DOCSLIB.ORG

Molar Dentition of the Docodontan Haldanodon (Mammaliaformes) As Functional Analog to Tribosphenic Teeth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Molar Dentition of the Docodontan Haldanodon (Mammaliaformes) As Functional Analog to Tribosphenic Teeth Molar dentition of the docodontan Haldanodon (Mammaliaformes) as functional analog to tribosphenic teeth DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von JANKA J. BRINKKÖTTER aus Berlin Bonn 2018 I Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Martin 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. P. Martin Sander Tag der Promotion: 14. Dezember 2018 Erscheinungsjahr: 2019 II List of abbreviations d – deciduous tooth M – upper molar m – lower molar P – upper premolar p – lower premolar m – mesial buc – buccal dex – dextral sin – sinistral L – length W – width fr. – fragment III List of contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 01 Kurzfassung ........................................................................................................................... 02 1 Aim of study ........................................................................................................................ 04 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 06 2.1 Systematical position of the Docodonta ............................................................................ 06 2.2 Definitions of terms ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Abrasion and Attrition ............................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Wear facets ................................................................................................................ 12 2.2.3 Mastication functions ................................................................................................ 13 2.2.3.1 Shear-cutting ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3.2 Crushing ............................................................................................................. 13 2.2.3.3 Grinding ............................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Morphology of “pseudotribosphenic“ molars ................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Convergent development of crushing basins on the lower molars in mammalian history ........................................................................................................................ 14 2.3.2 “Pseudotalonid basin”, “pseudoprotocone”, and “pseudotrigon basin” on docodont molars ........................................................................................................................ 17 3 Material ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Docodonta ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Haldanodon exspectatus K ÜHNE AND KRUSAT 1972 ................................................ 19 3.2 Marsupialia ........................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.1 Didelphis L INNAEUS 1758 ......................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Monodelphis B URNETT 1829 ..................................................................................... 21 4 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Terminology ...................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.1 Cusps and crests ........................................................................................................ 23 4.1.1.1 Docodonta .......................................................................................................... 23 4.1.1.2 Didelphis and Monodelphis ............................................................................... 24 4.1.2 Wear facets ................................................................................................................ 25 4.1.2.1 Docodonta .......................................................................................................... 25 4.1.2.2 Didelphis and Monodelphis ............................................................................... 27 IV 4.2 Measurements ................................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Recording of striations with scanning electron microscope (SEM) .................................. 28 4.4 CT scans, reconstruction, and printing of 3D-models ....................................................... 29 4.5 Occlusal Fingerprint Analyser (OFA) ............................................................................... 30 5 Results ................................................................................................................................. 32 5.1 Haldanodon molars ........................................................................................................... 32 5.1.1 Determination of position for isolated molars ........................................................... 32 5.1.2 Abrasion patterns of molar rows ............................................................................... 39 5.1.2.1 Definition of wear stages ................................................................................... 39 5.1.2.2 Wear pattern ...................................................................................................... 43 5.1.3 Position of facets ....................................................................................................... 45 5.1.4 Striation patterns and trailing edges .......................................................................... 47 5.2 Tooth-tooth-contact diagrams ........................................................................................... 59 5.2.1 Haldanodon ............................................................................................................... 59 5.2.2 Didelphis .................................................................................................................... 60 5.2.3 Monodelphis .............................................................................................................. 61 6 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 65 6.1 Location of basins and “pseudoprotocone“ on docodont molars ...................................... 65 6.1.1 Location of basins on the lower molars ..................................................................... 65 6.1.2 Location of “pseudotrigon basin“ and “pseudoprotocone“ on the upper molars ...... 66 6.2 Determination of position for isolated Haldanodon molars ............................................. 67 6.3 Wear patterns of Haldanodon molar rows ........................................................................ 70 6.4 Reconstruction of the mastication cycle of Haldanodon .................................................. 73 6.4.1 Previous studies on various docodont taxa ................................................................ 73 6.4.2 Position of facets on molars ...................................................................................... 77 6.4.3 Occlusion of molar dentition ..................................................................................... 81 6.4.4 Striation patterns on molars ....................................................................................... 85 6.4.5 Mastication movement .............................................................................................. 92 6.4.6 Functions performed by molars ................................................................................. 97 6.4.7 Relevance of the results for the Haldanodon molar dentition for other docodont taxa .......................................................................................................................... 102 6.5 Comparison of tribosphenic and docodont “pseudotribosphenic“ tooth morphology .... 111 6.5.1 Comparison of molar functions in Didelphis and Haldanodon .............................. 111 6.5.2 Comparison of molar functions in Monodelphis and Haldanodon ......................... 116 V 6.5.3 Disparities of molar functions in between tribosphenids and docodonts ................ 121 7 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 126 8 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ 130 9 References ......................................................................................................................... 131 Appendix .............................................................................................................................. 144 List of specimens List of measurements taken from Haldanodon molar rows List of highest, lowest, and mean values of measurements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptile-Like Physiology in Early Jurassic Stem-Mammals
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title: Reptile-like physiology in Early Jurassic stem-mammals Authors: Elis Newham1*, Pamela G. Gill2,3*, Philippa Brewer3, Michael J. Benton2, Vincent Fernandez4,5, Neil J. Gostling6, David Haberthür7, Jukka Jernvall8, Tuomas Kankanpää9, Aki 5 Kallonen10, Charles Navarro2, Alexandra Pacureanu5, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff11, Kelly Richards12, Kate Robson-Brown13, Philipp Schneider14, Heikki Suhonen10, Paul Tafforeau5, Katherine Williams14, & Ian J. Corfe8*. Affiliations: 10 1School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3Earth Science Department, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 4Core Research Laboratories, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 5European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. 15 6School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 7Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 8Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 9Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 10Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 20 11Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Zentrum für Material-und Küstenforschung GmbH Germany. 12Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 13Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 14Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Studies on Mesozoic and Paleogene Mammals in China
    Vol.24 No.2 2010 Paleomammalogy Recent Advances in Studies on Mesozoic and Paleogene Mammals in China WANG Yuanqing* and NI Xijun Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, CAS, Beijing 10004, China ike in other fields of paleontology, research in from the articular of the lower jaw and the quadrate of the paleomammalogy mainly falls into two aspects. cranium following the process of reduction and detachment LOne is related to the biological nature of fossil from the reptilian mandible, are new elements of the bony mammals, such as their systematics, origin, evolution, chain in the mammalian middle ear. The appearance of phylogenetic relationships, transformation of key features mammalian middle ear allows mammals to hear the sound and paleobiogeography, and the other is related to the of higher frequencies than reptiles do. Generally speaking, geological context, involving biostratigraphy, biochronology, a widely accepted hypothesis is that mammals originated faunal turnover and its relations to the global and regional from a certain extinct reptilian group. The formation and environmental changes. In the last decade, a number of development of the definitive mammalian middle ear well-preserved mammalian specimens were collected from (DMME) has thus become one of the key issues in the study different localities around the country. Such discoveries have of mammalian evolution and has drawn the attention from provided significant information for understanding the early many researchers for many years. evolution of mammals and reconstructing the phylogeny of Developmental biological studies have proven the early mammals. function of the Meckel’s cartilage and its relationship to Studies of Chinese Mesozoic mammals achieved the ear ossicles during the development of mammalian remarkable progress in the past several years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ear in Mammal-Like Reptiles and Early Mammals
    Acta Palaeontologica Polonica Vol. 28, No. 1-2 pp, 147-158 Warszawa, 1983 Second Symposium on Mesozoic T erre stial Ecosystems, Jadwisin 1981 KENNETH A. KERMACK and FRANCES MUSSETT THE EAR IN MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES AND EARLY MAMMALS KERMACK, K . A. a nd MUSS ETT, F.: The ear in mammal-like r eptiles an d early mammals. Acta Palaeont. P olonica , 28, 1-2, 147-158, 1983. Th e early m embers of the Theropsida lacked a tympanic membrane. In the later theropslds, the Therapsid a, a tym p an ic membrane develop ed from thc skin on the lateral side of th e lower jaw. The tympanum is not homologous In the Therapsida and ' t he Sauropslda. The ther apsid ea r w as a poor receiver of airborne sound, both In hi gh frequency r esp onse and In the r ange of frequencies encompassed. With the radiation of the Sauropsida in the Triassic the large therapsids became extinct, the small therap si ds evolv ed In to the mammal s and became nocturnal. High frequency hearin g w as essen tial for the nocturn al mode of life; quadrate and arttcutar became diss ociated from the jaw hinge to become the m ammali an au di tory ossi cles . I n the Theria the cochlea became coil ed. The spiral cochlea could n ot have existed until there w as a middle ear w ith the n ec essary h ig h f re q uency r esp onse. This m ay n ot have been until the Cretace ous.
    [Show full text]
  • Width Measured at the Level of Anterior Squamosal/Parietal Suture
    Fig. 5. (A) Scaling of brain vault size (width measured at the level of anterior squamosal/parietal suture) relative to skull size (measured at the distance between the left versus right temporomandibular joints). This shows that allometry of small size of Hadrocodium, by itself, is not sufficient to account for its very large braincase. Had-rocodium's brain vault is larger (wider) than expected for the crown-group mammals with similar skull width from the allometrical regression. By contrast, all contemporaneous mammaliaforms (triangles: Sinoconodon, Morganucodon, and Haldanodon) with the postdentary trough and meckelian groove have smaller (narrower) brain vaults than those living mammal taxa (and Hadrocodium) of comparable skull size. The brain vault is narrower in nonmammaliaform cynodonts (squares: Chaliminia, Massetoganthus, Probelesodon, Probainognathus, and Yunnanodon) than in mammaliaform stem taxa and much narrower than expected for crown group mammals of similar size. The allometric equation (natural logarithmic scale) for the brain vault width (Y) to the skull width at the level of TMJ (X) for species in the mammalian crown groups (circles: 37 living and 8 fossil species): Y =0.98X -0.31 (R2 – 0.715). Data from cynodonts, mammaliaforms, and Hadrocodium are added second arily for comparison with the regression of extant and fossil species of mammalian crown group. (B) Estimated body-size distributions of mammaliaform insectivores in the Early Jurassic Lufeng fauna [following method of Gingerich (50)]. The estimated 2-g body mass of Hadrocodium is in strong contrast to its contemporary mammaliaforms of the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, such as Sinconodon (from ~13 to ~517 g, based on skull length from 22 to 62 mm) and Morganucodon (from 27 to 89 g, based on skull length from 27 to 38 mm).
    [Show full text]
  • Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships
    438 Article 438 by Saswati Bandyopadhyay1* and Sanghamitra Ray2 Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships 1Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Kolkata 700108, India; email: [email protected] 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India; email: [email protected] *Corresponding author (Received : 23/12/2018; Revised accepted : 11/09/2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020028 The twelve Gondwanan stratigraphic horizons of many extant lineages, producing highly diverse terrestrial vertebrates India have yielded varied vertebrate fossils. The oldest in the vacant niches created throughout the world due to the end- Permian extinction event. Diapsids diversified rapidly by the Middle fossil record is the Endothiodon-dominated multitaxic Triassic in to many communities of continental tetrapods, whereas Kundaram fauna, which correlates the Kundaram the non-mammalian synapsids became a minor components for the Formation with several other coeval Late Permian remainder of the Mesozoic Era. The Gondwana basins of peninsular horizons of South Africa, Zambia, Tanzania, India (Fig. 1A) aptly exemplify the diverse vertebrate faunas found Mozambique, Malawi, Madagascar and Brazil. The from the Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic. During the last few decades much emphasis was given on explorations and excavations of Permian-Triassic transition in India is marked by vertebrate fossils in these basins which have yielded many new fossil distinct taxonomic shift and faunal characteristics and vertebrates, significant both in numbers and diversity of genera, and represented by small-sized holdover fauna of the providing information on their taphonomy, taxonomy, phylogeny, Early Triassic Panchet and Kamthi fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals from the Mesozoic of Mongolia
    Mammals from the Mesozoic of Mongolia Introduction and Simpson (1926) dcscrihed these as placental (eutherian) insectivores. 'l'he deltathcroids originally Mongolia produces one of the world's most extraordi- included with the insectivores, more recently have narily preserved assemblages of hlesozoic ma~nmals. t)een assigned to the Metatheria (Kielan-Jaworowska Unlike fossils at most Mesozoic sites, Inany of these and Nesov, 1990). For ahout 40 years these were the remains are skulls, and in some cases these are asso- only Mesozoic ~nanimalsknown from Mongolia. ciated with postcranial skeletons. Ry contrast, 'I'he next discoveries in Mongolia were made by the Mesozoic mammals at well-known sites in North Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expeditions America and other continents have produced less (1963-1971) initially led by Naydin Dovchin, then by complete material, usually incomplete jaws with den- Rinchen Barsbold on the Mongolian side, and Zofia titions, or isolated teeth. In addition to the rich Kielan-Jaworowska on the Polish side, Kazi~nierz samples of skulls and skeletons representing Late Koualski led the expedition in 1964. Late Cretaceous Cretaceous mam~nals,certain localities in Mongolia ma~nmalswere collected in three Gohi Desert regions: are also known for less well preserved, but important, Bayan Zag (Djadokhta Formation), Nenlegt and remains of Early Cretaceous mammals. The mammals Khulsan in the Nemegt Valley (Baruungoyot from hoth Early and Late Cretaceous intervals have Formation), and llcrmiin 'ISav, south-\vest of the increased our understanding of diversification and Neniegt Valley, in the Red beds of Hermiin 'rsav, morphologic variation in archaic mammals. which have heen regarded as a stratigraphic ecluivalent Potentially this new information has hearing on the of the Baruungoyot Formation (Gradzinslti r't crl., phylogenetic relationships among major branches of 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Femur of a Morganucodontid Mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Central Russia
    Femur of a morganucodontid mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Central Russia PETR P. GAMBARYAN and ALEXANDER 0.AVERIANOV Gambaryan, P.P. & Averianov, A.O. 2001. Femur of a morganucodontid mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Central Russia. -Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 46,1,99-112. We describe a nearly complete mammalian femur from the Middle Jurassic (upper Bathonian) from Peski quarry, situated some 100 km south east of Moscow, central Rus- sia. It is similar to the femora of Morganucodontidae in having a globular femoral head, separated from the greater trochanter and reflected dorsally, fovea capitis present, both trochanters triangular and located on the same plane, distal end flat, mediolaterally expanded, and somewhat bent ventrally, and in the shape and proportions of distal condyles. It is referred to as Morganucodontidae gen. et sp. indet. It is the first representa- tive of this group of mammals in Eastern Europe from the third Mesozoic mammal local- ity discovered in Russia. Exquisite preservation of the bone surface allowed us to recon- struct partial hind limb musculature. We reconstruct m. iliopsoas as inserting on the ridge, which starts at the lesser trochanter and extends along the medial femoral margin for more than half of the femur length. On this basis we conclude that the mode of loco- motion of the Peski morganucodontid was similar to that of modern echidnas. During the propulsive phase the femur did not retract and the step elongation was provided by pronation of the femur. Key words : Mammalia, Morganucodontidae, femur, anatomy, locomotion, Jurassic, Russia. Petr P. Gambaryan [[email protected]] and Alexander 0.
    [Show full text]
  • A Non-Mammaliaform Cynodont from the Upper Triassic of South Africa: a Therapsid Lazarus Taxon?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wits Institutional Repository on DSPACE A non-mammaliaform cynodont from the Upper Triassic of South Africa: a therapsid Lazarus taxon? Fernando Abdala1*, Ross Damiani2, Adam Yates1 & Johann Neveling3 1Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, 2050 South Africa 2Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, D-70191, Stuttgart, Germany 3Council for Geoscience, Private Bag X112, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa Received 20 January 2006. Accepted 10 January 2007 The tetrapod record of the ‘Stormberg Group’, including the Lower Elliot Formation, in the South African Karoo is widely dominated by archosaurian reptiles, contrasting with the therapsid dominion of the subjacent Beaufort Group. The only therapsids represented by skeletal remains in the Upper Triassic Lower Elliot Formation are the large traversodontid cynodont Scalenodontoides macrodontes and the recently described tritheledontid cynodont Elliotherium kersteni. Here we present a fragmentary lower jaw that provides evidence of a third type of cynodont for the Upper Triassic of South Africa. The fossil is tentatively assigned to the Diademodontidae. The latter representative of this family is known from the Late Anisian, and its tentative record in the Norian Lower Elliot Formation, if confirmed, will represent a case of Lazarus taxon. Thus, Diademodontidae apparently disappeared from the fossil record by the end of the Anisian and then reappeared in the Norian of South Africa, a stratigraphic interval of some 21 million years. This new cynodont record, together with the recently described Tritheledontidae, show that cynodonts are now the second most diverse tetrapod group in the Lower Elliot fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the World in Comics
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Earth Is Born 6 THE CENOZOIC 43 On the Prairies 44 THE PRECAMBRIAN 7 In the Trees 45 The Cradle of Life 8 Little Horses 46 The First Cells 9 The New Giants 47 A World of Microbes 10 Walking Whales 48 Upheavals 1 1 Swimming Whales 49 The First Faunas 12 Trumpeters 50 Island America 5 1 THE PALEOZOIC 13 The Rise of the Ruminants 52 The Explosion of Life 14 The Giraffe’s Neck 53 Pincers of the Sea 15 Teeth in the Sea 54 Conquering the Continents 16 Teeth on Land 55 Jaws of the Sea 17 The Hominids 56 The March of the Fish 18 On Four Feet 19 THE QUATERNARY 57 The Great Forest 20 The Ice Ages 58 Born on Land 2 1 Megafauna of the Tundra 59 The First Giants 22 The Reunion of the Americas 60 Reptiles Unlike the Others 23 An Island Continent 6 1 The Great Extinction 24 The First Humans 62 Conquering the World 63 THE MESOZOIC 25 Mini-Elephants of the Islands 64 The Time of the Crocs 26 Cro-Magnon 65 The First Dinosaurs 27 The Great Warming 66 The First Mammals 28 The Pterosaurs 29 THE TIME OF THE HUMANS 67 The Jurassic Sea 30 The Agricultural Revolution 68 Sea Monsters 3 1 Cows, Pigs, Poultry 69 The Ornithischians 32 The Industrial Revolution 70 The Epic of the Stegosaurs 33 The Sixth Extinction 7 1 The Sauropods 34 Living Planet 72 The Theropods 35 Life in the Universe 73 Dinosaurs with Feathers 36 Wings and Teeth 37 Geologic Time Scale 74 Rivals of the Dinosaurs 38 Fur Balls 39 Glossary 76 Flowers for the Dinosaurs 40 The End of a World 4 1 Index 78 Night of the Cretaceous 42 by Jean-Baptiste de Panafieu • illustrated by Adrienne Barman NEW YORK Triassic: 252 to 201 million years ago THE FIRST DINOSAURS Marasuchus feeds on Some of the archosaurs insects and small animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Mammals: a Study of Some Important Fossils
    CEN Tech. J., vol. 7(2), 1993, pp. 122–139 The Origin of Mammals: A Study of Some Important Fossils A. W. MEHLERT ABSTRACT For many years evolutionists have pointed to the alleged transition of reptiles to mammals as being the best example of the natural origin of a major taxon. At first sight such claims appear to have considerable justification, but when the fossil evidence is closely examined it can be shown that there are some grave deficiencies, and the claim is not only factually unproved but also contains a number of dubious assumptions. It is therefore proposed to subject certain of the key fossils to more scrutiny. INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF OVERVIEW therapsids of later Permian and Triassic ‘times’. It is supposedly within the order Therapsida (suborder In 1966 Olson wrote, Theriodontia), that we find the subgroups to which the ‘The reptilian-mammalian transition has by far the immediate ancestors of mammals are assigned (see Table finest record of showing the origin of a new 24). class.’ (Emphasis added.)1 Almost all authorities are convinced that the immediate Kemp in 1982 had the same view.2 If it can be shown that reptilian ancestors of the early mammals are to be found in such a claim is not as strong as Olson and Kemp believe, the infraorders Cynodontia, Tritylodontia and Ictidosauria, then by implication, the evolutionary origin of all other although all six theriodont subgroups contain fossils which classes in the animal and plant kingdoms must be even more appear to bear at least some mammalian-like features. doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteohistology of Late Triassic Prozostrodontian Cynodonts from Brazil
    Osteohistology of Late Triassic prozostrodontian cynodonts from Brazil Jennifer Botha-Brink1,2, Marina Bento Soares3 and Agustín G. Martinelli3 1 Department of Karoo Palaeontology, National Museum, Bloemfontein, South Africa 2 Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa 3 Departamento de Paleontologia e Estratigrafia, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil ABSTRACT The Prozostrodontia includes a group of Late Triassic-Early Cretaceous eucynodonts plus the clade Mammaliaformes, in which Mammalia is nested. Analysing their growth patterns is thus important for understanding the evolution of mammalian life histories. Obtaining material for osteohistological analysis is difficult due to the rare and delicate nature of most of the prozostrodontian taxa, much of which comprises mostly of crania or sometimes even only teeth. Here we present a rare opportunity to observe the osteohistology of several postcranial elements of the basal prozostrodontid Prozostrodon brasiliensis, the tritheledontid Irajatherium hernandezi, and the brasilodontids Brasilodon quadrangularis and Brasilitherium riograndensis from the Late Triassic of Brazil (Santa Maria Supersequence). Prozostrodon and Irajatherium reveal similar growth patterns of rapid early growth with annual interruptions later in ontogeny. These interruptions are associated with wide zones of slow growing bone tissue. Brasilodon and Brasilitherium exhibit a mixture of woven-fibered bone tissue and slower growing parallel-fibered and lamellar bone. The slower growing bone tissues are present even during early ontogeny. The relatively slower growth in Brasilodon and Brasilitherium may be related to their small body size compared to Prozostrodon and Irajatherium. These brasilodontids also exhibit osteohistological similarities with the Late Triassic/Early Jurassic mammaliaform Morganucodon and the Late Cretaceous multituberculate mammals Kryptobaatar and Nemegtbaatar.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous Amphilestid ('Triconodont') Mammals from Mongolia
    Early Cretaceous amphilestid ('triconodont') mammals from Mongolia ZOFIAKIELAN-JAWOROWSKA and DEMBERLYIN DASHZEVEG Kielan-Jaworowską Z. &Daslueveg, D. 1998. Early Cretaceous amphilestid (.tricono- dont') mammals from Mongotia. - Acta Pal.aeontol.ogicaPolonica,43,3, 413438. Asmall collection of ?Aptianor ?Albian amphilestid('triconodont') mammals consisting of incomplete dentaries and maxillae with teeth, from the Khoboor localiĘ Guchin Us counĘ in Mongolia, is described. Grchinodon Troftmov' 1978 is regarded a junior subjective synonym of GobiconodonTroftmov, 1978. Heavier wear of the molariforms M3 andM4than of themore anteriorone-M2 in Gobiconodonborissiaki gives indirect evidence formolariformreplacement in this taxon. The interlocking mechanismbetween lower molariforms n Gobiconodon is of the pattern seen in Kuchneotherium and Ttnodon. The ińterlocking mechanism and the type of occlusion ally Amphilestidae with Kuehneotheriidae, from which they differ in having lower molariforms with main cusps aligned and the dentary-squamosal jaw joint (double jaw joint in Kuehneotheńdae). The main cusps in upper molariforms M3-M5 of Gobiconodon, however, show incipient tńangular arrangement. The paper gives some support to Mills' idea on the therian affinities of the Amphilestidae, although it cannot be excluded that the characters that unite the two groups developed in parallel. Because of scanty material and arnbiguĘ we assign the Amphilestidae to order incertae sedis. Key words : Mammali4 .triconodonts', Amphilestidae, Kuehneotheriidae, Early Cretaceous, Mongolia. Zofia Kiel,an-Jaworowska [zkielnn@twarda,pan.pl], InsĘtut Paleobiologii PAN, ul. Twarda 5 I /5 5, PL-00-8 I 8 Warszawa, Poland. DemberĘin Dash7eveg, Geological Institute, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulan Bator, Mongolia. Introduction Beliajeva et al. (1974) reportedthe discovery of Early Cretaceous mammals at the Khoboor locality (referred to also sometimes as Khovboor), in the Guchin Us Soinon (County), Gobi Desert, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]