DOCSLIB.ORG

Butterflies of Lane County, Oregon: Checklist and Data Sheet Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Butterflies of Lane County, Oregon: Checklist and Data Sheet Date Butterflies of Lane County, Oregon: Checklist and Data Sheet Date: Recorder: Start Time: End Time: Site: Travel Mode: Distance: Habitat Type: Wind: Temp.: Sky: Observers: # Common Name Scientific Name Number Observed Family Papilionidae (Parnassians and Swallowtails) 1 Clodius Parnassian Parnassius clodius 2 Anise Swallowtail Papilio zelicaon 3 Western Tiger Swallowtail Papilio rutulus 4 Two-tailed Swallowtail Papilio multicaudata 5 Pale Swallowtail Papilio eurymedon Family Pieridae (Whites, Orangetips, Marbles, and Sulphurs) 6 Pine White Neophasia menapia 7 Western White Pontia occidentalis 8 Margined White Pieris marginalis 9 Cabbage White Pieris rapae 10 Sara’s Orangetip Anthocharis sara 11 Clouded Sulphur Colias philodice 12 Orange Sulphur Colias eurytheme 13 Western Sulphur Colias occidentalis 14 Queen Alexandra's Sulphur Colias alexandra Family Lycaenidae ("Gossamer-Wings", including Coppers, Hairstreaks, Elfins, and Blues) 15 Tailed Copper Lycaena arota 16 Great Copper Lycaena xanthoides nigromaculata 17 Edith's Copper Lycaena editha 18 Blue Copper Lycaena heteronea 19 Purplish Copper Lycaena helloides 20 Lilac-bordered Copper Lycaena nivalis 21 Mariposa Copper Lycaena mariposa 22 Golden Hairstreak Habrodais grunus 23 Sylvan Hairstreak Satyrium sylvinus 24 Hedgerow Hairstreak Satyrium saepium 25 Bramble Hairstreak Callophrys perplexa 26 Sheridan's Hairstreak Callophrys sheridanii 27 Brown Elfin Callophrys augustinus 28 Moss's Elfin Callophrys mossii 29 W estern Pine Elfin Callophrys eryphon 30 Thicket Hairstreak Callophrys spinetorum 31 Johnson's Hairstreak Callophrys johnsoni 32 Nelson's Juniper Hairstreak Callophrys gryneus nelsoni 33 Gray Hairstreak Strymon melinus 34 Eastern Tailed-blue Cupido comyntas 35 Western Tailed-blue Cupido amyntula 36 Spring Azure Celastrina echo 37 Dotted Blue Euphilotes enoptes 38 Arrowhead Blue Glaucopsyche piasus 39 Silvery Blue Glaucopsyche lygdamus NABA Eugene-Springfield Page 1 of 3 Butterflies of Lane County, Oregon: Checklist and Data Sheet # Common Name Scientific Name Number Observed 40 Anna’s Blue Plebejus anna 41 Greenish Blue Plebejus saepiolus 42 Boisduval's Blue Plebejus icarioides icarioides 43 Fender’s Blue Plebejus icarioides fenderi 44 Acmon Blue Plebejus acmon 45 Lupine Blue Plebejus lupini Family Nymphalidae ("Brushfoots", including Fritillaries, Checkerspots, Commas, Admirals, and more) 46 Great Spangled Fritillary Speyeria cybele 47 Zerene Fritillary aka Oregon Silverspot Speyeria zerene hippolyta 48 Callipe Fritillary Speyeria callippe 49 Atlantis Fritillary Speyeria atlantis 50 Hydaspe Fritillary Speyeria hydaspe 51 Mormon Fritillary Speyeria mormonia 52 Pacific aka Western Meadow Fritillary Boloria epithore 53 Northern Checkerspot Chlosyne palla 54 Hoffman's Checkerspot Chlosyne hoffmanni 55 Field Crescent Phyciodes pulchella 56 Mylitta Crescent Phyciodes mylitta 57 Chalcedona aka Snowberry Checkerspot Euphydryas chalcedona colon aka E. colon colon 58 Edith's Checkerspot Euphydryas editha 59 Satyr Comma Polygonia satyrus 60 Green Comma Polygonia faunus 61 Hoary Comma Polygonia gracilis zephyrus 62 Oreas Comma Polygonia oreas 63 California Tortoiseshell Nymphalis californica 64 Mourning Cloak Nymphalis antiopa 65 Milbert's Tortoiseshell Aglais milberti 66 American Lady Vanessa virginiensis 67 Painted Lady Vanessa cardui 68 West Coast Lady Vanessa annabella 69 Red Admiral Vanessa atalanta 70 Common Buckeye Junonia coenia 71 Lorquin's Admiral Limenitis lorquini 72 California Sister Adelpha californica Subfamily Satyrinae ("Satyrs", including Ringlets, Wood-Nymphs, and Arctics) 73 Common Ringlet aka Ochre Ringlet Coenonympha tullia eunomia 74 Common Wood Nymph Cercyonis pegala 75 Great Basin Wood Nymph Cercyonis sthenele 76 Small Wood Nymph Cercyonis oetus 77 Great Arctic Oeneis nevadensis Subfamily Danainae (Milkweed Butterflies) 78 Monarch Danaus plexippus Family Hesperiidae ("Skippers") 79 Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus clarus 80 Northern Cloudywing Thorybes pylades 81 Mexican Cloudywing Thorybes mexicana 82 Dreamy Duskywing Erynnis icelus 83 Propertius Duskywing Erynnis propertius 84 Pacuvius Duskywing Erynnis pacuvius 85 Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius NABA Eugene-Springfield Page 2 of 3 Butterflies of Lane County, Oregon: Checklist and Data Sheet # Common Name Scientific Name Number Observed 86 Two-banded Checkered Skipper Pyrgus ruralis 87 Common Checkered Skipper Pyrgus communis 88 Arctic Skipper Carterocephalus palaemon 89 Juba Skipper Hesperia juba 90 Western Branded Skipper Hesperia colorado 91 Sonoran Skipper Polites sonora 92 Sachem Atalopedes campestris 93 Woodland Skipper Ochlodes sylvanoides 94 Dun Skipper Euphyes vestris 95 Common Roadside Skipper Amblyscirtes vialis NABA Eugene-Springfield Page 3 of 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Superior National Forest
    Admirals & Relatives Subfamily Limenitidinae Skippers Family Hesperiidae £ Viceroy Limenitis archippus Spread-wing Skippers Subfamily Pyrginae £ Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus clarus £ Dreamy Duskywing Erynnis icelus £ Juvenal’s Duskywing Erynnis juvenalis £ Northern Cloudywing Thorybes pylades Butterflies of the £ White Admiral Limenitis arthemis arthemis Superior Satyrs Subfamily Satyrinae National Forest £ Common Wood-nymph Cercyonis pegala £ Common Ringlet Coenonympha tullia £ Northern Pearly-eye Enodia anthedon Skipperlings Subfamily Heteropterinae £ Arctic Skipper Carterocephalus palaemon £ Mancinus Alpine Erebia disa mancinus R9SS £ Red-disked Alpine Erebia discoidalis R9SS £ Little Wood-satyr Megisto cymela Grass-Skippers Subfamily Hesperiinae £ Pepper & Salt Skipper Amblyscirtes hegon £ Macoun’s Arctic Oeneis macounii £ Common Roadside-Skipper Amblyscirtes vialis £ Jutta Arctic Oeneis jutta (R9SS) £ Least Skipper Ancyloxypha numitor Northern Crescent £ Eyed Brown Satyrodes eurydice £ Dun Skipper Euphyes vestris Phyciodes selenis £ Common Branded Skipper Hesperia comma £ Indian Skipper Hesperia sassacus Monarchs Subfamily Danainae £ Hobomok Skipper Poanes hobomok £ Monarch Danaus plexippus £ Long Dash Polites mystic £ Peck’s Skipper Polites peckius £ Tawny-edged Skipper Polites themistocles £ European Skipper Thymelicus lineola LINKS: http://www.naba.org/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/ in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis Persius Persius
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius persius in Canada ENDANGERED 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius persius in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 41 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge M.L. Holder for writing the status report on the Eastern Persius Duskywing Erynnis persius persius in Canada. COSEWIC also gratefully acknowledges the financial support of Environment Canada. The COSEWIC report review was overseen and edited by Theresa B. Fowler, Co-chair, COSEWIC Arthropods Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l’Hespérie Persius de l’Est (Erynnis persius persius) au Canada. Cover illustration: Eastern Persius Duskywing — Original drawing by Andrea Kingsley ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 Catalogue No. CW69-14/475-2006E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43258-4 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2006 Common name Eastern Persius Duskywing Scientific name Erynnis persius persius Status Endangered Reason for designation This lupine-feeding butterfly has been confirmed from only two sites in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual Range, Targeting Ability, and Visual Habitat Detection by Greater Fritillary Butterfliesspeyeria Cybele (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and Speyeria Atlantis
    Journal of Insect Science, (2019) 19(4): 1; 1–10 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iez060 Research Perceptual Range, Targeting Ability, and Visual Habitat Detection by Greater Fritillary ButterfliesSpeyeria cybele (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and Speyeria atlantis Zachary G. MacDonald,1,4, John H. Acorn,1, Jian Zhang,2,3, and Scott E. Nielsen1, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article-abstract/19/4/1/5525229 by guest on 18 July 2019 1Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 751 General Services Building, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H1, Canada, 2Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, P.R. China, 3Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China, and 4Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Phyllis Weintraub Received 4 February 2019; Editorial decision 26 May 2019 Abstract Butterflies are widely invoked as model organisms in studies of metapopulation and dispersal processes. Integral to such investigations are understandings of perceptual range; the maximum distance at which organisms are able to detect patches of suitable habitat. To infer perceptual range, researchers have released butterflies at varying distances from habitat patches and observed their subsequent flight behaviors. It is often assumed that butterflies rely on visual senses for habitat detection; however, this assumption has not been explicitly investigated. Here, we assess the extent and sensory determinants of perceptual range for the great spangled fritillary (Speyeria cybele (Fabricius, 1775)) and Atlantis fritillary (Speyeria atlantis (W.H. Edwards, 1862)). This was achieved by experimentally releasing butterflies over open water at various distances from a lake island, representing an isolated habitat patch in a dichotomous habitat-matrix landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Silvery Blue Subspecies (Glaucopsyche Lygdamus Lygdamus and G
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' SOciety 45(4), 1991, 272-290 THE STATUS OF SILVERY BLUE SUBSPECIES (GLAUCOPSYCHE LYGDAMUS LYGDAMUS AND G. L. COUPERI: LYCAENIDAE) IN NEW YORK ROBERT DIRIG Bailey Hortorium Herbarium, 462 Mann Library, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 AND JOHN F. CRYAN New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 1 Hunterspoint Plaza, 47-40 Twenty-first Street, Long Island City, New York 11101 ABSTRACT. Two subspecies of the Silvery Blue (Glaucopsyche lygdamus, Lycaeni­ dae) are recorded from New York. The nominate subspecies was reported from central New York through 1969, but has not been seen from 1970-1991. Adults flew in May, and larvae fed on native Wood Vetch (Vicia caroliniana, Fabaceae) on steep, naturally unstable, southwest-facing shale banks. Glaucopsyche lygdamus couperi is reported for the first time from northern New York (and Vermont), where its larvae feed on planted or naturalized Tufted Vetch (Vicia cracca), and adults fly in June on weedy road banks. This butterfly is spreading south using vetch-lined highway corridors. The two entities exhibit marked ecological and phenotypic contrasts in New York. Additional key words: Fabaceae, Vicia cracca, Vicia caroliniana, range expansion, rare species. The Silvery Blue, Glaucopsyche Iygdamus (Doubleday) (Lycaeni­ dae), has been considered rare and local in New York, where the nominate subspecies reaches its northern limit (Klots 1951, Shapiro 1974, Opler & Krizek 1984). Literature references and specimens are scanty, and almost nothing has been published about its natural history in New York. Scudder (1889) said that ssp. Iygdamus was "known from the upper waters of the Susquehanna [River]," but gave no details.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rearing Method for Argynnis (Speyeria) Diana
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2011, Article ID 940280, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2011/940280 Research Article ARearingMethodforArgynnis (Speyeria) diana (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) That Avoids Larval Diapause Carrie N. Wells, Lindsey Edwards, Russell Hawkins, Lindsey Smith, and David Tonkyn Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, 132 Long Hall, Clemson, SC 29634, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Carrie N. Wells, [email protected] Received 25 May 2011; Accepted 4 August 2011 Academic Editor: Russell Jurenka Copyright © 2011 Carrie N. Wells et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We describe a rearing protocol that allowed us to raise the threatened butterfly, Argynnis diana (Nymphalidae), while bypassing the first instar overwintering diapause. We compared the survival of offspring reared under this protocol from field-collected A. diana females from North Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee. Larvae were reared in the lab on three phylogenetically distinct species of Southern Appalachian violets (Viola sororia, V. pubescens,andV. pedata). We assessed larval survival in A. diana to the last instar, pupation, and adulthood. Males reared in captivity emerged significantly earlier than females. An ANOVA revealed no evidence of host plant preference by A. diana toward three native violet species. We suggest that restoration of A. diana habitat which promotes a wide array of larval and adult host plants, is urgently needed to conserve this imperiled species into the future. 1. Introduction larvae in cold storage blocks and storing them under con- trolled refrigerated conditions for the duration of their The Diana fritillary, Argynnis (Speyeria) diana (Cramer overwintering period [10].
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • CA Checklist of Butterflies of Tulare County
    Checklist of Buerflies of Tulare County hp://www.natureali.org/Tularebuerflychecklist.htm Tulare County Buerfly Checklist Compiled by Ken Davenport & designed by Alison Sheehey Swallowtails (Family Papilionidae) Parnassians (Subfamily Parnassiinae) A series of simple checklists Clodius Parnassian Parnassius clodius for use in the field Sierra Nevada Parnassian Parnassius behrii Kern Amphibian Checklist Kern Bird Checklist Swallowtails (Subfamily Papilioninae) Kern Butterfly Checklist Pipevine Swallowtail Battus philenor Tulare Butterfly Checklist Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes Kern Dragonfly Checklist Checklist of Exotic Animals Anise Swallowtail Papilio zelicaon (incl. nitra) introduced to Kern County Indra Swallowtail Papilio indra Kern Fish Checklist Giant Swallowtail Papilio cresphontes Kern Mammal Checklist Kern Reptile Checklist Western Tiger Swallowtail Papilio rutulus Checklist of Sensitive Species Two-tailed Swallowtail Papilio multicaudata found in Kern County Pale Swallowtail Papilio eurymedon Whites and Sulphurs (Family Pieridae) Wildflowers Whites (Subfamily Pierinae) Hodgepodge of Insect Pine White Neophasia menapia Photos Nature Ali Wild Wanderings Becker's White Pontia beckerii Spring White Pontia sisymbrii Checkered White Pontia protodice Western White Pontia occidentalis The Butterfly Digest by Cabbage White Pieris rapae Bruce Webb - A digest of butterfly discussion around Large Marble Euchloe ausonides the nation. Frontispiece: 1 of 6 12/26/10 9:26 PM Checklist of Buerflies of Tulare County hp://www.natureali.org/Tularebuerflychecklist.htm
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Pieridae
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(2): 600-604 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2017; 5(2): 600-604 Life cycle of nilgiri clouded yellow Colias © 2017 JEZS Received: 16-01-2017 nilagiriensis C. & R. Felder [Lepidoptera: Pieridae] Accepted: 17-02-2017 Udhagamandalam, the Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu Jeevith S The Wynter Blyth Association, #7D Plains View Garden, Tiger Jeevith S and S Manoj Hill, Coonoor, The Nilgiris – 643 101, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract S Manoj The life cycle of Nilgiri Clouded Yellow butterfly Colias nilagiriensis C. & R. Felder, larval The Wynter Blyth Association, performance and life cycle on its new host plant Trifolium repens L. family Fabaceae was recorded and #7D Plains View Garden, Tiger described for the first time. The study was carried out during post monsoon in the year 2016 at Hill, Coonoor, The Nilgiris – 643 Udhagamandalam, the Nilgiris district, Tamil Nadu. Fresh eggs of Nilgiri Clouded Yellow were collected 101, Tamil Nadu, India from its host plant. Colias nilagiriensis completed its life cycle from egg to adult in 55-62 days. The larvae stage lasted 24-26 days followed pupa stage which lasted for 20-25 days. Keywords: Life cycle, Colias nilagiriensis, Trifolium repens, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris 1. Introduction The genus Colias Fabricius, 1807 is usually difficult to reach a taxonomic decision on [1] phenotypic difference . Colias nilagiriensis C. & R. Felder Nilgiri Clouded Yellow belongs to the whites and yellows family Pieridae and sub-family Coliadinae. It is a small butterfly endemic to Southern Western Ghats of India at an elevation 1,900 m above [2].
    [Show full text]