DOCSLIB.ORG

Herman Bavinck's Trinitarian Theology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Herman Bavinck's Trinitarian Theology Herman Bavinck’s Trinitarian Theology: The Ontological, Cosmological, and Soteriological Dimensions of the Doctrine of the Trinity by Gayle Elizabeth Doornbos A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Wycliffe College and Graduate Centre for Theological Studies of the Toronto School of Theology. In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College © Copyright by Gayle Elizabeth Doornbos 2019 Herman Bavinck’s Trinitarian Theology: The Ontological, Cosmological, and Soteriological Dimensions of the Doctrine of the Trinity Gayle Elizabeth Doornbos Doctor of Philosophy in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2019 Abstract Recent scholarship on the Dutch, Reformed theologian Herman Bavinck (1854-1921) has opened up new possibilities for examining the role of the doctrine of the Trinity in Bavinck’s systematic theology. Building on current research, this thesis suggests that Bavinck’s systematic theology can be identified as thoroughly trinitarian by identifying the ways that he uses the doctrine positively (structuring, norming, and informing) and negatively (apologetic) to construct his dogmatic theology. To do this, this dissertation utilizes an intriguing statement made by Bavinck within his treatment of the development of the doctrine of the Trinity in his Reformed Dogmatics concerning the ontological, cosmological, and soteriological dimensions of the doctrine of the Trinity as a framework for understanding his systematic project. Taking this statement to indicate a trinitarian line of reasoning within Bavinck, this thesis argues that Bavinck’s systematic theology can be understood as his articulation of the ontological, cosmological, and soteriological dimensions of the Trinity properly distinguished, developed, and related to one another. Primarily expositional in nature, constructive in analysis, and creative in its use of the ontological, cosmological, and soteriological dimensions, this dissertation situates the current thesis within Bavinck scholarship (Introduction), provides an extended defense of using the ii dimensions (Chapter 1), and articulates each dimension and their relationships to one another (Chapters 2-4). While the primary goal of this thesis is to contribute to Bavinck scholarship, the closing chapter shifts to suggest Bavinck as a conversation partner to contemporary discussions concerning the systematic role of the doctrine of the Trinity and constructive development of doctrine (Chapter 5). iii Acknowledgements One does not complete a dissertation without aid, support, and encouragement. Looking back, there are countless people without whom this dissertation would not have been completed. First, I must thank my supervisor, Dr. Joseph Mangina, who encouraged me to pursue a topic that I cared about and offered crucial feedback and assistance along the way. Thanks are also in order for the those who served on my committee: Dr. Robert Sweetman, Dr. John Vissers, and Fr. Gilles Mongeau, SJ. Dr. Vissers and Rev. Dr. Mongeau helped shape this project in its early stages, and Dr. Sweetman offered invaluable feedback on the project that shaped my finished project. I thank him for pushing me and engaging me throughout my thesis. The final product is better because of his input. Thanks are also due to the person through whom I was really introduced to Bavinck: Dr. John Bolt. His friendship, encouragement, and ongoing engagement with me have taught me a great deal. More than that, his love for the church and passion for theology have impacted me in innumerable ways. He has given me many great gifts. I also thank him for reading over the manuscript of this dissertation and offering encouragement and feedback. I also wish to thank the others who have guided me on my academic journey. Dr. John Cooper of Calvin Theological Seminary taught me how to read carefully and well—an invaluable gift. He also gave me a love for philosophical theology and a passion for seeing the relationship between theology and praxis. For these gifts, I am deeply thankful. My other professors at Calvin Theological Seminary deserve thanks for teaching me to love the Reformed tradition. And finally, I thank my professors at Redeemer University College for encouraging me to pursue academics. I would not be where I am today had they not advised me to pursue further education. I also want to extend gratitude to my teachers at the Toronto School of Theology as iv well as to Dr. Timothy Connor whom I worked for as a Teaching Assistant and offered his encouragement and advice to me throughout my time at TST. In terms of support and encouragement, there are no adequate words to thank the two ecclesiastical communities that I was a part of during this process: Hebron CRC and Sonlight CRC. These communities not only prayed for me and supported me, but they kept me grounded during times of stress and trial. A special note of thanks is due to ladies involved in the Women’s Ministry at Sonlight CRC who were my ever-present cheerleaders, especially during the last stages of this dissertation. Finally, I owe thanks to the friends and family who have been with me throughout this whole process. To all my friends and extended family, of whom there are too many to name, thank you for your support and encouragement. To my dad, who from a young age taught me to love the church and its people, thank you. You were the first one who engaged me in theological conversation, and there is no doubt in my mind that you instilled in me a deep curiosity, love of learning, and delight in theology. Thank you. To my mom, who taught me from a young age to pursing your work with, joy, tenacity, and passion, thank you. Thank you also for the countless hours you spent providing counsel and support throughout my doctorate. And finally, to my husband Kyle, thank you for your love, support, encouragement, and patience. You have been an endless source of encouragement to me, and I could not have completed this dissertation without you. Your passion for theology and joy in serving the church have inspired me and continue to shape my own approach to theology. Thank you also for providing me with countless hours of joyful theological discussions and much needed distractions during this long journey. v Contents List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Thesis Statement ................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Development and Goals ..................................................................................... 8 2. Herman Bavinck: The Neo-Calvinist between Two Worlds ......................................... 10 2.1 Early Life: Son of a Secessionist Pastor .......................................................... 11 2.2 Education: From Kampen to Leiden ............................................................... 12 2.3 Neo-Calvinism and Nineteenth-Century Dutch Protestant Theology ............. 14 2.4 Theologian, Philosopher, and Statesman: The Neo-Calvinist between Two Worlds ................................................................................................................... 17 3. Current State of Bavinck Scholarship: Two Bavincks and The Doctrine of God (Status Quaestionis) ....................................................................................................................... 19 4. Methodology .................................................................................................................. 31 4.1 Method and Sources: Chapters 1-4 .................................................................. 31 4.2 Limitations and the Question of Periodization ................................................ 33 4.3 Method and Sources: Chapter 5 ....................................................................... 35 5. Structure ......................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 1: An Extended Defense ............................................................................................... 38 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 38 2. Bavinck’s Theological Prolegomena ............................................................................. 39 2.1 Bavinck’s Theological Prolegomena in Historical Context ............................ 39 2.2 Irreducibly Theocentric: Dogmatics as the “Scientific System of the Knowledge of God” ............................................................................................... 41 2.3 Bavinck’s Epistemological Typology: Rationalism & Empiricism ................ 42 2.4 Bavinck’s Epistemology & The Scientific Principia ...................................... 45 2.5 Theology as a Science ..................................................................................... 52 2.6 Provisional Conclusions .................................................................................. 55 3. Bavinck and the Question of a Central Dogma ............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calvinism Isn't the Only Truth: Herman Bavinck's Impressions of The
    Calvinism Isn't the Only Truth: Hennan Bavinck's Impressions of the USA George Harinck On July 22 of the year 1892 two Dutch theologians passed through customs at Rotterdam harbor. They set sail to America to make a three months trip through the United States and Canada. Both of them were professor at the Theological School of the Gerefonneerde Kerken in Nederland at Kampen. According to their passports their names and dates of birth were: Douwe Klazes Wielenga, born August 22, 1841 and Herman Bavinck, born December 13, 1854. They were professors, but that did not mean they belonged to the substantial citizens of the Netherlands. Bavinck and Wielenga originated from the circles of the Secession of 1834, a group of simple and at first humiliated Reformed people. Their conviction was formulated in the classical texts of the Belgic Confession of 1561, the Heidelberg Catechism of 1563, and the Canons of Dordt of 1618/1619. Their piety was linked most closely to the Scriptures. They were trained to struggle by the history and doctrines of Calvinism, and they were familiar with suppression and believed they were among the elect. The trip of these two Refonned professors cannot be separated from the voluminous emigration of the Dutch to America in the second half of the nineteenth century, and the transatlantic ecclesiastical relationship that resulted from it. There had been contacts between the Nederlands Hervonnde Kerk and the Dutch Refonned Church of America since the seventeenth century, but they were watered down. The emigration flow towards America that originated in 1846, however, had changed this situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Or “Grace Restoring Nature”? Edwards and Bavinck on the Heart of Christian Salvation Dane C
    The Bavinck Review 3 (2012): 9–29 “Created Over a Second Time” or “Grace Restoring Nature”? Edwards and Bavinck on the Heart of Christian Salvation Dane C. Ortlund ([email protected]) Bible Publishing Director, Crossway Man must be converted twice, first from the natural to the spiritual life, and thereafter from the spiritual to the natural life. —Johann Cristoph Blumhardt Perhaps the two thinkers being most significantly re- appropriated and re-appreciated in current evangelical theological discourse are Jonathan Edwards and Herman Bavinck. Barth has certainly been on the receiving end of a surge of interest of late, as has Calvin with the recent celebration of his five hundredth birthday. Others too could be mentioned as enjoying fresh stage time such as B. B. Warfield to whom there has finally been devoted a synthetic explication of his thought;1 Charles Hodge, whose relation to Scottish Common Sense Realism and alleged rationalism is being hotly discussed;2 Cornelius Van Til, whose 1. Fred G. Zaspel, The Theology of B. B. Warfield: A Systematic Summary (Wheaton: Crossway, 2010); note also the forthcoming volume by the same author, Warfield on the Christian Life: Living in Light of the Gospel, Theologians on the Christian Life (Wheaton: Crossway). See also the recently published dissertation by David P. Smith, B. B. Warfield’s Scientifically Constructive Theological Scholarship, Evangelical Theological Society Monographs (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2011), which debunks reductionistic views of Warfield’s alleged “dictation” theory of inspiration. 2. Along with Smith’s work mentioned in the previous footnote, see, e.g., Paul Kjoss Helseth, “Right Reason” and the Princeton Mind: An Unorthodox Proposal (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed, 2010); Paul C.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and Covenant in a Via Media Position: the Example of J.J.P
    Page 1 of 6 Original Research Creation and covenant in a via media position: The example of J.J.P. Valeton Jr Author: The year 2012 marked the centenary of the death of the Utrecht Old Testament scholar J.J.P. Bob Becking1,2 Valeton Jr (1848–1912). He was a representative of the ‘via media’ approach of Dutch theology, Affiliations: which aimed at joining critical scholarship and piety, by avoiding the pitfalls of modernism 1Faculty of Humanities, as well as orthodoxy. Valeton accepted the critical analysis of Graf, Kuenen, and Wellhausen, Utrecht University, the but meanwhile remained a pious person. This article will discuss Valeton’s contributions to Netherlands critical scholarship of Genesis 1–3 as well as his profound ideas on ‘covenant’ as an expression 2Faculty of Theology, of ‘friendship’. Loader’s distinction between ‘knowledge open to faith’ and ‘knowledge open University of Pretoria, for scientific approach’ is very helpful in understanding the works and ideas of Valeton. South Africa Note: This article is dedicated Introduction to Prof. Dr James Alfred Loader. Prof. Bob Becking Bible and theology in the Netherlands is participating as research The scholarly work conducted in the 19th century is still the foundation on which our present work fellow with Prof. Dr Andries rests. Despite all sorts of interesting moves and methods such as structuralism, post-modernism, G. van Aarde, Honorary Professor in the Faculty post-colonialism and many other approaches (Haynes & McKenzie 1999; Barton 2007), without of Theology and Senior the critical liberal paradigm shift we would still be in the land of pre-modernism where faith Research Fellow of the and tradition were seen as argument and where evidence and experiment were not yet listed in Deputy Vice-Chancellor’s Unit for Advanced Studies many dictionaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Herman Bavinck's Theological Aesthetics: a Synchronic And
    TBR 2 (2011): 43–58 Herman Bavinck’s Theological Aesthetics: A Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis Robert S. Covolo PhD candidate, Fuller Theological Seminary In 1914 Herman Bavinck wrote an article for the Almanak of the Vrije Universiteit entitled, “Of Beauty and Aesthetics,” which has recently been translated and republished for the English-speaking world in Essays on Religion, Science, and Society.1 While this is not the only place where Bavinck treats the subject of beauty, this article stands out as a unique, extended glimpse into Bavinck’s theological aesthetics.2 In it we see that Bavinck was conversant with philosophical aesthetics and aware of the tensions of doing theological aesthetics from both a small “c” catholic and a distinctly Reformed perspective. There are many ways to assess Bavinck’s reflections on aesthetics. For example, one could look at the intimations in Bavinck’s works of the aesthetics formulations of later Dutch Reformed writers such as Rookmaker, Seerveld, or Wolterstorff.3 1. Herman Bavinck, “Of Beauty and Aesthetic” in Essays on Religion, Science and Society, ed. John Bolt, trans. Harry Boonstra and Gerrit Sheeres (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008), 245–60. 2. See also Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 2, God and Creation, ed. John Bolt, trans. John Vriend (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2004), 252–55. 3. This in itself would prove to be a very interesting study. In one section of the essay Bavinck entertains an idea by a “Mister Berland” who maintains “the characterization of an anarchist situation in the arts.” See Bavinck, “Of Beauty and Aesthetics,” 252.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Chapter Reference
    Proceedings Chapter Editors' Introduction CHALAMET, Christophe, et al. Abstract Introduction to the Volume "Game Over? Reconsidering Eschatology" Reference CHALAMET, Christophe, et al. Editors' Introduction. In: Chalamet, C. ; Dettwiler, A. ; Mazzocco, M. & Waterlot, G. Game Over? Reconsidering Eschatology. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter, 2017. DOI : 10.1515/9783110521412-201 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97634 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Editors’ Introduction This book gathers most of the papers which werepresented at an international theological conference held at the University of Geneva (October 22–24,2015). The conference was organized by the University of Geneva’sFaculty of Theology, jointlywith the Institut romand de systématique et d’éthique (IRSE),which be- longstothis Faculty. The project of organizingaconference on the topic of eschatology emerged duringadaylongconference on the thought of Jacques Ellul, as several members of Geneva’sTheologicalFaculty began discussing the question of the traditional Christian representations of “the end,” and especiallyits relationship to recent developments within the natural sciences on the end of the universe. The general public hears from the natural sciences that the universe will eventually die. Jour- nalists who cover the naturalsciencesask not whether the universe will die, but how that willhappen.¹ How should Christian theologyconsider the narrative(s) of the natural sciences concerning the final cataclysm towards which the uni- verse as awhole appears to headed ?Needless to day, with its vision of an ulti- mate judgment and redemption, in which God will wipe “every tear from their eyes” (Rev 21:4), in which God willbe“all in all” (1 Cor 15:28), Christian theology makes very different claims about the eschaton,i.e.the “end” of all things.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts of Synod 2015
    ACTS OF SYNOD 2015 Free Reformed Churches of North America Free Reformed Publications 18 Chapala Crescent SE Calgary, AB Canada T2X 3M4 Email: [email protected] Tel./Fax: 403.254.6591 website: www.frcna.org TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT ARTICLE PAGE REPORT Acts of Synod 8 7 STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS Church Order 16 10 68-77 Ethical Public Affairs 21 13 78-79 Finance 35 26 80-92 Foreign Missions 33-34,50,51 25,32 93-103 Interchurch Relations 24,41-45,47 15,29-31 104-109 Addresses 10,17,26,28,31,56 7,11,19,23,36 Appendix B: FRC Preaching guide 117 Outreach 37,53 27,34 110-121 Publications 29, 62 20,39 122-139 Refugee 40 28 140-143 Theological Education 18-20,22 11-13 144-153 Candidacy of Procee and Macleod 9,11-14 7,8-9 Theological Student Support Fund 49 31 154-159 Youth and Education 15 9 160-163 OTHER CORRESPONDENCE/REPORTS: Combined Consistories 38, 54 27, 35 Treasurer of Synod 52 33 49-54 Ad Hoc Emeritus Fund Committee 36 27 164 London FRC re. minister shortage 57 37 55 Synodical Deputies 58 37 OVERTURES: Brantford re. CO Art. 5G 25,48 18,31 56-59 Brantford re. Supplementary Psalter 30,32 22,24 65 Fenwick re. Visiting Ministers 27 19 66-67 Brantford re. Article 82B 55 35 60-64 OTHER List of Church Visitors/Counsellors 59 37 - List of Synodical Committees 42-45 List of Assessments 46 Synod 2015 News Release 61 38 40-41 4 FRCNA Synod 2015 ‐ Acts ACTS OF SYNOD of the FREE REFORMED CHURCHES OF NORTH AMERICA In Session at Brantford, Ontario June 1-5, 2015 ************** SESSION I Monday June 1, 2015 Article 1 ‐ Opening Synod is opened with a worship service commencing at 7:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Cornelis Petrus Tiele En De
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Cornelis Petrus Tiele en de Godsdienstwetenschap Molendijk, Arie Published in: Geloof en Onderzoek. Uit het leven en werk van C.P. Tiele (1830-1902) IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2002 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Molendijk, A. (2002). Cornelis Petrus Tiele en de Godsdienstwetenschap. In E. H. Cossee, & H. D. Tjalsma (editors), Geloof en Onderzoek. Uit het leven en werk van C.P. Tiele (1830-1902) (145 redactie, blz. 23- 41). s.n.. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 12-11-2019 CORNELIS PETRUS TIELE EN DE GODSDIENSTWETENSCHAP [E.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal to the Christian Reformed Church
    Appendix’ VII — (Acts, Article 77) APPEAL CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH To the General Synod of the Christian Reformed Church To the Consistories of the Christian Reformed Church To the Members of the Christian Reformed Church This letter comes to you on behalf of the Canadian Reformed Churches. It is a letter which is intended to be an appeal to you to return from the way in which you are going and to remove the leaven which threatens to permeate the whole Christian Reformed Church and can only result in a total loss of the truly Re­ formed identity. It is not the first time that we address ourselves to you. Our General Synod of Hamilton, 1962, decided to direct an Appeal to your 1963 Synod and also in­ structed its committee to send copies of that Appeal to all Consistories of the Christian Reformed Church. As a result of that Appeal, contact was established between a committee of the Christian Reformed Church and a committee ap­ pointed by the 1965 General Synod of the Canadian Reformed Churches. When the Synod of Hamilton 1962 decided to send such an Appeal, it fulfilled a pledge made at the first Classis Canada of the Canadian Reformed Churches, held in Lethbridge, Alberta, November 15,1950. This pledge was to be fulfilled, Classis stated, when the Churches would deem the proper moment for it to have come. It was not until 1962 that the decision of 1950 was executed. And now the Canadian Reformed Churches address themselves again to the Christian Reformed Church. We can understand it if one asks, “What, then, is going on, and what is the reason why we get these ‘Appeals’ from the Canadian Reformed Churches?” In answer to that question we shall relate some of the history.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Herman Bavinck 1854-1921 Theologian of the Word1
    page 1 Dr. Herman Bavinck 1854-1921 Theologian of the Word1 By Johan D. Tangelder hen I reflect on my spiritual pilgrimage, Reformed thinkers come to mind who became my mentors. The Dutch theologian Dr. Herman Bavinck heads the list. I was introduced to his theology through his magisterial work, the four-volume W Reformed Dogmatics (1906-1911), a gift from a generous host at whose place I stayed for a weekend during my studies at the Free University of Amsterdam. And over the years I have added to my Bavinck collection. He wrote not only on theology, but also on Christian politics and education, creation versus evolution, psychology and the family. His works are still relevant for the fierce spiritual battles raging in the 21st century. Writing at the turn of the last century, he stated: “...the twentieth century. .. [will] witness a gigantic conflict of spirits... between the old and the new worldview.” Bavinck foresaw the conflicts between the powers of darkness and the Kingdom of God we witness today. BAVINCK’S BACKGROUND Herman Bavinck’s father was a devout Secessionist minister, who lacked a complete formal theological education; however, he was well versed in Reformed theology. When Herman finished high school (gymnasium), he wanted to study at the university in Leiden. But his father urged him to study at least for one year at the Theological School in Kampen. Herman’s decision to study in Leiden, a centre of modernism, grieved many Secessionist leaders. Some believed that Jan Bavinck compromised both school and church by letting his son go to Leiden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Christianity and Science: a Brief Historical Study on Darwinism and the Dutch Neo-Calvinist Theologians
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE: A BRIEF HISTORICAL STUDY ON DARWINISM AND THE DUTCH NEO-CALVINIST THEOLOGIANS David Tong International Reformed Evangelical Seminary ABSTRAK: Kesimpulan filsuf Ilse N. Bulhof bahwa Darwinisme diterima dengan mudah di Belanda dengan perlawanan datang hanya dari kalangan agama perlu diperjelas lebih lanjut. Nyatanya, perlawanan terhadap Darwinisme juga datang dari golongan akademik dan tidak semua kalangan agama menolak Darwinisme. Tanpa keberatan kaum liberal modernis menerima Darwinisme. Dua tokoh penting dari gerakan neo-Calvinisme di Belanda, Abraham Kuyper dan Herman Bavinck, juga menerima evolusi sebagai suatu fakta walaupun mereka menolak paham Darwinisme. Kesimpulan Bulhof di atas tidak seharunya dimengerti sebagai pertentangan antara iman dan ilmu. Perlawanan yang sesungguhnya bukan perlawanan antara iman dan ilmu, tapi antara dua macam worldviews yang saling bertolak belakang. Inilah yang menyebabkan tidak semua ilmuwan juga menerima Darwinisme. Menarik untuk diamati bahwa generasi kedua dari gerakan neo-Calvinisme di Belanda (misalnya, Valentine Hepp) menolak semua bentuk evolusi. Beberapa alasan 302 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE yang mencoba untuk menjelaskan diskontinuitas antara kedua generasi neo-Calvinisme ini juga akan diberikan di dalam tulisan ini. KATA KUNCI: Abraham Kuyper, Herman Bavinck, Valentine Hepp, Neo- Calvinisme Belanda, evolusi, Darwinisme, teistik evousi, penciptaan yang ber-evolusi. ABSTRACT: The philosopher Ilse N. Bulhof's conclusion that the reception of Darwinism in the Netherlands was easy with opposition coming only from the religious quarters needs to be explained further. The fact is, opposition towards Darwinism came also from the academics and not all religious groups opposed it. The modern liberal accepted Darwinism without much reservation. Two great figures of the Dutch neo-Calvinisme, Abraham Kuyper and Herman Bavinck, accepted evolution as a fact while rejecting Darwinism.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Lions, Arabs & Israelites: Some Lessons from the Samson Story For
    Of Lions, Arabs & Israelites: Some Lessons from the Samson Story for Writing the History of Biblical Scholarship1 Paul Michael Kurtz Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow, University of Cambridge // Postdoctoral Research Associate, Queens’ College Hermann Spieckermann mit Zuneigung und Dank In the fancy of Judges 14, Samson is stronger than a lion. When the biblical hero stumbles upon the beast en route to Timnah, he tears it barehanded in two and continues on his merry way. Though perhaps not the most improbable of leonine accounts in the Hebrew Bible – considering Daniel went unmauled (Dan 6) while a prophet from Judah together with his donkey were uneaten (1 Kgs 13:11–33) – or those of Samson for that matter, ripping the king of beasts to pieces did pose something of a problem for interpreters of the late modern period. As historian Johann Georg Peter Möller, of Swedish Pomerania, confessed, in 1779, “If ever a history in the ho_[ly] scriptures has given cause for mockery, doubt, objection, and quip; so it is the history of Samson.” 2 Over a century later, even after “biblical science” had forged ahead, the issue abided for exegetes, among them Friedrich Baethgen. In 1888, the German Old Testament scholar published his Beiträge zur semitischen Religionsgeschichte, which sought to mark a contrast in the history of Israelite theism and that of other Semites’.3 Baethgen hoped to stem the rising tide of scholarship asserting a strong form of polytheism at the origin of Israel. Within the larger treatise, rife as it was with etymology, epigraphy alongside onomastics, the 1 This inquiry traces back to a scholarship kindly hosted by Hermann Spieckermann at the University of Göttingen under the aegis of the Fulbright Program, in 2010–11.
    [Show full text]
  • Herman Bavinck Speaks English: a Bibliographic Essay
    MJT 19 (2008) 117-126 HERMAN BAVINCK SPEAKS ENGLISH: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC ESSAY by John Bolt TO COMMEMORATE the complete translation of Herman Bavinck’s magiste- rial four-volume Reformed Dogmatics into English1 and the centenary of his 1908 Stone Lectures at Princeton Seminary, The Philosophy of Reve- lation,2 this bibliographic essay will review Bavinck’s own writings that are available in English along with significant scholarly treatments of his thought in the English language.3 Like his Neo-Calvinist contemporary Abraham Kuyper, Bavinck was accorded attention and respect in the American theological world while in the prime of his own theological career. This is remarkable considering that, unlike German, for example, the Dutch theological tradition, espe- cially of a minor and conservative branch of the Reformed faith, did not command such attention readily. Much of the credit for this must be given to Geerhardus Vos who introduced both men to Benjamin Warfield and was influential in bringing them to Princeton to deliver the prestig- ious Stone Lectures, Kuyper in 1898 and Bavinck in 1908.4 What is not as well known about Bavinck is that 1908 was not his first visit to North America. In 1892, the year that the Afscheiding (Seces- 1 Edited by John Bolt, translated by John Vriend, published by Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, 2003–08. The eschatology section of volume four was published separately in 1996 as The Last Things: Hope for this World and the Next; the creation section of volume 2 was pub- lished separately in 1999 as In the Beginning: Foundations of Creation Theology.
    [Show full text]