DOCSLIB.ORG

The Science of Sustainability EXPLORING a UNIFIED PATH for DEVELOPMENT and CONSERVATION the Science of Sustainability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Science of Sustainability EXPLORING a UNIFIED PATH for DEVELOPMENT and CONSERVATION the Science of Sustainability The Science of Sustainability EXPLORING A UNIFIED PATH FOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION The Science of Sustainability hile the U.S. city of Louisville, Kentucky isn’t known globally for the environmental work happening there, that might very well change— Wthe city has become home to a first-of-its-kind collaboration between environmentalists, city leaders and public health professionals. The Green Heart Project, funded in part by the United States National Institutes of Health, will plant trees in neighborhoods throughout the city and monitor how they af- fect residents’ health. It’s a boundary-pushing medical trial— a controlled study of nature as a medical intervention. Green Heart is just one project in one city, but it rep- resents a new way of thinking about the role of conservation in solving human problems. It is part of an emerging mod- el for cross-sector collaboration that aims to create a world ready for the sustainability challenges ahead. Is this world possible? Here, we present a new sci- ence-based view that says “yes”—but it will require new forms of collaboration across traditionally disconnected sec- © Randy Olson tors, and on a near unprecedented scale. 2 The Science of Sustainability: A False Choice In both options, we used leading projections of population growth and gross domestic product to estimate how demand for food, energy A False Choice and water will evolve between 2010 and 2050. Under business-as-usu- al, we played out existing expectations and trends in how those chang- Many assume that economic interests and environmental inter- es will impact land use, water use, air quality, climate, protected hab- ests are in conflict. But new research makes the case that this percep- itat areas and ocean fisheries. In the more sustainable scenario, we tion of development vs. conservation is not just unnecessary but ac- proposed changes to how and where food and energy are produced, tively counterproductive to both ends. Achieving a sustainable future asking if these adjustments could result in better outcomes for the will be dependent on our ability to secure both thriving human com- same elements of human well-being and nature. Our full findings are munities and abundant and healthy natural ecosystems. described in a peer-reviewed paper—“An Attainable Global Vision The Nature Conservancy partnered with the University of Min- for Conservation and Human Well-Being”—published in Frontiers in nesota and 11 other organizations to ask whether it is possible to Ecology and the Environment. achieve a future where the needs of both people and nature are ad- These scenarios let us ask, can we do better? Can we design a fu- vanced. Can we actually meet people’s needs for food, water and ener- ture that meets people’s needs without further degrading nature in gy while doing more to protect nature? the process? “The perception of development vs. conservation is not just unnecessary, but actively counterproductive to both ends.” To answer this question, we compared what the world will look Our answer is “yes,” but it comes with several big “ifs.” There is like in 2050 if economic and human development progress in a “busi- a path to get there, but matters are urgent—if we want to accomplish ness-as-usual” fashion and what it would look like if instead we join these goals by mid-century, we’ll have to dramatically ramp up our ef- forces to implement a “sustainable” path with a series of fair-minded forts now. The next decade is critical. and technologically viable solutions to the challenges that lie ahead. 3 The Science of Sustainability: A False Choice “The impression that economic and environmental goals are mutually exclusive Mike Benna has contributed to a lack of connection among Furthermore, changing course in the next ten years will require global collabora- tion on a scale not seen perhaps since World War II. The widely held impression that some of the sectors best economic and environmental goals are mutually exclusive has contributed to a lack of equipped to solve such connection among key societal constituencies best equipped to solve interconnected problems—namely, the public health, development, financial and conservation com- interconnected problems.” munities. This has to change. The good news is that protecting nature and providing water, food and energy to a growing world do not have to be either-or propositions. Our view, instead, calls for smart energy, water, air, health and ecosystem initiatives that balance the needs of economic growth and resource conservation equally. Rather than a zero-sum game, these elements are balanced sides of an equation, revealing the path to a future where people and nature thrive together. 4 TESTIMONIALS DR. SANIA NISHTAR, SI, FRCP, PhD “We must choose to prioritise long-term sustainability over short-term gratification, and calculate the true cost borne by Co-Chair, Independent High-Level Commission on societies in the future instead of just the price of actions and policies today. The global community has a responsibility to Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization facilitate this transformation, and it starts by recognizing the environment as a key determinant of human health.” “We have the knowledge, power and technology to fast-track solutions to the enormous environmental challenges we face. DOMINIC WAUGHRAY We just need to act much quicker, together and smarter. This analysis offers a wide lens on global systems and shows what’s Head of the Centre for Global Public Goods, Member of the Executive Committee,World Economic Forum possible by energizing communities, partnerships and innovative alliances while helping people harness Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies to drive impact.” ACHIM STEINER “Nature-based solutions for climate are one of the most cost-effective approaches we have for achieving our climate goals. Administrator They also provide multiple co-benefits for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Investing in nature is not only the United Nations Development Programme smart thing to do, it is the right thing to do.” “As we have seen in the fight for health equity, working towards a sustainable world requires a multisectoral approach DR. GARY L. GOTTLIEB, MD, MBA in which people, their surrounding environment, and the economy flourishes because all sectors have come together in Chief Executive Officer,Partners in Health partnership towards a common purpose.” SIR ANDREW HAINES “This landmark report shows how, with bold and ambitious policies which integrate the achievement of conservation and MBBS, MD, FRCGP, FRCP, FMedSci development goals, it is possible for humanity to flourish at much lower levels of environmental impact than hazardous Professor, Environmental Change and Public Health London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine ‘business-as-usual’ approaches.” DR. CINDY HUANG, PhD, MPA “We are facing unprecedented global challenges, from climate change to refugee crises to pandemic threats. The linkages Co-Director of Migration, Displacement, and between such challenges have yet to be fully explored and appreciated. This new study puts into stark relief why we must Humanitarian Policy, Center for Global Development look for solutions across sectors and silos.” “Our growing understanding of the intricate links between nature and the well-being of people shows that there are many DR. GEORGINA MACE, PhD Professor and Head of the Centre for Biodiversity and options that do not lead to trade-offs between the economy and the environment. The problem is that almost all institutions Environment Research, University College London and decision-making bodies treat the economy, health and the natural environment in separate silos. This governance challenge is critical to address soon.” “This important, path-breaking study indicates that—even with projected population and GDP growth—it’s indeed possible DR. HAROLD MOONEY, PhD to maintain global conservation targets. As it reports, this would require unprecedented policy shifts and collaborations Senior Fellow Emeritus, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment across traditionally disconnected sectors. But it explicitly and holistically shows us what the future could look like. There is promise for what we want to see, but we have to commit to change.” “This paper moves beyond clashing worldviews, which argue that the needs of people must be sacrificed for nature or that DR. TERRY CHAPIN, PhD nature must be sacrificed for people. Instead, it takes critical goals of each and asks whether they are compatible. Can they be Professor Emeritus, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Center for Humans & Nature met? Coarse-scale modeling has its limitations, but these findings show a future in which people and nature thrive is indeed plausible and worth working towards.” The Science of Sustainability: Two Paths to 2050 Two Paths to 2050 This vision is not a wholesale departure from what others have offered. A number of prominent scientists and organizations have put forward important and thoughtful views for a sustainable future; but often such plans consider the needs of people and nature in in- solation from one another, use analyses confined to limited sectors or geographies, or assume that some hard tradeoffs must be made, such as slowing global population growth, taking a reduction in GDP growth or shifting diets off of meat. Our new research considers glob- al economic development and conservation needs together, more ho- listically, in order to find a sustainable path forward. What could a different future look like? We’ve used as our stan- dard the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a set of 17 measures for “a world where all people are fed, healthy, em- ployed, educated, empowered and thriving, but not at the expense of other life on Earth.” Our analysis directly aligns with ten of those goals. Using the SDGs as our guideposts, we imagine a world in 2050 that looks very different than the one today—and drastically different from the one we will face if we continue in business-as-usual fashion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ensuring Availability and Sustainable Management Of
    Issue brief SDG 6 © Dan-Roizer ENSURING AVAILABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION FOR ALL Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) – Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all – confirms the importance of water and sanitation in the global political agenda. Building on the relevant Millennium Development Goal, SDG 6 addresses the sustainability of access to water and sanitation by focusing on the quality, availability and management of freshwater resources. The individual targets of SDG 6 Environmental dimension of UN Environment and SDG 6 cover the entire water cycle and its SDG 6 interconnections: As the global environmental authority, the SDG 6 recognizes that countries’ social United Nations Environment Programme ➡ 6.1: provision of drinking water development and economic prosperity (UN Environment) connects the issue of depend on the sustainable management of freshwater to other aspects of sustainable ➡ 6.2: sanitation and hygiene freshwater resources and ecosystems. development, such as oceans, land and services SDG 6 acknowledges that ecosystems and agriculture. This work entails building their inhabitants, including humans, are national capacity to monitor freshwater ➡ 6.3: treatment and reuse of water users and that their activities on land ecosystem health, including water wastewater and ambient can compromise the quality and availability quality, facilitating integrated water water quality of fresh water. resources management processes and ➡ 6.4: water-use efficiency and the implementation thereof, and providing scarcity The water-related ecosystems addressed guidelines and inputs for country-level in SDG 6 include wetlands, rivers, aquifers action to protect and restore freshwater ➡ 6.5: integrated water resources and lakes, which sustain a high level of ecosystems at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental, Economic and Community Benefits of Source Water Protection
    Beyond the Source The environmental, economic and community benefits of source water protection EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Healthy source watersheds are vital natural infrastructure for cities around the world Photo: © Mark Godfrey Executive Summary Healthy source watersheds are vital infrastructure urban source watersheds will be tapped by up to two-thirds of the global population Healthy source watersheds are vital natural infrastructure for nearly all cities though they represent one-third of the Earth’s land surface. Cities—as hubs for around the world. They collect, store and filter water and provide benefits for employment, services and investment—will clearly be the drivers of economic biodiversity conservation, climate change adaptation and mitigation, food security, growth. To grow sustainably, cities will need to play an active role in protecting the and human health and well-being. Today, an estimated 1.7 billion people living water sources on which people and nature depend, but they can’t do it on their own. in the world’s largest cities depend on water flowing from source watersheds Source watersheds are a nexus for action for those working to build resilient cities, sometimes located hundreds, if not thousands, of kilometers away. By 2050, those improve water security, drive sustainable development and create a stable climate. Current and potential urban source watersheds Figure ES.1. Watershed areas that currently or could potentially provide surface water supply to cities with populations greater than 100,000 Source watershed areas by percent overlap people. Darker colors indicate overlapping watershed areas, where multiple withdrawal points collect surface runoff from the same upstream land areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sustainability Within California's Improved Forest Management Carbon Offsets Program Cory Hertog Clark University, [email protected]
    Clark University Clark Digital Commons International Development, Community and Master’s Papers Environment (IDCE) 5-2018 Ecological Sustainability within California's Improved Forest Management Carbon Offsets Program Cory Hertog Clark University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers Part of the Environmental Policy Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Physical and Environmental Geography Commons, and the Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons Recommended Citation Hertog, Cory, "Ecological Sustainability within California's Improved Forest Management Carbon Offsets Program" (2018). International Development, Community and Environment (IDCE). 195. https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers/195 This Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Master’s Papers at Clark Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Development, Community and Environment (IDCE) by an authorized administrator of Clark Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Ecological Sustainability within California’s Improved Forest Management Carbon Offsets Program Cory Hertog May 2018 A Master’s Paper Submitted to the faculty of Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science of Environmental Science and Policy in the department of International Development, Community, and Environment and a Master of Business Administration in the Graduate School of Management And accepted on the recommendation of Dominik Kulakowski - Ph.D. Will O’Brien - J.D., M.B.A Graduate School of Geography Graduate School of Management Abstract Ecological Sustainability within California’s Improved Forest Management Carbon Offsets Program Cory Hertog Forest Carbon offsets are being used as a climate change mitigation strategy in multiple programs around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Livelihoods and Ecosystems Management
    Created in 1948, IUCN - The World Conservation Union brings together 77 states, 112 government agencies, 735 NGOs, 35 affiliates, and some 10,000 scientists and experts from 181 countries in a unique worldwide partnership. IUCN’s mission is to influence, e ncourage and assist societies throughout the world to con- serve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustain- able. IUCN is the world's largest environmental knowledge network and has helped over 75 countries to prepare and implement national conservation and biodiversity strategies. IUCN is a multi- cultural, multilingual organization with 1000 staff located in 42 countries. Its headquarters are in Gland, Switzerland. http://www.iucn.org [email protected] Sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems management For the Preparatory Committee for the World Summit on Sustainable Development - 4 th Preparatory Meeting, Bali (Indonesia) While one cannot say with any confidence what forms an ecological crunch might take, when it might happen, or how severe it might be, it is easier to predict who will have the worst of it. The poor and powerless cannot shield themselves from ecological problems today, nor will they be able to do it in the future. J.R. McNeill, “Something New under the Sun” Introduction As a conservation organization that puts people at centre stage in its mission and vision, IUCN welcomes the new international focus on poverty alleviation. We know from our own experience that the pursuit of enviro nmental goals at the expense of economic well-being and social justice is doomed to fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Consumerism: Moral Motivations to a Sustainable Future
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Green consumerism: moral motivations to a sustainable future 1 2 3 Sonya Sachdeva , Jennifer Jordan and Nina Mazar Green consumerism embodies a dilemma inherent in many more expensive green products that may act as a barrier to prosocial and moral actions — foregoing personal gain in favor engaging in green consumerism. Nonetheless there are of a more abstract, somewhat intangible gain to someone or several recurring themes in the expanse of literature on something else. In addition, as in the case of purchasing more the topic of green consumerism, which may shine a light expensive green products, there is sometimes a very literal cost on ways to promote green consumerism. that may act as a barrier to engaging in green consumerism. The current review examines endogenous, exogenous, and structural factors that promote green consumerism. We also What is green consumerism? 4 discuss its potential positive and negative spillover effects. We Oxymoronic implications aside, green consumerism is, close by discussing areas of research on green consumerism for a significant portion of the Western industrial popula- that are lacking — such as the moral framing of green tion, an accessible way to engage in pro-environmental, consumerism and the expansion of the cultural context in which sustainable behavior. An operational definition of green it is defined and studied. consumerism subsumes a list of behaviors that are under- Addresses taken with the intention of promoting positive environ- 1 5 U.S. Forest Service, United States mental effects. Some prototypical behaviors that fall 2 University of Groningen, The Netherlands within this rather vague definition are purchasing appli- 3 University of Toronto, Canada ances with energy star labels, buying organic products, or turning off electrical appliances when not in use, and Corresponding author: Sachdeva, Sonya ([email protected]) taking shorter showers.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Engagement 2016 Impact Report Photo to Come Thank You for Making This a Remarkable Year for Youth Engagement at the Nature Conservancy
    Youth Engagement 2016 Impact Report Photo to come Thank you for making this a remarkable year for Youth Engagement at The Nature Conservancy. With your support, we have made great strides in empowering the next generation of conservation leaders. I’ve seen the impact of our partnership in communities around the world—from Los Angeles to New York City to Hong Kong—and heard from students, teachers and young leaders about the effect that our work has had on their lives. And, I’m proud to say that this impact has been profound. Through our efforts, we have provided high-quality environmental education curriculum, offered environmental volunteer opportunities for young people in their own schools and communities, and provided paid high school and college internships to equip and empower our future conservation leaders. Understanding the role that nature plays in our everyday lives is the first step to protecting our natural resources, and our efforts to educate today’s youth on a large scale ensures that the next generation grows up with a conservation ethic. Empowering young people to take volunteer action on behalf of the environment ensures future advocates for our natural resources. And, training and supporting youth as they embark on their college and professional careers in conservation ensures that our future leaders will represent the rich cultural and ethnic diversity of our nation’s largest cities. I am inspired by the positive impacts that we have been able to achieve this year, and I am truly thankful for your generous support of The Nature Conservancy’s Youth Engagement Programs, and for your partnership in helping us to build stronger communities, a healthier world and an educated and empowered generation of young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Climate Change and Sustainability
    20 Perspectives on climate change and sustainability Coordinating Lead Authors: Gary W. Yohe (USA), Rodel D. Lasco (Philippines) Lead Authors: Qazi K. Ahmad (Bangladesh), Nigel Arnell (UK), Stewart J. Cohen (Canada), Chris Hope (UK), Anthony C. Janetos (USA), Rosa T. Perez (Philippines) Contributing Authors: Antoinette Brenkert (USA), Virginia Burkett (USA), Kristie L. Ebi (USA), Elizabeth L. Malone (USA), Bettina Menne (WHO Regional Office for Europe/Germany), Anthony Nyong (Nigeria), Ferenc L. Toth (Hungary), Gianna M. Palmer (USA) Review Editors: Robert Kates (USA), Mohamed Salih (Sudan), John Stone (Canada) This chapter should be cited as: Yohe, G.W., R.D. Lasco, Q.K. Ahmad, N.W. Arnell, S.J. Cohen, C. Hope, A.C. Janetos and R.T. Perez, 2007: Perspectives on climate change and sustainability. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 811-841. Perspectives on climate change and sustainable development Chapter 20 Table of Contents .....................................................813 Executive summary 20.7 Implications for regional, sub-regional, local and sectoral development; access ...................814 .............826 20.1 Introduction: setting the context to resources and technology; equity 20.7.1 Millennium Development Goals – 20.2 A synthesis of new knowledge relating
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Reading of Permaculture Literature
    Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2018/14 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling The quest for sustainability – a critical reading of permaculture literature ‘ Tove Janzon DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2018/14 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling The quest for sustainability – a critical reading of permaculture literature Tove Janzon Supervisor: Frans Lenglet Evaluator: Petra Hansson Copyright © Tove Janzon and the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2018 Content 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 The sustainable development concept ........................................................................................... 1 2.1.1 History .................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.2 Definitions .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 The permaculture concept ............................................................................................................. 2 2.2.1 History ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Maura Trainor
    Anne Maura Trainor The Nature Conservancy African Program 820G Rieveschl Hall Cincinnati, OH 45221 Email: [email protected] Phone 919.619.4678 DEGREES University of North Carolina, Ph.D., Geography, 2006 to 2011 Integrated field ecology with remote sensing identify and conserve critical dispersal habitats for the federally endangered species and provide scientific insights that prioritize mitigation measures while mediating conflicting land-use needs between a U.S. military installation, privately held lands, and public spaces in a highly fragmented landscape. Colorado State University, M.S., Wildlife Management and Conservation, 2001 to 2004 Incorporated animal movement behavior and geospatial analyses to refine habitat regulations and evaluated the effectiveness of mitigation efforts for federally protected species. University of New Hampshire, B.Sc., Biology (Focus: Ecology and Evolution), 1992 to 1996 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS THE NATURE CONSERVANCY Smart Growth Director, 2015 to Present I conduct spatial and statistical analysis related to The Nature Conservancy’s Development by Design approach – proactive scenario planning to avoid, minimize or offset the negative environmental impact of development throughout Africa. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, 2014 to Present THE NATURE CONSERVANCY AND YALE UNIVERSITY, New Haven, CT Postdoctoral Fellow, NatureNet Fellowship, 2013 to 2015 I lead two projects balancing the need for energy production while minimizing impacts and risks on biodiversity, provision of ecosystem services, and climate change mitigation. • Conducting an in-depth analysis predicting future land-use requirements under various energy development scenarios produced by the Energy Information Administration. This project also highlights how land-use intensity greatly varies among renewable, conventional, and unconventional energy productions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature Conservancy, with Partners, Works to Prevent New Invasions and Contain Established Invasive Species
    invasive species Preventing and containing the global spread of invaders Invasive species are threatening environments, economies and human health around the world. The Nature Conservancy, with partners, works to prevent new invasions and contain established invasive species. With more than two decades experience in invasive species management, the Conservancy is tackling the challenge through science leadership, effective land and water management, and encouraging better business practices and stronger public policies. invasive species threaten lives & economies around the world The estimated damage from invasives Invasive species are those non-native plants, animals and microorganisms that spread quickly and aggressively when worldwide totals more than $1.4 trillion– introduced outside their normal ranges. Often these introduced five percent of the global economy. species cause dramatic environmental changes and may lead to extinctions of native species or populations. Invasive species are spreading around the world at an accelerating rate due to Invasive species form the most common threat to the special places exponential increases in global trade and travel. No ecosystem on where The Nature Conservancy works. Often they threaten human the planet is immune from these invasions, which are contributing to well-being as well. The Nature Conservancy is the leading organization the greatest extinction of species since the death of the dinosaurs. working to prevent invasive species damage, deploying strategies to block invasive species introduction and reduce impacts at the Invasive species are the second leading global level, in key nations, and at critical conservation sites. cause for the loss of biodiversity. The Global Invasive Species Team focuses on preventing new introductions through partnerships with businesses and by Invasive species not only harm biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • ROBERT MCDONALD Senior Scientist for Sustainable Land-Use the Nature Conservancy 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 +1 703-841-2093 Rob [email protected]
    ROBERT MCDONALD Senior Scientist for Sustainable Land-Use The Nature Conservancy 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 +1 703-841-2093 [email protected] Research Themes: Ecosystem service supply and demand in urban areas; Land-use planning and conservation; Energy policy and land-use change; Sustainable agriculture. EDUCATION DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, May 2004 University Program in Ecology The Graduate School Duke University, Durham, NC Dissertation: Forest fragmentation and forest response in the North Carolina Piedmont. Concentration: Carbon sequestration, forest conservation, land-use change, landscape ecology, remote sensing. Awards: Aleane Webb Fellowship for excellence in Duke University Doctoral Research, 2003; NASA-MSU Travel Grant, International Association of Landscape Ecology Annual Meeting, 2002; National Science Foundation Pre-Doctoral Research Fellowship, 2001-2004; James B. Duke Fellowship for Academic Excellence, 2000; Bill and Melinda Gates Fellowship for Interdisciplinary Research, 2000. BACHELOR OF SCIENCE, cum laude, June 2000 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Major: Biology Minor: Chemistry. Honors thesis: Increased dominance by Acer rubrum and the decline of the Quercus- Carya climax in the North Carolina Piedmont. Honors: J.N. Couch Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research, 2000; F.J. LeClair Award for Excellence in Botanical Research, 2000; Phi Beta Kappa, 1999; Order of the Golden Key, 1999. PROFESSIONAL Lead scientist, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) EXPERIENCE Lead scientist for the Conservancy’s urban conservation strategy, which works to both preserve biodiversity near cities and to maintain ecosystem services that urban dwellers depend on. Also provides science support to our energy policy team, particularly thinking about how energy policy will affect land-use, water-use, and biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer's
    sustainability Article Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool Anna Lewandowska 1,*, Joanna Witczak 1, Pasquale Giungato 2 ID , Christian Dierks 3, Przemyslaw Kurczewski 4 and Katarzyna Pawlak-Lemanska 1 1 Faculty of Commodity Science, Poznan University of Economics and Business, 61-875 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (K.P.-L.) 2 Chemistry Department, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Taranto district-via Alcide de Gasperi, 74123 Taranto, Italy; [email protected] 3 Fraunhofer Project Group Materials Recycling and Resource Strategies, Brentanostrasse 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Machines and Transportation, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-61-854-3121 Received: 8 April 2018; Accepted: 29 May 2018; Published: 1 June 2018 Abstract: Characterizing consumers in terms of their propensity to practice sustainable consumption represents an interesting research challenge in which a crucial role is played by the questionnaire in terms of its structure and classification criteria. Various classification rules have been proposed in the literature, which can be used to identify consumer types and signify their propensity to practice the principles of sustainable development in daily life. In this paper, we based our approach in designing a classification tool on a combination of two elements: the concept of voluntary simplicity as a pillar for consumer characteristics and the idea of assessing consumers by using filters, in a modified form introducing many new aspects of life-cycle thinking.
    [Show full text]