Crab Creek Subbasin Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crab Creek Subbasin Plan Crab Creek Subbasin Plan 5/26/2004 Prepared for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Lincoln County Conservation District Prepared by KWA Ecological Sciences Inc. Subbasin Contributors Subbasin Team Leader Patrick Verhey, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Contributors (in alphabetical order): Juli Anderson, WDFW Paul Ashley, WDFW Jim Blanchard, United States Bureau of Reclamation Dennis Bly Mike Clement, Grant County PUD Bobby Cummins, Yakama Nation Don Derifield, East Columbia Basin Irrigation District Tom Dresser, Grant County PUD Greg Fitzgerald, WDFW Robert Flores, US Fish and Wildlife Service Keith Franklin, Quincy Irrigation District Crayton Guhlke Anita Harman Betsy Jordan, Quincy Irrigation District Oscar Kuch John Larson, Upper Grant Conservation District Tracy Lloyd, WDFW David Lundgren, Lincoln County Conservation District Shannon McDaniel, South Columbia Basin Irrigation District Mike LaPlant Moses Lake Irrigation Reclamation District Randy Hill, US Fish and Wildlife Service Jeff Korth, WDFW Dan Roseburg, Moses Lake Conservation District Richard Stevens Kate Terrell, US Fish and Wildlife Service Todd Thompson, Bureau of Land Management Bill White, Yakama Nation Dean White, Lincoln County Conservation District Coordinators Paul Wagner, KWA Ecological Sciences, Inc. Sammi Buzzard, KWA Ecological Sciences, Inc. Crab Creek Subbasin Plan Approach and Public Involvement Outreach The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Lincoln County Conservation District partnered to coordinate Subbasin Planning for the Crab Creek Subbasin. Lincoln County Conservation District has been responsible for outreach and public involvement. The timeline established by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC) has necessitated a very compressed process that has allowed little flexibility in stakeholder involvement. The rigorous schedule and limited budget have restricted the time available for outreach. In addition, the volume of work to be completed has resulted in many long meetings. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Lincoln County Conservation District’s commitment is to make it possible for local stakeholders to continue to be heard, and to contribute to decisions about issues that affect both their livelihoods and their quality of life. The NWPCC proposed a three year rolling review of subbasin plans, will make the plans relevant and enable them to be updated regularly, and adapted to new knowledge and information. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Lincoln County Conservation District staff and contractors have used the media and a series of public meetings to communicate with the general public about Subbasin Planning in the Crab Creek subbasin. In addition, the Coordinators delivered press releases to media representatives, and recruited stakeholders to represent local interests on the Subbasin Core Team (SCT). Outreach list In February, 2004, the Coordinators assembled an initial outreach list comprising about 50 names. The list included representatives of the following interests: • Agriculture • Business • Conservation and the environment • Government (including local government, and local and regional representatives of state, tribe and federal agencies) • Media • Recreation The list has continued to grow as individuals express interest in Subbasin Planning. It has been used throughout Subbasin Planning to promulgate information, extend invitations, and issue updates on the progress of the process and changes to the planning schedule. Information sheet The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Lincoln County Conservation District used an information sheet, “Subbasin Planning 101”, provided by the NWPCC to introduce Subbasin Planning to stakeholders and the media and explain opportunities for public involvement. The information included a telephone number and email, postal mail, and web site addresses that individuals could use to obtain more information. Infrastructure and Organization Subbasin Core Team The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Lincoln County Conservation District initiated formation of the Subbasin Core Team (SCT) with kickoff meetings in Harrington and Moses Lake on February 10, 2004. Twenty-three stakeholders attended the meeting in Harrington and sixteen stakeholders attended the meeting in Moses Lake. The agenda included an introduction to Subbasin Planning, an overview of the process, an explanation of the assessment methodology and work undertaken to date, and a description of anticipated roles and the SCT meeting schedule. The SCT met four times in February, 2004 and twice in March, 2004 for a reach designation and five Qualitative Habitat Assessment (QHA) meetings. At those meetings, Technical Group members presented QHA outcomes based on their initial assessment work, and worked with SCT members to refine the outcomes based on local knowledge and to develop preliminary lists of management strategies appropriate to the limiting factors indicated by the QHA outcomes. The SCT meetings occupied most of each day (9 AM-5 PM) due to the amount of time needed to review the QHA outcomes. Approach Start up The coordinators used the outreach list to invite stakeholders to participate in Subbasin Planning, and to release information to the media. Those avenues were used to initiate public involvement as follows: • February 1, 2004: Mailing of initial press release to all members of the outreach list Briefings to introduce Subbasin Planning and explain the process, timeline, and roles: • February 10, 2004: Two kickoff meetings were held; one in Harrington and one in Moses Lake • February and March, 2004; QHA model were and reviewed by stakeholders Drafts will be placed in local public libraries and sent to stakeholders on request. Stakeholders will have two weeks to submit comments on the first draft, and 90 days to comment on the final draft during the formal public review period. The meetings have been advertised, and releases sent to local media outlets. The media releases include an update on Subbasin Planning, outline next steps, and invite stakeholder participation. Public comments Comments collected at public meetings and during public review of draft Subbasin Plans have been appended to this plan as Appendix D. Crab Creek Subbasin Plan Table of Contents Subbasin Contributors..................................................................................................... 2 Coordinators.................................................................................................................2 Crab Creek Subbasin Plan Approach and Public Involvement ...................................... 2 Outreach.......................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 9 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................9 Socio-economic Objectives .......................................................................................11 Overview....................................................................................................................... 12 Subbasin Overview and Regional Context ................................................................... 12 Crab Creek Watershed ...............................................................................................12 Topography/Geomorphology.....................................................................................19 Climate.......................................................................................................................19 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................19 Land Use and Demographics .....................................................................................20 Riparian and Wetland.................................................................................................21 Other Habitats ............................................................................................................22 Hydrologic Function ..................................................................................................22 Fish distribution .........................................................................................................23 Artificial Production ..................................................................................................23 Terrestrial / Wildlife Resources.................................................................................... 24 Birds...........................................................................................................................31 Mammals....................................................................................................................35 Shrubsteppe Obligates ...............................................................................................35 Other Shrubsteppe Obligates .....................................................................................36 Reptiles and Amphibians ...........................................................................................37 Shrubsteppe obligates ................................................................................................37 Other Reptiles and Amphibians .................................................................................37
Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington's Channeled Scabland
    t\D l'llrl,. \·· ~. r~rn1 ,uR\fEY Ut,l\n . .. ,Y:ltate" tit1Washington ALBEIT D. ROSEWNI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Dlnctor DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 45 WASHINGTON'S CHANNELED SCABLAND By J HARLEN BRETZ 9TAT• PIUHTIHO PLANT ~ OLYMPIA, WASH., 1"511 State of Washington ALBERT D. ROSELLINI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 45 WASHINGTON'S CHANNELED SCABLAND By .T HARLEN BRETZ l•or sate by Department or Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Price, 50 cents. FOREWORD Most travelers who have driven through eastern Washington have seen a geologic and scenic feature that is unique-nothing like it is to be found anywhere else in the world. This is the Channeled Scab­ land, a gigantic series of deeply cut channels in the erosion-resistant Columbia River basalt, the rock that covers most of the east-central and southeastern part of the state. Grand Coulee, with its spectac­ ular Dry Falls, is one of the most widely known features of this ex­ tensive set of dry channels. Many thousands of travelers must have wondered how this Chan­ neled Scabland came into being, and many geologists also have speculated as to its origin. Several geologists have published papers outlining their theories of the scabland's origin, but the geologist who has made the most thorough study of the problem and has ex­ amined the whole area and all the evidence having a bearing on the problem is Dr. J Harlen Bretz. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020
    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, dladam@comcast.net Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of brad@pressworks-ink.com Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
    [Show full text]
  • COULEE CORRIDOR Scenic Byway
    COULEE CORRIDOR SCENIC BYWAY INDEX Sites Page Sites Page INFO KEY 1 1 Corfu Woods and Lower 2 28 Audubon Kiosk Overlook 7 Crab Creek 29 Rocky Ford Creek 2 Royal Lake Overlook 30 Oasis Park 3 Drumheller Overlook 31 Martin Road Russian-Olives 4 Crab Creek Access 32 Norton Road Shrub-Steppe 5 McManamon Lake 33 Jameson Lake 6 Frog Lake, Crab Creek 3 34 Eastern Douglas County 8 and Marsh Trails 35 SW Banks Lake/Ankeny Access 7 Unit 1 Marsh Overlook 36 Dry Falls Overlook 8 Soda and Migraine Lakes 37 Sun Lakes State Park 9 Pillar Wigeon Lakes Area 38 Blue Lake Rest Area 10 Lind Coulee Overview 39 Lake Lenore 9 11 O’Sullivan Dam 4 40 West Beach Park 12 Potholes State Park 41 Gloyd Seeps 13 Desert Wildlife Area - Road 42 Brook Lake C SE 43 Crab Lake/Wilson Creek 14 Birder’s Corner 15 Desert Wildlife Area – Road 44 Old Coulee Highway 10 ‘I’ SW Route 16 Beda Lake 45 Crescent Bay Lake 46 Fiddle Creek 17 Dodson Road - 5 47 Barker Canyon Winchester Wasteway 48 North Dam Park 18 Audubon Dodson Road 49 Osborn Bay Campground Nature Trail 19 Crab Creek Overlook 50 Northrup Point Access 11 20 Potholes Reservoir Peninsula 51 Northrup Canyon Overlook 52 Steamboat Rock Peninsula 53 Coulee City Community Park 21 North Potholes Reserve/ 6 Job Corps Dike 54 Sinlahekin Wildlife Area 12 22 Moses Lake Community Park 23 Moses Lake Outlets CREDITS 12 24 Snowy Owl Route 25 Montlake Park 26 Three Ponds Loggerhead Shrike © Ed Newbold, 2003 27 Neppel Landing Park The Great Washington State Birding Trail 1 COULEE CORRIDOR INFO KEY MAp Icons Best seasons for birding (spring, summer, fall, winter) Developed camping available, including restrooms; fee required Restroom available at day-use site Handicapped restroom and handicapped trail or viewing access Site located in an Important Bird Area Fee required.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL Brent Reese Bill Ecret Joseph K
    MOSES LAKE CITY COUNCIL Brent Reese Bill Ecret Joseph K. Gavinski David Curnel Jason Avila Mayor City Manager Karen Liebrecht Jon Lane Dick Deane MOSES LAKE July 9, 2013 AGENDA Civic Center - Council Chambers Sophia Guerrero, Executive Secretary 7:00 p.m. 1. ROLLCALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. IDENTIFICATION OF CITIZENS WANTING TO DISCUSS AGENDA ITEMS IDENTIFICATION OF CITIZENS WANTING TO DISCUSS NON-AGENDA ITEMS 4. PRESENTA TIONS AND AWARDS - None 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes - June 25, 2013 B. Approval of Bills and Checks Issued C. Accept Work - Tree Replacement Project 6. COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - None A. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee 7. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS AND QUOTES - None 8. PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Resolution - Six Year Street Program - Public Hearing B. Request to Use Close Streets - Tsunami Sushi 9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution - Accept Donation - Columbia Basin Walleye Club B. Resolution - Build on Unplatted Property - Crab Creek Homestead, LLC 10. REQUEST TO CALL FOR BIDS - None 11. REFERRALS FROM COMMISSIONS - None 12. OTHER ITEMS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION A. Request for City Water - Stienmetz Finance Municipal Police Chief Parks & Recreation Fire C hief Community City Attorney w. Robert Services Dave Ru ffin Spencer Grigg Tom Taylor Development Katherine L. Taylor Gary Harer Gilbert Alvarado Kenison Page 2 - Moses Lake City Council Meeting, July 9, 2013 13. NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 14. COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS 15. CITY MANAGER REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Census Update B. Well City Award C. Staff Reports 1. Ambulance Report 2. Building Activity Report 3. Quarterly Financial Report 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 35 Fishing Waters of Grant County
    TOP35 FISHING WATERS In Grant County, Washington For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 TourGrantCounty.com CONTENTS Grant County Tourism Commission The Top 35 Fishing Waters In Grant County, Washington PO Box 37 1. Potholes Reservoir (28,000 acres) .................................................1 Ephrata, Washington 98837 2. Banks Lake (24,900 acres) .......................................................2 TOP 3. Moses Lake (6,800 acres) .......................................................3 No part of this book may be reproduced in any 4. Blue Lake (534 acres) ...........................................................4 3 form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other 5. Park Lake (338 acres) ...........................................................5 5 means, without permission in writing from the 6. Burke Lake (69 acres) ...........................................................6 Grant County Tourism Commission. 7. Martha Lake (15 acres) ..........................................................7 FISHING 8. Corral Lake (70 acres) ...........................................................8 © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Fifth printing, 10m 9. Priest Lake Pool (below Wanapum Dam) ...........................................8 WATERS 10. Hanford Reach (below Priest Rapids Dam) .........................................10 11. Rocky Ford Creek .............................................................11 In Grant County, Washington
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal-Level Investigation Summary of Findings
    Appraisal-Level Investigation Summary of Findings Odessa Subarea Special Study Columbia Basin Project, Washington U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Boise, Idaho Upper Columbia Area Office,Yakima, Washington Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado March 2008 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Appraisal-Level Investigation Summary of Findings Odessa Subarea Special Study Columbia Basin Project, Washington Prepared by U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Boise, Idaho Upper Columbia Area Office, Yakima, Washington Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado March 2008 Appraisal-Level Investigation Summary of Findings Acronyms and Abbreviations BC benefit/cost BiOp biological opinion BPA Bonneville Power Administration CBP Columbia Basin Project CCT Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation CFR Comprehensive Facility Review cfs cubic feet per second CNWR Columbia National Wildlife Refuge CRI MOU Columbia River Initiative Memorandum of Understanding DEIS draft environmental impact statement DPS Definite Population Segments ECBID East Columbia Basin Irrigation District Ecology Washington Department of Ecology ESA Endangered Species Act ESU Evolutionarily Significant Units FCCD Franklin County Conservation District FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FEIS final environmental impact statement ft/s feet per second FWCA Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWS U.S Fish and Wildlife Service GIS Geographic Information System gpm gallons per minute GWMA Ground Water Management Area H.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockhounding North America
    ROCKHOUNDING NORTH AMERICA Compiled by Shelley Gibbins Photos by Stefan and Shelley Gibbins California Sapphires — Montana *Please note that the Calgary Rock and Lapidary Quartz — Montana Club is not advertising / sponsoring these venues, but sharing places for all rock lovers. *Also, remember that rules can change; please check that these venues are still viable and permissible options before you go. *There is some risk in rockhounding, and preventative measures should be taken to avoid injury. The Calgary Rock and Lapidary Club takes no responsibility for any injuries should they occur. *I have also included some locations of interest, which are not for collecting Shells — Utah General Rules for Rockhounding (keep in mind that these may vary from place to place) ! • Rockhounding is allowed on government owned land (Crown Land in Canada and Bureau of Land Management in USA) ! • You can collect on private property only with the permission of the landowner ! • Collecting is not allowed in provincial or national parks ! • The banks along the rivers up to the high water mark may be rock hounded ! • Gold panning may or may not need a permit – in Alberta you can hand pan, but need a permit for sluice boxes ! • Alberta fossils are provincial property and can generally not be sold – you can surface collect but not dig. You are considered to be the temporary custodian and they need to stay within the province Fossilized Oysters — BC Canada ! Geology of Provinces ! Government of Canada. Natural resources Canada. (2012). Retrieved February 6/14 from http://atlas.gc.ca/site/ english/maps/geology.html#rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • APS Bulletin June 1994
    A L B E R T A • P A L A E O N T O L O G I C A L • S O C I E T Y VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 JUNE 1994 1 ALBERTA PALAEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS President Les Adler 289-9972 Program Coordinator Holger Hartmaier 938-5941 Vice-President Peter Meyer 289-4135 Curator Harvey Negrich 249-4497 Treasurer Roger Arthurs 279-5966 Librarian Gerry Morgan 241-0963 Secretary Don Sabo 249-4497 Field Trip Coordinator Les Fazekas 248-7245 Past-President Percy Strong 242-4735 Directors at Large Dr. David Mundy 281-3668 DIRECTORS Wayne Braunberger 278-5154 Editor Howard Allen 274-1858 APAC† Representative Don Sabo 249-4497 Membership Vaclav Marsovsky 547-0182 The Society was incorporated in 1986, as a non-profit organization formed to: a. Promote the science of palaeontology through study and education. b. Make contributions to the science by: 1) discovery 4) education of the general public 2) collection 5) preservation of material for study and the future 3) description c. Provide information and expertise to other collectors. d. Work with professionals at museums and universities to add to the palaeontological collections of the province (preserve Alberta’s heritage) MEMBERSHIP: Any person with a sincere interest in palaeontology is eligible to present their application for membership in the Society. Single membership $10.00 annually Family or Institution $15.00 annually THE BULLETIN WILL BE PUBLISHED QUARTERLY: March, June, September and December. Deadline for submitting material for publication is the 15th of the month prior to publication. Society Mailing Address: Material for Bulletin: Alberta Palaeontological Society Howard Allen, Editor, APS P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Banks Lake Drawdown Environmental Impact Statement
    Banks Lake Drawdown Final Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of the Interior Upper Columbia Area Office Bureau of Reclamation Ephrata Field Office Pacific Northwest Region Ephrata, Washington Boise, Idaho May 2004 MISSION STATEMENTS The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Final Environmental Impact Statement Banks Lake Drawdown Douglas and Grant Counties, Washington Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation For further information contact: Jim Blanchard Special Projects Officer Ephrata Field Office Bureau of Reclamation Box 815 Ephrata, WA 98823 (509) 754-0226 The Action Alternative describes the resource conditions that would occur with Banks Lake water surface elevations between 1570 feet and 1560 feet, while the No Action Alternative describes the conditions that would occur without the action, with water surface elevation between 1570 feet and 1565 feet. Both the No Action and Action Alternatives include four potential operational scenarios that could occur annually within their respective ranges, depending upon the hydrology of any given year. Both alternatives include refilling the reservoir to elevation 1570 feet by September 22. The No Action Alternative is the preferred alternative. The draft environmental impact statement provided Reclamation’s determination that the Action Alternative “may affect but is not likely to adversely affect” the federally listed bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and would have no effect on the federally listed pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) or Ute ladies’-tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis).
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Greater Sage-Grouse in Washington: Progress Report
    STATE OF WASHINGTON Progress Report December 2019 Recovery of Greater Sage-grouse in Washington: Progress Report Mike Schroeder, Mike Atamian, Jason Lowe, Kim Thorburn, Mike Finch, Juli Anderson, Devon Comstock, Colin Leingang, Kevin White, Eric Braaten, and Derek Stinson Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program ABSTRACT Declining populations and distribution of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in Washington have resulted in serious concerns for their long-term conservation status. The overall population was estimated to be 676 in 2019, associated with 21 leks. The birds were distributed between 3 populations including 585 birds with 17 leks in Moses Coulee, 78 birds with 3 leks in the Yakima Training Center (YTC), and 13 birds with 1 lek in Crab Creek. A fourth population, the Yakama Nation, appeared to disappear between 2018 and 2019. The overall population increased 32% between 2017 and 2018 and decreased 5% between 2018 and 2019. Governmental agencies and non-governmental organizations are attempting to restore populations of sage-grouse with the aid of land acquisition, habitat improvement, conservation programs, and translocations. Between 2004 and 2016 the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), YTC, Yakama Nation, and others collaborated to translocate sage-grouse from other states (Nevada, Oregon, Idaho, and Wyoming) to 3 of the 4 populations in Washington. Six males and 93 females were translocated to YTC to genetically augment an endemic population, 145 males and 135 females were translocated to the Crab Creek area of Lincoln County to re-establish an extirpated population, and 85 males and 43 females were translocated to the Yakama Nation to re-establish an extirpated population.
    [Show full text]
  • Currents and Undercurrents: an Administrative History of Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 476 001 SO 034 781 AUTHOR McKay, Kathryn L.; Renk, Nancy F. TITLE Currents and Undercurrents: An Administrative History of Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-01-00 NOTE 589p. AVAILABLE FROM Lake Roosevelt Recreation Area, 1008 Crest Drive, Coulee Dam, WA 99116. Tel: 509-633-9441; Fax: 509-633-9332; Web site: http://www.nps.gov/ laro/adhi/adhi.htm. PUB TYPE Books (010) Historical Materials (060) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF03/PC24 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS --- *Government Role; Higher Education; *Land Use; *Parks; Physical Geography; *Recreational Facilities; Rivers; Social Studies; United States History IDENTIFIERS Cultural Resources; Management Practices; National Park Service; Reservoirs ABSTRACT The 1,259-mile Columbia River flows out of Canada andacross eastern Washington state, forming the border between Washington andOregon. In 1941 the federal government dammed the Columbia River at the north endof Grand Coulee, creating a man-made reservoir named Lake Roosevelt that inundated homes, farms, and businesses, and disrupted the lives ofmany. Although Congress never enacted specific authorization to createa park, it passed generic legislation that gave the Park Service authorityat the National Recreation Area (NRA). Lake Roosevelt's shoreline totalsmore than 500 miles of cliffs and gentle slopes. The Lake Roosevelt NationalRecreation Area (LARO) was officially created in 1946. This historical study documents
    [Show full text]