DOCSLIB.ORG

Nashua River Watershed 2003 Water Quality Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nashua River Watershed 2003 Water Quality Assessment Report NASHUA RIVER WATERSHED 2003 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS IAN BOWLES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAURIE BURT, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the MassDEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Needham can apply at their local library for loan of any MA DEP/DWM report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the Division of Watershed Management (DWM) in Worcester. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor RECOMMENDATIONS: by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Nashua River Watershed 2003 Water Quality Assessment Report 81wqar08.doc DWM CN107.5 ii NASHUA RIVER WATERSHED 2003 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Report Number: 81-AC-4 DWM Control Number: CN107.5 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Worcester, Massachusetts August 2008 Nashua River Watershed 2003 Water Quality Assessment Report 81wqar08.doc DWM CN107.5 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Coordination of local, state and federal agencies and private organizations is fundamental to the success of protecting and restoring water quality in Massachusetts Watersheds. Data and information used in this report was provided in part by the following agencies and organizations: State Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP): Bureau of Resource Protection (BRP) Division of Watershed Management (DWM) Bureau of Strategic Policy and Technology Wall Experiment Station (WES) Department of Conservation and Recreation (MA DCR) Division of Water Supply Protection (DWSP) Office of Watershed Protection (OWM) Department of Fish and Game (MA DFG) Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (MDFW) Department of Public Health (MA DPH) Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) Federal United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) United States Geological Survey (USGS) Water Resources Division (WRS) Regional Nashua River Watershed Association (NRWA) It is impossible to thank everyone who contributed to the assessment report process: field, laboratory, data management, writing, editing, and graphics, as well as meetings, phone calls, and e-mails. All of these contributions are very much appreciated. Nashua River Watershed 2003 Water Quality Assessment Report 81wqar08.doc DWM CN107.5 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures............................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables................................................................................................................................................vii Attached Data CD – Compendium of MassDEP DWM Nashua River Technical Memorandums and Reports........................................................................................................................................................viii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations............................................................................................................. ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... x Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Massachusetts Integrated List Of Waters..................................................................................................... 1 Nashua River Watershed Description........................................................................................................... 2 Objectives...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Report Format .......................................................................................................................... 3 Assessment Methodology............................................................................................................................. 4 Special Notes .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Malden Brook (Segment MA81-27) ............................................................................................................ 16 Unnamed Tributary "Boylston Brook" (Segment MA81-34)........................................................................ 17 Malagasco Brook (Segment MA81-29)....................................................................................................... 18 French Brook (Segment MA81-48) ............................................................................................................. 19 Unnamed Tributary (Segment MA81-50).................................................................................................... 20 Muddy Brook (Segment MA81-28) ............................................................................................................. 21 Unnamed Tributary (Segment MA81-49).................................................................................................... 22 Gates Brook (Segment MA81-24)............................................................................................................... 23 Scarletts Brook (Segment MA81-25) .......................................................................................................... 24 Quinapoxet River (Segment MA81-32)....................................................................................................... 25 Unnamed Tributary (Segment MA81-59).................................................................................................... 26 Trout Brook (Segment MA81-26)................................................................................................................ 27 Unnamed Tributary (Segment MA81-51).................................................................................................... 28 Poor Farm Brook (Segment MA81-52) ....................................................................................................... 29 Chaffins Brook (Segment MA81-33) ........................................................................................................... 30 Unnamed Tributary "Lower Chaffins Brook" (Segment MA81-35).............................................................. 31 Asnebumskit Brook (Segment MA81-56).................................................................................................... 32 Warren Tannery Brook (Segment MA81-53) .............................................................................................. 33 Unnamed Tributary (Segment MA81-58).................................................................................................... 34 Stillwater River (Segment MA81-31)........................................................................................................... 35 Unnamed Tributary (Segment MA81-54).................................................................................................... 36 Washacum Brook (Segment MA81-47) ...................................................................................................... 37 Connelly Brook (Segment MA81-57) .......................................................................................................... 38 Houghton Brook (Segment MA81-55)......................................................................................................... 39 Scanlon Brook (Segment MA81-44) ........................................................................................................... 40 Ball Brook (Segment MA81-45) .................................................................................................................. 41 East Wachusett Brook (Segment MA81-30) ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ffy 2019 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Per 23 Cfr 450.334
    FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER 23 CFR 450.334 Agency ProjInfo_ID MassDOT _Project Description▼ Obligation FFY 2019 FFY 2019 Remaining Date Programmed Obligated Federal Advance Federal Fund Fund Construction Fund REGION : BERKSHIRE MassDOT 603255 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-049, LAKEWAY DRIVE OVER ONOTA 10-Jul-19 $2,919,968.00 $2,825,199.25 Highway LAKE MassDOT 606462 LENOX- RECONSTRUCTION & MINOR WIDENING ON WALKER STREET 15-Apr-19 $2,286,543.00 $2,037,608.80 Highway MassDOT 606890 ADAMS- NORTH ADAMS- ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL EXTENSION TO ROUTE 21-Aug-19 $800,000.00 $561,003.06 Highway 8A (HODGES CROSS ROAD) MassDOT 607760 PITTSFIELD- INTERSECTION & SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 9 LOCATIONS ALONG 11-Sep-19 $3,476,402.00 $3,473,966.52 Highway SR 8 & SR 9 MassDOT 608243 NEW MARLBOROUGH- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, N-08-010, UMPACHENE FALLS 25-Apr-19 $1,281,618.00 $1,428,691.48 Highway OVER KONKAPOT RIVER MassDOT 608263 SHEFFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, S-10-019, BERKSHIRE SCHOOL ROAD OVER 20-Feb-19 $2,783,446.00 $3,180,560.93 Highway SCHENOB BROOK MassDOT 608351 ADAMS- CHESHIRE- LANESBOROUGH- RESURFACING ON THE 25-Jun-19 $4,261,208.00 $4,222,366.48 Highway ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL, FROM THE PITTSFIELD T.L. TO THE ADAMS VISITOR CENTER MassDOT 608523 PITTSFIELD- BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, P-10-042, NEW ROAD OVER WEST 17-Jun-19 $2,243,952.00 $2,196,767.54 Highway BRANCH OF THE HOUSATONIC RIVER BERKSHIRE REGION TOTAL : $20,053,137.00 $19,926,164.06 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Page 1 of 20 FFY 2019 ANNUAL LISTING OF OBLIGATED PROJECTS PER
    [Show full text]
  • Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY Concord River, Massachusetts Talbot Mills Dam Centennial Falls Dam Middlesex Falls DRAFT REPORT FEBRUARY 2016 Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring populations of diadromous fish to the Concord, Sudbury, and Assabet Rivers, collectively known as the SuAsCo Watershed. The primary impediment to fish passage in the Concord River is the Talbot Mills Dam in Billerica, Massachusetts. Prior to reaching the dam, fish must first navigate potential obstacles at the Essex Dam (an active hydro dam with a fish elevator and an eel ladder) on the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Middlesex Falls (a natural bedrock falls and remnants of a breached dam) on the Concord River in Lowell, and Centennial Falls Dam (a hydropower dam with a fish ladder), also on the Concord River in Lowell. Blueback herring Alewife American shad American eel Sea lamprey Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American shad, American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons The impact of diadromous fish species extends for pursuing fish passage restoration in the far beyond the scope of a single restoration Concord River watershed include the importance and historical presence of the project, as they have a broad migratory range target species, the connectivity of and along the Atlantic coast and benefit commercial significant potential habitat within the and recreational fisheries of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009
    Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5127 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph looking downstream at area of Suncook River avulsion, Epsom, New Hampshire. (Photograph taken on June 18, 2008) Flood Study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009 By Robert H. Flynn Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5127 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Flynn, R.H., 2010, Flood study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum To
    The City of Lowell • Department of Planning and Development JFK Civic Center • 50 Arcand Drive • Lowell, MA 01852 P: 978.674-4252 • F: 978.970.4262 www.LowellMA.gov Diane Nichols Tradd Assistant City Manager/DPD Director MEMORANDUM Craig Thomas Deputy Director TO: Eileen M. Donoghue, City Manager FROM: Diane N. Tradd, Assistant City Manager/DPD Director DATE: February 23, 2021 SUBJECT: MOTION OF 1/26/21 BY COUNCILOR DRINKWATER REQUEST CITY MANAGER PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE RIVERWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The Department of Planning and Development (DPD) is pleased to provide an update on many exciting projects to build or enhance trails along the Merrimack and Concord Rivers. Merrimack Riverwalk Phase II This $4.8 million project is a partnership between the City of Lowell and Lowell National Historical Park, with funding from a Federal Highway Administration Program and city capital funds. The project will extend the “Mile of Mills” Merrimack Riverwalk, also known as the Yankee Division Walkway, from its current terminus behind Boott Mills to a new, highly visible entry point in front of the Lowell Memorial Auditorium (LMA). The project will include an overlook at the confluence of the Concord and Merrimack Rivers and a dramatic new footbridge over the Concord River. A primary goal is to connect attractions such as the LMA, the Tsongas Center, UMass Lowell, and the Concord River Greenway, and the regional 230-mile Bay Circuit trail. Construction on this project began May 2020. MAS Building and Bridge has cleaned and scored the sewer interceptor box culvert that carries the path, installed lamps along the interceptor, installed abutments and micropiles that will support the bridge, and has begun installing the cantilevered overlook and fabricating the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum 84-7 2004 Merrimack River Watershed Fish
    Technical Memorandum 84-7 2004 Merrimack River Watershed Fish Population Assessment Robert J. Maietta Jane Ryder Watershed Planning Program Worcester, MA July 2008 CN 179.4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ian Bowles, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Laurie Burt, Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director 1 Introduction Fish population surveys were conducted at sixteen stations in the Merrimack River Watershed in Massachusetts using techniques similar to Rapid Bioassessment Protocol V as described originally by Plafkin et al. (1989) and later by Barbour et al. (1999) (See Figure 1). Standard Operating Procedures are described in Fish Collection Procedures for Evaluation of Resident Fish Populations (MassDEP 2006 CN 75.1). Surveys also included a habitat assessment component modified from that described in Barbour et al (1999). Methods Fish populations in the Merrimack River watershed were sampled during August and September of 2004 by electrofishing using a Smith Root Model 12 battery powered backpack electrofisher. A reach of between 80m and 100m was sampled by passing a pole-mounted anode ring, side to side through the stream channel and in and around likely fish holding cover. All fish shocked were netted and held in buckets. Sampling proceeded from an obstruction or constriction, upstream to an endpoint at another obstruction or constriction such as a waterfall or shallow riffle. Following completion of a sampling run, all fish were identified to species, measured, and released. Results of the fish population surveys can be found in Table 1. It should be noted that young-of-the-year (yoy) fish from most species (with the exception of salmonids) are not targeted for collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Tm-81-4 Nashua River Watershed Dwm Year 2003
    Technical Memorandum - TM-81-4 NASHUA RIVER WATERSHED DWM YEAR 2003 WATER QUALITY MONITORING DATA - RIVERS DWM Control Number: CN 107.2 Prepared By: Susan Connors December 2005 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Stephen R. Pritchard, Secretary Massachusetts Department Of Environmental Protection Robert W. Golledge, Jr., Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Glenn Haas, Acting Assistant Commissioner Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1. MassDEP DWM 2003 Nashua River Watershed Water Quality Station Locations and Parameters............................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 1. MassDEP DWM 2003 Nashua River Watershed Water Quality Station Locations............... 5 Objectives...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methods......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Station Observations..................................................................................................................................... 7 Survey Conditions ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Developing a Report Card Stakeholder Workshop Newsletter Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge February - March 2018
    The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Developing a Report Card Stakeholder Workshop Newsletter Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge February - March 2018 Watersheds As part of the landscape that saw the start of both Assabet River Watershed LOWELL the American revolution and the industrial revolution, Concord River Watershed TEWKSBURY Sudbury River Watershed the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers in Streams CHELMSFORD Massachusetts have a long history of use and abuse. Designated Wild & Scenic Restoring the health of these three interconnected Massachusetts BILLERICA WESTFORD r rivers has been the mission of OARS, the watershed e CARLISLE Riv d organization for the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord or c n LITTLETON o Rivers, for 31 years. Restoration takes many years of C BOXBOROUGH BEDFORD committed work by local communities and support ACTON from many sources. Effective actions depend on HARVARD a sound understanding of the science and the local context, which must be broadly understood STOW CONCORD and communicated. BOLTON MAYNARD LINCOLN CLINTON BERLIN In 2018, OARS partnered with the Integration and SUDBURY r HUDSON WAYLAND Rive Application Network, University of Maryland Center et ab ss A for Environmental Science to initiate a river report BOYLSTON WESTON card for the region. The report card will provide a MARLBOROUGH snapshot of current river conditions and the historical NORTHBOROUGH FRAMINGHAM trends and context of those conditions. NATICK WESTBOROUGH SOUTHBOROUGH To start the process, two workshops were held at SHREWSBURY Sudbury River HOPKINTON Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge on 28 ASHLAND SHERBORN February and 1 March 2018, with key stakeholders GRAFTON from all three river basins. The initial workshop elicited UPTON what stakeholders value about the rivers, and the 10 mi N 10 km subsequent workshop focused on how to measure Location of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord River watersheds those values, and where to find data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
    Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Report Concord River Watershed
    Flood Risk Report Concord River Watershed Middlesex and Worcester Counties, Massachusetts: Report Number 001 2/27/2013 CONCORD FLOOD RISK REPORT i This page left intentionally blank. CONCORD RIVER WATERSHED FLOOD RISK REPORT Project Area Community List Community Name Community Name Town Of Acton Town Of Tewksbury Town Of Ashland Town Of Upton Town Of Bedford Town Of Wayland Town Of Berlin Town Of Westborough Town Of Billerica Town Of Westford Town Of Bolton Town Of Weston Town Of Boxborough Town Of Boylston Town Of Carlisle Town Of Chelmsford Town Of Clinton Town Of Concord Town Of Framingham Town Of Grafton Town Of Harvard Town Of Holliston* Town Of Hopkinton Town Of Hudson Town Of Lincoln Town Of Littleton City Of Lowell City Of Marlborough Town Of Maynard Town Of Natick Town Of Northborough Town Of Sherborn Town Of Shrewsbury Town Of Southborough Town Of Stow Town Of Sudbury CONCORD RIVER WATERSHED FLOOD RISK REPORT i This page left intentionally blank. CONCORD RIVER WATERSHED FLOOD RISK REPORT Preface The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) program provides states, tribes, and local communities with flood risk information and tools that they can use to increase their resilience to flooding and better protect their citizens. By pairing accurate floodplain maps with risk assessment tools and planning and outreach support, Risk MAP has transformed traditional flood mapping efforts into an integrated process of identifying, assessing, communicating, planning for, and mitigating flood‐related risks. This Flood Risk Report (FRR) provides non‐regulatory information to help local or tribal officials, floodplain managers, planners, emergency managers, and others better understand their flood risk, take steps to mitigate those risks, and communicate those risks to their citizens and local businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Wachusett Reservoir Kiosk Poster
    Wachusett Reservoir Watershed DEPARTMENT OF CONSER VATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION Rivers The confluence of the Stillwater River and Quinapoxet River joining the South branch of the Nashua River attracted industry to what became known as the Oakdale area. The abundance of available water power resulted in flourishing industrial growth. Railroads Oakdale grew to be a major junction for two rail lines and a depot station to move manufactured goods. (Above) Nov 10, 1896. West Boylston (Above) March 12, 1902. Removing Oakdale Mill The Worcester, Nashua & Portland Manufacturing Company from the Central Pond dam. Considerable work was done tearing Division of the Boston & Maine Massachusetts Railroad tracks near bridge, down and cleaning up around the mills. Railroad line provided a direct Oakdale. The black stripe on the left telegraph north/south connection. pole indicates the future high water mark of The Central Massachusetts Railroad Wachusett Reservoir. Everything below was provided an east/west connection. removed or relocated. Reservoir (Right) May 8, 1902. During this era of industry and Soil-stripping railway under progress, the glacial Nashua River Boston & Maine Railroad tracks, Valley became the optimal location Oakdale. to provide clean drinking water for the growing Boston population. The acts of 1896 were the first time the state would flood an inhabited Sept. 29, 1905. Oakdale Quinapoxet River Channel. The river channels were widened and area to create a drinking water excavated. The hard soil and large boulders that were removed were used as embankments, berms supply. Sections of Boylston, West along the Central Massachusetts Railroad above Oakdale, and for surfacing new roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Wild and Scenic River Act 113 Stat
    PUBLIC LAW 106±20ÐAPR. 9, 1999 SUDBURY, ASSABET, AND CONCORD WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ACT 113 STAT. 30 PUBLIC LAW 106±20ÐAPR. 9, 1999 Public Law 106±20 106th Congress An Act Apr. 9, 1999 To designate a portion of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers as a component [H.R. 193] of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Sudbury, the United States of America in Congress assembled, Assabet, and Concord Wild SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. and Scenic River Act. This Act may be cited as the ``Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Massachusetts. Wild and Scenic River Act''. 16 USC 1271 note. SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SUDBURY, ASSABET, AND CONCORD SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERS, MASSACHUSETTS. (a) FINDINGS.ÐThe Congress finds the following: (1) The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Wild and Scenic River Study Act (title VII of Public Law 101±628; 104 Stat. 4497)Ð (A) designated segments of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, totaling 29 river miles, for study and potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; and (B) directed the Secretary of the Interior to establish the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Study Committee (in this section referred to as the ``Study Committee'') to advise the Secretary in conducting the study and in the consideration of management alternatives should the rivers be included in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. (2) The study determined the following river segments are eligible for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System based on their free-flowing condition and outstanding scenic, recreation, wildlife, cultural, and historic values: (A) The 16.6-mile segment of the Sudbury River beginning at the Danforth Street Bridge in the town of Framingham, to its confluence with the Assabet River.
    [Show full text]