CPA's Basic Guide to Mergers & Acquisitions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mergers & Acquisitions
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS INTRODUCTION Why merge? Why sell? 1. A division of a company might no longer fit into larger corp’s plans, so corp sells division 2. Infighting between owners of corp. Sell and split proceeds 3. Incompetent management or ownership 4. Need money 5. Business is declining 6. Industry-specific conditions 7. Economies of scale BASIC DEFINITIONS: MERGER: Owners of separate, roughly equal sized firms pool their interests in a single firm. Surviving firm takes on the assets and liabilities of the selling firm. PURCHASE: Purchasing firm pays for all the assets or all the stock of the selling firm. Distinction between a purchase and a merger depends on the final position of the shareholders of the constituent firms. TAKEOVER: A stock purchase offer in which the acquiring firm buys a controlling block of stock in the target. This enables purchasers to elect the board of directors. Both hostile and friendly takeovers exist. FREEZE-OUTS (also SQUEEZE-OUTS or CASH-OUTS): Transactions that eliminate minority SH interests. HORIZONTAL MERGERS: Mergers between competitors. This may create monopolies. Government responds by enacting Sherman Act and Clayton Act VERTICAL MERGERS: Mergers between companies which operate at different phases of production (e.g. GM merger with Fisher Auto Body.) Vertical mergers prevents a company from being held up by a supplier or consumer of goods. LEVERAGED BUYOUTS (LBOs): A private group of investors borrows heavily to finance the purchase control of an ongoing business. RECAPITALIZATIONS: Does not involve the combination of two separate entities. Here, a firm reshuffles its capital structure. In a SWAP, the corp takes back outstanding equity stocks in return for other types of securities (usually long term bonds or preferred stock) RESTRUCTURINGS: This term refers to a corporation’s changing form to downsize their operations. -
Boston University Journal of Science & Technology
4 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 1 January 23, 1997 Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law Symposium Financing the Biotech Industry: Can the Risks Be Reduced? Ronald Cass, Joshua Lerner, Farah H. Champsi, Stanley C. Erck, Jonathan R. Beckwith, Leslie E. Davis, Henri A. Termeer Table of Contents Speeches..........................................................................................................................[1] Dean Ronald Cass.............................................................................................[1] Joshua Lerner....................................................................................................[2] Farah Champsi..................................................................................................[8] Stanley Erck.....................................................................................................[18] Jonathan Beckwith.........................................................................................[24] Leslie Davis......................................................................................................[37] Henri Termeer.................................................................................................[47] Question and Answer Session..................................................................................[60] Financing the Biotech Industry: Can the Risks Be Reduced?† Jonathan R. Beckwith, Farah H. Champsi, Leslie E. Davis,* Stanley C. Erck, Joshua Lerner, Henri A. Termeer Dean Ronald Cass: 1. The biotechnology -
IFAC – Perspectives on Cost Accounting for Governments
September 2000 IFAC Study 12 Public Sector Committee Perspectives on Cost Accounting for Government International Public Sector Study Issued by the International Federation of Accountants International Federation of Accountants 535 Fifth Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10017 United States of America Copyright © 2000 by the International Federation of Accountants. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored ina retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, with the prior written permission of the International Federation of Accountants. Information about the International Federation of Accountants and copies of this Study can be found at its internet site, http://www.ifac.org The approved text of this Study is that published in the English language. ISBN 1-887-464-60-3 PREFACE The objective of the Public Sector Committee (PSC) of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) is to develop programs aimed at improving public sector financial management and accountability. To that end, the IFAC PSC issues Standards, Guidelines, Studies and Occasional Papers. Studies are undertaken by the Committee to provide information that contributes to public sector financial reporting, accounting or auditing knowledge, and to stimulate discussion. The objectives of government are determined by the political process, and cost accounting is one of a number of tools that may be used to achieve those objectives. Although in some situations cost accounting may not be as central to achieving a particular government’s objectives as it is generally for private sector entities, it nevertheless almost always provides important information to help improve the functions of government. -
48 CFR Ch. 99 (10–1–10 Edition)
9904.415 48 CFR Ch. 99 (10–1–10 Edition) TABLE XVII—SUMMARY OF COST OF MONEY COMPUTATION ON FACILITIES CAPITAL—Continued [Cost of money included in total cost input—regular method] Computation using regular Allocated to facilities, cap- Allocation base contract, ital cost of Amount table VIII money factor, table XV Manufacturing labor ....................................................................................................... 1,210,000 .18 217,800 Technical computer time ............................................................................................... 1 280 15.57895 4,362 Cost of money related to overheads ............................................................................. .................... ........................ 236,365 Cost of money above to be included in cost input ....................................................... 236,365 ........................ ................ Cost input, table VIII ...................................................................................................... 5,369,000 ........................ ................ Cost input including cost of money ............................................................................... 5,605,365 .00096 5,381 Total cost of money on facilities capital ......................................................... .................... ........................ 241,674 1 Hours. TABLE XVIII—SUMMARY OF COST OF MONEY COMPUTATION ON FACILITIES CAPITAL [Cost of money included in total cost input—alternative method] Computation using alter- -
An Introduction to Environmental Accounting A
United States Office of Pollution EPA 742-R-95-001 Environmental Protection Prevention And Toxics June 1995 Agency (MC 7409) Washington, D.C. 20460 ) An Introduction to EPA An Introduction to Environmental Environmental Accounting Accounting As A Business As A Business Management Tool: Management Tool: Key Concepts And Terms U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Design for the Environment Program Environmental Accounting Project This paper was prepared by ICF Incorporated under EPA Contract No. 68-W2-0008, Work Assignment 82. The EPA Work Assignment Managers were Marty Spitzer and Holly Elwood. Carlos Lago served as the EPA Project Officer. The ICF Work Assignment Manager was Paul Bailey. - iii. - Acknowledgments The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would like to thank all of the individuals who took the time to review earlier drafts of this Disclaimer paper and offered their helpful comments and suggestions. Their contributions are very much appreciated. The reviewers included the following individuals: This primer refers to environmental accounting activities at Robert W. Backes, Manager Terri Goldberg Accounting Implementation and Pollution Prevention Program Control Manager several companies in North America. These examples are by no Schering-Plough Corporation Northeast Waste Management Officials’ means exhaustive of the many laudable efforts underway to implement Corinne Boone Association (NEWMOA) Advisor: Full Cost Accounting environmental accounting at firms in many different industries. Environmental and Sustainable Lou Jones, Manager Development Division Corporate Accounting Moreover, by mentioning these examples, EPA is not necessarily Ontario Hydro Caterpillar Company Rick Brenner Joseph J. Martin, CMA endorsing their approaches or terminology. Strategic Planning and Assistant Controller Prevention Division IBM Corporation EPA, Federal Facilities Enforcement Office Robert C. -
Cost Allocation and Activity-Based Costing Systems
5 CostCost AllocationAllocation andand Activity-BasedActivity-Based CostingCosting SystemsSystems LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you will be able to 1. Explain the major purposes for allocating costs. 2. Explain the relationship between activities, resources, costs, and cost drivers. 3. Use recommended guidelines to charge the variable and fixed costs of service departments to other organizational units. 4. Identify methods for allocating the central costs of an organization. 5. Use the direct, step-down, and reciprocal allocation methods to allocate service department costs to user departments. 6. Describe the general approach to allocating costs to products or services. 7. Use the physical units and relative-sales-value methods to allocate joint costs to products. 8. Use activity-based costing to allocate costs to products or services. 9. Identify the steps involved in the design and implementation of activity-based costing systems. 10. Calculate activity-based costs for cost objects. 11. Explain why activity-based costing systems are being adopted. 12. Explain how just-in-time systems can reduce non-value-added activities A university’s computer is used for teaching and for government-funded research. How much of its cost should be assigned to each task? A city creates a special police unit to investigate a series of related assaults. What is the total cost of the effort? A company uses a machine to make two different products. How much of the cost of the machine belongs to each product? These are all problems of cost allocation, the subject of this chapter. University presidents, city man- agers, corporate executives, and others all face problems of cost allocation. -
Paper-18: Business Valuation Management
Group-IV : Paper-18 : Business Valuation Management [ December ¯ 2011 ] 33 Q. 20. X Ltd. is considering the proposal to acquire Y Ltd. and their financial information is given below : Particulars X Ltd. Y Ltd. No. of Equity shares 10,00,000 6,00,000 Market price per share (Rs.) 30 18 Market Capitalization (Rs.) 3,00,00,000 1,08,00,000 X Ltd. intend to pay Rs. 1,40,00,000 in cash for Y Ltd., if Y Ltd.’s market price reflects only its value as a separate entity. Calculate the cost of merger: (i) When merger is financed by cash (ii) When merger is financed by stock. Answer 20. (i) Cost of Merger, when Merger is Financed by Cash = (Cash - MVY) + (MVY - PVY) Where, MVY = Market value of Y Ltd. PVY = True/intrinsic value of Y Ltd. Then, = (1,40,00,000 – 1,08,00,000) + (1,08,00,000 – 1,08,00,000) = Rs. 32,00,000 If cost of merger becomes negative then shareholders of X Ltd. will get benefited by acquiring Y Ltd. in terms of market value. (ii) Cost of Merger when Merger is Financed by Exchange of Shares in X Ltd. to the shareholders of Y Ltd. Cost of merger = PVXY - PVY Where, PVXY = Value in X Ltd. that Y Ltd.’s shareholders get. Suppose X Ltd. agrees to exchange 5,00,000 shares in exchange of shares in Y Ltd., instead of payment in cash of Rs. 1,40,00,000. Then the cost of merger is calculated as below : = (5,00,000 × Rs. -
Cash Flow BCAS 18: Cash Flow
BANGLADESH COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BCAS - 18 Cash Flow BCAS 18: Cash Flow BCAS 18: Cash Flow 18.1 Introduction Cash flow in a company is a very important issue from managerial perspective. Forecasting cash flows are very important for decision making purposes. Reporting cash flow related information for internal decision making process receives extra attention along with external reporting. At the same time, management of cash flows on a regular basis is an important task of treasury now-a- days. The firms need to maintain a delicate balance between holding too much cash resulting into sacrifice of profitable investment opportunities and too little cash triggering unnecessary borrowing to support daily transactions. The purpose of this standard is to consider issues in developing and using cash flow information from a forward looking perspective. Sometimes it has been observed that in spite of adequate profit in business, they are unable to meet their taxes and dividends, just because of shortage of cash. Improving cash flow is a smart move for any business. It does not matter how great the business model is, how profitable it is, or how many investors the business has lined up. The business cannot survive if it fails to manage its cash properly. Given these trends, it is becoming increasingly important that cash flow information be prepared in a consistent and reliable manner. 18.2 Objectives The standard provides a basic guideline on forecasting cash inflows and outflows, reporting of cash flow related information, analyzing cash flow data and using cash flow data in different typical situations. The standard also highlights the importance of generating accurate cash flow information timely which is very important for cash flow management. -
True Cost Accounting Inventory Report
True Cost Accounting Inventory Report July 2020 Tobias Bandel (Soil & More Impacts), Maximiliano Cortes Sotomayor (TMG Thinktank for Sustainability), Benjamin Kayatz (Soil & More Impacts), Alexander Müller (TMG Thinktank for Sustainability), Olivia Riemer (TMG Thinktank for Sustainability) and Gyde Wollesen (Soil & More Impacts). Executive Summary This research is commissioned by the Global Alliance for the Future of Food and is conducted by Soil & More Impacts and TMG Thinktank for Sustainability. This report accompanies an Inventory of evaluation framework, resources, databases, and case studies that are useful for researchers, civil society organizations, policymakers, farmers and the private sector when conducting a true cost accounting (TCA) assessment in the field of agriculture and food systems. The report includes a review and synthesis of existing frameworks and methodologies used to apply TCA across food systems, background information on the inventory of databases, and a review of existing studies that can be considered as leading examples or current good practice in the field of TCA applications in the food and agriculture sector. Finally, the report presents strategic recommendations on how to strengthen the TCA systemic approach across food systems and outlines proposed next steps for the TCA for Food Systems Accelerator. The report is based on an online survey with the TCA Community of Practice, telephone interviews with TCA experts and practitioners, as well as on an extensive literature review. For the synthesis of TCA methodologies, the TEEBAgriFood Foundation Report, the Natural Capital Protocol, the Human and Social Capital Protocol and other familiar frameworks and publications as the ISO 14008 standard for “Monetary valuation of environmental impacts and related environmental aspects” were reviewed. -
Acquisitions Driven by Stock Overvaluation: Are They Good Deals? Fangjian FU Singapore Management University, [email protected]
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Lee Kong Chian School of Business Business 8-2011 Acquisitions Driven By Stock Overvaluation: Are They Good Deals? Fangjian FU Singapore Management University, [email protected] Leming LIN University of Florida Micah OFFICER Loyola Marymount University Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research Part of the Corporate Finance Commons, and the Finance and Financial Management Commons Citation FU, Fangjian; LIN, Leming; and OFFICER, Micah. Acquisitions Driven By Stock Overvaluation: Are They Good eD als?. (2011). European Finance Association Meeting, 17-20 August 2011. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3157 This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Acquisitions Driven by Stock Overvaluation: Are They Good Deals?* Fangjian Fu Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business -
Lecture 4 (Notes by Leora Schiff) 15.649 - the Law of Mergers and Acquisitions (Spring 2003) - Prof
Lecture 4 (Notes by Leora Schiff) 15.649 - The Law of Mergers and Acquisitions (Spring 2003) - Prof. John Akula Types of Acquisitions Governed by state law: 1. Delaware a. Flexible for corporate managers b. Body of precedent 2. California a. Other end of spectrum – heavy regulations I. Statutory Merger/Consolidation A. Stock Swap Statutory Merger 1. B merges into A 2. A and B merge into C – consolidation 3. stock-for-stock merger a. shareholders of B get stock in A (or C) b. A or C absorbs assets and liabilities of B corp c. Tax free - Type A reorganization B. Cash-out Statutory Merger 1. shareholders of B receive cash, debentures or non-voting equity 2. Taxable merger C. Procedure for Statutory Merger a. BOD both A and B pass resolution approving Agreement of Merger b. A and B shareholder vote - majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote must ratify agreement c. Certificate of Merger filed with DE Secy of State to become effective on date specified d. On date, reps. of both corporations meet and close transaction D. Three Exceptions to Voting Procedures 1. small-scale merger exception 2. parent-sub merger exception 3. holding company exception E. Conditions for Closing 1. Material Adverse Condition clause – depending on terms, could choose not to close. 1 II. Asset Acquisition A. Cash-for-Assets Acquisition 1. Taxable transaction 2. A can select assets and liabilities of B 3. A shareholders do not vote on asset acquisition 4. B shareholders are cashed out 5. A corp. gets new basis in B assets based on allocation of purchase price B. -
The Role of Stock Liquidity in Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment*
The Role of Stock Liquidity in Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment* Nishant Dass Georgia Institute of Technology Email: [email protected] Sheng Huang Singapore Management University Email: [email protected] Johan Maharjan Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Email: [email protected] Vikram Nanda University of Texas at Dallas Email: [email protected] May 2016 *We thank Itay Goldstein, Todd Gormley, Jarrad Harford, and seminar participants at Singapore Management University and Tshinghua University for helpful comments. All remaining errors are our own. The Role of Stock Liquidity in Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment Abstract We examine how stock liquidity – of both acquirers and targets – affects acquisitions. We contend, relying on a simple model, that liquidity enhances acquirer stock value as an acquisition currency, especially when target stock is less liquid. Supportive of this acquisition-currency hypothesis: greater acquirer (lower target) liquidity increases acquisition likelihood and payment with stock, reduces acquisition premium, and improves acquirer announcement returns in equity deals. Our identification strategy relies on the exogenous variation in stock liquidity induced by changes in the composition of Russell-1000/2000 indices to establish causality. Consistent with the beneficial role of stock liquidity, firms take steps to improve stock liquidity prior to acquisitions. JEL classification: G30, G34 Keywords: Stock liquidity, mergers and acquisitions, Russell index reconstitution “The Covance board also discussed with Goldman Sachs [its financial advisor] the liquid market for LabCorp stock, which would allow Covance stockholders to either keep or trade the stock portion of the consideration.” From Board of Directors of Covance Inc.