DOCSLIB.ORG

Fall 2019 Salinas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH Fall 2019 Salinas Monterey FORESTWATCH ADVOCATES JOIN NATIONWIDE CHORUS AGAINST LOOKING ACROSS Carmel River NATIONAL FOREST ROLLBACKS The Trump administration has proposed drastic changes to environmental protections for national for- THE FOREST Carmel valley ests. These changes would effectively gut the National Environmental Policy Act as it relates to the Los Padres and other forests throughout the country by creating massive loopholes for commercial logging and other activities while eliminating opportunities for public comment. Read more on page 4. An update on how we're protecting your region Big Sur Big Sur River Salinas River King city Table of Contents Arroyo Seco River YOUTH HELP REMOVE TRASH ON LA CUMBRE PEAK Base Camp .............................................................................................. 1 We teamed up with the Boys & Girls Club of Santa Barbara over the summer Comings and Goings ........................................................................... 1 San Antonio River to clean up La Cumbre Peak. These students, ranging from elementary to high school, explored the peak, enjoyed the ocean views, and gave the area Carrizo Victory ................................................................................... 2 a makeover! Logging Lawsuits ................................................................................ 3 NEPA Rollbacks ................................................................................... 4 Ojai WILD! Highlights ........................................................................ 5 Connecting Communities to Our Public Lands ........................... 6 FOREST SERVICE TO CONVERT STORM-DAMAGED ROAD TO NEW TRAIL Getting the Lead Out ......................................................................... 7 We were excited to see the Forest Service select an environmentally-friendly alternative Membership Has Its Benefits ............................................................ 7 to their La Brea Restoration Project that will decommission extremely-damaged roads and convert them to new hiking, biking, and horseback trails. These trails will serve as new ForestWatch Goes to Washington ................................................ 8 access points to the San Rafael Wilderness. Stellar Support: Rose Foundation ................................................. 8 Upcoming: Santa Barbara WILD! ........................................................ 9 San Luis Obispo HALTED! NEW DRILLING & PIPELINE IN THE CARRIZO PLAIN NATIONAL MONUMENT FORESTWATCH TAKES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO COURT OVER LOGGING PROJECTS Cuyama River Carrizo Plain The Bureau of Land Management upheld our appeal of their decision to allow drilling of a This summer, we spearheaded a legal challenge to two commercial logging projects near Mt. Pinos approved by the Forest new oil well and construction of a new pipeline in the Caliente Mountains of the Carrizo Service without proper environmental review or public input. One of the projects threatens California condor roosting sites. Plain National Monument. See page 2 for more details. Read more on page 3. New cuyama Santa maria Sisquoc River Frazier park FORESTWATCH TEAMS UP WITH SEAVEES TO CLEAN UP SANTA PAULA CANYON VOLUNTEERS AND FORESTWATCH TEAM Piru Creek ForestWatch teamed up with our good friends at SeaVees in Santa Barbara helped clean up Santa Paula Canyon on Earth UP TO CLEAN THE PLAYGROUND Day. They hiked to Big Cone Camp and back, picking up over 100 pounds of trash along the way! Santa Ynez We joined forces with AppFolio to remove trash throughout The Playground, a popular hiking and climbing spot in the Santa Barbara frontcountry. The group made it all the way Santa Ynez River Sespe Creek through the maze of boulders and even explored the famous Narrows—all while removing broken glass and beer cans. Santa Barbara Santa Clara River Ojai OJAI WILD! A MAJOR SUCCESS! Ventura Thank you to all of our guests, vendors and volunteers for helping to protect RESERVE YOUR SEATS AT THIS YEAR’S SANTA BARBARA WILD! Los Padres National Forest and the Carrizo Plain National Monument. Come enjoy an afternoon of friendship, auctions, live music, farm-to-table delectables and advocacy for our backyard. FALL2019 Cover Photo: Sunset on the Santa Ynez Mountains, by Bryant Baker BASE CAMP We often talk about the work we do in the context of future generations—protecting our national forests today so that future generations can continue to explore and enjoy them tomorrow. This summer, I saw this dynamic play out firsthand while taking our two boys—ages 7 and 9—on their first overnight backpacking trip in the Sierra. FORESTWATCH We hopped across boulders, crossed mountain streams, and BOARD conquered switchbacks. We were rewarded with extraordinary views of snow-capped peaks, wildflower-speckled meadows, starry ALLAN MORTON, President nights, quiet solitude, and a healthy sense of adventure. Santa Barbara Jeff Kuyper Executive Director It was an experience they’ll never forget. Their highlight was making RUSS RADOM, Vice President flavored snow-cones from a patch of snow a short hike from camp. Santa Ynez Valley But for me, the highlight was watching their curiosity unfold around every corner, the “wild” in TERRI LAINE, Secretary CARRIZO VICTORY wilderness freeing their imaginations. Around the lake, one brother carved a stick and stalked Oak View around the shore, hoping to spear a fish, while the other gave the fish names and secretly scared PATRICIA KROUT, Treasurer ForestWatch Halts Plans for New Oil Well and Pipeline them away so that they wouldn’t get caught. This lasted for hours. Santa Barbara Our public lands make moments like these possible. America’s national forests, national parks, RACHAEL BARKLEY This summer, the California Bureau of The oil well would have been drilled Carrizo Plain National Monument is and national monuments give us all hope for the future. They bring families together, create Ojai Land Management (BLM) halted plans on an existing oil pad that hasn’t been a vast expanse of grasslands and stark memories, and remind everyone – younger and older alike—about the truly important things for a new oil well and pipeline in Carrizo productive since the 1950s. Two years ridges known for their springtime CHRIS COLLIER in life. Plain National Monument. The decision ago, the oil company confirmed plans wildflower displays. Often referred to as Camarillo Conservationist Kris Tompkins says it best: “If you want to build an army of people who love nature, was in response to an appeal of the to abandon the pad, remove the old “California’s Serengeti,” it is one of the you have to get them out into it. You can’t protect a place unless you understand it. You can’t love it until ANNA DELASKI project’s approval, filed last year by Los drilling equipment, and restore the area last undeveloped remnants of the vast you know it.” Santa Ynez Valley Padres ForestWatch and the Center for and return it to the monument. The native grasslands that once carpeted ETHAN STONE Biological Diversity. It would have been work was never done. California’s inland valleys. Our public lands are places where we can all go to recharge our shared commitment to the first well approved by the Interior protecting the outdoors. They are places we can take our loved ones, so that they too can know Santa Barbara “We have precious few wild places left,” The Carrizo Plain is critical for Department since the monument was said Jeff Kuyper, Executive Director of the long-term conservation of the it, understand it, love it, and protect it. SAM THOMAS established in 2001. Thousand Oaks Los Padres ForestWatch. “The monument dwindling biodiverse southern San From the Sierra to the Rockies, from the Appalachians to the Cascades, and from the Andes to The agency's deputy director found that is already surrounded by oil development. Joaquin Valley ecosystem. It links the Coast and Transverse Ranges right here in our own backyard, thank you for building our the Bakersfield Field Office approved The line has to be drawn.” other valuable wildlife habitat like the army of people who love our shared public lands. Together we can continue making a difference FORESTWATCH the project without evaluating Los Padres National Forest, Salinas while building the next generation of wilderness stewards. greenhouse gas emissions, and how Valley, Cuyama Valley, and Bitter STAFF the project might impact threatened Creek National Wildlife Refuge in and endangered wildlife, and the western Kern County giving birds COMINGS AND GOINGS JEFF KUYPER climate. The field office was ordered and animals room to roam. As the Executive Director to conduct a new environmental impacts from climate change and Join us in bidding a fond farewell to Nathan Wallace! He served on analysis, including a consultation expanding regional industrialization BRYANT BAKER our Board as our financial advisor for two years, helping set up a Conservation Director with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife pressure our remaining wild places, system to accept donations of stock as a tax savings for our donors, Service. an uncompromising commitment to enacting policies to improve our long-term financial sustainability, REBECCA AUGUST The proposed well site is located Existing oil leases were “grandfathered” in their protection is the only hope that introducing us to new supporters throughout the Ojai Valley, Director of Advocacy at the base of the Caliente Mountains under the monument proclamation signed they will endure
Recommended publications
  • Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game

    Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game

    July 24, 2006 Ryan Broderick, Director California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Improving efficiency of California’s fish hatchery system Dear Director Broderick: On behalf of the Pacific Rivers Council and Center for Biological Diversity, we are writing to express our concerns about the state’s fish hatchery and stocking system and to recommend needed changes that will ensure that the system does not negatively impact California’s native biological diversity. This letter is an update to our letter of August 31, 2005. With this letter, we are enclosing many of the scientific studies we relied on in developing this letter. Fish hatcheries and the stocking of fish into lakes and streams cause numerous measurable, significant environmental effects on California ecosystems. Based on these impacts, numerous policy changes are needed to ensure that the Department of Fish and Game’s (“DFG”) operation of the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not adversely affect California’s environment. Further, as currently operated, the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, Administrative Procedures Act, California Endangered Species Act, and federal Endangered Species Act. The impacts to California’s environment, and needed policy changes to bring the state’s hatchery and stocking program into compliance with applicable state and federal laws, are described below. I. FISH STOCKING NEGATIVELY IMPACTS CALIFORNIA’S NATIVE SALMONIDS, INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Introduced salmonids negatively impact native salmonids in a variety of ways. Moyle, et. al. (1996) notes that “Introduction of non-native fish species has also been the single biggest factor associated with fish declines in the Sierra Nevada.” Moyle also notes that introduced species are contributing to the decline of 18 species of native Sierra Nevada fish species, and are a major factor in the decline of eight of those species.
  • Paleomagnetic Analysis of Miocene Basalt Flows in the Tehachapi Mountains, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2100

    Paleomagnetic Analysis of Miocene Basalt Flows in the Tehachapi Mountains, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2100

    Paleomagnetic Analysis of Miocene Basalt Flows in the Tehachapi Mountains, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2100 AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
  • State of California

    State of California

    Upper Piru Creek Wild Trout Management Plan 2012-2017 State of California Department of Fish and Game Heritage and Wild Trout Program South Coast Region Prepared by Roger Bloom, Stephanie Mehalick, and Chris McKibbin 2012 Table of contents Executive summary .................................................................................. 3 Resource status ........................................................................................ 3 Area description ...................................................................................................... 3 Land ownership/administration ............................................................................... 4 Public access .......................................................................................................... 4 Designations ........................................................................................................... 4 Area maps............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 1. Vicinity map of upper Piru Creek watershed ............................................ 5 Figure 2. Map of upper Piru Creek Heritage and Wild Trout-designated reach....... 6 Fishery description.................................................................................................. 6 Figure 3. Photograph of USGS gaging station near confluence of Piru and Buck creeks ..................................................................................................................... 7
  • Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State

    Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State

    Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Alabama Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama WILD William B. Bankhead National Forest 6,134 110 6,244 SCENIC William B. Bankhead National Forest 3,550 505 4,055 Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Arizona Fossil Creek, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 1,720 0 1,720 Tonto National Forest 1,085 0 1,085 RECREATIONAL Coconino National Forest 1,137 4 1,141 Tonto National Forest 1,136 0 1,136 Fossil Creek, Arizona Totals 5,078 4 5,082 Verde, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 525 0 525 Tonto National Forest 6,234 0 6,234 SCENIC Coconino National Forest 2,862 0 2,862 Prescott National Forest 2,148 25 2,173 Tonto National Forest 649 0 649 Verde, Arizona Totals 12,418 25 12,443 Arizona Totals 17,496 29 17,525 2020 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Arkansas Big Piney Creek, Arkansas SCENIC Ozark National Forest 6,448 781 7,229 Big Piney Creek, Arkansas Totals 6,448 781 7,229 Buffalo, Arkansas WILD Ozark National Forest 2,871 0 2,871 SCENIC Ozark National Forest 1,915 0 1,915 Buffalo, Arkansas Totals 4,785 0 4,786
  • Region of the San Andreas Fault, Western Transverse Ranges, California

    Region of the San Andreas Fault, Western Transverse Ranges, California

    Thrust-Induced Collapse of Mountains— An Example from the “Big Bend” Region of the San Andreas Fault, Western Transverse Ranges, California By Karl S. Kellogg Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5206 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Geology of the Mount Pinos and Frazier Mountain Region …………………………………… 3 Fracturing of Crystalline Rocks in the Hanging Wall of Thrusts ……………………………… 5 Worldwide Examples of Gravitational Collapse ……………………………………………… 6 A Spreading Model for Mount Pinos and Frazier Mountain ………………………………… 6 Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………………………… 8 References …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Illustrations 1. Regional geologic map of the western Transverse Ranges of southern California …………………………………………………………………………… 2 2. Simplified geologic map of the Mount Pinos-Frazier Mountain region …………… 2 3. View looking southeast across the San Andreas rift valley toward Frazier Mountain …………………………………………………………………… 3 4. View to the northwest of Mount Pinos, the rift valley (Cuddy Valley) of the San Andreas fault, and the trace of the Lockwood Valley fault ……………… 3 5.
  • List of Fish and Game Commission Designated Wild Trout Waters

    List of Fish and Game Commission Designated Wild Trout Waters

    The following waters are designated by the Commission as "wild trout waters": 1. American River, North Fork, from Palisade Creek downstream to Iowa Hill Bridge (Placer County). 2. Carson River, East Fork, upstream from confluence with Wolf Creek excluding tributaries (Alpine County). 3. Clavey River, upstream from confluence with Tuolumne River excluding tributaries (Tuolumne County). 4. Fall River, from Pit No. 1 powerhouse intake upstream to origin at Thousand Springs including Spring Creek, but excluding all other tributaries (Shasta County). 5. Feather River, Middle Fork, from Oroville Reservoir upstream to Sloat vehicle bridge, excluding tributaries (Butte and Plumas counties). 6. Hat Creek, from Lake Britton upstream to Hat No. 2 powerhouse (Shasta County). 7. Hot Creek, from Hot Springs upstream to west property line of Hot Creek Ranch (Mono County). 8. Kings River, from Pine Flat Lake upstream to confluence with South and Middle forks excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 9. Kings River, South Fork, from confluence with Middle Fork upstream to western boundary of Kings Canyon National Park excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 10. Merced River, South Fork, from confluence with mainstem Merced River upstream to western boundary of Yosemite National Park excluding tributaries (Mariposa County). 11. Nelson Creek, upstream from confluence with Middle Fork Feather River excluding tributaries (Plumas County). 12. Owens River, from Five Bridges crossing upstream to Pleasant Valley Dam excluding tributaries (Inyo County). 13. Rubicon River, from confluence with Middle Fork American River upstream to Hell Hole Dam excluding tributaries (Placer County). 14. Yellow Creek, from Big Springs downstream to confluence with the North Fork of the Feather River (Plumas County).
  • Draft SEIR Chapter 2 Program Description

    Draft SEIR Chapter 2 Program Description

    1 Chapter 2 2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 3 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Program Purpose 5 The purpose of the Proposed Program is to establish and implement a permitting program 6 for suction dredging activities consistent with the requirements of Fish and Game Code 7 section 5653 et seq. and the December 2006 Court Order. 8 2.1.2 Program Objectives 9 The objectives of the Proposed Program are as follows: 10 Comply with the December 2006 Court Order; 11 Promulgate amendments to CDFG’s previous regulations as necessary to 12 effectively implement Fish and Game Code sections 5653 and 5653.9 and other 13 applicable legal authorities to ensure that suction dredge mining will not be 14 deleterious to fish; 15 Develop a program that is implementable within the existing fee structure 16 established by statute for the CDFG’s suction dredge permitting program, as well 17 as the existing fee structure established by the CDFG pursuant to Fish and Game 18 Code section 1600 et seq.; 19 Fulfill CDFG’s mission to manage California's diverse fish, wildlife, and plant 20 resources, and the habitats upon which they depend, for their ecological values 21 and for their use and enjoyment by the public; 22 Ensure that the development of the regulations considers economic costs, 23 practical considerations for implementation, and technological capabilities 24 existing at the time of implementation; and 25 Fulfill the CDFG’s obligation to conserve, protect, and manage fish, wildlife, 26 native plants, and habitats necessary for biologically sustainable populations of 27 those species and as a trustee agency for fish and wildlife resources pursuant to 28 Fish and Game Code section 1802.
  • Temporal and Spatial Trends of Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary Underplating of Pelona and Related Schist Beneath Southern California and Southwestern Arizona

    Temporal and Spatial Trends of Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary Underplating of Pelona and Related Schist Beneath Southern California and Southwestern Arizona

    spe374-14 page 1 of 26 Geological Society of America Special Paper 374 2003 Temporal and spatial trends of Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary underplating of Pelona and related schist beneath southern California and southwestern Arizona M. Grove Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, 595 Charles Young Drive E, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA Carl E. Jacobson Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA Andrew P. Barth Department of Geology, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5132, USA Ana Vucic Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA ABSTRACT The Pelona, Orocopia, and Rand Schists and the schists of Portal Ridge and Sierra de Salinas constitute a high–pressure-temperature terrane that was accreted beneath North American basement in Late Cretaceous–earliest Tertiary time. The schists crop out in a belt extending from the southern Coast Ranges through the Mojave Desert, central Transverse Ranges, southeastern California, and southwest- ern Arizona. Ion microprobe U-Pb results from 850 detrital zircons from 40 meta- graywackes demonstrates a Late Cretaceous to earliest Tertiary depositional age for the sedimentary part of the schist’s protolith. About 40% of the 206Pb/238U spot ages are Late Cretaceous. The youngest detrital zircon ages and post-metamorphic mica 40Ar/39Ar cooling ages bracket when the schist’s graywacke protolith was eroded from its source region, deposited, underthrust, accreted, and metamorphosed. This interval averages 13 ± 10 m.y. but locally is too short (<~3 m.y.) to be resolved with our methods.
  • Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project

    Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project

    DRAFT Environmental Impact Report California State Clearinghouse No. 2005011071 Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project April 2005 This page intentionally left blank. DRAFT Environmental Impact Report California State Clearinghouse No. 2005011071 Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project Prepared for Castaic Lake Water Agency 27234 Bouquet Canyon Road Santa Clarita, California 91350 Prepared by April 2005 525 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara, California 93101 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ...............................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Intended Uses of the EIR...................................................................................................1-4 1.4 Permits and Other Approvals Required to Implement the Project.............................1-4 1.5 Related Environmental Documentation .........................................................................1-5 1.6 Public Involvement Process..............................................................................................1-5
  • Public Law 111-11

    Public Law 111-11

    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
  • 28 Critical Habitat Units for the California Red-Legged Frog In

    28 Critical Habitat Units for the California Red-Legged Frog In

    28 Critical Habitat Units for the California Red-Legged Frog In response to a 12-20-99, federal court order won by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Jumping Frog Research Institute, the Pacific Rivers Council and the Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service designated 4,138,064 acres of critical habitat for the California red-legged frog. The March 6, 2001 designation is comprised of 29 units spanning 28 California counties. UNIT ACRES COUNTY WATERSHEDS AND OWNERSHIP North Fork Feather 115,939 Butte Drainages within the North Fork Feather River watershed including the River Plumas French Creek watershed. 81% Plumas and Lassen National Forests, 19% mostly private land. Weber 59,531 El Dorado Drainages in Weber Creek and North Fork Cosumnes River watersheds. Creek-Cosumnes 64% private lands, 36% El Dorado National Forest Yosemite 124,336 Tuolumne Tributaries of the Tuolumne River and Jordan Creek, a tributary to the Mariposa Merced River 100% Stanislaus National Forest or Yosemite National Park. Headwaters of 38,300 Tehama Includes drainages within the headwaters of Cottonwood and Red Bank Cottonwood Creek creeks. 82 % private lands, 18% Mendocino National Forest. Cleary Preserve 34,087 Napa Drainages within watersheds forming tributaries to Pope Creek 88% private, 12% federal and state Annadel State Park 6,326 Sonoma Upper Sonoma Creek watershed found partially within Annadel State Preserve Park. 76% private, 24% California Department of Parks and Recreation Stebbins Cold 21,227 Napa Drainages found within and adjacent to Stebbins Cold Canyon Preserve Canyon Preserve Solano and the Quail Ridge Wilderness Preserve including watersheds that form Capell Creek, including Wragg Canyon, Markley Canyon, Steel Canyon and the Wild Horse Canyon watershed.
  • SEA Significant Ecological Area

    SEA Significant Ecological Area

    SEA Program | DRP Page 1 of 17 Skip To Content (#content) SEA • SEA Home (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/) • Proposed SEAS (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/proposed) • SEA Ordinance (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/ordinance) • SEATAC (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/seatac) • SEA History (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/history) • Studies & Resources (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/studies) • SEAs & The General Plan (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/biological) Significant Ecological Area - Proposed SEAs MARCH 24, 2015 GENERAL PLAN APPROVED AT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: WITH COUNTYWIDE SEA MAP and POLICY The Los Angeles County General Plan Update, including the SEA Program Goals and Policies, Countywide SEA and Coastal Resource Areas Map (Figure 9.3) (“SEA Map”) and SEA Descriptions were approved at public hearing of the Board of Supervisors on March 24th, 2015. • Click here for Final Draft of the General Plan March 24, 2015 (http://planning.lacounty.gov/generalplan/draft) • Click here for the report to the Board (http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/gp_2035_board- letter_20150324.pdf) -Click here for a PDF Copy of Map 9.3 (SEAs & CRAs) (http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/gp_2035_2014-FIG_9-3_significant_ecological_areas.pdf) SEA and Coastal Resource Areas Map/Figure 9.3: FEBRUARY 2015: MINOR CHANGES TO THE COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS TO MATCH THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS LOCAL COASTAL PLAN After the Santa Monica Mountains http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/proposed 10/18/2017 SEA Program | DRP Page 2 of 17 Local Coastal Plan was adopted minor changes were made to the proposed SEA Map to reflect the final approved boundaries of the Coastal Zone.