DOCSLIB.ORG

Incidence Graphs and Unneighborly Polytopes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Incidence Graphs and Unneighborly Polytopes Incidence Graphs and Unneighborly Polytopes vorgelegt von Diplom-Mathematiker Ronald Frank Wotzlaw aus G¨ottingen Von der Fakult¨at II – Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Technischen Universit¨at Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften – Dr. rer. nat. – genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Fredi Tr¨oltzsch Berichter: Prof. G¨unter M. Ziegler Prof. Gil Kalai Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 6. Februar 2009 Berlin 2009 D 83 . for though it cannot hope to be useful or informative on all matters, it does at least make the reassuring claim, that where it is inaccurate it is at least definitively inaccurate. In cases of major discrepancy it’s always reality that’s got it wrong. The Restaurant at the End of the Universe Douglas Adams For Finja and Nora Preface This thesis is about polytopes and “their life in high dimensions.” Nearly all questions considered here are trivial or simple exercises when restricted to dimensions that we can “see.” More often than not, the interesting examples start to appear in dimensions d = 6, 7, 8 or even much higher. Nevertheless, I have tried to illustrate ideas with pictures throughout. The reader should be warned however that they rarely show the real nature of the mathematical problem at hand. Some of the results are generalized to objects that are more abstract than polytopes. I have taken a pragmatical point of view with respect to the level of generality that theorems are stated and proved: If a generalization was asked for in the existing literature, it is provided (if possible). The following is a list of the main results in this thesis in order of appearance: The connectivity of (k,ℓ)-incidence graphs is determined for the case • ℓ 2k + 1 in Chapter 3. Athanasiadis’≥ conjecture on incidence graphs of Cohen-Macaulay cell • complexes is proved in Chapter 4. Linkages in polytopes on at most f0 (6d+7)/5 vertices are analyzed • completely in Chapter 5; this is based≤ on joint work with Axel Werner. Perles’ Skeleton Theorem is proved and generalized in a number of • ways in Chapters 6, 7, and 8. In particular, this theorem is re- established for graded relatively complemented lattices and for pyra- midally perfect lattices. A complete solution to Mani’s problem on nonsimplicial illuminated • polytopes is obtained in Chapter 9. Counterexamples to Marcus’ conjecture on positive k-spanning sets • are constructed for all k 2 in Chapter 10. ≥ Bienia & Las Vergnas’ problem on bounding the size of positive k- • spanning sets in oriented matroids is solved in Chapter 11. vii Apart from these results, many small improvements are made to existing results, and some unpublished results are re-established. The following is a list of minor results (some of them only partially new): Counterexamples to simplex refinements of polytopes with certain • properties are given in Chapter 2. These examples are originally due to Lockeberg, but our analysis of them is simpler. Counterexamples to a strong version of a conjecture about centrally • symmetric polytopes due to Gr¨unbaum are given in Chapter 2. Two generalizations of Balinski’s theorem are combined in Chapter 3 • to yield the so far strongest version of this theorem. A partial answer to a question by Athanasiadis on polytopality of • incidence graphs is given in Chapter 3. Larman & Mani’s lower bound on linkedness of general polytopes is • improved marginally in Chapter 5. This improvement implies exact values for linkedness of d-polytopes for d 5 and for d = 7, 8, 10, 13. ≤ This thesis was written in the time period between April 2006 and De- cember 2008. I had the enormous luck to be financially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) via the Research Training Group Meth- ods for Discrete Structures (MDS) and by the Berlin Mathematical School (BMS). In particular, the additional support for students with children has made my life a lot easier. A number of people had their influence on this thesis, and I want to mention them here. First and foremost, I thank my advisor G¨unter M. Ziegler. Without him, this thesis simply would not exist. He offered me a scholarship, first on his Leibniz grant and later in the MDS and in the BMS. These scholar- ships made it possible to attend conferences around the world and to visit Julian Pfeifle in Barcelona in the spring of 2008. G¨unter also helped me get invited to the MSRI Program on Computational Applications of Algebraic Topology in 2006. Besides this, he was responsible for keeping me busy with mathematical problems, helping me out with clever ideas when I got stuck, and for providing a relaxed work environment on floor MA 6-2. I would also like to thank Gil Kalai, who agreed to be co-referee for this thesis on rather short notice. Peter McMullen shared his ideas on unneighborly polytopes and care- fully read and responded to mine. He also copied large parts of Lockeberg’s thesis for me and sent them to Berlin. Thanks! Without Christos A. Athanasiadis, Chapters 3 and 4 would not exist. Apart from this, I thank him for coming to Berlin to present his results on viii connectivity of incidence graphs of polytopes in the MDS lecture on June 16, 2008. Micha A. Perles shared his knowledge on Perles’ Skeleton Theorem dur- ing a brief conversation at the “11th Midrasha Mathematicae” in Jerusalem. Many of the figures in this thesis were programmed in PostScript. I learned to program PostScript from Bill Casselmann in a course offered by the BMS. Besides being the math graphics guru, he is also a really nice guy. I received a lot of help from everyone at the BMS office: Nadja Wis- niewski, Anja Bewersdorff, Tanja Fagel, and Mariusz Szmerlo. Julian Pfeifle and his wonderful family, Lourdes, Nina, and Theo, made sure that my family and I had a great time in Barcelona. My friends in the Discrete Geometry Group made my time as a PhD stu- dent all the more enjoyable. In a very particular order (beauty? height? in- telligence? age?), they are Axel Werner, Thilo R¨orig, Raman Sanyal, Niko- laus Witte, Anna Gundert, Anton Dochtermann, Bruno Benedetti, Carsten Schultz, and Benjamin Matschke. Out of these, Anna, Raman, Anton and Axel deserve a special mentioning: They read parts of this thesis and helped to improve the exposition significantly. Elke Pose was of great help with administrative things. She also made sure that the supply of mineral water did not run out. I had a lot of fun presenting a program on Mathematik im Film together with Thomas Vogt on two occasions during the Jahr der Mathematik (2008). I have written this thesis in LATEX using the excellent memoir class by Peter Wilson. Figures were either programed in PostScript, as mentioned, or drawn in xfig. Life is not all mathematics (or is it?), and some of the things that helped me stay alive during the last years were sports (running in Kleistpark, swimming in Stadtbad Sch¨oneberg, and playing tennis with Till Plumbaum, Axel Werner, Andreas Profous, and Sebastian Stiller), learning Spanish (at the Sprach- und Kulturb¨orse der TU Berlin in the highly enjoyable courses by Florencia, Carmen, Liliana, and Miguel), the brilliant pieces by Les Luthiers, un grupo de m´usica y humor de Argentina, que he conocido gracias a Florencia, and some of the most interesting cities in the world: San Francisco, Jerusalem, Barcelona, Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin. I also wish to thank my parents for their continuing support. The two most important people in my life deserve the final spot: Nora and my wonderful epsilon Finja. Berlin, December 2008 Ronald Frank Wotzlaw ix Contents Preface vii Contents xi 0 Introduction 1 1 The Basics 7 1.1 Graphs.............................. 7 1.2 PosetsandLattices ....................... 10 1.3 Polytopes ............................ 13 I Connectivity of Polytope Skeleta 21 2 Refinement Homeomorphisms of Polytopes 23 2.1 Simplex Refinements of Polytopes . 27 2.2 Lockeberg’s Counterexamples . 30 2.3 Refinements of Centrally Symmetric Polytopes . 33 3 Incidence Graphs of Polytopes 37 3.1 Balinski’s Theorem for Polytopes . 38 3.2 HigherIncidenceGraphs . 41 3.3 Connectivity of Incidence Graphs . 43 3.4 Polytopality of Incidence Graphs . 48 4 Athanasiadis’ Conjecture on Incidence Graphs 53 4.1 Regular Cell Complexes . 54 xi Contents 4.2 Athanasiadis’Conjecture . 54 4.3 GraphManifolds ........................ 56 4.4 Basic Properties of Graph Manifolds . 60 4.5 Connectivity of Graph Manifold Skeleta . 64 4.6 Proof of Athanasiadis’ Conjecture . 72 5 Linkages in Polytope Graphs 75 5.1 Linkages............................. 77 5.2 Simplicial Polytopes and 3-Polytopes . 78 5.3 Minimal Linkedness of Polytopes . 81 5.4 Linkages in Polytopes with Few Vertices . 84 5.5 Minimal Linkedness in Small Dimensions . 96 II Perles’ Skeleton Theorem 99 6 Skeleta of Polytopes with Few Vertices 101 6.1 Reconstruction of Skeleta . 103 6.2 Perles’ Skeleton Theorem . 105 7 Perles’ Skeleton Theorem for Polytopes 109 7.1 Empty Faces in Polytopes . 111 7.2 A Bound on the Number of Flat Empty Faces . 112 7.3 Disjoint Empty Faces . 115 7.4 Pyramidally Inequivalent Complexes . 116 7.5 Empty Simplices in Simplicial Polytopes . 119 8 Generalizations of Perles’ Skeleton Theorem 121 8.1 Strong Spheres ....................... 122 PL 8.2 Empty Faces in Strong Spheres . 125 PL 8.3 Simplex Refinements of Spheres. 129 PL 8.4 Perles’ Skeleton Theorem for Spheres. 133 PL 8.5 Pyramidally Perfect Lattices . 136 8.6 Boolean Intervals . 137 8.7 Reconstruction of Skeleta . 139 8.8 Relatively Complemented Lattices . 141 8.9 EmptyPyramidsinLattices . 142 8.10 Empty Pyramids in Upper Intervals . 145 8.11 Proof for Relatively Complemented Lattices .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Circuit Diameter Conjecture
    On the Circuit Diameter Conjecture Steffen Borgwardt1, Tamon Stephen2, and Timothy Yusun2 1 University of Colorado Denver [email protected] 2 Simon Fraser University {tamon,tyusun}@sfu.ca Abstract. From the point of view of optimization, a critical issue is relating the combina- torial diameter of a polyhedron to its number of facets f and dimension d. In the seminal paper of Klee and Walkup [KW67], the Hirsch conjecture of an upper bound of f − d was shown to be equivalent to several seemingly simpler statements, and was disproved for unbounded polyhedra through the construction of a particular 4-dimensional polyhedron U4 with 8 facets. The Hirsch bound for bounded polyhedra was only recently disproved by Santos [San12]. We consider analogous properties for a variant of the combinatorial diameter called the circuit diameter. In this variant, the walks are built from the circuit directions of the poly- hedron, which are the minimal non-trivial solutions to the system defining the polyhedron. We are able to prove that circuit variants of the so-called non-revisiting conjecture and d-step conjecture both imply the circuit analogue of the Hirsch conjecture. For the equiva- lences in [KW67], the wedge construction was a fundamental proof technique. We exhibit why it is not available in the circuit setting, and what are the implications of losing it as a tool. Further, we show the circuit analogue of the non-revisiting conjecture implies a linear bound on the circuit diameter of all unbounded polyhedra – in contrast to what is known for the combinatorial diameter. Finally, we give two proofs of a circuit version of the 4-step conjecture.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Geometric Construction of Coordinates in a Convex Simplicial Polytope
    A general geometric construction of coordinates in a convex simplicial polytope ∗ Tao Ju a, Peter Liepa b Joe Warren c aWashington University, St. Louis, USA bAutodesk, Toronto, Canada cRice University, Houston, USA Abstract Barycentric coordinates are a fundamental concept in computer graphics and ge- ometric modeling. We extend the geometric construction of Floater’s mean value coordinates [8,11] to a general form that is capable of constructing a family of coor- dinates in a convex 2D polygon, 3D triangular polyhedron, or a higher-dimensional simplicial polytope. This family unifies previously known coordinates, including Wachspress coordinates, mean value coordinates and discrete harmonic coordinates, in a simple geometric framework. Using the construction, we are able to create a new set of coordinates in 3D and higher dimensions and study its relation with known coordinates. We show that our general construction is complete, that is, the resulting family includes all possible coordinates in any convex simplicial polytope. Key words: Barycentric coordinates, convex simplicial polytopes 1 Introduction In computer graphics and geometric modelling, we often wish to express a point x as an affine combination of a given point set vΣ = {v1,...,vi,...}, x = bivi, where bi =1. (1) i∈Σ i∈Σ Here bΣ = {b1,...,bi,...} are called the coordinates of x with respect to vΣ (we shall use subscript Σ hereafter to denote a set). In particular, bΣ are called barycentric coordinates if they are non-negative. ∗ [email protected] Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science 3 December 2006 v1 v1 x x v4 v2 v2 v3 v3 (a) (b) Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 LATTICE POINTS and LATTICE POLYTOPES Alexander Barvinok
    7 LATTICE POINTS AND LATTICE POLYTOPES Alexander Barvinok INTRODUCTION Lattice polytopes arise naturally in algebraic geometry, analysis, combinatorics, computer science, number theory, optimization, probability and representation the- ory. They possess a rich structure arising from the interaction of algebraic, convex, analytic, and combinatorial properties. In this chapter, we concentrate on the the- ory of lattice polytopes and only sketch their numerous applications. We briefly discuss their role in optimization and polyhedral combinatorics (Section 7.1). In Section 7.2 we discuss the decision problem, the problem of finding whether a given polytope contains a lattice point. In Section 7.3 we address the counting problem, the problem of counting all lattice points in a given polytope. The asymptotic problem (Section 7.4) explores the behavior of the number of lattice points in a varying polytope (for example, if a dilation is applied to the polytope). Finally, in Section 7.5 we discuss problems with quantifiers. These problems are natural generalizations of the decision and counting problems. Whenever appropriate we address algorithmic issues. For general references in the area of computational complexity/algorithms see [AB09]. We summarize the computational complexity status of our problems in Table 7.0.1. TABLE 7.0.1 Computational complexity of basic problems. PROBLEM NAME BOUNDED DIMENSION UNBOUNDED DIMENSION Decision problem polynomial NP-hard Counting problem polynomial #P-hard Asymptotic problem polynomial #P-hard∗ Problems with quantifiers unknown; polynomial for ∀∃ ∗∗ NP-hard ∗ in bounded codimension, reduces polynomially to volume computation ∗∗ with no quantifier alternation, polynomial time 7.1 INTEGRAL POLYTOPES IN POLYHEDRAL COMBINATORICS We describe some combinatorial and computational properties of integral polytopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitting Tractable Convex Sets to Support Function Evaluations
    Fitting Tractable Convex Sets to Support Function Evaluations Yong Sheng Sohy and Venkat Chandrasekaranz ∗ y Institute of High Performance Computing 1 Fusionopolis Way #16-16 Connexis Singapore 138632 z Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences Department of Electrical Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125, USA March 11, 2019 Abstract The geometric problem of estimating an unknown compact convex set from evaluations of its support function arises in a range of scientific and engineering applications. Traditional ap- proaches typically rely on estimators that minimize the error over all possible compact convex sets; in particular, these methods do not allow for the incorporation of prior structural informa- tion about the underlying set and the resulting estimates become increasingly more complicated to describe as the number of measurements available grows. We address both of these short- comings by describing a framework for estimating tractably specified convex sets from support function evaluations. Building on the literature in convex optimization, our approach is based on estimators that minimize the error over structured families of convex sets that are specified as linear images of concisely described sets { such as the simplex or the free spectrahedron { in a higher-dimensional space that is not much larger than the ambient space. Convex sets parametrized in this manner are significant from a computational perspective as one can opti- mize linear functionals over such sets efficiently; they serve a different purpose in the inferential context of the present paper, namely, that of incorporating regularization in the reconstruction while still offering considerable expressive power. We provide a geometric characterization of the asymptotic behavior of our estimators, and our analysis relies on the property that certain sets which admit semialgebraic descriptions are Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Polytopes with Special Simplices 3
    POLYTOPES WITH SPECIAL SIMPLICES TIMO DE WOLFF Abstract. For a polytope P a simplex Σ with vertex set V(Σ) is called a special simplex if every facet of P contains all but exactly one vertex of Σ. For such polytopes P with face complex F(P ) containing a special simplex the sub- complex F(P )\V(Σ) of all faces not containing vertices of Σ is the boundary of a polytope Q — the basis polytope of P . If additionally the dimension of the affine basis space of F(P )\V(Σ) equals dim(Q), we call P meek; otherwise we call P wild. We give a full combinatorial classification and techniques for geometric construction of the class of meek polytopes with special simplices. We show that every wild polytope P ′ with special simplex can be constructed out of a particular meek one P by intersecting P with particular hyperplanes. It is non–trivial to find all these hyperplanes for an arbitrary basis polytope; we give an exact description for 2–basis polytopes. Furthermore we show that the f–vector of each wild polytope with special simplex is componentwise bounded above by the f–vector of a particular meek one which can be computed explicitly. Finally, we discuss the n–cube as a non–trivial example of a wild polytope with special simplex and prove that its basis polytope is the zonotope given by the Minkowski sum of the (n − 1)–cube and vector (1,..., 1). Polytopes with special simplex have applications on Ehrhart theory, toric rings and were just used by Francisco Santos to construct a counter–example disproving the Hirsch conjecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Algorithmic, Enumerative and Geometric Combinatorics
    Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Topics in algorithmic, enumerative and geometric combinatorics Ragnar Freij Division of Mathematics Department of Mathematical Sciences Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg G¨oteborg, Sweden 2012 Topics in algorithmic, enumerative and geometric combinatorics Ragnar Freij ISBN 978-91-7385-668-3 c Ragnar Freij, 2012. Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers Tekniska H¨ogskola Ny serie Nr 3349 ISSN 0346-718X Department of Mathematical Sciences Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg SE-412 96 GOTEBORG,¨ Sweden Phone: +46 (0)31-772 10 00 [email protected] Printed in G¨oteborg, Sweden, 2012 Topics in algorithmic, enumerative and geometric com- binatorics Ragnar Freij ABSTRACT This thesis presents five papers, studying enumerative and extremal problems on combinatorial structures. The first paper studies Forman’s discrete Morse theory in the case where a group acts on the underlying complex. We generalize the notion of a Morse matching, and obtain a theory that can be used to simplify the description of the G-homotopy type of a simplicial complex. As an application, we determine the S2 × Sn−2-homotopy type of the complex of non-connected graphs on n nodes. In the introduction, connections are drawn between the first paper and the evasiveness conjecture for monotone graph properties. In the second paper, we investigate Hansen polytopes of split graphs. By applying a partitioning technique, the number of nonempty faces is counted, and in particular we confirm Kalai’s 3d-conjecture for such polytopes. Further- more, a characterization of exactly which Hansen polytopes are also Hanner polytopes is given.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 BASIC PROPERTIES of CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨Urgenrichter-Gebert, and G¨Unterm
    15 BASIC PROPERTIES OF CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨urgenRichter-Gebert, and G¨unterM. Ziegler INTRODUCTION Convex polytopes are fundamental geometric objects that have been investigated since antiquity. The beauty of their theory is nowadays complemented by their im- portance for many other mathematical subjects, ranging from integration theory, algebraic topology, and algebraic geometry to linear and combinatorial optimiza- tion. In this chapter we try to give a short introduction, provide a sketch of \what polytopes look like" and \how they behave," with many explicit examples, and briefly state some main results (where further details are given in subsequent chap- ters of this Handbook). We concentrate on two main topics: • Combinatorial properties: faces (vertices, edges, . , facets) of polytopes and their relations, with special treatments of the classes of low-dimensional poly- topes and of polytopes \with few vertices;" • Geometric properties: volume and surface area, mixed volumes, and quer- massintegrals, including explicit formulas for the cases of the regular simplices, cubes, and cross-polytopes. We refer to Gr¨unbaum [Gr¨u67]for a comprehensive view of polytope theory, and to Ziegler [Zie95] respectively to Gruber [Gru07] and Schneider [Sch14] for detailed treatments of the combinatorial and of the convex geometric aspects of polytope theory. 15.1 COMBINATORIAL STRUCTURE GLOSSARY d V-polytope: The convex hull of a finite set X = fx1; : : : ; xng of points in R , n n X i X P = conv(X) := λix λ1; : : : ; λn ≥ 0; λi = 1 : i=1 i=1 H-polytope: The solution set of a finite system of linear inequalities, d T P = P (A; b) := x 2 R j ai x ≤ bi for 1 ≤ i ≤ m ; with the extra condition that the set of solutions is bounded, that is, such that m×d there is a constant N such that jjxjj ≤ N holds for all x 2 P .
    [Show full text]
  • Plenary Lectures
    Plenary lectures A. D. Alexandrov and the Birth of the Theory of Tight Surfaces Thomas Banchoff Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA e-mail: Thomas [email protected] Alexander Danilovich Alexandrov was born in 1912, and just over 25 years later in 1938 (the year of my birth), he proved a rigidity theorem for real analytic surfaces of type T with minimal total absolute curvature. He showed in particular that that two real analytic tori of Type T in three-space that are iso- metric must be congruent. In 1963, twenty-five years after that original paper, Louis Nirenberg wrote the first generalization of that result, for five times differentiable surfaces satisfying some technical hypothe- ses necessary for applying techniques of ordinary and partial differential equations. Prof. Shiing-Shen Chern, my thesis advisor at the University of California, Berkeley, gave me this paper to present to his graduate seminar and challenged me to find a proof without these technical hypotheses. I read Konvexe Polyeder by A. D. Alexandrov and the works of Pogoreloff on rigidity for convex surfaces using polyhedral methods and I decided to try to find a rigidity theorem for Type T surfaces using similar techniques. I found a condition equivalent to minimal total absolute curvature for smooth surfaces, that also applied to polyhedral surfaces, namely the Two-Piece Property or TPP. An object in three- space has the TPP if every plane separates the object into at most two connected pieces. I conjectured a rigidity result similar to those of Alexandroff and Nirenberg, namely that two polyhedral surfaces in three-space with the TPP that are isometric would have to be congruent.
    [Show full text]
  • ADDENDUM the Following Remarks Were Added in Proof (November 1966). Page 67. an Easy Modification of Exercise 4.8.25 Establishes
    ADDENDUM The following remarks were added in proof (November 1966). Page 67. An easy modification of exercise 4.8.25 establishes the follow­ ing result of Wagner [I]: Every simplicial k-"complex" with at most 2 k ~ vertices has a representation in R + 1 such that all the "simplices" are geometric (rectilinear) simplices. Page 93. J. H. Conway (private communication) has established the validity of the conjecture mentioned in the second footnote. Page 126. For d = 2, the theorem of Derry [2] given in exercise 7.3.4 was found earlier by Bilinski [I]. Page 183. M. A. Perles (private communication) recently obtained an affirmative solution to Klee's problem mentioned at the end of section 10.1. Page 204. Regarding the question whether a(~) = 3 implies b(~) ~ 4, it should be noted that if one starts from a topological cell complex ~ with a(~) = 3 it is possible that ~ is not a complex (in our sense) at all (see exercise 11.1.7). On the other hand, G. Wegner pointed out (in a private communication to the author) that the 2-complex ~ discussed in the proof of theorem 11.1 .7 indeed satisfies b(~) = 4. Page 216. Halin's [1] result (theorem 11.3.3) has recently been genera­ lized by H. A. lung to all complete d-partite graphs. (Halin's result deals with the graph of the d-octahedron, i.e. the d-partite graph in which each class of nodes contains precisely two nodes.) The existence of the numbers n(k) follows from a recent result of Mader [1] ; Mader's result shows that n(k) ~ k.2(~) .
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal Volume Product of Three Dimensional Convex Bodies with Various Discrete Symmetries
    Minimal volume product of three dimensional convex bodies with various discrete symmetries Hiroshi Iriyeh ∗ Masataka Shibata † August 12, 2021 Abstract We give the sharp lower bound of the volume product of three dimensional convex bodies which are invariant under a discrete subgroup of O(3) in several cases. We also characterize the convex bodies with the minimal volume product in each case. In particular, this provides a new partial result of the non-symmetric version of Mahler’s conjecture in the three dimensional case. 1 Introduction and main results 1.1 Mahler’s conjecture and its generalization Let K be a convex body in Rn, i.e, K is a compact convex set in Rn with nonempty interior. Then K ⊂ Rn is said to be centrally symmetric if it satisfies that K = −K. Denote by Kn the set of all convex bodies in Rn equipped with the Hausdorff metric and n n by K0 the set of all K ∈ K which are centrally symmetric. The interior of K ∈ Kn is denoted by int K. For a point z ∈ int K, the polar body of K with respect to z is defined by z n K = {y ∈ R ;(y − z) · (x − z) ≤ 1 for any x ∈ K} , where · denotes the standard inner product on Rn. Then an affine invariant P(K) := min |K| |Kz| (1) z∈int K is called volume product of K, where |K| denotes the n-dimensional volume of K in Rn. arXiv:2007.08736v2 [math.MG] 8 Oct 2020 It is known that for each K ∈ Kn the minimum of (1) is attained at the unique point z on K, which is called Santaló point of K (see, e.g., [13]).
    [Show full text]
  • On K-Level Matroids: Geometry and Combinatorics Francesco Grande
    On k-level matroids: geometry and combinatorics ⊕ ⊕ Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademisches Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften am Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Francesco Grande Berlin 2015 Advisor and first reviewer: Professor Dr. Raman Sanyal Second reviewer: Professor Rekha Thomas, Ph.D. Date of the defense: October 12, 2015 Summary The Theta rank of a finite point configuration V is the maximal degree nec- essary for a sum-of-squares representation of a non-negative linear function on V . This is an important invariant for polynomial optimization that is in general hard to determine. We study the Theta rank of point configu- rations via levelness, that is a discrete-geometric invariant, and completely classify the 2-level (equivalently Theta-1) configurations whose convex hull is a simple or a simplicial polytope. We consider configurations associated to the collection of bases of matroids and show that the class of matroids with bounded Theta rank or levelness is closed under taking minors. This allows us to find a characterization of matroids with bounded Theta rank or levelness in terms of forbidden minors. We give the complete (finite) list of excluded minors for Theta-1 matroids which generalize the well-known series-parallel graphs. Moreover, we char- acterize the class of Theta-1 matroids in terms of the degree of generation of the vanishing ideal and in terms of the psd rank for the associated matroid base polytope. We analyze in full detail Theta-1 matroids from a constructive perspective and discover that they are sort-closed, which allows us to determine a uni- modular triangulation of every matroid base polytope and to characterize its volume by means of permutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Math.CO] 14 May 2002 in Npriua,Tecne Ulof Hull Convex Descrip the Simple Particular, Similarly in No Tion
    Fat 4-polytopes and fatter 3-spheres 1, 2, † 3, ‡ David Eppstein, ∗ Greg Kuperberg, and G¨unter M. Ziegler 1Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 2Department of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 3Institut f¨ur Mathematik, MA 6-2, Technische Universit¨at Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany φ We introduce the fatness parameter of a 4-dimensional polytope P, defined as (P)=( f1 + f2)/( f0 + f3). It arises in an important open problem in 4-dimensional combinatorial geometry: Is the fatness of convex 4- polytopes bounded? We describe and analyze a hyperbolic geometry construction that produces 4-polytopes with fatness φ(P) > 5.048, as well as the first infinite family of 2-simple, 2-simplicial 4-polytopes. Moreover, using a construction via finite covering spaces of surfaces, we show that fatness is not bounded for the more general class of strongly regular CW decompositions of the 3-sphere. 1. INTRODUCTION Only the two extreme cases of simplicial and of simple 4- polytopes (or 3-spheres) are well-understood. Their f -vectors F correspond to faces of the convex hull of F , defined by the The characterization of the set 3 of f -vectors of convex 4 valid inequalities f 2 f and f 2 f , and the g-Theorem, 3-dimensional polytopes (from 1906, due to Steinitz [28]) is 2 ≥ 3 1 ≥ 0 well-known and explicit, with a simple proof: An integer vec- proved for 4-polytopes by Barnette [1] and for 3-spheres by Walkup [34], provides complete characterizations of their f - tor ( f0, f1, f2) is the f -vector of a 3-polytope if and only if it satisfies vectors.
    [Show full text]