DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2007-2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2007-2008 The Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court of India ANNUAL REPORT 2007-2008 (Published by the Supreme Court of India) EDITORIAL COMMITTEE: For Official use Only Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran COPYRIGHT© 2008 : THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Publisher : The Supreme Court of India All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be New Delhi-110001 reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted Website – http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, Book : Annual Report 2007-2008 photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior (Contents mainly relate to 1.10.2007 to permission in writing of the copyright owner. 30-09.2008) Printed at I G Printers Pvt. Ltd. Tel. No: 011-26810297, 26817927 Photography: J.S. Studio (Sudeep Jain) 9810220385 (M) CONTENTS PAGE S. DESCRIPTION NO. NOS. 1. Hon’ble Chief Justice of India & Hon’ble Judges of Supreme Court ................................................................................. 9 2. An overview .......................................................................................... 39 The History Supreme Court – At present Court Building Lawyers’ Chambers Supreme Court Museum Retired Hon’ble Chief Justices Retired Hon’ble Judges 3. Jurisdiction .......................................................................................... 49 Original Appellate Advisory Review Curative Public Interest Litigation 4. The Bar ................................................................................................ 53 5. Court Administration ........................................................................... 55 6. Activities on Judicial Side ................................................................... 59 Filing, Registration & Listing Old and Urgent Matters Recent steps for expediting hearing & disposal Other steps Registrars’ Courts Statement of Institution, disposal & Pendency 7. Arrears Committee ............................................................................... 67 8. Conferences & Meets ........................................................................... 69 Legal Forum Meets Other International Conferences Chief Justices’ Conference Joint Conference of Chief Ministers & Chief Justices Visits of Foreign Delegations 9. Toning up of Registry ............................................................................ 75 Use of IT Library & Information System Digital Signature Transit home-cum-Guest House Other Facilities Recent Initiatives Budget 10. The Supreme Court in the Morning of the 21st Century ........................ 83 11. E-Committee ........................................................................................ 107 Phase - I Phase - II Phase - III 12. Role in Training & Education ............................................................... 109 Judicial Training Programmes held from October 2007 to May 2008 Legal Education Law Clerks 13. ADR & Mediation ................................................................................. 115 Mediation & Conciliation Project Committee Supreme Court Lok Adalats National Meet on Mediation & Conflict Resolution 14. Legal Services ...................................................................................... 117 Supreme Court Legal Services Committee Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society NALSA Activities of NALSA 15. Official Publications ............................................................................. 125 16. Court & Media ..................................................................................... 127 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PREAMBLE WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION. 7 8 1. FROM THE DESK OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA It gives me immense pleasure to present the Annual Report of Supreme Court of India for the year 2007-08. The Annual Reports of the previous years have been received very well, not only in India, but, also in other jurisdictions and have earned appreciation and recognition from all quarters. The Constitution of India declares it to be a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic. It also affirms a determination to secure liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship and equality of status and opportunity. The preamble to the Constitution resolves to provide justice to our people in all its forms: social, economic and political. Our Constitution intends to remove social and economic disparities, so as to make equal opportunities available to all and make the life of the poor, disadvantaged and disabled citizens of the country really meaningful and worthwhile, by removing economic inequalities, protecting the weaker sections of the society, and providing a decent standard of living to our people. The success of Indian Judiciary on the constitutional front is unparalled and its contribution in enlarging and enforcing human rights is universally appreciated. Indian courts are held in high esteem not only by developing, but, by developed countries as well. There is wide-spread praise for the quality of the judgments delivered and the work being done by Indian Judiciary. Their handling of Public Interest Litigation has brought Judicial Institutions closer to the oppressed weaker sections of the Society. Using tools of innovating and creative interpretation of Constitutional provisions, our courts have consistently endeavoured to render meaningful justice to the women, children, undertrial prisoners, bonded and casual labourers and other weaker and socially oppressed sections of the society. The concept of right to life has been expanded so as to include the right to live with dignity with bare necessities such as adequate nutrition, health, clothing and shelter. The enormous work done by Supreme Court of India in developing the concept of rule of law and due process of law, enshrined in Article 21 of our Constitution, and enlarging its scope, has been publicly 9 appreciated at various international forums and we, the citizens of India, can legitimately feel proud of this recognition. Judicial intervention has made it possible to seek enforcement of rights such as right to food, right to education and right to live in a healthy environment. However, there is also a growing criticism, sometimes from uninformed or ill-informed quarters, about the inability of our Justice Delivery System to provide timely justice and wipe out the huge backlog of cases at all levels. India has been making rapid strides in almost all the fields. Revolution in the field of communication, coupled with rising of literacy level, is resulting in increased awareness of legal rights, thereby increasing the number of cases coming to the courts for adjudication. Sincere efforts are being made at all levels to increase the output being given by our system and there has been substantial increase in disposal of cases, despite full judge-strength not being available to us. Supreme Court of India disposed of 38842 cases in the year 2001, whereas it disposed of 61957 cases in the year 2007 without there being any increase in the sanctioned strength of judges. As many as 53976 cases were disposed of by Supreme Court of India in the first 9 months of the current calendar year. However, institution of fresh cases increased from 39419 cases in the year 2001 to 69103 cases in the year 2007. 56396 cases were instituted in Supreme Court of India in first 9 months of the calendar year 2008. 1093598 cases were disposed of by High Courts in the year 2001. The disposal was increased to 1505073 cases in the year 2007 without commensurate increase in the number of Judges. But the Institution of cases in the High Courts increased from 1215426 cases in the year 2001 to 1590816 cases in the year 2007. The High Courts disposed of 716853 cases in the first half of this calendar year. This, however, was accompanied by institution of 805350 cases during this period. Our subordinate courts disposed of 12494911 cases in the year 2001. They were able to increase the disposal to 14797506 cases in the year 2007, despite non-availability of required infrastructure and adequate increase in their strength. But, the institution increased from 13438170 cases in the year 2001 to 15099421 cases in the year 2007. In the first half of this year, our Subordinate Courts disposed of 7356171 cases. The fresh institution during this period was 7934948. The average disposal per judge in the year 2007, was 2538 cases in the High Courts and 1182 cases in Subordinate Courts. Increase in the number of cases, on account of spread of legal literacy and better awareness of legal rights, is a welcome development and should not be a cause of concern. We, however, owe a duty to find suitable ways and means to cope with the increased load of work on the system. The need of the hour is to act swiftly and decisively, so as to retain the confidence of our people in the credibility and efficacy of our Justice Delivery System. Litigation through courts and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case of the Indian Supreme Court - and a Plea for Research
    The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process Volume 9 Issue 2 Article 3 2007 Scholarly Discourse and the Cementing of Norms: The Case of the Indian Supreme Court - and a Plea for Research Jayanth K. Krishnan Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/appellatepracticeprocess Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Jayanth K. Krishnan, Scholarly Discourse and the Cementing of Norms: The Case of the Indian Supreme Court - and a Plea for Research, 9 J. APP. PRAC. & PROCESS 255 (2007). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/appellatepracticeprocess/vol9/iss2/3 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process by an authorized administrator of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCHOLARLY DISCOURSE AND THE CEMENTING OF NORMS: THE CASE OF THE INDIAN SUPREME COURT -AND A PLEA FOR RESEARCH Jayanth K. Krishnan* I. INTRODUCTION For Americans, India has been a country of intense interest in recent years. Less than ten years ago India alarmed many around the world, including then-President Clinton, after it (and neighboring Pakistan) conducted a series of nuclear tests.' But even before this military display, India was on the radar of observers in the United States. Since opening its markets in 1991, India has been fertile ground for American entrepreneurs2 engaged in outsourcing and for other foreign investors as well. With the exception of a two-year period between 1975 and 1977, India has served as a light of democratic rule in the developing world since it gained independence from Britain in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • In Late Colonial India: 1942-1944
    Rohit De ([email protected]) LEGS Seminar, March 2009 Draft. Please do not cite, quote, or circulate without permission. EMASCULATING THE EXECUTIVE: THE FEDERAL COURT AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN LATE COLONIAL INDIA: 1942-1944 Rohit De1 On the 7th of September, 1944 the Chief Secretary of Bengal wrote an agitated letter to Leo Amery, the Secretary of State for India, complaining that recent decisions of the Federal Court were bringing the governance of the province to a standstill. “In war condition, such emasculation of the executive is intolerable”, he thundered2. It is the nature and the reasons for this “emasculation” that the paper hopes to uncover. This paper focuses on a series of confrontations between the colonial state and the colonial judiciary during the years 1942 to 1944 when the newly established Federal Court struck down a number of emergency wartime legislations. The courts decisions were unexpected and took both the colonial officials and the Indian public by surprise, particularly because the courts in Britain had upheld the legality of identical legislation during the same period. I hope use this episode to revisit the discussion on the rule of law in colonial India as well as literature on judicial behavior. Despite the prominence of this confrontation in the public consciousness of the 1940’s, its role has been downplayed in both historical and legal accounts. As I hope to show this is a result of a disciplinary divide in the historical engagement with law and legal institutions. Legal scholarship has defined the field of legal history as largely an account of constitutional and administrative developments paralleling political developments3.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs= 07-09-2020
    CURRENT AFFAIRS= 07-09-2020 KESAVANANDA BHARATI Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed grief over the passing away of Kesavananda Bharati Ji. About: Kesavananda Bharati was the head seer of the Edneer Mutt in Kasaragod district of Kerala since 1961. He left his signature in one of the significant rulings of the Supreme Court when he challenged the Kerala land reforms legislation in 1970. The Kesavananda Bharati judgement, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution. Justice Hans Raj Khanna asserted through the Basic Structure doctrine that the constitution possesses a basic structure of constitutional principles and values. The doctrine forms the basis of power of the Indian judiciary to review and override amendments to the Constitution of India enacted by the Indian parliament. MOPLAH REBELLION A report submitted to the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) in 2016 had recommended the removal of the Wagon Tragedy victims and Malabar Rebellion leaders Ali Musliyar and Variamkunnath Ahmad Haji, and Haji’s two brothers from a book on martyrs of India’s freedom struggle. CROSS & CLIMB 2019 1 About: The report sought the removal of names of 387 ‘Moplah rioters’ from the list of martyrs. The book, Dictionary of Martyrs: India’s Freedom Struggle 1857-1947, was released by Prime Minister Narendra Modi last week. The report describes Haji as the “notorious Moplah Riot leader” and a “hardcore criminal,” who “killed innumerable innocent Hindu men, women, and children during the 1921 Moplah Riot, and deposited their bodies in a well, locally known as Thoovoor Kinar”.
    [Show full text]
  • Dated 9Th October, 2018 Reg. Elevation
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA This file relates to the proposal for appointment of following seven Advocates, as Judges of the Kerala High Court: 1. Shri V.G.Arun, 2. Shri N. Nagaresh, 3. Shri P. Gopal, 4. Shri P.V.Kunhikrishnan, 5. Shri S. Ramesh, 6. Shri Viju Abraham, 7. Shri George Varghese. The above recommendation made by the then Chief Justice of the th Kerala High Court on 7 March, 2018, in consultation with his two senior- most colleagues, has the concurrence of the State Government of Kerala. In order to ascertain suitability of the above-named recommendees for elevation to the High Court, we have consulted our colleagues conversant with the affairs of the Kerala High Court. Copies of letters of opinion of our consultee-colleagues received in this regard are placed below. For purpose of assessing merit and suitability of the above-named recommendees for elevation to the High Court, we have carefully scrutinized the material placed in the file including the observations made by the Department of Justice therein. Apart from this, we invited all the above-named recommendees with a view to have an interaction with them. On the basis of interaction and having regard to all relevant factors, the Collegium is of the considered view that S/Shri (1) V.G.Arun, (2) N. Nagaresh, and (3) P.V.Kunhikrishnan, Advocates (mentioned at Sl. Nos. 1, 2 and 4 above) are suitable for being appointed as Judges of the Kerala High Court. As regards S/Shri S. Ramesh, Viju Abraham, and George Varghese, Advocates (mentioned at Sl.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Banerjee Ankita 145189
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The Santiniketan ashram as Rabindranath Tagore’s politics Banerjee, Ankita Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 THE SANTINIKETAN ashram As Rabindranath Tagore’s PoliTics Ankita Banerjee King’s College London 2020 This thesis is submitted to King’s College London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy List of Illustrations Table 1: No of Essays written per year between 1892 and 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 22-04-2021 Court No. 5 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI (TIME : 11:00 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 2.1 Connected SLP(C) No. 2165/2021 IV-A MAHESH KUMAR VERMA NIRAJ SHARMA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.16147/2021- EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 2.2 Connected SLP(C) No. 2178/2021 IV-A RAVI KALE NIRAJ SHARMA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.16333/2021- EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 8 SLP(C) No. 26657/2019 XVI RASOI LIMITED AND ANR. KHAITAN & CO. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3] {Mention Memo} IA No. 171231/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT Court No. 6 (Hearing Through Video Conferencing) HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH 2 (TIME : 11:00 AM) 13 Diary No. 14404-2020 IV-B UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1] Versus M/S FAMINA KNIT FABS RAJAN NARAIN[R-1] IA No. 91716/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 91717/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT 13.1 Connected Diary No.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India
    Supreme Court of India drishtiias.com/printpdf/supreme-court-of-india The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial court and the final court of appeal under the Constitution of India, the highest constitutional court, with the power of judicial review. India is a federal State and has a single and unified judicial system with three tier structure, i.e. Supreme Court, High Courts and Subordinate Courts. Brief History of the Supreme Court of India The promulgation of Regulating Act of 1773 established the Supreme Court of Judicature at Calcutta as a Court of Record, with full power & authority. It was established to hear and determine all complaints for any crimes and also to entertain, hear and determine any suits or actions in Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. The Supreme Courts at Madras and Bombay were established by King George – III in 1800 and 1823 respectively. The India High Courts Act 1861 created High Courts for various provinces and abolished Supreme Courts at Calcutta, Madras and Bombay and also the Sadar Adalats in Presidency towns. These High Courts had the distinction of being the highest Courts for all cases till the creation of Federal Court of India under the Government of India Act 1935. The Federal Court had jurisdiction to solve disputes between provinces and federal states and hear appeal against Judgements from High Courts. After India attained independence in 1947, the Constitution of India came into being on 26 January 1950. The Supreme Court of India also came into existence and its first sitting was held on 28 January 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Independence of the Judiciary-The Indian Experience
    SECURING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY-THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE M. P. Singh* We have provided in the Constitution for a judiciary which will be independent. It is difficult to suggest anything more to make the Supreme Court and the High Courts independent of the influence of the executive. There is an attempt made in the Constitutionto make even the lowerjudiciary independent of any outside or extraneous influence.' There can be no difference of opinion in the House that ourjudiciary must both be independent of the executive and must also be competent in itself And the question is how these two objects could be secured.' I. INTRODUCTION An independent judiciary is necessary for a free society and a constitutional democracy. It ensures the rule of law and realization of human rights and also the prosperity and stability of a society.3 The independence of the judiciary is normally assured through the constitution but it may also be assured through legislation, conventions, and other suitable norms and practices. Following the Constitution of the United States, almost all constitutions lay down at least the foundations, if not the entire edifices, of an * Professor of Law, University of Delhi, India. The author was a Visiting Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law, Heidelberg, Germany. I am grateful to the University of Delhi for granting me leave and to the Max Planck Institute for giving me the research fellowship and excellent facilities to work. I am also grateful to Dieter Conrad, Jill Cottrell, K. I. Vibute, and Rahamatullah Khan for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Motion for Presenting an Address to the President of India for the Removal of Mr
    1 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRESENTING AN ADDRESS TO THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA FOR THE REMOVAL OF MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA, CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA, UNDER ARTICLE 217 READ WITH 124 (4) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA THIS HOUSE RESOLVES that an address be presented to the President of India for the removal of Mr. Justice Dipak Misra, from the office of Chief Justice of India, for his following acts of misbehaviour, detailed in the Explanatory Note annexed herewith: I. The facts and circumstances relating to the Prasad Education Trust case, show prima facie evidence suggesting that Chief Justice Dipak Misra may have been involved in the conspiracy of paying illegal gratification in the case, which at least warrants a thorough investigation. II. That the Chief Justice Dipak Misra dealt on the administrative as well as judicial side, with a writ petition which sought an investigation into a matter in which he too was likely to fall within the scope of investigation since he had presided over every bench which had dealt with this case and passed orders in the case of Prasad Education Trust, and thus violated the first principle of the Code of Conduct for judges. III. That the Chief Justice Dipak Misra appears to have antedated an administrative order dated 6th November 2017 which amounts to a serious act of forgery/fabrication. IV. That Chief Justice Dipak Misra acquired land while he was an advocate, by giving an affidavit that was found to be false and despite the orders of the ADM cancelling the allotment in 1985, surrendered the said land only in 2012 after he was elevated to the Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Keesing's Contemporary Archives
    KEESING'S CONTEMPORARY ARCHIVES WEEKLY DIARY OF IMPORTANT WORLD EVENTS WITH INDEX CONTINUALLY KEPT UP-TO-DATE ESTABLISHED IN 1931 Reports, Statistics and Data selected, condensed, translated, summarised, and indexed from news­ papers, periodicals, and official publications of Great Britain, the British Empire, and Foreign Countries; as well as from information supplied by the recognised international news agencies VOLUME No. VI 1946-1948 KEESING'S PUBLICATIONS LIMITED (of London) 65 Bristol Road • Keynsham • Bristol 8930 KEESING'S CONTEMPORARY ARCHIVES November 8—15, 1947. A. INDIA - PAKISTAN. — The Kashmir Situation. - be supported " ; declared that the Kashmiri authorities had ignored Kashmiri and Pakistani Allegations and Counter- Pakistani suggestions, made much earlier, that representatives of Allegations of Frontier Violations. - Invasion of Kashmir both Governments should meet to seek a solution of outstanding by Moslem Tribesmen. - Kashmir's Accession to India. - difficulties ; and added that the Kashmiri Government's " unfounded allegations and accusations" were merely a " smoke-screen" Non-Acceptance by Pakistan. - Statements by Mr. intended to cover the real purposes of that Government's policy. Jinnah, Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan, and Pandit Nehru. - Mr. Jinnah went on to accuse the Kashmiri Government of differ­ Indian Troops sent to Kashmir. - Invaders driven from ential treatment of Moslems and non-Moslems, saying that on the Srinagar Approaches. - Kashmir Plebiscite on Accession one hand the Sheikh Mohamed Abdullah, who had been
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Sabharwal's Defence Becomes Murkier
    JUSTICE SABHARWAL’S DEFENCE BECOMES MURKIER: STIFLING PUBLIC EXPOSURE BY USING CONTEMPT POWERS Press Release: New Delhi 19th September 2007 Justice Sabharwal finally broke his silence in a signed piece in the Times of India. His defence proceeds by ignoring and sidestepping the inconvenient and emphasizing the irrelevant if it can evoke sympathy. To examine the adequacy of his defence, we need to see his defence against the gravamen of each charge against him. Charge No. 1. That his son’s companies had shifted their registered offices to his official residence. Justice Sabharwal’s response: That as soon as he came to know he ordered his son’s to shift it back. Our Rejoinder: This is False. In April 2007, in a recorded interview with the Midday reporter M.K. Tayal he feigned total ignorance of the shifting of the offices to his official residence. In fact, the registered offices were shifted back from his official residence to his Punjabi Bagh residence exactly on the day that the BPTP mall developers became his sons partners, making it very risky to continue at his official residence. Copies of the document showing the date of induction of Kabul Chawla, the promoter and owner of BPTP in Pawan Impex Pvt. Ltd., one of the companies of Jutstice Sabharwal’s sons, and Form no. 18 showing the shifting of the registered office from the official residence of Justice Sabharwal to his family residence on 23rd October 2004. Charge No. 2: That he called for and dealt with the sealing of commercial property case in March 2005, though it was not assigned to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of SBPROA Membership
    Sr.no. Name Address M.No. Date of Birth Tel. /Mb.No./E.Mail Month Station 1 Dev Raj Sharma Shiv Sadan, 91, Sec. 6, Urban 17 17/04/1924 094168-14515 0184- April Karnal Estate, Karnal 2283091, 094168- 14515 2 Amarjit Singh Kanwar 44 12/10/1926 October 3 Jaspal Singh c/o Prof. K.P. Singh, 501 46 28/10/1926 2206719,95019- October Patiala Satyendra TIFR Housing Complex, 78227 Homi Bhaba Road, Colaba-Mumbai- 400005 4 Tek Chand Bansal 618, Street No.6, Gurbux Colony, 55 12/01/1927 2226025, 97790- January Patiala Patiala 18992 5 Girdhari Lal Singla Araian Street, Behind Malwa 75 21/08/1929 2201573 August Patiala Cinema, Patiala 6 Surinder Mohan Walia Mohan Lodge, Near Bhagat Singh 76 06/12/1928 2228310, 98722- December Patiala Petrol Pump, The Mall, Patiala 10817 7 Hans Raj Aggarwal 13305-D, Shiv Colony, St No. 1, 98 19/09/1925 8725902011 September Bathnda Bhatinda 8 O.P. Kapoor 204, Markal Colony, Mirch Mandi, 102 19/10/1929 2305070 October Patiala Sanauri Adda, Patiala 9 Piara Lal Bansal 2372/1, Mohalla Lal Bagh, Patiala 107 20/10/1930 2202714 October Patiala 10 D.R. Gupta 1, Narula Colony, Lower Mall, 111 10/01/1931 2221858. 98766- January Patiala Patiala 21858 11 Gurdas Mal Mittal 3347 TIMBECREEK LANE NAPER 112 02/02/1930 6304160102 February VILL ILL USA-60565 12 Hari Om Parkash 11/272, Street No. 6, Left Opposite 135 09/08/1930 500233, 98724- August Bathinda Gopal Di Hatti, Manjit Indarpura, 91544 PP Mahesh & Faridkot-151203 Sons 13 Ishwar Dass Saggu 647, Sector 20-A, Chandigarh 147 15/01/1933 2281111, 98787- January Chandigarh 70882 14 T.P.
    [Show full text]