Panel Discussion: Private Equity As a Partner

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Panel Discussion: Private Equity As a Partner Panel Discussion: Private Equity as a Partner May 8, 2019 Discussion Topics Brady Ware Capital Overview M&A Market Overview Private Equity Overview Trends in the Industry Private Equity Benefits & Challenges Panel Discussion Brady Ware Capital Overview Brady Ware Capital, LLC – Investment Banking Advisory Overview Brady Ware Capital Team Cliff Bishop President Office: Dayton P: (937) 913-2538 E: [email protected] Roger Furrer Director Office: Dayton P: (937) 913-2565 E: [email protected] Stephen Ford Director 150+ Office: Columbus 22 Years P: (614) 384-8423 BWC Founded in Combined Years E: [email protected] 1997 of Experience Keith Warner Manager Invaluable Connections Broad Industry Experience Office: Dayton Affiliate of Brady Ware & Industrial P: (937) 913-2539 Company, a regional accounting Business Services E: [email protected] firm with 145+ employees and 4 Technology Manufacturing locations Grant Kramer Consumer Products Strategic Relationship with Duff & Associate Financial Services Phelps, LLC, an international Healthcare Office: Dayton investment banking firm with over Retail P: (937) 913-2516 70 offices and 3,300 employees E: [email protected] Brady Ware Capital, LLC 4 Brady Ware Capital Additions Brady Ware Capital continues to grow with two additions to the team in 2019. Stephen Ford Grant Kramer Director Associate Columbus, OH Dayton, OH Mergers & Acquisitions Mergers & Acquisitions Capital Raising Valuation Services Brady Ware Capital, LLC 5 Brady Ware Capital Services ▪ Brady Ware Capital has extensive experience working with middle-market companies to support an array of corporate objectives through our services and solutions listed below: Financial Advisory Services Investment Banking Corporate Finance Transaction Services Sell-side and buy-side M&A Consulting services and business analysis In conjunction with Brady Ware & Company, Specialty focus on lower-middle-market, including: provide a variety of services relating to a transaction including: privately-owned companies Cash Flow Tax due diligence and structuring Minority and majority recapitalizations of Debt Service Capacity debt and equity Due diligence, accounting-related work, Divisional/Customer Profitability and Quality of Earnings reports Strategic advisory and valuation services Return on Equity Brady Ware Capital, LLC 6 Brady Ware Capital, LLC – Selected Transactions Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Buy Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by Financial advisor to Financial advisor to Financial advisor to Ferco Financial advisor to Absocold The Retirement Plan Financial advisor to Vistech Financial advisor to Remington Steel, Inc. Aerospace Group Corporation Company, LLC Manufacturing Solutions C.H. Ellis Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Senior Debt Advisor has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by Provided financial advisory Financial advisor to Financial advisor to Quest Financial advisor to Financial advisor to Strategic Financial advisor to services to One10 regarding Qualitronics, Inc. Information Systems Cardboard Heroes Marketing, Inc. Composite Advantage senior debt providers Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Sell Side Advisor Buy Side Advisor Senior Debt Advisor has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has been acquired by has acquired Provided financial advisory services to Russell Cellular Financial advisor to 3 Sigma Financial advisor to Physician Financial advisor to Power Financial advisor to Invotec Financial advisor to regarding senior debt Corporation Technology Partners Services, LLC Engineering, Inc Russell Cellular providers Brady Ware Capital, LLC 7 Duff & Phelps Overview Overview Corporate Finance We are the largest We Perform: . M&A Advisory . Financial Sponsors Group independent global . Over 10,000 engagements annually for over 5,000 investment banking and clients . Fairness and Solvency Opinions . Restructuring Advisory valuation services firm . Over 6,000 valuation advisory engagements for more . Private Placement of Debt and than 1,700 clients Equity 3,300+ Employees . Portfolio valuation advisory services for 70% of top-tier . Transaction Advisory Services Serving clients globally through private equity firms Valuation . Over 1,000 transaction opinions for $2 trillion in deal 70+ Offices and Affiliates value since 2005 . Financial Reporting Valuation In North America, Latin America, . Nearly 400 M&A transactions over the last five years . Tax Services Europe, and Asia . Transfer Pricing . Fixed Asset Management and Strong Global Presence and Capabilities Insurance Solutions . Real Estate Services North America . Alternate Asset Advisory . 1,500+ Total Professionals . 200+ Corporate Finance DLMC Professionals Europe . Disputes and Investigations . 1,500+ Total Professionals . Legal Management Consulting . 250+ Corporate Finance Compliance and Regulatory Consulting Professionals Asia . Compliance Consulting . 250+ Total Professionals . Regulatory Consulting . 10+ Corporate Finance Professionals . Risk Consulting and Infrastructure . Regulatory Tax Advisory . Business Services Worldwide reach bolstered by globally focused ownership group Brady Ware Capital, LLC 8 8 M&A Market Overview BWC Market Observations Healthy Economic Backdrop Driving Strong Potential Turning Points in the Market Appetite for Acquisitions . Strong pressure to deploy . More sellers coming to market abundant capital for the right . Rising interest rates and stock deals (more buyers than sellers) market volatility S&P 500 companies are . 2020 election holding approximately $2 . Strong economic expansion trillion in cash entering 10th year Private equity firms are holding . Unknown events, e.g. tariffs, over $850 billion in committed geopolitical risks, etc. capital . Competitive and complex markets require companies to look for acquisitions to stay ahead . Low interest rate environment . Level of due diligence is high . Private equity is available to lower middle market companies . Many entrepreneurs remain “stuck” . Solid valuations that reflect business fundamentals Brady Ware Capital, LLC 10 Lower Middle Market Deal Statistics Source:Pitchbook Source:Pitchbook Brady Ware Capital, LLC 11 Private Equity Overview Private Equity Overview- A Snapshot Source: Prequin Differentiating Factors Sources of Capital Size Public and Private Pension Funds Specialties Qualified Individuals Services Endowment Funds Experience Insurance Companies Preferred Transaction Structures Investment Advisors & Money Management Firms Industries of Interest Sovereign Wealth Funds Locations of Interest Charitable Foundations Fund of Funds Brady Ware Capital, LLC 13 Private Equity Overview- Acquisition Objectives Goals & Objectives • Encourage owners and management to re-invest in the business to align long-term interests • Grow through strategic initiatives: Add employees to facilitate expansion Improve and increase service and product offerings Increase market share through organic growth and acquisitions Enter new markets • Increase efficiencies and optimize operations • Sell the business when strategically optimal Brady Ware Capital, LLC 14 Trends in the Industry Private Equity Committed Capital Significant Private Equity Capital Remains Available Approximately $855 billion of private equity capital remained unallocated at the end of the fourth quarter in 2018. $450 $855 $900 $400 $800 $350 $700 $300 $600 $250 $500 $200 $400 billions) $150 $300 ($billions) $100 $200 Capital Raised ($ $50 $100 $182 $106 $150 $158 $285 $281 $255 $312 $326 $346 $0 $0 CumulativeOverhang 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Dry Powder Capital Raised Source:Pitchbook Brady Ware Capital, LLC 16 Private Equity Deal Statistics Private Equity Deal Value and Count Continue to Increase The number of deals and total deal value continue to rise at a robust pace. Source:Pitchbook Brady Ware Capital, LLC 17 Private Equity Deal Statistics Cont. Private Equity Exit Activity Remains Moderate Increasing average hold times for portfolio companies is decreasing the amount of sales per year. Source:Pitchbook Brady Ware Capital, LLC 18 Private Equity Add-on Acquisitions Add-On Acquisitions Continue to Rise Acquisitions to expand current portfolio companies continue to increase as a percentage of total buyout activity. Source:Pitchbook Brady Ware Capital, LLC 19 Private Equity Benefits & Challenges Private Equity Benefits and Challenges Benefits Challenges Equity & Growth Capital Entrepreneurs as Employees • Liquidity and diversification for the owner • Transition from owner to employee • Growth capital to expand the business Transfer of Duties Potential for Loss of Jobs • Allows owner to focus on the business • Redundancy resulting in job loss- attributes he/she enjoys typically in administrative departments Expertise Increased Leverage • Private Equity can bring invaluable • Use of leveraged buyouts is a common expertise to grow the business practice and can put pressure on future cash flows Brady Ware Capital, LLC 21 Panel Discussion Our Panelists Jim Whalen John Jacinto Pete Munson Chairman and CEO of Hartzell President & CEO Managing Director Vistech Manufacturing Solutions Cardinal Equity Partners Former CEO of GEMCITY Engineering and Manufacturing Brady Ware Capital, LLC 23.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Private Equity in the Healthcare Market June 2019 Table of Contents
    UNDERSTANDING PRIVATE EQUITY IN THE HEALTHCARE MARKET JUNE 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. BCA Introduction 1 II. Healthcare Market Dynamics 8 III. What is Private Equity? 13 IV. What is a Recapitalization? 17 V. Appendix 20 I. BCA INTRODUCTION BCA IS ONE OF THE LARGEST HEALTHCARE BOUTIQUE INVESTMENT BANKS KEY FACTS 19 $6.4 billion 1 PARTNER-OWNED Total Investment Bankers Total Transaction Value 90% 10.9x 2 RELATIONSHIP-DRIVEN Closure Rate Avg. EBITDA Mult. For Healthcare Services Deals Closed in 2018 3 HEALTHCARE-FOCUSED 100 $85 million Total Transactions Closed Average Transaction Size 4 RESULTS-ORIENTED RELEVANT HEALTHCARE SERVICES TRANSACTIONS Recapitalization Sell-Side Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization RecapitalizationSell-Side Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Led By Led By Led By Sell-Side Advisory Recapitalization Recapitalization Sell-Side Advisory Led by Led by Led by Led By to Led by Led By to UnitrancheRecapitalization Debt RecapitalizationGrowth Equity RecapitalizationSell-Side Buy Side Recapitalization Sell-Side Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Recapitalization Acquired Recapitalization Debt-Private placement Equity Investment Sell-Side Advisory Recapitalization Led By Led By Led By Sell-Side Advisory Led by Led by Led By to Led by to $113,000,000 1 OUR HEALTHCARE INVESTMENT BANKING TEAM EXTENSIVE INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCED INVESTMENT BANKERS 2 3 DEEP BENCH 1 TRANSACTION EXPERIENCE
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Markets
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities Capital Markets OCTOBER 2017 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities Capital Markets Report to President Donald J. Trump Executive Order 13772 on Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System Steven T. Mnuchin Secretary Craig S. Phillips Counselor to the Secretary Staff Acknowledgments Secretary Mnuchin and Counselor Phillips would like to thank Treasury staff members for their contributions to this report. The staff’s work on the report was led by Brian Smith and Amyn Moolji, and included contributions from Chloe Cabot, John Dolan, Rebekah Goshorn, Alexander Jackson, W. Moses Kim, John McGrail, Mark Nelson, Peter Nickoloff, Bill Pelton, Fred Pietrangeli, Frank Ragusa, Jessica Renier, Lori Santamorena, Christopher Siderys, James Sonne, Nicholas Steele, Mark Uyeda, and Darren Vieira. iii A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities • Capital Markets Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 Scope of This Report 3 Review of the Process for This Report 4 The U.S. Capital Markets 4 Summary of Issues and Recommendations 6 Capital Markets Overview 11 Introduction 13 Key Asset Classes 13 Key Regulators 18 Access to Capital 19 Overview and Regulatory Landscape 21 Issues and Recommendations 25 Equity Market Structure 47 Overview and Regulatory Landscape 49 Issues and Recommendations 59 The Treasury Market 69 Overview and Regulatory Landscape 71 Issues and Recommendations 79
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Guide to Direct Listings
    January 8, 2021 A CURRENT GUIDE TO DIRECT LISTINGS To Our Clients and Friends: Over the course of December 2019, Gibson Dunn published its “Current Guide to Direct Listings” and “An Interim Update on Direct Listing Rules” discussing, among other things, the direct listing as an evolving pathway to the public capital markets and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rejection of a proposal by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to permit a privately held company to conduct a direct listing in connection with a primary offering, respectively. The NYSE continued to revise its proposal in consultation with the SEC and, on August 26, 2020, the SEC approved an amendment to the NYSE’s proposal that will permit primary offerings in connection with direct listings. The August 26 order, which would have become effective 30 days after being published in the Federal Register, was stayed by the SEC on September 1, 2020 in response to a notice from the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) that it intended to file a petition for the SEC to review the SEC’s approval. On December 22, 2020, the SEC issued its final approval of the NYSE’s proposed rules. Consequently, Gibson Dunn has updated and republished its Current Guide to Direct Listings to reflect today’s landscape, including an overview of certain issues to monitor as direct listing practice evolves included as Appendix I hereto. Direct Listings: An evolving pathway to the public capital markets. Direct listings have increasingly been gaining attention as a means for a private company to go public.
    [Show full text]
  • The Capital Markets Industry the Times They Are A-Changin’
    THE CAPITAL MARKETS INDUSTRY THE TIMES THEY ARE A-CHANGIN’ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The past five years have seen unprecedented The success of market participants will depend change in global capital markets. Buy-side on how well they position themselves to and sell-side participants, custodians, market respond to these challenges. They will need infrastructure and financial technology to retain the flexibility to deal with ongoing providers have all had to reassess their uncertainty but also identify their role in strategies, business models and risk the medium-term. In this paper, we pose frameworks. Today we find ourselves at a three questions. critical juncture. A new structure for the capital markets industry is emerging, however a great Addressing these questions will be critical for deal of uncertainty remains. all capital markets participants. 1. Where will opportunities be created Regulation continues to drive much of and lost? the change. The move towards greater transparency, less leverage and improved 2. What risks are emerging? governance is broadly welcomed across the 3. Who is positioned to meet the industry’s industry. However, while some regulations wide-ranging needs in 2020 and beyond? have been chewed and digested, in many places policy and regulatory requirements are still moving targets. Where will opportunities be created and lost? On top of regulation, shifting investor demands, rapid evolution in and increased Market and regulatory forces are reshaping dependence on technology, emergence of new the industry. Economic pressure, constrained risks and ever more interconnectedness are financial resources, greater scrutiny of all substantially affecting the capital markets conduct and conflicts, evolving client needs, value chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sell-Side Reccomendation Reports on Stock Returns
    REVISTA EVIDENCIAÇÃO CONTÁBIL & FINANÇAS João Pessoa, v.5, n.3, p.22-36, set./dez. 2017. ISSN 2318-1001 DOI:10.18405/recfin20170302 Available on: http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/recfin IMPACT OF SELL-SIDE RECCOMENDATION REPORTS ON STOCK RETURNS Bruno Sun1 Bachelor of Administration by University of São Paulo (USP) [email protected] Liliam Sanchez Carrete PhD of Administration by University of São Paulo (USP) Teacher at University of São Paulo (USP) [email protected] Rosana Tavares PhD of Administration by University of São Paulo (USP) Teacher at University of São Paulo (USP) [email protected] ABSTRACT Objective: this research aims to investigate the impact of sell-side analysts’ reports on stock returns. Foundation: it is inserted in equity investment analysts research contextualized in the Market Efficiency Theory which defines that in efficient markets the market prices reflects all the relevant information of its intrinsic price. Method: this investigation is based on the event study methodology, which event date is the publication of the recommendation report. The abnormal return obtained for the event date and the cumulative abnormal return is obtained from the date of publication of the recommendation for 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Results: results obtained were consistent in signal with the first hypothesis that abnormal return is positive for each one of the terms from the event date (1 day to 3 months) for recommendation of purchase and strong purchase. On the other hand, the abnormal return was all negative with statistical significance for sale recommendations in favor of the second hypothesis which comprises that the abnormal return is negative for each of the deadlines for the sell recommendations and strong sell.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Institutional Investors Interact with Sell-Side Analysts?
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – May/June 2018 Volume 34, Number 3 How Do Institutional Investors Interact With Sell-Side Analysts? Grace Il Joo Kang, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore Yong Keun Yoo, Korea University Business School, South Korea Seung Min Cha, Kyonggi University, South Korea ABSTRACT This paper examines how institutional investors interact with sell-side analysts (hereafter, SSAs) in Korean stock market. In particular, we examine the role of institutional investors as a more sophisticated mechanism which incorporates sell-side analysts’ stock recommendation, target price, and earnings forecast more rapidly than individual investors do. Moreover, we examine whether institutional investors differentiate the quality of sell-side analysts’ information. By using a sample of 1,421 firm-year observations in Korean stock market during 2001–2011, we find that the change of institutional investor’s ownership has a significantly positive association with the level of equity value estimates based on SSAs’ earnings forecasts relative to stock prices and their stock recommendation which are considered as SSAs’ indicator of stock market’s mispricing. In addition, we find that only when SSAs provide more accurate earnings forecasts, institutional investors incorporate SSA’s information into their stock trading. Thus, we conclude that institutional investors in Korean stock market contribute to the enhancement of stock market efficiency by incorporating SSAs’ information into their stock trading more rapidly than individual investors. Our findings add to the literature by shedding a light on the unobserved interaction among more sophisticated stock market participants, such as institutional investors and sell-side analysts. Keywords: Sell-Side Analyst; Institutional Ownership; Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts; Target Prices; Stock Recommendations I.
    [Show full text]
  • ENHANCED SCRUTINY on the BUY-SIDE Afra Afsharipour and J
    ENHANCED SCRUTINY ON THE BUY-SIDE Afra Afsharipour and J. Travis Laster** Empirical studies of acquisitions consistently find that public company bidders often overpay for targets, imposing significant losses on bidder shareholders. Numerous studies have connected bidder overpayment with managerial agency costs and behavioral biases that reflect management self-interest. For purposes of corporate law, these concerns implicate the behavior of fiduciaries—the officers and directors of the acquiring entity—and raise questions about whether those fiduciaries are fulfilling their duty of loyalty. To address comparable sell-side concerns, the Delaware courts developed an intermediate standard of review known as enhanced scrutiny. There has been little exploration, however, of whether the rationales for applying enhanced scrutiny to the actions of sell-side fiduciaries extend to comparable fiduciaries on the buy-side. This Article addresses this long-neglected question. Drawing upon the history of Delaware jurisprudence on enhanced scrutiny, it argues that enhanced scrutiny should extend to the decisions of buy-side fiduciaries. The Article also recognizes that, although doctrinally coherent, applying enhanced scrutiny to buy-side decisions would open the door to well-documented stockholder litigation pathologies that have undermined the effectiveness of enhanced scrutiny for sell-side decisions. To address these pathologies, the Delaware * Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Professor of Law & Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall Research Scholar, University of California, Davis School of Law. ** Vice Chancellor, Delaware Court of Chancery. For helpful comments and conversations, we thank the participants in the Fifth Annual Corporate and Securities Workshop (2017) held at UCLA School of Law, the Tulane Corporate and Securities Law Conference (2018), the Utah Law School Faculty Workshop (2018), and Jill Fisch, Cathy Hwang, Tom Joo, Therese Maynard, Steven Davidoff Solomon, Diego Valderrama and Urska Velikonja.
    [Show full text]
  • FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 Fintech Meets Alternative Investments
    FT PARTNERS FINTECH INDUSTRY RESEARCH Alternative Investments FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Innovation in a Burgeoning Asset Class March 2020 DRAFT ©2020 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Alternative Investments FT Partners | Focused Exclusively on FinTech FT Partners’ Advisory Capabilities FT Partners’ FinTech Industry Research Private Capital Debt & Raising Equity Sell-Side / In-Depth Industry Capital Buy-Side Markets M&A Research Reports Advisory Capital Strategic Structuring / Consortium Efficiency Proprietary FinTech Building Advisory FT Services FINTECH Infographics Partners RESEARCH & Board of INSIGHTS Anti-Raid Advisory Directors / Advisory / Monthly FinTech Special Shareholder Committee Rights Plans Market Analysis Advisory Sell-Side Valuations / LBO Fairness FinTech M&A / Financing Advisory Opinion for M&A Restructuring Transaction Profiles and Divestitures Named Silicon Valley’s #1 FinTech Banker Ranked #1 Most Influential Person in all of Numerous Awards for Transaction (2016) and ranked #2 Overall by The FinTech in Institutional Investors “FinTech Excellence including Information Finance 40” “Deal of the Decade” • Financial Technology Partners ("FT Partners") was founded in 2001 and is the only investment banking firm focused exclusively on FinTech • FT Partners regularly publishes research highlighting the most important transactions, trends and insights impacting the global Financial Technology landscape. Our unique insight into FinTech is a direct result of executing hundreds of transactions in the sector combined with over 18 years of exclusive focus on Financial Technology FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments I. Executive Summary 5 II. Industry Overview and The Rise of Alternative Investments 8 i. An Introduction to Alternative Investments 9 ii. Trends Within the Alternative Investment Industry 23 III. Executive Interviews 53 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal Advisory / Global
    Protect what is valuable Deal Advisory / Global We can help you achieve successful Sell Side transactions. Supporting growth through active portfolio management and successful divestments. Throughout this document, “KPMG” [“we,” “our,” and “us”] refers to KPMG International, a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms operating under the KPMG name, and/or to any one or more of such firms, and/or to KPMG Deal Advisory professionals working in KPMG member firms around the globe. KPMG International provides no client services. / 1 Your vision. Our proven Learn more about the six critical stages of capabilities. a divestiture and how we can help deliver portfolio value throughout the lifecycle. When it comes to selling a business, every decision counts. Our integrated team of specialists helps you make the right decisions throughout the sales process, combining Integrated services across deep sector knowledge and the foresight that the transaction lifecycle comes from experience. 1Portfolio Strategy 2Exit Options 3Prepare for Exit We take a practical 4 Deal Execution 5Pre-Close approach to 6Post-Close enhancing value. This document reflects a wide range of services and does not differentiate between those services that are permissible or not permissible for KPMG audit clients and their affiliates. Real results achieved by In addition, certain software and technology services, joining integrated specialists. with third parties in service delivery, are also subject to potential independence restrictions based upon the facts and Securing the best value for a divestiture is a circumstances presented in each situation. complex process that involves gaining a more objective view of your company and a more nuanced understanding of current market conditions, as well as divining the agendas of the buyers seated across from you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stock Selection and Performance of Buy-Side Analysts
    THE STOCK SELECTION AND PERFORMANCE OF BUY-SIDE ANALYSTS Boris Groysberg, Paul M. Healy, George Serafeim Harvard Business School and Devin Shanthikumar University of California, Irvine Forthcoming: Management Science May 2012 Abstract: Prior research on equity analysts focuses almost exclusively on those employed by sell- side investment banks and brokerage houses. Yet investment firms undertake their own buy-side research and their analysts face different stock selection and recommendation incentives than their sell-side peers. We examine the selection and performance of stocks recommended by analysts at a large investment firm relative to those of sell-side analysts from mid-1997 to 2004. We find that the buy-side firm’s analysts issue less optimistic recommendations for stocks with larger market capitalizations and lower return volatility than their sell-side peers, consistent with their facing fewer conflicts of interest and having a preference for liquid stocks. Tests with no controls for these effects indicate that annualized buy-side Strong Buy/Buy recommendations underperform those for sell-side peers by 5.9% using market-adjusted returns and by 3.8% using four-factor model abnormal returns. However, these findings are driven by differences in the stocks recommended and their market capitalization. After controlling for these selection effects, we find no difference in the performance of the buy- and sell-side analysts’ Strong Buy/Buy recommendations. JEL classification: M41, G14, G29 Keywords: buy-side analysts, sell-side analysts,
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse Behind a Closed Door: the Investment Value of Buy-Side Research and Its Effect on Fund Trades and Performance
    A glimpse behind a closed door: The investment value of buy-side research and its effect on fund trades and performance by Michael Rebello and Kelsey Wei May 2011 (VERY PRELIMINARY: PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE) ABSTRACT We examine proprietary research produced by buy-side analysts working for a large fund management company. Their primary research output is an estimate of the expected excess return for each stock they cover (buy-side alpha). We find that, for up to one quarter, buy-side alphas and changes in buy-side alphas consistently signal investment value. Moreover, buy-side alpha changes have greater investment value than changes in consensus sell-side recommendations. Portfolio managers working for the company make trades that are consistent with changes in buy- side alphas. Moreover, when the managers trade a stock that is not covered by a buy-side analyst, their trades are consistent with changes in buy-side alpha estimates for other stocks in the same industry. Trades are more sensitive to buy-side alphas and less sensitive to changes in consensus sell-side recommendations as the fraction of the fund’s holdings covered by buy-side analysts rises. Finally, fund performance improves with reliance on buy-side research. School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson TX 75080. We alone are responsible for all errors. 1 A glimpse behind a closed door: The investment value of buy-side research and its effect on fund trades and performance ABSTRACT We examine proprietary research produced by buy-side analysts working for a large fund management company. Their primary research output is an estimate of the expected excess return for each stock they cover (buy-side alpha).
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-Side M&A – Divestitures, Trade-Sales and Mergers
    White Paper #6: Sell-Side M&A – Divestitures, Trade-sales and Mergers © Copyright 2017 Remis AS / Ketil Wig Versjon 2.1 – Oct. 2017 While buy-side M&A processes (acquisitions) are focused on alignment of strategy, integration and risk management; the sell- side M&A (divestitures and trade-sales) skill set is concentrated around negotiations and tactics. Sell-side M&A is different! Sell-side and buy-side M&A are obviously different, but this difference goes deeper than most managers realize. For acquisition processes (see White Paper #5 on Buy-side M&A), strategy alignment, post- merger integrations, approach tactics and risk management are keys to success: For divestitures and trade sales the strategic themes are secondary (although by no means irrelevant), and negotiations and tactical skills are primary success factors. While the negotiation strength of the buyers in an acquisition process is influenced by such factors as alternative acquisition targets and their Illustration #1: A model for preconditions, strategic drivers, criteria and decision levels of an M&A divestiture process options for delivering growth (including e.g. organic growth, strategic alliances etc.), it is the seller in a sell-side transaction who to a large extent defines the landscape of negotiation - and the primary tool is the The role of strategy in divestitures and trade number of qualified buyers. sales For divestitures and When the decision to divest a business has been made, the obvious trade sales the The strategic drivers when executing a sell-side transaction (excluding objective of the seller is to maximize price and terms.
    [Show full text]