How FSU Stacks Up To Its Peers: National Views of FSU
THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Four Recent National Reports
• National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data Set (IPEDS) Data Feedback Report, 2009
• National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), 2008
• Collegiate Learning Assessment Institutional (CLA) Report, 2006-2008
• Oklahoma State University Graduate Assistant Survey, 2008 2 The Reports Compare FSU to Other Universities
• IPEDS • 61 Public Research Universities • NSSE • Southern University Group – 31 Public Research Universities • Public Universities in the Same Carnegie Classification – 23 Public Research Universities • Comparable Public Research Universities – 69 Public Research Universities • CLA • Universities (n=189) participating in the testing program – normed to students entering with similar SAT scores • OSU • Universities participating in the survey – 58 Research Univ.
3 Universities in IPEDS Comparison Group
Arizona State University of California - Berkeley University of Florida Colorado State UC - Davis University of Iowa Georgia Institute of Technology UC Irvine University of Kansas Indiana University UCLA University of Kentucky Kansas State University UC - Riverside University of Missouri Louisiana State university UC - San Diego University of New Mexico Michigan State UC - Santa Barbara University of Pittsburgh Montana State UC - Santa Cruz University of South Carolina North Carolina State University of Cincinnati University of South Florida Ohio State University of Colorado - Boulder University of Utah Oregon State University of Connecticut University of Virginia Pennsylvania State University of Delaware University of Washington Purdue University of Georgia University of Wisconsin Rutgers University of Hawaii - Manoa Virginia Polytechnic Institute Stony Brook University University of Illinois - Chicago Washington State SUNY at Albany University of Illinois - Urbana Wayne State Texas A&M University of Maryland - College Park The University of Tennessee University of Massachusetts - Amherst The University of Texas at Austin University of Michigan - Ann Arbor University of Buffalo University of Minnesota - Twin Cities University of Alabama - Birmingham University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Arizona University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
4
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, IPEDS Data Feedback Report, 2009, p. 9 FSU is One of the 20 Largest Public Universities in the United States
Size (in Rank University 1000s) 1 Ohio State University 52 2 Arizona State University - Tempe 3 University of Florida 4 University of Minnesota - Twin Cities 5 University of Texas - Austin 6 University of Central Florida 7 Michigan State University 8 Texas A&M 9 University of South Florida 10 Pennsylvania State University 11 University of Illinois - Champaign 12 University of Wisconsin - Madison 13 New York University 14 Purdue University 15 University of Michigan 16 Florida State University 17 University of Washington - Seattle 18 Indiana University - Bloomington 19 Florida International University 20 University of Arizona 37 5 source: Digest of Education Statsitics, 2008, Table 236 FSU is much younger than our peers A History of Change … And Progress
1851 Legislature enacted 1854 Florida Institute (“boys school”) 1857 Seminary West of the Suwannee (coed) 1861-65 Florida Collegiate and Military Institute 1865 Seminary West of the Suwannee 1901 Florida State College 1905 Florida Female College (“girls school”) 1909 Florida State College for Women note: motto and seal are introduced
1947 Florida State University (coed) note: Seminole becomes the mascot
1952 First Ph.D. awarded in Chemistry 6 FSU is Larger Than Most of Its Comparable or Aspirational Peers
Enrollment: Unduplicated Headount, FTE and Part-time fall, 2007-2008
50,000 45,812 45,000
40,000
34,623 35,000 32,453 29,590 30,000 27,308
25,000 23,770
20,000
15,000
10,000 6,625 4,519 5,000
0 Unduplicated Headcount Total Unduplicated Headcount Total FTE Enrollment Part-time fall Enrollment Undergraduate 7
FSU Comparison Group Median FSU is Also More Diverse Percent of All Students Enrolled by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2008
80
71 69 70
60
50 t n e
c 40 r e P
30
20
10 11 10 6 6 4 4 3 3 1 0 0 African-American Hispanic White Asian American Indian Non-resident Alien
FSU Comparison Group Median 8 FSU Attracts Undergraduates
Percent of Applicants Admitted and Enrolled
40
Enrolled Full Time
42
63
Admitted
47
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Percent of Students 9 FSU Comparison Group Median OUR STUDENTS TRAVEL GREAT DISTANCES TO ATTEND OUR UNIVERSITY
Distance From Home FSU Natl. 0-100 9% 50% 101-500 68% 42% >500 23% 8% 10 And Pass More Than 50 Other Institutions on Their Way to Us
State Universities Community Colleges Members of Independent College and Universities of Florida, Inc. Florida Association of Postsecondary Schools and Colleges, Inc. Other
11 Our students arrive very well prepared
▪ Our First-Time-In-College Students Arrive With Excellent Academic Credentials ▪ They Take Far More Than The Required Academic Courses in High School and Earn High Marks
Courses FSU Students National Required Average 18 25.5 18
12 We receive a large number of applications for graduate study
Graduate Student Applications, Admitted, & Enrolled, by Year
47.20% 2008 52.40%
49.00% 2007 54.90%
50.60% 2006 54.00%
48.40% 2005 53.50%
33.20% 2004 70.50%
34.10% 2003 56.40%
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00%
Enrolled/Admitted Admitted/Applied
13 Graduate Student Quality
Average GRE (Quantitative and Verbal) All Test Takers and FSU Enrolled Graduate Students, by Year 1100
1090 1091 1090 1084
1080 1079 e
r 1070 o c 1066 S
E 1063 R 1060 1064 G 1058 e g a r e v 1050 1052 A 1049 1046
1040
1030
1020 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 FSU Average GRE All Test Takers 14 In-State Undergraduate Tuition and Fees Are Low
Tuition and Fees for Full-Time, FTIC, Undergraduates: AY 2007-2008
Comparison Group Median $7,656
Δ = $3,669 per FTE or ~$108 million
FSU $3,987
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 FSU Comparison Group Median 15 FSU Has Less To Spend Than Its Peers
Core Expenses per FTE Enrollment, by Function: FY 2008
$1,202 Student Services $964
$2,299 Institutional Support $2,179
$2,787 Academic Support $1,530 Δ instructional = $2,638 per FTE
$2,232 Public Service $1,211
$7,445 Research $3,688
$11,062 Instruction $8,424
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 16 FSU Comparison Group Median Fewer Faculty Student-to-Faculty Ratio: Fall 2008
Comparison Group Median 18
FSU 25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 FTE FStudentsTE Studen tpers pe FTEr PTE instructional instructional s stafftaff 17 FSU Comparison Group Median Salaries are a Recruiting and Retention Issue
Average Salaries of Full-Time Instructional Staff Equated to 9- Month Contracts, by Academic Rank: AY 2008-2009
$140,000
$117,834 $120,000
$103,441 $100,000 $87,971 $82,652 $77,843 $80,000 $72,684 $69,396 $71,066
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0 All ranks Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor 18 FSU Comparison Group Median Graduate Student Stipend Recruiting Issues
Mean Graduate Student Stipends: 2008
$18,000 Δ = $2,772 Δ = $3,,034 $15,799 $16,000 $15,039
$14,000 $13,027 $12,005 $12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0 Research Assistants Teaching Assistants 19 FSU Oklahoma State University Survey of 42 Universities Nonetheless, Performance is Generally High
• Attracts Quality Undergraduate Students • Obtains High Retention and Graduation Rates Among Undergraduates • Maintains Substantial Degree Production • Achieves Faculty Publication • Attracts Quality Graduate Students • Sustains a Pervasive “Culture of Achievement” 20 Degree Production is High
Number of Degrees Awarded, By Level: AY 2007-2008
8,000 7,615
7,000
6,000
5,000 4,600
4,000
3,000
2,075 2,000 1,469
1,000 730 667
0 Doctor's Master's Bachelors
FSU Comparison Group Median 21 Retention & Graduation Rates have steadily improved 6-Year Graduation Rate for FTIC Students: By Race/Ethnicity of the 2002 Cohort
90 80 80 74 70 69 70 70 69 70 70 65 62 62 63 59 60 57
50 t n e c r e P 40
30
20
10
0 Overall African-American Hispanic White Asian American Indian Non-resident Alien 22 FSU Comparison Group Median First Year Retention is at an All-time High
91.0%
88.5%
86.0% 90.7% 89.0% 89.0%89.0%89.0% 88.0% 88.1% 83.5% 86.4%86.7% 85.0%85.8% 83.9%84.2%84.4% 83.5%82.6% 81.0% 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
First Year Retention 23 (n~6300 First Time in College) The Quality of Teaching is High— 80% of the faculty are rated Excellent or Very Good
Assessment Questions Evaluation
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 1. 1. Description of course objectives and ✔ assignments 2. ✔ 2. Communication of ideas and information 3. ✔ 3. Expression of expectations for performance in this class 4. ✔ 4. Ability to assist students in or out of class 5. ✔ 5. Respect and concern for students ✔ 6. Stimulation of interest in the course 6. 7. Facilitation of learning 7. ✔ 8. Overall assessment of instructor 8. ✔
24 Diversity in Graduate Student Degrees is High
• FSU Ranks 18th Nationally in the Number of Doctorates Awarded to African Americans • Ranked a Top School for Hispanics in Law • Ranked a Top School for Hispanics in Medicine
25 We have a Strong Record of Faculty Publications and Research Expenditures
PUBLICATIONS • 7,243 publications from 2004-2008 • 5,566 publications from 1999-2003 • 4,987 publications from 1994-1998 RESEARCH EXPENDITURES • $206.6 million in 2008 • $199.8 million in 2007 million in 2006 • $191.4 26 Success in a Number of Areas
Areas Where FSU Outperforms Peer Groups: NSSE 2008
56% Discussed grades or assignments 52% with an instructor 57% 61%
Received prompt oral or written 59% 56% feedback from faculty on you 61% academic performance 67%
Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods 62% from your courses and readings so 62% you can repeat them in pretty much 67% the same form 72%
61% Solving Complex real-world 62% problems 64% 67%
Worked harder than you thought 55% 51% you could to meet an instructor's 56% standards or expectations 58%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 27 80% FSU Southern University Group Public Universities: Same Carnegie Class Comparable Research Universities Overall Satisfaction Outpaces Peers
Overall Evaluation Among Seniors of FSU and Peers: NSSE 2008 92%
90% 90% 90% 89%
88% 87% 87%
86% 85%
84% 83%
82% 82%
80%
78% Would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution If you could start over again, would you definitely or probably go to the as excellent or good? same insitution you are now attending?
FSU Southern University Group Public Universities: Same Carnegie Class Comparable Research Universities 28 Satisfaction in Florida
Overall Satisfaction Among Seniors, by Selected Florida Universities: NSSE 2008
95%
90% 90% 90%
86%
85% 84% 84% 83% 83%
81% 80% 80%
77%
75%
70% FSU USF UCF FIU FAU
Would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution as excellent or good? If you could start over again, would you definitely or probably go to the same insitution you are now attending? 29 Students Demonstrate Progress
The 2008 Collegiate Learning Assessment Results
1. Performance Task Results for First-time, Full-time Students The increase in learning on the performance task is ABOVE EXPECTED at an institution with students of similar academic abilities. Freshman Score: 1143 Senior Score: 1246 CLA score Range: 400 to no maximum score.
2. Analytic Writing Task Results for First-time, Full-time Students The increase in learning on the analytic writing task is ABOVE EXPECTED at an institution with students of similar academic abilities. Freshman Score: 1058 Senior Score: 1279 CLA score Range: 400 to no maximum score.
3. Make-An-Argument Task Results for First-Time Students 4. Critique-An-Argument Task Results for First-Time Students The increase in learning on these tasks is AT EXPECTED at an institution with students of similar academic abilities.
30 Student Awards (2005-2009)
• Three RHODES SCHOLARS • Three TRUMAN SCHOLARS • Three GOLDWATER SCHOLARS • Thirteen FULBRIGHT FELLOWS • One UDALL SCHOLAR • Two PICKERING SCHOLARS • One ROTARY INTERNATIONAL SCHOLAR • Numerous other recognitions
31 There are Areas that Need Improvement • Some Will Require Additional Resources • Smaller Classes • More Classes • More Papers • More Research Opportunities • More Research Availability • Others Will Not • Student Collaboration • Culture of Increased Effort
32 Areas Where FSU Performs Areas WBelowhere FSU P ePeerrforms Be lGroups:ow Peer Groups: NSSE 2008 NSSE 2008
Completed a culminating senior 29% experience (capstone, 29% 29% thesis,exam) 16%
60% Worked with classmates outside of 59% class to prepare class assignments 62% 53%
80% Said the institution emphasizes 80% studying and academic work 81% 74%
57% Spent more than 10 hours/week 60% preparing for class 56% 50%
48% Wrote at least one paper or report 49% of 20 pages or more 47% 34%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
FSU Southern University Group Public Universities: Same Carnegie Class Comparable Research Universities 33 Reputation: US News and World Over Time
US NewsUS NRankingsews Rankings (U (Undergraduate)ndergraduate)
Magazine Edition: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Survey Year: 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Fall Stats 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Rank Among US Public Universities 52 53 54 50 48 Final Rank: Private & Public 109 110 112 102 102 Peer Assessment Rank 92 85 92 86 88 Financial Resources Rank 200 202 207 210 208 Graduate and Retention Rank 102 98 96 91 90 Student Selectivity Rank 77 115 120 99 84 Faculty Resources Rank 114 114 110 115 109 Alumni Giving Rank 90 50 50 43 45
Source: US News and World Report Best Colleges
34