DOCSLIB.ORG

R Graphics Output

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R Graphics Output Hexapoda Remipedia Branchiopoda Cephalocarida Pancrustacea Malacostraca Copepodoidea Thecostraca Ostracoda Oligostraca Chilopoda Diplopoda Myriapoda Pauropoda Arthropoda Symphyla Chelicerata CheliceromorphaPantopoda Tardigrada Tardigradoidea Ecdysozoa Lobopoda Onychophora Loricifera Nematoda Nemathelminthes Nematomorpha Kinorhyncha Priapulida Clitellata Orthonectida Annelida Myzostomida Sipunculida Protostomia Euannelida Nemertini Nemertea Archynchocoela Entoprocta Kamptozoa Cycliophora Gymnolaemata LophophorataEctoprocta Phylactolaemata Phoronida Rhynchonelliformea Brachiozoa Craniiformea Linguliformea Spiralia Gastropoda Scaphopoda Bivalvia Mollusca Cephalopoda Monoplacophora Polyplacophora Aplacophora Neodermata PlatyhelminthesRhabditophora Catenulida Mesozoa Dicyemida PlatyzoaGastrotricha Gastrotrichoidea Syndermata Gnathifera Micrognathozoa Gnathostomulida Chaetognatha Sagittoidea Bilateria Ascidiacea Tunicata Larvacea Mammalia Aves Reptilia Amphibia Vertebrata Dipnoi Actinopterygii Chondrichtyes Deuterostomia Cyclostomata Cephalochordata Leptocardii Pterobranchia Hemichordata Enteropneusta Holothurioidea Ophiuroidea Echinodermata Echinoidea Asteroidea Crinoidea Xenoturbelloidea XenacoelomorphaAcoelomorpha Nemertodermatida Acoela Myxosporea Myxozoa Malacosporea Polypodiozoa Medusozoa Hydrozoa Scyphozoa Animalia Natantes Cubozoa Cnidaria Staurozoa Coronatae Octocorallia Anthozoa Hexacorallia Ceriantharia Phagocytellozoa Placozoa Trichoplacoidea Ctenophora Ctenophora Ctenophoroidea Homoscleromorpha Calcarea Spongia Porifera Demospongia Hexactinellea Pinopsida Gnetopsida Spermatophyta Angiospermae Cycadopsida Ginkgoopsida Pteridopsida Marattiopsida Pteridophytina Ophioglossopsida Psilotopsida Vegetabilia Pteridophyta Equisetopsida LycopodiophytinaLycopodiopsida AnthocerotophytinaAnthocerotopsida Bryopsida Polytrichopsida Oedipodiopsida BryophytaBryophytina Andreaeopsida Sphagnopsida Takakiopsida Jungermanniopsida Hepaticae Marchantiopsida Haplomitriopsida Charophyceae Charophytina Mesostigmatophyceae Streptofilophyceae Ulvophyceae Chlorophyceae Chlorodendrophyceae Trebouxiophyceae ChlorophytaChlorophytina Pedinophyceae Chloropicophyceae Nephroselmidophyceae Mamiellophyceae Pyraminomonadophyceae Palmophyllophyceae PrasinodermophytinaPrasinodermophyceae Glaucophyta Glaucophyceae Florideophyceae Bangiophyceae Rhodophyta Proteorhodophyceae Cyanidiophyceae Rhodelphidia Picomonadea Chlorobionta Rhodelphea Endohelea Palpitia Cryptista Leucocrypta Cryptophyceae Hemimastigophora Hemimastigea Centrohelea Rappephyceae Heliozoa Prymnesiophyceae Alveida Telonemia Telonemea Xanthophyceae Chrysoparadoxophyceae Phaeosacciophyceae Xanthophytina Phaeophyceae Phaeothamniophyceae Raphidophyceae Actinophryida Chrysophyceae Chromophyta Eustigmatophyceae Chrysophytina Pinguiophyceae Olisthodiscophyceae Pelagophyceae Panalgae Dictyochophyceae Pelagophytina Bolidophyceae Bacillariophyceae Heterokonta Bigyromonadea Oomycota Oomycetes Eogyrea Labyrinthulea Bicoecea Opalozoa Placididea Opalinea Platysulcea Cariacotrichea Spirotrichea Spirotrichia Armophorea Litostomatea Oligohymenophorea Prostomatea Plagiopylea CiliophoraVentrata Phyllopharyngea Nassophorea Colpodea Protocruziea Heterotrichea Chromobionta PostciliodesmatophoraKaryorelictea Alveolata Coccidiomorphea Apicomplexa Gregarinomorphea Apicomonadea Dinoflagellata Ellobiopsea Myzozoa Syndinea Dinozoa Oxyrridea Squirmidea Perkinsida Protalveolata Colponemida Globothalamea Tubothalamea Monothalamea Retaria Acantharia Polycystinea Taxopodida Ascetosporea Gromiidea RhizariaRhizariaEndomyxa Plasmodiophorea Proteomyxidea Skiomonadea Chlorarachniophyceae Metromonadea Filosea Granofilosea Sarcomonadea Ventrifilosea Choanomonadea Filasterea Choanozoa Pluriformea Ichthyosporea Eurotiomycetes Lichinomycetes Geoglossomycetes Sordariomycetes Laboulbeniomycetes Leotiomycetes PezizomycotinaDothideomycetes Lecanoromycetes Sareomycetes Xylonomycetes Ascomycota Orbiliomycetes Pezizomycetes Saccharomycetes Archaeorhizomycetes TaphrinomycotinaTaphrinomycetes Protista Neolectomycetes Agaricomycetes AgaricomycotinaDacrymycetes Tremellomycetes Wallemiomycetes WallemiomycotinaBartheletiomycetes Mixiomycetes Microbotryomycetes Cystobasidiomycetes Atractiellomycetes PucciniomycotinaClassiculomycetes Basidiomycota Pucciniomycetes Spiculogloeomycetes Agaricostilbomycetes Tritirachiomycetes Malasseziomycetes Moniliellomycetes Panmycota UstilagomycotinaUstilaginomycetes Exobasidiomycetes EntorrhizomycotaEntorrhizomycetes Glomeromycetes Sanchytriomycetes Mucoromycetes Kickxellomycetes Eomycota Olpidiomycetes Nephridiophagida Chytridiomycetes Blastocladiomycetes Aphelidea Microsporea Opisthosporidia Cryptomycetes Cristidiscoidea Discosea Tubulinea Archamoebae Amoebozoa Variosea Mycetozoa Cutosea Breviatea Apusomonadea Anisomonadea Sulcozoa Hilomonadea Mantamonadea Ancyromonadea Kinetoplastea Diplosonematea Euglenozoa Postgaardea Euglenophyceae Percolozoa Heterolobosea Discoba Jakobea Loukozoa Tsukubea Excavata MalawimonadeaMalawimonadea Eopharyngea Metamonada Parabasalea Anaeromonadea Lokiarchaea Asgardarchaeota Heimdallarchaeota Wukongarchaeota Korarchaea Filarchaeota Crenarchaea Cenarchaea Halobacterota Archaebacteria Archaeoglobi Euryarchaeota Thermoplasmata Methanobacteria Thermococci Nanoarchea Nanoarchaeota ‘Undinarchaeota Micrarchaea Fervidibacteria Acetothermia Atribacteria Caldisericia Firmicutes Dictyoglomia Mollicutes Bacilli Limnochordia Clostridia Actinomycetia Actinobacteria Parcubacteria \N Microgenomates Caldilineia Monera Ktedonobacteria Chloroflexes Dehalococcoidia Thermomicrobia Terrabacteria Chloroflexi Fimbriimonadia Armatimonadetes Armatimonadia Nostocineae Oscillatorineae Cyanobacteria Gloeobacteria Vampirovibrionia Melainabacteria Thermotogia Synergistota Synergistia Thermi Fusobacteriota Fusobacteria Rhodobacteria Methylomirabilia Desulfobacteria Sumerlaeota Aminicenantes Nitrospiria Bacteria Proteobacteria Acidobacteria Chrysiogenetes Calescamantes Deferribacteres Epsilonproteobacteria Aquificae Dependentiae Marinimicrobia Chlorobia Ignavibacteria Rhodothermaeota Bacteroidia Bacteroidetes Latescibacteria Calditrichaeota Gemmatimonadetes Fibrobacteria Cloacimonetes Gracilicutes Chlamydiia Omnitrophica Kiritimatiellaeota Planctobacteria Verrucomicrobiia Lentisphaeria Planctomycetia Poribacteria Hydrogenedentes Aerophobetes Elusimicrobia Goldbacteria Elusimicrobes Spirochaetae Spirochaetes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León Facultad De Ciencias Biológicas
    UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVO LEÓN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS TESIS TAXONOMÍA, DISTRIBUCIÓN E IMPORTANCIA DE LAS ALGAS DE NUEVO LEÓN POR DIANA ELENA AGUIRRE CAVAZOS COMO REQUISITO PARCIAL PARA OBTENER EL GRADO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS CON ACENTUACIÓN EN MANEJO Y ADMINISTRACIÓN DE RECURSOS VEGETALES MAYO, 2018 TAXONOMÍA, DISTRIBUCIÓN E IMPORTANCIA DE LAS ALGAS DE NUEVO LEÓN Comité de Tesis Presidente: Dr. Sergio Manuel Salcedo Martínez. Secretario: Dr. Sergio Moreno Limón. Vocal 1: Hugo Alberto Luna Olvera. Vocal 2: Dr. Marco Antonio Alvarado Vázquez. Vocal 3: Dra. Alejandra Rocha Estrada. TAXONOMÍA, DISTRIBUCIÓN E IMPORTANCIA DE LAS ALGAS DE NUEVO LEÓN Dirección de Tesis Director: Dr. Sergio Manuel Salcedo Martínez. AGRADECIMIENTOS A Dios, por guiar siempre mis pasos y darme fortaleza ante las dificultades. Al Dr. Sergio Manuel Salcedo Martínez, por su disposición para participar como director de este proyecto, por sus consejos y enseñanzas que siempre tendré presente tanto en mi vida profesional como personal; pero sobre todo por su dedicación, paciencia y comprensión que hicieron posible la realización de este trabajo. A la Dra. Alejandra Rocha Estrada, El Dr. Marco Antonio Alvarado Vázquez, el Dr. Sergio Moreno Limón y el Dr. Hugo Alberto Luna Olvera por su apoyo y aportaciones para la realización de este trabajo. Al Dr. Eberto Novelo, por sus valiosas aportaciones para enriquecer el listado taxonómico. A la M.C. Cecilia Galicia Campos, gracias Cecy, por hacer tan amena la estancia en el laboratorio y en el Herbario; por esas pláticas interminables y esas “riso terapias” que siempre levantaban el ánimo. A mis entrañables amigos, “los biólogos”, “los cacos”: Brenda, Libe, Lula, Samy, David, Gera, Pancho, Reynaldo y Ricardo.
    [Show full text]
  • Akashiwo Sanguinea
    Ocean ORIGINAL ARTICLE and Coastal http://doi.org/10.1590/2675-2824069.20-004hmdja Research ISSN 2675-2824 Phytoplankton community in a tropical estuarine gradient after an exceptional harmful bloom of Akashiwo sanguinea (Dinophyceae) in the Todos os Santos Bay Helen Michelle de Jesus Affe1,2,* , Lorena Pedreira Conceição3,4 , Diogo Souza Bezerra Rocha5 , Luis Antônio de Oliveira Proença6 , José Marcos de Castro Nunes3,4 1 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Faculdade de Oceanografia (Bloco E - 900, Pavilhão João Lyra Filho, 4º andar, sala 4018, R. São Francisco Xavier, 524 - Maracanã - 20550-000 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil) 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais/INPE - Rede Clima - Sub-rede Oceanos (Av. dos Astronautas, 1758. Jd. da Granja -12227-010 - São José dos Campos - SP - Brazil) 3 Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - Departamento de Ciências Biológicas - Programa de Pós-graduação em Botânica (Av. Transnordestina s/n - Novo Horizonte - 44036-900 - Feira de Santana - BA - Brazil) 4 Universidade Federal da Bahia - Instituto de Biologia - Laboratório de Algas Marinhas (Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Campus de Ondina 40170-115 - Salvador - BA - Brazil) 5 Instituto Internacional para Sustentabilidade - (Estr. Dona Castorina, 124 - Jardim Botânico - 22460-320 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil) 6 Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (Av. Ver. Abrahão João Francisco, 3899 - Ressacada, Itajaí - 88307-303 - SC - Brazil) * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRAct The objective of this study was to evaluate variations in the composition and abundance of the phytoplankton community after an exceptional harmful bloom of Akashiwo sanguinea that occurred in Todos os Santos Bay (BTS) in early March, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Evolution: Major Ecological Adaptations and Evolutionary Transitions
    Biol. Rev. (2019), pp. 000–000. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12510 Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions Miguel A. Naranjo-Ortiz1 and Toni Gabaldon´ 1,2,3∗ 1Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain 2 Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain 3ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT Fungi are a highly diverse group of heterotrophic eukaryotes characterized by the absence of phagotrophy and the presence of a chitinous cell wall. While unicellular fungi are far from rare, part of the evolutionary success of the group resides in their ability to grow indefinitely as a cylindrical multinucleated cell (hypha). Armed with these morphological traits and with an extremely high metabolical diversity, fungi have conquered numerous ecological niches and have shaped a whole world of interactions with other living organisms. Herein we survey the main evolutionary and ecological processes that have guided fungal diversity. We will first review the ecology and evolution of the zoosporic lineages and the process of terrestrialization, as one of the major evolutionary transitions in this kingdom. Several plausible scenarios have been proposed for fungal terrestralization and we here propose a new scenario, which considers icy environments as a transitory niche between water and emerged land. We then focus on exploring the main ecological relationships of Fungi with other organisms (other fungi, protozoans, animals and plants), as well as the origin of adaptations to certain specialized ecological niches within the group (lichens, black fungi and yeasts).
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Is a Ubiquitous, Ancient, and Inherent Attribute of Eukaryotic Life
    PAPER Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of COLLOQUIUM eukaryotic life Dave Speijera,1, Julius Lukešb,c, and Marek Eliášd,1 aDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; bInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic; cCanadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1Z8; and dDepartment of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 8, 2015 (received for review February 14, 2015) Sexual reproduction and clonality in eukaryotes are mostly Sex in Eukaryotic Microorganisms: More Voyeurs Needed seen as exclusive, the latter being rather exceptional. This view Whereas absence of sex is considered as something scandalous for might be biased by focusing almost exclusively on metazoans. a zoologist, scientists studying protists, which represent the ma- We analyze and discuss reproduction in the context of extant jority of extant eukaryotic diversity (2), are much more ready to eukaryotic diversity, paying special attention to protists. We accept that a particular eukaryotic group has not shown any evi- present results of phylogenetically extended searches for ho- dence of sexual processes. Although sex is very well documented mologs of two proteins functioning in cell and nuclear fusion, in many protist groups, and members of some taxa, such as ciliates respectively (HAP2 and GEX1), providing indirect evidence for (Alveolata), diatoms (Stramenopiles), or green algae (Chlor- these processes in several eukaryotic lineages where sex has oplastida), even serve as models to study various aspects of sex- – not been observed yet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genome-Scale Phylogeny of the Kingdom Fungi
    Article A genome-scale phylogeny of the kingdom Fungi Graphical Abstract Authors Yuanning Li, Jacob L. Steenwyk, Ying Chang, ..., Chris Todd Hittinger, Xing-Xing Shen, Antonis Rokas Correspondence [email protected] (X.-X.S.), [email protected] (A.R.) In Brief Li et al. analyze 290 genes from 1,644 species to infer a genome-scale phylogeny of the fungal kingdom. Analyses using different approaches and data matrices show that 85% of inferred relationships among fungi are robustly supported. The results provide a robust phylogenomic framework to explore the tempo and mode of fungal evolution. Highlights d Genome-scale phylogeny of the fungal kingdom based on 290 genes and 1,644 species d 85% of inferred phylogenetic relationships among fungi are robustly supported d Certain unresolved relationships may be due to ancient diversification events d Fungal higher rank taxonomy broadly reflects organisms’ genome sequence divergence Li et al., 2021, Current Biology 31, 1–13 April 26, 2021 ª 2021 Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.074 ll Please cite this article in press as: Li et al., A genome-scale phylogeny of the kingdom Fungi, Current Biology (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cub.2021.01.074 ll OPEN ACCESS Article A genome-scale phylogeny of the kingdom Fungi Yuanning Li,1 Jacob L. Steenwyk,1 Ying Chang,2 Yan Wang,3,4 Timothy Y. James,5 Jason E. Stajich,3 Joseph W. Spatafora,2 Marizeth Groenewald,6 Casey W. Dunn,7 Chris Todd Hittinger,8 Xing-Xing Shen,9,* and Antonis Rokas1,10,* 1Department of Biological Sciences,
    [Show full text]
  • Based on SSU Rdna Sequences
    J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 48(5), 2001 pp. 604±607 q 2001 by the Society of Protozoologists Phylogenetic Position of Sorogena stoianovitchae and Relationships within the Class Colpodea (Ciliophora) Based on SSU rDNA Sequences ERICA LASEK-NESSELQUISTa and LAURA A. KATZa,b aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts 01063, and bProgram in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA ABSTRACT. The ciliate Sorogena stoianovitchae, which can form a multicellular fruiting body, has been classi®ed based upon its ultrastructure and morphology: the oral and somatic infraciliature of S. stoianovitchae most closely resemble those of members of the order Cyrtolophosidida in the class Colpodea. We characterized the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) gene sequence from S. stoianovitchae and compared this sequence with those from representatives of all ciliate classes. These analyses placed S. stoianovitchae as either sister to members of the class Nassophorea or Colpodea. In an in-group analysis, including all SSU rDNA sequences from members of the classes Nassophorea and Colpodea and representatives of appropriate outgroups, S. stoianovitchae was always sister to Platyophrya vorax (class Colpodea, order Cyrtolophosidida). However, our analyses failed to support the monophyly of the class Colpodea. Instead, our data suggest that there are essentially three unresolved clades: (1) the class Nassophorea; (2) Bresslaua vorax, Colpoda in¯ata, Pseudoplatyophrya nana, and Bursaria truncatella (class Colpodea); and (3) P. vorax and S. stoianovitchae (class Colpodea). Key Words. Bursariomorphida, ciliate phylogeny, Colpodida, Cyrtolophosidida, molecular systematics, Nassophorea, Sorogenida. OROGENA stoianovitchae is a unique ciliate that aggregates partial B. sphagni sequence), provide the ®rst molecular hy- S to produce an aerial fruiting body when cells are starved.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Approach Sheds New Light Onto the Systematics
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN An integrative approach sheds new light onto the systematics and ecology of the widespread ciliate genus Coleps (Ciliophora, Prostomatea) Thomas Pröschold1*, Daniel Rieser1, Tatyana Darienko2, Laura Nachbaur1, Barbara Kammerlander1, Kuimei Qian1,3, Gianna Pitsch4, Estelle Patricia Bruni4,5, Zhishuai Qu6, Dominik Forster6, Cecilia Rad‑Menendez7, Thomas Posch4, Thorsten Stoeck6 & Bettina Sonntag1 Species of the genus Coleps are one of the most common planktonic ciliates in lake ecosystems. The study aimed to identify the phenotypic plasticity and genetic variability of diferent Coleps isolates from various water bodies and from culture collections. We used an integrative approach to study the strains by (i) cultivation in a suitable culture medium, (ii) screening of the morphological variability including the presence/absence of algal endosymbionts of living cells by light microscopy, (iii) sequencing of the SSU and ITS rDNA including secondary structures, (iv) assessment of their seasonal and spatial occurrence in two lakes over a one‑year cycle both from morphospecies counts and high‑ throughput sequencing (HTS), and, (v) proof of the co‑occurrence of Coleps and their endosymbiotic algae from HTS‑based network analyses in the two lakes. The Coleps strains showed a high phenotypic plasticity and low genetic variability. The algal endosymbiont in all studied strains was Micractinium conductrix and the mutualistic relationship turned out as facultative. Coleps is common in both lakes over the whole year in diferent depths and HTS has revealed that only one genotype respectively one species, C. viridis, was present in both lakes despite the diferent lifestyles (mixotrophic with green algal endosymbionts or heterotrophic without algae).
    [Show full text]
  • Neoproterozoic Origin and Multiple Transitions to Macroscopic Growth in Green Seaweeds
    Neoproterozoic origin and multiple transitions to macroscopic growth in green seaweeds Andrea Del Cortonaa,b,c,d,1, Christopher J. Jacksone, François Bucchinib,c, Michiel Van Belb,c, Sofie D’hondta, f g h i,j,k e Pavel Skaloud , Charles F. Delwiche , Andrew H. Knoll , John A. Raven , Heroen Verbruggen , Klaas Vandepoeleb,c,d,1,2, Olivier De Clercka,1,2, and Frederik Leliaerta,l,1,2 aDepartment of Biology, Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; bDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium; cVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Center for Plant Systems Biology, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium; dBioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium; eSchool of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; fDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic; gDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; hDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; iDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee DD2 5DA, United Kingdom; jSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA 6009, Australia; kClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology, Ultimo, NSW 2006, Australia; and lMeise Botanic Garden, 1860 Meise, Belgium Edited by Pamela S. Soltis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, and approved December 13, 2019 (received for review June 11, 2019) The Neoproterozoic Era records the transition from a largely clear interpretation of how many times and when green seaweeds bacterial to a predominantly eukaryotic phototrophic world, creat- emerged from unicellular ancestors (8). ing the foundation for the complex benthic ecosystems that have There is general consensus that an early split in the evolution sustained Metazoa from the Ediacaran Period onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future Jan Pawlowski, Franck Lejzerowicz, Philippe Esling
    Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future Jan Pawlowski, Franck Lejzerowicz, Philippe Esling To cite this version: Jan Pawlowski, Franck Lejzerowicz, Philippe Esling. Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Sur- veys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future . Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, 2014, 227 (2), pp.93-106. 10.1086/BBLv227n2p93. hal-01577891 HAL Id: hal-01577891 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01577891 Submitted on 28 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268789818 Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future Article in Biological Bulletin · October 2014 Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 26 41 3 authors: Jan Pawlowski Franck Lejzerowicz University of Geneva University of Geneva 422 PUBLICATIONS 11,852 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 451 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Philippe Esling Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoust… 24 PUBLICATIONS 551 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: UniEuk View project KuramBio II (Kuril Kamchatka Biodiversity Studies II) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jan Pawlowski on 30 December 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Partitioning Between Phytoplankton and Bacteria in the Coastal Baltic Sea Frontiers in Marine Science, 7: 1-19
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Frontiers in Marine Science. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Sörenson, E., Lindehoff, E., Farnelid, H., Legrand, C. (2020) Resource Partitioning Between Phytoplankton and Bacteria in the Coastal Baltic Sea Frontiers in Marine Science, 7: 1-19 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.608244 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-99520 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 25 November 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.608244 Resource Partitioning Between Phytoplankton and Bacteria in the Coastal Baltic Sea Eva Sörenson, Hanna Farnelid, Elin Lindehoff and Catherine Legrand* Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University Centre of Ecology and Evolution and Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden Eutrophication coupled to climate change disturbs the balance between competition and coexistence in microbial communities including the partitioning of organic and inorganic nutrients between phytoplankton and bacteria. Competition for inorganic nutrients has been regarded as one of the drivers affecting the productivity of the eutrophied coastal Baltic Sea. Yet, it is unknown at the molecular expression level how resources are competed for, by phytoplankton and bacteria, and what impact this competition has on the community composition. Here we use metatranscriptomics and amplicon sequencing and compare known metabolic pathways of both phytoplankton and bacteria co-occurring during a summer bloom in the archipelago of Åland in the Baltic Sea to examine phytoplankton bacteria resource partitioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Flagellates – the New Recently Discovered Deep Branches of the Eukaryotic Tree and Their Evolutionary and Ecological Significance
    Protistology 14 (1), 15–22 (2020) Protistology Predatory flagellates – the new recently discovered deep branches of the eukaryotic tree and their evolutionary and ecological significance Denis V. Tikhonenkov Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, 152742, Russia | Submitted March 20, 2020 | Accepted April 6, 2020 | Summary Predatory protists are poorly studied, although they are often representing important deep-branching evolutionary lineages and new eukaryotic supergroups. This short review/opinion paper is inspired by the recent discoveries of various predatory flagellates, which form sister groups of the giant eukaryotic clusters on phylogenetic trees, and illustrate an ancestral state of one or another supergroup of eukaryotes. Here we discuss their evolutionary and ecological relevance and show that the study of such protists may be essential in addressing previously puzzling evolutionary problems, such as the origin of multicellular animals, the plastid spread trajectory, origins of photosynthesis and parasitism, evolution of mitochondrial genomes. Key words: evolution of eukaryotes, heterotrophic flagellates, mitochondrial genome, origin of animals, photosynthesis, predatory protists, tree of life Predatory flagellates and diversity of eu- of the hidden diversity of protists (Moon-van der karyotes Staay et al., 2000; López-García et al., 2001; Edg- comb et al., 2002; Massana et al., 2004; Richards The well-studied multicellular animals, plants and Bass, 2005; Tarbe et al., 2011; de Vargas et al., and fungi immediately come to mind when we hear 2015). In particular, several prevailing and very abun- the term “eukaryotes”. However, these groups of dant ribogroups such as MALV, MAST, MAOP, organisms represent a minority in the real diversity MAFO (marine alveolates, stramenopiles, opistho- of evolutionary lineages of eukaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Integrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF
    Integrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2018 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler March 14, 2018. Classification II: Phylogenetic taxonomy including incorporation of fossils; PhyloCode I. Phylogenetic Taxonomy - the argument for rank-free classification A number of recent calls have been made for the reformation of the Linnaean hierarchy (e.g., De Queiroz & Gauthier, 1992). These authors have emphasized that the existing system is based in a non-evolutionary world-view; the roots of the Linnaean hierarchy are in a specially- created world-view. Perhaps the idea of fixed, comparable ranks made some sense under that view, but under an evolutionary world view they don't make sense. There are several problems with the current nomenclatorial system: 1. The current system, with its single type for a name, cannot be used to precisely name a clade. E.g., you may name a family based on a certain type specimen, and even if you were clear about what node you meant to name in your original publication, the exact phylogenetic application of your name would not be clear subsequently, after new clades are added. 2. There are not nearly enough ranks to name the thousands of levels of monophyletic groups in the tree of life. Therefore people are increasingly using informal rank-free names for higher- level nodes, but without any clear, formal specification of what clade is meant. 3. Most aspects of the current code, including priority, revolve around the ranks, which leads to instability of usage. For example, when a change in relationships is discovered, several names often need to be changed to adjust, including those of groups whose circumscription has not changed.
    [Show full text]