DOCSLIB.ORG

Grades Seven and Eight in California Public Schools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grades Seven and Eight in California Public Schools A Look at Grades Seven and Eight in California Public Schools Transitioning to the California Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics Electronic Edition Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division Instruction and Learning Support Branch California Department of Education 2014 Prepublication Edition (This version has not been edited for publication.) A Look at Grades Seven and Eight in California Public Schools: Transitioning to the California Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics was developed by the Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division (CFIRD), California Department of Education (CDE). The 2014 prepublication electronic edition is different from the publication issued by the California Department of Education in 2012; it includes updated text and typographical corrections. This 2014 prepublication edition has not been edited by CDE Press for publication. © 2012, 2014 by the California Department of Education All rights reserved Reproduction of this document for resale, in whole or in part, is not authorized. Notice The guidance in A Look at Grades Seven and Eight in California Public Schools: Transitioning to the California Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics is not binding on local educational agencies or other entities. Except for the statutes, regulations, and court decisions that are referenced herein, the document is exemplary, and compliance with it is not mandatory. (See Education Code Section 33308.5.) 2014 Prepublication Edition (This version has not been edited for publication.) Contents Page A Message from the State Superintendent of Public Instruction .................................................................. i Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................... ii Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................iii The 1997 California Standards and the California Common Core State Standards…………………………… iii Universal Access………………………………………………………………………………………………………. iv A Blueprint for Great Schools…………………………………………………………………………………………. v Statewide Testing and Accountability………………………………………………………………………………… v Federal Accountability and Funding…………………………………………………………………………………. vi Classroom Assessment……………………………………………………………………………………………….. vi Instructional Materials………………………………………………………………………………………………… vii California Standards for the Teaching Profession………………………………………………………………… viii Other Resources………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ix Seventh-Grade Curriculum .......................................................................................................................... 7.1 English Language Arts ................................................................................................................................. 7.2 Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7.2 What Students Learn in Seventh Grade……………………………………………………………………………7. 2 Reading……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7.2 Reading Standards for Literature…………………………………………………………………………...…7.3 Reading Standards for Informational Text……………………………………………………………………7.4 Writing .................................................................................................................................................... 7.4 Speaking and Listening ........................................................................................................................... 7.5 Language ................................................................................................................................................ 7.5 Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects ................................. 7.6 Extra Support for Struggling Readers……………………………………………………………………………… 7.7 Support for English Learners………………………………………………………………………………………...7.8 The Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………….7.10 Mathematics ................................................................................................................................................ 7.20 Overview…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7.20 What Students Learn in Seventh Grade…………………………………………………………………………. 7.21 Standards for Mathematical Practice .................................................................................................... 7.21 Standards for Mathematical Content ..................................................................................................... 7.22 Ratios and Proportional Relationships .............................................................................................. 7.22 The Number System ......................................................................................................................... 7.23 Expressions and Equations ............................................................................................................... 7.23 2014 Prepublication Edition (This version has not been edited for publication.) Geometry .......................................................................................................................................... 7.23 Statistics and Probability ................................................................................................................... 7.24 Support for English Learners……………………………………………………………………………………….7. 24 Use of Technology…………………………………………………………………………………………………..7. 25 The Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………….7. 25 CA CCSSM Domains……………………………………………………………………………………………….7.31 Eighth-Grade Curriculum ............................................................................................................................. 8.1 English Language Arts ................................................................................................................................. 8.2 Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8. 2 What Students Learn in Eighth Grade……………………………………………………………………………...8. 2 Reading .................................................................................................................................................. 8.2 Reading Standards for Literature……………………………………………………………………………...8.3 Reading Standards for Informational Text……………………………………………………………...........8.4 Writing .................................................................................................................................................... 8.4 Speaking and Listening ........................................................................................................................... 8.5 Language ................................................................................................................................................ 8.6 Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects ................................. 8.6 Extra Support for Struggling Readers………………………………………………………………………………8. 7 Support for English Learners………………………………………………………………………………………...8. 8 The Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………….8.10 Mathematics ................................................................................................................................................ 8.20 Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...8. 20 What Students Learn in Eighth Grade…………………………………………………………………………….8. 21 Standards for Mathematical Practice .................................................................................................... 8.21 Standards for Mathematical Content ..................................................................................................... 8.22 The Number System ......................................................................................................................... 8.22 Expressions and Equations ............................................................................................................... 8.23 Functions .......................................................................................................................................... 8.24 Geometry .......................................................................................................................................... 8.24 Statistics and Probability ................................................................................................................... 8.25 Support for English Learners……………………………………………………………………………………….8. 25 Use of Technology…………………………………………………………………………………………………..8. 26 The Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………….8. 26 CA CCSSM Domains 8.31 Appendix A: CCSS College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards ....................................................... 1 Appendix B: Standards for Mathematical Practice ....................................................................................... 1 References ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 2014 Prepublication Edition (This version has not been edited for publication.) A Message from the State Superintendent of Public Instruction In 1997, California adopted its first set of content standards in English language arts and mathematics. These educational standards provided clear goals for student learning and helped teachers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution and Impact of English Language Policy in Taiwan
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 5-2-2021 Evolution and Impact of English Language Policy in Taiwan Kaitlin Ashleigh Rigby University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons Recommended Citation Rigby, Kaitlin Ashleigh, "Evolution and Impact of English Language Policy in Taiwan" (2021). Honors Theses. 1732. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1732 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVOLUTION AND IMPACT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE POLICY IN TAIWAN By Kaitlin Ashleigh Rigby A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford, MS May 2021 Approved By ______________________________ Advisor: Dr. Cheng-Fu Chen ______________________________ Reader: Dr. Zhini Zeng ______________________________ Reader: Dr. Joshua Howard i © 2021 Kaitlin Ashleigh Rigby ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT This thesis takes a look at how English language policy (ELP) in Taiwan has changed over time and how it has affected the education system. This thesis also investigates the different attitudes directed toward ELP, some areas of concern, and problems that have occurred as a result of Taiwan’s approach toward ELP. Understanding why Taiwan supports the English language as much as it does while also considering its approach to implementing policy will provide insight on how Taiwan believes that the ELP is a necessary part of globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Introduction to Technology Education in Taiwan
    Preface Technology Education at both elementary and secondary schools levels has become an important means to develop citizens' technological literacy for all worldwide. In Taiwan, Living Technology is also necessary to be energetically offered at both elementary and secondary school levels in order to improve technological literacy of the public. This brief introduction is to present the national status of technological literacy education at both elementary and secondary school levels, and provides examples of schools, written by school teachers, in the hope that domestic and international people will gain a better understanding of the ideal and reality of this field. We would like to acknowledge the support of funds for facilitating academic performances from the National Taiwan Normal University. Also, thanks to hardworking authors and editors. All of them are essential to the publication of this brief introduction. Lung-Sheng Steven Lee (Professor & Dean) July 2004 1 The National Status The Overview of Technology Education in Taiwan The Technology Education in Kindergartens, Elementary Schools, and Junior High Schools Technology Education at the Senior High School Level Technology Teacher Education Professional Associations and Events of Technology Education Examples of Schools The Affiliated Kindergarten of National Taiwan Normal University Taipei Municipal Jianan Elementary School Taichung Municipal Li Ming Elementary School Taipei Municipal Renai Junior High School Taipei Municipal Jinhua Junior High School The Affiliated Senior
    [Show full text]
  • Stats in Brief: Instructional Time for Third- and Eighth-Graders in Public and Private Schools
    The amount of time students spend in learning environments, as well STATS IN BRIEF as the amount of time that students U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FEBRUARY 2017 NCES 2017–076 are exposed to instruction in particular subjects, have been topics of debate and concern in education policy and practitioner circles (McMurrer 2008; Instructional Time National Academy of Education 2009). Indeed, an early but foundational review of literature on instructional time highlighted for Third- and its importance for student learning (Berliner 1990). Differences in the use of time, however, make instructional time Eighth-Graders difficult to study. For instance, allocated time—or the time that schools or teachers schedule for instruction in particular in Public and subjects—is distinct from the time that students spend actively engaged with and learning from instructional materials Private Schools: (Berliner 1990). Despite the difficulties in studying instructional time in its varied forms, researchers have agreed that it is School Year 2011–12 important to study the amount of time that students in different grades have been AUTHORS PROJECT OFFICER exposed to particular subjects (Coates Kathleen Mulvaney Hoyer John Ralph Dinah Sparks National Center for Education Statistics 2003; Lanahan, Princiotta, and Enyeart Activate Research, Inc. 2006; Long 2014; Morton and Dalton 2007; Perie, Baker, and Bobbitt 1997). Statistics in Brief publications present descriptive data in tabular formats to provide useful information to a broad audience, including members of the general public. They address topical issues and questions. They do not investigate more complex hypotheses, account for inter-relationships among variables, or support causal inferences. We This publication was prepared for NCES encourage readers who are interested in more complex questions and in- under Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Lasting Effects of School Entry Age: Evidence from Italian Students
    The Long-Lasting Effects of School Entry Age: Evidence from Italian Students Michela Ponzo and Vincenzo Scoppa ∗ Using data for 9, 13 and 15-year-old students from three different datasets (PIRLS-2006, TIMSS-2007 and PISA-2009), we investigate whether the age at school entry affects children school performance at the fourth, eighth and tenth grade levels. Since student’s age in a grade may be endogenous, we use an Instrumental Variable estimation strategy exploiting the exogenous variations in the month of birth coupled with the entry school cut-off date. We find that younger children score substantially lower than older peers at the fourth, the eighth and the tenth grade. The advantage of older students does not dissipate as they grow older. We do not find any significant effect of the relative age of a child with respect to the classmates’ age. Finally, we show that secondary school students are more likely to be tracked in more academic schools rather than in vocational schools if they are born in the early months of the year. Keywords: school entry age, educational production function, student achievement, choice of track; instrumental variables, Italy, PIRLS; TIMSS; PISA. JEL classifications: I21, I28, J13; J24 . 1. Introduction What is the optimal age for children to begin school? Do the effects of age on achievement, if any, tend to persist as children grow older? Are there consequences of school entry age when individuals enter in the labor market? To answer these questions, a growing economic literature is investigating the effects of school entrance age on student achievement and on individual labor market performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle School Grade Advancement Guidelines 345.4-Rule(3)
    Middle School Grade Advancement Guidelines 345.4-Rule(3) General The goal of the middle school is to provide a successful and rewarding educational experience for all students. As a part of this responsibility, it is necessary to identify early those students who appear to be having difficulties and devise a plan to assist them with their educational program. Should students exhibit academic deficiencies at the end of the school year, it is ultimately the responsibility of the principal to determine if a student will be promoted to the next higher grade, retained with appropriate placement at the student's current grade, directed to some remediation procedure in order to be promoted, or if other options should be implemented. Legal Premise The Board of Education, acting through its duly-appointed agents (administration and teachers), has full authority to determine the promotion and retention of students. The purpose of this policy is to recognize the district's authority to make these decisions while providing procedural and substantive safeguards that will assure placements that are in the best interests of students. Promotion Requirements In order for a sixth, seventh, or eighth grade student to be promoted to the next grade, the student must successfully complete the following requirements: 1. Receive no more than one failing (F) end of the year course grade in the following subjects: reading (grade six), mathematics, language arts, science, social studies. 2. Receive passing grades of D or better in at least half (50 percent) of all other subjects. If a student fails to meet the above requirements, the student may be promoted upon successful completion of a summer program prior to entering the next grade and/or with the recommendation of the principal.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights from TIMMS
    NATIONALCENTERFOREDUCATIONSTATISTICS Overall Comparative Findings N ATIONAL N ATIONAL N A C ENTER FOR TIONAL Overview C ENTER FOR C ENTER FOR EDUCA EDUCA TION E TION S DUCA S TATISTICS TION TATISTICS STATISTICS FIGURE10–OVERALLCOMPARATIVEFINDINGS and Key Findings U.S.PERFORMANCERELATIVETOTHEINTERNATIONALAVERAGEATAGLANCE Pursuing Excellence Pursuing Excellence Pursuing Excellence A S A STUDY A S TUDY M OF TUDY MATHEMA OF U.S. F ATHEMA U.S. E MATHEMA OF U.S. TICS AND OUR LEARNING TICS AND IGHTH-G TICS AND TWELFTH S TH-G , C SCIENCE RADE -G Content Fourth Eighth Final Year of Advanced Math & IN INTERNA CIENCE RADE URRICULUM IN I SCIENCE RADE A TEACHING, NTERNA A TIONAL CHIEVEMENT IN INTERNA , AND TIONAL CHIEVEMENT CONTEXT TIONAL ACHIEVEMENT CONTEXT CONTEXT Across Grade Levels Area Grade Grade Secondary School Science Students THIRD THIRD I INITIAL I INITIAL NTERNA FINDINGS FROM THE THIRD INITIAL NTERNA FINDINGS FROM THE TIONAL INTERNA F TIONAL TIONAL INDINGS FROM THE M MATHEMA ATHEMA TICS AND MATHEMA TICS AND TICS AND SCIENCE SCIENCE S STUDY CIENCE STUDY STUDY O O FFICE OF Mathematics Above Below Below ____ FFICE OF EDUCA OFFICE OF U.S. D U.S. D EDUCA EP TIONAL EDUCA TIONAL ARTMENT OF R U.S. D TIONAL EPARTMENT OF R ESEARCH AND EPAR ESEARCH AND EDUCA TMENT OF RESEARCH AND With information on a half-million students worldwide,including EDUCA TION IMPROVEMENT EDUCA TION IMPROVEMENT TION IMPROVEMENT NCES 97-198 Overall NCES 97-225 NCES 98-049 more than 33,000 U.S.students in more than 500 U.S.public and Science Above Above Below ____ private schools,the Third International Mathematics and Science Overall Study (TIMSS) is the largest,most comprehensive,and most rigorous interna- tional study ofschools and students ever conducted.During the 1995 school Advanced ____ ____ ____ Below year,students from 41 nations,including our country's major trading partners, Mathematics were assessed at three different grade levels (fourth,eighth,and in the final year ofsecondary school) to compare their mathematics and science achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands
    THE NETHERLANDS Martina Meelissen Annemiek Punter Faculty of Behavioral, Management & Social Sciences, University of Twente Introduction Overview of Education System Dutch schools traditionally have significant autonomy. The Dutch education system is based on the principle of freedom of education, guaranteed by Article 23 of the Constitution.1 Each resident of the Netherlands has the right to establish a school, determine the principles on which the school is based, and organize instruction in that school. Public and private schools (or school boards) may autonomously decide how and to a large extent, when to teach the core objectives of the Dutch curriculum based on their religious, philosophical, or pedagogical views and principles. The Minister of Education, Culture, and Science is primarily responsible for the structure of the education system, school funding, school inspection, the quality of national examinations, and student support.2 The administration and management of schools is decentralized and is carried out by individual school boards. Specifically, these boards are responsible for the implementation of the curriculum, personnel policy, student admission, and financial policy. A board can be responsible for one school or for a number of schools. The board for public schools consists of representatives of the municipality. The board for private schools often is formed by an association or foundation. Two-thirds of schools at the primary level are privately run. The majority of private schools are Roman Catholic or Protestant, but there also are other religious schools and schools based on philosophical principles. The pedagogical approach of a small number of public and private schools is based on the ideas of educational reformers such as Maria Montessori, Helen Parkhurst, Peter Petersen, Célestin Freinet, and Rudolf Steiner.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade Level Content Expectations
    S E V E N T H G R A D E SCIENCE GRADE LEVEL CONTENT 7 EXPECTATIONS v.4.07 SCIENCE Welcome to Michigan’s K-7 Grade Level Content Expectations SCIENCE PROCESSES Purpose & Overview In 2004, the Michigan Department of Education embraced the challenge of creating Grade Level Content Expectations in response to the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. This act mandated the existence of a set of PHYSICAL SCIENCE comprehensive state grade level assessments in Mathematics and English Language Arts that are designed based on rigorous grade level content. In addition, assessments for science in elementary, middle and high school, LIFE SCIENCE were required. To provide greater clarity for what students are expected to know and be able to do by the end of each grade, expectations for each grade level have been developed for science. In this global economy, it is essential that Michigan students possess EARTH SCIENCE personal, social, occupational, civic, and quantitative literacy. Mastery of the knowledge and essential skills defined in Michigan’s Grade Level Content Expectations will increase students’ ability to be successful academically, and contribute to the future businesses that employ them and the communities in which they choose to live. Reflecting best practices and current research, the Grade Level Content Expectations provide a set of clear and rigorous expectations for all students, and provide teachers with clearly defined statements of what students should know and be able to do as they progress through school. Development In developing these expectations, the Scholar Work Group depended heavily on the Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (National Assessment Governing Board, 2006) which had been the gold standard for the high school content expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download About TIMSS 2015
    About TIMSS 2015 In 2015, IEA and its TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center at Boston College conducted TIMSS 2015 at fourth and eighth grades and TIMSS Advanced 2015 for students in the final year of secondary school enrolled in special advanced mathematics and physics programs or tracks. Both TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS Advanced 2015 provide 20-year trend measures for countries that participated in the first TIMSS assessments in 1995. TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS Advanced 2015 continue the long history of international assessments in mathematics and science conducted by IEA – the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. IEA is an independent international cooperative of national research institutions and government agencies that has been conducting studies of cross-national achievement since 1959. IEA pioneered international comparative assessments of educational achievement in the 1960s to gain a deeper understanding of the effects of policies across countries’ different systems of education. IEA’s TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center is located in the Lynch School of Education at Boston College and has been responsible for directing TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced since 1995. TIMSS 2015 TIMSS is an international assessment of mathematics and science at the fourth and eighth grades that has been conducted every four years since 1995. TIMSS 2015 is the sixth assessment in the TIMSS series monitoring 20 years of trends in educational achievement, together with comprehensive data on students’ contexts for learning mathematics and science. In 2015, 57 countries and 7 benchmarking entities (regional jurisdictions of countries such as states or provinces) participated in TIMSS. In total, more than 580,000 students participated in TIMSS 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study of Eighth-Grade Science Teaching
    Highlights From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study of Eighth-Grade Science Teaching he Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 1999 Video Study is a follow-up and expansion of the TIMSS 1995 Video Study of mathematics teaching. Larger and more ambitious than the first, the 1999 Tstudy investigated eighth-grade science teaching as well as mathematics teaching, expanded the number of countries, and included more countries with relatively high achievement on TIMSS assessments in comparison to the United States. The results of the mathematics portion of the study are presented elsewhere (Hiebert et al. 2003). Discussion of the results from the 1995 Video Study can be found in Stigler et al. (1999) and Stigler and Hiebert (1999). This document highlights key findings from the science lessons and is based on the full report, Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (Roth et al. 2006). Who Participated in the Study and How Were Lessons Selected? The TIMSS student assessments of mathematics and science were conducted in 1994-95, in 1998-99, and again in 2003. The countries participating in the science portion of the TIMSS 1999 Video Study included Australia, the Czech Republic, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States. The countries were selected based on their performance in mathematics in 1995. At that time, the other four countries outperformed the United States (on average) in science as well as in mathematics. In 2003, U.S. students’ average score in science was not measurably different from the average score in Australia and the Netherlands, but remained significantly below the average score of Japanese students.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Opportunities to Learn Algebra and Students’ Algebra Achievement: a Comparative Study
    Opportunities to learn algebra 29 The Relationship between Opportunities to Learn Algebra and Students’ Algebra Achievement: A Comparative Study Rachel Angela Ayieko Duquesne University Abstract The article provides a report on the comparison of Opportunities to Learn algebra and eighth grade students’ algebra achievement in three countries: Botswana, Singapore and the United States. The study used student and teacher data from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (2011 and 2015). By using a multilevel regression analysis, the study presents the models within the three countries of the relationships between Opportunities to Learn algebra and eighth-grade students’ algebra achievement of the recent TIMSS cycle. The findings indicate that the Opportunities to Learn algebra are context specific and align with the expectations of the curriculum guides from the governing bodies within the countries. Also, the study shows that students who learned particular algebra topics in the early grades had significantly higher algebra scores in the TIMSS 2015 assessment. In particular, students who had been taught properties of functions and simplifying and evaluating algebraic expressions before eighth grade in the United States had significantly higher scores. Also, Singaporean students who had been taught simple linear equations and inequalities and simultaneous equations had higher algebra scores. Implications for policy and research are discussed. Keywords Curriculum, algebra achievement, achievement, Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Introduction mathematics in middle school and is introduced The technological advancement in the 21st by some teachers in the early elementary school century will require greater numbers of more years (Blanton & Kaput, 2005; MacGregor & graduates with fluency in Science Technology Price, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Tension Between Triumphing on the Matric and Learning Critical Thinking Skills Presented at the Burma Studies Conference, NIU October 2012 Dr
    The Tension between Triumphing on the Matric and Learning Critical Thinking Skills Presented at the Burma Studies Conference, NIU October 2012 Dr. Dorothy Guyot, Co-Founder of the Pre-Collegiate Program www.precollegiate.org In Myanmar the goal of fifteen year old students and their families is to excel on the matriculation examination. What intellectual and personal strengths grow in preparing for the matric? Among top Matric scorers, what augmenting of critical thinking skills is required to meet ASEAN goals? What are modes of developing them? Initial answers to these questions are drawn from my ten years’ teaching experience since co-founding the Pre-Collegiate Program of the Diplomatic School, Yangon. The 16-month Program assists students to: think clearly; become educated people who can entertain ideas that they do not accept; relate what they have known to new bodies of knowledge; and synthesize their traditional values with values essential in the modern way of life. The Program has enabled almost one hundred students to win scholarships abroad, to thrive in their studies, and, after college to go on to graduate school or return home to begin their careers. As we know, preparation for the national matriculation examination is the crucial period of schooling. A year of intensive study is generally regarded as essential for the six days of testing. Because medicine and engineering are prestigious careers almost all ambitious parents channel their children into the science stream for high school, that is, 10th and 11th grade. A few of their children prepare for the matric on their own and with friends.
    [Show full text]