DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Matagorda County, Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Matagorda County, Texas United States In cooperation with Department of Texas Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station Soil Survey of Natural Matagorda Resources Conservation Service County, Texas 1 How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 2 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1989. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1991. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1991. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Matagorda County Soil and Water Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: A duned area of Galveston fine sand, undulating, on the Matagorda Peninsula. The dunes protect the peninsula from tidal waves during storms. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service homepage on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 3 Contents How To Use This Soil Survey ................................. 1 FoB—Fordtran loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 Foreword ................................................................. 5 percent slopes ............................................. 35 General Nature of the County ................................... 7 FrA—Francitas clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes.......... 35 History and Settlement ......................................... 7 FuC—Fulshear fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 Agriculture .......................................................... 10 percent slopes ............................................. 36 Natural Resources and Industry ......................... 11 GaB—Galveston fine sand, undulating ............... 37 Climate ............................................................... 11 Ha—Harris clay, frequently flooded .................... 37 How This Survey Was Made ................................... 12 ImB—Ijam clay, 1 to 3 percent slopes ................. 38 General Soil Map Units ........................................ 15 KaB—Katy fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent Clayey and Loamy Soils of Upland Prairies ........ 15 slopes .......................................................... 38 1. Laewest-Dacosta ..................................... 15 LaA—Laewest clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes .......... 39 2. Edna-Texana-Telferner ............................ 16 LaB—Laewest clay, 1 to 3 percent slopes .......... 40 3. Livco-Dacosta ......................................... 17 LaD2—Laewest clay, 5 to 8 percent slopes, Clayey and Loamy Soils of Flood Plains ............. 17 eroded ......................................................... 40 4. Pledger-Asa............................................. 17 LoA—Laewest silty clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, 5. Brazoria-Norwood-Clemville .................... 18 overwashed ................................................. 40 Dominantly Clayey Soils on Coastal Lowlands ... 19 LtA—Livco-Dacosta complex, 0 to 1 percent 6. Livia-Palacios-Francitas ........................... 20 slopes .......................................................... 41 7. Harris-Velasco-Placedo ........................... 20 LvA—Livia loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes .............. 43 8. Surfside ................................................... 20 MuA—Mustang fine sand, 0 to 1 percent Sandy and Loamy Soils on the Matagorda slopes .......................................................... 44 Peninsula ..................................................... 21 No—Norwood silty clay loam, rarely flooded ...... 44 9. Galveston-Follet ...................................... 21 PaA—Palacios loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........ 45 Detailed Soil Map Units ........................................ 23 Pc—Placedo silty clay, frequently flooded .......... 46 Aa—Asa silt loam, rarely flooded........................ 24 Pe—Pledger clay, rarely flooded ......................... 47 As—Asa silty clay loam, rarely flooded ............... 24 Pg—Pledger clay, occasionally flooded .............. 47 Az—Asa silty clay loam, saline, occasionally RoB—Riolomas fine sand, 1 to 3 percent flooded ......................................................... 25 slopes .......................................................... 48 BaA—Bacliff clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes ............. 26 Sf—Sumpf clay, frequently flooded ..................... 49 Bb—Beaches ..................................................... 27 Sr—Surfside clay, occasionally flooded .............. 49 Br—Brazoria clay, rarely flooded ........................ 28 TfA—Telferner very fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 CeA—Cieno sandy clay loam, 0 to 1 percent percent slopes ............................................. 50 slopes .......................................................... 29 TxA—Texana fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent Cm—Clemville silty clay loam, rarely flooded ..... 29 slopes .......................................................... 50 DaA—Dacosta sandy clay loam, 0 to 1 TxB—Texana fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent percent slopes ............................................. 30 slopes .......................................................... 51 EdA—Edna fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent Ve—Velasco clay, frequently flooded .................. 52 slopes .......................................................... 31 Vs—Veston loam, strongly saline, frequently EoA—Edna silty clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, flooded ......................................................... 52 overwashed ................................................. 31 Prime Farmland .................................................... 53 ExA—Edna-Cieno complex, 0 to 1 percent Use and Management of the Soils ...................... 55 slopes .......................................................... 33 Crops and Pasture ............................................. 55 FaA—Faddin loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ........... 34 Crops ............................................................. 55 Fe—Follet loam, frequently flooded .................... 34 Pasture and Hayland ...................................... 58 4 Land Capability Classification ........................ 58 Placedo Series ................................................. 103 Yields per Acre ............................................... 60 Pledger Series.................................................. 103 Rangeland .......................................................... 60 Riolomas Series ............................................... 104 Marsh Rangeland ........................................... 62 Sumpf Series.................................................... 105 Prairie Rangeland .......................................... 66 Surfside Series ................................................. 106 Recreation .......................................................... 69 Telferner Series ................................................ 106 Wildlife Habitat ................................................... 69 Texana Series
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Living Shorelines Workshop Bill Balboa [email protected] Living Shorelines Workshop
    Living Shorelines Workshop Bill Balboa [email protected] Living Shorelines Workshop • MBF • Need • Planning • Shoreline protection projects • Grassy Point • Mouth of Carancahua Bay • GIWW • Observations • The Matagorda Bay Foundation is dedicated to the wise stewardship of central Texas’ estuaries and the coastal watersheds that sustain them. • Created in 1995 Inflows for Whoopers– Blackburn, Hamman & Garrison • February 2019 • San Antonio Bay Partnership, Lavaca Bay Foundation and East Matagorda Bay Foundation Matagorda Bay • The unknown coast Foundation • 2nd Largest estuary in Texas • Cultural, biological, economic importance • Freshwater - Colorado and Lavaca-Navidad • Gulf passes at Mitchell’s Cut and Pass Cavallo and the Matagorda Jetties • >270,000 acres of open water and bay bottom (East and West Bays) • ~100,000 acres of wetlands • >6500 acres of oyster habitat • ~8000 acres of seagrasses Planning Shoreline Projects Grassy Point Grassy Point Mouth of Carancahua Bay Schicke Pt. Redfish Lake Mouth of Carancahua Bay Rusty Feagin, Bill Balboa, Dave Buzan, Thomas Huff, Matt Glaze, Woody Woodrow, Ray Newby Mouth of Carahcahua Bay The problem • Carancahua Bay mouth widens • Larger waves impacting Port ~122 feet per year by erosion Alto’s docks and bulkheads • Already 61 acres of marsh and • Water quality declining seagrass lost • Altered fishing prospects as • Future loss of 624 acres of marsh Carancahua and Keller Bays and seagrass under threat merge with West Matagorda Bay Schicke Point 2005 2017 Mouth of Carancahua Bay Partners •
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Rookery Islands Project
    5 Chapter 5: Texas Rookery Islands Project 5.1 Restoration and Protection of Texas Rookery Islands: Project Description ................................... 1 5.1.1 Project Summary................................................................................................................. 1 5.1.2 Background and Project Description .................................................................................. 3 5.1.3 Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................ 13 5.1.4 Performance Criteria and Monitoring .............................................................................. 14 5.1.5 Offsets ............................................................................................................................... 14 5.1.6 Estimated Cost .................................................................................................................. 15 5.2 Texas Rookery Islands Project: Environmental Assessment ......................................................... 16 5.2.1 Introduction and Background, Purpose and Need ........................................................... 16 5.2.2 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ......................................................................... 17 5.2.3 Project Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 18 5.2.4 Galveston Bay Rookery Islands ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sabine Lake Galveston Bay East Matagorda Bay Matagorda Bay Corpus Christi Bay Aransas Bay San Antonio Bay Laguna Madre Planning
    River Basins Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin TPWD Canadian River Basin Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Wolf Creek Colorado River Basin Lipscomb Gene Howe WMA-W.A. (Pat) Murphy Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin R i t Strategic Planning a B r ve Gene Howe WMA l i Hartley a Hutchinson R n n Cypress Creek Basin Moore ia Roberts Hemphill c ad a an C C r e Guadalupe River Basin e k Lavaca River Basin Oldham r Potter Gray ive Regions Carson ed R the R ork of Wheeler Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin North F ! Amarillo Neches River Basin Salt Fork of the Red River Deaf Smith Armstrong 10Randall Donley Collingsworth Palo Duro Canyon Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin Playa Lakes WMA-Taylor Unit Pr airie D og To Nueces River Basin wn Fo rk of t he Red River Parmer Playa Lakes WMA-Dimmit Unit Swisher Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Castro Briscoe Hall Childress Caprock Canyons Caprock Canyons Trailway N orth P Red River Basin ease River Hardeman Lamb Rio Grande River Basin Matador WMA Pease River Bailey Copper Breaks Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Wilbarger W To Wichita hi ng ver Sabine River Basin te ue R Foard hita Ri er R ive Wic Riv i r Wic Clay ta ve er hita hi Pat Mayse WMA r a Riv Rive ic Eisenhower ichit r e W h W tl Caddo National Grassland-Bois D'arc 6a Nort Lit San Antonio River Basin Lake Arrowhead Lamar Red River Montague South Wichita River Cooke Grayson Cochran Fannin Hockley Lubbock Lubbock Dickens King Baylor Archer T ! Knox rin Bonham North Sulphur San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Crosby r it River ive y R Bowie R B W iv os r es
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE January 22, 2021
    PRESS RELEASE January 22, 2021 Contact: Steven J. Raabe, P.E., Trustee P.O. Box 1269 Poth, Texas 78147-1269 Phone: 361-200-1456 Website: www.mbmTrust.com Email: [email protected] MATAGORDA BAY MITIGATION TRUST ANNOUNCES FUNDING FOR NINE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS On October 30, 2020 the Matagorda Bay Mitigation Trust published a Request for Proposals for coastal environmental projects in four categories: habitat restoration, environmental research, public education, and improving public access. The Matagorda Bay Mitigation Trust received a total of 39 proposals, from 16 entities, totaling 14.5 million dollars. Today, Steven Raabe, Trustee of the Matagorda Bay Mitigation Trust, announces that nine projects, from six entities, totaling 3.2 million dollars have been approved for funding. “We were so fortunate to receive some great proposals and it was difficult for the selection committee to make their recommendation because of the limitation of available funds,” Raabe stated. “But we are extremely pleased with the quality, scope, and cost effectiveness of the proposals selected as a significant step to research, restore and improve the Matagorda and San Antonio bays area environment,” he added. The projects being funded, by category, are: Habitat Restoration (Three projects totaling $1,498,000) Protection and Restoration of the Blackjack Peninsula, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, $500,000, Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program 1 Protection and Restoration of Matagorda Island West Marsh, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, $498,000, Coastal
    [Show full text]
  • National Coastal Condition Assessment 2010
    You may use the information and images contained in this document for non-commercial, personal, or educational purposes only, provided that you (1) do not modify such information and (2) include proper citation. If material is used for other purposes, you must obtain written permission from the author(s) to use the copyrighted material prior to its use. Reviewed: 7/27/2021 Jenny Wrast Environmental Institute of Houston FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Lakes Field Lab, Data Report Research Design Field Lab, Data Rivers Design Field Lab, Data Report Research Design Field Streams Research Design Field Lab, Data Report Research Design Coastal Report Research Design Field Lab, Data Report Research Wetlands Research Research Research Design Field Lab, Data Report 11 sites in: • Sabine Lake • Galveston Bay • Trinity Bay • West Bay • East Bay • Christmas Bay 26 sites in: • East Matagorda Bay • Tres Palacios Bay • Lavaca Bay • Matagorda Bay • Carancahua Bay • Espiritu Santu Bay • San Antonio Bay • Ayres Bay • Mesquite Bay • Copano Bay • Aransas Bay 16 sites in: • Corpus Christi Bay • Nueces Bay • Upper Laguna Madre • Baffin Bay • East Bay • Alazan Bay •Lower Laguna Madre Finding Boat Launches Tracking Forms Locating the “X” Site Pathogen Indicator Enterococcus Habitat Assessment Water Field Measurements Light Attenuation Basic Water Chemistry Chlorophyll Nutrients Sediment Chemistry and Composition •Grain Size • TOC • Metals Sediment boat and equipment cleaned • PCBs after every site. • Organics Benthic Macroinvertebrates Sediment Toxicity Minimum of 3-Liters of sediment required at each site. Croaker Spot Catfish Whole Fish Sand Trout Contaminants Pinfish •Metals •PCBs •Organics Upper Laguna Madre Hurricanes Hermine & Igor Wind & Rain Upper Laguna Madre Copano Bay San Antonio Bay—August Trinity Bay—July Copano Bay—September Jenny Kristen UHCL-EIH Lynne TCEQ Misty Art Crowe Robin Cypher Anne Rogers Other UHCL-EIH Michele Blair Staff Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • GCBO AMOY Banding Data Metal Band Date Sex Age Latitude
    GCBO AMOY Banding Data Color Latitude Longitude Location Metal Band band Date Sex Age Notes 1106-18029 10 03/30/12 U ASY 29.2857 -94.87670 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18031 11 03/31/12 M ASY 29.33862 -94.89818 UTC - Swan Lake 1106-18030 12 03/30/12 U ASY 29.28472 -94.87776 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18032 13 04/06/12 U ASY 29.2715 -94.90929 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18033 14 04/06/12 M ASY 29.27054 -94.90942 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18034 15 04/07/12 F ASY 29.26871 -94.89269 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18035 16 04/07/12 M ASY 29.26871 -94.89269 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18036 17 04/09/12 M ASY 28.71102 -95.883472 CTC - East Matagorda Bay 1106-18037 18 04/24/12 M ASY 28.69111 -95.80801 CTC - East Matagorda Bay 1106-18038 19 04/27/12 M ASY 29.29744 -94.93923 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18039 20 04/28/12 M ASY 29.32525 -94.89201 UTC - Galveston Bay 1106-18040 21 04/28/12 F ASY 29.32525 -94.89201 UTC - Galveston Bay 1106-18042 22 05/04/12 M ASY 29.28323 -94.89272 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18043 23 05/04/12 F ASY 29.29048 -94.92956 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18044 24 05/06/12 M ASY 28.71203 -95.88785 CTC - East Matagorda Bay 1106-18045 25 05/06/12 F ASY 28.71203 -95.88785 CTC - East Matagorda Bay 1106-18047 26 05/09/12 F ASY 29.42962 -94.948651 UTC - Dickinson Bay 1106-18049 27 05/09/12 U ASY 29.43567 -94.92667 UTC - Moses Lake 1106-18050 28 05/10/12 M ASY 29.28986 -94.9366 UTC - West Galveston Bay 1106-18051 29 05/15/12 M ASY 29.09666 -95.17373 UTC - Bastrop Bay 1106-18052 30 05/15/12 M ASY 29.01956 -95.21854 UTC
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Guide |
    Texas Commercial Fishing regulations summary 2021 2022 SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 – AUGUST 31, 2022 Subject to updates by Texas Legislature or Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission TEXAS COMMERCIAL FISHING REGULATIONS SUMMARY This publication is a summary of current regulations that govern commercial fishing, meaning any activity involving taking or handling fresh or saltwater aquatic products for pay or for barter, sale or exchange. Recreational fishing regulations can be found at OutdoorAnnual.com or on the mobile app (download available at OutdoorAnnual.com). LIMITED-ENTRY AND BUYBACK PROGRAMS .......................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHERMAN LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHING BOAT LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................ 6 BAIT DEALER LICENSE TYPES LICENCIAS PARA VENDER CARNADA .................................................................................... 7 WHOLESALE, RETAIL AND OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS LICENCIAS Y PERMISOS COMERCIALES PARA NEGOCIOS MAYORISTAS Y MINORISTAS .......... 8 NONGAME FRESHWATER FISH (PERMIT) PERMISO PARA PESCADOS NO DEPORTIVOS EN AGUA DULCE ................................................ 12 BUYING AND SELLING AQUATIC PRODUCTS TAKEN FROM PUBLIC WATERS ............................. 13 FRESHWATER FISH ................................................................................................... 13 SALTWATER FISH .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Estuaries Human Recreational Activities
    bays in peril bays in peril WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT GLOSSARY OF KEY CONCEPTS A Water is the lifeblood of our Texas landscape. Texas Naturalized Conditions: rivers provide water and habitat for fi sh and wildlife A computer model scenario showing freshwater infl ow throughout the state and provide the freshwater that amounts that would have occurred during about a 50- forecast for freshwater keeps coastal estuaries functioning and healthy. Unfor- year period if there had not been water withdrawals, dams, or other human alterations of infl ow patterns. tunately, we haven’t done a very good job of protecting Used as a baseline for comparison. fl ows to our rivers. Most water use permits were issued without Future Use: any consideration of how much fl ow should be left in A computer model scenario showing freshwater the river to protect water quality, fi sh and wildlife, and infl ow amounts during the same period as for natu- Texas estuaries human recreational activities. ralized conditions if all existing water withdrawal permits were fully used and levels of wastewater reuse Even today, the state hasn’t come to grips with how to were increased to about 50%. protect river fl ows and freshwater infl ows to the coast. Periods Below Drought The state and 16 regional water planning groups are Tolerance Levels: Sabine Lake developing plans to meet water demands for the next 50 A determination of the number of periods of six con- years, but so far that process does not include freshwater secutive months of very low freshwater infl ows, with- report summary infl ows as a water demand to be met.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuaries & Bays
    Estuaries & Bays 67 HOUSTON ATLAS OF BIODIVERSITY ESTUARIES & BAYS A GULF OF MEXICO ESTUARY has a definite geometry, a pairing of one river or several with a pass or passes con- necting the bay to the Gulf. Within the last few thousand years—just the other day, geologically speaking—the sea level was about two hundred feet lower than it is today. In places the coastline was dozens or hundreds of miles far- ther out into the Gulf than it is now. As frozen water was unlocked when the last ice age retreated, the Gulf began to rise to its current level, flooding river val- leys that had cut into the shelf. Three of these flooded river valleys became the three great estuaries of the upper Texas coast: the Sabine Lake system that we share with Louisiana; the Galveston Bay system south and east of Houston; and the Matagorda Bay sys- tem to the southwest. Over time, river and Gulf The Black-crowned night sediments formed barrier islands paralleling the heron, Nycticorax nyc- coast and almost blocking the mouths of flooded ticorax, a resident of our valleys, so that only one or two openings allow estuaries, stalks its prey at the energy from the uplands to flow through the night, hence its name. bays and into the Gulf. We have been slow to appreciate what tremendous natural resources these water bodies are. Sabine Lake receives its fresh water from the Houston Bays Sabine and Neches rivers and Taylor Bayou and State Parks, WMA’s and <100 National Wildlife Refuges is connected to the Gulf by Sabine Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    WALLER MONTGOMERY Prairie S 6 2 1 t DISTRICT 8 H 3 MONTGOMERY 4 View w 6 y Tomball y Waller DISTRICT East Fork San w H Jacinto River t StLp 494 Dayton LEE Spring 8 S S China tH Pine Island w Liberty Ames y Nome 7 DISTRICT y S Devers 1 7 w t 3 H H 2 59 w S 1 y y 10 w t LIBERTY H H 9 2 Smithville t 5 4 w 1 S y Hempstead 9 Eastex y w Fwy 3 H 6 Hwy Atascocita DISTRICT S S S t H wy 159 DISTRICT t tH 9 Industry S 5 Lake Houston H 2 w 1 y 110th Congress of the United States w t y S Hw y w 7 tH y w Humble H y 1 w 15 t H 18 1 y 159 9 t on 4 4 S m u 6 JEFFERSON 0 a 3 e 1 y 71 Bellville B 6 w StHwy N y o w tH DISTRICT rt h H S we S t s t S Cedar Creek Reservoir t F Jersey L w p 10 y Village 8 Old River- 6 ( Crosby N Winfree y Aldine La Grange o w Fayetteville r H t t h S y B Hw e nt 4 StHwy 36 o r l eaum 2 WALLER t B e ) 1 v Sheldon i y Lake Charlotte Hw Lost R t Barrett S Lake y t C i e n 5 DISTRICT HARRIS d Mont a ri 9 r B Belvieu T y San Jacinto yu w 7 StHwy 73 H River t Beaumont S Hwy Cloverleaf 1 Winnie Pattison Hilshire 6 Highlands Lake Katy Village y Spring Cove Cotton Lake Anahuac w H StHwy 65 S Channelview t t Valley H S w San Hwy Jacinto Stowell BASTROP y Brookshire 7 1 Felipe Katy Blvd City Hedwig Village Hunters Old Alligator Sealy Fwy Creek River Bayou Anahuac Village Baytown CALDWELL Houston Piney Beach Bunker Hill e Scott Bay Point d Galena i 6 City Village Village West University s 4 Cinco y Park DISTRICT 1 a Dr Bessies Cr ) Place y AUSTIN Ranch y W w w H FAYETTE k 29 t P S Ma Columbus FM n adena Fwy CHAMBERS in o as S P Weimar FM
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Full Final Report Document Printed: 11/1/2018 Document Date: January 21, 2005 2
    1 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST Joni S. Charles, PhD Contracted through the River Systems Institute Texas State University – San Marcos For the National Wildlife Federation February 2005 Commercial Fishing Full Final Report Document Printed: 11/1/2018 Document Date: January 21, 2005 2 Introduction This report focuses on estimating the economic activity specifically associated with commercial fishing in Sabine Lake/Sabine-Neches Estuary, Galveston Bay/Trinity-San Jacinto Estuary, Matagorda Bay/Lavaca-Colorado Estuary, San Antonio Bay/Guadalupe Estuary, Aransas Bay/Mission-Aransas Estuary, Corpus Christi Bay/Nueces Estuary, Baffin Bay/Upper Laguna Madre Estuary, and South Bay/Lower Laguna Madre Estuary. Each bay/estuary area will define a separate geographic region of study comprised of one or more counties. Commercial fishing, therefore, refers to bay (inshore) fishing only. The results show the ex-vessel value of finfish, shellfish and shrimp landings in each of these regions, and the impact this spending had on the economy in terms of earnings, employment and sales output. Estimates of the direct impacts associated with ex-vessel values were produced using IMPLAN, an input-output of the Texas economy developed by the Minnesota IMPLAN Group. The input data was obtained from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) (Culbertson 2004). Commercial fishing impacts are provided in terms of direct expenditure, sales output, income, and employment. These estimates are reported by category of expenditure. A description of IMPLAN is included in Appendix C. Indirect and Induced (Secondary) impacts are generated from the direct impacts calculated by IMPLAN. Indirect impacts represent purchases made by industries from their suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon Texas Annual Report 2011
    Bird’s Eye View 2011 ANNUAL REPORT Photo: Black Skimmer (Alan D. Wilson) Dear Friends, I am thrilled to celebrate with you our achievements from the past year. Top among them was the grand opening of the Dogwood Canyon Audubon Center at Cedar Hill in September. We hosted 3,500 visitors over the weekend and paid tribute to our many donors and partners. (See next page for story on other Audubon Center accomplishments.) A new partnership between Audubon and the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department at Sheldon Lake State Park near Houston continues to gain momentum. We are in the early stages of a capital campaign to raise funds to build a world-class Audubon Center at the park. Once built, the Sheldon Lake State Park & Audubon Center will reach more than 10,000 school children a year. We’ll work in concert with the Houston Audubon chapter and other key partners to make the center an essential community resource for both birds and people. Visit audubontexas.org for more information on this project-in-progress. Our conservation collaboration with the Gorgas Science Foundation at the Sabal Palm Audubon Sanctuary in Brownsville continues to blossom. This special place featuring rare Sabal Palm forest and unique species has been reopened for more than a year, welcoming visitors to enjoy the Sanctuary’s 500 acres. Our Coastal Stewardship Program will soon welcome a new manager whose role will be to grow our coast-wide conservation work. The coastal manager will work to restore island rookeries, increase our volunteer workforce, garner new partnerships, and reach out to the public about our work with colonial waterbirds.
    [Show full text]