Support Letters for Julius' Landmarking Proposal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ANNUAL REPORT 543 Union Street #1E Brooklyn, NY 11215 718.541.4378 GOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Friends, Partners and Members
2015 ANNUAL REPORT 543 Union Street #1E Brooklyn, NY 11215 718.541.4378 GOWANUS CANAL CONSERVANCY 2015 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Friends, Partners and Members, Since its inception, the Conservancy has advocated for an open space network that would support and protect the health of the Gowanus Canal while providing access to its shores and vibrant public parks and corridors for the people who live, work and play in the neighborhood. In 2015, that vision started to become a reality. Construction began on the Sponge Park, which will transform the end of 2nd Street into a canal-fronting park that captures and filters stormwater. Additionally, as plans for new development and Superfund-related infrastructure emerge on the north end of the canal, it is clear that better (and more) public space is a priority, particularly along the canal’s edge. As these projects unfold, we are working closely with diverse local partners like Fifth Avenue Committee, Gowanus Alliance, Arts Gowanus, Old Stone House and others to ensure that these emerging public spaces not only reflect the community’s interests, priorities and needs, but weave together into an interconnected Greenscape, maximizing the health, resiliency, vibrancy and beauty of our Gowanus neighborhood. Throughout the next year, we will continue to reach out to residents, businesses and partners to get your input on the priorities for the Greenscape, with an eye toward designing a community-based masterplan that reflects the unique qualities of Gowanus. To learn more about the Greenscape initiative and how you can help, please visit our website www. gowanuscanalconservancy.org. We not only welcome your input, we need it! Ben Jones Board Chair LETTER FROM THE CHAIR SMITH ST ATLANTIC AVE GOWANUS WATERSHED PROSPECT PARK We envision the evolution of an Open, Clean and Alive Gowanus Canal and Watershed with accessible, connective open space; clean water, soil and air; and vibrant ecological, business and cultural activity. -
CDP.WEB .Doc Media C
** Will print automatically! If it doesn't, click here. ** MORNING INSIDER Speaker candidates unleashed | Construction safety | Retail killing itself Your Morning Insider for Nov. 2, 2017. Erik Engquist Published: November 2, 2017 - 12:01 am Who won the speaker debate? Given that the race for City Council speaker is decided by a handful of insiders in back rooms, the spectacle of the contenders making their cases in public at yesterday's Crain's forum was something to behold. All eight candidates were eager to attend, even though they have been campaigning privately among the Democratic county leaders, union presidents and council colleagues who decide the outcome. They showed up because to be a contender, one must be seen as a contender. Not being on stage works against that impression. Second, the event sold out well in advance, an indication of the importance that business people and their lobbyists place on being on good terms with the next speaker. But a fair number of them came for the entertainment value as well. So, who won? The answer depends on the criteria. Some candidates impressed the audience but expressed views that might hurt their chances for one reason or another. Here was one insider's take, based strictly on the latter criterion: "I though Ydanis Rodriguez did worst, followed by Donovan Richards and Jumaane Williams. Ritchie Torres undercut himself by talking up the solidarity of the [Bronx] delegation. Robert Cornegy was solid but didn't project as an institutional leader. Jimmy Van Bramer was the most clever but a little too democratic—I don't think turning the council into Albany by letting people do grandstand introductions [of legislation] and force uncomfortable votes is an idea that a lot of members really want, no matter how much they say they want more freedom. -
Sip-In" That Drew from the Civil Rights Movement by History.Com, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 11.07.19 Word Count 887 Level 1020L
The gay "sip-in" that drew from the civil rights movement By History.com, adapted by Newsela staff on 11.07.19 Word Count 887 Level 1020L Image 1. A bartender in Julius's Bar refuses to serve John Timmins, Dick Leitsch, Craig Rodwell and Randy Wicker, members of the Mattachine Society, an early American gay rights group, who were protesting New York liquor laws that prevented serving gay customers on April 21, 1966. Photo from: Getty Images/Fred W. McDarrah. In 1966, on a spring afternoon in Greenwich Village, three men set out to change the political and social climate of New York City. After having gone from one bar to the next, the men reached a cozy tavern named Julius'. They approached the bartender, proclaimed they were gay and then requested a drink, but were promptly denied service. The trio had accomplished their goal: their "sip-in" had begun. The men belonged to the Mattachine Society, an early organization dedicated to fighting for gay rights. They wanted to show that bars in the city discriminated against gay people. Discrimination against the gay community was a common practice at the time. Still, this discrimination was less obvious than the discriminatory Jim Crow laws in the South that forced racial segregation. Bartenders Refused Service To Gay Couples This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. A person's sexual orientation couldn't be detected as easily as a person's sex or race. With that in mind, the New York State Liquor Authority, a state agency that controls liquor sales, took action. -
New York City Council Environmental SCORECARD 2017
New York City Council Environmental SCORECARD 2017 NEW YORK LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS nylcv.org/nycscorecard INTRODUCTION Each year, the New York League of Conservation Voters improve energy efficiency, and to better prepare the lays out a policy agenda for New York City, with goals city for severe weather. we expect the Mayor and NYC Council to accomplish over the course of the proceeding year. Our primary Last month, Corey Johnson was selected by his tool for holding council members accountable for colleagues as her successor. Over the years he has progress on these goals year after year is our annual been an effective advocate in the fight against climate New York City Council Environmental Scorecard. change and in protecting the health of our most vulnerable. In particular, we appreciate his efforts In consultation with over forty respected as the lead sponsor on legislation to require the environmental, public health, transportation, parks, Department of Mental Health and Hygiene to conduct and environmental justice organizations, we released an annual community air quality survey, an important a list of eleven bills that would be scored in early tool in identifying the sources of air pollution -- such December. A handful of our selections reward council as building emissions or truck traffic -- particularly members for positive votes on the most significant in environmental justice communities. Based on this environmental legislation of the previous year. record and after he earned a perfect 100 on our City The remainder of the scored bills require council Council Scorecard in each year of his first term, NYLCV members to take a public position on a number of our was proud to endorse him for re-election last year. -
Theatre of the Oppressed Nyc
THEATRE OF THE OPPRESSED NYC The Impact of Theatre of the Oppressed NYC Legislative Theatre on New York City Policy and Civic Engagement Version 1.3 • Rebecca Kelly-Golfman WATCH ACT VOTE 1 THEATRE OF THE OPPRESSED NYC TABLE OF CONTENTS To holistically review the impact of TONYC Legislative Theatre we will (1) outline the background of Theatre of the Oppressed methodology and creation of Theatre of the Oppressed NYC; (2) share the policy impact of Legislative Theatre events from 2013-2016; (3) outline the changes in form and impact during the 5th Annual Legislative Theatre Festival in 2017; and (4) share Big Picture Takeaways. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND OF THEATRE OF THE OPPRESSED AND TONYC..........................................................................2 FORUM THEATRE......................................................................................................................................................................3 LEGISLATIVE THEATRE............................................................................................................................................................3 THEATRE OF THE OPPRESSED NYC..................................................................................................................................4 STRUCTURE OF LEGISLATIVE THEATRE..........................................................................................................................5 -
The Geography—And New Politics—Of Housing in New York City Public Housing
The Geography—and New Politics—of Housing in New York City Public Housing Tom Waters, Community Service Society of New York, November 2018 The 178,000 public housing apartments owned and operated by the New York City Housing Authority are often de- scribed as “a city within a city.” The Community Service Society has estimated the numbers of public housing apartments for the New York City portion of each legislative district in the city. These estimates were made by assigning buildings within public housing developments to legislative districts based on their addresses. United States Congress District U.S. Representative Public Housing 13 Adriano Espaillat 34,180 8 Hakeem Jeffries 33,280 15 José Serrano 32,210 7 Nydia Velazquez 26,340 12 Carolyn Maloney 10,290 9 Yvette Clarke 9,740 11 Max Rose 6,130 5 Gregory Meeks 5,980 10 Jerrold Nadler 5,530 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 5,500 16 Eliot Engel 4,630 6 Grace Meng 3,410 3 Tom Suozzi 0 New York State Senate District Senator Public Housing 30 Brian Benjamin 28,330 25 Velmanette Montgomery 16,690 32 Luis Sepúlveda 16,590 19 Roxanne J. Persaud 14,570 29 José M. Serrano 13,920 Learn more at www.cssny.org/housinggeography Community Service Society New York State Senate (cont.) District Senator Public Housing 18 Julia Salazar 13,650 26 Brian Kavanagh 12,020 23 Diane J. Savino 9,220 20 Zellnor Myrie 7,100 12 Michael Gianaris 6,420 33 Gustavo Rivera 5,930 36 Jamaal Bailey 5,510 31 Robert Jackson 5,090 10 James Sanders Jr. -
2019 NYC COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard Contents
NEW YORK LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS 2019 NYC COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard Contents FOREWORD 4 ABOUT THE BILLS 6 A NOTE TO OUR MEMBERS 11 KEY RESULTS 12 AVERAGE SCORES 13 LEADERSHIP 14 COUNCIL SCORES 16 METHODOLOGY 18 2 NEW YORK LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS COVER IMAGE: ©DEBERARR / STOCK.ADOBE.COM ALL IMAGES ON THESE PAGES COURTESY OF NYLCV 2019 NYC COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 3 Last year was a landmark year for the environment in New York City. As the most recent report from the Intergovern- As our 2019 NYC Scorecard shows, clean mental Panel on Climate Change makes plain, transportation remains one of our biggest we are in a climate crisis—and New York must priorities and it’s clear that the City Council lead the fight against climate change at this time made it a priority as well. We scored a whopping when the federal government is stepping back five bills that reduce emissions from the from international commitments and rolling back transportation sector—the largest contributor to common sense programs, like clean car standards. climate change in our state and nation. Among the In 2019, the City took bold action by adopting new bills is one that supports electrification of school climate legislation: bills were enacted to reduce buses. But electrification will not be enough. emissions from buildings, completely reimagine our That’s why we scored bills that give people more commercial waste system, and improve our streets mobility options, including e-bikes and scooters, to promote safety and sustainability—all policies and improve bus service and the streetscape to that we included in our previous NYC Policy prioritize pedestrians and bike paths so New Agendas and all critical steps in the fight against Yorkers can more easily choose sustainable climate change. -
Candidate Questionnaire
2013 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CANDIDATES FOR CITY COUNCIL Citizens Union would appreciate your response to the following questions related to policy issues facing the City of New York that are of concern to Citizens Union and residents of the City. We plan to make public your responses to this questionnaire in our Voters Directory, on our website, and in other appropriate venues. Responses to these questions will be one of several factors Citizens Union will use to evaluate candidates who are running for office in order to determine our "Preferred Candidates" for the primary election and "Endorsed Candidates" for the general election. If you seek our support, we would also need to schedule an interview with you as part of the evaluation process. We will not automatically schedule an interview with you if you return this questionnaire, as we prioritize competitive races and resources constrain us from evaluating all races. Please contact us if you wish to be interviewed. We thank you very much for your response. Candidate Name:Carlos Menchaca Age:32 Campaign Address: 4413 sth Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11220 Campaign Telephone Number: (718) 851-2681 Party Affiliation(s): Democrat and Working Families Campaign Manager Name: lvan Luevanos Website & Email: www.carlos*013.*om & carlos@carlos201 3.com Education: Jesuit University of San Francisco, Bachelor of Arts, Politics Bachelor of Arts, Performing Arts and Social Justice Occupation/Employer (or years in currently held elected office): City Council Candidate Previous Off ices, Cam palg ns and Com m u nity/Civic I nvolvement: -LGBT & HIV/AIDS Community Liaison Office of the Speaker of the New York City Council, Christine C. -
Queens Today
Volume 65, No. 92 FAriday, UGUST 23, 2019 50¢ Critics blast QUEENS City Council for jail plan TODAY hearing date By David Brand and Noah Goldberg — August 23, 2019 — Queens Daily Eagle Advocates and opponents of the city’s plan SINCE QUEENS BOROUGH PRES- to close Rikers Island and build four new jails ident Melinda Katz officially won the will pack City Hall for the council’s public long, drawn out Democratic primary for hearing on the proposal Sept. 5. That’s also the first day of public school for hundreds of Queens district attorney, there has been thousands of New York City students, and some speculation about when, exactly, the stakeholders say the hearing date could pose a winner of the November general election big obstacle to community engagement. would take office. The hearing will take place during a sched- uled meeting of the Subcommittee on Land- marks, Public Siting and Maritime Uses. A THE WINNER OF THE NOVEMBER City Council spokesperson told the Eagle that general election will take over for late DA it is expected to be the only hearing on the Richard Brown, who died in May after 28 Councilmember Adrienne Adams is chair of the Subcommittee on Landmarks, Public topic. years in office. Because Brown vacated Siting and Maritime Uses, which will host the City Council’s only public hearing on the Continued on page 9 the office, there was some confusion about “borough-based” jail plan on Sept. 5. Photo by John McCarten/City Council via Flickr whether the winner of the election would take over immediately — as would be the case in a special election or in a legislative election, said election attorney Martin Connors, a former state senator. -
STONEWALL INN, 51-53 Christopher Street, Manhattan Built: 1843 (51), 1846 (53); Combined with New Façade, 1930; Architect, William Bayard Willis
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 23, 2015, Designation List 483 LP-2574 STONEWALL INN, 51-53 Christopher Street, Manhattan Built: 1843 (51), 1846 (53); Combined with New Façade, 1930; architect, William Bayard Willis Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan, Tax Map Block 610, Lot 1 in part consisting of the land on which the buildings at 51-53 Christopher Street are situated On June 23, 2015 the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Stonewall Inn as a New York City Landmark and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No.1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of the law. Twenty-seven people testified in favor of the designation including Public Advocate Letitia James, Council Member Corey Johnson, Council Member Rosie Mendez, representatives of Comptroller Scott Stringer, Congressman Jerrold Nadler, Assembly Member Deborah Glick, State Senator Brad Hoylman, Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer, Assembly Member Richard N. Gottfried, the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, the Real Estate Board of New York, the Historic Districts Council, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Family Equality Council, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the National Parks Conservation Association, SaveStonewall.org, the Society for the Architecture of the City, and Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, New York City, as well as three participants in the Stonewall Rebellion—Martin Boyce, Jim Fouratt, and Dr. Gil Horowitz (Dr. Horowitz represented the Stonewall Veterans Association)—and historians David Carter, Andrew Dolkart, and Ken Lustbader. In an email to the Commission on May 21, 2015 Benjamin Duell, of Duell LLC the owner of 51-53 Christopher Street, expressed his support for the designation. -
From March 21 to April 5, 2021, Data for Progress Conducted a Survey of 1007 Likely Democratic Primary Voters in New York City Using SMS and Web Panel Respondents
From March 21 to April 5, 2021, Data for Progress conducted a survey of 1007 likely Democratic primary voters in New York City using SMS and web panel respondents. The sample was weighted to be representative of likely voters by age, gender, education, race, and voting history. The survey was conducted in English. The margin of error is ±3 percentage NB: subgroups with a n-size less than 40 (<40) are not shown on these cross-tabs. We choose not to display N<40 subgroups because the sample is too small to have statistical significance. We did, however, take samples of these subgroups for representational and weighting purposes to accurately reflect the electorate makeup. Some values may not add up to 100 due to rounding. [1] If the Democratic primary election for New York City Mayor was being held tomorrow, and these were the candidates, who would you vote for? Response Topline Female Male Under 45 45+ No College College Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino/a White Andrew Yang 26 24 30 30 24 29 23 41 25 19 29 Carlos Menchaca 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Dianne Morales 3 3 3 8 0 2 4 1 1 3 5 Eric Adams 13 14 12 8 16 15 11 3 22 8 8 Kathryn Garcia 4 5 4 8 2 3 6 4 1 5 5 Maya Wiley 10 9 10 8 11 9 10 6 9 14 10 Ray McGuire 6 3 10 3 7 5 7 3 7 6 5 Scott Stringer 11 12 11 6 14 11 12 6 8 9 18 Shaun Donovan 7 9 5 6 8 5 10 4 9 10 5 A different candidate 4 5 3 4 5 6 3 22 2 6 3 No one 14 17 10 19 12 15 14 8 15 20 12 Weighted N 1007 604 403 354 653 563 444 62 332 171 393 [2] Which candidate is your second choice for New York City Mayor? Response -
Letter from 17 NYC Council Members Re Grievance Assessment
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK June 13, 2018 Commissioner Cynthia Brann Department of Correction 75-20 Astoria Blvd. East Elmhurst, NY 11370 Dear Commissioner Brann: We, as the Members of the City Council Progressive Caucus, write today to urge the Department of Correction (DOC) to adopt the recommendations set forth by the Board of Correction (BOC) in their report, “Second Assessment of the New York City Department of Correction Inmate Grievance System.” In the report released Monday, the Board evaluated the current complaint systems in New York City jails and identified varying institutional problems which we believe must be addressed immediately. Ever since the City made 311 calls freely available to incarcerated individuals, the amount of 311 complaints has increased significantly—from 20,000 calls in 2016 to 30,000 calls in 2017. However, under current DOC policy, 311 complaints are not subject to a formal grievance process. There are no guidelines or practices to monitor the resolution of these complaints, effectively sending potentially thousands of complaints against the Department into a void. We agree with the Board that DOC must develop a formalized grievance policy to clarify the role of 311 calls in the grievance system. We also support the report’s recommendation of a central tracking system to monitor these complaints and provide incarcerated individuals with updates on the status of their complaints. This should be the bare minimum of what the City provides any New Yorker who files a complaint through 311—regardless of their incarceration status. Additionally, the report found that grievances filed not through 311 but through the Inmate Grievance and Request Program must fall within one of 29 established categories to be subject to formal review.