Architectural and Historical Survey of Whitewater, Wisconsin by Carol Lohry Cartwright

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Architectural and Historical Survey of Whitewater, Wisconsin by Carol Lohry Cartwright Architectural and Historical Survey of Whitewater, Wisconsin by Carol Lohry Cartwright WHITEWATER LANDMARKS COMMISSION: CITY OF WHITEWATER, WISCONSIN 2008 CITY OF WHITEWATER, WISCONSIN Architectural and Historical Survey Report Author: Carol Lohry Cartwright Prepared for the Landmarks Commission City of Whitewater, Wisconsin 2008 Landmarks Commission For inquiries about the Whitewater Landmarks Commission, please contact the City of Whitewater, 312 W. Whitewater St., Whitewater, Wisconsin 53190. Cover Photo: Whitewater Postcard, c. 1910, from the collections of the Whitewater Historical Society, used with permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank the Whitewater Landmarks Commission for their assistance in completing this report. The author would also like to thank the Whitewater Historical Society for the use of its manuscript and photographic collections. The Irvin Young Library in Whitewater was also very helpful in providing access to their collections, especially the Fred Kraege historical materials. These materials were an essential source of information for this project and the report could not have been completed without their use. The author would also like to thank Mary Nimm of the Community Development Authority for her technical assistance. 1 Federal Acknowledgment The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the Wisconsin Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society. Nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Wisconsin Historical Society. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1975, as amended, the U. s. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington DC 20240. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page Chapter 1 – Survey Methodology 4 Chapter 2 – Historical Background 8 Chapter 3 – Architecture 30 Residential Architecture 30 Commercial Architecture 42 Church Architecture 46 Public Architecture 48 Construction Materials 49 Architects and Builders 51 Chapter 4 – Historical Theme: Commerce 55 Chapter 5 – Historical Theme: Government 76 Chapter 6 - Results 87 Chapter 7 - Recommendations 95 Appendix 100 Summary of Survey Findings with Photographic Examples 3 CHAPTER ONE Methodology Introduction The City of Whitewater Community Development Authority, working with the Whitewater Landmarks Commission, received funding from a federal survey and planning grant administered by the Division of Historic Preservation of the Wisconsin Historical Society to conduct an intensive architectural and historical survey of Whitewater. The Whitewater Landmarks Commission and the City of Whitewater awarded a contract for this survey to Carol Lohry Cartwright, Historic Preservation Consultant. The intensive architectural and historical survey had four work elements: (1) a reconnaissance survey of the historic properties in Whitewater; (2) historical research for properties that were potentially eligible for the National Register and to provide historical context to evaluate surveyed properties and to prepare the chapters of the intensive survey report; (3) an evaluation of surveyed properties for their potential eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places and/or their contribution to potential historic districts; (4) completion of the survey report. Reconnaissance Survey The consultant surveyed the entire City of Whitewater, using the 1989 reconnaissance survey as a guide. The field work was completed according to the Wisconsin Historical Society’s Historic Preservation Division’s requirements for reconnaissance surveys. The consultant surveyed properties structure by structure and street by street for resources of architectural interest. Black and white photographs of properties of architectural interest were taken, along with properties included in the 1989 survey that had been altered. After the site-specific research was conducted, the consultant prepared reconnaissance survey cards for each of the buildings that were photographed. Most of these cards were continuation cards for properties placed in the Wisconsin Architecture and History Inventory in 1989. Surveyed properties were noted on a city zoning map by the use of photo codes as assigned by the Historic Preservation Division. Research The consultant undertook site-specific research for potentially eligible properties by reviewing Sanborn-Perris Fire Insurance Maps, historic plat maps, tax assessment roll information, and local history materials found in the collections of the Whitewater Historical Society and the Irvin L. Young Library. This research was used to prepare the reconnaissance survey cards and the Historic Preservation Division’s Architecture and Historic Data Base, and to help in evaluating the surveyed resources. 4 The consultant also conducted general historical research in order to help prepare this report. For this research, the consultant used the many published materials on the history of Whitewater found in the Whitewater Historical Society and the Irvin Young Library. The consultant completed a newspaper search for the 19th century and reviewed newspaper scrapbooks from the 20th century on file in the Whitewater Historical Society and the Irvin Young Library. The consultant also used the information from local historian Fred Kraege’s vast collections of newspaper clippings, copies of photos and materials filed in thematic notebooks located in the Irving L. Young Library. Identification and Evaluation of Significant Resources During the course of the project, the consultant analyzed the architectural and historical data to determine which resources were potentially individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and which groups of resources might form potentially eligible historic districts. These evaluations were reviewed with the chief of the Historic Buildings Section of the Division of Historic Preservation. The consultant noted the evaluations on the data base and in this report. These opinions were based on the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register criteria are used to guide state and federal agencies in evaluating nominations to the National Register of Historic Places. The criteria is described in How to Complete National Register Forms (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1991), and read as follows: “The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: “A. that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or “B. that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or “C. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or “D. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. “Ordinarily, cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions, or used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: 5 “A. a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or “B. a building or structure removed from its original location, but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic period or event; or “C. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no other appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life; or “D. a cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events; or “E. a reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or “F. a property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with his own
Recommended publications
  • (P 117-140) Flood Pulse.Qxp
    117 THE FLOOD PULSE CONCEPT: NEW ASPECTS, APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS - AN UPDATE Junk W.J. Wantzen K.M. Max-Planck-Institute for Limnology, Working Group Tropical Ecology, P.O. Box 165, 24302 Plön, Germany E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The flood pulse concept (FPC), published in 1989, was based on the scientific experience of the authors and published data worldwide. Since then, knowledge on floodplains has increased considerably, creating a large database for testing the predictions of the concept. The FPC has proved to be an integrative approach for studying highly diverse and complex ecological processes in river-floodplain systems; however, the concept has been modified, extended and restricted by several authors. Major advances have been achieved through detailed studies on the effects of hydrology and hydrochemistry, climate, paleoclimate, biogeography, biodi- versity and landscape ecology and also through wetland restoration and sustainable management of flood- plains in different latitudes and continents. Discussions on floodplain ecology and management are greatly influenced by data obtained on flow pulses and connectivity, the Riverine Productivity Model and the Multiple Use Concept. This paper summarizes the predictions of the FPC, evaluates their value in the light of recent data and new concepts and discusses further developments in floodplain theory. 118 The flood pulse concept: New aspects, INTRODUCTION plain, where production and degradation of organic matter also takes place. Rivers and floodplain wetlands are among the most threatened ecosystems. For example, 77 percent These characteristics are reflected for lakes in of the water discharge of the 139 largest river systems the “Seentypenlehre” (Lake typology), elaborated by in North America and Europe is affected by fragmen- Thienemann and Naumann between 1915 and 1935 tation of the river channels by dams and river regula- (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Touring Historical Whitewater
    Touring Historical Whitewater A Guide to Whitewater Homes, Schools, Parks, and Cemeteries Old City Hall Building (1899-1971) Front Cover: Whitewater‟s Old City Hall building once served as the center for City Offices, the Library, and Fire Department. Construction of the building, with Romanesque Revival Architecture, started in Nov. 1899. The building was dedicated in April 1900, and operated as Whitewater‟s City Hall until 1960s before being demolished in August 1971. Image courtesy of the Irvin L. Young Library. Table of Contents City of Whitewater ~ A Brief History ............................................ 1 Bassett House ~ 708 W. Main Street .............................................. 4 W. DeWolf House ~ 707-709 W. Main Street ................................ 5 Engebretsen-Dorr ~ 622 W. Main Street ........................................ 6 G. W. Esterly House ~ 604 W. Main Street .................................... 7 Winchester House ~ 532 W. Main Street ....................................... 8 Sanger Marsh House ~ W. 522 Main Street ................................... 9 Leon Pescheret House ~ 521 W. Main Street ............................... 10 J.J. Starin House ~ 507 W. Main Street ........................................ 11 Kinney-Coxe House ~ 504 W. Main Street .................................. 12 T.D. Weeks / Hall House ~ 452 W. Main Street .......................... 13 Newton M. Littlejohn ~ 429 W. Main Street ................................ 14 Hamilton House ~ 328 W. Main Street .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Whitewater Sub-Basin
    Whitewater Sub-basin HUC # 07140107 RAPID WATERSHED ASSESSMENT USDA NRCS 601 Business Loop 70 West Parkade Center, Suite 250 Columbia, MO 65203 Whitewater Sub-basin HUC #07140107 Introduction ..................................................... Page 3 A rapid watershed assessment Physical Description ........................................... Page 4 (RWA) evaluates resource A. Land Use/ Land Cover...................................Page 4 conditions and needs on an B. Grassland ..................................................Page 6 8-digit hydrologic unit (HU) C. Crop History ..............................................Page 6 basis. The assessment identifies D. Public Land ...............................................Page 6 E. Soil Capability ............................................Page 6 the primary resource concerns F. Common Resources ......................................Page 8 for the watershed being profiled G. Streams.................................................. Page 10 and provides estimate as to H. Wetlands ................................................ Page 12 where conservation investments I. Relief Map................................................ Page 13 would best address the concerns J. Geology .................................................. Page 14 of landowners, conservation Resource Concerns............................................Page 16 districts, stakeholders, and A. Soils ...................................................... Page 18 others. The RWA provides B. Soil Erosion.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Octagon House and Mount Airy: Exploring the Intersection of Slavery, Social Values, and Architecture in 19Th-Century Washington, DC and Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2017 The Octagon House and Mount Airy: Exploring the Intersection of Slavery, Social Values, and Architecture in 19th-Century Washington, DC and Virginia Julianna Geralynn Jackson College of William and Mary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Jackson, Julianna Geralynn, "The Octagon House and Mount Airy: Exploring the Intersection of Slavery, Social Values, and Architecture in 19th-Century Washington, DC and Virginia" (2017). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1516639577. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/S2V95T This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Octagon House and Mount Airy: Exploring the Intersection of Slavery, Social Values, and Architecture in 19th-Century Washington, DC and Virginia Julianna Geralynn Jackson Baldwin, Maryland Bachelor of Arts, St. Mary’s College of Maryland, 2012 A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of The College of William & Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of William & Mary August, 2017 © Copyright by Julianna Geralynn Jackson 2017 ABSTRACT This project uses archaeology, architecture, and the documentary record to explore the ways in which one family, the Tayloes, used Georgian design principals as a way of exerting control over the 19th-century landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • First Baptist Church Octagon House
    First Baptist Church Documentary Study Prepared for First Baptist Church 2932 King Street Alexandria, Virginia 22302 Julia Claypool, Historian Edna Johnston, Principal HISTORYmatters Washington, DC www.historymatters.net Georeferenced Maps Provided by AECOM May 19, 2016 First Baptist Church Documentary Study History Matters, LLC May 19, 2016 P a g e | 1 Documentary Study – First Baptist Church Property Introduction Located at 2932 King Street in Alexandria, Virginia, the First Baptist Church stands on the southwestern side of King Street (Leesburg Pike) on just over 16 acres of land. The property is bisected by Taylor Run, a stream that runs northwest to southeast. The focus of this documentary study is the Octagon House that stood on the property from 1856 to 1866. For its short existence, the Octagon House played a remarkable role in a turbulent time in Alexandria’s history. Built by Sarah W. Hall in 1856, the house’s octagonal design and cement construction were unusual in the area. After the death of her husband, Charles Hall, a prominent clergyman involved in the American Mission movement, Sarah Hall moved her three daughters from New York to join her eldest son Charles Stuart, who lived in the Alexandria area. With the outbreak of the American Civil War in the spring of 1861, the house’s location along Leesburg Pike and in the vicinity of several Union Army fortifications led to its use as a headquarters by several Union regiments and as a regimental hospital. During the Civil War, the Octagon House was associated with U.S. Brigadier General John Sedgwick (1813-1864) and nurse Amy Morris Bradley (1823-1904).
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Mendoza, for Agreeing To
    Q1: Today is November 5, 2005. It is 11:26 am. We are in room 2510 of the Daley Center Cook County Court building where we’re interviewing Judge Patricia Mendoza about her legal career, her background, how she became a judge in the Cook County system. Thank you, Judge Mendoza, for agreeing to talking with us today. The first thing we’d like to do is ask you a little bit about your background and upbringing, how your early experiences influenced your decision to enter the legal profession. Can you tell us a little bit about what it was like growing up in the Back of the Yards neighborhood in the 1960s? A: Well, it’s a working-class neighborhood. They have -- it was a changing neighborhood, changing over from Polish– Lithuanian to Mexican. You know, it was lower middle class. And there’s not a lot -- I don’t know. You know, it’s what I knew, so I couldn’t really compare it to anything else at the time. Q1: Mm-hmm. Did your parents -- had they lived there for a long time, or...? A: We actually moved there when I was 11. They had a bridal shop business that they opened up there. They had had a business previously, and I don’t know the name of the neighborhood. It was like 55th and the Garfield, Halsted area. That neighborhood had undergone a lot of race riots. 1 I vague -- I distinctly remember, you know, the riots because the store was on the dividing line -- at that time Halsted was the dividing line -- between black and white.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Stores
    For the exclusive use of M. Henny, 2015. 9-502-063 REV: MAY 20, 2010 LUC WATHIEU Apple Stores Ron Johnson (HBS ’84), Apple Computer’s Senior Vice-President of Retail, never missed a chance to show a customer through the nearest Apple Store. A former Vice-President of Merchandising at Target (a leading department store chain), Johnson joined Apple in January 2000 with the mission to oversee the creation of the company’s own stores. The first store opened in May 2001—and just seven months later, 27 identical stores had been opened across the United States. During his store visits, Johnson tried computer applications, listened to a store employee make a presentation in front of the 10-foot screen at the rear of the store in “the theater,” and respectfully introduced his guests to the local “genius,” the official title of a very knowledgeable employee who stood behind a “bar” (complete with stools and water bottles) and helped solve consumer problems. Every detail of the store experience had been carefully designed, and as much as Johnson enjoyed each tour, he was also checking that all the store’s elements were perfectly under control. “The store experience has to be the same every day, every hour, in every store. We care passionately about that,” he often said. The stores were expanding to new territories, mostly in high traffic shopping malls, with the explicit purpose of “enriching people’s lives” and converting new customers to Apple products. To complete that mission successfully, Johnson’s focus was on choosing the right locations, selecting and training knowledgeable and dedicated employees, and defining the most effective utilization of the innovative store elements such as the theater and the genius bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Report
    PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California September 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project Unincorporated Riverside County, California Prepared for: Travis J. McGill Director/Biologist ELMT Consulting 2201 North Grand Avenue #10098 Santa Ana, California 92711 Prepared by: Principal Investigator David Brunzell, M.A., RPA Contributions by Nicholas Shepetuk, B.A., and Dylan Williams, B.A. BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 BCR Consulting LLC Project No. EMT2002 Site Recorded: Whitewater Levee Keywords: Levee USGS Quadrangles: 7.5-minute White Water, California (1988) Section 22 of Township 2 South, Range 3 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian September 11, 2020 SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMEN T WHITEWATER PRESERVE LEVEE PROTECTION PROJECT RIVERSIDE COUNTY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to ELMT Consulting to conduct a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Whitewater Preserve Levee Protection Project (the project), consisting of 7.8 acres in unincorporated Riverside County, California. This work was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy requirements. During the current assessment, BCR Consulting completed a cultural resources records search summary, additional land use history research, and intensive field survey for the project site. The Eastern Information Center (EIC; the repository that houses cultural resources records for the project area) is closed to consultants in March 2020 due to Covid- 19 restrictions. Although the EIC has reportedly begun processing records search requests internally, we have not received results or estimated schedule for any requests since March.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THH INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Antour-Stiner House AND/OR COMMON Carmer Octagon House [LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 45 West Clinton Avenue _ NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Irvinqton __ VICINITY OF 23 Peter A. Peyser STATE CODE COUNTY CODE New York 36 Westchester 119 QCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENTUSE _DISTRICT _ PUBLIC ^OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM .XBUILDINGIS) .^PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED _ COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE _BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL ^PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS XYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED __YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Mrs. Elizabeth Black Carrner STREETS. NUMBER 45 West Clinton Avenue CITY, TOWN STATE Irvington VICINITY OF New York LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. Land Records Office STREETS NUMBER Westchester County Courthouse CITY, TOWN STATE White Plains Vnt-V REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey DATE February, 1975 ^FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress CITY, TOWN STATE Washington, District of Columbia DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT ^DETERIORATED X_UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS _ALTERED _MOVED DATE_ X.FAIR __UNEXPOSED X remodeled ———————————DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Surveyed by the Historic American Buildings Survey in February, 1975, the Armour-Stiner Octagon is situated on a three-acre wooded lot at the south­ west corner of W.
    [Show full text]
  • Podolak Multifunctional Riverscapes
    Multifunctional Riverscapes: Stream restoration, Capability Brown’s water features, and artificial whitewater By Kristen Nicole Podolak A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Professor Louise Mozingo Professor Vincent H. Resh Spring 2012 i Abstract Multifunctional Riverscapes by Kristen Nicole Podolak Doctor of Philosophy in Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Society is investing in river restoration and urban river revitalization as a solution for sustainable development. Many of these river projects adopt a multifunctional planning and design approach that strives to meld ecological, aesthetic, and recreational functions. However our understanding of how to accomplish multifunctionality and how the different functions work together is incomplete. Numerous ecologically justified river restoration projects may actually be driven by aesthetic and recreational preferences that are largely unexamined. At the same time river projects originally designed for aesthetics or recreation are now attempting to integrate habitat and environmental considerations to make the rivers more sustainable. Through in-depth study of a variety of constructed river landscapes - including dense historical river bend designs, artificial whitewater, and urban stream restoration this dissertation analyzes how aesthetic, ecological, and recreational functions intersect and potentially conflict. To explore how aesthetic and biophysical processes work together in riverscapes, I explored the relationship between one ideal of beauty, an s-curve illustrated by William Hogarth in the 18th century and two sets of river designs: 18th century river designs in England and late 20th century river restoration designs in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrepreneurship in the Natural Food and Beauty Categories Before 2000: Global Visions and Local Expressions
    Entrepreneurship in the Natural Food and Beauty Categories before 2000: Global Visions and Local Expressions Geoffrey Jones Working Paper 13-024 August 28, 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Geoffrey Jones Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Entrepreneurship in the Natural Food and Beauty Categories before 2000: Global Visions and Local Expressions Geoffrey Jones Harvard Business School August 2012 Abstract This working paper examines the creation of the global natural food and beauty categories before 2000. This is shown to have been a lengthy process of new category creation involving the exercise of entrepreneurial imagination. Pioneering entrepreneurs faced little consumer demand for natural products, and little consumer knowledge of what they entailed. The creation of new categories involved three overlapping waves of entrepreneurship. The first involved making the ideological case for natural products. This often entailed investment in education and publishing activities. Second, entrepreneurs engaged in the creation of industry associations which could advocate, as well as give the nascent industry credibility and create standards. Finally, entrepreneurs established retail stores, supply and distribution networks, and created brands. Entrepreneurial cognition and motivation frequently lay in individual, and very local, experiences, but many of the key pioneers were also highly globalized in their world views, with strong perception of how small, local efforts related to much bigger and global pictures. A significant sub-set of the influential historical figures were articulate in expressing strong religious convictions.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Neighborhood Focuses on the History and Architecture of Part of Our Local Environment That Is Both Familiar and Surprising
    Explore historic dc Explore historic CHILDREN’S WALKING TOUR CHILDREN’S EDITION included WHITE HOUSE inside! NEIGHBORHOOD WASHINGTON, DC © Washington Architectural Foundation, 2017 Welcome to the cap Welcome to Welcome This tour of Washington’s White House Neighborhood focuses on the history and architecture of part of our local environment that is both familiar and surprising. The tour kit includes everything a parent, teacher, Scout troop leader or home schooler would need to walk children through several blocks of buildings and their history and to stimulate conversation and activities as they go. Designed for kids in the 8-12 age group, the tour is fun and educational for older kids and adults as well. The tour materials include... • History of the White House Neighborhood • Tour Booklet Instructions • The White House Neighborhood Guide • Architectural Vocabulary • Conversation Starters • The White House Neighborhood Tour Stops • Children's Edition This project has been funded in part by a grant from the Dorothea DeSchweinitz Fund for the District of Columbia of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. This version of the White House Neighborhood children’s architectural tour is the result of a collaboration among Mary Kay Lanzillotta, FAIA, Peter Guttmacher and the creative minds at LookThink. White house neigh History of the White House Neighborhood The president's neighborhood hen Pierre L’Enfant designed the plan of Washington, W DC, in 1791, he selected the site for the President’s House west of the downtown. Next to the President’s House was an orchard, which was identified as President’s Park. When President Jefferson moved into the President’s House in 1801, he noted that the country residence was “free from the noise, the heat...and the bustle of a close built town.” Over the next 100 years, the neighborhood developed with many fashionable homes, including the Octagon and the Ringgold Residence.
    [Show full text]