<<

Control of Acer negundo insights from experimental and physiological studies

Merceron N., Lamarque L.J., Brogniez S., Ducournau Y., Buyle S., Degrave L., Roudie J., Felis O., Moreau A., Vernin P., Guengant Y., Delzon S., Porté A.J. [email protected]

4th International Symposium on Weeds and Invasive , Montpellier, 19-23 May 2014 1 Target : Boxelder (Acer negundo)

Light green foliage Fast-growing Dioecious species

Seed dispersal by Resprouts from Source : urban wind and water the stump 2 Distribution areas

introduced in Europe in 1689 (GB) around 1749 in France

Native range Invasive range

3 Lamarque LJ, PhD (2013) Invaded habitats Riparian forests and wetlands Local distribution

Fraxinus sp, Acer negundo Salix sp, Quercus sp Populus sp, = Alnus sp = LATE- INTERMEDIATE SUCCESSIONAL POSITION + = PIONEER SPECIES RIVERBANKS SPECIES

4 Negundo negatively impacts native species

Density

5 Lamarque et al. 2012 Ecography Negundo dominates native tree species

1 Frequency Adults 0.8

0.6 Acer negundo Native tree species 0.4

0.2

0 Acer Alnus Salix alba Populus Ulmus Corylus Crataegus Quercus negundo excelsior glutinosa nigra nigra minor avellana monogyna spinosa robur

1 1 Saplings Seedlings 0.8 0.8

0.6 0.6

0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2

0 Acer Fraxinus Prunus Ulmus Populus Corylus Sambucus Salix alba Quercus Crataegus Alnus 0 Acer Quercus Fraxinus Ulmus Corylus Salix alba Prunus Populus SambucusCrataegus Alnus negundo excelsior spinosa minor nigra avellana nigra robur monogyna glutinosa negundo robur excelsior minor avellana spinosa nigra nigra monogyna glutinosa

6 Methods in Lamarque et al. 2012 Ecography Local context : ecological and economic impacts

• River bank collapse

• Lower nesting

• Production and conservation concerns : . Replacement of Populus ( ), Alnus (energy) . Protected areas

7 Questions ?

Can we control Acer negundo establishment?

In which way?

8 Main methods to control invasive

Mortality rate (%) of resprouting

100

80

60 All species 40 Acer sp

20

0 Biological Chemical Mechanical

9 Review 50 articles Main methods to control invasive trees

Mortality rate (%) of resprouting invasive species

100

80

60Prohibited in natural areas (wetlands, forests …) All species 40 Acer sp

20

0 Biological Chemical Mechanical

10 Review 50 articles Experimental sites

Experiment 1st year of 2nd year of 11 setting up measurements measurements Experimental sites

1%1% 0% 7% 0% 1% Salles 3% 0% Bruges 11% Acer negundo Acer negundo Populus sp Ulmus minor Ulmus minor 16% Quercus robur Carpinus betulus Alnus glutinosa 69% 91% Quercus robur Platanus sp.

1% 1% 4% 0% Marestaing Acer negundo 22% Ulmus minor Fraxinus excelsior Alnus glutinosa 72% Salix alba

12 Experimental treatments

Cutting

Large girdling Juglone 1.30 m 1.30 m

0.20 m 0.20 m

C H G J + Cutting High cutting Girdling Juglone 13 Experimental treatments

High cutting

Large girdling Juglone 1.30 m 1.30 m

0.20 m 0.20 m

C H G J Cutting + Cutting High cutting Girdling Juglone 14 Experimental treatments

Girdling

Large girdling Juglone 1.30 m 1.30 m

0.20 m 0.20 m

C H G J Cutting + Cutting High cutting Girdling Juglone 15 Experimental treatments

Juglone

Juglone = allelopathic substance with herbicide properties

Large girdling Juglone 1.30 m 1.30 m

0.20 m 0.20 m

C H G J Cutting + Cutting High cutting Girdling Juglone 16 Experimental treatments

Measurments :

• Mortality : mortality rate (%) Juglone = allelopathic substance • Vitality : diameter of the five with largest resprouts herbicide properties

Large girdling Juglone 1.30 m 1.30 m

0.20 m 0.20 m

C H G J Cutting + Cutting High cutting Girdling Juglone 17 Mortality rate (%)

100

80 b 60

40

a Percentage 20 A a A a A A 0 Cutting Girdling High cutting Juglone Treatments N+1 N+2

Mortality rate by girdling best method

18 Diameter of resprouts

12 A A 10 a

8 B (cm)

b 6 c C d

4 Diameter 2

0 Cutting Girdling High cutting Juglone Treatments N+1 N+2

Girdling limits diameter of resprouts

19 Control method of A. negundo in natural areas

 Adults: girdling • Control rather than eradication • 2-3 year long • Stand level method

Seedlings: removal • No germination • No rain • Long distance dispersal?

Scars reconstructing the phloem tissues

20 High level of plasticity to nutrients and Light

• Growth (Relative Growth Rate) 12 Invasive Native

10

)

1

-

. d . 1 - 8

6

. mm. mm mm. .

3 -

(10 4 h

RGR 2

0 Full lightC Light Sshade DeepSS Shade FullC light Light Sshade DeepSS Shade N+ N- Nutrient Supply No Nutrient Supply

Beware of an opening in forest cover

21 Adapted from Porté et al. 2011 BMC Ecology Take Home Message

 No eradication but local elimination and control

 Girdling and seedling removal : best methods

•Beware of timing

•Beware of light and nutrients availability

22 The Negundo Team

And all the people from the Gers river management center, Bruges National Reserve, Natural Park of Landes de Gascogne, Pierroton 23 Hermitage Experimental Unit [email protected]