DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 3 – Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 3 – Page 1 Address 1 Address 2 Support/ Comments Object The Borough Aldreth Object Size will dominate the flat topography of the fenland landscape. Detract from Ely Cathedral. Inefficient. Impact on wildlife. Too close to residential property and the A10. Greed of landowners cannot be of greater importance that preserving productivity of grade1 agricultural land. Reduction in property prices. MOD has reservations. Visual impact from Wicken fen should be considered. The Borough Aldreth Object Too close to residential properties and the A10. Inefficient. Local residents face disruption during construction phase. Insufficient infrastructure. Vast amounts of concrete in the ground for years to come. Impact on wildlife. Impact on visual amenity of residents, upon Ely Cathedral must be considered alongside impact from Wicken Fen. Sufficient renewable energy produced in ECDC area. Renewable targets met. The Borough Aldtreth Object Out of character with the landscape and will do very little to benefit the environment in such a low wind speed area. The Borough Aldreth Object Too close to village of Stretham and will dominate area surrounding them. Seen from huge distance including Ely Cathedral. Noise and shadow flicker a significant disturbance. Companies erecting them and landowners gain massive payments at expense of everyone else as price of electricity increase to subsidise it. The Borough Aldreth Object Too close to nearby villages and too tall. Would degrade aesthetic qualities of landscape as well as affecting bird life and amenity value of the area. Other emptier open spaces to site this means of developing alternative energy. Cumulative effect. The Borough Aldreth Object Comments stand despite revised Environmental Statement. The Borough Aldreth Object Despite recent submissions I still object. High Street Aldreth Object Impact on landscape. Fens are renowned for ‘big skies’ and turbines will distract views. Main point of reference on landscape is Ely Cathedral – replacing with wind turbines is vandalism. Noise and flicker effects and inefficient. High Street Aldreth Object Turbines do not comply with policies EN1, EN2 and EN6 and would destroy the landscape and settlement character, affect residential amenity and protected species. High Street Aldreth Object Public benefits fail to outweigh the tremendous harm it will cause. Appendix 3 – page 1 Turbines do not comply with policies EN1, EN2 and EN6. Cannot minimise environmental and amenity impacts. Value of landscape demonstrated in Mereham Inquiry. May support land owner financially but will erode agricultural enterprise as a whole in the area. Scale is not inkeeping. Also contrary to Local Plan. Affect on social mobility of residents and reduction in house prices. Renewable targets already met. School Lane Aldreth Object Aldreth already feeling burden from berry fen. These turbines still higher than Ely Cathedral and would have hugely detrimental impact on the landscape. Spoils area for those that live here an visit. East Cambs already providing enough renewable energy. Very strong local opposition. School Lane Aldreth Object Example of how these developments can multiply as there is also an application for 3 turbines nearby. Need to protect environment from greedy developers. Low wind speeds in area, obstructive views, noise and shadow flicker, distance from very busy A10. Impact on wildlife. Can affect people with sensory processing difficulties, especially people on the Autistic spectrum. Do not know how they will affect a person until it is too late. School Lane Aldreth Object Objections still stand. Clear from fight to stop turbines on Berry Fen that local people do not want this. Current government has said that wind farms should only go ahead with support of local residents. High Street Earith Object Will dominate landscape and rivers. Clearly visible from Cambridge and Ely. Impact on unique view of Ely Cathedral. Will set a precedent. Prefer solar panels. John Anne Close Ely Object Not efficient – minimal contribution to the National Grid. Blot on landscape which would impact on peoples quality of life. Serious impact on visitors first impression of Ely and its Cathedral. Morley Drive Ely Object Blight on local landscape and views of Ely Cathedral. Negative impact on tourism. If any applications are approved this will set a precedent. Turbines do not reduce as much CO2 as stated. Not needed to aid renewable targets. Detrimental impact on wildlife and birds. St Marys Street Ely Object Too close to dwellings - subjected to noise and television reception affected. Danger to bird life and their habitat. Shadow flicker on A10 could distract motorists. Height means they will dominate and change the unique landscape. Insufficient electricity would be generated to Appendix 3 – page 2 justify affects on environment. Cowslip Drive LittleThetford Object Size of the turbines is so large it will have a detrimental impact for many miles. Affect on house prices. Purpose of turbines is not clear. Noise. Cranwells Way Little Thetford Object Turbines should be placed a lot further away from villages/towns/cities. Mereham development turned down because of landscape value. Turbines are inefficient. Proximity to A10 – increase in traffic movements. Noise created and television signal affected. Insufficient public consultation. Negative impact on houses prices. No benefits to villages or surrounding areas. Aldreth Road Haddenham Object Turbines will dominate landscape. Impact on residential amenity through noise, shadow flicker and visual intrusion. Degrading of views of Windmill, Old Engine and Stretham Church. Affect on River Ouse Walk and biodiversity in area. Will set a precedent. Aldreth Road Haddenham Object Turbines will dominate landscape. Impact on residential amenity through noise, shadow flicker and visual intrusion. Degrading of views of Windmill, Old Engine and Stretham Church. Affect on River Ouse Walk and biodiversity in area. Will set a precedent. Aldreth Road Haddenham Object Turbines will dominate landscape. Impact on residential amenity through noise, shadow flicker and visual intrusion. Degrading of views of Windmill, Old Engine and Stretham Church. Wind speed insufficient and it is unlikely that any CO2 savings will be made. Aldreth Road Haddenham Object Major detrimental change to landscape, views and visual amenity. Contrary to policies EN1 and EN2. Major detrimental impact on cultural heritage. Major detrimental change to residential visual amenity. Possible disturbance to archaeological remains. Major detrimental impact on leisure amenities. Disturbance from noise. Harm to wildlife. Cumulative impact. Affects on house prices and social mobility. Turbines likely to be inefficient and the developer has not attempted to obtain accurate windspeed measurements. Renewable energy targets already met. Aldreth Road Haddenham Object Major detrimental change to landscape, views and visual amenity. Contrary to policies EN1 and EN2. Major detrimental impact on cultural heritage. Major detrimental change to residential visual amenity. Possible disturbance to archaeological remains. Major detrimental impact on leisure amenities. Disturbance from noise. Harm to wildlife. Cumulative impact. Affects on house prices and social mobility. Appendix 3 – page 3 Turbines likely to be inefficient and the developer has not attempted to obtain accurate windspeed measurements. Renewable energy targets already met. Aldreth Road Haddenham Object Having read the revised ES I cannot see any new information to reduce or mitigate the adverse impacts and irreversible harm. Contrary to ENV1 and ENV6. Cumulative impact. Noise impact, impact on protected species and heritage assets. Provision should be made for a bond for demolition and removal of turbines. Does not comply with ministerial statement. Aldtreth Road Haddenham Object As above. Bell Gardens Haddenham Object Too close too many houses in Stretham. Intrusive to the closest houses. Visible for miles and would dominate and permanently spoil attractive fenland landscape and skylines. Out of keeping with rural environment. Amenity that droves and footpaths provide would be seriously degraded. The site is in the direction of the prevailing wind, noise audible at all times. Site is close to Old West River wildlife corridor – inevitable that birds will suffer fatal collisions. Precedent will be set. Windfarm forest effect already underway. No attempt to obtain accurate wind speed measurements. Must choose most beneficial type of renewable energy. Great Mill View Haddenham Object Turbines would industrialise rural landscape and impact cannot be mitigated. Mereham Inquiry stated visual value of the landscape. Residential and leisure amenity will be affected. Negative impact on views of Ely Cathedral. Safety issues – ice throws, noise and flicker. Government aware of issues. Hazard to drivers and health side effects. Close to Old West River. Applicant’s own ecologists recommend further survey work. Any bird deaths are unacceptable. Mortality risk for bats even greater. Impact on social mobility and house prices. Cumulative impact. Wind farms are inefficient and there is no need/. Great Mill View Haddenham Object Technology is not energy or CO2 efficient. Assessing each application on its own overlooks cumulative effects. More efficient, safer and less intrusive wind technologies available. UK Govt policy is rapidly evolving and changing – unwise to commit at this time. Low speed area and applicant has carried out no measurement of wind patterns or strength.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Registered Food Premises by Organisation
    Registered Food Premises by Organisation No of records 651 These records are valid as at 21/05/2010 16:01:28 Organisation Address Usage 1Eleven B & B 111 High Street Cheveley Newmarket Suffolk CB8 9DG Hotels, guest houses 72 B & B Medrena House 72 Wisbech Road Littleport Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 1JJ Hotels, guest houses A & N J Turner & Sons Croft House Hasse Road Soham Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 5UN Haulage Company A B Fish Lancaster Farm Witcham Road Mepal Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 2AF Fish processors A L Lee & Sons Whitebridge Farm Ely Road Littleport Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 1RT Potato Growers A L Saberton 21 Main Street Little Downham Cambridgeshire Wholesalers A Tasca 24 High Street Soham Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 5HE Cafes A10 Chip Van 10 Read Street Stretham Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 3JT Mobile vans (food preparation) Acremont House School Acremont House 30 Egremont Street Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 1AE Schools, hospitals etc. AJ Caterers 14A Station Road Littleport Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 1QE Cafes Alans Fish Bar 21 Broad Street Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 4BD Fish and Chips Aldreth Village Hall Aldreth Village Hall High Street Aldreth Cambridgeshire Village halls, community centres etc. Ali Taj 18 Churchgate Street Soham Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 5DS Restaurants Alis Kebabs 12 Main Street Littleport Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 1PJ Take away Amberside Amberside Stretham Station Road Wilburton Ely Cambridgeshire CB6 3QD Schools, hospitals etc. AMG Foods Ltd Trading As Sklep Monopoly. 56 High Street Soham Ely Cambridgeshire CB7 5HE Retailer Anchor Inn Anchor Inn
    [Show full text]
  • Gm/Lp/139/1/1413
    HADDENHAM LEVEL DRAINAGE COMMISSIONERS At a Meeting of the Haddenham Level Drainage Commissioners held at the Baptist Hall, Station Road, Haddenham on Thursday the 27th April 2017 PRESENT M Church Esq (Chairman) J Dennis Esq G L P Wilson Esq (Vice Chairman) K J Furness Esq T B Chambers Esq R J Lee Esq S G Cheetham Esq P Mappledoram Esq A J W Darby Esq S M Smith Esq Mrs M E Darby N E Tebbitt Esq R J Darby Esq R B Waddelow Esq N R Wright Esq Miss Samantha Ablett (representing the Clerk to the Commissioners) was in attendance. The Chairman welcomed Commissioners. _____________________ Apologies for absence Apologies for absence were received from C H Bidwell Esq, P G Dennis Esq, D Gillett Esq, H C Hurrell Esq, T Lee Esq, G R W Wright Esq and A R Yarrow Esq. Mr D Jordan (District Engineer) also apologised for being unable to attend today's meeting. C.123 Declarations of Interest Miss Ablett reminded the Commissioners of the importance of declaring an interest in any matter included in today’s agenda that involved or was likely to affect any of them. The Chairman declared an interest in agenda items 10(ii) and 33. Mr Mappledoram declared an interest in agenda item 24. C.124 Confirmation of Minutes RESOLVED That the Minutes of the Meeting of the Commissioners held on the 11th November 2016 are recorded correctly and that they be confirmed and signed. C.125 Health and Safety Further to C.102 the Chairman reported that he had received the documentation from the Middle Level Commissioners which gave details of reports the Commissioners should be preparing to form part of their risk assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dewsbury Families of Little Thetford, Cambridgeshire
    The Dewsbury Families of Soham, Wilburton, Stretham and Little Thetford, Cambridgeshire. Compiled by Andrew Martin www.familytreeuk.co.uk - updated 21st August 2005. 1. Bartholomew Dewsbury marred Hester 1. Bartholomew Dewsbury (bpt.1696, Stuntney, bur.02/02/1745, Stretham) married Alice (bur.28/06/1759, Stretham) a. Esther Dewsbury (bapt 1721, Stretham) married John Freeman on 10th April 1748 at Stretham, Cambridgeshire. b. Alice Dewsbury (bapt 1723, Stretham, bur.24/11/1725, Stretham) c. William Dewsbury (bapt 1726, Stretham, bur.24/11/1731, Stretham) d. Alice Dewsbury (bapt 1727, Stretham) married John Lowe (of Milton) 11th December 1746 at Stretham, Cambridgeshire. e. Bartholomew Dewsbury (bapt 1730, Stretham, bur.06/11/1737, Stretham) f. Jn Dewsbury (twin) (bapt 1732, Stretham, bur.22/01/1732, Stretham) g. Langford Dewsbury (twin) (bapt 1732, Stretham, bur.22/01/1732, Stretham) h. Langford Dewsbury (bapt 1733, Stretham, bur.27/11/1737, Stretham) i. Mary Dewsbury (bapt.23/03/1739, Stretham, bur 1740, Stretham) 2. Edward Dewsberry (bpt.1700, Stuntney, bur.1770, Little Thetford) married Elisabeth (bur.1762, Little Thetford) a. Edward Dewsbury (bpt.?/09/1734, Little Thetford) b. William Dewsbury (bpt.17/04/1737, Little Thetford) married Elizabeth Cook on 17th April 1769 at Soham, Cambridgeshire. i. Edward Dewsbury (bpt.07/10/1770, bur.18/06/1836, Wilburton) married Sarah (b.c.1771, bur.26/09/1844, Wilburton) 1. William Dewsbury (b.c.1811, Wilburton, d.22/09/1885, Stretham) married Rebecca Lythell (b.c.1820, Stretham, d.1889, Stretham) on 8th December 1840 at ? a. William Dewsbury (b.13/09/1840, d.03/01/1905, Stretham) married Hannah Watson (b.13/04/1845, Witchford, d.22/06/1929, Stretham) i.
    [Show full text]
  • Littleport Scrapbook 1897-1990 by Mike Petty
    Littleport Scrapbook 1897-1990 by Mike Petty Littleport Scrapbook 1897-1990 Extracts from ‘A Cambridgeshire Scrapbook’, compiled by Mike Petty 16 Nov 2016 Introduction Each evening from March 1997 to March 2015 I compiled a ‘Looking Back’ column in the Cambridge News in which I feature snippets from issues of 100, 75, 50 and 25 years ago. I sought out unusual items relating to villages and areas of Cambridge not usually featured These stories are from issues of the Cambridge Daily/Evening/Weekly News of 1897-1990 I can supply actual copies of many of these articles – please contact me. The full set of articles, numbering over 3,000 pages is available at bit.ly/CambsCollection The newspapers are held in the Cambridgeshire Collection together with other Cambridge titles back to 1762. They have a variety of indexes including a record of stories for every village in Cambridgeshire between 1770-1900 and newspaper cuttings files on 750 topics from 1958 to date. I initiated much of the indexing and have many indexes of my own. Please feel free to contact me for advice and assistance. For more details of newspapers and other sources for Cambridgeshire history see my website www.mikepetty.org.uk This index was produced as a part of my personal research resources and would benefit by editing. If you can make any of it work for you I am delighted. But remember you should always check everything! Please make what use of it you may. Please remember who it came from Mike Petty. Mike Petty – www.mikepetty.org.uk bit.ly/CambsCollection Littleport Scrapbook 1897-1990 by Mike Petty Littleport Scrapbook 1897-1990 1897 02 26 The clerk to the Ely Guardians applied for the removal of Tabitha Camm, an eccentric old woman aged 72 years who is living in a tumbled-down old hovel in Littleport fen.
    [Show full text]
  • Mingay Solar Extension Wilburton Cambridgeshire Archaeological Evaluation
    Mingay Solar Extension Wilburton Cambridgeshire Archaeological Evaluation for Mingay Farm Ltd CA Project: 660168 CA Report: 13615 December 2013 Mingay Solar Extension Wilburton Cambridgeshire Archaeological Evaluation CA Project: 660168 CA Report: 13615 prepared by Jeremy Mordue, Project Supervisor date 8 December 2013 checked by Derek Evans, Senior Project Officer date 16 December 2013 approved by Simon Carlyle, Principal Fieldwork Manager date 17 December 2013 issue 01 This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology Cirencester Milton Keynes Andover Building 11 Unit 4 Stanley House Kemble Enterprise Park Cromwell Business Centre Walworth Road Kemble, Cirencester Howard Way, Newport Pagnell Andover, Hampshire Gloucestershire, GL7 6BQ MK16 9QS SP10 5LH t. 01285 771022 t. 01908 218320 t. 01264 347630 f. 01285 771033 e. [email protected] © Cotswold Archaeology Mingay Solar Extension, Wilburton, Cambridgeshire: Archaeological Evaluation CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 The site .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8.43 Wilburton
    East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Pre-submission version (February 2013) Part Two: Village/Town Visions 8.43 Wilburton © East Cambridgeshire District Council Description of Wilburton Wilburton is small village situated 6 miles southwest of Ely, on the ridge between Stretham and Haddenham. The core of the village is designated as a Conservation Area with a particularly attractive area around the church. The main features of the village are shown on Map 8.47. Wilburton has a range of facilities including two shops, a public house, a village hall and social club, a primary school and St Peter’s Church. There is also a recreation ground with a cricket pitch, pavilion and local play area and a regular bus service to Cambridge. Key statistics Wilburton 163 Population 1320 165 Dwellings 550 New dwellings built 2001-12 (net) 78 164 Estimated new dwellings 2012-31 40 165 Employment To be confirmed following publication of 2011 Census data Regular services to Cambridge, Haddenham, Sutton, Chatteris Existing public transport services (Mon-Sat) Housing Wilburton is likely to continue to grow at a modest rate, with new housing being built on suitable ‘infill’ sites within the village. No new housing allocation sites are proposed on the edge of Wilburton. 163 Population and dwellings for Wilburton parish, Cambridgeshire County Council Research Group (mid-2010) 164 East Cambridgeshire Housing Trajectory 2012. Note, this is likely to be an underestimate as it excludes potential supply from rural exception windfall sites. 165 To be updated with forthcoming Census results East Cambridgeshire District Council Page 347 East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Pre-submission version (February 2013) Part Two: Village/Town Visions A ‘development envelope’ has been drawn around Wilburton to define the built-up part of the village where infill development may be permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Witches and Witchcraft in Ely
    Witches and Witchcraft in Ely A HISTORY Francis Young Printed for the author by Cambridge Print Solutions Cambridge, 2013 Published by Francis Young © Francis Young 2013 Francis Young has asserted his moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. francisyoung.wordpress.com ISBN 978-0-9926404-0-8 Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. Hereward and the Witch 3 2. A Necromancer in the Lady Chapel 5 3. Witchcraft and the Reformation 9 4. Witchfinders in Ely 11 5. Witchcraft in Ely in Modern Times 15 Notes 20 Introduction The Cambridgeshire Fens are one of the last places in England where traditional belief in witchcraft was widespread. Until as late as the mid-twentieth century, Fenland communities were isolated, and their inhabitants were more vulnerable to environmental illnesses, such as malaria, than the rest of the population. A hard life, geographical isolation, close-knit communities and mistrust of outsiders may all have contributed to the Fenlanders’ abiding belief in the power of witchcraft. Ely’s place in the history of English witchcraft is a special one. As the cathedral city at the heart of the Fens, under the independent jurisdiction of the Bishop, Ely was the place where anyone locally accused of witchcraft would be brought to trial. The city was the hub from which John Stearne completed the last stage of Matthew Hopkins’s infamous witch-hunt in the 1640s, and Ely was the scene for the (quite literal) downfall of the first ‘witch’ to appear in English history.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokens Found in Haddenham, Cambridgeshire, and a Seventeenth-Century Issuer
    TOKENS FOUND IN HADDENHAM, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, AND A SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ISSUER M.J. BONSER AND R.H. THOMPSON, with contributions by C.F. BESTER THE Revd. William Cole, the Cambridge antiquary (1714-82), owned extensive property in Haddenham in the south-west of the Isle of Ely, and two tokens found there are illustrated and described in vol. 32 of his manuscript collections.1 A. Garden of William Symonds, -1768. The first 'was dug up in a Garden belonging to me at Hadenham in the Isle of Ely, & given to me by my Tenant Wm Symonds in January 1768'. The second was 'found at Hadenham & given me as above 1768'. The wording in both cases leaves the date of finding open to doubt, but if not actually in 1768 it was presumably not long before. Cole's father had purchased several hundred acres including five tenements, to which the antiquary himself added two closes;- and the location of William Symonds's garden must remain uncertain, although it was probably in the hamlet of Aldreth, adjoinjng Ewell Fen in which Cole's farm Frog Hall was situated (a farmhouse and several cottages in Aldreth were associated with Frog Hall Farm until about 1944). 1. Nuremberg Rechenmeister jetton or Schulpfennig; second half of the sixteenth century. Similar to No. 20 below, but alphabet with G reversed and no additional letters; not illustrated. 2. Seventeenth-century token; c. 1660. Obv. IAMES PARTRICH OF around a mitre; surname appears as 'RICH'. Rev. ROOYSTON VINTNER around letter P above IC. Williamson,3 Hertfordshire 165 or 166; probably 165, on which a flaw developed across the first part of the surname; not illustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission - Review of Cambridgeshire County Council
    Local Government Boundary Commission - Review of Cambridgeshire County Council East Cambridgeshire - Conservative Party Response from South East Cambridgeshire Conservative Association (SECCA) Summary 1. We believe that single Member Divisions provide for the most effective local government in East Cambridgeshire, giving greater clarity to the electorate and to City, Town and Parish Councils and other local organisations. 2. Our preferred scenario (scenario 1) is based on 63 Members, meaning that 9 will be in East Cambridgeshire. This proposed scenario allows for provision of single Member Divisions, achieves good electoral equality, provides for convenient and effective local government and offers the best solution, by some margin, in terms of reflecting community interests and identity. 2.1. We strongly believe that the Boundary Commission’s proposal for two 2 Member Divisions (within the 61 Member scenario) has made serious compromises to both community interests and identity and to convenient and effective local government, markedly so for the proposed Littleport West Division (Division 16). The geographical size and marked difference in service needs of different parts of this Division could cause conflict in Members’ ability to represent the whole of the Division effectively. 2.2. Sutton, and particularly the villages to the south of Sutton (Wentworth, Witchford, Haddenham, Aldreth, Wilburton, Stretham and Little Thetford) are totally remote from Littleport - geographically (residents of those areas look to Ely and Cambridge and do not use or travel to Littleport), culturally (residents of those areas do not link themselves in any way to Littleport), demographically and in terms of service need (educational, economic and health and wellbeing needs are markedly different).
    [Show full text]
  • ELY ZIPPER Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    ELY ZIPPER bus time schedule & line map ELY ZIPPER Ely View In Website Mode The ELY ZIPPER bus line (Ely) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Ely: 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM (2) Ely: 1:30 PM - 5:30 PM (3) Witcham: 6:25 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ELY ZIPPER bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ELY ZIPPER bus arriving. Direction: Ely ELY ZIPPER bus Time Schedule 28 stops Ely Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM Market Street, Ely 39-41 Market Street, Ely Tuesday 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM King's School, Ely Wednesday 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM Tesco, Ely Thursday 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM The Dock, Ely Friday 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM Cambridge Commodities, Ely Saturday 6:45 AM - 12:30 PM Wellington Road, Ely Civil Parish Church Road, Wentworth Haddenham Road, Witcham Toll ELY ZIPPER bus Info Direction: Ely Manor Farm, Witcham Stops: 28 Martins Lane, Witcham Civil Parish Trip Duration: 55 min Line Summary: Market Street, Ely, King's School, Ely, Northumbria Close, Haddenham Tesco, Ely, Cambridge Commodities, Ely, Church Road, Wentworth, Haddenham Road, Witcham Toll, Hop Row, Haddenham Manor Farm, Witcham, Northumbria Close, Bull Lane, Haddenham Haddenham, Hop Row, Haddenham, Linden End, Haddenham, Linden Way, Haddenham, The Borough, Linden End, Haddenham Aldreth, Linden Way, Haddenham, Cherry Orchard, Haddenham, Orchard Way, Haddenham, High Street, Linden Way, Haddenham Wilburton, Carpond Lane, Wilburton, Station Road, Wilburton, Millƒeld Place, Wilburton, Short Road, The
    [Show full text]
  • STRETHAM Conservation Area DRAFT Supplementary Planning Document MARCH 2009 1 Introduction
    EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL Local Development Framework STRETHAM Conservation Area DRAFT Supplementary Planning Document MARCH 2009 1 Introduction 1.1 Stretham Conservation Area was designated on 21st September 1973. No comprehensive review or appraisal has taken place of the Conservation Area since. 1.2 The village’s lies just off the A10 from Ely to Cambridge. Originally the main road ran through the village but in modern times a by-pass was constructed. 1.3 The centre of the village is a pleasant triangle of land with the church, the pub and the post office clustered around the Cross. The Cross, High Street 2 Public Consultation 2.1 The public consultation will be carried out to comply with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement’ (17/10/06). 3 What are Conservation Areas? 3.1 Conservation Areas were introduced in the Civic Amenity Act 1967 and have evolved through a number of subsequent acts ending in the present Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 with adopted government guidance set out in Planning Policy Guidance note 15. 3.2 Stretham Conservation Area was designated in 1973. The definition of a Conservation Area is an 'area of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance' (Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990. 3.3 The Local Planning Authority has a duty to determine which parts of their district are areas of special architectural or historic interest. Having established a Conservation Area they are also required to carry out a periodic review of the designation and boundaries of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Assessment Evidence Report
    Site Assessment Evidence Report Final Report - November 2017 1 OS Map – Copyright Note The maps in this document are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100023279. 2017. 2 Contents Table of Contents Final Report - November 2017 ................................................................................................ 1 Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 6 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 6 General approach .................................................................................................................................... 7 Assumptions ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Site Assessment Criteria .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]