DOCSLIB.ORG

New Brighton Comfort Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Brighton Comfort Station NEW BRIGHTON COMFORT STATION Draft Environmental Impact Statement CEQR No.: 14DPR005K Lead Agency New York City Department of Parks and Recreation Lead Agency Contact Alyssa Cobb Konon Project Applicant New York City Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared By AKRF, Inc. March 2014 New Brighton Comfort Station DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) Project Location: Brooklyn, New York New Brighton, Brighton Beach Community District 13 CEQR No. 14DPR005K Type of Action: Type II ULURP No. n/a Lead Agency: New York City Department of Parks and Recreation Lead Agency Contact: Alyssa Cobb Konon Assistant Commissioner for Planning and Parklands New York City Department of Parks and Recreation The Arsenal, Central Park 830 Fifth Avenue, Room 403 New York, NY 10065 212-360-3402 Project Applicant: New York City Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared by: AKRF, Inc. 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Acceptance Date: March 3, 2014 The DEIS is available for review on the website of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation: http://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/coneyisland A public hearing on this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be held on March 20, 2014 between 6 PM and 9 PM at the Shorefront YM-YWHA of Brighton-Manhattan Beach at 3300 Coney Island Avenue in Brooklyn. Written comments on the DEIS are requested and will be received and considered by the Lead Agency until April 4, 2013. Please direct comments on the DEIS to Colleen Alderson: [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. S-1 1: Project Description ............................................................................................................... 1-1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 B. Project Background ......................................................................................................... 1-1 Brighton Beach ................................................................................................................... 1-1 Superstorm Sandy .............................................................................................................. 1-2 C. Project Purpose and Need ............................................................................................... 1-3 Public Health Requirements ............................................................................................... 1-3 Resiliency ........................................................................................................................... 1-4 D. Project Site ...................................................................................................................... 1-5 E. Proposed Replacement Comfort Station ......................................................................... 1-5 Proposed Design ................................................................................................................. 1-5 Proposed Operations .......................................................................................................... 1-6 F. Proposed Actions and Approvals .................................................................................... 1-6 G. City Environmental Quality Review ............................................................................... 1-7 Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 1-7 Analysis Framework .......................................................................................................... 1-8 2: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy .................................................................................. 2-1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 B. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 2-2 C. Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................... 2-2 Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 2-2 Zoning and Public Policy ................................................................................................... 2-3 D. Future Without the Proposed Project .............................................................................. 2-4 Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 2-4 Zoning and Public Policy ................................................................................................... 2-5 E. Future With the Proposed Project ................................................................................... 2-5 Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 2-5 Zoning and Public Policy ................................................................................................... 2-7 3: Open Space ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 B. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 3-1 C. Direct Effects Preliminary Assessment ........................................................................... 3-2 Conclusion of Preliminary Assessment .............................................................................. 3-3 4: Shadows ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 TOC-1 New Brighton Comfort Station B. Definitions and Methodology .......................................................................................... 4-1 Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 4-2 C. Preliminary Screening Assessment ................................................................................. 4-3 Tier 1 Screening Assessment .............................................................................................. 4-3 Tier 2 Screening Assessment .............................................................................................. 4-3 Tier 3 Screening Assessment .............................................................................................. 4-3 D. Detailed Shadow Analysis ............................................................................................... 4-4 Assessment of Shadow Effects ........................................................................................... 4-6 5: Urban Design and Visual Resources ................................................................................... 5-1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 5-1 B. Methodology .................................................................................................................... 5-1 C. Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................... 5-2 Urban Design ...................................................................................................................... 5-2 Visual Resources ................................................................................................................ 5-4 D. The Future Without the Proposed Project ....................................................................... 5-4 Project Site .......................................................................................................................... 5-5 Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 5-5 E. The Future With the Proposed Project............................................................................. 5-5 Urban Design ...................................................................................................................... 5-5 Visual Resources ................................................................................................................ 5-7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 5-7 6: Natural Resources ................................................................................................................. 6-1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6-1 Principal Conclusions ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Report on the City of New York's Existing and Possible Tree Canopy
    A Report on the City of New York’s Existing and Possible Tree Canopy Why is Tree Canopy Important? Project Background Tree canopy (TC) is the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that The goal of the project was to apply the USDA Forest Service’s cover the ground when viewed from above. Tree canopy provides many Tree Canopy (TC) Assessment Protocols to the City of New benefits to communities by improving water quality, saving energy, lower- York. The primary source of data for this assessment was Light ing city temperatures, reducing air pollution, enhancing property values, Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data acquired from April 14th to providing wildlife habitat, facilitating social and educational opportunities May 1st, 2010. The City of New York funded LiDAR acquisition, and providing aesthetic benefits. Establishing a tree canopy goal is crucial and the National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory for communities seeking to improve their green infrastructure and environ- Council (NUCFAC) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) mental quality. A tree canopy assessment is the first step in this goal- funded subsequent tree canopy analyses. The assessment was setting process, providing estimates for the amount of tree canopy current- performed by the Spatial Analysis Laboratory (SAL) at the Uni- ly present in a city as well as the amount of tree canopy that could theo- versity of Vermont’s Rubenstein School of the Environment retically be established. and Natural Resources. The analysis was conducted in collabo- ration with the New York City Department of Parks & Recrea- How Much Tree Canopy Does New York Have? tion, the New York City Urban Field Station, the USDA Forest An analysis of New York City’s tree canopy based on land-cover data de- Service’s Northern Research Station, and Columbia University.
    [Show full text]
  • February 19, 2019 Agenda
    Design Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 19, 2019 The Committee Meeting is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. Public Meeting 2:15 p.m. Election of Officers 2:30 p.m. Consent Items 26925: Conversion of Building 20 into a light-industrial building, Morris Avenue, Third Street, Dock Avenue, and Fourth Street, Brooklyn Navy Yard Industrial Park, Brooklyn. (Preliminary) (CC 33, CB 2) BNYDC 26926: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, Flushing Community Library, 41-17 Main Street, Flushing, Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 20, CB 7) DDC/QL 26927: Construction of three overlook areas and restoration of a wetland, Hylan Boulevard Bluebelt between Seaver Avenue and Stobe Avenue, New Creek watershed, Staten Island. (Final) (CC 50, CB 2) DDC/DEP/DOT 26928: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, louvers, and doors, Bellevue Men's Shelter, 400 East 30th Street, Manhattan. (Preliminary) (CC 4, CB 6) DDC/DHS 26929: Rehabilitation of the Bushwick Health Center, 335 Central Avenue, Brooklyn. (Final) (CC 37, CB 4) DDC/DOHMH 26930: Construction of a portion of the Brooklyn Waterfront Greenway (Hamilton Gowanus Connector), Hamilton Avenue and Smith Street to 3rd Avenue and 29th Street, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 38 & 39, CB 6 & 7) DDC/DOT 26931: Construction of a prototypical planted median, Atlantic Avenue from Logan Street to Rockaway Boulevard, Brooklyn and Queens. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 30, 32, & 37, CB BK5 & Q9) DDC/DOT 26932: Construction of streetscape improvements, Coney Island Hospital, Ocean Parkway between Avenue Z and Belt Parkway, Brooklyn. (Preliminary and Final) (CC 48, CB 13) DDC/DOT 26933: Installation of rooftop mechanical equipment, Queens District 7 Garage, 120-15 31st Avenue, Flushing, Queens.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Group Forest Restoration Team Planting Report Fall 2010
    Natural Resources Group Forest Restoration Team Planting Report Fall 2010 Dear Parkie, The Natural Resources Group (NRG) moved closer to our PlaNYC goal of planting over 400,000 trees throughout the city. This past fall we planted over 30,000 trees in 2 properties in all five boroughs. Our current tally stands at 222,188. Furthermore, we planted over 7,000 shrubs and over 4,000 herbaceous plants Our primary goal is to create and restore multi-story forests, bringing back the ecological richness of our region. Healthy multi-story forests provide cleaner air, cleaner water, and increased biodiversity. NRG again hosted the Million Trees volunteer day. Volunteers and Parks’ staff planted 21,806 trees altogether. Without volunteers and the support of the Agency, and our institutional and community partners, NRG would not reach its planting goals. Below is a summary of fall 2010. • Containerized trees planted by the Forest Restoration Team: 27,130 (2009: 26,139) • Containerized trees planted through contractors: 4,332 (2009: 9,652) • Balled & burlapped trees planted through contractors: 58 (2009: 267) • Containerized shrubs planted by the Forest Restoration Team: 5,701 (2009: 4,626) • Containerized shrubs planted through contractors: 1,492 (2009: 0) • Herbaceous plugs planted by the Forest Restoration Team: 4,540 (2009: 18,528) • Hosted 11 volunteer events with a total of 341 volunteers (2009: 32, 468) Sincerely, Tim Wenskus Deputy Director Natural Resources Group Total Plants Planted Trees 31,520 Shrubs 7,193 Herbaceous 4,540 Grand Total 43,253
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2000
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2000 Floyd Bennett Field Gateway NRA - Jamaica Bay Unit Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Floyd Bennett Field Gateway NRA - Jamaica Bay Unit Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national database. In addition,
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Three Wonder Walks
    Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) Featuring Walking Routes, Collections and Notes by Matthew Jensen Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) The High Line has proven that you can create a des- tination around the act of walking. The park provides a museum-like setting where plants and flowers are intensely celebrated. Walking on the High Line is part of a memorable adventure for so many visitors to New York City. It is not, however, a place where you can wander: you can go forward and back, enter and exit, sit and stand (off to the side). Almost everything within view is carefully planned and immaculately cultivated. The only exception to that rule is in the Western Rail Yards section, or “W.R.Y.” for short, where two stretch- es of “original” green remain steadfast holdouts. It is here—along rusty tracks running over rotting wooden railroad ties, braced by white marble riprap—where a persistent growth of naturally occurring flora can be found. Wild cherry, various types of apple, tiny junipers, bittersweet, Queen Anne’s lace, goldenrod, mullein, Indian hemp, and dozens of wildflowers, grasses, and mosses have all made a home for them- selves. I believe they have squatters’ rights and should be allowed to stay. Their persistence created a green corridor out of an abandoned railway in the first place. I find the terrain intensely familiar and repre- sentative of the kinds of landscapes that can be found when wandering down footpaths that start where streets and sidewalks end. This guide presents three similarly wild landscapes at the beautiful fringes of New York City: places with big skies, ocean views, abun- dant nature, many footpaths, and colorful histories.
    [Show full text]
  • Coney Island Comprehensive Rezoning Plan - Approved! Overview
    Projects & Proposals > Brooklyn > Coney Island Coney Island Comprehensive Rezoning Plan - Approved! Overview From its famed boardwalk, to the iconic Wonder Wheel, Cyclone, and Parachute Jump, to the once bustling midways along Surf Avenue and the Bowery, Coney Island’s legendary status as the world’s greatest urban amusement park lives in all of our memories. But over the years, this once vibrant area has shrunk and deteriorated, and is limited today to one block of seasonal amusements and a few remaining active frontages along Surf Avenue. The Department of City Planning, in partnership with the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC), the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) and the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), has developed a comprehensive plan that will establish a framework for the revitalization of the Coney Island amusement area and the surrounding blocks. The plan builds upon the few remaining amusements to create a 27-acre amusement and entertainment district that will reestablish Coney Island as a year-round, open and accessible amusement destination. Outside of the amusement area, the plan provides new housing opportunities, including affordable housing, and neighborhood services. The plan covers 19 blocks bounded by the New York Aquarium to the east, West 24th View the presentation Street to the west, Mermaid Avenue to the north and the Riegelmann Boardwalk to the south. The plan seeks to: Facilitate the development of a vibrant year round, 27-acre urban amusement and entertainment district by catalyzing a variety of new indoor and outdoor amusement, entertainment, and complimentary uses, and laying the groundwork for the development of a 12-acre urban amusement park preserving and expanding amusement uses in their historic boardwalk location in perpetuity; Rezoning Area Boundary View a larger image.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005—SIR 2007–5051 Prepared in Cooperation with the National Park Service
    Benotti, Abbene, & Terracciano—Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005—SIR 2007–5051 Long Island, New York: Loading in Jamaica Bay, Benotti, Abbene, & Terracciano—Nitrogen Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005 Scientifi c Investigations Report 2007–5051 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment to 2005 By Mark J. Benotti, Michele Abbene, and Stephen A. Terracciano Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5051 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Benotti, M.J., Abbene, Michele., and Terracciano, S.A., 2007, Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay, Long Island, New York: Predevelopment
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Natural Areas Initiative?
    NaturalNatural AAreasreas InitiativeInitiative What are Natural Areas? With over 8 million people and 1.8 million cars in monarch butterflies. They reside in New York City’s residence, New York City is the ultimate urban environ- 12,000 acres of natural areas that include estuaries, ment. But the city is alive with life of all kinds, including forests, ponds, and other habitats. hundreds of species of flora and fauna, and not just in Despite human-made alterations, natural areas are spaces window boxes and pet stores. The city’s five boroughs pro- that retain some degree of wild nature, native ecosystems vide habitat to over 350 species of birds and 170 species and ecosystem processes.1 While providing habitat for native of fish, not to mention countless other plants and animals, plants and animals, natural areas afford a glimpse into the including seabeach amaranth, persimmons, horseshoe city’s past, some providing us with a window to what the crabs, red-tailed hawks, painted turtles, and land looked like before the built environment existed. What is the Natural Areas Initiative? The Natural Areas Initiative (NAI) works towards the (NY4P), the NAI promotes cooperation among non- protection and effective management of New York City’s profit groups, communities, and government agencies natural areas. A joint program of New York City to protect natural areas and raise public awareness about Audubon (NYC Audubon) and New Yorkers for Parks the values of these open spaces. Why are Natural Areas important? In the five boroughs, natural areas serve as important Additionally, according to the City Department of ecosystems, supporting a rich variety of plants and Health, NYC children are almost three times as likely to wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: the Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2012 The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: The Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1815 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: The Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature by Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2012 © 2012 Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. William Kornblum _______________ ______________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee John Torpey ______________ ______________________________________________ Date Executive Officer William Kornblum Kenneth Gould Hester Eisenstein Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract The Creeks, Beaches, and Bay of the Jamaica Bay Estuary: The Importance of Place in Cultivating Relationships to Nature by Kristen L. Van Hooreweghe Adviser: Professor William Kornblum It is often assumed that people living in urban areas lack connections to the natural world and are the source of environmental problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Bb-Ci-Mb-Sg Cr 11-12-13-Final.Pdf
    This document was developed by the Southern Brooklyn Peninsula Planning Committee as part of the NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) Program within the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery. The NYRCR Program is supported by NYS Homes and Community Renewal, NYS Department of State, and NYS Department of Transportation. Assistance was provided by the following consulting firms: URS Corporation The LiRo Group AIM Development Jamie Caplan Consulting LLC (JCC) Planning4Places, LLC Cover photo courtesy: Butch Moran Southern Brooklyn Peninsula Conceptual Plan FOREWORD The New York Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) program was established by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo to provide additional rebuilding and revitalization assistance to communities damaged by Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Irene, and Tropical Storm Lee. This program empowers communities to prepare locally-driven recovery plans to identify innovative reconstruction projects and other needed actions to allow each community not only to survive, but also to thrive in an era when natural risks will become increasingly common. The NYRCR program is managed by the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery in conjunction with New York State Homes and Community Renewal and the Department of State. The NYRCR program consists of both planning and implementation phases, to assist communities in making informed recovery decisions. The development of this conceptual plan is the result of innumerable hours of effort from volunteer planning committee members, members of the public, municipal employees, elected officials, state employees, and planning consultants. Across the state, over 102 communities are working together to build back better and stronger. This conceptual plan is a snapshot of the current thoughts of the community and planning committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide INTRODUCTION . .2 1 CONEY ISLAND . .3 2 OCEAN PARKWAY . .11 3 PROSPECT PARK . .16 4 EASTERN PARKWAY . .22 5 HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR . .29 6 FOREST PARK . .36 7 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK . .42 8 KISSENA-CUNNINGHAM CORRIDOR . .54 9 ALLEY POND PARK TO FORT TOTTEN . .61 CONCLUSION . .70 GREENWAY SIGNAGE . .71 BIKE SHOPS . .73 2 The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway System ntroduction New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (Parks) works closely with The Brooklyn-Queens the Departments of Transportation Greenway (BQG) is a 40- and City Planning on the planning mile, continuous pedestrian and implementation of the City’s and cyclist route from Greenway Network. Parks has juris- Coney Island in Brooklyn to diction and maintains over 100 miles Fort Totten, on the Long of greenways for commuting and Island Sound, in Queens. recreational use, and continues to I plan, design, and construct additional The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway pro- greenway segments in each borough, vides an active and engaging way of utilizing City capital funds and a exploring these two lively and diverse number of federal transportation boroughs. The BQG presents the grants. cyclist or pedestrian with a wide range of amenities, cultural offerings, In 1987, the Neighborhood Open and urban experiences—linking 13 Space Coalition spearheaded the parks, two botanical gardens, the New concept of the Brooklyn-Queens York Aquarium, the Brooklyn Greenway, building on the work of Museum, the New York Hall of Frederick Law Olmsted, Calvert Vaux, Science, two environmental education and Robert Moses in their creations of centers, four lakes, and numerous the great parkways and parks of ethnic and historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Coney Island - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 8/3/11 11:29 AM
    Coney Island - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 8/3/11 11:29 AM Coney Island Coordinates: 40.574416°N 73.978575°W From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coney Island is a peninsula and beach on the Atlantic Ocean in southern Brooklyn, New York, United States. The site was formerly an island, but became partially connected to the mainland by landfill. Coney Island is possibly best known as the site of amusement parks and a major resort that reached their peak during the first half of the 20th century. It declined in popularity after World War II and endured years of neglect. In recent years, the area has seen the Coney Island peninsula from the air opening of MCU Park and has become home to the minor league baseball team the Brooklyn Cyclones. The neighborhood of the same name is a community of 60,000 people in the western part of the peninsula, with Sea Gate to its west, Brighton Beach and Manhattan Beach to its east, and Gravesend to the north. Contents 1 Geography 2 History 2.1 Etymology Aerial view of the beach at Coney 2.2 Resort Island[1] 2.3 Development 3 Demographics 4 Communities 5 Education 6 Transportation 7 Amusement parks 7.1 Rides 7.2 Rides of the past 7.3 Other venues 7.4 Beach 7.5 Other events Coney Island from space 8 In entertainment 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links Geography Coney Island is the westernmost part of the barrier islands of Long Island, about 4 miles (6.4 km) long and 0.5 miles (0.80 km) wide.
    [Show full text]