Submission to the Select Committee on the Recent Allegations Relating to Conditions and Circumstances at the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Submission to the Select Committee on the Recent Allegations Relating to Conditions and Circumstances at the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru Submission to the Select Committee on the Recent Allegations relating to Conditions and Circumstances at the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru May 2015 Department of Immigration and Border Protection - Submission to the Select Committee Page 1 of 60 Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 4 Chronology of the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru ................................................................... 6 PART ONE: Framework and governance ............................................................................................... 8 Framework of regional processing ...................................................................................................... 8 Applicable Acts ................................................................................................................................ 8 Memorandum of Understanding between Australia and Nauru ...................................................... 8 Administrative Arrangements .......................................................................................................... 9 Legal Framework for transfer to Nauru ........................................................................................... 9 Legal status of transferees in Nauru ............................................................................................... 9 Governance Arrangements ............................................................................................................... 10 Forums .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Role of the Government of Nauru ................................................................................................. 11 Role of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection ..................................................... 12 PART TWO: Service provision .............................................................................................................. 14 Service provision ............................................................................................................................... 14 Support services for vulnerable transferees, including children ....................................................... 14 Supporting survivors of torture and trauma ................................................................................... 14 Psychological support programme ................................................................................................ 15 Child safeguarding protocol .......................................................................................................... 15 Working with children checks ........................................................................................................ 16 Departmental Initiatives ................................................................................................................. 16 PART THREE: Incidents and allegations .............................................................................................. 18 Follow up actions .......................................................................................................................... 18 Reporting enhancements .............................................................................................................. 19 PART FOUR: Internal and external scrutiny ......................................................................................... 20 The Moss Review .............................................................................................................................. 20 Circumstances precipitating the Moss Review ............................................................................. 21 Key findings regarding allegations ................................................................................................ 23 Other reviews and reports ................................................................................................................. 27 Response to recommendations .................................................................................................... 27 Assurance ......................................................................................................................................... 28 The Detention Assurance Team ................................................................................................... 29 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................. 30 Annexure A - Establishment of the Nauru Regional Processing Centre .............................................. 31 Annexure B - Governance Forums ....................................................................................................... 37 Department of Immigration and Border Protection - Submission to the Select Committee Page 2 of 60 Annexure C - Provision of services to transferees ................................................................................ 39 Annexure D - Regional Processing Centre Guidelines ......................................................................... 42 Annexure E - Transfers ......................................................................................................................... 48 Annexure F - Refugee status determination ......................................................................................... 52 Annexure G - Settlement of refugees ................................................................................................... 55 List of referenced attachments .............................................................................................................. 60 Department of Immigration and Border Protection - Submission to the Select Committee Page 3 of 60 Introduction The Department of Immigration and Border Protection (the Department) welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to the Select Committee on the Recent Allegations relating to Conditions and Circumstances at the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru. In late 2011 and early 2012, there were a number of incidents in which boats carrying asylum seekers to Australia sank or capsized, resulting in loss of life. The magnitude of the number of lives lost by would-be asylum seekers during the dangerous boat journey to Australia, overlaid with information regarding the number of people expected to embark on similar journeys and the likelihood of further loss of life, prompted prolonged, and at times, heated public debate. In the first seven months of 2012 alone, 7,120 illegal maritime arrivals arrived in Australia. This exceeded the total number of arrivals in 2011 and 2010. Following extended Parliamentary debate and the failure to secure the passage of a number of Bills regarding the implementation of regional processing of asylum seekers, on 28 June 2012, the then Prime Minister, the Hon Julia Gillard MP, and then Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, the Hon Chris Bowen MP, announced that the Government had invited an Expert Panel to provide a report on the best way forward for Australia to prevent asylum seekers risking their lives at sea on dangerous boat journeys to Australia. Members of the Expert Panel were Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston AC AFC (Ret’d), Paris Aristotle AM, Director of the Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture Inc. (also known as Foundation House) and Professor Michael L’Estrange AO, Director of the National Security College at the Australian National University. The report was released on 13 August 2012, making 22 recommendations and four sub- recommendations, all of which were accepted. In response to the report, the Australian Government announced the implementation of regional processing of ‘irregular maritime arrivals’ (as was the terminology at the time) who arrived in Australia on or after 13 August 2012, in Nauru and Papua New Guinea. The Nauru Regional Processing Centre accepted the first group of transferees in September 2012. Regional processing and regional resettlement arrangements are an important aspect of the Australian Government’s border policies, and are critical to saving lives of illegal maritime arrivals who attempt to travel illegally by boat to Australia. People arriving in this manner are transferred to a regional processing centre in Nauru and Papua New Guinea for their asylum claims to be assessed. The Department refers to these people as ‘transferees’ this term is used throughout the submission.1 Nauru owns and administers the Nauru Regional Processing Centre, under Nauruan law. Australia provides capacity building and funding for Government of Nauru’s operation of the centre and coordinates the contract administration process. The Department is committed to working with Nauruan authorities to ensure that people accommodated at the Nauru Regional Processing Centre are provided with a safe and 1 The Government of Nauru use the term ‘asylum seekers.’ Department of Immigration and Border Protection - Submission to the Select Committee Page 4 of 60 secure environment. The Department continues to work closely with service providers and Nauruan authorities to ensure allegations of criminal activity are fully investigated. In accordance with the Select Committee’s Terms of Reference, this submission provides an overview
Recommended publications
  • Project Safecom News and Updates Thursday, 25 January 2018
    Project SafeCom News and Updates Thursday, 25 January 2018 Support us by making periodic donations: https://www.safecom.org.au/donate.htm 1. Parents demand Aung San Suu Kyi is cut from children’s book of role models 2. Sexual harassment and assault rife at United Nations, staff claim 3. Same-sex marriage sparks push for Australian bill of rights 4. Cate Blanchett urges Davos to give refugees more compassion 5. Australia's human rights record attacked in global report for 'serious shortcomings' 6. Declassified government documents: Refugee status reforms 7. Second group of Manus Island refugees depart for US under resettlement deal 8. Second group of refugees leave Manus bound for the United States 9. MEDIA RELEASE: Nauru refugees petition against delays and exclusion from the US 10. MEDIA RELEASE: Hunger strike over detention visit restrictions continues 11. Immigration detainees launch hunger strike 12. Malcolm Turnbull, Jacinda Ardern at odds over claim New Zealand is fuelling people smuggling 13. John Birmingham: There are votes in race-baiting and that's a stain on us all 14. Joumanah El Matrah: The feared other: Peter Dutton's and Australia's pathology around race 15. Labor lambasts Dutton for 'playing to the crowd' over Melbourne crime comments 16. Legal body says rule of law threatened after Dutton's criticism of judiciary 17. Greg Barns: Time to challenge the type of politics that plays the fear card 18. Dutton refuses Senate order to release details of refugee service contracts on Manus 19. Dutton's attacks on the judiciary are anything but conservative 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Julian Burnside's Errors
    _8462 SIQ 42 Vol 21:qxd8 17/09/13 11:04 AM Page 1 ISSUE 42 AUGUST 2013 ANNE HENDERSON – Learning from Calvin Coolidge STEPHEN MATCHETT on Lincoln’s White House, democracy and power at play ROSS FITZGERALD reviews books on Bill Woodfull, Old Xaverians Football Club, Footy Town and Madeleine St John Jim Griffin, Daniel Mannix & the ABD ANONYMOUS, a study on the American firearm Asylum Seekers and the Confusion of DAVID MARR & JULIAN BURNSIDE LINDA MOTTRAM & EMMA ALBERICI in the Conservative-Free-Zone MEDIA WATCH’S Sandalista Watch with the ABC’s “Whitlam: the Lyrical” Published by The Sydney Institute 41 Phillip St. with Gerard Henderson’s Sydney 2000 Ph: (02) 9252 3366 MEDIA WATCH Fax: (02) 9252 3360 _8462 SIQ 42 Vol 21:qxd8 17/09/13 11:04 AM Page 2 The Sydney Institute Quarterly Issue 42, August 2013 l CONTENTS LINDA MOTTRAM & EMMA ALBERICI REFLECT Editorial 2 ABC CONSENSUS ABC managing director and editor-in-chief Mark Scott Why the 1920s “Roared” - likes to present himself as a vibrant media manager with Calvin Coolidge and Debt a business plan that works. This glosses over the reality a that the ABC’s business plan involves travelling to - Anne Henderson 3 Canberra with an empty case and having it loaded up with taxpayers’ funds by an obliging government. A Study on the American Firearm Despite the current financial constraints, Mark Scott - Anonymous 7 managed to receive an extra $90 million for the ABC in this year’s budget. Some funds will be spent on a Fact i Checking Unit, which will ignore errors in ABC Book Reviews programs but will focus on the alleged errors made by - Ross Fitzgerald 11 business, political parties and other organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Jottings
    Australian Society of Presentation Sisters Spring 2014 Volume 7, Issue 3 Justice Jottings We acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land on which we live. We acknowledge their deep spiritual connections to this land and we thank them for the care they have shown to Earth over thousands of years. Inside this issue: The Moses in my heart trembles, She hears God’s challenge: not quite willing to accept the prophet The ground of your being is holy. G20 and the Cries hidden in my being, Take off your shoes! of the Vulnerable 1 wondering how much it will cost Awaken your sleeping prophet. to allow the prophet to emerge. Believe in your Moses and go. Sydney Peace Prize 1 In these lines, Macrina Wiederkehr This edition shows some of today’s prophets acting captures the reluctance experienced by on their beliefs with compassion and courage. Justice Contacts’ Anne Shay, Peta Anne Molloy Meeting 1 prophets across the centuries. The Cry of the Poor and the Cry of the The Lord hears the cries Earth 2-3 of the vulnerable Reconciliation: More Bridges to Cross 4 The G20 leaders and their staffs Much less media attention focused have left, the barricades have been on Christian groups who, during Fraser Island - removed. Political analysts have several months before the Summit, Native Title Rights 4 commented on the outcomes of this met and planned ways to alert the forum and rejoiced in the peaceful- wider community to the vulnerable ness of the street rallies. Many civil people who will be most affected by society groups tried to influence the Julian Burnside AO QC the G20 outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Act 2016
    REPUBLIC OF NAURU Crimes Act 2016 ______________________________ Act No. 18 of 2016 ______________________________ TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 – PRELIMINARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1 Short title .................................................................................................... 1 2 Commencement ......................................................................................... 1 3 Application ................................................................................................. 1 4 Codification ................................................................................................ 1 5 Standard geographical jurisdiction ............................................................. 2 6 Extraterritorial jurisdiction—ship or aircraft outside Nauru ......................... 2 7 Extraterritorial jurisdiction—transnational crime ......................................... 4 PART 2 – INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................ 6 8 Definitions .................................................................................................. 6 9 Definition of consent ................................................................................ 13 PART 3 – PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY ................................................. 14 DIVISION 3.1 – PURPOSE AND APPLICATION ................................................................. 14 10 Purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Allegations of Abuse, Self-Harm and Neglect of Asylum
    Chapter 2 Allegations of abuse, neglect and self-harm 2.1 This chapter examines the abuse, neglect and self-harm alleged to have occurred at the Regional Processing Centres (RPCs) in the Republic of Nauru (Nauru) and Papua New Guinea (PNG). 2.2 These allegations are not new. Numerous allegations of misconduct and neglect, both minor and major, have been made since the establishment of the RPCs. Many of these allegations have been outlined, in detail, in previous inquiries into these and related matters. 2.3 This report is not intended to duplicate the evidence presented to previous inquiries, and should be read in conjunction with those previous reports. However, this chapter will set out the range of allegations of abuse, self-harm and neglect, and discuss the new corroborative evidence from both primary and secondary sources in regards to historical claims of abuse, as well as claims of ongoing abuse and neglect. The Nauru files 2.4 On 10 August 2016, The Guardian Australia published over 2,000 incident reports from the Nauru RPC.1 These de-identified reports, referred to by the Guardian Australia as 'the Nauru files', detail incidents which were recorded between 2013 and 2015. At the time of their release, the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (the department) stated that the reports detailed 'unconfirmed allegations or uncorroborated statements and claims' and not proven facts.2 Some of the reports contain allegations made by asylum seekers and refugees, as reported to RPC staff. Many contain accounts of incidents which staff members witnessed first-hand, or in which they were personally involved.
    [Show full text]
  • CRC in Court: the Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment
    CRC in Court: The Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment CRC in Court: The Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child was written by Patrick Geary for the Child Rights International Network (CRIN). CRIN welcomes comments, suggestions and feedback; contact us at: The Child Rights International Network, 2 Pontypool Place, East Studio, London SE1 8QF, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 20 7401 2257. Email: [email protected]; Web: www.crin.org. Published by Child Rights International Network (CRIN) East Studio 2 Pontypool Place London, SE1 8QF United Kingdom +44 20 7401 2257 www.crin.org First published 2012. © Child Rights International Network 2012 The Child Rights International Network is a charity registered in England and Wales (1125925). Registered Company No. 6653398. CRIN encourages personal and educational use of this publication and grants permission for its reproduction in this capacity where proper credit is given in good faith. For resale or commercial distribution in any other manner, prior permission must be obtained in writing. Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................4 Status of the CRC in National Legal Systems..................................................5 Analysis ...........................................................................................................8 Conclusion......................................................................................................28 Recommendations..........................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Of the 90 YEARS of the RAAF
    90 YEARS OF THE RAAF - A SNAPSHOT HISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defence, the Royal Australian Air Force or the Government of Australia, or of any other authority referred to in the text. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise, for any statements made in this document. Release This document is approved for public release. Portions of this document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 90 years of the RAAF : a snapshot history / Royal Australian Air Force, Office of Air Force History ; edited by Chris Clark (RAAF Historian). 9781920800567 (pbk.) Australia. Royal Australian Air Force.--History. Air forces--Australia--History. Clark, Chris. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Office of Air Force History. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Development Centre. 358.400994 Design and layout by: Owen Gibbons DPSAUG031-11 Published and distributed by: Air Power Development Centre TCC-3, Department of Defence PO Box 7935 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 AUSTRALIA Telephone: + 61 2 6266 1355 Facsimile: + 61 2 6266 1041 Email: [email protected] Website: www.airforce.gov.au/airpower Chief of Air Force Foreword Throughout 2011, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has been commemorating the 90th anniversary of its establishment on 31 March 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Overview
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL OVERVIEW PHOTO: PAUL LOVELACE PHOTOGRAPHY Professor Ken Wiltshire AO Professor Ken Wiltshire is the JD Story Professor of Public Administration at the University of Queensland Business School. He is a Political long-time contributor to CEDA’s research and an honorary trustee. overview As Australia enters an election year in 2007, Ken Wiltshire examines the prospects for a long-established Coalition and an Opposition that has again rolled the leadership dice. 18 australian chief executive RETROSPECT 2006 Prime Minister and Costello as Treasurer. Opinion Politically, 2006 was a very curious and topsy-turvy polls and backbencher sentiment at the time vindi- … [Howard] became year. There was a phase where the driving forces cated his judgement. more pragmatic appeared to be the price of bananas and the depre- From this moment the Australian political than usual … dations of the orange-bellied parrot, and for a dynamic changed perceptibly. Howard had effec- nation that has never experienced a civil war there tively started the election campaign, and in the “ were plenty of domestic skirmishes, including same breath had put himself on notice that he culture, literacy, and history wars. By the end of the would have to win the election. Almost immedi- year both the government and the Opposition had ately he became even more pragmatic than usual, ” changed their policy stances on a wide range of and more flexible in policy considerations, espe- issues. cially in relation to issues that could divide his own Coalition. The defining moment For Kim Beazley and the ALP, Howard’s decision The defining moment in Australian politics was clearly not what they had wanted, despite their occurred on 31 July 2006 when Prime Minister claims to the contrary, but at least they now knew John Howard, in response to yet another effort to the lay of the battleground and could design appro- revive a transition of leadership to his Deputy Peter priate tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Together in Safety a Report on the Australian Government’S Separation of Families Seeking Safety
    Together in safety A report on the Australian Government’s separation of families seeking safety. Contact Acknowledgements David Burke and Josephine Langbien The Human Rights Law Centre Human Rights Law Centre acknowledges and pays our deep Level 17, 461 Bourke Street respects to the people of the Kulin and Melbourne VIC 3000 Eora Nations, the traditional owners of the lands on which our offices sit, and T: + 61 3 8636 4450 we acknowledge that those lands were E: [email protected] never ceded. We recognise the ongoing, [email protected] unrelenting work of Aboriginal and Torres W: www.hrlc.org.au Strait Islander peoples, communities and organisations to demand equality, Human Rights Law Centre justice and self-determination and we commit to standing with them in The Human Rights Law Centre uses this work. The policies of intentional strategic legal action, policy solutions family separation outlined in this report and advocacy to support people and should be understood in the context communities to eliminate inequality of the historical and ongoing removal and injustice and build a fairer, more of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander compassionate Australia. children from their families. We are an independent and We thank the Global Centre for Pluralism not-for-profit organisation and for generously supporting this project. donations are tax-deductible. Thank you to each of the individuals Follow us: @rightsagenda and families who agreed to share their personal stories with us for this report. Join us: www.facebook.com/ HumanRightsLawCentreHRLC Thank you also to the people and organisations who provided invaluable About this Report advice and input to the report, This report was produced with the including the American Civil Liberties support of the Global Centre for Union (ACLU), Behrouz Boochani, Pluralism, and in collaboration with the Dr Beth O’Connor and Médecins Sans Refugee Advice and Casework Service.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Member States Challenge Australia's Refugee and Asylum
    AUSTRALIA’S 2021 UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW BY UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UN MEMBER STATES CHALLENGE AUSTRALIA’S REFUGEE AND ASYLUM POLICIES Forty-seven UN member states raised concerns about and recommended changes to the Australian Government’s refugee, asylum and immigration detention policies when Australia’s human rights record came up for its third five-yearly Universal Period Review (UPR). Of the 122 UN member states participating in Australia’s UPR hearing before the UN Human Rights Council on 20 January 2021, 45 states made comments or recommendations on refugee and detention policies and another two states raised formal questions prior to the session. Critical to the 50 formal recommendations were the issues of offshore processing of people seeking asylum, indefinite immigration detention, lack of legislation to prohibit detention of children, refoulement, and lack of compliance of Australia’s asylum and border management policies with international law. Australia’s offshore processing policies generated the most discussion with 10 countries raising concerns about these policies and the majority calling for an end to offshore processing. Finland added that those subject to offshore policies need to be provided with pathways to resettlement. Many countries, including Germany and Norway, urged Australia to amend its detention policies to not only ensure immigration detention is time-limited but that is also subject to judicial review. Rwanda highlighted the large number of people in immigration detention and urged Australia to reduce this number especially given the risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Other issues of concern were conditions of immigration detention facilities, lack of access to family reunification for many refugees, the less robust refugee status determination process for people who arrived by sea, and the prevalence of hate speech against refugees and people seeking asylum.
    [Show full text]
  • Than Luck “From Climate Change and Sustainability to Proper Governance and Strengthening Our Democracy, the Ideas in More Than Luck Come at the Right Time
    More Than Luck “From climate change and sustainability to proper governance and strengthening our democracy, the ideas in More Than Luck come at the right time. And we need politicians who are willing to take them seriously. If we cannot think bigger than tweets, we are in trouble. If our politicians won't think bigger than sound-bites, we are lost." – JULIAN BURNSIDE, QC “Politics is not a horse race, but if you're anything like me and you're only just recovering from the "mule-trading" vibe of Election 2010, More Than Luck is a brilliant place to restore your faith. What sweet relief to find a collection of words, sentences, pages, chapters, a whole book that reminds us of the possibility these current times offer us.” – CLARE BOWDITCH, MUSICIAN More Than Luck: Ideas Australia needs now is both a collection of ideas for citizens who want real change and a to-do list for politicians looking to base public policies on the kind of future ideas australia needs now Australians really want. In this collection of essays, CPD fellows and thinkers show what’s needed to share this country’s good luck amongst all Australians, now and in the future. They examine where we are now and where we need to go if we are to move beyond the stasis that has settled over government and opposition in Australia. The result is a mix of easy wins that are ready to be implemented and some big, bold nation building ideas that may require a bit more backbone on the part of our political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • ADF Serials Telegraph News
    ADF Serials Telegraph News News for those interested in Australian Military Aircraft History and Serials Volume 6: Issue 1: Summer Supplementary, 2016 Editor and contributing Author: Gordon R Birkett, Message Starts: In this issue: News Briefs by Gordon Birkett @20156 Story: The Malaya Emergency and the start of Konfrontasi: their input on RAAF Re-equipment Decisions 1950/60's Part 2 Written by Gordon Birkett @2015 Story: RAAF Pilotless Interceptors Part 2 : Darwin 1965/AEW Neptunes Written by Gordon R Birkett@2016 Odd Shots: 1950's GRB Collection Message Traffic Selections: Please address any questions to: [email protected] in the meantime Message Board – Current hot topics: These boards can be accessed at: www.adf-messageboard.com.au/invboard/ News Briefs 4th December 2015: The second of two contracted LHDs for the Navy, L01 HMAS Adelaide, was commissioned into the RAN. 21st December 2015: The Government of Australia has requested a possible sale of 3 CH-47F Chinook Helicopters through FMS, increasing AAV total to 10 CH-47Fs 28th December 2015: Two Gulfstream G550 business jets, modified for surveillance and electronic warfare, will be delivered to the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) under a U.S. foreign military sale. 19th January 2016: Six No 1 Squadron Super Hornets, six No 75 Squadron F/A-18A Hornets, an E-7A Wedgetail and an AP-3C Orion deployed to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada for Exercise Red Flag 16-1 A44-201 of No 1 Squadron at Nellis AFB(USAF) during Red Flag 2016. Photo RAAF Official 25th January 2016: The first Australian pilots to undertake conversion training on the Pilatus PC-21 pilot training aircraft recently arrived in Switzerland.
    [Show full text]