DOCSLIB.ORG

SUMMARY REPORT the Committee on Regional Development Organised a Delegation Visit to the Netherlands Which Took Place from 18Th to 20Th March 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUMMARY REPORT the Committee on Regional Development Organised a Delegation Visit to the Netherlands Which Took Place from 18Th to 20Th March 2015 COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELEGATION TO THE NETHERLANDS 18 – 20 MARCH 2015 "Regional Smart Specialisation and European cooperation in practice" SUMMARY REPORT The Committee on Regional Development organised a delegation visit to the Netherlands which took place from 18th to 20th March 2015. The thematic focus of this delegation was to show the practical applications of Smart Specialisation strategies in the EU and in particular in one of the innovation leaders - the Netherlands. The EU's Smart Specialisation Smart specialisation is a new innovation policy concept designed to promote the efficient and effective use of public investment in research. Its goal is to boost regional innovation in order to achieve economic growth and prosperity, by enabling regions to focus on their strengths. Smart specialisation understands that spreading investment too thinly across several frontier technology fields risks limiting the impact in any one area. A smart specialisation strategy needs to be built on a sound analysis of regional assets and technology. It should also include an analysis of potential partners in other regions and avoid unnecessary duplication. Smart specialisation needs to be based on a strong partnership between businesses, public entities and knowledge institutions – such partnerships are recognised as essential for success. (You can find additional information on the Netherlands and Smart Specialisation in an annex of the summary report). The REGI delegation visit to the South of the Netherlands The members of the delegation visited technology and innovation sites, business incubators and small-size family- ran innovative agribusinesses, but also had the opportunity to discuss and exchange experience and thoughts on the implementation of European programmes in support for growth, jobs and innovation and co-financed by European funding. Wednesday, 18th of March - Zuid-Holland On the first day of the trip to the Netherlands, the members of REGI committee visited the Southern part of the country. The first sites to visit was the outstanding Yes-Delft - a state of the art leading local business incubator with a global outreach, aiming at providing support to young entrepreneurs bringing their bright innovative ideas to marketed products and appliances. During the presentations and the discussions, REGI committee members could witness the high quality of projects that were carried by some 70 entrepreneur apprentices with the useful advice and support of senior trainers and bigger companies. EU funding was indeed used in a very efficient way (ex: project for cost efficiency solutions for agricultural producers; project on mini-satellites and space research). 2 Next, the delegation visited a brand new and technologically advanced Bioprocess Pilot Facility in the vicinities of Delft. The Bioprocess Pilot Facility is a unique facility where companies and knowledge institutions can develop new sustainable production processes. These processes serve many purposes, such as converting bio based residues into useful materials or fuels. The facility has been specially designed to enable the transition from the laboratory to production on an industrial scale. It allows users to construct complex operations by linking separate process modules. The facility is partly financed by the ERDF and also benefited from FP7 R&D programme. The first day concluded with a dinner in Rotterdam, given by the Vice -governor of Zuid -Holland Mr Rogier Van den Sande and Mr Maarten Struijvenberg, director of the managing authority. At the dinner an official speech was also given by the mayor of Delft Mr Bas Verkerk, leader of ALDE group at the Committee of the Regions. Thursday, 19th of March - Zeeland, Den Hague and Eindhoven The second day of the visit started with a meeting /discussion with the provincial authorities of Zeeland at the Abbey of Middleburg. The Zeeland province is covered by the Southern-Netherlands Operational programme. Mr Han Polman, member of the executive board of King's Commissioner of the province of Zeeland, presented the smart specialisation strategy for the maritime Delta region and handed over their manifesto stating the priorities of a modern circular economy based on business and technological development with a particular accent on connections with a variety of partners. On the way to Den Hague the members of the delegation stopped for a refreshing lunch at a family owned sustainable oyster farm 'Oesterij', delivering first quality oysters to consumers worldwide. In Den Hague the delegation was received by the state secretary for the Ministry of economic affairs of the Netherlands, Ms Sharon Dijksma. Ms Dijskma briefly presented the EIS Funds in the Netherlands (attached in annex). She also presented few of the priorities of the forthcoming Dutch presidency of the EU in 2016, putting the accent on the importance of the strong support for urban areas that the European Parliament should send through the adoption of the Urban Agenda report, currently discussed in REGI committee. A number of additional issues were discussed, notably the implementation of the Junker plan and its financial aspects. In the afternoon, the delegation travelled to Eindhoven, in the Noord -Brabant province, where the MEP's visited the High Tech Campus in the "Brainport" region. 3 Brainport Innovation Strategy The clearest showcase for the link between an individual project and the regional smart specialisation strategy are the High Tech Campus in Eindhoven and the Automotive Campus in Helmond which are both part of the Brainport innovation strategy. These projects also have an apparent European dimension, as the aspects of European (Leuven and Aachen) and international cooperation are integrated in the strategy. Once again, the delegates were impressed by the outstanding qualities of the business incubator developed on the campus, where the Eindhoven University of Technologies has its premises. The incubator and the campus are enabling businesses and boosting collaborative and open research programmes of institutes like Holts Centre, Solliance and others. In the evening, the members of the delegation were invited to a dinner hosted by the King's commissioner of the province of North Brabant, Mr Wim Van de Donk and by Ms Imke Carsouw, Brainport development director. Friday, 20th of March - Helmond Automotive campus. End of delegation The delegation ended on Friday after a visit to the automotive campus in Helmond. The Automotive Campus in Helmond - located in the Brainport Region - is the national and international hotspot, meeting point and place of business in the field of automotive (technology) and smart mobility. The delegates could witness the attractive learning and working environment, state of the art technological (test) facilities and flexible accommodation concepts offered by the campus. The Campus is a one-stop-shop when it comes to automotive technology and mobility concepts. It welcomes engineers, suppliers, scientists, testers and assembly workers. For a "pit stop", co- creation or as a new home base for innovation and product development. It is also a meeting place where know-how and companies can get together with the aim of promoting cross-sector cooperation, exchange of knowledge and open innovation. Smart, safe and sustainable mobility solutions for people, roads and vehicles of today and tomorrow are realized at the Automotive Campus. The automotive campus benefited from some 1,5 million EUR from ERDF under the 2007 -2014 period to build facilities. 4 Programme EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Delegation to the Netherlands 'Regional Smart Specialisation and European cooperation in practice' 18 – 20 March 2015 Wednesday 18 March 2015 afternoon OP 'Kansen voor West': Zuid- Holland Individual arrival of the Members and the Staff to Schiphol Airport 12:00 – 12:30: The participants of the delegation meet at the Meeting Point of Schiphol Airport. Near the railway platforms you will see a giant cube constructed of red and white blocks and with panels displaying photos of objects. 12:30 – 14:30: Bus transfer to Delft, Zuid-Holland including the light lunch and pre-briefing on the projects visited 14:30 – 16:00: Meeting with Mr Pieter Guldemond, the Director of the project Yes!Delft Topics: Visit the project Yes!Delft in Delft, Zuid - Holland. Meeting with the companies from business incubator on European funding. Venue: Molengraaffsingel 12-14 2629 JD Delft Netherlands Phone:+31 15 278 2816 16:00 – 16:30: Bus transfer to the Bioprocess Pilot Facilitatoran - ERDF co-funded facility which stimulates scaling-up laboratory experiments to an industrial scale Venue: Alexander Fleminglaan 1 2613 AX Delft Phone: +31 (0) 15 5150 200 E-mail:[email protected] 16:30 – 17:45: Meeting with Mr Hans van Leeuwen, the Director of the Bioprocess Pilot Facilitator 5 Topics: Visit and presentation of the project and discussion on European funding opportunities and cooperation. Venue: Alexander Fleminglaan 1 2613 AX Delft Phone: +31 (0) 15 5150 200 E-mail:[email protected] 17:45 – 18:15: Bus transfer to Rotterdam Venue: SSRotterdam 3e Katendrechtse Hoofd 25 3072 AM Rotterdam http://ssrotterdam.nl/ 18:30 – 21:00: Dinner hosted by Mr Rogier van der Sande, the Vice-Governor of Zuid- Holland, Chair of the Monitoring Committee and Mr Maarten Struijvenberg, Managing Authority of the OP West Netherlands Venue: SSRotterdam 3e Katendrechtse Hoofd 25 3072 AM Rotterdam http://ssrotterdam.nl/ 21:00 – 22:30: Bus transfer to Middelburg and check in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Postbus 60 2501 CB Den Haag 06
    Postbus 60 06 - 16 27 04 35 IBAN: NL51ABNA0491044100 KvK: 58053174 2501 CB Den Haag www.prinsjesfestival.nl BTW nummer: 852851972B01 ANBI: 852851972 Prinsjesfestival 2016 | beeldverslag Prinsjesfestival viert het feest van de democratie. Na een korte aanloop omlijst- te Prinsjesfestival van donderdag 15 tot en met dinsdag 20 september 2016 voor de vierde maal Prinsjesdag. Prinsjesfestival is een moderne traditie die in Den Haag een betekenisvol programma biedt vol feestelijke en inhoudelijke activiteiten. Ditmaal was de provincie Zeeland strategisch partner van dit festi- val voor stad en land. Het centrale thema van Prinsjesfestival 2016 was: Democr@tie: tussen Facebook en Wetboek Over democratie en de digitale revolutie Dit beeldverslag bevat een deel van de activiteiten onder de vlag van Prinsjes- festival. Zie achterin voor het volledig overzicht van het programma, de samen- stelling van diverse gremia, een greep uit de pers, de tekst waarmee Prinsjes- dichter Franca Treur Prinsjesfestival 2016 opende, het menu voor PrinsjesDiner 2016 van Prinsjeskok Eric van Bochove. Eerste en laatste pagina beeldverslag: voor- en achterkant Festivalkrant Prinsjesfestival 2016. Postbus 60 06 - 16 27 04 35 IBAN: NL51ABNA0491044100 KvK: 58053174 2501 CB Den Haag www.prinsjesfestival.nl BTW nummer: 852851972B01 ANBI: 852851972 VRIJDAG 09.09.2016 | 20.00 | Nacht van de dictatuur ProDemos | ProDemos, Gevangenpoort. Postbus 60 06 - 16 27 04 35 IBAN: NL51ABNA0491044100 KvK: 58053174 2501 CB Den Haag www.prinsjesfestival.nl BTW nummer: 852851972B01 ANBI: 852851972 ZATERDAG 10.09.2016 (Dag van de democratie in Nederland, open monumentendag) | 10.00 – 16.30 | PrinsjesFototentoonstelling 2016 | Noenzaal Eerste Kamer | in samenwerking met Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Rabobank Nederland.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning the Horticultural Sector Managing Greenhouse Sprawl in the Netherlands
    Planning the Horticultural Sector Managing Greenhouse Sprawl in the Netherlands Korthals Altes, W.K., Van Rij, E. (2013) Planning the horticultural sector: Managing greenhouse sprawl in the Netherlands, Land Use Policy, 31, 486-497 Abstract Greenhouses are a typical example of peri-urban land-use, a phenomenon that many planning systems find difficult to address as it mixes agricultural identity with urban appearance. Despite its urban appearance, greenhouse development often manages to evade urban containment policies. But a ban on greenhouse development might well result in under-utilisation of the economic value of the sector and its potential for sustainability. Specific knowledge of the urban and rural character of greenhouses is essential for the implementation of planning strategies. This paper analyses Dutch planning policies for greenhouses. It concludes with a discussion of how insights from greenhouse planning can be applied in other contexts involving peri-urban areas. Keywords: greenhouses; horticulture; land-use planning; the Netherlands; peri-urban land-use 1 Introduction The important role played by the urban-rural dichotomy in planning practice is a complicating factor in planning strategies for peri-urban areas, often conceptualised as border areas (the rural-urban fringe) or as an intermediate zone between city and countryside (the rural-urban transition zone) (Simon, 2008). However, “[t]he rural-urban fringe has a special, and not simply a transitional, land-use pattern that distinguishes it from more distant countryside and more urbanised space.” (Gallent and Shaw, 2007, 621) Planning policies tend to overlook this specific peri-environment, focusing rather on the black-and-white difference between urban and rural while disregarding developments in the shadow of cities (Hornis and Van Eck, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Hague University of Applied Sciences Netherlands Partnership
    The Hague University of Applied Sciences Netherlands Partnership Southwestern has formally established an exchange program with The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS). This program allows two Southwestern students to attend The Hague Law School for up to one year of study, with credits earned there counting toward completion of their J.D. degree from Southwestern. In 2014-15, 3 students from The Hague participated, studying at Southwestern for one semester each; no Southwestern student participated in the program. Grading system Each module or subject taught at The Hague is worth a number of ECTS. One ECTS credit represents 28 hours of full-time study. The Dutch grading scale consists of numbers running from 1 to 10, with 1 is the lowest grade, 10 is the highest and 5.5 the lowest passing grade. Accessibility of Facilities for People with Disabilities Over recent years much effort has been made to improve accessibility: access to trams and buses has been improved, ramps are now present on roads. However, in older cities, such as the capital Amsterdam, access for people using a wheelchair is still complicated. Most museums, government buildings and train facilities have been modified. For detailed information on accessibility for individuals with disabilities, please visit http://southholland.angloinfo.com/information/healthcare/people-with- disabilities/ Cancellation Policy Southwestern reserves the right to change or cancel the Semester Exchange Program at The Hague University at any time prior to the application deadlines for the program, or at any time due to a U.S. State Department Travel Warning or Alert. Cancellation of the program will occur only if necessary for reasons beyond Southwestern's control.
    [Show full text]
  • Veere Is in the South Western Part of the Netherlands: Zeeland
    Veere Veere is in the south western part of the Netherlands: Zeeland. It is a province that consists of a number of islands (hence its name “sea land”) wherein a large portion of it is below sea level but ‘reclaimed’ over time from the sea by the locals as they formed man-made hills, dikes, and more. Which is called the Oosterscheldekering: the largest of the 13 Delta Works made by Netherlands. The name Veere means "ferry": Wolfert Van Borssele established a ferry and ferry house there in 1281. This ferry he called the "camper-veer" or "Ferry of Campu" which soon became known as "de Veer". That same year Wolfert built the castle Sandenburg on one of the dikes he had built. On 12 November 1282, Count Floris V. thereupon issued a charter by which Wolfert received the sovereignty to the land and castle with the ferry and ferry house. From that time on Wolfert was given the title of Lord Van der Veer. Veere received city rights in 1355. Veere has different inland marinas. A marina is a dock with moorings for small boats and yachts. Just beside the marina is The Grote Kerk (Big Church). The tower is somehow unfinished (dating back from 1348) as it was intended to be 3 times taller than it is now. Beside the church, there is a cistern (water reservoir) built in 1551 by the order of Maximilian of Bourgondy for the benefit of the Scottish wool merchants and this reservoir has a magnificent capacity of 2000 hectoliters (approx 45000 imp.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2018 T.M.C
    Research output and Asser Press publications Annex 2018 T.M.C. Annual Report 2018 | Annex 1: Research Output 1 1. Research Output 1.1 Publications 1.1.1 Articles Elazar-De Mota, Y. Belavusau, U. Elazar-De Mota, Y. ‘Slave trade, slavery and the law / legal developments and justifications’, Gids Belavusau, U. Slavernijverleden Nederland / Netherlands ‘Coming up Short: Police-Women and Slavery Heritage Guide. LM Publishers Indirect Height Discrimination in EU Law’, (2018): 80-81. 4(2-3), International Labour Rights Case Law (2018): 218-222. Gordon, G. Belavusau, U. & Wójcik, A. ‘La criminalisation de l’expression historique Gordon, G. en Pologne: la loi mémorielle de 2018’, 40 ‘Imperial Standard Time’, 29(4) European Archives de politique criminelle (2018): 175- Journal of International Law (2018): 1197- 188. 1222. Boutin, B. Hirsch Ballin, E.M.H. Boutin, B. Hirsch Ballin, E.M.H. ‘Responsibility in Connection with the ‘De betekenis van het Nieuw BW in de Conduct of Military Partners’, 56(1) The Nederlandse rechtsstaat’, 8(25) Nederlands Military Law and the Law of War Review Juristenblad (2018): 1779-1782. (2017-2018): 2-19. Hirsch Ballin, E.M.H. ‘De talen van Europa’, 2 Christen Duval, A. Democratische Verkenningen, (2018): 27- 32. Duval, A. ‘The Olympic Charter: A Transnational Constitution Without a State?’, 45(1) Journal of Law and Society (2018): 245-269. Duval A. ‘Publish (Tweets and Blogs) or Perish? Legal Academia in Times of Social Media’, (2018) 23(1) Tilburg Law Review: 91-108. T.M.C. Annual Report 2018 | Annex 1: Research Output 2 Lazic, V. Stolk, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Droomland of Niemandsland?
    advies van de raad voor het openbaar bestuur DROOMLAND OF NIEMANDSLAND? uitgangspunten voor het besturen van regio’s de raad voor het openbaar bestuur werkwijze is een onafhankelijk adviesorgaan van de Adviesaanvragen kunnen van alle regering en het parlement. De ROB minis teries en van de beide Kamers der adviseert – gevraagd of op eigen initiatief Staten­Generaal afkomstig zijn. De ROB – over de inrichting en het functioneren baseert zijn adviezen op bestuurlijke kennis van het openbaar bestuur en de beleids­ en ervaring, state­of­the­art wetenschap­ matige aspecten van financiële verhoudin­ pelijke inzichten en kennis name van gen tussen Rijk, gemeenten en provincies. opinies en inzichten uit de samenleving. Extra aandacht gaat uit naar de beginselen Ook via andere activiteiten (lezingen, van democratie en rechtsstaat. rondetafel gesprekken, congressen, inleidingen) levert de ROB een bijdrage aan wettelijke verankering het politiek­ bestuurlijke en maatschappe­ De ROB is ingesteld bij Wet van lijke debat over het functioneren van het 12 december 1996 (Wet op de raad voor het openbaar bestuur en de democratie. openbaar bestuur, Staatsblad 1996, nr. 623). Per 1 juli 2017 is de adviesfunctie van de samenstelling Raad voor de financiële verhoudingen (Rfv) De Raad bestaat uit een voorzitter en acht overgedragen aan de Raad voor het leden die worden benoemd bij Koninklijk Openbaar Bestuur. De Rfv was ingesteld Besluit. Zij zijn geselecteerd op basis van bij wet van 21 februari 1997. hun deskundigheid en maatschappelijke ervaring. Daarnaast kan de Raad voor De geschiedenis van de Raad voor het projecten tijdelijke raadsleden aanstellen. Openbaar Bestuur (ROB) gaat terug tot in 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Burch Seminar in Alaska and Iceland
    Burch Renewable Energy and Sustainability in Germany and the Netherlands Summary Burch Programs and Honors Study Abroad Title of Program: Burch Field Research Seminar: A glimpse into our future? Sustainability in Germany and the Netherlands Faculty Director: Dr. Gregory Gangi, Institute for the Environment and the Curriculum in Environment and Ecology Program Location(s): Freiburg, Germany The Hague and surrounding area, The Netherlands Ruhrgebeit, Germany Berlin, Germany Affiliation(s): Innovation Academy, Freiburg, Germany Program Duration: 6 weeks Total Credit Hours: 6 credits Proposed Courses: HNRS 352 The Future of Energy; Instructor: Dr. Gregory Gangi HNRS 352 Smart Cities; Instructor: Drs. Ing. Cor Rademaker Contact Hours: Future of Energy: 74 Smart Cities: 118 1 Burch Seminar in Germany and the Netherlands A glimpse into our future? Sustainability in Germany and the Netherlands Summer 2017 Six weeks (First summer session) Dr. Gregory Gangi Institute for the Environment and the Curriculum in Environment and Ecology And Drs. Ing. Cor Rademaker Curriculum in Environment and Ecology I. Introduction The world is undergoing the largest wave of urban growth in history. More than half of the world’s population now lives in towns and cities, and by 2030 this number will swell to about 5 billion. Much of this urbanization will unfold in Africa and Asia, bringing huge social, economic, and environmental transformations. Intensifying urbanization is not only a phenomenon of developing countries but also of developed countries. For example, many of the larger cities in the Benelux region (like Brussels, Antwerp, Rotterdam, and Amsterdam) are experiencing growth rates at or above 2% on annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Delft Survival Guide
    Delta Delta is the independent newspaper of TU Delft. www.delta.tudelft.nl COLOPHON Editor-in-chief, Delta: Frank Nuijens Editor: Molly Quell Writers: Damini Purkayastha, Caroline Vermeulen and Daniela Stow Layout design: Damini Purkayastha Cover Design: Stephan Timmers All articles printed in this book were first published in TU Delta from 2012 to 2015. Some text has been updated to reflect changes. To read the articles online log on to: www.delta.tudelft.nl/internationalstu- dents/survivalguide The Survival Guide is an on-going series and will be updated with new and relevant topics. For queries or topics you would like covered write to [email protected] Delta TU Delft 3 Table of Contents Life on campus 6 Survive: Campus 8 Survive: Bars on campus 11 Survive: TU Delft’s online forums 14 Survive: Mental health on campus 16 Getting around 18 Survive: The bike 19 Survive: The cycling rules 21 Survive: The public transport 24 Survive: The new train tickets 28 Survive: The news 31 Survive: Networking 34 Survive: The libraries 36 Survive: After-hour emergencies 39 Survive: Free wifi 41 Survive: The rain 43 Survive: The tourism 45 Survive: The snow 47 Survive: The trash 49 Survive: Visas 52 Survive: The medical system 54 4 Delta TU Delft Things to do 57 Survive: The beaches 59 Survive: The museums 61 Survive: Trivia nights 63 Survive: Sports clubs 65 Survive: The theatre 67 Survive: The events 69 Survive: Delft’s music events 72 Survive: The tastings 75 Survive: Winter activities in Delft 77 Survive: Watching sports 80 Survive:
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Dutch Revolt 1560–1700 Hugh Dunthorne Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83747-7 - Britain and the Dutch Revolt 1560–1700 Hugh Dunthorne Frontmatter More information Britain and the Dutch Revolt 1560–1700 England’s response to the Revolt of the Netherlands (1568–1648) has been studied hitherto mainly in terms of government policy, yet the Dutch struggle with Habsburg Spain affected a much wider commu- nity than just the English political elite. It attracted attention across Britain and drew not just statesmen and diplomats but also soldiers, merchants, religious refugees, journalists, travellers and students into the confl ict. Hugh Dunthorne draws on pamphlet literature to reveal how British contemporaries viewed the progress of their near neigh- bours’ rebellion, and assesses the lasting impact which the Revolt and the rise of the Dutch Republic had on Britain’s domestic history. The book explores affi nities between the Dutch Revolt and the British civil wars of the seventeenth century – the fi rst major challenges to royal authority in modern times – showing how much Britain’s chang- ing commercial, religious and political culture owed to the country’s involvement with events across the North Sea. HUGH DUNTHORNE specializes in the history of the early modern period, the Dutch revolt and the Dutch republic and empire, the his- tory of war, and the Enlightenment. He was formerly Senior Lecturer in History at Swansea University, and his previous publications include The Enlightenment (1991) and The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the Low Countries
    [Show full text]
  • List of Addresses of the Participants
    List of Addresses of the Participants Prof. R. J. Adrian Prof. Gido Buresti Dept. of Theor. & Appl. Mech. Dipt. di Jngegneria Aerospaziale University of lllinois at Urbana Universita di Pisa 216 Talbot Laboratory Via Diotisalvi 2 104 South Wright St. 1-56126 Pisa, Italia Urbana II. 61801-2983, USA [email protected] [email protected] Prof.S.Y. Alekseenko, Director Dr. Rene Delfos Inst. of Thermophysics Delft University of Technology Siberian Branch ofRAS Lab. for Aero- and Hydrodynamics Lavrentyev Ave, 1 Rotterdamseweg 145 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia NL- 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] Prof. S.P. Bardakhanov Prof. H. Eckelmann Inst. Theor. & Appl. Mech. Max-Planck Inst. f. Stromungsforschung Siberian Branch of Russian A.S. Bunsebnstrasse 10 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia D-37073 Gottingen, Germany [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Werner Benger Dr. Walter Egli Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum f. Informa- ABB Corporate Research Ltd. tionstechnik (Zm Berlin) LHS AG Zurich Takustrasse 7 CH-5405 Baden Dlittwil D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem, Germany Switzerland [email protected] [email protected] Pavel Y.Bulychev Prof. Dr. Marie Farge Depart. General Physics CNRS Lab. de Meteo. Dyn. Perm State University Ecole Normale Superieur 15, Bukirev St. 24, rue Lhomond 614600 Perm, Russia F-76231 Paris Cedex 05, France [email protected] [email protected] Prof. Tony Burden Dept. of Mechanics KTH S- 10044 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] 285 286 Prof. Adam Finchman Dr. Wolfram Hage LEGI-UJF-CNRS DLR (German Aerospace Center) Coriolis Inst.
    [Show full text]
  • Prestatieafspraken Geldrop-Mierlo 2021-2024 (Pdf)
    Prestatieafspraken Geld rop-M ierlo 2021-2024 *i\)rz--tf ;drop-Míerlo Huurders Belangen Vereniging ffierfof com lr* U.loningsIichting Paen rffi o *o$"o*rJF vÀt-t $J0*il8Ës*l,F wooN I Ílc. ,^\ SHGM Stichting Huurdersbelangen Geldrop-Mierlo - 1 Ondergetekenden, a. de publiekrechtelijke rechtspersoon GEMEENTE GELDROP-MIERLO, feitelijk adres Hofstraat 4 te (5664 HT) Geldrop, in de persoon van de heer G.M.J. Jeucken, wethouder van de gemeente, te dezer zake gevolmachtigd op 8 december 2019 door de heer J.C.J. van Bree, burgemeester van de gemeente en als zodanig deze gemeente vertegenwoordigend krachtens artikel 171 tweede lid van de Gemeentewet, handelend ter uitvoering van het besluit van het college van burgemeester en wethouders van 8 december 2019; b. de stichting 'STICHTING WOONBEDRIJF SWS.HHVL " gevestigd te Eindhoven en kantoorhoudende te 5611 GG aan het adres Wal 2 te Eindhoven (KvK-nummer 17058500), te dezer zake rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door mevrouw l. de Boer, hierna aangeduid als "Woonbedrijf'; c. de stichting met volledige rechtsbevoegdheid "WONINGSTIGHTING GOMPAEN" gevestigd te Helmond en kantoorhoudende te 5706 LR aan het adres Houtsestraat 69 te Helmond (KvK-nummer 40236239), te dezer zake rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer J.M. Lobée, hierna aangeduid als "Compaen"; d. de stichting 'STICHTING WOON!NC." gevestigd te Eindhoven en kantoorhoudende te 5623 KW aan het adres Winston Churchilllaan 87 te Eindhoven (KvK-nummer 17007288), te dezer zake rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door mevrouw J.A.P.M. Pijnenburg, hierna aangeduid als "Wooninc."; e. de vereniging met volledige rechtsbevoegdheid "HUURDERSBELANGENVERENIGING MIERLO" gevestigd te Mierlo en kantoor houdende te 5731 GW aan het adres Kersenstraal24 te Mierlo (KvK-nummer 40237836) te dezer zake rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer F.J.P.G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of Relationships Between Two Related but Separated Denominations: the Reformed Church in America and the Christian Reformed Church in North America
    A CONCISE HISTORY OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TWO RELATED BUT SEPARATED DENOMINATIONS: THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICA AND THE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH IN NORTH AMERICA The focus of this essay is on the interactions between two denominations whose roots in this country have different depths, but whose roots in the Netherlands extend all the way back to the Synod of Dort in 1618–1619; indeed, they extend back through John Calvin to the very beginning of Christianity. Some members of the Reformed Church in America (RCA) and most members of the Christian Reformed Church in North America (CRCNA) are also rooted in the Afscheiding (Secession) of 1834, so they share a heritage of secession from established churches. The Reformed Church in America, known as the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church (RPDC) prior to 1867, identifies 1628 as its date of origin, whereas the CRCNA views 1857 as its founding date. The latter date is the point at which our historical narrative begins, since the founding congregations of the CRCNA withdrew from the RPDC at that time. This account will reveal both tensions and collegiality between the denominations across the years. Secession of 1857 Ten years after the Reformed immigrants from the Netherlands and Germany settled in West Michigan and Iowa, four congregations with approximately three hundred families and two ministers seceded from their kin to form a new denomination. The specific issues cited in 1857 were the use of hymns in formal worship services, the lack of consistent catechetical instruction for young people, and the practice of open communion. Ten years later the question of church members belonging to secret, oath-bound societies further divided the two, because the RCA left the question of membership to local consistories, whereas the CRCNA forbade it.
    [Show full text]