DOCSLIB.ORG

A Global Comparison of Surface Soil Characteristics Across Five Cities: a Test of the Urban Ecosystem Convergence Hypothesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Global Comparison of Surface Soil Characteristics Across Five Cities: a Test of the Urban Ecosystem Convergence Hypothesis TECHNICAL ARTICLE A Global Comparison of Surface Soil Characteristics Across Five Cities: A Test of the Urban Ecosystem Convergence Hypothesis Richard V.Pouyat,1 Ian D. Yesilonis,2 Miklós Dombos,3 Katalin Szlavecz,4 Heikki Setälä,5 Sarel Cilliers,6 Erzsébet Hornung,7 D. Johan Kotze,5 and Stephanie Yarwood8 Key Words: Anthropogenic soils, experimental network, soil carbon, Abstract: As part of the Global Urban Soil Ecology and Education urban soils Network and to test the urban ecosystem convergence hypothesis,were- port on soil pH, organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (TN), phosphorus (Soil Sci 2015;180: 136–145) (P), and potassium (K) measured in four soil habitat types (turfgrass, ruderal, remnant, and reference) in five metropolitan areas (Baltimore, Budapest, rban soils provide many of the same ecosystem functions as Helsinki, Lahti, Potchefstroom) across four biomes. We expected the urban U “natural” and agricultural soils, for example, decomposition soil characteristics to “converge” in comparison to the reference soils. and nutrient cycling, water purification and regulation, and habitat Moreover, we expected cities in biomes with more limiting climatic condi- for an enormous diversity of organisms (Giller, 1996; Pouyat tions, or where local factors strongly affect soil characteristics, would ex- et al., 2010). Nonetheless, the increasing burden of expanding hibit the greatest variance across soil types within and among cities. In urban areas, concomitant need for new infrastructure, and accom- addition, soil characteristics related to biogenic factors (OC, TN) would modation of greater human population densities is resulting in a vary the most because of differences in climate and human efforts to over- worldwide alteration of these functions (Sachs, 2015). Therefore, come limiting environmental conditions. The comparison of soils among understanding the characteristics of urban soils and how they vary and within the five cities suggests that anthropogenic, and to a lesser degree is crucial to their management and restoration and ultimately to native, factors interact in the development of soils in urban landscapes. In the design of more sustainable cities (Pavao-Zuckerman, 2012; particular, characteristics affected by anthropogenic processes and closely Setälä et al., 2014). associated with biogenic processes (OC, TN) converged, while characteris- A central principle in urban ecological theory presupposes tics closely associated with parent material (K, P) did not converge, but that anthropogenic drivers dominate natural drivers in the control rather diverged, across all soil habitat types. These results partially sup- of ecosystem processes (Alberti, 1999; Kaye et al., 2006). If this ported the urban ecosystem convergence hypothesis in that a convergence assumption is true, it follows that both at regional and global occurred for soil characteristics affected by climatic conditions. However, scales ecosystem responses to urban land-use change should the divergence of K and P was unexpected and warrants adjusting the hy- converge relative to the native systems being replaced. This “con- pothesis to account for variations in anthropogenic effects (e.g., manage- vergence” in ecosystem properties is referred to as the urban eco- ment) that may occur within soil habitat types impacted by humans. system convergence hypothesis (Pouyat et al., 2003; McKinney, 2006; Pickett et al., 2008). In the case of the soil system, the con- 1U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Research & Development, vergence hypothesis suggests that soil responses will converge Washington, DC. across regional and global scales as long as anthropogenic drivers 2U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, c/o Baltimore Ecosystem (e.g., management) dominate over natural soil-forming factors Study, Baltimore, MD. (e.g., relief). This convergence occurs because human effects on 3Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. soil that are physical in nature (e.g., grading and irrigation) tend 4Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, to overwhelm native factors (e.g., topography and drainage) and Baltimore, MD. characteristics of soil that take thousands of years to develop. 5Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Lahti, Finland. Moreover, convergence occurs because of differential human 6Unit of Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. effort (e.g., water and nutrient supplements) to overcome environ- 7Department of Ecology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, mental constraints on net primary productivity (NPP) and accord- Budapest, Hungary. ingly soil biological processes—the greater the limitation on these 8Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College processes, the greater the effort by humans to overcome them. Park, MD. Address for correspondence: Richard V.Pouyat, U.S. Department of Agriculture Hence, in a global comparison of metropolitan areas, the differ- Forest Service, Research & Development, 1400 Independence Ave SW, ence between native and anthropogenic soil will be greatest for cit- Washington, DC 20250. E-mail: [email protected] ies located in biomes with the greatest limitations on NPP or Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest: The idea for GLUSEEN was made decomposition, such as a desert or boreal forest, and for those possible by a Fulbright Specialist grant to R. Pouyat at the University of Helsinki. The GLUSEEN network is supported by a supplemental grant to cities with local soil-forming factors (e.g., parent material) that NSF-ACI 1244820. Soil analyses were supported by the FEKUT grant (SZIE- disproportionately affect soil development (Pouyat et al., 2010; AOTK-KK-UK 12007) of the Hungarian Ministry of Human Resources Pouyat et al., in press). (E.H.). The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for The characteristics of urban soils vary widely and are depen- the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or dent on both direct and indirect effects resulting from urban land- the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that use and cover change. Examples of direct effects include soil may be suitable. disturbances such as grading (Pitt and Lantrip, 2000; McGuire, Received April 29, 2015. 2004; Trammell et al., 2011), management inputs such as irriga- Accepted for publication September 9, 2015. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. tion (Tenenbaum et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2006), and compaction ISSN: 0038-075X through trampling (Godefroid and Koedam, 2004), whereas indi- DOI: 10.1097/SS.0000000000000125 rect effects include environmental changes such as the urban heat 136 www.soilsci.com Soil Science • Volume 180, Number 4/5, April/May 2015 Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Soil Science • Volume 180, Number 4/5, April/May 2015 Global Comparison of Urban Soils island effect (Savva et al., 2010), atmospheric deposition (Lovett ecosystem convergence hypothesis (Pouyat et al., in press). We et al., 2000; Rao et al., 2014), and changes in plant and animal sampled only surface soils because of the network’s objective to species composition (McKinney, 2006). Early descriptions of ur- relate soil characteristics to soil community structure and decom- ban soils focused mainly on highly disturbed soils exhibiting high position rates that are primarily relegated to surface soil horizons spatial variability, massive structure (i.e., soils having no visible (Swift et al., 1979). Overall goals and objectives of GLUSEEN structure), low organic matter concentration, and contamination are reported by Pouyat et al. (in press). For this study, we address with toxic elements or compounds (Craul and Klein, 1980; the question: How do characteristics of urban soils compare to na- Patterson et al., 1980; Short et al., 1986; Jim, 1993). More recent tive soils at local, regional, and global scales? Specifically, we results show a greater variety of soil conditions that are often compared surface soil characteristics of public greenspace (turf- more favorable for plant growth than the preexisting native soil grass [TUR]), highly disturbed or fill areas (ruderal [RUD]), un- (Hope et al., 2005; Pouyat et al., 2007a; Davies and Hall, 2010; disturbed (remnant [REM]), and native (reference [REF]) soil Edmondson et al., 2012). Adding to the complexity of soil condi- habitat types within and among five metropolitan areas. These soil tions are human desires to maintain cultivated plant communities habitat types roughly corresponded to a continuum of anthropo- that represent the social norms of urban landscapes such as lawns genic effects from relatively low impacts (REF) to those largely and ornamental gardens (Cook et al., 2012; Kendal et al., 2012). impacted by indirect effects (REM), to types that are altered pri- In contrast to increasing heterogeneity, the lag effects of site marily by direct effects, such as in managed (TUR) and drastically history and the propensity of residents to uniformly manage yards disturbed (RUD) areas (Pouyat et al., in press). according to ownership boundaries may actually reduce within We expected surface soil characteristics to “converge” differ- parcel variation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IMPROVING the INDOOR ENVIRONMENT for HEALTH, WELL-BEING and PRODUCTIVITY Ronald a Wood Bsc. Phd. Department of Environmental
    IMPROVING THE INDOOR ENVIRONMENT FOR HEALTH, WELL-BEING AND PRODUCTIVITY Ronald A Wood BSc. PhD. Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, Westbourne Street, Gore Hill, NSW 2065, Australia e-mail: [email protected] Wednesday 30th April 2003 13:55 to 14:20 IMPROVING THE INDOOR ENVIRONMENT FOR HEALTH, WELL-BEING AND PRODUCTIVITY Ronald A Wood BSc. PhD. Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, Westbourne Street, Gore Hill, NSW 2065, Australia e-mail: [email protected] Presented at Greening Cities: a new urban ecology. 30th April. Australian Technology Park, Sydney Abstract This paper selectively reviews scientific research on the positive effects on building occupant’s health, well-being and productivity that result from the presence of indoor plants in the workplace. Case studies show improvement in indoor air quality, (with a reduction in the levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), improved productivity by up to 12%, and reduced absenteeism and staff turnover cost. Indoor air pollution is a health hazard, which causes diseases, lost work days and reduced quality of life. Unhealthy indoor air has been estimated to cost the Australian community $12 billion dollars a year, and is a generally unrecognized significant environmental issue. Introduction The term ‘building ecology’ has been used to describe a comprehensive systems approach to understanding interactions between building environments and their occupants (Levin, 1981) People react to indoor environments in markedly different ways. Complex modern building environments produce reactions of a psychological (perceptual) and physiological (biological) nature. The reasons why one environment is better than another are complex; besides the physical environment there are all the psychosocial factors that pertain to it, especially in the workplace (Wood and Burchett 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Urban Ecology Toward a Science of Cities
    BioScience Advance Access published February 24, 2016 Overview Articles Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities TIMON MCPHEARSON, STEWARD T. A. PICKETT, NANCY B. GRIMM, JARI NIEMELÄ, MARINA ALBERTI, THOMAS ELMQVIST, CHRISTIANE WEBER, DAGMAR HAASE, JÜRGEN BREUSTE, AND SALMAN QURESHI Urban ecology is a field encompassing multiple disciplines and practical applications and has grown rapidly. However, the field is heterogeneous as a global inquiry with multiple theoretical and conceptual frameworks, variable research approaches, and a lack of coordination among multiple schools of thought and research foci. Here, we present an international consensus on how urban ecology can advance along multiple research directions. There is potential for the field to mature as a holistic, integrated science of urban systems. Such an integrated science Downloaded from could better inform decisionmakers who need increased understanding of complex relationships among social, ecological, economic, and built infrastructure systems. To advance the field requires conceptual synthesis, knowledge and data sharing, cross-city comparative research, new intellectual networks, and engagement with additional disciplines. We consider challenges and opportunities for understanding dynamics of urban systems. We suggest pathways for advancing urban ecology research to support the goals of improving urban sustainability and resilience, conserving urban biodiversity, and promoting human well-being on an urbanizing planet. http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/ Keywords: urban ecology, conceptual frameworks, comparative research, urban systems, complexity espite significant challenges, cities are at the capacity of a system to absorb stress, to continue to develop, D forefront of sustainability practice, serving as the and to change without a loss of essential structure, function, focal points of actions promoting sustainability pathways identity, and feedback (Folke 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles in Sub-Boreal Forests of Eastern Europe
    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 17(1/2): 65-74 65 Wien, 30. Juni 2004 Reptiles in sub-boreal forests of Eastern Europe: patterns of forest type preferences and habitat use in Anguisfragilis, Zootoca vivipara and Natrix matrix (Squamata: Sauria: Anguidae, Lacertidae; Serpentes: Colubridae) Kriechtiere im subborealen Wald Osteuropas: Präferierte Waldtypen und Habitatnutzung bei Anguisfragilis, Zootoca vivipara und Natrix natrix (Squamata: Sauria: Anguidae, Lacertidae; Serpentes: Colubridae) ANDRIS CEIRÄNS KURZFASSUNG In zwei Nationalparks in Lettland (im Nationalpark von Kernen 1994-1997 und im Nationalpark von Gauja 1998-2000) wurden Daten über Waldlebensräume von Reptilien gesammelt. Die Klassifikation der Waldlebensräume erfolgte auf Grundlage der Typologie lettischer Wälder, die auf Standorteigenschaften basiert. Berechnet wurden für jeden Waldtyp die Abweichungen von den erwarteten Werten der Reptiliennachweise sowie die Nischenbreite und -Überlappung der Reptilienlebensräume. Drei Kriechtierarten - Anguis fragilis LINNAEUS, 1758, Zootoca vivipara (JACQUIN, 1787) und Natrix natrix (LINNAEUS, 1758) - kamen in den Waldlebensräume regelmäßig vor. Anguis fragilis wurde ausschließlich in trockenen und entwässerten Wäldern beobachtet, Z. vivi- para und N. natrix besiedelten die unterschiedlichsten Waldtypen. Für die genannten Arten werden die Präferenzen gegenüber bestimmten Waldtypen und das Ausmaß der Überlappung ihrer Lebensräume diskutiert. ABSTRACT Material on the forest habitats of reptiles was collected in two National Parks of Latvia: Kemeri National Park (1994-1997), and Gauja National Park (1998-2000). Habitats were classified according to the Latvian forest typology that focuses on site quality of the stand. Deviations from the expected proportions of reptile records for each forest type, niche breadth and overlap of the reptile habitats were determined.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Urban Environmental Burdens at Three Scales: Intra-Urban, Urban-Regional, and Global
    International Review for Environmental Strategies Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 335 – 356, 2005 © 2005 by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. All rights reserved Special Feature on the Environmentally Sustainable City An Overview of Urban Environmental Burdens at Three Scales: Intra-urban, Urban-Regional, and Global Gordon McGranahana This article focuses on the importance of scale to understanding urban environmental burdens and sustainability. It examines urban environmental burdens at three different scales: (1) within urban areas, where the central concern is how the quality of urban environments affects the lives of the people who live in them; (2) within urban regions, where relations between urban development and the state of adjoining ecosystems, resources , and waste sinks comes into focus; and (3) globally, where the emphasis is on the impact of urban production and consumption on global processes and distant resources. The spatial dimensions to urban environmental burdens are shown to be important ecologically, economically, and even politically. By focusing on a particular scale, it is easy to construct misleading accounts of the qualities of urban settlements that generate the environmental burdens. It is easy, for example, to present either urban poverty or affluence as the most serious threat to the environment, depending on whether the focus is on local or global environmental burdens. The article concludes with a comment on the implications for urban environmental agendas. Keywords: Urban, Environment, Sustainable, Cities, Ecological footprint. There is a long history of environmentalists presenting urban settlements in purely negative terms. This article follows a more recent tradition that recognizes that urban settlements are unsustainable in and of themselves, but also that they may provide the key to moving towards a more environmentally sustainable world (Rees and Wackernagel 1996; Satterthwaite 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Species-Rich Nardus Grasslands Via Phosphorus-Mining
    Restoration of species-rich Nardus grasslands via phosphorus-mining Stephanie Schelfhout ir. Stephanie SCHELFHOUT Restoration of species-rich Nardus grasslands via phosphorus-mining Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences: Forest and Nature Management February 2019 Dutch translation of the title: Herstel van soortenrijke heischrale graslanden via uitmijnen Illustration on the cover: Succisa pratensis – Blauwe knoop (front); Mowing management in a post-fertilization field in Vrieselhof, Ranst, Belgium (back) Citation of this thesis: Schelfhout S (2019) Restoration of species-rich Nardus grasslands via phosphorus-mining. Doctoral dissertation. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. ISBN-number: 978-946357174-6 Promotors: Prof. Dr. ir. Jan MERTENS ForNaLab, Dpt. of Environment, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Dr. ir. An DE SCHRIJVER, ForNaLab, Dpt. of Environment, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Fac. Science and Technology, University College Ghent Prof. Dr. ir. Kris VERHEYEN ForNaLab, Dpt. of Environment, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Prof. Dr. ir. Geert HAESAERT Dpt. of Plants and Crops, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Board of Prof. Dr. ir. Jo DEWULF (Chairman) examiners: EnVOC - STEN, Dpt. of Green Chemistry and Technology, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Prof. Dr. ir. Lander BAETEN ForNaLab, Dpt. of Environment, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Dr. ir. Frank NEVENS Dpt. of Plants and Crops, Fac. Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Dr. Tobias CEULEMANS Unit Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity conservation, Dpt. of Biology, University of Leuven Prof. Dr. Rob MARRS Dpt. of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool Dean: Prof. Dr. ir. Marc VAN MEIRVENNE Fac.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Today for Nature Tomorrow
    A review of the ecology, hydrology and nutrient dynamics of floodplain meadows in England No. 446 - English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 446 A review of the ecology, hydrology and nutrient dynamics of floodplain meadows in England David J.G. Gowing1, Jerry R.B. Tallowin2, Nancy B. Dise1, Joanne Goodyear2, Mike E. Dodd1 and Rebecca J Lodge1. 1Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA 2Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2002 Contents Executive summary 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Scope of the review..................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Review methodology................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Current distribution of Floodplain meadows in England............................................ 14 1.4 Perceived threats to the habitat.................................................................................... 15 2. Hydrology of floodplain meadows.............................................................................. 20 2.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystem Delineation for WATER PIPELINE from THE
    Aquatic ecosystem delineation for WATER PIPELINE FROM THE MAGALIES PIPELINE TO MAROELOESFONTEIN MINE March 2018 Compiled by: Mr Bertus Fourie (M.Sc. Aquatic Health, Pr.Sci.Nat) Aquatic ecosystem Report: Maroeloes water pipeline March 2018 1 of 58 pages DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE I, Bertus Fourie, declare that - I am subcontracted as specialist consultant by Galago Environmental cc. for the aquatic ecosystem delineation. I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant; I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; I will comply with the Act, regulations and all other applicable legislation; I will take into account, to the extent possible, the matters listed in Regulation 8; I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and - the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; All the particulars furnished by me in this form are true and correct; and I realise that a false declaration is an offence in terms of Regulation 71 and is punishable in terms of section 24F of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Approaches to Long-Term Studies of Urban Ecological Systems
    Articles IntegratedIntegrated ApproachesApproaches toto Long-TermLong-Term Studies Studies ofof UrbanUrban EcologicalEcological SystemsSystems NANCY B. GRIMM, J. MORGAN GROVE, STEWARD T. A. PICKETT, AND CHARLES L. REDMAN n 1935, Arthur Tansley wrote: I URBAN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS PRESENT We cannot confine ourselves to the so-called “natural” entities and ignore the processes and expressions of vegetation now so MULTIPLE CHALLENGES TO ECOLOGISTS— abundantly provided by man. Such a course is not scientifically PERVASIVE HUMAN IMPACT AND EXTREME sound, because scientific analysis must penetrate beneath the HETEROGENEITY OF CITIES, AND THE forms of the “natural” entities, and it is not practically useful because ecology must be applied to conditions brought about by NEED TO INTEGRATE SOCIAL AND human activity. The “natural” entities and the anthropogenic ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES, CONCEPTS, derivates alike must be analyzed in terms of the most appropriate concepts we can find. (Tansley 1935, p. 304) AND THEORY This quote captures the spirit of the new urban emphasis The conceptual basis for studying urban in the US Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) net- ecological systems work. We know now that Earth abounds with both subtle and pronounced evidence of the influence of people on Why has the study of urban ecological systems attracted so natural ecosystems (Russell 1993, Turner and Meyer much recent interest? The rationale for the study of 1993). Arguably, cities are the most human dominated of human-dominated systems is three-pronged. First, all ecosystems. Recent calls for studies on “human-domi- humans dominate Earth’s ecosystems (Groffman and nated ecosystems” (Vitousek et al. 1997) finally have been Likens 1994, Botsford et al.
    [Show full text]
  • International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Systems of the United States
    INTERNATIONAL ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION STANDARD: TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STATES EVT Legend Entire U.S. February 2009 Reported from NS_Systems v1.11 Robb Lankston phone: 406-329-2131 email: [email protected] 800 E. Beckwith Ave. Missoula, MT 59801 Back to Contents 1 of 634 This subset of the Terrestrial Ecological Systems of The United States covers ecological systems attributed to the United States. This classification has been developed in consultation with many individuals and agencies and incorporates information from a variety of publications and other classifications. Copyright © 2008 NatureServe, 1101 Wilson Blvd, 15th floor Arlington, VA 22209, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. NatureServe. 2008. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Systems of the United States. Natural Heritage Central Databases. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute Systems.mdb data is hereby granted under the following conditions: The above copyright notice must appear in all documents and reports; Any use must be for informational purposes only and in no instance for commercial purposes; Some data may be altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should still be referenced using the citation above. All documents produced from this database should acknowledge the financial support of The Nature Conservancy in the initial development of this classification. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right under any NatureServe copyright. Information Warranty Disclaimer: All data are provided as is without warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific data.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordination of Physiological and Structural Traits in Amazon Forest Trees
    Biogeosciences, 9, 775–801, 2012 www.biogeosciences.net/9/775/2012/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-9-775-2012 © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Coordination of physiological and structural traits in Amazon forest trees S. Patino˜ 1,2,†, N. M. Fyllas2, T. R. Baker2, R. Paiva3, C. A. Quesada2-4, A. J. B. Santos3,4,†, M. Schwarz1, H. ter Steege5, O. L. Phillips2, and J. Lloyd2,6 1Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Biogeochemie, Postfach 100164, 07701, Jena, Germany 2School of Geography, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT UK 3Institito Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia,ˆ Manaus, AM, Brazil 4Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Bras´ılia, DF, Brazil 5Dept. of Plant Ecology and Biodiversity, Utrecht University, The Netherlands 6School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4871, Australia †deceased Correspondence to: J. Lloyd ([email protected]) Received: 5 May 2011 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 25 May 2011 Revised: 16 November 2011 – Accepted: 18 January 2012 – Published: 16 February 2012 Abstract. Many plant traits covary in a non-random man- appears to be synchronised with increases in foliar nutrient ner reflecting interdependencies associated with “ecological concentrations and reductions in foliar [C]. Leaf and leaflet strategy” dimensions. To understand how plants integrate area and 8LS were less responsive to the environment than their structural and physiological investments, data on leaf ρx. and leaflet size and the ratio of leaf area to sapwood area Thus, although genetically determined foliar traits such as (8LS) obtained for 1020 individual trees (encompassing 661 those associated with leaf construction costs coordinate in- species) located in 52 tropical forest plots across the Ama- dependently of structural characteristics such as maximum zon Basin were incorporated into an analysis utilising ex- height, others such as the classical “leaf economic spectrum” isting data on species maximum height (Hmax), seed size, covary with structural traits such as leaf size and 8LS.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Stewardship of the Biosphere in the Urban Era Michail Fragkias Boise State University
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Economics Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Economics 1-1-2013 Stewardship of the Biosphere in the Urban Era Michail Fragkias Boise State University For complete list of authors, please see article. This document was originally published by Springer Netherlands in Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. This work is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License. Details regarding the use of this work can be found at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_33. Chapter 33 Stewardship of the Biosphere in the Urban Era Thomas Elmqvist , Michail Fragkias , Julie Goodness , Burak Güneralp , Peter J. Marcotullio , Robert I. McDonald , Susan Parnell , Maria Schewenius , Marte Sendstad , Karen C. Seto , Cathy Wilkinson , Marina Alberti , Carl Folke , Niki Frantzeskaki , Dagmar Haase , Madhusudan Katti , Harini Nagendra , Jari Niemelä , Steward T.A. Pickett , Charles L. Redman , and Keith Tidball 33.1 Introduction We are entering a new urban era in which the ecology of the planet as a whole is increasingly infl uenced by human activities (Turner et al. 1990 ; Ellis 2011 ; Steffen et al. 2011a , b ; Folke et al. 2011 ). Cities have become a central nexus of the relation- ship between people and nature, both as crucial centres of demand of ecosystem services, and as sources of environmental impacts. Approximately 60 % of the urban land present in 2030 is forecast to be built in the period 2000–2030 (Chap. 21 ). Urbanization therefore presents challenges but also opportunities. In the next two to three decades, we have unprecedented chances to vastly improve global sus- tainability through designing systems for increased resource effi ciency, as well as Coordinating Lead Authors : Thomas Elmqvist, Michail Fragkias, Julie Goodness, Burak Güneralp, Peter J.
    [Show full text]