Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states Gernot Eichmanna,1, Hèlios Sanchis-Alepuzb,3, Richard Williamsa,2, Reinhard Alkoferb,4, Christian S. Fischera,c,5 aInstitut für Theoretische Physik, Justus-Liebig–Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany bInstitute of Physics, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria cHIC for FAIR Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany Abstract We review the spectrum and electromagnetic properties of baryons described as relativistic three-quark bound states within QCD. The composite nature of baryons results in a rich excitation spectrum, whilst leading to highly non-trivial structural properties explored by the coupling to external (electromagnetic and other) cur- rents. Both present many unsolved problems despite decades of experimental and theoretical research. We discuss the progress in these fields from a theoretical perspective, focusing on nonperturbative QCD as encoded in the functional approach via Dyson-Schwinger and Bethe-Salpeter equations. We give a systematic overview as to how results are obtained in this framework and explain technical connections to lattice QCD. We also discuss the mutual relations to the quark model, which still serves as a reference to distinguish ‘expected’ from ‘unexpected’ physics. We confront recent results on the spectrum of non-strange and strange baryons, their form factors and the issues of two-photon processes and Compton scattering determined in the Dyson- Schwinger framework with those of lattice QCD and the available experimental data. The general aim is to identify the underlying physical mechanisms behind the plethora of observable phenomena in terms of the underlying quark and gluon degrees of freedom. Keywords: Baryon properties, Nucleon resonances, Form factors, Compton scattering, Dyson-Schwinger approach, Bethe-Salpeter/Faddeev equations, Quark-diquark model arXiv:1606.09602v2 [hep-ph] 22 Jul 2016 [email protected] [email protected]. [email protected] [email protected] 5christian.fi[email protected] Preprint submitted to Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics July 25, 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Experimental overview 5 2.1 The nucleon and its resonances....................................5 2.2 Photo- and electroproduction processes................................8 2.3 Experimental facilities......................................... 15 3 Baryon spectrum: theory overview 16 3.1 The quark model............................................ 16 3.2 Correlators and non-perturbative methods in QCD......................... 19 3.3 Extracting the hadron spectrum from QCD.............................. 27 3.4 Bound-state equations......................................... 32 3.5 Approximations and truncations.................................... 46 3.6 Results for the baryon spectrum.................................... 55 4 Form factors 64 4.1 Current matrix elements........................................ 65 4.2 Vector, axialvector and pseudoscalar vertices............................. 69 4.3 Methodological overview........................................ 73 4.4 Nucleon electromagnetic form factors................................. 79 4.5 Nucleon axial and pseudoscalar form factors............................. 84 4.6 Delta electromagnetic form factors.................................. 86 4.7 Nucleon transition form factors.................................... 89 4.8 Hyperon form factors.......................................... 92 5 Compton scattering 95 5.1 Overview of two-photon physics.................................... 96 5.2 Hadronic vs. quark-level description................................. 100 5.3 Applications............................................... 104 6 Outlook 107 A Conventions and formulas 109 B Quark-photon vertex and hadronic vacuum polarization 112 1 Introduction Baryons make up most of the visible mass of the universe. They are highly nontrivial objects governed by the strong interaction. Their complicated internal structure is far from understood and even supposedly trivial properties like the charge radius of the proton pose disturbing puzzles [1]. Historically, baryons have been the focus of both experimental and theoretical interest long before the dawn of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and will likely continue to be so for many decades to come. Within the naive but indisputably successful quark model, baryons consist of three massive constituent quarks that interact with each other by a mean-field type potential. In such a phenomenological picture, QCD’s gluons have been ‘integrated out’ and dissolved within the parameters of the model for the strong forces between the quarks. The constituent quarks are much heavier than the current quarks appearing in the renor- malized Lagrangian of QCD, and the reason for this discrepancy – dynamical chiral symmetry breaking – cannot be described within the quark model but is subject to the underlying QCD. Thus, while the simple quark model proved surprisingly successful in the past, it is generally accepted that it is far from the full story. The reasons for this are well known. For one, dynamics is an issue. Light quarks are genuinely relativistic objects and their dynamics in principle cannot be fully captured by non-relativistic approximations and leading- order corrections. This is already important for the spectrum but becomes even more apparent when form factors or scattering processes probe the internal baryon dynamics at medium to large momentum transfer. Then there are structural reasons. Some of the experimentally observed states with baryon number B = 1 ± simply may not resemble three-quark states. Instead, they may be hybrids, i.e. states with quantum numbers generated by three valence quarks plus an additional gluonic excitation, or they may be pentaquark states, i.e. states with three valence quarks and an additional valence quark-antiquark pair. Especially the latter possibility has generated a tremendous amount of interest over the years with many renewed activities after the recent report of an experimental signature of a potential pentaquark at LHCb [2]. In addition, well-established states such as the Λ(1405) have been discussed to contain a strong ‘penta’ KN¯ -component that may be responsible for its unexpectedly low mass. The latter case also shows the importance of the quark model as a standard by which one may define and distinguish the ‘expected’ from the ‘unexpected’. Despite its shortcomings, the quark model has dominated the theoretical discussion of baryons for a long time and generated a list of ‘standard phenomenological problems’ which have been extensively discussed in the literature, see e.g. [3,4] for reviews. Amongst these are: (i) The problem of missing resonances, which may be defined as states that are predicted by (symmetric) quark models but have not yet been identified in experiments. (ii) The question of three-quark vs. quark-diquark states, which is somewhat related and often discussed within the framework of point-like diquarks. The corresponding quark- diquark states then show a clearly different (and less overpopulated) spectrum than its three-quark counterpart. However, even such a reduced spectrum has not been fully seen in experiments so far. (iii) The role of meson cloud effects and corresponding meson-exchange forces between quarks on the structure and the dynamical properties of baryons, which are visible at small momentum transfer and for small quark masses. From a theoretical perspective it is highly desirable to bridge the gap between QCD and baryon phenomenol- ogy. In the quark model language this entails understanding in detail how masses of constituent quarks are generated by dynamical chiral symmetry breaking. To some extent the matter has been clarified already. In fact, as we will see in Sec.3, the answer to the question relates the small and large momentum region and leads to a natural and close connection between the notions of ‘constituent’ and ‘current’ quarks. Furthermore, the nature of ‘effective’ forces between the quarks encoded in the quark potential models needs to be inferred from the underlying QCD. In the heavy quark sector, this is a task partly solved by heavy quark effective theory, see e.g. [5]. In the light quark sector no such mapping exists due to the problems with relativity as discussed above. Thus the question has to be reformulated in a relativistic context and remains an interesting, important and open problem which we will discuss in more detail in the main body of this review. Another point of interest is the role that confinement plays in the structure and spectrum of baryons. Confinement, together with unitarity, leads as one of its consequences to quark-hadron duality, for a review see e.g. Ref. [6]. Beyond the absence of coloured states in the physical spectrum this duality is the clearest experimental signature for confinement, with the perfect orthogonality of the quark-glue versus the hadronic states providing an attractive way to express the subject. As beautiful as this result might be it leaves us with a 3 perplexing consequence: confinement is so efficient that the determination of hadronic observables alone does not allow definite conclusions on the physical mechanism behind it. If a purely hadronic “language” is sufficient to describe all of hadronic physics, then there is no a priori way to access the QCD degrees of freedom on purely observational grounds without any input from theory.