A History of the Road Controversy at Colorado National Monument
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
· .. - .- _. .. ..: ~ . · ... .' •, . .: ·.·· ... -· .. -·. ._ :.·. ·.-- ·. ' .-.. ', '. ·. _. ... .: · .., ·· .. ·· . •.: . .. · -. ~··' ·· .. .,_- ·-A< c.1a$sic · -- Weste~ ·· Q~~rreJ: _ ; : A :·mst~l-y ::of:-ihejl4'ad: .Co11tr~ve~y :. at ·· ..... ·· ·· · :Colorado Natiollal :Monulnenf~ · . ··' .. ... ·. ·,: .. -· ._,- . · •.· ::. : : . .. :·.· ·· ' ... .. .. ·.-· -· . ~x -- - ... __ .-... ~ ' .... - •:···· · ..... -. -:.·, . _.· -:··· . , ·.· __ : .,., : .._ ... ,. : . , . ·, · ·.. ·.· ,: -Lisa: _: s2hoc_ h~R()berts :·- ·- ·· · ,_ · _. ._...... ! • ~ .. ·.-;. ,: ·._ --. ,· .•.·· .. .> '! -·-: .. ·' ·· ,' .i.'. '; .. ... · ...· ...... .. ._. , .. ·.· .. , ·.. ' .. .·· ' .'·;. ~. ;.. ·:. : . ·.".' . ; . .· . .... ... ·.:• -'.· . • ! ," -, :· . .··. .. ;,. ' ~ ; • ' .·.· .~-. .. -.·: ' , _, .. • : .. ~~ ...,v-__· .. -r. - ' '!" ~ -· ••l : ·., ~ > ... ·. .. _. ,. ..... - ··"\ :;:~ :. : "'~--·- ...:' ..:. ~--': ·?(-~ ·.. ·. ~ . \ _.,_- · > .. ,,;_ , -~ . ·( - '.\. - : .:. .-. • --..:1' ·-'·:·.. -•. .. -·:: . ·.: · .. -·· . · ··. -. ·. -~ ·.. ..·. .. ... :· ··"... ... :. -- ~ .. :;'. ~ .~ .- : ·.·" '/ ·> cuLJiJRAL RESOuRCES 'SELECTIONS'' ' -·. ~-.: . - .. " . :.· .No> 10- ·-- ..- -: Inte~o~nt~in _ -R~gi_o_n ·. -- - ·_ < . ,·. .. .... -. 1.997 · ... ·· . ... ·.. _ :Nat1otial Pa.rk:Servk:e ". ' - , · . .'.· •':. ' • _; .. .'- " . :~ ,. " "~ · ., . ... .;. .. ··; : • · ... ·· .. ~· .· . ; .. ... -.:· ... ~ . ·.: ' ---~-., . " :.: · ;! _-_- .... :·._ ..: · .: :.~- :....... ·:-, · .. ,·. .. , .. .. ... •!' ;· . .. •· ..-.\.· ·.. · A Classic Western Quarre!: • A History of the Road Controversy at Colorado National Monument by Lisa Schoch-Roberts • U.S. Department of the· Interior National Park Service Intermountain Region Denver, Colorado • 1997 FOREWORD • As a part of the National Park Service' s mission to protect and interpret its resources, it is important ta make valuable, historical information readily available. To further that goal, 1 am pleased to present this volwne in our occasional series of publications on the Intermountain Region' s past. -----~This--history-is-the-frrst-v.olume_of_Colorado_N_ational Monument's Administrative History. Other volumes relating to the· creation of the monument and additionaI'°p"'e"rt";i;:n.:_en._t~---- issues will be published over the next few years. The history, written by Lisa Schoch-Roberts as her Master's Thesis from Colorado State University, addresses rnany issues related to the development of the monwnent and its roads, the use of the roads and the importance the roads have played in the history of the monument and the surrollllding area. The comprehensive coverage of the subject will aid present and future managers to protect the valuable resources at Colorado National Monument and will introduce new employees to the rich history of the monument' s past. ~~Cook Director • Mission: As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally-owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. -This includes fostering wise use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the.enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and minera! resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Departrnent also promotes the goals of the Take Pride in America campaign by encouraging stewardship and citizen responsibility for the public lands and promoting citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. Administration_ NPS-D52. 1997. • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract of Thesis . iiî Acknowledgements ........... iv Preface ..... ·········· .. ·················· ······· ~ Chapter One The Landscape I The Setting . 1 TheRootsofConflictl881-1911 ...................................... 3 Chapter Two "The Nationalization of a Cafion": The Local Park Movement: 1906-1911 . 14 Chapter Three The Otto Years: 1911-30 31 Otto's Agenda ................................................. 31 Road Building, 1911-1927 ......................................... 34 Park Administration and Otto's Ouster ................................ 44 The Chamber of Commerce and its New Program, 1927-1931 ................ 48 Chapter Four Construction of Rim Rock Drive: 1931-1950 . 52 Road Construction, 1931-1933 . 52 F.oad Construction, 1933-1942 . 60 • The CCC and Federal Work Camps at Colorado National Monument, 1933-1942 . 62 The Road Project and the Community . 67 Administration of Colorado National Monument, 1933-1942 . 75 The Postwar Years . 81 Chapter Five Origîns of the Road Controversy: 1951-1980 ................................ 84 Administration of Colorado National Monument, 1951-1980 .................... 84 Local Use of Colorado National Monument, 1951-1980 ....................... 90 The Commercial Vehicle Issue, 1955-1978 ............................... 92 Chapter Six The Lawsuît: 1981-1986 ... 104 The Lawsuit .................................................. 106 The Decision . ......................................... 118 Conclusion . 123 Works Cited . 128 • LIST OF FIGURES • Figure 1.1. Colorado National Monument and Surrounding Communities. .......... 4 Figure 1.2. Topography of Mesa County. Colorado ..................... 6 Figure 2.1. Historie photo of John Otto at what appears to be mouth of Fruita Canyon. ... 20 Figure 2.2. Historie photo of John Otto (top) and Whipple Chester ascending the 550-foot Independence Monument. ................... 21 Figure ·3 :-1-.--A:erial-view-of-Serpent 's-Trail··( right)-and-Rimrock-E>rive-(left)~: . 43 Figure 3.2. Car ascending Serpents Trail. ............................... 44 Figure 4.1. Progress of Construction on Rim Rock Drive. .................... 55 Figure 4.2. CCC camp NM-1-C at present site of Monument Canyon Trail parking area ... 66 Figure 4.3. Portion of group photo of CCC enrollees and army personnel at Colorado National Monument. ....... 66 Figure 4.4. View from cliff above the south portal of tunnel #3 (bottom right) and east side road and switchbacks. .......................... 68 Figure 4.5. Men working at Cold Shivers Point on east Rim Rock Drive ...... 68 Figure 4.6. Blasting at Half-Tunnel site . ........ 69 Figure 4.7. Blasting at Half-Tunnel site ................................. 69 Figure 4.8. Half-Tunnel site after the December 12, 1933 accident. ............... 70 Figure 4.9. Progress of Construction on Rim Rock Drive. .................. 73 Figure 4.10. Workers remove blast rubble from coyote hole or pilot bore in one of the road's three tunnels. .............. 74 Figure 4.11. North portal of tunnel #3 on east Rim Rock Drive. ................. 74 • • n • ABSTRACT OF THESIS "A CLASSIC WESTERN QUARREL:" A HISTORY OF THE ROAD CONTROVERSY AT COLORADO NATIONAL MONUMENT Between 1981 and 1986, Park Service officiais at Colorado National Monument, Mesa County officiais, and Glade Park property owner John R. Wilkenson were embroiled in a legal dispute over the use of the park's scenic road, Rim Rock Drive. Presiding Judge Richard Matscb' s 1986 decision in favor of the county and Wilkenson was based on pertinent laws as well as the unique history of the park's creation and development. In an effort to explain the outcome of the 1986 lawsuit, this study traces the evolution of the conflict that developed between the communities of the Grand Valley and the National Park Service from 191 I to 1986. The conflict was the result of a variety of factors: 1) local residents' involvement in the park' s creation and management Ied to a proprietary attitude toward the park that conflicted with the Park Service once that agency was established; 2) shifts in Park Service administration and inconsistent Park Service policies allowed local residents to develop unrealistic expectations of the park's role and how they could use the area; 3) mutual community and Park Service 1 interests in road building through the park led to an inevitable conflict over road use; 4) the local attitude toward land use and resistance to the federal government in general contrasted 1• with National Park Service ideology. This study attempts to accomplish several things. In a local context, it provides a history of Colorado National Monument and the community's involvement in that park's development. In the context of the National Park Service, this study reveals the extent to which local needs influenced park administration and ultimately, the park itself. • iii • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Since l began the research for this project in the Spring of 1992, nurnerous people have provided varying degrees of academic ad.vice, research assistance, and emotional support. "---Because-this-was_originally_my_Master's thesis,_ 1 exten~ thanks to those who struggled with me during my graduate school years and those who assisted me in revising it for {>ublication:-My greatest appreciation is extended to the members of my thesis committee from the Colorado State University history department who took time from their busy schedules to work with me. I would first like to thank Dr. Dan Tyler, who was rny academic advisor for the duration. His guidance, support, patience and the persona! time he invested throughout my years as a graduate student and through the rough spots of the thesis are much appreciated. Mr.