DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloadable PDF File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloadable PDF File Publication No. 171 The Massachusetts Acid Rain Monitoring Project: Ten Years of Monitoring Massachusetts Lakes and Streams with Volunteers. by Paul J. Godfrey Mark D. Mattson Marie-Françoise Walk Peter A. Kerr O.Thomas Zajicek Armand Ruby III The Massachusetts Acid Rain Monitoring Project: Ten Years of Monitoring Massachusetts Lakes and Streams with Volunteers. by Paul J. Godfrey Mark D. Mattson Marie-Françoise Walk Peter A. Kerr O.Thomas Zajicek Armand Ruby III November 1996 Abstract Between 1983 and 1985, the Acid Rain Monitoring (ARM) Project used as many as 1000 citizen volunteers to collect and help analyze more than 40,000 samples from 2444 lakes and 1670 streams, respectively 87% and 69% of the named lakes and streams in the state, and monitored a representative 453 randomly selected and 119 special interest lakes and streams for eight successive years (1985-1993) with approximately 300 volunteers. This report details the organizational effort that permitted maintenance of this ten year effort, the quality control efforts needed to insure that resulting data met scientific standards for quality, and the findings of ten years of extensive monitoring. Results for the nearly comprehensive initial phases of the project show that 5.5% of lakes and streams in Massachusetts are acidified (pH < 5.0 and ANC < 0 µeq/l); 57.4% were sufficiently low in acid neutralizing capacity to be considered threatened by acid deposition (0<ANC<200 µeq/l); and 37.1% were not threatened (ANC > 200 µeq/l). Spring samples contained an average of 45% more H+ (pH 6.44 vs 6.60) and 32% less ANC (257 vs 376 µeq/l) than fall samples. Lakes were slightly more sensitive than streams. Geographically, higher ANC was typical of extreme western parts of the state and lower ANC was typical of the north-central and southeastern portions. While results are more representative of Massachusetts lakes than the Eastern Lakes Survey because of planned exclusions in the latter’s site selections, the differences are relatively small. Comparisons between ARM results and those from other areas and countries suggest that Massachusetts surface waters are comparable to those from other areas of the world that are very sensitive to acid deposition. Most of the differences in water chemistry can be related to the underlying geology. The western edge of the state is substantially higher in most cations and anions than average while southeastern, north-central and the Berkshire Mountain region are lower. In three of six regions, sulfate levels were twice as high as anticipated from deposition and evapotranspiration. Massachusetts lake and stream sulfate levels were comparable to eastern Canada and other high deposition sites. Streams were higher than lakes in calcium, magnesium, potassium, sulfate, aluminum and silicon dioxide and lower in sodium, chloride, organic acids, iron, and manganese. The combination of relatively high organic acids and base cations may account for the somewhat smaller percentage of acidified surface waters than in other high deposition areas. The coastal region has a higher proportion of sodium and chloride resulting from sea salt influences. Statewide, sodium and chloride levels exceeded the amount expected solely from sea salt. A substudy of 162 randomly selected streams suggested that only 4% of the salt concentration of these streams could be attributed to sea salt. The remainder was highly correlated with the number of road lane miles in each stream’s watershed. Approximately 63% of the variance in stream sodium concentration were explained by the number of lane miles. Class 1 and 2 (interstate highways and major state roads) made the highest contribution with urban streets next. Rural roads contributed relatively little. Analyses of long-term trends in pH, ANC and selected ions from 10 years of data on 330 streams and 181 lakes showed a significant but small increase in average pH and increase in ANC. For streams, the median slope after correction for hydrologic variation was +0.021 pH/yr and, for i ANC, it was +2.4 µeq/l/yr. For lakes, the median slope (hydrologically corrected) was +0.016 pH/yr and +1.9 µeq/l/yr for ANC. Streams with higher ANCs show a faster rate of recovery than low ANC streams (4.15 µeq/L/yr vs 1.33 µeq/L/yr). For pH, high ANC streams showed a more gradual increase than low ANC streams (0.018 ñH units/yr vs. 0.026 ñH units/yr. Sulfate declined by 1.8 and 1.4 µeq/L/yr for streams and lakes, respectively. There was no trend for base cations in streams but a significant trend for base cations in lakes (+1.5 µeq/L/yr). The latter was counteracted by an increase in chloride of 1.4 µeq/L/yr. Most lakes and streams exhibited no significant trend for the 10 years of the study. However, 70 of 330 streams showed statistically significant increases in ANC, 11 showed decreases, 43 of 181 lakes increased in ANC while 7 decreased. Most of the streams and all of the lakes exhibiting statistically significant declines occurred in the southeastern portion of the state. In this group of lakes and streams only two lakes and two streams became acidic (dropped below 0.0 ANC and ñH 5.0) during the ten years of the study. The thousand or more volunteers participating in the project were profiled through a questionnaire distributed in 1989. Of the 40% responding, roughly 50% were original participants, 69% were male, 79% were married, 70% had a college degree, 63% lived in small towns, 54% were native to Massachusetts, and 75% had household incomes between $20,000 and $75,000. In total, they listed 76 hobbies, sports and interests. They also listed membership in 69 civic organizations and 20 different religions or religious beliefs. Ninety-seven percent considered their efforts on the project to be worthwhile. The ARM database is available on disk from the Water Resources Research Center, Blaisdell House, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-0820 or may be downloaded from the Center’s website at http://riga.fnr.umass.edu/~tei/wrrc/index.html. ii Foreword This report has three intended functions: first, to assemble the various reports that have been published on the scientific results in one common format; second, to provide full documentation of all aspects of the project, most of which have not been included in shorter journal publications, and third, to provide a "road map" for others who may want to try to create a long-term volunteer monitoring effort. Many of the parts of this report have been either published or presented elsewhere, but in the latter case, presentation may have been limited to conference attendees, ARM newsletter readers, or other restricted groups. Consequently, the ultimate goal of this report is to present the entire context of the ten year long Acid Rain Monitoring (ARM) Project in a way that makes clear the many benefits and the special requirements of this approach to environmental monitoring so that others may use the results and replicate the process. We were novices when ARM started. Many of the errors that we caution against were lessons learned the hard way. Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned is that errors can be made without being fatal, but not very many and not very large. Another lesson which is not expressed in the text is the error of understaffing. For all volunteer efforts, there are significant requirements for coordination, lab and data analysis, reporting, etc. All too often the sense of volunteerism carries over to the coordination in the form of trying to do the many necessary things with too few people working too many hours. It can be done but the risks of mistakes and burnout are much greater. The ARM staff have shown extraordinary dedication to the Project; working long hours and, after hours, they volunteered additional time to meet project's needs. More importantly, citizen monitoring demands rapid information turn-around and science demands beating the competition to the publication. Always understaffed and usually underequipped, ARM did well at the former, but less well at the latter. It is our hope that ARM provides an example of citizen monitoring, quality control, and scientific objectives that helps promote a new era of environmental science. It is also our hope that the story of ARM creates that last bit of necessary motivation for many, who might not otherwise participate for whatever reason, to become involved in the improvement of our environment. iii Acknowledgments Many people had a part in preparing this final report of the Acid Rain Monitoring Project, but these acknowledgements are a personal statement of the Project's Director, Dr. Paul Jos. Godfrey. The Acid Rain Monitoring Project would not have been possible without the help of thousands of individuals and many organizations, agencies and institutions. It is impossible to personally acknowledge each individual's efforts, yet each has played a key part in accomplishing the Project's objectives. Two individuals, both volunteers, stand out for their exemplary efforts to make the Project a success. Leon Ogrodnik was the principal architect of the Project's organization network. He worked with local organizations to identify key people within each county who would actively coordinate each district and county, and worked hand in hand with them to organize volunteers, find laboratories, establish the logistical arrangements, and initiate the publicity for our presentations and sampling days in the first year of the Project. In the early months of the Project, he travelled throughout the state, helping where help was needed, and he spent long hours on the telephone finalizing details. His dynamism, energy and genuine concern for the environment set an outstanding example of citizenship for us all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Views of the Blackstone River and the Mumford River
    THE SHlNER~ AND ITS USE AS A SOURCE OF INCOME IN WORCESTER, AND SOUTHEASTERN WORCESTER COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS By Robert William Spayne S.B., State Teachers College at Worcester, Massachusetts 19,3 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Oberlin College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Geography CONTENTS Ie INTRODUCTION Location of Thesis Area 1 Purpose of Study 1 Methods of Study 1 Acknowledgments 2 II. GEOGRAPHY OF SOUTHERN WORCESTER COUNTY 4 PIiYSICAL GEOGRAPHY 4 Topography 4 stream Systems 8 Ponds 11 Artificial 11 Glacial 12 Ponds for Bait Fishing 14 .1 oJ Game Fishing Ponds 15 Climatic Characteristics 16 Weather 18 POPULATION 20 Size of Population 20 Distribution of Population 21 Industrialization 22 III. GEOGRAPHICAL BASIS FOR TEE SHINER INDUSTRY 26 Recreational Demands 26 Game Fish Resources 26 l~umber of ;Ponds 28 Number of Fishermerf .. 29 Demand for Bait 30 l IV. GENERAL NATURE OF THE BAIT INDUSTRY 31 ,~ Number of Bait Fishermen 31 .1 Range in Size of Operations 32 Nature of Typical Operations 34 Personality of the Bait Fishermen 34 V. THE SHINER - ITS DESCRIPTION, HABITS AND , CHARACTERISTICS 35 VI. 'STANDARD AND IlIIlPROVISED EQUIPMENT USED IN .~ THE IhllUSTRY 41 Transportation 41 Keeping the Bait Alive 43 Foul Weather Gear 47 Types of Nets 48 SUCCESSFUL METHODS USED IN NETTING BAIT 52 Open Water Fishing 5'2 " Ice Fishing 56 .-:-) VII. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE SHINER INDUSTRY ~O VIII. FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR THE SHINER INDUSTRY 62 IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 69 x. APPENDIX 72 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Following Page .
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 783.6 KB, for Ten Mile River Watershed 2002 Water
    TEN MILE RIVER WATERSHED 2002 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE, JR., SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ARLEEN O’DONNELL, ACTING COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP’s) home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm#wqar Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Bridgewater can apply at their local library for loan of any MA DEP/Division of Watershed Management (DWM) report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 140 Corridor Study and Plan.3 General
    ROOUTEUTE 114040 COORRIDORRRIDOR PLLANAN SShrewsburyhrewsbury SStreettreet BBoylston,oylston, MMassachusettsassachusetts Prepared for: Town of Boylston, Massachusetts Blatman, Bobrowski, and Mead, LLC Prepared by: Community Opportunities Group, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts March 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................1 Key Findings .......................................................................................................................................................................1 Key Recommendations......................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Population and Household Characteristics ....................................................................................................................4 Industries and Employment .............................................................................................................................................7 Economic Development Capacity & Resources.............................................................................................................9 CORRIDOR PLANNING AREA .....................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-16 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 2. Cape Cod and the Islands K. E. Reback, P. D. Brady, K. D. McLaughlin, and C. G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts Technical Report Technical May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-16 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 2. Cape Cod and the Islands Kenneth E. Reback, Phillips D. Brady, Katherine D. McLauglin, and Cheryl G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Southshore Field Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fish and Game Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy-Herztfelder, Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, Governor TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 2: Cape Cod and the Islands Acknowledgements . iii Abstract . iv Introduction . 1 Materials and Methods . 1 Life Histories . 2 Management . 4 Cape Cod Watersheds . 6 Map of Towns and Streams . 6 Stream Survey . 8 Cape Cod Recommendations . 106 Martha’s Vineyard Watersheds . 107 Map of Towns and Streams . 107 Stream Survey . 108 Martha’s Vineyard Recommendations . 125 Nantucket Watersheds . 126 Map of Streams . 126 Stream Survey . 127 Nantucket Recommendations . 132 General Recommendations . 133 Alphabetical Index of Streams . 134 Alphabetical Index of Towns . .. 136 Appendix 1: List of Anadromous Species in MA . 138 Appendix 2: State River Herring Regulations . 139 Appendix 3: Fishway Designs and Examples . 140 Appendix 4: Abbreviations Used . 148 ii Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following people for their assistance in carrying out this survey and for sharing their knowledge of the anadromous fish resources of the Commonwealth: Brian Creedon, Tracy Curley, Jack Dixon, George Funnell, Steve Kennedy, Paul Montague, Don St.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Name Lat Long Location Town Stage Ruler Rationale Number # Subwatershed A-01-01-010 BB010 No Beaver Brook Beaver Brook Jewish Comm
    Master Site List 2007 Site Rev. Site Watershed CWF Waterbody Name Lat Long Location Town Stage Ruler Rationale Number # Subwatershed A-01-01-010 BB010 No Beaver Brook Beaver Brook Jewish Comm. 42.29549 -71.83817 On footbridge located south of Worcester On footbridge Baseline near beginning Ctr. northerly driveway at 633 of Beaver Brook Salisbury St. at the Jewish Community Center A-01-01-030 BB030 No Beaver Brook Beaver Brook Park Ave. 42.25028 -71.83142 Upstream of confluence of Worcester On abutment on To compare with Carwash Beaver Brook and Tatnuck south side of street Tatnuck Brook just Brook at Clark Fields carwash on above confluence Park Ave. A-02-01-010 BMB010 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Dunkirk 42.24258 -71.77599 At end of Dunkirk Ave, slightly Worcester Baseline where brook Brook Brook downstram of culvert. outfalls from culvert A-02-01-020 BMB020 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Dupuis Ave. 42.23554 -71.77297 Walk around lawn. Just before Worcester To monitor impacts of Brook Brook Beaver Brook enters pipe 50' Beaver Dam - see how upstream of pipe. quality improves after going through natural area A-02-01-040 BMB040 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Holdridge 42.23092 -71.76782 Downstream of stone bridge on Worcester 15 feet below Midway on course Brook Brook Holdridge Trail - on the west stone bridge on through wildlife sanctuary bank tree A-02-01-050 BMB050 No Broad Meadow Broad Meadow Dosco 42.19267 -71.75017 Beside Dosco Sheet Metal Millbury Attached to Dorothy Brook as it flows Brook Brook Company; 30 yards downstream concrete wall into the Blackstone River from Grafton St.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of MASHPEE BLUE PAGES a Citizens’ Guide to Protecting Cape Cod Waters
    TOWN OF MASHPEE BLUE PAGES A Citizens’ Guide to Protecting Cape Cod Waters Shannon Cushing, Grade 11 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This information is reprinted from the Island Blue Pages, courtesy of the Martha’s Vineyard Shellfish Group and the WampanoagThis information Tribe ofis Aquinnah.reprinted from For the a complete Island Blue version Pages of, courtesy the Island of theBlue Martha’s Pages, visit Vineyard the website Shellfish www.islandbluepages.org Group and the . or contactWampanoag tbe Martha’s Tribe Vineyardof Aquinnah. Shellfish For a Groupcomplete at 508version-693-0391. of the TheIsland Island Blue BluePages Pages, visit isthe an website adaptation, www.islandbluepages.org with permission, of the. or Pugetcontact Soundbook tbe Martha’s, a game Vineyard plan for Shellfish maintaining Group the at health508-693-0391. of our sister The Island estuary Blue on Pagesthe West is an Coast. adaptation, To learn with more permission, about the of the Puget Soundbook, a game plan for maintaining the health of our sister estuary on the West Coast. To learn more about the original project and the inspiration for the Blue Pages, visit www.forsea.org/pugetsoundbook/ original project and the inspiration for the Blue Pages, visit www.forsea.org/pugetsoundbook/ Thanks to Jim Kolb and Diane Bressler, the creators of the Puget Soundbook, which continues to inspire us with its words and Thanks to Jim Kolb and Diane Bressler, the creators of the Puget Soundbook, which continues to inspire us with its words and illustrations. illustrations. The Town of Mashpee, with permission, undertook the task of adapting the Orleans Blue Pages to reflect conditions specific to The Town of Mashpee, with permission, undertook the task of adapting the Orleans Blue Pages to reflect conditions specific to Mashpee.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan Pond River Swan Pond River Swan Pond River Stage Harbor Provincetown Harbor Provincetown Harbor
    Bourne Falmouth Sandwich Mashpee Barnstable Yarmouth Dennis Harwich Brewster Chatham Orleans Eastham Wellfleet Truro Provincetown WAQUOIT BAY WAQUOIT BAY WAQUOIT BAY PARKERS RIVER PARKERS RIVER SWAN POND RIVER SWAN POND RIVER SWAN POND RIVER STAGE HARBOR PROVINCETOWN HARBOR PROVINCETOWN HARBOR Childs River | 71% Childs River | 5% Childs River | 24% Lewis Pond | 100% Swan Pond River | 96% Swan Pond River | 1% Swan Pond River | 3% Little Mill Pond | 100% Provincetown Harbor | 7% Provincetown Harbor | 93% Quashnet River | 22% Quashnet River | 17% Quashnet River | 61% Lower Parkers River | 100% Swan Pond River North | 100% Mill Pond | 100% Eel Pond West | 95% Eel Pond West | 4% Eel Pond West | 1% Seine Pond | 100% Swan Pond River South | 100% Mitchell River | 100% Hamblin Pond & Red Brook | 31% Hamblin Pond & Red Brook | 69% Upper Parkers River | <1% Upper Parkers River | >99% Oyster Pond | 100% Waquoit Bay | 82% Waquoit Bay | 18% Oyster River | 100% WELLFLEET HARBOR WELLFLEET HARBOR WELLFLEET HARBOR Eel Pond East | 100% RUSHY MARSH BASS RIVER BASS RIVER BASS RIVER Stage Harbor | 100% Wellfleet Harbor | 11% Wellfleet Harbor | 88% Wellfleet Harbor | 2% Eel Pond South | 100% Rushy Marsh Pond | 100% Bass River Lower | 59% Bass River Lower | 41% Jehu Pond Great River | 100% Bass River Middle | 67% Bass River Middle | 33% Bass River Middle | <1% SULFUR SPRINGS ROCK HARBOR ROCK HARBOR PAMET RIVER Little River | 100% Dinah’s Pond | 100% Bucks Creek | 100% Rock Harbor | 79% Rock Harbor | 21% Pamet River | 100% Sage Lot Pond | 100% Follins Pond |
    [Show full text]
  • Attleboro MS4
    Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under Small MS4 General Permit Page 1 of 21 Part I: General Conditions General Information Name of Municipality or Organization: City of Attleboro State: MA EPA NPDES Permit Number (if applicable): MAR041087 Primary MS4 Program Manager Contact Information Name: Nicholas Title: Wyllie Street Address Line 1: Attleboro Department of Planning and Development Street Address Line 2: 77 Park Street City: Attleboro State: MA Zip Code: 02703 Email: [email protected] Phone Number: (508) 223-2222 Fax Number: (508) 222-3046 Other Information Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) Location https://www.cityofattleboro.us/DocumentCenter/View/2862/Stormwater- (web address or physical location, if already completed): Management-Plan-PDF Eligibility Determination Eligibility Criteria Endangered Species Act (ESA) Determination Complete? Yes (check all that apply): A B C Eligibility Criteria National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Determination Complete? Yes (check all that apply): A B C ✔ Check the box if your municipality or organization was covered under the 2003 MS4 General Permit MS4 Infrastructure (if covered under the 2003 permit) Estimated Percent of Outfall Map Complete? If 100% of 2003 requirements not met, enter an 100% (Part II, III, IV or V, Subpart B.3.(a.) of 2003 permit) estimated date of completion (MM/DD/YY): Web address where MS4 map is published: If outfall map is unavailable on the internet an electronic http://www.cityofattleboro.us/DocumentCenter/View/2885/Attleboro-MS4-Outfalls or
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 28, No
    BULLETIN OF THE MASSACI-IUSETTS ARCI-IAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOL. 28 NO.1 OCTOBER, 1966 CONTENTS Page NOTABLE UPPER CAPE COD SURFACE RECOVERIES WILLIAM S. FoWLER 1 OBSERVATIONS ON EASTERN ALGONKIAN LINQUISTICS LINQUISTICS NICHOLAS N. SMITH 4 A BUNGAY RIVER SITE GEORGE H. BARTON ,.......... 9 A PROBABLE FAKE PRE-COLUMBIAN MARKER BERNARD W. POWELL 10 PEBBLE-MADE PROJECTILE POINTS RICHARD Q. BoURN, JR. 14 CACHE OF ENGRAVED PEBBLES FROM NEW BRUNSWICK WILLIAM S. FOWLER 15 IN MEMORIAM 15 REDETERMINATION OF THE HALF-LIFE OF CARBON 14 WILLIAM B. BRIERLY Back Cover PUBLISHED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. SOCIETY OFFICE, Bronson Museum, 8 No. Main Street, Attleboro, Mass. a I'T C. 1M. I T TE COLLE -j; p.-wAT 'M!SACI1U~ n MASSACHUSETIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS President Harold F. Nye............ ..Converse Road. Marion, Mass. First Vice President Donald C. WildeL...... ..... 86 Brewster Avenue, South Braintree 85, Mass. Second Vice President William B. Brierly 9 Hawthorne Street, Millbury, Mass. Secretary Maurice Robbins........ .. Bronson Museum, Attleboro, Mass. Financial Secretary Mabel A. Robbins 23 Steere Street, Attleboro, Mass. Treasurer Arthur C. Staples , Segreganset, Mass. Editor William S. Fowler Bronson Museum, Attleboro, Mass. Trustees Society Officers and Immediate Past Presidents: Arthur C. Lord and Vigo C. Petersen Edward G. Bielski Robert A. Martin Norma G. Wentworth Robert E. Valyou George S. Gibb Frank Kremp MASSACHUSETIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY BULLETIN, pub- lished in four Numbers of one Volume each year, commencing in October. Price this issue $.75 (Subscription by membership in the Society: $3.(0) Note: Address aU requests concerning membership to the Secretary; all orders for back Bulletin numbers (4 for $1.00 to members) to the Editor; and mail Society dues to the Financial Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • E. Fisheries and Wildlife
    E. Fisheries and Wildlife Until recent decades, the vast majority of Mashpee’s territory was the domain not of man, but of beast. Our woods were only occasionally broken by a roadway, or a few homes, or a farmer’s fields. The hunting was good. Our clear lakes were famous for their fishing. Our streams flowed clean to pristine coastal bays teeming with fish and shellfish that helped feed and support many families. Much has changed with the explosive development of the last fifty years, and much of our wildlife has disappeared along with the natural habitat that supported it. However, much remains for our enjoyment and safekeeping. In this section we will look at Mashpee’s fish and shellfish, its mammals, birds and insects, important wildlife movement corridors and those species living in our town which are among the last of their kind. 1. Finfish Mashpee hosts four types of fin fisheries: fresh water ponds, rivers and streams, estuaries and coastal ponds and the open ocean. Our four large ponds provide some of the best fishing in the state. 203-acre Ashumet Pond, 317- acre Johns Pond and 729-acre Mashpee-Wakeby Pond are all cold water fisheries stocked with brown, brook and rainbow trout. In the last century, such famous anglers as Daniel Webster, President Grover Cleveland and the famous actor Joseph Jefferson looked forward to their fishing expeditions to Mashpee, while local residents looked forward to the income provided serving as guides to those and other wealthy gentlemen. Ashumet and Johns Ponds are also noted for their smallmouth bass, while Mashpee-Wakeby provides not only the smallmouth, but also chain pickerel, white perch and yellow perch.
    [Show full text]