Progress and Prospects for Studies on Chinese Amphibians
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Asian Herpetological Research 2010, 1(2): 64-85 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1245.2010.00064 Progress and Prospects for Studies on Chinese Amphibians FEI Liang, YE Changyuan and JIANG Jianping* Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China Abstract This work summarizes the history and progress of the studies on Chinese amphibians since they first ap- peared in the Chinese literature. A wide range of research has been carried out, including the history of the definition of amphibians, faunal surveys, systematic research, ecological research, biochemical research (isozyme and other proteins or peptides, chromosomes, DNA), anatomical research, embryological research, phylogenetic and zoogeographical re- search, and many others such as ultrastructure of organs, crossbreeding test, regeneration of organs, abnormality survey, acoustics, fossils, sperm ultrastructure and parasites. In addition, the prospects for studies on Chinese amphibians in future are proposed in this paper. Keywords progress, prospect, faunal survey, systematics, amphibian, China 1. Introduction on amphibian research for at least 3000 years: toads (maybe Bufo gargarizans) were equated to ugliness and China is located in east Asia and covers a land area of wickedness in ‘The Book of Songs’ (-3000 years ago), approximately 9.6 million km2. Due to the vast territory but frog (鼃, 黽) had been inscribed on bones or tortoise occupied by this country, extremely different landforms, shell approximately 16th − 11th centuray B.C. (Guo et al., complex environments, and diverse climates and vegeta- 1999). “人鱼” (Mermen, now called the Chinese giant tion, China is very rich in amphibians, not only contai- salamander, Andrias davidianus), “活师” ( meaning tad- ning extremely numerous rare and endemic species, but poles), and “黾” (meaning frogs) were mentioned in ‘The also preserving a large number of relic species. Presently, Classic of Mountains and Seas’ (−2500 years ago). Am- there are 386 species, and 10 subspecies, belonging to 76 phibians were divided into two groups: the worms and genera, 13 families and 3 orders, of which three species the fishes in the ‘Er Ya’ (−2000 years ago), an ancient are invasive aliens, and 242 species are endemic to China, book containing commentaries on classics, names etc, accounting for 62.8% of the total amphibians of China and into three groups in the ‘Origin of Chinese Charac- (Jiang et al., in press). This work summarizes the history ters’ (A.D.100−121), that is, 1) group with the ‘Fish’ and progress of the studies on Chinese amphibians since character including the Chinese giant salamander, 2) they first appeared in the Chinese literature, and proposes group with ‘Worm’ character including toads, and 3) the the prospects of the studies on Chinese amphibians in the “黾” with “frog” characters including toads. TAO Hong future. Jing (A.D. 502−549) listed the Chinese giant salamander, toads, and frogs as medicinal animals. In the ‘Compen- 2. Brief Historical Studies on Amphibians dium of Materia Medica’ (Li, 1596), amphibians were divided into two sections: Chinese giant salamander be- References were found for the Chinese historical records longing to the fishes without scales, and toads and frogs belong to worms of wet environment. These facts reflect *Corresponding author: Prof. JIANG Jianping, from Chengdu Institute a rudimentary understanding of amphibians in ancient of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, with his research focusing China. on systematics, evolutionary biology and conservation genetics of In other countries, Linnaeus (1758; 10th Edition) was amphibians E-mail: [email protected] the first scientist to establish the biological classifications Received: 12 June 2010 Accepted: 20 October 2010 (sometimes known as “Linnaean Taxonomy”): kingdom, No. 2 FEI Liang et al. Progress and Prospects for Studies on Chinese Amphibians 65 phylum, class, order, family and genus, and the introduc- former is the junior synonym of the latter. So the Apoda tion of the idea for a binomial nomenclature for naming had been replaced by Gymnophiona (Rafinesque- species. The Class Amphibia was first adopted by Lin- Schmaltz, 1814) in amphibians. naeus (1758; 10th Edition), including not only true am- The opinion that the Class Amphibia should be sepa- phibians but also reptiles and some fishes, and was di- rated from the Class Reptilia was widely adopted by vided into three orders: 1) Reptiles, a group with feet herpetologists (Gray, 1825; Wagler, 1828, 1830; Fitzinger, including Testudo, Draco, Lacerta (containing crocodiles, 1826, 1843; Günther, 1858). Boulenger (1890) indicated lizards, and salamanders), and Rana; 2) Serpentes, a that Amphibia was a transition group between Pisces and group without feet, including snakes, slowworm, and Reptilia. Dubois (1991) suggested Batrachology as a dis- caecilian; and 3) Nantes, a group with fins. Frogs were tinct scientific discipline to study amphibians. easy to be distinguished from other groups and assigned in the genus Rana (sensus lato), but salamanders were 3. Progress in Surveys and Studies of Chinese assigned to so called Lacerta, and caecilians were as- Amphibians signed to the order Serpentes. Generally speaking, the Class Reptilia was formally 3.1 Surveys and studies of Chinese amphibians prior used by Laurenti (1768), and it contained three orders: 1) to 1950 Salientia, including Pipa, Bufo, Rana and Hyla of tailless 3.1.1 By foreign scientists Linnaeus (1758) was the amphibians, and Proteus of tailed amphibians; 2) Gradi- first foreign researcher to record Chinese amphibians entia, including salamanders Triton (=Triturus, Salaman- identified from the specimens that had been brought to dra, lizards (Gekko, Chamaeleo, Iguana), and crocodiles Europe by Marco Polo in the 13th Century. Swede Osbeck (Crocodylus); and 3) Serpentia, including caecilian (Cae- (1771) was the first person to collect specimens of am- cilia) and snakes (Amphisbaena, Anguis, Natrix, Coro- phibians in China in the 18th century and recorded the nella, Boa, Coluber, Vipera). species Rana chinensis (= Hoplobatrachus chinensis) On the basis of internal structures, reproductive modes, from Guangdong Province (= Canton in the literature) of and development, Brongniart (1799) divided amphibians China. Wiegmann (1835) recorded a new species Rana and reptiles into two groups: The first group was set up rugulosa (= Hoplobatrachus chinensis) embedded in for reptiles, with caecilians assigned to the order Ophidii; specimens collected from Hong Kong, Macau, and and the second group was for Batrachia, i.e., Batraciens, Guangzhou by Meyen in 1831. In order to establish a including Salamandra, Rana, Hyla, and Bufo, of which museum, the Dutch in 1820 collected many amphibian salamanders were separated from lizards for the first time. specimens from Southern Asia, China, and Japan, and Latreille (1804) further indicated that Batrachii was those specimens from China including the genera Andrias, characterized by tips of toes without claw, juveniles with Hynobius, Onychodactylus, Cynops, Leptobrachium, Hy- gills, and metamorphism present in individual develop- larana, Polypedates, Buergeria, Theloderma, Microhyla mental process. Duméril (1806) put forward two French and Kalophrynus, which were denominated by Tschudi, terms, Anoures and Urodèles, the former means tailless and the genera Ichthyophis, Pelophylax and Limnonectes amphibians, and the latter tailed amphibians. These two denominated by Fitzinger. The creation of these genera terms were Latinized as Anura and Urodela by Fischer provided an important basis for further taxonomic studies van Waldheim in 1813 (Frost, 2010), which are two of of Chinese amphibians. the orders of living amphibians currently recognized. From 1840 to 1949, herpetologists from Britain, Ger- This was the first time to separate these taxonomic many, Russia, France, Austria, USA, and Japan came to groups had been separated from reptiles. Oppel (1811) China in different periods to survey amphibians and col- separated the group Apoda from the Class Reptilia and lect specimens. 45 new species were published by the combined them with salamanders (Caudata) and frogs British herpetologists in 35 articles, 17 new species by (Ecaudata) together as a larger group Nuda, of which the the American in 50 articles, 9 new species by the German three groups correspond to the three orders of extant am- and French each in 32 articles, 7 new species by the Rus- phibians recognized. From then on, amphibians were sian, and 3 new species by the Japanese. According to distinguished from reptiles with scales. It is necessary to preliminary statistics, more than 80 new species pub- explain here that the term Apoda had been preoccupied lished by them are now valid. Even though the type lo- by a group fish Apodes in Latreille (1804), and then the calities of the above new species are in China, the type 66 Asian Herpetological Research Vol. 1 specimens are now preserved in various museums of dif- Two Expeditions to Western China of 1868 and 1875’ ferent foreign countries. There were approximately 70 (1876), and ‘Anatomical and Zooll Researches: Com- colleagues collecting and writing about 170 articles on prising an Account of the Zooll Results of the Two Expe- Chinese amphibians. The following are the summaries of ditions to Western Yunnan’ (1878), and 9 new species of the major contributing countries and colleagues. amphibians and one new genus Tylototriton were pub- Cantor from England collected amphibians