<<

Milankovitch cycles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Milankovitch cycles are the collective effect of changes in the 's movements upon its , named after Serbian civil engineer and mathematician Milutin Milanković. The eccentricity, , and of the Earth's orbit vary in several patterns, resulting in 100,000- age cycles of the glaciation over the last few million . The Earth's axis completes one full cycle of precession approximately every 26,000 years. At the same , the elliptical orbit rotates, more slowly, leading to a 21,000-year cycle between the and the orbit. In addition, the angle between Earth's rotational axis and the normal to the plane of its orbit moves from 22.1 degrees to 24.5 degrees and back again on a 41,000-year cycle. Currently, this angle is 23.44 degrees and is decreasing.

The Milankovitch theory[1] of is not perfectly worked out; in particular, the largest observed response is at the 100,000-year timescale, but the forcing is apparently small at this scale, in regard to the ice ages. Various feedbacks (from , or from dynamics) are invoked to explain this discrepancy.

Milankovitch-like theories were advanced by Joseph Adhemar, and others, but verification was difficult due to the absence of reliably dated evidence and doubts as to exactly which periods were important. Not until the advent of deep- cores and a seminal paper by Hays, Imbrie and Shackleton, "Variations in the Earth's Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages", in Science, 1976,[2] did the theory attain its present state.

Contents

1 Earth’s movements 1.1 Orbital shape (eccentricity) 1.2 Axial tilt (obliquity) 1.3 Precession (wobble) 1.4 2 Problems 2.1 100,000-year problem 2.2 400,000-year problem 2.3 5 problem 2.4 Effect exceeds cause 2.5 The unsplit peak problem 2.6 The transition problem 3 Present conditions 4 The future 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links

Earth’s movements

As the Earth spins around its axis and orbits around the , several quasi-periodic variations occur. Although the curves have a large number of sinusoidal components, a few components are dominant. Milankovitch studied changes in the , obliquity, and precession () of Earth's movements. Such changes in movement and orientation change the amount and location of solar reaching the Earth. This is known as solar forcing (an example of ). Changes near the north polar area are considered important due to the large amount of , which reacts to such changes more quickly than the do.

Orbital shape (eccentricity)

The Earth's orbit is an . The eccentricity is a measure of the departure of this ellipse from circularity. The shape of the Earth's orbit varies from being nearly circular (low eccentricity of 0.005) to being mildly elliptical (high eccentricity of 0.058) and has a mean eccentricity of 0.028. The major component of these Circular orbit, no eccentricity. variations occurs on a period of 413,000 years (eccentricity variation of Orbit with 0.5 eccentricity. ±0.012). A number of other terms vary between 95,000 and 136,000 years, and loosely combine into a 100,000-year cycle (variation of −0.03 to +0.02). The present eccentricity is 0.017.

If the Earth were the only orbiting our Sun, the eccentricity of its orbit would not vary over time. The Earth's eccentricity varies primarily due to interactions with the gravitational fields of and . As the eccentricity of the orbit evolves, the semi-major axis of the orbital ellipse remains unchanged. From the perspective of the theory used in celestial mechanics to compute the evolution of the orbit, the semi-major axis is an adiabatic invariant. According to Kepler's third law the period of the orbit is determined by the semi-major axis. It follows that the Earth's , the length of a , also remains unchanged as the orbit evolves. Currently the difference between closest approach to the Sun (perihelion) and furthest distance (aphelion) is only 3.4% (5.1 million km). This difference is equivalent to about a 6.8% change in incoming solar radiation. Perihelion presently occurs around January 3, while aphelion is around July 4. When the orbit is at its most elliptical, the amount of solar radiation at perihelion is about 23% greater than at aphelion. This difference is roughly 4 the value of the eccentricity.

Season () Durations data from United States Naval Observatory (http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/EarthSeasons.php) Year Date: GMT Duration 2005 12/21/2005 18:35 88.99 days 2006 3/20/2006 18:26 92.75 days 2006 Solstice 6/21/2006 12:26 93.65 days 2006 Equinox 9/23/2006 4:03 89.85 days 2006 Winter Solstice 12/22/2006 0:22 88.99 days 2007 Spring Equinox 3/21/2007 0:07

Orbital mechanics require that the length of the seasons be proportional to the areas of the seasonal quadrants, so when the eccentricity is extreme, the seasons on the far side of the orbit can be substantially longer in duration. When autumn and winter occur at closest approach, as is the case currently in the northern hemisphere, the earth is moving at its maximum velocity and therefore autumn and winter are slightly shorter than spring and summer. Thus, summer in the northern hemisphere is 4.66 days longer than winter and spring is 2.9 days longer than autumn.

Axial tilt (obliquity)

The angle of the Earth's axial tilt (obliquity) varies with respect to the plane of the Earth's orbit. These slow 2.4° obliquity variations are roughly periodic, taking approximately 41,000 years to shift between a tilt of 22.1° and 24.5° and back again. When the obliquity increases, the amplitude of the seasonal cycle in insolation (INcident SOLar radiATION) increases, with in both hemispheres receiving more radiative flux from the Sun, and the less radiative flux. As a result, it is assumed that the winters become colder and summers warmer.

22.1-24.5° range of Earth's But these changes of opposite sign in the summer and winter are not of obliquity. the same magnitude. The annual mean insolation increases in high with increasing obliquity, while lower latitudes experience a reduction in insolation. Cooler summers are suspected of encouraging the start of an by melting less of the previous winter's ice and . So it can be argued that lower obliquity favors ice ages both because of the mean insolation reduction in high latitudes as well as the additional reduction in summer insolation.

Currently the Earth is tilted at 23.44 degrees from its orbital plane, roughly half way between its extreme values. The tilt is in the decreasing phase of its cycle, and will reach its minimum value around the year 10,000 AD. Precession (wobble)

Precession is the change in the direction of the Earth's axis of rotation relative to the fixed stars, with a period of roughly 26,000 years. This gyroscopic motion is due to the tidal forces exerted by the sun and the on the solid Earth, associated with the fact that the Earth is not a perfect sphere but has an equatorial bulge. The sun and moon contribute roughly equally to this effect. In addition, the orbital ellipse itself precesses in (anomalistic precession), primarily as a result of interactions with Jupiter and Saturn. This orbital precession is in the opposite sense to the gyroscopic motion of the axis of rotation, shortening the period of the precession of the with respect to the perihelion from 26,000 to 21,000 years.

When the axis is aligned so it points toward the Sun during perihelion, Precessional movement. one polar hemisphere will have a greater difference between the seasons while the other hemisphere will have milder seasons. The hemisphere which is in summer at perihelion will receive much of the corresponding increase in solar radiation, but that same hemisphere will be in winter at aphelion and have a colder winter. The other hemisphere will have a relatively warmer winter and cooler summer.

When the Earth's axis is aligned such that aphelion and perihelion occur near the equinoxes, the Northern and Southern Hemispheres will have similar contrasts in the seasons.

At present, perihelion occurs during the 's summer, and aphelion is reached during the southern winter. Thus the Southern Hemisphere seasons are somewhat more extreme than the Northern Hemisphere seasons, when other factors are equal.

Orbital inclination

The inclination of Earth's orbit drifts up and down relative to its present orbit with a cycle having a period of about 70,000 years. Milankovitch did not study this three-dimensional movement.

More recent researchers noted this drift and that the orbit also moves relative to the orbits of the other . The , the plane that represents the of the , is approximately the orbital plane of Jupiter. The inclination of the Earth's orbit has a 100,000 year cycle relative to the invariable plane. This 100,000-year cycle closely matches the 100,000-year pattern of ice ages.

It has been proposed that a disk of and other debris is in the invariable plane, and this affects the Earth's climate through several possible means. The Earth presently moves through this plane around January 9 and July 9, when there is an increase in radar-detected meteors and meteor-related noctilucent .[3][4]

A study of the of Antarctic ice cores using to ratios in air bubbles trapped in the ice, which appear to respond directly to the local insolation, concluded that the climatic response documented in the ice cores was driven by Northern Hemisphere insolation as proposed by the Milankovitch hypothesis (Kawamura et al, , 23 August 2007, vol 448, p912-917). This is an additional validation of the Milankovitch hypothesis by a relatively novel method, and is inconsistent with the "inclination" theory of the 100,000-year cycle. Problems

Because the observed periodicities of climate fit so well with the orbital periods, the orbital theory has overwhelming support. Nonetheless, there are several difficulties in reconciling theory with observations.

100,000-year problem

The 100,000-year problem is that the eccentricity variations have a significantly smaller impact on solar forcing than precession or obliquity and hence might be expected to produce the weakest effects. However, observations show that during The nature of can vary in a the last 1 million years, the strongest climate signal is the cyclic fashion, and these cycles can be 100,000-year cycle. In addition, despite the relatively large displayed in the sedimentary record. Here, cycles can be observed in the 100,000-year cycle, some have argued that the length of the colouration and resistance of different climate record is insufficient to establish a statistically strata significant relationship between climate and eccentricity variations.[5] Some models can however reproduce the 100,000 year cycles as a result of non-linear interactions between small changes in the Earth's orbit and internal oscillations of the .[6][7]

400,000-year problem

The 400,000-year problem is that the eccentricity variations have a strong 400,000-year cycle. That cycle is only clearly present in climate records older than the last million years. If the 100 ka variations are having such a strong effect, the 400 ka variations might also be expected to be apparent. This is also known as the stage 11 problem, after the in marine isotopic stage 11 which would be unexpected if the 400,000-year cycle has an impact on climate. The relative absence of this periodicity in the marine isotopic record may be due, at least in part, to the response times of the climate system components involved — in particular, the .

Stage 5 problem

The stage 5 problem refers to the timing of the penultimate interglacial (in marine isotopic stage 5) which appears to have begun 10 thousand years in advance of the solar forcing hypothesized to have been causing it. This is also referred to as the causality problem.

Effect exceeds cause The effects of these variations are primarily believed to be due to variations in the intensity of solar radiation upon various parts of the globe. Observations show climate behaviour is much more intense than the calculated variations. Various internal characteristics of climate systems are believed to be sensitive to the insolation changes, causing amplification () and damping responses (negative feedback).

The unsplit peak problem 420,000 years of data from Vostok, research station. The unsplit peak problem refers to the fact that eccentricity has cleanly resolved variations at both the 95 and 125 ka periods. A sufficiently long, well-dated record of climate change should be able to resolve both frequencies, but some researchers interpret climate records of the last million years as showing only a single spectral peak at 100 ka periodicity. It is debatable whether the quality of existing data ought to be sufficient to resolve both frequencies over the last million years.

The transition problem

The transition problem refers to the change in the frequency of climate variations 1 million years ago. From 1-3 million years, climate had a dominant mode matching the 41 ka cycle in obliquity. After 1 million years ago, this changed to a 100 ka variation matching eccentricity. No reason for this change has been established. Present conditions

The amount of solar radiation (insolation) in the Northern Hemisphere at 65° N seems to be related to occurrence of an ice age. Astronomical calculations show that 65° N summer insolation should increase gradually over the next 25,000 years, and that no declines in 65° N summer insolation sufficient to cause an ice age are expected in the next 50,000 to 100,000 years.

As mentioned above, at present perihelion occurs during the Southern Hemisphere's summer, and aphelion during the southern winter. Thus the Southern Hemisphere seasons should tend to be somewhat more extreme than the Northern Hemisphere seasons. The relatively low eccentricity of the present orbit results in a 6.8% difference in the amount of solar radiation during summer in the two hemispheres. The future

Since orbital variations are predictable[8], if one has a model that relates orbital variations to climate, it is possible to run such a model forward to "predict" future climate. Two caveats are necessary: that anthropogenic effects and that the mechanism by which influences climate is not well understood.

An often-cited 1980 study by Imbrie and Imbrie determined that, "Ignoring anthropogenic and other possible sources of variation acting at frequencies higher than one cycle per 19,000 years, this model predicts that the long-term cooling trend which began some 6,000 years ago will continue for the next 23,000 years."[9]

More recent work by Berger and Loutre suggests that the current warm climate may last another 50,000 years.[10] See also

Astrochronology Axial tilt Climate Cyclostratigraphy Greenhouse and Icehouse Earth Ice age Interglacial and Interstadial periods Last Precession (astronomy) Yarkovsky effect YORP effect References

1. ^ Milankovitch, Milutin (1998) [1941]. Canon of Insolation and the Ice Age Problem. Belgrade: Zavod za Udz̆benike i Nastavna Sredstva. ISBN 8617066199.; see also "Astronomical Theory of Climate Change (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/milankovitch.html) ". 2. ^ Hays, J.D.; Imbrie, J.; Shackleton, N.J. (1976). "Variations in the Earth's Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages". Science 194 (4270): 1121–1132. doi:10.1126/science.194.4270.1121. PMID 17790893. 3. ^ Richard A Muller, Gordon J MacDonald (1997). "Glacial Cycles and Astronomical Forcing". Science 277 (1997/07/11): 215–218. doi:10.1126/science.277.5323.215. 4. ^ "Origin of the 100 kyr Glacial Cycle: eccentricity or orbital inclination? (http://muller.lbl.gov/papers /nature.html) ". Richard A Muller. Retrieved on March 2, 2005. 5. ^ Wunsch, Carl (2004). "Quantitative estimate of the Milankovitch-forced contribution to observed Quaternary climate change". Reviews 23: 1001–1012. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.02.014. 6. ^ Ghil, Michael (1994). "Cryothermodynamics: the chaotic dynamics of paleoclimate". Physica D 77 (1-3): 130–159. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(94)90131-7. 7. ^ Gildor H, Tziperman E (2000). " ice as the glacial cycles' climate switch: Role of seasonal and orbital forcing". 15 (6): 605–615. doi:10.1029/1999PA000461. 8. ^ F. Varadi, B. Runnegar, M. Ghil (2003). "Successive Refinements in Long-Term Integrations of Planetary Orbits" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal 592: 620–630. doi:10.1086/375560. http://astrobiology.ucla.edu /OTHER/SSO/SolarSysInt.pdf. 9. ^ J Imbrie, J Z Imbrie (1980). "Modeling the Climatic Response to Orbital Variations". Science 207 (1980/02/29): 943–953. doi:10.1126/science.207.4434.943. PMID 17830447. 10. ^ Berger A, Loutre MF (2002). "Climate: An exceptionally long interglacial ahead?". Science 297 (5585): 1287–1288. doi:10.1126/science.1076120. PMID 12193773. Further reading

Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K (2001). "Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present". Science 292 (5517): 686–693. doi:10.1126/science.1059412. PMID 11326091. This review article discusses cycles and large-scale changes in the global climate during the . Zachos JC, Shackleton NJ, Revenaugh JS, Palike H, Flower BP (2001). "Climate Response to Orbital Forcing Across the Oligocene-Miocene Boundary". Science 292 (5515): 274–278. doi:10.1126/science.1058288. PMID 11303100. This article shows the influence of Milankovitch cyles on climate variation during the late Oligocene and early Miocene, around 20-25 million years ago. Tuenter, Erik (2000) (PDF). Modeling orbital induced variations in circum-. http://www.knmi.nl/onderzk/phd/tuenter.pdf. This thesis has a good introduction on Milankovitch cycles. It nicely describes an indirect influence of Milankovitch orbital variations on rainfall and other climate factors, using results from geological deposits as well as climate simulations. It focuses on the around the Mediterranean Sea. External links

Milankovitch Cycles and Glaciation (http://www.homepage.montana.edu/~geol445/hyperglac/time1 /milankov.htm) The Milankovitch band (http://www.agu.org/revgeophys/overpe00/node6.html) Some of the adoption of the Milankovitch hypothesis (and an alternative) (http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/IceAgeBook/IceAgeTheories.html) More detail on orbital obliquity also matching climate patterns (http://muller.lbl.gov/papers /sciencespectra.htm) Graph of variation in insolation (http://www.museum.state.il.us/exhibits/ice_ages /insolation_graph.html) Note 20,000 year, 100,000 year, and 400,000 year cycles are clearly visible. "Milutin Milankovitch (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/Giants/Milankovitch /milankovitch.html) ". On the Shoulders of Giants. Retrieved on November 2, 2007. Potential Problems with Milankovitch Theory (http://www.detectingdesign.com/milankovitch.html) by Sean Pitman (http://www.detectingdesign.com) The Seasons (http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/seasons_orbit.php) The NOAA page on Climate Forcing Data (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/forcing.html) includes (calculated) data on orbital variations over the last 50 million years and for the coming 20 million years. The orbital simulations by Varadi, Ghil and Runnegar (2003) (http://astrobiology.ucla.edu/OTHER /SSO/) provide another, slightly different series for orbital eccentricity, and also a series for orbital inclination ABC: Earth wobbles linked to extinctions (http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories /2006/1763328.htm)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles" Categories: Ice ages | History of climate | Climate forcing agents

This page was last modified on 20 December 2008, at 15:25. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.) Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)(3) tax-deductible nonprofit charity.