DOCSLIB.ORG

Catalysts for Rights: the Unique Contribution of the UN’S Independent Experts on Human Rights

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catalysts for Rights: the Unique Contribution of the UN’S Independent Experts on Human Rights Foreign Policy October 2010 at BROOKINGS Catalysts for for Catalysts r ights: The Unique Contribution of the UN’s Independent Experts on Human Rights the UN’s of Unique Contribution The Catalysts for rights: The Unique Contribution of the UN’s Independent Experts on Human Rights TEd PiccoNE Ted Piccone BROOKINGS 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036 www.brookings.edu Foreign Policy October 2010 at BROOKINGS Catalysts for rights The Unique Contribution of the U.N.’s Independent Experts on Human Rights Final Report of the Brookings Research Project on Strengthening U.N. Special Procedures TEd PiccoNE The views expressed in this report do not reflect an official position of The Brookings Institution, its Board, or Advisory Council members. © 2010 The Brookings Institution TABLE oF CoNTENTS acknowledgements . iii Members of Experts advisory group . v list of abbreviations . vi Executive summary ....................................................................... viii introduction . 1 Context . 2 Methodology . 3 A Short Summary of Special Procedures . 5 summary of findings . 9 Country Visits . .9 Follow-Up to Country Visits..............................................................19 Communications . 20 Resources . 31 Joint Activities and Coordination . .32 Code of Conduct . 34 Training . .34 Universal Periodic Review...............................................................35 Relationship with Treaty Bodies . 36 recommendations..........................................................................38 Appointments . 38 Country Visits and Communications .......................................................38 Follow-Up Procedures . 40 Resources . .41 Training . .41 Code of Conduct . 42 Relationship with UPR, Treaty Bodies, and other U.N. Actors . .42 appendices Appendix A HRC Resolution 5/1, the Institution Building Package ...........................44 Appendix B HRC Resolution 5/2, the Code of Conduct . .48 Appendix C Special Procedures of the HRC - Mandate Holders (as of 1 August 2010) . 55 Appendix d Human Rights Council Membership (2006-2010)...............................59 Appendix E Examples of how SP Visits and Communications Affect National Action.............61 Appendix F State Responses to Communications (2004-2008).............................69 Appendix G Status of Country Visits (as of June 2010)....................................71 Appendix H Project Methodology on Scoring Communications . 75 Appendix I List of Interviews . 78 Appendix J February 2010 Statement of Experts and Advocates............................84 CATALYSTS FOR RIGHTS The Unique Contribution of the U.N.’s Independent Experts on Human Rights ii ACKNoWLEdGEMENTS hen I arrived at The Brookings Institution community is, as then U.N. High Commissioner in April 2008 after running a small non- for Human Rights Louise Arbour declared, im- Wprofit organization devoted to research plementation, implementation, implementation. and advocacy on democracy and human rights, While new human rights norms may need to be I was struck immediately by the freedom I had developed in some areas, the bulk of the main hu- to develop my own research agenda. One of the man rights principles, protocols and procedures lingering questions that deserved more time and have already been conceptualized and codified analysis, in my view, was how the United Nations in treaties that have been signed and ratified by human rights system works and how it could be most governments. The real challenge is how improved. I was particularly interested in the the international system created since the end of work of the U.N.’s independent experts on hu- World War II can be more effective in influenc- man rights (known in U.N. parlance as the Spe- ing states to promote and protect human rights cial Procedures) who had drawn so much praise for all. Third, given the intensity of the debate and a fair amount of criticism for their activities. around creation of the Council, and knowing This issue had attracted more attention than usual that its work would be reviewed after five years in the context of the negotiations in 2005-06 to (2011), I felt there was an opportunity to contrib- abolish the Commission on Human Rights and ute something meaningful to the discussion. to create a new and more elevated Human Rights Council. Exasperation bordering on outright hos- I am grateful to so many people who helped make tility toward both the Commission and the Coun- this project a reality. Brookings President Strobe cil from the Bush Administration and other gov- Talbott has been a steady and stalwart supporter ernments only heightened my interest in examin- of the idea of doing more public policy research ing in more depth the tricky intersection between on questions of human rights, humanitarian af- universal norms and practical implementation of fairs and foreign policy. He, along with Martin In- such norms at the country level. dyk, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at Brookings, and his predecessor Carlos Pascual, I was drawn to this issue for several reasons. now U.S. Ambassador to Mexico, played an es- First, I knew from my own experience and fur- sential leadership role in backing this effort. Bruce ther research that sound, empirical studies of the Jones, who directs the Managing Global Insecu- role of the Special Procedures and the effective- rity project where I sit, challenged me early on to ness of this mechanism on the ground had never tackle the effectiveness question. Ongoing support been published. Second, I was convinced that the from the Foreign Policy team, especially Char- main challenge to the international human rights lotte Baldwin, Julia Cates, Adrienne Anzanello, CATALYSTS FOR RIGHTS The Unique Contribution of the U.N.’s Independent Experts on Human Rights iii Margaret Humenay, Gail Chalef, Kristina Server listed on page vii, I benefited greatly from the ex- and Jacqueline Geis, was essential for keeping the pertise and feedback of Nigel Rodley, Felice Gaer, project on track. Tania Baldwin, Elizabeth Ferris, Julia de Rivero, Philippe Dam, Dokhi Fassihian and Gay McDou- No intensive research project like this could hap- gall. From the Office of the High Commissioner pen without the vision and financial support of for Human Rights, I want to extend special thanks our donors. I am especially grateful to the Em- to Deputy High Commissioner Kyung-wha Kang, bassy of the Netherlands in Washington, led by a Charles Radcliffe, Craig Mokhiber, Heike Alefsen, real human rights leader in the diplomatic com- Eric Tistounet, Bacre Ndiaye, Orest Nowosad and munity, Ambassador Renee Jones-Bos, and Po- Gunnar Theissen, as well as Will Davis from the litical Counselor Robert Dresen for their early U.N. Information Center in Washington. and enthusiastic endorsement, as well as Maryem van den Heuvel, Edwin Keyzer and Peter Potman In order to do an objective evaluation of how gov- in the Hague. The Foreign Ministry of the Swiss ernments respond to the Special Procedures, we Confederation, with the support of Ralf Heckner had to analyze the public written record, which and Mirko Giulietti, provided timely financial as- is voluminous. To make sense of it, I had the in- sistance, as did the United Nations Foundation valuable assistance of my stellar Senior Research Better World Campaign thanks to Susan Myers Assistant, Emily Alinikoff. On this and so many and Peter Yeo. Support from the Connect U.S. other details from a to z, Emily made things hap- Fund was vital to our convening experts and hu- pen, brought new ideas, created new ways of ana- man rights defenders from around the world for lyzing and organizing data, organized multiple two days of meetings in Washington in February trips and interviews, and trained and coordinated 2010. I especially appreciate the guidance of Eric a fantastic group of top notch graduate and un- Schwartz, Nancy Soderberg, Heather Hamilton, dergraduate students. I am especially grateful to and Francesco Femia, along with Karin Ryan of Nicholas Marwell, who helped me conceptualize The Carter Center. the project, and Christopher Le Mon, who did excellent work on methodology. In addition, I I was very fortunate in carrying out the project want to thank Pooja Kadakia, Matthew Perault, to have the guidance and advice of an outstand- Patrick Griffith, Shubra Ohri, Anna Sims, Sayo ing Experts Advisory Group of practitioners, Saruta, Mila Cecerina, Bora Park, Anna Fox, and academics, lawyers, and activists who helped me Shannon Dobson for doing the yeoman’s work of work through the conceptual framing, method- analyzing scores of reports and communications. ology, and factual details of the report and ulti- mately to endorse its recommendations. I can’t Finally, I want to thank my dear wife, Susan thank them enough for their active participation Gibbs, and our three wonderful children for en- in our meetings and online and always friendly during my long hours away from home. and constructive input. In addition to this group CATALYSTS FOR RIGHTS The Unique Contribution of the U.N.’s Independent Experts on Human Rights iv MEMBERS oF EXPERTS WoRKING GRoUP Brookings Research Project on Strengthening U.N. Special Procedures robErta CohEn, nonresident Senior Fellow, the mission on Human Right, former Special Rappor- Brookings Institution and Senior Advisor to the teur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Special Representative of the Secretary General on former Special Rapporteur on the situation of hu- the human rights of internally displaced
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waltz's Theory of Theory
    WALTZ’S THEORY OF THEORY 201 Waltz’s Theory of Theory Ole Wæver Abstract Waltz’s 1979 book, Theory of International Politics, is the most infl uential in the history of the discipline. It worked its effects to a large extent through raising the bar for what counted as theoretical work, in effect reshaping not only realism but rivals like liberalism and refl ectivism. Yet, ironically, there has been little attention paid to Waltz’s very explicit and original arguments about the nature of theory. This article explores and explicates Waltz’s theory of theory. Central attention is paid to his defi nition of theory as ‘a picture, mentally formed’ and to the radical anti-empiricism and anti-positivism of his position. Followers and critics alike have treated Waltzian neorealism as if it was at bottom a formal proposition about cause–effect relations. The extreme case of Waltz being so victorious in the discipline, and yet being so consistently misinterpreted on the question of theory, shows the power of a dominant philosophy of science in US IR, and thus the challenge facing any ambitious theorising. The article suggests a possible movement of fronts away from the ‘fourth debate’ between rationalism and refl ectivism towards one of theory against empiricism. To help this new agenda, the article introduces a key literature from the philosophy of science about the structure of theory, and particularly about the way even natural science uses theory very differently from the way IR’s mainstream thinks it does – and much more like the way Waltz wants his theory to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Report of Special Procedures*
    United Nations A/HRC/18/51 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 September 2011 English/French/Spanish only Human Rights Council Eighteenth session Agenda item 5 Human rights bodies and mechanisms Communications Report of Special Procedures* Communications sent, 1 December 2010 to 31 May 2011; Replies received, 1 February 2011 to 31 July 2011 Joint report by the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context; the Working Group on arbitrary detention; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia; the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography; the Independent Expert in the field of cultural rights; the Special Rapporteur on the right to education; the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances; the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; the Special Rapporteur on the right to food; the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders;
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: Death Plot Against Human Rights Lawyer, Asma Jahangir
    UA: 164/12 Index: ASA 33/008/2012 Pakistan Date: 7 June 2012 URGENT ACTION DEATH PLOT AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYER Leading human rights lawyer and activist Asma Jahangir fears for her life, having just learned of a plot by Pakistan’s security forces to kill her. Killings of human rights defenders have increased over the last year, many of which implicate Pakistan’s Inter- Service Intelligence agency (ISI). On 4 June, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) alerted Amnesty International to information it had received of a plot by Pakistan’s security forces to kill HRCP founder and human rights lawyer Asma Jahangir. As Pakistan’s leading human rights defender, Asma Jahangir has been threatened many times before. However news of the plot to kill her is altogether different. The information available does not appear to have been intentionally circulated as means of intimidation, but leaked from within Pakistan’s security apparatus. Because of this, Asma Jahangir believes the information is highly credible and has therefore not moved from her home. Please write immediately in English, Urdu, or your own language, calling on the Pakistan authorities to: Immediately provide effective security to Asma Jahangir. Promptly conduct a full investigation into alleged plot to kill her, including all individuals and institutions suspected of being involved, including the Inter-Services Intelligence agency. Bring to justice all suspected perpetrators of attacks on human rights defenders, in trials that meet international fair trial standards and
    [Show full text]
  • International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: the Search for Foundations Author(S): James A
    International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations Author(s): James A. Caporaso Source: International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Summer, 1992), pp. 599-632 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706990 Accessed: 24-01-2019 14:28 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Organization This content downloaded from 64.28.140.228 on Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:28:56 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms International relations theory and multilateralism: the search for foundations James A. Caporaso Why has the concept of multilateralism not played a more prominent role in theories of international relations? The prima facie case for the importance of multilateral activity in the international realm would seem great. The world, we constantly tell ourselves, is increasingly drawn together. The Swedish econo- mist Assar Lindbeck argues that most external effects of production and consumption are external not only to the household but also to the country in which they occur.1 According to many different indicators, interdependence is on the increase in nearly all parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume VIII, Issue-3, March 2018
    Volume VIII, Issue-3, March 2018 March in History Nation celebrates Pakistan Day 2018 with military parade, gun salutes March 15, 1955: The biggest contingents of armoured and mech - post-independence irrigation anised infantry held a march-past. project, Kotri Barrage is Pakistan Army tanks, including the inaugurated. Al Khalid and Al Zarrar, presented March 23 , 1956: 1956 Constitution gun salutes to the president. Radar is promulgates on Pakistan Day. systems and other weapons Major General Iskander Mirza equipped with military tech - sworn in as first President of nology were also rolled out. Pakistan. The NASR missile, the Sha - heen missile, the Ghauri mis - March 23, 1956: Constituent sile system, and the Babur assembly adopts name of Islamic cruise missile were also fea - Republic of Pakistan and first constitution. The nation is celebrating Pakistan A large number of diplomats from tured in the parade. Day 2018 across the country with several countries attended the March 8, 1957: President Various aeroplanes traditional zeal and fervour. ceremony. The guest of honour at Iskandar Mirza lays the belonging to Army Avi - foundation-stone of the State Bank the ceremony was Sri Lankan Pres - Pakistan Day commemorates the ation and Pakistan Air of Pakistan building in Karachi. ident Maithripala Sirisena. passing of the Lahore Resolution Force demonstrated aer - obatic feats for the March 23, 1960: Foundation of on March 23, 1940, when the All- Contingents of Pakistan Minar-i-Pakistan is laid. India Muslim League demanded a Army, Pakistan Air Force, and audience. Combat separate nation for the Muslims of Pakistan Navy held a march-past and attack helicopters, March 14, 1972: New education the British Indian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Adress of Bertrand Ramcharan, Acting United Nations
    Opening Adress of Bertrand Ramcharan, Acting United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights At a Conference organized by the International Commission of Jurists Geneva, 23 October, 2003 The subject we have come here today to discuss is indeed an important and topical one: human rights, counter-terrorism, and international monitoring systems. I am pleased to be with you on this occasion and greet you warmly on behalf of all my colleagues in the Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights. Having been a Commissioner of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) before becoming a United Nations human rights Commissioner, you will understand my pleasure and gratitude, that this conference is being organized by the ICJ, with whom we have had a long and fruitful partnership for human rights going back for years. Some years ago, the ICJ did an important study on human rights and states of emergency and, more recently, it has done an important study on human rights and terrorism. The ICJ has thus made foundation contributions to the topics of interest to us today for which we are all grateful. I should like, in these opening remarks, to take each of the topics of our conference in turn: human rights, counter-terrorism, and international monitoring systems. First, human rights. What are the considerations that should be in our minds today as we commence this conference? It would be important, I believe, to remind ourselves of the international code of human rights that all Governments are pledged to live by. Can one say that the basic norms of international human rights law are in fact influencing all countries and that they are seeking in good faith to implement those norms? Many countries are indeed striving, in sometimes difficult circumstances, to follow the human rights path.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective
    Theodore Ruger, Dean and Bernard G. Segal Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law builds bridges with leading international organizations, legal institutions, world leaders, and policymakers that deepen our engagement with pressing global issues. At a time of great geopolitical upheavals, Penn Law's engagement with transnational leaders has helped strengthen our students’ shared commitments to multilateralism, strong international institutions, and diversity in leadership. In an age of intense inquiry of equal representation of gender and race in global decision- making, these portraits and perspectives showcase a few of the global voices that have influenced Penn Law's inclusive vision of global justice. Rangita de Silva de Alwis, Associate Dean of International Affairs, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ___ "In the course of history, there comes a time when humanity is called upon to shift to a new level of consciousness to reach a higher moral ground — that is where we are now." -Mary Robinson, President of Ireland; Penn Law Commencement Speaker 2017 “The number of women who have come forward as a result of the #MeToo movement has been astonishing. My hope is not just that it is here to stay, but that it is as effective for the woman who works as a maid in a hotel as it is for Hollywood stars." -Justice Ginsburg at Penn Law Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court; Penn Law Roberts Lecture, 2018 "Let it be said that human rights are women's rights, and women's rights are human
    [Show full text]
  • Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (Ms
    GA65 Third Committee Subject to change – Status as of 8 October 2010 Special procedure mandate-holders, Chairs of human rights treaty bodies or Chairs of Working Groups presenting reports Monday, 11 October (am) Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (Ms. Xiaoqiau ZOU, Vice-Chair, on behalf of Ms. Naela GABR, Chair of CEDAW) – oral report and interactive dialogue. Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Rashida MANJOO – oral report Wednesday, 13 October (pm) Special Representative of the Secretary-General on violence against children, Ms. Marta SANTOS PAIS. Chair of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Ms. Yanghee LEE - oral report. Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Ms. Najat M’jid MAALLA Monday, 18 October (am) Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedom of indigenous people, Mr. James ANAYA Tuesday, 19 October (am) Chair of the Committee against Torture, Mr. Claudio GROSSMAN – oral report and interactive dialogue. Chair of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, Mr. Victor Manuel RODRIGUEZ RESCIA – oral report and interactive dialogue. Wednesday, 20 October (pm) Independent Expert on minority issues, Ms. Gay McDOUGALL. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Mr. Tomas Ojea QUINTANA. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Mr. Richard FALK. Thursday, 21 October (am) Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Mr. Olivier DE SCHUTTER. Independent expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva, June 16Th, 2003 Bertrand Ramcharan Deputy High
    Geneva, June 16th, 2003 Bertrand Ramcharan Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Geneva, Switzerland RE: Human Rights and the World Summit on the Information Society Your Excellency Mr. Bertrand Ramcharan, The under-signed civil society organizations strongly encourage your active participation in the preparatory committee and summit meeting of the World Summit on the Information Society, taking place in September and December 2003, respectively. Human rights are an essential requirement of the Information Society, as elaborated in the draft declaration of the WSIS (WSIS/PCIP/DT/1-E): 10. The essential requirements for the development of an equitable Information Society include: The respect for all internationally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms. Notably the right to freedom of opinion and expression, including the right to hold opinions without interference and seek to, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers in accordance with article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to unhindered access by individuals to communication media and information sources… As the United Nations highest human rights official, your good offices are needed to ensure that human rights language in the WSIS process is comprehensive, strong and consistent with resolutions and decisions adopted by the Commission on Human Rights and build upon human rights language developed through the various UN world summits and conferences. Civil society organizations view ICTs as having both tremendous applications that enhance human rights, such as through the rapid dissemination of action alerts and instant access to human rights information, and disturbing capacities to greatly diminish human rights, such as by providing governments with means enabling intrusive surveillance and monitoring and therefore, repression.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Procedure Mandate-Holders Presenting to the Third Committee
    GA66 Third Committee Subject to change – Status as of 7 October 2011 Special procedure mandate-holders, Chairs of human rights treaty bodies or Chairs of Working Groups presenting reports Monday, 10 October (am) • Chair of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Ms. Silvia Pimentel – oral report and interactive dialogue. • Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Rashida MANJOO report and interactive dialogue. Wednesday, 12 October (pm) • Chair of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Mr. Jean Zermatten, – oral report. • Special Representative of the Secretary-General on violence against children, Ms. Marta SANTOS PAIS. • Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Ms. Najat M’jid MAALLA. Monday, 17 October (am) • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, Mr. James ANAYA. Tuesday, 18 October (am) • Chair of the Committee against Torture, Mr. Claudio GROSSMAN – oral report and interactive dialogue. • Chair of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, Mr. Malcolm David Evans – oral report and interactive dialogue. • Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of punishment, Mr. Juan MENDEZ Wednesday, 19 October (pm) • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Iran, Mr. Ahmed SHAHEED. • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Mr. Tomas Ojea QUINTANA. • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Mr. Marzuki DARUSMAN. Thursday, 20 October (am) • Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • It Should Be Noted That the Articles Contained in Disarmament Forum Are the Sole Responsibility of the Individual Authors
    It should be noted that the articles contained in Disarmament Forum are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. Printed at United Nations, Geneva GE.04-00125—January 2004 —3,600 UNIDIR/DF/2004/1 ISSN 1020-7287 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor's Note Kerstin VIGNARD................................................................................................................ 1 Special Comment United Nations Secretary-General Kofi ANNAN .................................................................. 3 Strengthening Disarmament and Security The nuclear non-proliferation regime: back to the future? John SIMPSON ................................................................................................................... 5 Arms control, disarmament and the United Nations Patricia LEWIS and Ramesh THAkuR ................................................................................... 17 The United Nations and the campaign against terrorism Chantal DE JONGE OUDRAAT............................................................................................ 29 Human rights and human security Bertrand RAMCHARAN ...................................................................................................... 39 Disarmament education: practicing what you preach Miguel MARÍN-BOSCH ....................................................................................................... 49 Open Forum Reversible or irreversible?
    [Show full text]
  • National Assembly
    February 23, 2016 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 1 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT Tuesday, 23rd February, 2016 The House met at 2.30 p.m. [The Speaker (Hon. Muturi) in the Chair] PRAYERS COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR DISCHARGE OF MEMBERS FROM COMMITTEES Hon. Speaker: Hon. Members, I want to encourage you to pay attention to what is happening. Hon. Members, I have this Communication from the Chair which is on discharge of Members from Committees. I wish to report to the House that I am in receipt of a letter dated 16th February 2016, from the Minority Party Whip notifying me that the CORD Coalition has discharged the following Members from Committees: (i) Hon. Khatib Mwashetani, MP, who is discharged from the Departmental Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. (ii) Hon. Salim Idd Mustafa, MP, who is discharged from the Departmental Committee on Labour and Social welfare and the Joint Committee on Parliamentary Broadcasting and Library. He is the Vice-Chairperson of the latter Committee. (iii) Hon. Gideon Mung’aro, MP, who is discharged from the Departmental Committee on Lands. Hon. Members, the letter which is written pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order No. 176 also intends to discharge Hon. Khatib Mwashetani, MP, from the House Business Committee (HBC) and the Budget and Appropriations Committee. However, it is a fact that the Member for Lungalunga Constituency is not a Member of the HBC which was constituted by this House on 9th February 2016. You are also aware that the Budget and Appropriations Committee is yet to be reconstituted. This, therefore, implies that the intended discharge of the Member for Lungalunga from these two Committees was inadvertent.
    [Show full text]