3

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 178 Doubles Quality Points per Tournament Above, on page 130, I explained the advantage of quality points as a measure of a player’s future potential. Unfortunately, quality points never meant as much in doubles. The reason was the way the WTA awarded them. They were awarded based on the combined team ranking. So even a team consisting of the world’s #1 and #2 doubles players had a combined ranking of 3, and was worth only 66 quality points, whereas a win over the #1 singles player was worth 100. A team consisting of the #3 and #4 players in the world, even though it would probably be the #2 team, had a combined ranking of 7, and was worth 43 quality points, compared to 75 for the #2 singles player. This could easily have been rectified by a change in the points table — but the WTA instead abolished quality points! It remains to be established if quality points per tournament are a good indicator of anything in doubles. It was, for instance, quite a surprise to see Srebotnik at #1 — after all, she reached three of the last five Slam finals, then clutched up. On the other hand, it’s no surprise to see the system promoting players like Martina Hingis and Svetlana Kuznetsova — though it’s not likely that they will be climbing the doubles rankings!. Q/T Rank 2007 Rank Player Name Score Rank Difference 14Katarina Srebotnik 32.8 -3 21Cara Black 31.4 1 21Liezel Huber 31.4 1 43Lisa Raymond 28.7 1 56Ai Sugiyama 27.6 -1 65Samantha Stosur 26.8 1 79Mara Santangelo 24.4 -2 87Chuang Chia-jung 20.7 1 98Chan Yung-jan 19.7 1 10 14 Dinara Safina 17.6 -4 11 10 Rennae Stubbs 16.7 1 12 64 Martina Hingis 16.3 -52 13 12 Alicia Molik 16.1 1 14 41 Svetlana Kuznetsova 16.0 -27 15 13 Nathalie Déchy 15.9 2 16 18 Sania Mirza 15.3 -2 17 11 Kveta Peschke 14.8 6 18 20 Peng Shuai 14.1 -2 19 21 Zheng Jie 13.3 -2 20 15 Yan Zi 12.4 5 21 48 Francesca Schiavone 12.1 -27 22 23 Gisela Dulko 11.8 -1 23 16 Sun Tiantian 10.5 7 24 44 Daniela Hantuchova 10.2 -20 25 26 Agnes Szavay 9.3 -1 25 17 Meghann Shaughnessy 9.3 8 24 Janette Husarova 7.2 27 Vania King 6.5 22 Elena Likhovtseva 6.5 72 Vera Zvonareva 6.3 19 Vladimira Uhlirova 4.9 30 Virginia Ruano Pascual 4.6 45 Elena Vesnina 4.5 25 Anabel Medina Garrigues 4.4 52 Anna-Lena Grönefeld 3.4 76 Corina Morariu 3.3 29 Shahar Peer 3.1 35 Maria Kirilenko 2.9

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 179 Doubles Tournament Strength-Based Rankings This is similar to the concept we used above for singles; see““Tournament Strength-Based Rankings” on page 131. In this case, I have used the tournament strengths from page 150. The points for a doubles event are set by dividing 7200 by the tournament strength (meaning that the maximum possible strength is about 200 points, though few events exceed 150 in practice); I have set a floor of 20 points. I have taken Challenger points only for Top 25 players.. AdjStr Rank Player Name Score 1Black 1718.00 1Huber 1718.00 3Raymond 1060.50 4 Srebotnik 997.50 5 Santangelo 938.75 6 Stosur 935.75 7 Sugiyama 869.25 8Chan 809.25 9 Stubbs 794.00 10 Chuang 783.50 11 Peschke 728.50 12 Molik 627.50 13 Yan 596.00 14 Déchy 577.50 15 Safina 558.75 16 Sun 461.25 17 Shaughnessy 418.50 18 Uhlirova 416.75 19 Tu 384.00 20 Peng 382.25 21 Zheng 375.00 22 Dulko 369.25 23 King 360.25 24 Husarova 355.00 25 Garbin 342.50 26 Medina Garrigues 323.75 27 Mirza 306.50 28 Likhovtseva 303.75 29 Vinci 286.75 30 Dushevina 268.50 31 Krajicek 268.00 32 Ruano Pascual 265.00 33 Pennetta 258.75 34 Szavay 255.75 35 Pratt 251.50 36 Hantuchova 251.25 37 Loit 242.50 38 Peer 239.75 39 Schiavone 238.00 40 Kuznetsova 234.75

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 180 Doubles Adjusted Strength per Tournament Ranking As with the “Adjusted Strength per Tournament Ranking” on page 133, we calculate this ranking by dividing the results of the preceding by the number of events.. This has interesting effects: Note Zheng back int he Top Ten, and Hingis at #18. But Vladimira Uhliraova falls out of the Top Forty. Adj/Trn Rank Player Name Score 1Black 74.7 1Huber 74.7 3 Stosur 72.0 4Raymond 66.3 5 Srebotnik 49.9 6 Santangelo 42.7 7 Zheng 41.7 8 Sugiyama 41.4 9 Stubbs 39.7 10 Chuang 39.2 11 Peschke 38.3 12 Chan 36.8 13 Safina 34.9 14 Molik 31.4 15 Yan 31.4 16 Déchy 30.4 17 Kuznetsova 29.3 18 Hingis 27.6 19 Garbin 24.5 20 Peng 23.9 21 Petrova 21.1 22 Hantuchova 20.9 23 Sun 20.1 24 Vinci 19.1 25 Shaughnessy 19.0 26 Mirza 18.0 27 Likhovtseva 17.9 28 Azarenka 17.7 29 Golovin 17.5 30 King 17.2 31 Szavay 17.1 32 Schiavone 17.0 33 Dulko 16.8 34 Dementieva 16.8 35 Shvedova 16.0 35 Tu 16.0 37 Ruano Pascual 15.6 38 Husarova 14.8 39 Medina Garrigues 14.7 40 Grönefeld 14.1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 181 Doubles “Majors Ranking” — Team This is, obviously, the same as the singles “Majors Ranking” on page 137. I have, however, significantly changed the list of events involved — omitting even the Madrid Championships. This is not because it’s a weak event, but because it involves only three matches. You get to the semifinal without even playing! So, based in part on the list of strongest events, I decided to rate results base on the Australian Open, Indian Wells, Miami, Rome, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, San Diego, the U.S. Open, Zürich, and Linz. To give these numbers some sort of perspective, last year’s co-#1 players Lisa Raymond and Samantha Stosur had 21 points (individually and as a team), followed by Cara Black and Rennae Stubbs with 12. The year before, Black had 17 majors points, followed by Stosur with 16. But that was an unusually weak year. In 2004, Black/Stubbs and Ruano Pascual/Suárez had 23 points; in 2003, Clijsters/Sugiyama had 23 points together. In 2002, Paola Suárez had 25 points (21 of them with Ruano Pascual). Lisa Raymond led the Tour in 2001, with 28 points. The best year in recent memory was Martina Hingis in 1998; her Grand Slam plus other results gave her 36 points. Martina Navratilova surely did better somewhere in the past, but we don’t have the tournament strengths to tell you just what her total would have been. Probably somewhere around 42-45. A total of 17 teams earned majors points this year. Note, however, the amazing fact that Black/Huber managed to earn points at all but one of the majors, with Raymond/Stosur doing almost as well until Stosur got sick. Note also that, though Srebotnik/Sugiyama came in third, they won no major titles; neither did co- #4 Chan/Chuang. A strange year. Major Major Sydn AO Miam Berli RG Wim SD USO Zür Linz Rank Team Points 1 Black/Huber 27 1 531155 15 2 Raymond/Stosur 13 15511 3 Srebotnik/Sugiyama 10 3 3 1 3 4T Chan/Chuang 8 3 1 1 3 4T Peschke/Stubbs1 81151 6Molik/Santangelo 7 5 1 1 7T Déchy/Saﬁna 5 5 7T Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 5 5 9T Azarenka/Chakvetadze 3 3 9T Bartoli/Tu 3 3 9T Garbin/Vinci 3 3 9T Raymond/Schiavone 3 3 13T Hingis/Hantuchova 1 1 13T Loit/Pratt 1 1 13T Peng/Tu 1 1 13T Szavay/Uhlirova 1 1 13T Yan/Zheng 1 1 1. In an astonishing feat, caused partly by rain delays, Peschke/Stubbs managed to reach the Berlin semiﬁnal without playing a match!

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 182 Doubles “Majors Ranking” — Individual Same as above, but based on individuals rather than teams. All told, 32 players earned at least one Majors point. Raymond and Stosur, not too surprisingly, earned points at the most Majors events — seven. But third place, interesting, did not go to Black or Stubbs or Yan or Zheng, but to Srebotnik. The highest-ranked doubles player not to earn any major points at all was #15 Sun Tiantian. Sania Mirza was the only other Top Twenty player not t show up -- but, interesting, most of the players from #22-#30 didn’t earn a score. Major WTA Major Sydne AO Miam Berlin RG Wim SanD USO Zürich Linz Rank Rank Player Points 1T 1 Black 271531155 15 1T 1 Huber 271531155 15 33Raymond 16 15511 3 45Stosur 13 15511 5T 4 Srebotnik 10 3 3 1 3 5T 6 Sugiyama 10 3 3 1 3 7T 8 Chan 8 3 1 1 3 7T 7 Chuang 8 3 1 1 3 7T 11 Peschke 8 1 1 5 1 7T 10 Stubbs 8 1 1 5 1 11T 12 Molik 7 5 1 1 11T 9 Santangelo 7 5 1 1 13T 13 Déchy 5 5 13T 52 Grönefeld 5 5 13T 14 Safina 5 5 13T 17 Shaughnessy 5 5 17 28 Tu 4 3 1 18T 32 Azarenka 3 3 18T 113 Bartoli 3 3 18T 75 Chakvetadze 3 3 18T 33 Garbin 3 3 18T 48 Schiavone 3 3 18T 49 Vinci 3 3 24T 44 Hantuchova 1 1 24T 64 Hingis 1 1 24T 42 Loit 1 1 24T 20 Peng 1 1 24T 38 Pratt 1 1 24T 26 Szavay 1 1 24T 19 Uhlirova 1 1 24T 15 Yan 1 1 24T 21 Zheng 1 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 183 Miscellaneous Statistics Statistics About Tournaments: Total WTA and Slam Events: 61 Slam and WTA Championships events: 5 Tier I events: 10 Tier II events: 15 Tier III events: 17 Tier IV events: 14 Total events in recent history: 2006: 61 ¥ 2005: 63 ¥ 2004: 60 ¥ 2003: 59 ¥ 2002: 64 ¥ 2001: 63

The following graph shows the fluctuation in number of tournaments of each type since 2001:

Tournament Tiers, Year by Year

50 Tier V Tier IV 40 Tier III Tier II 30 Olympics Tier I

Number of Events 20 Slam/Champ

0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 184 Total Ranked Players, 1999Ð2007 The table and graph show you the total number of players on the singles and doubles rankings over the last few years. (Why the sharp decline this year? Probably due to the points table revision that eliminates fractional points and so does not award points for certain first round loses that used to count. It’s interesting to note that the change did not affect doubles, where the number of players continues to climb) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Singles 1084 1245 1214 1253 1113 1256 1378 1500 1131 Doubles 820 908 967 1007 1055

This too we can graph:

Ranked Players, Year By Year

1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600 Ranked Players 400

200

0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year Singles Doubles

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 185 The Busiest Players on the Tour Total Events Played The table on the next page shows the number of matches played by every player in the Top Fifty, plus a couple of dozen players below that (all Top 100 players with 28 or more events, and all players, of any ranking, with 30 or more events). It also shows their WTA rankings. (NOTE: The WTA ranking lists theoretically show how many events players have played, but in fact these figures may be inaccurate due to required events. I have filled in the number of actual events played for the Top Forty; I have not checked players ranked below that, but simply used the WTA number.) We note that the top ten players in this list all played primarily at the Challenger level; in fact, only one Top Fifty player (the ubiquitous Marion Bartoli) had more than thirty events. Jelena Jankovic, with 28 events, was the next-busiest top player.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 186 Rank Player Events Rank Player Events 88 Malek, Tatjana 34 99 Camerin, Maria Elena 28 137 Klepac, Andreja 34 9 Hantuchova, Daniela 27 84 Kerber, Angelique 33 49 Govortsova, Olga 27 94 Osterloh, Lilia 33 16 Schnyder, Patty 26 184 Zahlavova, Sandra 33 21 Bammer, Sybille 26 254 Woerle, Kathrin 33 38 Dulko, Gisela 26 128 Yuan, Meng 32 22 Bondarenko, Alona 25 158 Pelletier, Marie-eve 32 34 Krajicek, Michaella 25 176 Kops-Jones, Raquel 32 44 Bondarenko, Kateryna 25 220 Huck, Violette 32 45 Loit, Emilie 25 10 Bartoli, Marion 31 48 Tu, Meilen 25 92 Poutchek, Tatiana 31 27 Srebotnik, Katarina 24 120 Schruff, Julia 31 33 Vakulenko, Julia 24 126 Czink, Melinda 31 35 Medina Garrigues, Anabel 24 127 Fedak, Yuliana 31 15 Saﬁna, Dinara 23 129 Nagy, Kira 31 25 Schiavone, Francesca 23 149 Fedossova, Youlia 31 26 Radwanska, Agnieszka 23 165 Chakhnashvili, Margalita 31 28 Razzano, Virginie 23 261 Jozami, Betina 31 39 Sugiyama, Ai 23 275 Liggan, Kelly 31 50 Morigami, Akiko 23 54 Muller, Martina 30 6 Chakvetadze, Anna 22 78 Dellacqua, Casey 30 17 Peer, Shahar 22 81 Craybas, Jill 30 41 Dushevina, Vera 21 108 Makarova, Ekaterina 30 46 Peng, Shuai 21 109 Voracova, Renata 30 4 Ivanovic, Ana 20 113 Bychkova, Ekaterina 30 11 Dementieva, Elena 20 122 Keothavong, Anne 30 32 Mirza, Sania 20 134 O'Brien, Katie 30 2 Kuznetsova, Svetlana 19 144 Brianti, Alberta 30 13 Golovin, Tatiana 19 160 Birnerova, Eva 30 14 Petrova, Nadia 19 212 South, Melanie 30 36 Santangelo, Mara 19 246 Schiechtl, Tina 30 20 Szavay, Agnes 18 264 Borwell, Sarah 30 30 Azarenka, Victoria 18 43 Daniilidou, Eleni 29 37 Garbin, Tathiana 18 79 Rodionova, Anastasia 29 24 Safarova, Lucie 16 90 Kudryavtseva, Alla 29 42 Paszek, Tamira 16 93 Ditty, Julie 29 47 Stosur, Samantha 16 3 Jankovic, Jelena 28 18 Mauresmo, Amelie 15 31 Kirilenko, Maria 28 1 Henin, Justine 14 40 Pennetta, Flavia 28 12 Vaidisova, Nicole 14 51 Knapp, Karin 28 19 Hingis, Martina 14 70 Errani, Sara 28 23 Zvonareva, Vera 14 77 Pin, Camille 28 5 Sharapova, Maria 13 85 Kremer, Anne 28 8 Williams, Venus 13 86 Poutchkova, Olga 28 29 Li Na 13 87 Gallovits, Edina 28 7 Williams, Serena 12

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 187 Total Matches Played by Top Players The table below shows the number of matches played by every player in the Top Forty, plus a few players below that. Rank Player Matches WTA Rnk Rank Player Matches WTA Rnk 1 Jankovic 97 3 24 Szavay 50 20 2Bartoli 78 10 25 Azarenka 49 30 2Hantuchova 78 9 25 Mirza 49 32 4Chakvetadze 75 6 25 Schiavone 49 25 5Kuznetsova 71 2 25 Vaidisova 49 12 6 Schnyder 70 16 25 Vakulenko 49 33 7 Ivanovic 69 4 30 Santangelo 48 36 8Bammer 68 21 Krajicek 47 34 9Hénin 67 1 Medina Garrigues 47 35 10 Safina 65 15 Safarova 44 24 11 Peer 64 17 Williams, S 44 7 12 Bondarenko, A 60 22 Zvonareva 44 23 12 Golovin 60 13 Garbin 43 37 12 Pennetta 60 40 Mauresmo 41 18 15 Dementieva 59 11 Sugiyama 40 39 16 Kirilenko 56 31 Hingis 37 19 16 Williams, V 56 8 Li Na 36 29 18 Radwanska,A 55 26 Stosur 33 47 18 Razzano 55 28 Grönefeld 19 205 20 Petrova 54 14 Clijsters 18 — 21 Srebotnik 53 27 Davenport 14 73 22 Dulko 52 38 Myskina 2 1065 23 Sharapova 51 5

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 188 It is interesting to ask if there is any correlation at all between ranking and number of matches played. Obviously there isn’t much for the Tour as a whole, or Jankovic would be #1. But let’s look at the WTA Top Thirty, since they, for the most part, were playing at the WTA level all year. If we graph their rankings against their matches played, we see this:

120

100

60 Ranking

0 051015 20 25 30 Events Played

There is perhaps a slight correlation there — but it appears to be slight. If we take the correlation coefficient between ranking and matches for these players, it turns out to be -.57, similar to a correlation of -.52 in 2006. (Correlation coefficients can range from 1, meaning perfect correlation, to 0, meaning no correlation, to -1, indicating inverse correlation.) What that -.57 number means is that, generally, the higher your ranking, the more matches you have played — but the correlation isn’t very high. (In standard physics-lab-type experiments, you routinely get correlation coefficients of at least .95.) Still, it’s much closer correlation than in 2005, there was a correlation of only .13. Which, for a data set this size, is no correlation at all.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 189 Number of Events Played by the Top 100 This is a statistic the WTA has made needlessly difficult to compute, because the “events played” column in their rankings no longer refers to events played but to nominal events played — required events which they skip are still counted. An extreme example of this was Anastasia Myskina: She was out with injury for most of the year. But her ranking was high enough that she was supposed to play the Australian Open, Miami, and Roland Garros. So there she was, on the next-to-last ranking list of the year, shown as having five events even though she had only two matches! I used to calculate this statistic for the Top 150. I finally decided to cut back to the Top 100. As it is, the WTA ranking list showed excess events for the following Top Fifty players: Dementieva, Golovin, Hénin, Hingis, Mauresmo, Mirza, Li Na, Peng, Venus Williams, and Zvonareva. That’s ten out fifty! And it’s just possible that I missed one or two below #50. The statistics below are based on actual events played, not nominal. In terms of actual events played, the Top 100 totalled 2262 events this year. That compares with 2308 in 2006, 2226 in 2005, 2265 in 2004, and 2330 in 2003. It will be seen that the total fluctuates somewhat, but not much in recent years. It is interesting to note that the maximum events played by a Top 100 player has gone up this year. Again. Tatiana Malek’s 24 events surpasses the 33 events put up by Marion Bartoli, Martina Müller, and Julia Schruff in 2006. In 2005, the most for a Top 100 player was 30 (by Craybas, Foretz, and Sromova). In 2004, Benesova and Jidkova led the Top 100 with 32 events each. 2003 was the last time a Top 100 player had more than 33 events: Vakulenko last year had fully 34. But three players with 33 events appears to be without precedent. Bartoli still manages to be the busiest player in the Top Fifty, and in the Top Twenty, and indeed in the Top Ten (though she is unlikely to be Top Ten next year). The median number of events this year is 23 — down from 24 in 2006. The mode is 23 events (that is, more players played 23 events than any other number); no fewer than 11 players played a 23-tournament schedule. We had 10 players play 28 events, and 10 more play 26, Interestingly, there was much more spread in the list this year than last; the most popular numbers were less popular in 2007 than 2006. Fully 35 of the Top 100 played 26 events or more; 46 played 24 events or more — dramatically down from the 56 last year. 35 players had 20 events or fewer — up from 26 last year. Still, only 15 Top 100 players played 16 or fewer events — but that list is highly distinguished, including as it does Davenport, Hénin, Hingis, Mauresmo, Sharapova, and Venus and Serena Williams. The table on the next page shows the list of Top 100 players with each number of events The number in parenthesis after the player’s name is her ranking. Top 25 players are shown in bold.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 190 # of # to Players Events play 34 1 Malek (88) 33 2 Kerber (84), Osterloh (94) 32 — 31 2 Bartoli (10), Poutchek (92) 30 3 Craybas (81), Dellacqua (78), Müller (54) 29 4 Daniilidou (43), Ditty (93), Kudryavtseva (90), Rodionova (79) 28 10 Camerin (99), Errani (70), Gallovits (87), Jankovic (3), Kirilenko (31), Knapp (51), Kremer (85), Pennetta (40), Pin (77), Poutchkova (86) 27 3 Govortsova (49), Hantuchova (9), Petkovic (100) 26 10 Bammer (21), Dulko (38), Meusburger (61), Rezai (80), Salerni (91), Schnyder (16), Shaughnessy (53), Shvedova (89), Vesnina (55), Zakopalova (62) 25 6 A. Bondarenko (22), K. Bondarenko (44), Krajicek (34), Loit (45), Parmentier (59), Tu (48) 24 5 Cibulkova (52), Medina Garrigues (35), Savchuk (97), Srebotnik (27), Vakulenko (33) 23 11 A. Radwanska (26), Harkleroad (76), Kanepi (75), Molik (58), Morigami (50), Nakamura (68), Pironkova (98), Razzano (28), Saﬁna (15), Schiavone (25), Sugiyama (39) 22 5 Chakvetadze (6), Déchy (69), Obziler (82), Peer (17), Y. Chan (67) 21 3 Dominguez Lino (72), Dushevina (41), Santangelo (36) 20 6 Dementieva (11), Ivanovic (4), Mirza (32), Peng (46), Vinci (63), Wozniacki (64) 19 5 Amanmuradova (95), Golovin (13), Granville (65), Kuznetsova (2), Petrova (14) 18 8 Azarenka (30), Garbin (37), Likhovtseva (66), Olaru (56), Perebiynis (96), Pratt (71), Ruano Pascual (83), Szavay (20) 17 1 Cornet (57) 16 3 Paszek (42), Safarova (24), Stosur (47) 15 1 Mauresmo (18) 14 6 Hénin (1), Hingis (19), Sequera (74), Vaidisova (12), Yan (60), Zvonareva (23) 13 3 Li Na (29), Sharapova (5), V. Williams (8) 12 1 S. Williams (7) 31Davenport (73) The above data can be graphed. The graph on the next page shows how popular each schedule is — that is, the number of players playing that number of events.

4 Number to Play 3

0 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334 Number of Events

It’s also interesting to compare rankings against number of events played. Do these correlate? The graph below shows the comparison. If there is any correlation, it is not obvious. In fact, the correlation coefficient between rankings and events played is only .37 (and even that is twice what it was last year). Playing a heavy schedule is not the way to get ahead.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 192 Total Matches Played by the Top 30 Doubles Players This is the doubles equivalent of the item “Total Matches Played by Top Players” on page 188, except that I only checked the Top Thirty. There are probably lower-ranked players with more doubles matches. The goal is simply to compare the matches played by the top players. Rank Player Matches WTA Rnk Rank Player Matches WTA Rnk 1Cara Black 83 1 15 A. Medina Garrigues 48 25 1 Liezel Huber 83 1 15 Vania King 48 27 3Vladimira Uhlirova 63 19 18 M. Shaughnessy 46 17 4Chuang Chia-Jung 62 7 19 Meilen Tu 45 28 4Mara Santangelo 62 9 20 Gisela Dulko 44 23 6Chan Yung-Jan 60 8 21 Samantha Stosur 43 5 7Katarina Srebotnik 57 4 21 Sania Mirza 43 18 8Ai Sugiyama 56 6 23 Elena Likhovtseva 41 22 9Rennae Stubbs 54 10 24 Nathalie Dechy 40 13 10 Kveta Peschke 52 11 24 V. Ruano Pascual 40 30 10 Yan Zi 52 15 26 Dinara Safina 38 14 12 Sun Tiantian 51 16 27 Peng Shuai 37 20 13 Lisa Raymond 50 3 27 Shahar Peer 37 29 14 Alicia Molik 49 12 29 Agnes Szavay 36 26 15 Janette Husarova 48 24 30 Zheng Jie 24 21 The graph is interesting: There does appear to be more of a correlation between matches played and ranking than we had in singles. And the correlation coefficient agrees: We have a coefficient of .65.

100

0 0 5 10 15 20 25 3 Ranking

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 193 Number of Events Played By the Top 100 Doubles Players This is the equivalent to the singles“Number of Events Played by the Top 100” on page 190.Interestingly, though the extremes are not too different in singles and doubles, the doubles Top 100 had many fewer events: 1903, compared to 2262 events for the top singles players. A little of this may be smaller draw sizes; it may also be significant that doubles is Best 11 rather than Best 17. The median number of events is much lower: 20, compared to 23 on the singles side. The mode is 20 events, played by 12 players. The table below shows the list of Top 100 players with each number of events The number in parenthesis after the player’s name is her ranking. Top 25 players are shown in bold. # of # to Players Events play 31 1 Uhlirova (19) 30 1 Daniilidou (54) 29 1 Rodionova (61) 28 1 Woehr (55) 27 1 Koryttseva (85) 26 4 Fusano (98), Grandin (88), Müller (69), Voracova (43) 25 5 Fedak (96), Krajicek (47), Kustova (83), Pennetta (37), Rosolska (84) 24 5 Craybas (74), Husarova (24), Kops-Jones (93), Poutchek (39), Tu (28) 23 8 Black (1), Ehritt-Vanc (79), Huber (1), Jans (77), K. Bondarenko (51), G. Navratilova (62), Sun (60), T. Sun (16) 22 7 A. Bondarenko (53), Dulko (23), Foretz (68), Medina Garrigues (25), Santangelo (9), Sfar (86), Shaughnessy (17) 21 5 Gajdosova (70), Kirilenko (35), Sugiyama (6), Y. Chan (8), Zahlavova Strycova (80) 20 12 Chuang (7), Dushevina (31), Hlavackova (99), Hradecka (67), Jidkova (92), Jugic-Salkic (100), King (27), Molik (12), Parra Santonja (73), Srebotnik (4), Stubbs (10), Voskoboeva (40) 19 9 Déchy (13), Dominguez Lino (65), Hsieh (46), Ji (94), Kostanic Tosic (81), Peer (29), Peschke (11), Pratt (38), Stewart (59) 18 7 Benesova (34), Kudryavtseva (56), Laine (89), Loit (42), Mattek (36), Vesnina (45), Yan (15) 17 2 Likhovtseva (22), Ruano Pascual (30) 16 6 Mirza (18), Morigami (63), Peng (20), Perebiynis (58), Raymond (3), Saﬁna (14) 15 4 Camerin (50), Granville (66), Szavay (26), Vinci (49) 14 7 Castano (91), Garbin (33), Grönefeld (52), Llagostera Vives (97), Nakamura (78), A.Radwanska (71), Schiavone (48) 13 2 Morariu (76), Stosur (5) 12 2 Azarenka (32), Harkleroad (95) 11 4 Chakvetadze (75), Hantuchova (44), Tanasugarn (82), Zvonareva (72) 10 2 Petrova (57), Schnyder (87) 9— 82Kuznetsova (41), Zheng (21) 7— 61Hingis (64) 51Dementieva (90)

6 Number to Play 4

0 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031 Number of Events

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 195 Injuries For years, I tried to keep track of injuries to top players, listing the type and the events they missed. I’ve given up. There are too many. We can hardly let a year pass without some investigation of injuries, though. We can at least list the rates of matches ending in withdrawals and retirements, or of last-minute bail-outs resulting in the introduction of a Lucky Loser into a main draw. In singles, the numbers are as follows for 2007: Withdrawals — 9 Retirements — 81 Lucky losers in WTA draws — 48 Total: 138 This is fascinating, because it means that (as measured by these statistics), the overall rate of injuries has gone down. For the first time in a decade. In 2006, I list 16 withdrawals, 90 retirements, and 64 Lucky Losers — a total of 170 players not completing a match. 2005, I show 61 retirements, 14 withdrawals, and 74 Lucky Losers — a total of 149 instances of players not finishing. I didn’t track retirements in 2004, so I can’t compare before that. I do note that the number of withdrawals was higher in 2004; it appears that increased pressure on players is causing them to try harder to either start their matches or to withdraw before play began.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 196 WTA Tour History Who Won What Summary — Singles The following table shows all active Tier II or higher titles and lists which of the top players have won them. The figures in the boxes show how many times the player has won each event and the year of her earliest win (e.g. by the Australian Open, in the column for Capriati, we see 2/01 — Capriati has won the Australian Open two times, starting in 2001). Looking at this list can give a measure both of a player’s success (Davenport, e.g., has a lot of titles) and her weaknesses (but Davenport has big holes in the clay season) The players listed are the Top Ten (minus Bartoli, who has never won a tournament larger than a Tier III, so why bother listing her when I can sneer at her here instead), plus the major players of recent years. Several of these players have also won Tier II events that are no longer played. The list: Clijsters — Hamburg (1/02), Leipzig (2/00), Filderstadt (2/02); Davenport — Atlanta (1/97), Chicago (1/97), Filderstadt (3/01), Philadelphia (2/99), Princess Cup (1/99), Scottsdale (1/01); Hingis — Filderstadt (4/96), Hamburg (2/98), Philadelphia (1/97); Martinez — Barcelona (1/91), Hamburg (1/95), Houston (1/93), Philadelphia (1/93), Stratton Mountain (2/93), Tampa (1/89); Mauresmo — Nice (1/01), Philadelphia (3/ 03); Pierce — Filderstadt (1/93), Princess Cup (1/95); Seles — Bahia (1/01), Barcelona (1/92), Chicago (1/ 93), Essen (1/92), Houston (3/89), Milan (1/91), Philadelphia (1/91), Princess Cup (5/91), San Antonio (1/ 90), Tampa (1/90); S. Williams — Hannover (1/00), Princess Cup (2/00), Scottsdale (1/02), Leipzig (1/02); V. Williams — Hamburg (2/99). In addition, some of our players won some of these events before they reached Tier II status: Clijsters won Luxembourg 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003; Hingis won Doha 2001; Martinez won Paris 1990; Seles won Doha 2002. In addition, Davenport won Cincinnati 2004 and Chakvetadze won Cincinnati 2007, it is about to be bumped up.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 197 Event Capri Chakv Clijst Daven Hantu Hénin Hingi Ivano Janko Kuzne Marti Maure Seles Shara SWill VWill Sydney 1/93 2/03 1/99 2/04 3/97 1/00 1/96 Australian 2/01 1/00 1/04 3/97 1/06 4/91 3/03 Pan Paciﬁc 4/98 5/97 1/05 Paris 1/04 1/97 2/01 2/99 1/02 Antwerp 1/04 2/05 2/02 Dubai 1/05 4/03 1/01 1/02 1/02 Doha 1/07 1/05 Indian Wel 2/03 2/97 2/02 1/04 1/98 1/92 1/06 2/99 Miami 1/05 2/97 1/06 2/90 4/02 3/98 Amelia Isl 3/97 1/95 1/01 2/99 1/02 Charleston 1/01 2/03 2/97 1/07 2/94 1/04 Warsaw 1/06 2/05 1/03 1/04 Berlin 3/02 1/99 1/07 2/98 2/01 1/90 Rome 1/03 2/98 1/07 4/93 2/04 2/90 1/02 1/99 Roland G 1/01 4/03 3/90 1/02 Eastbourne 1/05 1/01 2/06 1/04 1/96 Wimbledon 1/99 1/97 1/94 1/06 1/04 2/02 4/00 Stanford 1/07 4/01 3/98 2/96 2/90 2/00 San Diego 2/91 2/98 1/03 2/97 1/95 2/06 3/00 Los Angeles 2/03 4/96 1/07 1/95 3/90 2/99 Canadian O 1/91 1/05 2/03 2/99 1/06 2/02 4/95 1/01 New Haven 1/03 1/05 1/06 1/07 4/99 U.S. Open 1/05 1/98 2/03 1/97 1/04 2/91 1/06 2/99 2/00 Beijing 1/06 1/04 Luxembourg 1/05 1/07 Stuttgart 1/07 Moscow 1/06 1/00 Zürich 4/97 2/03 1/00 1/06 1/99 Linz 2/00 1/07 1/02 1/04 1/06 Champions 2/02 1/99 2/06 2/98 1/05 3/90 1/04 1/01 Different 721416218184258131491213 events won Total Tier 9/9 2/2 21/26 32/41 4/4 34/34 33/40 4/4 2/2 5/5 13/20 18/22 31/47 10/10 22/26 26/28 II+ wins (active/total) Who Won What Summary — Doubles The equivalent of the preceding, but for doubles. It’s harder to pick these players, as there are more doubles winners out there. I finally chose to list the Top Ten, meaning Black, Chan (who, however, has no Tier II or higher titles, so she came back off), Chuang, Huber, Raymond, Santangelo, Srebotnik, Stosur, Stubbs, and Sugiyama — plus Serena Williams as the other active player with the Career Slam (Venus’s record is the same as Serena’s except that she didn’t win Leipzig 2002), Likhovtseva and Ruano Pascual as the top active players,, and Hingis, Suárez and Sanchez-Vicario as the other most successful players of recent years. The final lines of the table differ slightly from the singles table. The line “Events won” lists the distinct active Tier II titles each player has won. Serena, for instance, has won seven titles at these 30 events — but she has two Wimbledons and two Australian Opens, so she has only five distinct titles. The next line, “To 2000,” lists each player’s titles at all Tier II+ events in the years leading up to 2000 (inclusive). We then show her total for the 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and the grand total. Note that the total may be higher

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 198 than the total titles listed, since some players will have titles at no-longer-extant tournaments (e.g. Hingis has 36 total doubles titles, but only 31 show up in the list; she also won Hamburg 1995, 2002, Filderstadt 1997, 2000, Leipzig 1997, Philadelphia 2000 which are no longer played). Event Black Chua Hingi Huber Likho Raym Ruano Santa Sanch Srebo Stosur Stubb Suáre Sugiy SWill Sydney 1/04 1/98 1/99 1/02 3/91 1/05 3/02 3/99 AustraliaO 1/07 4/97 1/07 1/00 1/04 3/92 1/00 1/04 2/01 Pan Paciﬁc 1/04 2/98 1/05 4/01 1/92 2/06 4/01 Paris 1/07 1/98 1/07 Antwerp 3/04 1/07 1/06 1/03 Dubai 1/07 1/07 1/05 1/05 Doha 1/07 1/04 1/06 Indian Well 1/99 6/94 2/04 2/06 2/93 2/04 1/01 Miami 2/98 1/03 3/02 5/92 2/06 1/02 1/00 Amelia Isla 1/01 1/03 1/07 6/90 2/06 1/05 Charleston 1/97 1/99 3/01 4/00 4/90 1/06 2/01 3/00 Warsaw 1/03 1/06 Berlin 1/05 1/07 1/03 1/00 1/07 1/03 Rome 2/01 1/99 1/05 1/01 1/00 2/98 1/07 2/93 1/00 2/98 1/06 Roland Gar 2/98 1/06 4/01 1/07 1/06 4/01 1/03 1/99 Eastbourne 1/99 5/01 2/95 1/07 3/01 1/00 Wimbledon 3/04 2/96 2/05 1/01 1/95 2/01 1/03 2/00 Stanford 2/03 1/97 2/02 1/94 2/02 San Diego 4/01 1/97 1/07 1/01 1/00 1/05 2/94 3/00 1/03 Los Angele 1/98 1/06 2/92 2/03 1/06 CanadianO 2/98 1/02 2/94 1/07 1/92 1/02 2/04 New Haven 1/01 1/01 2/99 1/03 1/07 1/02 1/05 1/99 1/03 1/00 U.S. Open 1/98 2/01 3/02 2/93 1/05 1/01 3/02 1/00 1/99 Beijing 1/07 1/06 1/06 Luxembour 1/05 1/05 Stuttgart 1/06 1/06 1/07 Moscow 1/07 1/01 1/07 2/99 1/97 1/05 1/99 1/00 Zürich 3/04 3/96 2/99 1/97 5/99 1/03 1/98 Linz 1/07 2/03 1/04 1/06 1/06 1/03 Champions 1/07 2/99 1/07 3/01 1/03 2/92 2/05 1/01 1/03 Event won 15 1 20 12 11 22 14 4 19 3 16 19 13 16 5 To 2000 0 0 33 0 4 16 2 0 56 0 0 15 2 11 5 2001 501159101007111 2002 002009503008502 2003 1 0 — 3 0 6 5 0 — 003581 2004 7 0 — 0 2 1 5 0 — 006510 2005 6 0 — 2 2 6 5 0 — 074300 2006 20001820—283220 2007 911905 4 25301 Totals 30 1 37 15 14 38 25 4 60 4 20 49 23 24 9 We note that Lisa Raymond has the widest range of titles — though it’s largely a matter of winning fast events with Stubbs and slow with Stosur. Serena Williams has the distinction of being the only player in recent times to win all four Slams in both singles and doubles; Navratilova of course did it to, and others before her, but that was pre-Rebound Ace.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 199 Who Won What — History of Tournaments The following tables list players who won the equivalent of Tier II and higher events. Some tournaments (e.g. Warsaw and Shanghai before 2003, Doha before 2004, Luxembourg before 2005) were not Tier II events for this entire period; these winners are shown in italics Who Won What Part 1: 2002Ð2007 Tournament 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Sydney Clijsters Hénin-Hardenne Molik Hénin-Hardenne Clijsters Hingis Australian Open S. Williams Mauresmo S. Williams Hénin-Hardenne S. Williams Capriati Pan Pacific Hingis Dementieva Sharapova Davenport Davenport Hingis Paris Petrova Mauresmo Safina Clijsters S. Williams V. Williams Antwerp Mauresmo Mauresmo Mauresmo Clijsters V. Williams V. Williams Dubai Hénin Hénin-Hardenne Davenport Hénin-Hardenne Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo Doha Hénin Petrova Sharapova Myskina Myskina Seles Scottsdale Sugiyama S. Williams Indian Wells Hantuchova Sharapova Clijsters Hénin-Hardenne Clijsters Hantuchova Miami S. Williams Kuznetsova Clijsters S. Williams S. Williams S. Williams Amelia Island Golovin Petrova Davenport Davenport Dementieva V. Williams Charleston Jankovic Petrova Hénin-Hardenne V. Williams Hénin-Hardenne Majoli Warsaw Hénin Clijsters Hénin-Hardenne V. Williams Mauresmo Bovina Hamburg Clijsters Berlin Ivanovic Petrova Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo Hénin-Hardenne Hénin Rome Jankovic Hingis Mauresmo Mauresmo Clijsters S. Williams Roland Garros Hénin Hénin-Hardenne Hénin-Hardenne Myskina Hénin-Hardenne S. Williams Eastbourne Hénin Hénin-Hardenne Clijsters Kuznetsova Rubin Rubin Wimbledon V. Williams Mauresmo V. Williams Sharapova S. Williams S. Williams Stanford Chakvetadze Clijsters Clijsters Davenport Clijsters V. Williams San Diego Sharapova Sharapova Pierce Davenport Hénin-Hardenne V. Williams Los Angeles Ivanovic Dementieva Clijsters Davenport Clijsters Rubin Canadian Open Hénin Ivanovic Clijsters Mauresmo Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo Olympics1 Hénin-Hardenne New Haven Kuznetsova Hénin-Hardenne Davenport Bovina Capriati V. Williams U.S. Open Hénin Sharapova Clijsters Kuznetsova Hénin-Hardenne S. Williams Bahia Myskina Beijing2 Szavay Kuznetsova Kirilenko S. Williams Dementieva Smashnova Princess Cup S. Williams Leipzig Myskina S. Williams Luxembourg Ivanovic A. Bondarenko Clijsters Molik Clijsters Clijsters Stuttgart Hénin Petrova Filderstadt Davenport Davenport Clijsters Clijsters Moscow Dementieva Chakvetadze Pierce Myskina Myskina Maleeva Zürich Hénin Sharapova Davenport Molik Hénin-Hardenne Schnyder Linz Hantuchova Sharapova Petrova Mauresmo Sugiyama Hénin Philadelphia Mauresmo Mauresmo Mauresmo Championships Hénin Hénin-Hardenne Mauresmo Sharapova Clijsters Clijsters 1. Olympic tennis events were held in past years, but 2004 was the first year they bore points and became a non-exhibition 2. Shanghai until 2004

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 200 Who Won What Part 2: 1996Ð2002 Tournament 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 Sydney Hingis Hingis Mauresmo Davenport Sanchez-V Hingis Seles Australian Open Capriati Capriati Davenport Hingis Hingis Hingis Seles Pan Paciﬁc Hingis Davenport Hingis Hingis Davenport Hingis Majoli Paris V. Williams Mauresmo Tauziat S. Williams Pierce Hingis Halard-D Antwerp V. Williams Nice Mauresmo Hannover (Essen) S. Williams Novotna Schnyder Majoli Majoli Dubai Mauresmo Hingis Scottsdale S. Williams Davenport rained out Indian Wells Hantuchova S. Williams Davenport S. Williams Hingis Davenport Graf Miami/Key Biscay S. Williams V. Williams Hingis V. Williams V. Williams Hingis Graf Amelia Island V. Williams Mauresmo Seles Seles Pierce Davenport Spirlea Charleston1 Majoli Capriati Pierce Hingis Coetzer Hingis Sanchez-V Hamburg Clijsters V. Williams Hingis V. Williams Hingis Majoli Sanchez-V Berlin Hénin Mauresmo Martinez Hingis Martinez M. Fernandez Graf Rome S. Williams Dokic Seles V. Williams Hingis Pierce Martinez Roland Garros S. Williams Capriati Pierce Graf Sanchez-V Majoli Graf Eastbourne Rubin Davenport Halard-D Zvereva Novotna rained out Seles Wimbledon S. Williams V. Williams V. Williams Davenport Novotna Hingis Graf Stanford V. Williams Clijsters V. Williams Davenport Davenport Hingis Hingis San Diego V. Williams V. Williams V. Williams Hingis Davenport Hingis Date Los Angeles Rubin Davenport S. Williams S. Williams Davenport Seles Davenport Canadian Open Mauresmo S. Williams Hingis Hingis Seles Seles Seles New Haven2 V. Williams V. Williams V. Williams V. Williams Graf Davenport U.S. Open S. Williams V. Williams V. Williams S. Williams Davenport Hingis Graf Bahia Myskina Seles Princess Cup S. Williams Dokic S. Williams Davenport Seles Seles Seles Surabaya3 Wang Leipzig S. Williams Clijsters Clijsters Tauziat Graf Novotna Huber Moscow Maleeva Dokic Hingis Tauziat Pierce Novotna Martinez Filderstadt Clijsters Davenport Hingis Hingis Testud Hingis Hingis Zürich Schnyder Davenport Hingis V. Williams Davenport Davenport Novotna Linz Hénin Davenport Davenport Pierce Novotna Rubin Appelmans Chicago Davenport Novotna Philadelphia Davenport Davenport Graf Hingis Novotna Championships Clijsters S. Williams Hingis Davenport Hingis Novotna Graf 1. Hilton Head until 2001 2. Tournament held in Atlanta in 1997 3. The WTA lists Surabaya as a Tier II in 1996. The ﬁeld does not back this up

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 201 Who Won What Part 3: 1990Ð1996 Order of events is (approximately) as in 1995. Tournament Winner In 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Sydney Seles Sabatini Date Capriati Sabatini Novotna Zvereva Australian Open Seles Pierce Graf Seles Seles Seles Graf Pan Paciﬁc Majoli Date Graf Navratilova Sabatini Sabatini Graf Paris1 Halard-D Graf Navratilova Navratilova Essen Majoli Novotna Medvedeva Seles Indian Wells2 Graf M. Fernandez Graf M. Fernandez Seles Navratilova Navratilova Delray Beach3 Graf Graf Graf Graf Sabatini Sabatini Lipton Graf Graf Graf Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Seles Seles San Antonio Navratilova Graf Seles Houston Graf Hack Martinez Seles Seles KMaleeva Hilton Head Sanchez-V Martinez Martinez Graf Sabatini Sabatini Navratilova Amelia Island Spirlea Martinez Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Sabatini Sabatini Graf Tampa Seles Barcelona Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Seles Martinez Sanchez-V Hamburg Sanchez-V Martinez Sanchez-V Sanchez-V Graf Graf Graf Rome Martinez Martinez Martinez Martinez Sabatini Sabatini Seles Berlin Graf Sanchez-V Graf Graf Graf Graf Seles Roland Garros Graf Graf Sanchez-V Graf Seles Seles Seles Eastbourne Seles Tauziat McGrath Navratilova McNeil Navratilova Navratilova Wimbledon Graf Graf Martinez Graf Graf Graf Navratilova Stratton Mtn Martinez Martinez Newport Sanchez-V Canadian Open Seles Seles Sanchez-V Graf Sanchez-V Capriati Graf Los Angeles4 Davenport Martinez Frazier Navratilova Navratilova Seles Seles San Diego Date Martinez Graf Graf Capriati Capriati Graf Washington, DC Sanchez-V Navratilova U.S. Open Graf Graf Sanchez-V Graf Seles Seles Sabatini Princess/Nicherei Seles Pierce Sanchez-V Coetzer Seles Seles MFernandez Leipzig Huber Huber Novotna Graf Graf Graf Graf Milan Seles Filderstadt Hingis Majoli Huber Pierce Navratilova Huber MFernandez Surabaya5 Wang Zürich Novotna Majoli Maleeva ManMaleeva Graf Graf Graf Brighton M. Fernandez Novotna Novotna Graf Graf Graf Chicago Novotna Maleeva Zvereva Seles Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Oakland Hingis Maleeva Sanchez-V Navratilova Seles Navratilova Seles New England Graf Philadelphia Novotna Graf Huber Martinez Graf Seles Championships Graf Graf Sabatini Graf Seles Seles Seles 1. There was a tournament in Paris prior to 1993, but it was smaller and at a different time; winners are not recorded here 2. Indian Wells: Palm Springs until 1991 3. Delray Beach: Boca Raton until 1992 4. Sometimes designated “Manhattan Beach” 5. The WTA lists Surabaya as a Tier II in 1996. The ﬁeld does not back this up

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 202 Who Won What Part 4: 1986Ð1989 Order of events is (approximately) as in 1990. A major change in Tier schedule occurred between 1987 and 1988, with very many $150,000 events upgrading in the interim. In 1987, $150,000 was the equivalent of Tier II; in 1988, it was not. I have listed as Tier II events only those $150,000 events which upgraded in 1988 — but marked them in italics for 1987 (not previously). TThe Tour shifted to a Calendar Year system in 1986. Note that this resulted in many events not being played in 1986. Tournament 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 Brisbane Zvereva Sukova Shriver Mandlikova Sydney Zvereva Navratilova Shriver Garrison Australian Open Graf Graf Graf Mandlikova Pan Paciﬁc Graf Navratilova Shriver Sabatini Graf1 Chicago Navratilova Garrison-Jackson Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Washington, DC Navratilova Graf Navratilova Mandlikova Indian Wells2 Navratilova Maleeva-Fragniere Boca Raton Sabatini Graf Sabatini Graf Lipton Seles Sabatini Graf Graf Houston KMaleeva Seles Evert Evert Evert San Antonio Seles Graf Graf Hilton Head Navratilova Graf Navratilova Graf Graf Amelia Island Graf Sabatini Navratilova Graf Graf Tampa Seles Martinez Evert Evert Hamburg Graf Graf Graf Graf Rome Seles Sabatini Sabatini Graf Berlin Seles Graf Graf Graf Graf Roland Garros Seles Sanchez-Vicario Graf Graf Evert Eastbourne Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Sukova Navratilova Wimbledon Navratilova Graf Graf Navratilova Navratilova Newport Sanchez-Vicario Garrison McNeil Shriver Shriver Canadian Open Graf Navratilova Sabatini Shriver Sukova San Diego Graf Graf Rehe Reggi Cincinnati Potter Los Angeles3 Seles Navratilova Evert Graf Navratilova Mahwah Graf Graf Man. Maleeva Graf U.S. Open Sabatini Graf Graf Navratilova Navratilova Dallas Navratilova Navratilova Evert Leipzig Graf Princess/Nicherei M. Fernandez New Orleans Evert Evert Navratilova Zürich Graf Graf Shriver Graf Filderstadt M. Fernandez Sabatini Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Brighton Graf Graf Graf Sabatini Graf Oakland4 Seles Garrison Navratilova Garrison New England Graf Navratilova Navratilova Shriver Navratilova Indianapolis Martinez Graf Championships Seles Graf Sabatini Graf Navratilova 1. Listed by the WTA as a Tier I event but with $50,000 in prize money. Presumably the former is correct 2. Palm Springs in 1989 3. Sometimes designated Manhattan Beach 4. Sometimes designated San Francisco, e.g. in 1987

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 203 Who Won What Part 5: 1983Ð1986 Order of events is (approximately) as in 1985. See footnotes (on the following page), as the tour order was complex at this time; many events moved and the schedule was repeatedly adjusted. Tournament 19861 1985(-1986)2 1984(-1985)3 1983(Ð1984) Palm Beach Gard4 Horvath Evert Boston Mandlikova Hilton Head Graf Evert Evert Navratilova Amelia Island Graf Garrison Navratilova Evert Orlando5 Evert Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Houston Evert Navratilova Mandlikova Atlanta Shriver Italian Open6 Reggi ManMaleeva Temesvari Johannesburg Evert Sydney Indoors Shriver Berlin Graf Evert Kohde-Kilsch Evert French Open Evert Evert Navratilova Evert Eastbourne Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Wimbledon Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Newport Shriver Evert Navratilova Moulton Indianapolis7 Graf Temesvari ManMaleeva Temesvari Los Angeles Navratilova Kohde-Kilsch Evert Navratilova Canadian Open Sukova Evert Evert Navratilova Mahwah Graf Rinaldi Navratilova Durie U.S. Open Navratilova Mandlikova Navratilova Navratilova Queens Grand Prix8 Bonder Richmond Fairbank Hartford Schaefer Detroit Ruzici Chicago Navratilova Gadusek Shriver New Orleans Navratilova Evert Navratilova Fort Lauderdale9 Navratilova Navratilova Evert Filderstadt10 Navratilova Shriver Lindqvist Navratilova Brighton Graf Evert Hanika Evert Zürich Garrison Garrison Tampa Rehe Torres Navratilova Lions Cup11 Evert ManMaleeva Navratilova Brisbane Navratilova Sukova Shriver Sydney Navratilova Navratilova Durie Australian Open Navratilova Evert Navratilova Pan Paciﬁc Graf12 ManMaleeva Washington, DC Navratilova Navratilova Mandlikova New England Navratilova Navratilova Key Biscayne13 Evert Evert Lipton Evert Navratilova Oakland Evert Mandlikova Mandlikova Princeton14 Navratilova Mandlikova Navratilova Dallas Navratilova Mandlik/Navrat15 Championships Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 204 1. Partial year; see note on 1985Ð1986. 2. Until 1986, the Tour used a “tournament year” stretching from roughly March to March. In 1986, it switched to a calendar year form, explaining why many events are omitted (but not shown as unplayed) in 1986 3. The 1984/1985 season was 13 months long, including March 1985 and March 1986. One tournament — Dallas — was therefore played twice in that year, and not at all in the 1983/1984 season. 4. Reduced to a $50,000 tournament in 1985, coupled with a “4-woman special” won by Evert 5. Marco Island in 1986, with reduced prize money and an earlier date 6. The Italian Open was “in exile” 1980-1985, held in Taranto (with a $50,000 prize) in 1985, and in Perugia in 1984 and before (with a more normal $150,000 prize). It was not held in 1986 (not unusual given the realignment) 7. In some years (e.g. 1985), there were two Indianapolis events, perhaps on different surfaces. This is the larger 8. Held in Tokyo. Singles only; no doubles. Featured a third and fourth place playoff as well as winner and runner-up 9. Bonaventure in 1984; Deer Creek in 1983, with reduced prize money 10. Stuttgart until 1985 11. Held in Tokyo. Singles only; no doubles. Featured a third and fourth place playoff as well as winner and runner-up 12. Listed by the WTA as a Tier I event but with $50,000 in prize money. Presumably the former is correct 13. Key Biscayne: Later Boca Raton 14. Held in Livingston in the 1983/1984 season 15. Dallas 1984/1985: Won by Mandlikova in March 1984 and by Navratilova in March 1985

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 205 Active Leaders in Titles (Singles/Doubles) Minimum ten titles required to be listed, except for this year’s Slam winners, shown in [square brackets]. Players in bold won at least one title in 2006 Singles Doubles Player Titles Player Titles Davenport*...... 52† Raymond* ...... 65 Hingis* ¤...... 43 Stubbs* ...... 58 Hénin* ...... 38 Suárez*¤ ...... 44 Clijsters*¤ ...... 34 Ruano Pascual* ...... 38 V. Williams* ...... 34† Hingis*...... 37 S. Williams* ...... 27† Black* ...... 36 Mauresmo* ...... 24 Davenport* ...... 36 Pierce*...... 18 Sugiyama*...... 34 Sharapova* ...... 16 Likhovtseva¤ ...... 27 Smashnova¤...... 12 Huber*...... 24 Myskina*...... 10 Husarova ...... 23 Schnyder ...... 10 Stosur*...... 22 Loit ...... 16 Srebotnik ...... 16 Shaughnessy ...... 15 Kuznetsova* ...... 13 Morariu*¤...... 13 Yan* ...... 13 Petrova ...... 12 Clijsters*¤...... 11 Peschke ...... 11 Sun ...... 11 Pierce* ...... 10 Rubin* ...... 10 S. Williams* ...... 10 Zheng*...... 10 [Molik*...... 7] [Saﬁna* ...... 6] [Santangelo* ...... 6] [Déchy* ...... 4] * Titles include at least one Slam † Excludes Olympics before 2004, Grand Slam Cup ¤ Has announced plans to retire or retired this year

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 206 Recent Singles Winners, Finalists, Semiﬁnalists The following list shows every player to have reached a WTA semifinal, with listed result, since the beginning of 1999. Titles shown in Highlight. As a good general rule, the longer a player’s entry, the better she is; the higher the fraction of her entry in Highlight, the better she handles pressure (not even close to the same thing). Amanmuradova, Akgul — Tashkent 2005 F, Cincinnati 2007 SF Ani, Maret — Acapulco 2006 SF Appelmans, Sabine — Luxembourg 1999 SF Arn, Greta — Estoril 2007 W Arvidsson, Sofia — Quebec City 2005 F, Memphis 2006 W, Stockholm 2006 SF Asagoe, Shinobu — Oklahoma City 2001 SF, Acapulco 2003 SF, Birmingham 2003 F, Hobart 2004 F, Auckland 2005 F, Pan Pacific 2005 SF Azarenka, Victoria — GuangZhou 2005 SF, Tashkent 2006 SF, Estoril 2007 F, Prague 2007 SF, Tashkent 2007 F Bacheva, Lubomira — Estoril 1999 SF Bachmann, Angelika — Tashkent 1999 SF Bammer, Sybille — Pattaya City 2006 SF, Hobart 2007 SF, Pattaya City 2007 Win, Indian Wells 2007 SF, Amelia Island 2007 SF, Stanford 2007 SF Bardina, Vasilisa — Hobart 2007 F Barna, Anca — Estoril 2002 F, Vienna 2003 SF, Pattaya City 2003 SF, Tashkent 2004 SF Bartoli, Marion — Canberra 2003 SF, Auckland 2004 SF, Hyderabad 2004 SF, Cincinnati 2004 SF, Auckland 2005 SF, Quebec City 2005 SF, Auckland 2006 W, Bali 2006 F, Seoul 2006 SF, Japan Open 2006 W, Quebec City 2006 W, Prague 2007 F, Strasbourg 2007 SF, Birmingham 2006 SF, Birmingham 2007 SF, Eastbourne 2007 SF, Wimbledon 2007 F, Luxembourg 2007 SF, Linz 2007 SF Bedanova, Daja — Princess Cup 2000 SF, Bratislava 2000 W, Gold Coast 2002 SF, Eastbourne 2002 SF Beigbeder, Celine — Strasbourg 2001 SF Benesova, Iveta — Bratislava 2002 F, Hobart 2003 SF, Acapulco 2004 W, Estoril 2004 F, Budapest 2004 SF, Forest Hills 2004 F, Hobart 2005 SF, Forest Hills 2005 SF, Hobart 2006 F Bes, Eva — Antwerp 2001 SF Black, Cara — Birmingham 1999 SF, Auckland 2000 F, Birmingham 2000 SF, Hobart 2001 SF, Big Island 2002 W Bondarenko, Alona — Hyderabad 2005 F, Rabat 2006 SF, Luxembourg 2006 W, Warsaw 2007 F, Istanbul 2007 SF Boogert, Kristie — Antwerp 1999 SF, Budapest 2000 F Bovina, Elena — Estoril 2001 F, Estoril 2002 SF, Warsaw 2002 W, Quebec City 2002 W, Gold Coast 2003 SF, Filderstadt 2003 SF, New Haven 2004 W, Hasselt 2004 F, Moscow 2004 SF, Linz 2004 F Brandi, Kristina — ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2000 SF, Hobart 2004 SF Brémond, Severine (Beltrame) — Bangkok 2006 SF, Quebec City 2006 SF Bychkova, Ekaterina — Tashkent 2005 SF Callens, Els — Antwerp 1999 SF, Big Island 2002 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 207 Camerin, Maria Elena — Casablanca 2001 F, Bali 2004 SF, Hasselt 2004 SF, Tashkent 2005 SF, Forest Hills 2006 SF, Portoroz 2006 F Capriati, Jennifer — Strasbourg 1999 W, Quebec City 1999 W, Australian Open 2000 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2000 SF, Luxembourg 2000 W, Zürich 2000 SF, Quebec City 2000 F, Australian Open 2001 W, Oklahoma City 2001 F, Scottsdale 2001 SF, Ericsson 2001 F, Charleston 2001 W, Berlin 2001 W, Roland Garros 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 SF, Canadian Open 2001 F, New Haven 2001 SF, U. S. Open 2001 SF, Zürich 2001 SF, Australian Open 2002 W, Scottsdale 2002 F, Miami 2002 F, Charleston 2002 SF, Berlin 2002 SF, Rome 2002 SF, Roland Garros 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 F, Los Angeles Championships 2002 SF, Dubai 2003 SF, Indian Wells 2003 SF, Miami 2003 F, Amelia Island 2003 SF, Berlin 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2003 SF, Stanford 2003 F, New Haven 2003 W, U. S. Open 2003 SF, WTA Championships 2003 SF, Doha 2004 SF, Berlin 2004 SF, Rome 2004 F, Roland Garros 2004 SF, U. S. Open 2004 SF Casanova, Myriam — Budapest 2002 F, Brussels 2002 W, Antwerp 2004 SF Castaño, Catalina — Bogota 2002 SF, Budapest 2005 F, Seoul 2005 SF, Canberra 2006 SF Cervanova, Ludmila — Bratislava 2001 SF, Casablanca 2003 SF, Budapest 2003 SF, Palermo 2003 SF, Casablanca 2004 F, Acapulco 2005 F, Bogota 2006 SF Chan Yung-Jan — Japan Open 2006 SF, Bangkok 2007 SF Chladkova, Denisa — Budapest 1999 SF, Strasbourg 1999 SF, Knokke-Heist 1999 F, Pattaya City 1999 SF, Hannover 2000 F, Bratislava 2000 SF, Helsinki 2002 F, Warsaw 2003 SF, Palermo 2004 SF Chakvetadze, Anna — New Haven 2005 SF, Warsaw 2006 SF, Canadian Open 2006 SF, GuangZhou 2006 W, Moscow 2006 W, Hobart 2007 W, Antwerp 2007 SF, Miami 2007 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2007 W, Cincinnati 2007 W, Stanford 2007 W, San Diego 2007 SF, U. S. Open 2007 SF, Madrid Championships 2007 SF Chi, Jane — Japan Open 1999 SF Cho, Yoon Jeong — Pattaya City 2002 F, Auckland 2003 F, Memphis 2003 SF, Canberra 2006 F Cibulkova, Dominika — Guangzhou 2007 SF Cirstea, Sorana — Budapest 2007 F, Bali 2007 SF Clijsters, Kim — Luxembourg 1999 W, Bratislava 1999 F, Hobart 2000 W, Filderstadt 2000 F, Leipzig 2000 W, Indian Wells 2001 F, Bol 2001 SF, Roland Garros 2001 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2001 F, Knokke- Heist 2001 SF, Stanford 2001 W, New Haven 2001 SF, Princess Cup 2001 SF, Leipzig 2001 W, Luxembourg 2001 W, Munich Championships 2001 SF, Sydney 2002 SF, Australian Open 2002 SF, Hamburg 2002 W, Rome 2002 SF, Stanford 2002 F, Princess Cup 2002 F, Leipzig 2002 SF, Filderstadt 2002 W, Luxembourg 2002 W, Los Angeles Championships 2002 W, Sydney 2003 W, Australian Open 2003 SF, Antwerp 2003 F, Scottsdale 2003 F, Indian Wells 2003 W, Miami 2003 SF, Berlin 2003 F, Rome 2003 W, Roland Garros 2003 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 W, Wimbledon 2003 SF, Stanford 2003 W, San Diego 2003 F, Los Angeles 2003 W, U. S. Open 2003 F, Leipzig 2003 SF, Filderstadt 2003 W, Zürich 2003 SF, Luxembourg 2003 W, WTA Championships 2003 W, Australian Open 2004 F, Paris 2004 W, Antwerp 2004 W, Hasselt 2004 SF, Indian Wells 2005 W, Miami 2005 W, Warsaw 2005 SF, Eastbourne 2005 W, Stanford 2005 W, Los Angeles 2005 W, Canadian Open 2005 W, U. S. Open 2005 W, Luxembourg 2005 W, Hasselt 2005 W, Australian Open 2006 SF, Antwerp 2006 F, Warsaw 2006 W, Roland Garros 2006 SF, Eastbourne 2006 SF, Wimbledon 2006 SF, Stanford 2006 W, San Diego 2006 F, Hasselt 2006 W, Madrid Championships 2006 SF, Sydney 2007 W, Australian Open 2007 SF, Antwerp 2007 F

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 208 Coetzer, Amanda — Oklahoma City 1999 F, Pan Pacific 1999 F, Eastbourne 1999 SF, Stanford 1999 SF, San Diego 1999 SF, Oklahoma City 2000 SF, Hamburg 2000 SF, Berlin 2000 F, Antwerp 2000 W, New Haven 2000 SF, Acapulco 2001 W, Amelia Island 2001 F, Hamburg 2001 SF, Luxembourg 2001 SF, Moscow 2002 SF, Memphis 2003 F, Acapulco 2003 W Cohen-Aloro, Stéphanie — Estoril 2004 SF Courtois, Laurence — Tashkent 1999 F, Antwerp 2000 SF Craybas, Jill — Japan Open 2002 W, Memphis 2006 SF, Auckland 2007 SF Czink, Melinda — Canberra 2005 F, Bangalore 2006 SF Daniilidou, Eleni — Budapest 2002 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2002 W, Bahia 2002 F, Auckland 2003 W, Paris 2003 SF, Birmingham 2003 F, Auckland 2004 W, Miami 2004 F, Portoroz 2005 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2006 SF, Seoul 2006 W, New Haven 2007 SF, Seoul 2007 SF Davenport, Lindsay — Sydney 1999 W, Australian Open 1999 SF, Wimbledon 1999 W, Stanford 1999 W, San Diego 1999 SF, Los Angeles 1999 SF, New Haven 1999 F, U. S. Open 1999 SF, Princess Cup 1999 W, Philadelphia 1999 W, Chase Championships 1999 W, Sydney 2000 F, Madrid 1999 W, Australian Open 2000 W, Scottsdale 2000 F (rainout), Indian Wells 2000 W, Ericsson 2000 F, Wimbledon 2000 F, Stanford 2000 F, Los Angeles 2000 F, U. S. Open 2000 F, Zürich 2000 F, Linz 2000 W, Philadelphia 2000 W, Sydney 2001 F, Australian Open 2001 SF, Pan Pacific 2001 W, Scottsdale 2001 W, Eastbourne 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 SF, Stanford 2001 F, San Diego 2001 SF, Los Angeles 2001 W, New Haven 2001 F, Filderstadt 2001 W, Zürich 2001 W, Linz 2001 W, Munich Championships 2001 F, Stanford 2002 SF, San Diego 2002 SF, Los Angeles 2002 F, New Haven 2002 F, U. S. Open 2002 SF, Moscow 2002 F, Zürich 2002 F, Sydney 2003 F, Pan Pacific 2003 W, Indian Wells 2003 F, Charleston 2003 SF, Amelia Island 2003 F, San Diego 2003 SF, Los Angeles 2003 F, New Haven 2003 F, U. S. Open 2003 SF, Sydney 2004 SF, Pan Pacific 2004 W, Indian Wells 2004 F, Amelia Island 2004 W, Strasbourg 2004 F, Wimbledon 2004 SF, Stanford 2004 W, Los Angeles 2004 W, San Diego 2004 W, Cincinnati 2004 W, U. S. Open 2004 SF, Filderstadt 2004 W, Moscow 2004 SF, Australian Open 2005 F, Pan Pacific 2005 F, Dubai 2005 W, Indian Wells 2005 F, Amelia Island 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 F, New Haven 2005 W, Bali 2005 W, Filderstadt 2005 W, Zürich 2005 W, Los Angeles Championships 2005 SF, Dubai 2006 SF, New Haven 2006 F, Bali 2006 SF, Bali 20 07 W, Beijing 2007 SF, Quebec City 2007 W Dechaume-Balleret, Alexia — Prostejov 1999 SF Déchy, Nathalie — Paris 1999 SF, Bratislava 1999 SF, Gold Coast 2000 SF, Oklahoma City 2000 F, Estoril 2000 F, Strasbourg 2000 SF, Canberra 2001 SF, Scottsdale 2002 SF, Bratislava 2002 SF, Gold Coast 2003 W, Sarasota 2003 SF, Gold Coast 2004 SF, Indian Wells 2004 SF, New Haven 2004 F, Australian Open 2005 SF, Strasbourg 2005 SF, Luxembourg 2005 SF, Quebec City 2005 SF, Forest Hills 2007 SF de Lone, Erica — Kuala Lumpur 1999 F de los Rios, Rossana — Bahia 2001 SF, Pattaya City 2001 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 209 Dementieva, Elena — Palermo 1999 SF, Indian Wells 2000 SF, Los Angeles 2000 SF, U. S. Open 2000 SF, [Olympics 2000 Silver], Chase Championships 2000 SF, Acapulco 2001 F, Ericsson 2001 SF, Leipzig 2001 SF, Moscow 2001 F, Acapulco 2002 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2002 F, Filderstadt 2002 SF, Antwerp 2003 SF, Amelia Island 2003 W, Canadian Open 2003 SF, New Haven 2003 SF, Bali 2003 W, Shanghai 2003 W, Moscow 2003 SF, Miami 2004 F, Roland Garros 2004 F, Los Angeles 2004 SF, San Diego 2004 SF, New Haven 2004 SF, U. S. Open 2004 F, Hasselt 2004 W, Moscow 2004 F, Zürich 2004 SF, Sydney 2005 SF, Indian Wells 2005 SF, Charleston 2005 F, Los Angeles 2005 SF, U. S. Open 2005 SF, Filderstadt 2005 SF, Moscow 2005 SF, Philadelphia 2005 F, Pan Pacific 2006 W, Antwerp 2006 SF, Indian Wells 2006 F, Warsaw 2006 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2006 SF, Los Angeles 2006 W, Moscow 2006 SF, Pan Pacific 2007 SF, Istanbul 2007 W, San Diego 2007 SF, New Haven 2007 SF, Moscow 2007 W Diaz-Oliva, Mariana — Estoril 1999 SF, Bogota 2001 SF, Bol 2001 F, Palermo 2002 W, Acapulco 2003 F Ditty, Julie — Quebec City 2007 SF Dokic, Jelena — Wimbledon 2000 SF, [Olympics 2000 SF], Hamburg 2001 SF, Rome 2001 W, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2001 SF, Sopot 2001 SF, Bahia 2001 F, Princess Cup 2001 W, Moscow 2001 W, Zürich 2001 F, Linz 2001 F, Paris 2002 F, Sarasota 2002 W, Amelia Island 2002 SF, Hamburg 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2002 F, Birmingham 2002 W, San Diego 2002 F, Los Angeles 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 SF, Bahia 2002 SF, Princess Cup 2002 SF, Warsaw 2003 SF, Zürich 2003 F, Pan Pacific 2004 SF Domachowska, Marta — Sopot 2004 SF, Seoul 2004 F, Strasbourg 2005 F, Beijing 2005 SF, Memphis 2006 F Dominguez Lino, Lourdes — Bogota 2005 F, Bogota 2006 W, Budapest 2006 F, Forest Hills 2006 SF, Bogota 2007 SF Dragomir Ilie, Ruxandra — Amelia Island 1999 F, Berlin 1999 SF, New Haven 1999 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2000 F, Hobart 2001 SF Drake, Maureen — Cairo 1999 SF Dulko, Gisela — Casablanca 2002 SF, Hobart 2005 F, Estoril 2005 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 SF, Bangkok 2005 SF, Pattaya City 2007 F, Budapest 2007 W, Forest Hills 2007 W, Portoroz 2007 SF Dushevina, Vera — Helsinki 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2005 F, Stockholm 2005 SF, Stockholm 2007 F, Portoroz 2007 SF Errani, Sara — Acapulco 2007 SF, Palermo 2007 SF, Bali 2007 SF Farina Elia, Silvia — Auckland 1999 SF, Prostejov 1999 F, Estoril 2000 SF, Palermo 2000 SF, Gold Coast 2001 F, Porto 2001 SF, Strasbourg 2001 W, Sopot 2001 SF, Moscow 2001 SF, Pan Pacific 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2002 W, Quebec City 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2003 W, Eastbourne 2003 SF, Canberra 2004 F, Antwerp 2004 F, Strasbourg 2004 SF, Stockholm 2004 SF, Luxembourg 2004 SF, Gold Coast 2005 SF, Amelia Island 2005 F Fedak, Yuliana — Canberra 2005 SF Fernandez, Clarisa — Roland Garros 2002 SF, Bogota 2005 SF Fernandez, Mary Joe — Strasbourg 1999 SF Flipkens, Kirsten — Forest Hills 2004 SF Frazier, Amy — Hobart 1999 SF, Japan Open 1999 W, Madrid 1999 W, Stanford 1999 SF, Princess Cup 1999 SF, Quebec City 1999 SF, Hobart 2000 SF, San Diego 2000 SF, Japan Open 2000 F, Quebec City 2000 SF, Hobart 2002 SF, Princess Cup 2002 SF, Hobart 2003 F, Hobart 2004 W, Vienna 2004 SF, Stanford 2004 SF, Cincinnati 2004 SF, Auckland 2005 SF, Quebec City 2005 W, Memphis 2006 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 210 Gagliardi, Emmanuelle — Cairo 1999 SF, São Paulo 2000 SF, Indian Wells 2002 SF, Auckland 2003 SF, Estoril 2003 SF, Tashkent 2003 SF Gallovits, Edina — Barcelona 2007 F Garbin, Tathiana — Bogota 2000 F, Estoril 2000 SF, Budapest 2000 W, Bol 2002 SF, Tashkent 2002 SF, Sopot 2002 SF, Modena 2005 F, Palermo 2006 F, Portoroz 2006 SF, Gold Coast 2007 SF, Bogota 2007 F Gersi, Adriana — Portschach 1999 SF, Portschach 2000 SF, Doha 2001 SF, Basel 2001 W Glatch, Alexa — Forest Hills 2005 SF Goerges, Julia — Stockholm 2007 SF Golovin, Tatiana — Paris 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 F, Gold Coast 2005 SF, Paris 2005 SF, Charleston 2005 SF, Birmingham 2005 SF, Seoul 2005 SF, Japan Open 2005 F, Paris 2006 SF, Miami 2006 SF, Stanford 2006 SF, Stuttgart 2006 F, Antwerp 2007 SF, Amelia Island 2007 W, Canadian Open 2007 SF, Portoroz 2007 W, Stuttgart 2007 F, Zürich 2007 SF Govortsova, Olga — Tashkent 2007 SF Gorrochategui, Ines — Warsaw 1999 F Graf, Steffi — Sydney 1999 SF, Hannover 1999 SF, Indian Wells 1999 F, Lipton 1999 SF, Roland Garros 1999 W, Wimbledon 1999 F Grahame, Amanda — Canberra 2002 SF Grande, Rita — Hobart 1999 F, Kuala Lumpur 1999 SF, Oklahoma City 2000 SF, Hobart 2001 W, Shanghai 2001 SF, Bratislava 2001 W, Bratislava 2002 SF, Casablanca 2003 W, Casablanca 2004 SF Granville, Laura — Memphis 2003 SF, Quebec City 2003 SF, Memphis 2004 SF, Vancouver 2004 F, Birmingham 2005 SF Grönefeld, Anna-Lena — Pattaya City 2005 F, Hyderabad 2005 SF, Stanford 2005 SF, Beijing 2005 F, Luxembourg 2005 F, Acapulco 2006 W, Charleston 2006 SF, Istanbul 2006 SF Gubacsi, Zsofia — Casablanca 2001 W, Porto 2002 SF Habsudova, Karina — Portschach 1999 W, Sopot 1999 F, Bratislava 2000 SF Halard-Decugis, Julie — Auckland 1999 W, Hobart 1999 SF, Bol 1999 F, Berlin 1999 F, Birmingham 1999 W, Los Angeles 1999 F, Paris 2000 SF, Eastbourne 2000 W, Princess Cup 2000 F, Japan Open 2000 W Hantuchova, Daniela — Oklahoma City 2001 SF, Birmingham 2001 SF, Indian Wells 2002 W, Eastbourne 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 SF, New Haven 2002 SF, Filderstadt 2002 F, Linz 2002 SF, Antwerp 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2004 F, Doha 2005 SF, Cincinnati 2005 SF, Los Angeles 2005 F, Filderstadt 2005 SF, Auckland 2006 SF, Zürich 2006 F, Doha 2007 SF, Indian Wells 2007 W, Rome 2007 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2007 SF, Stanford 2007 SF, Bali 2007 F, Kolkata 2007 SF, Luxembourg 2007 F, Linz 2007 W Harkleroad, Ashley — Charleston 2003 SF, Strasbourg 2003 SF, Auckland 2004 F

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 211 Hénin, Justine — Antwerp 1999 W, Gold Coast 2001 W, Canberra 2001 W, Estoril 2001 SF, Berlin 2001 SF, Roland Garros 2001 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 F, Big Island 2001 F, Filderstadt 2001 F, Gold Coast 2002 F, Antwerp 2002 SF, Amelia Island 2002 F, Berlin 2002 W, Rome 2002 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2002 SF, Wimbledon 2002 SF, Leipzig 2002 SF, Zürich 2002 SF, Linz 2002 W, Sydney 2003 SF, Australian Open 2003 SF, Antwerp 2003 SF, Dubai 2003 W, Charleston 2003 W, Amelia Island 2003 SF, Berlin 2003 W, Roland Garros 2003 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 F, Wimbledon 2003 SF, San Diego 2003 W, Canadian Open 2003 W, U. S. Open 2003 W, Leipzig 2003 F, Filderstadt 2003 F, Zürich 2003 W, WTA Championships 2003 SF, Sydney 2004 W, Australian Open 2004 W, Dubai 2004 W, Doha 2004 SF, Indian Wells 2004 W, Amelia Island 2004 SF, Olympics 2004 W, Charleston 2005 W, Warsaw 2005 W, Berlin 2005 W, Roland Garros 2005 W, Canadian Open 2005 F, Sydney 2006 W, Australian Open 2006 F, Dubai 2006 W, Indian Wells 2006 SF, Charleston 2006 SF, Berlin 2006 F, Roland Garros 2006 W, Eastbourne 2006 W, Wimbledon 2006 F, New Haven 2006 W, U. S. Open 2006 F, Madrid Championships 2006 W, Paris 2007 SF, Dubai 2007 W, Doha 2007 W, Miami 2007 F, Warsaw 2007 W, Berlin 2007 SF, Roland Garros 2007 W, Eastbourne 2007 W, Wimbledon 2007 SF, Canadian Open 2007 W, U. S. Open 2007 W, Stuttgart 2007 W, Zürich 2007 W, Madrid Championships 2007 W Henke, Vanessa — Portoroz 2005 SF Hingis, Martina — Sydney 1999 F, Australian Open 1999 W, Pan Pacific 1999 W, Lipton 1999 SF, Hilton Head 1999 W, Rome 1999 SF, Berlin 1999 W, Roland Garros 1999 F, San Diego 1999 W, Los Angeles 1999 SF, Canadian Open 1999 W, U. S. Open 1999 F, Filderstadt 1999 W, Zürich 1999 F, Philadelphia 1999 F, Chase Championships 1999 F, Sydney 2000 SF, Australian Open 2000 F, Pan Pacific 2000 W, Scottsdale 2000 F (rainout), Indian Wells 2000 F, Ericsson 2000 W, Hamburg 2000 W, Berlin 2000 SF, Roland Garros 2000 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2000 W, Los Angeles 2000 SF, Canadian Open 2000 W, U. S. Open 2000 SF, Filderstadt 2000 W, Zürich 2000 W, Moscow 2000 W, Philadelphia 2000 F, Chase Championships 2000 W, Sydney 2001 W, Australian Open 2001 F, Pan Pacific 2001 F, Doha 2001 W, Dubai 2001 W, Indian Wells 2001 SF, Ericsson 2001 SF, Charleston 2001 F, Berlin 2001 SF, Rome 2001 SF, Roland Garros 2001 SF, San Diego 2001 SF, Los Angeles 2001 SF, U. S. Open 2001 SF, Filderstadt 2001 SF, Sydney 2002 W, Australian Open 2002 F, Pan Pacific 2002 W, Scottsdale 2002 SF, Indian Wells 2002 F, Hamburg 2002 SF, Gold Coast 2006 SF, Pan Pacific 2006 F, Doha 2006 SF, Indian Wells 2006 SF, Rome 2006 W, Canadian Open 2006 F, Kolkata 2006 W, Gold Coast 2007 F, Pan Pacific 2007 W Hopkins, Jennifer — Warsaw 2000 SF, Hobart 2001 F Hopmans, Amanda — Prostejov 1999 SF, Auckland 2000 SF, Warsaw 2000 F Hrdlickova, Kveta: See Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke Hsieh Su-Wei — Bali 2001 SF Huber, Anke — Filderstadt 1999 SF, Leipzig 1999 SF, Estoril 2000 W, Hamburg 2000 SF, Sopot 2000 W, Paris 2001 F, Nice 2001 SF, Strasbourg 2001 SF, Canadian Open 2001 SF Husarova, Janette — Doha 2002 SF Irvin, Marissa — Big Island 2001 SF Ivanovic, Ana — Canberra 2005 W, Warsaw 2005 SF, Zürich 2005 SF, Linz 2005 SF, Canadian Open 2006 W, Pan Pacific 2007 F, Amelia Island 2007 SF, Berlin 2007 W, Roland Garros 2007 F, Wimbledon 2007 SF, Los Angeles 2007 W, Luxembourg 2007 W, Madrid Championships 2007 SF Jackson, Jamea — Birmingham 2006 F

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 212 Jankovic, Jelena — Budapest 2004 W, Linz 2004 SF, Dubai 2005 F, Berlin 2005 SF, Birmingham 2005 F, Seoul 2005 F, Strasbourg 2006 SF, Los Angeles 2006 F, U. S. Open 2006 SF, Beijing 2006 SF, GuangZhou 2006 SF, Auckland 2007 W, Sydney 2007 F, Dubai 2007 SF, Doha 2007 SF, Charleston 2007 W, Warsaw 2007 SF, Rome 2007 W, Strasbourg 2007 SF, Roland Garros 2007 SF, Birmingham 2007 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2007 F, Los Angeles 2007 SF, Canadian Open 2007 F, Beijing 2007 F, Stuttgart 2007 SF Jidkova, Alina — Memphis 2002 SF, Vancouver 2004 SF, Quebec City 2004 SF Kandarr, Jana — Estoril 2001 SF Kanepi, Kaia — Kolkata 2005 SF, Prague 2006 SF, Hasselt 2006 F, Bad Gastein 2007 SF Kapros, Aniko — Budapest 2001 SF, Casablanca 2001 SF, Japan Open 2003 F Keothavong, Anne — Kolkata 2007 SF King, Vania — Bangalore 2006 SF, Bangkok 2006 W Kirilenko, Maria — Hyderabad 2004 F, Hyderabad 2005 SF, Beijing 2005 W, Japan Open 2005 SF, Kolkata 2007 W, Seoul 2007 SF Kleinova, Sandra — Stockholm 2004 SF Knapp, Karin — Budapest 2007 SF, Palermo 2007 SF, Bad Gastein 2007 SF Koryttseva, Mariya — Kolkata 2007 F Kostanic, Jelena — Antwerp 2000 SF, Vienna 2001 SF, Helsinki 2003 F, Charleston 2004 SF, Vienna 2004 SF, Budapest 2005 SF, Hobart 2006 SF, Pattaya City 2006 F, Bangalore 2006 F Kournikova, Anna — Oklahoma City 1999 SF, Hilton Head 1999 F, Amelia Island 1999 SF, Eastbourne 1999 SF, Sydney 2000 SF, Paris 2000 SF, Scottsdale 2000 SF, Stanford 2000 SF, San Diego 2000 SF, Luxembourg 2000 SF, Moscow 2000 F, Leipzig 2000 SF, Chase Championships 2000 SF, Pan Pacific 2001 SF, Auckland 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2002 SF, Acapulco 2002 SF, San Diego 2002 SF, Shanghai 2002 F Krajicek, Michaella — Tashkent 2005 W, Hasselt 2005 SF, Hobart 2006 W, Istanbul 2006 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2006 W, Budapest 2006 SF, Hasselt 2006 SF Krasnoroutskaya, Lina — Luxembourg 1999 SF, Pattaya City 2002 SF, Doha 2003 SF, Canadian Open 2003 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 SF Kremer, Anne — Pattaya City 1999 F, Auckland 2000 W, Eastbourne 2000 SF, Pattaya 2000 W, Budapest 2001 F, Quebec City 2001 SF, Amelia Island 2002 SF, Seoul 2004 SF Kruger, Joanette — Kuala Lumpur 1999 SF, São Paulo 2000 SF, Berlin 2000 SF, Japan Open 2000 SF, Bali 2001 F, Japan Open 2001 SF Kurhajcova, Lubomira — Pattaya City 2003 F, Bogota 2004 SF Kuti Kis, Rita — Estoril 1999 F, Budapest 1999 SF, Bogota 2000 SF, São Paulo 2000 W, Strasbourg 2000 F, Bogota 2001 F Kuznetsova, Svetlana — Casablanca 2002 SF, Helsinki 2002 W, Bali 2002 W, San Diego 2003 SF, Dubai 2004 F, Doha 2004 F, Warsaw 2004 F, Eastbourne 2004 W, U. S. Open 2004 W, Bali 2004 W, Beijing 2004 F, Filderstadt 2004 SF, Pan Pacific 2005 SF, Warsaw 2005 F, Eastbourne 2005 SF, Sydney 2006 SF, Dubai 2006 SF, Miami 2006 W, Amelia Island 2006 SF, Warsaw 2006 F, Rome 2006 SF, Roland Garros 2006 F, Eastbourne 2006 SF, New Haven 2006 SF, Bali 2006 W, Beijing 2006 W, Stuttgart 2006 SF, Zürich 2006 SF, Dubai 2007 SF, Doha 2007 F, Indian Wells 2007 F, Warsaw 2007 SF, Berlin 2007 F, Rome 2007 F, New Haven 2007 W, U. S. Open 2007 F, Stuttgart 2007 SF, Moscow 2007 SF Lamade, Bianka — Tashkent 2001 W

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 213 Lee-Waters, Lindsay — Canberra 2005 SF Leon Garcia, Gala — São Paulo 1999 SF, Bol 2000 SF, Madrid 2000 W, Sopot 2000 F, Palermo 2001 SF, Knokke-Heist 2001 F, Sopot 2001 F, Princess Cup 2001 SF, Big Island 2002 SF Li Na — GuangZhou 2004 W, Hobart 2005 SF, Estoril 2005 F, Rabat 2005 SF, Bali 2005 SF, Estoril 2006 F, Berlin 2006 SF, Sydney 2007 SF, Indian Wells 2007 SF Li Ting — GuangZhou 2004 SF Likhovtseva, Elena — Hannover 1999 SF, Strasbourg 1999 F, Amelia Island 2000 SF, Leipzig 2000 F, Eastbourne 2001 SF, Hobart 2003 SF, Doha 2003 F, Canadian Open 2004 F, Forest Hills 2004 W, Roland Garros 2005 SF, Kolkata 2005 SF Linetskaya, Evgenia — Pattaya City 2005 SF, Memphis 2005 SF Llagostera Vives, Nuria — Acapulco 2001 SF, Rabat 2005 W, GuangZhou 2005 F, Pattaya City 2006 SF, Estoril 2007 SF Loit, Emilie — Casablanca 2001 SF, Brussels 2002 SF, Canberra 2003 SF, Acapulco 2003 SF, Bogota 2004 SF, Casablanca 2004 W, Estoril 2004 W, Strasbourg 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 SF, Rabat 2005 SF, Stockholm 2005 SF, Acapulco 2006 SF, Estoril 2006 SF, Portoroz 2006 SF, Acapulco 2007 W Lucic, Mirjana — Wimbledon 1999 SF Majoli, Iva — Madrid 2000 SF, Kuala Lumpur 2000 F, Quebec City 2001 F, Charleston 2002 W, Bol 2002 F, Sarasota 2003 SF Maleeva, Magdalena — ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 SF, Pattaya City 1999 W, Luxembourg 2000 F, Pan Pacific 2001 SF, Paris 2001 SF, Nice 2001 F, Budapest 2001 W, Leipzig 2001 F, Linz 2001 SF, Strasbourg 2002 SF, Moscow 2002 W, Luxembourg 2002 F, Birmingham 2003 W, Pan Pacific 2004 F Mandula, Petra — Vienna 2002 SF, Sopot 2003 SF Marrero, Marta — Knokke-Heist 2000 SF, Knokke-Heist 2001 SF, Casablanca 2003 SF, Acapulco 2004 SF, Estoril 2004 SF Martinez, Conchita — Amelia Island 1999 SF, Sopot 1999 W, Gold Coast 2000 F, Australian Open 2000 SF, Amelia Island 2000 F, Hilton Head 2000 SF, Berlin 2000 W, Roland Garros 2000 F, Canadian Open 2000 SF, Philadelphia 2000 SF, Sydney 2001 SF, Charleston 2001 SF, Rome 2001 SF, Bali 2002 F, Zürich 2002 SF, Indian Wells 2003 SF, Eastbourne 2003 F, Charleston 2004 F, Pattaya City 2005 W Martinez Sanchez, Maria Jose — Madrid 2001 SF Martinez Granados, Conchita — Bol 1999 SF, Bol 2003 F Matevzic, Maja — Porto 2002 SF, Bratislava 2002 W Mattek, Bethanie — Cincinnati 2005 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 214 Mauresmo, Amélie — Australian Open 1999 F, Paris 1999 F, Rome 1999 SF, Bratislava 1999 W, Linz 1999 SF, Sydney 2000 W, Hannover 2000 SF, Bol 2000 F, Rome 2000 F, Moscow 2000 SF, Sydney 2001 SF, Paris 2001 W, Nice 2001 W, Amelia Island 2001 W, Berlin 2001 W, Rome 2001 F, Paris 2002 SF, Antwerp 2002 SF, Dubai 2002 W, Wimbledon 2002 SF, Canadian Open 2002 W, U. S. Open 2002 SF, Moscow 2002 SF, Filderstadt 2002 SF, Antwerp 2003 F, Dubai 2003 SF, Warsaw 2003 W, Berlin 2003 SF, Rome 2003 F, New Haven 2003 SF, Moscow 2003 F, Philadelphia 2003 W, WTA Championships 2003 F, Sydney 2004 F, Amelia Island 2004 F, Berlin 2004 W, Rome 2004 W, Eastbourne 2004 SF, Wimbledon 2004 SF, Canadian Open 2004 W, Olympics 2004 F, Filderstadt 2004 F, Linz 2004 W, Philadelphia 2004 W, Los Angeles Champ 2004 SF, Paris 2005 F, Antwerp 2005 W, Doha 2005 SF, Miami 2005 SF, Rome 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 SF, Canadian Open 2005 SF, New Haven 2005 F, Filderstadt 2005 F, Philadelphia 2005 W, Los Angeles Championships 2005 W, Australian Open 2006 W, Paris 2006 W, Antwerp 2006 W, Doha 2006 F, Miami 2006 SF, Berlin 2006 SF, Wimbledon 2006 W, U. S. Open 2006 SF, Beijing 2006 F, Madrid Championships 2006 F, Paris 2007 SF, Antwerp 2007 W, Dubai 2007 F, Strasbourg 2007 F, Eastbourne 2007 F McQuillan, Rachel — Dubai 2001 SF Medina Garrigues, Anabel — Antwerp 2001 SF, Madrid 2001 SF, Palermo 2001 W, Hobart 2002 F, Bogota 2003 F, Palermo 2003 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 SF, Palermo 2004 W, Forest Hills 2004 SF, Luxembourg 2004 SF, Strasbourg 2005 W, Palermo 2005 W, New Haven 2005 SF, Canberra 2006 W, Strasbourg 2006 SF, Palermo 2006 W, GuangZhou 2006 F, Strasbourg 2007 W Meusburger, Yvonne — Bad Gastein 2007 F Mikaelian, Marie-Gayanay — Tashkent 2001 SF, Basel 2001 F, Tashkent 2002 W, Quebec City 2002 F, Gold Coast 2003 F Mirza, Sania — Hyderabad 2005 W, Forest Hills 2005 F, Japan Open 2005 SF, Kolkata 2006 SF, Hobart 2007 SF, Pattaya City 2007 SF, Cincinnati 2007 SF, Stanford 2007 F Molik, Alicia — Shanghai 2001 SF, Doha 2002 SF, Hobart 2003 W, Sarasota 2003 F, Budapest 2003 F, Vienna 2004 F, Stockholm 2004 W, Olympics 2004 Bronze, Zürich 2004 W, Luxembourg 2004 W, Sydney 2005 W, Antwerp 2005 SF, Doha 2005 F Montolio, Angeles — Palermo 1999 F, Budapest 2000 SF, Portschach 2000 SF, Estoril 2001 W, Bol 2001 W, Madrid 2001 F, Porto 2002 W Morariu, Corina — Japan Open 1999 SF, Bol 1999 W, Rome 2000 SF Morigami, Akiko — Hyderabad 2003 SF, Shanghai 2003 SF, Cincinnati 2005 F, San Diego 2005 SF, Prague 2007 W, Cincinnati 2007 F Müller, Martina — Budapest 2002 W, Budapest 2006 SF, Palermo 2007 F Myskina, Anastasia — Palermo 1999 W, Sopot 2000 SF, Moscow 2001 SF, Birmingham 2002 F, Eastbourne 2002 F, New Haven 2002 SF, Bahia 2002 W, Leipzig 2002 F, Doha 2003 W, Sarasota 2003 W, Leipzig 2003 W, Moscow 2003 W, Philadelphia 2003 F, Doha 2004 W, Indian Wells 2004 SF, Roland Garros 2004 W, San Diego 2004 F, Canadian Open 2004 SF, Sopot 2004 SF, Olympics 2004 SF, Filderstadt 2004 SF, Moscow 2004 W, Los Angeles Champ 2004 SF, Antwerp 2005 SF, Stockholm 2005 F, Canadian Open 2005 SF, Kolkata 2005 W, Zürich 2005 SF, Pan Pacific 2006 SF, Istanbul 2006 F, Eastbourne 2006 F, Stockholm 2006 F Nagyova, Henrieta — Prostejov 1999 W, Portschach 1999 SF, Warsaw 2000 W, Palermo 2000 W, Kuala Lumpur 2000 W, Pattaya 2000 SF, Bahia 2001 SF, Pattaya City 2001 F, Warsaw 2002 F, Palermo 2002 SF, Sopot 2002 F, Pattaya City 2003 W Nakamura, Aiko — Japan Open 2006 F Nola, Pavlina (Stoyanova) — Palermo 2000 F, Shanghai 2000 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 215 Noorlander, Seda — Tashkent 2001 F Novotna, Jana — Pan Pacific 1999 SF, Hannover 1999 W, Hilton Head 1999 SF Obata, Saori — Bali 2003 SF, Tashkent 2003 F Obziler, Tzipora — GuangZhou 2006 SF, Bangalore 2007 SF, Guangzhou 2007 F Olaru, Ioana Raluca — Memphis 2007 SF, Fes 2007 SF Ondraskova, Zuzana — Pattaya 2000 SF, Prague 2005 F Oremans, Miriam — ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 SF, Warsaw 2000 SF, Bratislava 2000 F, Birmingham 2001 F Osterloh, Lilia — Oklahoma City 1999 SF, Canberra 2002 SF, Quebec City 2006 SF Panova, Tatiana — Kuala Lumpur 2000 SF, Pattaya 2000 F, Auckland 2002 F, Sarasota 2002 F, Pattaya City 2002 SF, Sydney 2003 SF Papadaki, Christina — Bogota 1999 F Parmentier, Pauline — Tashkent 2007 W Parra Santonja, Arantxa — Japan Open 2003 SF, Tashkent 2003 SF Paszek, Tamira — Portoroz 2006 W Peer, Shahar — Canberra 2006 SF, Pattaya City 2006 W, Prague 2006 W, Istanbul 2006 W, Gold Coast 2007 SF, Memphis 2007 F, Miami 2007 SF Peng Shuai — Sydney 2005 SF, San Diego 2005 SF, Prague 2006 SF, Strasbourg 2006 F, Beijing 2006 SF, Pattaya City 2007 SF, Beijing 2007 SF Pennetta, Flavia — Hyderabad 2003 SF, Acapulco 2004 F, Budapest 2004 SF, Palermo 2004 F, Sopot 2004 W, Bogota 2005 W, Acapulco 2005 W, Modena 2005 SF, Palermo 2005 SF, Gold Coast 2006 F, Bogota 2006 F, Acapulco 2006 F, Estoril 2006 SF, Bogota 2007 SF, Acapulco 2007 F, Barcelona 2007 SF, Seoul 2007 SF, Japan Open 2007 SF, Bangkok 2007 W Perebiynis, Tatiana — Stockholm 2004 F Peschke, Kveta Hrdlickova — Bratislava 1999 SF, Leipzig 1999 F, Linz 2000 SF, Linz 2005 SF, Luxembourg 2006 SF Petrova, Nadia — Amelia Island 2001 SF, Gold Coast 2002 SF, Roland Garros 2003 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 SF, Zürich 2003 SF, Linz 2003 F, Philadelphia 2003 SF, Gold Coast 2004 F, Miami 2004 SF, Amelia Island 2004 SF, Bali 2004 SF, Linz 2004 SF, Philadelphia 2004 SF, Paris 2005 SF, Amelia Island 2005 SF, Berlin 2005 F, Roland Garros 2005 SF, Bangkok 2005 F, Linz 2005 W, Philadelphia 2005 SF, Auckland 2006 SF, Antwerp 2006 SF, Doha 2006 W, Amelia Island 2006 W, Charleston 2006 W, Berlin 2006 W, Stuttgart 2006 W, Moscow 2006 F, Linz 2006 F, Paris 2007 W, Amelia Island 2007 F, Eastbourne 2007 SF, Los Angeles 2007 F Pierce, Mary — Gold Coast 1999 F, Hamburg 1999 F, Rome 1999 F, Canadian Open 1999 SF, Filderstadt 1999 F, Zürich 1999 SF, Linz 1999 W, Leipzig 1999 SF, Scottsdale 2000 SF, Indian Wells 2000 SF, Hilton Head 2000 W, Roland Garros 2000 W, Canberra 2001 SF, Filderstadt 2003 SF, Quebec City 2003 SF, Paris 2004 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 W, Roland Garros 2005 F, San Diego 2005 W, U. S. Open 2005 F, Moscow 2005 W, Los Angeles Championships 2005 F, Paris 2006 F Pin, Camille — Vancouver 2004 SF, Japan Open 2006 SF, Auckland 2007 SF Pironkova, Tszvetana — Istanbul 2005 SF, Palermo 2005 SF, Stockholm 2006 SF, Stockholm 2007 SF Pisnik, Tina — Warsaw 1999 SF, Tashkent 1999 SF, Bol 2000 W, Luxembourg 2001 SF, ’s- Hertogenbosch 2002 SF, Rome 2003 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 216 Pitkowski, Sarah — Budapest 1999 W, Bol 1999 SF, Antwerp 1999 F, Linz 1999 SF, Budapest 2000 SF, Tashkent 2000 SF Plischke, Sylvia — Bogota 2000 SF Pous Tio, Laura — Prague 2005 SF, Budapest 2005 SF Poutchek, Tatiana — Pattaya City 2001 SF, Budapest 2002 SF, Tashkent 2002 F Poutchkova, Olga — Kolkata 2006 F, Tashkent 2006 SF, Quebec City 2006 F Pratt, Nicole — Shanghai 2001 F, Hobart 2002 SF, Birmingham 2002 SF, Hyderabad 2004 W Prusova, Libuse — Bol 2002 SF Radwanska, Agnieszka — Luxembourg 2006 SF, Stockholm 2007 W Randriantefy, Dally — Acapulco 2005 SF, Strasbourg 2005 SF Raymond, Lisa — Moscow 1999 SF, Birmingham 2000 W, Birmingham 2001 SF, Big Island 2001 SF, Luxembourg 2001 F, Memphis 2002 W, Birmingham 2002 SF, Stanford 2002 SF, Big Island 2002 F, Pan Pacific 2003 SF, Memphis 2003 W, Memphis 2004 F, New Haven 2004 SF Razzano, Virginie — Sarasota 2002 SF, Luxembourg 2002 SF, Estoril 2003 SF, Tashkent 2004 F, Amelia Island 2005 SF, Barcelona 2007 SF, Forest Hills 2007 F, Guangzhou 2007 W, Japan Open 2007 W Reeves, Samantha — Bol 2003 SF Rezai, Aravane — Istanbul 2007 F Rittner, Barbara — Knokke-Heist 1999 SF, Luxembourg 2000 SF, Antwerp 2001 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2003 SF Rodionova, Anastasia — Quebec City 2002 SF, Guangzhou 2007 SF Ruano Pascual, Virginia — Madrid 2000 SF, Brussels 2002 SF, Tashkent 2003 W, Pattaya City 2005 SF, Seoul 2006 SF Rubin, Chanda — Hobart 1999 W, Indian Wells 1999 SF, Madrid 1999 SF, Quebec City 1999 SF, Hobart 2000 F, Pan Pacific 2000 SF, Eastbourne 2000 SF, Linz 2000 SF, Quebec City 2000 W, Eastbourne 2001 SF, Madrid 2002 F, Eastbourne 2002 W, Los Angeles 2002 W, Linz 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2003 SF, Miami 2003 SF, Madrid 2003 W, Eastbourne 2003 W, Bali 2003 F, Shanghai 2003 F, Luxembourg 2003 F, Pan Pacific 2004 SF Safarova, Lucie — Estoril 2005 W, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 F, Forest Hills 2005 W, Gold Coast 2006 W, Amelia Island 2006 SF, Palermo 2006 SF, Paris 2007 F, Estoril 2007 SF Safina, Dinara — Estoril 2002 SF, Sopot 2002 W, Palermo 2003 W, Paris 2004 SF, Luxembourg 2004 F, Paris 2005 W, Estoril 2005 SF, Prague 2005 W, Luxembourg 2005 SF, Moscow 2005 SF, Hasselt 2005 SF, Gold Coast 2006 SF, Rome 2006 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2006 F, Canadian Open 2006 SF, Gold Coast 2007 W, Charleston 2007 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2007 SF, Moscow 2007 SF Salerni, Maria Emilia — Hobart 2004 SF, Quebec City 2004 SF, Fes 2007 SF Sanchez Lorenzo, Maria — Knokke-Heist 1999 W, Bol 2000 SF, Budapest 2003 SF, Bol 2003 SF, Madrid 2003 F, Bogota 2004 F, Acapulco 2004 SF, Bogota 2006 SF Sanchez-Vicario, Arantxa — Cairo 1999 W, Hamburg 1999 SF, Berlin 1999 SF, Roland Garros 1999 SF, Gold Coast 2000 SF, Hilton Head 2000 F, Hamburg 2000 F, Roland Garros 2000 SF, Canadian Open 2000 SF, Filderstadt 2000 SF, Porto 2001 W, Amelia Island 2001 SF, Madrid 2001 W, Princess Cup 2001 F, Bali 2001 SF, Brussels 2002 F, Bali 2002 SF Santangelo, Mara — Hobart 2006 SF, Bangalore 2006 W, Bangalore 2007 F, Birmingham 2007 SF Savchuk, Olga — Bangalore 2007 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 217 Schaul, Claudine — Strasbourg 2004 W Schett, Barbara — Sydney 1999 SF, Auckland 1999 SF, Hamburg 1999 SF, Moscow 1999 F, Portschach 2000 W, Zürich 2000 SF, Doha 2001 SF, Madrid 2003 SF Schiavone, Francesca — Tashkent 2000 F, Auckland 2001 SF, Canberra 2003 F, Stanford 2003 SF, Los Angeles 2003 SF, Sydney 2004 SF, Warsaw 2004 SF, Los Angeles 2005 SF, Bali 2005 F, Moscow 2005 F, Hasselt 2005 F, Sydney 2006 F, Amelia Island 2006 F, Luxembourg 2006 F, Bad Gastein 2007 W, Zürich 2007 SF Schnyder, Patty — Gold Coast 1999 W, Hilton Head 1999 SF, Portschach 2000 F, Gold Coast 2001 SF, Vienna 2001 F, Pattaya City 2001 W, Antwerp 2002 SF, Charleston 2002 F, Zürich 2002 W, Gold Cost 2003 SF, Sopot 2003 SF, Linz 2003 SF, Australian Open 2004 SF, Charleston 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 SF, Zürich 2004 SF, Gold Coast 2005 W, Dubai 2005 SF, Charleston 2005 SF, Berlin 2005 SF, Rome 2005 F, Cincinnati 2005 W, Stanford 2005 SF, Bali 2005 SF, Zürich 2005 F, Linz 2005 F, Paris 2006 SF, Charleston 2006 F, Cincinnati 2006 SF, Stanford 2006 F, San Diego 2006 SF, Bali 2006 SF, Stuttgart 2006 SF, Linz 2006 SF, Rome 2007 SF, San Diego 2007 F, Linz 2007 F Schruff, Julia — Estoril 2003 F, Acapulco 2007 SF Seles, Monica — Australian Open 1999 SF, Pan Pacific 1999 SF, Amelia Island 1999 W, Roland Garros 1999 SF, Canadian Open 1999 F, New Haven 1999 SF, Princess Cup 1999 F, Oklahoma City 2000 W, Ericsson 2000 SF, Amelia Island 2000 W, Hilton Head 2000 SF, Rome 2000 W, Stanford 2000 SF, San Diego 2000 F, New Haven 2000 F, [Olympics 2000 Bronze], Princess Cup 2000 SF, Chase Championships 2000 F, Oklahoma City 2001 W, Scottsdale 2001 SF, Stanford 2001 SF, San Diego 2001 F, Los Angeles 2001 F, Canadian Open 2001 SF, Bahia 2001 W, Japan Open 2001 W, Shanghai 2001 W, Australian Open 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2002 F, Paris 2002 SF, Doha 2002 W, Dubai 2002 SF, Indian Wells 2002 SF, Miami 2002 SF, Madrid 2002 W, Bahia 2002 SF, Pan Pacific 2003 F, Dubai 2003 F Serra Zanetti, Adriana — Bratislava 2001 SF Serra Zanetti, Antonella — Casablanca 2003 F, Acapulco 2005 SF, Bangkok 2005 SF Sequera, Milagros — Quebec City 2003 F, Fes 2007 W Serna, Magui — Birmingham 1999 SF, Knokke-Heist 2000 SF, Porto 2001 F, Eastbourne 2001 F, Porto 2002 F, Estoril 2002 W, Estoril 2003 W, Budapest 2003 W Sharapova, Maria — Birmingham 2003 SF, Japan Open 2003 W, Luxembourg 2003 SF, Quebec City 2003 W, Memphis 2004 SF, Birmingham 2004 W, Wimbledon 2004 W, Beijing 2004 SF, Seoul 2004 W, Japan Open 2004 W, Zürich 2004 F, Philadelphia 2004 SF, Los Angeles Champ 2004 W, Australian Open 2005 SF, Pan Pacific 2005 W, Doha 2005 W, Indian Wells 2005 SF, Miami 2005 F, Rome 2005 SF, Birmingham 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 SF, U. S. Open 2005 SF, Beijing 2005 SF, Los Angeles Championships 2005 SF, Australian Open 2006 SF, Pan Pacific 2006 SF, Dubai 2006 F, Indian Wells 2006 W, Miami 2006 F, Birmingham 2006 SF, Wimbledon 2006 SF, San Diego 2006 W, Los Angeles 2006 SF, U. S. Open 2006 W, Zürich 2006 W, Linz 2006 W, Madrid Championships 2006 SF, Australian Open 2007 F, Pan Pacific 2007 SF, Istanbul 2007 SF, Roland Garros 2007 SF, Birmingham 2007 F, San Diego 2007 W, Los Angeles 2007 SF, Madrid Championships 2007 F Shaughnessy, Meghann — Bogota 1999 SF, Auckland 2000 SF, Shanghai 2000 W, Gold Coast 2001 SF, Scottsdale 2001 F, Hamburg 2001 F, Stanford 2001 SF, Quebec City 2001 W, Sydney 2002 F, Sarasota 2002 SF, Strasbourg 2002 SF, Canberra 2003 W, Scottsdale 2003 SF, Dubai 2004 SF, Tashkent 2004 SF, Memphis 2005 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 SF, Rabat 2006 W, Forest Hills 2006 W, Bangkok 2006 SF, Barcelona 2007 W Shvedova, Yaroslava — Bangalore 2007 W

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 218 Sidot, Anne-Gaëlle — Canadian Open 1999 SF, Hannover 2000 SF Smashnova, Anna — Tashkent 1999 W, Strasbourg 2000 SF, Palermo 2000 SF, Knokke-Heist 2000 W, Basel 2001 SF, Auckland 2002 W, Canberra 2002 W, Berlin 2002 SF, Vienna 2002 W, Shanghai 2002 W, Auckland 2003 SF, Sopot 2003 W, Helsinki 2003 W, Moscow 2003 SF, Vienna 2004 W, Istanbul 2005 SF, Modena 2005 W, Budapest 2005 W, Budapest 2006 W, Forest Hills 2006 F Snyder, Tara — Quebec City 1999 SF Spears, Abigail — Seoul 2004 SF, Quebec City 2004 F Spirlea, Irina — Gold Coast 1999 SF, Cairo 1999 F Sprem, Karolina — Strasbourg 2003 F, Vienna 2003 F, Helsinki 2003 SF, Canberra 2004 SF, Antwerp 2004 SF, Berlin 2004 SF, Kolkata 2005 F Srebotnik, Katarina — Estoril 1999 W, Palermo 1999 SF, Pan Pacific 2000 SF, Bogota 2002 F, Acapulco 2002 W, Luxembourg 2002 SF, Bogota 2003 SF, Palermo 2003 F, Palermo 2004 SF, Auckland 2005 W, Stockholm 2005 W, Portoroz 2005 F, Cincinnati 2006 F, Zürich 2006 SF, Portoroz 2007 F Stevenson, Alexandra — Wimbledon 1999 SF, Memphis 2002 F, Linz 2002 F, Scottsdale 2003 SF Stosur, Samantha — Gold Coast 2004 SF, Gold Coast 2005 F, Sydney 2005 F, Prague 2006 F, New Haven 2006 SF Strycova, Barbora — GuangZhou 2004 SF Suárez, Paola — Bogota 1999 SF, Madrid 1999 F, São Paulo 2000 F, Amelia Island 2000 SF, Sopot 2000 SF, Auckland 2001 F, Bogota 2001 W, Acapulco 2001 SF, Vienna 2001 SF, Acapulco 2002 F, Madrid 2002 SF, Palermo 2002 SF, Bogota 2003 SF, Vienna 2003 W, Canadian Open 2003 SF, Auckland 2004 SF, Canberra 2004 W, Roland Garros 2004 SF Sucha, Martina — Quebec City 2001 SF, Bratislava 2002 F, Hobart 2002 W, Helsinki 2002 SF, Budapest 2004 F, GuangZhou 2004 F, Quebec City 2004 W, Rabat 2006 F Sugiyama, Ai — Gold Coast 1999 SF, Japan Open 1999 F, Princess Cup 1999 SF, Japan Open 2001 SF, Memphis 2002 SF, Los Angeles 2002 SF, Shanghai 2002 SF, Scottsdale 2003 W, Los Angeles 2003 SF, Shanghai 2003 SF, Linz 2003 W, Philadelphia 2003 SF, Gold Coast 2004 W, Dubai 2004 SF, San Diego 2005 F, Doha 2006 SF, Seoul 2006 F Sun Tiantian — Tashkent 2006 W Svensson, Åsa (Carlsson) — Kuala Lumpur 1999 W, Palermo 2001 SF, Bol 2002 W Szavay, Agnes — Modena 2005 SF, Budapest 2007 SF, Palermo 2007 W, New Haven 2007 F, Beijing 2007 W Talaja, Silvija — Warsaw 1999 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 1999 F, Portschach 1999 F, Sopot 1999 SF, Knokke-Heist 1999 SF, Pattaya City 1999 SF, Gold Coast 2000 W, Strasbourg 2000 W, Porto 2001 SF, Auckland 2002 SF, Warsaw 2002 SF, Japan Open 2002 F Tanasugarn, Tamarine — Birmingham 2000 F, Japan Open 2000 SF, Shanghai 2000 SF, Kuala Lumpur 2000 SF, Dubai 2001 SF, Japan Open 2001 F, Canberra 2002 F, Doha 2002 F, Japan Open 2002 SF, Hyderabad 2003 W, Pattaya City 2003 SF, Hyderabad 2004 SF, Japan Open 2004 SF, Bangkok 2006 F Tauziat, Nathalie — Birmingham 1999 F, Eastbourne 1999 F, Zürich 1999 SF, Moscow 1999 W, Leipzig 1999 W, Philadelphia 1999 SF, Chase Championships 1999 SF, Paris 2000 W, Birmingham 2000 SF, New Haven 2000 SF, Filderstadt 2000 SF, Moscow 2000 SF, Leipzig 2000 SF, Philadelphia 2000 SF, Paris 2001 SF, Dubai 2001 F, Strasbourg 2001 SF, Birmingham 2001 W, Los Angeles 2001 SF, Leipzig 2001 SF, Zürich 2001 SF Taylor, Sarah — Bali 2002 SF, Japan Open 2002 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 219 Testud, Sandrine — Indian Wells 1999 SF, Sopot 1999 SF, Filderstadt 1999 SF, Linz 1999 SF, Pan Pacific 2000 F, Ericsson 2000 SF, Canberra 2001 F, Doha 2001 F, Bol 2001 SF, Big Island 2001 W, Filderstadt 2001 SF, Munich Championships 2001 SF, Dubai 2002 F, Charleston 2002 SF Torrens Valero, Cristina — Budapest 1999 F, Warsaw 1999 W, São Paulo 1999 SF, Antwerp 2000 F, Bogota 2001 SF, Budapest 2001 SF, Tashkent 2001 SF, Palermo 2001 F, Sopot 2001 W, Basel 2001 SF, Bogota 2002 SF Tu, Meilen — Quebec City 2000 SF, Auckland 2001 W, Birmingham 2006 SF, Memphis 2007 SF Tulyaganova, Iroda — Tashkent 2000 W, Shanghai 2000 F, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2001 SF, Vienna 2001 W, Knokke-Heist 2001 W, Linz 2001 SF, Vienna 2002 F, Hyderabad 2003 F, Madrid 2003 SF, Kolkata 2006 SF, Tashkent 2006 F Vaidisova, Nicole — Vancouver 2004 W, Tashkent 2004 W, Memphis 2005 SF, Istanbul 2005 F, Seoul 2005 W, Japan Open 2005 W, Bangkok 2005 W, Philadelphia 2005 SF, Sydney 2006 SF, Strasbourg 2006 W, Roland Garros 2006 SF, Stanford 2006 SF, San Diego 2006 SF, Moscow 2006 SF, Linz 2006 SF, Sydney 2007 SF, Australian Open 2007 SF, Zürich 2007 SF, Linz 2007 SF Vakulenko, Julia — Canberra 2004 SF, Berlin 2007 SF, Quebec City 2007 F Van Roost, Dominique (Monami) — Auckland 1999 F, Paris 1999 SF, Luxembourg 1999 F, Moscow 1999 SF, Eastbourne 2000 F, Knokke-Heist 2000 F Vento-Kabchi, Maria — Hobart 2000 SF, Stanford 2003 SF, Bali 2003 SF, Leipzig 2003 SF, Stanford 2004 SF Vesnina, Elena — Forest Hills 2007 SF, Tashkent 2007 SF Vinci, Roberta — Tashkent 2002 SF, Eastbourne 2005 SF, Palermo 2006 SF, Bogota 2007 W Wartusch, Patricia — São Paulo 1999 F, Bogota 2000 W, Vienna 2002 SF, Casablanca 2002 W, Helsinki 2002 SF, Doha 2003 SF Washington, Mashona — Japan Open 2004 F Weingärtner, Marlene — Auckland 2001 SF, Charleston 2001 SF, Luxembourg 2003 SF, Bali 2004 F Widjaja, Angelique — Bali 2001 W, Shanghai 2002 SF, Pattaya City 2002 W Williams, Serena — Paris 1999 W, Indian Wells 1999 W, Lipton 1999 F, Los Angeles 1999 W, U. S. Open 1999 W, Paris 2000 F, Hannover 2000 W, Wimbledon 2000 SF, Los Angeles 2000 W, Canadian Open 2000 F, Princess Cup 2000 W, Indian Wells 2001 W, Canadian Open 2001 W, U. S. Open 2001 F, Munich Championships 2001 W, Sydney 2002 SF, Scottsdale 2002 W, Miami 2002 W, Berlin 2002 F, Rome 2002 W, Roland Garros 2002 W, Wimbledon 2002 W, U. S. Open 2002 W, Princess Cup 2002 W, Leipzig 2002 W, Los Angeles Championships 2002 F, Australian Open 2003 W, Paris 2003 W, Miami 2003 W, Charleston 2003 F, Rome 2003 SF, Roland Garros 2003 SF, Wimbledon 2003 W, Miami 2004 W, Rome 2004 SF, Wimbledon 2004 F, Los Angeles 2004 F, Beijing 2004 W, Los Angeles Champ 2004 F, Australian Open 2005 W, Dubai 2005 SF, Cincinnati 2006 SF, Los Angeles 2006 SF, Australian Open 2007 W, Miami 2007 W, Moscow 2007 F

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 220 Williams, Venus — Hannover 1999 F, Oklahoma City 1999 W, Lipton 1999 W, Hamburg 1999 W, Rome 1999 W, Stanford 1999 F, San Diego 1999 F, New Haven 1999 W, U. S. Open 1999 SF, Zürich 1999 W, Philadelphia 1999 SF, Chase Championships 1999 SF, Wimbledon 2000 W, Stanford 2000 W, San Diego 2000 W, New Haven 2000 W, U. S. Open 2000 W, [Olympics 2000 Gold], Linz 2000 F, Australian Open 2001 SF, Nice 2001 SF, Indian Wells 2001 SF, Ericsson 2001 W, Hamburg 2001 W, Wimbledon 2001 W, San Diego 2001 W, New Haven 2001 W, U. S. Open 2001 W, Gold Coast 2002 W, Paris 2002 W, Antwerp 2002 W, Dubai 2002 SF, Miami 2002 SF, Amelia Island 2002 W, Hamburg 2002 F, Roland Garros 2002 F, Wimbledon 2002 F, Stanford 2002 W, San Diego 2002 W, New Haven 2002 W, U. S. Open 2002 F, Los Angeles Championships 2002 SF, Australian Open 2003 F, Antwerp 2003 W, Warsaw 2003 F, Wimbledon 2003 F, Charleston 2004 W, Warsaw 2004 W, Berlin 2004 F, Stanford 2004 F, Los Angeles 2004 SF, Antwerp 2005 F, Miami 2005 SF, Istanbul 2005 W, Wimbledon 2005 W, Stanford 2005 F, Rome 2006 SF, Memphis 2007 W, Charleston 2007 SF, Wimbledon 2007 W, U. S. Open 2007 SF, Seoul; 2007 W, Japan Open 2007 F, Bangkok 2007 SF Wozniak, Aleksandra — Fes 2007 F Wozniacki, Caroline — Japan Open 2007 SF Yan Zi — GuangZhou 2005 W, Rabat 2006 SF, Canadian Open 2007 SF, Bangkok 2007 SF Yi Jing-Qian — Tashkent 2000 SF Zakopalova, Klara (Koukalova) — Antwerp 2001 F, Casablanca 2002 F, Sopot 2003 F, Casablanca 2004 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2004 F, Sopot 2004 F, Japan Open 2004 SF, Prague 2005 SF, ’s-Hertogenbosch 2005 W, Palermo 2005 F, Portoroz 2005 W, Prague 2007 SF Zheng Jie — Japan Open 2003 SF, Hobart 2005 W, Rabat 2005 F, GuangZhou 2005 SF, Estoril 2006 W, Stockholm 2006 W Zuluaga, Fabiola — Bogota 1999 W, São Paulo 1999 W, Rome 2000 SF, Madrid 2000 F, Bogota 2002 W, Madrid 2002 SF, Bogota 2003 W, Australian Open 2004 SF, Bogota 2004 W, Bogota 2005 SF Zvereva, Natasha — Eastbourne 1999 W Zvonareva, Vera — Warsaw 2002 SF, Palermo 2002 F, Sopot 2002 SF, Bol 2003 W, Strasbourg 2003 SF, Vienna 2003 SF, Linz 2003 SF, Memphis 2004 W, Warsaw 2004 SF, Rome 2004 SF, Eastbourne 2004 SF, San Diego 2004 SF, Canadian Open 2004 SF, Cincinnati 2004 F, Beijing 2004 SF, Philadelphia 2004 F, Memphis 2005 W, Rome 2005 SF, Auckland 2006 F, Birmingham 2006 W, Cincinnati 2006 W, Hasselt 2006 SF, Auckland 2007 F, Charleston 2007 SF, Luxembourg 2007 SF, Quebec City 2007 SF

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 221 Career Results for Leading Players Career Results — Singles The following tables summarize the performances of certain top singles players, both current and recently retired. The criterion used is that a player must have retired since 1996, and must have, or be projected to have, at least 20 career singles titles. The table then attempts (probably with some inaccuracy) to break out a player’s titles by year, surface, and tier. Tiers have been translated, to the extent possible, to the current Slam-Champ-I-II-III-IV-V system, even though the system has changed dramatically over the years (e.g. events now titled Tier II might have had prizes of $225,000 or $350,000 in the early Nineties; similarly, in the late Eighties the money gap between Tier I and Tier II was only 3:2, compared to the 2:1 ratio of today. The list below does not represent the nomenclature at the time but what appears to me to be the best approximation to the nomenclature of today). Tournaments of Tier II or higher are shown in bold; lesser results in plain text. Slams are in bold coloured type. The year-end championships is also in bold colour as the closest thing to an indoor Slam. Note: Here as elsewhere, events which do not follow WTA admission rules (Olympics prior to 2004, Fed Cup, Hopman Cup, Grand Slam Cup) are not listed. Since some WTA lists include the Olympics, their totals for Capriati, Davenport, Graf, Venus Williams, etc. may be one or more tournaments higher. Jennifer Capriati Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 3; Grass: 0; Indoor: 2. Total: 13 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 4; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1990 Puerto Rico (III) 1991 San Diego (II), Canadian Open (II) 1992 San Diego (II) 1993 Sydney (II) 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Strasbourg (III) Quebec City (III) 2000 Luxembourg (III) 2001 Australian Open (Slam) Charleston (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 2002 Australian Open (Slam) 2003 New Haven (II) 2004 2005 2006

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 222 Kim Clijsters Career Titles: Hardcourt: 15; Clay: 3; Grass: 2; Indoor: 14. Total: 34 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 2; Tier I: 5; Tier II: 18; Tier III: 7; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Luxembourg (III) 2000 Hobart (V) Leipzig (II) 2001 Stanford (II) Leipzig (II), Luxembourg (III) 2002 Hamburg (II) Filderstadt (II), Luxembourg (III), Los Angeles (Champ) 2003 Sydney (II), Indian Wells (I), Stanford Rome (I) ’s-Hertogenbosch Filderstadt (II), Luxembourg (III), (II), Los Angeles (II) (III) Los Angeles (Champ) 2004 Paris (II), Antwerp (II) 2005 Indian Wells (I), Miami (I). Stanford (II), Eastbourne (II) Hasselt (III) Los Angeles (II), Canadian Open (I), U. S. Open (Slam), Luxembourg (II) 2006 Stanford (II) Warsaw (II) Hasselt (III) 2007 Sydney (II) Lindsay Davenport Career Titles: Hardcourt: 24; Clay: 8; Grass: 2; Indoor: 18. Total: 52 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 1; Tier I: 11; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 11; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1993 Lucerne (III) 1994 Brisbane (III) Lucerne (III) 1995 Strasbourg (III) 1996 Los Angeles (II) Strasbourg (III) 1997 Indian Wells (I), Atlanta (II) Amelia Island (II) Oklahoma City (III), Zürich (I), Chicago (II) 1998 Stanford (II), San Diego (II), Pan Pacific (I), Zürich (I) Los Angeles (II), US Open (Slam) 1999 Sydney (II), Stanford (II), Madrid (III) Wimbledon (Slam) Philadelphia (II), Chase Princess Cup (II) (Champ) 2000 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Linz (II), Philadelphia (II) Wells (I) 2001 Scottsdale (II), Los Angeles (II) Eastbourne (II) Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I), Linz (II) 2002 2003 Pan Pacific (I) 2004 Stanford (II), Los Angeles (II), Amelia Island (II) Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt (II) San Diego (I), Cincinnati (III) 2005 Dubai 2005 (II), New Haven Amelia Island (II) Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I) 2004 (II), Bali (III) 2006 2007 Bali (III) Quebec City (III)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 223 Steffi Graf Career Titles: Hardcourt: 36; Clay: 32; Grass: 7; Indoor: 31. Total: 106 By Tier: Slams: 22; Championships: 5; Tier I: 30; Tier II: 48; Tier III: 1 GRAND SLAM 1988 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1986 Mahwah (II) Hilton Head (I), Amelia Pan Pacific (I), Brighton (I), Island (I), Indianapolis (I), Zürich (II) Berlin (II) 1987 Boca Raton (I), Lipton (I), Los Hilton Head (I), Amelia Zürich (II), Virginia Slims Angeles (I) Island (I), Rome (II), Berlin (Champ) (II), Roland Garros (Slam), Hamburg (II) 1988 Australian Open (Slam), San Berlin (I), Roland Garros Wimbledon Brighton (II) Antonio (II), Lipton (I), Mahwah (Slam), Hamburg (II) (Slam) (II), US Open (Slam) 1989 Australian Open (Slam), San Hilton Head (I), Hamburg Wimbledon Washington (I), Zürich (II), Antonio (II), Boca Raton (I), San (II), Berlin (I) (Slam) Brighton (II), Virginia Slims Diego (II), Mahwah (II), U. S. (Champ) Open (Slam) 1990 Australian Open (Slam), Amelia Island (II), Pan Pacific (II), Leipzig (II), Canadian Open (I), San Diego Hamburg (II) Zürich (II), Brighton (II), New (II) England (II) 1991 San Antonio (II) Hamburg (II), Berlin (I) Wimbledon Leipzig (II), Zürich (II), (Slam) Brighton (II) 1992 Boca Raton (I) Hamburg (II), Berlin (I) Wimbledon Leipzig (II), Zürich (II), (Slam) Brighton (II), Philadelphia (II) 1993 Delray Beach (II), San Diego (II), Hilton Head (I), Berlin (I), Wimbledon Leipzig (II), Virginia Slims Canadian Open (I), US Open Roland Garros (Slam) (Slam) (Champ) (Slam) 1994 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Berlin (I) Pan Pacific (I) Wells (II), Delray Beach (II), Lipton (I), San Diego (II) 1995 Delray Beach (II), Lipton (I), US Houston (II), Roland Wimbledon Paris (II), Philadelphia (I), Open (Slam) Garros (Slam) (Slam) New York (Champ) 1996 Indian Wells (II), Lipton (I), US Berlin (I), Roland Garros Wimbledon Chase (Champ) Open (Slam) (Slam) (Slam) 1997 Strasbourg (III) 1998 New Haven (II) Leipzig (II), Philadelphia (II) 1999 Roland Garros (Slam)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 224 Justine Hénin Career Titles: Hardcourt: 18; Clay: 12; Grass: 3; Indoor: 6. Total: 39 By Tier: Slams: 7; Championships: 2; Tier I: 10; Tier II: 16; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Antwerp (IV) 2000 2001 Gold Coast (III), Canberra (III) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) 2002 Berlin (I) Linz (II) 2003 Dubai (II), San Diego (II), Canadian Open Charleston (I), Berlin (I), Zürich (I) (I), U. S. Open (Slam) Roland Garros (Slam) 2004 Sydney (II), Australian Open (Slam), Dubai (II), Indian Wells (I), Olympics (II) 2005 Charleston (I), Warsaw (II), Berlin (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 2006 Sydney (II), Dubai (II+), New Haven (II) Roland Garros (Slam) Eastbourne (II) Madrid (Champ) 2007 Dubai (II), Doha (II), Canadian Open (I), Warsaw (II), Roland Eastbourne (II) Stuttgart (II), U. S. Open 2007 (Slam) Garros (Slam) Zürich (I), Madrid (Champ) Martina Hingis Career Titles: Hardcourt: 18; Clay: 7; Grass: 2; Indoor: 16. Total: 43 By Tier: Slams: 5; Championships: 2; Tier I: 17; Tier II: 16; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1996 Filderstadt (II), Oakland (II) 1997 Sydney (II), Australian Open Hilton Head (I) Wimbledon (Slam) Pan Pacific (I), Paris (II), (Slam), Lipton (I), Stanford (II), Filderstadt (II), Philadelphia San Diego (II), US Open (Slam) (II) 1998 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Hamburg (II), Rome Chase (Champ) Wells (I) (I) 1999 Australian Open (Slam), San Hilton Head (I), Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt Diego (II), Canadian Open (I) Berlin (I) (II) 2000 Ericsson (I), Canadian Open (I) Hamburg (II) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) Pan Pacific (I), Filderstadt (II), Zürich (I), Moscow (I), Chase (Champ) 2001 Sydney (II), Doha (III), Dubai (II) 2002 Sydney (II) Pan Pacific (I) 2003 RETIRED 2004 RETIRED 2005 2006 Kolkata (III) Rome (I) 2007 Pan Pacific (I)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 225 Svetlana Kuznetsova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 7; Clay: 1; Grass: 1; Indoor: 0. Total: 9 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 0; Tier II: 4; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2002 Bali (III) Helsinki (IV) 2003 2004 U. S. Open (Slam), Bali (III) Eastbourne (II) 2005 2006 Miami (I), Bali (III), Beijing (II) 2007 New Haven (II)

Conchita Martinez Career Titles: Hardcourt: 9; Clay: 20; Grass: 1; Indoor: 3. Total: 33 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 9; Tier III: 13; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Soﬁa (III) 1989 Wellington (V), Phoenix (III) Tampa (II) 1990 Scottsdale (III) Paris (III) Indianapolis (III) 1991 Barcelona (II), Kitzbühel (III), Paris (III) 1992 Kitzbühel (III) 1993 Brisbane (III), Stratton Houston (II), Rome (I) Philadelphia (I) Mountain (II) 1994 Stratton Mountain (II) Hilton Head (I), Rome (I) Wimbledon (Slam) 1995 San Diego (II), Los Angeles Hilton Head (I), Amelia Island (II) (II), Hamburg (II), Rome (I) 1996 Rome (I) Moscow (III) 1997 1998 Berlin (I), Warsaw (III) 1999 Sopot (III) 2000 Berlin (I) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Pattaya City (III)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 226 Amélie Mauresmo Career Titles: Hardcourt: 6; Clay: 6; Grass: 1; Indoor: 11. Total: 24 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 1; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 14; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Bratislava (V) 2000 Sydney (II) 2001 Amelia Island (II), Berlin (I) Paris (II), Nice (II) 2002 Dubai (II), Canadian Open (I) 2003 Warsaw (II) Philadelphia (II) 2004 Canadian Open (I) Berlin (I), Rome (I) Linz (II), Philadelphia (II) 2005 Rome (I) Antwerp (II). Philadelphia (II), Los Angeles (Champ) 2006 Australian Open (Slam) Wimbledon (Slam) Paris (II), Antwerp (II) 2007 Antwerp (II) Anastasia Myskina Career Titles: Hardcourt: 4; Clay: 3; Grass: 0; Indoor: 3. Total:10 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 3; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Palermo (V) 2000 2001 2002 Bahia (II) 2003 Doha (III) Sarasota (IV) Leipzig (II), Moscow (I) 2004 Doha (II) Roland Garros (Slam) Moscow (I) 2005 Kolkata (III) 2006 Jana Novotna Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 4; Grass: 2; Indoor: 15. Total: 24 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 1; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 11; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Adelaide (III) 1989 Strasbourg (III) 1990 Albuquerque (III) 1991 Sydney (II) Oklahoma City (III) 1992 1993 Osaka (III), Brighton (II) 1994 Leipzig (II), Brighton (II), Essen (II) 1995 Linz (III) 1996 Madrid (III) Zürich (I), Chicago (II), Philadelphia (II) 1997 Madrid (III) Leipzig (II), Moscow (I), Chase (Champ) 1998 Prague (III) Eastbourne (II), Linz (II) Wimbledon (Slam) 1999 Hannover (II)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 227 Mary Pierce Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 7; Grass: 1; Indoor: 7. Total: 18 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 5; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1991 Palermo (V) 1992 Cesena (V), Palermo (V) Puerto Rico (III) 1993 Filderstadt (II) 1994 1995 Australian Open (Slam), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) 1996 1997 Rome (I) 1998 Amelia Island (II) Paris (II), Moscow (I), Luxembourg (III) 1999 Linz (II) 2000 Hilton Head (I), Roland Garros (Slam) 2001 2002 2003 2004 ’s-Hertogenbosch (III) 2005 San Diego (I) Moscow (I) 2006 Gabriela Sabatini Career Titles: Hardcourt: 9; Clay: 11; Grass: 0; Indoor: 7. Total: 27 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 2; Tier I: 11; Tier II: 10; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1985 Japan Open (V) 1986 1987 Pan Pacific (I) Buenos Aires (V) Brighton (II) 1988 Boca Raton (I), Canadian Open (I) Buenos Aires (V), Rome (II) Virginia Slims (Champ) 1989 Lipton (I) Amelia Island (II), Rome (I) Filderstadt (II) 1990 Boca Raton (II), US Open (Slam) 1991 Boca Raton (I) Hilton Head (I), Amelia Island (II), Pan Pacific (II) Rome (I) 1992 Sydney (II) Hilton Head (I), Amelia Island (I), Pan Pacific (II) Rome (I) 1993 1994 Virginia Slims (Champ) 1995 Sydney (II)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 228 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 19; Grass: 1; Indoor: 1. Total: 29 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 0; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 13; Tier III: 3; Tier IV: 3; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Brussels (IV) 1989 Barcelona (IV), Roland Garros (Slam) 1990 Barcelona (III) Newport (II) 1991 Washington, DC (II) 1992 Lipton (I), Canadian Open (I) 1993 Lipton (I) Amelia Island (II), Barcelona (II), Hamburg (II) 1994 Canadian Open (I), US Open Amelia Island (II), Barcelona (II), Oakland (II) (Slam), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) Hamburg (II), Roland Garros (Slam) 1995 Barcelona (II), Berlin (I) 1996 Hilton Head (I), Hamburg (II) 1997 1998 Sydney (II) Roland Garros (Slam) 1999 Cairo (III) 2000 2001 Porto (IV), Madrid (III) 2002 Monica Seles Career Titles: Hardcourt: 27; Clay: 14; Grass: 1; Indoor: 11. Total: 53 By Tier: Slams: 9; Championships: 3; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0’ Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1989 Houston (II) 1990 Lipton (I), San Antonio (II), Los Angeles Tampa (II), Rome (I), Berlin Oakland (II), Virginia (II) (I), Roland Garros (Slam) Slims (Champ) 1991 Australian Open (Slam), Lipton (I), Los Houston (II), Roland Garros Milan (II), Philadelphia Angeles (II), US Open (Slam), Tokyo/ (Slam) (II), Virginia Slims Nicherei (II) (Champ) 1992 Australian Open (Slam), Indian Wells Houston (II), Barcelona (II), Essen (II), Oakland (II), (II), US Open (Slam), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) Roland Garros (Slam) Virginia Slims (Champ) 1993 Australian Open (Slam) Chicago (II) 1994 1995 Canadian Open (I) 1996 Sydney (II), Australian Open (Slam), Eastbourne Canadian Open (I), Tokyo/Nicherei (II) (II) 1997 Los Angeles (II), Canadian Open (I), Princess Cup (II) 1998 Canadian Open (I), Princess Cup (II) 1999 Amelia Island (II) 2000 Amelia Island (II), Rome (I) Oklahoma City (III) 2001 Bahia (II), Japan Open (III), Shanghai (IV) Oklahoma City (III) 2002 Doha (III) Madrid (III) 2003

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 229 Maria Sharapova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 0; Grass: 3; Indoor: 5. Total: 16 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 1; Tier I: 5; Tier II: 2; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2003 Japan Open (III) Quebec City (III) 2004 Seoul (IV), Japan Open (III) Birrmingham (III), Los Angeles (Champ) Wimbledon (Slam) 2005 Doha (II) Birmingham (III) Pan Paciﬁc (I) 2006 Indian Wells (I), San Diego (I), U. S. Open Zürich (I), Linz (II) (Slam) 2007 San Diego (I) Serena Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 18; Clay: 2; Grass: 2; Indoor: 5. Total: 27 By Tier: Slams: 8; Championships: 1; Tier I: 8; Tier II: 10; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Indian Wells (I), Los Angeles (II), US Paris (II) Open (Slam) 2000 Los Angeles (II), Princess Cup (II) Hannover (II) 2001 Indian Wells (I), Canadian Open (I) Munich (Champ) 2002 Scottsdale (II). Miami (I). U. S. Open Rome (I), Roland Wimbledon (Slam) Leipzig (II) (Slam), Princess Cup (II) Garros (Slam) 2003 Australian Open (Slam), Miami (I) Wimbledon (Slam) Paris (II) 2004 Miami (I), Beijing (II) 2005 Australian Open (Slam) 2006 2007 Australian Open (Slam). Miami (I) Venus Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 17; Clay: 7; Grass: 3; Indoor: 7. Total: 34 By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 0; Tier I: 6; Tier II: 16; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 10; Tier V: 0 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Lipton (I) Oklahoma City (III) 1999 Lipton (I), New Haven (II) Hamburg (II), Rome (I) Oklahoma City (III), Zürich (I) 2000 Stanford (II), San Diego (II), New Wimbledon (Slam) Haven (II), US Open (Slam) 2001 Ericsson (I), San Diego (II), New Hamburg (II) Wimbledon (Slam) Haven (II), U. S. Open (Slam) 2002 Gold Coast (III), Stanford (II), Amelia Island (II) Paris (II), Antwerp (II) San Diego (II), New Haven (II) 2003 Antwerp (II) 2004 Charleston (I), Warsaw (II) 2005 Istanbul (III) Wimbledon (Slam) 2006 2007 Seoul (IV) Wimbledon (Slam) Memphis (III)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 230 Career Results — Doubles For inclusion in this list, players must have at least two Slams, and must have, or project to have should they play a full career, at least 25 doubles titles. Other criteria are similar to those for singles. For brevity, partners are listed only by initial in the following tables — e.g. the first item for Serena Williams is Oklahoma City (III/VW). This means Serena won Oklahoma City 1998, a Tier III, with VW=Venus Williams. The list of partners follows the list of results for each player. Players with whom the player won a Slam shown in bold. Note: Martina Navratilova is excluded because I just don’t trust the early WTA data. The surface data for some of the older players may also be inaccurate. Cara Black Career Titles: Hardcourt: 15; Clay: 4; Grass: 4; Indoor: 13. Total: 36 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 1; Tier I: 10; Tier II: 15; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 3 Partners with whom has won titles: 8 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2000 Auckland (V/AF) 2001 Hobart (V/EL), San Diego (II/EL), New Hamburg (II/ Birmingham (III/EL) Haven (II/EL), Princess Cup (II/LH) EL), Rome (I/EL) 2002 Bali (III/VRP) Porto (IV/IS) 2003 Hobart (V/EL), Stanford (II/LR) 2004 Sydney (II/RS), San Diego (I/RS) Wimbledon (Slam/RS) Antwerp (II/EC), Pan Paciﬁc (I/RS), Filderstadt (II/RS), Zürich (I/RS) 2005 Stanford (II/RS) Rome (I/LH) Wimbledon (Slam/LH) Antwerp (II/EC), Zürich (I/ RS), Philadelphia (II/RS) 2006 San Diego (I/RS) Zürich (I/RS) 2007 Australian Open (Slam/LH), Doha (II/ Wimbledon (Slam/LH) Paris (II/LH), Antwerp (II/ LH), San Diego (I/LH) LH), Moscow (I/LH), Linz (II/LH), Madrid (Champ/ LH) Partners: AF=Alexandra Fusai, EC=Els Callens, EL=Elena Likhovtseva, IS=Irina Selyutina, LH=Liezel Huber, LR=Lisa Raymond, RS=Rennae Stubbs, VRP=Virginia Ruano Pascual Kim Clijsters Career Titles: Hardcourt: 4; Clay: 2; Grass: 1; Indoor: 4. Total: 11 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 2 Partners with whom has won titles: 5 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1999 Bratislava (V/LC) 2000 Antwerp (V/SA) 2001 2002 Los Angeles (II/JD) Luxembourg (III/JH) 2003 Sydney (II/AS), Scottsdale (II/AS). Roland G (Slam/AS) Wimbledon (Slam/AS) Antwerp (II/AS), San Diego (II/AS) Zürich (I/AS) 2004 2005 2006 Partners: AS=Ai Sugiyama, JD=Jelena Dokic, JH=Janette Husarova, LC= Laurence Courtois, SA=Sabine Appelmans

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 231 Lindsay Davenport Career Titles: Hardcourt: 17; Clay: 6; Grass: 2; Indoor: 11. Total: 36 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 3; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 19; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 7 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1994 Indian Wells (II/LR) Oakland (II/ASV) 1995 Sydney (II/JN), Indian Wells (II/LR), Strasbourg (III/ Nicherei (II/MJF) MJF) 1996 Sydney (II/MJF), Los Angeles (II/NZ) Roland Garros Oakland (II/MJF), Chase (Slam/MJF) (Champ/MJF) 1997 Indian Wells (I/NZ), Stanford (II/MH), Amelia Island (II/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/NZ) Chase U. S. Open (Slam/JN) JN), Berlin (I/JN) (Champ/JN) 1998 Indian Wells (I/NZ), Stanford (II/NZ), Berlin (I/NZ) Filderstadt (II/NZ), Chase San Diego (II/NZ) (Champ/NZ) 1999 Stanford (II/CM), San Diego (II/CM) Wimbledon (Slam/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/NZ) CM) 2000 Indian Wells (I/CM) 2001 Filderstadt (II/LR), Zürich (I/LR) 2002 Filderstadt (II/LR) 2003 Indian Wells (I/LR) Amelia Island (II/ Eastbourne (II/ LR) LR) 2004 2005 2006 Bali (III/CM) 2007 Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CM=Corina Morariu, JN=Jana Novotna, LR=Lisa Raymond, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, NZ=Natasha Zvereva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 232 Gigi Fernandez Career Titles: Hardcourt: 25; Clay: 14; Grass: 8; Indoor: 21. Total: 68 By Tier: Slams: 17; Championships: 2; Tier I: 13; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 7; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 1 Partners with whom has won titles: 11 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 4 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1985 Delray Beach (V/MN), Canadian Washington (III/MN) Open (II/MN), Fort Lauderdale (III/ RW) 1986 1987 Mahwah (III/LM) Newport (III/LM) Piscataway (III/LM) 1988 U. S. Open (Slam/RW) Suntory/Tokyo (IV/RW) 1989 Canadian Open (I/RW), VS Newport (II/LM) Filderstadt (II/RW) Doubles (I/RW), Puerto Rico (IV/ RW) 1990 Los Angeles (II/JN), U. S. Open Hamburg (II/MN) Pan Pacific (II/ES), (Slam/MN) Worcester (II/HS) 1991 Brisbane (III/JN), Light ’n Lively (I/ Roland G (Slam/JN) Chicago (II/JN), Oakland (II/ HS) PF), Indianapolis (III/PF) 1992 U. S. Open (Slam/NZ) Houston (II/PF), Wimbledon (Slam/ Oakland (II/NZ), Roland G (Slam/NZ) NZ) Philadelphia (II/NZ) 1993 Australian Open (Slam/NZ), Hilton Head (I/NZ), Eastbourne (II/ Leipzig (II/NZ), Filderstadt Delray Beach (II/NZ), Light ’n Berlin (I/NZ), Roland NZ), Wimbledon (II/NZ), VSlims (Champ/NZ) Lively (I/NZ), San Diego (II/HS) G (Slam/NZ) (Slam/NZ) 1994 Australian Open (Slam/NZ), Rome (I/NZ), Berlin Eastbourne (II/ Chicago (II/NZ), Filderstadt Miami (I/NZ) (I/NZ), Roland G NZ), Wimbledon (II/NZ), Philadelphia (I/NZ), (Slam/NZ) (Slam/NZ) VSlims (Champ/NZ) 1995 San Diego (II/NZ), Los Angeles (II/ Hamburg (II/MH), Pan Pacific (I/NZ), NZ), U. S. Open (Slam/NZ) Rome (I/NZ), Roland Filderstadt (II/NZ) G (Slam/NZ) 1996 San Diego (II/CM), U. S. Open Pan Pacific (I/NZ) (Slam/NZ) 1997 Sydney (II/ASV) Roland G (Slam/NZ) Wimbledon (Slam/ NZ) Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CM=Conchita Martinez, ES=Elizabeth Smylie, HS=Helena Sukova, JN=Jana Novotna, LM=Lori McNeil, MH=Martina Hingis, MN=Martina Navratilova, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, PF=Patty Fendick, RW=Robin White

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 233 Martina Hingis Career Titles: Hardcourt: 15; Clay: 6; Grass: 3; Indoor: 13. Total: 37 By Tier: Slams: 9; Championships: 2; Tier I: 13; Tier II: 13; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 13 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 6 GRAND SLAM 1998 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1995 Hamburg (II/GF) 1996 Wimbledon (Slam/ Zürich (I/HS) HS) 1997 Australian Open (Slam/NZ), Hilton Head (I/ Paris (II/JN), Leipzig (II/JN), Stanford (II/LD), San Diego (II/ MJF) Filderstadt (II/ASV), Zürich (I/ ASV) ASV) 1998 Sydney (II/HS), Australian Open Roland G (Slam/ Wimbledon (Slam/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/ML) (Slam/ML), Miami (I/JN), Los JN) JN) Angeles (II/NZ), Canadian Open (I/ JN), U. S. Open (Slam/JN) 1999 Australian Open (Slam/AK), Rome (I/AK) Eastbourne (II/ Chase (Champ/AK) Indian Wells (I/AK), Miami (I/JN) AK) 2000 Canadian Open (I/NT) Roland G (Slam/ Pan Paciﬁc (I/MP), Filderstadt MP) (II/AK), Zürich (I/AK), Philadelphia (II/AK), Chase (Champ/AK) 2001 Moscow (I/AK) 2002 Australian Open (Slam/AK) Hamburg (II/BS) 2003 RETIRED 2004 RETIRED 2005 RETIRED 2006 2007 Doha (II/MK) Partners: AK=Anna Kournikova, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, BS=Barbara Schett, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, MK=Maria Kirilenko, MP=Mary Pierce, JN=Jana Novotna, LD=Lindsay Davenport, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, ML=Mirjana Lucic, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, NZ=Natasha Zvereva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 234 Liezel Huber Career Titles: Hardcourt: 12; Clay: 4; Grass: 2; Indoor: 6. Total: 24 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 1; Tier I: 4; Tier II: 7; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 4; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 9 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2001 Princess Cup (II/CB), Japan Open (III/ RM), Shanghai (IV/LM) 2002 Auckland (IV/NA) 2003 Miami (I/MM), Sarasota (IV/MN) Warsaw (II/MM), Linz (II/AS) Madrid (III/JC) 2004 Hyderabad (IV/SM) 2005 Rome (I/CB) Wimbledon (Slam/CB) 2006 Bangalore (III/SM), Kolkata (III/SM) Strasbourg (III/MN) 2007 Australian Open (Slam/CB), Doha (II/ Wimbledon (Slam/CB) Paris (II/CB), Antwerp CB), San Diego (I/CB) (II/CB), Moscow (I/ CB), Linz (II/CB), Madrid (Champ/CB) Partners: AS=Ai Sugiyama, CB=Cara Black, JC=Jill Craybas, LN=Lenka Nemeckova, MM=Magdalena Maleeva, MN=Martina Navratilova, NA=Nicole Arendt, RM=Rachel McQuillan, SM=Sania Mirza Anna Kournikova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 7; Clay: 2; Grass: 1; Indoor: 6. Total: 16 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 2; Tier I: 4; Tier II: 6; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 6 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Princess Cup (II/MS) 1999 Australian Open (Slam/ Rome (I/MH) Eastbourne (II/ Chase (Champ/MH) MH), Indian Wells (I/MH) MH) 2000 Gold Coast (III/JHD) Hamburg (II/NZ) Filderstadt (II/MH), Zürich (I/MH), Philadelphia (II/MH), Chase (Champ/MH) 2001 Sydney (II/BS) Moscow (I/MH) 2002 Australian Open (Slam/ MH), Shanghai (IV/JL) 2003 Partners: BS=Barbara Schett, JHD=Julie Halard-Decugis, JL=Janet Lee, MH=Martina Hingis, MS=Monica Seles, NZ=Natasha Zvereva

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 235 Svetlana Kuznetsova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 8; Clay: 3; Grass: 1; Indoor: 1. Total: 13 By Tier: Slams: 1; Championships: 0; Tier I: 3; Tier II: 4; Tier III: 4; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 5 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2002 Japan Open (III/ASV) Sopot (III/ASV), Helsinki (IV/ASV) 2003 Gold Coast (III/MN), Dubai (II/ Rome (I/MN) Leipzig (II/MN) MN), Canadian Open (I/MN) 2004 Gold Coast (III/EL), Doha (II/EL) 2005 Australian Open (Slam/AMo), Miami (I/AMo) 2006 Eastbourne (II/AMa) Partners: AMa=Amélie Mauresmo, AMo=Alicia Molik, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, EL=Elena Likhovtseva, MN=Martina Navratilova Alicia Molik Career Titles: Hardcourt: 4; Clay: 1; Grass: 1; Indoor: 1. Total: 7 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 3; Tier III: 0; Tier IV: 1; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 6 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors

2004 Stockholm (IV/BS) Eastbourne Philadelphia (II/LR) (II/MSe) 2005 Australian Open (Slam/SK), Doha (II/FS), Miami (I/SK) 2006 2007 Roland Garros (Slam/MSa) Partners: BS=Barbara Schett, FS=Francesca Schiavone, LR=Lisa Ryamond MSa=Mara Santangelo, MSe=Magui Serna, SK=Svetlana Kuznetsova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 236 Larisa (Savchenko) Neiland Career Titles: Hardcourt: 21; Clay: 12; Grass: 12; Indoor: 21. Total: 66 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 10; Tier II: 28; Tier III: 19; Tier IV: 7; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles:16 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 16 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1985 Salt Lake City (IV/SP) Seabrook (IV/SP) 1986 New Orleans (III/SP) Little Rock (IV/SP) 1987 Boca Raton (II/SP) Eastbourne (II/SP) Wichita (IV/SP), Oklahoma City (IV/SP) 1988 Birmingham (III/NZ) Indianapolis (IV/NZ) 1989 Amelia Island (II/NZ), Birmingham (III/NZ) Moscow (III/NZ), Roland G (Slam/NZ) Chicago (II/NZ) 1990 Light n Lively (II/NZ) Birmingham (III/NZ), Nashville (III/KJ) Eastbourne (II/NZ) 1991 Auckland (IV/PF), Boca Raton (I/ Hamburg (II/JN), Eastbourne (II/NZ), Philadelphia (II/JN) NZ), Canadian Open (I/NZ), Los Berlin (I/NZ) Wimbledon (Slam/ Angeles (II/NZ), Washington (II/JN) NZ) 1992 Brisbane (III/JN), Boca Raron (I/ Berlin (I/JN) Eastbourne (II/JN) Leipzig (II/JN), NZ), Miami (I/ASV), Light n’ Lively Brighton (II/JN) (II/JN), San Diego (II/JN) 1993 Brisbane (III/CMa), Miami (I/JN), Osaka (III/JN) Canadian Open (I/JN) 1994 Schenectady (III/MM) Amelia Island (II/ASV), Birmingham (III/ZG) Osaka (III/RS), Brighton Barcelona (II/ASV) (II/MB) 1995 Barcelona (II/ASV), Paris (II/MM), Moscow Edinburgh (II/M) (III/MM), Leipzig (II/ MM), Brighton (II/MM) 1996 Canadian Open (I/ASV) Berlin (I/MM) Rosmalen (III/BSM) Essen (II/MM), Moscow (III/NM) 1997 Birmingham (III/KA) Luxembourg (III/HS) 1998 1999 Gold Coast (III/CMo), Los Angeles Hamburg (II/ASV) Birmingham (III/ Leipzig (II/MP) (II/ASV) CMo) Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, BSM=Brenda Schultz-McCarthy, CMa=Conchita Martinez, CMo=Corina Morariu, JN=Jana Novotna, KA=Katrina Adams, KJ=Kathy Jordan, MB=Manon Bollegraf, MM=Meredith McGrath, MP=Mary Pierce, NM=Natalia Medvedeva, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, PF=Patty Fendick, RS=Rennae Stubbs, SP=Svetlana Parkhomenko, ZG=Zina Garrison Jackson

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 237 Jana Novotna Career Titles: Hardcourt: 35; Clay: 17; Grass: 8; Indoor: 16. Total: 76 By Tier: Slams: 12; Championships: 2; Tier I: 16; Tier II: 36; Tier III: 10; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 17 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 5 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1987 San Diego (III/CS) Strasbourg (III/CS), Hamburg (II/CKK) 1988 Canadian Open (I/HS), Mahwah (II/ Rome (II/CS), Oklahoma City (III/CS) HS) Hamburg (II/TSL) 1989 Brisbane (III/HS), Boca Raton (II/HS), Barcelona (III/TSL) Wimbledon (Slam/ Zürich (II/HS) Miami (I/HS) HS) 1990 Brisbane (III/HS), Sydney (II/HS), Roland G (Slam/HS) Wimbledon (Slam/ Australian Open (Slam/HS), Indian HS) Wells (II/HS), Miami (I/HS), Boca Raton (II/HS), Los Angeles (II/GF) 1991 Brisbane (III/GF), Washington (II/LN) Hamburg (II/LN), Chicago (II/GF), Zürich Roland G (Slam/GF) (II/AS), Filderstadt (II/ MN), Philadelphia (II/LN) 1992 Brisbane (III/LN), Light n Lively (II/ Berlin (I/LN) Eastbourne (II/ Leipzig (II/LN), Brighton LN), San Diego (II/LN) LN) (II/LN) 1993 Miami (I/LN), Canadian Open (I/LN) Rome (I/ASV) Osaka (III/LN), Paris (II/ AS) 1994 Delray Beach (II/ASV), Light & Lively Hamburg (II/ASV) (II/ASV), U. S. Open (Slam/ASV), San Diego (II/ASV) 1995 Sydney (II/LD), Australian Open Eastbourne (II/ WTA (Champ/ASV) (Slam/ASV), Miami (I/ASV), Delray ASV), Wimbledon Beach (II/MJF) (Slam/ASV) 1996 Miami (I/ASV) Hilton Head (I/ASV), Eastbourne (II/ Paris (II/KB), Filderstadt Madrid (III/ASV) ASV) (II/NA) 1997 U. S, Open (Slam/LD) Amelia Island (II/ Paris (II/MH), Leipzig (II/ LD), Berlin (I/LD) MH), Chase (Champ/LD) 1998 Miami (I/MH), Canadian Open (I/ Roland G (Slam/MH) Eastbourne (II/ MH), U. S. Open (Slam/MH) MdS), Wimbledon (Slam/MH) 1999 Miami (I/MH), Canadian Open (I/MP) Hilton Head (I/EL) Partners: AS=Andrea Strnadova, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CKK=Claudia Kohde-Kilsch, CS=Catherine Suire, EL=Elena Likhovtseva, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, KB=Kristie Boogert, LD=Lindsay Davenport, LN=Larisa Neiland, MdS=Mariaan de Swardt, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, MN=Martina Navratilova, MP=Mary Pierce, NA=Nicole Arendt, TSL=Tine Scheuer-Larsen

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 238 Lisa Raymond Career Titles: Hardcourt: 22; Clay: 9; Grass: 6; Indoor: 28. Total: 65 By Tier: Slams: 5; Championships: 3; Tier I: 20; Tier II: 30; Tier III: 7; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 6 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1993 Nicherei (II/CR) 1994 Indian Wells (II/LD) 1995 Indian Wells (II/LD) 1996 Chicago (II/RS), Philadelphis (II/RS) 1997 Quebec City (III/RS), Philadelphia (II/RS) 1998 Boston (III/RS) Hannover (II/RS) 1999 New Haven (II/RS) Oklahoma City (III/RS), Zürich (I/RS), Moscow (I/RS), Philadelphia (II/RS) 2000 Australian Open (Slam/RS), San Rome (I/RS), Madrid Diego (II/RS) (III/RS) 2001 Scottsdale (II/RS), U. S. Open Charleston (I/RS) Eastbourne (II/RS), Pan Pacific (I/RS), Filderstadt (Slam/RS) Wimbledon (Slam/ (II/LD), Zürich (I/LD), Munich RS) (Champ/RS) 2002 Sydney (II/RS), Scottsdale (II/ Charleston (I/RS) Eastbourne (II/RS) Pan Pacific (I/RS), Filderstadt RS), Indian Wells (I/RS), Miami (II/LD) (I/RS), Stanford (II/RS) 2003 Indian Wells (I/LD), Stanford Amelia Island (II/LD) Eastbourne (II/LD) Filderstadt (II/RS), (II/CB) Philadelphia (II/MN) 2004 Vienna (III/MN) Philadelphia (II/AM) 2005 New Haven (II/SS), U. S. Open Eastbourne (II/RS) Luxembourg (II/SS), Moscow (Slam/SS) (I/SS), Los Angeles (Champ/SS) 2006 Indian Wells (I/SS), Miami (I/ Charleston (I/SS), Pan Pacific (I/SS), Memphis (III/ SS) Roland Garros (Slam/ SS), Stuttgart (II/SS), Linz (II/ SS) SS), Hasselt (III/SS), Los Angeles (Champ/SS 2007 Indian Wells (I/SS), Miami (I/ Berlin (I/SS) Eastbourne (II/SS) Pan Pacific (I/SS) SS) Partners: AM=Alicia Molik, CB=Cara Black, CR=Chanda Rubin, LD=Lindsay Davenport, MN=Martina Navratilova, RS=Rennae Stubbbs, SS=Samantha Stosur

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 239 Virginia Ruano Pascual Career Titles: Hardcourt: 17; Clay: 19; Grass: 0; Indoor: 2. Total: 38 By Tier: Slams: 8; Championships: 1; Tier 3: 11; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 8; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 3 Partners with whom has won titles: 6 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Hobart (V/PS) Budapest (V/PS), Rome (I/PS) 1999 Madrid (III/PS) 2000 Hilton Head (I/PS), Sopot (III/PS) 2001 Antwerp (V/EC), Madrid (III/PS), Roland Garros (Slam/PS), Knokke-Heist (IV/MS) 2002 Canadian Open (I/PS), U. S. Open Bogota (III/PS), Acapulco (III/PS), Rome (I/ (Slam/PS), Bahia (II/PS), Bali (III/CB) PS), Roland Garros (Slam/PS) 2003 New Haven (II/PS), U. S. Open (Slam/ Charleston (I/PS), Berlin (I/PS) Los Angeles PS) (Champ/PS) 2004 Australian Open (Slam/PS), Indian Charleston (I/PS), Roland Garros (Slam/PS) Luxembourg Wells (I/PS), U. S. Open (Slam/PS) (III/PS) 2005 Dubai (II/PS), Indian Wells (I/PS), Charleston (I/CM), Roland Garros (Slam/PS) San Diego (I/CM) 2006 Los Angeles (II/PS), Beijing (II/PS), Seoul (IV/PS) 2007 Stockholm (IV/AMG) Partners: AMG=Anabel Medina Garrigues, CB=Cara Black, CM=Conchita Martinez, EC=Els Callens, MS=Magui Serna, PS=Paola Suárez

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 240 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Career Titles: Hardcourt: 25; Clay: 31; Grass: 3; Indoor: 10. Total: 69 (WTA says 68 but lists 69 events) By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 2; Tier I: 16; Tier II: 35; Tier III: 6; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 2 Partners with whom has won titles: 24 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 3 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1986 Athens (IV/IC) 1987 1988 1989 1990 Hilton Head (I/MN), Amelia Island (II/MP), Tampa (II/MP), Barcelona (III/MP) 1991 Sydney (II/HS) Amelia Island (II/HS), Barcelona (II/MN) 1992 Sydney (II/HS), Australian Open Hilton Head (I/NZ), Amelia Pan Paciﬁc (II/HS), (Slam/HS), Miami (I/LN), Los Island (II/NZ), Barcelona (II/ Filderstadt (II/HS) Angeles (II/HS) CM) VSlims (Champ/HS) 1993 U. S. Open (Slam/HS) Barcelona (II/CM), Rome (I/JN) Essen (II/HS) 1994 Delray Beach (II/JN), Light n Hilton Head (I/LM), Amelia Oakland (II/LD) Lively (II/JN), San Diego (II/JN), Island (II/LN), Barcelona (II/ Canadian Open (I/MM), U. S. Open LN), Hamburg (II/JN) (Slam/JN), Nicherei (II/JHD) 1995 Australian Open (Slam/JN), Miami Barcelona (II/LN) Eastbourne (II/ WTA (Champ/JN) (I/JN) JN), Wimbledon (Slam/JN) 1996 Australian Open (Slam/CR), Miami Hilton Head (I/JN), Amelia Eastbourne (II/ (I/JN), Canadian Open (I/LN) Island (II/CR), Hamburg (II/BS), JN) Rome (I/IS), Madrid (III/JN) 1997 Sydney (II/GF), Miami (I/NZ), San Madrid (III/MJF) Filderstadt (II/MH), Diego (II/MH) Zürich (I/MH), Moscow (I/NZ) 1998 1999 Los Angeles (II/LN) Cairo (III/LC), Hamburg (II/LN) 2000 Berlin (I/CM) Leipzig (II/AGS) 2001 Miami (I/NT) 2002 Doha (III/JH), New Haven (II/DH), Amelia Island (II/DH), Sopot (III/ Princess Cup (II/SK) SK), Helsinki (IV/SK) 2003 RETIRED 2004 Palermo (V/AMG) 2005 Partners: AGS=Anne-Gaëlle Sidot, AMG=Anabel Medina Garrigues, BS=Brenda Schultz, CM=Conchita Martinez, CR=Chanda Rubin, DH=Daniela Hantuchova, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, IC=Isabel Cueto, IS=Irina Spirlea, JH=Janette Husarova, JHD=Julie Halard (later Julie Halard-Decugis), JN=Jana Novotna, LC=Laurence Courtois, LM=Lori McNeil, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, MM=Meredith McGrath, MN=Martina Navratilova, MP=Mercedes Paz, LN=Larisa Nieland, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, SK=Svetlana Kuznetsova

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 241 Samantha Stosur Career Titles: Hardcourt: 7; Clay: 4; Grass: 1; Indoor: 10. Total:22 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 2; Tier I: 8; Tier II: 8; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 2 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2005 Sydney (II/BS), New Haven (II/ Amelia Island (II/BS) Luxembourg (II/LR), Moscow (ILR), LR), U. S. Open (Slam/LR) Los Angeles (Champ/LR) 2006 Indian Wells (I/LR), Miami (I/ Charleston (I/LR), Pan Pacific (I/LR), Memphis (III/LR), LR) Roland Garros (Slam/ Stuttgart (II/LR), Linz (II/LR), LR) Hasselt (III/LR), Los Angeles (Champ/ LR) 2007 Indian Wells (I/LR), Miami (I/ Berlin (I/LR) Eastbourne (II/ Pan Pacific (I/LR) LR) LR) Partners: BS=Bryanne Stewart, LR=Lisa Raymond Rennae Stubbs Career Titles: Hardcourt: 20; Clay: 7; Grass: 7; Indoor: 24. Total: 58 By Tier: Slams: 4; Championships: 1; Tier I: 18; Tier II: 26; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 11 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1992 Canadian Open (I/LM) Hamburg (II/SG) Birmingham (III/LM) Osaka (III/HS) 1993 Indian Wells (II/HS) Hamburg (II/SG) 1994 Strasbourg (III/LM) Osaka (III/LN) 1995 Birmingham (III/MB) 1996 Chicago (II/LR), Philadelphia (II/LR) 1997 Quebec City (III/LR), Philadelphia (II/LR) 1998 Boston (III/LR) Hannover (II/LR) 1999 New Haven (II/LR) Oklahoma City (III/LR), Zürich (I/LR), Moscow (I/LR), Philadelphia (II/LR) 2000 Australian Open (Slam/LR), Rome (I/LR), San Diego (II/LR) Madrid (III/LR) 2001 Scottsdale (II/LR), U. S. Open Charleston (I/LR) Eastbourne (II/LR), Pan Pacific (I/LR), Munich (Slam/LR) Wimbledon (Slam/LR) (Champ/LR) 2002 Sydney (II/LR), Scottsdale (II/ Charleston (I/LR) Eastbourne (II/LR) Pan Pacific (I/LR) LR), Indian Wells (I/LR), Miami (I/LR), Stanford (II/LR) 2003 Los Angeles (II/MP) Pan Pacific (I/EB), Filderstadt (II/LR) 2004 Sydney (II/CB), San Diego (I/ Wimbledon (Slam/CB) Pan Pacific (I/CB), Filderstadt CB) (II/CB), Zürich (I/CB) 2005 Stanford (II/CB) Eastbourne (II/LR) Zürich (I/CB), Philadelphia (II/ CB) 2006 Sydney (II/CM), San Diego (I/ Zürich (I/CB) CB) 2007 Los Angeles (II/KHP) Stuttgart (II/KHP), Zürich (I/ KP) Partners: CB=Cara Black, CM=Corina Morariu, EB=Elena Bovina, HS=Helena Sukova, KVP=Kveta Hrdlickova Peschke, LM=Lori McNeil, LN=Larisa Neiland, LR=Lisa Raymond, MB=Manon Bollegraf, MP=Mary Pierce, SG=Steffi Graf

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 242 Paola Suárez Career Titles: Hardcourt: 15; Clay: 27; Grass: 0; Indoor: 2. Total: 44 By Tier: Slams: 8; Championships: 1; Tier I: 9; Tier II: 5; Tier III: 11; Tier IV: 4; Tier V: 6 Partners with whom has won titles: 5 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1996 Bol (V/LM) 1997 1998 Hobart (V/VRP) Bogota (V/JH), Budapest (V/VRP), Bol (V/ LM), Rome (I/VRP), Maria Lankowitz (V/LM) 1999 Madrid (III/VRP), Sopot (III/LM), Sao Paulo (III/LM) 2000 Bogota (IV/LM), Sao Paulo (IV/LM), Hilton Head (I/VRP), Klagenfurt (III/LM), Sopot (III/ VRP) 2001 Madrid (III/VRP), Roland Garros (Slam/ VRP), Vienna (III/PT) 2002 Canadian Open (I/VRP), U. S. Open Bogota (III/VRP), Acapulco (III/VRP), Rome (Slam/VRP), Bahia (II/VRP) (I/VRP), Roland Garros (Slam/VRP) 2003 New Haven (II/VRP), U. S. Open Charleston (I/VRP), Berlin (I/VRP) Los Angeles (Slam/VRP) (Champ/VRP) 2004 Australian Open (Slam/VRP), Indian Charleston (I/VRP), Roland Garros (Slam/ Luxembourg Wells (I/VRP), U. S. Open (Slam/VRP) VRP) (III/VRP) 2005 Dubai (II/VRP), Indian Wells (I/VRP) Roland Garros (Slam/VRP) 2006 Los Angeles (II/VRP), Beijing (II/ VRP), Seoul (IV/VRP) 2007 Auckland (IV/JH) Bogota (III/LDL) Partners: JH=Janette Husarova, LDL=Lourdes Dominguez Lino, LM=Laura Montalvo, PT=Patricia Tarabini, VRP=Virginia Ruano Pascual

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 243 Ai Sugiyama Career Titles: Hardcourt: 20; Clay: 3; Grass: 3; Indoor: 8. Total: 34 By Tier: Slams: 3; Championships: 0; Tier I: 7; Tier II: 14; Tier III: 9; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 1 Partners with whom has won titles: 15 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 2 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1994 Japan Open (III/MD) 1995 Hobart (V/KN) 1996 Japan Open (III/KD) 1997 Princess Cup (II/MS) 1998 Gold Coast (III/EL) Luxembourg (III/EL), Leipzig (II/EL), Philadelphia (II/EL) 1999 Sydney (II/EL) Strasbourg (III/EL) 2000 Sydney (II/JHD), Miami (I/JHD), New Eastbourne (II/NT) Moscow (I/JHD) Haven (II/JHD), U. S. Open (Slam/ JHD), Princess Cup (II/JHD) 2001 Canberra (III/NA), Indian Wells (I/NA) 2002 Memphis (III/ET) 2003 Sydney (II/KC), Scottsdale (II/KC), Roland G (Slam/ Wimbledon (Slam/ Antwerp (II/KC), Zürich San Diego (II/KC) KC) KC) (I/KC), Linz (II/LH) 2004 Canadian Open (I/SA), Bali (III/AM) 2005 Birmingham (III/DH) 2006 Doha (II/DH) Rome (I/DH) 2007 Canadian Open (I/KS) Partners: AM=Anastasia Myskina, DH=Daniela Hantuchova, EL= Elena Likhovtseva, ET=Elena Tatarkova, JHD=Julie Halard-Decugis, KC=Kim Clijsters, KD=Kimiko Date, KN=Kyoko Nagatsuka, KS=Katarina Srebotnik, LH=Liezel Huber, MD = Mami Donoshiro, MS=Monica Seles, NA=Nicole Arendt, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, SA=Shinobu Asagoe

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 244 Helena Sukova Career Titles: Hardcourt: 26; Clay: 12; Grass: 5; Indoor: 25. Total: 68 By Tier: Slams: 9; Championships: 1; Tier I: 12; Tier II: 36; Tier III: 10; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 21 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 4 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1984 Perugia (II/IB) Sydney (II/CKK) Marco Island (III/HM), Stuttgart (II/CKK) 1985 Los Angeles (I/CKK), U. S. Berlin (II/CKK), Pan Pacific (I/CKK) Open (Slam/CKK) Lugano (III/BG) 1986 Miami (I/PS) Amelia Island (I/CKK), Chicago (II/CKK), Dallas Berlin (II/SG) (II/CKK), Brighton (II/ SG), Hilversum (III/KJ) 1987 Berlin (II/CKK) Wimbledon (Slam/ Bridgestone (I/CKK), CKK) Chicago (II/CKK), Brighton (II/KJ) 1988 San Antonio (II/LM), Pan Pacific (II/PS) Canadian Open (I/JN), Mahwah (II/JN) 1989 Brisbane (III/JN), Boca Raton Wimbledon (Slam/JN) Zürich (II/Novotna) (II/JN), Miami (I/JN) 1990 Brisbane (III/JN), Sydney (II/ Roland G (Slam/JN) Wimbledon (Slam/JN) Brighton (II/NT), JN), Australian Open (Slam/ Worcester (II/GF) JN), Indian Wells (II/JN), Boca Raton (II/JN), Miami (I/JN) 1991 Sydney (II/ASV), Light & Amelia Island (II/ASV) Lively (I/GF) 1992 Sydney (II/ASV), Australian Rome (I/MS) Pan Pacific (II/ASV), Osaka Open (Slam/ASV), Los Angeles (III/RS), Zürich (II/ASV), (II/ASV) Filderstadt (II/ASV), VirginiaS (Champ/ASV) 1993 Indian Wells (II/RS), Stratton Lucerne (III/MJF) Pan Pacific (I/MN), Essen Mountain (II/ES), San Diego (II/ASV) (II/GF), Los Angeles (II/ASV), U. S. Open (Slam/ASV) 1994 1995 Oakland (II/LM), Philadelphia (II/LM) 1996 Karlovy Vary (III/KH) Wimbledon (Slam/MH) Zürich (I/MH) 1997 Strasbourg (III/NZ) Luxembourg (III/LN) 1998 Sydney (II/MH) Partners: ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, BG=Bonnie Gadusek, CKK=Claudia Kohde-Kilsch, ES=Elizabeth Smylie, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HM=Hana Mandlikova, IB=Iva Budarova, JN=Jana Novotna, KH=Karina Habsudova, KJ=Kathy Jordan, LM=Lori McNeil, LN=Larisa Neiland, MH=Martina Hingis, MJF=Mary Joe Fernandez, MN=Martina Navratilova, MS=Monica Seles, NT=Nathalie Tauziat, NZ=Natasha Zvereva, PS=Pam Shriver, RS=Rennae Stubbs, SG=Steffi Graf

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 245 Serena Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 1; Grass: 2; Indoor: 4. Total: 10 By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 2; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 2 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Oklahoma City (III/VW), Zürich (I/VW) 1999 U. S. Open (Slam/VW) Roland G (Slam/VW) Hannover (II/VW) 2000 Wimbledon (Slam/VW) 2001 Australian Open (Slam/VW) 2002 Wimbledon (Slam/VW) Leipzig (II/AS) 2003 Australian Open (Slam/VW) 2004 2005 2006 Partners: AS=Alexandra Stevenson, VW=Venus Williams Venus Williams Career Titles: Hardcourt: 3; Clay: 1; Grass: 2; Indoor: 3. Total: 9 By Tier: Slams: 6; Championships: 0; Tier I: 1; Tier II: 1; Tier III: 1; Tier IV: 0; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 1 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1998 Oklahoma City (III/SW), Zürich (I/SW) 1999 U. S. Open (Slam/SW) Roland G (Slam/SW) Hannover (II/SW) 2000 Wimbledon (Slam/SW) 2001 Australian Open (Slam/SW) 2002 Wimbledon (Slam/SW) 2003 Australian Open (Slam/SW) 2004 2005 2006 Partners: SW=Serena Williams

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 246 Yan Zi Career Titles: Hardcourt: 7; Clay: 4; Grass: 2; Indoor: 0. Total: 13 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 1; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 1 Partners with whom has won titles: 1 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2005 Hobart (V/JZ), Hyderabad (IV/JZ) 2006 Australian Open (Slam/JZ), Berlin (I/JZ), Rabat(IV/JZ) ’s-Hertogenbosch (III/JZ), New Haven (II/JZ) Wimbledon (Slam/JZ) 2007 Guangzhou (III/SP), Japan Open Charleston (I/JZ), (III/TS),Banglok (III/TS) Strasbourg (III/JZ) Partners: JZ=Zheng Jie, SP=Peng Shuai, TS=Sun Tiantian Zheng Jie Career Titles: Hardcourt: 4; Clay: 4; Grass: 2; Indoor: 0. Total: 10 By Tier: Slams: 2; Championships: 0; Tier I: 2; Tier II: 1; Tier III: 2; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 1 Partners with whom has won titles: 1 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 1 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 2005 Hobart (V/ZY), Hyderabad (IV/ ZY) 2006 Australian Open (Slam/ZY), Berlin (I/JZ), Rabat(IV/ ’s-Hertogenbosch (III/ New Haven (II/ZY) ZY) ZY), Wimbledon (Slam/ ZY) 2007 Charleston (I/ZY), Strasbourg (III/ZY) Partners: ZY=Yan Zi

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 247 Natasha Zvereva Career Titles: Hardcourt: 24; Clay: 20; Grass: 12; Indoor: 24. Total: 80 By Tier: Slams: 18; Championships: 3; Tier I: 23; Tier II: 29; Tier III: 5; Tier IV: 2; Tier V: 0 Partners with whom has won titles: 12 ¥ Partners with whom has won Slams: 4 Year Hardcourt Clay Grass Indoors 1988 Birmingham (III/LS) Indianapolis (IV/LS) 1989 Amelia Island (II/LN), Birmingham (III/LN) Chicago (II/LN), Roland Garros (Slam/ Moscow (IV/LN) LN) 1990 Light & Lively (II/LN) Birmingham (III/LN), Eastbourne (II/LN) 1991 Boca Raton (I/LN), Canadian Open Hilton Head (I/CKK), Eastbourne (II/LN), Brighton (II/PS) (I/LN), Los Angeles (II/LN), U. S. Berlin (I/LN) Wimbledon (Slam/LN) Open (Slam/PS) 1992 Boca Raton (I/LN), U. S. Open Hilton Head (I/ASV), Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Zürich (II/HS), (Slam/GF) Amelia Island (II/ Oakland (II/GF), ASV), Roland G Philadelphia (II/GF) (Slam/GF) 1993 Australian Open (Slam/GF), Delray Hilton Head (I/GF), Eastboune (II/GF), Leipzig (II/GF), Beach (II/GF), Light ’n Lively (II/ Berlin (I/GF), Roland Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Filderstadt (II/GF), GF) G (Slam/GF) VSlims (Champ/GF) 1994 Australian Open (Slam/GF), Miami Rome (I/GF), Berlin Eastbourne (II/GF), Chicago (II/GF), (I/GF) (I/GF), Roland G Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Filderstadt (II/GF), (Slam/GF) Philadelphia (I/GF), VSlims (Champ/GF) 1995 San Diego (II/GF), Los Angeles (II/ Rome (I/GF) Pan Pacific (I/GF), GF), U. S. Open (Slam/GF) Roland G (Slam/GF) Filderstadt (II/GF) 1996 Los Angeles (II/LD), U. S. Open Pan Pacific (I/GF) (Slam/GF) 1997 Australian Open (Slam/MH), Indian Strasbourg (III/HS), Wimbledon (Slam/GF) Pan Pacific (I/LD), Wells (I/LD), Miami (I/ASV) Roland G (Slam/GF) Moscow (I/ASV) 1998 Indian Wells (I/LD), Stanford (II/ Berlin (I/LD) Filderstadt (II/LD), LD), San Diego (II/LD), Los Angeles Moscow (I/MP), Chase (II/MH) (Champ/LD) 1999 Pan Pacific (I/LD) 2000 Hamburg (II/AK) Hannover (II/ÅC) 2001 2002 Madrid (III/MN) Partners: ÅC=Åsa Carlsson (now Svensson), AK=Anna Kournikova, ASV=Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, CKK=Claudia Kohde- Kilsch, GF=Gigi Fernandez, HS=Helena Sukova, LD=Lindsay Davenport, LN=LS=Larisa (Savchenko) Neiland, MH=Martina Hingis, MN=Martina Navratilova, MP=Mary Pierce, PS=Pam Shriver

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 248 Slam History Singles Slam Winners The following list shows, year by year, who won which Slams, and also shows the Open Era Slam Count for each player. (Note that some players, e.g. Court and King, have earlier Slams; these do not appear in the totals. Also, the Australian Open is always counted as the first Slam of the year even when it was actually the last, i.e. 1978-1985.) Multiple Slam winners shown in Bold Pre-Open Era Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon U. S. Open 1884 — — Watson — 1885 — — Watson** — 1886 — — Hillyard(Bingley)* — 1887 — — Dod* Jansell 1888 — — Dod** Townsend* 1889 — — Hillyard* Townsend** 1890 — — Rice* Roosevelt* 1891 — — Dod* Cahill* 1892 — — Dod** Cahill** 1893 — — Dod** Terry* 1894 — — Hillyard* Hellwig* 1895 — — Cooper* J.Atkinson* 1896 — — Cooper** Moore* 1897 — — Hillyard* J.Atkinson* 1898 — — Cooper* J.Atkinson** 1899 — — Hillyard* M.Jones* 1900 — — Hillyard** McAteer* 1901 — — Cooper Sterry* Moore* 1902 — — Robb* M.Jones* 1903 — — Chambers(Douglass)* Moore* 1904 — — Chambers(Douglass)** Sutton* 1905 — — Sutton* Moore* 1906 — — Chambers(Douglass)* Homans* 1907 — — Sutton* Sears* 1908 — — Cooper Sterry* Wallach* 1909 — — Boothby* Hotchkiss* 1910 — — Chambers* Hotchkiss** 1911 — — Chambers** Hotchkiss** 1912 — — Larcombe* Browne* 1913 — — Chambers* Browne** 1914 — — Chambers** Browne** 1915 — — — Mallory(Bjurstedt)* 1916 — — — Mallory(Bjurstedt)** 1917 — — — Mallory(Bjurstedt)** 1918 — — — Mallory(Bjurstedt)** 1919 — — Lenglen* Wightman* 1920 — — Lenglen** Mallory 1921 — — Lenglen** Mallory 1922 Molesworth — Lenglen Mallory 1923 Molesworth — Lenglen Wills 1924 Lance — McKane Wills 1925 Akhurst Lenglen Lenglen Wills 1926 Akhurst Lenglen McKane Godfree Mallory 1927 Boyd Bouman Wills Wills 1928 Akhurst Wills Wills Wills 1929 Akhurst Wills Wills Wills Moody 1930 Akhurst Wills Moody Wills Moody Nuthall

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 249 Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon U. S. Open 1931 Buttsworth Aussern Aussern Wills Moody 1932 Buttsworth Wills Moody Wills Moody Jacobs 1933 Hartigan Scriven Wills Moody Jacobs 1934 Hartigan Scriven Round Jacobs 1935 Round Sperling Wills Moody Jacobs 1936 Hartigan Sperling Jacobs Marble 1937 Bolton(Wynne) Sperling Round Lizana 1938 Bundy Mathieu Wills Moody Marble 1939 Westacott Mathieu Marble Marble 1940 Bolton(Wynne) — — Marble 1941 — — — Cooke 1942 — — — Betz 1943 — — — Betz 1944 — — — Betz 1945 — — — Cooke 1946 Bolton duPont(Osborne) Betz Betz 1947 Bolton Todd duPont(Osborne) Brough 1948 Bolton Landry Brough duPont 1949 Hart duPont Brough duPont 1950 Brough Hart Brough duPont 1951 Bolton Fry Hart Connolly 1952 Coyne Long Hart Connolly Connolly 1953 Connolly Connolly Connolly Connolly 1954 Coyne Long Connolly Connolly Hart 1955 Penrose Mortimer Brough Hart 1956 Carter Gibson Fry Fry 1957 Fry Bloomer Gibson Gibson 1958 Mortimer Kormoczi Gibson Gibson 1959 CarterReitano Truman Bueno Bueno 1960 Court(Smith) Hard Bueno Hard 1961 Court(Smith) A.Jones(Haydon) Mortimer Hard 1962 Court(Smith) Court(Smith) Susman Court(Smith) 1963 Court(Smith) Turner Court(Smith) Bueno 1964 Court(Smith) Court(Smith) Bueno Bueno 1965 Court(Smith) Turner Court(Smith) Court(Smith) 1966 Court(Smith) A.Jones King(Moffitt) Bueno 1967 Richey Durr King(Moffitt) King(Moffitt) 1968 King(Moffitt)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 250 Open Era Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon U. S. Open 1968 Richey King (1) Wade (1) 1969 Court (1) Court (2) A. Jones Court (3) 1970 Court (4) Court (5) Court (6) Court (7) 1971 Court (8) Goolagong (1) Goolagong (2) King (2) 1972 Wade (2) King (3) King (4) King (5) 1973 Court (9) Court (10) King (6) Court (11) 1974 Goolagong (3) Evert (1) Evert (2) King (7) 1975 Goolagong (4) Evert (3) King (8) Evert (4) 1976 Goolagong Cawley (5) Barker Evert (5) Evert (6) 1977 Reid Jausovec Wade (3) Evert (7) Goolagong Cawley (6) 1978 O’Neil Ruzici Navratilova (1) Evert (8) 1979 B. Jordan Evert Lloyd (9) Navratilova (2) Austin (1) 1980 Mandlikova (1) Evert Lloyd (10) Goolagong Cawley (7) Evert Lloyd (11) 1981 Navratilova (3) Mandlikova (2) Evert Lloyd (12) Austin (2) 1982 Evert Lloyd (13) Navratilova (4) Navratilova (5) Evert Lloyd (14) 1983 Navratilova (6) Evert Lloyd (15) Navratilova (7) Navratilova (8) 1984 Evert Lloyd (16) Navratilova (9) Navratilova (10) Navratilova (11) 1985 Navratilova (12) Evert Lloyd (17) Navratilova (13) Mandlikova (3) 1986 Evert Lloyd (18) Navratilova (14) Navratilova (15) 1987 Mandlikova (4) Graf (1) Navratilova (16) Navratilova (17) 1988 Graf (2) Graf (3) Graf (4) Graf (5) 1989 Graf (6) Sanchez-Vicario (1) Graf (7) Graf (8) 1990 Graf (9) Seles (1) Navratilova (18) Sabatini 1991 Seles (2) Seles (3) Graf (10) Seles (4) 1992 Seles (5) Seles (6) Graf (11) Seles (7) 1993 Seles (8) Graf (12) Graf (13) Graf (14) 1994 Graf (15) Sanchez-Vicario (2) Martinez Sanchez-Vicario (3) 1995 Pierce (1) Graf (16) Graf (17) Graf (18) 1996 Seles (9) Graf (19) Graf (20) Graf (21) 1997 Hingis (1) Majoli Hingis (2) Hingis (3) 1998 Hingis (4) Sanchez-Vicario (4) Novotna Davenport (1) 1999 Hingis (5) Graf (22) Davenport (2) S. Williams (1) 2000 Davenport (3) Pierce (2) V. Williams (1) V. Williams (2) 2001 Capriati (1) Capriati (2) V. Williams (3) V. Williams (4) 2002 Capriati (3) S. Williams (2) S. Williams (3) S. Williams (4) 2003 S. Williams (5) Hénin-Hardenne (1) S. Williams (6) Hénin-Hardenne (2) 2004 Hénin-Hardenne (3) Myskina Sharapova (1) Kuznetsova 2005 S. Williams (7) Hénin-Hardenne (4) V. Williams (5) Clijsters 2006 Mauresmo (1) Hénin-Hardenne (5) Mauresmo (2) Sharapova (2) 2007 S. Williams (8) Hénin (6) V. Williams (6) Hénin (7)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 251 Doubles Slam Winners Pre-Open Era Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1889 — — — Ballard/Townsend 1890 — — — E.Roosevelt/G.Roosevelt 1891 — — — Cahill/Morgan 1892 — — — Cahill/McKinlay 1893 — — — Terry/Butler 1894 — — — Hellwig/J.Atkinson 1895 — — — Hellwig/J.Atkinson 1896 — — — Moore/J.Atkinson 1897 — — — J.Atkinson/K.Atkinson 1898 — — — J.Atkinson/K.Atkinson 1899 — — — Craven/McAteer 1900 — — — Parker/Champlin 1901 — — — J.Atkinson/McAteer 1902 — — — J.Atkinson/M.Jones 1903 — — — Moore/Neely 1904 — — — Sutton/Hall 1905 — — — Homans/Neely 1906 — — — Coe/Platt 1907 — — — Wimer/Neely 1908 — — — Ev.Sears/Curtis 1909 — — — Hotchkiss/Rotch 1910 — — — Hotchkiss/Rotch 1911 — — — Hotchkiss/El.Sears 1912 — — — Browne/Green 1913 — — McNair/Boothby Browne/L.Williams 1914 — — Morton/Ryan Browne/L.Williams 1915 — — — Hotchkiss/El.Sears 1916 — — — Mallory(Bjur.)/El.Sears 1917 — — — Mallory(Bjur.)/El.Sears 1918 — — — Zinderstein/Goss 1919 — — Lenglen/Ryan Zinderstein/Goss 1920 — — Lenglen/Ryan Zinderstein/Goss 1921 — — Lenglen/Ryan Browne/L.Williams 1922 Boyd/Mountain — Lenglen/Ryan Zinderstein Jessup/Wills 1923 Boyd/Harper(Lance) — Lenglen/Ryan McKane/Covell 1924 Akhurst/Harper(Lance) — Wightman/Wills Wightman/Wills 1925 Akhurst/Harper Lenglen/Vlasto Lenglen/Ryan Browne/Wills 1926 Boyd/M.Wood Lenglen/Vlasto Browne/Ryan Ryan/Goss 1927 Bickerton/M.Wood Heine/Peacock Wills/Ryan Godfree/Harvey 1928 Akhurst/Boyd Bennett/Watson Saunders/Watson Wightman/Wills 1929 Akhurst/Bickerton Bouman/de Alvarez Saunders Mitchell/Watson Watson/Saunders Mitchell 1930 Molesworth/Hood Wills Moody/Ryan Wills Moody/Ryan Nuthall/Palfrey 1931 Akhurst Cozens/Bickerton Whittingstall/Nuthall Barron/Mudford Nuthall/Whittingstall 1932 Buttsworth/Cox Wills Moody/Ryan Metaxa/Sigart Jacobs/Palfrey 1933 Molesworth/Hood Mathieu/Ryan Mathieu/Ryan Nuthall/James 1934 Akhurst Cozens/Bickerton Mathieu/Ryan Mathieu/Ryan Jacobs/Palfrey 1935 Dearman/Lyle Scriven/Stammers James/Stammers Jacobs/Palfrey 1936 Coyne/Bolton(Wynne) Mathieu/Yorke James/Stammers Van Ryn/Babcock 1937 Coyne/Bolton(Wynne) Mathieu/Yorke Mathieu/Yorke Palfrey Fabyan/Marble 1938 Coyne/Bolton(Wynne) Mathieu/Yorke Palfrey Fabyan/Marble Palfrey Fabyan/Marble 1939 Coyne/Bolton(Wynne) Mathieu/Jedrzejowska Palfrey Fabyan/Marble Palfrey Fabyan/Marble 1940 Coyne/Bolton(Wynne) — — Palfrey Fabyan/Marble 1941 — — — Palfrey Fab/duPont(Osbo) 1942 — — — Brough/duPont(Osborne)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 252 1943 — — — Brough/duPont(Osborne) 1944 — — — Brough/duPont(Osborne) 1945 — — — Brough/duPont(Osborne) 1946 Fitch/Bevis Brough/duPont(Osborne) Brough/duPont(Osborne) Brough/duPont(Osborne) 1947 Coyne Long/Bolton(Wynne) Brough/duPont(Osborne) Hart/Todd Brough/duPont(Osborne) 1948 Coyne Long/Bolton(Wynne) Hart/Todd Brough/duPont Brough/duPont 1949 Coyne Long/Bolton(Wynne) Brough/duPont Brough/duPont Brough/duPont 1950 Brough/Hart Fry/Hart Brough/duPont Brough/duPont 1951 Coyne Long/Bolton(Wynne) Fry/Hart Fry/Hart Fry/Hart 1952 Coyne Long/Bolton(Wynne) Fry/Hart Fry/Hart Fry/Hart 1953 Connolly/Sampson Fry/Hart Fry/Hart Fry/Hart 1954 Hawton/Penrose Connolly/Hopman Brough/duPont Fry/Hart 1955 Hawton/Penrose Fleitz/Hard Mortimer/Shilock Brough/duPont 1956 Hawton/Coyne Long Buxton/Gibson Buxton/Gibson Brough/duPont 1957 Gibson/Fry Bloomer/Hard Gibson/Hard Brough/duPont 1958 Hawton/Coyne Long Reyes/Ramirez Bueno/Gibson Arth/Hard 1959 Schuurman/S.Reynolds S.Reynolds/Schuurman Arth/Hard Arth/Hard 1960 Bueno/Truman Bueno/Hard Bueno/Hard Bueno/Hard 1961 Reitano/Court(Smith) S.Reynolds/Schuurman Hantze/King(Moffitt) Hard/Turner 1962 Court(Smith)/Ebbern S.ReynoldsPri/Schuurman King(Moff)/Hantze Susman Bueno/Hard 1963 Court(Smith)/Ebbern A.Jones/Schuurman Bueno/Hard Ebbern/Court(Smith) 1964 Tegart Dalton/Turner Court(Smith)/Turner Court(Smith)/Turner King(Mof)/Hantze Susm 1965 Court(Smith)/Turner Court(Smith)/Turner Bueno/King(Moffitt) Graebner/Richey 1966 Graebner/Richey Court(Smith)/Tegart Bueno/Richey Bueno/Richey 1967 Turner/Tegart Dalton Durr/Sheriff Casals/King(Moffitt) Casals/King(Moffitt) 1968 Krantzcke/Reid(Melville)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 253 Open Era Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1968 Durr/A Jones Casals/King Bueno/Court 1969 Court/Tegart Dalton Durr/A Jones Court/Tegart Dalton Durr/Hard 1970 Court/Tegart Dalton Chanfreau/Durr Casals/King Court/Tegart Dalton 1971 Court/Goolagong Cawley Chanfreau/Durr Casals/King Casals/Tegart Dalton 1972 Gourlay/Harris King/Stove King/Stove Durr/Stove 1973 Court/Wade Court/Wade Casals/King Court/Wade 1974 Goolagong Cawley/Michel Evert/Morozova Goolagong/Michel Casals/King 1975 Goolagong Cawley/Michel Evert/Navratilova Kiyomura/Sawamatsu Court/Wade 1976 Goolagong Cawley/Gourlay Bonicelli/Chanfreau Lovera Evert/Navratilova Boshoff/Kloss 1977 Balestrat/Gourlay* Mariskova/Teeguarden Gourlay Cawley/Russell Navratilova/Stove 1978 Nagelsen/Tomanova Jausovec/Ruzici Reid/Turnbull King/Navratilova 1979 Chaloner/Evers Stove/Turnbull King/Navratilova Stove/Turnbull 1980 Navratilova/Nagelsen K Jordan/A Smith K Jordan/A Smith King/Navratilova 1981 K Jordan/A Smith Fairbank/Harford Navratilova/Shriver K Jordan/A Smith 1982 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/A Smith Navratilova/Shriver Casals/Turnbull 1983 Navratilova/Shriver Fairbank/Reynolds Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver 1984 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver 1985 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver K. Jordan/Smylie Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova 1986 Navratilova/Temesvari Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver 1987 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova Navratilova/Shriver 1988 Navratilova/Shriver Navratilova/Shriver Graf/Sabatini G Fernandez/White 1989 Navratilova/Shriver Savchenko/Zvereva Novotna/Sukova Mandlikova/Navratilova 1990 Novotna/Sukova Novotna/Sukova Novotna/Sukova G Fernandez/Navratilova 1991 Fendick/MJ Fernandez G Fernandez/Novotna Savchenko Neiland/Zvereva Shriver/Zvereva 1992 Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva 1993 G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova 1994 G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario 1995 Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario G Fernandez/Zvereva Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario G Fernandez/Zvereva 1996 Rubin/Sanchez-Vicario Davenport/ MJ Fernandez Hingis/Sukova G Fernandez/Zvereva 1997 Hingis/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva G Fernandez/Zvereva Davenport/Novotna 1998 Hingis/Lucic Hingis/Novotna Hingis/Novotna Hingis/Novotna 1999 Hingis/Kournikova Williams/Williams Davenport/Morariu Williams/Williams 2000 Raymond/Stubbs Hingis/Pierce Williams/Williams Halard-Decugis/Sugiyama 2001 Williams/Williams Ruano Pascual/Suárez Raymond/Stubbs Raymond/Stubbs 2002 Hingis/Kournikova Ruano Pascual/Suárez Williams/Williams Ruano Pascual/Suárez 2003 Williams/Williams Clijsters/Sugiyama Clijsters/Sugiyama Ruano Pascual/Suárez 2004 Ruano Pascual/Suárez Ruano Pascual/Suárez Black/Stubbs Ruano Pascual/Suárez 2005 Kuznetsova/Molik Ruano Pascual/Suárez Black/Huber Raymond/Stosur 2006 Yan/Zheng Raymond/Stosur Yan/Zheng Déchy/Zvonareva 2007 Black/Huber Molik/Santangelo Black/Huber Déchy/Safina

* This is the January winner; the “other” Australian Open, in December, had the doubles final rained out

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 254 Men’s Singles Slam Winners Note: * indicates a Slam played in the Challenge Round Era.** indicates a defending champion who won the Challenge Round. Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1877 — — Gore — 1878 — — Hadow* — 1879 — — Hartley* — 1880 — — Hartley** — 1881 — — W.Renshaw* Sears 1882 — — W.Renshaw** Sears 1883 — — W.Renshaw** Sears 1884 — — W.Renshaw** Sears** 1885 — — W.Renshaw** Sears** 1886 — — W.Renshaw** Sears** 1887 — — Lawford* Sears** 1888 — — E.Renshaw* Slocum* 1889 — — W.Renshaw* Slocum** 1890 — — Hamilton* Campbell* 1891 — — Baddeley* Campbell** 1892 — — Baddeley** Campbell** 1893 — — Pim* Wrenn* 1894 — — Pim** Wrenn** 1895 — — Baddeley* Hovey* 1896 — — Mahony* Wrenn* 1897 — — R.Doherty* Wrenn** 1898 — — R.Doherty** Whitman* 1899 — — R.Doherty** Whitman** 1900 — — R.Doherty** Whitman** 1901 — — Gore* Larned* 1902 — — L.Doherty* Larned** 1903 — — L.Doherty** L.Doherty* 1904 — — L.Doherty** Ward* 1905 Heath — L.Doherty** Wright* 1906 Wilding — L.Doherty** Clothier* 1907 Rice — Brookes* Larned* 1908 Alexander — Gore* Larned** 1909 Wilding — Gore** Larned** 1910 Heath — Wilding* Larned** 1911 Brookes — Wilding** Larned 1912 Parke — Wilding** McLoughlin 1913 Parker — Wilding** McLoughlin 1914 A.Wood — Brookes* Williams 1915 Lowe — — Johnston 1916 — — — Williams 1917 — — — Murray 1918 — — — Murray 1919 Kingscote — Patterson* Johnston 1920 P.Wood — Tilden* Tilden 1921 Gemmel — Tilden** Tilden 1922 Anderson — Patterson Tilden 1923 P.Wood — Johnston Tilden 1924 Anderson — Borotra Tilden 1925 Anderson Lacoste Lacoste Tilden 1926 Hawkes Cochet Borotra Lacoste 1927 Patterson Lacoste Cochet Lacoste 1928 Borotra Cochet Lacoste Cochet

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 255 1929 Gregory Lacoste Cochet Tilden 1930 Moon Cochet Tilden Doeg 1931 Crawford Borotra S.Wood Vines 1932 Crawford Cochet Vines Vines 1933 Crawford Crawford Crawford Perry 1934 Perry von Cramm Perry Perry 1935 Crawford Perry Perry Allison 1936 Quist von Cramm Perry Perry 1937 McGrath Henkel Budge Budge 1938 Budge Budge Budge Budge 1939 Bromwich McNeill Riggs Riggs 1940 Quist — — McNeill 1941 — — — Riggs 1942 — — — Schroeder 1943 — — — Hunt 1944 — — — Parker 1945 — — — Parker 1946 Bromwich Bernard Petra Kramer 1947 Pails Asboth Kramer Kramer 1948 Quist Parker Falkenburg Gonzalez 1949 Sedgman Parker Schroeder Gonzalez 1950 Sedgman Patty Patty Larsen 1951 Savitt Drobny Savitt Sedgman 1952 McGregor Drobny Sedgman Sedgman 1953 Rosewall Rosewall Seixas Trabert 1954 Rose Trabert Drobny Seixas 1955 Rosewall Trabert Trabert Trabert 1956 Hoad Hoad Hoad Rosewall 1957 Cooper Davidson Hoad Anderson 1958 Cooper Rose Cooper Cooper 1959 Olmedo Pietrangeli Olmedo Fraser 1960 Laver Pietrangeli Fraser Fraser 1961 Emerson Santana Laver Emerson 1962 Laver Laver Laver Laver 1963 Emerson Emerson McKinley Osuna 1964 Emerson Santana Emerson Emerson 1965 Emerson Stolle Emerson Santana 1966 Emerson Roche Santana Stolle 1967 Emerson Emerson Newcombe Newcombe 1968 Bowrey ***** ***** ***** 1968 ***** Rosewall (1) Laver (1) Ashe (1)+(Amateur:Ashe) 1969 Laver (2) Laver (3) Laver (4) Laver (5)+(Amateur:S.Smith) 1970 Ashe (2) Kodes (1) Newcombe (1) Rosewall (2) 1971 Rosewall (3) Kodes (2) Newcombe (2) S.Smith (1) 1972 Rosewall (4) Gimeno S.Smith (2) Nastase (1) 1973 Newcombe (3) Nastase (2) Kodes (3) Newcombe (4) 1974 Connors (1) Borg (1) Connors (2) Connors (3) 1975 Newcombe (5) Borg (2) Ashe (3) Orantes 1976 Edmondson Panatta Borg (3) Connors (4) 1977 Tanner+Gerulaitis Vilas (1) Borg (4) Vilas (2) 1978 Vilas (3) Borg (5) Borg (6) Connors (5) 1979 Vilas (4) Borg (7) Borg (8) McEnroe (1) 1980 Teacher Borg (9) Borg (10) McEnroe (2) 1981 Kriek Borg (11) McEnroe (3) McEnroe (4) 1982 Kriek Wilander (1) Connors (6) Connors (7) 1983 Wilander (2) Noah McEnroe (5) Connors (8) 1984 Wilander (3) Lendl (1) McEnroe (6) McEnroe (7)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 256 1985 Edberg (1) Wilander (4) Becker (1) Lendl (2) 1986 Lendl (3) Becker (2) Lendl (4) 1987 Edberg (2) Lendl (5) Cash Lendl (6) 1988 Wilander (5) Wilander (6) Edberg (3) Wilander (7) 1989 Lendl (7) Chang Becker (3) Becker (4) 1990 Lendl (8) Gomez Edberg (4) Sampras (1) 1991 Becker (5) Courier (1) Stich Edberg (5) 1992 Courier (2) Courier (3) Agassi (1) Edberg (6) 1993 Courier (4) Bruguera (1) Sampras (2) Sampras (3) 1994 Sampras (4) Bruguera (2) Sampras (5) Agassi (2) 1995 Agassi (3) Muster Sampras (6) Sampras (7) 1996 Becker (6) Kafelnikov (1) Krajicek Sampras (8) 1997 Sampras (9) Kuerten (1) Sampras (10) Rafter (1) 1998 Korda Moya Sampras (11) Rafter (2) 1999 Kafelnikov (2) Agassi (4) Sampras (12) Agassi (5) 2000 Agassi (6) Kuerten (2) Sampras (13) Safin (1) 2001 Agassi (7) Kuerten (3) Ivanisevic Hewitt (1) 2002 Johansson Costa Hewitt (2) Sampras (14) 2003 Agassi (8) Ferrero Federer (1) Roddick 2004 Federer (2) Gaudio Federer (3) Federer (4) 2005 Safin (2) Nadal (1) Federer (5) Federer (6) 2006 Federer (7) Nadal (2) Federer (8) Federer (9) 2007 Federer (10) Nadal (3) Federer (11) Federer (12)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 257 Men’s Doubles Slam Winners Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1881 — — — Clark/Taylor 1882 — — — R.Sears/Dwight 1883 — — — R.Sears/Dwight 1884 — — E.Renshaw/W.Renshaw R.Sears/Dwight 1885 — — E.Renshaw/W.Renshaw** R.Sears/Dwight 1886 — — E.Renshaw/W.Renshaw** R.Sears/Dwight 1887 — — Lyon/Wilberforce* R.Sears/Dwight 1888 — — E.Renshaw/W.Renshaw* Campbell/Hall 1889 — — E.Renshaw/W.Renshaw** Slocum/Taylor 1890 — — Pim/Stoker* Hall/Hobart 1891 — — H.Baddeley/W.Baddeley* Campbell/Huntington 1892 — — Barlow/Lewis* Campbell/Huntington 1893 — — Pim/Stoker* Hobart/Hovey 1894 — — H.Baddeley/W.Baddeley* Hobart/Hovey 1895 — — H.Baddeley/W.Baddeley** Chace/Wrenn 1896 — — H.Baddeley/W.Baddeley** C.Neel/S.Neel 1897 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty* Ware/Sheldon 1898 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty** Ware/Sheldon 1899 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty** Ward/Davis 1900 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty** Davis/Ward 1901 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty** Davis/Ward 1902 — — Si.Smith/Riseley* L.Doherty/R.Doherty 1903 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty* L.Doherty/R.Doherty 1904 — — L.Doherty/R.Doherty** Ward/Wright 1905 Lycett/Tachell — L.Doherty/R.Doherty** Ward/Wright 1906 Heath/Wilding — Si.Smith/Riseley* Ward/Wright 1907 Gregg/Parker — Brookes/Wilding* F.Alexander/Hackett 1908 F.Alexander/Dunlop — Ritchie/Wilding* F.Alexander/Hackett 1909 Keane/Parker — Gore/Barrett* F.Alexander/Hackett 1910 Campbell/Rice — Ritchie/Wilding* F.Alexander/Hackett 1911 Heath/Lycett — Gobert/Decugis* Little/Touchard 1912 Parke/Dixon — Barrett/Dixon* McLoughlin/Bundy 1913 Hedermann/Parker — Barrett/Dixon** McLoughlin/Bundy 1914 Campbell/Patterson — Brookes/Wilding* McLoughlin/Bundy 1915 Rice/Todd — — Johnston/Griffin 1916 — — — Johnston/Griffin 1917 — — — F.Alexander/Throckmortn 1918 — — — Richards/Tilden 1919 P.Wood/Thomas — Thomas/P.Wood* Brookes/Patterson 1920 P.Wood/Thomas — Williams/Garland* Johnston/Griffin 1921 Eaton/Gemmell — Lycett/Woosnam* Richards/Tilden 1922 Hawkes/Patterson — J.Anderson/Lycett Richards/Tilden 1923 P/Wood/St.John — Godfree/Lycett Norton/Tilden 1924 J.Anderson/Brooks — Hunter/Richards H.Kinsey/R.Kinsey 1925 P.Wood/Patterson Borotra/Lacoste Borotra/Lacoste Richards/Williams 1926 Hawkes/Patterson Richards/Kinsey Brugnon/Cochet Richards/Williams 1927 Hawks/Patterson Cochet/Brugnon Hunter/Tilden Hunter/Tilden 1928 Borotra/Brugnon Borotra/Brugnon Brugnon/Cochet Hennessy/Lott 1929 Crawford/Hopman Lacoste/Borotra Allison/Van Ryn Doeg/Lott 1930 Crawford/Hopman Cochet/Brugnon Allison/Van Ryn Doeg/Lott 1931 Donohoe/Dunlop Lott/Van Ryn Lott/Van Ryn Allison/Van Ryn 1932 Crawford/Moon Cochet/Brugnon Borotra/Brugnon Gledhill/Vines 1933 Gledhill/Vines Hughes/Perry Borotra/Brugnon Lott/Stoefen 1934 Perry/Hughes Borotra/Brugnon Lott/Stoefan Lott/Stoefen 1935 Crawford/McGrath Crawford/Quist Crawford/Quist Allison/Van Ryn

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 258 1936 Quist/Turnbull Borotra/Bernard Hughes/Tuckey Budge/Mako 1937 Quist/Turnbull von Cramm/Henkel Budge/Mako von Cramm/Henkel 1938 Bromwich/Quist Destremau/Petra Budge/Mako Budge/Mako 1939 Bromwich/Quist McNeill/Harris Cooke/Riggs Bromwich/Quist 1940 Bromwich/Quist — — Kramer/Schroeder 1941 — — — Kramer/Schroeder 1942 — — — Mulloy/Talbert 1943 — — — Kramer/Parker 1944 — — — McNeill/Falkenburg 1945 — — — Mulloy/Talbert 1946 Bromwich/Quist Bernard/Petra Brown/Kramer Mulloy/Talbert 1947 Bromwich/Quist Fannin/Sturgess Falkenburg/Kramer Kramer/Schroeder 1948 Bromwich/Quist Bergelin/Drobny Bromwich/Sedgman Mulloy/Talbert 1949 Bromwich/Quist Gonzalez/Parker Gonzalez/Parker Bromwich/Sidwell 1950 Bromwich/Quist Talbert/Trabert Bromwich/Quist Bromwich/Sedgman 1951 McGregor/Sedgman McGregor/Sedgman McGregor/Sedgman McGregor/Sedgman 1952 McGregor/Sedgman McGregor/Sedgman McGregor/Sedgman Rose/Seixas 1953 Hoad/Rosewall Hoad/Rosewall Hoad/Rosewall Hartwig/Rose 1954 Hartwig/Rose Seixas/Trabert Hartwig/Rose Seixas/Trabert 1955 Seixas/Trabert Seixas/Trabert Hartwig/Hoad Kamo/Miyagi 1956 Hoad/Rosewall Candy/Perry Hoad/Rosewall Hoad/Rosewall 1957 Fraser/Hoad M.Anderson/Cooper Patty/Mulloy Cooper/Fraser 1958 Cooper/Fraser Cooper/Fraser Davidson/Schmidt Olmedo/Richardson 1959 Laver/Mark Sirola/Pietrangeli Emerson/Fraser Emerson/Fraser 1960 LaverMark Emerson/Fraser Osuna/Ralston Emerson/Fraser 1961 Laver/Mark Emerson/Laver Emerson/Fraser McKinley/Ralston 1962 Emerson/Fraser Emerson/Fraser B.Hewitt/F.Stolle Osuna/Palafox 1963 B.Hewitt/F.Stolle Emerson/Santana Osuna/Palafox McKinley/Ralston 1964 B.Hewitt/F.Stolle Emerson/Fletcher B.Hewitt/F.Stolle McKinley/Ralston 1965 Newcombe/Roche Emerson/F.Stolle Newcombe/Roche Emerson/F.Stolle 1966 Emerson/F.Stolle Graebner/Ralston Fletcher/Newcombe Emerson/F.Stolle 1967 Newcombe/Roche Newcombe/Roche B.Hewitt/McMillan Newcombe/Roche 1968 Crealy/Stone ***** ***** ***** 1968 ***** Rosewall/F.Stolle Newcombe/Roche Lutz/S.Smith 1969 Emerson/Laver Newcombe/Roche Newcombe/Roche Rosewall/F.Stolle 1970 Lutz/S.Smith Nastase/Tiriac Newcombe/Roche Barthes/Pilic 1971 Newcombe/Roche Ashe/Riessen Emerson/Laver Newcombe/Taylor 1972 Davidson/Rosewall B.Hewitt/McMillan B.Hewitt/McMillan Drysdale/Taylor 1973 M.Anderson/Newcombe Newcombe/Okker Connors/Nastase Davidson/Newcombe 1974 Case/Masters Crealy/Parun Newcombe/Roche Lutz/S.Smith 1975 J.Alexander/Dent Gottfried/Ramirez Gerulaitis/A.Mayer Connors/Nastase 1976 Newcombe/Roche McNair/Stewart Gottfried/Ramirez Okker/Riessen 1977 Ashe/Roche + Ruffels/Stone Gottfried/Ramirez Case/Masters B.Hewitt/McMillan 1978 Fibak/Warwick G.Mayer/Pfister B.Hewitt/McMillan Lutz/S.Smith 1979 McNamara/McNamee A.Mayer/G.Mayer Fleming/J.McEnroe Fleming/J.McEnroe 1980 Edmondson/Warwick Amaya/Pfister McNamara/McNamee Lutz/S.Smith 1981 Edmondson/Warwick Gunthardt/Taroczy Fleming/J.McEnroe Fleming/J.McEnroe 1982 J.Alexander/Fitzgerald Stewart/Taygan McNamara/McNamee Curren/Denton 1983 Edmondson/McNamee Jarryd/Simonsson Fleming/J.McEnroe Fleming/J.McEnroe 1984 Edmondson/Stewart Leconte/Noah Fleming/J.McEnroe Fitzgerald/Smid 1985 Annacone/Van Rensburg Edmondson/Warwick Gunthardt/Taroczy Flach/Seguso 1986 Fitzgerald/Smid Nystrom/Wilander Gomez/Zivojinovic 1987 Edberg/Jarryd Jarryd/Seguso Flach/Seguso Edberg/Jarryd 1988 Leach/Pugh Gomez/E.Sanchez Flach/Seguso Casal/E.Sanchez 1989 Leach/Pugh Grabb/P.McEnroe Fitzgerald/Jarryd J.McEnroe/Woodforde 1990 Aldrich/Visser Casal/E.Sanchez Leach/Pugh Aldrich/Visser 1991 Davis/Pate Fitzgerald/Jarryd Fitzgerald/Jarryd Fitzgerald/Jarryd

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 259 1992 Woodbridge/Woodforde Hlasek/Rosset J.McEnroe/Stich Grabb/Reneberg 1993 Visser/Warder L.Jensen/M.Jensen Woodbridge/Woodforde Flach/Leach 1994 Eltingh/Haarhuis B. Black/Stark Woodbridge/Woodforde Eltingh/Haarhuis 1995 Palmer/Reneberg Eltingh/Haarhuis Woodbridge/Woodforde Woodbridge/Woodforde 1996 Edberg/Korda Kafelnikov/Vacek Woodbridge/Woodforde Woodbridge/Woodforde 1997 Woodbridge/Woodforde Kafelnikov/Vacek Woodbridge/Woodforde Kafelnikov/Vacek 1998 Björkman/Eltingh Eltingh/Haarhuis Eltingh/Haarhuis S.Stolle/Suk 1999 Björkman/Rafter Bhupathi/Paes Bhupathi/Paes Lareau/O’Brien 2000 E.Ferreira/Leach Woodbridge/Woodforde Woodbridge/Woodforde L.Hewitt/Mirnyi 2001 Björkman/Woodbridge Bhupathi/Paes Johnson/Palmer W. Black/Ullyett 2002 Knowles/Nestor Haarhuis/Kafelnikov Björkman/Woodbridge Bhupathi/Mirnyi 2003 Llodra/Santoro Bryan/Bryan Björkman/Woodbridge Björkman/Woodbridge 2004 Llodra/Santoro Malisse/O. Rochus Björkman/Woodbridge Knowles/Nestor 2005 W. Black/Ullyett Björkman/Mirnyi Huss/Moodie Bryan/Bryan 2006 Bryan/Bryan Björkman/Mirnyi Bryan/Bryan Damm/Paes 2007 Bryan/Bryan Knowles/Nestor Clement/Llodra Aspelin/Knowle

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 260 Mixed Doubles Slam Winners (Since 1982) Australian Open1 Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1982 — Turnbull/Lloyd A. Smith/Curren A. Smith/Curren 1983 — B. Jordan/Teltscher Turnbull/Lloyd Smylie/Fitzgerald 1984 — A. Smith/Stockton Turnbull/Lloyd Man. Maleeva/TomGullickson 1985 — Navratilova/Gunthardt Navratilova/McNamee Navratilova/Gunthardt 1986 — K.Jordan/Flach K. Jordan/Flach Reggi/Casal 1987 Garrison/Stewart Shriver/E. Sanchez Durie/Bates Navratilova/E. Sanchez 1988 Novotna/Pugh McNeil/Lozano Garrison/Stewart Novotna/Pugh 1989 Novotna/Pugh Bollegraf/Nijssen Novotna/Pugh White/Cannon 1990 Zvereva/Pugh Sanchez-Vicario/Lozano Garrison/Leach Smylie/Woodbridge 1991 Durie/Bates Sukova/Suk Smylie/Fitzgerald Bollegraf/Nijssen 1992 Provis/Woodforde Sanchez-Vicario/WoodbridgeNeiland/Suk Provis/Woodforde 1993 Sanchez-Vicario/Woodbridge Manutokova/Olhovskiy Navratilova/Woodforde Sukova/Woodbridge 1994 Neiland/Olhovskiy Boogert/Oosting Sukova/Woodbridge Reinach/Galbraith 1995 Zvereva/Leach Neiland/Woodforde Navratilova/Stark McGrath/Lucena 1996 Neiland/Woodforde Tarabini/Frana Sukova/Suk Raymond/Galbraith 1997 Bollegraf/Leach Hiraki/Bhupathi Sukova/Suk Bollegraf/Leach 1998 V. Williams/Gimelstob V. Williams/Gimelstob S. Williams/Mirnyi S. Williams/Mirnyi 1999 de Swardt/Adams Srebotnik/Norval Raymond/Paes Sugiyama/Bhupathi 2000 Stubbs/Palmer de Swardt/Adams Po/Johnson Sanchez-Vicario/Palmer 2001 Morariu/E. Ferreira Ruano Pascual/Carbonell Hantuchova/Friedl Stubbs/Woodbridge 2002 Hantuchova/Ullyett C. Black/W. Black Likhovtseva/Bhupathi Raymond/M. Bryan 2003 Navratilova/Paes Raymond/M. Bryan Navratilova/Paes Srebotnik/B. Bryan 2004 Bovina/Zimonjic Golovin/Gasquet C. Black/W. Black Zvonareva/B. Bryan 2005 Stosur/Hanley Hantuchova/Santoro Pierce/Bhupathi Hantuchova/Bhupathi 2006 Hingis/Bhupathi Srebotnik/Zimonjic Ram/Zvonareva Navratilova/B. Bryan 2007 Likhovtseva/Nestor Déchy/Ram Jankovic/J. Murray Azarenka/Mirnyi

1. There was no mixed doubles at the Australian Open from 1969Ð1986

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 261 Singles and Doubles at the Same Slam (Open Era) It’s tough enough to win one part of a Slam. Winning singles and doubles is that much harder. The following list shows, year by year, the players who have won both. The first name in each column is, of course, the player who won both; the second name is her doubles partner. Australian Open Roland Garros Wimbledon US Open 1968 King w/Casals 1969 Court w/Tegart Dalton 1970 Court w/Tegart Dalton Court w/Tegart Dalton 1971 Court w/Goolagong 1972 King w/Stove King w/Stove 1973 Court w/Wade Court w/Wade King w/Casals Court w/Wade 1974 Goolagong w/Michel Evert w/Morozova King w/Casals 1975 Goolagong w/Michel Evert w/Navratilova 1976 Goolagong w/Gourlay Evert w/Navratilova 1977 1978 Ruzici w/Jausovec 1979 Navratilova w/King 1980 1981 1982 Navratilova w/A. Smith Navratilova w/Shriver 1983 Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver 1984 Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver 1985 Navratilova w/Shriver 1986 Navratilova w/Shriver Navratilova w/Shriver 1987 Navratilova w/Shriver 1988 Graf w/Sabatini 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Sanchez-Vicario w/Novot 1995 1996 1997 Hingis w/Zvereva 1998 Hingis w/Lucic Novotna w/Hingis 1999 Hingis w/Kournikova Davenport w/Morariu S. Williams w/Williams 2000 Pierce w/Hingis V. Williams w/Williams 2001 2002 S. Williams w/Williams 2003 S. Williams w/Williams 2004 2005 2006 2007

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 262 Doubles Slams and Partners The following tables show, for most of the major doubles players of the Open Era, the Slams they won and the partners with whom they won them. The emphasis has been placed on “career Slammers” — players who won all four Slams in their doubles careers. Grand Slams are shown in Bold Rosie Casals Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 King 1969 1970 King 1971 King Tegart Dalton 1972 1973 King 1974 King 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Turnbull

Margaret Court Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 Bueno 1969 Tegart Dalton Tegart Dalton 1970 Tegart Dalton Tegart Dalton 1971 Goolagong Cawley 1972 1973 Wade Wade Wade 1974 1975 Wade

Judy Tegart Dalton Australian French Wimbledon USO 1969 Court Court 1970 Court Court 1971 Casals

Francoise Durr Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 AJones 1969 AJones Hard 1970 Chanfreau 1971 Chanfreau 1972 Stove

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 263 Gigi Fernandez Australian French Wimbledon USO 1988 White 1989 1990 Navratilova 1991 Novotna 1992 Zvereva Zvereva Zvereva 1993 Zvereva Zvereva Zvereva 1994 Zvereva Zvereva Zvereva 1995 Zvereva Zvereva 1996 Zvereva 1997 Zvereva Zvereva

Evonne Goolagong (Cawley) Australian French Wimbledon USO 1971 Court 1972 1973 1974 Michel Michel 1975 Michel 1976 Gourlay

Martina Hingis Australian French Wimbledon USO 1996 Sukova 1997 Zvereva 1998 Lucic Novotna Novotna Novotna 1999 Kournikova 2000 Pierce 2001 2002 Kournikova

Kathy Jordan Australian French Wimbledon USO 1980 A. Smith A. Smith 1981 A. Smith A. Smith 1982 1983 1984 1985 Smylie

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 264 Billie Jean King Australian French Wimbledon USO 1968 Casals 1969 1970 Casals 1971 Casals 1972 Stove Stove 1972 1973 Casals 1974 Casals 1975 1976 1977 1978 Navratilova 1979 Navratilova 1980 Navratilova

Martina Navratilova Australian French Wimbledon USO 1975 Evert 1976 Evert 1977 Stove 1978 King 1979 King 1980 Nagelson King 1981 Shriver 1982 Shriver ASmith Shriver 1983 Shriver Shriver Shriver 1984 Shriver Shriver Shriver Shriver 1985 Shriver Shriver 1986 Temesvari Shriver Shriver 1987 Shriver Shriver Shriver 1988 Shriver Shriver 1989 Shriver Mandlikova 1990 GFernandez

Jana Novotna Australian French Wimbledon USO 1989 Sukova 1990 Sukova Sukova Sukova 1991 1992 GFernandez 1993 1994 Sanchez-Vicario 1995 Sanchez-Vicario Sanchez-Vicario 1996 1997 Davenport 1998 Hingis Hingis Hingis

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Australian French Wimbledon USO 1992 Sukova 1993 Sukova 1994 Novotna 1995 Novotna Novotna 1996 Rubin Pam Shriver Australian French Wimbledon USO 1981 Navratilova 1982 Navratilova Navratilova 1983 Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova 1984 Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova 1985 Navratilova Navratilova 1986 Navratilova Navratilova 1987 Navratilova Navratilova Navratilova 1988 Navratilova Navratilova 1989 Navratilova 1990 1991 Zvereva

Anne Smith Australian French Wimbledon USO 1980 Jordan Jordan 1981 Jordan Jordan 1982 Navratilova

Helena Sukova Australian French Wimbledon USO 1985 Kohde-Kilsch 1986 1987 Kohde-Kilsch 1988 1989 Novotna 1990 Novotna Novotna Novotna 1991 1992 ASV 1993 ASV 1994 1995 1996 Hingis

Venus or Serena Williams Australian French Wimbledon USO 1999 Williams Williams 2000 Williams 2001 Williams 2002 Williams 2003 Williams

Natasha Zvereva Australian French Wimbledon USO 1989 Savchenko 1990 1991 Savchenko Neiland Shriver 1992 GFernandez GFernandez GFernandez 1993 GFernandez GFernandez GFernandez 1994 GFernandez GFernandez GFernandez 1995 GFernandez GFernandez 1996 GFernandez 1997 Hingis GFernandez GFernandez

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 267 Grand Slams and Career Slams A “Grand Slam” consists of winning all four Slams in a single year — a rare accomplishment indeed. A “Career Slam” consists of winning all four Slams at some time in one’s career, though not all in one year. The following lists summarize the Career Slams for Women in the Open Era. Grand Slams, Singles, Open Era1 Margaret Court, 1970 Steffi Graf, 19882

Career Slams, Singles, Open Era3 Margaret Court (Grand Slam, 1970) Steffi Graf (Grand Slam, 1988) Chris Evert — Australian Open 1982, 1984 Roland Garros 1974, 1975, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1985, 1986 Wimbledon 1974, 1976, 1981 U. S. Open 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1982 Martina Navratilova4 — Australian Open 1981, 1983, 1985 Roland Garros 1982, 1984 Wimbledon 1978, 1979, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1990 U. S. Open 1983, 1984, 1986, 1987 Serena Williams5 — Australian Open 2003, 2005, 2007 Roland Garros 2002 Wimbledon 2002, 2003 U. S. Open 1999, 2002

Grand Slams, Doubles, Open Era, team Martina Navratilova/Pam Shriver, 1984

Grand Slams, Doubles, Open Era, individual6 Martina Navratilova, 1984 (with Pam Shriver) Pam Shriver, 1984 (with Martina Navratilova)7 Martina Hingis, 1998 (with Mirjana Lucic, Australian Open, and Jana Novotna, other 3 Slams)8

Career Slams, Doubles, Open Era, team9 Martina Navratilova/Pam Shriver (20 Slams as a team) Gigi Fernandez/Natasha Zvereva (14 Slams as a team) Kathy Jordan/Anne Smith (4 Slams as a team) Venus Williams/Serena Williams (6 Slams as a team)

1. Maureen Connolly also won a Grand Slam before the Open Era 2. Stefﬁ Graf is the only player, man or woman, to win the singles Grand Slam in the four-surfaces era 3. Maureen Connolly, Doris Hart, and Shirley Fry had Career Slams before the Open Era. Billie Jean King won a Career Slam partly in the Open Era, but her only Australian Open title was pre-Open Era. 4. Martina Navratilova has a non-calendar Grand Slam in 1983Ð1984: Wim 83, USO 83, AO 83, RG 84, Wim 84, USO 84 5. Serena Williams had a non-calendar Grand Slam in 2002Ð2003: RG 02, Wi 02, USO 02, AO 03 6. Maria Bueno also won a Grand Slam in doubles before the Open Era 7. Navratilova and Shriver are the only team to win a Grand Slam together in the Open Era 8. Hingis is the only player to win a multi-partner Grand Slam in the Open Era (Bueno did it before the Open Era) Hingis also has the only doubles Grand Slam in the four-surface era. 9. Margaret Court and Judy Tegart Dalton won a Career Slam as a team, but their only Roland Garros title was before the Open Era

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 268 Career Slams, Doubles, Open Era, with partners, individual1 Martina Navratilova (Grand Slam, 1984) Pam Shriver (Grand Slam, 1984) Martina Hingis (Grand Slam, 1998) Margaret Court — Australian Open 1969, 1970 (Tegart Dalton), 1971 (Goolagong Cawley), 1973 (Wade) Roland Garros 1973 (Wade) Wimbledon 1969 (Tegart Dalton) U.S. Open 1970 (Tegart Dalton) Gigi Fernandez — Australian Open 1993, 1994 (Zvereva) Roland Garros 1991 (Novotna), 1992-1995, 1997 (Zvereva) Wimbledon 1992-1994, 1997 (Zvereva) U.S. Open 1988 (White), 1990 (Navratilova), 1992, 1995, 1996 (Zvereva) Kathy Jordan — Australian Open 1981 (A. Smith) Roland Garros 1980 (A. Smith) Wimbledon 1980 (A. Smith), 1985 (Smylie) U. S. Open 1981 (A. Smith) Jana Novotna — Australian Open 1990 (Sukova), 1995 (Sanchez-Vicario) Roland Garros 1990 (Sukova), 1991 (G. Fernandez), 1998 (Hingis) Wimbledon 1989, 1990 (Sukova), 1995 (Sanchez-Vicario), 1998 (Hingis) U. S. Open 1994 (Sanchez-Vicario), 1997 (Davenport), 1998 (Hingis) Anne Smith — Australian Open 1981 (Jordan) Roland Garros 1980 (Jordan), 1982 (Navratilova) Wimbledon 1980 (Jordan) U. S. Open 1981 (Jordan) Lisa Raymond — Australian Open 2000 (Stubbs) Roland Garros 2006 (Stosur) Wimbledon 2001 (Stubbs) U. S. Open 2001 (Stubbs), 2005 (Stosur) Helena Sukova — Australian Open 1990 (Novotna), 1992 (Sanchez-Vicario) Roland Garros 1990 (Novotna) Wimbledon 1987 (Kohde-Kilsch), 1989, 1990 (Novotna), 1996 (Hingis) U. S. Open 1985 (Kohde-Kilsch), 1993 (Sanchez-Vicario) Venus/Serena Williams —Australian Open 2001 (Williams), 2003 (Williams) Roland Garros 1999 (Williams) Wimbledon 2000 (Williams), 2002 (Williams) U. S. Open 1999 (Williams) Natasha Zvereva — Australian Open 1993, 1994 (G. Fernandez), 1997 (Hingis) Roland Garros 1989 (Savchenko), 1992-1995, 1997 (G. Fernandez) Wimbledon 1991 (Savchenko Nieland), 1992-1994, 1997 (G. Fernandez) U.S. Open 1991 (Shriver), 1992, 1995, 1996 (G. Fernandez)

1. Louise Brough, Maria Bueno, Shirley Fry, Doris Hart, and Lesley Turner Bowrey also had Career Slams before the Open Era. Judy Tegart Dalton won a career Slam partly in the Open Era, but her only Roland Garros title was before the Open Era

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 269 Total Slam Victories, Open Era Note that many of these players (e.g. Court, King) also won Slams before the Open Era. These Slams are not counted (e.g. Court had 24 total singles Slams, but 13 were before the Open Era, so she is listed as having 11 Open Era titles) Singles Doubles — Multiple Winners Doubles — One-Time Winners 22 Steffi Graf 31 Martina Navratilova 1Dianne Balestrat 18 Chris Evert 21 Pam Shriver Fiorella Bonicelli Martina Navratilova 18 Natasha Zvereva Delina Boshoff* 11 Margaret Court 17 Gigi Fernandez Maria Bueno 9Monica Seles 12 Jana Novotna Judy Chaloner* 8Billie Jean King 10 Margaret Court Dianne Evers* Serena Williams Billie Jean King Patty Fendick 7 Evonne Goolagong Cawley 9Martina Hingis Steffi Graf* Justine Hénin-Hardenne Helena Sukova Julie Halard-Decugis 6Venus Williams 8Virginia Ruano Pascual Darlene Hard 5Martina Hingis Paola Suárez Tanya Harford 4Hana Mandlikova 7Rosie Casals Kerry Harris Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario 6 Francoise Durr Mima Jausovic* 3 Jennifer Capriati Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario Anne Kiyomura* Lindsay Davenport Betty Stove Ilana Kloss* Virginia Wade Serena Williams Svetlana Kuznetsova 2 Tracy Austin Venus Williams Mirjana Lucic Amélie Mauresmo 5 Judy Tegart Dalton Hana Mandlikova Mary Pierce Evonne Goolagong Cawley Regina Mariskova* Maria Sharapova Kathy Jordan Corina Morariu 1 Sue Barker Lisa Raymond Olga Morozova Kim Clijsters Anne Smith Mary Pierce Mima Jausovec 4Helen Gourlay Cawley Kerry Melville Reid Anne Jones Rennae Stubbs Candy Reynolds Barbara Jordan Wendy Turnbull Chanda Rubin Svetlana Kuznetsova Virginia Wade JoAnne Russell Iva Majoli 3Cara Black Virginia Ruzici* Conchita Martinez Lindsay Davenport Gabriela Sabatini* Anastasia Myskina Chris Evert Dinara Safina Jana Novotna Gail Chanfreau Lovera Mara Santangelo Chris O’Neil Peggy Michel Kazuko Sawamatsu* Nancy Richey Ai Sugiyama Elizabeth Smylie Kerry Melville Reid 2Kim Clijsters Pam Teeguarden* Virginia Ruzici Nathalie Décby Andrea Temesvari Gabriela Sabatini Rosalyn Fairbank Renata Tomanova Mary Joe Fernandez Robin White Liezel Huber Vera Zvonareva Ann Haydon Jones Claudia Kohde-Kilsch * Part of a “One Slam Wonder” Anna Kournikova team, i.e. one where each won Alicia Molik only one doubles Slam Betsy Nagelson Larisa Savchenko Neiland Samantha Stosur Yan Zi Zheng Jie

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 270 Players and Titles Players with Titles, Year by Year The following list shows, year by year, all the players with titles in a given year, and the number of titles for each player. (Note: Prior to 1993, the season was considered to start before the beginning of the calendar year, and prior to 1986, multiple years are listed, e.g. 1985/1986. The following lists are based on “Tour Years,” not calendar years, with 1985/1986 listed as “1985,” etc.) 2007 (total of 34 winners, 61 events) — Hénin (10), Chakvetadze (4), Jankovic (4), Ivanovic (3), V. Williams (3), Davenport (2), Dementieva (2), Dulko (2), Golovin (2), Hantuchova (2), Razzano (2), Szavay (2), S. Williams (2), Arn (1), Bammer (1), Clijsters (1), Hingis (1), Kirilenko (1), Kuznetsova (1), Loit (1), Mauresmo (1), Medina Garrigues (1), Morigami (1), Parmentier (1), Pennetta (1), Petrova (1), A. Radwanska (1), Safina (1), Schiavone (1), Sequera (1), Sharapova (1), Shaughnessy (1), Shvedova (1), Vinci (1) 2006 (total of 29 winners, 61 events) — Hénin-Hardenne (6), Petrova (5), Sharapova (5), Mauresmo (4), Bartoli (3), Clijsters (3), Kuznetsova (3), Peer (3), Chakvetadze (2), Dementieva (2), Hingis (2), Krajicek (2), Medina Garrigues (2), Shaughnessy (2), Zheng (2), Zvonareva (2), Arvidsson (1), A. Bondarenko (1), Daniilidou (1), Dominguez Lino (1), Grönefeld (1), Ivanovic (1), King (1), Paszek (1), Safarova (1), Santangelo (1), Smashnova (1), Sun (1), Vaidisova (1) 2005 (total of 30 winners, 63 events) — Clijsters (9), Davenport (6), Hénin-Hardenne (4), Mauresmo (4), Sharapova (3), Vaidisova (3), Koukalova (2), Medina Garrigues (2), Pennetta (2), Pierce (2), Safarova (2), Safina (2), Schnyder (2), Smashnova (2), Srebotnik (2), V. Williams (2), Frazier (1), Ivanovic (1), Kirilenko (1), Krajicek (1), Llagostera Vives (1), Martinez (1), Mirza (1), Molik (1), Myskina (1), Petrova (1), S. Williams (1), Yan (1), Zheng (1), Zvonareva (1) 2004 (total of 31 winners, 60 events) — Davenport (7), Hénin-Hardenne (5), Mauresmo (5), Sharapova (5), Kuznetsova (3), Molik (3), Myskina (3), Clijsters (2), Loit (2), Vaidisova (2), S. Williams (2), V. Williams (2), Benesova (1), Bovina (1), Daniilidou (1), Dementieva (1), Frazier (1), Jankovic (1), Li Na (1), Likhovtseva (1), Medina Garrigues (1), Pennetta (1), Pierce (1), Pratt (1), Schaul (1), Smashnova (1), Suárez (1), Sucha (1), Sugiyama (1), Zuluaga (1), Zvonareva (1) 2003 (total of 30 winners, 59 events) — Clijsters (9), Hénin-Hardenne (8), Myskina (4), Serena Williams (4), Dementieva (3), Mauresmo (2), Pistolesi (2), Rubin (2), Serna (2), Sharapova (2), Sugiyama (2), Capriati (1), Coetzer (1), Daniilidou (1), Davenport (1), Déchy (1), Farina Elia (1), Grande (1), Maleeva (1), Molik (1), Nagyova (1), Raymond (1), Ruano Pascual (1), Safina (1), Shaughnessy (1), Suárez (1), Tanasugarn (1), Venus Williams (1), Zuluaga (1), Zvonareva (1) 2002 (total of 37 winners, 64 events) — S. Williams (8), V. Williams (7), Clijsters (4), Smashnova (4), Bovina (2), Dokic (2), Hénin (2), Hingis (2), Kuznetsova (2), Mauresmo (2), Rubin (2), Seles (2), Black (1), Capriati (1), M. Casanova (1), Craybas (1), Daniilidou (1), Diaz-Oliva (1), Farina Elia (1), Hantuchova (1), Majoli (1), Maleeva (1), Matevzic (1), Mikaelian (1), Montolio (1), Müller (1), Myskina (1), Raymond (1), Safina (1), Schnyder (1), Serna (1), Srebotnik (1), Sucha (1), Svensson (1), Wartusch (1), Widjaja (1), Zuluaga (1) 2001 (total of 30 winners, 63 events) — Davenport (7), V. Williams (6), Mauresmo (4), Seles (4), Capriati (3), Clijsters (3), Dokic (3), Hénin (3), Hingis (3), S. Williams (3), Grande (2), Montolio (2), Sanchez- Vicario (2), Tulyaganova (2), Coetzer (1), Farina Elia (1), Gersi (1), Gubacsi (1), Lamade (1), Maleeva (1), Medina Garrigues (1), Rittner (1), Schnyder (1), Shaughnessy (1), Suárez (1), Tauziat (1), Testud (1), Torrens Valero (1), Tu (1), Widjaja (1) 2000 (total of 29 winners, 56 events excluding rain-out at Scottsdale) — Hingis (9), V. Williams (5), Davenport (4), Nagyova (3), Seles (3), S. Williams (3), Clijsters (2), Halard-Decugis (2), Huber (2), Kremer (2), Pierce (2), Talaja (2), Bedanova (1), Capriati (1), Coetzer (1), Garbin (1), Kuti Kis (1), Leon Garcia (1), Martinez (1), Mauresmo (1), Pisnik (1), Raymond (1), Rubin (1), Schett (1), Shaughnessy (1), Smashnova (1), Tauziat (1), Tulyaganova (1), Wartusch (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 271 1999 (total of 33 winners, 57 events) — Davenport (7), Hingis (7), V. Williams (6), S. Williams (4), Capriati (2), Halard-Decugis (2), Tauziat (2), Zuluaga (2), Brandi (1), Carlsson (1), Clijsters (1), Frazier (1), Graf (1), Habsudova (1), Hénin (1), Mag. Maleeva (1), Martinez (1), Mauresmo (1), Morariu (1), Myskina (1), Nagyova (1), Novotna (1), Pierce (1), Pitkowski (1), Rubin (1), Sanchez Lorenzo (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Schnyder (1), Seles (1), Smashnova (1), Srebotnik (1), Torrens Valero (1), Zvereva (1) 1998 (total of 23 winners, 51 events excluding rain-out at Birmingham) — Davenport (6), Hingis (5), Schnyder (5), Novotna (4), Pierce (4), Graf (3), Halard-Decugis (2), Martinez (2), Nagyova (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Seles (2), Sugiyama (2), V. Williams (2), Coetzer (1), de Swardt (1), Hrdlickova (1), Lucic (1), Ruano-Pascual (1), Snyder (1), Spirlea (1), Suárez (1), Testud (1), Van Roost (1) 1997 (total of 25 winners, 50 events excluding rain-out at Eastbourne) — Hingis (12), Davenport (6), Novotna (4), Majoli (3), Seles (3), Coetzer (2), van Roost (2), Dragomir (1), Graf (1), Kruger (1), Likhovtseva (1), Lucic (1), Maruska (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Nagyova (1), Paulus (1), Pierce (1), Ruano-Pascual (1), Rubin (1), Sawamatsu (1), Schett (1), Schultz-McCarthy (1), Sugiyama (1), Tauziat (1), Testud (1) 1996 (total of 25 winners, 50 events) — Graf (7), Seles (5), Novotna (4), Dragomir (3), Huber (3), Date (2), Davenport (2), Halard-Decugis (2), Hingis (2), Majoli (2), Martinez (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Wang (2), Appelmans (1), Cacic (1), McGrath (1), Nagyova (1), Paulus (1), Pizzichini (1), Raymond (1), Schett (1), Schultz-M (1), Spirlea (1), Van Roost (1), Wild (1) 1995 (total of 27 winners, 49 events) — Graf (9), Martinez (6), Mag. Maleeva (3), Majoli (2), M. J. Fernandez (2), Paulus (2), Pierce (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Schultz (2), Wild (2), Bradtke (1), Date (1), Frazier (1), Garrison Jackson (1), Hack (1), Halard (1), Huber (1), Kruger (1), Meshki (1), Novotna (1), Richterova (1), Sabatini (1), Seles (1), Spirlea (1), Tauziat (1), Wang (1), Wiesner (1) 1994 (total of 29 winners, 55 events) — Sanchez-Vicario (8), Graf (7), Martinez (4), Huber (3), Novotna (3), Appelmans (2), Basuki (2), Date (2), Davenport (2), Mag. Maleeva (2), McGrath (2), Coetzer (1), Endo (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Frazier (1), Hack (1), Halard (1), Helgeson (1), Kat. Maleeva (1), Maleeva-Fragniere (1), McNeil (1), Navratilova (1), Sabatini (1), Sawamatsu (1), Spirlea (1), Wagner (1), Wang (1), Wiesner (1), Zvereva (1) 1993 (total of 30 winners, 60 events) — Graf (10), Martinez (5), Navratilova (5), Sanchez-Vicario (4), Basuki (2), Bobkova (2), Coetzer (2), Garrison Jackson (2), Maleeva-Fragniere (2), Medvedeva (2), Novotna (2), Seles (2), Wang (2), Wild (2), Capriati (1), Date (1), Davenport (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Grossi (1), Hack (1), Huber (1), Likhovtseva (1), McNeil (1), Neiland (1), Pierce (1), Provis (1), Reinach (1), Sawamatsu (1), Schultz (1), Tauziat (1) 1992 (total of 30 winners, 57 events) — Seles (10), Graf (8), Sabatini (5), Navratilova (4), Pierce (3), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Sukova (2), Appelmans (1), Basuki (1), Capriati (1), Cecchini (1), Date (1), Frazier (1), Garrison-Jackson (1), Hack (1), Halard (1), Mag. Maleeva (1), Maleeva-Fragniere (1), Martinez (1), McNeil (1), Medvedeva (1), Probst (1), Provis (1), Rittner (1), Schultz (1), Stafford (1), van Lottum (1), White (1), Wiesner (1), Zrubakova (1) 1991 (total of 29 winners, 60 events) — Seles (10), Graf (7), Navratilova (5), Sabatini (5), Maleeva- Fragniere (3), Martinez (3), Appelmans (2), Capriati (2), McNeil (2), Novotna (2), Basuki (1), Cecchini (1), Demongeot (1), G. Fernandez (1), Halard (1), Huber (1), Lindqvist (1), Kat. Maleeva (1), Martinek (1), Meshki (1), Neiland (1), Piccolini (1), Pierce (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Schultz (1), Sukova (1), Sviglerova (1), Zardo (1), Zrubakova (1) 1990 (total of 30 winners, 59 events) — Graf (10), Seles (9), Navratilova (6), Martinez (3), M. J. Fernandez (2), Meshki (2), Sabatini (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Zvereva (2), Bonsignori (1), Capriati (1), Cecchini (1), Cueto (1), Dahlman (1), Frazier (1), Garrison-Jackson (1), Haumuller (1), Huber (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Lindquist (1), K. Maleeva (1), Medvedeva (1), Novotna (1), Paulus (1), Paz (1), Probst (1), Reggi (1), Sawamatsu (1), Tauziat (1), Van Rensburg (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 272 1989 (total of 27 winners, 61 events) — Graf (14), Navratilova (8), Sabatini (4), Garrison[-Jackson] (3), Kat. Maleeva (3), Martinez (3), Cueto (1 listed as “Cuerto”) (2), Gildemeister (2), Maleeva-Fragniere (2), Novotna (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Bollegraf (1), Cecchini (1), Cordwell (1), Dahlman (1), Fendick (1), Frazier (1), Magers (1), McNeil (1), Meshki (1), Minter (1), Okamoto (1), Quentrec (1), Seles (1), Sukova (1), Wiesner (1), Zrubakova (1) 1988 (total of 28 winners, 62 events) — Graf (10), Navratilova (9), Sabatini (5), Evert (4), Shriver (4), Cecchini (2), Cueto (2), Dias (2), Fendick (2), Maleeva-Fragniere (2), McNeil (2), Rehe (2), Gomer (1), Hetherington (1), Javer (1), Kelesi (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Langrova (1), Magers (1), Kat. Maleeva (1), Martinez (1), Minter (1), Paulus (1), Paz (1), Potter (1), Sanchez-Vicario (1), Sloane (1), Wiesner (1) 1987 (total of 24 winners, 54 events) — Graf (11), Evert (5), Navratilova (4), Shriver (4), Mandlilova (3), Sabatini (3), Cecchini (2), Garrison (2), Kat. Maleeva (2), Man. Maleeva[-Fragniere] (2), Minter (2), Sukova (2), Bassett Seguso (1), Cioffi (1), Goles (1), Hakami (1), Horvath (1), Magers (1), Nelson- Dunbar (1), Potter (1), Reggi (1), Rehe (1), Smylie (1), White (1) 1986 (total of 19 winners, 40 events) — Navratilova (9), Graf (7), Evert (3), Gurney (2), McNeil (2), Reggi (2), Shriver (2), Sukova (2), Burgin (1), Cacchini (1), G. Fernandez (1), Garrison (1), Hanika (1), Herr (1), Herreman (1), Huber (1), Hy (1), Kelesi (1), Rinaldi (1) 1985 (total of 23 winners, 53 events) — Navratilova (13), Evert (11), Shriver (4), Gadusek (3), Garrison (2), Kat. Maleeva (2), Rehe (2), Cecchini (1), Croft (1), Hobbs (1), Horvath (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Man. Maleeva (1), Mandlikova (1), Mesker (1), Potter (1), Reggi (1), Rinaldi (1), Ruzici (1), Sabatini (1), Temesvari (1), Thompson (1), White (1) 1984 (total of 22 winners, 51 events) — Navratilova (15), Evert (7), Man. Maleeva (4), Mandlikova (4), Cecchini (2), Lindqvist (2), Louie Harper (2), Drescher (1), Gadusek (1), Garrison (1), Gildemeister (1), Hamika (1), Horvath (1), Inoue (1), Kohde-Kilsch (1), Paz (1), Russell (1), Shriver (1), Sukova (1), Torres (1), Vermaak (1), White (1) 1983 (total of 25 winners, 49 events excluding rain-out at Lugano) — Navratilova (13), Evert (5), Mandlikova (3), Shriver (3), Temesvari (3), Bonder (2), Durie (2), Daniels (1), Fairbank (1), Gadusek (1), Horvath (1), Inoue (1), King (1), Klitch (1), Leand (1), Lindqvist (1), Moulton (1), Mundel- Reinbold (1), Paradis (1), Russell (1), Ruzici (1), Shaefer (1), Smylie (1), Tanvier (1), Vermaak (1)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 273 Most Titles, Year By Year The following list shows the three players with the most titles, year by year, and the number of titles. Year Player with Most Titles #2 in titles #3 in titles 2007 Hénin (10) Chakvetadze (4)1, Jankovic (4) Ivanovic (3), V. Williams (3) 2006 Hénin-Hardenne (6) Petrova (5), Sharapova (5) Mauresmo (4) 2005 Clijsters (9) Davenport (6) Hénin-Hardenne (4), Mauresmo (4) 2004 Davenport (7) Hénin-Hardenne (5), Kuznetsova (3), Molik (3), Mauresmo (5), Sharapova (5)2 Myskina (3) 2003 Clijsters (9) Hénin-Hardenne (8) Myskina (4),3 Serena Williams (4) 2002 S. Williams (8) V. Williams (7) Clijsters (4), Smashnova (4)4 2001 Davenport (7) V. Williams (6) Mauresmo (4), Seles (4) 2000 Hingis (9) V. Williams (5) Davenport (4) 1999 Davenport (7), Hingis (7) V. Williams (6) S. Williams (4) 1998 Davenport (6) Hingis (5), Schnyder (5)5 Novotna (4), Pierce (4) 1997 Hingis (12) Davenport (6) Novotna (4) 1996 Graf (7) Seles (5) Novotna (4) 1995 Graf (9) Martinez (6) Mag. Maleeva (3) 1994 Sanchez-Vicario (8) Graf (7) Martinez (4) 1993 Graf (10) Martinez (5), Navratilova (5) Sanchez-Vicario (4) 1992 Seles (10) Graf (8) Sabatini (5) 1991 Seles (10) Graf (7) Navratilova (5), Sabatini (5) 1990 Graf (10) Seles (9) Navratilova (6) 1989 Graf (14) Navratilova (8) Sabatini (4) 1988 Graf (10) Navratilova (9) Sabatini (5) 1987 Graf (11) Evert (5) Navratilova (4), Shriver (4) 1986 Navratilova (14) Graf (7) Evert (3) 1985 Navratilova (13) Evert (11) Shriver (4) 1984 Navratilova (15) Evert (7) Man. Maleeva (4), Mandlikova (4) 1983 Navratilova (13) Evert (5) Mandlikova (3), Shriver (3), Temesvari (3) 1. Of Chakvetadze’s four titles, only one (Stanford) was a Tier II or higher — historically rare for a player near the top of the title list. Yet note that, in 2007, low-level titles were common for the leaders. Jankovic had two of her four titles at low- level events, and Venus Williams had two of her three titles below the Tier II level. 2. Of Sharapova’s ﬁve titles, three were below the Tier II level; the other two were above the Tier I level. Sharapova, through the end of 2004, had never won a Tier I or Tier II title — which is even stranger than all the footnotes ab9ove and below, though she changed that in 2005 3. Of Myskina’s four titles, two were below the Tier II level. Compare thi to Clijsters, who won seven of her nine titles at Tier II or better events; Hénin-Hardenne won all eight of hers titles at Tier II or better events 4. As noted above, most players on this list, particularly in recent years, won the majority of their titles at Tier II or higher events. Smashnova 2002 is an exception; all four of her titles were small events. 5. Like Smashnova 2002, Schnyder had mostly small titles: four of her ﬁve were Tier III or lower.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 274 Five Or More Titles in a Year The following table shows all players who have earned five or more WTA Tour titles in a year (from the founding of the Tour in 1971), with the total years with five or more titles Total Years Player Years with 5+ titles with 5+ titles 15 Chris Evert 1973, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 15 Martina Navratilova 1977, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 90, 91, 93 11 Stefﬁ Graf 1986, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96 7 Billie Jean King 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1977 6Evonne Goolagong Cawley 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1976, 1978 6 Lindsay Davenport 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2004, 2005 4 Justine Hénin 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007 4Martina Hingis 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 4Monica Seles 1990, 1991, 1992, 1996 4Virginia Wade 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975 4Venus Williams 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 3Tracy Austin 1979, 1980, 1981 3Margaret Court 1971, 1972, 1973 2 Kim Clijsters 2003, 2005 2 Hana Mandlikova 1980, 1984 2 Conchita Martinez 1993, 1995 2 Gabriela Sabatini 1991, 1992 2Maria Sharapova 2004, 2006 1 Francoise Durr 1971 1Manuela Maleeva-Fragniere 1984 1 Amélie Mauresmo 2004 1 Nadia Petrova 2006 1 Nancy Richey 1972 1Patty Schnyder 1998 1 Serena Williams1 2002 1. The WTA lists Serena as having ﬁve titles in 1999, but one of these was the Grand Slam Cup, which is an exhibition.

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 275 Surface Sweeps — Singles (Since 1990) A “surface sweep” consists of winning titles on all four major surfaces (clay, grass, hard, indoor) in a single year. The following list shows all recent instances, with the total titles on each surface and the name of the best title on each surface. Year Player Titles and Surfaces 1990 Martina Navratilova Clay: 1 (Hilton Head), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hard: 2 (Palm Springs), Indoor: 1 (Chicago) 1991 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Berlin), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 1 (San Antonio), Indoor: 1 (Zürich) 1992 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Berlin), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 1 (Boca Raton), Indoor: 4 (Philadelphia) 1993 Steffi Graf Clay: 3 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 2 (Tour Championships) 1995 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 3 (Chase Championships) 1996 Steffi Graf Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 1 (Chase Championships) 1997 Martina Hingis Clay: 1 (Hilton Head), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 6 (Australian Open, U. S. Open), Indoor: 4 (Pan Pacific) 1999 Lindsay Davenport Clay: 1 (Madrid), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 2 (Sydney), Indoor: 3 (Chase Championships) 2000 Martina Hingis Clay: 1 (Hamburg), Grass: 1 (’s-Hertogenbosch), Hard: 2 (Miami), Indoor: 5 (Chase Championships) 2002 Serena Williams Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 1 (Leipzig) 2003 Kim Clijsters Clay: 1 (Rome), Grass: 1 (’s-Hertogenbosch), Hard: 2 (Indian Wells), Indoor: 3 (Los Angeles Championships) 2006 Justine Hénin-HardenneClay: 1 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 3 (Dubai), Indoor: 1 (Madrid Championships) 2007 Justine Hénin Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 3 (Madrid Championships)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 276 Surface Sweeps — Doubles (Since 1990) Note: Where teams are shown with a surface sweep, titles are listed only for the team — e.g. Raymond in 2001 had seven titles with Stubbs, as shown in the entry, and two more with Davenport, not shown. Year Player/Team Titles and Surfaces 1990 Helena Sukova Clay: 1 (Roland Garros w/Novotna), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/Novotna), Hard: 6 (Australian Open w/Novotna), Indoor: 2 (Brighton w/Tauziat) 1991 Larisa Neiland Clay: 2 (Berlin w/Zvereva), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon w/Zvereva), Hard: 5 (Canadian Open w/Zvereva), Indoor: 1 (Philadelphia w/Novotna) 1991 Natasha Zvereva Clay: 2 (Hilton Head w/Kohde-Kilsch), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon w/ Neiland), Hard: 4 (U. S. Open w/Shriver), Indoor: 1 (Brighton w/ Shriver) 1992 G. Fernandez/Zvereva Clay: 2 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 1 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 2 (Philadelphia) 1992 Neiland/Novotna Clay: 1 (Berlin), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 3 (San Diego), Indoor: 2 (Brighton) 1992 Rennae Stubbs Clay: 1 (Hamburg w/Graf), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/McNeil), Hard: 1 (Canadian Open w/McNeil), Indoor: 1 (Osaka w/Sukova) 1993 G. Fernandez/Zvereva Clay: 3 (Roland Garros), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (Australian Open), Indoor: 3 (Tour Championships) 1994 Larisa Neiland Clay: 2 (Amelia Island w/Sanchez-Vicario), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/ Garrison Jackson), Hard: 1 (Schenectady w/McGrath), Indoor: 2 (Brighton w/Bollegraf) 1994 G. Fernandez/Zvereva Clay: 3 (Roland Garros), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hard: 2 (Australian Open), Indoor: 4 (Tour Championships) 1995 A. Sanchez-Vicario Clay: 1 (Barcelona w/Neiland), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon w/Novotna), Hard: 2 (Australian Open w/Novotna), Indoor: 1 (Chase Championships w/Novotna) 1996 Larisa Neiland Clay: 1 (Berlin w/McGrath), Grass: 1 (Rosmalen w/Schultz- McCarthy), Hard: 1 (Canadian Open w/Sanchez-Vicario), Indoor: 2 (Essen w/McGrath) 1996 Jana Novotna Clay: 2 (Hilton Head w/Sanchez-Vicario), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne w/ Sanchez-Vicario), Hard: 1 (Lipton w/Sanchez-Vicario), Indoor: 2 (Filderstadt w/Arendt) 1996 B. Schultz-McCarthy Clay: 1 (Hamburg w/Sanchez-Vicario), Grass: 1 (Rosmalen w/ Neiland), Hard: 1 (Indian Wells w/Rubin), Indoor: 2 (Oklahoma City w/ Rubin) 1997 Natasha Zvereva Clay: 2 (Roland Garros w/G. Fernandez), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/G. Fernandez), Hard: 3 (Australian Open w/Hingis), Indoor: 2 (Pan Pacific w/Davenport) 1998 Martina Hingis Clay: 1 (Roland Garros w/Novotna), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/Novotna), Hard: 6 (Australian Open w/Lucic, U.S Open w/Novotna), Indoor: 1 (Pan Pacific w/Lucic) 1999 Hingis/Kournikova Clay: 1 (Rome), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 2 (Australian Open), Indoor: 1 (Chase Championships) 1999 Larisa Neiland Clay: 1 (Hamburg w/Sanchez-V), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/Morariu), Hard: 2 (Los Angeles/w/ Sanchez-V), Indoor: 1 (Leipzig/ w/Pierce) 2001 Raymond/Stubbs Clay: 1 (Charleston), Grass: 2 (Wimbledon), Hardcourt: 2 (U. S. Open), Indoor: 2 (Munich)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 277 2001 Elena Likhovtseva Clay: 2 (Rome w/Black), Grass: 1 (Birmingham w/Black), Hard: 3 (San Diego w/Black), Indoor: 1 (Leipzig w/Tauziat) 2002 Raymond/Stubbs Clay: 1 (Charleston), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Hard: 5 (Miami), Indoor: 1 (Pan Pacific) 2003 Clijsters/Sugiyama Clay: 1 (Roland Garros), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon), Hard: 3 (San Diego), Indoor: 2 (Zürich) 2003 Lisa Raymond Clay: 1 (Amelia Island w/Davenport), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne w/ Davenport), Hard: 2 (Indian Wells w/Davenport), Indoor: 2 (Filderstadt w/Stubbs, Philadelphia w/Navratilova) 2005 Cara Black Clay: 1 (Rome w/Huber), Grass: 1 (Wimbledon w/Huber), Hard: 1 (Stanford w/Stubbs), Indoor: 3 (Zürich w/Stubbs) 2007 Raymond/Stosur Clay: 1 (Berlin), Hard: 2 (Miami), Grass: 1 (Eastbourne), Indoor: 1 (Pan Pacific)

Career Surface Sweeps/Singles The list below shows all players active in 2002 or after to have won titles on all four surfaces, showing the strongest title on each surface and the year in which she achieved the sweep (i.e. earned her first title on her “last” surface) If a title is marked “etc.” (e.g. Seles is marked “Roland Garros 1990, etc.), this means that she won it several times starting with that year.) The “best” tournament is based on tournament tier. Slam titles are abbreviated. Player Year Best Clay Best Grass Best Hard Best Indoors Clijsters 2003 Rome 2003 Eastbourne 2005 U. S. Open 2005 WTA Champ 2002, etc. Davenport 1999 Amelia Island 1997, Wimbledon 1999 USO 1998, AO 2000 WTA Champ. 1999 etc. Dokic 2002 Rome 2001 Birmingham 2002 Princess Cup 2001 Moscow 2001 Hénin 2002 Roland Garros Eastsbourne 2006 U. S. Open 2003,etc. Madrid 2003,etc. Championships 2006, etc. Hingis 1997 Hilton Head 1997, Wimbledon 1997 AO 1997, etc. USO WTA Champ 1998, etc.; Rome 1998, 1997 etc. etc.; Berlin 1999 Maleeva 2003 Budapest 2001 Birmingham 2003 Pattaya 1999 Zürich 1994, Moscow 2002 Martinez 1994 Rome 1993, etc.; Wimbledon 1994 San Diego 1995 Philadelphia 1993 Hilton Head 1994, etc.; Berlin 1998, etc. Mauresmo 2006 Rome 2004, etc.; Wimbledon 2006 Australian Open WTA Champ. 2005 Berlin 2001, etc. 2006 Pierce 2004 Roland Garros 2000 ’s-Hertogenbosch Australian Open Moscow 1998 2004 1995 Rubin 2003 Madrid 2003 Eastbourne 2002 Los Angeles 2002 Linz 1997, etc. Seles 1996 RG 1990, etc. Eastbourne 1996 AO 1991, etc.; USO WTA Champ 1990, 1991, etc. etc. S. Williams 2002 RG 2002 Wim 2002, etc. AO 2003, etc.; USO WTA Champ. 2001 1999, etc. V. Williams 2000 Rome 1999 Wim 2000, etc. USO 2000, etc. Zürich 1999 Zvonareva 2006 Bol 2003 Birmingham 2006 Cincinnati 2006 Memphis 2004, 2005

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 278 Career Grand Surface Sweep The Grand Surface Sweep is a higher-order version of the Surface Sweep: It entails a title, Tier I or higher, on all seven major WTA surfaces: Rebound Ace, DecoTurf, Red Clay, Green Clay, Grass, Carpet (including Greenset and Supreme) and Indoor Hardcourts. The WTA established the Tier I event in 1990 (though there were approximate equivalents for about a decade before that). In that period, the events of each type, by surface, were as follows: Rebound Ace: Australian Open DecoTurf: U. S. Open, Miami, Canadian Open, Boca Raton 1991Ð1992, Indian Wells 1997-present, San Diego 2004-present Red Clay: Roland Garros, Rome, Berlin Green Clay: Hilton Head/Charleston Grass: Wimbledon Carpet: WTA Championships 1990-2000, Chicago 1990, Pan Pacific 1993-present, Philadelphia 1993- 1995, Moscow 1997-present Indoor Hard: WTA Championships 2001-present, Zürich 1993-present

From this data, we can compile the (very short) list of Grand Surface Sweepers (this is all-time, since the Australian Open shifted to Rebound Ace; note that the list includes some events from the Slams and “Super Series” before 1990, though those “excess events” include only events which are still active):

1. Steffi Graf Rebound Ace: Australian Open [1988], [1989], 1990, 1994 DecoTurf: U. S. Open [1988], [1989], 1993, 1995, 1996; Miami [1987], [1988], 1994, 1995, 1996; Canadian Open 1990, 1993; Boca Raton 1992 Red Clay: Roland Garros [1987], [1988], 1993, 1995, 1996, 1999; Rome, Berlin [1988], [1989], 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996 Green Clay: Hilton Head [1986], [1987], [1989], 1993; [Amelia Island 1986, 1987] Grass: Wimbledon [1988], [1989], 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996 Carpet: WTA Championships [1987], [1989], 1993, 1995, 1996; Pan Paciﬁc [1986], 1994; Philadelphia 1995; Moscow 1997- present Indoor Hard: [Washington 1989]

2. Martina Hingis Rebound Ace: Australian Open 1997, 1998, 1999 DecoTurf: U. S. Open 1997; Miami 1997, 2000; Canadian Open 1999, 2000; Indian Wells 1998 Red Clay: Rome 1998, Berlin 1999 Green Clay: Hilton Head 1997, 1999 Grass: Wimbledon 1997 Carpet: WTA Championships 1998, 2000; Pan Paciﬁc 1997, 1999, 2000, 2002; Moscow 2000 Indoor Hard: Zürich 2000

Lacking Rebound Ace and, apparently, Indoor Hard was Martina Navratilova. (This is largely lack of opportunity.)

Of the top active or recently active players, Serena Williams lacks green clay and carpet; Venus Williams lacks Rebound Ace and carpet; Lindsay Davenport lacks green and red clay; Monica Seles lacks grass and indoor hardcourt, Justine Hénin-Hardenne lacks grass and carpet; Kim Clijsters lacks Rebound Ace, green clay, grass, and carpet; Anastasia Myskina lacks Rebound Ace, DecoTurf, green clay, grass, and indoor hardcourt; and Amélie Mauresmo lacks Rebound Ace, green clay, grass, indoor hardcourt, and carpet.

Note that Graf was the only player ever to complete the calendar year Grand Surface Sweep (1989).

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 279 Year-End Top Players Year-End Top Eight, Alphabetical, with Years, Since 1975 The following tables list every player to end a Tour year in the Top Eight since computer rankings began in 1975. The first table, in alphabetical order, lists each year in which the player ended at #1, #2, #3, etc. Player Years was #1 Yrs was #2 Years was #3 Years was #4 Years #5-#8 Austin 1980, 1981 1979 1982 #6-1978 Balestrat #6-1979; #7-1976; #8-1978 Barker #5-1976, 1977 Bunge #7-1983 Capriati 2001 2002 #6-1991, 2003; #7-1992; #8-1990 Casals #6-1977 Chakvetadze #6-2007 Clijsters 2003, 2005 2002 #5-2001, 2006 Coetzer 1997 Court #6-1975 Date 1995 #8-1996 Davenport 1998, 2001, 2004, 1999, 2000 1997 #5-2003; #6-1994 2005 Dementieva #6-2004, #8-2003, 2005, 2006 Dokic #8-2001 Durie #6-1983 Evert 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1982, 1987, 1988 1980, 1981 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986 Fernandez, M 1990 #6-1992; #7-1993; #8-1991, 1995 Garrison[-J] 1989 #8-1985 Goolagong 1976 1975, 1978 1979 #5-1980 Graf 1987, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992 1986 #6-1985 1990, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 Hanika #5-1983; #6-1981 Hantuchova #8-2002 Hénin- 2003, 2006, 2007 #5-2002; #6-2005, #7-2001, #8- Hardenne 2004 Hingis 1997, 1999, 2000 1998 1996, 2001 #7-2006 Huber, Anke #6-1996 Jaeger 1982, 1983 1981 #7-1980 Ivanovic 2007 Jankovic 2007 Jausovec #8-1976 King 1975, 1977 #5-1978, 1979; #6-1980 Kohde-Kilsch #5-1985; #7-1986; #8-1984 Kournikova #8-2000 Kuznetsova 2007 2006 #5-2004 Majoli #6-1997; #7-1996 Maleeva, K #6-1990 Maleeva, Mag #6-1995

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 280 Maleeva, Man #6-1984, 1988; #7-1985; #8-1986, 1987 Mandlikova 1984, 1985 1980, 1986 #5-1981, 1987; #7-1982 Martinez 1995 1994 1993 #5-1996, 2000; #7-1989; #8-1992, 1998 Mauresmo 2004 2005, 2006 2003 #6-2002 Morozova #7-1975 Myskina 2004 #7-2003 Navratilova 1978, 1979, 1982, 1987, 1988, 1989 1977, 1980, 1981, 1975, 1976, 1991 #5-1992; #8-1994 1983, 1984, 1985, 1990, 1993 1986 Novotna 1997 1996, 1998 1994 #6-1993; #7-1991 Petrova #6-2006 Pierce #5-1994, 1995, 1999, 2005; #7- 1997, 1998, 2000 Potter #8-1982 Reid #8-1978 Richey Gunter #8-1975 Sabatini 1989, 1991, 1992 1988 #5-1990, 1993; #6-1987; #7-1994, 1995 Sanchez-Vicari 1993, 1994, 1996 1995 1992, 1998 #5-1989, 1991; #7-1990 Schett #8-1999 Schnyder #7-2005 Seles 1991, 1992 1990, [1996] 2000 #5-1997; #6-1989, 1998, 1999; #7-2002; #8-1993 Sharapova 2006 2004, 2005 #-2007 Shriver 1983, 1984, 1985, #5-1988; #6-1982, 1986; #7-1981 1987 Spirlea #8-1997 Stove #6-1976; #7-1977 Sukova #5-1986; #7-1984, 1987; #8-1988, 1989 Tauziat #7-1999 Turnbull #5-1982, 1984; #7-1978, 1979; #8-1980, 1981, 1983 Wade 1976 1977, 1978 #5-1975; #8-1979 Williams, S 2002 2003 1999 #6-2000, 2001; #7-2004, 2007 Williams, V. 2002 1999, 2000, 2001 #5-1998; #8-2007 Zvereva #7-1988

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 281 Total Years Ended At Each Rank, Alphabetical, Since 1975 Players who were Top Eight this year (2007) shown in bold Player Years #1 Years #2 Years #3 Years #4 Years #5 Years #6 Years #7 Years #8 Total Austin 2 1 1 1 5 Balestrat 1113 Barker 2 2 Bunge 11 Capriati 1 1 2117 Casals 1 1 Chakvetadze 1 1 Clijsters 2 1 1 4 Coetzer 1 1 Court 1 1 Date 1 1 2 Davenport 4 2 1 1 1 9 Dementieva 1 3 4 Dokic 11 Durie 1 1 Evert 5 7 2 14 Fernandez, M 1 1125 Garrison[-J] 1 1 2 Goolagong 1211 5 Graf 8 2 1 1 12 Hanika 1 1 2 Hantuchova 11 Hénin 3 11117 Hingis 3 1 2 1 7 Huber, Anke 1 1 Ivanovic 1 1 Jaeger 2 1 1 4 Jankovic 1 1 Jausovec 11 King 2 2 1 5 Kohde-Kilsch 1 1 1 3 Kournikova 11 Kuznetsova 1 1 1 3 Majoli 1 1 2 Maleeva, K 1 1 Maleeva, Mag 1 1 Maleeva, Man 2125 Mandlikova 2 2 2 1 7 Martinez 1112 128 Mauresmo 1 2 1 1 5 Morozova 11 Myskina 1 1 2 Navratilova 73531 120 Novotna 1 2 1 1 1 6 Petrova 1 1

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 282 Pierce 4 3 7 Potter 11 Reid 11 Richey Gunter 11 Sabatini 31212 9 Sanchez-Vicari 3122 1 9 Schett 11 Schnyder 11 Seles 2 1(2) 1131110(11) Sharapova 1 2 1 4 Shriver 4121 8 Spirlea 11 Stove 1 1 2 Sukova 1 2 2 5 Tauziat 11 Turnbull 2 2 3 7 Wade 1 2 1 15 Williams, S 1 1 1 2 2 7 Williams, V. 1 3 1 1 6 Zvereva 11

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 283 Strongest Career Rankings Showings Based on the above statistics, we can produce a career “ranking of rankings.” In the system below, one point is awarded for a year in which a player ends at #8. Two are awarded for #7, 3 for #6, 4 for #5, 6 for #4, 8 for #3, 12 for #2, and 16 for #1. It is interesting to note that 2007 made relatively little difference in the rankings — Justine Hénin passed Gabriela Sabatini to reach #8, and Venus Williams joins the Top Ten, but that’s it..

Note: for purposes of reckoning, Monica Seles is omitted from the rankings for 1995, but is treated as #2 for 1996, with all players below her demoted one position. Ranking Player Score Ranking Player Score 1Navratilova 211 34T Garrison[-Jackson] 7 2Evert 180 34T Hanika 7 3 Graf 163 34T Kohde-Kilsch 7 4Davenport 95 37T Balestrat 6 5 Seles 78 37T Coetzer 6 6 Hingis 72 37T Date 6 7 Sanchez-Vicario 62 37T Dementieva 6 8 Hénin 58 37T Ivanovic 6 9 Sabatini 45 42 Stove 5 10T Austin 41 43 Majoli 4 10T Williams, V. 41 44T Casals 3 12 Williams, S 40 44T Chakvetadze 3 13T Clijsters 38 44T Court 3 13T Goolagong 38 44T Durie 3 13T Mandlikova 38 44T Maleeva, K 3 16T Martinez, C. 37 44T Maleeva, Magdalena 3 16T Novotna 37 44T Petrova 3 18 Shriver 36 51T Bunge 2 19 King 35 51T Huber, A 2 20 Mauresmo 32 51T Morozova 2 21 Capriati 29 51T Schnyder 2 22 Wade 25 51T Tauziat 2 23 Jaeger 24 51T Zvereva 2 24 Sharapova 23 57T Dokic 1 25T Kuznetsova 22 57T Hantuchova 1 25T Pierce 22 57T Jausovec 1 27 Turnbull 15 57T Kournikova 1 28 Fernandez, M 13 57T Potter 1 29T Maleeva[-Fragniere] 10 57T Reid 1 29T Sukova 10 57T Richey Gunter 1 31T Barker 8 57T Schett 1 31T Jankovic 8 57T Spirlea 1 31T Myskina 8

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 284 Total Years in the Top Eight The following table shows the all-time leaders in most years spent in the Top Eight. Player Years Spent in Top Eight Navratilova 20 Evert 14 Graf 12 Seles 11 Davenport 9 Sabatini 9 Sanchez-Vicario 9 Martinez, Conchita 8 Shriver 8 Capriati 7 Hénin 7 Hingis 7 Mandlikova 7 Pierce 7 Turnbull 7 Williams, Serena 7 Novotna 6 Williams, Venus 6 Austin 5 Fernandez, Mary Joe 5 Goolagong 5 King 5 Maleeva[-Fragniere], Manuela 5 Mauresmo 5 Sukova 5 Wade 5

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 285 Doubles Wins & Partners Winningest Doubles Player, Year By Year, From 1983 The following list shows the player with the most doubles titles each year, and lists the partners with whom she played and the number of tournaments they won together. Year Player # of titles Partners 1983 Martina Navratilova 11 Shriver (9), Reynolds (2) Pam Shriver 11 Navratilova (9), Evert (1), Potter (1) 1984 Martina Navratilova 13 Shriver (10), G. Fernandez (1), Smylie (1) 1985 Pam Shriver 12 Navratilova (7), Smylie (2), Fairbank (1), Mandlikova (1), Sukova (1) 1986 Martina Navratilova 9 Shriver (7), Temesvari (2) 1987 Martina Navratilova 9 Shriver (7), K. Jordan (1), Sabatini (1) 1988 Martina Navratilova 8 Shriver (5), Casals (1), Kucyzynska (1), McNeil (1) Pam Shriver 8 Navratilova (5), K. Adams (1), Nagelson (1), Sukova (1) 1989 Katrina Adams 8 Garrison (4), McNeil (3), Shriver (1) Pam Shriver 8 Navratilova (4), K. Adams (1), Graf (1), Mandlikova (1), Nagelson (1) 1990 Helena Sukova 10 Novotna (8), G. Fernandez (1), Tauziat (1) 1991 Larisa Neiland 10 Zvereva (6), Novotna (3), Fendick (1) 1992 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario 10 Sukova (6), Zvereva (2), Martinez (1), Neiland (1) 1993 Gigi Fernandez 12 Zvereva (11), Sukova (1) 1994 Gigi Fernandez 11 Zvereva (11) Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario 11 Novotna (5), Neiland (2), Davenport (1), Halard (1), McGrath (1), McNeil (1), Natasha Zvereva 11 G. Fernandez (11) 1995 Gigi Fernandez 8 Zvereva (7), Hingis (1) 1996 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario 9 Novotna (4), Rubin (2), Neiland (1), Schultz-McCarthy (1), Spirlea (1) 1997 Martina Hingis 8 Sanchez-Vicario (3), Novotna (2), Davenport (1), M. J. Fernandez (1), Zvereva (1) Natasha Zvereva 8 Davenport (2), G. Fernandez (2), Sanchez-Vicario (2), Hingis (1), Sukova (1) 1998 Martina Hingis 9 Novotna (5), Lucic (2), Sukova (1), Zvereva (1) 1999 Martina Hingis 6 Kournikova (5), Novotna (1) Corina Morariu 6 Davenport (3), Neiland (2), Po (1) 2000 Julie Halard-Decugis 10 Sugiyama (6), Morariu (2), Kournikova (1), Testud (1) 2001 Lisa Raymond 9 Stubbs (7), Davenport (2) 2002 Lisa Raymond 9 Stubbs (8), Davenport (1) 2003 Ai Sugiyama 8 Clijsters (7), Liezel Huber (1) 2004 Cara Black 7 Callens (1), Stubbs (6) Nadia Petrova 7 Shaughnessy (7) Meghann Shaughnessy 7 Petrova (7) 2005 Samantha Stosur 7 Raymond (5), Stewart (2) 2006 Lisa Raymond 10 Stosur (10) Samantha Stosur 10 Raymond (10) 2007 Cara Black 9 Huber (9) Liezel Huber 9 Black (9)

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 286 The data above can be graphed, showing how the number of titles won by the winningest player has tended to decline over the years, especially on the singles side (it appears the general decline in doubles, and emergence of a number of female doubles specialists, has allowed the doubles number to stay relatively high: There are only a few player left who know how to win in doubles). The graph below shows the number of titles won by both the winningest singles player and the winningest doubles player since 1983.

Titles, Year by Year

8 Total Titles 6

0 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Year

Singles Doubles

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Page 287 Index A Bacsinszky/Vedy 17 Bondarenko, A./K. Bondarenko 27 Bad Gastein 10, 23, 56 Bondarenko, Kateryna 6, 12, 27 Abramovic, Ivana 12, 13 Bahia 200, 201 Bondarenko, K./Bondarenko, V. 12 Abramovic/Abramovic 23 Baker, Leanne 12 Bonicelli/Chanfreau Lovera 254 Abramovic/Sromova 12 Baker/Ditty 30 Boogert, Kristie 207 Acapulco 10, 15 Balestrat, Dianne 280, 282 Bordeaux $100K+H 27 Adamczak/Haynes 19 Balestrat/Gourlay 254 Boshoff/Kloss 254 Adams, Katrina 286 Bali 10, 26, 45 Boston 204 Albanese, Lauren 20 Bammer,Sybille 2, 5, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, Boston $50K 22 Albuquerque $75K 28 16, 23, 27, 40, 42, 65, 66, 67, 83, 91, Bovina, Elena 200, 207 Alves, Maria Fernanda 20 93, 207 Bovina/Zimonjic 261 Alves/Hrdinova 28 Bangalore 10, 14 Brandi, Kristina 14, 24, 207 Amanmuradova, Akgul 23, 207 Bangkok 10, 29, 53 Bratislava $100K+H 30 Amanmuradova/Kuryanovich 20 Barcelona 10, 21, 202 Brémond, Severine (Beltrame) 15, Amelia Island 8, 9, 16, 46, 198, 199, Bardina, Vasilisa 11, 12, 13, 14, 207 207 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 Barker, Sue 251, 280, 282 Brianti, Alberta 11, 13, 30 Ani, Maret 17, 26, 28, 29, 207 Barna, Anca 207 Brianti/Koryttseva 27 Ani/Brianti 15 Barrois, Kristina 11, 29 Brighton 202, 203, 204 Ani/Kanepi 22 Bartoli, Marion 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 15, Brisbane 203, 204 Ani/Klepac 24 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, Brodsky, Gail 29 Ani/Kloesel 28 43, 62, 65, 66, 67, 75, 77, 78, 79, 85, Bronx $50K 25 Ani/Maes 18 86, 88, 91, 93, 127, 145, 183, 187, Budapest 10, 17 Antoniychuk, Kristina 25 207 Bueno/Court 254 Antwerp 8, 9, 14, 32, 51, 198, 199, Bartoli/Tu 12, 182 Bunge, Bettina 280, 282 200, 201 Bedanova, Daja 207 Buzarnescu/Kapshay 25 Appelmans, Sabine 201, 207 Beigbeder, Celine 207 Bychkova, Ekaterina 11, 15, 17, 22, Argeri, Maria Jose 13 Beijing 8, 9, 27, 59, 198, 199, 200 25, 31, 207 Arn, Greta 6, 10, 17, 40, 207 Benesova, Iveta 30, 143, 148, 207 Arvidsson, Sofia 13, 14, 17, 20, 29, Benesova/Husarova 28, 146 C 207 Benesova/Voskoboeva 12 Cabeza Candela/Salerni 19 Arvidsson/Ant. Serra Zanetti 14 Berlin 8, 9, 18, 33, 36, 48, 150, 198, Cagnes-sur-Mer $100K 17 Asagoe, Shinobu 141, 145, 207 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 Callens, Els 207 Ashland $50K 28 Bes, Eva 207 Camerin, Maria Elena 12, 13, 144, Atlanta 204 Beygelzimer, Yulia 12, 16, 18 208 Auckland 10, 12, 49 Beygelzimer/Chakhnashvili 22 Canadian Open 8, 9, 25, 33, 36, 47, Austin, Tracy 251, 270, 275, 280, 282, Beygelzimer/Fedak 11 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 284, 285 Biella $100K 22, 54 Canepa/Knapp 23 Australian Open 8, 9, 13, 33, 36, 60, Birmingham 10, 21, 49 198, 200, 201, 202, 150, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, Capriati, Jennifer Birnerova, Eva 11, 12, 13, 22 206, 208, 222, 251, 270, 280, 282, 204 Black, Cara 140, 141, 142, 143, 145, 285 Azarenka, Victoria 2, 5, 7, 15, 17, 18, 148, 152, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 20 29, 41, 65, 66, 67, 86, 91, 93, 99, Carson $50K 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, 193, 199, 263, 270, 280, 282 143, 145, 183, 207 Casals, Rosie 206, 207, 278, 286 Casals/King 254 Azarenka/Chakvetadze 23, 24, 182 Black/Huber 13, 14, 16, 22, 24, 25, 29, Casals/Tegart Dalton 254 Azarenka/Mirnyi 261 30, 31, 146, 182, 254 Casals/Turnbull 254 Azarenka/Peer 28 Black/Stubbs 254 Casanova, Myriam 208 Azarenka/Poutchek 15, 29 Black/W. Black 261 Castaño, Catalina 208 B Blahotova/Koryttseva 13 Cervanova, Ludmila 208 Boca Raton 203 Cetkovska, Petra 20, 29, 30, 148 Bacheva, Lubomira 207 Boca Raton — see also Delray Beach Cetkovska/A. Hlavackova 18 Bachmann, Angelika 13, 16, 18, 22, Bogota 10, 15 Cetkovska/Hlavackova 146 207 Bollegraf/Leach 261 Cetkovska/Zahlavova Strycova 29 Bachmann/Henke 16 Bonaventure — See Fort Lauderdale Chakhnashvili, Margalita 12, 23 Bacsinszky, Timea 16, 17, 26 Bondarenko, Alona 2, 5, 7, 17, 20, 27, Chakhnashvili/Milevskaya 30 27 Bacsinszky/Kloesel 44, 65, 66, 67, 72, 73, 74, 75, 78, 91, 26 Bacsinszky/Kosinska 93, 200, 207

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Chakvetadze,Anna 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, Court, Margaret 251, 263, 268, 269, Dementieva, Elena 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 270, 275, 280, 282 10, 13, 14, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29, 39, 30, 31, 39, 40, 44, 65, 66, 67, 70, 74, see also Bueno/Court 40, 45, 65, 66, 67, 74, 76, 85, 86, 88, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, Court/Goolagong Cawley 254 89, 91, 93, 136, 200, 210, 280, 282 91, 93, 111, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, Court/Tegart Dalton 254 Denain $75K 26 130, 132, 133, 134, 136, 183, 198, Court/Wade 254 Detroit 204 200, 208, 274, 280, 282 Courtois, Laurence 209 Diaz-Oliva, Mariana 210 Chaloner/Evers 254 Cravero, Jorgelina 20, 21, 24, 30 Dinan $75K 16 Chan Chin-Wei 21 Cravero/Jozami 24, 30 Disderi/Obziler 11 Chan Yung-Jan 6, 16, 18, 19, 29, 31, Cravero/Kustova 20 Ditty, Julie 17, 24, 30, 31, 210 89, 140, 142, 143, 145, 148, 153, Craybas, Jill 12, 19, 31, 209 Ditty/Grandin 24 183, 208 Craybas/Grandin 26 Dnepropetrovsk $50K 23 Chan/H. Chan 31 Cuneo $50K+H 22 Doha 8, 9, 15, 47, 198, 199, 200 Chan/Chuang 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, Czink, Melinda 13, 18, 22, 24, 28, 209 Dokic, Jelena 201, 210, 278, 280, 282 22, 26, 146, 182 Czink/Grandin 22 Domachowska, Marta 16, 210 Chan/Hsieh 11 Czink/Haynes 28 Domachowska/Laine 18 Chan/Luzhanska 24 Czink/Lee-Waters 24 Domínguez Lino, Lourdes 6, 15, 148, Chan/Mirza 20 210 Chan/Safina 28 D Domínguez Lino/Parra Santonja 15, Chanfreau Lovera, Gail (Sheriff) Dallas 203, 204 17, 146 see Bonicelli/Chanfreau Lovera Daniilidou, Eleni 6, 25, 28, 141, 145, Domínguez Lino/Pennetta 21 Chanfreau/Durr 254 154, 209 Domínguez Lino/Suárez 15, 146 Chang Kai-Chen 11 Daniilidou/Woehr 28 Dothan $75K 16 Charleston 8, 9, 16, 49, 150, 198, 199, Date, Kimiko 201, 202, 280, 282 Douchevina/Perebiynis 17 200, 201 Davenport,Lindsay 3, 6, 7, 10, 26, 27, Dragomir Ilie, Ruxandra 210 Charlottsville $50K 18 31, 40, 45, 62, 65, 66, 67, 80, 81, 84, Drake, Maureen 210 Chase Championships 198, 199, 200, 85, 86, 89, 91, 93, 104, 108, 111, Dubai 8, 9, 14, 32, 47, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202 130, 137, 154, 198, 200, 201, 202, 201 Chen Yangchong 21 206, 209, 223, 232, 251, 270, 274, Dubai $75K 2006 12 Chen/Zhou 21 275, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 285 Dubois, Stéphanie 14, 24, 25, 28, 29, Chi, Jane 208 Davenport/M. J. Fernandez 254 30, 31 Chicago 201, 202, 203, 204 Davenport/Morariu 254 Dubois/Kleybanova 30, 31 Chladkova, Denisa 208 Davenport/Novotna 254 Dubois/Pelletier 25 Cho, Yoon Jeong 208 Davydova/Kondratieva 26 Dubois/Voracova 31 Chuang Chia-Jung 19, 140, 142, 143, de Lone, Erica 209 Dulko, Gisela 6, 10, 14, 17, 18, 26, 145, 148, 153, 183, 193, 199 de los Rios, Rossana 12, 22, 26, 28, 27, 40, 140, 143, 145, 155, 210 Chuang/Hsieh 27, 28, 146 30, 209 Durie, Jo 204, 280, 282 Chuang/King 29 de los Rios/Gallovits 20 Durr, Françoise 263, 270, 275 Cibulkova, Dominika 6, 22, 28, 29, de Swardt/Adams 261 see also Chanfreau/Durr 254 30, 208 Deauville $50K 2006 11 Durr/Hard 254 Cincinnati 10, 23, 44, 203 Dechaume-Balleret, Alexia 209 Durr/A Jones 254 Cirstea, Sorana 17, 21, 26, 30, 31, 208 Déchy, Nathalie 6, 26, 30, 140, 141, Durr/Stove 254 Clijsters,Kim 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 142, 143, 145, 148, 154, 183, 206, Dushevina, Vera 6, 24, 27, 143, 145, 14, 16, 17, 39, 44, 65, 66, 67, 70, 80, 209 148, 210 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 89, 91, 93, 102, Déchy/Ram 261 Dushevina/Perebiynis 146 104, 108, 111, 130, 133, 134, 137, Déchy/Safina 26, 146, 182, 254 Dzehalevich, Ekaterina 12, 26, 31, 198, 200, 201, 206, 208, 223, 231, Déchy/Santangelo 19, 146 148 251, 274, 275, 276, 278, 280, 282 Déchy/Zvonareva 254 Dzehalevich/Milevskaya 23 Clijsters/Sugiyama 254, 278 Dekmeijere/Ditty 13 Dzehalevich/Yakimova 29, 146 Coetzer 201, 202, 209, 280, 282 Dekmeijere/Lepchenko 28 Cohen-Aloro, Stéphanie 18, 21, 23, Dekmeijere/Senoglu 22 E 209 Dellacqua, Casey 6, 18, 19, 24, 25 Eastbourne 8, 9, 22, 32, 47, 198, 199, Cohen-Aloro/Sfar 16 Dellacqua/Grandin 24 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 Coin, Julie 27 Delray Beach 202 Ehritt-Vanc, Andreea 148 Compostizo de Andres, Eloisa 23 Ehritt-Vanc/Rodionova 17, 19, 146 Contrexeville $50K 23 Ericsson 202, 203 Cornet, Alizé 6, 16, 23, 24, 27 see also Miami

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Errani, Sara 6, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 23, Garbin 6, 7, 12, 15, 17, 45, 91, 93, Han/Xu 27 26, 75, 210 143, 145, 183, 211 Hanika, Sylvia 204, 280, 282 Errani/Gabba 16 Garbin/Vinci 18, 19, 182 Hannover 201 Esperon/Lepore 25 Garrison(-Jackson), Zina 203, 204, Hantuchova, Daniela 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, Essen 201, 202 280, 282 12, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, Estoril 10, 17 Gersi, Adriana 211 28, 30, 39, 47, 65, 66, 67, 78, 80, 82, Evers, Dianne Gifu $50K 18 83, 85, 86, 88, 91, 93, 127, 132, 141, see also Chaloner/Evers Glatch, Alexa 211 144, 145, 183, 198, 200, 201, 211, Evert, Chris 203, 204, 251, 268, 270, Goerges, Julia 24, 29, 211 280, 282 275, 280, 282, 284, 285 Gojnea/Niculesc 18 Hantuchova/Bhupathi 261 Evert/Morozova 254 Gold Coast 10, 12, 55 Hantuchova/Friedl 261 Evert/Navratilova 254 Golovin, Tatiana 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, Hantuchova/Santoro 261 14, 16, 25, 27, 28, 30, 39, 40, 65, 66, Hantuchova/Ullyett 261 F 67, 72, 73, 74, 76, 85, 86, 88, 89, 91, Harford, Tanya Fairbank/Harford 254 93, 124, 126, 128, 129, 132, 136, see also Fairbank/Harford Fairbank/Reynolds 254 200, 211 Harkleroad, Ashley 6, 11, 16, 17, 21, Farina Elia, Silvia 210 Golovin/Gasquet 261 30, 31, 211 Fedak, Yuliana 11, 12, 14, 98, 210 Goolagong (Cawley), Evonne 251, Harris, Kerry Fedossova, Youlia 23, 29 264, 270, 275, 280, 282, 285 see also Gourlay/Harris Fendick/MJ Fernandez 254 see also Court/Goolagong Cawley Hartford 204 Ferguson, Sophie 27 Goolagong Cawley/Gourlay 254 Haynes, Angela 20, 30 Fernandez, Clarisa 210 Gorrochategui, Ines 211 Haynes/Kops-Jones 30 Fernandez, Gigi 233, 264, 268, 269, Gourlay Cawley, Helen Haynes/Lee-Waters 20 270, 277, 286 see also Balestrat/Gourlay Haynes/Washington 29 Fernandez, Gigi/Navratilova 254 see also Goolagong Cawley/ Hénin,Justine 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, Fernandez, Gigi/White 254 Gourlay 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, 28, 30, Fernandez, Gigi/Zvereva 254, 268, Gourlay Cawley/Russell 254 31, 32, 39, 47, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 277 Gourlay/Harris 254 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, Fernandez, Mary Joe 201, 202, 203, Govortsova, Olga 6, 14, 18, 19, 29, 31, 84, 85, 86, 88, 89, 91, 93, 102, 104, 210, 280, 282, 285 211 108, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, see also Davenport/MJ Fernandez Graf, Steffi 137, 201, 202, 203, 204, 132, 133, 134, 136, 137, 198, 200, see also Fendick/MJ Fernandez 211, 224, 251, 268, 270, 274, 275, 201, 206, 212, 225, 251, 270, 274, Fes 10, 19 276, 280, 282, 284, 285 275, 276, 278, 280, 282, 284, 285 Filderstadt 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 Graf/Sabatini 254 Henke, Vanessa 212 Flipkens, Kirsten 210 Grahame, Amanda 211 Hilton Head 202, 203, 204 Forest Hills 10, 26 Grande, Rita 211 Hingis, Martina 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, Foretz, Stéphanie 11, 21, 23, 24, 30 Grandin, Natalie 22 13, 14, 15, 27, 39, 48, 65, 66, 67, 85, Foretz/Vedy 16 Grandin/Kops-Jones 13 86, 89, 91, 93, 137, 149, 156, 183, Fort Lauderdale 204 Grant/Rao 20 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 206, 212, Frazier, Amy 202, 210 Granville, Laura 6, 211 225, 234, 251, 264, 268, 269, 270, French Open Grönefeld, Anna-Lena 3, 7, 12, 46, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 280, 282, see Roland Garros 65, 66, 67, 70, 141, 145, 149, 155, 284, 285, 286 Fujiwara, Rika 27, 31 183, 211 Hingis/Bhupathi 261 Fujiwara/Namigata 19, 27 Grönefeld/Shaughnessy 12, 146, 182 Hingis/Hantuchova 182 Fukuoka $50K 19 Guangzhou 10, 28, 54 Hingis/Kirilenko 15, 146 Fusano, Christina 149 GuangZhou $50K 21 Hingis/Kournikova 254, 277 Fusano/Kops-Jones 31, 146 Gubacsi, Zsofia 211 Hingis/Lucic 254, 268 Fusano/Tsoubanos 12 Gullickson/Lee-Waters 19 Hingis/Novotna 254, 268 Gumulya, Sandy 22 Hingis/Pierce 254 G Hingis/Sukova 254 Gadusek, Bonnie 204 H Hingis/Zvereva 254 Gagliardi, Emmanuelle 16, 17, 18, 24, Habsudova, Karina 211 Hiraki/Bhupathi 261 211 Hack, Sabine 202 Hisamatsu, Shiho 13, 18, 19, 27 Gajdosova, Jarmila 15 Halard-Decugis,Julie 201, 202, 211, Hlavackova, Andrea 149 Gajdosova/Morigami 15 286 Hobart 10, 13, 44 Gallovits, Edina 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, Halard-Decugis/Sugiyama 254 Hopkins, Jennifer 212 21, 22, 211 Hamburg 200, 201, 202, 203 Hopmans, Amanda 212

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Houston 202, 203, 204 Jans/Rosolska 12, 19, 29 Klepac/Likhovtseva 27 Hradecka, Lucie 21, 148 Japan Open 10, 54 Kleybanova, Alisa 26 Hradecka/U. Radwanska 25 Jausovec, Mima 251, 280, 282 Kleybanova/Pivarova 26 Hradecka/Voracova 20, 21, 23, 27, Jausovec/Ruzici 254 Kleybanova/Ruutel 26 146 Ji Chunmei 149 Kleybanova/Vierin 27 Hrdinova, Eva 21, 30 Ji/S. Sun 18, 26, 146 Kloesel, Sandra 11, 13, 26, 29 Hrdinova/Pelletier 26, 29 Jidkova, Alina 213 Kloss, Ilana Hrdlickova, Kveta Jidkova/Poutchek 23 see Boshoff/Kloss See Kveta (Hrdlickova) Peschke Johannesburg 204 Knapp, Karin 6, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 213 Hsieh Su-Wei 11, 21, 144, 148, 212 Johansson, Mathilde 14, 18, 21 Kohde-Kilsch, Claudia 204, 280, 282 Hsieh/S-Y Hsieh 31 Jones, Ann 251 Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova 254 Hsieh/Kudryavtseva 14 see also Durr/A. Jones Kolkata 10, 27, 50 Hsieh/S. Uberoi 12 Jordan, Barbara 251 Kondratieva, Maria 25, 26 Huang/Xu 21 Jordan, Kathy 264, 268, 269, 270 Kops-Jones, Racquel 25, 149 Huber, Anke 201, 202, 212, 280, 282 Jordan, Kathy/Anne Smith 254, 268 Kops-Jones/Osterloh 17, 18 Huber, Liezel (Horn) 140, 141, 142, Jordan/Smylie 254 Kops-Jones/Spears 31 143, 145, 148, 156, 173, 174, 175, Joue-Les-Tours $50K 29 Koryttseva, Mariya 18, 27, 149, 213 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, Jounieh $75K 18 Koryttseva/Kustova 23, 25, 27, 146 193, 199, 206, 235, 286 Jovanovic/Jugic-Salkic 24 Koryttseva/Laine 12 Husarova, Janette 140, 143, 145, 148, Jovanovic/Poltoratskaya 21 Korzeniak, Anna 26 157, 206, 212 Jugic-Salkic/Kostanic 12 Kostanic, Jelena 12, 19, 213 Husarova/Suárez 12, 146 Jugic-Salkic/Kustova 26 Kournikova, Anna 213, 235, 277, 280, Jugic-Salkic/Senoglu 14 282 I Jugic-Salkic/Voracova 22 see also Hingis/Kournikova Iijima, Kumiko 21 Krajicek, Michaella 5, 18, 23, 65, 66, Iijima/Okamoto 18 K 68, 77, 91, 93, 144, 213 Iijima/Yonemura 27 Kachlikova, Katarina 18 Krasnoroutskaya, Lina 213 Indian Harbor Beach $50K 19 Kandarr, Jana 213 Krauth/Nooni 18 Indian Wells 8, 9, 15, 47, 198, 199, Kanepi, Kaia 6, 22, 23, 24, 213 Kremer, Anne 25, 27, 83, 213 200, 201, 202, 203 Kaohsiung $75K 2006 11 Krstajic, Danica 21 Indianapolis 203, 204 Kapros, Aniko 213 Krstajic/Mircic 21 Irvin, Marissa 212 Keothavong, Anne 14, 19, 24, 25, 27, Kruger, Joanette 213 Istanbul 10, 20, 45 213 Kudryavtseva, Alla 16, 17, 18, 27, 31, Italian Open — see Rome Kerber, Angelique 14, 19, 20, 187 149 Ivanova, Ekaterina 17, 26 Kerber/Meusburger 16 Kudryavtseva/Pavlyuchenkova 31 Ivanova/Manasieva 31 Kerber/Szatmari 14 Kulikova, Regina 21 Ivanova/Rodina 17 Key Biscayne 204 Kurhajcova, Lubomira 213 Ivanovic, Ana 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, see also Lipton, Ericsson, Miami Kuryanovich/Manasieva 19 13, 16, 18, 20, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31, 39, Kharkov $100K 27, 44 Kustova, Darija 149 48, 62, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, King, Billie Jean 251, 265, 270, 275, Kustova/Makarova 22 76, 77, 78, 79, 85, 86, 88, 91, 93, 280, 282, 285 Kustova/Poutchek 11, 13 108, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, see also Casals/King Kuti Kis, Rita 213 132, 133, 134, 136, 198, 200, 212, King/Navratilova 254 Kutuzova, Viktoriya 11, 20, 21 274, 280, 282 King/Stove 254 Kuznetsova, Svetlana 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, King, Vania 143, 145, 148, 157, 213 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, J King/Kudryavtseva 27, 146 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39, 50, 65, 66, Jackson, Jamea 212 King/Mirza 19, 146 68, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, Jaeger, Andrea 280, 282 King/Stubbs 13 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 91, 93, 102, 104, Jankovic,Jelena 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, King/Sun 28 111, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, Kirilenko,Maria 5, 7, 10, 13, 14, 17, 132, 133, 134, 136, 144, 158, 198, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39, 27, 28, 29, 39, 50, 65, 66, 67, 70, 83, 200, 206, 213, 236, 251, 274, 280, 49, 62, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 91, 93, 143, 145, 149, 158, 200, 213 282 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 91, 93, Kirkland, Jessica 20 Kuznetsova/Molik 14, 254 111, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 132, Kiyomura/Sawamatsu 254 Kvitova, Petra 21, 30 133, 134, 136, 187, 198, 200, 213, Klaschka/Roesch 14 274, 280, 282 Kleinova, Sandra 213 L Jankovic/J. Murray 261 Klepac, Andreja 187 Laine, Emma 12

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Laine/Szavay 19 Makarova/Osterloh 30 Mirza, Sania 5, 7, 13, 14, 19, 23, 29, Lamade, Bianka 213 Maleeva, Katerina 202, 203, 280, 282 65, 66, 68, 83, 91, 93, 140, 141, 143, Lapuschenkova, Anna 23, 25, 26 Maleeva, Magdalena 200, 201, 202, 145, 146, 148, 159, 215 Larcher de Brito, Michelle 28, 62 214, 278, 280, 282 Mirza/Mattek 23, 146 Las Vegas $75K 15 Maleeva-Fragniere, Manuela 202, Mirza/Peer 23, 146 Latina $50K 16 203, 204, 275, 281, 282, 285 Mirza/Santangelo 25, 146 Lawrenceville $50K 30 Malek, Tatjana 13, 17, 19, 26, 27, 30, Molik, Alicia 6, 140, 142, 143, 145, Lawrenceville $50K 2006 11 187 149, 160, 183, 200, 206, 215, 274 Lee-Waters, Lindsay 214 Manasieva, Vesna 19, 27 Molik, Alicia Lefevre/Szatmari 25 Mandlikova, Hana 203, 204, 251, 270, see also Kuznetsova/Molik Leipzig 200, 201, 202, 203 275, 281, 282, 285 Molik/Santangelo 20, 25, 146, 182, Leon Garcia, Gala 214 Mandlikova/Navratilova 254 254 Lepchenko, Varvara 16, 18, 22, 28, 29 Mandula, Petra 214 Molik/Sun 20 Lexington $50K 24 Mariskova/Teeguarden 254 Montolio, Angeles 215 Li Na 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 15, 20, 21, 51, 65, Marrero, Marta 18, 214 Monzon $75K 19 66, 68, 81, 82, 91, 93, 214 Marrero/Suarez Navarro 17 Morariu, Corina 160, 206, 215, 286 Li Ting 214 Marseille $50K 21 Morariu/E. Ferreira 261 Liggan, Kelly 20, 22 Martinez, Conchita 198, 201, 202, Morigami, Akiko 6, 10, 15, 18, 23, 31, Likhovtseva, Elena 6, 140, 143, 145, 203, 206, 214, 226, 251, 275, 278, 40, 215 149, 158, 199, 214, 278 281, 282, 285 Morita, Ayumi 18 Likhovtseva/Bhupathi 261 Martinez Granados, Conchita 214 Morita/Namigata 29 Likhovtseva/Nestor 261 Martinez Sanchez, Maria Jose 17, 214 Morita/Sugiyama 18 Likhovtseva/Vesnina 13, 14, 17, 146 Matevzic, Maja 214 Morita/Yonemura 19 Linetskaya, Evgenia 214 Mattek, Bethanie 11, 12, 19, 143, 149, Morozova, Olga 281, 282 Linz 8, 9, 30, 47, 198, 199, 200, 201 214 see also Evert/Morozova Lions Cup (Tokyo) 204 Mauresmo, Amélie 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, Moscow 8, 9, 29, 45, 198, 199, 200, Lipton 204 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 22, 27, 32, 39, 201 See also Miami 51, 65, 66, 68, 77, 78, 79, 82, 86, 91, Moscow $50K 26 Lisicki, Sabine 14 93, 137, 198, 200, 201, 206, 215, Müller, Martina 6, 15, 17, 21, 22, 23, Lisjak, Ivana 11, 19, 21 227, 251, 270, 274, 275, 278, 281, 24, 215 Liu Wan-Ting 21 282, 285 Müller/G. Navratilova 17 Livingston — See Princeton McGrath, Meredith 202 Müller/Schaul 24 Llagostera Vives, Nuria 17, 62, 149, McNeil, Lori 202, 203 Munich 198, 199, 200, 201 214 McQuillan, Rachel 215 Myskina, Anastasia 3, 7, 12, 52, 65, Llagostera Vives/Parra Santonja 21, Medina Garrigues, Anabel 5, 7, 10, 66, 68, 93, 200, 201, 206, 227, 251, 146 13, 20, 24, 26, 28, 39, 51, 65, 66, 68, 274, 281, 282 Llaguno/Vergos 21 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 91, 93, 140, Loit, Emilie 6, 10, 11, 15, 17, 21, 23, 141, 145, 149, 159, 215 N 24, 27, 40, 144, 183, 206, 214 Medina Garrigues/Ruano Pascual 13, Nagelsen, Betsy Loit/Pratt 15, 182 16, 22, 24 see also Navratilova/Nagelson Los Angeles 8, 9, 25, 48, 198, 199, Medvedeva, Natalia 202 Nagelsen/Tomanova 254 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 Memphis 10, 15, 60 Nagy, Kyra 21, 24, 26, 29 Los Angeles Championships 8 Mestre $50K 26 Nagyova, Henrieta 215 Lucic, Mirjana 214 Meusburger, Yvonne 6, 16, 19, 23, 25, Nakamura, Aiko 6, 23, 215 see also Hingis/Lucic 27, 215 Namigata, Junri 19, 27 Lukic, Vojislava 26 Miami 8, 9, 16, 33, 36, 60, 150, 198, Navratilova, G./Uhlirova 13 Luxembourg 8, 9, 28, 48, 198, 199, 199, 200, 201 Navratilova,Martina 141, 145, 202, 200 Michel, Margaret 203, 204, 206, 251, 265, 268, 269, see also Goolagong Cawley/Michel 270, 274, 275, 276, 281, 282, 284, M Mikaelian, Marie-Gayanay 215 285, 286 Madrid Championships 9, 31, 32, 33, Milan 202 see also Evert/Navratilova 36, 47, 150 Milan $50K+H 2006 12 see also Fernandez/Navratilova Maes, Caroline 18 Milevskaya, Ksenia 21, 23 see also King/Navratilova Mahwah 203, 204 Milevskaya/Vaisemberg 21 see also Mandlikova/Navratilova Majoli, Iva 200, 201, 202, 214, 251, Minsk $50K 31 Navratilova/B. Bryan 261 280, 282 Navratilova/Nagelsen 254 Makarova, Ekaterina 21, 30, 31 Navratilova/Paes 261

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Navratilova/Shriver 254, 268 Parra Santonja, Arantxa 148, 216 Pratt, Nicole 6, 15, 144, 148, 183, 217 Navratilova/Smith 254 Pastikova/Sromova 21 Pratt/Santangelo 14, 146 Navratilova/Stove 254 Paszek, Tamira 6, 98, 216 Pratt/Stewart 15, 147 Navratilova/Temesvari 254 Pattaya City 10, 14, 42 Prerov $75K 20 Neffa-de los Rios, Rossana Peer, Shahar 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 15, 16, 29, Princess Cup 200, 201, 202, 203 see Rossana de los Rios 52, 65, 66, 68, 80, 81, 82, 83, 91, 93, Princeton 204 Neiland, Larisa 237, 277, 286 99, 143, 145, 149, 160, 216 Prusova, Libuse 217 see also under Savchenko Pelletier, Marie-Eve 28 Neiland/Novotna 277 Peng Shuai 6, 14, 27, 28, 140, 143, Q Neiland/Woodforde 261 145, 149, 161, 183, 216 Quebec City 10, 31, 45 Neiland/Zvereva 254 Peng/Sun 16 Queens Grand Prix (Tokyo) 204 New England 202, 203, 204 Peng/Tu 182 R New Haven 8, 9, 25, 50, 198, 199, Peng/Yan 28, 146 Radwanska, Agnieszka 2, 5, 7, 10, 22, 200, 201 Pennetta, Flavia 6, 7, 10, 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 40, 54, 62, 65, 66, 68, 91, 93, New Orleans 203, 204 28, 29, 39, 53, 65, 66, 68, 70, 75, 91, 99, 149, 217 Newport 202, 203, 204 93, 143, 216 Radwanska, Urszula 149 Nice 201 Pennetta/Vinci 15 Radwanska/Radwanska 20, 147 Nola, Pavlina (Stoyanova) 215 Perebiynis, Tatiana 17, 20, 27, 149, Rakhim, Amina 26 Noorlander, Seda 216 216 Rakhim/Ar. Rodionova 23 Novotna, Jana 201, 202, 216, 238, Perianu, Anda 14, 17 Ram/Zvonareva 261 251, 265, 269, 270, 277, 281, 282, Perianu/Scheepers 17 Randriantefy, Dally 217 285 Perry, Shenay 16, 19 Rao, Sunitha 20, 25, 30 see also Davenport/Novotna Pervak, Ksenia 25 Raymond,Lisa 140, 141, 142, 143, see also Hingis/Novotna Peschke, Kveta (Hrdlickova) 140, 145, 148, 161, 173, 174, 175, 176, Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario 254 141, 142, 143, 145, 148, 161, 183, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, 199, Novotna/Sukova 254 206, 212, 216 217, 239, 266, 269, 286 Peschke/Stubbs 22, 25, 28, 30, 146, Raymond/M. Bryan 261 O 182 Raymond/Galbraith 261 O’Brien, Katie 25 Petange $75K+H 24 Raymond/Paes 261 O’Neil, Chris 251 Petkovic, Andrea 17, 23, 24, 26 Raymond/Schiavone 30, 182 Oakland 204 Petrova,Nadia 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, Raymond/Stosur 13, 15, 18, 22, 146, see also Stanford 14, 15, 16, 22, 24, 25, 28, 39, 53, 65, 182, 254 Obata, Saori 216 66, 68, 77, 82, 89, 91, 93, 102, 132, Raymond/Stubbs 254, 278 Obziler, Tzipora 14, 28, 30, 31, 216 141, 145, 200, 206, 216, 274, 275, Razzano, Virginie 2, 5, 7, 10, 19, 21, Olaru, Ioana Raluca 6, 15, 17, 19, 29, 281, 282, 286 26, 28, 29, 39, 40, 54, 65, 66, 68, 70, 76, 216 Philadelphia 200, 201, 202 83, 89, 91, 93, 217 Olympics 200 Pierce,Mary 200, 201, 202, 206, 216, Reeves, Samantha 217 Ondraskova, Zuzana 19, 20, 21, 216 228, 251, 270, 278, 281, 283, 285 Reggi, Raffaella 203, 204 Oremans, Miriam 216 see also Hingis/Pierce Rehe, Stephanie 203, 204 Orlando 204 Pierce/Bhupathi 261 Reid, Kerry Melville 251, 281, 283 Ortisei $75K 13 Pin, Camille 6, 12, 17, 216 Reid/Turnbull 254 Osterloh, Lilia 19, 20, 30, 187, 216 Pironkova, Tsvetana 24, 27, 216 Reynolds, Candy Ozegovic, Nika 19 Pisnik, Tina 216 see also Fairbank/Reynolds Pitkowski, Sarah 217 Rezai, Aravane 6, 11, 20, 31, 62, 217 P Pittsburg $75K 31 Richey, Nancy 251, 275, 281, 283 Palermo 10, 23, 59 Pivovarova, Anastasia 25 Richmond 204 Palm Beach Gardens 204 Plischke, Sylvia 217 Rimini $75K 24 Palm Springs 203 Po/Johnson 261 Rinaldi, Kathy 204 see also Indian Wells Poitiers $75K 2006 11 Rittner, Barbara 217 Pan Pacific 8, 9, 13, 48, 198, 199, 200, Portoroz 10, 27, 46 Rodina, Evgenia 31 201, 202, 203, 204 Potter, Barbara 203, 281, 283 Rodionova, Anastasia 6, 19, 28, 149, Pandzic, Jelena 31 Pous Tio, Laura 18, 217 217 Panova, Tatiana 216 Poutchek, Tatiana 18, 144, 217 Rodionova/Savchuk 30 Papadaki, Christina 216 Poutchek/Rodionova 29 Roland Garros 8, 9, 20, 32, 33, 36, 47, Paris 8, 9, 53, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202 Poutchek/Yakimova 18 150, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, Parmentier, Pauline 6, 10, 20, 24, 25, Poutchkova, Olga 18, 31, 217 204 27, 29, 30, 40, 216 Prague 10, 18 Rolle, Ahsha 18, 19, 25

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Rome 8, 9, 19, 49, 150, 198, 199, 200, Sawamatsu, Kazuko Sprem, Karolina 219 201, 202, 203, 204 see Kiyomura/Sawamatsu Srebotnik, Katarina 2, 3, 5, 7, 27, 58, Rome $100K 18 Schaul, Claudine 218 65, 66, 68, 70, 91, 93, 140, 141, 142, Ruano Pascual, Virginia 141, 142, Scheepers, Chanelle 19, 22 143, 145, 148, 164, 173, 174, 175, 143, 145, 149, 162, 199, 206, 217, Schett, Barbara 281, 283 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, 240, 270 Schiavone, Francesca 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 199, 206, 219 Ruano Pascual/Carbonell 261 17, 21, 23, 30, 40, 56, 62, 65, 66, 68, Srebotnik/B. Bryan 261 Ruano Pascual/Suárez 254 91, 93, 141, 144, 145, 163, 183, 218 Srebotnik/Norval 261 Rubin, Chanda 200, 201, 206, 217, Schiechtl, Tina 23, 25 Srebotnik/Sugiyama 20, 22, 25, 30, 278 Schnyder, Patty 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 19, 20, 31, 182 Rubin/Sanchez-Vicario 254 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 57, 65, 66, 68, 70, Srebotnik/Zimonjic 261 Russell, JoAnne 72, 74, 77, 79, 80, 88, 91, 93, 200, Sromova, Hana 12 see Gourlay Cawley/Russell 201, 206, 218, 275, 281, 283 Stanford 8, 9, 23, 44, 198, 199, 200, Ruzici, Virginia 204, 251 Schruff, Julia 13, 15, 24, 29, 30, 218 201, 202, 203 see also Jausovec/Ruzici Schultz-McCarthy, Brenda 18, 277 Stevenson, Alexandra 28, 219 Scottsdale 200, 201 Stewart, Bryanne 149 S Sea Island $50K 17 Stockholm 10, 24, 54 Sabatini, Gabriela 202, 203, 228, 251, Seles,Monica 198, 200, 201, 202, 203, Stosur,Samantha 6, 7, 15, 58, 65, 66, 275, 281, 283, 284, 285 218, 229, 251, 270, 274, 275, 278, 69, 91, 93, 140, 141, 142, 143, 145, see also Graf/Sabatini 281, 283, 284, 285 148, 165, 174, 175, 177, 181, 183, Safarova, Lucie 2, 5, 7, 13, 17, 55, 62, Seoul 10, 28, 60 199, 206, 219, 242, 286 65, 66, 68, 73, 86, 91, 93, 99, 217 Sequera, Milagros 6, 10, 14, 17, 19, see also Raymond/Stosur Safina,Dinara 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 16, 40, 218 Stosur/Hanley 261 19, 22, 29, 39, 55, 65, 66, 68, 72, 73, Serna, Magui 218 Stove, Betty 270, 281, 283 74, 75, 88, 91, 93, 140, 141, 143, Serra Zanetti, Adriana 218 see also Durr/Stove 145, 148, 162, 183, 200, 206, 217 Serra Zanetti, Antonella 218 see also King/Stove see also Déchy/Safina Sfar, Selima 18, 21 see also Navratilova/Stove Safina/Srebotnik 12, 147 Sharapova,Maria 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, Stove/Turnbull 254 Saguenay $50K 14 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, 31, Strasbourg 10, 20, 51 Saint Gaudens $50K 20 32, 39, 57, 65, 66, 68, 72, 73, 74, 76, Stratton Mountain 202 Saint Paul $50K 14 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 91, 93, Strycova, Barbora 219 Saint Raphael $50K 30 108, 124, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, Stubbs,Rennae 140, 141, 142, 143, Salerni, Maria Emilia 19, 24, 217 132, 133, 134, 136, 137, 198, 200, 145, 148, 165, 183, 199, 206, 242, San Antonio 202, 203 206, 218, 230, 251, 270, 274, 275, 277 San Diego 8, 9, 24, 32, 57, 198, 199, 281, 283 Stubbs/Palmer 261 200, 201, 202, 203 Shaughnessy 6, 10, 18, 21, 40, 140, Stubbs/Woodbridge 261 San Diego $50K 2006 12 141, 143, 145, 149, 164, 183, 206, Stuttgart 8, 9, 28, 33, 36, 47, 198, 199, San Francisco $50K 30 218, 286 200 Sanchez Lorenzo, Maria 217 ’s-Hertogenbosch 10, 22, 44 Suárez, Paola 141, 145, 148, 165, 199, Sanchez, Olivia 23, 26 Shriver, Pam 203, 204, 266, 268, 269, 206, 219, 243, 270 Sanchez-Vicario, Arantxa 199, 201, 270, 281, 283, 285, 286 Suarez Navarro, Carla 24 202, 203, 217, 229, 241, 251, 266, see also Navratilova/Shriver Suarez Navarro/Yakimova 24 270, 274, 277, 281, 283, 284, 285, Shriver/Zvereva 254 Sucha, Martina 219 286 Shulaeva, Ekaterina 29 Sugiyama, Ai 6, 7, 28, 59, 65, 66, 69, see also Novotna/Sanchez-Vicario Shvedova, Yaroslava 6, 10, 14, 40, 91, 93, 140, 141, 143, 145, 149, 166, see also Rubin/Sanchez-Vicario 218 173, 176, 178, 179, 183, 199, 200, Sanchez-Vicario/Palmer 261 Sidot, Anne-Gaëlle 219 206, 219, 244, 286 Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova 254 Skavronskaia, Lioudmila 20 see also Halard-Decugis/Sugiyama Santangelo,Mara 5, 7, 13, 14, 21, 56, Smashnova, Anna 200, 206, 219 Sugiyama/Bhupathi 261 78, 91, 93, 140, 142, 143, 145, 148, Smith, Anne 266, 268, 269, 270 Sugiyama/Srebotnik 147 163, 180, 183, 193, 199, 206, 217 see also Kathy Jordan/Anne Smith Sukova, Helena 203, 204, 245, 266, see also Molik/Santangelo see also Navratilova/Smith 269, 270, 277, 281, 283, 285, 286 Santangelo/Srebotnik 16, 147 Smylie, Elizabeth see also Hingis/Sukova Savchenko, Larisa see also Jordan/Smylie see also Kohde-Kilsch/Sukova see also Neiland, Larisa Snyder, Tara 219 see also Novotna/Sukova Savchenko/Zvereva 254 Spears, Abigail 12, 24, 25, 219 see also Sanchez-Vicario/Sukova Savchuk, Olga 14, 24, 30, 217 Spirlea, Irina 201, 202, 219, 281, 283 Sukova/Suk 261

WTA Statistical Abstract ©2007 Robert Waltz Index Sun Shengnan 149 V V. Williams/Gimelstob 261 Sun Tiantian 140, 143, 145, 148, 166, Williams/Williams 254, 268 Vaidisova,Nicole 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 206, 219 Wimbledon 8, 9, 22, 33, 36, 60, 150, 16, 30, 31, 60, 65, 66, 69, 72, 77, 78, Sun/Tu 21 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 88, 91, 93, Sun/Yan 29, 146 Woerle, Kathrin 23, 187 124, 126, 128, 129, 130, 133, 134, Surabaya 201 Wozniacki, Caroline 6, 13, 15, 16, 29, 220 Svensson, Åsa (Carlsson) 219 221 Vakulenko, Julia 5, 15, 18, 31, 62, 65, Sydney 8, 9, 12, 44, 198, 199, 200, Wozniak, Aleksandra 11, 12, 14, 19, 66, 69, 70, 73, 74, 88, 91, 93, 99, 201, 202, 203, 204 24, 30, 221 220 Sydney Indoors 204 Van Roost, Dominique (Monami) 220 Szatmari, Agnes 25 X Vancouver $50K 25 Szavay, Agnes 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 17, 19, Xie Yan-Ze 27 Vento-Kabchi, Maria 220 23, 25, 27, 28, 39, 59, 65, 66, 69, 70, Vesnina, Elena 6, 17, 26, 29, 144, 145, 75, 76, 79, 81, 83, 84, 89, 91, 93, Y 149, 168, 220 143, 145, 149, 167, 183, 200, 219 Vinci, Roberta 6, 10, 12, 15, 26, 40, Yakimova, Anastasia 11, 16, 17, 18, Szavay/Uhlirova 15, 17, 23, 147, 182 144, 183, 220 26, 27, 149 Yan Zi 6, 25, 29, 62, 98, 140, 141, T Virginia Slims Championships 203, 204 142, 143, 145, 148, 168, 183, 206, Takao, Erika 18, 19 Vogele, Stefanie 23 221, 247 Talaja, Silvija 219 Voracova, Renata 21, 24, 26, 144, 148 Yan/Zheng 16, 20, 146, 182, 254 Tampa 202, 203, 204 Voracova/Zahlavova Strycova 23, 30 Yi Jing-Qian 221 Tanasugarn 11, 31, 219 Voskoboeva, Galina 21, 24, 144 Yuan Meng 11, 31 Taoyuan $50K 31 Tarabini/Frana 261 W Z Tashkent 10, 29 Wade, Virginia 251, 270, 275, 281, Zagreb $50K 21 Tauziat, Nathalie 201, 202, 219, 281, 283, 285 Zagreb $75K+H 19, 59 283 see also Court/Wade Zahlavova Strycova, Barbora 21, 26 Taylor, Sarah 219 Waikoloa $50K 13 Zahlavova, Sandra 23, 187 Teeguarden, Pam Wang Shi-Ting 201, 202 Zakopalova, Klara (Koukalova) 6, 12, see also Mariskova/Teeguarden Warsaw 8, 9, 17, 47, 198, 199, 200 17, 18, 20, 21, 30, 221 Tegart Dalton, Judy 263, 270 Wartusch, Patricia 220 Zec Peskiric, Masa 16 see also Casals/Tegart Dalton Washington 202, 203, 204 Zhang Shuai 21 see also Court/Tegart Dalton Washington $75K 24 Zhao Yijing 27 Temesvari, Andrea 204 Washington, Mashona 220 Zheng Jie 7, 60, 91, 93, 140, 141, 142, see also Navratilova/Temesvari Weingärtner, Marlene 220 143, 145, 148, 168, 183, 206, 221, Testud, Sandrine 201, 220 White, Robin 247 Tetreault, Valerie 20 see also Fernandez/White see also Yan/Zheng Thyssen, Nicole 18 Wickmayer, Yanina 31 Zlin $50K 21 Tokyo $50K 27 Widjaja, Angelique 220 Zuluaga, Fabiola 221 Tomanova, Renata Widmer, Gaelle 20 Zürich 8, 9, 30, 33, 36, 47, 198, 199, see also Nagelson/Tomanova Williams, Serena 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 Torrens Valero, Cristina 220 16, 29, 39, 60, 62, 65, 66, 69, 70, 72, Zvereva, Natasha 201, 202, 203, 221, Torrent $50K 17 73, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 91, 93, 248, 267, 268, 269, 270, 277, 281, Troy $50K 29 102, 108, 111, 124, 126, 127, 128, 283, 286 Tu, Meilen 6, 15, 26, 31, 143, 145, 129, 130, 132, 133, 134, 136, 137, see also Fernandez/Zvereva 183, 220 168, 198, 199, 200, 201, 206, 220, see also Hingis/Zvereva Tulyaganova, Iroda 220 230, 246, 251, 267, 268, 269, 270, see also Neiland/Zvereva Turnbull, Wendy 267, 281, 283, 285 274, 275, 276, 278, 281, 283, 285 see also Savchenko/Zvereva see also Casals/Turnbull S. Williams/Mirnyi 261 see also Shriver/Zvereva see also Reid/Turnbull Williams, Venus 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, Zvonareva, Vera 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 16, 27, see also Stove/Turnbull 16, 22, 26, 28, 29, 39, 40, 60, 62, 65, 28, 31, 61, 62, 65, 66, 69, 72, 73, 74, 76, 88, 91, 93, 141, 145, 169, 221, U 66, 69, 70, 72, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 84, 85, 89, 91, 93, 104, 111, 124, 126, 278 8, 9, 26, 33, 36, 47, 150, U. S. Open 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 134, 136, Zvonareva/B. Bryan 261 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 168, 198, 200, 201, 206, 221, 230, 140, 143, 145, Uhlirova, Vladimira 246, 251, 267, 268, 269, 270, 274, 149, 167, 183, 193 275, 278, 281, 283, 284, 285