Friends of Collector Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Friends of Collector Inc Friends of Collector Inc Submission Select Committee on Wind Turbines Select Committee on Wind Turbines PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 March 20, 2015 22 March 2015 Senate Inquiry into Wind Farms 2 Introduction and context The Friends of Collector organisation and its members congratulate the Senate on initiating this inquiry and opening up the wind industry and the policy settings that support it to closer public scrutiny. In responding to the invitation to provide a submission, while we are concerned about a number of the aspects outlined in the terms of reference, we have opted to focus on term of reference (d), namely: The implementation of planning processes in relation to wind farms, including the level of information available to prospective wind farm hosts Formed in early 2011 and with close to 100 members, the FOC has for more than four years maintained its firm opposition to the establishment of an what was planned to be an 88- turbine wind farm extending along 15 km on the ridges extending from the Hume Highway at Cullerin to above the Collector Village near Lake George in NSW, barely 60km from Canberra. This would adjoin the already established Cullerin Wind Farm with 15 turbines on the northern side of the Hume Highway. It would also be close to the established Capital Wind Farm at Lake George and with 67 turbines, currently the largest wind farm in NSW. It is also close to the proposed Tarago wind farm with a further 110 turbines. Since the unveiling of the Transfield Services proposal for Collector in 2010, the FOC and the local community have endured the worst of NSW’s planning processes including a cynical and tokenistic community consultation effort by the wind farm proponent. In 2011, in the face of strong opposition from the local community including a complaint to the NSW Planning Minister and ICAC that it had failed to declare almost $40,000 in political donations despite being required to under the planning rules, Transfield Services sold down an 80% interest in the wind farm to Thai energy company Ratchaburi to form RATCH Australia. Since then the Collector community had dealt with RATCH. Wind farms have lost their social licence to operate In the end, despite our best efforts to express our deep reservations and opposition to the proposal, late in December 2013 the NSW Planning Assessment recommended approval for a reduced scheme of 55 turbines along much of the ridge near Collector. Because of RATCH and Transfield’s own actions and approach, their relationship with the Collector community had become so toxic and dysfunctional that even in approving the reduced 55 turbine scheme the NSW Planning Assessment Commission found that ‘it (the RATCH/Transfield community consultation) has not been best practice and has exacerbated tensions within the Collector community’. 22 March 2015 Senate Inquiry into Wind Farms 3 We go further; we believe at Collector and more widely across NSW and other parts of Australia, the wind industry’s anti-community practices mean that it has squandered its social licence to operate. The industry must radically change its model and practices to regain any semblance of trust and co-operation with communities and regain its social licence to operate. We would prefer that the Senate encourage the Government to support renewable technologies other than wind as we head towards more reliance on renewable energy sources. The Government should divert any future funding for renewable projects away from wind to lower impact technologies, particularly large scale solar. And it is not only the Friends of Collector who believe the wind industry has lost its social licence to operate in NSW. Even some of the most ardent supporters of wind energy believe it has done so – even the ALP and Green dominated ACT Government which is committed to a 90% renewable energy target by 2020. NSW wind farms rejected by ALP ACT Gov’t in wind auction In February, only a matter of weeks ago, the ACT Government refused to award any NSW wind farm – including that already approved at Collector – any contract for long term supply of energy to the Canberra market under its much-touted ‘wind auction’. Given the ACT Government’s clear intention to support the establishment of local NSW wind farms, this is a signficant decision based partly on price but also openly on the lack of NSW wind farms to properly engage with their affected communities. All developers participating in the wind auction were required to demonstrate best practice community engagement processes for their projects and contributions to local job creation. The ACT ‘wind auction’ was concluded in February 2015 with three successful proponents: • Ararat Wind Farm Pty Ltd for a 80.5 MW proposal to be located north-west of Ballarat, Victoria. The project is being developed by RES Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of RES UK, a global renewable energy company. • Coonooer Bridge Wind Farm Pty Ltd for a 19.4 MW proposal to be located north- west of Bendigo, Victoria. The project is being developed by Windlab Ltd, a Canberra based renewable energy company. • Hornsdale Wind Farm Pty Ltd for a 100 MW proposal to be located south-east of Port Augusta, South Australia. The project is being developed by Neoen, a French based renewable energy company. This lack of a social licence and dificulties in dealing with community concerns was raised in the ABC Country Hour report on the ACT Government announcement in February: 22 March 2015 Senate Inquiry into Wind Farms 4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-06/act-wind-farm-contract/6075646 Australian Capital Territory energy contract to interstate wind farms blow to local operators NSW Country Hour - Michael CavanaGh An inability to work with the wider community is one reason given for rejecting a number of wind farms in southern New South Wales vying to supply electricity to the Australian Capital Territory. Licences to provide power were granted to two Victorian operations and one in South Australia which will begin pushing electricity into the grid by 2017. A number of wind farms surrounding the ACT had hoped to be part of the deal. "They need to continue to push hard," ACT Environment Minister Simon Corbell stated. "There are some good projects in the region but they just weren't as strong as other projects. "I would encourage them to look at the outcomes of the auction." The criteria set by the government includes price, and also how the companies operating the wind farms were involved with the community.” Members of Friends of Collector were also advised by the ACT Government Minister Corbell of this focus on the need for positive community engagement (see attached letter) Wind industry pattern of negative behaviour built on sense of entitlement The Senate has a genuine opportunity to see for itself in the range of submissions that there is a pattern of negative and cynical behaviour towards communities displayed by the wind industry that is not confined to one company or another. The negative practices are endemic and are a reflection of how the wind industry sees itself, namely one that is entitled to impose turbines on communities virtually at will for their own financial gain all under the guise of, and in the wider interests of, increasing renewable energy generation. This sense of entitlement should be unacceptable to government, to electricity consumers and particularly to the wider community. Under these practices, little attention is paid to addressing genuine community concerns. The goal is to gain as quickly as possible planning approval in spite of, rather than with, those residents affected. 22 March 2015 Senate Inquiry into Wind Farms 5 Communities are seen as an inconvenient bump in the road. The relationship with RATCH/Transfield in our direct experience at Collector is at best described as passive- aggressive. Rarely has it been constructive. A member of the Friends of Collector did attempt to bridge the gap and in 2012 agreed to join a RATCH-established ‘community forum’. His letter of resignation is copied below. His comments are self-explanatory. COLLECTOR NSW 2581 Ms Chair Collector Windfarm Forum Resignation from the Ratch Australia Collector Windfarm Community Forum Dear Ms I hereby resign from the Forum. Thank you for the opportunity to participate over the past two years. I believe in climate change and renewable energy and had hoped that Ratch Australia would effectively engage with the Collector community. Unfortunately, much of Ratch’s engagement has been characterised by false and misleading information: people have been reported to be at meetings when they have not been there; to have supported positions and roles which they have not agreed to; and points of disagreement or where tangible commitment has been required have been either ignored or evaded by clever words. It has become apparent that looking good for Government stakeholders is clearly a higher priority for Ratch than honest communication with the Collector community. The recent Collector community petition where over 80% of the townspeople call for the ACT Government to reject Ratch’s wind auction tender, confirms its failures in this area. Two years of clever, empty promises and meetings is enough: there are better things to do! People here want more than public relations spin in return for destroying our visual amenity, real estate values and community harmony. Yours sincerely 6 August 2014 Our concerns and experience is further outlined in detail in our submission to the Planning Assessment Commission in 2013 and this is attached for reference. 22 March 2015 Senate Inquiry into Wind Farms 6 Over the years we believe that this unacceptable ‘shortcutting’ behaviour by the wind industry has received succour and quiet encouragement from some pro-renewable energy policy makers and administators within the NSW, ACT and Federal bureaucracy.
Recommended publications
  • Emergency Response Plan Capital & Woodlawn Wind Farms
    Emergency Response Plan Capital & Woodlawn Wind Farms Document Version: 1.1 Document Date: 23 January 2018 If an incident has occurred, evacuate if required and immediately refer to Section 2 - Emergency Response Flowchart on page 7. Call 000 (triple zero) or radio Site Supervisor for assistance. All staff members should familiarise themselves with this document. Contents 1 - Plan Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 - Emergency Response Flowchart .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3 - Site Details ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Location ............................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Site Office (O&M Building) ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Site Muster Location ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Site Layout ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Industry Overview
    RENEWABLE ENERGY INDUSTRY OVERVIEW Aaron Bonanno and Chris Martell Training • Consulting • Engineering • Publications creating sustainable change through education, communication and leadership © 2014 GSES P/L COMPANY PROFILE Established in 1998, GSES® leads Australia in renewable energy engineering, training and consultancy. - Official Australian - System testing and - Grid Connected PV, - Grid Connected PV Registered Training commissioning Stand-Alone PV and Systems Design and Organisation (RTO) hybrid system design Installation - Tender specification and - Face to face practical evaluation - Feasibility studies - Stand Alone Power and online training Systems Design and - System compliance - DNSP liaison for Grid Installation - Grid Connect PV (GCPV), inspections for the Clean Connected systems Stand-Alone, GC with Energy Regulator and - News releases, Technical Batteries, Solar private business Articles and much more. Fundamentals, etc. creating sustainable change through education, communication and leadership © 2014 GSES P/L CONTENTS • Status of the Renewable Energy Sector • Australia • Global • Current Industry Direction • Policy • Economic Drivers • Disruptive Technology • What is the Future of the Industry • New Technology • New Energy Markets creating sustainable change through education, communication and leadership © 2014 GSES P/L INTRODUCTION United Nations World Human Population Estimated Global Energy Consumption Per Capita Current Consumption In Relatable Terms: 80Gj/person/year ~= 60kWh/person/day ~= 390TWh Globally/day
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in NSW: Myths and Facts
    Wind Energy in NSW: Myths and Facts 1 INTRODUCTION Wind farms produce clean energy, generate jobs and income in regional areas and have minimal environmental impacts if appropriately located. Wind farms are now increasingly commonplace and accepted by communities in many parts of the world, but they are quite new to NSW. To increase community understanding and involvement in renewable energy, the NSW Government has established six Renewable Energy Precincts in areas of NSW with the best known wind resources. As part of the Renewable Energy Precincts initiative, the NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW) has compiled the following information to increase community understanding about wind energy. The technical information has been reviewed by the Centre for Environmental and Energy Markets, University of NSW. The Wind Energy Fact Sheet is a shorter and less technical brochure based on the Wind Energy in NSW: Myths and Facts. The brochure is available for download at www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/climatechange/10923windfacts.pdf. For further renewable energy information resources, please visit the Renewable Energy Precincts Resources webpage at http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/climatechange/reprecinctresources.htm. 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...............................................................................................................3 WIND FARM NOISE ..................................................................................................4 WIND TURBINES AND SHADOW FLICKER...........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Infigen Energy Annual Report 2018
    Annual Report 2019. Infigen Energy Image: Capital Wind Farm, NSW Front page: Run With The Wind, Woodlawn Wind Farm, NSW Contents. 4 About Infigen Energy 7 2019 Highlights 9 Safety 11 Chairman & Managing Director’s Report Directors’ Report 16 Operating & Financial Review 31 Sustainability Highlights 34 Corporate Structure 35 Directors 38 Executive Directors & Management Team 40 Remuneration Report 54 Other Disclosures 56 Auditor’s Independence Declaration 57 Financial Report 91 Directors’ Declaration 92 Auditor’s Report Additional Information 9 Investor Information 8 10 Glossary 1 10 4 Corporate Directory Infigen Energy Limited ACN 105 051 616 Infigen Energy Trust ARSN 116 244 118 Registered office Level 17, 56 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia +61 2 8031 9900 www.infigenenergy.com 2 Our Strategy. We generate and source renewable energy. We add value by firming. We provide customers with reliable clean energy. 3 About Infigen Energy. Infigen is leading Australia’s transition to a clean energy future. Infigen generates and sources renewable energy, increases the value of intermittent renewables by firming, and provides customers with clean, reliable and competitively priced energy solutions. Infigen generates renewable energy from its owned wind farms in New South Wales (NSW), South Australia (SA) and Western Australia (WA). Infigen also sources renewable energy from third party renewable projects under its ‘Capital Lite’ strategy. Infigen increases the value of intermittent renewables by firming them from the Smithfield Open Cycle Gas Turbine facility in Western Sydney, NSW, and its 25MW/52MWh Battery at Lake Bonney, SA, where commercial operations are expected to commence in H1FY20. Infigen’s energy retailing licences are held in the National Electricity Market (NEM) regions of Queensland, New South Wales (including the Australian Capital Territory), Victoria and South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Minutes of Meeting 8
    Yass Valley Wind Farm & Conroys Gap Wind Farm Level 11, 75 Miller St NORTH SYDNEY, NSW 2060 Phone 02 8456 7400 Draft Minutes of Meeting 8 Yass Valley Wind Farm & Conroys Gap Wind Farm Community Consultation Committee Present: Nic Carmody Chairperson NC Paul Regan Non-involved landowner PR John McGrath Non-involved landowner JM Rowena Weir Non-involved landowner RW Tony Reeves Involved landowner TR Chris Shannon Bookham Ag Bureau CS Peter Crisp Observer PC Barbara Folkard Observer BF Brian Bingley Observer BB Wilma Bingley Observer LB Noeleen Hazell Observer NH Bruce Hazell Observer BH Alan Cole Observer AC Andrew Bray Observer AB Mark Fleming NSW OEH (Observer) MF Andrew Wilson Epuron AW Donna Bolton Epuron DB Julian Kasby Epuron JK Apologies: Sam Weir Bookham Ag Bureau Wendy Tuckerman Administrator Hilltops Council Neil Reid Hilltops Council Stan Waldren Involved landowner YASS VALLEY & CONROYS GAP WIND FARM PTY LTD COMMUNITY CONSULTATION COMMITTEE Page 2 of 7 Absent: Councillor Ann Daniel Yass Valley Council Date: Thursday 23rd June 2016 Venue: Memorial Hall Annex, Comur Street, Yass Purpose: CCC Meeting No 8 Minutes: Item Agenda / Comment / Discussion Action 1 NC opened the Community Consultation Committee (CCC) meeting at 2:00 pm. - Apologies were noted as above. 2 Pecuniary or other interests - No declarations were made. 3 Minutes of Previous meeting No comments were received on the draft minutes of meeting number 7, which had been emailed to committee members. The draft minutes were accepted without changes and the finalised minutes will be posted on the project website. AW 4 Matters arising from the Previous Minutes JM raised that the planned quarterly meetings had not been occurring and that the previous meeting was in March 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Gundaroo's Christmas Lead-Up Begins Early
    Volume 194 Print circulation 570 — Readership keeps growing December 2019 Gundaroo’s Christmas lead-up begins early Gundaroo began gearing up the inaugural Bungendore Open Gardens collaborated in for the festive season at the end of was declared a big success. a widely varied November. On the weekend of 23rd The general repertoire of and 24th, citizens and friends enjoyed opinion was traditional four big events – and they all ‘played that all four songs and selected to packed houses’. gardens – Fieldstone, Christmas Bungendore Open Gardens and Capital Fox’s Folly season songs. Brewing tasting with live music ran all (pictured), (See page 13.) weekend. ‘Concert at the Courthouse’ Thornleigh was held on Saturday afternoon, and The Old A great ‘Food and Film’ combination followed by the Gundaroo Film Society Stonehouse – fundraising dinner on Saturday night. Gundaroo Film Society ended its year were with a specially catered dinner for a And, although not confined to the delightful in packed Hall of more than 90 members weekend, the exhibition of Nino their different and guests, followed by a popular ‘food Bellantonio’s art at the Cork Street Café ways. film’, Mostly Martha. and Gallery was well patronised. (See Six Bungendore charities benefited from page 13.) As always, this end-of-year feast raises the takings, as well as Abbeyfield Aged funds to help with maintenance and Bungendore Open Gardens Care fundraising committee (just from improvement of the Hall. (See Film Having hosted over the weekend more selling morning and afternoon teas). Society article on page 6.) than 1,100 visitors (not counting The weekend is being considered for a Fireside Chats and journey to Bethlehem children) – including from Gundaroo – regular place in the Open Gardens Canberra calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • RRS Final Report De#525C53
    >>>> PRYOR KNOWLEDGE (ACT) Pty Ltd ABN 84 080 527 902 PO Box 2115 Kambah Village Kambah ACT 2902 RESOURCE RECOVERY STRATEGY REPORT for PALERANG COUNCIL June 2006 Pryor Knowledge (ACT) Pty Ltd 1 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary page 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Areas of responsibility 4 1.3 Palerang Council area and population 5 1.4 Present services and waste volumes 5 1.5 Survey results and consultations 6 1.6 The central issue 7 1.7 The recommended solution 7 1.8 Financial implications 9 1.9 Conclusions and recommendations 9 2. Introduction page 11 2.1 What is Waste? 11 2.2 Commercial and Industrial Waste 12 2.3 Building and Demolition Waste 12 2.4 Waste as a resource 12 3. Development of the strategy page 15 3.1 Aim 15 3.2 Stage 1 15 3.3 Stage 2 18 3.4 Stage 3 18 4. Strategy discussion page 19 4.1 Principles 19 4.2 Overview 19 4.3 Discussion of each stage 21 5. Financial considerations page 32 5.1 Matters included in calculations 32 5.2 Overall budget 35 5.3 Financial discussion 37 5.4 Incentives 38 5.5 Management 38 6. Conclusions and Recommendations page 40 6.1 Conclusions 40 6.2 Recommendations 41 Pryor Knowledge (ACT) Pty Ltd 2 7. ATTACHMENTS page 42 1 GENERAL BACKGROUND ON THE SHIRE 42 2 BRIEF OVERVIEW OF NSW LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS 44 3 DATA AND ANALYSIS 52 4 ADDITIONAL DATA FROM BIN AUDITS 65 5 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FORMS 70 6 SURVEY OF RESIDENT RATEPAYERS 76 7 MODEL TRANSFER STATIONS 85 8 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 89 9 WASTE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES 105 10 ORGANIC RESOURCE RECOVERY 108 11 DEMOGRAPHIC AND WASTE STREAM ANALYSIS 112 12 REFERENCES 122 Disclaimer This product has been supplied by Pryor Knowledge (ACT) Pty Ltd solely for use by Palerang Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Resources of New South Wales
    Renewable energy resources of New South Wales Wind Ballina REFERENCE Moree Wind power generator capacity (megawatts) Grafton 100 < 1000 10 < 100 Bourke 1 < 10 less than 1 Co­s Harbour Armidale Wind speed (metres per second) 10.2 Tamworth 6.3 Cobar Nyngan Port Macquarie 2.4 Topographic Broken Hill Dubbo City, town Highway State border Newcastle Key transmission lines (kilovolts) Orange Forbes 66 132 370 people directly employed (2014–15) 220 & 330 Sydney 500 * Mildura 1725 Hay Wollongong GWh generated (2015) Wagga Goulburn Wagga 7 major* wind farms Major project – over 30 MW. Gullen Range Wind Farm A.C.T. Capacity: 172 MW Batemans Bay 327 0 200 km Capital Wind Farm wind turbines Albury Capacity: 140 MW 650 MW maximum capacity Bega Boco Rock Wind Farm Eden Capacity: 114 MW NT QLD This map shows modelled onshore and offshore mean annual wind WA speed data, and the location and capacity of operating wind farms. SA The modelled wind speed data has a spatial resolution of 1 km and is presented at 100 m above the ground. This height is representative of ACT hub heights used for modern wind turbines. Hub height refers to the VIC height of a wind turbine, excluding the length of the turbine blades. TAS www.resourcesandenergy.nsw.gov.au Taralga Wind Farm (107 MW), all of which have been Wind Onshore and offshore wind provided by Garrad Hassan Pacific Pty Ltd Glossary (DNV GL) https://www.dnvgl.com/energy Wind energy commissioned since late 2009. Infographics and figure data sources In 2015, wind energy provided 2.5% of total electricity capacity the amount of energy generated for any length Economic Capacity and generation data compiled by NSW Division of What is wind energy? generated in NSW (including ACT).
    [Show full text]
  • Kyoto Energypark
    Kyoto energypark Appendix K(i) Duponts Property Research Land Value Impact Assessment for Kyoto Energy Park (December 2008) pamada LAND VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENT – KYOTO ENERGY PARK KEY INSIGHTS LAND VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR KYOTO ENERGY PARK Prepared for KEY INSIGHTS December 2008 1 LAND VALUE IMPACT ASSESSMENT – KYOTO ENERGY PARK KEY INSIGHTS INTRODUCTION Duponts has been engaged by Key Insights Pty Ltd to assess the impact on land values of the Kyoto Energy Park at Mountain Station and Middlebrook Station, via Scone. Duponts has made this assessment based on a review of literature on the matter, information of the development gained from the proponent, an informal inspection of the local area, our knowledge of land values in the Scone region and our knowledge of the impact developments of this nature have on land values. BACKGROUND EXISTING WIND FARMS IN NSW There are currently four wind farms operating in NSW including Blayney Wind Farm, Crookwell Wind Farm, Hampton Wind Park and Kooragang Island. In total they generate enough electricity to supply power to approximately 6,000 homes annually. Kooragang Island Crookwell Wind Farm Blayney Wind Farm Hampton Wind Park In 1997 Energy Australia installed 1 wind turbine on Kooragang Island, on the northern side of Newcastle harbour. The wind turbine provides 600kW of energy to Energy Australia’s Pure Energy customers. Crookwell Wind farm has 8 wind turbines located in the southern tablelands of NSW. Opened in 1998 it was the first grid-connected wind farm in Australia. The wind farm has a total capacity of 4.8 MW. The wind farm is currently owned by Eraring Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Southern Inland Region
    WELCOME TO THE SOUTHERN INLAND REGION HILLTOPS UPPER LACHLAN Young WINGECARRIBEE Taralga Boorowa Crookwell Berrima Bowral MossVale Harden Exeter Binalong Gunning Goulburn Yass Marulan YASS Murrumbateman GOUBURN MULwaREE vaLLEY Gundaroo Sutton Bungendore Queanbeyan Queanbeyan- Braidwood paLERANG Captains Flat Adaminaby Cooma Perisher Berridale Valley Nimmitabel Thredbo Jindabyne Village SNOWY MONARO Bombala Delegate WELCOME TO THE SOUTHERN INLAND REGION CONTENTS ABOUT RDA SOUTHERN INLAND 1 WHO WE ARE 1 OUR REGION 1 OUR CHARTER 2 OUR COMMITTEE 2 OUR STAFF 2 HilltoPS 3 UPPER LACHLAN 6 GOULBURN MULWAREE 10 QUEANBEYAN-Palerang 13 SNOWY MONARO 16 WINGECARRIBEE 19 Yass VALLEY 22 What to DO SOON AFTER ARRIVAL IN AUSTRALIA 24 APPLYING FOR A TAX FILE NUMBER 24 MEDICARE 25 OPENING A BANK ACCOUNT IN AUSTRALIA 26 EMERGENCY SERVICES 28 EMPLOYMENT 31 HOUSING 33 TRANSPORT 34 SCHOOLS 35 MULTICULTURAL SERVICES 36 WELCOME to THE SOUTHERN INLAND REGION ABOUT RDA SOUTHERN INLAND WHO WE ARE Regional Development Australia Southern Inland (RDA Southern Inland) is part of a national network of 52 RDA Committees across Australia. These committees are made up of local leaders who work with all levels of government, business and community groups to support the development of regional Australia. Our aim is to maximise economic development opportunities for the Southern Inland region by attracting new businesses and investment to the region, growing our local business potential and encouraging innovation. RDA Southern Inland is administered by the Department of Infrastructure, Regional Development and Cities and is an Australian Government initiative. OUR REGION RDA Southern Inland works across a region that takes in seven local government areas in the south-east of NSW, encompassing 44,639 square kilometres of NSW land area.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Lands Study Report (Exhibited in 2015)
    Attachment 1 VERSION 3.2 PALERANG RURAL LANDS STUDY REPORT Information, issues and options for the future land use of the Palerang rural areas. Prepared by: Garret Barry Planning Services Pty Ltd For: PALERANG COUNCIL June 2015 Palerang Rural Lands Study Report Prepared for: PALERANG COUNCIL JUNE 2015 Garret Barry Planning Services Pty Ltd PO Box 7155 Tathra NSW 2550 tel 02 6494 4145 email [email protected] Palerang Rural Lands Study Report Report Title Palerang Rural Lands Study Report Project: Palerang Rural Lands Study Client: Palerang Council Draft/Final: Draft recommended to Council for public exhibition Note to readers: This is a draft report to be presented to Council for consideration of proceeding to public exhibition. It has been produced by the project consultants, Garret Barry Planning Services Pty Ltd. Reviewed By: Prepared By: G Barry Position: Position: Director Signed: Signed: Date: Date: © Garret Barry Planning Services Pty Ltd June 2015 i Palerang Rural Lands Study Report Document Distribution Version No. Copies Format Issued To Date 2 Word and PDF Project Manager 03/02/15 3 Word Project Manager 27/04/15 3.2 Word Project Manager 26/5/15 Study Team Member Name Position Organisation Garret Barry Director Garret Barry Planning Services Stig Virtanen Researcher Garret Barry Planning Services Leanne Jackson GIS Garret Barry Planning Services © Garret Barry Planning Services Pty Ltd June 2015 ii Palerang Rural Lands Study Report TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................... IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... XI 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Palerang Rural Lands Study ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Council Welcomes More Than $6.3 Million in Funding to Boost Local Economy and Improve Local Roads
    TheThe ValleyValley ViewsViews Issue 35 | Spring 2020 COUNCIL WELCOMES MORE THAN $6.3 MILLION IN FUNDING TO BOOST LOCAL ECONOMY AND IMPROVE LOCAL ROADS Mayor Rowena Abbey (centre) welcomed Goulburn MP Wendy Tuckerman, NSW Transport and Roads Minister Paul Toole, Nationals by-election candidate Trevor Hicks and Deputy FUNDING SNAPSHOT Prime Minister Michael McCormack to Yass on Monday, 29 June Application One: Resealing 56km of local roads • Total cost – $2,745,000. Yass Valley Council has of the program will be welcomed more than $6.3 $6,340,000 of which Council • Grant funding – $2,395,000. million in funding provided will contribute $800,000 • Council contribution – $350,000. by the NSW and Australian from the Development Application Two: Rehabilitation of 8kms of sealed roads Governments to improve local Contribution Reserve. • Total cost – $3,595,000. roads, accelerate community At the ordinary meeting on • Grant funding – $3,145,000. projects and support jobs Wednesday, 22 July, Council throughout the region. also accepted funding of • Council contribution – $450,000. The NSW Government made $857, 227 provided by the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program a $500 million commitment Australian Government • LED Upgrade of Council’s Street Lighting – $472,341* to improve council roads under the Local Roads and • Construction of a shared path between Nash Place to Yass across rural and regional Community Infrastructure Valley Way then to Grand Junction Road – 130m – $35,000. NSW under the Fixing Local Program. This program aims Roads Program in late 2019. to assist community led • Construction of a shared path in Dutton Street, Yass The Australian Government recovery from COVID-19 by between Rossi Street to Riverbank Park – 200m – $55,000.
    [Show full text]