DOCSLIB.ORG

The 'Ordo Salutis' and Charismatic Movement DOUGLAS ROBINSON

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 'Ordo Salutis' and Charismatic Movement DOUGLAS ROBINSON The 'Ordo Salutis' and Charismatic Movement DOUGLAS ROBINSON One of the central concerns of the last five centuries of theological debate has been the relationship of justification to sanctification. Prior to the Reformation, justification and sanctification were not clearly distinguished. Justification was, in effect, dependent in part upon a prior work of sanctification. The Reformers reordered this under­ standing. They clearly separated these works of grace. Justification became entirely dependent upon the imputed righteousness of Christ. Man's response to this example of God's grace is to respond by faith. The work of sanctification follows on from this. It is, however, never complete, for whilst man is justified, he always remains a sinner­ simu/ justus-simul peecat or. The Protestant ordo salutis is thus justifi­ cation followed by santification, whereas the Catholic order is the reverse of this. Within Protestantism, one of the most significant developments in the accepted ordo salutis came from John Wesley. In his theology, the focus of the ordo salutis shifted from justification to a point subsequent to it. For Wesley, the ordo salutis began with prevenient grace which draws men to the Father; then convincing grace brings about repentance and saving faith. From saving faith, justification ensues. Yet this brings about only a 'relative change'-liberation from the guilt of sin. Final justification is not complete at this point. A work of sanctification must be effected between the two moments of justification. This work of sanctification has a dual nature. Sanctification not only has a progressive and gradual character; Wesley also believed that it is a particular experience taking place at an identifiable moment. It is given in answer to faith, and is received in its entirety. As a result of this gift, the Christian's life increases in sanctity, 'which is a necessary qualification for eternallife.'1 It is clear that, under this scheme, sanctification must become the dominant component in salvation. Wesley himself was aware of this, and regarded his doctrine of sanctification as the peculiar tenet of the Methodist movement. As he wrote in a letter dated 15 September 1790: 'This doctrine (full sanctification) is the grand deposition which God has lodged with the people called the Methodists, and for the sake of propagating this chiefly He appeared to raise us up. '2 Wesley's emphasis was subsequently adopted and modified by the evangelists and theologians of the American holiness movement. In this new context, and under the influence of the camp meeting, the 232 The 'Ordo Salutis' and the Charismatic Movement principal modifications were in the direction of individualism, emotionalism and an increasing emphasis upon the crisis experience. In the mid-nineteenth century, through the preaching of C. G. Finney and the writing of Asa Mahan, the crisis experience became known as 'the baptism with the Holy Ghost'. This term came into greater prominence with the evangelistic campaigns of both Moody and Torrey who, in their counselling, promised a further experience of grace called 'baptism in the Spirit' which converts were to seek diligently. Torrey added a new and decisive element. He wrote: 'The baptism with the Holy Spirit is an experience connected with, and primarily for the purpose of service ... the baptism with the Holy Spirit has no direct reference to cleansing from sin. It has to do with gifts for service rather than with graces of character ... '3 The significant change here is in the purpose of sanctification. Wesley had seen the work of sanctification as having two parts: first, the relationship between the believer and God through Christ; and second, the transformation of behaviour. Torrey saw it a different way. Sanc­ tification was no longer the divinization of man; it was his empowering. The focus of theology was moving even further away from justification; here we see it moving away from sanctification. This continuing change of theological focus became more pro­ nounced at the end of the century. Benjamin Irwin, a Baptist preacher, was drawn into the holiness movement and discovered in the writings of John Fletcher, an early Methodist, an important new emphasis. Fletcher had taught that beyond sanctification there is a further experience which he called 'the baptism of burning love'. This is an inflow of divine fullness which is given only to the sanctified and the pure in heart. Irwin adopted this into a three-stage ordo salutis: conversion, sanctification, and the baptism of fire. As the nineteenth century came to a close, Americans were surrounded by a whirlwind of change: economic, social, intellectual and religious. This led to a widespread desire for the church to demon­ strate to the world its power and vitality. It was directly from this context that Pentecostalism sprang. As a full scale movement it dates from the remarkable series of meetings in Azusa Street, Los Angeles, which began in 1906. But its beginnings may be traced back to the Topeka Bible College where what was to become a distinctive belief for Pentecostals was first fully formulated at the end of 1900--namely 'that in apostolic times speaking in tongues was considered to be the initial physical evidence of a person having received the baptism in the Holy Spirit. •• This new and distinctive doctrine fitted into the order of salvation in the following manner: first came conversion, then sanctification, followed by baptism in the Spirit. The early teachers of the movement, 233 Churchman Parham and Seymour, regarded sanctification as the essential prepara­ tion for the baptism in the Holy Spirit. This represents a de-eschatolo­ gization of the Wesleyan scheme of salvation. For Wesley, the purpose of sanctification was to prepare for salvation; now it paved the way for service and individual assurance of God's presence and power. This three-tier view of salvation was the hallmark of the emerging Pentecostal movement. However, from a relatively early point, W. H. Durham began to put forward a simpler scheme: I began to write against the doctrine that it takes two works of grace to save and to cleanse a man. I denied and still deny that God does not deal with the nature of sin at conversion. I deny that a man who is converted and born again is outwardly washed and cleansed but that his heart is left unclean with enmity towards God in it ... This would not be salvation. Salvation is an inward work ... It means a change of nature ... It means that all the old man, or old nature which was sinful and depraved, and which was the very thing in us that was condemned, is crucified with Christ.' Thus sanctification is no longer a distinct and sudden experience subsequent to justification. The two are merged into one work of grace, which is quite separate from baptism in the Spirit. No longer is there a three-stage way of salvation, only a two-stage ordo salutis. Despite some vociferous opposition to Durham when he first put forward this two-stage scheme, it became the dominant model within Pentecostalism. Upon first encounter, the Pentecostal preaching of salvation appears to be thoroughly within the Protestant framework. The starting-point is identical, 'the utter depravity of human nature' bringing as its consequence 'the necessity for repentance and regeneration.' A person who is regenerate is said to be justified by faith in the atoning blood of Christ. In spite of this formal affirmation of the doctrine of justification by faith, the doctrine is robbed of meaning by various other elements in Pentecostal teaching. First, the utter depravity of human nature is not taken very seriously in connection with the genesis of faith. In contrast to Luther's view of the bondage of the will, man plays a decisive role in coming to faith. Thus Pearlman, a leading Pentecostal, says, 'Is faith a human or a divine activity? The fact that man is commanded to believe implies the ability and the obligation to do so. '6 Second, it cannot be doubted that the doctrine of justification by faith does not, in the Pentecostal movement, hold the central position that it does within Reformed theology. For whilst sanctification may no longer be the dominant motif of Pentecostal theology, its focus of attention remained at a point subsequent to justification; namely, baptism in the Spirit. This is the primary characteristic of Pentecostal preaching and practice. 234 The 'Ordo Salutis' and the Charismatic Movement Thirdly, Pentecostalism suffers from the merging of justification with sanctification. Within Pentecostalism, justification does not have any clear precedence over sanctification. Pentecostals emphasize sanctification to such a degree that justification by faith is claimed to be insufficient for salvation. They insist that there must be a minimum of sanctification or there can be no redemption. So Barrett says, 'Inward purification must be achieved in order to enter heaven, because it is written "holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord" (Heb. 12: 14). ' 7 Professor Hollenweger illustrates this understanding very vividly in the story of the man condemned to death for embezzlement. 8 Those present in court took pity on him and raised £1,999,19.6<1. But since the man owed £2,000, the judge ruled that he must be condemned. In despair, the man went through all his pockets and then, to wild applause, produced 6d. This example demonstrates the dual character of justification within Pentecostalism. Despite the extensive changes in the ordo salutis since Wesley's scheme, it still bears his mark. In spite ofthe large proportion of the debt being paid for him (£1,999.19.6<1), there still remains a proportion which depends upon the exertion of the condemned (6d). Sanctification is still a necessary qualification for justification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See APOSTOLIC JOURNEY OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI TO BRAZIL ON THE OCCASION OF THE FIFTH GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE BISHOPS OF LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN INAUGURAL SESSION OF THE FIFTH GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE BISHOPS OF LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI Conference Hall, Shrine of Aparecida Sunday, 13 May 2007 Dear Brother Bishops, beloved priests, religious men and women and laypeople, Dear observers from other religious confessions: It gives me great joy to be here today with you to inaugurate the Fifth General Conference of the Bishops of Latin America and the Caribbean, which is being held close to the Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida, Patroness of Brazil. I would like to begin with words of thanksgiving and praise to God for the great gift of the Christian faith to the peoples of this Continent. Likewise, I am most grateful for the kind words of Cardinal Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa, Archbishop of Santiago and President of CELAM, spoken in his own name, on behalf of the other two Presidents and for all the participants in this General Conference. 1. The Christian faith in Latin America Faith in God has animated the life and culture of these nations for more than five centuries. From the encounter between that faith and the indigenous peoples, there has emerged the rich Christian culture of this Continent, expressed in art, music, literature, and above all, in the religious traditions and in the peoples’ whole way of being, united as they are by a shared history and a 2 shared creed that give rise to a great underlying harmony, despite the diversity of cultures and languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Plenary Indulgence
    Our Lady of Lourdes Hospitality North American Volunteers Pope Francis Proclaims Plenary Indulgence Affirming the Response to the PAENITENIARIA 10th Year Jubilee Plenary Indulgence Honoring Our Lady of Lourdes Hospitality North American Volunteers, by Apostolic Papal Decree a Plenary Indulgence is granted to faithful making pilgrimage to Lourdes or experiencing Lourdes in a Virtual Pilgrimage with North American Lourdes Volunteers by fulfilling the usual norms and conditions between July 16, 2013 thru July 15, 2020. APOSTOLICA Jesus Christ lovingly sacrificed Himself for the salvation of humanity. Through Baptism, we are freed from the Original Sin of disobedience inherited from Adam and Eve. With our gift of free will we can choose to sin, personally separating ourselves from God. Although we can be completely forgiven, temporal (temporary) consequences of sin remain. Indulgences are special graces that can rid us of temporal punishment. What is a plenary indulgence? “An indulgence is a remission before God of the temporal punishment Our Lady of Lourdes Hospitality North American Volunteers due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven.” (CCC 1471) There Public Association of the Christian Faithful and First Hospitality of the Americas are two types of indulgences: plenary and partial. A plenary indulgence www.LourdesVolunteers.org [email protected] removes all of the temporal punishment due to sin; a partial indulgence (315) 476-0026 FAX (419) 730-4540 removes some but not all of the temporal punishment. © 2017 V. 1-18 What is temporal punishment for sin? How can the Church give indulgences? Temporal punishment for sin is the sanctification from attachment to sin, The Church is able to grant indulgences by the purification to holiness needed for us to be able to enter Heaven.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charismatic Movement and Lutheran Theology [1972]
    THE CHARISMATIC MOVEMENT AND LUTHERAN THEOLOGY Pre/ace One of the significant developments in American church life during the past decade has been the rapid spread of the neo-Pentecostal or charis­ matic movement within the mainline churches. In the early sixties, experi­ ences and practices usually associated only with Pentecostal denominations began co appear with increasing frequency also in such churches as the Roman Catholic, Episcopalian, and Lutheran. By the mid-nineteen-sixties, it was apparent that this movement had also spread co some pascors and congregations of The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. In cerrain areas of the Synod, tensions and even divisions had arisen over such neo-Pente­ costal practices as speaking in tongues, miraculous healings, prophecy, and the claimed possession of a special "baptism in the Holy Spirit." At the request of the president of the Synod, the Commission on Theology and Church Relations in 1968 began a study of the charismatic movement with special reference co the baptism in the Holy Spirit. The 1969 synodical convention specifically directed the commission co "make a comprehensive study of the charismatic movement with special emphasis on its exegetical aspects and theological implications." Ie was further suggested that "the Commission on Theology and Church Relations be encouraged co involve in its study brethren who claim to have received the baptism of the Spirit and related gifts." (Resolution 2-23, 1969 Pro­ ceedings. p. 90) Since that time, the commission has sought in every practical way co acquaint itself with the theology of the charismatic movement. The com­ mission has proceeded on the supposition that Lutherans involved in the charismatic movement do not share all the views of neo-Pentecostalism in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Insights from John Wesley and ‘The People Called Methodists’
    DENOMINATIONAL IDENTITY IN A WORLD OF THEOLOGICAL INDIFFERENTISM: SOME INSIGHTS FROM JOHN WESLEY AND ‘THE PEOPLE CALLED METHODISTS’ David B. McEwan This article has been peer reviewed. This article examines the importance of denominational identity for the early Methodists and its implications for us today. John Wesley clearly believed God had raised up the Methodists to live and proclaim the message of scriptural holiness. The challenge of maintaining the ethos of the Methodist communities required close attention to those critical elements that shaped both their lives and their beliefs. Evidence is presented of Wesley’s commitment to focus on the ‘essentials’ that defined his movement, while leaving room for diversity on ‘non-essentials’ to allow for cooperation in mission between different Christian traditions. Having identified these critical elements in Wesley’s own day, the question is asked how this might be applied today, not only in a local church setting but also for those involved in theological education and ministerial formation. ____________________________________________________ Introduction In the last ten years or so there has been a spate of books, articles, and conferences expressing concern about evangelical identity and denominational identity. Recently the Assemblies of God raised questions about the current importance and practice of speaking in tongues within their movement. Many Reformed denominations are seeking to return to a more robust form of Calvinism and my own denomination (Church of the Nazarene) is concerned about the loss of our Wesleyan heritage, particularly the emphasis on holiness of heart and life. The focus of this paper is not to examine whether the current concerns are valid, nor is it to examine all the possible reasons for this loss of ‘identity.’ Instead, I want to look briefly at one particular concern highlighted by many denominational scholars and leaders— Aldersgate Papers, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Amillennialism Reconsidered Beatrices
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1,185-210. Copyright 0 2005 Andrews University Press. AMILLENNIALISM RECONSIDERED BEATRICES. NEALL Union College Lincoln, Nebraska Introduction G. K. Beale's latest commentary on Revelation and Kim Riddlebarger's new book A Casefor Ami~~ennialismhave renewed interest in the debate on the nature of the millennium.' Amillennialism has an illustrious history of support from Augustine, theologians of the Calvinistic and ~utheran confessions, and a long line of Reformed theologians such as Abraham Kuyper, Amin Vos, H. Ridderbos, A. A. Hoekema, and M. G. line? Amillennialists recognize that a straightforward reading of the text seems to show "the chronologicalp'ogression of Rev 19-20, the futurity of Satan's imprisonment,the physicality of 'the first resurrection' and the literalness of the one thousand years" (emphasis supplied).) However, they do not accept a chronologicalprogression of the events in these chapters, preferring instead to understand the events as recapitulatory. Their rejection of the natural reading of the text is driven by a hermeneutic of strong inaugurated eschatology4-the paradox that in the Apocalypse divine victory over the dragon and the reign of Christ and his church over this present evil world consist in participating with Christ in his sufferings and death? Inaugurated eschatology emphasizes Jesus' victory over the powers of evil at the cross. Since that monumental event, described so dramatically in Rev 12, Satan has been bound and the saints have been reigning (Rev 20). From the strong connection between the two chapters (see Table 1 below) they infer that Rev 20 recapitulates Rev 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Sanctification
    THEOLOGY & APPLICATION Understanding Sanctification anctification is the work of God within the believer by which we grow into the image of Jesus Christ and display the fruit of the Spirit. The imputed holiness of Christ becomes ours at the moment of our Sconversion. Now in our daily behavior, practical holiness is to be lived out. Models of Sanctification THE TEACHING OF CHRISTIAN PERFECTION John Wesley (1703–91) believed in a state of Christian perfection — a state subsequent to salvation. This teaching of Christian perfection is based on a second blessing being the key to holiness. This second work of God was described as “perfection,” “second blessing,” “holiness,” “perfect love,” or “entire sanctification.” This view is that through a second experience, followers of Jesus enter an upgraded quality of Christian living. Through this second blessing, we sense God’s love more vividly and our own love for God. The heart is cleansed from sin so that sin ceases to control the believer’s behavior. Full and genuine holiness of life (so it is claimed) comes after this second experience, this second work of grace. This “perfection” happens in a single instant when the believer is raised to the higher level of perfection. But this state of perfection can be lost. The believer then falls away and may be eternally lost. THE HOPE OF THE GOSPEL 117 Critique Christian perfection is not a biblical view of sanctification. This view confuses Christian maturity with Christian perfection. In sanctification, we grow in Christian maturity, but we never reach Christian perfection until that eternal day when we see Jesus Christ face to face.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected]
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Trends and Issues in Missions Center for Global Ministries 2009 Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements" (2009). Trends and Issues in Missions. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_missions/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Trends and Issues in Missions by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pentecostal/Charismatic Movements Page 1 Pentecostal Movement The first two hundred years (100-300 AD) The emphasis on the spiritual gifts was evident in the false movements of Gnosticism and in Montanism. The result of this false emphasis caused the Church to react critically against any who would seek to use the gifts. These groups emphasized the gift of prophecy, however, there is no documentation of any speaking in tongues. Montanus said that “after me there would be no more prophecy, but rather the end of the world” (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Vol II, p. 418). Since his prophecy was not fulfilled, it is obvious that he was a false prophet (Deut . 18:20-22). Because of his stress on new revelations delivered through the medium of unknown utterances or tongues, he said that he was the Comforter, the title of the Holy Spirit (Eusebius, V, XIV).
    [Show full text]
  • The Doctrine of Sanctification
    The Doctrine of Sanctification by Charles Hodge Table of Contents Its Nature -- Is is a Supernatural Work -- Proof of its Supernatural Character -- All Holy Exercises referred to the Spirit as their Author -- We are taught to pray for Repentance, Faith, and other Graces -- Argument from the Believer's Union with Christ -- Argument from related Doctrines Wherein it consists -- Putting off the Old, and putting on the New Man -- Paul details his own Experience in Roman. vii. 7-25 -- What Romans vii. 7-25 teaches -- Galatians v. 16-26 -- Ephesians iv. 22-24 The Method of Sanctification -- The Soul is led to exercise Faith -- The Effect of Union with Christ -- The Inward Work of the Spirit -- God calls the Graces of his People into Exercise -- The Church and Sacraments as means of Grace -- The Kingly Office of Christ The Fruits of Sanctification, or Good Works -- Romish Doctrine on Good Works -- Works of Supererogation -- Precepts and Counsels -- The Sense in which the Fruits of the Spirit in Believers are called Good Necessity of Good Works -- Antinomianism -- Relation of Good Works to Reward -- Romish Doctrine -- Refutation of this Romish Doctrine -- Doctrine of the older Protestant Divines Perfectionism -- Protestant Doctrine -- Argument from the General Representations of Scripture -- Passages which describe the Conflict between the Flesh and the Spirit -- Argument from the Lord's Prayer -- Argument from the Experience of Christians Theories of Perfectionism Pelagian Theory -- Pelagian Theory -- The Romish Theory -- The Arminian Theory -- Oberlin Theory -- The Relation between these Theories of Perfection Endnotes § 1. Its Nature. SANCTIFICATION in the Westminster Catechism is said to be "the work of God's free grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole man after the image of God, and are enabled more and more to die unto sin and live unto righteousness." Agreeably to this definition, justification differs from sanctification, (1.) In that the former is a transient act, the latter a progressive work.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Reason 1 Completed = Test Question on Diocesan Religion Test
    Date Comments and edits Faith and Reason 1 Completed ∆ = Test question on Diocesan Religion Test Faith and Reason as found in the Nicene Creed I. “I believe…” A. Students will articulate the relationship between faith and reason. 1. Faith (CCC 878) a. Heb 11:1 “Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen.” ∆ b. Belief is only possible through continuous grace and the Holy Spirit, CCC153 ∆ c. We will be saved by God’s grace if we cooperate with it d. Truly a human act, CCC 154 ∆ e. In faith the human intellect and will cooperate with divine grace, CCC 155 (relationship between faith and freedom is any act of Faith must be made freely) f. There are external proofs of God’s revelation that join the internal helps of the Holy Spirit, CCC 156 g. We profess this revelation in the creed, celebrate it in the sacraments, live by right conduct, and respond to it in prayer. h. Distinction between Fides Quae and Fides Qua : The faith that we believe with (theological virtue) and the faith that we believe in (objective content) 2. Reason and its relationship with faith (see teachings of John Paul II and St. Thomas Aquinas) ∆ 3. Faith is reasonable B. The learner will be able to dialogue regarding challenges about the Catholic Faith through use of the Magisterium, Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and reason. 1. Introduction ∆ a. 1 Pet 3:15-16 “Always be ready to give an explanation to anyone who asks you for a reason for your ∆ hope but do it with gentleness and reverence.” ∆ b.
    [Show full text]
  • SLOW LEARNERS in the CHURCH Last Week’S Column Discussed How a Single Letter in an Esoteric Greek Word Made All the Difference in Defining Catholic Dogma About Jesus
    “THE THIRD TIME’S A CHARM”: SLOW LEARNERS IN THE CHURCH Last week’s column discussed how a single letter in an esoteric Greek word made all the difference in defining Catholic dogma about Jesus. By all accounts, Nicaea was a success. And yet, as is so often the case, people were slow– very slow– to assimilate its decrees. In fact, the Arian crisis continued to brew even after the priest’s teaching was declared heretical. So, we jump ahead for a moment to the Council of Ephesus in 431 A.D. (the 3rd council) which forbade any changes to the Creed promulgated at Nicaea under pain of condemnation. Now, fast forward to Chalcedon in 451 A.D., when an impasse of sorts was reached. In view of the fixed nature of the creed according to Ephesus, bishops felt that to add or change the Creed would violate an earlier council and were extremely hesitant to do so. And yet it was inadequate. Ephesus (431) had decreed: “It is not permitted to produce … any other creed except the one which was defined by the holy fathers who were gathered together in the Holy Spirit at Nicaea. Any who dare to compose… another creed.” They weren’t joking! In the nick of time, an archdeacon in Constantinople rose, and proposed a brilliant way forward. An earlier Council held at Constantinople in 381 A.D. had largely gone unnoticed to the wider Church. This is not unsurprising in its day. It’s not as if the Council decrees were broadcast on EWTN! This is part of the problem in reconstructing historical events accurately.
    [Show full text]
  • The Active Role of Christ and the Holy Spirit in the Sanctification of the Eucharistic Elements Edward J
    Theological Studies 45(1984) THE ACTIVE ROLE OF CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THE SANCTIFICATION OF THE EUCHARISTIC ELEMENTS EDWARD J. KILMARTIN, S.J. University of Notre Dame URING THE LAST two decades several bilateral ecumenical commis­ D sions of Christian churches have issued agreed statements on the subject of the Eucharist. In general they display a striking conformity in the way they speak about how Christ's sacramental presence is realized. In this essay all examples derive from commissions which have Roman Catholic participants and, in individual cases, representatives of the Anglican, Lutheran, Orthodox, or Reformed traditions. Besides the pas­ sages quoted from bilateral commission documents, relevant sections of the Faith and Order Commission's "Lima text" of 1982 are included. This document is the product of the collaboration of representatives of nearly all major Christian denominations along with the five churches mentioned above. The content of these texts is analyzed and compared with the tradi­ tional theologies of these churches. At least superficially, the way of describing the sanctification of the Eucharistie elements corresponds to the language and theological viewpoint of the Orthodox and Reformed Churches. It is less at home with the Anglo-Catholic, Lutheran, and Roman Catholic traditional theologies. This raises the question about the extent to which an ecumenical agreement has actually been attained, particularly between Orthodox and Roman Catholic theologies; for if the latter theologians can use the same language as the Orthodox and, in turn, do accept the same concept of essential change of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ as the Orthodox, it would seem that full agreement on the theology of the sanctification of bread and wine is in sight.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Vatican Ii (1943-1986 American Mariology)
    FACULTAS THEOLOGICA "MARIANUM" MARIAN LffiRARY INSTITUTE (UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON) TITLE: THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF BIBLICAL MARIOLOGY PRE- AND POST-VATICAN II (1943-1986 AMERICAN MARIOLOGY) A thesis submitted to The Theological Faculty "Marianwn" In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Licentiate of Sacred Theology By: James J. Tibbetts, SFO Director: Reverend Bertrand A. Buby, SM Thesis at: Marian Library Institute Dayton, Ohio, USA 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 The Question of Development I. Introduction - Status Questionis 1 II. The Question of Historical Development 2 III. The Question of Biblical Theological Development 7 Footnotes 12 Chapter 2 Historical Development of Mariology I. Historical Perspective Pre- to Post Vatican Emphasis A. Mariological Movement - Vatican I to Vatican II 14 B. Pre-Vatican Emphasis on Scripture Scholarship 16 II. Development and Decline in Mariology 19 III. Development and Controversy: Mary as Church vs. Mediatrix A. The Mary-Church Relationship at Vatican II 31 B. Mary as Mediatrix at Vatican II 37 c. Interpretations of an Undeveloped Christology 41 Footnotes 44 Chapter 3 Development of a Biblical Mariology I. Biblical Mariology A. Development towards a Biblical Theology of Mary 57 B. Developmental Shift in Mariology 63 c. Problems of a Biblical Mariology 67 D. The Place of Mariology in the Bible 75 II. Symbolism, Scripture and Marian Theology A. The Meaning of Symbol 82 B. Marian Symbolism 86 c. Structuralism and Semeiotics 94 D. The Development of Two Schools of Thought 109 Footnotes 113 Chapter 4 Comparative Development in Mariology I. Comparative Studies - Scriptural Theology 127 A. Richard Kugelman's Commentary on the Annunciation 133 B.
    [Show full text]