Immunomodulation of T Helper Cells by Tumor Microenvironment in Oral
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Complementary DNA Microarray Analysis of Chemokines and Their Receptors in Allergic Rhinitis RX Zhang,1 SQ Yu,2 JZ Jiang,3 GJ Liu3
RX Zhang, et al ORIGINAL ARTICLE Complementary DNA Microarray Analysis of Chemokines and Their Receptors in Allergic Rhinitis RX Zhang,1 SQ Yu,2 JZ Jiang,3 GJ Liu3 1 Department of Otolaryngology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China 2 Department of Otolaryngology , Jinan General Hospital of PLA, Shandong, China 3 Department of Otolaryngology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China ■ Abstract Objective: To analyze the roles of chemokines and their receptors in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis by observing the complementary DNA (cDNA) expression of the chemokines and their receptors in the nasal mucosa of patients with and without allergic rhinitis, using gene chips. Methods: The total RNAs were isolated from the nasal mucosa of 20 allergic rhinitis patients and purifi ed to messenger RNAs, and then reversely transcribed to cDNAs and incorporated with samples of fl uorescence-labeled with Cy5-dUPT (rhinitis patient samples) or Cy3- dUTP (control samples of nonallergic nasal mucosa). Thirty-nine cDNAs of chemokines and their receptors were latticed into expression profi le chips, which were hybridized with probes and then scanned with the computer to study gene expression according to the different fl uorescence intensities. Results: The cDNAs of the following chemokines were upregulated: CCL1, CCL2, CCL5, CCL7, CCL8, CCL11, CCL13, CCL14, CCL17, CCL18, CCL19, CCL24, and CX3CL1 in most of the allergic rhinitis sample chips. CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CCR8 and CX3CR1 were the highly expressed receptor genes. Low expression of CXCL4 was found in these tissues. Conclusion: The T helper cell (TH) immune system is not well regulated in allergic rhinitis. -
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Editor-In-Chief: H
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Editor-in-Chief: H. Dong ▶ 94% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again Since its inception in 1976, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy (CII) has reported significant advances in the field of tumor immunology. The journal serves as a forum for new concepts and advances in basic, translational, and clinical cancer immunology and immunotherapy. CII is keen to publish broad-ranging ideas and reviews, results which extend or challenge established paradigms, as well as negative studies which fail to reproduce experiments that support current paradigms, and papers that do succeed in reproducing others’ results in different contexts. Cll is especially interested in papers describing clinical trial designs and outcome regardless of whether they met their designated endpoints or not, and particularly those shedding light on immunological mechanisms. CII is affiliated with the Association for Cancer Immunotherapy (CIMT), Canadian Cancer 12 issues/year Immunotherapy Consortium (CCIC), The Japanese Association for Cancer Immunology (JACI), Network Italiano per la Bioterapia dei Tumori (NIBIT),and Sociedad Española de Inmunologia- Electronic access Grupo Española de InmunoTerapia (SEI-GEIT). ▶ link.springer.com CIMT: http://www.cimt.eu/home Subscription information CCIC: http://www.immunotherapycancer.ca/ ▶ springer.com/librarians JACI: http://www.jaci.jp/eng/index.html NIBIT: http://www.nibit.org/index.php SEI-GEIT: http://www.inmunologia.org/grupos/home.php? UpOm5=M&Upfqym5uom=GK CITIM: http://www.canceritim.org Impact Factor: 6.968 (2020), Journal Citation Reports® On the homepage of Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy at springer.com you can ▶ Sign up for our Table of Contents Alerts ▶ Get to know the complete Editorial Board ▶ Find submission information. -
Prospects for NK Cell Therapy of Sarcoma
cancers Review Prospects for NK Cell Therapy of Sarcoma Mieszko Lachota 1 , Marianna Vincenti 2 , Magdalena Winiarska 3, Kjetil Boye 4 , Radosław Zago˙zd˙zon 5,* and Karl-Johan Malmberg 2,6,* 1 Department of Clinical Immunology, Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] 3 Department of Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0310 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] 5 Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland 6 Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (K.-J.M.) Received: 15 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Simple Summary: Sarcomas are a group of aggressive tumors originating from mesenchymal tissues. Patients with advanced disease have poor prognosis due to the ineffectiveness of current treatment protocols. A subset of lymphocytes called natural killer (NK) cells is capable of effective surveillance and clearance of sarcomas, constituting a promising tool for immunotherapeutic treatment. However, sarcomas can cause impairment in NK cell function, associated with enhanced tumor growth and dissemination. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of sarcoma-mediated suppression of NK cells and their implications for the design of novel NK cell-based immunotherapies against sarcoma. -
The Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine in This Issue
June 2021 ISSN 1650-3414 Volume 32 Number 2 Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC Editor-in-chief: Prof. János Kappelmayer, MD, PhD Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary e-mail: [email protected] The Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine In this issue Introducing the eJIFCC special issue on “POCT – making the point” Guest editor: Sergio Bernardini 116 Controlling reliability, interoperability and security of mobile health solutions Damien Gruson 118 Best laboratory practices regarding POCT in different settings (hospital and outside the hospital) Adil I. Khan 124 POCT accreditation ISO 15189 and ISO 22870: making the point Paloma Oliver, Pilar Fernandez-Calle, Antonio Buno 131 Utilizing point-of-care testing to optimize patient care James H. Nichols 140 POCT: an inherently ideal tool in pediatric laboratory medicine Siobhan Wilson, Mary Kathryn Bohn, Khosrow Adeli 145 Point of care testing of serum electrolytes and lactate in sick children Aashima Dabas, Shipra Agrawal, Vernika Tyagi, Shikha Sharma, Vandana Rastogi, Urmila Jhamb, Pradeep Kumar Dabla 158 Training and competency strategies for point-of-care testing Sedef Yenice 167 Leading POCT networks: operating POCT programs across multiple sites involving vast geographical areas and rural communities Edward W. Randell, Vinita Thakur 179 Connectivity strategies in managing a POCT service Rajiv Erasmus, Sumedha Sahni, Rania El-Sharkawy 190 POCT in developing countries Prasenjit Mitra, Praveen Sharma 195 In this issue How could POCT be a useful tool for migrant and refugee health? Sergio Bernardini, Massimo Pieri, Marco Ciotti 200 Direct to consumer laboratory testing (DTCT) – opportunities and concerns Matthias Orth 209 Clinical assessment of the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Ag chemiluminescence immunoassay Gian Luca Salvagno, Gianluca Gianfilippi, Giacomo Fiorio, Laura Pighi, Simone De Nitto, Brandon M. -
Bioinformatics Identification of CCL8/21 As Potential Prognostic
Bioscience Reports (2020) 40 BSR20202042 https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20202042 Research Article Bioinformatics identification of CCL8/21 as potential prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer microenvironment 1,* 2,* 3 4 5 1 Bowen Chen , Shuyuan Zhang ,QiuyuLi, Shiting Wu ,HanHe and Jinbo Huang Downloaded from http://portlandpress.com/bioscirep/article-pdf/40/11/BSR20202042/897847/bsr-2020-2042.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 1Department of Breast Disease, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 3Department of Emergency, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 4Department of Oncology, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 5Department of Medical Imaging, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China Correspondence: Shuyuan Zhang ([email protected]) Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among females world- wide. The tumor microenvironment usually prevents effective lymphocyte activation and infiltration, and suppresses infiltrating effector cells, leading to a failure of the host toreject the tumor. CC chemokines play a significant role in inflammation and infection. Methods: In our study, we analyzed the expression and survival data of CC chemokines in patients with BC using several bioinformatics analyses tools. Results: The mRNA expression of CCL2/3/4/5/7/8/11/17/19/20/22 was remark- ably increased while CCL14/21/23/28 was significantly down-regulated in BC tis- sues compared with normal tissues. Methylation could down-regulate expression of CCL2/5/15/17/19/20/22/23/24/25/26/27 in BC. Low expression of CCL3/4/23 was found to be associated with drug resistance in BC. -
Engineered Marrow Macrophages for Cancer Therapy: Engorgement, Accumulation, Differentiation, and Acquired Immunity
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Engineered Marrow Macrophages For Cancer Therapy: Engorgement, Accumulation, Differentiation, And Acquired Immunity Cory Alvey University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Pharmacology Commons Recommended Citation Alvey, Cory, "Engineered Marrow Macrophages For Cancer Therapy: Engorgement, Accumulation, Differentiation, And Acquired Immunity" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2164. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2164 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2164 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Engineered Marrow Macrophages For Cancer Therapy: Engorgement, Accumulation, Differentiation, And Acquired Immunity Abstract The ability of a macrophage to engulf and break down invading cells and other targets provides a first line of immune defense in nearly all tissues. This defining ability ot ‘phagos’ or devour can subsequently activate the entire immune system against foreign and diseased cells, and progress is now being made on a decades-old idea of directing macrophages to phagocytose specific targets such as cancer cells. Physical properties of cancer cells influence phagocytosis and relate via cytoskeleton forces to differentiation pathways in solid tumors. Here, SIRPα on macrophages from mouse and human marrow was inhibited to block recognition of CD47, a ‘marker of self.’ These macrophages were then systemically injected into mice with fluorescent human tumors. Within days, the tumors regressed, and fluorescence analyses showed that the more the SIRPα-inhibited macrophages engulfed, the more they accumulated within tumors. In vitro phagocytosis experiments on transwells revealed that macrophage migration through micropores was inhibited by eating. -
Immunotherapy, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer
cells Review Immunotherapy, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer Charles Robert Lichtenstern 1,2, Rachael Katie Ngu 1,2, Shabnam Shalapour 1,2,* and Michael Karin 1,2,3 1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; karinoffi[email protected] 2 Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Signal Transduction, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 3 Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 3 March 2020; Published: 4 March 2020 Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type, and third highest in mortality rates among cancer-related deaths in the United States. Originating from intestinal epithelial cells in the colon and rectum, that are impacted by numerous factors including genetics, environment and chronic, lingering inflammation, CRC can be a problematic malignancy to treat when detected at advanced stages. Chemotherapeutic agents serve as the historical first line of defense in the treatment of metastatic CRC. In recent years, however, combinational treatment with targeted therapies, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, has proven to be quite effective in patients with specific CRC subtypes. While scientific and clinical advances have uncovered promising new treatment options, the five-year survival rate for metastatic CRC is still low at about 14%. Current research into the efficacy of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient and microsatellite instability high (dMMR–MSI-H) CRC tumors have shown promising results, but its use in other CRC subtypes has been either unsuccessful, or not extensively explored. -
1995) Borrelia Burgdorferi-Specific T Lymphocytes Induce Severe Destructive Lyme Arthritis
LTT (Lymphozyten-Proliferationstest, „Lymphozyten-Transformationstest“) Interferon Gamma Test, ELISpot (T-Cell Spot), dem Lymphozytentransformationstest bei Borreliose und bei anderen Infektionskrankheiten Im Lymphozyten-Proliferationstest, auch Lymphozyten-Transformationstest genannt (LTT), wird die Proliferationskapazität von Lymphozyten dargestellt. Der Test dient der Bewertung des Immunstatus oder der Diagnose einer speziellen Sensibilisierung. In the Lymphocyte proliferation assay, also known as lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), the proliferation capacity of lymphocytes is shown. The test is used to evaluate the immune status or the diagnosis of specific sensitization of an object. Im Interferon Gamma Test, dem ELISPOT (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot), auch T- Cellspot genannt, wird durch die Bestimmung der Zytokin – Produktion die Quantität und die Qualität einer T – Zell - Immunantwort zeitnah dokumentiert. In the Interferone Gamma Test, ELISPOT (Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot), also called T-Cell spot, represented by the determination of cytokine – Production, the quantity and quality of T - cell - immune response in a timely manner is documented. Lim LC, England DM, DuChateau BK, Glowacki NJ, Schell RF (1995) Borrelia burgdorferi-specific T lymphocytes induce severe destructive Lyme arthritis. Infect. Immun. 63, 1400-1408. Dwyer JM et al. (1979) Behavior of human immunoregulatory cells in culture. L Variables requiring consideration for clinical studies. Clin Exp Immunol 38, 499-513 Johnson C, Dwyer JM (1981) Quantitation of spontaneous suppressor cell activity in human cord blood lymphocytes and their behavior in culture (abstract). Fed Proc 40, 1075 Czerkinsky C, Nilsson L, Nygren H, Ouchterlony O, Tarkowski A (1983) A solid-phase enzyme- linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay for enumeration of specific antibody-secreting cells.J Immunol Methods 65 (1–2), 109–121. -
Innate Immunity and Inflammation
ISBTc ‐ Primer on Tumor Immunology and Biological Therapy of Cancer InnateInnate ImmunityImmunity andand InflammationInflammation WillemWillem Overwijk,Overwijk, Ph.D.Ph.D. MDMD AndersonAnderson CancerCancer CenterCenter CenterCenter forfor CancerCancer ImmunologyImmunology ResearchResearch Houston,Houston, TXTX www.allthingsbeautiful.com InnateInnate ImmunityImmunity andand InflammationInflammation • Definitions • Cells and Molecules • Innate Immunity and Inflammation in Cancer • Bad Inflammation • Good Inflammation • Therapeutic Implications InnateInnate ImmunityImmunity andand InflammationInflammation • Definitions • Cells and Molecules • Innate Immunity and Inflammation in Cancer • Bad Inflammation • Good Inflammation • Therapeutic Implications • Innate Immunity: Immunity that is naturally present and is not due to prior sensitization to an antigen; generally nonspecific. It is in contrast to acquired/adaptive immunity. Adapted from Merriam‐Webster Medical Dictionary • Innate Immunity: Immunity that is naturally present and is not due to prior sensitization to an antigen; generally nonspecific. It is in contrast to acquired/adaptive immunity. • Inflammation: a local response to tissue injury – Rubor (redness) – Calor (heat) – Dolor (pain) – Tumor (swelling) Adapted from Merriam‐Webster Medical Dictionary ““InnateInnate ImmunityImmunity”” andand ““InflammationInflammation”” areare vaguevague termsterms •• SpecificSpecific cellcell typestypes andand moleculesmolecules orchestrateorchestrate specificspecific typestypes ofof inflammationinflammation -
Metastasis: Active Lymph Nodes
RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS METASTASIS subcapsular sinus. Further investiga- tions in vivo revealed that CCR8 acti- vation in tumour cells was required Active lymph nodes for tumour cell extravasation from lymphatic vessels, specifically for the Lymph node metastases are CCL1 activates CCR8-mediated transmigration of tumour cells from indicative of poor prognosis but intracellular signalling in tumour the subcapsular sinus into the lymph tumour cell the mechanisms of tumour cell cells, which resulted in cellular node cortex. entry into the dissemination via the lymphatics changes that are consistent with cell These data unpick the process of are poorly understood. Although it migration. lymphatic dissemination and iden- lymph node is widely believed that tumour cells Is the CCR8–CCL1 paracrine tify the sequence of steps leading to requires active enter the lymph nodes passively with pathway important in lymphatic lymph node metastasis. The authors cell migration the flow of lymph, previous data have metastasis? The suppression of showed that CCR8 is expressed by indicated that some chemokines may CCR8 expression or activity in a large subset of human melanoma promote lymphatic extravasation human melanoma cells did not samples, and it will be interesting and metastasis. Das et al. now dem- affect tumour growth or vasculariz to determine whether this pathway onstrate that tumour cell entry into ation on implantation into immuno can be targeted to prevent lymph the lymph node requires active cell deficient mice, but significantly node metastasis. migration and they also identify the reduced the incidence of lymph Gemma K. Alderton lymphatic endothelium of the lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Das, S. -
Principles of Tumour Immunology
Principles of tumour immunology Michele Teng Nov 20th 2017, Singapore Cancer Immunoregulation and Immunotherapy Laboratory QIMR Berghofer MRI Brisbane, Australia [email protected] Disclosure Slide • I have received speakers bureau honoria from Merck Sharp & Dohme. Talk Outline 1. Hallmarks of Cancer 2. Cells of the Immune system 3. The Cancer Immunity Cycle - Tumor-associated antigens (TAA), Cellular and Humoral responses to TAA 4. Conceptual developments in the field of tumour immunology - Immunosurveillance and role of innate immunity, immune balance against cancer Sources of slide • Charles Janeway’s Immunobiology text book • Peer-reviewed articles (Pubmed) • Online slides ( URL listed) Cancer Hallmarks of Cancer (2000) Hanahan and Weinberg, Cell 2000 Emerging Hallmarks and Enabling Characteristics Hanahan and Weinberg, Cell 2011 Hallmarks of Cancer (2017) In Vitrogen Immunology (Study of the immune system) Cells of the immune system ILCs –innate lymphoid cells MAITs –Mucosal associated invariant T cells gd T cells – gamma delta T cells (ILCs) (gd, MAIT) Cancer Immunology (Study of the response of the immune system to cancer) The Cancer-Immunity Cycle – Steps to generate an effective anti-tumour response Chen and Mellman Immunity 2013 Not all cell deaths are equal (at priming an immune response) Cells can die in different ways DAMPs Tumour fragments Immunogenic Cell Death (ICD) DAMPs – Damage (Adjuvanticity, Antigenicity) associated molecular patterns Differential requirements for the immunogenicity of cell death TLR4 Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Feb;17(2):97-111. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.107. The Cancer-Immunity Cycle Immunity. 2013 Jul 25;39(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012. -
Identification of CCL1 As a Gene Differentially Expressed in CD4+ T Cells Expressing TIM-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.4110/in.2011.11.4.203 ORIGINAL ARTICLE pISSN 1598-2629 eISSN 2092-6685 Identification of CCL1 as a Gene Differentially Expressed in CD4+ T cells Expressing TIM-3 Ka Jung Jun1,2, Mi Jin Lee1,2, Dong Chul Shin1,2, Min Yeong Woo1,2, Kyongmin Kim1 and Sun Park1* 1Department of Microbiology and 2Graduate Program of Molecular Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 442-749, Korea Background: T cell immunoglobulin mucin containing mole- responses and the pathogenesis of several diseases (1). With cule (TIM)-3 is expressed in differentiated Th1 cells and is in- its blocking antibody or its soluble fusion protein TIM-3-Ig, volved in the suppression of the cytokine production by these Th1 immune response as well as anti-tumor immunity is en- cells. However, the regulation of the expression of other T hanced (2-4). Also, induction of tolerance in an experimental cell genes by TIM-3 is unclear. Herein, we attempted to iden- transplantation model is abrogated by injection of TIM-3 anti- tify differentially expressed genes in cells abundantly ex- body (5). Furthermore, dysregulation of T cell TIM-3 ex- pressing TIM-3 compared to cells with low expression of pression is observed in several autoimmune diseases includ- TIM-3. Methods: TIM-3 overexpressing cell clones were es- ing multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn s dis- tablished by transfection of Jurkat T cells with TIM-3 ex- ’ pression vector. For screening of differentially expressed ease (6-8). genes, gene fishing technology based on reverse tran- Galectin-9 and phosphatidylserine have been identified as scription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using an an- TIM-3 ligands.